This page is a redirect. The following categories are used to track and monitor this redirect:
|
article. Shortcut WP:OBVIOUSWP:OBVIOUS Do not state facts that may be obvious to you, but are not necessarily obvious to the reader. Usually, such a statement...
Click to read more »Yes, dear Wikipedians, an obvious sock is quite obvious. For instance: If Editor A is blocked for harassing Editor B and then a brand-new account, Editor...
Click to read more »writes a statement on the board, turns to the audience, and starts: "It's obvious...." He pauses, turns back to the board, studies what he has written, scratches...
Click to read more »Obvious vandalism is a term used in several policies, such as the three-revert rule exceptions, limited ban exceptions, and in the instructions for pages...
Click to read more »redirecting to Obvious. Radiant_>|< 10:47, July 19, 2005 (UTC) Delete - not notable - (Radiant, did you mean an article other than "Obvious"?) - Tεxτurε...
Click to read more »Articles for deletion/Captain Obvious Articles for deletion/Captain Obvious (2nd nomination) Articles for deletion/Captain Obvious (3rd nomination) Articles...
Click to read more »User:LinguistAtLarge/Captain obvious. - A Man In Bl♟ck (conspire - past ops) 21:47, 16 February 2009 (UTC) Captain obvious (edit | talk | history | protect |...
Click to read more »that "obvious" statements, such as "the sky is blue", do not need citing. However, there are some reasons why you do need to cite the "obvious", such...
Click to read more »Articles for deletion/Captain Obvious Articles for deletion/Captain Obvious (2nd nomination) Articles for deletion/Captain Obvious (3rd nomination) Articles...
Click to read more »result was keep. Majorly (Talk) 14:10, 17 December 2006 (UTC) Captain Obvious (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)...
Click to read more »Articles for deletion/Captain Obvious Articles for deletion/Captain Obvious (2nd nomination) Articles for deletion/Captain Obvious (3rd nomination) Articles...
Click to read more »Obvious (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Copy of an article deleted four years ago at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Captain Obvious (3rd...
Click to read more »to deletion (glossary) Help, my article got nominated for deletion! Ron Obvious (Monty Python) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch |...
Click to read more »to deletion (glossary) Help, my article got nominated for deletion! Ron Obvious (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)...
Click to read more »as vandalism Beeblebrox (talk) 01:07, 29 March 2012 (UTC) Wikipedia:The Obvious (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) I'm not sure what to do...
Click to read more »full text or a description of the portion of the text in question (if not obvious)] [the topic of the comment] Examples: cm noteworthiness cmt: questioning...
Click to read more »this page. The result was redirect. W.marsh 14:09, 23 October 2007 (UTC) Obvious (Christina Aguilera song) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links |...
Click to read more »identified by its habitual characteristics. The duck test does not apply to non-obvious cases. Unless there is evidence which proves otherwise beyond a reasonable...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Microchip08/Extremely obvious User talk:Microchip08/Extremely obvious should be deleted as well I am also nominating the...
Click to read more »assume good faith and consider that something that may be obvious to you may not be obvious to them, and that many things that "everyone knows" turn out...
Click to read more »page. The result was no consensus. BJTalk 09:41, 27 March 2009 (UTC) Ron Obvious (Monty Python character) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links |...
Click to read more »isn't a speedy delete?" Inevitably, VfD gets hit with articles that are obvious deletes. They rack up ten to fifteen "delete" votes with no "keep" votes...
Click to read more »validate the article. Sometimes articles that we think are obvious deletes are not obvious in the eyes of the person who wrote the article. By giving...
Click to read more »fashion a better rating? It deserves at least a B (or even A) as it has no obvious biases or inaccuracies, all the main points are covered, every paragraph...
Click to read more »Ahoy! (talk) I call for sanctions when there is a cause for sanctions, mr obvious sock. Here we have an editor once topic-banned for misrepresenting a source...
Click to read more »This guideline explains how to handle cases where this format is not obvious, or for one reason or other is not followed. There are several acceptable...
Click to read more »Magog the Ogre (t • c) 03:43, 26 June 2019 (UTC) Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 06:38, 27 June 2019 (UTC) The above discussion is...
Click to read more »etc. PL : No obvious vandalism. DE : No obvious vandalism. RU : No obvious vandalism, no obvious libel towards living persons, no obvious faults in look...
Click to read more »though some such players could have articles under titles other than the obvious ones their names might suggest. There will be a crossover with the earliest...
Click to read more »question. And if you see a sentence without a ref, even if it is completely obvious, you can challenge it and it has to get a ref, though I wouldn't reccomend...
Click to read more »you’ve followed the steps to addressing inappropriate usernames. UAA is for obvious and serious violations only. Do not report borderline username violations;...
Click to read more »early years of Wikipedia there was no real answer to this question for the obvious reason that there is no one right way; indeed, there may be an infinite...
Click to read more »most common name as the one obvious name of this topic and continue with #One obvious name. Otherwise go to #The one obvious name is ambiguous - is this...
Click to read more »log). unused, low-res, no obvious encyclopedic use. FASTILY 02:01, 16 November 2019 (UTC) Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 06:32...
Click to read more »One of the cleanup templates, the now-deprecated {{expand}}, stated the obvious — if an article is featured-article or at least good-article quality, then...
Click to read more »This guideline explains how to handle cases where this format is not obvious, or for one reason or another is not followed. In general this guideline...
Click to read more »it, as there might be reasons for the oddity that are not immediately obvious. Shortcuts WP:UNINWP:UNIN WP:NUNIWP:NUNI In general, most legitimate higher-education...
Click to read more »It may seem obvious that editors should choose their own words when writing articles. We have a long content guideline on plagiarism and another explanatory...
Click to read more »result was speedy keep. No point wasting time in leaving this open, Obvious Keep is obvious (non-admin closure) –Davey2010 Merry Xmas / Happy New Year 02:50...
Click to read more »biographies are about women. This page may help to identify the subtle and more obvious ways in which titles, language, images, and linking practices can discriminate...
Click to read more »content which is present in the Encyclopaedia Biblica. In many cases this is obvious when the article is about a religious topic and contains much information...
Click to read more »image. Most captions draw attention to something in the image that is not obvious, such as its relevance to the text. A caption may be a few words or several...
Click to read more »Some terms may be self-defining or obvious just from the text but should still get a wikilink. Others are less obvious and if they can be explained within...
Click to read more »individuals noticing, but not one suspected its authenticity. This leads to one obvious question: how many more are there? ← Back to Contents View Latest Issue...
Click to read more »"accurate". A page documenting obvious facts exists somewhere. People will actually look up and read a page documenting obvious facts, just like you are right...
Click to read more »upload log). unused, low-res, no obvious encyclopedic use FASTILY 06:27, 19 March 2019 (UTC) Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 23:49,...
Click to read more »their vandalism. Stating that a certain individual is involved in very obvious vandalism probably does not enable any better recognition or response to...
Click to read more »Willy1018 (talk) 14:00, 13 December 2018 (UTC) Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 07:28, 16 December 2018 (UTC) The above discussion...
Click to read more »This nomination fails the basic premise that there should not be any obvious gaps in the topic. Seeing the actual template that connects these articles...
Click to read more »employment, clique, or other personal details. Sometimes intentions are obvious; blatant sockpuppets and vandals who have been adequately warned have already...
Click to read more »use. Pkbwcgs (talk) 06:36, 21 April 2018 (UTC) Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 01:52, 22 April 2018 (UTC) The above discussion is...
Click to read more »templates was created to ease the inclusion of these triple references. The obvious choice for the names of such templates have been the country codes by which...
Click to read more »a case in which it is incredibly obvious a keep or delete vote will happen (hoax articles or vandal noms for obvious keeps like nation articles, for instance)...
Click to read more »in military history was probably a foregone conclusion! As is probably obvious from my work here, my personal interest is the Royal Navy in the Napoleonic...
Click to read more »creating a predictable naming convention for MoS pages, and resolving obvious self-contradictions in MoS pages, were largely met by 2010. The Wikipedia...
Click to read more »makes the answer obvious, I still have no idea how the original clue is related. – SD0001 (talk) 03:46, 2 November 2021 (UTC) Not obvious enough for me to...
Click to read more »always check the full guideline. Only include the most important and non-obvious points from the guideline. Try to keep the "dos" and "don'ts" lists the...
Click to read more »referred to as just "Fast", and one officially so, Fast Five, so this is an obvious redirect. It's used in the wild. ' "Fast" film series ''Fast franchise'...
Click to read more »section, the userbox should go at the end of the section, unless some obvious ordering is present, in which case that order should be maintained. If...
Click to read more »edits should be made to this page. The result was Snow Keep. Obvious Keep is obvious (non-admin closure) –Davey2010Talk 00:56, 26 October 2015 (UTC)...
Click to read more »Something else that you need to watch out for are "obvious" facts which are not necessarily obvious to people from other areas. Examples include the level...
Click to read more »battleground, along with snide remarks, sarcasm, and straw man arguments with the obvious intention of derailing the RfC. I'd like an uninvolved admin to impose...
Click to read more »certainly have enough sources to meet Wikipedia's inclusion guidelines. Obvious notability describes when few or no references are placed within an article...
Click to read more »five are good enough. It doesn't break criteria 1(d) because it isn't an obvious or notable gap. --haha169 (talk) 19:16, 5 June 2008 (UTC) Yep, fair enough...
