Redirect to:
This page is a redirect. The following categories are used to track and monitor this redirect:
|
follow it, though exceptions may apply. Substantive edits to this page should reflect consensus. Shortcuts WP:OVERCATWP:OVERCAT WP:OCATWP:OCAT WP:OCWP:OC...
Click to read more »(edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Nominator's rationale: WP:OCAT. Only three articles, unlikely to expand Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw...
Click to read more »The following was originally posted to the discussion page of WP:OCAT as a personal short essay explaining handling the subdividing Category:People from...
Click to read more »in a category instead.--JForget 23:14, 23 August 2007 (UTC) Delete per WP:OCAT - "Non-notable intersections by religion" Corpx 01:36, 24 August 2007 (UTC)...
Click to read more »principle of performer-by-performance OCAT. Otto4711 (talk) 16:52, 1 July 2009 (UTC) There is a place for OCAT, but the persistent abuse of a potentially...
Click to read more »retained, which IMO trumps any race/ethnicity argument. Please read WP:OCAT#SMALL and WP:OCAT#NARROW, which is a more relevant policy than some bogus race vs...
Click to read more »preferred method for these: see WP:OCAT#Award recipients. Good Ol’factory (talk) 03:59, 18 February 2009 (UTC) Delete per nom, OCAT, and many recent precedents...
Click to read more »better suited as a category (which some even in that case may consider as WP:OCAT). MuZemike (talk) 06:10, 24 August 2008 (UTC) This is nonsense, you cannot...
Click to read more »John Vandenberg (chat) 23:00, 30 January 2010 (UTC) Delete. Yet more WP:OCAT by century. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 03:34, 31 January 2010...
Click to read more »be the right term here, this is a pretty good example of why we have WP:OCAT#EGRS. Two entries in this category. Neither seem to apply well (One famous...
Click to read more »logs) Nominator's rationale: Eponymous categories are discouraged per WP:OCAT. So far, only one page has been categorized here, and that is an image. I...
Click to read more »this page. The result was Delete. 1st-AFD is not a vote; 2nd-we have a WP:OCAT that guides us to "Avoid intersections of two traits that are unrelated,...
Click to read more »| history | links | watch | logs) Nominator's rationale: Delete. Per WP:OCAT#Award. Another prestigious award to receive that is non-defining, and more...
Click to read more »directly states that these particular ethnicity/politician categories are WP:OCAT and should not exist in their current state. Furthermore, these categories...
Click to read more »article or merge the cast list into the main article for the show. See WP:OCAT for why cast lists should not be done as categories. Dugwiki 16:00, 10 July...
Click to read more »particularly satisfied with the language at the top of WP:OCAT or at WP:OCAT#Award winners; the general OCAT language refers to "existing guidelines and previous...
Click to read more »for a long time (>3 years) with many edits, it remains a mess. It fails WP:OCAT. It lumps together a heterogeneous mix of conditions – from urban myths with...
Click to read more »watch | logs) Nominator's rationale: Uneeded eponyomous category, per WP:OCAT. Lugnuts (talk) 08:57, 8 August 2009 (UTC) Delete - small eponymous category...
Click to read more »article or merge the cast list into the main article for the show. See WP:OCAT for why cast lists should not be done as categories. Dugwiki 16:00, 10 July...
Click to read more »how it is that "Cat:Songs covered by Artist Xyz" is OCAT,but "Cat:Songs by Artist Xyz" is not OCAT? I'm having a hard time seeing any real difference....
Click to read more »already deleted: This just seems to be a continuation. WP:NOT, WP:TRIVIA, WP:OCAT#byethnicity all apply. Bulldog123 (talk) 02:12, 13 September 2008 (UTC) Note:...
Click to read more »article or merge the cast list into the main article for the show. See WP:OCAT for why cast lists should not be done as categories. Dugwiki 16:02, 10 July...
Click to read more »CHAMPION (talk) (contributions) (logs) 05:25, 31 March 2017 (UTC) Delete; WP:OCAT by shared name. Bearcat (talk) 03:49, 2 April 2017 (UTC) Delete as a blatant...
Click to read more »2016 (UTC) Delete – I would be in favour of adding something formal to WP:OCAT to discourage these. Oculi (talk) 12:32, 8 July 2016 (UTC) Delete This is...
Click to read more »article or merge the cast list into the main article for the show. See WP:OCAT for why cast lists should not be done as categories. Dugwiki 15:59, 10 July...
Click to read more »Mormons in the DOJ?) Raised by multiple users. (Over) categorization - OCAT is primarily related to categories not articles, however this guideline reflects...
Click to read more »categorize Cast lists should almost never be done as categories. See WP:OCAT for details. Dugwiki 15:57, 10 July 2007 (UTC) Keep. Work on it instead of...
Click to read more »— Preceding unsigned comment added by 104.205.17.157 (talk) Delete per WP:OCAT. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 07:10, 1 April 2018 (UTC) No need to bother -...
Click to read more »details. Good Ol’factory (talk) 02:49, 20 December 2012 (UTC) Delete caste is OCAT; as would be class in Western culture: Category:Land owning people, Category:Rich...
Click to read more »(UTC) Categories are more stringent regarding such intersections; see WP:OCAT, and Muslim actors CFD. And nothing more specific than Category:Indian Muslims...
Click to read more »High Commissioners to each other instead of ambassadors. This is not WP:OCAT. Peterkingiron (talk) 23:23, 23 December 2011 (UTC) Keep This fits as part...
Click to read more »films (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Nominator's rationale: WP:OCAT; Splitting the category "English-language German films" into three categories...
Click to read more »Nominator's rationale: Delete. Overcategorization by name characteristic. Per WP:OCAT: "Avoid categorising by a subject's name when it is a non-defining characteristic...
Click to read more »Irrelevant Intersections for Lists or IIFL is the WP:OCAT's Non-notable intersections by ethnicity, religion, or sexual preference applied to lists, with...
Click to read more »talk | history | links | watch | logs) Nominator's rationale: Delete. WP:OCAT. This is one of a handful of "American scientists of X descent" cats that...
Click to read more »categories but now believe them to be overcategorisation by award per WP:OCAT. BelovedFreak 20:58, 2 March 2008 (UTC) Delete per nom and a big smile for...
Click to read more »discussed at cfd recently, where it survived despite my own views. It fails WP:OCAT#Eponymous, as can be seen by the random collection of articles that have...
Click to read more »article or merge the cast list into the main article for the show. See WP:OCAT for why cast lists should not be done as categories. Dugwiki 16:01, 10 July...
Click to read more »Wryspy 02:16, 14 August 2007 (UTC) Delete per nom & ample precedent, see WP:OCAT. Carlossuarez46 05:37, 14 August 2007 (UTC) Delete. SilkTork 09:16, 14 August...
Click to read more »page history: to listify some entries in category:Doctor Who which were WP:OCAT (categorisation by performance). In other words, I found these pages categorised...
Click to read more »category would be fine. Stifle (talk) 10:58, 3 February 2009 (UTC) Per WP:OCAT, a category is not fine; radio stations are not categorized by individual...
Click to read more »(UTC) I removed the paragraph from WP:OCAT because I saw no discussion about the addition of the paragraph at WT:OCAT and I have still not seen any evidence...
Click to read more »September 2008 (UTC) Strong delete per WP:OCAT. MuZemike (talk) 07:59, 21 September 2008 (UTC) How is WP:OCAT applicable to a list? Exit2DOS2000•T•C• 10:38...
Click to read more »Ukrainian descent Nominator's rationale: Delete. Standard WP:OCAT by ethnicity. WP:OCAT states: should only be created where that combination is itself...
Click to read more »(UTC) WP:NOT#DIR doesn't, and can't, apply to all lists. There is an WP:OCAT. It's just in an altered form than a category, but still has the exact same...
Click to read more »(UTC) Delete. Duplication of existing category and even if it was not, it is OCAT. Vegaswikian (talk) 18:55, 19 April 2010 (UTC) The above is preserved as...
Click to read more »deletion. Cgingold (talk) 22:56, 20 March 2009 (UTC) Have you heard of WP:OCAT. Please provide a reasoning for why this does not meet those guidelines for...
Click to read more »conflict with WP:CATGRS? Occuli (talk) 20:00, 5 August 2011 (UTC) Delete, WP:OCAT -also, the wording seems strange, is Black African descent in contradistinction...
Click to read more »the list is sufficient. Occuli (talk) 19:01, 23 April 2009 (UTC) Delete OCAT, not defining. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 03:13, 24 April 2009 (UTC) Moderate...
Click to read more »Nominator's rationale: This is the endless subdividing they warn about in WP:OCAT. First of all, being of "___ descent" is almost always not more than a word...
Click to read more »played major roles behind the camera) nor could one reasonably be written; OCAT. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 19:41, 7 July 2009 (UTC) Keep as is per everything...
Click to read more »purposes. (WP:OCAT) –Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 00:50, 5 December 2011 (UTC) Upmerge to Category:Holocaust survivors. Agreed as WP:OCAT. – Fayenatic (talk)...
Click to read more »Category:Hungarian-German film directors Nominator's rationale: Delete. Big WP:OCAT. Nothing distinct about being both Hungarian-American and a film director...
Click to read more »lists from categories in that regard. Categories are even more strict per WP:OCAT, if anything. postdlf (talk) 17:24, 7 August 2020 (UTC) Comment I'm gonna...
Click to read more »are a lot of people citing guidelines WP:TRIVIA WP:IDONTLIKEIT WP:NOT WP:OCAT but there's little real debate here, because no one is really exploring what...
Click to read more »WP:OCAT. Carlossuarez46 22:16, 1 August 2007 (UTC) Merge into Category:People from Savannah, Georgia. Violates WP:OCAT#Intersection by location, WP:OCAT#Non-notable...
Click to read more »covered WP:OCAT#Non-defining_or_trivial_characteristic. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 15:31, 10 December 2009 (UTC) Delete per WP:OCAT. Debresser...
Click to read more »singer-songwriters (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Nominator's rationale: WP:OCAT by ethnicity. There are few pages in this category, and there's already a...
Click to read more »lenient with such intersections in categories than we are in lists. See WP:OCAT. postdlf (talk) 13:29, 16 July 2014 (UTC) By "dealt with by the category...
Click to read more »Category:American baseball players and Category:African American sportspeople per WP:OCAT --Kbdank71 18:23, 9 August 2007 (UTC) Category:African American baseball...
Click to read more »logs. Otto4711 (talk) 21:31, 29 April 2008 (UTC) Delete as non-defining OCAT trivia. Good Ol’factory (talk) 22:53, 29 April 2008 (UTC) Without for a moment...
