Redirect to:
Wikipedia is a free online encyclopedia. The amount of information on Wikipedia is practically unlimited, but Wikipedia does not aim to contain all knowledge...
Click to read more »(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP: NOTJARGON. Unreferenced, evidently self-published (see User talk:Nguyen Si Phuoc)...
Click to read more »Seen On TV. Carrite (talk) 06:23, 3 June 2014 (UTC) Delete - as per WP:NOTJARGON. —Mythdon (talk contribs) 09:55, 3 June 2014 (UTC) Delete. Not seeing...
Click to read more »coverage to show the WP:GNG criteria has been meet and this is borderline WP:NOTJARGON. Mkdwtalk 07:12, 28 January 2013 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »Redirect to Comparison of single-board computers. WP:SPAM (maybe) and WP:NOTJARGON (certainty). Pax 02:07, 25 January 2015 (UTC) Keep. This appears to be...
Click to read more »need it, people who don't understand the jargon can't use it. Per WP:NOTJARGON, the same policy as WP:NOTHOWTO, supported by MOS:JARGON. Anything that's...
Click to read more »(talk) 15:34, 26 August 2020 (UTC) Delete: Article needs WP:TNT to meet WP:NOTJARGON: "Academic language. Texts should be written for everyday readers, not...
Click to read more »also agree that WP:NOTPROMO is being disregarded here, as well as WP:NOTJARGON, as the article is dominated with language used by policy wonks. Spintendo ...
Click to read more »3aye3r/quick_question_what_is_an_intel_confidential_cpu/ Delete as WP:NOTJARGON. How a company that isn't the government classifies its materials is not...
Click to read more »September 2017 (UTC) Delete as not a repository for Half-Life jargon: WP:NOTJARGON AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 03:41, 27 September 2017 (UTC) Delete per nom...
Click to read more »---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 14:33, 23 August 2018 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTJARGON until the variants are notable again to be mentioned. Is this the right...
Click to read more »personal essay for an undergrad sociology course, in blatant violation of WP:NOTJARGON/WP:NOTESSAY, MOS:JARGON, and just the basic principle of encyclopedic...
Click to read more »need it, people who don't understand the jargon can't use it. Per WP:NOTJARGON, the same policy as WP:NOTHOWTO, supported by MOS:JARGON. Anything that's...
Click to read more »with scientific correctness and encyclopedia building. I am aware of WP:NOTJARGON, but one thing is to avoid specific technical knowledge, another is to...
Click to read more »(talk) 15:34, 26 August 2020 (UTC) Delete: Article needs WP:TNT to meet WP:NOTJARGON: "Academic language. Texts should be written for everyday readers, not...
Click to read more »also agree that WP:NOTPROMO is being disregarded here, as well as WP:NOTJARGON, as the article is dominated with language used by policy wonks. Spintendo ...
Click to read more »(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP: NOTJARGON. Unreferenced, evidently self-published (see User talk:Nguyen Si Phuoc)...
Click to read more »Redirect to Comparison of single-board computers. WP:SPAM (maybe) and WP:NOTJARGON (certainty). Pax 02:07, 25 January 2015 (UTC) Keep. This appears to be...
Click to read more »for the sake of argument : ) - Consider WP:RECENTISM, or at least WP:NOTJARGON : ) - jc37 02:16, 9 June 2013 (UTC) Merge - but should be done as a manual...
Click to read more »coverage to show the WP:GNG criteria has been meet and this is borderline WP:NOTJARGON. Mkdwtalk 07:12, 28 January 2013 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »Seen On TV. Carrite (talk) 06:23, 3 June 2014 (UTC) Delete - as per WP:NOTJARGON. —Mythdon (talk contribs) 09:55, 3 June 2014 (UTC) Delete. Not seeing...
Click to read more »understood with those who have advanced knowledge of Hindu astrology, then WP:NOTJARGON also applies. Location (talk) 14:37, 18 August 2014 (UTC) Is there any...
Click to read more »19:59, 6 October 2023 (UTC) There are plenty of guidelines such as WP:NOTJARGON, WP:NOTJOURNAL and MOS:LEAD. The challenge is getting them followed. There...
Click to read more »