Redirect to:
This page is a redirect. The following categories are used to track and monitor this redirect:
|
Articles relying on a single source should be tagged with the template {{onesource}} at the top of the article to notify editors of the issue. Due to a high...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Not a notable word/concept; WP:ONESOURCE issues (effectively). Alexbrn talk|contribs|COI 18:56, 26 January 2014...
Click to read more »JSTOR · TWL) This page is in probable violation of WP:N, WP:IRS, and WP:ONESOURCE. HollandLop (talk) 21:06, 28 September 2016 (UTC) The one source has no...
Click to read more »views) (delete) – (View log) Unencyclopedic, limited to local scope, "onesource" - and that one scope basically says "No more Slo Ball Placement", so...
Click to read more »contribs · CheckUser (log)) Code letter: C Supporting evidence: Removing onesource and fact tags:[1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11]...
Click to read more »group or set by independent reliable sources.' This article relies on WP:ONESOURCE, not multiple which NLIST requires. 11WB (talk) 15:21, 13 February 2026...
Click to read more »company, without references to show notability, per WP:GNG, WP:V, WP:ONESOURCE. I also note that it is a holding company, and according to the only source...
Click to read more »(UTC) But even then, you are relying heavily upon a single source. As WP:ONESOURCE says, a subject for which only one source can be cited is unlikely to...
Click to read more »February 2017 (UTC) Delete. According to the article, it is based on WP:ONESOURCE, which suggests the possibility of WP:V issues. A bit of quick Google-ing...
Click to read more »FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This article is quite poor in that it only has WP:ONESOURCE and given the lack of detail in that one source, the article likely uses...
Click to read more »sources should not be used for major facts like this per the guidelines. WP:ONESOURCE also says that per the general notability guideline, we should use a greater...
Click to read more »05:01, 16 May 2016 (UTC) Delete - Seriously fails WP:RS... basically WP:ONESOURCE and not notable. - Pmedema (talk) 15:27, 16 May 2016 (UTC) Relisted to...
Click to read more »Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:14, 24 April 2024 (UTC) Delete: Violation of WP:ONESOURCE and fails WP:GNG. BlakeIsHereStudios (talk | contributions) 17:50, 25...
Click to read more »found) - concerns about WP:N on talk page (by User:OlEnglish) and WP:ONESOURCE. Since article has not been improved since X201's small addition, taking...
Click to read more »free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This article only has WP:ONESOURCE and contains far more information than could be provided through that...
Click to read more »broken link has not been removed from the article. I'll tagg it with Onesource. - Jameson L. Tai talk ♦ contribs 04:46, 12 December 2007 (UTC) Update:...
Click to read more »Article relies on one singular source to cover the whole article. Fails WP:ONESOURCE and WP:NOTABILITY. I put notability because without the citations we can't...
Click to read more »Samoht27 (talk) 05:29, 25 April 2024 (UTC) Delete as per nomination, WP:ONESOURCE. Orange sticker (talk) 10:56, 25 April 2024 (UTC) Delete One source is...
Click to read more »help to validate the article. As it stands, it could be tagged with {{onesource}}. Another fix you could make is to consolidate the multiple instances...
Click to read more »company, without references to show notability, per WP:GNG, WP:V, WP:ONESOURCE. I also note that it is a holding company, and according to the only source...
Click to read more »(UTC) Articles written by Kiko Escuadro should be counted as just WP:ONESOURCE even if published by different publishers (ABS-CBN and Manila Standard)...
Click to read more »notable article. Cdtew (talk) 02:13, 3 July 2013 (UTC) Weak delete - WP:ONESOURCE (well, once you add that source into this article), but if it were to...
Click to read more »Thanks. Ism schism (talk) 22:51, 16 January 2010 (UTC) Delete for now: WP:ONESOURCE (1 article in Miami Herald) and all other sources are ISKCON (BBT) sites...
Click to read more »where to add a second from. Bobo. 03:11, 22 October 2017 (UTC) The WP:ONESOURCE complaint has now been dealt with, rendering John Pack Lambert's complaint...
Click to read more »04:16, 31 January 2009 (UTC) At the time you tagged the article with {{onesource}} and {{citations missing}}, it had 8 inline references from 5 different...
Click to read more »probably not notable per the general notability guideline, WP:NGEO and WP:ONESOURCE. The article currently needs many more sources to be strongly reconsidered...
Click to read more »BTW, having a single source only is not a valid reason for deletion, WP:ONESOURCE is just an essay. --Cyfal (talk) 21:35, 10 March 2025 (UTC) Keep. Not...
Click to read more »that multiple appropriate sources are available, I will add Template:Onesource to the article while removing the AFD template. --User:Ceyockey (talk...
Click to read more »There's a hefty article in the November 1977 edition of Ebony. While that's ONESOURCE, there may have been other coverage in (eg) offline African-American...
Click to read more »probably not notable per the general notability guideline, WP:NGEO and WP:ONESOURCE. The article currently needs many more sources to be strongly reconsidered...
Click to read more »EnvironmentalDoor (talk) 17:44, 21 March 2026 (UTC) Delete per nom, above, and WP:ONESOURCE. Videogameplayer99 (talk) 20:29, 21 March 2026 (UTC) Delete WP:FANCRUFT...
Click to read more »inadequately cited: add templates {{Refimprove}}, {{Primarysources}}, {{Onesource}} and {{rs}} as appropriate to put the article in Category:Articles lacking...
Click to read more »for example - so WP:NOTMIRROR applies. Only one source is offered so WP:ONESOURCE also kicks in and no actual evidence of notability is offered. Blue Square...
Click to read more »set by independent reliable sources'. This list relies heavily on WP:ONESOURCE. WP:SIGCOV says that: 'Multiple publications from the same author or organization...
Click to read more »it's sad that articles are being sent to deletion based on WP:ONESOURCE, or that ONESOURCE is being used as a supposedly valid argument, when anyone who...
