This page is a redirect. The following categories are used to track and monitor this redirect:
|
descriptive title created by Wikipedia editors. Shortcuts WP:NPOVNAMEWP:NPOVNAME WP:POVNAMEWP:POVNAME When the subject of an article is referred to mainly...
Click to read more »WP:RNEUTRAL, using non-neutral language is permitted in some circumstances. WP:NPOVNAME, explaining that some circumstances, indicates that non-neutral terms are...
Click to read more »and with the parallels to Hitler Youth probably pushes the bounds of WP:NPOVNAME and maybe BLP with which redirs must comply. FYI, the creator has also...
Click to read more »article about the thing shouldn't be named for it. The examples given in WP:NPOVNAME reflected dominant usage over decades or centuries, not a year and a half...
Click to read more »unquestionably the proper title. As we dig close into the policy at section WP:NPOVNAME, we see "When the subject of an article is referred to mainly by a single...
Click to read more »that calls for an article name change, not deletion, and even then WP:NPOVNAME allows for the use of a POV name if that is what is being used in sources...
Click to read more »that calls for an article name change, not deletion, and even then WP:NPOVNAME allows for the use of a POV name if that is what is being used in sources...
Click to read more »17:17, 17 July 2025 (UTC) It is so completely not the common name. See WP:NPOVNAME, which says to avoid Trendy slogans and monikers that seem unlikely to...
Click to read more »article about the thing shouldn't be named for it. The examples given in WP:NPOVNAME reflected dominant usage over decades or centuries, not a year and a half...
Click to read more »use of legal names or legal titles. It even explicitly states, under WP:NPOVNAME, that the "prevalence of the name ... generally overrides concern that...
Click to read more »(RM) The concern regarding non-neutrality of a descriptive title WP:NPOVNAME and WP:NDESC was essentially ignored in the discussion, and was not considered...
Click to read more »acceptable and supported by sources, at least under WP:RNEUTRAL and WP:NPOVNAME. Neutrality issues in the article text itself aren't relevant to this RfD...
Click to read more »understandings of policy take a position, such as the term "massacre" being an WP:NPOVNAME. Editors comment at RMs when this benefits Israeli perspectives, e.g. Calling...
Click to read more »canvassing not to have taken place, the new title is a breach of WP:NPOV, WP:NPOVNAME and in particular WP:IMPARTIAL. The sourcing is not definitive to say the...
Click to read more »over which title is more accurate, so we default to most common as per WP:NPOVNAME which explicitly states they are not required to be neutral. If no one...
Click to read more »be WP:NPOV, it would defeat the continued argument to support it per WP:NPOVNAME (I, like you, support the usage of "coup attempt"). Again, I recognize...
Click to read more »"Great March of Return" were newer, which actually further aligns with WP:NPOVNAME that gives an exception for names "remembered or connected with a particular...
Click to read more »17:17, 17 July 2025 (UTC) It is so completely not the common name. See WP:NPOVNAME, which says to avoid Trendy slogans and monikers that seem unlikely to...
Click to read more »understandings of policy take a position, such as the term "massacre" being an WP:NPOVNAME. Editors comment at RMs when this benefits Israeli perspectives, e.g. Calling...
Click to read more »