Click to read more »inline citations. B2. It reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain obvious omissions or inaccuracies. B3. It has a defined structure, including a...
Click to read more »manner to win disputes). When those two began circling each-other, it was obvious that things were about to get really ugly for everyone in their general...
Click to read more »friends about it. One approach is to investigate Wikipedia categories. The obvious category is water. Each project participant will have categories of special...
Click to read more »some symbolic significance, perhaps even foreboding, although it is quite obvious that few editors have been able to grasp the symbolism considering the...
Click to read more »edits should be made to this page. The result was speedy keep. Obvious Keep is obvious (non-admin closure) –Davey2010Talk 22:24, 27 October 2015 (UTC)...
Click to read more »some calculations (to an article) that are not in the sources, but are an obvious and acceptable interpretation of the source data: Routine calculations...
Click to read more »discussed. Unexplained content removal (UCR) occurs when the reason is not obvious; the edit is then open to being promptly reverted. Changes which remove...
Click to read more »rollback function is designed by default to be used only for the reversion of obvious vandalism only. The warning or message that is left on the editor's talk...
Click to read more »org/wiki" No obvious link to original article or GFDL essentialresults: No substantial content at examples; site is domain parked ezresult: no obvious Wikipedia...
Click to read more »©Geni (talk) 17:36, 9 February 2016 (UTC) I was going to comment on an obvious problem, but this is Wikipedia. I can change it!— Vchimpanzee • talk •...
Click to read more »and complete overview of the club and its history, and feel there are no obvious gaps in this group of articles. ChrisTheDude (talk) 15:40, 19 December...
Click to read more »edits should be made to this page. The result was delete. Obvious votestaking is obvious Spartaz Humbug! 22:18, 20 November 2015 (UTC) The Critical Badger...
Click to read more »problem is large. A significant fraction of the articles he edited are in obvious need of some work, not including expansion, and he made about 20,000 edits...
Click to read more »blatantly obvious here, Notability is obviously going to be judged differently on each article so this bundle is rather silly!, Anyway obvious Keep. (non-admin...
Click to read more »can always throw up some surprises and situations for which there is no obvious answer. Finding a way through all the policies, guidelines and opinions...
Click to read more »Jordan 1972 (talk) 17:38, 1 February 2020 (UTC) Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 03:19, 2 February 2020 (UTC) The above discussion...
Click to read more »is often the intended result. We would all like to believe that it's an obvious lesson we learned during childhood, and that we are unlikely to be fooled...
Click to read more »proposed that they be avoided due to concerns that may not be immediately obvious: Meta-template schemes can be fragile and hard for new editors to understand...
Click to read more »greater difficulty with achieving neutrality in form, as it is not always obvious how the structure of an article can favor undue weight on a single perspective...
Click to read more »made to this page. The result was delete. Technical SNG pass trumpted by obvious failure to pass gng Spartaz Humbug! 12:11, 20 September 2014 (UTC) Takumi...
Click to read more »identified by its habitual characteristics. The duck test does not apply to non-obvious cases. Unless there is evidence which proves otherwise beyond a reasonable...
Click to read more »reputation, in retrospect Wikipedia's article on Epstein seems like an obvious potential target for conflict-of-interest or paid editing. The New York...
Click to read more »regularly stand in the way of trying to make Wikipedia better and their obvious aim is to disintegrate the integrity and quality of Wikipedia. They are...
Click to read more »Wikipedia writers and editors contribute a lot of featured and good articles, but occasionally, they add patent nonsense. This falls into two categories:...
Click to read more »<ref> tags, but also some others). The problems involved have had one obvious symptom: strip markers, instead of being merely an internal concept in...
Click to read more »Countless times editors have challenged obvious vandalism or implausible edits and stopped there, while less obvious vandalism from the same editor goes unchallenged...
Click to read more »source}}, {{Di-no license}} {{no license}} or not tagged at all, with no obvious way to tell whether we can legally use them or not. Eventually, if we can't...
Click to read more »policies or guidelines). Do not list discussions where the consensus is obvious. In discussions where consensus is entirely clear to everyone involved...
Click to read more »Harrier Assault (Walnutjk) B-17 Flying Fortress: The Mighty 8th (Captain Obvious and his crime-fighting dog) Balloon Pop (Wiki131wiki) Template:Batman video...
Click to read more »be successful, or whether it will even make it to a public launch, the obvious comparison that has sparked the Internet alight is with Wikipedia. There...
Click to read more »the relationship between an IP and a named account. If a case is very obvious it may be declined and the person duck blocked, making the check unnecessary...
Click to read more »--Minorax«¦talk¦» 09:15, 14 August 2022 (UTC) Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 03:18, 21 August 2022 (UTC) The above discussion...
Click to read more »edits should be made to this page. The result was speedy keep. Obvious keep is obvious. (non-admin closure) — Jkudlick tcs 00:44, 29 December 2015 (UTC)...
Click to read more »them a carrot. Their chewing is often primitive. This becomes the most obvious when it yields improperly-formatted footnotes, or pictures not thumbed...
Click to read more »policy, Wikipedia:Blocking policy, it is acceptable for sysops to ban obvious trolls." (Fred Bauder) Voting to accept: Camembert, Fred Bauder, the Epopt...
Click to read more »committee members would be swayed by the biased naming. The naming is an obvious general problem, easily remedied by using an acronym or a number, and the...
Click to read more »cyberbullying, it is inappropriate on Wikipedia and all other places. It is obvious that being rude is unnecessary and uncivil. When deciding what to say to...
Click to read more »addition, 97% of the vandalism observed is done by anonymous editors. Obvious vandalism is the vast majority of vandalism used. Roughly 25% of vandalism...
Click to read more »no tag with the same name to copy the content from, it now displays an obvious error message rather than a blank reference. (r26045, bug 11426) After...
Click to read more »Jordan 1972 (talk) 17:09, 6 February 2020 (UTC) Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 06:28, 8 February 2020 (UTC) The above discussion...
Click to read more »WP:SNOWPROWP:SNOWPRO Sometimes the support for a proposal is so overwhelming or so obvious that it has a snowball's chance in hell of failing. Such proposals may...
Click to read more »missing. Action should not generally be taken on an issue (aside from obvious vandalism and other unambiguous violations of community standards) until...
Click to read more »factor in the multiple disputes that fester on Wikipedia, and despite how obvious some of these things are, they still end up needing to be reinforced in...
Click to read more »of hoaxes: Type 1 – Admission of hoax Type 2a – Obvious hoax due to elaborateness Type 2b – Obvious hoax due to pattern of vandalism by the account which...
Click to read more »applies. Hence, any other non-speedy criteria, even "common sense" or "obvious", may be suitable points but only at a full discussion at Categories for...
Click to read more »Definitely. Where to draw the line for 'obvious' is another debate entirely. Morwen - Talk 11:00, 3 Jul 2004 (UTC) Yes. Obvious should mean flouting the system...
Click to read more »other pages, for example category talk pages. Probably because it's so obvious, nobody has even seen the need to write it down. Which is a good thing...
Click to read more »can strike in many forms, but there are several we all share, the most obvious, and in many ways the most painful, is bereavement. The unexpected death...
Click to read more »it, as there might be reasons for the oddity that are not immediately obvious! This project should endeavor to remain consistent, firstly by abiding...
Click to read more »content which is present in the Jewish Encyclopedia. In many cases this is obvious when the article is about a Jewish topic (e.g., an aspect of the Torah)...
Click to read more »with Alx-pl), but also finding secondary sources in English. For me, an obvious hurdle is that my English isn't quite good enough to write brilliant prose...
Click to read more »edits should be made to this page. The result was speedy keep. Obvious Keep is obvious (non-admin closure) –Davey2010Talk 18:57, 5 December 2015 (UTC)...
Click to read more »whether it pertains to the article's subject. Usually, this is obvious. When not obvious, relevance is decided by the editors of the article, based on...
Click to read more »WP:DRIVEBYTAGWP:DRIVEBYTAG WP:HIT&RUNTAGWP:HIT&RUNTAG Adding tags for non-obvious or perceived problems—without identifying the problem well enough for it...
Click to read more »Jordan 1972 (talk) 01:05, 1 March 2021 (UTC) Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 02:33, 1 March 2021 (UTC) The above discussion is...
Click to read more »articles related to Vienna. The German article and its subarticles are, for obvious reasons, much more comprehensive than the English version. Translating...
Click to read more »ontaining_no_singletons_-_obvious_proof.3F|A006355 - Number of binary vectors of length n containing no singletons - obvious proof?]]...
Click to read more »The adminship process serves a variety of goals, many of them non-obvious. These can be grouped into several key areas: Discernment Motivation Fair process...
Click to read more »sound as realistic as possible, but they may be easily found if leaving an obvious inconsistency (e.g., putting sexual content on a page about a children's...
Click to read more »further edits should be made to this page. The result was keep. Obvious snow keep is obvious. —Tom Morris (talk) 14:20, 11 June 2013 (UTC) 1996 shooting of...
Click to read more »edits should be made to this page. The result was speedy delete. Obvious sock is obvious. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 10:23, 27 June 2015 (UTC) Turner Broadcasting...
Click to read more »further edits should be made to this page. The result was Speedy Keep: obvious case of misinterpretation of WP:NOTE and/or a case of WP:POINT. --User:Ceyockey...
Click to read more »and role-playing games. In the case of action-adventure, the reason is obvious, as it is possibly the broadest genre in all of video gaming, a giant catchall...