Click to read more »cut-off point, which will also shift as the article ages. It's also WP:ONESOURCE from one single 1985 book, which miraculously already seems to know which...
Click to read more »MrX 02:11, 10 July 2014 (UTC) Oh, indeed, right now it's probably WP:ONESOURCE and the similar film names will yield a lot of false positives. Shawn...
Click to read more »JSTOR · TWL) Notability is usually not established via one source per WP:ONESOURCE. Per WP:NTEAM, the general notability guideline takes precedence and that...
Click to read more »of Belgrade" article, as, seemingly after 7+ years being marked with onesource, it still remains with only one source. NeoJade ( Talk | Contribs ) •...
Click to read more »discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 11:04, 5 October 2018 (UTC) Delete. See WP:ONESOURCE and WP:NRVE. Also, I am against a skateboarding in Ethiopia article. It...
Click to read more »by Hobit (talk • contribs) 04:15, 9 May 2018 (UTC) Weak delete per WP:ONESOURCE. wumbolo ^^^ 13:46, 10 May 2018 (UTC) There are quite a few sources in...
Click to read more »Gregson-Hadley house. This is thus sufficient and reliable (edit: though WP:ONESOURCE) to construct a referenced biography, however I still don't believe Gregson...
Click to read more »work or similarly named article. I make it a point to never create a WP:ONESOURCE article—or so I thought—and I for one would have no objection if the article...
Click to read more »see this as a viable search term either and it relies too much on WP:ONESOURCE (which shouldn't be a redlink). --Farix (Talk) 12:23, 6 March 2009 (UTC)...
Click to read more »for a Yale obituary, this alone does not constitute notability per WP:ONESOURCE. Judging from a Google search as called for by WP:BEFORE, there are very...
Click to read more »a courtesy, consider tagging articles with only one source with the {{onesource}} template tag so interested editors can address the issue. An example...
Click to read more »com/2013/02/11/180158/etf-securities-sole-provider-precious-metal-etfs-schwab-etf-onesource (R/Xmeta/L- still there) 2017-02-07 20:16:21 (UTC): User 71.175.11.36...
Click to read more »article proves the topic is not independently notable as it only uses WP:ONESOURCE, it would also be far easier to get all the information you need about...
Click to read more »if there was a consensus that webcomics examiner is reliable, still WP:ONESOURCE. QiuLiming1 (talk) 23:27, 24 July 2022 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »underlying !vote leans to keep, following the guideline in WP:BIO1E (AKA WP:ONESOURCE and WP:1E) that parses the differences between the case to keep and the...
Click to read more »see this as a viable search term either and it relies too much on WP:ONESOURCE (which shouldn't be a redlink). --Farix (Talk) 12:25, 6 March 2009 (UTC)...
Click to read more »to the relevant CI link too - here. This will please the equally vocal ONESOURCE folk... Bobo. 23:00, 27 May 2019 (UTC) Comment: I'd have more sympathy...
Click to read more »Nerd1a4i (talk) 17:00, 1 October 2017 (UTC) Comment - okay, so this WP:ONESOURCE thing is becoming an issue all of a sudden. All you need to do is request...
Click to read more »FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:MILMOS#BATTLESIN. Most entries WP:UNSOURCED, or WP:ONESOURCE by Standish Hayes O'Grady from 1892 (WP:AGEMATTERS). Follow-up to List...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Notability issues. WP:ONESOURCE Redtigerxyz Talk 11:30, 1 November 2011 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...
Click to read more »company, without references to show notability, per WP:GNG, WP:V, WP:ONESOURCE. I also note that it is a holding company, and according to the only source...
Click to read more »the article is from the Dictionary of Welsh Biography, it is only WP:ONESOURCE. Her first husband's entry in the Dictionary of Welsh Biography mentions...
Click to read more »(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:ONESOURCE applies here, and there's no independent, significant source to establish...
Click to read more »of the table in Ref. 16, which is the only source cited. So we have WP:ONESOURCE, WP:COPYVIO, and WP:NLIST all in one go. The dePRODer's "but it's useful"...
Click to read more »documentation outside Historical RFA. Additionally, it falls under the WP:ONESOURCE umbrella for relying on the Historical RFA entry alone. EditorGirlAL07...
Click to read more »fact that only one, primary source is used is not a good idea per WP:ONESOURCE. This article also is not very detailed in terms of text used rather than...
Click to read more »notability. Even if the commentary is in-depth, it would be a case of WP:ONESOURCE. I, Jethrobot drop me a line (note: not a bot!) 07:17, 20 August 2011...
Click to read more »rarely done Ikon No-Blast 15:33, 10 January 2010 (UTC) Delete: as per WP:ONESOURCE notability and WP:V issues.--Redtigerxyz Talk 16:02, 10 January 2010 (UTC)...
Click to read more »notability? —Oluwa2Chainz »» (talk to me) 07:42, 2 March 2017 (UTC) WP:ONESOURCE? Not for me. But then it's also mentioned in the Macworld roundup and...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Khilkov (recently unanimously deleted). Relies on WP:ONESOURCE, russianartdealer.com, which is a WP:SPS; WP:OR; fails WP:GNG. Rule of...
Click to read more »article is unclear use: Templates {{Refimprove}}, {{Primarysources}}, {{Onesource}} and {{rs}} as appropriate to put the article in Category:Articles lacking...
Click to read more »articles with false, outdated, and non-notable information with the WP:ONESOURCE of the GNIS. Reywas92Talk 19:57, 7 January 2020 (UTC) Here's the Topo...
Click to read more »notability" with an emphasis on plural "sources" as explicitly stated in WP:ONESOURCE: "a subject for which only one source can be cited is unlikely to merit...
Click to read more »You are relying heavily on Nanda, but I don't think that it creates a {{onesource}}-type problem. I've made a few formatting changes to the references that...