Click to read more »building (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Nominator's rationale: WP:OCAT. Subjective and loose ended. Unlikely to expand unless you really stretch...
Click to read more »criteria for inclusion, the category fails one or other of WP:OCAT#ARBITRARY and WP:OCAT#SUBJECTIVE. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 11:49, 8 December...
Click to read more »15:38, 29 January 2008 (UTC) Delete as WP:OCAT trivial. Sting au Buzz Me... 00:01, 30 January 2008 (UTC) Delete OCAT, or we'll have 26 cats on each typeface...
Click to read more »Category:American Jews in the military (which itself may or may not pass WP:OCAT, I don't know), but that would also suggest that a list that doesn't just...
Click to read more »Wolves (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Nominator's rationale: WP:OCAT Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 01:59, 10 June 2017 (UTC) Keep...
Click to read more »institution.Chendy (talk) 11:45, 10 May 2008 (UTC) Reply. See WP:OCAT, in particular WP:OCAT#Non-defining_or_trivial_characteristic. --BrownHairedGirl (talk)...
Click to read more »00:22, 15 December 2009 (UTC) Comment. Can you convince me that this is not OCAT or too small of a category and that it should be kept? Vegaswikian (talk)...
Click to read more »seems to be clearly in conflict with a number of past decisions and with WP:OCAT as it stands. Perhaps this indicates a change in consensus in this area:...
Click to read more »21 December 2012 (UTC) Delete as WP:OCAT. – Fayenatic London 11:42, 21 December 2012 (UTC) Delete per WP:OCAT. - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback)...
Click to read more »category Corpx 03:55, 12 July 2007 (UTC) I'm not sure but couldn't that be WP:OCAT? Roman Catholic Comedians? Bulldog123 04:00, 12 July 2007 (UTC) Good point...
Click to read more »talk | history | links | watch | logs) Nominator's rationale: Delete per WP:OCAT#SMALL. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 14:44, 26 November 2007 (UTC)...
Click to read more »for the film. PC78 (talk) 15:22, 6 April 2008 (UTC) Delete - I agree it's OCAT for the film but a couple of the articles need one or more additional categories...
Click to read more »Cyrus XIII (talk) 22:40, 11 April 2008 (UTC) The guideline is Wikipedia:OCAT#Eponymous_categories_for_people. Otto4711 (talk) 22:53, 11 April 2008 (UTC)...
Click to read more »category about people, this should be deleted per eponymous precedent and OCAT. as a category about the company, I agree with DGG and his/her arguments...
Click to read more »"Jones" in the same category. Snocrates 23:40, 9 January 2008 (UTC) Delete OCAT by name, and one would think that there can only be one "most" of anything...
Click to read more »(UTC) Strong Delete Trivial intersection of religion + celebrity status (WP:OCAT) Corpx 04:51, 10 August 2007 (UTC) Not trivial at all, far from it. Scientology...
Click to read more »the place to find your old pals. If this had been more serious, this is OCAT - not every regimental association needs to be the subject of a category...
Click to read more »like the idea of the category, but it's against WP:OCAT and might lead to future violations of WP:OCAT. Practically every New Testament figure communicated...
Click to read more »guideline to justify those comments on intersection categories: WP:OCAT and WP:OCAT, which I cited several numerous times in my reply to you when you asked...
Click to read more »things that categories cannot (read WP:LIST). The co-op list is kind of an OCAT list and can probably be cleaned up and turned into a sortable table. However...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails Wikipedia:OCAT#Arbitrary inclusion criterion. What is the difference between a player with...
Click to read more »eponymous category, per WP:OCAT. Karppinen (talk) 10:10, 17 August 2009 (UTC) Keep This is a parent category, and is not OCAT, but is very well needed....
Click to read more »| talk | history | links | watch | logs) Nominator's rationale: Delete, OCAT. Categorizing birds by one mountain range in Mexico (with a slight tip in...
Click to read more »do tend to overcategorize and that's why there are limitations to it WP:OCAT. However, we also tend to overlist and destory the purpose of a list WP:OLIST...
Click to read more »Circeus 00:29, 10 September 2007 (UTC) Delete trivial intersection per OCAT. Carlossuarez46 17:05, 10 September 2007 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »clients Scott Boras have. See WP:OCAT Delete Jaranda wat's sup 20:16, 25 July 2007 (UTC)) Delete per nom; this is Ocat in the extreme and a terrible precedent...
Click to read more »but it certainly doesn't apply here. That would be like my arguing that WP:OCAT doesn't apply at CfD because the source is not reliable; The statement is...
Click to read more »nom. -- Prove It (talk) 13:42, 3 September 2007 (UTC) Upmerge all trivial OCAT per nom, TewfikTalk 09:22, 7 September 2007 (UTC) The above discussion is...
Click to read more »delete the category. Otto4711 (talk) 21:38, 27 March 2009 (UTC) Query – WP:OCAT has strictures against eponymous categories for people, but does not mention...
Click to read more »of the Jewish jurists aren't religious) is irrelevant and constitutes WP:OCAT#Irrelevant_Intersections_By_Religion_Or_Ethnicity. The systematic categorizing...
Click to read more »August 2007 (UTC) Delete Textbook example of trivial intersection. See WP:OCAT Corpx 03:37, 9 August 2007 (UTC) That's about categories, not lists; the...
Click to read more »Ukrainian descent Nominator's rationale: Delete or Upmerge. Another egregious WP:OCAT by ethnicity issue. There is no documentation linking heritage with architecture...
Click to read more »links | watch | logs) Nominator's rationale: Delete. Another one for the WP:OCAT "people who happen to have held two unrelated occupations at different times...
Click to read more »ever performed at the Met, making maintenance difficult. Besides which, WP:OCAT explicitly excludes performers by performance venue; it simply isn't a useful...
Click to read more »match. Note that I am not putting in my usual vote to listify and delete as OCAT, because the BAFTA awards are major awards (unlike the MTV ones, also with...
Click to read more »categories? Greg Comlish (talk) 02:12, 16 March 2009 (UTC) WP:CAT and WP:OCAT. Otto4711 (talk) 04:03, 16 March 2009 (UTC) Merge (as needed) per Greg Comlish...
Click to read more »Who (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Nominator's rationale: Per WP:OCAT#PERF - "Avoid categories which categorise performers by their portrayal of...
Click to read more »WP:OCAT. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 19:37, 7 December 2009 (UTC) Delete. Agree with BrownHairedGirl that this should be added to OCAT. Bearcat...
Click to read more »WP:CATFAQ, WP:CLS, and in particular see WP:OCAT -- the top of WP:CAT describes categories as "defining" and WP:OCAT gives a lot of examples of the kinds of...
Click to read more »personally not seeing how that one isn't WP:OCAT still. Bulldog123 19:17, 8 February 2011 (UTC) Referring to WP:OCAT is not enough to counter the evidence that...
Click to read more »Category:People of medieval Scotland Nominator's rationale: delete/merge per WP:OCAT. These categories add very little value since individual biographies are...
Click to read more »distinct genre of film in its own right, but is merely an non-defining WP:OCAT distinction that's being subjectively applied to some films whose core genre...
Click to read more »article or merge the cast list into the main article for the show. See WP:OCAT for why cast lists should not be done as categories. Dugwiki 16:01, 10 July...
Click to read more »Unlike lists, categories can't have arbitrary inclusion criteria, see WP:OCAT. This list also has the merit of giving the actual GI in some cases. Kappa...
Click to read more »Kozina (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Nominator's rationale: WP:OCAT#SMALL. Not expandable, because Kozina wrote only one opera. --Eleassar my...
Click to read more »Ol’factory (talk) 23:32, 19 October 2009 (UTC) Merge all per nom and per OCAT as trivial intersection. Now excuse me while I get back to planning the annual...
Click to read more »rationale: Delete. Another in a long line of eponym categories afoul of WP:OCAT. See here for a long list of precedents. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 17:32, 29...
Click to read more »largest publishers categorized by every major language on earth (see WP:OCAT). postdlf (talk) 17:13, 10 January 2015 (UTC) Relisted to generate a more...
Click to read more »history | links | watch | logs) Nominator's rationale: Delete. Useless WP:OCAT - Dedicated group-subject subcategories should only be created where that...
Click to read more »to Category:Endemic fauna of California Nominator's rationale: Upmerge, OCAT. Category:Endemic fauna of California only has 32 entries and is more than...
Click to read more »Cincinnati are really no different that criminals from anywhere else. Wayyyy WP:OCAT. Carlossuarez46 18:51, 12 August 2007 (UTC) Delete overcategorization per...
Click to read more »repeated place names. BencherliteTalk 16:21, 11 June 2008 (UTC) Delete as WP:OCAT. Bearcat (talk) 20:32, 11 June 2008 (UTC) Keep - I am extremely disappointed...
Click to read more »talk | history | links | watch | logs) Nominator's rationale: Delete WP:OCAT by shared surname, with no evidence given that any of these Barlows are actually...
Click to read more »22 October 2012 (UTC) Delete performer by performance in the ivory tower. OCAT. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 01:40, 26 October 2012 (UTC) The above is preserved...
Click to read more ». RevelationDirect (talk) 02:52, 18 November 2015 (UTC) Delete per nom. OCAT by source, but we still insist on keeping crap like Category:Bayer objects...
Click to read more »list of WP articles). As for your categorization suggestion, please read WP:OCAT and WP:BLPCAT. If we are to maintain this information here in such detail...
Click to read more »(UTC) Delete per nom. This a performers-by-performance category (see WP:OCAT), and a very weak one at that. -BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 15:59...
Click to read more »subject's notability. Addressing WP:OCAT, there is nothing that applies to this category negatively. The closest criteria of OCAT would be those regarding trivial...
Click to read more »this is a race/ethnicity category in disguise, it's similarly unnecessary OCAT even if you believe that some race/ethnicity cats are OK, because most Americans...
Click to read more »better-structured category. Alansohn (talk) 05:40, 7 June 2009 (UTC) Delete as OCAT and probably POV inclusion criteria. Since many churches follow this, the...
Click to read more »categorized under region, which is not a defining feature and is just WP:OCAT. Also see past CfDs at Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2015_July...
Click to read more »which categories are deleted under the chapter and verse of the Apocrypha of OCAT, I fail to see how lumping these articles into generic categories -- despite...
Click to read more »than this category and are basically issues with WP:OCAT. I suggest you pipe in at Wikipedia talk:OCAT -- I'm sure there are others who have your view of...
Click to read more »WP:OCAT#SMALL. Unnecessary—everything is interlinked; small—unlikely to expand. Good Ol’factory (talk) 21:20, 9 March 2009 (UTC) Digression re WP:OCAT &...