Click to read more »world", but there are only eight Ghits, and nothing factual that is not an obvious WP mirror. The author ExtremeDown! (talk · contribs) contributed only on...
Click to read more »recognitions. Diplomatic recognition is a specific act. It's different from "obvious recognition" (deduced from UN admission without objections, "warm welcome...
Click to read more »article to featured article standard every quarter (3 months). Beyond the obvious goal of improving the quality of Wikipedia entries, the purpose of this...
Click to read more »encyclopedia that anyone can edit. A hoax is simply a more obscure, less obvious form of vandalism, and perpetrators of hoaxes are subject to blocking and...
Click to read more »and tactics proving far superior. It's hard to fault this book, but the obvious thing to note is that the length is just too short to do this topic justice...
Click to read more »smaller every year". However as the vocabulary got bigger instead, it became obvious that it owed at least as much to the pioneering work of Ambrose Bierce's...
Click to read more »which is obvious. Note that what is obvious to one person may not be obvious to someone else. However, sometimes things really are too obvious for words...
Click to read more »notable info from this episode go? Any notable info from the RAW specials is obvious, but this one? Maybe into the WWE ECW article? We need to think of that...
Click to read more »purpose of speedy deletion is to chunk out the most going-down-in-flames obvious cases, the matters for which it is unambiguous and inescapable that the...
Click to read more »This should describe why you believe there's puppetry occurring, however obvious it might be. If this is not the first time the user is suspected, links...
Click to read more »was clumsily done, with the main gun turrets and side barbettes being obvious fakes. For instance, most of the side barbettes are simply flat pieces...
Click to read more »consensus is to Redirect so pointless leaving this for another day!, Obvious consensus is obvious. (non-admin closure) –Davey2010Talk 00:44, 25 February 2016 (UTC)...
Click to read more »discussions. —♥Nici♥Vampire♥Heart♥ 20:12, 23 August 2008 (UTC) Delete for obvious reasons that SRX stated. -- iMatthew T.C. 20:38, 23 August 2008 (UTC) Delete...
Click to read more »this for featured list removal because it is missing entries that are obvious even to the casual tourist - two examples that come to mind are Diamond...
Click to read more »necessitating Captain Obvious's involvement to save them from themselves. He always appeared just in the nick of time to state the obvious, which was his main...
Click to read more »(UTC) Obvious keep per scj. --John (talk) 21:32, 20 October 2010 (UTC) Obvious keep, indeed. htom (talk) 20:07, 21 October 2010 (UTC) Obvious keep, for...
Click to read more »edits should be made to this page. The result was speedy delete. Obvious hoax is obvious. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 19:52, 29 April 2015 (UTC) The Samurai (film)...
Click to read more »self-evident that they may not even require a source, and the blatantly obvious can almost always be stated without including contrary viewpoints (which...
Click to read more »Sierra Two Zero One Zero ✈ 04:31, 15 March 2011 (UTC) Hello there Capt Obvious. — Coffee // have a cup // essay // 23:14, 19 March 2011 (UTC) What the...
Click to read more »blank Scott Davis Talk 04:25, 17 April 2018 (UTC) Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 12:08, 18 April 2018 (UTC) The above discussion is...
Click to read more »low-priority software tasks did not take place for a while (one of the more obvious results of this was that contributions of user accounts that had been renamed...
Click to read more »not contain obvious omissions or inaccuracies. Q. How comprehensive does the article need to be? A. You are checking that there are no obvious gaps and that...
Click to read more »edits should be made to this page. The result was speedy keep. Obvious troll is obvious. (non-admin closure) –Davey2010Talk 14:28, 25 April 2015 (UTC)...
Click to read more »Current and ongoing: When an editor is on an "in progress" campaign of obvious vandalism, warnings are not required. Rampaging vandals should usually...
Click to read more »looking for sources Prune dead links Featured Article Review It might seem obvious, but it's easier to not pay close attention to FAs on your watchlist then...
Click to read more »summary or on the talk page. Even if the reason seems obvious to you, it will not always be obvious to someone else. Step one: start a discussion on talk...
Click to read more »upload log). unused, low-res, no obvious encyclopedic use FASTILY 01:32, 26 June 2019 (UTC) Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 07:11,...
Click to read more »edits should be made to this page. The result was Speedy Keep. Obvious sock was obvious, non-admin closure. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 14:18, 26 July...
Click to read more »entirely unexpected target, checking the history is always prudent. In obvious cases, a bold correction is the most efficient solution. The following...
Click to read more »require that editors continue to assume good faith in the presence of obvious evidence to the contrary (e.g. vandalism), nor does assuming good faith...
Click to read more »upload log). unused, low-res, no obvious use FASTILY 23:54, 18 September 2019 (UTC) Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 01:54, 21 September...
Click to read more »–LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 01:32, 28 August 2022 (UTC) Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 04:41, 28 August 2022 (UTC) The above discussion...
Click to read more »substituted by looking at the template page which will either have an obvious "Being deleted" tag or have a deletion reason linking to the TfD discussion...
Click to read more »September 2005 (UTC) Support because in excess of 90% of WP:CP submissions are obvious. Let's cut out the bureacracy in the easy cases, just like we do with other...
Click to read more »RfD. Cross namespace redirects to these spaces should serve a clear and obvious purpose to justify the possibility of surprising an editor by whisking...
Click to read more »2020 (UTC) Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 00:26, 6 February 2020 (UTC) Delete, no obvious use in article (appears to be photo...
Click to read more »further edits should be made to this page. The result was keep. Obvious snow keep is obvious. —Tom Morris (talk) 14:20, 11 June 2013 (UTC) 1996 shooting of...
Click to read more »above. Additionally, it is well-written, formatted, and "does not contain obvious omissions or inaccuracies". In particular, it should cite and address the...
Click to read more »content is notable enough to be kept in the main article. Merging it is the obvious way to go, then. Creating an AfD in a case like this is inapporpriate,...
Click to read more »others. Comments I agree with Djsasso. Pretty obvious. I'm sorry, but this is more than a little obvious! KC109 (talk) 00:22, 5 February 2008 (UTC) Conclusions...
Click to read more »which a subject is notable beyond any doubt. In theory, some subjects are obvious for inclusion in an encyclopedia. No one would dispute the presence of...
Click to read more »vs. time of editing Andrew Keen debate John Seigenthaler panel Erasing obvious vandalism from database BLP - Brian Peppers and limiting article sizes...
Click to read more »the decreasing number of new articles being created is that most of the obvious topics have now been taken. While it is certainly true that articles on...
Click to read more »coverage (as is usual on such articles). Thus, since an obvious merge target exists, that is the obvious answer Black Kite 13:26, 24 March 2010 (UTC) There...
Click to read more »edits should be made to this page. The result was Speedy close, obvious troll is obvious. Non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now...
Click to read more »require that editors continue to assume good wraith in the presence of obvious evidence to the contrary (eg. possession). Nor does it imply that benevolent...
Click to read more »log). unused, low-res, no obvious encyclopedic use FASTILY 00:54, 28 August 2019 (UTC) Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 23:23...
Click to read more »Report active, obvious, and persistent vandals and spammers here. Shortcut WP:AIVWP:AIV Before reporting, read the spam and vandalism pages, as well as...
Click to read more »cases, such as where a source of questionable reliability (rather than an obvious unreliable source) has been added, the biography should be listed instead...
Click to read more »of as an extension of WP:BLUE: if it's obvious, go ahead and add them up. However, here it is not at all obvious that the ESPN source supports the aggregate...
Click to read more »edits should be made to this page. The result was Speedy Keep. Obvious sock was obvious; non-admin closure. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 14:12, 26 July...
Click to read more »consensus. the relisting got us no further; it is obvious the pair of words exists; it is not obvious that it is used specifically of a particular political...
Click to read more »further edits should be made to this page. The result was keep. Obvious Keep is obvious. (non-admin closure) –Davey2010 Merry Xmas / Happy New Year 02:13...
Click to read more »Editors. There is no Divine Right of Editors. (Hopefully the title made this obvious.) It does not matter who or what you are, you have to be a responsible...
Click to read more »{{WikiProject Science}} unless the connection to veterinary medicine is clearly obvious to the reader. Pharmaceutical companies: Use {{WikiProject Pharmacology}}...
Click to read more »of consensus on this encyclopedia should be codified as a policy. It is obvious that consensus should not be changed to a simple majority or a given percentage...
Click to read more »apply to the following: Reverting obvious vandalism (such as page content being replaced by obscenities) or obvious violations of the policy about biographies...
Click to read more »topic ban last time; I wonder if that's changed now that we're up to four obvious 1RR violations, the most recent of which have come almost immediately after...
Click to read more »8 April 2008 (UTC) Strong keep, but rename to List of dancers for the obvious reason that "some" is indiscriminate. There are several reasons why categories...
Click to read more »multiple sockpuppets. See Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets if it is a non-obvious case, and requests for checkuser if additional evidence is required. Complex...
Click to read more »21 November 2014 (UTC) You failed to catch the obvious damage to the article, please check for obvious concerns between the successful review and the...
Click to read more »If the matter under discussion is not contentious and the consensus is obvious to the participants, then formal closure is neither necessary nor advisable...
Click to read more »the presentation and helps readers focus on facts and explanations. The obvious exceptions to this guideline are articles or sections of articles on biographies...
Click to read more »00:13, 16 August 2007 (UTC) All articles have now had at least a first pass where obvious rejection have taken place. KTC 08:50, 11 September 2007 (UTC)...
