This page is a redirect. The following categories are used to track and monitor this redirect:
|
are presumed to be notable. Shortcuts WP:GEOLANDWP:GEOLAND WP:NPLACEWP:NPLACE WP:NCITYWP:NCITY WP:NTOWNWP:NTOWN WP:NSETTLEMENTWP:NSETTLEMENT WP:POPULATEDWP:POPULATED...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NPLACE Bryce M (talk) 23:45, 25 February 2026 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NPLACE, WP:GNG and only cites one single source. Cupper52 (talk) 11:52, 16 January...
Click to read more »to the unreliable GNIS database and an online mapping service. Fails WP:NPLACE as not legally-recognised, so must meet WP:GNG requiring significant coverage...
Click to read more »originally PRODed this article last week on the basis that it failed WP:NPLACE, and I still believe it does. I was unaware it had already been PRODed once...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NPLACE Bryce M (talk) 16:27, 15 July 2026 (UTC) Note: this discussion has been...
Click to read more »Chemmalamattom, Kerala, India[2]; it even has the 12 Apostles Church. Keep per WP:NPLACE, as a verified village. I've tidied up the article a little. Edgepedia (talk)...
Click to read more »unrelated to the village. I cannot find evidence that this article meets WP:NPLACE. FAdesdae378 (talk · contribs) 00:00, 13 September 2022 (UTC) Note: This...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NPLACE. Not even heard about it. I lived in Harnett county for my entire life and...
Click to read more »inherently notable (see WP:NPLACE). Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 03:41, 27 October 2014 (UTC) Keep Sorry never read WP:NPLACE. I now think Riggend should...
Click to read more »referenced, per WP:NPLACE. Qrsdogg (talk) 04:42, 9 July 2011 (UTC) Keep per WP:NPLACE jsfouche ☽☾Talk 22:24, 10 July 2011 (UTC) Keep per WP:NPLACE --DThomsen8...
Click to read more »Fails WP:NPLACE. --VitorFriboquen :] (Talk) 01:11, 18 July 2026 (UTC) It does not appear that there is any speedy deletion criterion for NPLACE failures...
Click to read more »Shortcuts WP:POPPWP:POPP WP:NPLACEWP:NPLACE A populated place is notable if it meets Wikipedia's notability guidelines. A map or atlas cannot be used as...
Click to read more »to Fort Wayne, Indiana. There is no presumption of notability under WP:NPLACE for this neighborhood, which fails to satisfy the general notabiity guideline...
Click to read more »FENS · JSTOR · TWL) The page originally existed under the premise of WP:NPLACE?, but was merged into the settlement Westcliff-on-Sea after a discussion...
Click to read more »FENS · JSTOR · TWL) I couldn't find sources to verify that this meets WP:NPLACE/WP:GNG. Boleyn (talk) 18:11, 13 September 2024 (UTC) Note: This discussion...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NPLACE, Sourced only the unreliable GNIS database. No evidence that this place...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) I couldn't establish that this meets WP:NPLACE or WP:GNG, but perhaps it's clearer with access to Asian languages? Creator...
Click to read more »independent and can NOT be used to contribute to meet GNG criteria or NPLACE and in addition NPLACE does not supersede GNG. Cassiopeia talk 01:12, 25 October 2024...
Click to read more »March 2014 (UTC) Delete as failing WP:NPLACE. ansh666 05:04, 26 March 2014 (UTC) Delete does not meet WP:NPLACE or WP:GNG.--Dwaipayan (talk) 01:41, 27...
Click to read more »establish that this meets WP:NPLACE or WP:GNG Boleyn (talk) 19:35, 10 March 2015 (UTC) speedy keep. Actually meets WP:NPLACE (item 3) ; In fact, WP:NGEO...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NPLACE, Sourced only the unreliable GNIS database. No evidence that this place...
Click to read more »Comment I get 111 hits on gnews search for it. So, it probably satisfies WP:NPLACE because its existence can be verified through reliable sources. MakeSense64...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NPLACE. Fairly smaller neighbourhood in Ahmedabad. Ahmedabad has 48 Wards (which...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Does not satisfy WP:NPLACE only sources I found is WP:TRIVIALMENTION of the place Warm Regards, Miminity...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NPLACE, Sourced only the unreliable GNIS database. No evidence that this place...
Click to read more »previous discussions at Wikiproject UK Geography, wards do not come under WP:NPLACE, and such must meet WP:GNG. This article does not meet GNG, as it only has...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NPLACE, Sourced only the unreliable GNIS database. No evidence that this place...
Click to read more »single farm on the Ohio River. Fails WP:NPLACE. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 22:43, 29 September 2025 (UTC) Keep per WP:NPLACE. The article was more than a mere post...
Click to read more »JSTOR · TWL) I recently PRODed this article on the basis that it fails WP:NPLACE, and I still believe it does. The article was quickly dePRODed for reasons...
Click to read more »if "they consist of legally separate municipalities or communes" (per WP:NPLACE). Pawtucketville has only 29,561 inhabitants (see here), and appears to...
Click to read more »clearly diverse views on how to consider shopping malls in the context of WP:NPLACE. Mildly it would be good to have this clarified as a policy outcome, somewhere...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Does not meet WP:NPLACE criteria for notability - sourced solely from GNIS. Previously deleted as...
Click to read more »was keep. The consensus in this discussion is that this article meets WP:NPLACE and there is also little articulated support for the deletion nomination...
Click to read more »obviously scrape WP data. Fails WP:NPLACE. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 23:04, 9 May 2025 (UTC) Delete - fails WP:NPLACE. ロドリゲス恭子 (talk) 14:44, 10 May 2025 (UTC)...
Click to read more »Indiana. Shellwood (talk) 14:31, 28 January 2026 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:NPLACE as not a legally-recognised place. No secondary sources, no evidence of...
Click to read more »reliable sources to support an article. Not legally recognised either so NPLACE doesn't apply. Traumnovelle (talk) 08:36, 25 October 2024 (UTC) Note: This...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NPLACE, Sourced only the unreliable GNIS database. No evidence that this place...
Click to read more »are not inherently notable; fails WP:NPLACE. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 21:48, 26 September 2025 (UTC) Keep per WP:NPLACE. Mentioned as "a fair weather town"...
Click to read more »Shellwood (talk) 15:27, 13 September 2021 (UTC) Delete Does not meet WP:NPLACE or WP:GNG. The closest I could find is Nava Raipur Atal Nagar Vikas Pradhikaran...
Click to read more »Clearly not a community, fails WP:NPLACE. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 12:45, 30 April 2025 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:NPLACE. ロドリゲス恭子 (talk) 23:10, 6 May 2025 (UTC)...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This does not satisfy WP:NPLACE as sources I found are either WP:PRIMARY or WP:TRIVIAL Warm Regards, Miminity...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) If this is a town, it should meet WP:NPLACE. However, I could not find sources to prove it, and the sources originally...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NPLACE, Sourced only the unreliable GNIS database. No evidence that this place...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NPLACE and WP:GNG. No indication that this was a village. –dlthewave ☎ 04:40, 29...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NPLACE, Sourced only the unreliable GNIS database. No evidence that this place...
Click to read more »been significantly expanded since its nomination and is notable under WP:NPLACE, and there is significant coverage from lots of sources. (non-admin closure)...
Click to read more »Keep as per WP:NPLACE- articles on villages are kept. Rayabhari (talk) 16:50, 3 July 2013 (UTC) See my comments above on why WP:NPLACE isn't always accurate...
Click to read more »(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Per WP:NPLACE, a settlement is only presumed notable if it is both populated and legally...
Click to read more »free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NPLACE as not legally-recognised. NPLACE states that instead we require "non-trivial coverage by...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NPLACE and WP:GNG. Run-of-the-mill subdivision. –dlthewave ☎ 18:40, 18 July 2026...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NPLACE, Sourced only the unreliable GNIS database. No evidence that this place...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable park, fails WP:GNG and WP:NPLACE. Joseph2302 (talk) 18:20, 3 June 2015 (UTC) Keep - has received enough coverage...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NPLACE Bryce M (talk) 17:36, 2 June 2026 (UTC) Note: this discussion has been included...
Click to read more »sign of legal recognition or significant coverage, this village fails WP:NPLACE and WP:GNG. The Economy, Culture & society and Infrastructure and education...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) I couldn't find the sources to show WP:NPLACE or WP:GNG are met, but aware I may be missing something as I am not familiar...
Click to read more »keep per WP:NPLACE. AfD is not the place to discuss moves. Winner 42 Talk to me! 15:41, 22 May 2015 (UTC) Speedy Keep Passes WP:NPLACE. Note the nominator...
Click to read more »FENS · JSTOR · TWL) The page originally existed under the premise of WP:NPLACE?, but was merged into the settlement Chalkwell after a discussion at the...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NPLACE, Sourced only the unreliable GNIS database. No evidence that this place...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:GNG and WP:NPLACE. Seems to be just a rest stop. ロドリゲス恭子 (talk) 18:25, 7 May 2025 (UTC) Note:...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NPLACE, seems to be nothing more than just a post. ロドリゲス恭子 (talk) 18:09, 8 May...
Click to read more »"community", sourced only to the useless GNIS database for 17 years. Fails WP:NPLACE as not legally-recognised. Does not appear to exist as a distinct place...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NPLACE, Sourced only the unreliable GNIS database. No evidence that this place...
Click to read more »free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) No evidence of meeting WP:NPLACE - this was a populated place without legal recognition. Only sources are...
