Redirect to:
This page is a redirect. The following categories are used to track and monitor this redirect:
|
week) There is a very large redirects backlog Shortcuts WP:NPPSWP:NPPS WP:NPP/SWP:NPP/S WP:NPRSCHOOLWP:NPRSCHOOL The New Page Review training program is...
Click to read more »redirects by creator unreviewed articles with merge tags AfD created by NPPs in the past week Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Reports/Easy reviews Unreviewed...
Click to read more »days may be automatically archived. The New pages patrol noticeboard or NPP/N exists to provide a simple means for editors to request review of and provide...
Click to read more »most of all it has to do with the fact that NPP has to be reactive rather than proactive. In the case of NPP, we have to act in the case of an improper...
Click to read more »NPP backlog v t e Articles 26590 ↑276 Oldest article 17 years old Redirects 52708 Oldest redirect 5 years old Article reviews 1428 Redirect reviews 2412...
Click to read more »Shortcut WP:NPPSWP:NPPS New tools are currently in development by the Wikimedia Foundation to assist in the quality control of new pages. Editors who patrol...
Click to read more »NPP backlog v t e Articles 26590 ↑276 Oldest article 17 years old Redirects 52708 Oldest redirect 5 years old Article reviews 1428 Redirect reviews 2412...
Click to read more »Mainspace is the only namespace where the page curation toolbar displays. NPPs do not need to patrol other namespaces, and are encouraged to focus on mainspace...
Click to read more »NPP backlog v t e Articles 26590 ↑276 Oldest article 17 years old Redirects 52708 Oldest redirect 5 years old Article reviews 1428 Redirect reviews 2412...
Click to read more ».NPPS-participation-box .mw-heading2, .NPPS-goals .mw-heading2 { border-bottom: none; } .NPPS-outer-border { width: 100%; border: 1px solid #005633;...
Click to read more »Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 00:22, 24 September 2016 (UTC) (personal focus on NPP, COI, spam & paid editing) Dat GuyTalkContribs 07:51, 24 September 2016 (UTC)...
Click to read more »NPP: Still heaven or hell for new users – and for the reviewers: Just what is NPP? Why does it need the WMF? Why does it need YOU? ← Back to Contents...
Click to read more »The NPP browser (direct link) is a user-friendly tool hosted on Toolforge that is helpful in quickly finding articles and draft submissions with topics...
Click to read more »NPP backlog v t e Articles 26590 ↑276 Oldest article 17 years old Redirects 52708 Oldest redirect 5 years old Article reviews 1428 Redirect reviews 2412...
Click to read more »NPP backlog v t e Articles 26590 ↑276 Oldest article 17 years old Redirects 52708 Oldest redirect 5 years old Article reviews 1428 Redirect reviews 2412...
Click to read more »WMF continues to stonewall development – NPP wishes again relegated to stocking fillers ← Back to Contents View Latest Issue 28 October 2018 Special report...
Click to read more »project, and have found a worrying error rate, far in excess of the usual NPP errors. In a very small sample (not had time to look at more, for firefighting...
Click to read more »familiarisation of article PAGs and how to apply them. Reduction in the workload at NPP. User:BusterD – project lead (Jan 2023–Present) User:Kudpung – project lead...
Click to read more »major difference between AfC and NPP is the location of the pages. Drafts have been brought into the NPP tool recently so NPP reviewers can review Drafts the...
Click to read more »opinions based in policy, and have been courteous in arguing their position. At NPP, Rosguill has been a huge asset, having reviewed tens of thousands of pages...
Click to read more »whereas private media was more neutral. Coverage of the then-opposition NPP was relatively neutral across state and private media, but private media...
Click to read more »curriculum used by most trainers. Estimated time 3 months. User:Cassiopeia/NPPS/FormalDude User:Barkeep49/NPPSchool/Celestina The "short" curriculum used...
Click to read more »this would be beneficial because it would 1) reduce the # of editors doing NPPs incorrectly and for this reason would also 2) draw more users to it because...
Click to read more »essential MediaWiki extension used by the English Wikipedia's New Pages Patrol (NPP)—is not considered an active project within the WMF, and that software support...
Click to read more »NPP backlog v t e Articles 26590 ↑276 Oldest article 17 years old Redirects 52708 Oldest redirect 5 years old Article reviews 1428 Redirect reviews 2412...
Click to read more »Wikimania 2018 ends; changes at NPR: New admins and Kudpung finally leaves NPP after 7 years. ← Back to Contents View Latest Issue 31 July 2018 News and...
Click to read more »categories, adding stub tags, and creating talk pages, are optional now for NPPs. If NPPs don't have to add talk pages, not sure it'd be fair to require that...
Click to read more »npp-synevyr.net.ua: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • Spamcheck • blacklist hits • MER-C X-wiki • gs • Reports:...
Click to read more »Reporting statistics of link npp-web.co.jp; 0 records. npp-web.co.jp: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • Spamcheck...
Click to read more »Here are the top-secret steps that are sure to keep the new pages patrol (NPP) off your back: If you are planning on committing UPE successfully, you should...
Click to read more »NPP backlog v t e Articles 26590 ↑276 Oldest article 17 years old Redirects 52708 Oldest redirect 5 years old Article reviews 1428 Redirect reviews 2412...
Click to read more »restore the NPP, but said "I won't object if the bit is restored" so I requested NPP again. . My WP:PERM request was denied June 13 (see logs at NPP PERM if...
Click to read more »to allow both Articles for Creation (AfC) reviewers and New Page Patrol (NPP) reviewers to prioritize pages for review using quality and copyright violation...
Click to read more »September 2012 by the Wikimedia Foundation in direct collaboration with the NPP team, greatly improved again in 2018 in collaboration with the Wikipedia...
Click to read more »0006/15/20161/4/20183/25/2018no. Unreviewed articlesWikipedia Signpost - NPP work gets better View source data. After the New Pages Reviewer user right...
Click to read more »Much ado about Fox News: Source reliability, NPP, and appearance discussions. ← Back to Contents View Latest Issue 30 September 2022 Discussion report...
Click to read more »chat gives new mop, WMF seeks "sound logo" and "organizer lab" In focus NPP: Still heaven or hell for new users – and for the reviewers In the media...
Click to read more »Some wishes do come true: NPP wins the wish list poll; Wikipedia editors will be able to work better at night; new WMF appointments and new arbitrators;...
Click to read more »(NPP source guide) Documentation: Based on {{RSP entry}}...
Click to read more »What the community should be focusing on right now is the huge backlog at NPP, our only firewall against inappropriate new articles, and subjected to a...
Click to read more »that they could not do NPP, then they probably would not do NPP. I mean, it is not as if there was a queue of people outside NPP that we would have to...
Click to read more »September An open letter from the English Wikipedia's New Page Review (aka NPP) has attracted well over 400 signatures in support from Wikipedians over...
Click to read more »354, 2, 1) www.sdbj.com/PDF/Fast100.pdf (160, 35, 2, 1) www.emsnow.com/npps/story.cfm?id=27228 (160, 12, 2, 1) www.gateway.com (160, 29, 2, 1) www.hp...
Click to read more »we need every single one of them and cannot afford to lose any. If the NPPs have to slap a few CSDs on the rest, which will be incredibly easy and take...
Click to read more »NPP backlog v t e Articles 26590 ↑276 Oldest article 17 years old Redirects 52708 Oldest redirect 5 years old Article reviews 1428 Redirect reviews 2412...
Click to read more »Sigalov is on and Peel is in. In focus NPP: Still heaven or hell for new users – and for the reviewers Just what is NPP? Why does it need the WMF? Why does...
Click to read more »NPP backlog v t e Articles 26590 ↑276 Oldest article 17 years old Redirects 52708 Oldest redirect 5 years old Article reviews 1428 Redirect reviews 2412...
Click to read more »recreated the article. This should be deleted as it is circumventing the NPP process. Bruxton (talk) 17:25, 5 September 2022 (UTC) Note: This discussion...
Click to read more »the long-term objective of merging NPP and AfC, presumably to help NPP by getting the AfC reviewers involved. NPP might be short-handed but AfC is, too...
Click to read more »less a problem with NPP); it does not catch duplication of existing articles right at the beginning (this is not a problem with NPP); it mentions the possibility...
Click to read more »adminship. MB has been editing since 2015; I noticed him while monitoring NPP, and I don't ever remember declining a single tag. He also does a tremendous...
Click to read more »watch | logs) Category:NPP articles by importance (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Category:High-importance NPP articles (edit | talk |...
Click to read more »Earth seen from Apollo 17 North America from low orbiting satellite Suomi NPP Earth at night (2016) Earth at night (1994–1995) Mars in true colour by OSIRIS...
Click to read more »Patrolling the "oldest" articles in the NPP Queue has its own sets of questions and procedures that complement standard NPP workflows. Reviewing articles at...
Click to read more »In focus NPP: Still heaven or hell for new users – and for the reviewers 2022-09-30 Just what is NPP? Why does it need the WMF? Why does it need YOU?...
Click to read more »NPP backlog v t e Articles 26590 ↑276 Oldest article 17 years old Redirects 52708 Oldest redirect 5 years old Article reviews 1428 Redirect reviews 2412...
Click to read more »here. For further information on the state of the project, see the latest NPP newsletter. Discuss this newsletter Subscribe Archive << Previous Archive — Current...
Click to read more »'qualifications') , neither does NPP (yet), and that, IMO, is most likely the reason for the core issues associated with AfC and NPP. The proposals and 'to do'...
Click to read more »anything you want – well, almost. Special report NPP needs you WMF continues to stonewall development; NPP wishes again relegated to stocking fillers. Special...
Click to read more »NPP Francis Asenso -Boakye, Bantama - NPP Ralph Poku-Adusei, Bekwai - NPP Nana Asafo-Adjei Ayeh, Bosome-Freho - NPP Yaw Osei Adutwum, Bosomtwe - NPP Nana...