Click to read more »all must be relevant to the topic at hand. While the latter is clearly obvious when it comes to basic editing and manual of style, what isn't mentioned...
Click to read more »not appeared here, you can try purging the cache. As for the (kind of) obvious question of how the actual spending of the Foundation compares to the survey...
Click to read more »here, you can try purging the cache. That this is unfinished is probably obvious. I had asked for this to be held back, but.. it wasn't. Adam Cuerden (talk)Has...
Click to read more »isn't a speedy delete?" Inevitably, VfD gets hit with articles that are obvious deletes. They rack up ten to fifteen "delete" votes with no "keep" votes...
Click to read more »infoboxes, repositioning images, disambiguating links, and fixing non-obvious vandalism. The Bright Line has no infrastructure to support it—With no...
Click to read more »so-called "common knowledge" today, but weren't known in the past or weren't obvious. It's a good idea for there to be some explanation of how these facts were...
Click to read more »incomplete. Some changes, such as styling improvements, do not result in obvious or noticeable differences. This list does not include all failed proposals...
Click to read more »both Rollback and PC reviewer rights. The right would only be used for obvious spam and vandalism. This proposal first originated from a discussion at...
Click to read more »community—in obvious cases that leaves room for a level of judgement ("trolls should be blocked" gives precedent for an admin to identify a user as an obvious troll...
Click to read more »optional. The article reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain obvious omissions or inaccuracies – it contains a large proportion of the material...
Click to read more »- Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Free Republic I think this is an obvious, disruptive sock puppet, which should result in a block. No checkuser is...
Click to read more »MarioJump83! 00:31, 15 January 2021 (UTC) Strong Support as the nominator. Obvious is obvious. It's a major travesty that L&D2000 has never gotten this award until...
Click to read more »09:45, 12 May 2017 (UTC) Delete as obvious WP:SOAPBOX. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 17:33, 12 May 2017 (UTC) Delete: Obvious WP:PROMO, with nothing to fill WP:GNG...
Click to read more »result was Draftify. This AFD is frankly, a mess; it would seem to be obvious that there is the possibility of a useful article here but this one is...
Click to read more »the initial reasoning. Some "Obvious GNG" and "obvious notable" mentions above with no explanation for why it seems obvious, which makes it difficult to...
Click to read more »page. Obvious fortified defensive buildings (castles proper) may be called 'castle' if desired. Example: Gravensteen Grand buildings with obvious connections...
Click to read more »samples of notable tracks that represent the genre are recommended for obvious reasons. Make sure you understand the guidance on fair use for audio first...
Click to read more »edits should be made to this page. The result was Speedy Keep. Obvious sock was obvious; non-admin closure. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 14:12, 26 July...
Click to read more »impacted by the ever-increasing number of interesting things to do. One obvious example is the rise of social media such as Facebook. As importantly, all...
Click to read more »Example: Albania at http://pinkjustis.info/Albania No obvious mention of Wikipedia No obvious mention of GFDL Says "Copyright www.pinkjustis.info 2006"...
Click to read more »Support - as well per WP:WIAFT.--SRX 03:17, 28 December 2008 (UTC) Support obvious -- Escape Artist Swyer Talk Contributions 19:30, 28 December 2008 (UTC)...
Click to read more »handful will merit "Top" importance for equally obvious reasons. In cases where importance is not so obvious or there is a dispute over the importance, a...
Click to read more »but missed that the meaning of "architecture" might not be immediately obvious. Feel free to edit it or add links if you think it could be made clearer :)...
Click to read more »of sockpuppetry, file a report at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations. Obvious and malicious sockpuppets engaging in vandalism may be reported to AIV...
Click to read more »make room for other topics. But I'd argue against it, in this case it is obvious they are about the same subject but things can get fuzzy very quickly....
Click to read more »edits should be made to this page. The result was Speedy Keep. Obvious sock was obvious; non-admin closure. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 14:12, 26 July...
Click to read more »or crude humor to a page, illegitimately blanking pages, and inserting obvious nonsense into a page. Abusive creation or usage of user accounts and temporary...
Click to read more »valid analytic perspectives. The author's own viewpoint is mentioned or obvious. Alternate viewpoints are compared in persuasive terms. If you come across...
Click to read more »investigate · cuwiki · SI) User compare report Auto-generated every hour. Obvious sock is obvious, see page history here[1] Darkness Shines (talk) 22:13, 22 April...
Click to read more »intractable, and especially to deny a developing consensus even when it's obvious, insisting on an RFC to prolong the process of adding something they don't...
Click to read more » The result was speedy keep. "They seem me trollin'" applies, Obvious troll is obvious. (non-admin closure) –Davey2010Talk 15:05, 17 February 2015 (UTC)...
Click to read more »protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log) Obvious hoax about a fake animated film. I consider myself fairly knowledgeable...
Click to read more »<imagemap>. There is an example on the technical village pump. One less obvious but important improvement is that branches of parser functions like {{#if:}}...
Click to read more »Shortcut WP:FANDCWP:FANDC A list of Featured articles that do not have an obvious "connection" to a date for "Today's Featured Article" scheduling purposes...
Click to read more »academic standards at the University of Smartsylvania). Laying aside the obvious conflict of interest (read: VANITY) and advertising implications, posting...
Click to read more »that was not in the original, such as noise reduction or click removal (obvious fade ups and fade downs at the start and end need not be listed); (vi)...
Click to read more »or Python Wiki or which wiki? TELL US! Although your intentions may be obvious, such a blatant misuse of language is nevertheless painful, and to editors...
Click to read more »by series tend to be the most diverse, structurally. This is due to an obvious fact: every series is different. A series of 14 main games and dozens of...
Click to read more »category tree. Some of these are quick fixes; misspellings, obvious redirects to create, obvious candidates for delinking, slightly wrong names of existing...
Click to read more »have this right.) The purpose of reviewing is to catch and filter out obvious inappropriate edits and vandalism on articles under pending changes protection...
Click to read more »Runtshit vandal. RolandR 08:25, 2 July 2007 (UTC) Comments This is so obvious, I'll take it to WP:AIV. Shalom Hello 08:30, 2 July 2007 (UTC) Now joined...
Click to read more »2014. This is an unconventional military history in a number of ways. An obvious difference is that the book is structured as if it was a novel - it starts...
Click to read more »Fast and the Furious film franchise, therefore F&F8; it's such a dead obvious abbreviation. [23][24][25][26][27] -- 70.51.201.106 (talk) 20:31, 27 June...
Click to read more »MINUTES after creation and you should be following WP:BEFORE!, Obvious Keep is obvious (non-admin closure) –Davey2010 Merry Xmas / Happy New Year 00:00...
Click to read more »discussion discourages administrative intervention in all but the most obvious calls, such as clear violation of WP:3RR. This creates a forum where responsible...
Click to read more »deletion discussions. Racer-Ωmegα 22:19, 27 July 2015 (UTC) Delete Obvious hoax is obvious. --Diego Grez (talk) 23:59, 27 July 2015 (UTC) Delete as I'm not...
Click to read more »Wikipedia, regardless of whether one thinks the meaning of the reference is "obvious". Sources for such claims must be secondary sources in which reliable persons...
Click to read more »per period of time (usually 24 hours or one week); exceptions, such as obvious vandalism, may apply. The user is additionally required to discuss any...
Click to read more »display of the image's information in a table below the image was the most obvious effect). This fixed some bugs, and caused some more which have now been...
Click to read more »editors carelessly editing at high rates and making mistakes which would be obvious if edits were properly reviewed may be treated as if they are operating...
Click to read more »to this page. The result of the discussion was SNOW-deleted: Obvious result is obvious. Drmies (talk) 16:08, 11 September 2015 (UTC) Wikipedia:Wikiproject...
Click to read more »majority seem to know pro wrestling is scripted, so I would think it would be obvious.--WillC 07:16, 28 April 2010 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved as...
Click to read more »it, as there might be reasons for the oddity that are not immediately obvious! General guidance on editing articles is given in the Wikipedia Manual...
Click to read more »than six articles, anyway. That is, these should be items that have no obvious connection but which, nonetheless, can be linked between very quickly in...
Click to read more »libel. FlaggedRevisions thereby functions as a low-level filter against obvious vandalism. Any registered editor may request 'reviewer' privileges at Wikipedia:Requests...
Click to read more »followers like August Kubizek and Rudolf Hess in particular. Besides the obvious reasons, Machtan has received criticism of his book because it claims that...
Click to read more »move would be contested. For technical move requests, such as to correct obvious typographical errors, see Requesting technical moves. The technical moves...
Click to read more »But don't nominate Mike for admin when it is obvious that he will not win and when it is also obvious that the process will only bring up negatives....
Click to read more »deletion: Extremely short articles which add no information beyond what is obvious from the title. ike9898 02:15, Jan 7, 2005 (UTC) BLANKFAZE | (что??) 00:03...
Click to read more »No further edits should be made to this page. The result was delete. obvious example for the proper use of BLP 1E. DGG ( talk ) 03:09, 3 June 2016 (UTC)...
Click to read more »article, please say that; many of the articles I review have typos and other obvious problems that other reviewers could have fixed themselves, but didn't....
Click to read more »proportion to its prevalence in reliable sources. Wikipedia's less-than-obvious meaning of "neutral point of view" is a perennial source of confusion....