Click to read more »WP:COI editors have tried to add reliable sources but at best I can see WP:ONESOURCE. Of particular interest is his claim -- and that of his management --...
Click to read more »far the question has been more to do with references (particularly WP:ONESOURCE) than it has been to do with any kind of inclusion criteria. The only...
Click to read more »when I clicked the diff from my watchlist which is why I added the {{onesource}} tag. Raykyogrou0 (Talk) 10:13, 16 January 2014 (UTC) Obvious Keep -...
Click to read more »Darkm777 (talk) 01:54, 21 October 2025 (UTC) I guess the issue would be WP:ONESOURCE FaviFake (talk) 16:29, 21 October 2025 (UTC) Yes, so maybe DRAFT is a...
Click to read more »something that bites or produces blisters by contact. But this is largely WP:ONESOURCE. The source attributes the discovery to Kasturba Medical College but the...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles with a single source – multiple sources are always better than {{onesource}}. Wikipedia:Conflict of interest – a Wikipedia behavioral guideline regarding...
Click to read more »sources (which should be findable if an article is notable). If we remove onesource and mark those articles with the notability template, people will argue...
Click to read more »push for the addition of sources, that is better left to tags like {{onesource}}. Abductive (reasoning) 18:50, 13 September 2009 (UTC) After investigating...
Click to read more »this? Please see WP:NPOV. It needs independent, reliable sources. The WP:ONESOURCE is not enough. See also WP:BFAQ. Chzz ► 16:19, 23 October 2010 (UTC)...
Click to read more »inadequately cited: add templates {{Refimprove}}, {{Primarysources}}, {{Onesource}} and {{rs}} as appropriate to put the article in Category:Articles lacking...
Click to read more »results that fit significant coverage, with only one applicable result (WP:ONESOURCE). Sottolacqua (talk) 16:30, 7 October 2011 (UTC) Your query lists the...
Click to read more »com/2013/02/11/180158/etf-securities-sole-provider-precious-metal-etfs-schwab-etf-onesource (R/Xmeta/L) 2017-02-07 20:16:21 (UTC): User 71.175.11.36 t • c • dc •...
Click to read more »inadequately cited: add templates {{Refimprove}}, {{Primarysources}}, {{Onesource}} and {{rs}} as appropriate to put the article in Category:Articles lacking...
Click to read more »an out of date article from The New York Times. This presents major WP:ONESOURCE and point of view issues, as the lesbian kiss episode phenomenon has been...
Click to read more »following related page because this article also fails WP:GNG, WP:SIGCOV, WP:ONESOURCE and WP:OR, as well as an additional issue with WP:SELFPUB: Intervision...
Click to read more »October 2017 (UTC) Precisely why we need to be vigilant as per the whole WP:ONESOURCE argument - which this sockpuppet user does not even come close to referencing...
Click to read more »independent reliable sources", plural; and with good reason - see WP:ONESOURCE. It is even more important for a biography of a living person. Please...
Click to read more »deletion (glossary) Help, my article got nominated for deletion! Military OneSource (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)...
Click to read more »(t · c); see discussion (2 participants; relisted) 28 Jul 2026 – Military OneSource (talk · edit · hist) AfDed by Longhornsg (t · c) was closed as delete...
Click to read more »article for sure, especially given how close we'd be to violating WP:ONESOURCE, but it is promising that we've even got that much. I'm definitely leaning...
Click to read more »(t · c); see discussion (3 participants; relisted) 28 Jul 2026 – Military OneSource (talk · edit · hist) AfDed by Longhornsg (t · c) was closed as delete...
Click to read more »this problem wouldn't exist. Bobo. 15:01, 25 December 2019 (UTC) And if ONESOURCE is still a problem after all this time, dare I say that it's fairly obvious...
Click to read more »does help with notability but by itself does not establish it, per WP:ONESOURCE. Jrcla2 (talk) 15:08, 27 December 2013 (UTC) Keep. In addition to Jrcla2's...
Click to read more »created a new rivalry also appears to run afoul of WP:Recentism and WP:ONESOURCE. Combined, these issues provide serious concerns regarding the WP:N requirement...
Click to read more »(t · c); see discussion (2 participants; relisted) 28 Jul 2026 – Military OneSource (talk · edit · hist) AfDed by Longhornsg (t · c) was closed as delete...
Click to read more »Gene93k (talk) 22:26, 6 April 2015 (UTC) Delete per WP:ONEEVENT and WP:ONESOURCE Longevitydude (talk) 23:49, 6 April 2015 (UTC) Delete a promo piece for...
Click to read more »all this information it may fall in a grey area copyright-wise per WP:ONESOURCE. Orange sticker (talk) 09:51, 28 May 2025 (UTC) This isn't a database...
Click to read more »or if there is only one source and it is too short/undetailed per WP:ONESOURCE. Edvin Hebovija Dan Barrera Found some in-depth coverage of his fight...
Click to read more »It's not {{unreferenced}}, but it is either {{Self-published}} or {{Onesource}}. Titoxd(?!?) 02:21, 22 January 2007 (UTC) Yeah, I found that out, but...
Click to read more »2017 (UTC) Comment - I have added a second source just in case the WP:ONESOURCE argument pops up here... Anyone who wishes to reformat these as references...
Click to read more »make templates backwards-compatible. The article maintenance tags like {{onesource}} which request editors to add and verify sources could even wrap this...
Click to read more »on 05 Aug 2026; see discussion (3 participants) 28 Jul 2026 – Military OneSource (talk · edit · hist) AfDed by Longhornsg (t · c) was closed as delete...
Click to read more »lot about it. Several Utah Educational Network IPs have been removing {{onesource}} and {{unreferencedsect}} tags from Savant syndrome for days; 205.118...
Click to read more »acceptable sources. Corvus cornix 20:31, 18 May 2007 (UTC) I have added {{Onesource}} to the article. Hope this is OK with Pigs onthewing. Purgatory Fubar...