Click to read more »sign of legal recognition or significant coverage, this village fails WP:NPLACE and WP:GNG. The Economy, Culture & society and Infrastructure and education...
Click to read more »and Indiana. Shellwood (talk) 13:01, 5 August 2025 (UTC) Delete: Fails WP:NPLACE for not meeting WP:GNG itself. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 09:18, 12 August...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NPLACE, Sourced only the unreliable GNIS database. No evidence that this place...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NPLACE, Sourced only the unreliable GNIS database. No evidence that this place...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) I can find no evidence this hamlet meets WP:NPLACE and the article provides none. Its four sources are two mentions of a chapel...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NPLACE Bryce M (talk) 14:34, 23 May 2026 (UTC) Note: this discussion has been included...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NPLACE, not legally-recognised. No evidence that this is a distinct place. Coordinates...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NPLACE, Sourced only the unreliable GNIS database. No evidence that this place...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NPLACE, Sourced only the unreliable GNIS database. No evidence that this place...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NPLACE Bryce M (talk) 11:30, 28 March 2026 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NPLACE, I did a WP:BEFORE search, and did not find significant coverage, or any...
Click to read more »true - WP:NPLACE is one of our least restrictive guidelines, and if this was a settlement prior, and we can verify that, it meets WP:NPLACE. There's no...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NPLACE and WP:GNG. No sign of a community at this location. Satellite view and...
Click to read more »even be a legally recognized governmental entity and probably fails WP:NPLACE. South Azerbaijani Wikipedia has an article on this subject, but it is similarly...
Click to read more »discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:20, 27 October 2014 (UTC) Keep per WP:NPLACE: "Cities and villages anywhere in the world are generally kept, regardless...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NPLACE and WP:GNG. This is most likely just a post more than a community. ロドリゲス恭子...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NPLACE, Sourced only the unreliable GNIS database and 2 Google Books. There's no...
Click to read more »Pakistan website for its geographic location. In my view, the article meets WP:NPLACE and WP:GEOLAND now...Ngrewal1 (talk) 19:20, 9 August 2026 (UTC) Relisted...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NPLACE, Sourced only the unreliable GNIS database. No evidence that this place...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NPLACE, Sourced only the unreliable GNIS database. No evidence that this place...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NPLACE, Sourced only the unreliable GNIS database. No evidence that this place...
Click to read more »below. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 23:01, 10 February 2011 (UTC) Comment WP:NPLACE reflects the usual outcome on cities and villages being notable. I can't...
Click to read more »to keep articles on clearly designated inhabited settlements (essay WP:NPLACE). Having said that there is much logic in a merge to Boxted as a separate...
Click to read more »Keep Per WP:FIVE #1 "Gazeteer" and WP:NPLACE.--Pontificalibus (talk) 10:48, 24 August 2011 (UTC) Keep per WP:NPLACE. Binksternet (talk) 17:21, 24 August...
Click to read more »therefore failing WP:NPLACE. -- [2] AnonymousScholar49 (talk) 23:49, 6 May 2025 (UTC) Delete - Per nom. Doesn't meet WP:NPLACE. -- Itzcuauhtli11 (talk)...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NPLACE Bryce M (talk) 13:12, 2 July 2026 (UTC) Note: this discussion has been included...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NPLACE Bryce M (talk) 11:20, 17 March 2026 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...
Click to read more »FENS · JSTOR · TWL) PROD tag removed in 2021 by IP without comment. Fails WP:NPLACE. Single sentence permastub sourced only to the unreliable GNIS database...
Click to read more »on any of the reasons for deletion that I am familiar with. Even if WP:NPLACE was not met (and I do not think that is the case), we would redirect to...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NPLACE, Sourced only the unreliable GNIS database. No evidence that this place...
Click to read more »Coordinates given point to a remote woodland area with no structures. Fails WP:NPLACE as not legally-recognised. Fails WP:GNG as lacking significant coverage...
Click to read more »not accurate, with nothing resembling a place around the area. Fails WP:NPLACE. Jordano53 22:16, 16 May 2026 (UTC) Note: this discussion has been included...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NPLACE and WP:GNG. Sourced only the unreliable GNIS database. The article does...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NPLACE and WP:GNG. Every source that I've found points to this being a railroad...
Click to read more »the Channal either of those features. The policy for villages etc is WP:NPLACE which requires reliable and verifiable source to establish notability (WP:NOTE)...
Click to read more »JSTOR · TWL) Could not find any trace of this story online. Seems to fail WP:NPLACE. Esprit15d • talk • contribs 20:50, 30 April 2017 (UTC) The above discussion...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NPLACE, Sourced only the unreliable GNIS database. No evidence that this place...
Click to read more »Bridgeville. There's nothing in WP:NPLACE that would establish this as a notable unincorporated community, nor does WP:NPLACE guarantee that an unincorporated...
Click to read more »26 March 2026 (UTC) Delete fails WP:NPLACE Agnieszka653 (talk) 17:16, 27 March 2026 (UTC) Delete fails WP:NPLACE per Iljhgtn. ScottyNolan (talk) 12:39...
Click to read more »12:36, 17 July 2018 (UTC) Keep - This looks like a distinct village.[1] WP:NPLACE. I removed the nonsensical content and reduced it to a stub. --Oakshade...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NPLACE and violates the WP:MASSCREATE GNG source requirement. Sourced only to maps...
Click to read more »Bhamo Township WinKyaw (talk) 17:53, 16 June 2026 (UTC) *Delete - Fails NPLACE, and these gazetteer sources do not contribute to GNG. The Keep vote directly...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Poorly sourced article which fails WP:NPLACE and WP:GNG. –Cupper52Discuss! 13:45, 11 January 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion...
Click to read more »Does not meet WP:NPLACE and WP:SIGCOV. Article subject is not a Census Designated Place in Iowa [1] [2] which is a usual WP:NPLACE indicator. Does not...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NPLACE Bryce M (talk) 10:02, 21 July 2026 (UTC) Note: this discussion has been...
Click to read more »fail of WP:NPLACE with what public information can be found. Iljhgtn (they/them · talk) 13:57, 10 February 2026 (UTC) Delete fails WP:NPLACE Agnieszka653...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NPLACE and WP:GNG. This was the location of David Baughman's store and post office...
Click to read more »Sitush (talk) 15:34, 19 February 2018 (UTC) Keep Places WP:NPLACE. Recreating a PROD is allowed, I'm not sure how that's relevant. Also, AFD...
Click to read more »(UTC) Keep Looks like village is a tourist destination which passes WP:NPLACE. Agnieszka653 (talk) 02:44, 1 July 2026 (UTC) Relisted to generate a more...
Click to read more »free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Does not appear to meet WP:NPLACE / WP:GNG Boleyn (talk) 17:42, 28 September 2025 (UTC) Note: This discussion...
Click to read more »free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Doesn't meet WP:GEOLAND, WP:NPLACE or WP:GNG in my opinion. Boleyn (talk) 07:44, 10 May 2020 (UTC) Note: This...
Click to read more »(UTC) Delete per WP:NPLACE which says that "Populated, legally recognized places are typically presumed to be notable". Per WP:NPLACE and WP:GNIS the GNIS...
Click to read more »Thanks, Fade258 (talk) 14:42, 13 March 2026 (UTC) Delete per fail of WP:NPLACE. Iljhgtn (they/them · talk) 20:33, 13 March 2026 (UTC) Redirect to Greer...
Click to read more »that this meets WP:GNG, it has some basic Ghits but not much. As for WP:NPLACE, it depends if this is considered a 'larger neighbourhood' or 'smaller suburb'...
Click to read more »further edits should be made to this page. The result was Withdrawn. Per WP:NPLACES fulfilled by Phil Bridger. (non-admin closure) I, Jethrobot drop me a line...
Click to read more »Thanks, ArcAngel (talk) 22:15, 26 September 2023 (UTC) Keep meets WP:NPLACE as it is real and populated. I've removed the OR. It also looks like this...
Click to read more »Single-sentence permastub sourced only to the unreliable WP:GNIS database. Fails WP:NPLACE as not legally-recognised. Lacking secondary sources. AusLondonder (talk)...
Click to read more »redirect to Santiago de Veraguas as it's not legally recognised and per WP:NPLACE would require WP:SIGCOV to deserve it's own article - which I cannot find...
Click to read more »determined. Iglooflame (talk) 14:43, 23 March 2012 (UTC) Comment Per WP:NPLACE landmarks often survive AfD. So, I am not so sure it should be deleted....
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NPLACE; no mention of "Big Poplar Tree" as a place in newspapers.com, NewspaperARCHIVE...
Click to read more »some consideration. Small neighborhood without widespread usage per WP:NPLACE; tried to find sources, almost-but-not-quite notable per WP:GNG. --L235...
Click to read more »Japan. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 22:57, 27 June 2023 (UTC) Keep under WP:NPLACE, which states that "populated, legally recognized places are typically presumed...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NPLACE. Fairly smaller neighbourhood in Ahmedabad. Ahmedabad has 48 Wards (which...
Click to read more »permastub sourced only to the unreliable GNIS database and a map. Fails WP:NPLACE as lacking legal recognition, so must meet WP:GNG, requiring "significant...
Click to read more »September 2020 (UTC) Delete or redirect to Kallar Syedan Tehsil per WP:NPLACE: must be a very tiny village indeed, if it exists. I've copied this link...
Click to read more »unincorporated place, this does not have presumption of notability per WP:NPLACE. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 01:42, 4 August 2026 (UTC) Note: this discussion has...