Click to read more »input I can give (and I can't run any kind of scripts from the page for obvious security reasons). jp×g 01:25, 31 January 2022 (UTC) Newbie question -...
Click to read more »made to this page. The result was speedy Deleted (A7) by C.Fred. Obvious A7 is obvious!, Not sure why it was brought here but tagged as such anyway (non-admin...
Click to read more »protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log) Obvious hoax and borderline A1 nonsense. szyslak 09:24, 16 February 2008 (UTC)...
Click to read more »parties will be motivated by bias. Further, if the bias is not immediately obvious, there is less chance with a less notable subject of anyone knowledgeable...
Click to read more »campaign, and the Moodbar simply never took off, despite filling an even more obvious need. It would be tempting, then, to think that the English Wikipedia community...
Click to read more »playing. But it seems that the more time you spend on Wikipedia the more obvious it becomes that editing is a kind of playing. Crafting an article isn't...
Click to read more »editor to find fault or violations in another editor when it is not already obvious that such has occurred. It is often a lack of assumption of good faith...
Click to read more »Obvious question: how do you prove the wikiname is the handle of a person of the female gender? Jackiespeel 17:01, 12 December 2006 (UTC) Obvious answer:You...
Click to read more »23:18, 19 March 2007 (UTC) Delete - obvious hoax. - Richard Cavell 00:23, 20 March 2007 (UTC) Delete - obvious hoax. At least one variation of the article...
Click to read more »(obviously) - clearly it was a comment I made, but which is ridiculously not obvious. Oh, from the Top 50. Maybe if you needlessly told me off at that page...
Click to read more »consensus. While I personally don't agree with the outcome, there's no obvious consensus here. --MZMcBride (talk) 00:09, 26 September 2008 (UTC) Kaveh...
Click to read more »usable, such as the brief name drops and the primary sources. It's pretty obvious that if this page is deleted it'll be re-added by one of the same people...
Click to read more »further edits should be made to this page. The result was Speedy close, for obvious reasons. El_C 14:29, 15 December 2006 (UTC) Orthodox Halakha (edit | talk |...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This is an obvious advertisement for an App. I am somewhat unsure of the notability, however...
Click to read more »with search - the launch of Wikia-related Grub open source search invites obvious comparisons with Wikipedia. Also this week: From the editor — Citizendium...
Click to read more »because Halloween (film series) is not a GA and the topic does have an obvious gap with the rest of the films missing. --Maitch 13:52, 6 February 2007...
Click to read more »deletion/Misinformation related to the COVID-19 pandemic by China due to obvious similarities. El_C 22:14, 30 January 2021 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to...
Click to read more »there is a linkable article (in which case use the title) or an extremely obvious English name. Use the French (or Dutch, if that is more common in English)...
Click to read more »are mandatory. Try to assume good faith in relation to all but the most obvious socks. Please do not notify the suspected accounts. This tends to result...
Click to read more »this a little bit). I'm looking for any other feedback apart from the obvious. Thanks — Wackymacs (talk ~ edits) 16:48, 28 May 2008 (UTC) Comments A...
Click to read more »Done by Pyrotec in Jan 2010. Minimal changes to the article to then, no obvious reason to reassess now. Thparkth (talk) 01:12, 13 October 2011 (UTC) Lobotomy...
Click to read more »denying the user the right to make such edits, to blocking the user in obvious cases of vandalism. The actions could be different based on edit count...
Click to read more »several editors have pointed out, the framing of the article also raises obvious POV and OR problems. -- ChrisO 08:00, 5 October 2007 (UTC) Psychiatric...
Click to read more »explained. And as Brion Vibber described, the warnings are often very obvious: "Firefox can throw up a scary dialog box on every page view... Chrome...
Click to read more »is of interest to WikiProject Mysticism" on their talk pages. The most obvious article is the article on Mysticism, but there are many other articles...
Click to read more »use. Pkbwcgs (talk) 15:35, 16 April 2018 (UTC) Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 23:49, 16 April 2018 (UTC) The above discussion is...
Click to read more »or user can find without instruction is the hyphen. This leads us to an obvious conclusion: if a Wikipedia editor is expected to be able to type it, a...
Click to read more »upload log). Unused, low-res, no obvious use. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 13:32, 7 November 2022 (UTC) Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 14:55,...
Click to read more »edits should be made to this page. The result was Speedy Keep. Obvious sock was obvious, non-admin closure. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 14:17, 26 July...
Click to read more »phenomenon which is either not verifiably existent or, conversely, blindingly obvious). These articles very often start with the name of the site, properly capitalized...
Click to read more »question will become notable. D.M.N. (talk) 19:42, 16 July 2008 (UTC) An obvious Delete, per WP:N, WP:CRUFT, WP:RS, and WP:CITE. Feedback ☎ 22:07, 16 July...
Click to read more »problems and its greatest strengths. The negative effects of anti-Elitism are obvious: Real and perceived lack of credibility. The dominance of difficult people...
Click to read more »tagged – you can simply delete those from the list. For others, it will be obvious what tag they should get. Add the tag, save the image, and remove it from...
Click to read more »or problems involving editor conduct. AN/I seems to work best for more 'obvious' or less complex problems like sock puppetry, "short term" problems (problems...
Click to read more »the juxtaposition really does constitute SYNTH, the insinuation will be obvious to everyone. Gray-area cases aren't SYNTH, just unclear writing. Y An apple...
Click to read more »Saying that a user has made unconstructive edits is simply stating the obvious truth, while saying that these edits make the user an unconstructive user...
Click to read more »post mentions only the specific issue of climate change as an example of "obvious" Wikipedia bias and "an effort to censor information", citing the work...
Click to read more »are vandalism and 97% of that vandalism is done by anonymous editors. Obvious vandalism is the vast majority of vandalism used. From the data gathered...
Click to read more »anywhere. Ixfd64 (talk) 17:49, 21 October 2021 (UTC) Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 00:26, 22 October 2021 (UTC) The above discussion...
Click to read more »material; removal of such material will be considered as ‘reversions of obvious vandalism’ for the purposes of revert limitations or restrictions. If he...
Click to read more »with the article, we might not believe you moved it, because it isn't obvious in the edit history. F4: If some of the text was copied from another Wikipedia...
Click to read more »simply not knowing everything that you do. Do not treat everything as obvious, and do not be overly witty, smart-alecky, or clever, as that is annoying...
Click to read more »access date. The article reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain obvious omissions or inaccuracies. It contains a large proportion of the material...
Click to read more »well. While the efforts to remove the Q clearance image were relatively obvious, the edits by the National Institute on Drug Abuse took longer to clear...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This is an obvious hoax by an obvious sock puppet who belongs to Category:Wikipedia sockpuppets of RealMadridCF2012...
Click to read more »free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Does not meet WP:POLITICIAN, obvious WP:PROMOTION and WP:AUTOBIOGRAPHY violations. 117Avenue (talk) 01:36, 27...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was keep. Obvious consensus to keep the panda ₯’ 23:13, 17 May 2014 (UTC) AfDs for this article:...
Click to read more »be appropriate to use the Level 4im warning. Alternatively, in cases of obvious bad faith vandalism, it may be appropriate to use a level 3 warning in...
Click to read more »creates a large demand for takes about why they suck. The obvious reasons are, well, obvious, so they are written into takes within the first couple days...
Click to read more »meteorites. Some of these are quick fixes; misspellings, obvious redirects to create, obvious candidates for delinking, slightly wrong names of existing...
Click to read more »further edits should be made to this page. The result was speedy delete, obvious hoax. Like User:Gene93k, I find it hard to accept that a turn of the last...
Click to read more »[210] "For any reverts you make in mainspace that are not of clear and obvious vandalism (within the definition above), you must go to the article's talk...
Click to read more »analysis, with the statistics needed gradually rising with time. The most obvious dangers being that of an overall decline in successful RfA, leading to...
Click to read more »topics into chronological order with the oldest at the top Correcting any obvious indentation mistakes Cleaning up formatting mistakes, such as tags that...
Click to read more »the people. Some of these are quick fixes; misspellings, obvious redirects to create, obvious candidates for delinking, slightly wrong names of existing...
Click to read more »extent anyway – if the multiple pen-name user ensures that there is no obvious link between times and areas of activity, and avoids idiomatic language...
Click to read more »two really speak for themselves. The first page is for the reporting of obvious cases of sockpuppetry to be dealt with quickly by admins who can block...
Click to read more »recent changes to Wikipedia, automated programs (bots) that undo very obvious vandalism, an edit filter that flags and sometimes prohibits problem edits...
Click to read more »More controversial is what is sufficient for inclusion. WP:GNG is an obvious sufficiency criteria, but as established in various WP:AfD debates, proofs...
Click to read more »Speedy delete as a "blatant and obvious hoax". --brewcrewer (yada, yada) 18:55, 19 May 2008 (UTC) Speedy delete as an obvious hoax -- don't waste any more...
Click to read more »(UTC) Doesn't set out a case for the connection between users; if it is obvious from the contributions, please list on AN/I for an administrator to block...
Click to read more »it, as there might be reasons for the oddity that are not immediately obvious! For details please refer to Wikipedia:Manual of Style (Arabic) The Arabic...
Click to read more »require that editors continue to assume good faith in the presence of obvious evidence of intentional wrongdoing. However, do not assume there is more...
Click to read more »understand particular reasons why a policy might apply. While it may be obvious to you why a given policy applies, it may not be to others – even very...
