Redirect to:
This page is a redirect. The following categories are used to track and monitor this redirect:
|
On Wikipedia, notability is a test used by editors to decide whether a given topic warrants its own article. For people, the person who is the topic of...
Click to read more »Reporting statistics of link npeople.ucoz.ru; 3 records. npeople.ucoz.ru: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • Spamcheck...
Click to read more »discussions. NorthAmerica1000 05:01, 5 October 2014 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:NPEOPLE. --Mr. Guye (talk) 01:09, 9 October 2014 (UTC) Delete as lacking in depth...
Click to read more »Subject is a CEO of a social media marketing company. Little to suggest NPEOPLE is met and WP:SOAP. JMWt (talk) 10:08, 13 October 2023 (UTC) Note: This...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This article is not notable. It fails WP:NPEOPLE. Interstellarity (talk) 15:28, 15 December 2019 (UTC) Note: This discussion...
Click to read more »that Janhrach brought up last time still exist, "Does not seem to pass NPEOPLE. I see only passing mentions in independent sources. [1] is an interview...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:AUTHOR and NPEOPLE. Even on Amazon there is only an unavailable book [1]. The person is mentioned...
Click to read more »GNG. Oaktree b (talk) 01:54, 15 December 2022 (UTC) Delete - Lacks WP:NPEOPLE and WP:SIGCOV Pranesh Ravikumar (talk) 03:30, 15 December 2022 (UTC) The...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NPEOPLE. — Rhododendrites talk | 02:41, 12 May 2014 (UTC) Keep: Per WP:MUSBIO...
Click to read more »WP:RESUME.4meter4 (talk) 16:15, 9 October 2025 (UTC) Delete: Doesn't meet WP:NPEOPLE, can't find any reliable independent sources which are talking specifically...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Nominating for deletion per WP:GNG and WP:NPEOPLE. The subject does not demonstrate sustained, significant coverage in reliable...
Click to read more »received significant coverage in reliable sources, no other criterion of WP:NPEOPLE is met, and the article is shamelessly promotional. Salvio Let's talk about...
Click to read more »child actor galleries. As such, I assert that the article fails WP:GNG, WP:NPEOPLE and WP:NACTOR. Scottyoak2 (talk) 02:40, 3 May 2018 (UTC) Note: This discussion...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NPEOPLE, non-notable violinist. Created by SPA who has had many articles deleted...
Click to read more »in any sources I found. Coverage is only trivial. Fails WP:GNG, and WP:NPEOPLE - specifically WP:CREATIVE. ProofRobust 19:50, 20 November 2022 (UTC) Battle...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NPEOPLE and WP:GNG. Most of the movies she acted in are non-notable, selected few...
Click to read more »FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:GNG and WP:BASIC. Also fails WP:ANYBIO and WP:NPEOPLE in general. Reference only seems to mention the subject a few times, which...
Click to read more »businessman in reliable sources, and the closest he appears to come to WP:NPEOPLE is having once been nominated for an award. Cordless Larry (talk) 08:41...
Click to read more »failing WP:GNG with zero indi third party substantial sources, let alone WP:NPEOPLE - only passing mentions or non-indi sources. A quick search finds passing...
Click to read more »TWL) This has 4 citations, 2 of which are from YouTube. This fails WP:NPEOPLE as well. In solidarity Dafootballguy Want to talk? 22:32, 28 June 2026...
Click to read more »TWL) Can't find anything suggesting the topic would meet WP:GNG or WP:NPEOPLE CharlieEchoTango (contact) 10:20, 26 February 2012 (UTC) Note: This debate...
Click to read more »August 2020 (UTC) Delete. Couldn't find anything that meets WP:GNG, WP:NPEOPLE, or WP:NBOX. // Timothy :: talk 05:12, 14 August 2020 (UTC) Delete:...
Click to read more »meets WP:SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and in depth. From WP:NPEOPLE: "For people, the person who is the topic of a biographical article should...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NPEOPLE. Sources given either don't meet WP:SIGCOV or aren't independent. This...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NPEOPLE, not notable for any of the areas covered. Article is also something of...
