Redirect to:
interpreted within their area of interest. This page is not a Wikipedia policy, as it has not been reviewed by the community. Shortcut WP:OFFCRICWP:OFFCRIC...
Click to read more »article on a non-notable OAP cricket league which fails WP:GNG and WP:OFFCRIC. Just because retired players are taking part, doesn't make this inherently...
Click to read more »highest domestic level or in the lower levels of international cricket", WP:OFFCRIC - only Pentangular Trophy in his time period in Pakistan. Vestrian24Bio...
Click to read more »has been specified to be non-notable in WP:OFFCRIC. Arnav Bhate (talk) 11:30, 25 February 2024 (UTC) WP:OFFCRIC is a depreciated guideline, the real question...
Click to read more »2022 (UTC) Yes, according to WP:NCRIC, WP:CRIC notability point 2 and WP:OFFCRIC (international cricket point 3), a person from an associate nation playing...
Click to read more »Non-notable league which doesn't meet the wider inclusion guidelines of WP:OFFCRIC, let alone WP:GNG. AA (talk) 20:07, 19 September 2024 (UTC) The above discussion...
Click to read more »JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable cricket tournament which fails WP:NCRIC via WP:OFFCRIC. References are just WP:ROUTINE at best and WP:PROMOTION at worst. Fails...
Click to read more »in highest-level apart from that it isn't presumed to be notable at WP:OFFCRIC. — A.A Prinon Leave a dialogue 09:07, 18 June 2021 (UTC) The Women's County...
Click to read more »matches cannot even be used to determine notability for players as per WP:OFFCRIC. Upon a WP:BEFORE search, I found one TOI source, but it looks like a passing...
Click to read more »September 2024 (UTC) Delete. Non-notable cricket league which fails WP:OFFCRIC and WP:GNG. AA (talk) 00:21, 21 September 2024 (UTC) The above discussion...
Click to read more »determining notability – and Sri Lankan FC competitions are not included in WP:OFFCRIC anyway. wjematherplease leave a message... 11:05, 6 October 2022 (UTC)...
Click to read more »Trophy, which is not notable enough to presume coverage for a player per WP:OFFCRIC. RoboCric (talk) 08:01, 18 April 2023 (UTC) Delete in absence of suitable...
Click to read more »Cricket does meet the notability inclusion guideline for players (see WP:OFFCRIC), and the same is true for supposed under-19 players. Going back to there...
Click to read more »coverage, i.e. scorecards and fixture announcements. It fails WP:CRIN via WP:OFFCRIC from my interpretation, as it is not of Grade standard. My main concern...
Click to read more »Delete. The season of a non-notable cricket tournament. Fails WP:GNG and WP:OFFCRIC. AA (talk) 14:32, 22 September 2024 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »September 2024 (UTC) Delete. Non-notable cricket league which fails WP:OFFCRIC and WP:GNG. AA (talk) 22:30, 19 September 2024 (UTC) The above discussion...
Click to read more »either, as he doesn't have participation in any of the matches listed in WP:OFFCRIC. Previously, it was soft deleted through AFD, but has again been created...
Click to read more »A quick search reveals little coverage and nothing in depth. Fails WP:OFFCRIC and WP:GNG. AA (talk) 11:20, 28 August 2024 (UTC) Note: This discussion...
Click to read more »trivia: WP:OFFCRIC. AA (talk) 22:49, 6 July 2024 (UTC) And again you put your sng over the gng Spartaz Humbug! 06:23, 8 July 2024 (UTC) WP:OFFCRIC is a depreciated...
Click to read more »FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable tournament which fails WP:NCRIC via WP:OFFCRIC. There is very little coverage I can find from this one event. 18 years...
Click to read more »free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:GNG, WP:NCRIC/WP:OFFCRIC. Non-notable tournament which ran twice, over 15 years ago. No WP:LASTING...
Click to read more »historically notable, which this is not. Fails WP:GNG, WP:EVENT, WP:NCRIC/WP:OFFCRIC. AA (talk) 18:43, 6 June 2024 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...
Click to read more »15 June 2022 (UTC) Delete. This league does not satisfy WP:NCRIC or WP:OFFCRIC (i. e. matches do not hold official T20 status). StickyWicket (talk) 12:08...
Click to read more »JSTOR · TWL) Another mass-created minor league which fails WP:GNG and WP:OFFCRIC. Oh, and I better nominate it for deletion, despite the threat not too...
Click to read more »Quaid-e-Azam Trophy (if either are; neither competition seems to be listed in WP:OFFCRIC as an official competition since the QEA re-expanded once more; correct...
Click to read more »T10 league is not played in T20 status, so not deemed notable as per WP:OFFCRIC. Subject fails to meet the wider requirements of WP:GNG. All WP:REFBOMBs...