Click to read more »| talk | history | links | watch | logs) Nominator's rationale: Delete, OCAT. The two included species are widely distributed throughout North America...
Click to read more »"the Liberals" or has "Liberal" in its name, it essentially violates WP:OCAT#SHAREDNAMES. Good Ol’factory (talk) 23:00, 13 September 2009 (UTC) Delete...
Click to read more »POV/shockingly biased exchange between them was as follows: "Delete all OCAT by subjective criteria that is not defining. Race/Ethnicity + Nationality...
Click to read more »For just four articles, there is no need for a category either (see WP:OCAT#SMALL). –Black Falcon (Talk) 05:31, 10 March 2009 (UTC) Delete per above...
Click to read more »Category:Postage stamp images. This is more than sufficient. Also per WP:OCAT. Laurel Lodged (talk) 21:01, 6 June 2012 (UTC) Support A better way to subcategorize...
Click to read more »Otto4711 (talk) 19:21, 5 October 2008 (UTC) What has been foisted upon us at WP:OCAT based on the consensus of three editors is that an award must somehow be...
Click to read more »avoid triple intersection categories for expatriate sportspeople. Per WP:OCAT (and especially WP:OCEGRS), it is unlikely that the specific contributions...
Click to read more »would appear to be OCAT since it creates a series of very small categories. The merge proposed does not really address that OCAT problem but does at...
Click to read more »updated to the new category name. -- 67.70.32.97 (talk) Support per nom. OCAT. Grutness...wha? 10:57, 2 October 2020 (UTC) Propose: Rename main cat and...
Click to read more »as well. Eponymous categories like this are generally frowned upon per WP:OCAT. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)...
Click to read more »17 December 2011 (UTC) Comment -- We discourage award categories as WP:OCAT, for all but the most major categories such as Nobel Prizes. This is clearly...
Click to read more »regular updates. Lquilter (talk) 21:43, 26 February 2008 (UTC) Delete per nom. OCAT. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 21:50, 26 February 2008 (UTC) The above is preserved...
Click to read more »Nominator's rationale: Eponymous category for a singer; unnecessary per WP:OCAT. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 20:49...
Click to read more »Council to Category:Chicago City Council members Nominator's rationale: Per WP:OCAT. This is a triple intersection of municipality, sexuality, and political...
Click to read more »the category has very little potential for growth (WP:OCAT), and is a narrow intersection (WP:OCAT)? If someone is born in Nigeria and then moves to England...
Click to read more »individual personality who happens to have worked for the station (violating WP:OCAT as a "performer by performance" category.) The category had also, mysteriously...
Click to read more »logs) Nominator's rationale: {{{3|Delete, too broad of a category, fails WP:OCAT). Jaranda wat's sup Sports! 20:47, 6 September 2007 (UTC) Delete Overcat...
Click to read more »bands, cite them in "normal" music pages. It is proposed for deletion for WP:OCAT Betina 00:19, 17 May 2007 (UTC) Weak Keep There's an encyclopedic article...
Click to read more »producer in the cat did win in 1982. I think the whole mini-tree is borderline OCAT, but if kept, subcats would be ok if someone were to finish sorting the main...
Click to read more »April 2009 (UTC) Delete / Rename if kept As currently worded, Wikipedia:OCAT#Award recipients limits awards to those such as "Category:Nobel laureates...
Click to read more »that's a good sampling.) The previous category was deleted based on the WP:OCAT#AWARD guideline, but I think halls of fame are not truly individual awards;...
Click to read more »already listed in his article, which is all that's necessary here. Textbook WP:OCAT. Bearcat (talk) 02:54, 17 March 2009 (UTC) Delete - overcategorization. --R'n'B...
Click to read more »03:01, 22 April 2009 (UTC) Delete unnecessary religion/race/ethnicity cat - OCAT. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 01:48, 24 April 2009 (UTC) Rename to Category:Jewish...
Click to read more »Category:Supply-Siders to lump them both together? It's various people by opinion, which is OCAT. Carlossuarez46 19:03, 1 December 2007 (UTC) So that's where that policy...
Click to read more »(singer) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Nominator's rationale: WP:OCAT. Singer only has two albums and four notable songs (the rest are just redirects)...
Click to read more »and a category for actors who starred in those series — which violates WP:OCAT as "performer by performance". I thus propose that we rename the category...
Click to read more »Culcheth (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Nominator's rationale: OCAT, only two members; Culcheth is a neighbourhood of Warrington and apparently...
Click to read more »12 May 2009 (UTC) Delete per nom & precedent; performer by performance OCAT. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 23:29, 12 May 2009 (UTC) Keep per the Sky rationale...
Click to read more »Trust (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Nominator's rationale: OCAT and not a defining characteristic for the individuals. It currently has only...
Click to read more »be an intersection of unrelated characteristics, rightly deplored by WP:OCAT. Occuli (talk) 19:06, 25 February 2011 (UTC) Support end to these categories...
Click to read more »around 200 serial killers. We don't need to divide by state. delete per WP:OCAT --Obi-Wan Kenobi (talk) 15:04, 12 June 2013 (UTC) Delete per nom. I hope...
Click to read more »like it. Harrisburg proper only has two malls which means this would be WP:OCAT; extending to a clearly defined MSA would allow it to be more inclusive and...
Click to read more »Delete. Agree with nominator. -Rocket000 01:39, 1 September 2007 (UTC) Delete OCAT per nom, TewfikTalk 08:21, 4 September 2007 (UTC) The above discussion is...
Click to read more »fascinating article but drives a squadron of horses and carriages through WP:OCAT. Oculi (talk) 10:20, 19 January 2012 (UTC) Upmerge as per Black Falcon. Whilst...
Click to read more »October 2008 (UTC) Delete as a non-defining or trivial characteristic. (See WP:OCAT) Original research is better dealt with on an article-by-article basis. -...
Click to read more »nomination - I didn't realize that such categories were exceptions to WP:OCAT. Ten Pound Hammer • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 17:50, 12 September...
Click to read more »resulting categories technically violate WP:OCAT or not, if the undifferentiated parent category is very large. OCAT policy even explicitly states that location...
Click to read more »After reading the lead for Tabloid, I wonder if this is defining of simply OCAT? Vegaswikian (talk) 21:21, 6 January 2008 (UTC) delete not defining; very...
Click to read more »logs) Nominator's rationale: Links only into two articles. Appears to be WP:OCAT. We already have Not everything needs a navbox, maybe I can create a Not...
Click to read more »Everett (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Nominator's rationale: WP:OCAT#SMALL. Everett wrote only two notable songs. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did...
Click to read more »'current' categories. Occuli (talk) 23:44, 16 January 2009 (UTC) Delete OCAT and Current. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 23:18, 19 January 2009 (UTC) Delete no...
Click to read more »appeared to be a more "delete" mentality for the other categories as WP:OCAT. Thefore, in this nomination Category:African-American actors, Category:Asian...
Click to read more »do not need to be categorised by each of them – indeed, that would be WP:OCAT. Most do not mention gongs in the article, so playing gongs is not WP:DEFINING...
Click to read more »nom and WP:OC. Otto4711 (talk) 19:41, 26 May 2008 (UTC) Delete per nom, OCAT. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 18:10, 29 May 2008 (UTC) The above is preserved as...
Click to read more »WP:ILIKEIT". Y'know, form a WP:CONSENSUS on it. Maybe develop a guieline like WP:OCAT or WP:NENAN. And as to your howls of "bureaucratic analysis and rule-making"...
Click to read more »articles, and neither do the creators. You also need to understand that WP:OCAT, though not specific to lists, has been applied numerous times, legitimately...
Click to read more »possibly be speedied as re-created category previously deleted. In the WP:OCAT discussion of non-notable intersections, Category:LGBT murderers is given...
Click to read more »only with notable matches, each categorised into 2 team categories - hardly OCAT. (See e.g. 2004 Danish Cup Final.)Occuli (talk) 20:42, 27 October 2008 (UTC)...
Click to read more »Gene93k (talk) 00:01, 22 September 2012 (UTC) This isn't a category, so WP:OCAT does not apply. The rest of your nom is just a bunch of WP:VAGUEWAVEs with...
Click to read more »is it WP:OCAT? Keep unless there's a better deletion rationale than this. Bearcat (talk) 04:55, 26 December 2009 (UTC) Keep per per WP:OCAT#SMALL, as...
Click to read more »bats (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Nominator's rationale: WP:OCAT#SMALL, zero chance of expansion. No other show features a bat prominently...
Click to read more »easily be added to, especially from South America, is already enough - see WP:OCAT. Johnbod 23:38, 9 August 2007 (UTC) This article is Thiruchelvam Nihal Jim...
Click to read more »nor too much more that would be notable enough for its own article (cf. WP:OCAT#Small_with_no_potential_for_growth. That other junk exists is not a good...
Click to read more »talk | history | links | watch | logs) Nominator's rationale: Delete per WP:OCAT#OPINION. Creator of the cat agrees at Category_talk:Criticism of Calvinism...
Click to read more »much sub-categorizing. Jrcla2 (talk) 15:59, 8 March 2013 (UTC) Delete as WP:OCAT; upmerge entries to Category:People from Fresno, California and Category:American...
Click to read more »(UTC) Delete as WP:OCAT; the list in the article is more appropriate. – Fayenatic London 21:18, 1 November 2012 (UTC) Delete as WP:OCAT per nominator. Vicars...
Click to read more »its own right." Jonathanwallace (talk) 21:10, 21 February 2011 (UTC) WP:OCAT only applies to categories, not lists in article space. postdlf (talk) 12:48...
Click to read more »others are empty. Allanon already appears in Category:Shannara, so this is WP:OCAT for one article to have 5 categories for itself. -- 70.50.148.122 (talk)...
Click to read more »Marcocapelle (talk) 06:40, 14 October 2018 (UTC) I don't see this as WP:OCAT because of the shared name, but a useful way to diffuse Category:Lists of...
Click to read more »appropriate for inclusion in a given category should be removed. And, as per WP:OCAT, the exception for not categorizing occupations by religion is when there...
Click to read more »awards (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Nominator's rationale: WP:OCAT#SMALL. Also delete subcategory Category:PEN New England awards, which has...
Click to read more »is not only racist as Taprobanus has stated, but should be deleted per WP:OCAT. Also the comparison to the Basque paramilitary fails, because even groups...
Click to read more »the Cavalry 02:11, 9 August 2007 (UTC) Delete per trivial intersection (WP:OCAT Corpx 05:07, 9 August 2007 (UTC) Delete - per above, mostly. -- Anonymous...