Click to read more »a new editor?) RS user removed PROD but also removed COI, LIMITED and ONESOURCE tags too. RS I add back missing tags TP I leave a note covering: 1/ WP:COI...
Click to read more »free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This article only has WP:ONESOURCE meaning little content is verifiable and there is no significant secondary...
Click to read more »FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This article for a television program only has WP:ONESOURCE so does not comply well with the general notability guideline. There is...
Click to read more »on 08 Aug 2026; see discussion (4 participants) 28 Jul 2026 – Military OneSource (talk · edit · hist) AfDed by Longhornsg (t · c) was closed as delete...
Click to read more »problems I have seen come up especially in recent PROD debates is WP:ONESOURCE. If the person who had sent the article(s) to PROD would simply point...
Click to read more »and the season every year 2. The parent article itself has lingering {{onesource}} tag, ( removed after this comment). There's insufficient content to...
Click to read more »for talk page discussion[326]). Add on to this his adding a pointy WP:ONESOURCE template to the section[327] despite my having already explained to him...
Click to read more »am nominating the following pages, all because of WP:GNG (WP:SIGCOV/WP:ONESOURCE) Tyumen Oblast in the Turkvision Song Contest (edit | talk | history |...
Click to read more »it's sad that articles are being sent to deletion based on WP:ONESOURCE, or that ONESOURCE is being used as a supposedly valid argument, when anyone who...
Click to read more »(UTC) Nor do we have articles with indiscriminate information. Per WP:ONESOURCE (essay) articles with one source do not merit their own article, and often...
Click to read more »essays. Dream Focus 15:38, 5 November 2019 (UTC) For non-essays see WP:ONESOURCE and WP:GNG "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent...
Click to read more »that qualifies as extensive outside coverage of him, it's clearly WP:ONESOURCE. Jrcla2 (talk) 06:49, 30 December 2011 (UTC) Actually, even if you wish...
Click to read more »who knows a single thing about cricket could easily add a second. WP:ONESOURCE has become a very contentious issue recently but where cricket articles...
Click to read more »{{One other topic}} {{Singlesource}}, {{Single source}}, {{Oneref}}, {{Onesource}}, {{1source}}, {{Single-source}}, {{1 source}}, {{1r}}, {{1R}}, {{Onereference}}...
Click to read more »2007 (UTC) Paid financial research: http://www.hoovers.com http://www.onesource.com Free corporate profiles, SEC filings, annual statements, etc.: http://www...
Click to read more »practical to have articles on all of them Single source, articles with WP:ONESOURCE The pitfalls of articles having a single source Talent, notability WP:TALENT...
Click to read more »place of a source that is not particularly a better source, or making WP:ONESOURCE articles, or citing something to the point that its relevance is strained...
Click to read more »topic-banned. As per the usual, the delete arguments are based on WP:ONESOURCE (which is fixable as soon as you point it out to someone), and WP:DONTKNOWHISFIRSTNAME...
Click to read more »AfD debate appears to be based on the difference between applying WP:ONESOURCE and not. So this article falls below "normal community standards"? Wikipedia...
Click to read more »Thanks. Ism schism (talk) 22:51, 16 January 2010 (UTC) Delete for now: WP:ONESOURCE (1 article in Miami Herald) and all other sources are ISKCON (BBT) sites...
Click to read more »where to add a second from. Bobo. 03:11, 22 October 2017 (UTC) The WP:ONESOURCE complaint has now been dealt with, rendering John Pack Lambert's complaint...
Click to read more »October 2017 (UTC) Precisely why we need to be vigilant as per the whole WP:ONESOURCE argument - which this sockpuppet user does not even come close to referencing...
Click to read more »created a new rivalry also appears to run afoul of WP:Recentism and WP:ONESOURCE. Combined, these issues provide serious concerns regarding the WP:N requirement...
Click to read more »on 05 Aug 2026; see discussion (6 participants) 28 Jul 2026 – Military OneSource (talk · edit · hist) AfDed by Longhornsg (t · c) was closed as delete...
Click to read more »Nerd1a4i (talk) 17:00, 1 October 2017 (UTC) Comment - okay, so this WP:ONESOURCE thing is becoming an issue all of a sudden. All you need to do is request...
Click to read more »deletion because it plainly violated several key guidelines: WP:GNG, WP:ONESOURCE,WP:UNDUE and,WP:BLP), for example. You completely rewrote it, and these...
Click to read more »the editor(s) talk page? Maurreen (talk) 17:04, 4 March 2010 (UTC) {{onesource}} is what you seek. Ks0stm (T•C•G) 17:05, 4 March 2010 (UTC) Or, if I...
Click to read more »broken link has not been removed from the article. I'll tagg it with Onesource. - Jameson L. Tai talk ♦ contribs 04:46, 12 December 2007 (UTC) Update:...
Click to read more »see this as a viable search term either and it relies too much on WP:ONESOURCE (which shouldn't be a redlink). --Farix (Talk) 12:23, 6 March 2009 (UTC)...
Click to read more »(UTC) But even then, you are relying heavily upon a single source. As WP:ONESOURCE says, a subject for which only one source can be cited is unlikely to...
Click to read more »that one book, mainly in the yellow press, and so I am concerned that WP:ONESOURCE may apply here (a lack of significant coverage in multiple reliable sources...
Click to read more »this problem wouldn't exist. Bobo. 15:01, 25 December 2019 (UTC) And if ONESOURCE is still a problem after all this time, dare I say that it's fairly obvious...
Click to read more »that multiple appropriate sources are available, I will add Template:Onesource to the article while removing the AFD template. --User:Ceyockey (talk...
Click to read more »(UTC) Was it the point of adding a {{nofootnotes}}, {{refimprove}}, {{onesource}}, or even {{expand}} tag to an article that already has a visible stub...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Not a notable word/concept; WP:ONESOURCE issues (effectively). Alexbrn talk|contribs|COI 18:56, 26 January 2014...