Click to read more »Shawn in Montreal (talk) 00:33, 24 June 2016 (UTC) Keep meets WP:GNG, WP:NPEOPLE and WP:ENT Daniel kenneth (talk) 14:03, 25 June 2016 (UTC) Response and...
Click to read more »(talk) 18:24, 18 December 2019 (UTC) Speedy keep: passes WP:GNG and WP:NPEOPLE easily. See Al Jazeera, CNN, The Guardian, Jewish Chronicle 1, Jewish Chronicle...
Click to read more »nom and does not satisfy WP:NACADEMIC. I would say doesn't satisfy WP:NPEOPLE either. – The Grid (talk) 13:36, 9 November 2021 (UTC) Delete because there...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) The article does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NPEOPLE:WP:BASIC. The subject lacks multiple independent secondary sources providing...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Does not seem to past WP:GNG and WP:NPEOPLE, a BEFORE search yields nothing but primary sources. Seawolf35 (talk -...
Click to read more »Delete The article does not meet WP:GNG, WP:CREATIVE or WP:BASIC. From WP:NPEOPLE: "For people, the person who is the topic of a biographical article should...
Click to read more »to be interviews with them, but I'm not sure that's enough to meet WP:NPEOPLE. Ravensfire (talk) 19:54, 14 June 2022 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...
Click to read more »LinkedIn. OhNoitsJamie Talk 01:24, 30 January 2014 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:NPEOPLE. ///EuroCarGT 01:38, 30 January 2014 (UTC) So is my page going to be deleted...
Click to read more »kept for who was on crews for many, many years), and the person fails WP:NPEOPLE and WP:NSPORTS. (It's also worth mentioning that the Snowball Derby is...
Click to read more »Twitter followers, WP:PUFFERY, poor sources. Ultimately just fails WP:NPEOPLE. --— Rhododendrites talk | 19:49, 12 June 2014 (UTC) Delete – Rhododendrites...
Click to read more »TWL) I'm not seeing the sort of independent coverage required to meet WP:NPEOPLE, nor does this person's jobs meet WP:ANYBIO or WP:NPOL. Of the third party...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NPEOPLE. The first and second sources, which are the school's staff directory and...
Click to read more »instead. Their rationale follows: Nominating for deletion per WP:GNG and WP:NPEOPLE. The subject does not demonstrate sustained, significant coverage in reliable...
Click to read more »May 2019 (UTC) It’s no wonder NMODEL is being “re-litigated” on the WP:NPEOPLE talk page. Idiocy like this comment. Absolute lack of understanding of...
Click to read more »decline. No in-depth coverage of the person at all. Doesn't satisfy WP:NPEOPLE, WP:GNG or WP:ANYBIO. Below is my assessment of the current sources in...
Click to read more »Radhaswamisatsangdinod (talk • contribs) 06:51, 12 October 2025 (UTC) You should read WP:NPEOPLE, to understand the notability guidelines for biographies. Zuck28 (talk)...
Click to read more »it meets either WP:GNG or WP:NPEOPLE. - MrOllie (talk) 22:07, 29 July 2023 (UTC) I have reviewed WP:GNG and WP:NPEOPLE. Over the next few days, asap...
Click to read more »but that would be a separate article; I don't see enough here to pass WP:NPEOPLE (and then there's WP:BLP, WP:PROMO, and WP:COI....). --— Rhododendrites...
Click to read more »(talk) 05:02, 16 August 2016 (UTC) No assertion of notability, fails WP:NPEOPLE and WP:NOTINHERITED applies - the article claims he is a businessman, but...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Does not seem to pass NPEOPLE. I see only passing mentions in independent sources. [1] is an interview...
Click to read more »2020 (UTC) Keep I think these sources establish notability WP:GNG, WP:NPEOPLE: [1], [2], [3]. WP:BASIC allows for "If the depth of coverage in any given...
Click to read more »Tuesden (talk) 17:12, 17 December 2025 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:GNG and WP:NPEOPLE. And looks promotional as previously told ~2025-40198-86 (talk) 16:29,...