Click to read more »Jon Kolbert (talk) 05:03, 19 March 2018 (UTC) Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 12:27, 22 March 2018 (UTC) The above discussion is...
Click to read more »topics you'd like to work on. Check out their pages and see if there are obvious mistakes or problems. Maybe even do a little research first so you're prepared...
Click to read more »and Hungary. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 08:06, 3 August 2026 (UTC) Seems obvious, why don't you WP:BOLDMERGE it? Reywas92Talk 13:05, 3 August 2026 (UTC)...
Click to read more »added to the article before nominating it, though this may be ignored in obvious cases, such as replacing a low-resolution version of an image with a higher...
Click to read more »countries and former empires become less obvious if their extent in either space or time is less, and are equally obvious if their extent in space is greater...
Click to read more »starts editing articles to remove pro death penalty arguments, it will be obvious that they are POV pushing. Also, I do hope the nominator notified all the...
Click to read more »December 2009 (UTC) Keep I don't even know why this was nominated, its an obvious keep, weel sourced and if anything just needs to be expanded up to current...
Click to read more »reliable sources. Meatsgains (talk) 19:52, 30 January 2017 (UTC) Delete - An obvious hoax article, based on a video from a comedian. 64.183.45.226 (talk) 20:04...
Click to read more »to the present day. All lists are of featured standard and there are no obvious gaps. NapHit (talk) 19:44, 29 January 2012 (UTC) Comment I'll support if...
Click to read more »steps will it take to protect them? This essay fails to answer either obvious question about this potential threat. -- llywrch (talk) 23:01, 2 August...
Click to read more »Wikifauna, who frown over how the ironic WikiImp leaves behind so many obvious problems, in need of fixes from so many different directions, all so easily...
Click to read more »edits should be made to this page. The result was speedy delete. G3 - obvious hoax J.delanoygabsadds 04:22, 2 January 2010 (UTC) Crab collars (edit |...
Click to read more »File:PM visits the 1st Bn CLI.jpg, no obvious use FASTILY 23:39, 4 September 2019 (UTC) Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 06:03, 8 September...
Click to read more »which allows a user to flag a revision as being checked for vandalism and obvious nonsense, and "Reviewer", which allows a user to flag a revision as a "good"...
Click to read more »topics you'd like to work on. Check out their pages and see if there are obvious mistakes or problems. Maybe even do a little research first so you're prepared...
Click to read more »(talk) 22:00, 25 November 2017 (UTC) Delete, essentially orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 03:22, 26 November 2017 (UTC) The above discussion...
Click to read more »further edits should be made to this page. The result was delete. It isn't obvious that the the suggested redirect target is the best one; the name, or a...
Click to read more »for. Jack N. Stock (talk) 04:28, 30 January 2017 (UTC) Delete Obvious WP:POVFORK is obvious. Shock Brigade Harvester Boris (talk) 04:27, 30 January 2017...
Click to read more »someone if they revert too much. Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents is the obvious place to report parole violations. Wikipedia:Probation...
Click to read more »should be made to this page. The result was Speedily deleted because obvious hoaxes are vandalism. And more's the pity: this one was damnably clever...
Click to read more »Faddle 19:21, 4 August 2020 (UTC) delete I guess I didn't really make it obvious in my previous comment. Praxidicae (talk) 11:49, 10 August 2020 (UTC) Delete...
Click to read more »leave closing rationales, even when it's obvious and nobody cares. Well, this is unanimous, so it's obvious and nobody cares. WilyD 09:52, 4 December...
Click to read more »obvious hoax.--John (talk) 05:44, 27 September 2012 (UTC) I think this is a hoax...Müdigkeit (talk) 01:22, 27 September 2012 (UTC) Delete - obvious hoax...
Click to read more »Bishopstoke. Kelly hi! 09:56, 22 May 2018 (UTC) Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 14:17, 22 May 2018 (UTC) The above discussion is...
Click to read more »MediaWiki:Revertpage from Reverted edits by $2 to last version by $1 to Reverted obvious vandalism by $2 to last version by $1 Changing this message without warning...
Click to read more »grave, Berlin. Kelly hi! 10:20, 21 May 2018 (UTC) Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Have you considered using a PROD for deleting these types of files...
Click to read more »been addressed, any remaining differences being for obvious reasons. I can't see any other obvious problems, supporting now Jimfbleak - talk to me? 15:21...
Click to read more »report Auto-generated every hour. Rather obvious, A slap on the wrists this time should suit.Master Obvious sock Darkness Shines (talk) 19:58, 3 November...
Click to read more »done.--KorruskiTalk 14:02, 29 August 2013 (UTC) Speedy delete—Obvious hoax is obvious. Livit⇑Eh?/What? 21:10, 29 August 2013 (UTC) Oh My God. JUST FUCKING...
Click to read more »small crowdsourcing payout, the benefits of infiltrating their ranks are obvious. Apply for these permissions as soon as possible, preferably at the same...
Click to read more »all contributors agree with deletion, or when deletion is the plainly obvious outcome. Delete the file. Using the link in the FFD page will normally...
Click to read more »(UTC) The most obvious answer would be Danny Glover. ←Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 23:08, 22 August 2021 (UTC) The least obvious answer might...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Obvious keep, the nomination reads as WP:IDONTLIKEIT and clearly ignores the substantial...
Click to read more »unnecessary to cite a source in describing events or other details. It should be obvious to potential readers that the subject of the article is the source of the...
Click to read more »I don't think a case can be made out for "deletion harassment". It is obvious, even to an user who is uninvolved with CC, that there are problems with...
Click to read more »there is a strong case for not using Wikipedia in court decisions for the obvious reason that it's (non-pre-moderated) user-generated content, this particular...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Obvious insertion of misinformation. Keegantalk 05:44, 15 August 2008 (UTC) Route...
Click to read more »(#1) is of course the founder and CEO of SpaceX. Now, let's address the obvious theme one will find throughout this list: Super Bowl LII (#10), the 52nd...
Click to read more »it, as there might be reasons for the oddity that are not immediately obvious! Following are the agreed-upon naming conventions for the most-common types...
Click to read more »see that the work you do is appreciated. On the other hand, there's the obvious negative of seeing the negative opinions and views. There's also plenty...
Click to read more »definitive proof. Given that good faith must be assumed, unless it is obvious beyond a reasonable doubt that sockpuppetry is occurring, or the checkuser...
Click to read more »meteorites. Some of these are quick fixes; misspellings, obvious redirects to create, obvious candidates for delinking, slightly wrong names of existing...
Click to read more »WP:CORPDEPTH and GNG. -- HighKing++ 15:40, 13 May 2017 (UTC) Delete: Obvious spam is obvious. --Guy Macon (talk) 15:39, 14 May 2017 (UTC) The above discussion...
Click to read more »further edits should be made to this page. The result was Speedied as obvious POV and original research, created by an SPA to create a negative impression...
Click to read more »rest of the article. In articles with very many footnotes, it may not be obvious which references are suitable for further reading, and such entries may...
Click to read more »citations in my opinion - my rule of thumb is that anything that isn't obvious to someone who is completely new to the topic needs a reference. Also,...
Click to read more »draft. Legacypac (talk) 07:14, 7 November 2017 (UTC) Delete. Obvious pseudoscience is obvious (and unverifiable). In theory an article might be able to exist...
Click to read more »guideline Learn about spam and how to respond to it WikiProject Spam Report obvious spam at WikiProject Spam External links guideline Learn about appropriate...
Click to read more »be made to this page. The result was keep. Note I voted, but this is obvious. Neil ム 13:16, 12 September 2007 (UTC) Mark Warner (Canadian politician)...
Click to read more »that it is notable. No other reasons were given for deletion, nor are any obvious to me. ~ BigrTex 17:43, 10 May 2008 (UTC) Image:Basketball EVHS.jpg (delete...
Click to read more »latter view being made by Skapperod or others is presumably because of the obvious: resigning ones tools does not absolve that user of responsibility - that...
Click to read more »because Halloween (film series) is not a GA and the topic does have an obvious gap with the rest of the films missing. --Maitch 13:52, 6 February 2007...
Click to read more »was Speedily Deleted (non-admin closure) by User:Parsecboy per CSD G3 as obvious vandalism. WilliamH (talk) 20:11, 23 May 2008 (UTC) The Battle Of Landcross...
Click to read more »(𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 11:30, 5 March 2021 (UTC) Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 07:20, 6 March 2021 (UTC) The above discussion is...
Click to read more »the Ogre (t • c) 04:13, 5 February 2020 (UTC) Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 00:32, 7 February 2020 (UTC) The above discussion...
Click to read more »edits should be made to this page. The result was delete. The outcome is obvious, but I need to note that I find it rather shocking that the "sources" for...
Click to read more »| upload log). Unused, low-res, no obvious use FASTILY 04:57, 8 July 2019 (UTC) Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 23:57, 8 July...
Click to read more »production has been steadily increasing for three years, but this only became obvious in 2007. Growth was evident at featured topics, which jumped from six to...
Click to read more »block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki · SI) Beyond obvious WP:DUCK. Gadeshina33's last edit was vandalism to her talk page, which...
Click to read more »cared enough to add it, removing obvious lies added by your competitors or disgruntled ex-employees, fixing obvious errors like not listing the new CEO...
Click to read more »stage is concluded, the scrutineers will quickly verify that there are no obvious flaws in the resulting tally which would indicate a problem in the software;...
Click to read more »page. The result was keep. While I sympathize with the nominator it is obvious that this does indeed meet the notability guidelines, and therefore should...
