Redirect to:
This page is a redirect. The following categories are used to track and monitor this redirect:
|
accepted standard that all editors should normally follow. Substantive edits to this page should reflect consensus. Shortcuts WP:NPOVWP:NPOV WP:NPVWP:NPV...
Click to read more »php/business-planning-info/npv-irr-etc/45--net-present-value-npv.html. * Links added in this diff: www.investplans.ru/index.php/business-planning-info/npv...
Click to read more »but another might wish to relieve her of her burden, and making this topic NPV is presenting me with difficulties. Part of my objective in posting here...
Click to read more »Trump fan but none of those are very collabertive or suggest editing with a NPV. Legacypac (talk) 04:08, 29 August 2017 (UTC) Keep: Good lord, this is silly...
Click to read more »(Speak - Contributions) 01:07, 12 April 2008 (UTC) Delete Article fails, WP:NPV, WP:RS, WP:ADS, WP:ORG AND WP:JNN. There are no independant sources in the...
Click to read more »established. Jezhotwells (talk) 14:26, 7 August 2009 (UTC) Speedy Delete WP:NPV, advertising, self-promotion. See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Four...
Click to read more »notability standards (WP:N, WP:GNG, only reference is the team website, fails COI/NPV, potentail ADV). Previously deleted via WP:PROD, brought back via WP:REFUND...
Click to read more »section there, and there is enough properly cited NPV material, then create an new article with an NPV name and link from main Puerto Rico article. As an...
Click to read more »collaborating with others joining the F&S Project on how to write NPV language, etc. --WP:NPV language seems more important to me regarding these fraternity...
Click to read more »with all notable films. The article on English Wikipedia complies with WP:NPV and WP:GNG. It is a stub with no promotional tone. Brenthaven (talk) 16:56...
Click to read more »TWL) DELETE Its unsources and written like an essay and its not written NPV Christian75 (talk) 11:28, 30 June 2012 (UTC) Delete as an essay for OR and...
Click to read more »material that is accepted in Wikipedia articles: Neutral point of view (WP:NPV) – All Wikipedia articles and other encyclopedic content must be written...
Click to read more »FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Doesn’t comply with GNG, ANYBIO and lacks of CCS and NPV. It claims notability as column writers, translators, and Gatestone writer...
Click to read more »the subject is notable, but the article as written sure doesn't look like NPV or COI or such. Draftify is a good option for an enthusiastic editor to re-write...
Click to read more »result of the debate was KEEP. -Splash 02:48, 20 August 2005 (UTC) Spam. No NPV - not 'encyclopedic' Erwin Walsh Delete. Not notable. Harro5 09:26, August...
Click to read more »the subject of constant edit warring and it shows. There are terrible WP:NPV, WP:V, and WP:OR issues raised on the talk page that have gone unaddressed...
Click to read more »Why not fix the article rather than destroy it if you're not happy with WP:NPV which is what you should be arguing if you're calling it an advertisement...
Click to read more »article in a way that it violated Wikipedia's guidelines (Most notably WP:NPV). He was in violation of WP:3RR so I informed him of that on the talkpage...
Click to read more »You can get a meaningfull NPV figure in your case by just suming the earnings ratios for each year. The basic priciple of NPV is that a dollar in the hand...
Click to read more »written in its current form without any problems with regard to WP:ROC and WP:NPV, then WP:SIGCOV, WP:BIO and WP:GNG have been adhered to. If colleague Edwardx...
Click to read more »editing this current version that runs afoul of multiple policies like WP:NPV, WP:WEASEL. Clearly, this person fails notability for individuals.WikiManOne...
Click to read more »"iNVISIBLE"). The Emmys were not awarded directly or exclusively to him. WP:NPV JohnMizuki (talk) 12:52, 18 July 2026 (UTC) Note: this discussion has been...
Click to read more »the fact that pages that contain information about Kosovo are often out of NPV because of Slavic tendencies to present UNMIK as an dictatorship founder...
Click to read more »advertising here. Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Also violates WP:NPV--Paul McDonald (talk) 15:11, 7 August 2009 (UTC) Comment. Yes I think I will...
Click to read more »Icewhiz (talk) 06:04, 14 July 2019 (UTC) Comment: Obvious WP:COI and WP:NPV issues. However, those warrant clean-up rather than deletion as long as the...
Click to read more »said Zebedee 10:29, 14 April 2010 (UTC) Delete as per nom. Also fails WP:NPV. &dorno rocks. (talk) 13:24, 14 April 2010 (UTC) Keep though small, there...
Click to read more »that I consider to meet: WP:POLITICIAN and this has been nominated with WP:NPV in mind, this is purly about the notability criteria in WP:POLITICIAN --Wintonian...
Click to read more »ought to be about the fact that she is an author not a candidate perhaps a NPV tag should be added? I'm not really sure whether to keep it or delete it...
Click to read more »Appears to surpass WP:GNG. We may need to edit based on WP:COI and/or WP:NPV and or WP:ADV... but these are all editing and cleanup issues, not an issue...
Click to read more »a bit of editing to present it's subject from a neutral point of view WP:NPV. Phrases like "disrupted the rest of the beauty market", "high-performance...
Click to read more »(UTC) Merge to Implications of divorce or another existing article once any NPV text has been removed. This annotated bibliography isn't original research...
Click to read more »name is counterintuitive or not, because as it stands, the article fails WP:NPV. Discussion with other editors to enquire why they refuse to discuss the...
Click to read more »vandalized my user page, which leads me to believe that he is not a good NPV source of information about this subject. Oops, I think I know what happened...
Click to read more »Pallida Mors 04:46, 25 May 2009 (UTC) I think you are mistaking this with IRR and NPV - I suggest with respect that the OP ignores the above comment, as it will...
Click to read more »newspaper but not for an encyclopedia. Written to promote policy so violates WP:NPV Borock (talk) 12:01, 10 March 2015 (UTC) Keep This is a long-standing article...
Click to read more »same.—Ryulong (竜龙) 19:39, 5 August 2012 (UTC) Speedy keep No violations of NPV or NOTE. Seems fine. Close the discussion. Supercharger12821 (talk) 21:23...
Click to read more »G) 20:28, 13 November 2009 (UTC) Keep. am sure we can edit this and ad a NPV. also this has some nice info. and has got all the sourcing.i will try edit...
Click to read more »March 2019 (UTC) Comment The Wired article referenced above has undisclosed NPV issues. The Chief Editor of Wired at the time, Chris Anderson, was in the...
Click to read more »clean-up and removed some articles that were not relevant at all to make it WP:NPV compliant. The subject has notable references like Forbes and has accomplishments...
Click to read more »Assignment What do you think of Wikipedia's definition of "neutrality"? NPV or "No original research" NOR What are the impacts and limits of Wikipedia...
Click to read more »discussion) to improve the article by fixing the alleged problems (WP:N & WP:NPV). Given the time stamp of this AfD, Zippogeek's notice of deletion talk page...
Click to read more »CPU and memory Looking for old software that combined decision trees with NPV Wikipedia:Reference_desk/Archives/Computing/2010 January 4 Vista Sidebar...
Click to read more »investments return 20% and 25% in ROI, but the first provides 1 million dollars of NPV, while the second provides just $100, you borrow money to invest in the lower...
Click to read more »favor of a move or redirect, as the title "semi-Christian" doesn't convey an NPV --Blu Aardvark 9 July 2005 11:55 (UTC) Delete: seems to be there on the basis...