Click to read more »(talk) 05:04, 29 September 2022 (UTC) Delete - Fails WP:SIGCOV and WP:OFFCRIC. Kpddg (talk) 11:05, 29 September 2022 (UTC) Redirect to List of Otago...
Click to read more »editor who sticks to players who played in matches of status as per WP:OFFCRIC. This guy played in a 2-day match, so no status was attached. As for finding...
Click to read more »article on a non-notable OAP cricket league which fails WP:GNG and WP:OFFCRIC. Just because retired players are taking part, doesn't make this inherently...
Click to read more »TOURNAMENT articles for deletion which do not fall under WP:OFFCRIC. However, unfortunately OFFCRIC is not an official policy or guideline. There is sufficient...
Click to read more »(talk) 20:17, 12 May 2022 (UTC) Delete as per nom. Fails WP:NCRIC and WP:OFFCRIC. --Whiteguru (talk) 22:09, 12 May 2022 (UTC) Delete...there is no logical...
Click to read more »Joseph2302 (talk) 16:36, 4 July 2024 (UTC) Delete. Per nom. Fails WP:GNG, WP:OFFCRIC, and WP:EVENT. Its whole existence is based around WP:INHERITED and has...
Click to read more »2024 (UTC) Keep. This article meet WP:GNG in WP:NSPORT (and WP:CRIN / WP:OFFCRIC) criteria. An ODI cricket tournament featuring full memebers of the ICC...
Click to read more »ideally I'd like teams which hold status only to have articles per WP:OFFCRIC). StickyWicket aka AA (talk) 13:53, 2 December 2023 (UTC) Keep These are...
Click to read more »nominated for deletion. It meets WP:OFFCRIC. Dz5t 8O12 (talk) 10:13, 13 April 2026 (UTC) That is incorrect. OFFCRIC discusses match types and competitions...
Click to read more »mentioned player hasn't yet played in a global T20 WC qualifier. Secondly, WP:OFFCRIC just states that players participating in these matches may have sufficient...
Click to read more »2024 (UTC) So that's a lot of personal opinion... where's the WP:GNG, WP:OFFCRIC, WP:EVENT pass? AA (talk) 10:46, 4 September 2024 (UTC) Relisted to generate...
Click to read more »referencing meets a GNG level or not. Given the newness and existing WP:OFFCRIC practices, I think the right approach is to delete for now, and recreate...
Click to read more »permanent nature which themselves ensure notability. Shortcut WP:OFFCRICWP:OFFCRIC A list of notable competitions and leagues that the Cricket WikiProject...
Click to read more »odd cricket is included in this. Anyone even slightly aware of our WP:OFFCRIC tournament inclusion criteria should know it is probably the most restrictive...
Click to read more »2022 (UTC) Yes, according to WP:NCRIC, WP:CRIC notability point 2 and WP:OFFCRIC (international cricket point 3), a person from an associate nation playing...
Click to read more »15 June 2022 (UTC) Delete. This league does not satisfy WP:NCRIC or WP:OFFCRIC (i. e. matches do not hold official T20 status). StickyWicket (talk) 12:08...
Click to read more »editor who sticks to players who played in matches of status as per WP:OFFCRIC. This guy played in a 2-day match, so no status was attached. As for finding...
Click to read more »(talk) 05:04, 29 September 2022 (UTC) Delete - Fails WP:SIGCOV and WP:OFFCRIC. Kpddg (talk) 11:05, 29 September 2022 (UTC) Redirect to List of Otago...
Click to read more »matches cannot even be used to determine notability for players as per WP:OFFCRIC. Upon a WP:BEFORE search, I found one TOI source, but it looks like a passing...
Click to read more »in highest-level apart from that it isn't presumed to be notable at WP:OFFCRIC. — A.A Prinon Leave a dialogue 09:07, 18 June 2021 (UTC) The Women's County...
Click to read more »(talk) 20:17, 12 May 2022 (UTC) Delete as per nom. Fails WP:NCRIC and WP:OFFCRIC. --Whiteguru (talk) 22:09, 12 May 2022 (UTC) Delete...there is no logical...
Click to read more »FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable tournament which fails WP:NCRIC via WP:OFFCRIC. There is very little coverage I can find from this one event. 18 years...
Click to read more »determining notability – and Sri Lankan FC competitions are not included in WP:OFFCRIC anyway. wjematherplease leave a message... 11:05, 6 October 2022 (UTC)...
Click to read more »T10 league is not played in T20 status, so not deemed notable as per WP:OFFCRIC. Subject fails to meet the wider requirements of WP:GNG. All WP:REFBOMBs...
