Redirect to:
This page is a redirect. The following categories are used to track and monitor this redirect:
|
of information on Wikipedia is practically unlimited, but Wikipedia does not aim to contain all knowledge. What to exclude is determined by an online...
Click to read more »previously defined the threshold for inclusion in Wikipedia as "verifiability, not truth". "Verifiability" was used in this context to mean that material added...
Click to read more »transcluded onto the main RfA page. However, if an RfA application is clearly not going to succeed, it will likely be closed early. If you are reading this...
Click to read more »Wikipedia's markup language and its policies, guidelines, and community standards. Not having a clue is a normal stage in the editor life cycle. We want editors...
Click to read more »Wikipedia is not § NOT PAPERS and Wikipedia:The perfect article). However, there are situations where topics the general audience do not need to know...
Click to read more »Wikipedia is not a dictionary, phrasebook, or a slang, jargon, or usage guide. Instead, the goal of this project is to create an encyclopedia. Our sister...
Click to read more »arise, they are resolved through discussion, debate and collaboration. While not forbidden, polls should be used with care. When polls are used, they should...
Click to read more »like that are often speedily closed and the article kept because that is not a valid criterion; besides, if the article needs to be rewritten, that is...
Click to read more »chosen to contribute to Wikipedia, you need to remember... Wikipedia is not about you. Sure, you see Wikipedia articles on all sorts of individuals,...
Click to read more »Ten things you may not know about Wikipedia is a list of insights about Wikipedia specifically targeted at people who have limited or no prior experience...
Click to read more »believe do qualify to the not original research category of the No original research policy. This page is not policy, and should not be applied as if it were...
Click to read more »am notable". You do not qualify to have an article on Wikipedia simply because you exist. Your dearly departed relatives do not qualify to have an article...
Click to read more »be listed as GAs. Good articles are "satisfactory" or "decent" articles, not great articles. The standards for GAs are fairly high, but noticeably lower...
Click to read more »Wikipedia is not a game of Whac-A-Mole. You don't score points for seeing how many articles facing deletion that pop up daily you can mark down in as...
Click to read more »Do not create hoaxes on Wikipedia. Doing so would damage Wikipedia and your reputation. A hoax is an attempt to trick an audience into believing that...
Click to read more »arguments about things notability is not. If you are new to Wikipedia, you will need to know that "notable" does not simply mean "noteworthy," which is...
Click to read more »One sentence does not an article make. A single sentence cannot impart sufficient information on a reader on a subject in a significant, meaningful way...
Click to read more »is not for things that you and/or your friends made up. If you have invented something in school, the lab, your garage, or the pub, and it has not yet...
Click to read more »requirements, in some cases, in our deletion policy; "notability" in Wikipedia does not equate to just a subjective determination of importance, but is based on...
Click to read more »serious message, but it is also meant to be satirical and humorous. It is not meant to be used intentionally or unintentionally to bite the newbies. If...
Click to read more »redirects here, for whether Crunchbase is reliable or not, see WP:CRUNCHBASE. Wikipedia is not Crunchbase. Getting an article in Wikipedia for yourself...
Click to read more »notability is still usually a process, rarely an event. An encyclopedia should not begin to move at lightning speed to keep up with the rat race. Indeed, as...
Click to read more »Do not insult the vandals. Most "vandals" fall into one of two categories: newbies who do not know any better, and true vandals or trolls. Getting angry...
Click to read more »impossible to manage the flow of articles. The presence of similar articles does not necessarily validate the existence of other articles, and may instead point...
Click to read more »Wikipedians that "Notability is not temporary" and it "does not degrade over time". This may be true, if one assumes that entropy does not exist. For the purposes...
Click to read more »Log yourself out now! This is Wikipedia. You do not have to log in to edit, and almost anyone can edit almost any article at any given time. But be aware...
Click to read more »Wikipedia is not a mirror of public domain or other primary source material. In Wikipedia articles, quotes of any original texts being discussed should...
Click to read more »people seem to believe that there should be a navbox on every page, but not everything truly needs a navbox. Even the most clueless new user can find...
Click to read more »Potential, not just current state relates to the debate on whether articles in the mainspace should be deleted, merged, or kept based on their current...
Click to read more »Wikipedia isn't to be used for spam. However, inappropriate promotion need not be about profit. It may take the form of promoting a charitable, non-profit...
Click to read more »Wikipedia is not therapy. It does not exist for the purpose of letting people practice occupational therapy skills, such as using computers, typing, organizing...
Click to read more »most editors are volunteer editors, and Wikimedia does not hire paid editors, people sometimes do not have the time or energy to check for notability on every...
Click to read more »Wikipedia and its policies and guidelines may be accused of being disloyal or of not working to improve the encyclopedia. In discussions on or about Wikipedia...
Click to read more »Wikipedia. Some things, given some thought, should not be. Some examples of things that should not be surprising: Sometimes people who aren't vandals...
Click to read more »This essay describes what adminship is and isn't. Admins do not have "command authority" in the sense that some imagine. They can draw a line based on...
Click to read more »Wikipedia is not about winning or losing. It is not a battleground/contest/competition, and disputes over content or behavior are not meant to be "won"...
Click to read more »project, most of the time you're not actually required to do anything you don't want to. With rare exceptions, it's not the end of the world. 99.9999999999%...
Click to read more »space (example). New pages created in the user or user talk spaces will not show up in the list that new article patrollers regularly review. Once you've...
Click to read more »known as AfD. The two factions are known as inclusionists and deletionists. Not all agree that these labels are helpful, and indeed many or most participants...
Click to read more »to the event article. If the event is not significant or the individual's role was either not substantial or not well documented. John Hinckley Jr., for...
Click to read more »are useful and necessary, they are created for a specific purpose. Thus, not every subject on Wikipedia needs a template created for it. Articles that...
Click to read more »that this should not be taken to foolish extremes stems from a statement made by Jimmy Wales in March 2005: Our social policies are not a suicide pact....
Click to read more »general and specialized encyclopedias, almanacs, and gazetteers. Wikipedia is not a soapbox, an advertising platform, a social network, a vanity press, an...
Click to read more »response. However, if it does meet notability requirements, the article should not be nominated for deletion. In an average year, countless non-notable events...
Click to read more »generated by IP address editors. While 80% of edits by unregistered users were not vandalism, the fact that the vast majority of vandalism does come from unregistered...
Click to read more »Voting Is Not Evil (VINE) is a counterpoint to the Wikipedia essay "Polling is not a substitute for discussion", or WP:PNSD, a page written from scratch...
Click to read more »the policy in many cases. After all, Wikipedia does not have firm rules. "SYNTH" as a policy is not a re-statement of Wikipedia's policy against original...
Click to read more »verifiable as to its membership in the list. We do not need a list that is meaningless to readers. Do not make lists that have too many listees. For example...
Click to read more »articles, and we can't and shouldn't have that many WikiProjects. There are not that many editors, because of systemic bias, and fragmentation counters organization...
Click to read more »highly unlikely that you live on a Monopoly game board, we suggest that you not even try. Any one of the many regions in the Pokémon video game series or...
Click to read more »Please do not murder the newcomers, no matter how good of a resolution it may seem. Otherwise, there might be a news article titled "man murdered by international...
Click to read more »this argument holds no weight since: It is not supported by any policies, guidelines or precedents; It does not represent a neutral point of view; It demonstrates...
Click to read more »self-evident to a reader in the way an article is written. Pages should not be written so special instructions are needed to know how to read it. The...
Click to read more »reliable sources to support your assertion. do not nominate another article for deletion that you do not really believe ought to be deleted, giving the...
Click to read more »contributors to Wikipedia may have difficulty determining what is and is not routine coverage of people and or events. The guideline WP:ROUTINE is widely...
Click to read more »Shortcuts WP:NOTLEVELWP:NOTLEVEL WP:PLAYINGFIELDWP:PLAYINGFIELD Notability is not a level playing field. This means that in certain areas, the inclusion requirements...
Click to read more »Wikipedia is not a newspaper or online news site. Most newspapers are journals of current news, reporting current events in the world. Some newspaper...
Click to read more »against publication of original research. However, counting and sorting are not original research and therefore can be included in any article where taking...
Click to read more »discouraged – especially for children or underage users. If you are a child, do not post any personally identifiable information about yourself anywhere on Wikipedia...
Click to read more »does not automatically warrant a redlink, or a biographical article for that person. We should not present things in a way that the sources do not. If...
Click to read more »pattern-matching AfD norms to MfD sometimes encounter drafts that, while not eligible for a speedy deletion criterion, would be deleted with prejudice...
Click to read more »redirected category will not show up in the target category. And since redirected categories do not become "red links", editors will not be aware when they...