Click to read more »no other source could be found other than WP mirrors. Obviously fails WP:NPLACE and WP:GNG. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 12:00, 2 August 2025 (UTC) Delete Couldn't...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NPLACE / WP:GEOLAND and WP:GNG. The article is an entirely unsourced local place...
Click to read more »keep. Consensus developed that the article subject is notable under WP:NPLACE, with more sources and information available at the Polish translation....
Click to read more »I'm sorry, but I don't think we should be rewriting WP:NPLACE; I don't see anything in NPLACE that would apply here. Conversely, there's nothing in the...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NPLACE Bryce M (talk) 23:22, 7 May 2026 (UTC) Note: this discussion has been included...
Click to read more »2024 (UTC) Delete as WP:NPLACE states "Populated, legally recognized places are typically presumed to be notable" but per WP:NPLACE and WP:GNIS the GNIS...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:GNG and WP:NPLACE, Nothing more than a post. ロドリゲス恭子 (talk) 18:07, 7 May 2025 (UTC) Note:...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NPLACE and WP:GNG. Sourced only the unreliable GNIS database. The article does...
Click to read more »pages fails WP:NPLACE no evidence of significant coverage or notability. Agnieszka653 (talk) 06:00, 10 April 2026 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:NPLACE. I did find...
Click to read more »2021 (UTC) Keep Per the excellent research by Magnolia677. Satisfies WP:NPLACE. Smartyllama (talk) 20:47, 26 January 2021 (UTC) Relisted to generate a...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NPLACE, Sourced only the unreliable GNIS database. No evidence that this place...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NPLACE Bryce M (talk) 10:25, 11 April 2026 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...
Click to read more »-The Gnome (talk) 13:16, 7 July 2026 (UTC) The relevant guideline is WP:NPLACE which requires that a populated place either be "legally recognized" or...
Click to read more »(see WP:NPLACE), and in addition the mall is a hub for several city bus routes. PKT(alk) 15:15, 22 August 2012 (UTC) Just to clarify, NPLACE is an essay...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NPLACE and WP:GNG. No evidence of a community at this location. The article Welcome...
Click to read more »(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Per WP:NPLACE, since this location is not recognised by the Census, it needs to pass WP:GNG...
Click to read more »FENS · JSTOR · TWL) No evidence of a unincorporated community. Fails WP:NPLACE. Sourced only the unreliable GNIS database. VitorFriboquen :] (Talk) 16:03...
Click to read more »find sources to add showing it meets WP:NPLACE / WP:GNG. Boleyn (talk) 19:24, 14 July 2024 (UTC) Draftify: WP:NPLACE and WP:GNG apply. Draftification will...
Click to read more »JSTOR · TWL) I recently PRODed this article on the grounds that it failed WP:NPLACE, and I still believe it does. The dePRODer said to take this to AfD, so...
Click to read more »has legal regonition from the government of Iran, meaning it passes WP:NPLACE. I'd be happy to clean it up if it isn't deleted. TheManInTheBlackHat (Talk)...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NPLACE Bryce M (talk) 21:46, 8 March 2026 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) I couldn't find sources to show this meets WP:NPLACE / WP:GNG Boleyn (talk) 12:34, 2 October 2025 (UTC) Note: This discussion...
Click to read more »discussions. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 10:46, 3 July 2013 (UTC) Keep per WP:NPLACE. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 10:48, 3 July 2013 (UTC) Keep. The village verifiably...
Click to read more »Keep Officially recognized populated geographic location. WP:NGEO and WP:NPLACE. Mkdwtalk 09:24, 2 April 2013 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved as...
Click to read more »unincorporated place, this does not have presumption of notability per WP:NPLACE. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 01:42, 4 August 2026 (UTC) Note: this discussion has...
Click to read more »anything else out. Mangoe (talk) 05:10, 25 November 2022 (UTC) Keep - Per WP:NPLACE. Just needs some work to find historical sources. ProofRobust 08:56, 25...
Click to read more »FantasticWikiUser(Ts and Cs) 14:49, 8 March 2026 (UTC) Delete non-notable fail of WP:NPLACE. Iljhgtn (they/them · talk) 03:53, 10 March 2026 (UTC) Delete - for lack...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NPLACE Bryce M (talk) 18:56, 3 July 2026 (UTC) Note: this discussion has been included...
Click to read more »165.91.13.29 (talk) 15:15, 6 June 2018 (UTC) Keep per WP:GEOLAND and WP:NPLACE as an officially recognised populated place. Existence verified in multiple...
Click to read more »discussions. czar · · 05:20, 28 April 2013 (UTC) Keep per WP:NGEO and WP:NPLACE. Populated settlements are generally considered notable regardless of size...
Click to read more »free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Should meet WP:GEOLAND / WP:NPLACE but I couldn't verify anything here. Boleyn (talk) 15:42, 9 July 2017 (UTC)...
Click to read more »performed a wp:BEFORE search. Though it does have run-of-the-mill coverage. WP:NPLACE indicates: "Very small malls ... are generally deleted." Was PRODed, but...
Click to read more »article on Florida restaurant lacks significant coverage for WP:GNG, fails WP:NPLACE. Vrac (talk) 00:44, 25 January 2015 (UTC) Delete: Although there are some...
Click to read more »JSTOR · TWL) This is an article on a proposal; I don't see that it meets WP:NPLACE or WP:GNG. Possibly worth a redirect to List of U.S. county secession proposals...
Click to read more »2024 (UTC) add Keep, a separate village should be ok for notability per WP:NPLACE. --Soman (talk) 22:39, 29 April 2024 (UTC) Keep. Separate village. Satisfies...
Click to read more »"community", sourced only to the useless GNIS database for 17 years. Fails WP:NPLACE as not legally-recognised. Does not appear to exist as a distinct place...
Click to read more »peculiar name!) needs improvement and reliable sources; Keep as per WP:NPLACE Rayabhari (talk) 13:36, 2 June 2013 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »Overhaul and expansion of a 57-store, 102,000 sf mall. Furthermore, WP:NPLACE indicates: "Very small malls ... are generally deleted." From what I have...
Click to read more »place is Vaishali district does not have any legal recognition to meet WP:NPLACE. However, there are other places named Naya Tola elsewhere (such as in Kathihar...
Click to read more »geographical location. Maile66 (talk) 13:17, 18 June 2012 (UTC) Keep WP:NPLACE: Cities and villages are generally kept, regardless of size, as long as...
Click to read more »free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) I don't believe this meets WP:NPLACE. The sourcing present on this article is the only non-trivial, secondary...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) fails WP:GNG and WP:NPLACE. run of the mill shopping centre with no coverage to reveal any notability...
Click to read more »it's a article that fails WP:NPLACE and has no sources. Agnieszka653 (talk) 18:31, 19 April 2026 (UTC) Delete fails WP:NPLACE, no sources to prove legal...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NPLACE. Fairly smaller neighbourhood in Ahmedabad. Unreferenced. Ahmedabad has...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Doesn't meet WP:NPLACE or WP:GNG Boleyn (talk) 21:25, 6 January 2015 (UTC) Keep obviously; meets...
Click to read more »better verification of existence in the 2011 national census. Passes WP:NPLACE. Don't like adding content from Google snippets (easy to misinterpret) but...
Click to read more »caste stuff. - NitinMlk (talk) 18:21, 31 October 2016 (UTC) Keep per WP:NPLACE. Small-village stubs are perfectly acceptable provided they can be shown...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Does not satisfy WP:NPLACE. No WP:SIGCOV about it and the given sources do not demonstrate notability...
Click to read more »FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Sourced only to the useless GNIS database. Fails WP:NPLACE as not legally-recognised. Lacking in-depth secondary source coverage. AusLondonder...
Click to read more »settlements are basically inherently notable, so no deleting please. see WP:NPLACE. agree with Rincewind42, "Zhuyeping" should be title of surviving article...
Click to read more »as articles, as long as they are verifiable in reliable sources per WP:NPLACE. (non-admin closure) I, Jethrobot drop me a line (note: not a bot!) 18:38...
Click to read more »reply on what to do about such articles on my talkpage. So according to WP:NPLACE I've made a poor nomination. Harsh (talk) 13:53, 5 September 2012 (UTC)...
Click to read more »available. [1] Till I Go Home (talk) 09:06, 30 December 2011 (UTC) Delete. WP:NPLACE states that "Larger malls are generally considered notable. Very small malls...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NPLACE. Lacks any sources at all and a google search found almost nothing. Eternal...
Click to read more »MT TrainDiscuss 04:42, 20 February 2018 (UTC) It does however meet WP:NPLACE as it is a populated place and it's existence can be verified. (by looking...
Click to read more »FENS · JSTOR · TWL) tagged for lack of sources since 11 years ago. fails WP:NPLACE. lettherebedarklight〔晚安 おやすみ〕ping me when replying 03:21, 9 November 2022...
Click to read more »article. Fixed the existing archived reference already there. Passes WP:NPLACE now,... which states..."Cities and villages are generally kept, regardless...
Click to read more »July 2026 (UTC) Keep per editors above and new sources this page passes WP:NPLACE. Agnieszka653 (talk) 01:15, 27 July 2026 (UTC) Keep AfD evaluates whether...
Click to read more »Also found nothing via basic searches, so as it stands, fails WP:GNG & WP:NPLACE. Eagleash (talk) 15:24, 25 April 2022 (UTC) Delete : - Not able to find...
Click to read more »unincorporated place, this does not have presumption of notability per WP:NPLACE. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 01:36, 4 August 2026 (UTC) Note: this discussion has...