Click to read more »talk:Newbie treatment at Criteria for speedy deletion#Proposal/Idea for NPP changes - Twinkle and Huggle scripts for newpage and construction tags Wikipedia...
Click to read more »NPP backlog v t e Articles 26590 ↑276 Oldest article 17 years old Redirects 52708 Oldest redirect 5 years old Article reviews 1428 Redirect reviews 2412...
Click to read more »working there has been a very enjoyable project. I've also done a lot with NPP. I've worked to make the newsletter for that project, try to answer questions...
Click to read more »after a 6 month suspension of the case. Miscellaneous The new pages patrol (NPP) team has prepared an appeal to the Wikimedia Foundation (WMF) for assistance...
Click to read more »New Page Patrol and even hosts a “school” to mentor and teach others about NPP. He is an OTRS volunteer. He understands deletion (390 well-argued !votes...
Click to read more »Random Page Patrol. Onel5969: I came across it as part of New pages patrol (NPP). Souravdas1998: I joined Wikipedia in 2016 when I got my first internet...
Click to read more »you much insight into the mindset of an author. And 2) you should use the NPP perm to demonstrate your understanding of many of our core policies. (Others...
Click to read more »workload from NPP to AfC. Following that shift, we see indications that AfC struggles to keep up with the increased number of submissions, while NPP gets some...
Click to read more »tools for the Curation system. Stay up to date by subscribing here to the NPP newsletter that appears every two months, and/or putting the reviewers' talk...
Click to read more »extension beyond that. Have I missed a discussion with NPP about this? Has there been any redirect NPP related bot approvals between the first one and this...
Click to read more »en:user:166.70.238.44 <-> drugs.com (0%/0%/0% - Added link: www.drugs.com/npp/wintergreen.html (Monitored rule: \bdrugs\.com - reason for monitoring \bdrugs\...
Click to read more »try a different MP altogether. Albert Kan-Dapaah, Afigya Sekyere West - NPP (Wikidata:Q2638264)Piousmaiden (talk) 09:00, 4 July 2020 (UTC)Piousmaiden...
Click to read more »article reviewers all time (NPP HoF quarry) – 2026.01.01". 20 January 2026. "Quarry – Top redirect reviewers all time (NPP HoF quarry) – 2026.01.01". 1...
Click to read more »User:Samtar/sandbox/NPP/tabs User:Samtar/sandbox/NPP/ParticipantsHeader If you participate in New Page Patrolling please add yourself to the list below...
Click to read more »When doing NPP and coming across an article with lack of evidence of notability and/or inadequate referencing, one has the options of draftifying it,...
Click to read more »has a WP:CSD-linked letter-number prepended to the deletion reason. The NPP zoom interface will greatly help the experienced patrollers, but a tool to...
Click to read more »days may be automatically archived. The New pages patrol noticeboard or NPP/N exists to provide a simple means for editors to request review of and provide...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Spotted in NPP. I cannot find any references for this class of boat online, and it's sourced...
Click to read more »variety of data sets available for download, including full shots from Suomi-NPP. https://www.avl.class.noaa.gov/saa/products/welcome (NOAA CLASS) – The NOAA's...
Click to read more »work but this does not make them necessarily not worth doing the work. So NPPs appear to me to be very trigger-happy, still, whatever process may have recently...
Click to read more »eligible for the Redirect Ninja Master award "NPP - Top reviewers (redirects only) in 2024". 2 January 2025. "NPP - Top reviewers (articles only) in 2024"...
Click to read more »what you mean by "step out of the way" --the many things we do at COIN and NPP and AfC and normal editing are not in the way of a more definitive solution...
Click to read more »gh/tema-central-cpp-wishes-npp-a-successful-primaries/?amp https://mobile.ghanaweb.com/GhanaHomePage/NewsArchive/Tema-Central-CPP-wishes-NPP-a-successful-primaries-985171...
Click to read more »catch-22 where no matter what I do, someone's going to complain? When I'm doing NPP, I need to get articles out of the queue, and this one was not fit to remain...
Click to read more »be singled out? Don't a lot of users do NPP with other tools, like Twinkle? I think you should refer to NPP-related tags and criteria in general. Also...
Click to read more »improvements, efforts to invite new editors to participate in NPP increased and more editors requested the NPP user right so they could help, and most importantly...
Click to read more »Sigalov is on and Peel is in. In focus: NPP: Still heaven or hell for new users – and for the reviewers Just what is NPP? Why does it need the WMF? Why does...
Click to read more »(unless it's flagged for hopefully quick NPP review) As one example of the zillions of possibilities at NPP I had a new good faith editor generate >200...
Click to read more »The recommendations and guidelines for new page patrollers described at WP:NPP which should be studied carefully before using these tools. Page curation...
Click to read more »additional reviews are highly appreciated. 2024 and 2025 NPP Awards JTtheOG was selected as the NPP reviewer of the year for both 2024 and 2025, for reviewing...
Click to read more »requests at WP:RM/TR, and this would also be helpful for draftifying when doing NPP. I meet the editing requirements, and have not had any blocks or 3RR issues...
Click to read more »number of prolific NPPs isn't the answer either. I'd also be cautious about reducing the level of quality control required as part of NPP. Various ideas also...
Click to read more »edits should be made to this discussion. In order to reduce the burden at WP:NPP a list of possible Autopatrol candidates was generated on 05 March 2010 using...
Click to read more »2017 (UTC) Comment - User:L3X1 - This didn't make it past NPP. I tagged it for AFD from NPP. I considered it a non-obvious hoax. If someone else considers...
Click to read more »running... X-750 Rust In Peace... Polaris 12:50, 28 June 2022 (UTC) Sorry, NPPs are busy people and while I congratulate you on your work, I see no reason...
Click to read more »Swedish sports media company Everysport Group ESPN (NPP source guide) [9] – US-based Global News (NPP source guide) [10] – Canada-based news company The...
Click to read more »sources for Nigeria-related information. Help WP:NIGERIA contributors, AfC and NPP reviewers. NB:Some reliable sources can publish unreliable pieces so each...
Click to read more »including CSD, AfD, UAA, NPP as well as ITN/C. (I would note that we are not exactly drowning in admins who are active in NPP.) His content creation is...
Click to read more »have a grand total of one uses... ever. Also somewhat redundant to {{Stop NPP}} series which at least has been used occasionally (though really I don't...
Click to read more »please post (preferably a permalink) to the logs here when done. Granted +NPP for 10 days and +confirmed indefinitely for purpose of trial. --TheSandDoctor...
Click to read more »are a large number of articles about women and related topics at AFC and NPP. Following are the links to bot-generated pages tracking these articles....
Click to read more »2023". EastMojo. "NPP open for alliance with like-minded parties in 2023 Nagaland Assembly election". assamtribune.com. 15 May 2022. "NPP says it has started...
Click to read more »include UAA (where he is an absolutely prolific contributor), COIN, and NPP. As someone who responds to revdel/oversight requests, I can attest that...
Click to read more »edits should be made to this discussion. In order to reduce the burden at WP:NPP a list of possible Autopatrol candidates was generated on 05 March 2010 using...
Click to read more »Sorry, temporary accounts cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions...
Click to read more »"description": "This page lists the NPP coordinators that are involved in testing the massmessage before the NPP newsletter is released. This isn’t the...
Click to read more »More than sufficient sourcing available to satisfy the GNG. References "NPP confident of winning 30+ seats in next year's Meghalaya assembly elections"...
Click to read more »these, if not more, created within a few minutes of each other. I was on NPP at the time, and there was a gigantic flood of one sentence stubs on Portuguese...
Click to read more »Rosguill talk 03:50, 16 June 2019 (UTC) Approved. Thank you to the various NPPs that have commented. Primefac (talk) 17:51, 16 June 2019 (UTC) The above...
Click to read more »many more. My interactions with Joe have primarily came from working at NPP and AfD: Joe is consistently one of the most level-headed voices in these...
Click to read more »project to increase understanding of editors who work on new page patrol (NPP). NPP is the first line of defense against articles that do not belong on Wikipedia...
Click to read more »edits should be made to this discussion. In order to reduce the burden at WP:NPP a list of possible Autopatrol candidates was generated on 05 March 2010 using...
Click to read more »For redirects For articles Additionally, the NPP Technical Achievement Award was awarded to DannyS712 for his work on programming DannyS712 bot III, which...
Click to read more »edits should be made to this discussion. In order to reduce the burden at WP:NPP a list of possible Autopatrol candidates was generated on 05 March 2010 using...
Click to read more »think the net effect will be to discourage people from new page patrolling. NPP is already a thankless task, add the risk of being called out in front of...
Click to read more »articles, 0 of which have been deleted. I have often reviewed their work during NPP and have never found any problems (via TSI spot-check, Earwig, etc.) requiring...
Click to read more »corrected twice already by the jury. Akwasi Afrifa (Ghanaian MP), Fomena - NPP Amoaniwaa (talk) 09:21, 2 August 2020 (UTC)(Wikidata:Q98000358) Amoaniwaa...
Click to read more »Hello New pages patrol/Newsletter/Archive, Community Wishlist Survey – NPP needs you – Vote NOW Community Wishlist Voting takes place 16 to 30 November...
Click to read more »edits should be made to this discussion. In order to reduce the burden at WP:NPP a list of possible Autopatrol candidates was generated on 05 March 2010 using...
Click to read more »well Redirect reviews were also counted towards this Eligible, but opted out of the award. Please contact any NPP co-ordinator, if you change your mind...
Click to read more »Community Wishlist Survey. Last month's issue of The Signpost, Special Report 'NPP: This could be heaven or this could be hell for new users – and for the reviewers'...
Click to read more »all. People may still stumble across an autopatrolled article and perform NPP-like actions on it, including adding it back to the queue if they feel it...