Click to read more »submitted one and a voter has linked you here. Don't be discouraged to be told "not quite yet"; whoever linked to this essay is telling you that you are doing...
Click to read more »that an article is small or contains very little content and therefore must not be notable. This is a fallacy simply because a short article may be incomplete...
Click to read more »editors in discussions about articles may state that Wikipedia does (or does not) need that article as an argument. This essay supports the idea that "need"...
Click to read more »Wikipedia is not being written in an organized fashion. Thousands of volunteer editors work away on millions of articles, depending on their interests...
Click to read more »Wikipedia is not a crystal ball, nor is it a collection of unverifiable content. It is an encyclopedia that needs to be reliable. If sources do not exist, it...
Click to read more »compromise the integrity of Wikipedia just to get a kick out of it. It does not include misguided or obtuse editors who change a page because they genuinely...
Click to read more »is no exception. This page enumerates user opinions on why Wikipedia is not so great. For formal criticisms, see Criticism of Wikipedia. Much of the...
Click to read more »Do not post legal threats on Wikipedia. A legal threat, in this context, is a threat to engage in an off-wiki ("real life") legal or other governmental...
Click to read more »they frequently miss out one crucial detail: Wikipedia is not and will never be finished. Not even close. In fact, we're just getting started. In its very...
Click to read more »it! Quick, we have to add it to Wikipedia!" Well... hold up. Not so fast. This does not necessarily need to be mentioned on Wikipedia, much less require...
Click to read more »Do not make personal attacks anywhere on Wikipedia. Comment on content, not on the contributor. Personal attacks harm the Wikipedia community and the collaborative...
Click to read more »bigger articles should feel a bit more "mainstream". Note that this guide is not intended to replace Wikipedia's Manual of Style and that articles should...
Click to read more »remember that these sanctions are intended to be significantly preventative, not exclusively punitive. Some editors, even some administrators on Wikipedia...
Click to read more »articles that adequately inform the reader about the subject. Articles should not give our personal recommendation on which wines are superior, what region...
Click to read more »regard to our core content policies of neutral point of view (which does not mean no point of view), verifiability and no original research, is a deliberate...
Click to read more »separate, basic characteristics to identify: Is this source self-published or not? (If so, then see Wikipedia:Identifying and using self-published sources...
Click to read more »we are all unique individuals and that we matter, is that the wiki does not need you—especially if you're high-maintenance. It likes you, it appreciates...
Click to read more »dealing with such individuals to "call a spade a spade". However, doing so is not a necessary part of dealing effectively with them, and it can be a very bad...
Click to read more »arguments covered are those that are irrelevant or at best side issues, do not address the merits of the reason to keep or delete, are based on anecdote...
Click to read more »going to be valuable in dealing with vandalism, so this is not about pretending vandalism does not exist. Instead, information on vandalism should be critically...
Click to read more »number of widely respected older paper books may not show up on a Google search. But no Google hits does not mean that this theory is non-notable or a hoax...
Click to read more »Shortcut WP:WORLDWP:WORLD Wikipedia is not a forum or a soapbox. Editors should remember that their egos are not on the line while they are here at Wikipedia...
Click to read more »subject-specific notability guideline (SNG); and It is not excluded under the What Wikipedia is not policy. This is not a guarantee that a topic will necessarily be...
Click to read more »but all united by a willingness to help. Even the best articles should not be considered complete, as each new editor can offer new insights on how...
Click to read more »If a policy violation is not clear-cut, an amicable resolution to the problem is going to require a human explanation, not an automated template. However...
Click to read more »Wikipedia is not an acceptable source for citations elsewhere on Wikipedia. As a user-generated source, it can be edited by anyone at any time, and any...
Click to read more »Not The Wikipedia Weekly/Episode 02 Not The Wikipedia Weekly/Episode 03 Not The Wikipedia Weekly/Episode 04 Not The Wikipedia Weekly/Episode 05 Not The...
Click to read more »etc.) is deleted (or not accepted for publication from a draft), various policies and guidelines such as "What Wikipedia is not", notability, verifiability...
Click to read more »editing, not neutral content. It means "neutrally reflecting what the sources say. It does not mean that the article has to be 'neutral'." We do not document...
Click to read more »"Wiki" is usually not a proper name and, when it is, it does not refer to Wikipedia. Please understand that "wiki" is a generic term that describes a type...
Click to read more »optional strategies that editors may use to seek consensus. This process is not mandated by Wikipedia policy, except in the case of enforced BRD, but it...
Click to read more »promotional material is added in a good-faith effort to improve Wikipedia, it is not appropriate for an encyclopedia article. External link spamming: Sometimes...
Click to read more »upon an editor who will argue that Wikipedia cannot claim that the Earth is not flat. But you may indeed encounter some who will strenuously maintain that...
Click to read more »WP:MEDICALWP:MEDICAL WP:NOMEDICALWP:NOMEDICAL WP:NOMEDWP:NOMED WIKIPEDIA DOES NOT GIVE MEDICAL ADVICE Wikipedia contains articles on many medical topics; however...
Click to read more »Wikipedia is not working to a deadline, though it is not an excuse for complacency. There are various points of view on what this lack of a deadline means...
Click to read more »Shortcut WP:FIRE-NOTWP:FIRE-NOT Do not include the following on a page for a fire department (Remember that Wikipedia is not a stats book nor is it a memorial):...
Click to read more »from that viewpoint are consequently objectively true. That is not the policy, and it is not our aim! Rather, to be neutral is to describe debates rather...
Click to read more »"third party". "Secondary" does not necessarily mean "independent" or "uninvolved". Most independent sources are not secondary sources. Primary source...
Click to read more »stay that way forever? Fact is, on Wikipedia, nothing is in stone. Not once. Not ever. See this sentence? It can be deleted any time by any Wikipedian...
Click to read more »zeal to head off others' unwise actions, we may put forth ideas they have not entertained before. As the popular saying goes, "don't give 'em any ideas"...
Click to read more »WikiLeaks is not affiliated with Wikipedia or the Wikimedia Foundation in any way whatsoever. "Wiki" is a generic word that anyone can use; it is not a brand...
Click to read more »"It is not a hoax. There is plenty of proof that it exists. It had its picture in three local websites. Therefore, we should have an article about it...
Click to read more »outcome (including an outcome that editors do not agree) clear. If the matter under discussion is not contentious and the consensus is obvious to the...
Click to read more »supports the material. Any material that needs an inline citation but does not have one may be removed. Please immediately remove contentious material about...
Click to read more »"cruft" in itself is not a rational argument for deletion, vast amounts of specific information on topics of little notability are not acceptable for Wikipedia...
Click to read more »from editing. Wikipedia must never be misused to harass anyone, whether or not the subject of the harassment is an editor here. Edits constituting harassment...
Click to read more »When writing about women on Wikipedia, ensure articles do not use sexist language, perpetuate sexist stereotypes, or otherwise demonstrate prejudice against...
Click to read more »the articles students plan to work on, including planned articles that do not yet exist links to any draft versions, such as pages in a user sandbox It...
Click to read more »covered (). If no reliable sources can be found on a topic, Wikipedia should not have an article on it. This guideline discusses the reliability of various...
Click to read more »from a revision of this page dated 25 September 2011 (2011-09-25), and does not reflect subsequent edits. (Audio help · More spoken articles) Wikipedia:Be...
Click to read more »opinion, followed by your signature. For instance: [[Wikipedia:Consensus not numbers]]: I think Martin has a good point here, but overall I'd be inclined...
Click to read more »to discuss issues when needed. If you are trying to improve content (and not simply reverting vandalism) and someone reverts you, and if you want to restore...
Click to read more »space for editors to discuss editing that page. Article talk pages should not be used by editors as platforms for their personal views on a subject. While...
Click to read more »understanding of the topic at hand. Whenever writing or editing an article, consider not only what to put in the article, but also what links to include to help the...
Click to read more »Take a look at this. This is not meant to single any one user out, but this edit revert was not necessary. This was probably reverted because the editor...
Click to read more »is not interesting. For the sake of completeness, however, it is accepted that every integer between −1 and 101 has its own article even if it is not as...
Click to read more »is not always vandalism, though vandalism is always disruptive. Each case should be treated independently, taking into consideration whether or not the...
Click to read more »opinions or advice, not admonishment. They should not be used as an end-run around the Wikipedia process of establishing consensus. It is not a good idea to...
Click to read more »serviceable computer, and people who do not have free time to edit the encyclopedia. Topics for which reliable sources are not recently published, easily available...
Click to read more »person's life. "Notable" in the sense of being famous or popular—although not irrelevant—is secondary. This notability guideline for biographies reflects...