Click to read more »attained the stature of a Nobel (which is what we hold awards to). See WP:OCAT#Award. --Lquilter (talk) 17:39, 26 March 2014 (UTC) The Nobel Prize is too...
Click to read more »intersection of journalists with city falls afoul of several principles of WP:OCAT, including both LOCATION and DEFINING. Bearcat (talk) 17:16, 24 July 2015...
Click to read more »appropriate subcategories. DGG (talk) 14:31, 30 June 2009 (UTC) Delete per nom; OCAT by unnecessary race/ethnic categories. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 17:43, 1 July...
Click to read more »or districts.Shyamsunder (talk) 22:47, 17 July 2015 (UTC) Delete per WP:OCAT. Talukas report into districts and should be classed in that hierarchy which...
Click to read more »to delete this category. Brain Rodeo (talk) 02:30, 19 July 2008 (UTC) Per OCAT, occupational categories on Wikipedia should normally only be subgrouped...
Click to read more »category is a WP:OCAT#Trivial intersection is not correct. The proper issue at hand deals really with location alone, so it would be WP:OCAT#Intersection...
Click to read more »bands". Lugnuts (talk) 17:56, 28 May 2010 (UTC) Delete – this is undoubtedly OCAT. Category:Mike Watt project bands is also dubious - how do we decide if a...
Click to read more »categorized in this way. Mackensen (talk) 11:00, 16 March 2009 (UTC) Delete OCAT by intersection of job, employer, and birth location, like Category:Google...
Click to read more »Do we really need these at all? To my mind, this is just begging for WP:OCAT-happy category bloat without much tangible benefit. Delete sez I, but if...
Click to read more »hundreds of other writers. Lesnail 15:16, 6 April 2007 (UTC) Delete per WP:OCAT. -- Samuel Wantman 06:52, 7 April 2007 (UTC) Delete per nom. No need for...
Click to read more »all Clear OCAT Johnbod 23:52, 2 December 2007 (UTC) Delete all for overcategorization. Doczilla 06:12, 3 December 2007 (UTC) Delete all OCAT. Carlossuarez46...
Click to read more »logs) Per WP:OCAT, this is an irrelevant intersection between race and province. Picaroon 20:33, 21 March 2007 (UTC) Delete per nom (WP:OCAT) TonyTheTiger...
Click to read more »exisitence. The proposed category is simply over-categorization, see WP:OCAT. This also appears to be arbitrary inclusion criteria WP:OC#Arbitrary. Thanks...
Click to read more »nor any policy against them. WP:OCAT is a guideline, not a rule, nor a policy. I fail to see exactly what from WP:OCAT specifically disallows this. Furthermore...
Click to read more »OK the category is partiallly subcategorized but it shouldn't be, per WP:OCAT). Kappa 00:53, 5 September 2007 (UTC) With regard to British Asian being...
Click to read more »(Macedonia is a redirect.) Occuli (talk) 22:32, 29 January 2009 (UTC) Delete OCAT by occupation & race/ethnicity. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 00:42, 30 January 2009...
Click to read more »Carlossuarez46 16:43, 14 September 2007 (UTC) Delete per nom and per WP:OCAT#Eponymous_categories_for_people. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 18:56...
Click to read more »(talk) 03:29, 27 May 2010 (UTC) Delete, per WP:OCAT. Jayjg (talk) 03:32, 28 May 2010 (UTC) Delete, per WP:OCAT. Plus, it's redundant with List of film producers...
Click to read more »editor, is in WP:CfD and it's got a consensus of delete right now due to WP:OCAT. That's not necessarily a reason to delete the article because I think they...
Click to read more »is the performance? The 'deleters' need to come up with a more relevant 'OCAT' section. (I expect CBC is much the same - there will be plenty who cannot...
Click to read more »watch | logs) Nominator's rationale: Only three articles and a redirect. WP:OCAT. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 04:07...
Click to read more »take? This takes the least amount of steps. Therefore I don't consider it OCAT. Research is tedious enough, to simplify it like this, which has been my...
Click to read more »in a "Coast to Coast AM affiliates" category, in obvious violation of WP:OCAT. Even as the "creator" (read that as "dutiful carrier-outer of CFD consensus"...
Click to read more »pretty much the definition of "small with limited potential for growth" in WP:OCAT. Anatrace Membrane Protein Award Avanti Award in Lipids Distinguished Service...
Click to read more »Delete three item category for official products for a particular platform, OCAT. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 19:23, 5 December 2007 (UTC) Delete per nom. --BrownHairedGirl...
Click to read more »over-cat, emerson7 16:36, 2 September 2009 (UTC) Comment. Exactly why is this OCAT? In reading the main article, I saw at least 5 more articles that could be...
Click to read more »pretty much the definition of "small with limited potential for growth" in WP:OCAT. Anatrace Membrane Protein Award Avanti Award in Lipids Distinguished Service...
Click to read more »Hudson (talk) 00:16, 22 June 2011 (UTC) Listify and delete per WP:OCAT#AWARD and / or WP:OCAT#PERF. Yes, it's an honour of sorts to be invited onto the programme...
Click to read more »main reason for this nomination is that this cat and it's subcats fail WP:OCAT#Intersection by location. Specifically, "avoid subcategorizing subjects by...
Click to read more »two cents. --Vasco Amaral (talk) 17:16, 6 October 2011 (UTC) Delete - WP:OCAT might refer to categories and not articles, but the same principle applies...
Click to read more »guidelines, as are WP:CAT and WP:OCAT. If CfD discussions were to treat guidelines as purely a personal choice, then WP:CAT and WP:OCAT would also be optional....
Click to read more »have spent some time residing in any of those neighborhoods. WP:CAT and WP:OCAT offer a number of means for determining when a list would work better than...
Click to read more »--Mike Selinker (talk) 14:54, 2 April 2008 (UTC) Comment looks rather like WP:OCAT to me, especially if it includes all residents for a period. Johnbod (talk)...
Click to read more »Category:Birds of Ontario to Category:Birds of Canada Nominator's rationale: Upmerge, OCAT. I checked every included article, and none of the included species are even...
Click to read more »Cultic Studies Association or a new article on the award; then delete. WP:OCAT#Award. This is the usual outcome. Peterkingiron (talk) 22:14, 6 May 2013...
Click to read more »(talk) 01:13, 10 April 2013 (UTC) Delete, although just for the record WP:OCAT's proscription against "venues by event" is probably a better encapsulation...
Click to read more »history work?John Pack Lambert (talk) 01:59, 13 May 2012 (UTC) Delete; WP:OCAT by a non-encyclopedic characteristic. It's only a surface similarity between...
Click to read more »per nomination UnitedStatesian (talk) 19:42, 6 May 2009 (UTC) Delete all OCAT by ethnicity per nom. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 17:07, 8 May 2009 (UTC) Note:...
Click to read more »novelists and Category:Gay poets, and we just don't need that. Delete as WP:OCAT by overly narrow intersection. Bearcat (talk) 17:30, 27 April 2012 (UTC)...
Click to read more »overcategorization. Maralia (talk) 03:44, 16 December 2007 (UTC) Delete ocat for this purpose. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 00:56, 19 December 2007 (UTC) The...
Click to read more »over (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Nominator's rationale: WP:OCAT by plot point. Wikipedia does not have any scheme of "Episodes of [Show]...
Click to read more »content, for articles, categories and other content. This is where the WP:OCAT guideline is coming from. Therefore arguing that there is "no valid reason...
Click to read more »talk | history | links | watch | logs) Nominator's rationale: Delete per WP:OCAT#Award. Okay, I love that this award exists, but C-3PO, Data (Star Trek),...
Click to read more »(pertaining to ABS-CBN). Starczamora (talk) 09:45, 31 July 2008 (UTC) delete per OCAT.--Lenticel (talk) 10:56, 31 July 2008 (UTC) Delete as performer by venue...
Click to read more »films (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Nominator's rationale: WP:OCAT by intersection of characteristics. Apart from these two categories, Wikipedia...
Click to read more »makes them notable. Debresser's use of the term "trivial" is not that of WP:OCAT:"In general, categorize by what may be considered notable in a person's life...
Click to read more »comments above. -- roundhouse0 (talk) 14:54, 4 May 2008 (UTC) Delete - WP:OCAT#small category with little or no growth potential. Even if the redirect were...
Click to read more »need this anyway, isn't it total WP:OCAT?" Bearcat (talk) 02:31, 11 October 2010 (UTC) Which of the sections in WP:OCAT do you think it falls under? --Bsherr...
Click to read more »sites (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Nominator's rationale: WP:OCAT. Only one possible entry, zero chance of expansion. Ten Pound Hammer • (What...
Click to read more »(talk) 05:00, 19 November 2007 (UTC) It is clear from the section of WP:OCAT you quote that the category must be "by performance" - ie the performance...
Click to read more »the subcategory is undesirable, e.g. per one of the reasons stated in WP:OCAT. For example you might nominate Category:State-sponsored Linux distributions...
Click to read more »May 2008 (UTC) Delete - This is categorization by shared name, clear WP:OCAT. Otto4711 (talk) 12:58, 25 May 2008 (UTC) Probably listify, definitely delete...
Click to read more »This category fits both WP:OCAT#Non-defining or trivial characteristic / WP:OCAT#Unrelated subjects with shared names and WP:OCAT#Trivial intersection. (Intersection...
Click to read more »named after them, and if this were this a category it would struggle with WP:OCAT. The subject of the template should be mentioned in every article. They aren't...
Click to read more »nominate this category for deletion in line with this guideline: Wikipedia:OCAT#Venues by event. If you browse that page, you will see that this is consistent...
Click to read more »articles) that is unlikely to grow. TM 14:56, 27 March 2020 (UTC) Keep per OCAT as part of wider scheme (16 state sub-cats in Category:Conservative synagogues...
Click to read more »in politics; which, btw, was established in 2012; sic, among others, WP:OCAT fails. Roland zh (talk) 04:51, 17 September 2016 (UTC) / [edited ] Roland...
Click to read more »reason why we have separated out female Emperors from the main category? OCAT by gender, perhaps? Either way, rename. Resolute 01:10, 28 February 2008...
Click to read more »nom. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 18:26, 12 November 2015 (UTC) Delete WP:OCAT and per nom. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 19:16, 12 November 2015 (UTC) Merge, not...
Click to read more »(UTC) Keep – categorising a suicide bombing in Morocco as such is hardly OCAT. The alternative would be 'upmerge to Category:Suicide bombing' (which should...