Click to read more »speedily delete as "blindingly obvious and nonsalvageable nonsense" (and WP:SNOW. JDoorjam Talk 04:08, 1 June 2006 (UTC) Obvious hoax and nonsense, but the...
Click to read more »edits should be made to this page. The result was Speedy Delete as an obvious hoax. Vary | Talk 05:45, 27 November 2007 (UTC) Le Wiggles (edit | talk |...
Click to read more »that was not in the original, such as noise reduction or click removal (obvious fade ups and fade downs at the start and end need not be listed). For a...
Click to read more »Silver The LSS a blatatent vandal and an obvious sockpuppet. next there was one-WsonXM Sil the Lss Angel, a obvious sock and a vandal. Next we have One-Winged...
Click to read more »full explanation of what I did, how I did it, and responses to the most obvious questions can be found below). The generative pre-trained transformers...
Click to read more »article for editing, paste it back in, and save it. When not dealing with obvious vandalism, reverting often is a bad strategy. It alienates other users...
Click to read more »inline citations, it must not convey any contentious point, or material not obvious to any reader. The alt text is intended to be read out by screen readers...
Click to read more »copyright violations, posting of personal information, or similar edits. One obvious advantage to transparent deletion is in seeing what problem editors have...
Click to read more »may appeal their restriction after 14 April 2011. Scjessey may revert obvious vandalism and make routine cleanup-style edits to CCT (as part of Wikipedia:Recent...
Click to read more »cater to all tastes, and with the exception of attack pages, hoaxes & obvious spam, they generally hold that if someone makes the effort to create an...
Click to read more »have any questions, see the talk page. The scope of the project is quite obvious, any article that is directly related to the Seattle Mariners. That includes...
Click to read more »question whether the nom even knows what "Listcruft" even is!, Obvious Keep is obvious (non-admin closure) –Davey2010Talk 13:41, 10 January 2016 (UTC)...
Click to read more »Unfortunately, only blatant and obvious hoaxes can be speedied. Adding a new 20th century US President would be obvious, but this one is much less so,...
Click to read more »the editor is an obvious give away User:Stank58, Stanlee Kelly get it shortened to Stank? Something smells and this was an obvious speedy candidate....
Click to read more »as truth. Papoman001 (talk) 20:06, 19 December 2016 (UTC) As a rather obvious sock of Mittens700 (talk · contribs), both of your contributions are more...
Click to read more »the initial reasoning. Some "Obvious GNG" and "obvious notable" mentions above with no explanation for why it seems obvious, which makes it difficult to...
Click to read more »wondering what the assessment criteria were. A "vandal" edit is fairly obvious, but what makes a single edit "excellent" instead of "average"? — V = IR...
Click to read more »notable, competed at the top level of his sport, won the NWA Tag Title. Obvious Keep--Curtis23's Usalions 17:00, 15 May 2010 (UTC) Keep per above, with...
Click to read more »(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Obvious advertisement brochure for the product, including unsourced "product line...
Click to read more »nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) due to their obvious pattern on behavior on Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Consumed Crustacean...
Click to read more »admin to block you. rating: All I can say about this user is "obvious troll is obvious". rating: Go troll somewhere else. rating: Somebody block this...
Click to read more »been addressed, any remaining differences being for obvious reasons. I can't see any other obvious problems, supporting now Jimfbleak - talk to me? 15:21...
Click to read more »to indicate when it should be updated. In the above statement the most obvious date is 31 December 2036, after which time construction will have finished...
Click to read more »that those with a financial connection to a company provide clear and obvious disclosures regarding their affiliation. If readers presume Wikipedia's...
Click to read more »articles being manipulated by any one interest group, as there are no obvious applicable points of weakness or "approved circle", through which editorial...
Click to read more »necessary, but the text of the article is even more necessary. If it is not obvious to a reviewer, when reading a draft, that the subject satisfies either...
Click to read more »16 April 2007 (UTC) At the very outset, all these are disruptive and obvious sockpuppets. The extremely offensive and bad language used in all those...
Click to read more »part of creating a new article is finding an interesting topic; so many obvious things have been written about already. We have some resources that may...
Click to read more »No further edits should be made to this page. The result was delete. Obvious hoax Black Kite (talk) 18:58, 22 March 2013 (UTC) Ehsan Malik (edit | talk |...
Click to read more »should be made to this page. The result was delete. SNOW. conclusion is obvious. DGG ( talk ) 00:05, 27 December 2017 (UTC) Alex Gurteen (edit | talk |...
Click to read more »the AfD. Oh well. Gigs (talk) 14:44, 10 June 2009 (UTC) Delete this is obvious promotion of a non-notable organization. Gigs (talk) 14:44, 10 June 2009...
Click to read more »others at a minor catwalk do 10 years ago - apparently done nothing since, obvious WP:COI, fails WP:RS Plutonium27 (talk) 05:55, 9 December 2022 (UTC) Note:...
Click to read more »further edits should be made to this page. The result was Userfied as obvious self-promotion. Guy (Help!) 17:51, 16 August 2011 (UTC) Bahram nouraei...
Click to read more »Wikipedians both on and in their own terms. Some of these terms are the obvious ones, like the various strings of acronyms in policies or the odd way in...
Click to read more »wrong notability criterion in nomination (should be WP:PROF not WP:GNG), obvious pass of WP:PROF#C1 (heavily cited publications) as well as #C3 for the...
Click to read more »either. It is not obvious to me that this is an organisation rather than a place. In England, a "chambers" is a set of rooms. It isn't obvious to me that the...
Click to read more »eletion/2007_April_14#Image:Coapon.JPG. These sockpuppets appear quite obvious, and have been shut down. See Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets...
Click to read more »whatsoever. gargleafg (talk) 00:40, 22 May 2015 (UTC) Speedy Delete - Obvious spam is obvious. –Davey2010Talk 04:55, 22 May 2015 (UTC) The above discussion is...
Click to read more »The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made...
Click to read more »was keep. SushiGeek 03:29, 12 April 2006 (UTC) Dicdef of a completely obvious concept plus unverified original research plus meaningless trivia. Brian...
Click to read more »worst this is a redirect to List of Boland representative cricketers - an obvious ATD exists, there are various reasons for redirecting, the name is clearly...
Click to read more »of this spree have (oh, shit!) nothing to do with the Tor network. For obvious reasons it would be foolish of me to say which is which, though I don't...
Click to read more »good-faith editors? Lots of "obvious hoaxes" are notable; I understand that when you say "obvious hoax", you mean, "obvious hoax wikipedia articles", but...
Click to read more »edits should be made to this page. The result was speedy delete. CSD G3. Obvious hoax and blatant disruption; WP:SNOW — LinguistAtLarge • Talk 00:28, 1...
Click to read more »the list has obvious, uncontentious and simple inclusion criteria then that would be OK, but if we have to make up our own non-obvious, non-trivial inclusion...
Click to read more »to this page. The result was redirect. Closing it early since it's so obvious. Geschichte (talk) 19:59, 10 January 2021 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to...
Click to read more »I've listed this article for peer review because, although all of the obvious issues with it have been fixed during the ongoing featured article nomination...
Click to read more »blatantly obvious original research using "weasel words" to avoid attributing it to a published source. Another example of blatantly obvious original research...
Click to read more »further edits should be made to this page. The result was speedied as obvious hoax. JDoorjam JDiscourse 01:52, 11 March 2007 (UTC) David Picker (edit |...
Click to read more »too many one or two sentence paragraphs Structure: 5 Not a particularly obvious section order Aesthetics: 4 My first impression of the article is that...
Click to read more »blankfaze, the proposal aims to expedite the deletion process for some obvious cases that do not need fuller consideration at Votes for deletion. Blankfaze...
Click to read more »article. See Wikipedia:How to edit a page Of course if the article has an obvious potential for encyclopedic growth, and has a conventional name, then you...
Click to read more »"keep" opinions are mostly not based in policy, but the redirect is an obvious alternative to deletion. Sandstein 20:11, 1 May 2022 (UTC) [Hide this box]...
Click to read more »for in August 2010 - consistent violations of NPOV. Further, while it's obvious that this is not the users first account (second edit shows facility with...
Click to read more »Lurker 12:52, 19 June 2007 (UTC) Evidence Cstanfie2 seems like a very obvious sock of Cstanfie, blocked for issuing legal threats. For further evidence...
Click to read more »edits should be made to this page. The result was speedy delete G3 as an obvious hoax. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 04:55, 13 July 2019 (UTC) [Hide this box]...
Click to read more »indicating a preference for some standard without indicating which), with the obvious exception of proper nouns (e.g. the U.S.Army does not call itself the American...
Click to read more »links to other websites. Some editors are surprised to discover that some "obvious" criteria are not included in the guideline, such as whether the website...
Click to read more »An obvious hoax. Please note: WP:CSD does not allow for Speedy deletion of hoax pages. Delete. Owen× ☎ 20:13, 29 July 2007 (UTC) Actually, obvious hoaxes...
Click to read more »further edits should be made to this page. The result was Speedy delete as obvious self-promotion Cory Basil (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links |...
Click to read more »Foundation was dismissed on 7/1/08. Jimmy Interview from last week Erasing obvious vandalism from database BLP - Brian Peppers and limiting article sizes...
Click to read more »notability of this game. - Dravecky (talk) 01:49, 29 November 2013 (UTC) Obvious Keep. The depth and breadth of the sourcing should confirm that this was...