Click to read more »links | watch | logs) I'm having trouble identifying what I think must be NPV issues on my article for Burp Suite Draft:Burp Suite. This software was requested...
Click to read more »is what it needs to become a GA. I agree it needs newer sources, and WP:NPV suffers, but it is a good start at a article. -- :- ) Don 16:20, 27 October...
Click to read more »research. It would be nearly impossible to source this and get it right per NPV. Waiting on a fight for what the mean of "disgraced" is. ZacBowling (user|talk)...
Click to read more »history | links | watch | logs) (diff !top) - Link: readyexcel.com/download/financial-npv-irr-calculator/ (R/Xmeta/L- removed) Displayed all 9 additions....
Click to read more »donations. Fundraising appeals should be crafted and targetted to maximize the NPV of financial and in-kind contributions. We can potentially target the content...
Click to read more »You are analyzing the wrong end of the equation. The mathematical odds and NPV and IRR and all that finance jargon is to be dealt with on their end... not...
Click to read more »Frankly, I have to wonder if the proposal to delete is not at heart an NPV violation -- is the motivation that the BED comparison is politically inconvenient...
Click to read more »web hosting service. I'd put this down as violating WP:ADV or WP:COI or WP:NPV or I'd even allow "ignore the rules" and get rid of this. If someone would...
Click to read more »2019 (UTC) Keep - the article needs a complete overhaul so that it meets NPV guidelines; it definitely comes across as promotional. A found some third-party...
Click to read more »with WP:V, and the article has basically been rewritten to comply with WP:NPV, the only remaining issue that I am aware of is WP:N. I will continue to...
Click to read more »NPV_q/Default.aspx" (162, 152, 149, 1) www.westclintech.com/Documentation/XLeratorDBfinancialDocumentation/tabid/64/topic/NPV/Default.aspx"...
Click to read more »at old deleted page of this new creation with so many new tag like - WP:NPV, WP:N, WP:RS, WP:What Wikipedia is not and don’t know what more will follow...
Click to read more »https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Communion_and_Liberation/Archive_1 (under NPV accusations, for instance.) I pointed out to the user repeatedly that his...
Click to read more »The Signpost should strive for neutrality but it is by no means bound be NPV, which is an article space policy. Opinionated articles that aren't listed...
Click to read more »relevant policy here? —Tenryuu 🐲 ( 💬 • 📝 ) 00:42, 6 February 2025 (UTC) WP:NPV has no instance of the string "interview". Further, it wants "as far as possible...
Click to read more »article, it is well written, aside from WP:NPV, and referenced properly. I do think it needs to be rewritten with a NPV by someone without COI issues. Click23...
Click to read more »18:27, 8 May 2019 (UTC) Keep Article cleaned up to comply with WP:NPV, WP:COMPOSER and WP:MUSICBIO. Promotional content is removed including external...
Click to read more »applied a strict NPV to all pictures, we would have to effectively disallow pictures about controversial topics." We don't apply strict NPV to all pictures...
Click to read more »related to the subject in some way. Clear violations of WP:YOURSELF and WP:NPV. Another contributor, "Kingmanatee" wrote the following: "Added Collins'...
Click to read more »article content needs some improvement in tone as some cases violate WP:NPV I suppose.--Harryishere (talk) 10:24, 3 August 2020 (UTC) Blocked for UPE...
Click to read more »policies and POLICYLIST for a list of all the policies and guidelines. WP:NPV Neutral Point of View: One of the more important policies of Wikipedia is...
Click to read more »can be brought to a higher standard, and if there is any way of keeping it NPV, it is not something for Wikipedia Donovan Ravenhull 14:17, 2 September 2005...
Click to read more »your portfolio? What is the CAPM alpha of your portfolio? e) What is the NPV of your portfolio in year 0? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 170.135...
Click to read more »Objectivity (journalism). This concept is included in the see also portion of WP:NPV. Many of the articles on city councilors in Ottawa lack sources, and otherwise...
Click to read more »about Wikipedia What do you think of Wikipedia's definition of "neutrality"? NPV or "No original research" NOR What are the impacts and limits of Wikipedia...
Click to read more »I see some people (mostly IPs) update maintenance template(like npv dispute, unreferenced) dates to current month. I think it is wrong as the dates are...
Click to read more »failures of this list and its committee without feeling like I'm breaking WP:NPV and also in a way that makes it smooth for you and easy to follow. Perhaps...
Click to read more »providing citations or trimming unverified details, as well as editing for NPV. —GrantNeufeld (talk) 10:28, 3 March 2012 (UTC) Keep and cleanup (vote changed...
Click to read more »(UTC) Questioning the neutrality of a contributor in order to preserve WP:NPV is well within the Wikipedia guidelines. You still have not answered how...
Click to read more »also be deleted, and that would be silly, becuase there is a place for a NPV source on such matters. There seems very little reason to delete a pretty...
Click to read more »best way to show evidence of notability in the article, while adhering to NPV? Disclosure: Qi liqueur is made by a relative of the author. Keep --BTB 14:01...
Click to read more »misunderstanding of the definition within Wikipedia and its implications to a NPV. Allow me to explain my understanding. The verifiability wikipedia policy...
Click to read more »information mentioned in the article. It needs to be changed as its not per WP:NPV. The article may be kept but it should be much thin to pass as an encyclopedic...
Click to read more »links | watch | logs) (diff !top) - Link: www.tomspencer.com.au/2008/09/05/npv-net-present-value-analysis-framework/ (R/Xmeta/L- removed) 2011-12-02 05:16:32...
Click to read more »about Wikipedia What do you think of Wikipedia's definition of "neutrality"? NPV or "No original research" NOR What are the impacts and limits of Wikipedia...
Click to read more »time, since most of you have proven that you are incapable of writing in NPV style and all the time you spend posting obviously biased trash will be deleted...
Click to read more »21 October 2017 (UTC) The term "clutching at straws" shows problem in WP:NPV, WP:OR and is not WP:V, thus has ruined the testimony by this editor. Invalid...
Click to read more »links | watch | logs) (diff !top) - Link: www.tomspencer.com.au/2008/09/05/npv-net-present-value-analysis-framework/ (R/Xmeta/L- removed) 2011-12-02 05:16:32...
Click to read more »Captjosh (talk) 16:57, 10 December 2010 (UTC) - Love finding hard-to-find but NPV citations. Carcharoth 00:24, 4 October 2007 (UTC) Cartman005 (talk) 21:55...
Click to read more »or anything else. Understand what we mean by a neutral point of view WP:NPV before tackling/editing this sort of topic. Be neutral. Citation is your...
Click to read more »in early Christian theology Nominator's rationale: This category is non NPV. Heresy is a label for an idea you don't agree with. In this case, these...
Click to read more »11/25; as of 11/25, Edward was accused of breaking WP:COI, WP:BLP, WP:DIS, WP:NPV, WP:VER as to those, we received two diffs (diff diff) relevant only to WP:COI...
Click to read more »an well covered incident by sources of different medias , as WP:V and WP:NPV. An cross border strike by a nuclear armed state which is again seen after...
Click to read more »the reportee - Is the reportee maintaining a neutral point of view, per WP:NPV? If this is what they said on Talk:Phosphatase/GA1 - "This article is well-written...
Click to read more »the Berkelee genesis of the company Further cleanup is required as per WP:NPV and WP:MoS. OliverKianzo (talk) 14:40, 9 May 2019 (UTC) Note to Closer It...
Click to read more »criteria." 16:39, 3 May 2015 (UTC) "There is no any result or decision on WP:NPV!!" Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning here Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute...