Click to read more »lot of NPP, so I know how often people make these kinds of mistakes. I think that there’s a real need to have a great culture of behaviour on NPP, something...
Click to read more »with some good results and to discourage other NPPs from taking it to AfD. This template is part of the NPP Toolbar tool package and should NOT be deleted...
Click to read more »in contravention of any Wikipedia policies or guidelines. As part of the NPP project It is one of the essential elements of the early research that was...
Click to read more »WP:AUTHOR. The article has been greatly improved since nomination. I know NPP is a difficult arena to work in, but perhaps placing some kind of a notability...
Click to read more »anything you want – well, almost. Special report: NPP needs you WMF continues to stonewall development; NPP wishes again relegated to stocking fillers. Special...
Click to read more »participation and retention without making NPP more difficult, then I'm all for it. If we're going to keep NPP effective and easy to do, however, I do have...
Click to read more »discussion in the NPP discussion page in May 2022 here. There seem to be reviewers who simply use Page curation to manage the NPP feed and mark articles...
Click to read more »efforts to communicate with users, upholding NPP's goal of nurturing new users and quality over quantity. NPP Technical Achievement Award As a special recognition...
Click to read more »December 2022 (UTC) Delete I’m surprised that this was reviewed and passed at NPP. Mccapra (talk) 04:31, 10 December 2022 (UTC) Delete - Fails WP:NBOOK and...
Click to read more »corrected twice already by the jury. Akwasi Afrifa (Ghanaian MP), Fomena - NPP Amoaniwaa (talk) 22:13, 1 September 2020 (UTC)(Wikidata:Q98000358) Nimot123...
Click to read more »sources are not frequently discussed on the reliable sources noticeboard, the NPP coordinators have organized broad discussions covering such sources. Wikipedia:New...
Click to read more »major difference between AfC and NPP is the location of the pages. Drafts have been brought into the NPP tool recently so NPP reviewers can review Drafts the...
Click to read more »at AFC. The ability to deal with the large amount of obvious junk in the NPP and AFC streams would be useful too. Undeletion for WP:REFUNDs and history...
Click to read more »Yes Function details: As background, members of New Page Patrollers (WP:NPP) have caught up tagging the backlog of new pages. However there is still...
Click to read more »ability to jump back a specific number or edits or days, as with NPP. I remember when NPP did not have that feature, and it was great getting it. I have...
Click to read more »going to scale, assuming a list that is 5,000 articles long or whatever the NPP queue is currently. One would think that the "approved" articles will have...
Click to read more »reviewing 360 articles ("one-a-day"), and 100 reviews earns the "Standard" NPP barnstar. About 90 reviewers received barnstars for each of the years 2018...
Click to read more »a tooltip saying telling you so. Now per policy if your part of the Afc/NPP group, the source must be removed as part of the review process. scope_creepTalk...
Click to read more »Wikipedia's Live Help Channel, or the #articles-for-creation channel in the NPP Discord. To join, follow the instructions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Articles...
Click to read more »to sponsor such a newbie. 68.165.77.64 (talk) 13:57, 1 March 2011 (UTC) NPP and Newbies Those who think New Page Patrollers are too mean to Newbies should...
Click to read more »06:34, 18 April 2011 (UTC) (also currently working on improvement of the NPP process). JohnCD (talk) 20:54, 6 May 2011 (UTC) Reaper Eternal (talk) 15:40...
Click to read more »are a large number of articles about women and related topics at AFC and NPP. Following are the links to bot-generated pages tracking these articles....
Click to read more »was tagged as reviewed, falling off the NPP queue). The lesson here is - don't tag an article as reviewed at NPP while there are deletion tags on it. Ritchie333...
Click to read more »Top new article reviewers as of 03:53, 16 August 2026 (UTC) Please note the following: Only reviews of mainspace pages are counted. The report is limited...
Click to read more »3 December with a resounding success for NPP, reminding the WMF and the volunteer communities just how critical NPP is to maintaining a clean encyclopedia...
Click to read more »that the nominator's admitted pattern of focusing on NPP, swapping usernames, and returning to NPP is compliant with WP:CLEANSTART, which extols the new...
Click to read more »active at NPP are reviewers in the first place, while #4 would involve significant work for admins. #2 would ensure a significant user base for NPP from the...
Click to read more »of denoument afterward was pretty disabling. OK, I've had a look at your NPP work, and you've done a great job so far. You've made a couple of mistakes...
Click to read more »on one of the many backlogs List tasks related to new page patrolling (WP:NPP) and counter-vandalism patrolling (WP:CVU) in this section. Take a look at...
Click to read more »have a full knowledge of them. NPP Tools Report Superlinks – allows you to check an article's history, logs, talk page, NPP flowchart (on unpatrolled pages)...
Click to read more »have a full knowledge of them. NPP Tools Report Superlinks – allows you to check an article's history, logs, talk page, NPP flowchart (on unpatrolled pages)...
Click to read more »than a dicdef that has been languishing at the bottom of the NPP list since 31 Augustat NPP for ten weeks because its creator cant't be bothered to come...
Click to read more »Questions from a Noob Pritch London Afc reviewers list Imbalance between NPP and AfC processes RFC related to AfC Too many reviews, too few re-reviewed...
Click to read more »NPP backlog v t e Articles 26590 ↑276 Oldest article 17 years old Redirects 52708 Oldest redirect 5 years old Article reviews 1428 Redirect reviews 2412...
Click to read more »Of course, I have had disagreements with other editors in the context of NPP, WP:AfC, and WP:AfD. I’ve been able to keep a cool head in these situations...
Click to read more »the two users mostly concerned with investigating the performance of the NPP system Correlation between edit count and number of patrols: r = 0.055 (p...
Click to read more »at NPP and hold back the floodgates of crap, promo, and copyvio that show up in the queue every day. Of course, those who've never done a single NPP review...
Click to read more »asking for sloppy reviewing. What we need, just as we desperately do at WP:NPP, is a greater number of more competent reviewers. I see recently that some...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:GNG, fails WP:NDIRECTOR, fails WP:NACTOR.(NPP action) Usedtobecool ☎️ 02:53, 2 April 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...
Click to read more »initiated. DGG ( talk ) 20:12, 24 March 2013 (UTC) Oppose. Given that most NPPs say there are no problem to be solved by this, then this looks like a useless...
Click to read more »NPP backlog v t e Articles 26590 ↑276 Oldest article 17 years old Redirects 52708 Oldest redirect 5 years old Article reviews 1428 Redirect reviews 2412...
Click to read more »note: The Notability Police (NP) is not to be confused with New Page Patrol (NPP), a ragtag group of vigilantes that serve Wikipedia's subsidiary purpose...
Click to read more »NPP backlog v t e Articles 26590 ↑276 Oldest article 17 years old Redirects 52708 Oldest redirect 5 years old Article reviews 1428 Redirect reviews 2412...
Click to read more »NPP backlog v t e Articles 26590 ↑276 Oldest article 17 years old Redirects 52708 Oldest redirect 5 years old Article reviews 1428 Redirect reviews 2412...
Click to read more »Advertising. If needed, potential draftify- how is this procedure allowed per WP:NPP inappropriate? VickKiang (talk) 20:32, 8 November 2022 (UTC) @PerryPerryD:...
Click to read more »the new pages feed for NPP. EaglesFan37 (talk) 18:08, 26 May 2026 (UTC) @EaglesFan37 It doesn't seem very in good faith to camp NPP feeds and tag those that...
Click to read more »Wikimania 2018 ends; changes at NPR New admins and Kudpung finally leaves NPP after 7 years. In the media Blackouts in Europe; Wikipedia and capitalists;...
Click to read more »to NPP. And on that note, I’ll ping DGG. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 21:46, 6 April 2015 (UTC) Having run into this issue while trying to reduce the NPP backlog...
Click to read more »Welcome to Phase 2 of the January–February 2026 NPP drive. During Phase 1, we reviewed 16,658 articles and 4,416 redirects, and there is currently a backlog...
Click to read more »WikiProject College football. He intends to participate at AIV, AFD, MFD and NPP, and has increasing expertise at sockpuppet investigations. Six articles...
Click to read more »updated sorted topic list. New reviewers The NPP School is being underused. The learning curve for NPP is quite steep, but a detailed and easy-to-read...
Click to read more »provided and agreed upon by the NPP team. John Vandenberg (chat) 09:37, 3 June 2008 (UTC) Is there an ongoing discussion with NPP folks anywhere? dihydrogen...
Click to read more »the article. Nevertheless, would the above voter also please do some WP:NPP sometimes to see what kind of garbage is coming in any minute, and how we...
Click to read more »comments demonstrate) make the problem worse by driving anyone not doing NPP from the whole area (editors who could be doing an efficient job of watching...
Click to read more »program with me (training page), and started (but did not complete) the NPP school program with Cassiopea (training page). Andrew Base was blocked on...
Click to read more »times. Either we should delete it or mainspace it so it can be run through NPP Legacypac (talk) 05:12, 23 February 2018 (UTC) Possibly notable. --SmokeyJoe...
Click to read more »are swamped with a 14k+/- backlog at NPP. Keep an eye on draftified articles and clean them up, or become an NPP reviewer where you can help fix the problems...
Click to read more »proposal on NPP will be negligible. --Ahecht (TALK PAGE) 15:40, 18 April 2018 (UTC) I'm not so concerned about the impact of outreach events on NPP itself...
Click to read more »got bitten by New Page Patrol being done from the front of the queue. WP:NPP says: New page patrollers are highly encouraged to patrol the oldest pages...
Click to read more »for some of the most important policy changes over the years - including NPP and travelled(sic) extensively for Wikipedia at my own cost. All that is...
Click to read more »own online community newsletter. News and notes Some wishes do come true NPP wins the wish list poll; Wikipedia editors will be able to work better at...