Click to read more »criticism-categories. Stefanomione (talk) 22:34, 30 January 2012 (UTC) Delete per OCAT; not useful in any conceivable imaginings. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 06:41, 31...
Click to read more »literature without needing this category on top. Seems like a classic WP:OCAT to me; while certainly there are writers from Canada who live in the United...
Click to read more »eponymous article. Otto4711 18:20, 16 June 2007 (UTC) Delete per nom and per WP:OCAT#Eponymous_categories_for_people. This is an eponymous category for a father...
Click to read more »Delete categories distinguishing how various images were uploaded seems to be ocat to me - there's only one image here anyway, for which this category is probably...
Click to read more »(UTC) Keep or upmerge to all the parents. I have never quite grasped how 'OCAT' applies to small categories ... I can see that 'category sprawl' can be...
Click to read more »not small categories and the nom is guilty of hyperbole as worse cases of OCAT are legion. I don't myself see much point in laboriously dividing everyone...
Click to read more »Is everyone who could be listed defined by losing? If not, this would be OCAT. Is dropping out of the nomination process before the first primary losing...
Click to read more »which is the better word. LeSnail (talk) 19:09, 21 January 2008 (UTC) Delete OCAT by sex + avocation. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 00:59, 22 January 2008 (UTC) Delete...
Click to read more »heqs ·:. 10:22, 13 July 2007 (UTC) Delete As per numerous previous cfds and WP:OCAT, most bands do not need an eponymous category solely for albums, songs and...
Click to read more »Afd here. Johnbod (talk) 16:27, 9 November 2008 (UTC) Delete. Definite WP:OCAT, it doesn't matter if the article is deleted or not. Bsimmons666 (talk) Friend...
Click to read more »a sufficient condition. If it were sufficient, all other criteria in WP:OCAT could be striken. Marcocapelle (talk) 07:41, 7 December 2022 (UTC) The above...
Click to read more »was a notable theme but not the central one; categorising them would be WP:OCAT but the list could state the context. - Fayenatic (talk) 21:56, 30 August...
Click to read more »influence, and at least 100 of these 'spots' are handed out every year. Per ocat we should not do cats based on top-100-lists per Wikipedia:OC#TOPTEN. Additionally...
Click to read more »Harvest (talk) 10:56, 6 February 2008 (UTC) No, and if you read WP:CAT and WP:OCAT and WP:CLS, you will see that "categorize" is not a good answer because many...
Click to read more »(UTC) Delete categorizing people by their first language and nationality is OCAT. Just waiting for someone who'll want to categorize various Americans as...
Click to read more »instance, imo. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:23, 25 June 2011 (UTC) Delete per WP:OCAT. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 01:43...
Click to read more »| talk | history | links | watch | logs) Nominator's rationale: Delete, OCAT, as trivial intersection of specific office held and unrelated place. This...
Click to read more »00:34, 15 August 2007 (UTC) Delete an arbitrary list and I think it is WP:OCAT Corpx 00:53, 15 August 2007 (UTC) I don't see any overlistification here...
Click to read more »against each other, most of them won't get selected, either) — but per WP:OCAT#CANDIDATES, we're not supposed to be using categories for that purpose. I'm...
Click to read more »a lake. So what do these have in common? The shared "name" of "Sea" - WP:OCAT. Perhaps something like Category:Subdivisions of the sea and trim out Aral...
Click to read more »(nationality, ethnicity, gender, occupation) which is generally considered WP:OCAT, in particular WP:OCEGRS. But Category:Israeli women singers is a poor target...
Click to read more »rationale: Just having a category for the band itself is unacceptable per WP:OCAT. I suggest removing Category:New Grass Revival albums and New Grass Revival...
Click to read more »for indexing them, and means that the same indexing scheme then passes WP:OCAT as a category Category:Festschrifts. This would then necessarily statisfy...
Click to read more »hierarchy of Category:Eponymous categories is to be put up for deletion as WP:OCAT by shared naming characteristic. As for the names of the contents, the best...
Click to read more »Non-defining characteristic. Otto4711 21:02, 7 October 2007 (UTC) Delete OCAT, non-defining, contrived connection. Carlossuarez46 21:15, 7 October 2007...
Click to read more »arguments to delete cite precedent and (implicitly) WP:OCAT#Small_with_no_potential_for_growth and WP:OCAT#Eponymous_categories_for_people, whereas reasons...
Click to read more »May 2#Law review people.--GrapedApe (talk) 02:42, 2 May 2013 (UTC) Delete OCAT by award. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 23:50, 2 May 2013 (UTC) Delete This does...
Click to read more »sufficient criterion. Categories can be merged/deleted by any criterion in WP:OCAT, not just by WP:NONDEF. I am disputing the smallcat exception here, first...
Click to read more »pages then, and Category:People by nationality just the one ... is this OCAT? Opposing such ludicrous non-arguments becomes tiresome. Occuli (talk) 17:48...
Click to read more »Only the main article and a subcategory for the battles so may well be ocat. If kept, should probably be renamed to Category:Maryland Campaign to match...
Click to read more »categorization of buildings by office park or development, which is probably OCAT, esp. given that there are only 2 articles here, one of which is already...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) delete as per previous discussion and WP:OCAT#Non-notable_intersections_by_ethnicity.2C_religion.2C_or_sexual_preference...
Click to read more »needs to exist. Zoporific 21:58, 3 February 2008 (UTC) Delete not defining, OCAT by trivial award - must be hundreds of thousands of these people. If this...
Click to read more »history | links | watch | logs) Nominator's rationale: I believe this is WP:OCAT; I can't find any other example of a category being used to group cemeteries...
Click to read more »WP:NOTDIRECTORY. Thanks, IZAK (talk) 12:18, 25 October 2010 (UTC) Delete. WP:OCAT. Jayjg (talk) 21:43, 26 October 2010 (UTC) Possible rename to Category:American...
Click to read more »2013 (UTC) Keep We never delete these, even if there is just one film. WP:OCAT expressly does not apply in cases like this. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:51...
Click to read more »"occupation-from-city" rather than renaming; these constitute an unnecessary WP:OCAT intersection. Keep anything that's already in conformance with the "match...
Click to read more »Category:Canadian sportspeople of Scottish descent Nominator's rationale: Delete. WP:OCAT. Ukrainian-Canadian sports, Irish-Canadian sports and English-Canadian sports...
Click to read more »related to Hinduism. Snocrates 12:50, 29 December 2007 (UTC) Delete both as OCAT and trivial intersection. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 00:53, 1 January 2008 (UTC)...
Click to read more »there are too many possible permutations to avoid anything else being WP:OCAT. - The Bushranger One ping only 08:59, 9 December 2017 (UTC) No, because...
Click to read more »rationale: Delete. I'm nominating this batch as an irrelevant intersection per WP:OCAT. Tina Fey already has three on her article, and yet it would appear all three...
Click to read more »inaccurate and the scheme is an extension of OCAT by shared name.- choster (talk) 17:37, 4 December 2012 (UTC) Delete OCAT per choster. If the articles don't talk...
Click to read more »Vegaswikian (talk) 21:12, 11 January 2010 (UTC) Speedy delete per nom and per WP:OCAT#SHAREDNAMES; has been deleted at least three times before under different...
Click to read more »and on and so forth. If this kind of thing isn't already covered by an WP:OCAT proscription, it probably should be. Bearcat (talk) 02:54, 8 September 2019...
Click to read more »(talk/contribs)~ 02:33, 14 November 2020 (UTC) Upmerge per nom We've always used WP:OCAT and to a lesser extent WP:OCLOCATION when dealing with these, and while we've...
Click to read more »both these award winner categories should be deleted as categories per WP:OCAT#Award, with information retained in lists on the relevant award entries....
Click to read more »Erdos numbers are trivial. If they are trivial, then, by the terms of WP:OCAT, they should not form the basis of categories. (This presumption arises from...
Click to read more »AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 06:54, 14 December 2009 (UTC) Delete per nom, and per WP:OCAT#SMALL. If there an ongoing problem of an editor creating categories which...
Click to read more »instrumental albums he did, neither of which has an article. In short, WP:OCAT#SMALL for a person whose bread-and-butter is not songwriting. Ten Pound Hammer...
Click to read more »award.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:39, 16 April 2013 (UTC) Delete per nom OCAT. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 17:25, 16 April 2013 (UTC) Listify --NaBUru38 (talk)...
Click to read more »eponymous category for a band, OCAT per numerous precedents. Carlossuarez46 22:01, 6 November 2007 (UTC) Delete per WP:OCAT#Eponymous_categories_for_people...
Click to read more »not parallel.) Carminis (talk) 01:31, 11 February 2008 (UTC) Delete both ocat by award. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 20:20, 12 February 2008 (UTC) Keep both LeRAM...
Click to read more »Propose deleting Category:LGBT directors from Taiwan Nominator's rationale: WP:OCAT by triple intersection of sexuality, occupation and nationality. This is...
Click to read more »is "defining" of the included subjects, and I would say no. See CAT, WP:OCAT. --Lquilter (talk) 15:35, 14 February 2008 (UTC) Sorry, didn't realise categories...
Click to read more »16 January 2013 (UTC) Delete we categorize articles not titles (see WP:OCAT) these are articles on various things that have some Greek association in...
Click to read more »Group (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Nominator's rationale: WP:OCAT#SMALL, only four entries, zero chance of expansion Ten Pound Hammer • (What...
Click to read more »category is not "the typical categorization scheme", but is unnecessary WP:OCAT. Bearcat (talk) 00:15, 18 April 2010 (UTC) The existing category is Category:Faculty...
Click to read more »| talk | history | links | watch | logs) Nominator's rationale: Delete. OCAT. This structure contains two articles plus the main article which has major...
Click to read more »(UTC) Delete – per nom. Oculi (talk) 13:04, 14 April 2017 (UTC) Delete as WP:OCAT by shared name. Clearly the intention here was for the category to serve...
Click to read more »pattern. Hmains (talk) 03:03, 27 December 2007 (UTC) Keep per Grutness and WP:OCAT#SMALL. Snocrates 12:13, 29 December 2007 (UTC) Keep per Grutness. Carlossuarez46...
Click to read more »something like that? Sting_au Talk 23:28, 7 January 2008 (UTC) Delete as OCAT and non-defining; on a more grammatical note haven't all photographers been...
Click to read more »start categorizing allies in every conflict, it would become a serious WP:OCAT issue. Marcocapelle (talk) 16:54, 17 November 2019 (UTC) Delete per nom and...
Click to read more »just a different term, not a fundamentally different thing. Delete as WP:OCAT. Bearcat (talk) 21:29, 28 February 2014 (UTC) Delete per remarks above. Cgingold...