Click to read more »Politics and Scotland. Crowsus (talk) 07:29, 7 January 2024 (UTC) Keep per WP:NPLACE: Populated, legally recognized places are typically presumed to be notable...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:GNG and WP:NPLACE. Only thing of note is that it has an 'unusual name' by one source, and...
Click to read more »below this notice. Thanks, LFaraone 02:10, 8 July 2013 (UTC) Keep per WP:NPLACE. Deor (talk) 02:16, 8 July 2013 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NPLACE, Sourced only the unreliable GNIS database. No evidence that this place...
Click to read more »deletion discussions. Chidgk1 (talk) 19:59, 17 March 2023 (UTC) Keep: Per WP:NPLACE, populated and legally recognized places are typically presumed to be notable...
Click to read more »unincorpoated place, this does not have presumption of notability per WP:NPLACE. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 01:27, 4 August 2026 (UTC) Note: this discussion has...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NPLACE. Fairly smaller neighbourhood in Ahmedabad. Ahmedabad has 48 Wards (which...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NPLACE, Sourced only the unreliable GNIS database. No evidence that this place...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Sourced only to GNIS, this fails GNG and NPLACE. Older topo maps show the name in the same typeface as churches and schools...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) I couldn't find evidence it meets WP:NPLACE / WP:GNG. Boleyn (talk) 12:57, 10 September 2025 (UTC) Note: This discussion...
Click to read more »villages in Østfold Baerentp (talk) 17:23, 14 July 2018 (UTC) Keep per WP:NPLACE -- » Shadowowl | talk 19:13, 15 July 2018 (UTC) Keep per same reasoning...
Click to read more »say 09:58, 30 December 2011 (UTC) Keep. Places are generally notable. WP:NPLACE states that "Cities and villages are generally kept, regardless of size...
Click to read more »reference to the 2011 census results. Meets the gazetteer function and WP:NPLACE #3. AllyD (talk) 08:03, 2 January 2018 (UTC) Speedy Keep: The place exists...
Click to read more »seems to indicate that it is), then it likely merits its own article per WP:NPLACE. It already makes no sense to delete a good-faith, non-problematic draft...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:GNG and WP:NPLACE; Wikipedia is not a travel guide. Redirect to Kandy District? thejiujiangdragon...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Does not satisfy WP:NPLACE. No WP:SIGCOV about it and the given sources do not demonstrate notability...
Click to read more »Speedy keep as an erroneous nomination: I recommend the nominator read WP:NPLACE. This is a populated, legally recognized community. No valid rationale for...
Click to read more »no evidence that this place is legally recognized or defined. Hence, WP:NPLACE does not apply, and this fails WP:GNG. Allan Nonymous (talk) 16:57, 21 April...
Click to read more »unincorpoated place, this does not have presumption of notability per WP:NPLACE. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 01:31, 4 August 2026 (UTC) Note: this discussion has...
Click to read more »empty-handed on reliable sources covering this significantly. also, fails wp:nplace. although the last point states that Named natural features are often notable...
Click to read more »exists then it's about equivalent to a Parish - which is enough to pass wp:NPLACE. The only question is whether it exists or whether it's a hoax. Neonchameleon...
Click to read more »SVcode(Talk) 20:02, 12 July 2026 (UTC) Delete No WP:SIGCOV and article fails WP:NPLACE. Agnieszka653 (talk) 02:51, 18 July 2026 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 01:00, 7 July 2024 (UTC) Keep: per WP:NPLACE. Why do you want to delete (or merge?) this? There are tens of thousands...
Click to read more »census citation. No content beyond bare demographic data. Does not meet WP:NPLACE threshold for a standalone article. Flyingphoenixchips (talk) 02:13, 18...
Click to read more »September 2016 (UTC) Keep as villages are normally considered notable as per WP:NPLACE Atlantic306 (talk) 18:03, 17 September 2016 (UTC) Keep, per WP:GEOLAND and...
Click to read more »demonstrated in satisfying WP:GEOLAND with sufficient notability through GNG. WP:NPLACE is also met by subject, since the degree of coverage by reliable independent...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NPLACE Bryce M (talk) 11:34, 28 March 2026 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...
Click to read more »nothing to merge. The township article is similarly uninformative. Fails WP:NPLACE. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 23:18, 26 August 2025 (UTC) Delete Non-notable place...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:GNG and WP:NPLACE. Sourced only to census records, there is no indication that this is an...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NPLACE, Sourced only the unreliable GNIS database. No evidence that this place...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NPLACE Bryce M (talk) 12:00, 28 April 2026 (UTC) Note: this discussion has been...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NPLACE and WP:GNG, lacking either legal recognition of significant coverage. The...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) I couldn't establish that this meets WP:NPLACE, WP:GNG or any other aspect of WP:NOTABILITY. I added it's first ref but...
Click to read more »10 August 2013 (UTC) Keep Articles on villages are usually kept per WP:NPLACE if discussed in any reliable source. A Google Books search for "Majhoi,...
Click to read more »2024 (UTC) Keep (speedy and close). Subject article appears to meet WP:NPLACE (as a populated place that is covered in reliable sources). Zero indication...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NPLACE and WP:GNG. Satellite views shows this is nothing more than just a post...
Click to read more »Probably just a side track serving a single farm; obvious failure of WP:NPLACE and WP:GNG. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 21:17, 4 July 2026 (UTC) The above discussion...
Click to read more »not appear to exist as a distinct place. No secondary sources. Fails WP:NPLACE as not a legally-recognised place. AusLondonder (talk) 12:13, 24 January...
Click to read more »deletion), there is plenty of evidence to indicate that the subject meets WP:NPLACE - as a populated place which is covered in multiple seemingly reliable/independent...
Click to read more »by Po'pay in 1680–1692. So this confederation/polity might not pass WP:NPLACE? Would prefer merge to Pueblo Revolt though. - Asdfjrjjj (talk) 04:59, 12...
Click to read more »the town exists, and therefore this article should be kept pursuant to WP:NPLACE. Dolovis (talk) 05:13, 19 May 2011 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »unincorporated place, this does not have presumption of notability per WP:NPLACE. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 01:38, 4 August 2026 (UTC) Note: this discussion has...
Click to read more »should be made to this page. The result was keep. Consensus to keep per WP:NPLACE. Article has been significantly improved since it was nominated for deletion...
Click to read more »sources to confirm the information in this article, to prove that it meets WP:NPLACE / WP:GNG, or that it exists. Boleyn (talk) 15:39, 28 October 2025 (UTC)...
Click to read more »[4] [5]. Even if we say that it doesn't qualify for notability under WP:NPLACE, I think it does under WP:GNG - it is quite unique among post offices for...
Click to read more »mention Ah Cut. As such, seems to fail WP:GNG. Not sure it's saved by WP:NPLACE either. Ajpolino (talk) 04:58, 8 July 2016 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NPLACE, no evidence of a community. The name does not appear on topo maps until...
Click to read more »discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:09, 13 April 2026 (UTC) Delete fails WP:NPLACE. Agnieszka653 (talk) 04:19, 20 April 2026 (UTC) The above discussion is...
Click to read more »stands, I can't find any unaffiliated reliable sources that would meet NPLACE. If this project ever gets revived and built, it could be a different story...
Click to read more »and Indiana. Shellwood (talk) 12:29, 2 May 2025 (UTC) Delete- Fails WP:NPLACE and WP:NGEO. ロドリゲス恭子 (talk) 19:25, 8 May 2025 (UTC) Redirect to North Township...
Click to read more »notable, because notability encompasses their entire history. ... per WP:NPLACE. We're talking about the headquarters of a local government area in Nigeria...
Click to read more »added by Bettersmiley (talk • contribs) Comment Counties are notable per WP:NPLACE, and AFD is not cleanup, but there appears to be no such county as East...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:GNG and WP:NPLACE. May be a good idea to merge, also. P,TO 19104 (talk) (contribs) 16:45,...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NPLACE Bryce M (talk) 11:27, 30 June 2026 (UTC) Note: this discussion has been...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NPLACE and WP:GNG. Sourced only to the Iranian census which includes many places...
Click to read more »wikipedia-appropriate which also verify the place as being populated. It meets WP:NPLACE for those reasons and has enough information beyond the basic to be kept...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NPLACE, Sourced only the unreliable GNIS database. No evidence that this place...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NPLACE, Sourced only the unreliable GNIS database. No evidence that this place...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NPLACE Bryce M (talk) 11:36, 28 March 2026 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NPLACE, Sourced only the unreliable GNIS database. No evidence that this place...
Click to read more »WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:19, 21 July 2025 (UTC) Delete I also found nothing, fails WP:NPLACE as we need more than just GNIS to have an article. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk)...
Click to read more »FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Dirth of sources about this alleged place, fails WP:NPLACE requirements. -Samoht27 (talk) 20:45, 29 August 2025 (UTC) Note: This discussion...
Click to read more »Road were found. Obviously not a community; false article that fails WP:NPLACE. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 00:28, 19 September 2025 (UTC) Delete Small and tiny...
Click to read more »article in another language. So, it's a matter of expansion. Passes WP:NPLACE. Sir Tragedy (talk) 12:15, 14 December 2018 (UTC) Comment/Question - I don't...
Click to read more »and Indiana. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:26, 19 May 2025 (UTC) Delete - fails WP:NPLACE. Only briefly a post office at most. ロドリゲス恭子 (talk) 15:48, 19 May 2025 (UTC)...
Click to read more »FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Could not find any significant coverage to meet GNG or NPLACE. –dlthewave ☎ 12:41, 6 April 2023 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NPLACE. No evidence that this place is a unincorporated community. VitorFriboquen :]...