Click to read more »to delete it's powerful political meaning, certainly a gross violation of NPV. As far as the phrase's significance, to devote two small paragraphs for...
Click to read more »sources as being kicked off the team for boozing it up. Certainly meets NPV, and I'm okay with it.--Paul McDonald (talk) 21:15, 6 March 2010 (UTC) The...
Click to read more »not in ANI if I remember correctly and the goal wasn't to punish editors. NPV board, here, and here. The Wikiquette alert was in response in you cursing...
Click to read more »wikiuser and definitely not a SPA. Anyone with a objective and impartially WP:NPV would acknowledge the consensus how biased and one sided Yelena Senyavskaya...
Click to read more »from the discussion that Attleboro refuses to learn basic concepts about WP:NPV and WP:RS.) --Dr. Fleischman (talk) 23:21, 1 November 2013 (UTC) There's...
Click to read more »respect neither Wikipedia, neither me as an editor, neither warnings and WP:NPV" 20:31, 7 April 2015 (UTC) "Undid revision 655400939 by Dr.K. (talk) It was...
Click to read more »unilaterally make controversial edits to these articles. Maintaining a WP:NPV is critical to constructive edits to Wikipedia. Further discussions with...
Click to read more »is referred to in the article, and more significantly conflicts with WP:NPV" 11:43, 13 May 2014 (UTC) "restored 'generally', as it is untrue to say there...
Click to read more »Just responding (see my talk page) that accusations about breaking OR and NPV are nonsense, just asking for a DRN, is that 'harrassing'? Getting curiouser...
Click to read more »but they do demonstrate an fundamental misunderstanding of WP:RS and WP:NPV. This guy has been editing politics pages for years and years and still doesn't...
Click to read more »apply. You can't add your personal opinion to Wikipedia articles, see WP:NPV" 15:21, 2 December 2016 (UTC) "removed word "falsely" as per consensus on...
Click to read more »dies after the vote but before the electoral college meets). Admitedly the NPV seems to have having trouble attracting the support of the non swing Republican...
Click to read more »article development, he's evidently not a disinterested party and I see no NPV at all here. Can this topic be confided to watchers in the Environment Project...
Click to read more »to a discussion ([82]) in which I tried to explain to him the policy WP:NPV and the guideline WP:WTA. I failed in this attempt, and MaxBrowne called...
Click to read more »suggested that he stop deleting sources and, in order to comply with the WP:NPV I invited him to add his sources. In response, he added a source in Persian...
Click to read more »in mind, I have carefully read through Wikipedia’s policies regarding WP:NPV, WP:V and WP:COI, and find it important to follow these closely. Keeping...
Click to read more »the latter. Your attitude shows really well you aren't here to have a WP:NPV. This isn't discussable, you have to follow the guidelines." I do not see...
Click to read more »Resolved Some hyper-enthusiastic Britney fan has changed the title of this article to Blackout without any sources. The article itself has been changed...
Click to read more »didn't handle it as well as he should have, but your massive POV violates WP:NPV to a massive degree. You guys have been bickering so much I don't even know...
Click to read more »NPD NPE NPF NPG NPH NPI NPJ NPK NPL NPM NPN NPO NPP NPQ NPR NPS NPT NPU NPV NPW NPX NPY NPZ NQA NQB NQC NQD NQE NQF NQG NQH NQI NQJ NQK NQL NQM NQN NQO...
Click to read more »pages, paid employees of companies attempting to subvert Wikipedia's WP:NPV guidelines strictly for financial reasons. Imposing sanctions against legitimate...
Click to read more »a sewer": "There are countless examples of violations of the WP:BLP, WP:NPV and WP:RS policies here. It looks like a few activists have taken over this...
Click to read more »in adding dubious, improperly sourced, irrelevant, badly-worded and non-NPV content, for example, here, here, here. The editor also insists on ascribing...
Click to read more »clear it's celebrity gossip site, therefore there are concerns regarding WP:NPV including WP:Weight, so care and caution must be used when citing with regard...
Click to read more »that the Global citizenship award should be added back to comply with WP:NPV. ANLgrad (talk) 12:44, 8 August 2022 (UTC) Hello, I'm trying correct something...
Click to read more »deleted entirely, without any discussion on the talk page, and well sourced NPV material is replaced with advert promotional sources, unsourced false statements...
Click to read more »balancing/nuancing information, or essential context or detail needed for NPV/BLP, and source those too. If it's improved today, it wouldn't have any reason...
Click to read more »bad faith, violation of WP:BLP questionable objectivity of the editor, WP:NPV and other things. I am still new to Wikipedia so I could do with guidance...
Click to read more »discussion. Hello. I have had my opinion that there is a violation of WP:NPOV, WP:NPV, WP:POV, WP:NEUTRAL posted on the page's talk page removed by user "Flyer22_Reborn"...
Click to read more »that had been incorrectly omitted and redirected to "Iron lung" (as the NPV article now documents clearly, "Iron lung" is merely a subset of "Negative...
Click to read more »removes the information from the article based on the source in defiance of WP:NPV[97][98] claiming that it contributes nothing to the article however this...
Click to read more »long history of this with other articles. This section is written from a NPV. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.31.47.43 (talk) 17:11, 30 January...
Click to read more »based on a sensitive topic. Its here because admins surely don't violate WP:NPV.--Musa Raza (talk) 16:22, 1 May 2019 (UTC) As it is right now, there was...
Click to read more »accusations are WP:DE and a violation of the rules prescribed in WP:CONS, WP:NPV, WP:RSPRIMARY. Previously, the user was already blocked due to the edit war...
Click to read more »better to focus on the applicable policies and guidelines, namely, WP:V, WP:NPV, WP:OR, and WP:BLP. R2 (bleep) 20:23, 8 May 2019 (UTC) I will not comment...
Click to read more »deleted five (!) reliable sources that was added by me. [32] This is WP:NPV violation (admins, please consider it too).This comment is not finished yet...
Click to read more »Russo-Georgian War Tskhinvali Gergiev 1991–1992 South Ossetia War Look at NPV Due to regular vandalism of Ossetia and Ossetian related articles it is recommended...
Click to read more »community to somehow adjust how we apply bedrock policies like WP:V and WP:NPV to reflect the fact that some folks on one end of the political spectrum...
Click to read more »other issues with his conduct. Selective application of and disregard for WP:NPV ([91]), which he followed up with accusing me of violating NPOV and complaining...
Click to read more »policy I do understand is of great importance. I have abused WP:BITE and WP:NPV, plus many others "WPs". I have said in defense that it is because of past...
Click to read more »others of this family biased allegations without keeping in mind WP:NOR, WP:NPV, or WP:COI. Beside that, his contribution list shows WP:SPA as he is focused...
Click to read more »Liberation/Archive 1#Citations Usage and Talk:Communion and Liberation/Archive 1#NPV Violations and Factual Accuracy) on sourcing the content, and the wording...
Click to read more »sources without explanation. In my opinion, these actions violate WP:DIS, WP:NPV, WP:VER, WP:CONS. Александр Мотин's comments: «removed incorrect explanatory...
Click to read more »existing pages). In addition, I think that the readers will be better served if NPV applies to the entire topic and not to every individual page. In several...
Click to read more »According to WP:ALIVE, the content of article should be edited from WP:NPV, now that core content policy is violated.Gdv777 (talk) 15:33, 12 May 2014...