Click to read more »threshold) and what reliable source tells us that it's at least that much. Pure OCAT and OR and SYNTH. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 06:34, 26 March 2013 (UTC) Delete...
Click to read more »27#Category:LGBT directors from the United States just last week. But this is still WP:OCAT by triple intersection of sexuality, occupation and nationality, which is...
Click to read more »Delete per nom. These are a long way from needing a category. The policy (WP:OCAT I think) say 2 or 3 are needed, but a few more might be better. I wonder...
Click to read more »watch | logs) Nominator's rationale: Without any direction this is likely OCAT. Are we talking about production? Consumption? Transportation? This is not...
Click to read more »--Storm Rider (talk) 05:40, 20 June 2007 (UTC) Delete per nom and per WP:OCAT#Non-defining_or_trivial_characteristic. Listify if anyone wants to create...
Click to read more »is unlikely to substantially grow. TM 17:02, 24 March 2020 (UTC) Keep per OCAT as part of wider scheme (38 state sub-cats in Category:Reform synagogues...
Click to read more »gargoyles. As far as I can see, the cartoon is the only TV show about them. WP:OCAT#SMALL to the extreme. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 04:53...
Click to read more »January 2009 (UTC) Delete OCAT by nationality & religion. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 19:10, 26 January 2009 (UTC) Delete. OCAT. Kittybrewster ☎ 23:07, 29...
Click to read more »the category. VegaDark (talk) 21:18, 22 February 2008 (UTC) Delete per WP:OCAT - categorisation by opinion. I take it we are dealing with the You Ess Ay...
Click to read more »(talk) 12:50, 20 May 2008 (UTC) Listify and delete - as spake Otto4711. It's OCAT:various. -- roundhouse0 (talk) 12:58, 20 May 2008 (UTC) Listify per above...
Click to read more »categories - here as elsewhere Pius's admirers are testing the limits of WP:OCAT. Johnbod (talk) 16:34, 21 September 2009 (UTC) Weakish delete. I've seen...
Click to read more »Titans (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Nominator's rationale: WP:OCAT. Three of the five articles are up for prod but either way I just don't feel...
Click to read more »rationale: Inappropriate self-named category for a singer; not necessary per WP:OCAT. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 20:28...
Click to read more »Category:French-American soul singers, or the such which would be ethnic. WP:OCAT Carlossuarez46 (talk) 19:13, 12 November 2015 (UTC) Keep. Ghmyrtle pretty...
Click to read more »| history | links | watch | logs) Nominator's rationale: Delete - per WP:OCAT, no different from other cast member categories that are uniformly deleted...
Click to read more »any other XfD? Alansohn (talk) 20:52, 12 April 2009 (UTC) (1) Yes, try WP:OCAT. It sets a bad precedent to keep a category that is clearly overcategorization...
Click to read more »section. The result of the discussion was: Keep as per previous discussion, WP:OCAT#Small_with_no_potential_for_growth will allow for categories which are "part...
Click to read more »logs) Nominator's rationale: Delete and listify as overcategorisation per WP:OCAT#Award_winners. All the people in this category will notable primarily for...
Click to read more »category has left the building eh...Delete as OCAT. Bradjamesbrown (talk) 11:53, 12 February 2010 (UTC) Delete as OCAT and misnamed. Debresser (talk) 20:11, 13...
Click to read more »concern is that even though single-item categories would normally be WP:OCAT, in these particular cases the categorization scheme as a whole would be...
Click to read more »his article. Johnbod 16:49, 26 August 2007 (UTC) Delete As described in WP:OCAT, films-by-actor categories are a bad idea because of the large amount of...
Click to read more »history | links | watch | logs) Nominator's rationale: Perfect example of WP:OCAT Delete. This is a Secret account 21:45, 11 November 2007 (UTC) As long as...
Click to read more »links | watch | logs) Nominator's rationale: Totally unmanageable; fails WP:OCAT and created by an editor notorious for contentious editing. Chubbles (talk)...
Click to read more »be well populated. However I wonder when that might cross the line into OCAT. How would we deal with shows on BBC America that were first shown on the...
Click to read more »basin out into Regions, Subregions, Accounting Units and Cataloging Units is OCAT and would make navigation significantly more difficult. If anything we should...
Click to read more »listed in the award page. Lquilter (talk) 18:46, 25 January 2008 (UTC) Delete OCAT by award, per nom. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 22:07, 29 January 2008 (UTC) Listify...
Click to read more »of people that have been notable in their field. The POV word "awfully WP:OCAT" would make sense of, like Decatur, the Cat from Ponce consisted of a listing...
Click to read more »"non-defining" doesn't take matters much further forward. The relevant guideline, WP:OCAT, says that "if something could be easily left out of a biography, it is likely...
Click to read more »2008 (UTC) Delete Confusing. MBisanz talk 08:42, 10 May 2008 (UTC) Delete OCAT. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 23:08, 13 May 2008 (UTC) The above is preserved as...
Click to read more »much more appropriate. DexDor (talk) 05:36, 5 June 2017 (UTC) Delete per WP:OCAT and VR's point about a lack of clarity on what constitutes funding. Kamalthebest...
Click to read more »Category:Shopping malls in Washington (state) Nominator's rationale: WP:OCAT#SMALL. Only three articles; the Spokane market does not appear to have had...
Click to read more »"halls of fame" categories. Snocrates 23:22, 27 January 2008 (UTC) Delete OCAT by award, we don't categorize all magazines' best of award winners. Carlossuarez46...
Click to read more »of these people. Dominictimms 13:54, 12 July 2007 (UTC) Delete As per WP:OCAT, most award winner listing should be handled as list articles, not categories...
Click to read more »from Shkodër Nominator's rationale: Upmerge back to the city. This fails WP:OCAT/WP:OCLOCATION, an over-diffusion of player by sport and city. SportingFlyer...
Click to read more »rationale: This is, in essence, Category:Radio stations nicknamed Froggy, and an OCAT by shared name. These stations share nothing except marketing puns; they...
Click to read more »the comment. It wasn't trolling in any way, it was a reference to this: WP:OCAT where it states Dedicated group-subject subcategories, such as Category:LGBT...
Click to read more »memoirists. This category is a triple intersection that is best avoided per WP:OCAT. User:Namiba 21:02, 6 April 2020 (UTC) Oppose : The really has to be women...
Click to read more »Based on what I've seen in Category:Villages in Canada, this does seem to be OCAT: there is but one other eponymous village category, Category:Stirling, Alberta...
Click to read more »[40], [41]. Two guidelines I've recently been involved in writing are WP:OCAT and WP:PNSD; it should be obvious from their respective talk pages that they...
Click to read more »much more strongly by references to Wikipedia guidelines, in particular WP:OCAT. In closing this discussion with a decisive outcome rather than "no consensus"...
Click to read more »example. It's more about what relevance does this category have to pass WP:OCAT if there is no reason to suggest all these people have LGBT issues that affect...
Click to read more »Overcategorization by trivia. Eliyak T·C 06:33, 21 September 2008 (UTC) Delete per WP:OCAT. Lugnuts (talk) 11:56, 21 September 2008 (UTC) Delete per both - only 1 member...
Click to read more »dubious category. Tazmaniacs (talk) 14:33, 25 July 2008 (UTC) Delete per nom. OCAT, even if there were more than 1. Johnbod (talk) 17:52, 25 July 2008 (UTC)...
Click to read more »Canadian? --William Allen Simpson (talk) 15:43, 21 June 2009 (UTC) It isn't OCAT - the underlying categories are such as Category:Vladimir Nabokov characters...
Click to read more »trouble is, it isn't really defining for any of those groups, which under WP:OCAT makes it hard to justify a category. Where you went to school or university...
Click to read more »Talk 22:20, 28 November 2010 (UTC) Comment It is certainly defining, so OCAT is not a worry. Hindu majority districts would not be defining, I think....
Click to read more »people are collectively referred to as the "Beathard family". WP:SYNTH, WP:OCAT. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 04:08, 23 December 2019 (UTC)...
Click to read more »poorly defined inclusion criteria, and lapsing in some respects toward WP:OCAT by shared name. Bearcat (talk) 02:52, 1 September 2016 (UTC) Delete – even...
Click to read more »I don't see a numerical consensus to delete. So on to the arguments. WP:OCAT is strong argument, and the Delete commentors mostly made this argument....
Click to read more »13:31, 20 June 2011 (UTC) I still think Wayne County should be merged per WP:OCAT since, again, Macomb County only has 3 malls. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters...
Click to read more »Delete and up merge Peak coal to Category:Peak fuels. Looks like another OCAT category. I think only one of the members here even belongs in the category...
Click to read more »article or merge the cast list into the main article for the show. See WP:OCAT for why cast lists should not be done as categories. Dugwiki 15:59, 10 July...
Click to read more »English soccer (football) are players rather than non-playing individuals. OCAT. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 03:54, 12 December 2007 (UTC) Merge per both. Johnbod...
Click to read more »There's nothing affirmatively wrong with having the category. None of WP:OCAT seems to apply, no? --Bsherr (talk) 01:48, 27 October 2010 (UTC) And, yes...
Click to read more »background (or lack thereof) and deemed it fitfully irrelevant. This is WP:OCAT#Non-notable in list format. Bulldog123 14:06, 17 July 2007 (UTC) Speedy Close...
Click to read more »September 2011 (UTC) Delete, apparently trivial intersection, shared-name OCAT. –Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 21:17, 6 September 2011 (UTC) The above is...
Click to read more »Seems unlikely to expand. LeSnail (talk) 21:15, 8 May 2011 (UTC) Delete OCAT. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 18:10, 10 May 2011 (UTC) The above is preserved as...
Click to read more »biographies to Category:American biographies Nominator's rationale: UpMerge. OCAT, upmerge to parent. Vegaswikian (talk) 22:18, 21 February 2009 (UTC) Merge...
Click to read more »-- Prove It (talk) 12:59, 11 September 2007 (UTC) Merge per nom and WP:OCAT#Trivial intersection or narrow. I do have to say that I was intrigued by...
Click to read more »certainly happening here Alansohn (talk) 18:41, 25 November 2008 (UTC) Per WP:OCAT#EPONYMOUS: In general, avoid creating categories named after individual people...
Click to read more »overcategorization chaos. Ricky81682 (talk) 21:29, 27 July 2016 (UTC) Delete. WP:OCAT. We should only categorize shows by original broadcaster. --Rob Sinden (talk)...
Click to read more »Vegaswikian (talk) 03:32, 21 January 2012 (UTC) Delete per nom, per WP:OCAT#Shared names. Oculi (talk) 16:26, 21 January 2012 (UTC) Delete per nom. Another...