Click to read more »Unremarkable businessman, only link is to company biography, fails WP:NPEOPLE and WP:GNG. Using AfD as opposed to "lower" deletion forms because I am...
Click to read more »(talk) 22:18, 1 December 2022 (UTC) Delete - Does not pass WP:GNG or WP:NPEOPLE. ProofRobust 22:32, 1 December 2022 (UTC) Delete no sources found, nothing...
Click to read more »appear to have the necessary coverage in secondary sources to meet WP:NPEOPLE. Cordless Larry (talk) 07:04, 15 January 2018 (UTC) Note: This discussion...
Click to read more »and from my brief searching, there seems insufficient to pass GNG or WP:NPEOPLE for a standalone article so a redirect to the family's page seems an appropriate...
Click to read more »(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:NPEOPLE minor role character. Lacks significant coverage of her roles necessary...
Click to read more »WP:NBEAUTY, having not won one of the Big Four beauty pageants, fails WP:NPEOPLE and WP:GNG as well. Sources found no significant coverage in multiple reliable...
Click to read more »(UTC) Delete: No indication of notability, Does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NPEOPLE Seawolf35 T--C 18:48, 27 November 2023 (UTC) Delete. In addition to the...
Click to read more »FENS · JSTOR · TWL) The article does not meet WP:GNG or WP:BASIC. From WP:NPEOPLE: "For people, the person who is the topic of a biographical article should...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) The article does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NPEOPLE - For people, the person who is the topic of a biographical article should...
Click to read more »FENS · JSTOR · TWL) The article does not meet WP:GNG or WP:BASIC. From WP:NPEOPLE: "For people, the person who is the topic of a biographical article should...
Click to read more »- No sufficient coverage, Article is only a short paragraph, Fails WP:NPEOPLE. --- PaulGamerBoy360 (talk) 22:12, 5 May 2023 (UTC) Note: This discussion...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) The article does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NPEOPLE:WP:BASIC. The subject lacks multiple independent secondary sources providing...
Click to read more »article + "Afrobeats" did not show anything that would help meet WP:GNG, WP:NPEOPLE (or combined under WP:BASIC) or WP:NARTIST. // Timothy :: talk 05:44...
Click to read more »(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:NPEOPLE minor role character. Graywalls (talk) 23:55, 30 September 2020 (UTC) Note:...
Click to read more »opinion below. SSSB (talk) 08:53, 18 June 2019 (UTC) Delete - Fails WP:N, WP:NPEOPLE and WP:JOURNALIST (his work for the official F1 website/social media channels...
Click to read more ». It voids as well. And not only BLP, but the subject satisfy GNG and NPEOPLE as well. And why? Because he has been published into multiple secondary...
Click to read more »September 2023 (UTC) Delete, not much indication that he passes WP:GNG and WP:NPEOPLE, as of the moment. Could have a future entry though. Seawolf35 (talk) 15:25...
Click to read more »meet and fails the following article policies. WP:AUTOBIO, WP:BLP and WP:NPEOPLE. Please note I often visit Recent Changes so I can monitor activity on...
Click to read more »articles that are biographies of living people must pass the strict WP:NPEOPLE guidelines. The easiest way to pass is for there to be significant coverage...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NACADEMIC, WP:NPEOPLE and WP:GNG. Is an WP:AUTOBIO. Possibly consider deleting creator's userpage...
Click to read more »fuzzy. I am also fairly certain that deletion is supported through an NPEOPLE rationale, as this is someone with very limited SIGCOV outside of some...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Does not appear meet WP:GNG or WP:NPEOPLE. ProofRobust 22:47, 1 December 2022 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...
Click to read more »(talk) 17:34, 5 December 2023 (UTC) Delete: Not much WP:SIGCOV and fails WP:NPEOPLE. Seawolf35 T--C 00:11, 6 December 2023 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »08:56, 18 August 2020 (UTC) Delete: Subject does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NPEOPLE. WP:BEFORE didn't show anything that addressed the subject directly and...
Click to read more »source. OhNoitsJamie Talk 01:26, 30 January 2014 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:NPEOPLE. ///EuroCarGT 01:37, 30 January 2014 (UTC) Delete all. Even after looking...