Click to read more »that article that I've cut, if this is kept. Keep in mind: that's WP:ONESOURCE, so far. And mere production listings are not significant coverage, of...
Click to read more »04:16, 31 January 2009 (UTC) At the time you tagged the article with {{onesource}} and {{citations missing}}, it had 8 inline references from 5 different...
Click to read more »far the question has been more to do with references (particularly WP:ONESOURCE) than it has been to do with any kind of inclusion criteria. The only...
Click to read more »February 2017 (UTC) Delete. According to the article, it is based on WP:ONESOURCE, which suggests the possibility of WP:V issues. A bit of quick Google-ing...
Click to read more »if there was a consensus that webcomics examiner is reliable, still WP:ONESOURCE. QiuLiming1 (talk) 23:27, 24 July 2022 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »that one book, mainly in the yellow press, and so I am concerned that WP:ONESOURCE may apply here (a lack of significant coverage in multiple reliable sources...
Click to read more »company, without references to show notability, per WP:GNG, WP:V, WP:ONESOURCE. I also note that it is a holding company, and according to the only source...
Click to read more »to the relevant CI link too - here. This will please the equally vocal ONESOURCE folk... Bobo. 23:00, 27 May 2019 (UTC) Comment: I'd have more sympathy...
Click to read more »views) (delete) – (View AfD) Unencyclopedic, limited to local scope, "onesource" - and that one scope basically says "No more Slo Ball Placement", so...
Click to read more »rarely done Ikon No-Blast 15:33, 10 January 2010 (UTC) Delete: as per WP:ONESOURCE notability and WP:V issues.--Redtigerxyz Talk 16:02, 10 January 2010 (UTC)...
Click to read more »AfD debate appears to be based on the difference between applying WP:ONESOURCE and not. So this article falls below "normal community standards"? Wikipedia...
Click to read more »when I clicked the diff from my watchlist which is why I added the {{onesource}} tag. Raykyogrou0 (Talk) 10:13, 16 January 2014 (UTC) Obvious Keep -...
Click to read more »company, without references to show notability, per WP:GNG, WP:V, WP:ONESOURCE. I also note that it is a holding company, and according to the only source...
Click to read more »05:01, 16 May 2016 (UTC) Delete - Seriously fails WP:RS... basically WP:ONESOURCE and not notable. - Pmedema (talk) 15:27, 16 May 2016 (UTC) Relisted to...
Click to read more »for example - so WP:NOTMIRROR applies. Only one source is offered so WP:ONESOURCE also kicks in and no actual evidence of notability is offered. Blue Square...
Click to read more »veracity. It may encourage uncritical "flyby" editing. Instead use e.g. {{onesource}} or {{primarysources}} where appropriate; these templates encapsulate...
Click to read more »articles with false, outdated, and non-notable information with the WP:ONESOURCE of the GNIS. Reywas92Talk 19:57, 7 January 2020 (UTC) Here's the Topo...
Click to read more »results that fit significant coverage, with only one applicable result (WP:ONESOURCE). Sottolacqua (talk) 16:30, 7 October 2011 (UTC) Your query lists the...
Click to read more »an out of date article from The New York Times. This presents major WP:ONESOURCE and point of view issues, as the lesbian kiss episode phenomenon has been...
Click to read more »which is not at all a good thing on Wikipedia. Speaking of one source, WP:ONESOURCE#Lone source published by the article's subject would be a read. You might...
Click to read more »closure (requested moves) 4,600 5282 Template:Numero 4,600 5283 Template:Onesource 4,600 5284 Template:Photograph requested 4,600 5285 Template:R from NLM...
Click to read more »discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 11:04, 5 October 2018 (UTC) Delete. See WP:ONESOURCE and WP:NRVE. Also, I am against a skateboarding in Ethiopia article. It...
Click to read more »article for sure, especially given how close we'd be to violating WP:ONESOURCE, but it is promising that we've even got that much. I'm definitely leaning...
Click to read more »push for the addition of sources, that is better left to tags like {{onesource}}. Abductive (reasoning) 18:50, 13 September 2009 (UTC) After investigating...
Click to read more »something that bites or produces blisters by contact. But this is largely WP:ONESOURCE. The source attributes the discovery to Kasturba Medical College but the...
Click to read more »Gregson-Hadley house. This is thus sufficient and reliable (edit: though WP:ONESOURCE) to construct a referenced biography, however I still don't believe Gregson...
Click to read more »notable article. Cdtew (talk) 02:13, 3 July 2013 (UTC) Weak delete - WP:ONESOURCE (well, once you add that source into this article), but if it were to...
Click to read more »notability. Even if the commentary is in-depth, it would be a case of WP:ONESOURCE. I, Jethrobot drop me a line (note: not a bot!) 07:17, 20 August 2011...
Click to read more »(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:ONESOURCE applies here, and there's no independent, significant source to establish...
Click to read more »topic-banned. As per the usual, the delete arguments are based on WP:ONESOURCE (which is fixable as soon as you point it out to someone), and WP:DONTKNOWHISFIRSTNAME...
Click to read more »and the season every year 2. The parent article itself has lingering {{onesource}} tag, ( removed after this comment). There's insufficient content to...
Click to read more »notability? —Oluwa2Chainz »» (talk to me) 07:42, 2 March 2017 (UTC) WP:ONESOURCE? Not for me. But then it's also mentioned in the Macworld roundup and...
Click to read more »by Hobit (talk • contribs) 04:15, 9 May 2018 (UTC) Weak delete per WP:ONESOURCE. wumbolo ^^^ 13:46, 10 May 2018 (UTC) There are quite a few sources in...
Click to read more »Gobbleswoggler (talk) 08:18, 30 July 2010 (UTC) Tagged with expand, wikify, uncat, onesource, copyedit and notability. Kayau Voting IS evil 10:41, 30 July 2010 (UTC)...
