On Wikipedia, notability is a test used by editors to decide whether a given topic warrants its own article. For people, the person who is the topic of...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NPERSON - being a military officer during WW2 is laudable but unfortunately is...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NPERSON as WP:V search comes up with social media and people unrelated to subject...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NPERSON. Current references are all either primary sources or trivial mentions...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NPERSON. Only sources that list them are B&N website and IMDB, the latter of which...

it is a criteria for likely notable under WP:NPERSON, but NPERSON does not supersede GNG nor does NPERSON say it is automatic. If her only claim to notability...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) A7 speedy declined. Fails WP:NPERSON. DrStrauss talk 15:20, 21 August 2017 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...

Coolabahapple (talk) 12:31, 15 June 2017 (UTC) Delete for failing WP:NPERSON. If newcomer author wishes in back as a user draft, fine. Schmidt, Michael...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails NPERSON. Notability is not inherited from broadcasting on a notable news station...

WP:BEFORE check does not show sufficient sourcing to meet WP:GNG or WP:NPERSON. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 13:28, 14 January 2022 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

Seems to be notable only for social media presence. Beyond that, fails WP:NPERSON. My name isnotdave (talk/contribs) 18:30, 28 July 2017 (UTC) Note: This...

T0mpr1c3 (talk) 21:59, 19 July 2018 (UTC) Keep since subject meets WP:NPERSON per WP:V, e.g. Independent, South Africa article; Times of India article;...

is evidently original work, unblemished by sourcing. Subject fails WP:NPERSON. -The Gnome (talk) 18:08, 22 October 2019 (UTC) The above discussion is...

Qype, the company he founded. Doesn't independently meet WP:GNG or WP:NPERSON. Eddie891 Talk Work 17:14, 2 June 2020 (UTC) Delete a non-notable businessman...

WP:GNG. Blue Rasberry (talk) 17:19, 25 July 2017 (UTC) Delete: fails WP:NPERSON. DrStrauss talk 08:37, 1 August 2017 (UTC) Delete WP:GNG fail. L3X1 (distænt...

Sarahj2107 (talk) 14:50, 12 June 2014 (UTC) Delete. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NPERSON. --Mr. Guye (talk) 22:42, 12 June 2014 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...

almost no secondary source coverage of the subject, thus failing GNG and NPERSON. As there are instances of writing by the subject, it may be a case of...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NPERSON and WP:GNG. Mr. Guye (talk) 03:15, 16 December 2014 (UTC) Note: This debate...

11:10, 11 July 2017 (UTC) Delete: sources do not give WP:SIGCOV, fails WP:NPERSON. DrStrauss talk 11:42, 11 July 2017 (UTC) Delete, does not have significant...

to USCGC Paul Clark as the ship's namesake, not otherwise passing GNG/NPERSON/SOLDIER. - The Bushranger One ping only 04:24, 17 January 2021 (UTC) The...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:GNG, WP:NPERSON, and WP:MUSICBIO. Sources given on page are the same press release in two...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Does not meet WP:NPERSON or WP:GNG. Mynameisnotdave (talk/contribs) (formerly Insulam Simia) 17:13...

Lambert (talk) 03:37, 9 March 2018 (UTC) Delete - fails WP:PORNBIO, WP:NPERSON, and WP:GNG. L293D (☎ • ✎) 15:07, 10 March 2018 (UTC) The above discussion...

journalist and presenter, cannot find any evidence of any notability, Fails NPERSON and GNG –Davey2010Talk 19:40, 13 November 2024 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

enough by itself. A google search indicates no in-depth coverage to meet WP:NPERSON independently. In the article, sourcing is either unreliable (i.e. self-published...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Appears to violate WP:NPERSON, WP:GNG. He's cited as a rep, but not as an individual. Citations go to...

Redirect to USS Lloyd E. Acree as the ship's namesake; doesn't pass GNG, WP:NPERSON, or SOLDIER. - The Bushranger One ping only 03:58, 17 January 2021 (UTC)...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NPERSON. Coverage is limited to namedrops in connection with her business rather...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NPERSON being only mentioned in passing as a television actress's husband, in the...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NPERSON. DrStrauss talk 11:17, 9 July 2017 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...

per WP:TOOSOON. D4iNa4 (talk) 12:50, 26 May 2020 (UTC) Delete fails WP:NPERSON or WP:GNG, take your pick. Eddie891 Talk Work 14:57, 26 May 2020 (UTC)...

WP:NACTOR, which is the same as WP:NMODEL, as well as more broadly WP:NPERSON. -The Gnome (talk) 10:43, 22 March 2019 (UTC) The discussion above is closed...

JSTOR · TWL) Questionable notability since 2008!! Fails WP:GNG and WP:NPERSON. Mr. Guye (talk) 21:21, 2 September 2014 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...

other primary source stuff, or mere mentions. Doesn't appear to meet WP:NPERSON/WP:GNG. Was previously PRODded in 2015 but removed by DGG. talk to !dave...

absence of in-depth, reliable sources and as such fails WP:GNG and WP:NPERSON. Eddie891 Talk Work 12:02, 22 May 2020 (UTC) Delete a non-notable person...

rather widely cited on top of that. I think that's enough to scrape by NPERSON or maybe NSOLDIER #8, as his book and collections are well regarded. Eddie891...

Mangalashery, or his company/achievements, so it probably fails WP:GNG and WP:NPERSON. Between the complete lack of sources for a BLP and the résumé-like style...

Thanks, –Davey2010 • (talk) 17:42, 31 August 2014 (UTC) Delete. Fails WP:NPERSON. --Mr. Guye (talk) 21:35, 2 September 2014 (UTC) The above discussion is...

January 2021 (UTC) Delete - Not only does he not appear to meet WP:GNG, WP:NPERSON, or WP:SOLDIER...but honestly from a look at the references I'm pretty...

have reliable sources, and contains some biased text. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NPERSON. Searches returns sources covering Trivendra Singh Rawat, a politician...

GNG. –Davey2010Talk 17:05, 2 March 2018 (UTC) Delete - fails PORNBIO, NPERSON, and no RS. L293D (☎ • ✎) 14:44, 9 March 2018 (UTC) The above discussion...

fails GNG shouldn't be so difficult naa. That being said, article fails WP:NPERSON. the award won isn't notable. Many of the sources present fails Wp:RS....

JSTOR · TWL) Contested PROD. This is a sportswriter who fails WP:GNG/WP:NPERSON/WP:NWRITER; I cannot find any significant coverage about him. BY him, a...

NorthAmerica1000 23:42, 30 November 2014 (UTC) Delete No coverage, fails WP:NPERSON.--Fauzan✆ talk✉ mail 17:07, 1 December 2014 (UTC) The above discussion...

Dawnseeker2000 16:44, 27 September 2015 (UTC) Keep: Appears to meet WP:NPERSON through secondary coverage such as this and this. While the article is...

MrClog (talk) 23:20, 16 July 2019 (UTC) Delete since subject fails WP:NPERSON. A rather unfortunate time for such texts since summer heat amplifies the...

non-notable, also tagged CSD G4. Regardless, I don't see coverage to meet WP:NPERSON or NPOL. Eddie891 Talk Work 14:30, 25 June 2020 (UTC) Delete does not meet...

there are passing mentions in several books, nothing suggests he meets NPERSON or one of the other NSOLDIER criteria Eddie891 Talk Work 14:40, 13 June...

Delete I am not convinced there is enough WP:SIGCOV for her to pass WP:NPERSON. There is an article on Igromania, but mostly an interview (primary source)...

Keep - I don't know the history of the article but it seems to pass WP:NPERSON to me. shoy (reactions) 13:59, 19 August 2016 (UTC) Keep Sources include:...

reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject" per WP:NPERSON. --Rubbish computer 14:35, 27 September 2015 (UTC) Delete - nothing I could...

2018 (UTC) Keep - enough reliable sources exist to satisfy WP:ANYBIO, WP:NPERSON, and WP:GNG. L293D (☎ • ✎) 13:12, 8 March 2018 (UTC) The above discussion...

WP:GNG. Mztourist (talk) 07:10, 13 June 2020 (UTC) Weak delete fail of WP:NPERSON and WP:NSOLDIER; there's passing coverage of him in this book and this...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NPERSON Bryce M (talk) 11:28, 28 March 2026 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...

academic, so WP:NACADEMIC is not applicable. The more relevant SNG is WP:NPERSON, which still requires significant coverage in reliable, independent sources...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Does not appear to pass WP:NPERSON. No evidence of coverage in independent sources, and more narrowly seems...

Lambert (talk) 18:30, 25 June 2020 (UTC) Delete 1) doesn't seem to meet WP:NPERSON with little clearly reliable coverage, and 2) in not clearly notable private...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NPERSON and WP:GNG, almost no coverage, sourcing is currently mostly from a user...

8 June 2020 (UTC) Delete as non-notable person failing WP:GNG and WP:NPERSON with no multiple in-depth reliable independent sources. Given sources focus...

Rogermx (talk) 16:27, 5 June 2019 (UTC) Delete since subject fails WP:NPERSON. The aroma of vanity begins to permeate the premises. -The Gnome (talk)...

Pack Lambert (talk) 03:46, 2 March 2018 (UTC) Keep passes WP:GNG and WP:NPERSON. L293D (☎ • ✎) 02:43, 4 March 2018 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fail of WP:SOLDIER and WP:NPERSON. Was not a general-equivalent, did not recieve a major award. There has...

still has only affiliated coverage. Failure of WP:GNG, WP:NPOL, and WP:NPERSON. Mr. Guye (talk) 01:55, 3 April 2015 (UTC) Comment: Wgolf should see this...

that republished his essay, and similar articles. Not enough to meet WP:NPERSON or WP:GNG Eddie891 Talk Work 12:38, 6 June 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

a politician, head of LSI in Terana, etc. Easily passes WP:GNG and WP:NPERSON. — Quasar G. 15:33, 15 June 2017 (UTC) Comment Where is the refs in the...