Click to read more »both sides could relax a bit and refrain from direct edits and allow an NPV editor making agreed changes? I not convinced this "sock it and see" approach...
Click to read more »npd npe npf npg nph npi npj npk npl npm npn npo npp npq npr nps npt npu npv npw npx npy npz nqa nqb nqc nqd nqe nqf nqg nqh nqi nqj nqk nql nqm nqn nqo...
Click to read more »Iron lung is marked as the "main article" within the section on "Types of NPV" and in that article the cuirass has its own brief subsection. I'm no expert...
Click to read more »to support it's own projects via banners is perfectly acceptable. The WP:NPV would be maintained. An article is of course appropriate and can contain...
Click to read more »published under notable record labels. But the article content suffers from NPV concerns and is promotional, it defintely requires cleanup. Chirota (talk)...
Click to read more »households, most of whom were firmly middle-class. (And that does not include the NPV of Social Security and Medicare, which is, according to WSJ, on the order...
Click to read more »Village Voice editors believed in WP:NPV? That is just not right. It doesn't make any sense!?! Why would any editor be WP:NPV? What artistic insolence! Who does...
Click to read more »Merge with other articles. The entire topic is conflict which has to violate NPV and therefore I think this "vote" is ridiculous without knowing the positions...
Click to read more »the ones related to it), vis-a-vis Wikipedia's editing policy (WP:SOAP, WP:NPV). I'm also asking if the way it's written warrants a {{advert}}, or if it...
Click to read more »of birth.. GiftigerWunsch [TALK] 22:53, 2 June 2010 (UTC) Thank you, WP:NPV? I have tried to write it in a neutral way, but if you mean that there is...
Click to read more »applied a strict NPV to all pictures, we would have to effectively disallow pictures about controversial topics." We don't apply strict NPV to all pictures...
Click to read more »editorial, wrote that "Editorials do not have to use NPV language, but we at Wikipedia must do so WP:NPV. Therefore, we should not quote extensively, as this...
Click to read more »alternative investment projects, then you would calculate the expected-NPV (ENPV) by using NPV with decision trees. However this does not take account of utility...
Click to read more »belive. And our Job is to collect this knowledge. Article is well written, NPV seems to be OK. So we have to keep the article. Marcus Cyron (talk) 18:45...
Click to read more »Editing policy+Edit warring+Wheel war+Vandalism+Ownership of articles NOR+NPV+V (I know this one has been tried before; unfortunately people are very nervous...
Click to read more »with you, notwithstanding the fact that these are clear violations of wp:NPV. Maashatra11 (talk) 23:11, 23 June 2010 (UTC) Keep Gaza flotilla massacre...
Click to read more »Wikipedia approach every user learns their first year, ie., to strive for WP:NPV WP:NPOV. That is the remedy, not deletion. Provided that the minimal standard...
Click to read more »(talk) 01:49, 15 February 2009 (UTC) I will keep WP:Source, WP:Fringe,and WP:NPV in mind. Thank you.Smallman12q (talk) 13:53, 15 February 2009 (UTC) I came...
Click to read more »September 2011 (UTC) I am in a discussion about the aspartame controversy at NPV. If I do not sign on the discussion is not visible. It appears when I sign...
Click to read more »the subject is notable, but the article as written sure doesn't look like NPV or COI or such. Draftify is a good option for an enthusiastic editor to re-write...
Click to read more »you might feel, but, please, take a step back and recall yourself the WP:NPV policy. Edith Sirius Lee (talk) 15:49, 29 July 2010 (UTC) Sorry I did not...
Click to read more »2011 (UTC) Support - I support this because while not being consistent with NPV, SOPA endangers the very idea of open internet sites like wikipedia Cat Cubed...
Click to read more »labeling. This article is consistent with WP:VERIFY, WP:CONSENSUS, WP:RS, WP:NPV, etc., etc. The editors on this article discuss and collaborate. It has even...
Click to read more »section there, and there is enough properly cited NPV material, then create an new article with an NPV name and link from main Puerto Rico article. As an...
Click to read more »all the economics concepts correct, and presents opposing viewpoints in an NPV language. As for the weight given to Mackay and modern critiques, I feel...
Click to read more »referenced/cited using a third-party, independent source. These resources may help: WP:NPV, WP:RS, WP:NOR. While not all of the content is flattering, it is well sourced...
Click to read more »Evidence claims, and as his link clearly shows, Habap, not myself opened the NPV thread about Operation Dropshot, which is still listed in Aftermath of World...
Click to read more »Why not fix the article rather than destroy it if you're not happy with WP:NPV which is what you should be arguing if you're calling it an advertisement...
Click to read more »clear it's celebrity gossip site, therefore there are concerns regarding WP:NPV including WP:Weight, so care and caution must be used when citing with regard...
Click to read more »with WP:V, and the article has basically been rewritten to comply with WP:NPV, the only remaining issue that I am aware of is WP:N. I will continue to...
Click to read more »The article has been cleaned up. Now it makes some sense and maintains NPV. Jmath666 15:45, 24 June 2007 (UTC) Comment. It makes sense, now. However...
Click to read more »that I consider to meet: WP:POLITICIAN and this has been nominated with WP:NPV in mind, this is purly about the notability criteria in WP:POLITICIAN --Wintonian...
Click to read more »it's poorly written with improper grammar and uses none neutral phrases WP:NPV. My major fault to the article is it's use of resources from the company's...
Click to read more »participate in this activity I will refrain from continuing to campaign for NPV. (Is NPV something you detest Robert K S?) I do not want to participate in any...
Click to read more »various states or outcomes and then use the decision trees (possibly using NPV also) as mentioned below. 92.24.186.101 (talk) 12:50, 23 December 2010 (UTC)...
Click to read more »finance problem, you would choose whichever values gave you the highest NPV. As this continues into the infinite future, the Gordon model might apply...
Click to read more »of that information, I am just asking for the line to written as per WP:NPV which states that 'articles must not take sides, but should explain the sides...
Click to read more »related to the subject in some way. Clear violations of WP:YOURSELF and WP:NPV. Another contributor, "Kingmanatee" wrote the following: "Added Collins'...
Click to read more »vandalized my user page, which leads me to believe that he is not a good NPV source of information about this subject. Oops, I think I know what happened...
Click to read more »Icewhiz (talk) 06:04, 14 July 2019 (UTC) Comment: Obvious WP:COI and WP:NPV issues. However, those warrant clean-up rather than deletion as long as the...
Click to read more »existing pages). In addition, I think that the readers will be better served if NPV applies to the entire topic and not to every individual page. In several...
Click to read more »collaborating with others joining the F&S Project on how to write NPV language, etc. --WP:NPV language seems more important to me regarding these fraternity...
Click to read more »have found one instance of similar Windows software, but this does not use NPV. Failing that, I might try writing something similar myself. The two hurdles...
Click to read more »is Wikipedia's stance when it comes to cases like this? I know about WP:NPV, but I've also seen a lot of arguments boiling down to "because all the important...
Click to read more »(UTC) Questioning the neutrality of a contributor in order to preserve WP:NPV is well within the Wikipedia guidelines. You still have not answered how...
Click to read more »G) 20:28, 13 November 2009 (UTC) Keep. am sure we can edit this and ad a NPV. also this has some nice info. and has got all the sourcing.i will try edit...
Click to read more »2016 (UTC) Comment: I promote the discussion about this article but from NPV - I wrote there: ,,So if somebody has a time for quick view and discussion...
Click to read more »controversial and a spam/promo target. The article needs to be rewritten in NPV. STILL, this guy and his company are extremely influential. A search on Google...