Click to read more »FENS · JSTOR · TWL) The article does not meet WP:GNG or WP:BASIC. From WP:NPEOPLE: "For people, the person who is the topic of a biographical article should...
Click to read more »listings like IMDB. As such, I feel that the article fails WP:GNG, WP:NPEOPLE and WP:NACTOR. I actually turn up more material about the 1984 video from...
Click to read more »Talk! 20:40, 2 February 2023 (UTC) Delete per nom. It seems to fail WP:NPEOPLE due to lack of significant coverage about the subject themselves, rather...
Click to read more »unremarkable person possibly fitting WP:CSD#A7 if not definitely failing WP:NPEOPLE. DrStrauss talk 12:59, 4 March 2017 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »playing bass in an unsigned punk band are way below the standard for WP:NPEOPLE. ~dom Kaos~ (talk) 11:40, 7 December 2017 (UTC) Delete. Looks like a hoax...
Click to read more »FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non notable individual, does not comply at all with WP:NPEOPLE. Although it contains some references from Chilean mainstream media, it...
Click to read more »cateria for any of this if not all. WP:GNG WP: BASIC WP: CREATIVE and WP:NPEOPLE [1] [2] [3] and they are good source for WP:GNG and WP: BASIC ( They satisfied...
Click to read more »suggest PsychoticIncall read our WP:NOTABILITY guidelines, especially WP:NPEOPLE and WP:NEVENT. BastunĖġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ! 10:41, 8 September 2024 (UTC) Delete lack...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Article does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NPEOPLE - For people, the person who is the topic of a biographical article should...
Click to read more »12 August 2020 (UTC) Delete Could find anything that meets WP:GNG, WP:NPEOPLE or WP:ARTIST. // Timothy :: talk 05:23, 14 August 2020 (UTC) Delete:...
Click to read more »Delete The article does not meet WP:GNG, WP:CREATIVE or WP:BASIC. From WP:NPEOPLE: "For people, the person who is the topic of a biographical article should...
Click to read more »to do more, an article can be warranted, but as of now, doesn't meet WP:NPEOPLE. ~ | twsx | talkcont | ~ 08:05, 14 July 2014 (UTC) Do Not Delete have you...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non notable person, fails WP:GNG and WP:NPEOPLE, BEFORE searches bring up one blog and a bunch of stuff about an actor...
Click to read more »exclusionary guideline, requiring a higher standard than GNG, unlike all the NPEOPLE standards, which offer a lower level of notability than GNG. This is a...
Click to read more »(talk) 13:33, 31 October 2015 (UTC) Thanks for the clarification. A/c NPEOPLE, judges who hold statewide office are generally notable. I do not think...
Click to read more »Deltaspace42 (talk • contribs) 13:00, 10 July 2026 (UTC) Delete Doesn't meet WP:NPEOPLE & WP:GNG, as others have mentioned. I also agree that AI is likely being...
Click to read more »many other people have written about him or his publications (see also WP:NPEOPLE --— Rhododendrites talk | 13:52, 14 January 2014 (UTC) Comment - An update...
Click to read more »mentions. Subject does not appear to meet the standards of WP:ACADEMIC, WP:NPEOPLE, or WP:GNG. KDS4444Talk 09:10, 12 November 2015 (UTC) Speaking as the person...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) No indication of passing WP:GNG of WP:NPEOPLE, most substantial part of article was a copyvio and I can find no indication...
Click to read more »coverage is about single kidnapping incident. Doesnt match WP:GNG and WP:NPEOPLE.~2025-40198-86 (talk) 16:32, 22 December 2025 (UTC) I feel they are only...
Click to read more »Delete In my opinion, the article's content does not correspond to WP:NPEOPLE. Neither does it refer to any reliable sources. ThegaBolt (talk) 18:46...
Click to read more »@Marianaa20624 because you have done nothing to prove how this person meets the WP:NPEOPLE criteria. Qcne (talk) 11:49, 23 September 2023 (UTC) The draft is also...