AaronWikia (talk) 22:55, 4 March 2018 (UTC) Keep - satisfies WP:NHOCKEY and WP:NPERSON though its borderline with GNG. L293D (☎ • ✎) 13:45, 8 March 2018 (UTC)...

"the first", therefore no immediate claim to notability; I don't see WP:NPERSON passed, or WP:NACTOR, and WP:NMUSIC looks also to not be a pass unless...

talk to me 03:19, 20 August 2014 (UTC) Delete - per WP:SCHOLAR and WP:NPERSON. The subject has not received a well-known and significant award or honor...

Deathlibrarian (talk) 01:41, 7 March 2018 (UTC) Keep. Enough sources to pass NPERSON and ENTERTAINER. L293D (☎ • ✎) 14:55, 10 March 2018 (UTC) The above discussion...

Thanks, Ad Orientem (talk) 23:57, 20 June 2017 (UTC) Delete: fails WP:NPERSON and WP:GNG. The article has only one source, and the argument that something...

07:29, 23 March 2019 (UTC) Delete per nimination since subject fails WP:NPERSON and WP:CREATIVE. -The Gnome (talk) 13:02, 23 March 2019 (UTC) Weak delete...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Doesn't seem to meet WP:GNG or WP:NPERSON. The best sourcing is from a youth news site that wrote about him burning...

that means is that she is notable for one event, not that she passes WP:NPERSON or WP:GNG. Eddie891 Talk Work 00:11, 13 June 2020 (UTC) Redirect to Miss...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This biography seems to fail WP:GNG and WP:NPERSON. Searches found no sources with significant coverage of the article subject...

which he generated a spat of coverage for in early 2019 (close fail of WP:NPERSON and a bit of a BLP1E). This is pretty borderline case, with a fair bit...

FENS · JSTOR · TWL) The article does not establish notability per WP:BIO/WP:NPERSON; sources appear non-independent and fail WP:GNG. It is the classic career...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NACADEMIC and WP:NPERSON Polygnotus (talk) 14:44, 27 August 2024 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...

by reliable secondary sources to qualify as notable per WP:GNG and WP:NPERSON. Being an ambassador isn’t inherently notable. I’d expect to see more WP:SIGCOV...

19:22, 11 February 2019 (UTC) Delete per nomination. Subject fails WP:NPERSON, WP:NCREATIVE, and WP:MUSICBIO. -The Gnome (talk) 05:48, 13 February 2019...

Zigzig20s (talk) 03:43, 5 March 2018 (UTC) Keep - passes WP:NAUTHOR and WP:NPERSON. L293D (☎ • ✎) 13:21, 7 March 2018 (UTC) Keep as has coverage in reliable...

The sources found or cited are quite poor, and certainly do not meet WP:NPERSON or even WP:GNG: NYS Women Inc is a women's support group that has simply...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Article falls afoul of WP:NPERSON and WP:1E; a lot of sources for this guy were wrote on 5 Jan 2010, which...

the article subject has enough WP:SIGCOV to satisfy GNG, NATHLETE, or NPERSON. Serratra (talk) 01:15, 30 January 2023 (UTC) Delete Best sources I could...

Delete - I'm an Inclusionist too, but this appears to fail WP:NPOL and WP:NPERSON. L293D (☎ • ✎) 00:56, 10 March 2018 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Unsourced article for person who seems to fail WP:NPERSON and WP:GNG. Someone with a WP:LIBRARY pass would be helpful. —moonythedwarf...

| history | links | watch | logs) Non-notable person failing WP:GNG/WP:NPERSON with no reliable independent in-depth sources. The sources given are puffery...

cult. The article fails to assert notability of its subject, failing WP:NPERSON. Lack of sources/references does not help. — kashmiri TALK 22:14, 10 April...

is concluded, and she doesn't have enough coverage to meet WP:GNG or WP:NPERSON independently. WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is not a valid AfD rationale. Eddie891...

device, but not individually notable per either WP:SOLDIER or WP:GNG/WP:NPERSON. - The Bushranger One ping only 18:46, 20 January 2021 (UTC) Redirect per...

are all about the company and the person), subject meets WP:GNG and WP:NPERSON. Some months ago, it'd be a cinch for a Merge with the article on the company...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:GNG and WP:NPERSON. Most of the focus in this article is on two controversial statements that...

participating in a major battle. There's not coverage of him to meet WP:NPERSON and the general consensus has been that MBE alone is not sufficiently distinguished...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Unsourced advertisement, fails WP:GNG and WP:NPERSON —moonythedwarf (Braden N.) 03:36, 26 November 2020 (UTC) Delete: Reads...

JSTOR · TWL) Although known for some of her songs in Cytus II, fails WP:NPERSON: Could not find reliable sources on Bing or Google. Aasim (talk) 07:09...

Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 11:21, 4 January 2025 (UTC) Delete: article violating WP:NPERSON and WP:GNG as there is a lack of independent coverage in RS. Malik-Al-Hind...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NPERSON Bryce M (talk) 10:32, 11 April 2026 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...

DaveApter (talk) 14:56, 9 March 2018 (UTC) Delete or Merge - fails WP:NPERSON and WP:NAUTHOR . L293D (☎ • ✎) 14:43, 10 March 2018 (UTC) Delete, or possibly...

NAUTHOR but given the coverage and sources, it appears to pass GNG and NPERSON. L293D (☎ • ✎) 16:01, 10 March 2018 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

16:30, 28 September 2013 (UTC) Delete - Fails not just WP:SOLDIER, but WP:NPERSON too, not to mention WP:NOTMEMORIAL. - The Bushranger One ping only 17:25...

-- Whpq (talk) 17:34, 25 April 2019 (UTC) Delete since subject fails WP:NPERSON. Yet another political operative who, despite the effort to the contrary...

Lilia (talk) 15:01, 5 February 2025 (UTC) Delete since subject fails WP:NPERSON and is not saved by WP:NCREATIVE. Does it smell of that familiar aroma...

Best, GPL93 (talk) 12:33, 5 May 2019 (UTC) Delete since subject fails WP:NPERSON. -The Gnome (talk) 08:44, 9 May 2019 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) TL;DR: delete per WP:PROMO and WP:NPERSON. G11 speedy was declined, in hindsight probably correctly because it isn't...

article, none demonstrate WP:SIGCOV, which means this individual fails WP:NPERSON. A WP:BEFORE turned up nothing demonstrating notability. 11WB (talk) 09:11...

mentions in relation to the university, FX company and Reuters. Fails WP:NPERSON and WP:GNG. Slywriter (talk) 13:01, 3 June 2022 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no! 22:19, 6 November 2025 (UTC) Delete per WP:GNG and WP:NPERSON SnowyRiver28 (talk) 22:44, 6 November 2025 (UTC) The above discussion is...

Delete on account of subject lacking encyclopaedic value and failing WP:NPERSON. The article has been created by a sockpuppet and cultivated by a professional...

either non-independent or do not show that the person meets WP:GNG or WP:NPERSON. Further searches do not show anything additional. Majora (talk) 01:19...

believe the article fails WP:GNG/WP:NPERSON and is unsafe under WP:BLP. Proposed outcomes: Delete the article per GNG/NPERSON/BLP. If consensus is not to delete...

the Blue Angels, and I don't see enough here to pass WP:SOLDIER or WP:NPERSON. As I mentioned above, the fact he was a Blue Angel may mean there is coverage...

and the rest of the article and sources don't demonstrate passing GNG, NPERSON, or SOLDIER. However, she was classmates with the RAF's first female pilot...

Non-notable high-school football player, just entering college. Fails WP:GNG, WP:NPERSON, WP:NSPORT. Also, notability is not inherited. The Bushranger One ping...

(talk) 17:00, 10 March 2017 (UTC) Delete: belongs on a blog, fails WP:NPERSON and WP:GNG. DrStrauss talk 20:10, 10 March 2017 (UTC) Keep: The actress...

of the Wizards (talk) 11:23, 18 February 2023 (UTC) Delete. Fails GNG, NPERSON, and BIO. Shawn Teller (talk) 01:13, 19 February 2023 (UTC) The above discussion...

otherwise doesn't seem to be enough coverage of him to meet WP:GNG or WP:NPERSON Eddie891 Talk Work 13:36, 29 June 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...

- Epinoia (talk) 15:01, 9 May 2019 (UTC) Delete since subject fails WP:NPERSON. Agree with nominator about a brief WP:BIO1E. -The Gnome (talk) 09:10,...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NPERSON and WP:GNG. No indication of notability (looks like it was created for...

Delete. I can't find any sources that are reliable or independent; fails WP:NPERSON an WP:GNG. Seems like it was created by a family member based on the username...

Fails WP:NSOLDIER as was only a colonel. Comes closer to WP:GNG and WP:NPERSON, but still doesn't quite seem to hit the mark. Coverage consists of obituary...

talk! 02:37, 1 May 2025 (UTC) Redirect to Kerbal Space Program per WP:NPERSON being failed. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 11:41, 1 May 2025 (UTC) Redirect – Per above...

February 2023 (UTC) Delete. The article subject doesn’t meet WP:GNG or NPERSON. I did a pretty exhaustive search for reliable independent sources that...

Katakana546 (talk) 12:20, 30 December 2022 (UTC) Delete - Fails WP:GNG and WP:NPERSON. The ⬡ Bestagon[t][c] 12:52, 30 December 2022 (UTC) Keep - Current head...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NPERSON Polygnotus (talk) 19:32, 8 June 2025 (UTC) Weak keep per my rationale in...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Doesn't meet WP:GNG and WP:NPERSON. M S Hassan (talk | contributions) 06:44, 31 July 2024 (UTC) Note: This...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Not notable. Fails gng, nsports, and nperson Mr. Guye (talk) 01:28, 13 June 2014 (UTC) Comment may well be notable as...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Does not meet WP:NPERSON. Only sources on him are from the school district he works in and an interview...