Click to read more »to delete it's powerful political meaning, certainly a gross violation of NPV. As far as the phrase's significance, to devote two small paragraphs for...
Click to read more »27 May 2019 (UTC) Delete per nomination; major unreferenced WP:BLP and WP:NPV issues, and one not-yet-full-term president (out of 45) or one country (out...
Click to read more »sources are definitely independent and represent Neutral Point of View (WP:NPV), and the information is not "trivial." Even if you personally think that...
Click to read more »article, it is well written, aside from WP:NPV, and referenced properly. I do think it needs to be rewritten with a NPV by someone without COI issues. Click23...
Click to read more »requesting to go through this page history. The article was not according to WP:NPV so I fixed that but a person is inserting unsourced material again and again...
Click to read more »controversial and a spam/promo target. The article needs to be rewritten in NPV. STILL, this guy and his company are extremely influential. A search on Google...
Click to read more »relevant policies I believe the comment violates in the Wikipedia policy WP:NPV and WP:CS in general. Is there something else I should add to the note to...
Click to read more »18:27, 8 May 2019 (UTC) Keep Article cleaned up to comply with WP:NPV, WP:COMPOSER and WP:MUSICBIO. Promotional content is removed including external...
Click to read more »also be deleted, and that would be silly, becuase there is a place for a NPV source on such matters. There seems very little reason to delete a pretty...
Click to read more »clean-up and removed some articles that were not relevant at all to make it WP:NPV compliant. The subject has notable references like Forbes and has accomplishments...
Click to read more »(Speak - Contributions) 01:07, 12 April 2008 (UTC) Delete Article fails, WP:NPV, WP:RS, WP:ADS, WP:ORG AND WP:JNN. There are no independant sources in the...
Click to read more »(UTC) Merge to Implications of divorce or another existing article once any NPV text has been removed. This annotated bibliography isn't original research...
Click to read more »March 2019 (UTC) Comment The Wired article referenced above has undisclosed NPV issues. The Chief Editor of Wired at the time, Chris Anderson, was in the...
Click to read more »discussion) to improve the article by fixing the alleged problems (WP:N & WP:NPV). Given the time stamp of this AfD, Zippogeek's notice of deletion talk page...
Click to read more »article content needs some improvement in tone as some cases violate WP:NPV I suppose.--Harryishere (talk) 10:24, 3 August 2020 (UTC) Blocked for UPE...
Click to read more »written in its current form without any problems with regard to WP:ROC and WP:NPV, then WP:SIGCOV, WP:BIO and WP:GNG have been adhered to. If colleague Edwardx...
Click to read more »information mentioned in the article. It needs to be changed as its not per WP:NPV. The article may be kept but it should be much thin to pass as an encyclopedic...
Click to read more »it's poorly written with improper grammar and uses none neutral phrases WP:NPV. My major fault to the article is it's use of resources from the company's...
Click to read more »sources as being kicked off the team for boozing it up. Certainly meets NPV, and I'm okay with it.--Paul McDonald (talk) 21:15, 6 March 2010 (UTC) The...
Click to read more »editing sources you mention, I also relied on WP:BLP, WP:V, WP:CS, and WP:NPV, and looked to other published Wikipedia biographies for examples on language...
Click to read more »editing sources you mention, I also relied on WP:BLP, WP:V, WP:CS, and WP:NPV, and looked to other published Wikipedia biographies for examples on language...
Click to read more »advertising? I am in the company's employ, and have attempted to write it in a NPV carefully for that reason. This organization does not itself sell or market...
Click to read more »research. It would be nearly impossible to source this and get it right per NPV. Waiting on a fight for what the mean of "disgraced" is. ZacBowling (user|talk)...
Click to read more »published under notable record labels. But the article content suffers from NPV concerns and is promotional, it defintely requires cleanup. Chirota (talk)...
Click to read more »belive. And our Job is to collect this knowledge. Article is well written, NPV seems to be OK. So we have to keep the article. Marcus Cyron (talk) 18:45...
Click to read more »because I expect only encyclopedia material; it is because I expect to find NPV information on a subject which is written and reviewed by a group of people...
Click to read more »Frankly, I have to wonder if the proposal to delete is not at heart an NPV violation -- is the motivation that the BED comparison is politically inconvenient...
Click to read more »Objectivity (journalism). This concept is included in the see also portion of WP:NPV. Many of the articles on city councilors in Ottawa lack sources, and otherwise...
Click to read more »PIN Monika S. Schmid (also 294)- PIN Mary Crovatt Hambidge - rewrote with NPV, added image- PIN Helen Campbell Norman - PIN Marcela Pérez de Cuéllar- PIN...
Click to read more »advertising here. Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Also violates WP:NPV--Paul McDonald (talk) 15:11, 7 August 2009 (UTC) Comment. Yes I think I will...
Click to read more »Unnecessary cross namespace redirect. We already have WP:neutral pov, WP:NPV and WP:NPOV and others - we don't need this too. Mhiji 15:10, 9 January 2011...
Click to read more »Merge with other articles. The entire topic is conflict which has to violate NPV and therefore I think this "vote" is ridiculous without knowing the positions...
Click to read more »opinion expressed in this article; sometimes bordering on hyperbole. Per WP:NPV, I question whether the tone is sufficiently impartial and ask whether a...
Click to read more »said Zebedee 10:29, 14 April 2010 (UTC) Delete as per nom. Also fails WP:NPV. &dorno rocks. (talk) 13:24, 14 April 2010 (UTC) Keep though small, there...
Click to read more »NPD NPE NPF NPG NPH NPI NPJ NPK NPL NPM NPN NPO NPP NPQ NPR NPS NPT NPU NPV NPW NPX NPY NPZ NQA NQB NQC NQD NQE NQF NQG NQH NQI NQJ NQK NQL NQM NQN NQO...
Click to read more »is what it needs to become a GA. I agree it needs newer sources, and WP:NPV suffers, but it is a good start at a article. -- :- ) Don 16:20, 27 October...
Click to read more »editing this current version that runs afoul of multiple policies like WP:NPV, WP:WEASEL. Clearly, this person fails notability for individuals.WikiManOne...
Click to read more »21 October 2017 (UTC) The term "clutching at straws" shows problem in WP:NPV, WP:OR and is not WP:V, thus has ruined the testimony by this editor. Invalid...
Click to read more »WP:TENDENTIOUS, and because the nominator (Redacted) and as such is violating WP:NPV, thus making this whole farce a vandalistic act by way of WP:VAND, in that...
Click to read more »at old deleted page of this new creation with so many new tag like - WP:NPV, WP:N, WP:RS, WP:What Wikipedia is not and don’t know what more will follow...
Click to read more »web hosting service. I'd put this down as violating WP:ADV or WP:COI or WP:NPV or I'd even allow "ignore the rules" and get rid of this. If someone would...
Click to read more »sources are definitely independent and represent Neutral Point of View (WP:NPV), and the information is not "trivial." Even if you personally think that...
Click to read more »2019 (UTC) Keep - the article needs a complete overhaul so that it meets NPV guidelines; it definitely comes across as promotional. A found some third-party...
Click to read more »Wikipedia approach every user learns their first year, ie., to strive for WP:NPV WP:NPOV. That is the remedy, not deletion. Provided that the minimal standard...
Click to read more »TWL) DELETE Its unsources and written like an essay and its not written NPV Christian75 (talk) 11:28, 30 June 2012 (UTC) Delete as an essay for OR and...