Click to read more »as a way to slip past NPP; and there *is* a fix to the userspace-to-mainspace-loophole, rumour has it, although not every NPP patroller uses the bugfixed...
Click to read more »discussions. /wiae /tlk 14:22, 2 March 2016 (UTC) Delete as I patrolled this at NPP and planned to also nominate for deletion as none of this satisfies the applicable...
Click to read more »The following templates can be used for inviting possible editors to join NPP. Hi New pages patrol/Coordination, we need experienced volunteers. New Page...
Click to read more »GOCE, Wikify, Biographies, Peerage and Baronetage, and NPP. Overall, I participate in WP:NPP, WP:AIV, WP:UAA, WP:RFF, WP:CSD, WP:AFD, WP:MFD. As far...
Click to read more »together on one page. While I enjoy and have learned a lot by doing a lot of WP:NPP, vandalism cleanup, and some participation in wp:afd, I have to say that...
Click to read more »the dicussion re: the NPP continues. Thanks, Martinp23 20:35, 27 March 2007 (UTC) Hi Martin, yes I generally agree, I'm assuming NPP is New Page Patrol?...
Click to read more »currently take part in WP:UNI as well as WP:NPP. If I were to be granted adminship, I will work on WP:NPP, Typo fixing, and working on articles focusing...
Click to read more »agreed upon, including MB themselves. Noting their counterargument that "NPP has too many rejections to maintain best practise" is a question that the...
Click to read more »(UTC): User SDZeroBot t • c • dc • l • ef • b • bl; (79751) to User:SDZeroBot/NPP sorting/Culture/Biography (edit | [[:|talk]] | history | links | watch |...
Click to read more »there already a system of flagging up new articles for inspection by the NPP? This template doesn't seem to add any value, seems rather bitey and so should...
Click to read more »accusation against Swarm (that Swarm errored in granting the NPP) while removing the NPP. This is in the evidence diffs but not highlighted specifically...
Click to read more »problem with discussions being relisted due to insufficient participation. WP:NPP also has frequent backlogs. Review the pages tagged for speedy deletion at...
Click to read more »this made it through either NPP or AfC Nosebagbear (talk) 08:34, 7 June 2018 (UTC) It didn't, Nosebagbear. I speedied it on NPP. Speedy template was removed...
Click to read more »available: TBD Function overview: Mark as reviewed all the redirects in the NPP queue that are bolded in the lead of the target article. Links to relevant...
Click to read more »interested me, like Charles Mattocks and other important Vermonters. Did a lot of NPP and AfC work, and eventually shifted away from the English Wikipedia to more...
Click to read more »Naturally, the way proposed to fix that is not to recruit far and wide for new NPPs and make the process simpler, but instead, to choke down on the opportunities...
Click to read more »work at NPP. And NPP do a fantastic job in general. And CASSIOPEIA's error rate is really low. High AfD nom. rate is to be expected for an NPP nom'ing...
Click to read more »Fool (nom) has been editing since late 2009, and has worked on vandalfighting, NPP, article writing, and referencing other people's contributions. He has recently...
Click to read more »voluteers at NPP, which is what we need. The restriction of requiring autoconfirmation will get us less volunteers and make things worse, not only at NPP but everywhere...
Click to read more »This page is designed to collate materials for NPP School teachers. If you are a NPP trainer please feel free to add your own materials for use by others...
Click to read more »much as we can do to deal with incoming articles on a single track, and NPP is the best we have. What we do need is a way for putting articles in need...
Click to read more »the organization in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. (NPP action) Extraordinary Writ (talk) 21:05, 21 September 2022 (UTC) Note: This...
Click to read more »out NPP in a bit - however I only joined AfC a bit over a week ago! Between AfC, AfD, Vandal Patrol I'm lacking time to create as it is - think NPP might...
Click to read more »work. --Kudpung (talk) 03:34, 10 February 2011 (UTC) That Timneu22 follow NPP guidelines and refrain from speedying or AfD-ing new articles created in...
Click to read more »article useful links and even de-orphan it. Edit conflicts are frequent at NPP and frustrating - especially if you've spent twenty minutes salvaging something...
Click to read more »history | links | watch | logs) autobio page moved from mainspace by an alert NPP editor last September. User made a small edit and then abandoned the page...
Click to read more »learn as Girth has shown himself to be. I met him when he asked to join my NPP School while Mz7 met him as a student at the Counter Vandalism Unit Academy...
Click to read more »editors with a good understanding of Wikipedia policy, invite them to join NPP by dropping the invitation template on their talk page with: {{subst:NPR...
Click to read more »just over a year and is very inexperienced. Plus, Cassiopeia(Hog farm's NPPS trainer) is not an admin. So I see no reason to support this candidate. 223...
Click to read more »Contributions) 14:28, 31 January 2017 (UTC) Speedy Delete Suprised the Holy Church of NPP didn't flag this one at the door. L3X1 My Complaint Desk Comment. Articles...
Click to read more »primarily focus on WP:CSD and WP:REVDEL (mostly RD1) within the scope of NPP and address reports to WP:AIV, especially when said noticeboard is backlogged...
Click to read more »JSTOR · TWL) Ostensibly a promotional exercise. Originally moved to draft from NPP and then moved back to mainspace by one the many contributors who appear...
Click to read more »March 2011 (UTC) See WP:NPP. WuhWuzDat 15:55, 22 March 2011 (UTC) I'm familiar with it. There's a specific section in WP:NPP about dealing with new editors...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This article has been sitting in the NPP queue since January so notability appears unclear. I can’t find any sources...
Click to read more »Hello New pages patrol/Newsletter/Archive, Source Guide Discussion The first NPP source guide discussion is now underway. It covers a wide range of sources...
Click to read more »regarding NPP/autopatrolled etc. in this and the previous discussion? People are well aware of that issue, and no one is proposing bombing the NPP queues...
Click to read more »everyone. There's tons of these in the NPP queue right now, and all have poor sourcing and no self-respecting NPP reviewer would accept them. When a redirect...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Reviewed during NPP. No evidence of wp:notability under SNG or GNG. A mausoleum in a cemetery...
Click to read more »blame NPP in general. /ƒETCHCOMMS/ 16:32, 27 January 2011 (UTC) Fine, but... this thread isn't about NPP. WP:FEED fulfils a function which NPP cannot...
Click to read more »have clarified that. ResMar 02:36, 8 February 2012 (UTC) How is it that the NPP work the WMF claims is a "top priority" (and could have easily been resolved...
Click to read more »/wiae /tlk 20:04, 20 February 2016 (UTC) Delete as I patrolled this at NPP last week and had plans to nominate it because none of this suggests better...
Click to read more »important NPP tool for dealing with articles of borderline notability or poor sourcing. I am not convinced that taking this tool away from NPPs patrolling...
Click to read more »Hello New pages patrol/Archive, WMF at work on NPP Improvements Niharika Kohli, a product manager for the growth team, announced that work is underway...
Click to read more »however I would be keen to help new editors in whatever way I can. Since I NPP I may was well try to work on this --Guerillero | My Talk 00:43, 31 March...
Click to read more »recreated and are now appearing in the NPP queue backlog (this particular one wasn't). As they come up during my NPP is when I take action. If they were...
Click to read more »(with a typo "AfC reviewer" which should have been "NPP reviewer"). Since the page has already passed NPP as notable, re-draftication is not appropriate,...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Reviewed through NPP, doesn't appear to be a notable artist, coverage consists of brief blurbs...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Reviewed during NPP. This is basically a "stats only" article with no sources covering the topic...
Click to read more »permission, but there are only about a dozen who significantly contribute to NPP. This means we have an active pool of about 450 to address the backlog. We...
Click to read more »12 July 2022 (UTC) Delete: Wow I remembered hearing about hoaxes during NPP school, but never thought I would see one pop up like this. Dr vulpes (💬...
Click to read more »Akwasi Afrifa (Ghanaian MP), Fomena - NPP Amoaniwaa (talk) 22:13, 1 September 2020 (UTC)(Wikidata:Q98000358) Nimot123 (talk) 16:15, 1 September 2020 (UTC)Y...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) I unwisely passed this at NPP though I removed slabs of unsourced text. The sourcing is rubbish and I don’t...
Click to read more »NPP backlog v t e Articles 26590 ↑276 Oldest article 17 years old Redirects 52708 Oldest redirect 5 years old Article reviews 1428 Redirect reviews 2412...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Reviewed under new article curation / NPP. No indication of wp:notability. No GNG suitable sources given and I couldn't...
Click to read more »next to nothing to do with NPP; of course as an NPP reviewer I support the draftification of poorly sourced articles in the NPP feed; however, this proposal...
Click to read more »covered in a NPP review are gigantic. The list of all of the tags to apply implies catching every possible problem or weakness in an article. The NPP flowchart...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NFOOTY, fails WP:BIO. (NPP action) Usedtobecool ☎️ 06:51, 29 September 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Too soon. Is there even a title? WP:RUMOUR.(NPP action) Usedtobecool ☎️ 16:51, 20 September 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion...
Click to read more »also actively involved in various "housekeeping" tasks such as WP:AfD, WP:NPP, WP:PC, WP:CUV apart from my attempts in building the encyclopedia. I have...
Click to read more »longstanding precedent and consensus. That said, it is such blatant spam that if at NPP it had been given the G11, as patrolling admin I probably would not have...
Click to read more »free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) I came across this page on NPP and cannot find any reliable, 3rd-party sources for it, so I am nominating...
Click to read more »comments to last month's Signpost issue I called it out in context of the NPP open letter to the Foundation; on the other hand the more recent open letter...
Click to read more »--Bejnar (talk) 16:40, 9 October 2017 (UTC) Delete: Came across this during npp, seems a bit WP:TOOSOON as well. Shellwood (talk) 15:01, 11 October 2017...