Pack Lambert (talk) 18:31, 24 June 2020 (UTC) Delete fails WP:NPOL and WP:NPERSON, the coverage I found consisted of an obituary, seems to have been a popular...

 Velella  Velella Talk   12:15, 26 May 2020 (UTC) Delete fails WP:GNG and WP:NPERSON, no indication of notability in the article, no indication arises from...

news search shows only one trivial mention which means the topic fails WP:NPERSON. Aasim 07:50, 18 August 2020 (UTC) WP:CSD#G5 (Wikipedia:Sockpuppet...

(and more) here. Merko (talk) 19:24, 30 May 2022 (UTC) Keep Passes WP:NPERSON, significant mentions in reliable sources at Paste Magazine (part of it...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Appears to fail WP:NPERSON and WP:GNG. No in-depth covering of the subject, just a passing mention...

October 2025 (UTC) Delete: Zero secondary sources to make him meet WP:NPERSON. Yeshivish613 (talk) 18:58, 9 October 2025 (UTC) Delete: lacks enough independent...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Subject fails WP:NPERSON, WP:GNG. Clear promotion. Ighs (talk) 15:26, 7 July 2026 (UTC) Delete....

03:04, 20 December 2019 (UTC) Delete per nomination since subject fails WP:NPERSON, being only and momentarily semi-famous for one fling, uhh thing. -The...

(talk) 07:52, 20 May 2025 (UTC) Further, I can't see him meeting WP:GNG, WP:NPERSON, WP:ANYBIO, WP:AUTHOR, or WP:ENTERTAINER. Simply not notable; just redirect...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NPERSON notability guideline. Nice little story, but this guy lived in a tiny town...

type entries. Gbawden (talk) 11:39, 14 August 2014 (UTC) Delete - Per WP:NPERSON Found multiple references but they are not secondary . [1] feels like a...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable academic, doesn't meet WP:NPERSON. Stub hasn't been edited substantially since last November. Ighs (talk)...

itself it wouldn't establish GNG), as WP:AUD has never been extended to WP:NPERSON (despite proposals to do so). I'd consider it more regional than local...

comes to Uganda every end of the year to throw parties") abjectly fails WP:NPERSON. Description of subject and his major claim to notability is that he's...

(UTC) Delete. The references don’t establish notability per WP:GNG, WP:NPERSON, or WP:NATHLETE, not to mention WP:NBIO. I did my own search for any sources...

editing, violating Wikipedia’s neutral point of view. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NPERSON. M S Hassan 📬✍🏻 19:06, 29 September 2024 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

him culd still be no notable, until some admin give me refe to read WP:NPERSON and WP:42 So he asked me to read them and understand so that i could provide...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NPERSON Bryce M (talk) 10:36, 11 April 2026 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...

well-established WP:CONSENSUS that is WP:SOLDIER, and does not pass WP:NPERSON or WP:GNG. WP:NOTMEMORIAL. - The Bushranger One ping only 20:04, 25 August...

burst of coverage around his death doesn't establish passage of WP:GNG, WP:NPERSON or WP:SOLDIER. A good man who should be remembered, but Wikipedia is not...

sources discussing subject. Nothing in article shows meeting WP:GNG or WP:NPERSON Slywriter (talk) 02:00, 21 April 2022 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...

notability guidelines that say they are "presumed" notability as per WP:NPERSON "meeting one or more does not guarantee that a subject should be included...

required for an author to qualify for a WP entry here: WP:NAUTHOR. Or, WP:NPERSON is another option. Innisfree987 (talk) 01:10, 14 June 2017 (UTC) Comment...

Nathanson seems to have just bubbled under the minimum coverage to satisfy NPERSON. However, he's definitely a real and somewhat influential musician. I'm...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) NPERSON fail. There is only one non-primary source and it is either a passing mention...

source is affiliated. The article does not convey why the subject passes WP:NPERSON. DrStrauss talk 21:29, 30 July 2017 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...

about his career and personal life is not enough to meet WP:GNG pr WP:NPERSON as is. I'm still trying to find a way to appropriately cover the situation...

There is no support whatsoever for that interpretation in WP:GNG, WP:NPERSON, or WP:BASIC. Cbl62 (talk) 22:17, 5 April 2021 (UTC) At the time Alft was...

WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 21:53, 2 May 2026 (UTC) Delete as failing to meet WP:GNG/WP:NPERSON. I've confirmed that the Rwanda Information Society Authority is part of...

before they win, and he has not had enough coverage to meet WP:GNG or WP:NPERSON Eddie891 Talk Work 20:48, 8 June 2020 (UTC) Comment. Does his television...

Larry (talk) 19:12, 29 September 2015 (UTC) Delete as appears to fail WP:NPERSON. --Rubbish computer 22:18, 29 September 2015 (UTC) Unelected candidates...

October 2020 (UTC) @Carthex: still no evidence how this subject meets WP:NPERSON. If you come to this help desk another time, please bring your WP:THREE...

February 2023 (UTC) Keep. There is sufficient WP:SIGCOV to satisfy WP:GNG, WP:NPERSON, and WP:NACTOR. Shawn Teller (talk) 01:34, 22 February 2023 (UTC) The above...

referred to as a "key witness" by one of them, he still doesn't meet WP:NPERSON. APerson (talk!) 19:57, 18 July 2014 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

only passing mentions as a citizen scientist. rather clearly fails WP:NPERSON and WP:GNG. Eddie891 Talk Work 15:49, 7 June 2020 (UTC) Delete a non-notable...

and abroad, in the half a century passed since his death. Note that WP:NPERSON explicitely requires significant coverage. kashmiri TALK 21:46, 14 November...

other than president of trade association (i.e. trivial mention). Fails WP:NPERSON. Sailsbystars (talk) 03:44, 15 January 2014 (UTC) KEEP – Note that this...

criteria of WP:NMUSIC is met, or if we should use the more general WP:NPERSON. @Robert McClenon and Sulfurboy: any aditional advice? Note that the draft...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NPERSON. Only coverage from trivial mention in Amnesty International document and...

seeing any evidence of WP:SIGCOV, and as such don't believe this meets WP:NPERSON. 11WB (talk) 18:34, 21 January 2026 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...

Talk! 07:42, 27 November 2024 (UTC) Delete The article appears to fail WP:NPERSON. Sources are essentially PR or interviews. The above comment offers no...

simple things, right: difference This still doesn't meets WP:BLP and WP:NPERSON. Victor Schmidt (talk) 14:35, 1 September 2020 (UTC) IanTEB (talk · contribs)...

Air Medal is not a sufficiently prominent decoration. Otherwise fails WP:NPERSON and WP:GNG as there is not in-depth coverage in multiple reliable sources...

25 October 2018 (UTC) Keep on account of subject verifiably meeting WP:NPERSON and WP:CRIMINAL. -The Gnome (talk) 10:54, 29 October 2018 (UTC) Comment...

have sufficient WP:SIGCOV to establish WP:NOTABILITY per WP:GNG and WP:NPERSON. If the subject had evidence of notability, I would say keep the article...

nothing to indicate lasting significance or a pass of WP:GNG and/or WP:NPERSON Eddie891 Talk Work 14:24, 10 June 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...

mainspace. Delete may also be the better option, I doubt the subject meets WP:NPERSON. Ighs (talk) 19:42, 9 July 2026 (UTC) Note: this discussion has been included...

commanding troops at the battle. Not enough coverage to meet WP:GNG or [[WP:NPERSON]; according to GBooks he was the first Californian to "be killed in action...

discospinster talk 02:32, 3 January 2026 (UTC) Delete - Fails WP:GNG and WP:NPERSON. --Seawolf35 T--C 07:29, 3 January 2026 (UTC) Delete – Blatant WP:PROMO...

show anything that would satisfy notability guidelines per WP:GNG and WP:NPERSON. Shawn Teller (talk) 22:35, 19 February 2023 (UTC) The above discussion...

SwisterTwister talk 04:12, 29 September 2015 (UTC) Delete as appears to not meet WP:NPERSON. --Rubbish computer 22:38, 29 September 2015 (UTC) Keep and trim: While...

paid article is not a valid reason for deletion; I agree that WP:GNG, WP:NPERSON and such seem to be questionable at best here, but the nomination's phrasing...

to USS Cross, the ship named after him, as he does not pass WP:GNG, WP:NPERSON, or WP:SOLDIER. - The Bushranger One ping only 19:46, 24 January 2021 (UTC)...

certain wealth or net worth ranking, we need RS that mention it; see WP:NPERSON and WP:GNG. The person is not a company; SIRS hence doesn't apply. Fermiboson...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NPERSON altogether. I have been unable to find a single reliable source that would...

01:33, 4 October 2015 (UTC) Keep per Duffbeerforme as appears to meet WP:NPERSON. --Rubbish computer 11:15, 4 October 2015 (UTC) Delete per nom and SwisterTwister...

notable personages who are missed by WP:GNG. If somebody passes WP:GNG/WP:NPERSON then whether they meet WP:SOLDIER or not is irrelevant - WP:SOLDIER only...

offline sources are entirely acceptable. Which isn't to say he passes NPERSON otherwise, it doesn't look like it, but the source 'not being accessable'...

may satisfy the "well-known and significant award or honor" part of WP:NPERSON.--Prisencolin (talk) 03:53, 31 August 2016 (UTC) i know, i know, i put...

halted on that question, no RfC has been created, the last discussion at WT:NPERSON was in April, and AFAIK no attempts have been made to pursue this through...