Click to read more »Shellwood (talk) 22:56, 22 April 2025 (UTC) Delete No RS, no article; fails WP:NPLACE. Gotta love the "well, duh" explanation of the name, though. WeirdNAnnoyed...
Click to read more »county, school district. That's pretty much the definition of failing WP:NPLACE. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 11:19, 8 September 2025 (UTC) The above discussion...
Click to read more »--Gabriel (talk to me ) 23:00, 19 October 2022 (UTC) Keep – Subject meets NPLACE. Princess of Ara 11:31, 20 October 2022 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »never end). Svartner (talk) 04:47, 10 March 2026 (UTC) Delete no pass of WP:NPLACE. Iljhgtn (they/them · talk) 00:33, 12 March 2026 (UTC) The above discussion...
Click to read more »03:29, 15 April 2011 (UTC) Keep, landmarks are considered notable under WP:NPLACE and any building with obvious significant on a city skyline (such as being...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:GNG and WP:NPLACE. Bbb23 (talk) 18:11, 18 August 2013 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...
Click to read more »(talk) 23:10, 26 February 2026 (UTC) Delete clippings and snippets fails WP:NPLACE. Iljhgtn (they/them · talk) 18:11, 27 February 2026 (UTC) The above discussion...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:GNG and WP:NPLACE. This place seems to be nothing more than a post. I've gone through topos...
Click to read more »Being on a motorway exit sign does not establish notability. This fails WP:NPLACE so must meet WP:GNG requiring significant coverage in reliable secondary...
Click to read more »unincorpoated place, this does not have presumption of notability per WP:NPLACE. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 01:16, 4 August 2026 (UTC) Note: this discussion has...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NPLACE Bryce M (talk) 11:31, 30 June 2026 (UTC) Note: this discussion has been...
Click to read more »place..PROD contested on grounds that it was "located on a map". Fails WP:NPLACE as not legally-recognised. Fails WP:GNG as lacking significant coverage...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NPLACE Bryce M (talk) 11:28, 30 June 2026 (UTC) Note: this discussion has been...
Click to read more »sign of legal recognition or significant coverage, this village fails WP:NPLACE and WP:GNG. The Economy, Culture & society and Infrastructure and education...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:GNG and WP:NPLACE. Sourced only to census records, there is no indication that this is an...
Click to read more »personal level probably years ago, but it is not notable at all for WP:NPLACE or any other notability guideline. Iljhgtn (they/them · talk) 03:52, 7 March...
Click to read more »notable without real coverage, and that's pretty unlikely here. Fails WP:NPLACE and WP:GNG. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 22:35, 5 August 2025 (UTC) The above discussion...
Click to read more »rail point with never more than 2 buildings: [1]. Not notable, fails WP:NPLACE. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 22:30, 18 June 2026 (UTC) Delete - No sign that this...
Click to read more »this is a crossroad with a couple of farms in the general area. Fails WP:NPLACE. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 22:02, 29 June 2026 (UTC) The above discussion is...
Click to read more »never had any other infrastructure until the present day: [1]. Fails WP:NPLACE. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 22:11, 28 June 2026 (UTC) The above discussion is...
Click to read more »notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 01:05, 28 March 2023 (UTC) Keep as per WP:NPLACE this is a named place that was once populated and even though it might not...
Click to read more »free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Does not appear to meet WP:NPLACE. No sources. PROD tag removed without concerns being addressed. AusLondonder...
Click to read more »to be notable. Wikipedia:Notability (geographic features). See also WP:NPLACE. Keep, satisfied notability for human settlements, several google book hits...
Click to read more »Coolabahapple (talk) 19:44, 13 February 2020 (UTC) Speedy Keep Clearly satisfies WP:NPLACE. A political party being based there may not grant it notability in and...
Click to read more »railroad wye without so much as a building; clearly not a community. Fails WP:NPLACE. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 21:22, 4 July 2026 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »containing over 12,000 people.[1]. I think there is enough to satisfy WP:NPLACE. AllyD (talk) 19:49, 5 February 2015 (UTC) Relisted to generate a more thorough...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NPLACE and WP:GNG. Sourced only to the Iranian census which includes many places...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NPLACE. Sourced only the unreliable GNIS database. VitorFriboquen :] (Talk) 00:54...
Click to read more »woods with no human infrastructure; absolutely not a community. Fails WP:NPLACE. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 21:41, 20 August 2025 (UTC) Note: This discussion...
Click to read more »desperate. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 23:03, 4 March 2026 (UTC) Delete - fails WP:NPLACE. ScalarFactor (talk) 01:53, 10 March 2026 (UTC) The above discussion is...
Click to read more »1 September 2016 (UTC) Keep per WP:GEOFEAT and Arxiloxos. Also see WP:NPLACE. clpo13(talk) 23:58, 1 September 2016 (UTC) Keep - The nom needs to do better...
Click to read more »pretty clearly just a former rail junction, nothing that would satisfy WP:NPLACE. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 11:25, 6 July 2026 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »22:18, 6 March 2026 (UTC) Delete further searches yields nothing meeting WP:NPLACE. Iljhgtn (they/them · talk) 17:51, 9 March 2026 (UTC) The above discussion...
Click to read more »found people with the last name Ahern. Obvious failure of WP:GNG and WP:NPLACE. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 22:54, 5 July 2026 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »Wikipedia Loc863 (talk) 18:27, 6 July 2026 (UTC) The relevant guideline, WP:NPLACE, requires populated places to either have official recognition or meet WP:GNG...
Click to read more »Burkina Faso. Giuliotf (talk) 01:13, 11 January 2026 (UTC) Delete per WP:NPLACE, can't find any reliable information on the place, other than it does probably...
Click to read more »anything resembling a "community" appear on topo maps. Total fail of WP:NPLACE. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 10:55, 16 June 2026 (UTC) Note: this discussion has...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NPLACE and WP:GNG. No evidence of a community at this location. Historical topos...
Click to read more »have a page for it. If not, then it needs to pass WP:GNG (according to WP:NPLACE), but I couldn't find any significant coverage of it. – numbermaniac 14:38...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NPLACE and WP:GNG. This article is sourced only to the Iranian census which covers...
Click to read more »2019 (UTC) Keep With more than 800 people living there, it would pass WP:NPLACE. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 18:25, 21 October 2019 (UTC) Keep As a populated...
Click to read more »place has seen regular mention in the local press, which would satisfy WP:NPLACE, so I have passed the article. It is now at Speckled Wood, Hastings. However...
Click to read more »24 May 2025 (UTC) Delete - just a rail junction. Fails WP:NGEO and WP:NPLACE. ロドリゲス恭子 (talk) 18:06, 27 May 2025 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) No evidence that this meets WP:GNG or WP:NPLACE. Iranian census records are not sufficient to establish that this was a...
Click to read more »and Myanmar. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 06:08, 18 May 2024 (UTC) Delete - From a WP:NPLACE perspective, there may be enough for this housing development to meet WP:GNG...
Click to read more »ရေလဲ in Shwegu Township and in Bhamo Township, nowhere near this. Fails WP:NPLACE. EmeraldRange (talk/contribs) 12:51, 1 June 2026 (UTC) The above discussion...
Click to read more »quick search for sources shows several, and certainly enough to meet WP:NPLACE. Mccapra (talk) 10:58, 16 May 2025 (UTC) I don't think this is a legally...
Click to read more »appears to be a part of Brockworth, Gloucestershire so, in line with WP:NPLACE, a redirect/merge there with a couple of sentences may be appropriate. Coolabahapple...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NPLACE Bryce M (talk) 11:26, 30 June 2026 (UTC) Note: this discussion has been...
Click to read more »sign of legal recognition or significant coverage, this village fails WP:NPLACE and WP:GNG. The Economy, Culture & society and Infrastructure and education...
Click to read more »typically kept as long as they can be verified using a reliable source (WP:NPLACE). (non-admin closure) I, Jethrobot drop me a line (note: not a bot!) 15:12...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NPLACE and WP:GNG, sourced only to census records. –dlthewave ☎ 04:28, 29 May 2026...
Click to read more »remain notable, because notability encompasses their entire history." WP:NPLACE says: "Cities and villages anywhere in the world are generally kept, regardless...
Click to read more »place. VMS Mosaic (talk) 02:22, 15 July 2016 (UTC) Keep. This town meets WP:NPLACE. "Cities and villages anywhere in the world are generally kept, regardless...
Click to read more »5 July 2026 (UTC) Delete per nom; just a rail waypoint/siding, fails WP:NPLACE and WP:GNG. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 22:57, 5 July 2026 (UTC) The above discussion...
Click to read more »and Indiana. Shellwood (talk) 23:24, 14 May 2025 (UTC) Delete - fails WP:NPLACE, no sign of a town. ロドリゲス恭子 (talk) 22:07, 15 May 2025 (UTC) The above discussion...
Click to read more »WP:GNG. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 23:08, 5 February 2026 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:NPLACE, no legal recognition. Another useless GNIS permastub. AusLondonder (talk)...
Click to read more »MitYehor📘^talk 21:39, 29 May 2026 (UTC) Delete - No indication that this meets NPLACE or is even an actual village. –dlthewave ☎ 02:33, 30 May 2026 (UTC) The...
Click to read more »free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) It doesn't appear to meet WP:NPLACE or WP:GNG and has been in CAT:NN for 4 years. Possible WP:ATD is merge/redirect...