Click to read more »directors and was a C-level executive there. I'm not sure there is an NPEOPLE subheading for business executives, but I think she seems encyclopedic...
Click to read more »(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:NPEOPLE Paradoctor (talk) 07:12, 9 October 2024 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...
Click to read more »and reliable sources that gives her significant coverage per WP:GNG, WP:NPEOPLE ~2025-40198-86 (talk) 07:46, 14 December 2025 (UTC) Comment: I haven't...
Click to read more »wanting to bludgeon the point but I totally disagree with you because WP:NPEOPLE clearly states just under the WP:BASIC criteria that also says "See also:...
Click to read more »WP:NPEOPLE, and I've certainly made the mistake of forgetting to check if an academic passes that criteria even if they don't seem to pass WP:NPEOPLE. As...
Click to read more »our standards, see WP:NACADEMIC for the academic related criteria; or WP:NPEOPLE for the more generic people critiera. Every single source is WP:PRIMARY...
Click to read more »has primary sources. Google search found no reliable coverage. Fails WP:NPEOPLE and WP:GNG. Creater probaly has a COI. Xzkdeng (talk) 08:35, 25 February...
Click to read more »weak individually and it really only squeaks past GNG collectively. WP:NPEOPLE states, "For people, the person who is the topic of a biographical article...
Click to read more »I think all subjects should be scrutinized by the criterion found at NPEOPLE as the test: "..."worthy of notice" or "note" – that is, "remarkable" or...
Click to read more »per all that has been said, including failure of WP:GNG, WP:RS, and WP:NPEOPLE, which reads as follows (boldface is my doing): People are presumed notable...
Click to read more »that all women who do not meet NHOCKEY are not notable as any NSPORTS or NPEOPLE can still meet GNG. And as GNG is the nomination reason, lets keep the...
Click to read more »any awards for her illustrations/art? or exhibited them? looking at WP:NPEOPLE having created works is not enough. Coolabahapple (talk) 20:14, 27 April...
Click to read more »already used in the article I find it to be far past the threshold of GNG/NPEOPLE. --— Rhododendrites talk | 20:07, 9 April 2014 (UTC) Keep - Notorious...
Click to read more »no notability outside of her relationship with Lady Gaga and fails WP:NPEOPLE and WP:MUSICBIO. SplashScreen (talk) 14:41, 11 July 2012 (UTC) No, that...
Click to read more »article or delete it"; the age of the article precludes WP:BLPPROD. If WP:NPEOPLE is met, that is sufficent for this article, so the discussion needs to...
Click to read more »rejected your draft- there is simply no evidence this person meets our WP:NPEOPLE notability criteria, and you've already had five reviews. Your two new...
Click to read more »even as a proto-summary until September 2006, whereas this is what NORG, NPEOPLE, and NWEB looked like around that date. (There was some previous discussion...
Click to read more »2025-06-01T00:11:35Z (diff; had been pending for 61 days) Pass meets WP:NPEOPLE ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 07:57, 1 June 2025 (UTC) Accepted Angela Sara Cacciapuoti...
Click to read more »KfcClash (talk) 20:12, 20 October 2023 (UTC) Firstly, people must meet the WP:NPEOPLE criteria in order for an article to be written about them. Your draft did...
Click to read more »help it pass. Lukeno94 (talk) 09:06, 4 February 2013 (UTC) See also WP:NPEOPLE. - The Bushranger One ping only 10:46, 6 February 2013 (UTC) The author...
Click to read more »reliable archives and peer-reviewed literature, and passes WP:GNG and WP:NPEOPLE by a mile. Referenced in many books ([6],[7],[8],[9]), as well as national...
Click to read more »free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Article fails WP:GNG and WP:NPEOPLE. The single source in the article gives no assertion of notability, and...
Click to read more »declined. Did you have a specific question, perhaps about WP:GNG OR WP:NPEOPLE these both go into great detail about what we consider as a notable person...
Click to read more »out in the very first paragraph of the "Additional criteria" of the WP:NPEOPLE notability guidelines) has not been understood or resolved, but that's...