(talk) 09:02, 20 March 2019 (UTC) Delete since subject clearly fails WP:NPERSON. -The Gnome (talk) 10:49, 22 March 2019 (UTC) Delete - while exclusivity...

about Kelley Mach61 14:34, 2 October 2024 (UTC) Delete since this fails WP:NPERSON and is not saved by either WP:NCREATIVE or by WP:MUSIC's pertinent paragraph...

added by Rytter192 on 17:10, 5 October 2024 Delete since subject fails WP:NPERSON and clearly does not meet WP:SPORTSPERSON. Wikipedia is not a directory...

(here), and so on, unearthed by Bakazaka, seal it. The subject meets WP:NPERSON. -The Gnome (talk) 13:18, 6 March 2019 (UTC) Changing to weak keep. Yes...

Necrothesp (talk) 15:03, 8 September 2014 (UTC) Delete. Fails WP:GNG, WP:NPERSON and WP:SOLDIER. I'm sure he was a good man who served ably, but Wikinotable...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NPERSON as non-notable.  ΤheQ Editor  Talk? 02:19, 27 September 2014 (UTC) Note:...

promotional of him and sourcing isn't in-depth or reliable enough to meet NPERSON. Eddie891 Talk Work 14:35, 25 June 2020 (UTC) Keep As seen by the number...

started), still, the references do not show that this article meets WP:NPERSON or WP:GNG most are just trivial mentions of the subject, most are not that...

district]" doesn't confer notability, and there's no indication that WP:NPERSON is met here. - The Bushranger One ping only 04:08, 12 May 2025 (UTC) Delete...

of itself but probably gives him a big boost with regards to WP:GNG/WP:NPERSON; whereas having stars on the shoulders does, indeed, mean notable. - The...

confines of the modelling world), and that's whether you go by WP:NMODEL, WP:NPERSON or WP:GNG. ogenstein (talk) 08:21, 23 May 2019 (UTC) It’s no wonder NMODEL...

28 November 2020 (UTC) @N0c2c1: this topic does not appear to meet WP:NPERSON. In addition, Wikipedia is not interested in a rerun of the Seigenthaler...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:GNG and WP:NPERSON. Lack of quality independent WP:SIGCOV, some cited awards don't seem to...

appreciated, but Wikipedia is not a memorial, and I don't see WP:GNG, WP:NPERSON, or WP:SOLDIER being met here. - The Bushranger One ping only 18:10, 11...

since subject fails WP:NACTOR, WP:ANYBIO, WP:SIGCOV (aka WP:GNG), and WP:NPERSON. The multiple porn-industry awards do not confer Wikinotability on our...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:GNG/WP:NPERSON and WP:NACTOR. The article is a minimally sourced filmography with no significant...

accident", which is not an establishment of notability. Fails WP:SOLDIER, WP:NPERSON. The Bushranger One ping only 05:36, 18 December 2013 (UTC) Note: This...

yet. Papaursa (talk) 16:51, 24 July 2025 (UTC) Delete Subject fails WP:NPERSON and WP:GNG. No reliable significant coverage so appears to be non-notable...

there is an underlying systemic bias issue here, a broader discussion (at NPERSON, the village pump, in an RfC, etc.) might be warranted, as individual AfDs...

Speedy keep. Fram (talk) 08:12, 25 January 2021 (UTC) Note According to WP:NPERSON a person should have had “significant coverage in multiple published secondary...

I could not find any evidence in the draft that this subject meets WP:NPERSON. Google Searches are no reliable sources, as they might change at any time...

orphans. No significant independent coverage to meet WP:NAUTHOR or WP:NPERSON. Newspapers.com, ProQuest, and Google came up and the best were interviews...

subject meets WP:NPERSON. Note that the draft has been rejected, which means that unless you come up with a credible claim for WP:NPERSON the reviewers don't...

but its extremely unlikely that this topic meets WP:BLP, let alone WP:NPERSON. The former is especially important when writing about minors. Victor Schmidt...

been rejected, because there is no evidence of this subject meeting WP:NPERSON. This draft is unreferenced. Victor Schmidt (talk) 21:56, 1 January 2021...

Carockstar has provided various sources, so now it passes WP:GNG and WP:NPERSON. If these sources are declared to fail WP:RS, then we should incubate it...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Does not meet WP:NPERSON. The article relies primarily on trivial coverage from entertainment news...

not a reason to delete. However, there is no notability here. Fails WP:NPERSON, WP:SOLDIER. WP:NOTMEMORIAL. - The Bushranger One ping only 18:08, 24 May...

can be found. JohnmgKing (talk) 20:23, 29 May 2020 (UTC) Delete fails WP:NPERSON. promotional, was perhaps a failed candidate in the 2004 Indian general...

received good coverage in the news media, he qualify under WP:GNG and WP:NPERSON. Hzh (talk) 11:24, 21 July 2018 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

2020, showing that the significance isn't one-off. Passes WP:GNG and WP:NPERSON. The article may be a promo, but with this amount of coverage that isn't...

besides, the subject is not very well referenced, and it fails GNG and WP:NPERSON. L293D (☎ • ✎) 01:53, 4 March 2018 (UTC) Drafitify Move to draft and wait...

December 2024 (UTC) Keep His activities at UH are sufficient to meet WP:NPERSON. He is not only notable for a single event. PhotographyEdits (talk) 17:05...

per nomination and Chalk19's additional sleuthing. A person who fails WP:NPERSON, an architect who fails WP:ARCHITECT, and a painter who fails WP:CREATIVE...

combat" might be a claim of notability - if the WP:GNG as articulated in WP:NPERSON is met. Is it? - The Bushranger One ping only 12:36, 28 January 2014 (UTC)...

language that I can't read. I am afraid that this draft currently fails WP:NPERSON let alone WP:BLP. Victor Schmidt (talk) 07:54, 23 January 2021 (UTC)...

definition. We will not accept an article on a non-notable subject. See WP:NPERSON for our notability definition for people. -Arch dude (talk) 14:31, 4 July...

(talk) 17:12, 8 June 2020 (UTC) this article currently has one source. WP:NPERSON requires at least three. 17:45, 8 June 2020 (UTC) 17:57:07, 8 June 2020...

using AI? SecretSpectre (talk) 22:29, 12 April 2026 (UTC) Keep: Meets WP:NPERSON on multiple independent grounds. Winner of high stakes poker season 16...

donations suggesting they were in any way special, it would be different. NPERSON says " multiple independent sources may be combined to demonstrate notability;...

Randykitty (talk) 16:58, 17 May 2019 (UTC) Delete since subject fails WP:NPERSON. She is known strictly for a rather non-notable award. I see Keep suggestions...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:GNG, WP:BLP1E, WP:NPERSON. There are no significant coverage in independent reliable sources about...

on LGBTQ issues. But, with this additional sourcing, she may meet WP:NPERSON's basic criteria, especially now that there is more than one source of significant...

article. Hemiauchenia (talk) 20:23, 5 February 2023 (UTC) To elaborate: WP:NPERSON in its opening paragraph says subjects of standalone bios should be "remarkable"...

16 March 2020 (UTC) @SethBrewster: First of all, WP:TRUTH. Secondly, WP:NPERSON applies here, presumably the section on entertainers. Since this is a WP:BLP...

sources would not help your cause, as there would still be no evidence of WP:NPERSON anywhere in the draft. Victor Schmidt (talk) 18:23, 25 October 2020 (UTC)...

Dezignme (talk) 10:24, 3 September 2020 (UTC) No indication how this meets WP:NPERSON. [1] is a directory entry lacking WP:SIGCOV. [2] is something by the subject...

DJ Cane (talk) 12:36, 30 January 2023 (UTC) Delete. Doesn’t satisfy WP:NPERSON Serratra (talk) 06:02, 29 January 2023 (UTC) Striking comment by blocked...

therefore fails both the policy for biographys of living persons and WP:NPERSON. Based on your username I gather this is an autobiography, please be advised...

that when people reference this redirect they are really referring to WP:NPERSON. I'm wondering if that's a more suitable target for that reason, as well...

WP:SIGCOV guidelines and warrant keeping the article under WP:GNG and WP:NPERSON. The case for deletion would be stronger if these conditions weren’t met...

13:43, 14 March 2024 (UTC) Delete since adequate sourcing that supports WP:NPERSON exists not. All we have really is the report in some small publication...

conclusion, I believe this subject does not meets the requirements of WP:NPERSON or WP:GNG. ConeKota (talk) 21:34, 29 March 2026 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NPERSON. Non-notable individual, run-of-the-mill educational administrator. No...

(talk) 04:30, 8 November 2020 (UTC) nothing even remotely looking like WP:NPERSON or WP:NACTOR. Instagra is not a relable source. Victor Schmidt (talk) 07:36...

27 November 2020 (UTC) But still doesn't satisfy any of WP:V WP:BLP WP:NPERSON or WP:RS or WP:SELFPUB or WP:PRIMARY. You are welcome to attempt and change...

CT55555(talk) 02:12, 31 January 2023 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTGENEALOGY, WP:NPERSON, and WP:GNG. After a comprehensive search that took me most of the day...

WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:33, 17 June 2025 (UTC) Delete I am not seeing this pass WP:NPERSON. If events are notable, an article should be made about those specific...

takes a few weeks. As for the current revision, I am unsure if it meets WP:NPERSON. Imdb.com is not considered a reliable source. While you are waiting, you...

Long story short, I currently see no evidence of Esparnia Edna meeting WP:NPERSON. The draft is currently unverfiable. The draft's text combined with the...