Click to read more »very bottom of a long article: Nov 21 2010 — Moves orphan, refimprove, onesource, and inline tags to the bottom of the article. Adds a rescue tag to the...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Notability issues. WP:ONESOURCE Redtigerxyz Talk 11:30, 1 November 2011 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...
Click to read more »notability" with an emphasis on plural "sources" as explicitly stated in WP:ONESOURCE: "a subject for which only one source can be cited is unlikely to merit...
Click to read more »found) - concerns about WP:N on talk page (by User:OlEnglish) and WP:ONESOURCE. Since article has not been improved since X201's small addition, taking...
Click to read more »JSTOR · TWL) This page is in probable violation of WP:N, WP:IRS, and WP:ONESOURCE. HollandLop (talk) 21:06, 28 September 2016 (UTC) The one source has no...
Click to read more »company, without references to show notability, per WP:GNG, WP:V, WP:ONESOURCE. I also note that it is a holding company, and according to the only source...
Click to read more »MrX 02:11, 10 July 2014 (UTC) Oh, indeed, right now it's probably WP:ONESOURCE and the similar film names will yield a lot of false positives. Shawn...
Click to read more »There's a hefty article in the November 1977 edition of Ebony. While that's ONESOURCE, there may have been other coverage in (eg) offline African-American...
Click to read more »WP:COI editors have tried to add reliable sources but at best I can see WP:ONESOURCE. Of particular interest is his claim -- and that of his management --...
Click to read more »on Template talk:Onesource which was never answered. I was reading in Template:Onesource#Usage and it seems to me that the {{onesource}} is for when citations...
Click to read more »Gene93k (talk) 22:26, 6 April 2015 (UTC) Delete per WP:ONEEVENT and WP:ONESOURCE Longevitydude (talk) 23:49, 6 April 2015 (UTC) Delete a promo piece for...
Click to read more »or if there is only one source and it is too short/undetailed per WP:ONESOURCE. Edvin Hebovija Dan Barrera Found some in-depth coverage of his fight...
Click to read more »work or similarly named article. I make it a point to never create a WP:ONESOURCE article—or so I thought—and I for one would have no objection if the article...
Click to read more »who knows a single thing about cricket could easily add a second. WP:ONESOURCE has become a very contentious issue recently but where cricket articles...
Click to read more »does help with notability but by itself does not establish it, per WP:ONESOURCE. Jrcla2 (talk) 15:08, 27 December 2013 (UTC) Keep. In addition to Jrcla2's...
Click to read more »which is not at all a good thing on Wikipedia. Speaking of one source, WP:ONESOURCE#Lone source published by the article's subject would be a read. You might...
Click to read more »about a person not yet shown to meet notability guidelines and See [[WP:ONESOURCE]] Draft:Ayotola Tehingbola Ayotola Tehingbola 2026-06-29 - Filled in 6...
Click to read more »that qualifies as extensive outside coverage of him, it's clearly WP:ONESOURCE. Jrcla2 (talk) 06:49, 30 December 2011 (UTC) Actually, even if you wish...
Click to read more »that article that I've cut, if this is kept. Keep in mind: that's WP:ONESOURCE, so far. And mere production listings are not significant coverage, of...
Click to read more »2017 (UTC) Comment - I have added a second source just in case the WP:ONESOURCE argument pops up here... Anyone who wishes to reformat these as references...
Click to read more »organization since Gangitano's death in 1998. That article is tagged as {{Onesource}} and I suggest that tag is definitely in this case an indicator for improvement...
Click to read more »{{unreferencedsection}}. If it has insufficient references, {{refimprove}}, {{onesource}}, or one of the other cleanup templates may be in order. If the article...
Click to read more »deletion because it plainly violated several key guidelines: WP:GNG, WP:ONESOURCE,WP:UNDUE and,WP:BLP), for example. You completely rewrote it, and these...
Click to read more »there may be copyright, original research, and notability concerns. WP:ONESOURCE, WP:1R Low Bare notability Be cautious with creating articles that are...
Click to read more »template do you add? Fanoftheworld (talk) 00:18, 19 April 2009 (UTC) {{Onesource}}, or perhaps {{Primary sources}} in that specific case. Algebraist 00:22...
Click to read more »09:02:41 (UTC): User Dlhoangkim t • c • dc • l • ef • b • bl; (15) to Corban OneSource (edit | [[:|talk]] | history | links | watch | logs) (diff - DELETED)...
Click to read more »09:02:41 (UTC): User Dlhoangkim t • c • dc • l • ef • b • bl; (15) to Corban OneSource (edit | [[:|talk]] | history | links | watch | logs) (diff - DELETED)...
Click to read more »underlying !vote leans to keep, following the guideline in WP:BIO1E (AKA WP:ONESOURCE and WP:1E) that parses the differences between the case to keep and the...
Click to read more »NA-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t) Military OneSource (talk) removed. Josef M. Brožek renamed to Josef Brožek. Draft:Supportive...
Click to read more »there may be copyright, original research, and notability concerns. WP:ONESOURCE WP:1R Low Assessing reliability There are a number of ways in which you...
Click to read more »Infringing versions deleted. KrakatoaKatie 22:16, 7 April 2008 (UTC) Military OneSource (history · last edit) from [4]. Yamla (talk) 16:46, 24 March 2008 (UTC)...
Click to read more »other sources. While it would be tempting to start discussing about WP:ONESOURCE, WP:CONFLICT, WP:PRIMARY and WP:VERIFY, the Neutrality and tone of whole...
Click to read more »(UTC): User Timcorban123 t • c • dc • l • ef • b • bl; (12) to Corban OneSource (edit | [[:|talk]] | history | links | watch | logs) (diff top?) - Link:...
Click to read more »(t · c); see discussion (3 participants; relisted) 28 Jul 2026 – Military OneSource (talk · edit · hist) AfDed by Longhornsg (t · c) was closed as delete...