Click to read more »signatures in a disruptive manner may result in user blocks. Signatures should not be used in main namespace pages (i.e., Wikipedia articles), as the content...
Click to read more »unrealistic. Therefore, this essay gives some practical advice. Not citing common knowledge and not providing bibliographic entries for very famous works is...
Click to read more »will not take sides and will report both the good and the bad about you from verifiable and reliable sources. It will not promote you. It will not right...
Click to read more »desire to get articles or other materials on Wikipedia deleted. This essay is not in total opposition to deletion. There are some materials that do need to...
Click to read more »Some page names are not possible because of limitations imposed by the MediaWiki software. In some cases (such as names which should begin with a lowercase...
Click to read more »conventions, on which choices of article titles are based. This page does not detail titling for pages in other namespaces, such as categories. It is supplemented...
Click to read more »is not determinative. Being the original source of the name is also not determinative. Boston, Massachusetts, is the primary topic for Boston, not the...
Click to read more »about that here. Do not feel upset if your bold edit gets changed or reverted. Of course, others here will edit what you write. Do not take it personally...
Click to read more »categorization is primarily used to navigate between similar articles. Categories do not have a references section. Albert Einstein is a notable individual for many...
Click to read more »separate, basic characteristics to identify: Is the source self-published or not? Is the source independent or third-party, or is it closely affiliated with...
Click to read more »the world! Use of the word "hardcore": All garage bands, even if they are not "hardcore", seem to love to describe themselves as such. Use of nicknames:...
Click to read more »places, but not all. For example, in the attached screenshot from Template:Did you know nominations/Abdul El-Sayed, their username is not struck, but...
Click to read more »prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia. Blocks are lifted if they are not (or no longer) necessary to prevent such damage or disruption. You, as a...
Click to read more »draft via Article wizard or request an article at requested articles. Do not provide your email address or other contact details. Answers will be provided...
Click to read more »Wikipedia is not a "forum". It does not have "moderators", but it does have administrators. Wikipedia is not the chat page of the web site of an interest...
Click to read more »WP:BUTWP:BUT This page lists articles that exist in many other languages but not on English Wikipedia. Articles contained in many other languages of Wikipedia...
Click to read more »The following editors were nominated for bureaucrat status but did not succeed: 172, 9 October 2004 – withdrawn by candidate (9/14/3) 1ne, 26 November...
Click to read more »to help readers locate a different article if the one they are seeing is not the one they are looking for. Readers may have arrived at the article containing...
Click to read more »Wikipedia articles must not contain original research. On Wikipedia, original research means material—such as facts, allegations, and ideas—for which...
Click to read more »Assuming good faith (AGF) means assuming that people are not deliberately trying to hurt Wikipedia, even when their actions are harmful. This is a fundamental...
Click to read more »WP:LDWP:LD WP:IANALWP:IANAL WP:DNGLAWP:DNGLA WP:NOLEGALWP:NOLEGAL WIKIPEDIA DOES NOT GIVE LEGAL OPINIONS Wikipedia contains articles on many legal topics; however...
Click to read more »under the MoS, one should be used consistently within an article and should not be changed without good reason. Edit warring over stylistic choices is unacceptable...
Click to read more »images (including photographs). They may or may not already be posted on some other website. They may or may not actually be appropriate for inclusion in Wikipedia...
Click to read more »particular statement is not supported, and even doubted by some, many readers don't fully understand the community's processes. Not all tags get addressed...
Click to read more »From WP:NOT § INTERNET: Internet guides. Wikipedia articles should not exist only to describe the nature, appearance or services a website offers, but...
Click to read more »pages of the English Wikipedia. It does not cover other editions of Wikipedia. Wikipedia is operated by the not-for-profit Wikimedia Foundation, which...
Click to read more »Delete Does not meet WP:ATHLETE. There are several faults with this statement, first and foremost is that WP:ATHLETE is a guideline and not a policy, secondly...
Click to read more »talk page. Blocks are used to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, not to punish users (see § Purpose and goals). Any user may report disruption...
Click to read more »editors should assume that others are trying to help, not hurt the project. The guideline does not require that editors continue to assume good faith in...
Click to read more »is not for requesting translations of copyrighted sources outside Wikipedia. It is also not for articles currently in English Wikipedia that are not in...
Click to read more »originally posted the material. Such materials (pages) are moved because they are not ready to be seen by the public (articles), used on other pages (templates)...
Click to read more »achieve the Five Pillars—Wikipedia's goals. Consensus on Wikipedia does not require unanimity (which is ideal but rarely achievable), nor is it the result...
Click to read more »for-profit educational institutions or organizations, etc. This guideline does not cover small groups of closely related people such as families, entertainment...
Click to read more »on the move discussion and the subsequent results of the move discussion, not on the person who closed the discussion. If you have ongoing concerns about...
Click to read more »articles should not present new theories, ideas, data, or analysis. What Wikipedia is not – Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, but it is not a paper encyclopedia...
Click to read more »particular viewpoint. The advice in this guideline is not limited to the examples provided and should not be applied rigidly. If a word can be replaced by...
Click to read more »justifiable. Claiming "My edits were right, so it wasn't edit warring" is not a valid defense. There is a bright line known as the three-revert rule (3RR)...
Click to read more »was removed, and what you can do about a deletion you disagree with. Do not despair: none of the information on a "deleted" page has actually been lost...
Click to read more »current process established, in December 2013. Anyone, including users who are not logged in, can create and edit drafts. Drafts have "Draft:" before their...
Click to read more »if an article is speedily deleted for the wrong reason (the reason was not within the criteria for speedy deletion), but the article has no chance of...
Click to read more »purposes of promotion or showcasing their favored point of view, which is not allowed. Wikipedia's Arbitration Committee has determined that "single purpose...
Click to read more »ludicrous or damaging to the project. Challenges should not be frivolous: Challenges should not be made frivolously or casually, and should never be made...
Click to read more »to the site, but this is the "encyclopedia that anyone can edit": it is not perfect yet! Thousands of articles need simple improvements you can make...
Click to read more »satisfy the notability guidelines is not a criterion for speedy deletion. An article on an artist or band that does not indicate that the subject of the article...
Click to read more »Avoid collections of miscellaneous facts or examples, since Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. Whether presented in list format...
Click to read more »{{subst:uw-userpage}} when immediate action is not otherwise necessary. Your in this context means associated with you, not belonging to you. User page Your user...
Click to read more »deletion discussions (e.g., "it's not important"), then it should only be proposed for merging or redirecting as it is not a candidate for deletion If the...
Click to read more »have comments about a specific article, use that article's talk page. Do not provide your email address or any other contact information. Answers will...
Click to read more »maintained even if they are not immediately used to illustrate articles. Wikipedia, by contrast, is not a file host and therefore does not permit unused files...
Click to read more »material is attributable to a reliable published source, not whether it is true. Wikipedia is not the place to publish your opinions, experiences, or arguments...
Click to read more »page that transcludes a template, they only see the {{Template call}} and not the underlying code. This procedure is used for most templates to avoid having...
Click to read more »a high-quality encyclopedia in a spirit of mutual respect. Wikipedia is not, however, a social networking site. Social networking sites are places where...
Click to read more »accusations of plagiarism because we must stick closely to sources, but not too closely. Because plagiarism can occur without an intention to deceive...
Click to read more »candidate and deter them from further productive contributions. This is clearly not in the best interests of Wikipedia. Any candidate who sees that their BRFA...
Click to read more »disrupt the encyclopedia while trying to help it. In such cases, they may not have been able to anticipate a potential for their edits to be disruptive...
Click to read more »not be cited as being from the album Hurts to be Human, or an X (formerly Twitter) user named "i😍dogs" should not be cited as "i[love]dogs". Do not use...
Click to read more »World Nine-ball Champions. Shortcut MOS:NOICONSMOS:NOICONS Icons should not be used in prose in the article body, as in "Jackson moved to Bristol, England...
Click to read more »problem and to gather keywords, references and bibliographical pointers, but not as a source in itself. Remember that Wikipedia is a wiki. Anyone in the world...
Click to read more »additional criteria for use in deciding whether a book should or should not have an article on Wikipedia. Satisfying this notability guideline generally...
Click to read more »experience with media files may be taken into account. The user right is not normally given to brand-new editors, regardless of the number of files uploaded...
Click to read more »editing is a pattern of editing that is partisan, biased, skewed, and does not maintain an editorially neutral point of view. It may also involve repeated...
Click to read more »styles, choose one and use it consistently throughout an article, and do not unreasonably alter a choice that has already been made. The MoS has too many...
Click to read more »it is impossible to accurately copy-edit the text. The following should not be speedily deleted as patent nonsense (though some might meet other speedy-deletion...