Wikipedia article is that the subject be notable by our definition. See WP:NPERSON. If the subject is not notable, we will delete any attempt you make to...

sources also fail WP:INDEPENDENT) Therefore, the Draft currently fails WP:NPERSON. Victor Schmidt (talk) 16:19, 2 July 2020 (UTC) MAPPLab (talk · contribs)...

independent sources with significant coverage and as such currently fails WP:NPERSON. Apart from that, its also written in a promotional manner. Thats the exact...

a one man studio, but the person doesn't seem to pass WP:NARTIST or WP:NPERSON either and was previously deleted for non-notability here. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ)...

Aroon Shahzad (talk) 17:44, 26 November 2020 (UTC) No evidence of WP:NPERSON. Note that a Wikipedia article may not nessesarely be desireable. In addition...

some of them. All that I looked at seems to meet WP:NCORP respectively WP:NPERSON for persons. If you want me to have a detailed and explained look at one...

August 2020 (UTC) This submission doesn't indicate how the subject meets WP:NPERSON. Instagram isn't considered a reliable source. Victor Schmidt (talk) 14:15...

in otherwise doubtful cases, but this should not preempt the general WP:NPERSON notability requirements for people, in particular that of having received...

establish notability. This article doesn’t meey WP:GNG or WP:BASIC, let alone NPERSON. Serratra (talk) 03:32, 30 January 2023 (UTC) The relevant guideline is...

could review the guidelines on notability for individuals at Wikipedia:NPERSON, and also Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners. Have you looked at some...

sources and therefore fails Wikipedia's Verifyability-Policy (amongst WP:NPERSON). It therefore cannot be published in the current state. As for the redirect/duplication...

the rule is that you must be notable by Wikipedia's standards - see WP:NPERSON - and have reliable, independent, published secondary sources to prove...

Katakana546 (talk) 12:20, 30 December 2022 (UTC) Delete - Fails WP:GNG and WP:NPERSON. The ⬡ Bestagon[t][c] 12:52, 30 December 2022 (UTC) Keep - Current head...

currently doesn indicate how the subject meets Wikipedia:ENTERTAINER or WP:NPERSON. Victor Schmidt (talk) 14:25, 10 October 2020 (UTC) Thank you for your...

03:20, 21 March 2019 (UTC) 20260806140208 Delete since subject fails WP:NPERSON. Wikipedia is not a collectioon of random information, nor a forum for...

org/wiki/Talk:Spandana_Palli#the_subject_of_the_article_doesn't_fails_WP:NPERSON | page. Requesting you to kindly edit my article Spandana Palli from redirection...

curently lacks any form of verfyability and therefore currently fails WP:NPERSON. We don't use plain external links in the article text. I will shortl leave...

2017 (UTC) Delete - absolutely no indication that the subject meets WP:NPERSON, being a self proclaimed sorcerer is of no significance at all, as well...

this wouldn't help much. It is way too short and lacks sourcing, see WP:NPERSON.--♦IanMacM♦ (talk to me) 16:46, 20 December 2024 (UTC) Might also be Draft:...

wikis are not considered reliable sources and there is no evidence how WP:NPERSON is met Victor Schmidt (talk) 16:19, 12 February 2021 (UTC) Amana22 (talk ·...

the significant, independent, in-depth coverage required by WP:GNG or WP:NPERSON. Per WP:BLP1E, a person mentioned incidentally in a short-lived, event-based...

autobiography is not a basis on which to establish notability, per WP:NPERSON. If you want an article on this project, please find reliable, secondary...

2016 (UTC) Agreed A simple solution would be create a subsection to WP:NPERSON dealing with Beauty Pageant contestants. I think it could be written to...

Influencers do not have their own specific criteria; they would need to meet WP:NPERSON. 3. See WP:SUICIDE for how to handle various threats of harm. 199.208.172...

(diff; had been pending for 72 days) Pass He seems to clearly pass WP:NPERSON, though why isn't awfully flattering. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 20:10, 7 August 2026...

secondary sources that discuss the subject. You should also review WP:NPERSON. If you have questions, let us know. Thanks, --Hammersoft (talk) 02:07...

references are sufficient to establish notability. Please carefully read WP:NPERSON, and then if you think I'm wrong, please make an explicit case that the...

February 2019 (UTC) Delete per nomination since subject fails WP:GNG and WP:NPERSON. The subject is not some award but a person. -The Gnome (talk) 10:57, 13...

concerned, the sources that have shown this person meets WP:GNG and WP:NPERSON. His membership and other achievements as listed in the article sources...

reliable here, preferably without spelling mistakes in the url?. Keep WP:NPERSON in mind. @Robert McClenon: for your notice. Victor Schmidt (talk) 07:20...

@Theroadislong:. If you have sources that show that this subject indeed passes WP:NPERSON or a different notability guideline, please paste them here. Victor Schmidt...

fails WP:GNG. I didn't check with the other notability guidelines like WP:NPERSON. @Atlantic306: if by Twitch you mean Twitch.tv, that is unsuitable for...

subject. In a few years, when it can established that this subject passes WP:NPERSON we can continue. For now this is the end of line. Victor Schmidt (talk)...

only passing mentions as a citizen scientist. rather clearly fails WP:NPERSON and WP:GNG. Eddie891 Talk Work 15:49, 7 June 2020 (UTC) Delete a non-notable...

different one. As for the current draft, I am not certain that it meets WP:NPERSON. imdb.com, Discogs and Wikis arent a reliable source. Victor Schmidt mobil...

Your sources are all WP:YOUTUBE or WP:IMDB, questionable reliability. WP:NPERSON not met yet. Sungodtemple (talk • contribs) 13:34, 27 April 2023 (UTC)...

first thing you should do is to read up on our notability standards; WP:NPERSON is the general standard for people, with some specific guidance for performers...

draft currently lacks reliable independent sources. It therefore fails WP:NPERSON. Victor Schmidt (talk) 17:52, 10 June 2020 (UTC) Lauratheschit (talk ·...

DaveApter (talk) 14:56, 9 March 2018 (UTC) Delete or Merge - fails WP:NPERSON and WP:NAUTHOR . L293D (☎ • ✎) 14:43, 10 March 2018 (UTC) Delete, or possibly...

February 2026 (UTC) The guideline is proving the individual is notable (WP:NPERSON), which PRIMARY sources cannot do. Sources to verify works the individual...

September 2020 (UTC) Would you please indicate here how this meets WP:NPERSON or otherwise have a look at Help:Wikitext so you be able to format your...

THANKS 4realtz (talk) 08:17, 9 October 2020 (UTC) @4realtz: please review WP:NPERSON along with WP:42 and present us your best three sources you think would...

(UTC) Shashankrao28, I assume that you mean Wikipedia. Please read WP:NPERSON and Your first article. Doctors are not treated any differently than people...

convincing case that either the person or the company are notable. Read WP:NPERSON and WP:NCORP. Interviews do not add to notability. Being on a "Top 100"...

@Imtiyazrasoool: As currently written, the draft does not indicate how WP:NPERSON is met. Press releases, routine announcements, interviews and other primary...

received good coverage in the news media, he qualify under WP:GNG and WP:NPERSON. Hzh (talk) 11:24, 21 July 2018 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

June 2020 (UTC) Weak redirect to The Lumineers. doesn't seem to meet WP:NPERSON or WP:MUSICBIO independently. The best coverage of him is a profile in...

WP:GNG. Blue Rasberry (talk) 17:19, 25 July 2017 (UTC) Delete: fails WP:NPERSON. DrStrauss talk 08:37, 1 August 2017 (UTC) Delete WP:GNG fail. L3X1 (distænt...

articles in English about subjects that meet our notability standards (WP:NPERSON), see here for instructions and explanations of how to go about it. 199...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NPERSON - being a military officer during WW2 is laudable but unfortunately is...

cult. The article fails to assert notability of its subject, failing WP:NPERSON. Lack of sources/references does not help. — kashmiri TALK 22:14, 10 April...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NPERSON. Only sources that list them are B&N website and IMDB, the latter of which...

"the first", therefore no immediate claim to notability; I don't see WP:NPERSON passed, or WP:NACTOR, and WP:NMUSIC looks also to not be a pass unless...

July 2020 (UTC) ... but none of them appear to met the criteria at WP:NPERSON, i.e. they are reliable independent and have significant coverage. Victor...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fail of WP:SOLDIER and WP:NPERSON. Was not a general-equivalent, did not recieve a major award. There has...

June 2020 (UTC) Weak redirect to The Lumineers. doesn't seem to meet WP:NPERSON or WP:MUSICBIO independently. The best coverage of him is a profile in...

teacher and high school tennis coach who sadly died at 35. According to WP:NPERSON, For people, the person who is the topic of a biographical article should...

rather widely cited on top of that. I think that's enough to scrape by NPERSON or maybe NSOLDIER #8, as his book and collections are well regarded. Eddie891...

can be found. JohnmgKing (talk) 20:23, 29 May 2020 (UTC) Delete fails WP:NPERSON. promotional, was perhaps a failed candidate in the 2004 Indian general...

that republished his essay, and similar articles. Not enough to meet WP:NPERSON or WP:GNG Eddie891 Talk Work 12:38, 6 June 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

is not a web host. In order to have an article, a person should meet WP:NPERSON. Generally speaking, Wikipedia does not have articles about most mayors...

Dawnseeker2000 16:44, 27 September 2015 (UTC) Keep: Appears to meet WP:NPERSON through secondary coverage such as this and this. While the article is...

be restored, but unless you can demonstrate that the subject meets WP:NPERSON, you are probbbably wasting your time. Victor Schmidt (talk) 14:50, 22...

fails GNG shouldn't be so difficult naa. That being said, article fails WP:NPERSON. the award won isn't notable. Many of the sources present fails Wp:RS....

it is a criteria for likely notable under WP:NPERSON, but NPERSON does not supersede GNG nor does NPERSON say it is automatic. If her only claim to notability...