Click to read more »Karnataka per policy. The nominator should know about these things at WP:NPP..Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 05:28, 24 October 2019 (UTC) Response Hey Kudpung...
Click to read more »by an NPP reviewer. Usually the AFC acceptance counts as the NPP review. Robert McClenon (talk) 15:52, 14 December 2016 (UTC) I posted at NPP about the...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Reviewed through NPP. Not seeing enough sourcing to pass WP:NBIO or WP:GNG. The article is currently...
Click to read more »Links to relevant discussions (where appropriate): Initial discussions on NPP Discord + previous BRFAs surrounding AFD notifications Edit period(s): Continuous...
Click to read more »discussions. 10:26, 2 December 2022 (UTC) Another long time resident of the NPP queue. Several reviewers have judged the topic to be non notable and redirected...
Click to read more »a comment on the passing ones. Or is there something about the psyche of NPPs where they don't care about the new good content coming out?TCO (talk) 06:18...
Click to read more »at NPP where new mainspace creations come under scrutiny is ofttimes not much better than at AfC. Not to mention that the low hanging fruit at NPP gets...
Click to read more »sources for Malawi-related information. Help WP:MALAWI contributors, AfC and NPP reviewers. NB:Some reliable sources can publish unreliable pieces so each...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) @Ammarpad:, came across this in NPP, author of page removed your CSD advert tag, exerts notability in talk page...
Click to read more »2022 (UTC) Perhaps LiAnna (Wiki Ed) can clarify this? As a reviewer for NPP, I'm often left with no one to talk to. By the time the article reaches mainspace...
Click to read more »somewhat procedural; I'm neutral here but don't think the page can pass NPP without discussion. power~enwiki (π, ν) 01:38, 1 June 2018 (UTC) Note: This...
Click to read more »and SwisterTwister, you really NEED to use WP:BEFORE both here and over WP:NPP. Remember, not all WP:UGLY articles are crap. Thanks going out to Robman94...
Click to read more »(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) From the NPP queue: article about a podcast series that I don’t think has the in-depth...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Reviewed through NPP. No indication of notability. There are no independent reliable sources cited...
Click to read more »directory, while ignoring criteria for inclusion (WP:NOTDIRECTORY). According to NPP this page was previously deleted. --- Steve Quinn (talk) 02:06, 27 July 2021...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NFOOTY, fails WP:NBIO. (NPP action) Usedtobecool ☎️ 08:47, 29 September 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion...
Click to read more »appropriate): Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers#Automate populating the NPP backlog chart (permalink) Edit period(s): 4 times a daily Estimated number...
Click to read more »discussions. /wiae /tlk 14:14, 3 March 2016 (UTC) Delete as I patrolled this at NPP and planned to nominate because none of this satisfies WP:ENTERTAINER with...
Click to read more »org%2fwiki%2fAnatoly_Fomenko&coi=239137&cop=main-title&c=facemoods.11.err&ap=2&npp=2&p=0&pp=0&pvaid=b31673f56ad540c6a980225a09c6de0b&ep=2&euip=90.165.33...
Click to read more »Whiteguru (talk) 08:29, 17 August 2021 (UTC) Merge: I saw this page earlier at NPP and knew it was gonna end up here. A merge with Palestinians in Iraq is the...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:BLP1E; fails WP:NCYC.(NPP action) Usedtobecool ☎️ 06:54, 23 September 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion...
Click to read more »logs) (diff !top) - Link: www.energoatom.com.ua/en/about-6/separated-59/npp_khmelnytska-63 (R/Xmeta/L) 2020-10-25 01:33:18 (UTC): User AndriiDr t • c •...
Click to read more »nothing at all for any applicable notability and I myself patrolled this at NPP and questioned it also, Delete for now at best. SwisterTwister talk 04:51...
Click to read more »either delete the long stale page, amd if not, promote to mainspace for NPP to review? Legacypac (talk) 22:40, 10 March 2018 (UTC) Delete. No third party...
Click to read more »free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:GNG, fails WP:NFILM. (NPP action) Usedtobecool ☎️ 16:55, 3 October 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion...
Click to read more »side of the NPP project. He has consistently made contributions to the maintenance PageTriage extension (the extension that supports all NPP work), serving...
Click to read more »That makes me think we do not need a standalone even if it is important.(NPP action) Usedtobecool ☎️ 12:26, 27 September 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NFOOTY. Fails WP:NBIO. (NPP action) Usedtobecool ☎️ 07:30, 29 September 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion...
Click to read more »independent reliable sources that discuss Noori directly and in detail. (NPP action) Extraordinary Writ (talk) 03:59, 20 July 2022 (UTC) Note: This discussion...
Click to read more »specialised podcasting WP:RSes that I am unaware of where he's had coverage. (NPP action) Usedtobecool ☎️ 07:25, 20 September 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion...
Click to read more »nothing at all for the convincing notability. I myself encountered this at NPP and planned to nominate. SwisterTwister talk 23:22, 9 May 2016 (UTC) Comment:...
Click to read more »of GermanKitty and was blocked today, 3 May 2022. Article was reviewed on NPP by DMySon. See here --Whiteguru (talk) 23:04, 4 May 2022 (UTC) The above...
Click to read more »Oppose NPP ban for ST. ST NPPed 500 articles in 24 hours? Why were there 500 articles to be reviewed? I doubt that ST was out-clicking the other NPPs. If...
Click to read more »any sigcov either, so Reddy does not appear to be notable at this time. (NPP action) Extraordinary Writ (talk) 06:24, 18 June 2022 (UTC) Note: This discussion...
Click to read more »(Durban) and M25 (Durban) redirected as well. Originally redirect as part of WP:NPP review by concerted effort to revert. scope_creepTalk 19:33, 28 November...
Click to read more »essentially hogtie non-admin NPP into proposing deletion or tag bombing and would remove the option for Draftification from non-admin NPP altogether. — InsertCleverPhraseHere...
Click to read more »Delete as none of this satisfies WP:ENTERTAINER and I patrolled this at NPP so I also planned to nominate for deletion. SwisterTwister talk 05:35, 6...
Click to read more »- Pmedema (talk) 13:56, 16 May 2016 (UTC) Delete should not have passed NPP DeVerm (talk) 01:11, 22 May 2016 (UTC) Delete as there's nothing for convincing...
Click to read more »best contributions to Wikipedia, and why? A: I feel my NPP work is my most important work, as NPP now is a very broken process, and I've been one of a few...
Click to read more »Quran. Jahaza (talk) 20:30, 3 November 2022 (UTC) Keep I passed this at NPP in July as it seems to be a valid topic with a discussion of history and...
Click to read more »June 2022 (UTC) Delete I tagged it as potentially not WP:GNG-worthy during NPP simply 'cos I thought I'd sent too much to AfD for the day. So here's a delete...
Click to read more »second tier ticket. Should we delete this draft or should it he promoted so NPP can review it? Legacypac (talk) 18:53, 10 March 2018 (UTC) Keep/Promote to...
Click to read more »history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) Ran across this on NPP, unsure of what speedy criteria it might fit, although it probably borders...
Click to read more »the community, and that a select group of elites do not get to bypass the doublecheck that NPP provides. ThemFromSpace 03:18, 29 November 2009 (UTC)...
Click to read more »GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 15:17, 23 April 2016 (UTC) Delete as I reviewed this at NPP and there's simply nothing to suggest better for the applicable notability...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NFOOTY. Fails WP:NBIO. (NPP action) Usedtobecool ☎️ 06:54, 29 September 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion...
Click to read more »not at NPP: it places too much expectation on new users. Therefore, to deal with this and all the other perennial complaints lodged against NPPs, I propose...
Click to read more »GabeIglesia (talk) 12:48, 18 April 2016 (UTC) Delete as I myself reviewed this at NPP with nothing suggesting better notability and improvements so I watchlisted...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NFOOTY. Fails WP:NBIO. (NPP action) Usedtobecool ☎️ 07:11, 29 September 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion...
Click to read more »around 2,370 pages that were reviewed by Agent VII during the September 2025 NPP backlog drive, due to them reviewing too fast to be able to give a proper...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Doing my part of NPP reviewing, I tried BEFORE but couldn't find any significant coverage in reliable...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Reviewed through WP:NPP. Apparent autobiography of a non-notable artist/writer. Sources are entirely...
Click to read more »Hatchens (talk) 02:44, 21 December 2021 (UTC) Comment: Failed AfD tagging via NPP reviewer's tool. Kindly ignore it. -Hatchens (talk) 02:55, 21 December 2021...
Click to read more »XfDs, which is great especially the minor ones, like CfD, RfD, and FfD. NPP is great too, and being a Clerk is, out of things, one thing I haven't done...
Click to read more »Drive results: We made massive progress during the recent four weeks of the NPP Backlog Drive, during which the backlog reduced by nearly six thousand articles...
Click to read more »of notability after this long. This is textbook A7; so tagged. And yeah, NPP is pretty yellow when I looked this evening. =( --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr...
Click to read more »2023-01-01 Congratulations. In focus NPP: Still heaven or hell for new users – and for the reviewers 2022-09-30 Just what is NPP? Why does it need the WMF? Why...
Click to read more »concise list of major contributions is: Template creation and maintenance, NPP (which has made me fairly well experienced in CSDs), welcoming new users...
Click to read more »Munich, Germany. The Delta II rocket with its NPOESS Preparatory Project (NPP) spacecraft payload shortly before the service structure was rolled back...
Click to read more »nominated it for deletion myself last night but decided to consult another NPP instead. This character lacks the sort of real world significance Wikipedia...
Click to read more »anything you want – well, almost. Special report: NPP needs you WMF continues to stonewall development; NPP wishes again relegated to stocking fillers. Special...
Click to read more »(talk) 19:08, 10 September 2022 (UTC) Delete I can’t see how this got through NPP. Mccapra (talk) 21:50, 10 September 2022 (UTC) Comment -- I would want to...