Click to read more »admin directly Still not sure what to do? Seek advice at the Teahouse Be brief and include diffs demonstrating the problem Do not report breaches of personal...
Click to read more »Noticeboards should not be a substitute for talk pages. Editors are expected to have had extensive discussion on a talk page (not just through edit summaries)...
Click to read more »may be compared and judged to be a good article (GA). A good article does not have to meet the more demanding featured article criteria. The six good article...
Click to read more »students: Wikipedia's users, editors, volunteers and administrators will not do your schoolwork or homework for you. Your teacher or professor assigned...
Click to read more »should not provide step-by-step directions, patient instructions, disclaimers or warnings. Wikipedia is not an instruction manual and does not give medical...
Click to read more »you with complete, accurate, or reliable information. That is not to say that you will not find valuable and accurate information in Wikipedia; much of...
Click to read more »about real-world subjects, not creating a fantasy world. Editors are not characters in a game; they are real people. You should not be here to gain experience...
Click to read more »information on retitling files, categories, and other items, see § When not to use this page. Before moving a page or requesting a move, please review...
Click to read more »people find the documentation that will guide them to participate more. I'm not good at composition. I've been reading and editing Wikipedia for a long time...
Click to read more »editorial bias. Wikipedia aims to describe disputes, but not engage in them. The aim is to inform, not influence. Editors, while naturally having their own...
Click to read more »offers advice on applying the non-free content criteria to logos. It does not replace the policy, which is fully applicable to logos. Company logos may...
Click to read more »adding information about living persons to any Wikipedia page, including but not limited to articles, talk pages, project pages, and drafts. Such material...
Click to read more »single citation; it is not appropriate to accumulate a list of "synonyms" from multiple sources, since the separate sources may not be compatible with one...
Click to read more »rationale. The examples below are generic and meant for reference, and are not meant to be copied verbatim to fair use media pages. === Fair use in [[ARTICLE...
Click to read more »expanded articles that are selected through an informal review process. It is not a general trivia section. The choice of articles is subject to a set of criteria...
Click to read more »reliable secondary sources may itself be an indication of significance, not including any sources is entirely irrelevant to an assessment under these...
Click to read more »first, and only post here if that discussion requires additional input. Do not copy and paste defamatory material here; instead, link to a diff showing...
Click to read more »same words coming verbally from a person standing in front of you. Irony is not always obvious when written. Remember that text comes without facial expressions...
Click to read more »are unsuitable. Important note: just because you did not have to pay money for the image does not mean that it is "free content" or acceptable for use...
Click to read more »ratings are primarily intended for the internal use of the project, and do not necessarily imply any official standing within Wikipedia as a whole. 2. How...
Click to read more »An article striving for perfection... Is on a notable topic. Fills a gap not provided by existing or related articles. Has an appropriate structure. Has...
Click to read more »in-depth arguments on when it is appropriate to use a source. The list is not an independent document; it is derived from the conclusions of the referenced...
Click to read more »projects. Username changes are handled by global renamers and stewards, not by local administrators or bureaucrats, and are governed by the global rename...
Click to read more »Do not place requests with insufficient sources in hopes for more sources to be found later. If a topic does not have enough right now, it should not be...
Click to read more »on Wikipedia for each of these systems. Accordingly, these methods should not be considered in conflict with each other. Rather, they are synergistic,...
Click to read more »subsections, whether the term appears in the lead or not . This is not a requirement: for instance, it will not be desirable in a case where a large number of...
Click to read more »not edit articles that are closely related to you, such as your school's article, or any articles related to your location and where you live. Do not...
Click to read more »subject, or affiliated with the subject. Not their website, not a press release, not an interview. We're not interested in what the subject has to say...
Click to read more »the ground" (also paraphrased as "I wouldn't know him from Adam"). This is not a judgment on the quality of the individual themself. They may be a worthy...
Click to read more »website, not the subject's social media, not interviews (with the person, or of an organization's employees, officers or other insiders), and not press releases...
Click to read more »every reader should know. Significant information should not appear in the lead if it is not covered in the remainder of the article; the article should...
Click to read more »links, links to web pages outside Wikipedia. External links normally should not be placed in the body of an article. All external links must conform to certain...
Click to read more »will then be attributed to the chosen username (contributions made while not logged in to any account are attributed to a temporary account with an automatically...
Click to read more »separate, basic characteristics to identify: Is this source self-published or not? (For this question, see Wikipedia:Identifying and using self-published sources...
Click to read more »item that does not stand out from the rest. Something or someone that is "run-of-the-mill" is probably not notable, so it would be best not to create a separate...
Click to read more »copyrighted, you must cite the source to avoid plagiarism. Generally no, do not copy text from other sources. This usually is both a copyright violation...
Click to read more »Obsolete – The file has been replaced by a better version. Orphan – The file is not used on any pages in Wikipedia. Unencyclopedic – The file doesn't seem likely...
Click to read more »resorting to inappropriate conduct of their own. Wikipedia is not a battleground: Wikipedia is not a place to hold grudges or insult, harass, or intimidate...
Click to read more »acceptable, utilising them in a disruptive, misleading, or unhelpful manner is not. As a rule of thumb, if you suspect the use of multiple accounts or IPs in...
Click to read more »innocuous intentions will not usually serve as an excuse. Shortcuts WP:ILLEGITWP:ILLEGIT WP:BADSOCKWP:BADSOCK Editors must not use alternative accounts...
Click to read more »No. Anyone of any age may edit articles or register. Wikipedia does not even require that users disclose their age when registering! Note that users...
Click to read more »Creating a Wikipedia account is easy, fast, and free of charge. You are not required to create or use an account to read, edit, or contribute to Wikipedia...
Click to read more »be reached via http://enwp.org/WP:ICT/FL when forwarding the full URL is not convenient. If an image is available under one of these licenses, it is acceptable...
Click to read more »community review process or being elected by their fellow editors. They do not act as employees of the Wikimedia Foundation. They are never required to...
Click to read more »WP:PLOTSUMNOTWP:PLOTSUMNOT A plot summary is not a recap. It should not cover every scene or every moment of a story. A summary is not meant to reproduce the experience...
Click to read more »general and specialized encyclopedias, almanacs, and gazetteers. Wikipedia is not a soapbox, an advertising platform, a social network, a vanity press, an...
Click to read more »MOS:IBPMOS:IBP The purpose of an infobox is to summarize, but not supplant, the key facts that appear in an article. Barring the specific exceptions...
Click to read more »clearly established pattern of similar subtypes exists. The proposed topic may not be controversial in scope. List speedy creation proposals in the same proposal...
Click to read more »care not to speedily delete pages or media except in the most obvious cases. If a page has survived its most recent deletion discussion, it should not be...
Click to read more »easily on https://worldcat.org (WorldCat). If the Wikipedia author does not do this, readers are left to fend for themselves. The section is one of the...
Click to read more »must provide this evidence in a clear way. Vaguely worded submissions will not be investigated. You need to actually show why your suspicion that the accounts...
Click to read more »review may not be needed. Such discussion also gives the closer the opportunity to clarify the reasoning behind a decision. Check that it is not on the list...
Click to read more »some commonly nominated subjects. This page is not a policy or guideline, and previous outcomes do not bind future ones. The community's actual notability...
Click to read more »may close a discussion. For practical purposes, non-administrators should not take formal action in discussions whose outcome would require the use of...
Click to read more »an article have copyright violations (copyvio), and speedy deletion does not apply. The removal of copyrighted content has been contested. Removal or...
Click to read more »plagiarism within articles relying on a single source, the one source tag should not be removed until multiple sources are utilized to verify content in the article...
Click to read more »To use copyrighted material on Wikipedia, it is not enough that we have permission to use it on Wikipedia alone. That's because Wikipedia itself states...
Click to read more »do not list it here. Turning redirects into articles is wholly encouraged. Be bold! If you want to move a page but a redirect is in the way, do not list...
Click to read more »might make things worse, consider not doing it. Do not take it too seriously. Remember that Wikipedia is a hobby and not an obligation or commitment. Keep...
Click to read more »Wikipedia articles have been documented below for your convenience. However, not all errors are covered here. Keep in mind that newcomers to Wikipedia may...
Click to read more »to do otherwise. The Arbitration Committee has ruled that editors should not change an article from one guideline-defined style to another without a substantial...
Click to read more »guideline to the articles this project covers, not a replacement of said guideline. Hence, the advice is not intended to lend additional support to deletion...
Click to read more »United States fair use law in terms of what is and is not allowed. Note: Non-free media files that do not include both a copyright tag and a use rationale...