Click to read more »further edits should be made to this discussion. Ruchir Gupta fails WP:NPEOPLE so I had nominated for speedy deletion. User is repeatedly removing tag...
Click to read more »2014 (UTC) Keep - Surprised by the nomination. Easy pass for WP:GNG or WP:NPEOPLE as far as I see. A lot of the coverage about him comes from the last 18...
Click to read more »prestigious Yash Bharati for his contribution in literature, he meets WP:NPEOPLE and WP:ANYBIO.--Ajinkyasingh (talk) 16:43, 5 October 2021 (UTC) Thanks...
Click to read more »automatic notability. They still need to pass WP:GNG, WP:BLP1E, WP:SOLDIER, WP:NPEOPLE, and/or whichever other guideline is relevant. - The Bushranger One ping...
Click to read more »Notability is not the strongest but I'm confident that it's past the WP:NPEOPLE benchmark. It's not really helpful that lots of people have turned up to...
Click to read more »policies. Creating an article on victims and survivors would violate WP:NPEOPLE, an impotant guideline, and WP:BLP1E, a part of the most important policy...
Click to read more »noise for those looking for things closer to NEVENTs rather than closer to NPEOPLE. That said, some feel that the listing of births and deaths is something...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) The article does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NPEOPLE:WP:BASIC. The subject lacks multiple independent secondary sources providing...
Click to read more »determination regarding whether the significant coverage aspect of WP:NPEOPLE is fulfilled. Others put out an argument based on WP:ANYBIO#1, but I find...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NPEOPLE. — Rhododendrites talk | 02:41, 12 May 2014 (UTC) Keep: Per WP:MUSBIO...
Click to read more »listings like IMDB. As such, I feel that the article fails WP:GNG, WP:NPEOPLE and WP:NACTOR. I actually turn up more material about the 1984 video from...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NPEOPLE. Sources given either don't meet WP:SIGCOV or aren't independent. This...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) The article does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NPEOPLE - For people, the person who is the topic of a biographical article should...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) The article does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NPEOPLE:WP:BASIC. The subject lacks multiple independent secondary sources providing...
Click to read more »August 2020 (UTC) Delete. Couldn't find anything that meets WP:GNG, WP:NPEOPLE, or WP:NBOX. // Timothy :: talk 05:12, 14 August 2020 (UTC) Delete:...
Click to read more »Unremarkable businessman, only link is to company biography, fails WP:NPEOPLE and WP:GNG. Using AfD as opposed to "lower" deletion forms because I am...
Click to read more »FENS · JSTOR · TWL) The article does not meet WP:GNG or WP:BASIC. From WP:NPEOPLE: "For people, the person who is the topic of a biographical article should...
Click to read more »Shawn in Montreal (talk) 00:33, 24 June 2016 (UTC) Keep meets WP:GNG, WP:NPEOPLE and WP:ENT Daniel kenneth (talk) 14:03, 25 June 2016 (UTC) Response and...
Click to read more »exclusionary guideline, requiring a higher standard than GNG, unlike all the NPEOPLE standards, which offer a lower level of notability than GNG. This is a...
Click to read more »businessman in reliable sources, and the closest he appears to come to WP:NPEOPLE is having once been nominated for an award. Cordless Larry (talk) 08:41...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Does not appear meet WP:GNG or WP:NPEOPLE. ProofRobust 22:47, 1 December 2022 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...
Click to read more »May 2019 (UTC) It’s no wonder NMODEL is being “re-litigated” on the WP:NPEOPLE talk page. Idiocy like this comment. Absolute lack of understanding of...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This article is not notable. It fails WP:NPEOPLE. Interstellarity (talk) 15:28, 15 December 2019 (UTC) Note: This discussion...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NACADEMIC, WP:NPEOPLE and WP:GNG. Is an WP:AUTOBIO. Possibly consider deleting creator's userpage...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) The article does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NPEOPLE:WP:BASIC. The subject lacks multiple independent secondary sources providing...
Click to read more »March 2021 (UTC) There isn't a businessperson-specific subheader under WP:NPEOPLE as far as I am aware. —A little blue Bori v^_^v Takes a strong man to deny...