Click to read more »Village Voice editors believed in WP:NPV? That is just not right. It doesn't make any sense!?! Why would any editor be WP:NPV? What artistic insolence! Who does...
Click to read more »FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Doesn’t comply with GNG, ANYBIO and lacks of CCS and NPV. It claims notability as column writers, translators, and Gatestone writer...
Click to read more »misunderstanding of the definition within Wikipedia and its implications to a NPV. Allow me to explain my understanding. The verifiability wikipedia policy...
Click to read more »2016 (UTC) Comment: I promote the discussion about this article but from NPV - I wrote there: ,,So if somebody has a time for quick view and discussion...
Click to read more »providing citations or trimming unverified details, as well as editing for NPV. —GrantNeufeld (talk) 10:28, 3 March 2012 (UTC) Keep and cleanup (vote changed...
Click to read more »same.—Ryulong (竜龙) 19:39, 5 August 2012 (UTC) Speedy keep No violations of NPV or NOTE. Seems fine. Close the discussion. Supercharger12821 (talk) 21:23...
Click to read more »According to WP:ALIVE, the content of article should be edited from WP:NPV, now that core content policy is violated.Gdv777 (talk) 15:33, 12 May 2014...
Click to read more »redirecting/deleting it is not, please make specific concrete points and see WP:RS, WP:NPV & WP:DEL and especially WP:DEM. it's not a content fork, I wrote basically...
Click to read more »Pass draft has serious issues with neutrality (WP:NPOV) and notability (WP:NPV) CONFUSED SPIRIT(Thilio).Talk 15:31, 7 December 2025 (UTC) Declined Draft:Андрей...
Click to read more »are WP:RS and WP:INDEPENDENT sources ??? Article does not pass WP:V and WP:NPV. Further, I have already expressed concern that taking article to talk-page...
Click to read more »Appears to surpass WP:GNG. We may need to edit based on WP:COI and/or WP:NPV and or WP:ADV... but these are all editing and cleanup issues, not an issue...
Click to read more »are WP:RS and WP:INDEPENDENT sources ??? Article does not pass WP:V and WP:NPV. Further, I have already expressed concern that taking article to talk-page...
Click to read more »redirecting/deleting it is not, please make specific concrete points and see WP:RS, WP:NPV & WP:DEL and especially WP:DEM. it's not a content fork, I wrote basically...
Click to read more »are placed in the category "rich" according to their nominal wealth, and NPV wealth is not measured for that purpose? So its just a matter of definition...
Click to read more »with all notable films. The article on English Wikipedia complies with WP:NPV and WP:GNG. It is a stub with no promotional tone. Brenthaven (talk) 16:56...
Click to read more »used claims of WP:CON, a guideline, to promote a POV that violated WP:V, WP:NPV, and WP:NOR. Comment by Arbitrators: Comment by parties: Removal of the long...
Click to read more »makes no distinction based on relative reliability among sources (see WP:NPV#Bias in sources) so again, the discussion belongs elsewhere. --Dr. Fleischman...
Click to read more »notability standards (WP:N, WP:GNG, only reference is the team website, fails COI/NPV, potentail ADV). Previously deleted via WP:PROD, brought back via WP:REFUND...
Click to read more »English language sources, I find no reason to include Ukrainian sources per WP:NPV and WP:NONENG. Just for example Unian.net is a Kiev based news agency it...
Click to read more »Wikipedia editors. I still disagree, but under these terms it's no longer an NPV issue. ShaleZero 18:04, 17 September 2007 (UTC) Note we never linked to any...
Click to read more »how I should handle this as it is BLP and not well sources, but also has NPV problems. Should this be article for deletion? Absolutely AFD material.....
Click to read more »newspaper but not for an encyclopedia. Written to promote policy so violates WP:NPV Borock (talk) 12:01, 10 March 2015 (UTC) Keep This is a long-standing article...
Click to read more »articles "It’s time to act against the EDL" which I would say it is not a NPV C. 22468 (talk) 17:17, 24 September 2011 (UTC) Neutrality and reliability...
Click to read more »have been one of the other times this went to noticeboards. It was also on NPV, afaik more than once. I came into it on a RfC, matter of fact. But yeah...
Click to read more »Therefore, not having an open discussion while also removing sources violates WP:NPV and challenges the use of consensus as an administrative tool. TLDR: In order...
Click to read more »Stop clogging n' making your own interpretations of guidelines with a non NPV....if ya found wording that states primary sources cant be used to corroborate...
Click to read more »undone many edits of vandalism, unverifiable content, and potentially non-NPV additions in the past already. I have a little over 1,200 edits, have created...
Click to read more »argue this either way in good faith. Guy (help!) 15:08, 4 June 2020 (UTC) WP:NPV: "Wikipedia aims to describe disputes, but not engage in them. Editors, while...
Click to read more »Wikipedia article so that is my only concern. I tried to write the article in NPV. Wikipedia was linking to the wrong guy (an actor) in a Chicken Soup article...
Click to read more »Russian discourse not withstanding sources and other basic rules such as NPV. All editors, who kept protesting were banned forever. That is not the only...
Click to read more »merit as reliable sources. Language has nothing to do with it. Also, WP:NPV demands that all significant points of view must be included, this alone...
Click to read more »only be planned on a long term basis, 10 or 20 years. The point is, both NPV and JPV require a prediction of demand growth, interest rates, and inflation...
Click to read more »I'm having trouble figuring out how to ask for an article to be made. The process seems super complicated. All I want is an article about a game that has...
Click to read more »The article has been cleaned up. Now it makes some sense and maintains NPV. Jmath666 15:45, 24 June 2007 (UTC) Comment. It makes sense, now. However...
Click to read more »being considered, especially if there are ongoing WP:UNDUE, WP:BLP or WP:NPV concerns and it also helps direct editors to the appropriate place to deposit...
Click to read more »standard. My edits have largely been to restore recent deletions with more NPV and references, or to offer referenced counterpoints. Admitedly the references...
Click to read more »this helped in creating a perception that this was a discussion with WP:NPV in mind. This should have raised a red flag to the closing editor. Thus,...
Click to read more »that if Bomberswarm2 is sometimes removing referenced information and the NPV should be enacted there with a few discussions on each page and it looks...
Click to read more »controversial and a spam/promo target. The article needs to be rewritten in NPV. STILL, this guy and his company are extremely influential. A search on Google...
Click to read more »NobelPrize.org. That is your subjective interpretation, and that would violate WP:NPV! That source only shows the universities, research institutions or companies...
Click to read more »Value of those payments of 6144. (The entire transaction has a negative NPV of 3,855). This seems to tell me that the asset is overpriced at 10,000,...
Click to read more »disputes Leiter's findings, let the dispute be added to the entry to maintain NPV.Unemployed Northeastern (talk) 22:22, 21 May 2015 (UTC) That's completely...
Click to read more »to the policy on WP:NPV. Statements in an article must be made in an WP:NPV manner, but sources themselves do not have to be WP:NPV, as long as they are...
Click to read more »It should include an estimated cash-flow forecast, and calculation of the NPV and IRR. There are billions of books about writing business plans, but you...
Click to read more »you would require for such a high risk investment, and then calculate the NPV of the money you expect to recieve in the future. The lower limit could be...
Click to read more »can be brought to a higher standard, and if there is any way of keeping it NPV, it is not something for Wikipedia Donovan Ravenhull 14:17, 2 September 2005...