Click to read more »material. I'm usually a bit lax on albums but don't think I would be doing my NPP job properly if I passed this one. North8000 (talk) 21:39, 31 May 2022 (UTC)...
Click to read more »I think NPP and RC patrol are a valuable asset to Wikipedia but I feel we as a community have grown too dependent and attached to them. NPP and RC patrol...
Click to read more »The purpose of this page is to centralize information about reliable sources for use by new page reviewers when reviewing new articles. It is intended...
Click to read more »around NPP, it's a sign that the user is trusted enough to skip NPP. --Izno (talk) 23:24, 27 November 2020 (UTC) Besides Wugapodes, At least one NPP editor...
Click to read more »undersourced corpspam from the dawn of time. This would never make it through AFC/NPP today. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 14:20, 6 June 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...
Click to read more »redirects, been an active participant in the NPP community, and has been the driving force for the emerging NPP Source Guide that will help reviewers better...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Reviewed during NPP. This is basically a "stats only" article with no sources covering the topic...
Click to read more »talk page. The thing that makes me want to vote Delete is the fact that the NPP grumps will obstruct the creation of all those redlinks, and they may actually...
Click to read more »NPPs can install to help with this: User:Novem Linguae/Scripts/NotSoFast.js. Bummer that this made it to ANI; this could have been posted at WT:NPP or...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Reviewed as a part of NPP / new article curation. No indication of notability. List of works is largely...
Click to read more »thanks for the question. I've taken a look at WP:NPP and orphan tagging indeed seems to be a part of the NPP review process. This bot would probably be better...
Click to read more »Australia. signed, Rosguill talk 20:54, 24 June 2022 (UTC) Delete Saw this in NPP myself yesterday and thought it looked non-notable, but decided to defer...
Click to read more »notable so normally I would send to draft, however because of the large NPP backlog it is too late to do that without a determination at AfD (the article...
Click to read more »Information for nominators and taggers is available on the revised page at WP:NPP. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 01:20, 7 May 2011 (UTC) Keep. I've added some of...
Click to read more »code available: Function overview: Upload and update graph for unreviewed NPP articles. Links to relevant discussions (where appropriate): Edit period(s):...
Click to read more »as none of this satisfies WP:ENTERTAINER and I myself patrolled this at NPP with plans to nominate for deletion. SwisterTwister talk 22:10, 6 March 2016...
Click to read more »free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) I found this in the backlog at NPP. Since I am unsure of the standards for this sort of article, I'd rather...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Reviewed during NPP. No evidence of wp:notability under SNG or GNG. Tagged by others for this...
Click to read more »apologize for not being more diligent and fixing myself - too focused on NPP pass/fail. --MJH (talk) 15:35, 8 December 2012 (UTC) Comment - I was a little...
Click to read more »sources such as Khabarhub. It was fake accepted to mainspace. But, as an NPP reviewer has already marked it as reviewed, draftifying again without consensus...
Click to read more »--obi2canibetalk contr 18:11, 9 April 2016 (UTC) Delete as I myself patrolled this at NPP and certainly noticed the troubles, nothing suggests any better applicable...
Click to read more »with NPP and the least you can do is AGF. If you like, tell me I should have searched more deeply per WP:BEFORE. Perhaps you ought to instead visit NPP and...
Click to read more »a hashtag as I can't find evidence of a movement as such, fails WP:GNG. (NPP action) Usedtobecool ☎️ 11:22, 18 September 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion...
Click to read more »JSTOR · TWL) Reviewed during NPP. No evidence of wp:notability under SNG or GNG. This is one of 4 near-identical articles in the NPP que. I took on to AFD (...
Click to read more »in-depth coverage of the organization in independent reliable sources. (NPP action) Extraordinary Writ (talk) 21:50, 22 February 2022 (UTC) Note: This...
Click to read more »sources are passing mentions of this topic. Fails GNG, and NFILM. According to NPP this page was previously deleted. Steve Quinn (talk) 03:05, 27 July 2021...
Click to read more »GabeIglesia (talk) 00:29, 17 April 2016 (UTC) Delete as I myself reviewed this at NPP and searches simply found nothing at all. SwisterTwister talk 04:56, 17 April...
Click to read more »Velella Velella Talk 03:22, 30 March 2016 (UTC) Delete as I patrolled this at NPP with plans to nominate since it was obviously questionable. SwisterTwister...
Click to read more »( talk ) 02:57, 12 April 2016 (UTC) Delete as I myself patrolled this at NPP and watchlisted it for attention later as this suggests nothing better for...
Click to read more »in my NPP curation process and tagged the notability issue after doing a thorough BEFORE. I skipped marking it as reviewed and moved on as per NPP review...
Click to read more »when I went through NPP, I could only do a few at a time because I would get bogged down on those. That is why I only perform NPP when there is a backlog...
Click to read more »watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log) I found this article during NPP and tried to reconfirm its data via Google, but I found nothing to confirm...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Reviewed through NPP, obviously non-notable company sourced exclusively to unreliable sources...
Click to read more »it easier on NPPs, but might also discourage the creation of those first attempt gems (polished or in the rough) that one sees as a NPP. 3. Have you been...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This BLP has been at the back of the NPP queue for months. From the lead section the subject sounds like he may well...
Click to read more »30 March 2021 (UTC) Draftify (which I think could have been done at the NPP stage): potential merit as an upcoming topic, with usable primary sources...
Click to read more »Drchriswilliams (talk) 14:36, 26 March 2016 (UTC) Delete as I patrolled this at NPP and planned to nominate since all of this is questionably notable for clear...
Click to read more »of GermanKitty and was blocked today, 3 May 2022. Article was reviewed on NPP by DMySon. See here --Whiteguru (talk) 22:56, 4 May 2022 (UTC) The above...
Click to read more »are many NPP tasks that don't involve deletion, and as long as Andrew is happy to delegate to others as needed (e.g via the very active NPP noticeboard)...
Click to read more »references can be categorised into two bursts: January 2021 and mid-2021. (NPP action) Usedtobecool ☎️ 09:22, 29 October 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion...
Click to read more »intercontinental scholarship bill for around 300 attendees to a Wikimania, or provide NPP with a complete, desperately needed rewrite of the code of its MetaWiki curation...
Click to read more »IcewedgeHugglesGoats! (talk · contribs) ) and branched out into Xfd's and a lot of NPP. I am much more of a metapedian than a content builder although I have created...
Click to read more »Montreal (talk) 16:55, 15 April 2016 (UTC) Delete as I myself patrolled this at NPP with there being no convincing signs at all of any applicable notability...
Click to read more »determine a way to estimate the volunteer hours impact of the pilot program on NPP, CCI, and the general community. Outstanding question: What is the best way...
Click to read more »discussion, nor appear to have significant experience in PRODs/CSDs/AfC/NPP... While, if given the mop, I'm assuming that the candidate will mainly focus...
Click to read more »addressing issues outside of NPP, and this proposal is specifically about NPP, so I don't see why anything other than NPP activity should be relevant to...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Reviewed through NPP. Guy whose claim to fame is buying some NFTs. This source only mentions him...
Click to read more »Some Wikipedians have formed a project to provide information related to chemistry. The main efforts focus on providing clearly written articles that give...
Click to read more »discussions. Lightburst (talk) 17:23, 24 June 2020 (UTC) Delete I saw this at NPP and was considering PROD/AFDing it, but kept putting it off - it was accepted...
Click to read more »As the role of Wikipedia:WikiProject New page has been superseded by WP:NPP, this WikiProject is unlikely to be revived so the userbox is not going to...
Click to read more »help with evaluating candidate articles for graduation. If you've done WP:NPP before, you are probably qualified to be an evaluator. Common problems that...
Click to read more »ThePlatypusofDoom (talk) 11:32, 14 April 2016 (UTC) Delete as I myself patrolled this at NPP with plans to nominate since none of this suggests better for the applicable...
Click to read more »will show drafts instead of articles in the feed, this shouldn't impact NPP activities and is part of the WMF's AfC Improvement Project. As part of this...
Click to read more »deleted before this version was started and I encountered it both times at NPP. SwisterTwister talk 18:04, 6 February 2016 (UTC) Relisted to generate a...
Click to read more »SwisterTwister talk 03:39, 3 March 2016 (UTC) Delete as I patrolled this at NPP and planned to nominate, actually considering using PROD instead of me starting...
Click to read more »— crh 23 (Talk) 08:32, 22 April 2016 (UTC) Delete as I myself noticed this at NPP, too soon at best if ever an article should occur. SwisterTwister talk 05:56...
Click to read more »10:37, 15 June 2022 (UTC) The nominator noted that this was surfaced during NPP and also their reasons for the nomination, which were sound. The article...
Click to read more »mark and Jemima2019 gets the WD mark. Akwasi Osei-Adjei, Ejisu/Juabeng- NPP Hannah Nyame (talk) 14:08, 3 October 2020 (UTC)(Wikidata:Q424369) Nimot123...
Click to read more »JSTOR · TWL) Reviewed during NPP. No evidence of wp:notability under SNG or GNG. This is one of 4 near-identical articles in the NPP que. I took on to AFD (...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NFOOTY, fails WP:NBIO. (NPP action) Usedtobecool ☎️ 07:37, 29 September 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion...
Click to read more »Article is an obvious puff piece. I am flabbergasted as to how this passed NPP. FoCuS contribs; talk to me! 00:44, 26 April 2016 (UTC) Delete Fails GNG...
Click to read more »independent of this tragedy. But since these had been reviewed through the NPP process by another editor, I didn't feel comfortable simply redirecting,...
Click to read more »draft, or did you encounter it on NPP? (If you aren't familiar with reviewing drafts and encounter problematic ones on NPP, it might be a good idea to leave...