Click to read more »shortcut". What's the point in eventually changing the 2600 redirects from Onesource to One source? Basically, you may be right about point 1, although it...
Click to read more »Cavalry Regiment (talk) removed. Jerrod Sessler (talk) removed. Military OneSource (talk) removed. 2026 United States–Israeli strikes on Iraq renamed to...
Click to read more »the article with {{onesource}} rather than seeking deletion. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 00:24, 27 January 2008 (UTC) Tagged as {{onesource}} per your suggestion...
Click to read more »co.uk/music/release/vb3n/ can be found, and we can tag the article {{onesource}} 68.148.164.166 (talk) 06:12, 8 June 2008 (UTC) Drill n bass is an underground...
Click to read more »Infringing versions deleted. KrakatoaKatie 22:16, 7 April 2008 (UTC) Military OneSource (history · last edit) from [4]. Yamla (talk) 16:46, 24 March 2008 (UTC)...
Click to read more »citizenship, including 4 people who also have French citizenship. It's WP:ONESOURCE, and has nothing to do with the Arab Leage as an intergovernmental organisation...
Click to read more »(t · c); see discussion (2 participants; relisted) 28 Jul 2026 – Military OneSource (talk · edit · hist) AfDed by Longhornsg (t · c) was closed as delete...
Click to read more »209 (talk) 17:24, 30 September 2008 (UTC) So we went from "fringe" to {{onesource}}. Since Luck (1985) is academically published, I do suppose it is permissible...
Click to read more »endorsed by Northamerica1000 on 29 Jul 2016 was deleted 29 Jul 2016 – Corban OneSource PRODed by Trivialist was deleted 30 Jul 2016 – Betinvest PRODed by SwisterTwister...
Click to read more »Pokemon games it does. I would say this very likely qualifies for a {{onesource}} tag as it relies mostly on IGN for its analysis and primary sources...
Click to read more »co.uk/music/release/vb3n/ can be found, and we can tag the article {{onesource}} 68.148.164.166 (talk) 06:12, 8 June 2008 (UTC) Drill n bass is an underground...
Click to read more »(talk) removed. Draft:Mark 10 missile launcher (talk) removed. Military OneSource (talk) removed. 2005 Indonesian beheadings of Christian girls renamed...
Click to read more »Cavalry Regiment (talk) removed. Jerrod Sessler (talk) removed. Military OneSource (talk) removed. Iran–U.S. RQ-170 incident renamed to 2011 Iran RQ-170...
Click to read more »(t · c); see discussion (2 participants; relisted) 28 Jul 2026 – Military OneSource (talk · edit · hist) AfDed by Longhornsg (t · c) was closed as delete...
Click to read more »on 05 Aug 2026; see discussion (6 participants) 28 Jul 2026 – Military OneSource (talk · edit · hist) AfDed by Longhornsg (t · c) was closed as delete...
Click to read more »com/ksrm/3.20.htm#p8 (1702, 103, 2, 1) duck:8080?remove=onesource (1702, 1502, 0, 0) duck:8080?confirm=onesource (1702, 1502, 0, 0) duck:8080?remove=cpu_technologies...
Click to read more »D'Souza and User:Redtigerxyz User:Deepak D'Souza claimed that this was WP:ONESOURCE - I provided another independent source. WP:SYN was alleged regarding...
Click to read more »even Kingdoms in pre-colonial Africa may be criticized on grounds of {{onesource}}, since it seems arbitrary to compare the Sahelian kingdoms to those...
Click to read more »that the page lacked references from reliable, secondary sources, and |onesource= because most of what is in the article appears to have been sourced from...
Click to read more »the article with {{onesource}} rather than seeking deletion. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 00:24, 27 January 2008 (UTC) Tagged as {{onesource}} per your suggestion...
Click to read more »coverage" section of the page. Thinking this inappropriate, I added a onesource tag to the beginning of the page, which prompted vehement opposition by...
Click to read more »sourced only from the subject's website. I have repeatedly tagged it with {{onesource}}; other editors have added {{primarysources}} and {{unreferenced}}. The...
Click to read more »2007 (UTC) Offhand I could suggest Template:Primarysources, Template:Onesource, Template:Citecheck or Template:Unverifiable-external-links. None of these...
Click to read more »2008 Corvus cornix (Talk | contribs) (2,360 bytes) ({{cleanup-rewrite}}{{onesource}}{{notable}}) (undo) Best Robert Chave (talk) 00:11, 15 April 2008 (UTC)...
Click to read more »(UTC) Articles written by Kiko Escuadro should be counted as just WP:ONESOURCE even if published by different publishers (ABS-CBN and Manila Standard)...
Click to read more »group or set by independent reliable sources.' This article relies on WP:ONESOURCE, not multiple which NLIST requires. 11WB (talk) 15:21, 13 February 2026...
Click to read more »article proves the topic is not independently notable as it only uses WP:ONESOURCE, it would also be far easier to get all the information you need about...
Click to read more »(links here) 1484 2246 Cc-by-4.0 (links here) 1482 2247 Onesource (links here) 1482 2248 WPFarm (links here) 1482 2249...
Click to read more »am nominating the following pages, all because of WP:GNG (WP:SIGCOV/WP:ONESOURCE) Tyumen Oblast in the Turkvision Song Contest (edit | talk | history |...
Click to read more »probably not notable per the general notability guideline, WP:NGEO and WP:ONESOURCE. The article currently needs many more sources to be strongly reconsidered...
Click to read more »free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This article only has WP:ONESOURCE and contains far more information than could be provided through that...
Click to read more »BTW, having a single source only is not a valid reason for deletion, WP:ONESOURCE is just an essay. --Cyfal (talk) 21:35, 10 March 2025 (UTC) Keep. Not...
Click to read more »S - (3804) - soft delete - closed 06:49, 9 August 2026 (UTC) Military OneSource - (4164) - delete - closed 00:27, 5 August 2026 (UTC) Drug policy of Nigeria...