Click to read more »townland. Northamerica1000(talk) 16:32, 22 August 2012 (UTC) Keep Per WP:NPLACE, as populated areas are inherently notable. I, Jethrobot drop me a line...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NGEO and WP:NPLACE. This place seems to only be an RV campground, not a community. A WP:BEFORE...
Click to read more »delete per WP:DEL7. Sam Sailor 14:53, 20 September 2018 (UTC) Keep per WP:NPLACE. I added a source. TimTempleton (talk) (cont) 17:55, 21 September 2018 (UTC)...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This article fails WP:NPLACE as it lacks WP:SIGCOV only WP:TRIVIALMENTION. Warm Regards, Miminity (talk)...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) I couldn't find source to prove this meets WP:NPLACE / WP:GNG. Possible WP:ATD is merge/redirect to Plaquemines Parish, Louisiana...
Click to read more »WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 22:12, 6 March 2026 (UTC) Delete total fail of WP:NPLACE and GEO. Not notable tiny place. Iljhgtn (they/them · talk) 17:50, 9 March...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NPLACE and WP:NGEO. Doing a WP:BEFORE search only brought up searches fearing the...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NPLACE, Sourced only the unreliable GNIS database. No evidence that this place...
Click to read more »notable, because notability encompasses their entire history. ... per WP:NPLACE. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 13:03, 20 May 2025 (UTC) The above discussion is...
Click to read more »Delete - not covered by WP:GEONATURAL, not verifiably documented as WP:NPLACE and never destined to get GNG. ChrysGalley (talk) 12:35, 19 February 2026...
Click to read more »(talk) 10:09, 28 February 2026 (UTC) Delete as a non-notable fail of WP:NPLACE. Iljhgtn (they/them · talk) 05:57, 1 March 2026 (UTC) The above discussion...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NPLACE Bryce M (talk) 23:02, 10 July 2026 (UTC) Note: this discussion has been...
Click to read more »Indiana. Shellwood (talk) 23:21, 11 February 2026 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:NPLACE. No secondary sourcing to meet WP:GNG. AusLondonder (talk) 23:31, 12 February...
Click to read more »no evidence of significant coverage or offical recognition to meet WP:NPLACE. –dlthewave ☎ 17:30, 11 July 2026 (UTC) Delete. Not a populated place in...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NPLACE, Sourced only the unreliable GNIS database. No evidence that this place...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NPLACE, Sourced only the unreliable GNIS database and inactive PDF. No evidence...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Faiils GNG and NPLACE. A minature railroad is not notable enoguh for its own article, if the shellfield...
Click to read more »Non-notable locale.TH1980 (talk) 03:25, 17 November 2024 (UTC) Delete: Fails WP:NPLACE. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 08:48, 19 November 2024 (UTC) The above discussion...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NPLACE, Sourced only the unreliable GNIS database. No evidence that this place...
Click to read more »discussions. North America1000 02:55, 21 March 2018 (UTC) Keep Passes WP:NPLACE per the UN map. Smartyllama (talk) 12:43, 21 March 2018 (UTC) No, it does...
Click to read more »FENS · JSTOR · TWL) A housing complex with no claim to notability per WP:NPLACE. Also adding for the same reason: Cefncaeau (another housing row) Ddôl Fach...
Click to read more »both of which get a fair number of hits and which I think would pass WP:NPLACE if we created them, since Bihawana is a [city or village] anywhere in the...
Click to read more »the location given. Sam Sailor 14:57, 20 September 2018 (UTC) Keep per WP:NPLACE. I added some info to substantiate its existence. TimTempleton (talk) (cont)...
Click to read more »and highway landmark, and I found no significant coverage that would meet NPLACE or GNG. –dlthewave ☎ 15:32, 6 April 2023 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...
Click to read more »crossroad without so much as a house. Obviously not a community, fails WP:NPLACE. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 22:07, 28 June 2026 (UTC) The above discussion is...
Click to read more »though. Clarityfiend (talk) 10:14, 23 November 2017 (UTC) Keep Passes WP:NPLACE. Hrodvarsson (talk) 23:50, 29 November 2017 (UTC) The above discussion is...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NPLACE and WP:GNG. This was always just a rail depot with a grain elevator, and...
Click to read more »sources, but from maps it was clearly just a rail siding. WP:GNG and WP:NPLACE failure. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 22:04, 28 June 2026 (UTC) The above discussion...
Click to read more »community, it would be a "populated place without legal recognition" in WP:NPLACE, which defers to WP:GNG. From a search, I don't see any sources that would...
Click to read more »(talk) 11:11, 1 December 2022 (UTC) Delete, it relies on the NGIS which WP:NPLACE says isn't valid for establishing legal recognization. Quaemenelimbus (🗨...
Click to read more »Illinois. –dlthewave ☎ 21:36, 27 June 2026 (UTC) Speedy delete: Fails WP:NPLACE VitorFriboquen :] (Talk) 21:54, 27 June 2026 (UTC) While that may be a reason...
Click to read more »the midst of farmland without even a house nearby. Absolute failure of WP:NPLACE and confusing to boot since there is a Yankeetown, Indiana. WeirdNAnnoyed...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NPLACE and WP:GNG. Sourced only to the Iranian census which includes many places...
Click to read more »(UTC) Keep - villages are considered to have inherent notability (see WP:NPLACE. jsfouche ☽☾Talk 22:22, 10 July 2011 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »May 2025 (UTC) Delete Clearly a rail point, not a community, failing WP:NPLACE and WP:NGEO. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 11:25, 19 May 2025 (UTC) Delete - agree...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NPLACE, Sourced only the unreliable GNIS database. No evidence that this place...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) I couldn't find sources to show this meets WP:NPLACE / WP:GNG. Boleyn (talk) 21:53, 31 July 2024 (UTC) Note: This discussion...
Click to read more »Necrothesp (talk) 14:30, 12 December 2012 (UTC) Keep Per WP:GEOLAND and WP:NPLACE, "Villages are generally kept, regardless of size, as long as their existence...
Click to read more »with the citations in the article and I feel that be enough to cover WP:NPLACE. Regards. Govvy (talk) 11:16, 23 March 2026 (UTC) Note: This discussion...
Click to read more »article with lack of reliable sources to be found to prove the place meets WP:NPLACE. -Samoht27 (talk) 17:19, 24 January 2025 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...
Click to read more »@Ymblanter. There have been places called this, the nominator should read the WP:NPLACE. Clear pass. Besides that, it seems that a WP:BEFORE check was not performed...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NPLACE, Sourced only the unreliable GNIS database. No evidence that this place...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) I couldn't find sources to show this meets WP:NPLACE / WP:GNG. Sources in other language WPs aren't reliable. Boleyn (talk) 21:17...
Click to read more »find references to this place as a villa estate, not clear if fit meets WP:NPLACE / WP:GNG. I did not find evidence of notable archaeology. Boleyn (talk)...
Click to read more »crossroad and a couple of very scattered houses in the general area. Fails WP:NPLACE. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 21:21, 9 August 2025 (UTC) The above discussion is...
Click to read more »couldn't find much coverage of this location when searching online. WP:NPLACE specifies that it needs to pass the WP:GNG since it's not recognised by...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) A village should meet WP:NPLACE or WP:GNG, but I couldn't find reliable sources to add to this unreferenced...
Click to read more »this village exists or had existed as a legally recognised place per WP:NPLACE in the coordinates given. EmeraldRange (talk/contribs) 20:26, 10 December...
Click to read more »navigational list, but the vast majority of the entries are one-line stubs. WP:NPLACE (which just mentions common outcomes and isn't even a guideline per se)...
Click to read more »19:04, 17 September 2022 (UTC) Delete all all fail WP:GNG and WP:NCORP/WP:NPLACE. Primary references and a mention in a bus timetable are hardly WP:SIGCOV...
Click to read more »FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Unreferenced with no indication of notability per WP:NPLACE, and no significant coverage online from WP:Reliable sources. Prod contested...
Click to read more »Not even any houses. Obviously not a community and obvious fail of WP:NPLACE. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 12:13, 20 September 2025 (UTC) Delete WP:GEOLAND says...
Click to read more »2014 (UTC) Keep towns, villages and land marks are generally kept per WP:NPLACE. And in this case the town/village actually exists. Coordinates were also...
Click to read more »Dlthewave explanation. Svartner (talk) 12:57, 1 June 2026 (UTC) Delete WP:NPLACE. Wallpaperwizard (talk) 14:19, 1 June 2026 (UTC) The above discussion is...
Click to read more »without other claims to notability, which suggests it might not meet WP:NPLACE. I don't read the relevant languages but am not seeing anything other than...
Click to read more »starship.paint (talk / cont) 14:36, 11 November 2024 (UTC) Delete: Fails WP:NPLACE. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 10:12, 18 November 2024 (UTC) The above discussion...
Click to read more »probably got its data from GNIS, don't strike me as reliable sources. Fails WP:NPLACE. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 21:30, 4 July 2026 (UTC) Relisted to generate a more...
Click to read more »to the reference given above. With the other refs, I think it now meets NPLACE. With thanks to User:Voice of Clam. JMWt (talk) 20:11, 20 December 2022...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NPLACE, Sourced only the unreliable GNIS database. No evidence that this place...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NPLACE and WP:GNG. No evidence of a community here. Appears to be a former railroad...
Click to read more »places that are not villages.' I couldn't find sources to show it meets WP:NPLACE / WP:GNG. Boleyn (talk) 16:28, 11 February 2024 (UTC) Note: This discussion...
Click to read more »EmeraldRange (talk/contribs) 22:50, 15 June 2026 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:NPLACE and google searches don't turn anything new up. Agnieszka653 (talk) 03:15...