Lambert (talk) 18:30, 25 June 2020 (UTC) Delete 1) doesn't seem to meet WP:NPERSON with little clearly reliable coverage, and 2) in not clearly notable private...

demonstrate that he's "notable" according to the criteria of either WP:NPERSON or WP:NMUSIC. (It's not necessary to meet the criteria of both.) Which...

mentions in relation to the university, FX company and Reuters. Fails WP:NPERSON and WP:GNG. Slywriter (talk) 13:01, 3 June 2022 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

otherwise doesn't seem to be enough coverage of him to meet WP:GNG or WP:NPERSON Eddie891 Talk Work 13:36, 29 June 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...

before they win, and he has not had enough coverage to meet WP:GNG or WP:NPERSON Eddie891 Talk Work 20:48, 8 June 2020 (UTC) Comment. Does his television...

(user-generated, not independent) If you want to assert a specific criterion of WP:NPERSON, please tell us what that might be. Victor Schmidt (talk) 17:48, 11 September...

and the rest of the article and sources don't demonstrate passing GNG, NPERSON, or SOLDIER. However, she was classmates with the RAF's first female pilot...

required for an author to qualify for a WP entry here: WP:NAUTHOR. Or, WP:NPERSON is another option. Innisfree987 (talk) 01:10, 14 June 2017 (UTC) Comment...

2018 (UTC) Keep - enough reliable sources exist to satisfy WP:ANYBIO, WP:NPERSON, and WP:GNG. L293D (☎ • ✎) 13:12, 8 March 2018 (UTC) The above discussion...

Larry (talk) 19:12, 29 September 2015 (UTC) Delete as appears to fail WP:NPERSON. --Rubbish computer 22:18, 29 September 2015 (UTC) Unelected candidates...

since subject fails WP:NACTOR, WP:ANYBIO, WP:SIGCOV (aka WP:GNG), and WP:NPERSON. The multiple porn-industry awards do not confer Wikinotability on our...

Pack Lambert (talk) 18:31, 24 June 2020 (UTC) Delete fails WP:NPOL and WP:NPERSON, the coverage I found consisted of an obituary, seems to have been a popular...

to USS Cross, the ship named after him, as he does not pass WP:GNG, WP:NPERSON, or WP:SOLDIER. - The Bushranger One ping only 19:46, 24 January 2021 (UTC)...

Best, GPL93 (talk) 12:33, 5 May 2019 (UTC) Delete since subject fails WP:NPERSON. -The Gnome (talk) 08:44, 9 May 2019 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

device, but not individually notable per either WP:SOLDIER or WP:GNG/WP:NPERSON. - The Bushranger One ping only 18:46, 20 January 2021 (UTC) Redirect per...

11:10, 11 July 2017 (UTC) Delete: sources do not give WP:SIGCOV, fails WP:NPERSON. DrStrauss talk 11:42, 11 July 2017 (UTC) Delete, does not have significant...

enough by itself. A google search indicates no in-depth coverage to meet WP:NPERSON independently. In the article, sourcing is either unreliable (i.e. self-published...

Mangalashery, or his company/achievements, so it probably fails WP:GNG and WP:NPERSON. Between the complete lack of sources for a BLP and the résumé-like style...

 Velella  Velella Talk   12:15, 26 May 2020 (UTC) Delete fails WP:GNG and WP:NPERSON, no indication of notability in the article, no indication arises from...

there are passing mentions in several books, nothing suggests he meets NPERSON or one of the other NSOLDIER criteria Eddie891 Talk Work 14:40, 13 June...

Seems to be notable only for social media presence. Beyond that, fails WP:NPERSON. My name isnotdave (talk/contribs) 18:30, 28 July 2017 (UTC) Note: This...

T0mpr1c3 (talk) 21:59, 19 July 2018 (UTC) Keep since subject meets WP:NPERSON per WP:V, e.g. Independent, South Africa article; Times of India article;...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails NPERSON. Notability is not inherited from broadcasting on a notable news station...

a politician, head of LSI in Terana, etc. Easily passes WP:GNG and WP:NPERSON. — Quasar G. 15:33, 15 June 2017 (UTC) Comment Where is the refs in the...

paid article is not a valid reason for deletion; I agree that WP:GNG, WP:NPERSON and such seem to be questionable at best here, but the nomination's phrasing...

(and more) here. Merko (talk) 19:24, 30 May 2022 (UTC) Keep Passes WP:NPERSON, significant mentions in reliable sources at Paste Magazine (part of it...

WP:NACTOR, which is the same as WP:NMODEL, as well as more broadly WP:NPERSON. -The Gnome (talk) 10:43, 22 March 2019 (UTC) The discussion above is closed...

SwisterTwister talk 04:12, 29 September 2015 (UTC) Delete as appears to not meet WP:NPERSON. --Rubbish computer 22:38, 29 September 2015 (UTC) Keep and trim: While...

Coolabahapple (talk) 12:31, 15 June 2017 (UTC) Delete for failing WP:NPERSON. If newcomer author wishes in back as a user draft, fine. Schmidt, Michael...

Thanks, Ad Orientem (talk) 23:57, 20 June 2017 (UTC) Delete: fails WP:NPERSON and WP:GNG. The article has only one source, and the argument that something...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:GNG and WP:NPERSON. Most of the focus in this article is on two controversial statements that...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NPERSON as WP:V search comes up with social media and people unrelated to subject...

type entries. Gbawden (talk) 11:39, 14 August 2014 (UTC) Delete - Per WP:NPERSON Found multiple references but they are not secondary . [44] feels like...

besides, the subject is not very well referenced, and it fails GNG and WP:NPERSON. L293D (☎ • ✎) 01:53, 4 March 2018 (UTC) Drafitify Move to draft and wait...

Non-notable high-school football player, just entering college. Fails WP:GNG, WP:NPERSON, WP:NSPORT. Also, notability is not inherited. The Bushranger One ping...

other than president of trade association (i.e. trivial mention). Fails WP:NPERSON. Sailsbystars (talk) 03:44, 15 January 2014 (UTC) KEEP – Note that this...

to USCGC Paul Clark as the ship's namesake, not otherwise passing GNG/NPERSON/SOLDIER. - The Bushranger One ping only 04:24, 17 January 2021 (UTC) The...

Pack Lambert (talk) 03:46, 2 March 2018 (UTC) Keep passes WP:GNG and WP:NPERSON. L293D (☎ • ✎) 02:43, 4 March 2018 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

JSTOR · TWL) Questionable notability since 2008!! Fails WP:GNG and WP:NPERSON. Mr. Guye (talk) 21:21, 2 September 2014 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...

WP:NPERSON or WP:NENTERTAINER. Cullen328 (talk) 04:58, 10 September 2022 (UTC) We do not have a special notability criteria for mentalists. WP:NPERSON and...

(talk) 17:00, 10 March 2017 (UTC) Delete: belongs on a blog, fails WP:NPERSON and WP:GNG. DrStrauss talk 20:10, 10 March 2017 (UTC) Keep: The actress...

(here), and so on, unearthed by Bakazaka, seal it. The subject meets WP:NPERSON. -The Gnome (talk) 13:18, 6 March 2019 (UTC) Changing to weak keep. Yes...

that means is that she is notable for one event, not that she passes WP:NPERSON or WP:GNG. Eddie891 Talk Work 00:11, 13 June 2020 (UTC) Redirect to Miss...

concerned, the sources that have shown this person meets WP:GNG and WP:NPERSON. His membership and other achievements as listed in the article sources...

other primary source stuff, or mere mentions. Doesn't appear to meet WP:NPERSON/WP:GNG. Was previously PRODded in 2015 but removed by DGG. talk to !dave...

03:20, 21 March 2019 (UTC) 20260813180120 Delete since subject fails WP:NPERSON. Wikipedia is not a collectioon of random information, nor a forum for...

news search shows only one trivial mention which means the topic fails WP:NPERSON. Aasim 07:50, 18 August 2020 (UTC) WP:CSD#G5 (Wikipedia:Sockpuppet...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NPERSON as non-notable.  ΤheQ Editor  Talk? 02:19, 27 September 2014 (UTC) Note:...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NPERSON and WP:GNG. Mr. Guye (talk) 03:15, 16 December 2014 (UTC) Note: This debate...

cite sources, WP:RS to figure out the kinds of sources needed, and WP:NPERSON for our guideline on what makes a person notable by our standards (not...

almost no secondary source coverage of the subject, thus failing GNG and NPERSON. As there are instances of writing by the subject, it may be a case of...

25 October 2018 (UTC) Keep on account of subject verifiably meeting WP:NPERSON and WP:CRIMINAL. -The Gnome (talk) 10:54, 29 October 2018 (UTC) Comment...

itself it wouldn't establish GNG), as WP:AUD has never been extended to WP:NPERSON (despite proposals to do so). I'd consider it more regional than local...

source is affiliated. The article does not convey why the subject passes WP:NPERSON. DrStrauss talk 21:29, 30 July 2017 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...

Rogermx (talk) 16:27, 5 June 2019 (UTC) Delete since subject fails WP:NPERSON. The aroma of vanity begins to permeate the premises. -The Gnome (talk)...

Keep - I don't know the history of the article but it seems to pass WP:NPERSON to me. shoy (reactions) 13:59, 19 August 2016 (UTC) Keep Sources include:...

not a reason to delete. However, there is no notability here. Fails WP:NPERSON, WP:SOLDIER. WP:NOTMEMORIAL. - The Bushranger One ping only 18:08, 24 May...

nothing to indicate lasting significance or a pass of WP:GNG and/or WP:NPERSON Eddie891 Talk Work 14:24, 10 June 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...

all speedy deletion tags: The article back then didn't had a claim on WP:NPERSON, qualifying it for CSD criteria A7. That being said, I would haven't tagged...