Click to read more »FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Article has been redirected once, but reverted. The NPP seems to be a short lived 2019 initiative of Dr Dharamvir Gandhi, with only...
Click to read more »utility · Interaction Timeline · SPI Tools Tried to add the sockpuppeteer to a NPP backlog drive Mach61 13:49, 26 August 2024 (UTC) Accused parties may also...
Click to read more »had missed some of the indicators that the subject wasn't notable in my NPP review. My bad. Vexations (talk) 12:36, 10 December 2021 (UTC) Delete - fails...
Click to read more »simply continue to pursue my quests for reform and improvement of RfA and NPP and my gnomish CSD and AfD work, and maintaining our school project and its...
Click to read more »SwisterTwister talk 04:15, 31 March 2016 (UTC) Delete as I myself patrolled this at NPP and watchlisted for attention since none of this clearly suggests how's it...
Click to read more »coverage in secondary reliable sources. I tagged with notability during NPP and explained to the creator my concerns, but haven't seen improvement since...
Click to read more »requirements at WP:SIGCOV. Fails WP:NAUTHOR as an author of one non-notable book.(NPP action) Usedtobecool ☎️ 04:20, 28 October 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Nominated for AfD during NPP reviewing. WP:Before shows no significant or independent coverage of this...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Reviewed during NPP. No evidence of wp:notability under SNG or GNG. No sources except for stats...
Click to read more »Liz Read! Talk! 04:44, 19 July 2022 (UTC) Delete I see I passed this at NPP, but I shouldn’t have. Mccapra (talk) 07:51, 19 July 2022 (UTC) Delete per...
Click to read more »free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable. Spam. See plot.(NPP action) Usedtobecool ☎️ 09:01, 17 September 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion...
Click to read more »WP:GNG or WP:SNG. Fails WP:NOTPUBLICFIGURE. Attempted to speedy delete by NPP Reading Beans as per WP:A7 but was reverted. Dr vulpes (💬 • 📝) 03:20, 7...
Click to read more »For what it's worth, he appears to be a new editor who's blind diving into NPP. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 18:03, 21 December 2011 (UTC) Comment...
Click to read more »but half of them have been quickly A7'ed, that might suggest that having NPPs continue to patrol their creations would be a good idea. 28bytes (talk) 17:26...
Click to read more »sources. Fails WP:NACTOR and WP:GNG. Seems to have a decent publicist though.(NPP action) Usedtobecool ☎️ 14:13, 1 November 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion...
Click to read more »drivers licence, don't care and haven't even read the instructions at WP:NPP, WP:CURATION, and WP:DELETION and as long as the community continues to repel...
Click to read more »WP:NOTADVERT. The references are blatant advertisements, as is our article. (NPP action) Usedtobecool ☎️ 03:21, 13 October 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion...
Click to read more »despite nomination from a blocked sock. I am surprised it was accepted at NPP and survived for nearly 7 years here. — Preceding unsigned comment added...
Click to read more »systematically goes through all old articles and marks them off, similar to NPP, as meeting 2020 standards, or deals with them if they don't. It'd have to...
Click to read more »Wikic¤l¤gyt@lk to M£ 16:56, 20 February 2016 (UTC) Delete as I encountered this at NPP and planned to nominate because this is currently questionable for all applicable...
Click to read more »are active on, then you can add a post there asking participants to join NPP. Please be careful not to double invite folks that have already been invited...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) BLP tagged for notability in the NPP queue for two months. Notability is doubtful - although there are sources...
Click to read more »assertions to notability in the original article version I found during NPP. Most admins would have rejected a CSD. §FreeRangeFrog 20:30, 17 November...
Click to read more »review at least 50 articles or redirects will receive a Special Edition NPP Barnstar: . Those who review 100, 250, 500, or 1000 pages will also receive...
Click to read more »JSTOR · TWL) Reviewed during NPP. No evidence of wp:notability under SNG or GNG. This is one of 4 near-identical articles in the NPP que. I took on to AFD (...
Click to read more »SwisterTwister talk 05:50, 3 March 2016 (UTC) Delete as I reviewed this at NPP and planned to nominate, none of this suggests satisfying any applicable...
Click to read more »None of the available sources qualify as significant coverage, in my view. (NPP action) Extraordinary Writ (talk) 06:17, 12 April 2022 (UTC) Note: This discussion...
Click to read more »Legend (talk) 02:13, 23 March 2016 (UTC) Delete as I myself patrolled this at NPP and planned to nominate because none of this satisfies any applicable notability...
Click to read more »ApLundell (talk) 03:33, 29 May 2022 (UTC) Yeah, I moved it from mainspace during NPP which lead me to this article. Harmless where it is unless moved back without...
Click to read more »expanding USSR-related articles, Runescape when there's a new update, and NPP. I am currently working on an article about coal balls. Have you been in...
Click to read more »(UTC) Delete as certainly nothing for the applicable notability, I nearly NPP reviewed this myself and I would've considered PROD as another path to deletion...
Click to read more »afds until we sidebar this whole question of NOHARM and GEOLAND. Since my NPP mentor is already in this discussion, I'm sure she'd be happy to help examine...
Click to read more »Vipinhari || talk 05:38, 21 March 2016 (UTC) Delete as I reviewed this at NPP and this seems questionable for WP:ENTERTAINER. SwisterTwister talk 06:02...
Click to read more »18:52, 18 June 2009 (UTC) I prodded this article after finding it on the WP:NPP backlog. It appears to me that it violates WP:WEBSITE as the nominator has...
Click to read more »about which you are particularly pleased, and why? Mostly WP:RCP and WP:NPP, which I enjoy. P.S. I'd like to take this opportunity to thank everyone...
Click to read more »anything online, literally. Would appear to fail WP:GNG and WP:SINGER. (NPP action) Usedtobecool ☎️ 10:04, 18 September 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Reviewed through NPP. Promotional article on a software package sourced to random no-name websites...
Click to read more »not have accepted it. We need some way of sending afc acceptances through NPP so they will be more visible. DGG ( talk ) 21:05, 18 November 2012 (UTC)...
Click to read more »2016 (UTC) Delete as this is exactly what I've been seeing rather often at NPP and it's troubling because it could be accepted but needing better improvements...
Click to read more »make a great point - and to take it a bit further - it's not just in the NPP area. I used to spend a lot of time at the help desk, and those "redlink"...
Click to read more »WP:NARTIST criteria appear to be met either, in my view. Too soon, perhaps. (NPP action) Extraordinary Writ (talk) 00:36, 19 June 2022 (UTC) Note: This discussion...
Click to read more »directory-style coverage. Initially redirected to DePauw Tigers football as part of NPP, was reverted without explanation. Obviously I am open to ATD outcomes like...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Reviewed through NPP. I am not seeing how this biography of a product designer passes WP:NBIO...
Click to read more »(talk) 20:44, 3 December 2020 (UTC) Delete. I reviewed this article for WP:NPP. I, too, tried to research the artist before templating it as having notability...
Click to read more »deleting articles that have sat around for 7 years; if nothing else, it means NPP have reviewed and checked it originally without intending to do so. Nevertheless...
Click to read more »at WP:AFCR. It is up to you if you also want to mark your AFC accepts as NPP reviewed (this is allowed but optional, depends if you would like a second...
Click to read more »list, a help document for new participants in editathons explaining the AfC/NPP process. Question: for TonyBallioni - is this already sufficient? DrStrauss...
Click to read more »please help out as much as you can. If you are not, please check out WP:NPP, then take a look at the requirements at WP:NPR and if you feel up to it...
Click to read more »PageTriage code upgrades: Upgrades to the PageTriage code, initiated by the NPP open letter in 2022 and actioned by the WMF Moderator Tools Team in 2023...
Click to read more »Meatsgains (talk) 02:30, 19 April 2016 (UTC) Delete as I myself reviewed this at NPP and none of this suggests the necessary solid notability. SwisterTwister...
Click to read more »It's amazing that this content was allowable "back in the day." Today's NPP would flag this immediately and there's no way this would pass AfC today...
Click to read more »AfC reviewers, NPP reviewers would pretty quickly get crucified for this behaviour and is against the process (see the aforementioned NPP flowchart). If...
Click to read more »(talk) 17:39, 11 December 2021 (UTC) Delete I marked this as reviewed for WP:NPP, but should have AfD'd it at the same time. No significant coverage in independent...
Click to read more »fanfic. MikeWazowski (talk) 15:20, 22 June 2011 (UTC) Thanks - fairly new to NPP so I don't want to be too reckless. A7? Brammers (talk/c) 15:32, 22 June...
Click to read more »drives/October 2023, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages! Announcing the NPP October Backlog Drive! We have done amazing work so far in May to reduce...
Click to read more »patrol/Newsletter/Archive, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages! Announcing the NPP New Year Backlog Drive! We have done amazing work so far in December to reduce...
Click to read more »October 2013 (UTC) Delete I flagged this with OR/SYNTH when I found it during NPP. Can't put it better than the nominator did, it's essentially an ad for the...
Click to read more »articles now. I have edited elsewhere, and on any topics, done roles such as NPP and anti-vandalism, and have a though understanding of major processes without...
Click to read more »people patrolling the incoming new articles via the New Page Patrol process (NPP). The ACTRIAL modification, however, diverts those newly registered users...
Click to read more »troublesome users. Recent change patrol, which I spend time on whenever NPP doesn't really appeal, often turns up users that need a quick block to limit...
Click to read more »of Fame. Congratulations everyone! Minimum deletion time: The previous WP:NPP guideline was to wait 15 minutes before tagging for deletion (including draftification...
Click to read more »have even that. This was accepted at AfC ; I doubt it would have been at NPP. DGG ( talk ) 20:16, 19 December 2013 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...
Click to read more »this location. That new page was also tagged for notability concerns via WP:NPP. Despite the WP:REFBOMB in the lead, I don’t really think all those pass...