Click to read more »the nearby "New Hope Indiana Dragway". Absolutely not a place, fails WP:NPLACE. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 21:46, 8 September 2025 (UTC) The above discussion...
Click to read more »on the maps, so I say this is unverifiable and a GNIS-only failure of WP:NPLACE. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 21:52, 16 June 2026 (UTC) The above discussion is...
Click to read more »In short, the revision cited by me will be a valid article, as per WP:NPLACE. PS: WP:DISCUSSAFD states that WP:ATD should be considered, which in turn...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NPLACE, Sourced only the unreliable GNIS database. No evidence that this place...
Click to read more »find sources to add. I couldn't find sources online to confirm it meets WP:NPLACE/WP:GNG. References in other WP languages are mirror sites, or it came up...
Click to read more »notability guidelines. There's no Census entry for this community, so WP:NPLACE says that it needs to pass WP:GNG, but I couldn't find any significant coverage...
Click to read more »coverage, no reliable sources in the article with none in sight; fails WP:NPLACE. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 11:55, 16 September 2025 (UTC) There are numerous...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NPLACE, Sourced only the unreliable GNIS database. No evidence that this place...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NPLACE, Sourced only the unreliable GNIS database. No evidence that this place...
Click to read more »FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Unreferenced since 2012. One sentence article. Fails WP:NPLACE and WP:GEOLAND. Fairly small neighbourhood in Ahmedabad. Ahmedabad has 48...
Click to read more »TWL) This appears to be more a farm than a settlement which would meet WP:NPLACE / WP:GNG. Boleyn (talk) 13:35, 23 September 2025 (UTC) Note: This discussion...
Click to read more »not provide enough sourcing to establish the village under WP:GNG or WP:NPLACE. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Umais Bin Sajjad (talk • contribs)...
Click to read more »notability. RangersRus (talk) 20:47, 13 February 2024 (UTC) Delete: all fail WP:NPLACE and WP:GNG.S0091 (talk) 15:14, 18 February 2024 (UTC) The above discussion...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NPLACE, Sourced only the unreliable GNIS database. No evidence that this place...
Click to read more »Dan arndt (talk) 04:37, 31 July 2026 (UTC) Keep per WP:HEY it passes WP:NPLACE. Agnieszka653 (talk) 19:48, 31 July 2026 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »corresponding Spanish article. Fails WP:GNG and (assuming it is inhabited) WP:NPLACE. Allan Nonymous (talk) 23:54, 17 June 2024 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...
Click to read more »(talk) 17:48, 28 February 2026 (UTC) Delete lacking sourcing to meet WP:NPLACE or GEO notability guidelines. Iljhgtn (they/them · talk) 20:27, 28 February...
Click to read more »article. It's big and bold so editors will not miss it. They still do. Per NPLACE: Populated, legally recognized places are typically presumed to be notable...
Click to read more »delete I want to keep this, but lacking anything source wise it fails WP:NPLACE. Iljhgtn (they/them · talk) 18:32, 28 February 2026 (UTC)tyers versus "Freedon...
Click to read more »15:44, 6 May 2025 (UTC) Delete, fails WP:NFEAT and doesn't apply to WP:NPLACE. -Samoht27 (talk) 17:39, 6 May 2025 (UTC) Delete - part WP:MADEUP. ロドリゲス恭子...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) I believe this article fails WP:NPLACE. It is not legally recognized, and I can find no mention of this unincorporated...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) According to WP:NPLACE, since this community is not recognised by the Census (not to be confused...
Click to read more »2024 (UTC) Delete per nom. Sloppy map misreading + GNIS = failure of WP:NPLACE. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 23:14, 20 December 2024 (UTC) The above discussion...
Click to read more »elevator. Neither of these amounts to a populated place as required by WP:NPLACE. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 15:06, 1 September 2024 (UTC) The above discussion...
Click to read more »GNG - but one experienced editor was of the opinion wards come under WP:NPLACE and have a presumption of notability, so not clearcut. Close call but on...
Click to read more »sign of legal recognition or significant coverage, this village fails WP:NPLACE and WP:GNG. The Economy, Culture & society and Infrastructure and education...
Click to read more »EmeraldRange (talk/contribs) 15:49, 7 June 2026 (UTC) Delete - Fails GNG, NPLACE and most importantly WP;V. –dlthewave ☎ The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »pdf -- doesn't look like this is a census designated place, failing WP:NPLACE. AnonymousScholar49 (talk) 23:18, 6 May 2025 (UTC) Delete Non-notable. No...
Click to read more »on this point) of a type which we generally regard as notable under WP:NPLACE or WP:GEOLAND. However, the article does suffer in large measure from the...
Click to read more »hardly a hill of beans! Sionk (talk) 21:38, 9 October 2012 (UTC) Keep per WP:NPLACE. Seeing as it is marked on Google Maps, I'd say it exists, so keep. Also...
Click to read more »below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:45, 28 May 2025 (UTC) Keep - Per WP:NPLACE, it is also considered a "built-up" area. (the rough UK version of a CDP)...
Click to read more »Spider) 16:21, 21 July 2024 (UTC) Delete — regarding WP:NGEO, although WP:NPLACE does say that populated areas are presumed to be notable, I can find essentially...
Click to read more »just a station (or was), clearly not a community. Fails both WP:GNG and WP:NPLACE. It does appear on maps at least as far back as 1953 but that's probably...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) I couldn't find sources to show it meets WP:NPLACE or WP:GNG. Boleyn (talk) 18:05, 20 February 2024 (UTC) Delete or redirect...
Click to read more »(which, despite not currently having an article, almost certainly meets NPLACE) and, sometimes, that it is Vaishnava. This source, though, suggests that...
Click to read more »books/databases that are doubtful, based on the other geographic AfD's. Fails WP:NPLACE. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 11:16, 21 July 2025 (UTC) The above discussion is...
Click to read more »14:51, 24 June 2019 (UTC) Keep per Andrew. Also it looks like passes WP:NPLACE. Masum Reza📞 06:08, 26 June 2019 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) I don't think this meets WP:NPLACE or WP:GNG. Possible WP:ATD of merge/redirect to Hines Interests Limited...
Click to read more »Keep: per the govt. document found. Govt. recognized place, hence passes NPLACE. BhikhariInformer (talk) 11:53, 11 October 2025 (UTC) Comment. From what...
Click to read more »ex-rail siding spot. TH1980 (talk) 23:51, 28 March 2026 (UTC) Delete fails WP:NPLACE Agnieszka653 (talk) 17:46, 31 March 2026 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »this, and the fact this is merely a geographic formation, this fails WP:NPLACE by a long shot. Allan Nonymous (talk) 22:20, 27 April 2024 (UTC) Note: This...
Click to read more »Boynamedsue – Y no issues, passes WP:NPLACE Bethany Township, Osborne County, Kansas – Boynamedsue – Y no issues, passes WP:NPLACE Yoo Yeongha – Boynamedsue –...
Click to read more »JSTOR · TWL) Geographical feature, without demonstration of notability per WP:NPLACE; draftified but quickly moved back to mainspace without adequate improvement...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:GNG and WP:NPLACE. Unable to find any sources via Google or its sub-engines, the only sources...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NPLACE. The source give 404 error, while is inactive. I don't selected the sorting...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NPLACE, Sourced only the unreliable GNIS database. No evidence that this place...
Click to read more »Fram (talk) 08:18, 1 August 2025 (UTC) Delete: Street doesn't not meet WP:NPLACE which specifically asks us to rely on WP:GNG. I don't see the independent...
Click to read more »Joseph2302 (talk) 12:10, 28 February 2023 (UTC) Delete per nom and WP:GNG, WP:NPLACE and WP:NORG. As indicated by other contributors, a WP:BEFORE search returns...
Click to read more »October 2014 (UTC) Snow keep. Inhabited places are inherently notable (see WP:NPLACE). Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 03:41, 27 October 2014 (UTC) Comment: While populated...
Click to read more »notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 11:52, 26 August 2024 (UTC) Keep: Seems to meet WP:NPLACE. C F A 💬 23:02, 26 August 2024 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NPLACE, Sourced only the unreliable GNIS database. No evidence that this place...
Click to read more »AusLondonder (talk) 19:10, 10 March 2026 (UTC) Delete tiny island, fails WP:NPLACE. Iljhgtn (they/them · talk) 03:03, 12 March 2026 (UTC) Delete - for lack...
Click to read more »sign of legal recognition or significant coverage, this village fails WP:NPLACE and WP:GNG. The Economy, Culture & society and Infrastructure and education...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NPLACE, Sourced only the unreliable GNIS database. No evidence that this place...
Click to read more »way, it's infrastructure, not a community, and thus a failure of both WP:NPLACE and WP:GNG. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 22:25, 18 June 2026 (UTC) Delete - Appears...
Click to read more »on maps, and there isn't really any development there at all. Fails WP:NPLACE. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 12:09, 2 August 2025 (UTC) The above discussion is...
Click to read more »the name used by a property developer for a housing development. Fails WP:NPLACE as not legally-recognised. AusLondonder (talk) 23:41, 3 February 2026 (UTC)...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Not notable. See WP:NPLACE. Rob Sinden (talk) 11:46, 15 September 2015 (UTC) Note: This debate has...
Click to read more »Very few sources for much information on the former village. Although WP:NPLACE states that even abandoned places "can be notable": Geographic Names Information...
Click to read more »☎ ✎ 07:34, 18 January 2025 (UTC) Keep: Location and population meets WP:NPLACE. -- D'n'B-📞 -- 12:33, 18 January 2025 (UTC) Keep it seems to be a census...