Click to read more »series) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Nominator's rationale: WP:OCAT#SMALL. Only three articles, zero chance of expansion. The media files outside...
Click to read more »Rename - either rename in line with other inductee categories or delete as WP:OCAT by non-defining award. List exists in main article already. Otto4711 (talk)...
Click to read more »January 2010 (UTC) Upmerge all per nominator. Is this a quadrupal interstion? OCAT. While being a head coach can be important, I don't believe that being the...
Click to read more »Category:Native Hawaiian people.- choster (talk) 20:49, 24 October 2012 (UTC) Delete, OCAT, no article Hawaiian players of American football nor Native Hawaiian players...
Click to read more »named in the track listing of its parent album. Per standard Wikipedia WP:OCAT policy about this kind of thing, the band's article itself already serves...
Click to read more »11:49, 5 August 2007 (UTC) Weak Keep, as while I sympathise with SilkTork's OCAT concerns, I can't support deletion as long as we haven't established a clear...
Click to read more »can go either way.--T. Anthony (talk) 03:47, 2 May 2008 (UTC) Delete as OCAT intersection of politics and occupation. Do libertarian SciFi writers write...
Click to read more »Overcategorization; performers should not be categorized by performance. See Wikipedia:OCAT#Performers_by_performance Matchups (talk) 03:59, 17 February 2008 (UTC) Nominator...
Click to read more »WP:DUPCAT violation in addition to all of the ways it falls afoul of WP:OCAT.) Bearcat (talk) 02:14, 15 March 2015 (UTC) Upmerge to Category:Organizations...
Click to read more »Ohio (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Nominator's rationale: WP:OCAT. Small category with little chance of expansion. Delete or upmerge to Category:Columbus...
Click to read more »May 2007 (UTC) Delete per nom as a superfluous eponymous category per WP:OCAT#Eponymous_categories_for_people. (well done Otto for nominating so many of...
Click to read more »Category:Led Zeppelin. -- Prove It (talk) 23:12, 28 March 2007 (UTC) Delete per WP:OCAT#Eponymous categories for people. Doczilla 04:03, 29 March 2007 (UTC) Delete...
Click to read more »completely arbitrary. Postdlf (talk) 00:58, 15 October 2008 (UTC) Delete per nom. Ocat for sure. Johnbod (talk) 02:16, 15 October 2008 (UTC) Delete overcategorisation...
Click to read more »racial identity or gender or sexual orientation. Accordingly, this is an WP:OCAT violation as an intersection of unrelated characteristics — and even if these...
Click to read more »no Cornish marine biologists?!? Cgingold 11:47, 2 October 2007 (UTC) WP:OCAT#Small with no potential for growth says "Avoid categories that will never...
Click to read more »history | links | watch | logs) Nominator's rationale: May be a case of WP:OCAT#Unrelated subjects with shared names. In mathematics, the category contains...
Click to read more »every possible sourced attribute which avoids the standard exclusions in WP:OCAT; that would lead to massive category clutter. Some editorial judgement is...
Click to read more »inappropriate performer-by-performance category, per WP:OCAT#Performers by performance (and in particular, WP:OCAT#Performers by venue). May even be a recreation;...
Click to read more »any other division of people by profession" because it falls afoul of WP:OCAT#Non-notable intersections by ethnicity, religion, or sexual preference, which...
Click to read more »predominantly results in subcategories that are too small to be legitimate as per WP:OCAT#SMALL. We only allow the splitout in a few specific cases where a merged...
Click to read more »custody (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Nominator's rationale: Per WP:OCAT. It is non-defining for a career criminal to die in prison custody. User:Namiba...
Click to read more »confusing, name. - AdamBMorgan (talk) 11:45, 31 July 2009 (UTC) Delete as WP:OCAT by shared name. We don't need a category for things whose only commonality...
Click to read more »don't take out cues from Italian WP. (2) Categorizing by day is more of an OCAT than by year, for the reason given by Postdlf below. (3) Consensus can change...
Click to read more »Merge all with the appropriate XXth century writers; the "women" part is OCAT. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 23:00, 27 January 2009 (UTC) Do you object to the...
Click to read more »of E50 gives an illustration of why the current categories result in WP:OCAT. – Fayenatic London 20:33, 3 June 2015 (UTC) Nominator's rationale: Per WP:NARROWCAT...
Click to read more »Delete, posthaste. older ≠ wiser 12:23, 13 November 2010 (UTC) Delete as WP:OCAT by shared naming characteristic. Bearcat (talk) 23:57, 13 November 2010 (UTC)...
Click to read more »Category:'N Sync is an unnecessary eponymous people category as described in WP:OCAT#Eponymous categories for people because the main article for 'N Sync already...
Click to read more »becoming increasingly popular. Rray (talk) 00:16, 5 February 2008 (UTC) Delete OCAT, what about match game? didn't people write their answers on cards? Note...
Click to read more »these characteristics for a number of reasons (WP:V, WP:OR, WP:SYNTH, WP:OCAT, arbitrariness, and yes, WP:BLP). Carlossuarez46 02:23, 6 September 2007...
Click to read more »this category is against them, most notably it is a clear example of WP:OCAT. What is next? "Category:Former towns of Ottoman Empire"? Come on. --No.13...
Click to read more »them and aren't narrow, arbitrary, trivial, etc. I don't see anything in WP:OCAT that specifically rules out triple intersections. - Stepheng3 (talk) 20:22...
Click to read more »boundary. Peterkingiron (talk) 18:29, 31 January 2010 (UTC) Delete as WP:OCAT by non-defining characteristic; seems like the underlying point of this is...
Click to read more »made to this section. The result of the debate was Listify & Delete per WP:OCAT. Per BrownHairedGirl, list already exists at FIFA World Cup awards. --Xdamrtalk...
Click to read more »scheme" (WP:MUSCAT), and thus explicitly an exception to the guideline WP:OCAT#Small with no potential for growth. Probably has potential for growth in...
Click to read more »{{subst:cfd-notify}} Cgingold (talk) 18:59, 4 February 2009 (UTC) Delete OCAT, not defining, should we further define them into Category:Female African-American...
Click to read more »(UTC) Not true. See WP:OCAT and many, many previous cfds for eponymous categories. Dugwiki 15:02, 21 August 2007 (UTC) WP:OCAT is a mere guideline, so...
Click to read more »talk | history | links | watch | logs) Nominator's rationale: Delete per WP:OCAT. I may be wrong, but I'm not aware of a practice of categorising academics...
Click to read more »00:36, 28 November 2010 (UTC) Well, I might be completely incorrect but WP:OCAT has been used as a guideline in AfD discussions for years now. Few have objected...
Click to read more »--BelovedFreak 20:35, 12 February 2008 (UTC) Delete for same reason as last time, OCAT intersection: no article Gay Neo-Nazis could be written NPOV & V. This is...
Click to read more »talk | history | links | watch | logs) Nominator's rationale: Delete. WP:OCAT#EPONYMOUS violation as an eponymous category for a person who doesn't have...
Click to read more »should be a list rather than a category, as suggested by both WP:CLS and WP:OCAT. I'll reiterate that changing a category to a list is not a loss of information...
Click to read more »restriction. -- 65.92.180.137 (talk) 23:04, 3 February 2013 (UTC) Delete OCAT, per nom. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 22:51, 6 February 2013 (UTC) The above is...
Click to read more »entire act), I don't think we should categorize performer by performance (WP:OCAT), which is what this would be if we used the argument that Jewish humor (most...
Click to read more »a decent rename option (there isn't) or if it was the only problem. (2) OCAT / unconvincing arguments that this is a defining characteristic of a company...
Click to read more »{{subst:cfd-notify}} (talk) 23:43, 21 July 2008 (UTC) Delete looks like OCAT to me. I'm okay with a list of students as well.--Lenticel (talk) 23:57,...
Click to read more »are trying to implement an overly strict/deletionist interpretation of WP:OCAT that the community has not expressed a consensus for Purplebackpack89≈≈≈≈...
Click to read more »keep or delete; rename per nom, feel free to renominate it to deal with the OCAT issues . Kbdank71 17:02, 16 April 2008 (UTC) Propose renaming Category:Australian...
Click to read more »violation.John Pack Lambert (talk) 00:53, 4 September 2013 (UTC) Delete OCAT per shared name. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 07:48, 6 September 2013 (UTC) comment...
Click to read more »performed); The Two Faces of Mitchell and Webb (a stage show they performed). OCAT guidelines are clear. We don't categorize performances on the basis of who...
Click to read more »maybe. But Films? Since when was October Sky about coal-mining? Extreme WP:OCAT Bulldog123 15:58, 5 July 2007 (UTC) Delete - These types of "films about"...
Click to read more »overcategorization. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:56, 20 March 2013 (UTC) Delete, WP:OCAT like births below. – Fayenatic London 19:02, 20 March 2013 (UTC) delete,...
Click to read more »--Highway 231 (talk) 04:57, 22 January 2014 (UTC) Delete Classic example of OCAT by similarity of something about how the name came to be (eponymous cities...
Click to read more »and are therefore something that most editors apparently agree with. WP:OCAT in particular has been in place for quite a while and also has been supported...
Click to read more »good at writing it.--T. Anthony (talk) 15:43, 16 February 2009 (UTC) Delete OCAT by improper intersection. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 00:04, 18 February 2009 (UTC)...
Click to read more »talk | history | links | watch | logs) Nominator's rationale: Delete per WP:OCAT#Eponymous_categories_for_people. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 13:15...
Click to read more »(UTC) In that case, keep. If they wrote the song together, it would be WP:OCAT to have a separate category for each band member. - Presidentman talk · contribs...
Click to read more »main article for the band acts as the central hub for navigation. See WP:OCAT and many, many previous deletions. Dugwiki 15:30, 17 July 2007 (UTC) Keep...
Click to read more »why you're citing the "small with no potential for growth" portion of WP:OCAT because the nomination does not suggest deletion on that basis. The nomination...
Click to read more »enough articles to make a category useful to the reader, making this WP:OCAT. (If in future we do - because the WP community finds some individual incidents...
Click to read more »Carlossuarez46 (talk) 16:53, 7 December 2007 (UTC) Delete per nom and per WP:OCAT#SMALL. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 12:31, 8 December 2007 (UTC)...
Click to read more »IL (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Nominator's rationale: WP:OCAT. Only three articles, unlikely to expand Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw...
Click to read more »be categorized under Category:Snipers, we don't need a subcat for 1, too OCAT. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 00:57, 12 March 2008 (UTC) Delete with option to recreate...