The sources found or cited are quite poor, and certainly do not meet WP:NPERSON or even WP:GNG: NYS Women Inc is a women's support group that has simply...

have reliable sources, and contains some biased text. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NPERSON. Searches returns sources covering Trivendra Singh Rawat, a politician...

absence of in-depth, reliable sources and as such fails WP:GNG and WP:NPERSON. Eddie891 Talk Work 12:02, 22 May 2020 (UTC) Delete a non-notable person...

Thanks, –Davey2010 • (talk) 17:42, 31 August 2014 (UTC) Delete. Fails WP:NPERSON. --Mr. Guye (talk) 21:35, 2 September 2014 (UTC) The above discussion is...

2020, showing that the significance isn't one-off. Passes WP:GNG and WP:NPERSON. The article may be a promo, but with this amount of coverage that isn't...

still has only affiliated coverage. Failure of WP:GNG, WP:NPOL, and WP:NPERSON. Mr. Guye (talk) 01:55, 3 April 2015 (UTC) Comment: Wgolf should see this...

GNG. –Davey2010Talk 17:05, 2 March 2018 (UTC) Delete - fails PORNBIO, NPERSON, and no RS. L293D (☎ • ✎) 14:44, 9 March 2018 (UTC) The above discussion...

him culd still be no notable, until some admin give me refe to read WP:NPERSON and WP:42 So he asked me to read them and understand so that i could provide...

NAUTHOR but given the coverage and sources, it appears to pass GNG and NPERSON. L293D (☎ • ✎) 16:01, 10 March 2018 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

referred to as a "key witness" by one of them, he still doesn't meet WP:NPERSON. APerson (talk!) 19:57, 18 July 2014 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

may satisfy the "well-known and significant award or honor" part of WP:NPERSON.--Prisencolin (talk) 03:53, 31 August 2016 (UTC) i know, i know, i put...

2017 (UTC) Delete - absolutely no indication that the subject meets WP:NPERSON, being a self proclaimed sorcerer is of no significance at all, as well...

There is no support whatsoever for that interpretation in WP:GNG, WP:NPERSON, or WP:BASIC. Cbl62 (talk) 22:17, 5 April 2021 (UTC) At the time Alft was...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NPERSON altogether. I have been unable to find a single reliable source that would...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Does not meet WP:NPERSON or WP:GNG. Mynameisnotdave (talk/contribs) (formerly Insulam Simia) 17:13...

sources discussing subject. Nothing in article shows meeting WP:GNG or WP:NPERSON Slywriter (talk) 02:00, 21 April 2022 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NPERSON and WP:GNG, almost no coverage, sourcing is currently mostly from a user...

WP:BEFORE check does not show sufficient sourcing to meet WP:GNG or WP:NPERSON. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 13:28, 14 January 2022 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

burst of coverage around his death doesn't establish passage of WP:GNG, WP:NPERSON or WP:SOLDIER. A good man who should be remembered, but Wikipedia is not...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Not notable. Fails gng, nsports, and nperson Mr. Guye (talk) 01:28, 13 June 2014 (UTC) Comment may well be notable as...

fails WP:GNG. I didn't check with the other notability guidelines like WP:NPERSON. @Atlantic306: if by Twitch you mean Twitch.tv, that is unsuitable for...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NPERSON. Coverage is limited to namedrops in connection with her business rather...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NPERSON being only mentioned in passing as a television actress's husband, in the...

and abroad, in the half a century passed since his death. Note that WP:NPERSON explicitely requires significant coverage. kashmiri TALK 21:46, 14 November...

appreciated, but Wikipedia is not a memorial, and I don't see WP:GNG, WP:NPERSON, or WP:SOLDIER being met here. - The Bushranger One ping only 18:10, 11...

various contexts". If we want to consider WP:SNGs, she is notable under WP:NPERSON because she meets WP:BASIC (which is the same as GNG). Levivich (talk)...

halted on that question, no RfC has been created, the last discussion at WT:NPERSON was in April, and AFAIK no attempts have been made to pursue this through...

of itself but probably gives him a big boost with regards to WP:GNG/WP:NPERSON; whereas having stars on the shoulders does, indeed, mean notable. - The...

promotional of him and sourcing isn't in-depth or reliable enough to meet NPERSON. Eddie891 Talk Work 14:35, 25 June 2020 (UTC) Keep As seen by the number...

FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Unsourced article for person who seems to fail WP:NPERSON and WP:GNG. Someone with a WP:LIBRARY pass would be helpful. —moonythedwarf...

notability guidelines that say they are "presumed" notability as per WP:NPERSON "meeting one or more does not guarantee that a subject should be included...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) A7 speedy declined. Fails WP:NPERSON. DrStrauss talk 15:20, 21 August 2017 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...

JSTOR · TWL) Although known for some of her songs in Cytus II, fails WP:NPERSON: Could not find reliable sources on Bing or Google. Aasim (talk) 07:09...

is evidently original work, unblemished by sourcing. Subject fails WP:NPERSON. -The Gnome (talk) 18:08, 22 October 2019 (UTC) The above discussion is...

Necrothesp (talk) 15:03, 8 September 2014 (UTC) Delete. Fails WP:GNG, WP:NPERSON and WP:SOLDIER. I'm sure he was a good man who served ably, but Wikinotable...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Appears to violate WP:NPERSON, WP:GNG. He's cited as a rep, but not as an individual. Citations go to...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Article falls afoul of WP:NPERSON and WP:1E; a lot of sources for this guy were wrote on 5 Jan 2010, which...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Does not appear to pass WP:NPERSON. No evidence of coverage in independent sources, and more narrowly seems...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) TL;DR: delete per WP:PROMO and WP:NPERSON. G11 speedy was declined, in hindsight probably correctly because it isn't...

either non-independent or do not show that the person meets WP:GNG or WP:NPERSON. Further searches do not show anything additional. Majora (talk) 01:19...

well-established WP:CONSENSUS that is WP:SOLDIER, and does not pass WP:NPERSON or WP:GNG. WP:NOTMEMORIAL. - The Bushranger One ping only 20:04, 25 August...

-- Whpq (talk) 17:34, 25 April 2019 (UTC) Delete since subject fails WP:NPERSON. Yet another political operative who, despite the effort to the contrary...

Sarahj2107 (talk) 14:50, 12 June 2014 (UTC) Delete. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NPERSON. --Mr. Guye (talk) 22:42, 12 June 2014 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...

comes to Uganda every end of the year to throw parties") abjectly fails WP:NPERSON. Description of subject and his major claim to notability is that he's...

Carockstar has provided various sources, so now it passes WP:GNG and WP:NPERSON. If these sources are declared to fail WP:RS, then we should incubate it...

19:22, 11 February 2019 (UTC) Delete per nomination. Subject fails WP:NPERSON, WP:NCREATIVE, and WP:MUSICBIO. -The Gnome (talk) 05:48, 13 February 2019...

Randykitty (talk) 16:58, 17 May 2019 (UTC) Delete since subject fails WP:NPERSON. She is known strictly for a rather non-notable award. I see Keep suggestions...

it. That said, you should review our notability standard for people: WP:NPERSON, and also our guideline about editing with a conflict of interest: WP:COI...

are all about the company and the person), subject meets WP:GNG and WP:NPERSON. Some months ago, it'd be a cinch for a Merge with the article on the company...

07:29, 23 March 2019 (UTC) Delete per nimination since subject fails WP:NPERSON and WP:CREATIVE. -The Gnome (talk) 13:02, 23 March 2019 (UTC) Weak delete...

Delete on account of subject lacking encyclopaedic value and failing WP:NPERSON. The article has been created by a sockpuppet and cultivated by a professional...

there is an underlying systemic bias issue here, a broader discussion (at NPERSON, the village pump, in an RfC, etc.) might be warranted, as individual AfDs...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Appears to fail WP:NPERSON and WP:GNG. No in-depth covering of the subject, just a passing mention...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Unsourced advertisement, fails WP:GNG and WP:NPERSON —moonythedwarf (Braden N.) 03:36, 26 November 2020 (UTC) Delete: Reads...

01:33, 4 October 2015 (UTC) Keep per Duffbeerforme as appears to meet WP:NPERSON. --Rubbish computer 11:15, 4 October 2015 (UTC) Delete per nom and SwisterTwister...

per nomination and Chalk19's additional sleuthing. A person who fails WP:NPERSON, an architect who fails WP:ARCHITECT, and a painter who fails WP:CREATIVE...

talk to me 03:19, 20 August 2014 (UTC) Delete - per WP:SCHOLAR and WP:NPERSON. The subject has not received a well-known and significant award or honor...

donations suggesting they were in any way special, it would be different. NPERSON says " multiple independent sources may be combined to demonstrate notability;...

NorthAmerica1000 23:42, 30 November 2014 (UTC) Delete No coverage, fails WP:NPERSON.--Fauzan✆ talk✉ mail 17:07, 1 December 2014 (UTC) The above discussion...

combat" might be a claim of notability - if the WP:GNG as articulated in WP:NPERSON is met. Is it? - The Bushranger One ping only 12:36, 28 January 2014 (UTC)...

JSTOR · TWL) Contested PROD. This is a sportswriter who fails WP:GNG/WP:NPERSON/WP:NWRITER; I cannot find any significant coverage about him. BY him, a...

notable personages who are missed by WP:GNG. If somebody passes WP:GNG/WP:NPERSON then whether they meet WP:SOLDIER or not is irrelevant - WP:SOLDIER only...

mainspace yet because it doesn't show that the subject is notable. Quoting WP:NPERSON, you must include "multiple published secondary sources that are reliable...

WP:NCORP, WP:NOLYMPICS, WP:NARTIST, WP:NMUSICIAN, WP:NACADEMIC, WP:NPERSON, WP:NPERSON, WP:NORG, WP:NALBUM, etc., but have seen nothing that answers the...