Click to read more »if the place as named exists, I don't believe it meets the low bar of WP:NPLACE. Bbb23 (talk) 16:32, 31 March 2024 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...
Click to read more »Geography and Illinois. –dlthewave ☎ 16:07, 28 June 2026 (UTC) Delete: Fails WP:NPLACE VitorFriboquen :] (Talk) 17:53, 28 June 2026 (UTC) DELETE Gard is an unincorporated...
Click to read more »a few houses in the area, which is what's there now. Not notable per WP:NPLACE based on information provided. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 23:40, 17 August 2025...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NPLACE, Sourced only the unreliable GNIS database. No evidence that this place...
Click to read more »Reconstruction Bureau, Government of Pakistan. In my view, the article meets WP:NPLACE now...Ngrewal1 (talk) 18:06, 30 July 2026 (UTC) Ok to keep per WP:GEOLAND...
Click to read more »2026 (UTC) Keep. Verified and looks to have presumed notability under WP:NPLACE. Content here: [2] but would need confirming in reliable sources, assuming...
Click to read more »Article about a museum in Guatemala that cites no sources and fails WP:NPLACE and WP:GNG. A very short stub. Cupper52 (talk) 19:59, 11 January 2021 (UTC)...
Click to read more »District is. ← Metallurgist (talk) 00:05, 26 March 2026 (UTC) Delete fails WP:NPLACE Agnieszka653 (talk) 02:30, 31 March 2026 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NPLACE, Sourced only the unreliable GNIS database. No evidence that this place...
Click to read more »finds no independent significant coverage, indicating notability under WP:NPLACE. Appears to be the name of a commercial housing development, rather than...
Click to read more »appears in at least one book, many other hits on Google Books, passes NPLACE easily. MediaKyle (talk) 11:44, 30 July 2026 (UTC) Simply appearing in an...
Click to read more »Keep Officially recognized populated geographic location. WP:NGEO and WP:NPLACE. Finnegas (talk) 22:52, 12 October 2013 (UTC) Relisted to generate a more...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NPLACE Bryce M (talk) 21:34, 7 May 2026 (UTC) Note: this discussion has been included...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Can't keep using WP:NPLACE as a rational and seems to fail WP:SIGCOV. It's just a point on a railway...
Click to read more »WP:GNG. --Danre98(talk^contribs) 16:03, 15 July 2020 (UTC) Weak Keep per WP:NPLACE: "Cities and villages anywhere in the world are generally kept, regardless...
Click to read more »administrative division of the country, of course it passes GNG. Keep per WP:NPLACE #1 Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 18:34, 12 November 2024 (UTC) Strong keep its...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NPLACE, Sourced only the unreliable GNIS database. No evidence that this place...
Click to read more »FENS · JSTOR · TWL) I couldn't find sources to confirm that this meets WP:NPLACE / WP:GNG. Boleyn (talk) 17:19, 24 September 2024 (UTC) Note: This discussion...
Click to read more »free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) No evidence of meeting WP:NPLACE - this was a populated place without legal recognition. Only sources are...
Click to read more »recognized places are typically presumed to be notable". Also meets WP:NPLACE which states, "Cities and villages are generally kept, regardless of size...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:BEFORE shows no evidence of meeting WP:NPLACE: that this place is legally recognised and not just mentioned in online...
Click to read more »archdiocese's social-security program is probably real enough to scrape by per WP:NPLACE. Deor (talk) 15:36, 18 August 2013 (UTC) Note: I've cleaned up the article...
Click to read more »(reasoning) 16:36, 27 March 2018 (UTC) Keep -- Malls are notable. See WP:NPLACE. 192.160.216.52 (talk) 17:00, 27 March 2018 (UTC) That is a misreading of...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NPLACE, maplandia is not a RS or SIGCOV. Nagol0929 (talk) 16:18, 17 November 2023...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) No evidence of a community. Fails WP:NPLACE. Sourced only the unreliable GNIS database. VitorFriboquen :] (Talk) 18:06...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Completely uncoursed, fails WP:NPLACE as I could not find any reliable sources or indication of legal recognition...
Click to read more »Pigeon, IN doesn't meet the GNG by itself, and it isn't notable according WP:NPLACE. AnonymousScholar49 (talk) References https://www.census...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) No evidence of a community. Fails WP:NPLACE. Sourced only the unreliable GNIS database. VitorFriboquen :] (Talk) 21:56...
Click to read more »live there. Andrew D. (talk) 15:38, 19 November 2017 (UTC) Keep per WP:NPLACE. As Andrew D states, the place exists, people live there, there are numerous...
Click to read more »this is just an open field, obviously not a "community". Total fail of WP:NPLACE. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 21:22, 25 September 2025 (UTC) The above discussion...
Click to read more »FENS · JSTOR · TWL) I couldn't find sources to establish that this meets WP:NPLACE/WP:GNG. Boleyn (talk) 18:50, 22 September 2024 (UTC) Note: This discussion...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) I couldn't find sources to confirm this meets WP:NPLACE / WP:GNG. Boleyn (talk) 16:50, 8 July 2024 (UTC) Keep: Populated & legally...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NPLACE, Sourced only the unreliable GNIS database. No evidence that this place...
Click to read more »WP:OUTCOMES is what is the most easy to immediate cite. Particularly WP:NPLACE and WP:MAPOUTCOMES. These say that major geological features and places...
Click to read more »sign of legal recognition or significant coverage, this village fails WP:NPLACE and WP:GNG. The Economy, Culture & society and Infrastructure and education...
Click to read more »newspaper, but spanning 50 years) I think this just squeaks through WP:NPLACE. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 01:26, 23 June 2025 (UTC) Keep. An easily expanded...
Click to read more »settlements, are generally considered to be notable per WP:GEOLAND. See WP:NPLACE. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:42, 22 October 2018 (UTC) I think this falls under...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NPLACE, Sourced only the unreliable GNIS database. No evidence that this place...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:GNG and WP:NPLACE. Almost zero evidence this place even exists. As for the USGS, it only shows...
Click to read more »got in the place-names book just because of the unusual name. Fails WP:NPLACE. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 11:45, 13 June 2026 (UTC) Keep: Balzac, Colorado is...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NPLACE, Sourced only the unreliable GNIS database. No evidence that this place...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NPLACE Bryce M (talk) 22:54, 10 July 2026 (UTC) Note: this discussion has been...
Click to read more »TWL) I can't find evidence of notability as either a populated place (WP:NPLACE) nor a geographic feature (WP:NATFEAT). GNIS only lists it as a summit,...
Click to read more »(please ping upon response) (talk) 20:10, 8 August 2026 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:NPLACE I don't think the sources provided are significant coverage. Agnieszka653...
Click to read more »etc. Therefore, these prove that this is an inhabited village and meets NPLACE. All the sources I can in fact find are in arabic. It seems like the name...
Click to read more »guidelines. If others think the directory listings are enough to satisfy WP:NPLACE, then please explain why and ping me. BhikhariInformer (talk) 01:57, 5 October...
Click to read more »T-intersection with a couple of houses and (until 1963) a rail crossing. Fails WP:NPLACE. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 21:41, 8 September 2025 (UTC) The above discussion...
Click to read more »the same county. This is a database entry with no evidence of passing WP:NPLACE. • Gene93k (talk) 21:16, 4 March 2018 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...
Click to read more »the sort of notable place that's generally kept under criteria such as WP:NPLACE. See for example the many GNews results at [1] and [2]. I agree that the...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:GNG, WP:NOTTRAVEL, WP:NPLACE. Required to have multiple reliable independent sources to merit and article...
Click to read more »although populated it doesn't fulfil the legally recognised aspect of WP:NPLACE. Needs additional sources put forward to write something, otherwise it will...
Click to read more »here nor in the RFC referenced in the final comment. There's clearly an WP:NPLACE argument to be made for a shopping mall of this magnitude, although I am...
Click to read more »Consensus from RFD already seems pretty clear that the subject fails WP:NPLACE and WP:GNG and my BEFORE didn't uncover anything that would suggest otherwise...
Click to read more »independent secondary sources to establish notability and satisfy WP:GNG and WP:NPLACE. Shawn Teller (talk) 22:33, 19 February 2023 (UTC) The above discussion...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NPLACE. Most GBooks hits are for geology. Sourced only the unreliable GNIS database...
Click to read more »Delete per nom. Tioaeu8943 (talk) 19:52, 20 March 2026 (UTC) Delete fails WP:NPLACE Agnieszka653 (talk) 16:45, 26 March 2026 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NPLACE and WP:GNG criteria. Redirect to Packages Limited. Vegan Gypsy (talk) 19:45...
Click to read more »no issues, meets NPlace Barabhita Union – MPGuy2824 – Y no issues, meets NPlace Baktaboli Union – MPGuy2824 – Y no issues, meets NPlace Muhammad Atzar –...
Click to read more »history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) They fail WP:NPLACE and in most of the cases, the articles lack real context and content beyond...
Click to read more »this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 04:29, 3 May 2025 (UTC) Delete - fails WP:NPLACE. ロドリゲス恭子 (talk) 19:33, 8 May 2025 (UTC) Delete. Appears to be a railspot...
Click to read more »sign of legal recognition or significant coverage, this village fails WP:NPLACE and WP:GNG. The Economy, Culture & society and Infrastructure and education...
Click to read more »reason to ping me though but FWIW, Iyana-Iba (where this should be) passes NPLACE, IMO and this nomination seems to be, yet, another bad faith nomination...
Click to read more »