Click to read more »subject is to narrow for it to be anything but a stub. I think it violates WP:OCAT, specifically WP:OCLOCATION, which is among the reasons for deletion. This...
Click to read more »individual parliament that they happen to have served in; it seems quite WP:OCAT to me, frankly, because it leads to extreme category bloat in the case of...
Click to read more »for religous-based occupations. On the other hand, it may qualify as a WP:OCAT#Narrow intersection, as the number of members is so small that a single category...
Click to read more »is important/defining enough to merit treating it as an exception to WP:OCAT#AWARD? That to me seems to be the point of disagreement, and where productive...
Click to read more »the school renaming or not. However, "honorary degree recipients" is WP:OCAT#overcategorization by award. People's connections with the school may be...
Click to read more »Williams (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Delete Upmerge as needed. OCAT on a Hot Tin Roof -- Tennessee Williams wrote poetry? Who knew?? Apparently...
Click to read more »it to this cat. The remaining four comments did want to delete due to WP:OCAT, but I'd hardly say that it qualifies for WP:SNOW. Not quite. I'd suggested...
Click to read more »yes, I'd like to delete them, but I'm willing to relax the standards of WP:OCAT if others are as well. -- ☑ SamuelWantman 03:56, 8 August 2008 (UTC) I'm...
Click to read more »Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 19:16, 24 April 2008 (UTC) Keep per Wikipedia:OCAT#Non-defining_or_trivial_characteristic, per Roundhouse. Detail of high school...
Click to read more »system and the problem of burdening articles with too many categories (see WP:OCAT), but there is no good reason or pragmatic need to apply the same standards...
Click to read more »Marcocapelle (talk) 06:40, 14 October 2018 (UTC) I don't see this as WP:OCAT because of the shared name, but a useful way to diffuse Category:Lists of...
Click to read more »commonality between otherwise unrelated events, but is essentially just WP:OCAT on a superficially shared characteristic. The two-day category, for instance...
Click to read more »:: Kevinalewis : (Talk Page)/(Desk) 08:08, 20 September 2007 (UTC) Delete OCAT, there may or may not be differences between works by men and by women. Do...
Click to read more »guideline, and has the same status as other guidelines such as WP:CAT and WP:OCAT, which form the basis of discussions here. Why do we keep on having the go...
Click to read more »American actors (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Delete, per WP:OCAT, being Scots-Irish American and being an actor is not a valid intersection...
Click to read more »performer-by-performance.--Mike Selinker 23:36, 28 August 2007 (UTC) Delete as an OCAT, since while I appreciate the relevance of the collaboration, it is better...
Click to read more »Category:Wheelchair sports competitors Nominator's rationale: Only one entry; WP:OCAT#SMALL, unlikely to be expanded. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now...
Click to read more »Overcategorization. Lugnuts (talk) 07:12, 28 April 2008 (UTC) Delete as OCAT based on sex. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 19:17, 28 April 2008 (UTC) Delete per...
Click to read more »BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 01:00, 17 January 2014 (UTC) Delete both WP:OCAT#AWARD; these are described as the 6th most important award of Croatia - is...
Click to read more »categories and the overwhelming majority were blatantly useless and violated WP:OCAT. Flooding CFD with hundreds and hundreds of noms would have been just as...
Click to read more »going to add the US the the third world countries, this category can go as OCAT. Vegaswikian (talk) 23:00, 26 July 2008 (UTC) Delete as redundant cat.--Lenticel...
Click to read more »(UTC) Delete - This is also not a useful form of categorization; see WP:OCAT. Dr. Submillimeter 15:18, 4 January 2007 (UTC) delete Which top 40? If it...
Click to read more »he lived his teenage years in Indonesia How2what4 (talk) Please read WP:OCAT#Defining and tell me if Barack Obama will reasonably be identified as a TCK...
Click to read more »saying[149] I don't really mind. [SNIP] You should take further discussion to WT:OCAT and WP:CFD.. Then when I mentioned that failure at a CFD 6days later,[150]...
Click to read more »invented term that has no actual sourced usage whatsoever. Delete as WP:NOR/WP:OCAT; the head article's been tagged for BLPprod as it contains a list of people...
Click to read more »critics (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Nominator's rationale: WP:OCAT#OPINION discourages categorizing people by their views. In addition, opposition...
Click to read more »journalists (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Nominator's rationale: WP:OCAT by ethnicity. There can be no article written about a specific persons ethnicity...
Click to read more »– Muboshgu (talk) 22:10, 19 June 2013 (UTC) Delete OCAT by AWARD. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 04:36, 21 June 2013 (UTC) "OCAT by AWARD"? What does this mean? Sorry, I...
Click to read more »restate the long history of category discussions which led to things like WP:OCAT, or it's usercat relation which is transcluded to USERCAT. What I was trying...
Click to read more »extreme local level (that may be affiliated with a national group). This is WP:OCAT by a really trivial intersection; in no case does this contribute anything...
Click to read more »based on having the phrase without borders in the article's title. Clearly OCAT. Vegaswikian (talk) 19:21, 13 July 2008 (UTC) Keep - I just fixed up the...
Click to read more »(UTC) The 1st edit to Nadine Coyle after semiprotection expired was yet more OCAT vandalism from IP (who is now edit warring over it). I'm using iPhone, so...
Click to read more »should be made to this section. The result of the debate was merge, per WP:OCAT "However, not every verifiable fact (or the intersection of two or more such...
Click to read more »not needed.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:10, 14 January 2013 (UTC) Delete OCAT by award. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 17:44, 16 January 2013 (UTC) The above is...
Click to read more »Jewish philosopher category an example of a non-notable intersection on WP:OCAT? These is no indication any of the Jewish American philosophers listed are...
Click to read more »and the other two are also in other relevant stub categories. tl;dr: WP:OCAT#SMALL. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 03:13, 30 May 2022 (UTC)...
Click to read more »parent categories simultaneously. Dugwiki 16:05, 27 August 2007 (UTC) Delete OCAT ethnicity + religion (or lack thereof) what's next Category:Basque Roman...
Click to read more »the parent had: categorization of unrelated subjects with shared names, WP:OCAT, etc. A suggestion was made at the time to kill the subcats, but they were...
Click to read more »of many instances. We finally have a real opportunity to get rid of this OCAT and SYNTH trivia without agenda getting in the way... Bulldog123 11:33, 16...
Click to read more »Carminis (talk) 21:36, 7 February 2008 (UTC) Delete per nom. Appears to be OCAT for many of the recipients as it's non-defining for them. A perfect candidate...
Click to read more »admins in the area of CfD, is to me another indication that this is indeed WP:OCAT. A list, to be sure; a category, no. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:32, 5 September...
Click to read more »2009 (UTC) Delete per both. Johnbod (talk) 14:56, 5 April 2009 (UTC) Delete OCAT on one-issue stance. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 22:35, 6 April 2009 (UTC) The...
Click to read more »category for each conflict could lead to nasty category pileups (and WP:OCAT). As the wars/conflicts/interventions are more or less related under the...
Click to read more »Crosspost --Chaswmsday (talk) 18:46, 1 October 2012 (UTC) God no. See WP:OCAT; we do not categorize articles by every fact they contain, and categorizing...
Click to read more »was not a rationale for deletion. CLN is a guideline, but so is Wikipedia:OCAT#Award recipients. They are not in conflict if interpreted in the way Postdlf...
Click to read more »talk | history | links | watch | logs) Nominator's rationale: Delete per WP:OCAT#Trivial_intersection: "Avoid intersections of two traits that are unrelated...
Click to read more »for speedy deletion. Otto4711 (talk) 19:39, 15 May 2009 (UTC) Delete as WP:OCAT. The film's article and navbox already serve as sufficient navigational hubs...
Click to read more »13 April 2009 (UTC) Upmerge to parent, distinction by sex is not needed. OCAT. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 20:37, 13 April 2009 (UTC) Reply: Distinction by sex...
Click to read more »links | watch | logs) Delete - This category is the very embodiment of WP:OCAT: extremely narrow in definition and very little prospect of growth. It's...
Click to read more »feces (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Nominator's rationale: WP:OCAT#SMALL, unlikely to be expanded, doesn't seem like a common enough topic....
Click to read more »Pair (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Nominator's rationale: WP:OCAT#SMALL, only five entries, not likely to expand. Ten Pound Hammer • (What...
Click to read more »several). Good Ol’factory (talk) 01:34, 21 March 2013 (UTC) Delete as WP:OCAT; a list in the article would be better. If the category is kept, it will...
Click to read more »read. Dr. Submillimeter 14:36, 13 April 2007 (UTC) Delete As above, see WP:OCAT#Award winners for explanation of why most awards use list articles for their...
Click to read more »category. Greg Grahame 01:00, 5 June 2007 (UTC) Delete per nom and per WP:OCAT#Performers_by_performance. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 19:05, 4...
Click to read more »really no reason a person would look for them that way. This is blatent OCAT pbp 23:45, 2 August 2013 (UTC) Merge per nom; each county in each state can...
Click to read more »singles (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Nominator's rationale: WP:OCAT#SMALL, zero chance for expansion. Label was only in business for a year,...
Click to read more »cats but it does make a lot of sense. Shouldn't it be included in the WP:OCAT guideline? Marcocapelle (talk) 14:44, 6 October 2016 (UTC) I don't think...
Click to read more »series) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Nominator's rationale: WP:OCAT#SMALL. Only three articles, zero chance of expansion. The media files outside...
Click to read more »List of Rescue Me characters page and a bunch of redirects, which per WP:OCAT is just not enough. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 21:32,...
Click to read more »| talk | history | links | watch | logs) Nominator's rationale: WP:OCAT. Contains only main article, character list and episode list. Ten Pound Hammer...
Click to read more »Category:Welsh people by occupation, and there's also no reason (other than OCAT) not to have this with subcategories for Category:Welsh civil servants in...
Click to read more »2008 (UTC) Delete unnecessary intersection by sex and occupation/event. OCAT. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 18:53, 23 January 2008 (UTC) Upmerge all to the equivalently-named...
Click to read more »Category:Descendants of James I of England (her grandfather). Or delete per OCAT:ARBITRARY STARTING POINT. There is Descendants of George I of Great Britain...
Click to read more »listify. I don't know where to begin. The category is obviously ambiguous and OCAT. Winning a $1 is winning the lottery. So being listed is subjective and probably...
Click to read more »2009 (UTC) Delete both - the former is clear-cut performer by performance OCAT and the second is unnecessary. Otto4711 (talk) 22:57, 3 March 2009 (UTC)...
Click to read more »