16:30, 28 September 2013 (UTC) Delete - Fails not just WP:SOLDIER, but WP:NPERSON too, not to mention WP:NOTMEMORIAL. - The Bushranger One ping only 17:25...

the Blue Angels, and I don't see enough here to pass WP:SOLDIER or WP:NPERSON. As I mentioned above, the fact he was a Blue Angel may mean there is coverage...

MrClog (talk) 23:20, 16 July 2019 (UTC) Delete since subject fails WP:NPERSON. A rather unfortunate time for such texts since summer heat amplifies the...

various contexts". If we want to consider WP:SNGs, she is notable under WP:NPERSON because she meets WP:BASIC (which is the same as GNG). Levivich (talk)...

processes, so please excuse any missteps on my part. This article fails WP:NPERSON, WP:CRIME, and WP:1E. Wikipedia's people-notability guideline says that...

confines of the modelling world), and that's whether you go by WP:NMODEL, WP:NPERSON or WP:GNG. ogenstein (talk) 08:21, 23 May 2019 (UTC) It’s no wonder NMODEL...

accident", which is not an establishment of notability. Fails WP:SOLDIER, WP:NPERSON. The Bushranger One ping only 05:36, 18 December 2013 (UTC) Note: This...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:GNG, WP:NPERSON, and WP:MUSICBIO. Sources given on page are the same press release in two...

February 2019 (UTC) Delete per nomination since subject fails WP:GNG and WP:NPERSON. The subject is not some award but a person. -The Gnome (talk) 10:57, 13...

can be corrected if somebody writes a new article that indicates how WP:NPERSON is met. Victor Schmidt (talk) 15:08, 7 September 2020 (UTC) (edit conflict)...

October 2025 (UTC) Strong Keep – The subject clearly meets WP:ENT and WP:NPERSON criteria for notability. John Rey Malto has received multiple independent...

re-submitting with no improvement, and there is no indication this person meets WP:NPERSON. qcne (talk) 10:00, 8 July 2025 (UTC) Teuku2012 (talk · contribs) Draft:A...

notability requirements for organizations. (WP:NCORP) and for individuals (WP:NPERSON). Really. I mean it. Wikipedia wants an article on every notable subject...

be digital or online, but they do need to be verifiable. Please see WP:NPERSON for more information about what is necessary -- things like diplomas and...

Since he's a person, you have the choice of WP:NPERSON (notable person) or WP:GNG (general notability). NPERSON has subcriteria, so it may be that you are...

independent of Lawson that devote significant coverage to Lawson. See WP:NPERSON. His own website is not independent. Passing mentions are not significant...

by Wikipedia standards. Since Gong is a person, you can use either WP:NPERSON, for people (there are subcategories you may also want to look into), or...

(UTC) There is no evidence that this person meets our WP:NPOLITICIAN or WP:NPERSON criteria. Qcne (talk) 12:43, 13 December 2023 (UTC) Yuvi1024 (talk · contribs)...

encyclopedia... yeah, I'm comfortable with completely throwing any sort of NPERSON SNG out the window here. λ NegativeMP1 16:43, 29 July 2025 (UTC) Keep The...

neutral on the matter; if the community has found enough sources to pass WP:NPERSON, then that's that; if not, that's also that. - The Bushranger One ping...

Krumholz is notable under. As he's a person, you have the choice of WP:NPERSON (notable person) or WP:GNG (general notability). There are sub-criteria...

November 2024 (UTC) @Chethu0728 Please see the criteria for inclusion at WP:NPERSON. You will need to totally re-write this draft as currently it is just a...

December 2024 (UTC) Keep His activities at UH are sufficient to meet WP:NPERSON. He is not only notable for a single event. PhotographyEdits (talk) 17:05...

here). 3) Articles about people need to show how the person passes the WP:NPERSON notability test, or in your case perhaps the more specific WP:NAUTHOR notability...

WP:NACADEMIC is actually the criteria you need to meet, not the stricter NPERSON. Read over NACADEMIC. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 20:24, 22...

WP:NACTOR yet and there isn't evidence for meeting the more general WP:NPERSON criteria, but that criterion #3 is debatable, so I think a second opinion...

article. Then after that you can see if he meets the requirements for WP:NPERSON NZFC(talk) 21:50, 6 January 2018 (UTC) (edit conflict) So, there are a...

for NACADEMIC.) Instead, it looks to me like the more relevant SNG is WP:NPERSON, which is far broader in its scope and much closer to the GNG in most circumstances...

neutral on the matter; if the community has found enough sources to pass WP:NPERSON, then that's that; if not, that's also that. - The Bushranger One ping...

person does not pass WP:NBASIC either. If you can prove notability under WP:NPERSON let me know on my User Talk Page and I will have another look. Qcne (talk)...

Guardian article. You therefore haven't yet proven notability under WP:NPERSON, sorry. Qcne (talk) 11:42, 21 May 2024 (UTC) Sorry but that's not accurate...

Coverage of this politician/lawyer seems trivial. Does not meet WP:NPOL, WP:NPERSON. Ighs (talk) 12:34, 12 July 2026 (UTC) Note: this discussion has been included...

know. Antny08 (talk) 14:47, 26 March 2024 (UTC) Delete For failing WP:NPERSON - the source analysis seems right on the money. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 12:55, 21 March...

WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:33, 17 June 2025 (UTC) Delete I am not seeing this pass WP:NPERSON. If events are notable, an article should be made about those specific...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NPERSON. Current references are all either primary sources or trivial mentions...

been declined multiple times via AfC, primarily for notability (WP:GNG/WP:NPERSON) and BLP concerns (e.g., due weight on a past allegation section). The...

comments regarding Draft:Alexis Marcou, which was declined for failing WP:NPERSON and reading like an advertisement The rejection reason given was that the...

further unless substantially more sources that proof notability under WP:NPERSON can be found. qcne (talk) 16:25, 9 December 2025 (UTC) ~2025-39608-49 (talk ·...

certain wealth or net worth ranking, we need RS that mention it; see WP:NPERSON and WP:GNG. The person is not a company; SIRS hence doesn't apply. Fermiboson...

about his career and personal life is not enough to meet WP:GNG pr WP:NPERSON as is. I'm still trying to find a way to appropriately cover the situation...

show anything that would satisfy notability guidelines per WP:GNG and WP:NPERSON. Shawn Teller (talk) 22:35, 19 February 2023 (UTC) The above discussion...

academic, so WP:NACADEMIC is not applicable. The more relevant SNG is WP:NPERSON, which still requires significant coverage in reliable, independent sources...

believe the article fails WP:GNG/WP:NPERSON and is unsafe under WP:BLP. Proposed outcomes: Delete the article per GNG/NPERSON/BLP. If consensus is not to delete...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NPERSON Bryce M (talk) 10:36, 11 April 2026 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...

February 2026 (UTC) The guideline is proving the individual is notable (WP:NPERSON), which PRIMARY sources cannot do. Sources to verify works the individual...

WP:SIGCOV guidelines and warrant keeping the article under WP:GNG and WP:NPERSON. The case for deletion would be stronger if these conditions weren’t met...

journalist and presenter, cannot find any evidence of any notability, Fails NPERSON and GNG –Davey2010Talk 19:40, 13 November 2024 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

article. Hemiauchenia (talk) 20:23, 5 February 2023 (UTC) To elaborate: WP:NPERSON in its opening paragraph says subjects of standalone bios should be "remarkable"...

Nathanson seems to have just bubbled under the minimum coverage to satisfy NPERSON. However, he's definitely a real and somewhat influential musician. I'm...

the article subject has enough WP:SIGCOV to satisfy GNG, NATHLETE, or NPERSON. Serratra (talk) 01:15, 30 January 2023 (UTC) Delete Best sources I could...

Delete. I can't find any sources that are reliable or independent; fails WP:NPERSON an WP:GNG. Seems like it was created by a family member based on the username...

about Kelley Mach61 14:34, 2 October 2024 (UTC) Delete since this fails WP:NPERSON and is not saved by either WP:NCREATIVE or by WP:MUSIC's pertinent paragraph...

Delete I am not convinced there is enough WP:SIGCOV for her to pass WP:NPERSON. There is an article on Igromania, but mostly an interview (primary source)...

CT55555(talk) 02:12, 31 January 2023 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTGENEALOGY, WP:NPERSON, and WP:GNG. After a comprehensive search that took me most of the day...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NPERSON Bryce M (talk) 11:28, 28 March 2026 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This biography seems to fail WP:GNG and WP:NPERSON. Searches found no sources with significant coverage of the article subject...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NPERSON. Non-notable individual, run-of-the-mill educational administrator. No...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) NPERSON fail. There is only one non-primary source and it is either a passing mention...

February 2023 (UTC) Keep. There is sufficient WP:SIGCOV to satisfy WP:GNG, WP:NPERSON, and WP:NACTOR. Shawn Teller (talk) 01:34, 22 February 2023 (UTC) The above...

editing, violating Wikipedia’s neutral point of view. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NPERSON. M S Hassan 📬✍🏻 19:06, 29 September 2024 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Does not meet WP:NPERSON. The article relies primarily on trivial coverage from entertainment news...

offline sources are entirely acceptable. Which isn't to say he passes NPERSON otherwise, it doesn't look like it, but the source 'not being accessable'...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Doesn't meet WP:GNG and WP:NPERSON. M S Hassan (talk | contributions) 06:44, 31 July 2024 (UTC) Note: This...

October 2025 (UTC) Strong Keep – The subject clearly meets WP:ENT and WP:NPERSON criteria for notability. John Rey Malto has received multiple independent...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NPERSON Polygnotus (talk) 19:32, 8 June 2025 (UTC) Weak keep per my rationale in...

by reliable secondary sources to qualify as notable per WP:GNG and WP:NPERSON. Being an ambassador isn’t inherently notable. I’d expect to see more WP:SIGCOV...