Click to read more »be quickly cleared up here. My complaints should have centred around WP:NPV and WP:CIVIL. I'll make a change over there as well. I think the real point...
Click to read more »but another might wish to relieve her of her burden, and making this topic NPV is presenting me with difficulties. Part of my objective in posting here...
Click to read more »because I expect only encyclopedia material; it is because I expect to find NPV information on a subject which is written and reviewed by a group of people...
Click to read more »made within the context of the Argentine Claim in order to be considered NPV, then clearly by his definitions, and by virtue of his lack of acknowledgement...
Click to read more »noticed that much information here is not sourced and highly subjective/non-NPV. That which is sourced appears to be self published from the subject's website...
Click to read more »2013 until she was impeached in 2017." I thought that the lead violated WP:NPV and that being a "convicted criminal" wasn't Park Geun-hye's defining characteristic...
Click to read more »go through the shows personalities problems with unslanted journalism and NPV? The Hackery of the schedule we can go through the problems with each of...
Click to read more »how Korean is by his unethical editing. The article seriously violates WP:NPV and holds his political agendas. This project proposal is his own contradiction...
Click to read more »NobelPrize.org. That is your subjective interpretation, and that would violate WP:NPV! That source only shows the universities, research institutions or companies...
Click to read more »inclusion of the scout oath on grounds of WP:OR,WP:NPV and specifically WP:Substantiate within WP:NPV. Please before commenting do read the discusion to...
Click to read more »for encouraging some of other editors to balance the content and achieve a NPV on the article); I got curious (as you say) about why you created the article...
Click to read more »IP vandalism. It has mostly been edits in violation of WP:BLP and/or WP:NPV. However recently an edit by an IP editor disclosed the name of the anonymous...
Click to read more »WP:AFC, Please make sure to source it WP:NOTE, make sure it is neutral WP:NPV, Have fun, write a great article, ask questions as you go. Don't worry, you...
Click to read more »the article's tone. The point of view must be neutral in accordance of WP:NPV. You can also visit WP:BIO for more guidelines regarding notability of living...
Click to read more »over a decade ago because newbie editors weren't following the rules about NPV, COPYVIO and PEACOCK. Let me also address the issue of notability, and predicate...
Click to read more »(click on book and then on the copyright page) [43] To create a neutral NPV page, here are a couple of options: Remove the SRF cover Use the historical...
Click to read more »WIKI. because wiki page already updated to void someone's edits without NPV and valid references. thanks i will find that feedback thing. Landy3 (talk)...
Click to read more »the last word" as was stated in an entry above, is in the proper spirit of NPV. The alleged stalker situation obviously merits inclusion, but should be...
Click to read more »— Cs32en (talk) 18:53, 27 April 2009 (UTC) Your 1st link support a more NPV NY TIMESThe controlled-demolition theory is the sine qua non of the 9/11...
Click to read more »the fact that pages that contain information about Kosovo are often out of NPV because of Slavic tendencies to present UNMIK as an dictatorship founder...
Click to read more »time, since most of you have proven that you are incapable of writing in NPV style and all the time you spend posting obviously biased trash will be deleted...
Click to read more »reliable sources. Before I untook my first wiki entries I research the COI and NPV and felt comfortable, even though I know the individuals that I am at the...
Click to read more »Obama, or it violates the left-wing bias of Wikipedia. I gotta tell you, our NPV has failed in politics articles but thanks God is much better in articles...
Click to read more »contributor from the article editing and protect the article to preserve the WP:NPV. Kutyava (talk) 00:54, 17 October 2019 (UTC) Declined Full protection would...
Click to read more »Semi-protection: High level of vandalism in the form of a politically biased, non-NPV section on alt-right being repeatedly added. 166.181.85.121 (talk) 03:31...
Click to read more »Semi-protection: Removing of information based on the source in defiance of WP:NPV[40][41]. Interfase (talk) 05:50, 12 November 2016 (UTC) Declined – Content...
Click to read more »semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – COI and NPV violations. User:Afrazwarsi, a SPA, has made numerous unsourced edits to...
Click to read more »result of the debate was KEEP. -Splash 02:48, 20 August 2005 (UTC) Spam. No NPV - not 'encyclopedic' Erwin Walsh Delete. Not notable. Harro5 09:26, August...
Click to read more »just the artist's ideas about his work. None of the articles present a NPV or contribute to notability.--WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 22:57, 29 March 2024...
Click to read more »accusations. Due to false balance and poor sourcing, possible violation of WP:NPV. Due to previous points, a problem of potentially libelous and defamatory...
Click to read more »favor of a move or redirect, as the title "semi-Christian" doesn't convey an NPV --Blu Aardvark 9 July 2005 11:55 (UTC) Delete: seems to be there on the basis...
Click to read more »7 December 2013 (UTC) Chris, I believe you're confusing WP:COI with WP:NPV. Just because an editor is biased doesn't mean they have a conflict. You...
Click to read more »Original Research are the 3 basic principles of Wikipedia. I maintain the NPV basic principle is violated in the article titled “aspartame controversy”...
Click to read more »user's contribution to the article are mixed, and seem to have both a Non-NPV and a mildly spammy feel. --Joe Sperrazza (talk) 05:20, 8 May 2008 (UTC)...
Click to read more »NPD NPE NPF NPG NPH NPI NPJ NPK NPL NPM NPN NPO NPP NPQ NPR NPS NPT NPU NPV NPW NPX NPY NPZ NQA NQB NQC NQD NQE NQF NQG NQH NQI NQJ NQK NQL NQM NQN NQO...
Click to read more »Wikipedia and RationalWiki do, in fact, compete—the first striving for NPV of subject matter, the second existing in ridicule. Also, this COI submission...
Click to read more »period rule is one of the most popular alternatives to net present value (NPV). It is an investment decision rule which states that all investment projects...
Click to read more »I had made every effort to ensure that notability was established, with NPV throughout, and that referencing was thorough. I had used the CNN and CNBC...
Click to read more »edits and it becomes obvious that the current version is definitely not NPV and actually the page is being vandalized to push this plagiarism accusation...
Click to read more »all the economics concepts correct, and presents opposing viewpoints in an NPV language. As for the weight given to Mackay and modern critiques, I feel...
Click to read more »the subject of constant edit warring and it shows. There are terrible WP:NPV, WP:V, and WP:OR issues raised on the talk page that have gone unaddressed...
Click to read more »time, since most of you have proven that you are incapable of writing in NPV style and all the time you spend posting obviously biased trash will be deleted...
Click to read more »No further edits should be made to this discussion. Issue deals with WP:NPV. Editors might be interested. Can find it here: Talk:Audrey Strauss#RfC including...
Click to read more »the ones related to it), vis-a-vis Wikipedia's editing policy (WP:SOAP, WP:NPV). I'm also asking if the way it's written warrants a {{advert}}, or if it...
Click to read more »opinion expressed in this article; sometimes bordering on hyperbole. Per WP:NPV, I question whether the tone is sufficiently impartial and ask whether a...
Click to read more »best way to show evidence of notability in the article, while adhering to NPV? Disclosure: Qi liqueur is made by a relative of the author. Keep --BTB 14:01...
Click to read more »not a gold badge for guaranteed inclusion. 00:57, 13 February 2012 (UTC) NPV calls on use to include significant material, as determined by reliable sources...
Click to read more »views) I noticed that the entire article on Kashish Das Shrestha violates NPV principle of Wikipedia. It is nothing more than a publicity stunt of the...