Click to read more »of previous Arbitration decisions or discretionary sanctions, please do not open a new Arbitration case. Instead, please submit your request to /Requests/Enforcement...
Click to read more »trying to shut down someone else's RfC? "RFCBEFORE" is good advice, but it's not required. RfCs are time-consuming, and Wikipedia being a volunteer project...
Click to read more »and broader participation. If you wish to propose something new that is not a policy or guideline, use Village pump (proposals). Alternatively, for drafting...
Click to read more »that a person or organization, does not own the article or have any right to dictate what the article may or may not say. No one, whether a subject or an...
Click to read more »(The prefix search parameter does not find redirects.) Only the "Search" report is not case sensitive. (Prefix is not case sensitive, PrefixIndex is.)...
Click to read more »located at the beginning of the article, before the first heading. It is not a news-style lead or "lede" paragraph. The typical Wikipedia visit is a few...
Click to read more »permitted by our licenses. The goal of Wikipedia is to create an encyclopedia, not merely to perpetuate itself, so the articles produced should be useful, even...
Click to read more »consistent template. Do not rely solely on navboxes for links to articles highly relevant to a particular article. Navboxes are not displayed on the mobile...
Click to read more »these requirements. Wikipedia is not and must not become the validating source for non-significant subjects, and it is not a forum for original research...
Click to read more »established magazine to warrant an article on Wikipedia, as it usually will not have had time to become influential. Writing an article about a magazine...
Click to read more »make your request, please take the following steps: Make sure that it does not fall under the scope of one of the WikiProjects listed in the violet box...
Click to read more »don't-give-a-shitism ("DGASism"), is an ism concerned mainly with not giving a fuck. This is not a joke; it's as serious an endeavor as anything else. The motto...
Click to read more »WP:RMCOIWP:RMCOI An involved editor, whether an administrator or otherwise, may not close a move request (with certain exceptions, detailed below). These criteria...
Click to read more »guideline reflects consensus about the notability of academics (people, not academic subjects) as measured by their academic achievements. An academic...
Click to read more »bureaucratic and counter to the open and transparent spirit of a wiki; Wikipedia is not a bureaucracy. Esperanza was first nominated for deletion in November 2006...
Click to read more »disambiguation pages are kept in the Article namespace (mainspace), they are not articles; rather, they are aids in searching for articles. There are standards...
Click to read more »of or topics within Wikipedia, a user category should not exist for it and the userbox should not be used for categorisation. Users of the userbox can...
Click to read more »action such as moving or keeping), or the nomination is obviously generated (not merely refined) by a large language model or similar AI technology. However:...
Click to read more »be reached via http://enwp.org/WP:ICT/FL when forwarding the full URL is not convenient. If an image is available under one of these licenses, it is acceptable...
Click to read more »outright forbid content which is not sufficiently unrestricted for reuse. However, non-copyright related restrictions are not considered relevant to Wikipedia's...
Click to read more »such cases. When an independent clause ends with a dash or semicolon, do not capitalize the following word, even if it begins a new independent clause...
Click to read more »not meant to be a put-down: from what I know, WP:VNOT necessitates consensus but not necessarily "sources need to be this type", and WP:DUE does not necessitate...
Click to read more »as station but it links to the Wikipedia article about train stations. Do not confuse piped links and redirects: they are two very different mechanisms...
Click to read more »Wikipedia is not The manual of style for writing about fiction For starters, the main work must be notable to begin with. If the work itself is not notable...
Click to read more »as being the subject of significant treatment in reliable sources, does not and cannot degrade over time, but can only remain steady or increase. It...
Click to read more »these mirrors and forks on Wikipedia Copies of Wikipedia are not reliable sources and not acceptable external links in articles per the verifiability policy...
Click to read more »However, it is not always easy to convert raster images like GIFs, PNGs, or JPEGs to SVG, and some images (especially photos) are not conducive to this...
Click to read more »on the internet as it is not an entity. International treaties, like the Berne Convention, are not self-executing and do not supersede local law. There...
Click to read more »This guideline is used to help evaluate whether or not a sports person or sports league/organization (amateur or professional) is likely to meet the general...
Click to read more »of instructions should only be used if something on the Commons site does not suit you. Many people give Wikipedia permission to reuse their content (text...
Click to read more »publisher are not directly associated with the topic. Authors should not include members of the production, and publishers should not include the studio...
Click to read more »are usually not removed, and user talk pages are usually not deleted. Courtesy vanishing is discretionary and may be refused. It is not intended as a...
Click to read more »Assessment Criteria below. Often when articles are first tagged they will not be assessed on these qualities, but they will automatically be added to the...
Click to read more »are independent of the subject") and its relationship to WP:NOT § NEWS (i.e. Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of news material). By attempting...
Click to read more »no information regarding the substantive reason for your reversion and is not supported by either general or Wikipedia space policy. Consider these alternatives...
Click to read more »of several editors can generally be relied upon, answers are not policy. This page is not a forum for general discussions unrelated to the reliability...
Click to read more »link (which is styled like this) signifies that the linked-to page does not exist. Either it never existed or it did previously exist but has been deleted...
Click to read more »grading scheme v t e The criteria used for rating article importance are not meant to be an absolute or canonical view of how significant the topic is...
Click to read more »reverse some of a previous edit. However, this is not the way the community defines reversion, because it is not consistent with either the principle of collaborative...
Click to read more »affecting a subject, whether controversial or not, should be kept in historical perspective. What is most recent is not necessarily what is most noteworthy: new...
Click to read more »and they are well aware of that and simply do not care to understand that this is applicable EVERYWHERE, not just on the article in question, and continue...
Click to read more »of the title. Either way, the existence of a "hook" in a given article is not a good reason to "hang" irrelevant, undue or biased material there. A coatrack...
Click to read more »something can be identified by its habitual characteristics. The duck test does not apply to non-obvious cases. Unless there is evidence which proves otherwise...
Click to read more »for Quarry tool. When you visit the tool page, if the data displayed is not latest, please fork the script and run. Top editors of previous week...
Click to read more »WikiProject, not to the entire world! If your article is graded as a "low" (nor "No-") importance, it does not mean your article does not matter, it means...
Click to read more »"alphabet soup" such as WP:V, WP:OR, WP:NPOV, WP:RS, WP:THIS, and WP:THAT (not to mention over 1600 like this one). However, if you start out by following...
Click to read more »wiki-wide implications (e.g. any change to our policies or guidelines). Do not list discussions where the consensus is obvious. In discussions where consensus...
Click to read more »work, also trying to find photos I can use, as photos of the building are not in the Creative Commons due to French law. Greenroof1234 (talk) 10:44, 26...
Click to read more »protected template on the Main Page (see past items in the ITN archives). Do not report errors in ITN items that are already on the Main Page here – discuss...
Click to read more »Wikipedians, with regards to our work as a dedicated WikiProject. The project is not a Task force under WikiProject Film, but a WikiProject in its own right,...
Click to read more »and back up facts with wikilinks and links to sources. Do not edit others' comments and do not give any medical or legal advice. See also: Teahouse Help...
Click to read more »Adding an AfD to this page does not add it to the main page at WP:AFD. Similarly, removing an AfD from this page does not remove it from the main page at...
Click to read more »Adding an AfD to this page does not add it to the main page at WP:AFD. Similarly, removing an AfD from this page does not remove it from the main page at...
Click to read more »material that belongs in the article, and thus also determines what does not belong (i.e., what is "out of scope"). The lead, ideally the introductory...
Click to read more »threads in which the stalker is not directly involved. Talk page stalkers often make very constructive commentary, and should not be confused with Wikihounders...
Click to read more »no longer not do informal mediation if it did exist, but instead has not chosen to go on to not do other (heh, heh, heh) things which are not more important...
Click to read more »breaking news sources. Impassioned discussions on talk pages that debate not just the notability of the recent event ("Is this topic of lasting importance...
Click to read more »be regarded as uncivil. As with most of the issues of what Wikipedia is not within Wikipedia itself, there is no firm policy on the inclusion of obscure...
Click to read more »Not done GA: Done B: Not done C: Not done Start: In-progress Stub: Not done Start class countries assessed: Artsakh Start-class assessment not started...
Click to read more »Reasons you may be on this list: You have not made regular contributions to articles in this wikiproject. You have not been active on Wikipedia for a period...
Click to read more »edit Shortcuts WP:SPIDWP:SPID WP:SpidersWP:Spiders "Not long ago the spiders were the most neglected of the most interesting animals..." — Theodore Horace...
Click to read more »opinion of the person who added this link, the article in question does not conform to Wikipedia:Neutral point of view. Drive-by tagging is discouraged...