Click to read more »Cricket does meet the notability inclusion guideline for players (see WP:OFFCRIC), and the same is true for supposed under-19 players. Going back to there...
Click to read more »coverage, i.e. scorecards and fixture announcements. It fails WP:CRIN via WP:OFFCRIC from my interpretation, as it is not of Grade standard. My main concern...
Click to read more »JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable cricket tournament which fails WP:NCRIC via WP:OFFCRIC. References are just WP:ROUTINE at best and WP:PROMOTION at worst. Fails...
Click to read more »such coverage was okay if a player meets other notability criteria. WP:OFFCRIC lists the Indian Premier League as a noteworthy league, and while I disagree...
Click to read more »trivia: WP:OFFCRIC. AA (talk) 22:49, 6 July 2024 (UTC) And again you put your sng over the gng Spartaz Humbug! 06:23, 8 July 2024 (UTC) WP:OFFCRIC is a depreciated...
Click to read more »has been specified to be non-notable in WP:OFFCRIC. Arnav Bhate (talk) 11:30, 25 February 2024 (UTC) WP:OFFCRIC is a depreciated guideline, the real question...
Click to read more »highest domestic level or in the lower levels of international cricket", WP:OFFCRIC - only Pentangular Trophy in his time period in Pakistan. Vestrian24Bio...
Click to read more »Delete. The season of a non-notable cricket tournament. Fails WP:GNG and WP:OFFCRIC. AA (talk) 14:32, 22 September 2024 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »article on a non-notable OAP cricket league which fails WP:GNG and WP:OFFCRIC. Just because retired players are taking part, doesn't make this inherently...
Click to read more »TOURNAMENT articles for deletion which do not fall under WP:OFFCRIC. However, unfortunately OFFCRIC is not an official policy or guideline. There is sufficient...
Click to read more »Quaid-e-Azam Trophy (if either are; neither competition seems to be listed in WP:OFFCRIC as an official competition since the QEA re-expanded once more; correct...
Click to read more »nominated for deletion. It meets WP:OFFCRIC. Dz5t 8O12 (talk) 10:13, 13 April 2026 (UTC) That is incorrect. OFFCRIC discusses match types and competitions...
Click to read more »nominated for deletion. It meets WP:OFFCRIC. Dz5t 8O12 (talk) 10:13, 13 April 2026 (UTC) That is incorrect. OFFCRIC discusses match types and competitions...
Click to read more »mentioned player hasn't yet played in a global T20 WC qualifier. Secondly, WP:OFFCRIC just states that players participating in these matches may have sufficient...
Click to read more »free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:GNG, WP:NCRIC/WP:OFFCRIC. Non-notable tournament which ran twice, over 15 years ago. No WP:LASTING...
Click to read more »JSTOR · TWL) Another mass-created minor league which fails WP:GNG and WP:OFFCRIC. Oh, and I better nominate it for deletion, despite the threat not too...
Click to read more »historically notable, which this is not. Fails WP:GNG, WP:EVENT, WP:NCRIC/WP:OFFCRIC. AA (talk) 18:43, 6 June 2024 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...
Click to read more »A quick search reveals little coverage and nothing in depth. Fails WP:OFFCRIC and WP:GNG. AA (talk) 11:20, 28 August 2024 (UTC) Note: This discussion...
Click to read more »ideally I'd like teams which hold status only to have articles per WP:OFFCRIC). StickyWicket aka AA (talk) 13:53, 2 December 2023 (UTC) Keep These are...
Click to read more »2024 (UTC) Keep. This article meet WP:GNG in WP:NSPORT (and WP:CRIN / WP:OFFCRIC) criteria. An ODI cricket tournament featuring full memebers of the ICC...
Click to read more »either, as he doesn't have participation in any of the matches listed in WP:OFFCRIC. Previously, it was soft deleted through AFD, but has again been created...
Click to read more »such coverage was okay if a player meets other notability criteria. WP:OFFCRIC lists the Indian Premier League as a noteworthy league, and while I disagree...
Click to read more »referencing meets a GNG level or not. Given the newness and existing WP:OFFCRIC practices, I think the right approach is to delete for now, and recreate...
Click to read more »Trophy, which is not notable enough to presume coverage for a player per WP:OFFCRIC. RoboCric (talk) 08:01, 18 April 2023 (UTC) Delete in absence of suitable...
Click to read more »Non-notable league which doesn't meet the wider inclusion guidelines of WP:OFFCRIC, let alone WP:GNG. AA (talk) 20:07, 19 September 2024 (UTC) The above discussion...
Click to read more »2024 (UTC) So that's a lot of personal opinion... where's the WP:GNG, WP:OFFCRIC, WP:EVENT pass? AA (talk) 10:46, 4 September 2024 (UTC) Relisted to generate...
Click to read more »