Click to read more »auripes NPV ICTV Ivela eshanensis Ivela eshanensis Chao 1983 Ivela ochropoda Ivela ochropoda (Eversmann) Ivela ochropoda Evers. Ivela ochropoda NPV ICTV...
Click to read more »article. I have worked on the article to make it compliant with WP:CCPOL, WP:NPV and WP:GNG guidelines. I have also edited the content to make it more encyclopedic...
Click to read more »cervinata (Walker, 1865a) E Wiseana cervinata GV ICTV Wiseana cervinata NPV ICTV Wiseana cervinata Walker 1865 Wiseana copularis Wiseana copularis (Meyrick...
Click to read more »this helped in creating a perception that this was a discussion with WP:NPV in mind. This should have raised a red flag to the closing editor. Thus,...
Click to read more »of birth.. GiftigerWunsch [TALK] 22:53, 2 June 2010 (UTC) Thank you, WP:NPV? I have tried to write it in a neutral way, but if you mean that there is...
Click to read more »published. It's not on Wikipedia to "white knighting" Melas if claims to be a NPV source of information. The post was published by then named Fundación Gabriel...
Click to read more »equivalence between the primary subject and a minority point of view (per WP:NPV, WP:FALSEBALANCE, WP:WEIGHT, WP:PSCI); 3. Because the lead cannot be used...
Click to read more »related with http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:MrOllie Working Capital IRR NPV these test and links removed by user http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:MrOllie...
Click to read more »good knowledge of policies and can help with things like MOS:, WP:BLP, WP:NPV. I like to work with newbies and help them. My talk page is always open to...
Click to read more »Time Magazine, the Village Voice, the New York Post, etc., is far from NPV. MBernal615 (talk) 07:40, 7 February 2010 (UTC) Yes, the issue is about verification...
Click to read more »npd npe npf npg nph npi npj npk npl npm npn npo npp npq npr nps npt npu npv npw npx npy npz nqa nqb nqc nqd nqe nqf nqg nqh nqi nqj nqk nql nqm nqn nqo...
Click to read more »Hufnagel Moma burmana Moma burmana (Berio 1973) Moma champa Moma champa NPV ICTV Moma confusa Moma crassesignata Moma crassesignata Lempke 1964 Moma...
Click to read more »Ticelvetreesi Ticelvetreesi Chapman 1929 Ticera Ticera castanea Ticera castanea NPV ICTV Ticera castanea Swinhoe 1892 Ticera Swinhoe 1892 Ticerra castanea Tichastraea...
Click to read more »1948 Pygaera anastomosis GV ICTV Pygaera anastomosis L. Pygaera anastomosis NPV ICTV Pygaera anastomosis tristis Pygaera anastomosis var. tristis Staudinger...
Click to read more »any game show article - should include a critical reception section per WP:NPV, one of our five pillars, which states that "Articles must not take sides...
Click to read more »differently from my previous edit [[11]], and I still think it crosses the NPV line but I'm done arguing. And I'm banned from editing anyway :) Gcmackay...
Click to read more »you can't sense a difference, there is nothing that can help you maintain NPV. Getting back to quality of your sources: reliability of the source on a...
Click to read more »grossulariata Mendelian -- wsp•jstorP•efloras•gs•gb•g Abraxas grossulariata NPV ICTV -- wsp•jstorP•efloras•gs•gb•g Abraxas grossulariata pura -- wsp•jstorP•efloras•gs•gb•g...
Click to read more »stood up for WP:NPV . I do not really care much about the topic, but I care about Wiki-Policies, and I feel compelled to defend WP:NPV , when it is violated...
Click to read more »mention the subject matter in any way. Should it be labeled as SPAM, NOR, or NPV? 74.93.193.189 (talk) 20:50, 5 July 2011 (UTC) Please see the latest updates...
Click to read more »redirecting/deleting it is not, please make specific concrete points and see WP:RS, WP:NPV & WP:DEL and especially WP:DEM. Prototyperspective (talk) 15:38, 11 September...
Click to read more »failures of this list and its committee without feeling like I'm breaking WP:NPV and also in a way that makes it smooth for you and easy to follow. Perhaps...
Click to read more »investments return 20% and 25% in ROI, but the first provides 1 million dollars of NPV, while the second provides just $100, you borrow money to invest in the lower...
Click to read more »is this a "nationalist debate" when it is a dispute about origins? As WP:NPV states:All encyclopedic content on Wikipedia must be written from a neutral...
Click to read more »related to NPV, and the AI presents a 'solution' rather than simple 'AI optimized search' that too based on its own 'interpretation' of WP:NPV just like...
Click to read more »correctly identified all AI-generated content. However, its specificity and NPV were the lowest, at 0%, indicating a limitation in correctly identifying...
Click to read more »Russo-Ukrainian War as written violates Wikipedia:Neutral point of view policy (WP:NPV), i.e. representing fairly, proportionately, and, as far as possible, without...
Click to read more »just the artist's ideas about his work. None of the articles present a NPV or contribute to notability.--WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 22:57, 29 March 2024...
Click to read more »only a single subject might become an indication of coi and violation of npv. Now I have read all the COI guidelines and understood my mistake. And it...
Click to read more »appeals to a certain side or not. Making arguments like this goes again WP:NPV Friedbyrd (talk) 16:35, 8 March 2024 (UTC) lol, Evie publishes COVID conspiracy...
Click to read more »criticisms or controversial items from articles. Most of the times this is a COI/NPV issue and the criticism they tend to wrongly remove is justified by WP:DUE...
Click to read more »"iNVISIBLE"). The Emmys were not awarded directly or exclusively to him. WP:NPV JohnMizuki (talk) 12:52, 18 July 2026 (UTC) Note: this discussion has been...
Click to read more »criticisms or controversial items from articles. Most of the times this is a COI/NPV issue and the criticism they tend to wrongly remove is justified by WP:DUE...
Click to read more »WP:DUE, so does information promoting somebody shouldn't. An example of WP:NPV from the other side I guess. 𝓔xclusive𝓔ditor Ping Me🔔 16:36, 28 January...
Click to read more »I am seeking an outside opinion regarding a series of deletions and accusations of "POV-pushing" by User:Impru20 across several articles related to Spanish...
Click to read more »an well covered incident by sources of different medias , as WP:V and WP:NPV. An cross border strike by a nuclear armed state which is again seen after...
Click to read more »forms of all Wikipedia guidelines and a brief definition (e.g. WP:GNG, WP:NPV)? I usually find it difficult to use the shortened forms when commenting...
Click to read more »those attempts were incompatible with our policies (I would guess WP:RS & WP:NPV). Please note those policies were mentioned in this section at your User...
Click to read more »discussion. I see some people (mostly IPs) update maintenance template(like npv dispute, unreferenced) dates to latestcurrent month. I think it is wrong...
Click to read more »my submission has now been rejected a second time. The first time only NPV was cited, now still for the same thing plus subject qualification. Is anyone...
Click to read more »(UTC) Bias has been eliminated by the principle of Neutral Point of View (NPV) Tesleemah (talk) 09:53, 14 September 2024 (UTC) I don't think it's true...
Click to read more »specific, users ignoring points that are being made because of WP:RS and WP:NPV, which simply went ignored in favor of brow-beating me repeatedly until I...
Click to read more »Paracetamol (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Reason: Large amount of non-NPV editing during current ongoing debate in politics. The revision at https://en...
Click to read more »state border," puts the subject in a negative light and is a violation of WP:NPV. Calling him a "Political Prisoner" as many supporting articles have stated...
Click to read more »