Click to read more »or just want to give some advice about the translation in progress. Do not forget to watch this page]. In particular, you can use {{Doubt | original...
Click to read more »Requests that do not follow the instructions at the top of the page will be moved here. Common reasons for noncompliance include: Did not cite a code letter...
Click to read more »material that may offend. Wikipedia is not censored. However, offensive words and offensive images should not be included unless they are treated in an...
Click to read more »and back up facts with wikilinks and links to sources. Do not edit others' comments and do not give any medical or legal advice. See also: Teahouse Help...
Click to read more »acceptable. Users with this right have no additional technical abilities; it does not change how an editor creates articles, nor does it change or "enhance" any...
Click to read more »Wikimedia Foundation currently does not consider this page to be a communication venue. Discussions of proposals which do not require significant foundation...
Click to read more »templates, files etc.) are counted. Some types of edits, such as page moves, are not captured by the counting method employed to compile this list, so there may...
Click to read more »or just want to give some advice about the translation in progress. Do not forget to watch this page]. In particular, you can use {{Doubt | original...
Click to read more »or just want to give some advice about the translation in progress. Do not forget to watch this page]. In particular, you can use {{Doubt | original...
Click to read more »or just want to give some advice about the translation in progress. Do not forget to watch this page]. In particular, you can use {{Doubt | original...
Click to read more »aid or comment on the encyclopedia but not on any unrelated causes. Essays have no official status and do not speak for the Wikipedia community because...
Click to read more »eye with apparent promises to contain a reductive summary of information; not all information can be so neatly contained. Like a bulleted list, or a timeline...
Click to read more »or just want to give some advice about the translation in progress. Do not forget to watch this page]. In particular, you can use {{Doubt | original...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard) for evaluation. Mediation equally is not suited to parties who are disagreeing "for the sake of disagreeing" or who...
Click to read more »essay. Editing. Do not make substantive additions to a policy or guideline unless the addition solves a real and significant problem, not just a hypothetical...
Click to read more »and back up facts with wikilinks and links to sources. Do not edit others' comments and do not give any medical or legal advice. See also: Teahouse Help...
Click to read more »If you do not want to receive automated messages from HostBot, please add your name to the list below by signing with four tildes. <!-- sign '~~~~' here...
Click to read more »or categorisation, and these edits are not transferred over by the primary content author, a history merge is not needed. Place {{History merge|NAME OF...
Click to read more »bot tasks, to get early feedback on ideas for bot tasks (controversial or not), and to seek bot operators for bot tasks. Consensus-building discussions...
Click to read more »practices that may win a court case, but are likely not helpful for resolving disputes on Wikipedia, which is not a bureaucracy. As another example, the three-revert...
Click to read more »pages for the purpose of advertising, spam, and promotion. These creations not only degrade the quality of the encyclopedia, but are fundamentally against...
Click to read more »pages for ease of navigation, and correlating similar information. However, not every verifiable fact (or the intersection of two or more such facts) in...
Click to read more »edits. To do that we post a welcome message on their talk pages (if they do not have a talk page yet, create one for them!). It is best to post a personalized...
Click to read more »Adding an AfD to this page does not add it to the main page at WP:AFD. Similarly, removing an AfD from this page does not remove it from the main page at...
Click to read more »(t · c); see discussion 30 Jun 2026 – Correlation does not (talk · edit · hist) →Correlation does not imply causation was RfDed by Jruderman (t · c); see...
Click to read more »circumstances. If you are discussing another editor on a talk page, it makes sense not to do so behind that editor's back. When you nominate a page for deletion...
Click to read more »essays, provided that they do not hold them out as general consensus or policy. The value of essays – how essays are not policies or guidelines. However...
Click to read more »same essential information as the image. In situations where the image is not available to the reader, perhaps because they have turned off images in their...
Click to read more »2022 (UTC) Case amended by remedy on 00:54, 19 July 2025 (UTC) Please do not edit this page directly unless you wish to become a participant in this request...
Click to read more »Adding an AfD to this page does not add it to the main page at WP:AFD. Similarly, removing an AfD from this page does not remove it from the main page at...
Click to read more »content that is the sole creation of the contributor. Additional licenses are not required or suggested by Wikipedia, but some users—for a variety of ideological...
Click to read more »example: Polio not Poliomyelitis Smallpox not Variola Major Sometimes exceptions need to be made, usually when newly discovered viruses do not yet have a...
Click to read more »Adding an AfD to this page does not add it to the main page at WP:AFD. Similarly, removing an AfD from this page does not remove it from the main page at...
Click to read more »one or more of the criteria listed in the protection policy. Reviewers do not take responsibility for the correctness of edits they accept. A reviewer...
Click to read more »provide a basis for a uniform presentation of road junction information, not all information is applicable to all roads in all regions. Thus, certain...
Click to read more »You are not irreplaceable is an important concept to remember in a worldwide collaborative project like Wikipedia. There is no editor who is indispensable...
Click to read more »interpretations, or opinions do not belong here. Wikipedia is not a soapbox, not an advertising platform, not a vanity press, not a blog, not an experiment in anarchy...
Click to read more »This means: Neutral Wikipedia does not judge or advocate specific views or opinions, or make determinations on "correctness". Where differing views exist...
Click to read more »Adding an AfD to this page does not add it to the main page at WP:AFD. Similarly, removing an AfD from this page does not remove it from the main page at...
Click to read more »just don't like it, its inverse, I just like it, and their variants, are not arguments to use in talk page discussions. In their book, Business Negotiation...
Click to read more »independent, reliable sources are styled that way in Wikipedia. Do not invent new styles that are not used by independent reliable sources. These practices help...
Click to read more »Images may be deleted on Wikipedia if they do not conform to our image use policy or if they are no longer needed. The purpose of this page is to provide...
Click to read more »These ratings are intended for internal use within the project, and do not necessarily constitute an official rating in any meaningful sense. 2. How...
Click to read more »yourself. Do not use {{edit fully-protected}} on this page, which will not get a faster response. It is unnecessary, because this page is not protected,...
Click to read more »from a page does not delete it; it just leaves a blank page, which is discouraged as it is confusing to readers. Removed text is not permanently lost...
Click to read more »and/or that you are the world's greatest orator/debater. Some other users may not agree. What you have to understand is we have seen it all before; every argument...
Click to read more »The list should originate as a section within that article, and should not be broken out into a separate article until it becomes so long as to be disproportionate...
Click to read more »The following is not one of Wikipedia's notability guidelines. However, it is meant to provide a tool to help determine if a television-related topic...
Click to read more »the first character of the target as the target page, although this will not affect the working of the redirect. Although wikisyntax allows spaces and...
Click to read more »Movie Database (IMDb) on Wikipedia raises questions if such references do not follow the important points given in the reliable sources guideline. This...
Click to read more »verifiability and neutral point of view. Despite the popularity of Wikipedia, it is not a soapbox to use for editors' activism, recruitment, promotion, advertising...
Click to read more »significant local coverage in independent reliable sources, but most of them are not noteworthy enough for an encyclopedia article. As well, some run-of-the-mill...
Click to read more »For those not familiar, TV Tropes is a wiki that lists plot devices, tropes, and the like in all manner of fiction. However, the fact that it is a wiki...
Click to read more »not be used to establish notability. It is long established that Wikipedia is not a primary source, nor a free wiki host. Wikipedia articles are not intended...
Click to read more »12:11, 1 August 2026 (UTC) The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion...
Click to read more »If you're new to this website, these are probably ten things you may not know about images on Wikipedia. We hope this gives you a better idea of the whats...
Click to read more »specialized encyclopedias, almanacs, and gazetteers". However, this should not be misunderstood as stating that Wikipedia IS a gazetteer. Wikipedia is very...
Click to read more »thus avoiding potential confusion for those not familiar with its abbreviation. Remember that Wikipedia does not have the same space constraints as paper...
Click to read more »Wikipedia is not a directory NOR (WP:NOR) – No original research NOT (WP:NOT) – What Wikipedia is not NOT PAPER (WP:NOT PAPER) – Wikipedia is not a manual...
Click to read more »notability section. Institutions offering ISCED 2011 level 1 will normally not have a separate article, but be placed in a schools section in their controlling...
Click to read more »Assume good faith, if possible. An alternate account that is not used for abuse does not warrant a complaint. Keep in mind that users may sometimes make...
Click to read more »WikiProject, not to the entire world! If your article is graded as a "low" (nor "No-") importance, it does not mean your article does not matter, it means...
Click to read more »appropriate field of an infobox. If there is no commonly used Irish version, it is not appropriate or encyclopaedic to "invent" such names, as this constitutes...
Click to read more »is not appropriate behavior, and how to deal civilly and rationally with other editors—including those with whom you may disagree. However, do not expect...