Click to read more »no such intentions. I am merely trying to pragmatically help tackle the NPP backlog. PK650 (talk) 01:18, 26 May 2022 (UTC) Comment There seem to be a...
Click to read more »December 2014 (UTC) Delete I was about to CSD this when I saw the blip while NPP. Google has zip, there's nothing widely covered here. Just looks like it's...
Click to read more »discospinster talk 19:38, 28 December 2010 (UTC) Delete Discovered this during NPP. IP address being very clever and linked it to somewhat related articles...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NFOOTY. (NPP action) Usedtobecool ☎️ 06:59, 29 September 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion...
Click to read more »notability, and I know I wouldn't deny a speedy deletion if I came across this on NPP. J Milburn 09:55, 28 April 2007 (UTC) Delete- little notability. Eaomatrix...
Click to read more »Basalisk inspect damage⁄berate 15:10, 28 May 2012 (UTC) If you're doing NPP, please be aware that you're being watched to see how quickly you're pouncing...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This article has been sitting at the back of the NPP queue for a month. I guess many patrollers have looked at it but no-one is...
Click to read more »user's patrol activities, I agree that they are too new to be successful at NPP. I see at least one other spurious CSD nomination, here, in their recent...
Click to read more »crap pages expecting someone to eventually fix them. This isn't just at NPP, Kakinada Municipal Corporation is 7 years old and has zero content about...
Click to read more ».. really? That seems like overly aggressive new page patrolling to me. NPP is for stopping immediate harm, and probably NN topics like this are pretty...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Reviewed as part of NPP. I'm not seeing any evidence that this photographer passes WP:GNG or WP:NARTIST...
Click to read more »Wikipedia are, I would say I work in a lot of different areas: AfD, AfC, NPP, RCP, adding refs to articles, etc. Have you been in editing disputes or...
Click to read more »(talk) 20:39, 9 January 2012 (UTC) delete - I removed the a7 tag since WP:NPP warns against overuse of A7 for not being notable (in your opinion): an article...
Click to read more »professionals in a position of authority. Fact: Anyone can participate in NPP, even unregistered users. While new page reviews generally have to have been...
Click to read more »"influencer" that was apparently accepted from AfC and then marked as reviewed at NPP, when it clearly was not in a state to be accepted, by NagalimNE. I tried...
Click to read more »the candy bar protest. He was active on the Teahouse, New pages patrol (NPP), and at Articles for deletion (AfD). He touched many people here with his...
Click to read more »I assume if the RfD is closed and it's expanded later, it'll appear in NPP as normal. But if it's expanded while an RfD is open, then it would escape...
Click to read more »there's some ancient MFD code that I have no idea if works or not) Discourage NPPs from using valuable patrol time to patrol a namespace that we don't normally...
Click to read more »notability concerns. I would suggest that Alexf505 should stay away from NPP and other stuff besides anti-vandalism patrolling until they've gained sufficient...
Click to read more »and/or patrollers should be aware of this at WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES, and the WP:NPP tutorial. Redirects are uncontroversial and there is no need to add to our...
Click to read more »vanity piece and Possible COI (all the hallmarks of a commissioned work per NPP). A plethora of sources does not automatically confer notability. Dammitkevin...
Click to read more »is an article that's basically WP:COVERT for the person and the product.(NPP action) Usedtobecool ☎️ 08:09, 26 September 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion...
Click to read more »asserted, plus it fails WP: GNG. It is also an autobiography. I saw this on NPP, but wasn't 100% sure what to do, so I left this alone. Electric Catfish...
Click to read more »that page move gimmick, I mean other than trying to avoid the scrutiny of NPP by a hireling who knew his work wouldn't stand up to any real review and...
Click to read more »rule for NPP exists and that an NPP admin is on record stating the G11 tag was inappropriately placed, I would appreciate the restoration of my NPP rights...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) I found this page at the end of the backlog of WP:NPP and tried to source it. The page claims that Muhammad Wala is in Chiniot...
Click to read more »speedy keep. Nominator is urged to read, mark and learn from WP:BEFORE, WP:NPP and WP:CSD. JohnCD (talk) 11:44, 8 February 2016 (UTC) Cornwall Park, Auckland...
Click to read more »similarly titled articles/drafts about the same non-notable person showing up on NPP today with both above users as only editors JW 1961 Talk 13:12, 25 May 2021...
Click to read more »JSTOR · TWL) non notable and very highly promotional. Should not have passed NPP. DGG ( talk ) 04:43, 29 January 2019 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...
Click to read more »a revoke of the NPP Permission. I went through a tough NPP School, I learned several days our NPP Policies and did thousands of NPP reviews and I am...
Click to read more »work. @Kudpung I think the NPP do a great job, but there is a possibility of tool misuse that I think an article on the NPP page acknowledges. So, are...
Click to read more »company. TOW 19:32, 18 April 2016 (UTC) Delete as I myself reviewed this at NPP and am not convincing how this shows the applicable notability, too soon...
Click to read more »FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Speedied and deleted twice for blatant promotion, cleared NPP in its current form. Even with the balder promotional language stripped out...
Click to read more »less than 20 seconds. This is not too many to put a burden on the backlog, but also not too few to avoid compromising the quality and NPP standards....
Click to read more »articles, 0 of which have been deleted. I have often reviewed their work during NPP and have never found any problems (via TSI spot-check, Earwig, etc.) requiring...
Click to read more »the current NPP draftification practices are procedurally problematic. WP:Draftify policy says that if a page is draftified as a part of NPP, "Other editors...
Click to read more »Everything else should happen on the NPP side of things. I also see WAY too many articles that would pass NPP end up being declined at AfC because they...
Click to read more »search found no significant coverage sufficient for Marx to pass the GNG. (NPP action) Extraordinary Writ (talk) 04:44, 23 February 2022 (UTC) Note: This...
Click to read more »AfD the article is WP:UGLY so positively wade in and fix it. Luckily WP:NPP hopefully stops inadequate article coming through. I guess as I'm in the...
Click to read more »promotional. --Lockley (talk) 05:16, 16 June 2020 (UTC) Delete saw this at NPP, would have A7'd it if it wasn't here already. No independent sources and...
Click to read more »turns up nothing. (To save anyone inclined to investigate the trouble, the NPP reviewer who approved this has already had the permission yanked, although...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) As a part of NPP, I had draftified this article on 26 June 2020, two days later it was moved...
Click to read more »5 May 2011 (UTC) Note/Oppose two of these Came across these from doing NPP of the file namespace. Hellschreiber and RTTY do not play for me using the...
Click to read more »free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This article has been in the NPP queue for months. Various reviewers have tagged it or redirected it but these...
Click to read more »minor typos and added sources. Most of my maintenance work has been with NPP, and it’s the kind of work that I enjoy doing. I can also be found moving...
Click to read more »of an editor once they reached autoconfirmed status to get it out of the NPP new editors review pool. TonyBallioni (talk) 04:44, 2 August 2017 (UTC) Speedy...
Click to read more »if they don't care about the view of one of the most prolific NPPers on NPP then I have no reason to give up my time trying to help them. Malleus Fatuorum...
Click to read more »17:20, 21 January 2018 (UTC) Comment Admittedly, I only passed that through NPP unscathed because of the other 20-odd articles we have on these conferences...
Click to read more »• contribs) 03:58, 18 March 2011 (UTC) Delete. I saw the article through NPP after creation. I started a search for sources to add to the article, but...
Click to read more »article.TH1980 (talk) 02:33, 14 July 2017 (UTC) Delete I had seen this at NPP and almost sent to AfD, but DGG had tagged it for A7. Fails WP:N on both...
Click to read more »Optional Question from Yanksox 4. Two Parts Part A:You are an admin on NPP, and you encounter 5 pages which are: This This is tagged as db-bio, but...
Click to read more »participating in WP:AFD discussions. For new page review, read through WP:NPP, although this one requires a lot of experience to do effectively. Learning...
Click to read more »if this AfD happened before I took the trouble to upload a picture for a NPP-approved article that looked like it needed one. Haleth (talk) 04:22, 25...
Click to read more »the articles previously reviewed by SafariScribe that are now back in the NPP queue. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 09:58, 27 July 2026 (UTC) That’s not an issue...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Reviewed during NPP. No evidence of notability under SNG or GNG. The SNG explicitly says that...
Click to read more »appropriate is draftify but I don't want to go ahead and unilaterally draftify an NPP reviewed article. Mako001 (C) (T) 🇺🇦 16:20, 7 May 2022 (UTC) Note: This...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) A running (athletics) magazine found during NPP which I tried unsuccessfully to source. Basically, little to zero third-party...
Click to read more »11:57, 30 October 2020 (UTC) Comment I tried reading this last night at NPP and gave up. Reading it again, it seems to be an assembly of sourced snippets...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:GNG.(NPP action) Usedtobecool ☎️ 03:11, 2 April 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...
Click to read more »Linguae, English Wikipedia administrator, volunteer developer, and lead NPP coordinator, explain how collaboration between the WMF and volunteer developers...
Click to read more »simply continue to pursue my quests for reform and improvement of RfA and NPP and my gnomish CSD and AfD work, and maintaining our school project and its...
Click to read more »back from NPP and as soon as it was possible, I encouraged others to take over the initiatitive which they are doing very well. Although NPP still has...
Click to read more »was tempted to just back off of NPP before my next RfA and avoid the issue, but decided instead to do tons more NPP and thus gain the trust of the community...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This article has been on NPP for years and all we've got is a number of tags. I believe that this article...
Click to read more »2018 (UTC) Based on this I'm going to mainspace it. See how it fairs with NPP. Legacypac (talk) 23:08, 6 March 2018 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »Great picture. Articles in which this image appears The Blue Marble, Suomi NPP FP category for this image Featured pictures/Space/Looking back Creator National...
Click to read more »