Click to read more »free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This article only has WP:ONESOURCE meaning little content is verifiable and there is no significant secondary...
Click to read more »to Cold_War_leaders to Ronald_Reagan to Ronald_Reagan_Trail Military_OneSource (talk) via ROOT to Military Hotwash (talk) via ROOT to Military to Military_science...
Click to read more »cut-off point, which will also shift as the article ages. It's also WP:ONESOURCE from one single 1985 book, which miraculously already seems to know which...
Click to read more »FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:MILMOS#BATTLESIN. Most entries WP:UNSOURCED, or WP:ONESOURCE by Standish Hayes O'Grady from 1892 (WP:AGEMATTERS). Follow-up to List...
Click to read more »Article relies on one singular source to cover the whole article. Fails WP:ONESOURCE and WP:NOTABILITY. I put notability because without the citations we can't...
Click to read more »that is enough. ProfessorKaiFlai (talk) 08:49, 6 June 2024 (UTC) The WP:ONESOURCE essay may or may not have something helpful. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk)...
Click to read more »on (population lists for various animal taxa) are in violation of WP:ONESOURCE because all population estimates come from the IUCN Red List. For an example...
Click to read more »for a Yale obituary, this alone does not constitute notability per WP:ONESOURCE. Judging from a Google search as called for by WP:BEFORE, there are very...
Click to read more »of Belgrade" article, as, seemingly after 7+ years being marked with onesource, it still remains with only one source. NeoJade ( Talk | Contribs ) •...
Click to read more »of the table in Ref. 16, which is the only source cited. So we have WP:ONESOURCE, WP:COPYVIO, and WP:NLIST all in one go. The dePRODer's "but it's useful"...
Click to read more »tag...." – You omit what Kryn [correctly spelled] notes there: "removed onesource tag (visual arts pages reach notability on one museum source, and this...
Click to read more »following related page because this article also fails WP:GNG, WP:SIGCOV, WP:ONESOURCE and WP:OR, as well as an additional issue with WP:SELFPUB: Intervision...
Click to read more »EnvironmentalDoor (talk) 17:44, 21 March 2026 (UTC) Delete per nom, above, and WP:ONESOURCE. Videogameplayer99 (talk) 20:29, 21 March 2026 (UTC) Delete WP:FANCRUFT...
Click to read more »Samoht27 (talk) 05:29, 25 April 2024 (UTC) Delete as per nomination, WP:ONESOURCE. Orange sticker (talk) 10:56, 25 April 2024 (UTC) Delete One source is...
Click to read more »Darkm777 (talk) 01:54, 21 October 2025 (UTC) I guess the issue would be WP:ONESOURCE FaviFake (talk) 16:29, 21 October 2025 (UTC) Yes, so maybe DRAFT is a...
Click to read more »JSTOR · TWL) Notability is usually not established via one source per WP:ONESOURCE. Per WP:NTEAM, the general notability guideline takes precedence and that...
Click to read more »This is not a correctly formatted RfC, and the opening section is a flagrant violation of WP:RFCNEUTRAL. Anyone is free to create a new RfC on Science...
Click to read more »FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This article for a television program only has WP:ONESOURCE so does not comply well with the general notability guideline. There is...
Click to read more »sources should not be used for major facts like this per the guidelines. WP:ONESOURCE also says that per the general notability guideline, we should use a greater...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Khilkov (recently unanimously deleted). Relies on WP:ONESOURCE, russianartdealer.com, which is a WP:SPS; WP:OR; fails WP:GNG. Rule of...
Click to read more »Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:14, 24 April 2024 (UTC) Delete: Violation of WP:ONESOURCE and fails WP:GNG. BlakeIsHereStudios (talk | contributions) 17:50, 25...
Click to read more »an educator to view--which already doesn't count. TL/DR: Firmly in WP:ONESOURCE territory for the most part--and in turn, clearly short of WP:NAUTHOR...
Click to read more »is not to remove references from articles with onesource tags or sections of articles with onesource tags as is the case for the 8 articles you directed...
Click to read more »citizenship, including 4 people who also have French citizenship. It's WP:ONESOURCE, and has nothing to do with the Arab Leage as an intergovernmental organisation...
Click to read more »the article is from the Dictionary of Welsh Biography, it is only WP:ONESOURCE. Her first husband's entry in the Dictionary of Welsh Biography mentions...
Click to read more »documentation outside Historical RFA. Additionally, it falls under the WP:ONESOURCE umbrella for relying on the Historical RFA entry alone. EditorGirlAL07...
Click to read more »all this information it may fall in a grey area copyright-wise per WP:ONESOURCE. Orange sticker (talk) 09:51, 28 May 2025 (UTC) This isn't a database...
Click to read more »set by independent reliable sources'. This list relies heavily on WP:ONESOURCE. WP:SIGCOV says that: 'Multiple publications from the same author or organization...
Click to read more »GreyStar456 (talk) 17:09, 8 March 2024 (UTC) @GreyStar456 There is a template {{onesource}} placed near the top of the article when viewed in the source editor...
Click to read more »fact that only one, primary source is used is not a good idea per WP:ONESOURCE. This article also is not very detailed in terms of text used rather than...
Click to read more »vessel - (5171) - merge - closed 06:03, 7 August 2026 (UTC) Military OneSource - (4164) - delete - closed 00:27, 5 August 2026 (UTC) RPB-1 - (3627) -...
Click to read more »Clara Stack - (5836) - keep - closed 18:41, 4 August 2026 (UTC) Military OneSource - (4164) - delete - closed 00:27, 5 August 2026 (UTC) First Bank of Greenwich...
Click to read more »the Blind - (11899) - keep - closed 19:51, 4 August 2026 (UTC) Military OneSource - (4164) - delete - closed 00:27, 5 August 2026 (UTC) St. Mary Church...
Click to read more »