Click to read more »solid books by doctorate posessing Egyptologists, so if there are any obvious holes that need to be filled in, it would be good to neatly and clearly...
Click to read more »The result of the debate was Speedy delete obvious hoax, copy & paste of Alexander Edelman, also an obvious hoax. Just zis Guy you know? 16:04, 16 May...
Click to read more »possibly adult volunteers) if known description of area served if not obvious from council name. Cross links to other state Scouting articles if council...
Click to read more »it is. Write a line or two about who or what the subject is (State the obvious). A good intro should also contain a concise overview of the article, summarizing...
Click to read more »problem and beginning a discussion on how to fix it or, for simpler and more obvious problems, a remark using the reason parameter (available in all templates...
Click to read more »Thanks! DRosenbach (Talk | Contribs) 02:33, 28 May 2014 (UTC) To state the obvious, is she sure she's logged in to her account? Is she using the Facebook...
Click to read more »Obvious haox. --fvw* 22:38, 2005 Jan 3 (UTC) Yes, obvious hoax. Everyone knows that "Operation ToastWomble" was the government's secret plan to take down...
Click to read more »be used for articles which appear to be copyright violations or contain obvious and major errors that you aren't easily able to fix. Another editor should...
Click to read more »oodles that are frozen. All we need now is sources for this blindingly obvious fact and we'd have a valid directory entry. Pity Wikipedia isn't a directory...
Click to read more »declines with no edit summaries done by obvious socks. Hairhorn (talk) 18:52, 29 March 2010 (UTC) Speedy delete, Obvious hoax, bs, nonsense, detritus. -Quartermaster...
Click to read more »somewhere into the sublime. These are either the incredibly obvious redirects to their incredibly obvious target or they are nothing. They are not the lunacy...
Click to read more »26 August 2007 (UTC) It's missing obvious members of that "government". That's criterion 1(d) "There is no obvious gap (missing or stub article) in the...
Click to read more »with sub-sub-clauses. Check your spelling: Usually misspelled words are obvious in their intent (e.g., "Qualty" is obviously "Quality"), however "Tedting"...
Click to read more »"obvious" misspellings, miscapitalizations, or redundancies. Your help is needed nominating these for deltetion, mostly by identifying the "obvious" replacement...
Click to read more »this page. The result was merge to User:GiantSnowman/Jonathan Lewis. obvious solution DGG ( talk ) 09:22, 28 February 2017 (UTC) Jonathan Lewis (soccer...
Click to read more »Wikipedia, a need for a standard for spelling and transliteration is becoming obvious. Anyone interested in such a project is requested to join this project...
Click to read more »the initial reasoning. Some "Obvious GNG" and "obvious notable" mentions above with no explanation for why it seems obvious, which makes it difficult to...
Click to read more »encourages or even suggests this practice. So why is it done? The most obvious reason is that users feel that their comments will gain a different level...
Click to read more »result was redirect to List of school shootings in the United States. Obvious target anyway. Spartaz Humbug! 21:02, 7 June 2022 (UTC) [Hide this box]...
Click to read more »advocate Keep at AfD. Seems pretty obvious... Just zis Guy you know? 07:09, 6 July 2006 (UTC) Declined. Indeed, obvious enough that it can be blocked without...
Click to read more »readers, please let us know. But beyond that all i can say is the very obvious - they are a very diverse group. Probably ranging in age from 10 to 100...
Click to read more »status cannot be considered perfect. They are just considered not to have obvious issues. Experience has shown however that even Featured Articles can improve...
Click to read more »a Google search. Georgia guy 21:26, 6 March 2007 (UTC) Strong delete, obvious hoax, an altered version of the legit article The Jungle Book (1967 film)...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was keep. obvious consensus DGG ( talk ) 04:00, 27 June 2016 (UTC) Josip Pečarić (edit |...
Click to read more »clefs. Pkbwcgs (talk) 18:12, 20 April 2018 (UTC) Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 09:00, 21 April 2018 (UTC) The above discussion is...
Click to read more »expanded, so I have addressed the Style and Tone label by rewriting the obvious Swedish translation. Ex nihil (talk) : Ex nihil (talk) 13:55, 17 January...
Click to read more »Article development Newly created articles are checked for obvious problems by members of the New pages patrol. These editors collaborate to identify...
Click to read more »Speedy if possible, as there's no real need for debate about an obvious fix to an obvious error. Bearcat (talk) 00:08, 11 September 2016 (UTC) The above...
Click to read more »1963 Gousha map shows four-digit "state secondary" numbers. There is an obvious pattern in comparing old to new numbers. They also match the numbers in...
Click to read more »admin status primarily to help remove obvious vandalism. I fully support Dwheeler's request for Adminship. Very obvious and non-controversial choice. Do I...
Click to read more »--Minorax«¦talk¦» 14:10, 13 September 2022 (UTC) Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 00:14, 14 September 2022 (UTC) The above discussion...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) CSD'd it under G3. Got reverted. Taking to AfD. Obvious Hoax. -- Rsrikanth05 (talk) 05:35, 31 December 2015 (UTC) delete this moronic...
Click to read more »now because it fails to satisfy WP:WIAFT criterion 1(d): "There are no obvious gaps (missing or low quality articles) in the topic. A topic must not cherry...
Click to read more »was delete. I am invoking NOTAVOTE here and discounting several fairly obvious sock votes. The WP:PAG based weight of the discussion clearly comes down...
Click to read more »must also accept that others will edit the page. Unless the edits are obvious vandalism, each edit should be viewed as a good faith attempt to improve...
Click to read more »(And I'd point out that while it may be obvious that a woman walked out of a courtroom, it is in no way obvious that this is "a sign of how much the law...
Click to read more »deletion – community discussion Speedy deletion – obvious cases for deletion Proposed deletion – obvious cases for deletion that do not meet the Speedy deletion...
Click to read more »edits should be made to this page. The result was snowball delete as an obvious hoax. Maxim (☎) 20:04, 22 August 2008 (UTC) Grambling "GT All Business"...
Click to read more »this page. The result was no consensus. I won't bore you, it's fairly obvious on reading this which way it has to be closed. We can always discuss this...
Click to read more »point: Whenever you write a page, never finish it. Always leave something obvious to do: an uncompleted sentence, a question in the text (with a not-too-obscure...
Click to read more »"This includes blatant and obvious misinformation." However, under WP:HOAX, "only in extreme cases of blatant and obvious hoaxes should articles be speedy...
Click to read more »is only 15. JohnCD (talk) 12:14, 25 March 2009 (UTC) Delete, as obvious fake is obvious. It is simply Alexander Ovechkin's article with the name changed...
Click to read more »orphaned, no obvious use as the article on Cameron McKay was deleted. HouseBlastertalk 00:09, 7 May 2022 (UTC) Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat...
Click to read more »this be speedied? This is a very, very obvious hoax. --Targeman 17:57, 10 August 2007 (UTC) Strong delete. Obvious hoax. There is this ([1]), but all that...
Click to read more »November 2018 (UTC) Delete - Does not look like obvious U5 or obvious G11, and U5 and G11 are meant to be obvious. However, abandoned for seven years by editor...
Click to read more »{{u|Sdkb}} talk 21:58, 12 April 2021 (UTC) Support meets the criteria with no obvious gaps, well-defined topical scope, under a shared template/category. Huge...
Click to read more »block · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser (log)) Obvious meatpuppetry might be obvious. -Pickbothmanlol- 00:03, 6 December 2009 (UTC) See Defending...
Click to read more »2004 (UTC) Your wish is my command... Dan100 10:47, Jan 1, 2005 (UTC) An obvious keep. Everyking 21:56, 27 Dec 2004 (UTC) Delete, this distinction is not...
Click to read more »it were obvious vandalism, it would be a speedy. I disagree with the characterization of any hoax as obvious vandalism. This one seems obvious but there...
Click to read more »03:27, 27 November 2007 (UTC) WP:OBVIOUS: "State facts which may be obvious to you, but are not necessarily obvious to the reader." Based on this I started...
Click to read more »edits should be made to this page. The result was speedy close. It is obvious that no consensus will result from this mass nomination, please relist...
Click to read more »WP:CORP. Joseph2302 (talk) 21:03, 1 May 2015 (UTC) Speedy Delete Obvious sock is obvious. Winner 42 Talk to me! 21:18, 1 May 2015 (UTC) Speedy delete as...
Click to read more »something specific in mind, check out their pages and see if there are obvious mistakes or problems. Maybe even do a little research first so you're prepared...
Click to read more »and another source which says all widgets are gadgets. It might seem obvious from this that all ratchets are gadgets, but such a statement would be...
Click to read more »World War I that the industrial revolution's full effect on war became obvious to world. It is for this reason that World War I is also known as the first...
Click to read more »User:Ansarhussain and User:Ramamurty.buddhavarapu, and your recent statement "it is obvious advertising for the website www.midday.com, so it should be blocked indef...
Click to read more »roughly under the "T" of "THE ILLUSTRATED LONDON NEWS" you'll see a very obvious white line that shouldn't be there. I spent hours fixing that in Microsoft...
Click to read more »it's obvious that "Xanthereturns" is an obvious sock puppet. And then "Waveisback" began vandalising the same pages in the same style, so it's obvious that...
Click to read more »further edits should be made to this page. The result was speedy keep. obvious bad faith nomination. DGG ( talk ) 00:16, 12 May 2012 (UTC) AfDs for this...
Click to read more »