Click to read more »guideline explains why spoiler warnings are no longer used on Wikipedia. It is not acceptable to add "spoiler warning" notices or to delete information from...
Click to read more »references, proving otherwise will solve this problem. If you feel you do not have what it takes to improve an article itself when it is up for deletion...
Click to read more »characteristics of the person the article is about, not characteristics of the article: e.g. do not add Category:Biography. Subcategories of Category:Biography...
Click to read more »title, the article should reside at the normal name, e.g. London Calling, not London Calling (album). In cases where disambiguation is needed, the term...
Click to read more »Services Act. One may be forgiven for predicting that this is not a simple task, and probably not possible; accordingly, the authors urge the UK to reconsider...
Click to read more »created from a revision of this page dated 18 June 2007 (2007-06-18), and does not reflect subsequent edits. (Audio help · More spoken articles) Wikipedia:Complete...
Click to read more »However, in many other cases, it will not be. One section of the article title policy says Wikipedia does not necessarily use the subject's "official"...
Click to read more »composition) Books, multi-volume works (e.g., encyclopedias), and booklets But not pre-modern religious texts or scriptures: the Bible, the Quran, the Bhagavad...
Click to read more »sources. It is static, that is, the data in the chart cannot change and does not dynamically change. This excludes dynamic "all-time" charts, such as the...
Click to read more »purpose of Wikipedia—making a great encyclopedia. Wikipedia is not an online newspaper and does not accept original works of journalism or first-hand reports...
Click to read more »Wikipedia could be said to be "truth, not verifiability": i.e. whether reliable sources state it to be true; not whether individual editors think they...
Click to read more »be acceptable as an external link, but not as a reliable source, or vice versa. Also note that this page does not prescribe any recommendations of what...
Click to read more »involved editors may make brief statements in separate sections but should not edit the section for discussion among uninvolved editors. Editors are normally...
Click to read more »discussions that have been archived from Village pump (technical). Please do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to revive any of these discussions...
Click to read more »This is not the case. Either editor may withdraw from the discussion by stating that: The discussion has reached an impasse, They will not continue it...
Click to read more »general notability guidelines or other inclusion criteria. Therefore, they are not included. A subject may be the biggest, the best, or the most well-known...
Click to read more »What Wikipedia is not – Outtakes is a composition that explores Wikipedia's official policy What Wikipedia is not. As noted in that policy, "Wikipedia...
Click to read more »Wikipedia improves through not only the hard work of its more dedicated members, but also through the important work done by the developers of MediaWiki...
Click to read more »sometimes felt that "obvious" statements, such as "the sky is blue", do not need citing. However, there are some reasons why you do need to cite the...
Click to read more »articles should stay in the dialect that currently predominates and should not be converted just for the sake of conversion. Any inter-dialect conversion...
Click to read more »consensus building, and committees are not required. The process is dependent on reviewer integrity. Reviewers may not review articles that they have edited...
Click to read more »This page is not one of Wikipedia's notability guidelines. The following is a tool to help determine whether a media outlet is a valid subject for a Wikipedia...
Click to read more »contrary. However, like bad faith itself, the assumption of bad faith should not be assumed merely because at first glance it might seem to be present. The...
Click to read more »be appealed to Arbcom. In a parallel fashion, the sanctions here can also not be done by another administrator unless appealed to WP:AN. It would be helpful...
Click to read more »rules. User:Bigbro has a history of making infrequent edits. Not particularly helpful, but not really doing any harm. Late one Saturday night Bigbro begins...
Click to read more »information to articles as soon as events happen. An editor normally will not add new information in the form of entire paragraphs or sections because...
Click to read more »create their own articles, not adopt the work of others. But while this is an easy approach to recommend, plagiarism may not be as simple as it first seems—it...
Click to read more »04:34, 27 March 2026 (UTC) Watchlist all case pages: 1, 2, 3, 4 Please do not edit this page directly unless you wish to become a participant in this case...
Click to read more »for a journal not to be notable under this guidance but still meet WP:GNG for other reasons. Note that this page provides guidance, not rules; exceptions...
Click to read more »is provided in the "Request" section below. Requests may not exceed 500 words and 20 diffs (not counting required information), except by permission of...
Click to read more »some mobile Wikipedia apps. The default desktop view of an article does not show the short description, but logged-in users can change this by enabling...
Click to read more »01:40, 4 April 2018 (UTC) The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion...
Click to read more »people, whether they are Wikipedia editors or not. Doing so violates Wikipedia's civility policy, and is not allowed anywhere on Wikipedia. If you feel that...
Click to read more »(UTC) The issue is that the userpage is found in the category (which was not linked properly). I'll try and edit that out.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 23:47, 14 September...
Click to read more »human too. Unregistered are not a lower category of users. They are not a special subset that we tolerate. They are not locust swarms intent on destroying...
Click to read more »subjects. Wikipedia's official "Neutral Point of View" (NPOV) policy does not mean that all the POVs of all the Wikipedia editors have to be represented...
Click to read more »should not be confused with being friendly or courteous, let alone charitable or credulous. A key concept: treating someone in a "not bad" way does not always...
Click to read more »Two months later, when this reform failed to surface and most cases were not responded to for a long time, the project was shut down. This page is maintained...
Click to read more »And he is not capable in contributing in any other way, because he does not speak English and uses Google translate. Not biting newcomers is not about agenda...
Click to read more »minutes, if not seconds (via the recent changes function, or via an automated bot); but sometimes it can remain unnoticed for days, and even if not, someone...
Click to read more »the user is choosing not to hear, or not to respond to, the concerns raised by others on his talk page. I also hope that this is not a case of WP:DEW in...
Click to read more »entirely in the previous one or two years are not regarded as historical articles, since they have not been studied by historians. When historians first...
Click to read more »is provided in the "Request" section below. Requests may not exceed 500 words and 20 diffs (not counting required information), except by permission of...
Click to read more »incubator was a place for holding articles that did not meet Wikipedia's content criteria (WP:NOT, WP:N, WP:OR, WP:NPOV, WP:BLP, and WP:V), but a rationale...
Click to read more »only edit that can be viewed as problematic, was not so problematic if one look closely. I did not blanket revert, I took the most prominent source and...
Click to read more »formatting (e.g., background color changes) to convey meaning. Additionally, do not refer to tables in body text as being positioned on the left or right side...
Click to read more »that a proposed target would be overburdened. Shortcuts WP:FUT NOT DISALLOWEDWP:FUT NOT DISALLOWED WP:FUT OKAYWP:FUT OKAY A cogent example in discussing...
Click to read more »Bagatti. It's not at all fake. Just check it." I retrieved the source again (it is beside me) and checked that the given information is not only not on Plate...
Click to read more »or not to do anything concerning Indian removal, so the statement was not correct. Not only that, but Cmguy posted these comments, which were not related...
Click to read more »template that gives us these totals does not correctly link to Unassessed articles. As it is a shared template, we do not wish to change it. The link to find...
Click to read more »is not warranted. A neutral voice might help.--Chaser (talk) 15:15, 26 September 2010 (UTC) First, I have not violated 3rr. That's ridiculous, not all...
Click to read more »to WP:V's talk page is not about KD Tries Again (talk · contribs), it is specifically about use of Facebook as a source (or not) under WP:SELFPUB. -- Cirt...
Click to read more »involved editors may make brief statements in separate sections but should not edit the section for discussion among uninvolved editors. Editors are normally...
Click to read more »me to leave Wikipedia after I told him not to post on my talk page time after time is not civil and I do not have to heed his advice after the incivility...
Click to read more »Resolved - AN/I is not dispute resolution. (copy of the e-mail sent to unblock) Dear Sirs, I would like to draw your attention to the fact that the user...
Click to read more »"corruption and misconduct" like "Governor Blagojevich" for posting sock template. Not a legal threat, but definitely disruptive. Recommend the anon be blocked...
Click to read more »11:59, 25 March 2015 (UTC) The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion...
Click to read more »has not already commented. That Flyer22 be barred from opening any new discussion about, or related to, RJR3333, on any page on which RJR3333 has not already...
Click to read more »another rabbit hole Tiptoety talk 06:21, 15 August 2008 (UTC) IMO this is not a case to be reported at AIV, but the user is clever enough and this may...
Click to read more »would urge an explanatory edit summary. We sometimes salt a title when we do not think there ever should be an article with that name, but that isn't the...
Click to read more »License (GFDL) and the Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike license. It is not legally possible for individuals or organizations who contribute to Wikipedia...
Click to read more »Reason for not requiring notification clarified. wctaiwan (talk) 23:50, 18 December 2013 (UTC) The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it...
Click to read more »You may not publish your own research here. Your website, as it is self-published, is not a reliable source; it is not independent, and it is not peer-reviewed...
Click to read more »against consensus. MikeWazowski (talk) 16:39, 4 July 2010 (UTC) Comment Not a 3RR violation as edits are over several days, but template protected and...
Click to read more »violation right now, but somehow I can not understand what happened. Thanks.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:34, 16 June 2019 (UTC) Not sure what's happened. First... 10:35...
Click to read more »in "See also") Artistic pool (exists as section at Trick shot, but does not really belong there, as it consists of more than trick shots; see Talk:Trick...
Click to read more »Thewelshboyo (talk • contribs) 20:36, 3 December 2011 (UTC) It's not on-wiki, ergo, it's not really our business. Maybe Twitter has a comparable policy. Drmies...
Click to read more »(UTC) "The "right to vanish" is not a "right to a fresh start" under a new identity. Vanishing means that the individual, not the account, is vanishing. There...
Click to read more »After an hour and a half, he had not replied but was still actively editing elsewhere. I took that to mean that he did not have a rebuttal to my points,...
Click to read more »do not seek to impose orthodoxy: not on whether Sunni or Shia is the legitimate strain of Islam, not on which entity legitimately owns Kosovo, not on...
Click to read more »forms are City, Yukon (not City, Yukon Territory) and City, Nunavut (not City, Nunavut Territory), but City, Northwest Territories (not City, Northwest). For...
Click to read more »not generally common knowledge outside the community. Adds articles to Category:Low-importance Bahrain articles Unknown - Any article which has not yet...
Click to read more »general public (those who have not waived their their right to free speech as a condition of government employment) but I am not a lawyer. — CharlotteWebb...
Click to read more »comply with Wikipedia standards. SilkTork *YES! 11:42, 28 December 2010 (UTC) Not looking for a full case or anything, but this seems to be heating up again...
Click to read more »page contains some guidelines, although not all of them apply (for example, because upload.wikimedia.org is not MediaWiki, there is no maxlag parameter)...
Click to read more »admin may be needed, but in the interest of transparency the matter I can not handle the matter since I am one of a number of the current admins and coordinators...
Click to read more »the nomination instead); note that it should be the template, not a subst. Lists may not be at PR, GAN and FLC at the same time Check WP:FLCs regularly...
Click to read more »were not violating the 3RR as well but the RVs from 9 to 11 do, permanent deletion of referenced information which might be considered edits not in good...
Click to read more »is provided in the "Request" section below. Requests may not exceed 500 words and 20 diffs (not counting required information), except by permission of...
Click to read more »will be dizzy" Arcayne Suffice it to say, I am not comfortable with his obsession with me, and do not feel particularly welcome here, is this just Wikipedia...
Click to read more »asked by me to not post my name in a talk page heading as I feel it is being done just for the purposes of harassment. I asked him to not do this here,...
Click to read more »16:01, 28 January 2020 (UTC) The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion...
Click to read more »01:52, 19 August 2008 (UTC) The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. Links added...
Click to read more »Grandmaster and gave a detailed explenation on that in the talkpage, why he is not doing the same?. I request intervention of admins. --Vacio (talk) 05:21,...
Click to read more »Breein1007 himself did not use the talkpage as he had asked the IP to do: [43] He just reverted, inserting a sentence that the source did not support, that had...
Click to read more »disputes, and follow community norms of behavior. A genuine clean start is not considered improper. However, if an editor uses their new account to resume...
Click to read more »Tiderolls 03:53, 17 October 2009 (UTC) (edit conflict) However, Dewar210 was not blocked until 3:45 UTC according to the block log, but Tide rolls' report...
Click to read more »The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached...
Click to read more »employee, even if either is notable! (See: Conflict of interest, Wikipedia is not here to tell the world about your noble cause, and An article about yourself...
Click to read more »23:59, 24 June 2013 (UTC) The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion...
Click to read more »few days ago, people said they were going to check the articles, but I'm not aware of any checking actually happening until this review of a single article...
Click to read more »is not true either. I will here, once again, request, that you all are not taken in by his candy talking, decitful behavour and the like. He is not a person...
Click to read more »addition was challenged. User:Dimadick will be notified. It looks like this is not the first time this editor has had problems with adding categories. Fyunck(click)...
Click to read more »block. BrownHairedGirl and The Bushranger should go well out of their way to not think about Skookum1. (non-admin closure) Hasteur (talk) 16:32, 1 May 2014...
Click to read more »(talk) 18:38, 22 May 2014 (UTC) The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion...
Click to read more »15:24, 5 April 2016 (UTC) The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion...
Click to read more »00:28, 17 April 2013 (UTC) The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion...
Click to read more »--Taivo (talk) 19:16, 1 February 2015 (UTC) Where's is your proof? And I have not extended the page[1] or written even 3 sentences. Bladesmulti (talk) 04:57...
Click to read more »disingenuous. I did not pass three reverts as the account above claims. I only reverted twice: [17], [18]. This post was most certainly not a revert. It was...
Click to read more »do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. Not quite...
Click to read more »00:45, 31 March 2015 (UTC) The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion...
Click to read more »dispute, and discussion is necessary in order to reach a consensus. It is not always necessary to formally request a move in these circumstances: you can...
Click to read more »Day Saints? Specifically [1] [2] [3][4] I'm involved, and to be honest I'm not certain if this kind of "free speech" should be tolerated on Wikipedia, as...
Click to read more »comment) Looks fine to me - it's worded neutrally, merely asking for input, and not trying to sway opinion. GiantSnowman 01:26, 10 April 2011 (UTC) (Non-administrator...
Click to read more »and call anyone who attempts to prevent him from doing so names. Were I not arguably involved I would indef as a disruptive account. I could, of course...
Click to read more »these things hanging for weeks. AfD's are supposed to last five days, not ten, not fifteen. Corvus cornixtalk 04:23, 19 February 2008 (UTC) Um, as a frequent...
Click to read more »directly. I admit that in the beginning, when I lacked experience and did not know that this is a violation of any policies, I opened several accounts...
Click to read more »is provided in the "Request" section below. Requests may not exceed 500 words and 20 diffs (not counting required information), except by permission of...
Click to read more »9 February 2012: "Your Arbcom links are irrelevant..." Claim that edits not covered by this case. 01:24, 9 February 2012: "I have already refuted your...
Click to read more »Okay, I hate bringing things to ANI. Not sure when the last time I did was. However, at this point I seem to have no other choice. Approximately 2-3 months...
Click to read more »added to Category:Disputed non-free images as of 9 September 2008. I am not arguing with the mass tagging, but I would like to request that other editors...
Click to read more »reverted the page 2 times so was not blocked. But apparently the guy is a vandal on many other pages and was 3rr blocked not just for 24 hours but for 48...
Click to read more »assistance, but this is not the venue. ―Mandruss ☎ 00:48, 2 May 2017 (UTC) The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments...
Click to read more »Resolved Note: The link is pretty graphic, so I should advise not to click on it if you are at work or might be offended. I don't want to "shock" anyone...
Click to read more »Resolved – (though not by me) Carcharoth (talk) 01:13, 19 June 2011 (UTC) There's an unclosed DRV at Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2011 June 6. It's...
Click to read more »is inflammatory. We have not had edit warring on this article for two months and it has been resurrected by users who are not willing to reach a compromise...
Click to read more »is provided in the "Request" section below. Requests may not exceed 500 words and 20 diffs (not counting required information), except by permission of...
Click to read more »was reported had not made any edits for a long time. I was not saying that it was a bad report, nor was I saying that his edits were not vandalism. I looked...
Click to read more »smaller towns). As with other types of articles, we do not delete an article because editors have not yet cited their sources, but only if there is no evidence...
Click to read more »Don't call the kettle black. The kettle may or may not be black, but attacking it for its blackness will only draw attention to your own blackness, which...
Click to read more »real name. So I suspect this violation of policy is due to frustration and not knowing our policies. I already deleted the offending versions and will create...
Click to read more »Chicagoblok. Am I allowed to unlink the pages as this situation is clearly not ideal? Due to the redirects I am unable to inform the user that they are...
Click to read more »the many user conduct issues identified in this thread. This editor has not demonstrated that he is able or willing to follow policies and guidelines...
Click to read more »07:53, 9 August 2015 (UTC) The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion...
Click to read more »user named PeeJay used a double-team tactic to get me blocked. Since I am not too experienced in wikipedia, I fell for it. However, I did study up on it...
Click to read more »I do suppose there's not much else that can be done. I encourage RCP'ers, as well as editors active in template maintenance, to keep on the lookout for...
Click to read more »