Click to read more »(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:NPEOPLE minor role character. Lacks significant coverage of her roles necessary...
Click to read more »any awards for her illustrations/art? or exhibited them? looking at WP:NPEOPLE having created works is not enough. Coolabahapple (talk) 20:14, 27 April...
Click to read more »article (using our special definition of notability which can be found at WP:NPEOPLE). You have three sources, but they're all the same source. It seems like...
Click to read more »discussions. NorthAmerica1000 05:01, 5 October 2014 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:NPEOPLE. --Mr. Guye (talk) 01:09, 9 October 2014 (UTC) Delete as lacking in depth...
Click to read more »interest in this article? The draft does not prove notability under WP:NPEOPLE. Let's go through your sources to understand why: The Independent: an interview...
Click to read more »(talk) 13:33, 31 October 2015 (UTC) Thanks for the clarification. A/c NPEOPLE, judges who hold statewide office are generally notable. I do not think...
Click to read more »meets WP:SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and in depth. From WP:NPEOPLE: "For people, the person who is the topic of a biographical article should...
Click to read more »per all that has been said, including failure of WP:GNG, WP:RS, and WP:NPEOPLE, which reads as follows (boldface is my doing): People are presumed notable...
Click to read more »many other people have written about him or his publications (see also WP:NPEOPLE --— Rhododendrites talk | 13:52, 14 January 2014 (UTC) Comment - An update...
Click to read more »(talk) 18:24, 18 December 2019 (UTC) Speedy keep: passes WP:GNG and WP:NPEOPLE easily. See Al Jazeera, CNN, The Guardian, Jewish Chronicle 1, Jewish Chronicle...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Article does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NPEOPLE - For people, the person who is the topic of a biographical article should...
Click to read more »FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:GNG and WP:BASIC. Also fails WP:ANYBIO and WP:NPEOPLE in general. Reference only seems to mention the subject a few times, which...
Click to read more »help it pass. Lukeno94 (talk) 09:06, 4 February 2013 (UTC) See also WP:NPEOPLE. - The Bushranger One ping only 10:46, 6 February 2013 (UTC) The author...
Click to read more »I think all subjects should be scrutinized by the criterion found at NPEOPLE as the test: "..."worthy of notice" or "note" – that is, "remarkable" or...
Click to read more »to be interviews with them, but I'm not sure that's enough to meet WP:NPEOPLE. Ravensfire (talk) 19:54, 14 June 2022 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:AUTHOR and NPEOPLE. Even on Amazon there is only an unavailable book [24]. The person is mentioned...
Click to read more »appear to have the necessary coverage in secondary sources to meet WP:NPEOPLE. Cordless Larry (talk) 07:04, 15 January 2018 (UTC) Note: This discussion...
Click to read more »2014 (UTC) Keep - Surprised by the nomination. Easy pass for WP:GNG or WP:NPEOPLE as far as I see. A lot of the coverage about him comes from the last 18...
Click to read more »that all women who do not meet NHOCKEY are not notable as any NSPORTS or NPEOPLE can still meet GNG. And as GNG is the nomination reason, lets keep the...
Click to read more »unremarkable person possibly fitting WP:CSD#A7 if not definitely failing WP:NPEOPLE. DrStrauss talk 12:59, 4 March 2017 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »LinkedIn. OhNoitsJamie Talk 01:24, 30 January 2014 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:NPEOPLE. ///EuroCarGT 01:38, 30 January 2014 (UTC) So is my page going to be deleted...
Click to read more »promote Salah Moenis and has zero sources. Please very carefully read WP:VERIFY, WP:NPOV, and WP:NPEOPLE. Qcne (talk) 20:04, 15 September 2023 (UTC)...
Click to read more »(talk) 05:02, 16 August 2016 (UTC) No assertion of notability, fails WP:NPEOPLE and WP:NOTINHERITED applies - the article claims he is a businessman, but...
Click to read more »article + "Afrobeats" did not show anything that would help meet WP:GNG, WP:NPEOPLE (or combined under WP:BASIC) or WP:NARTIST. // Timothy :: talk 05:44...
Click to read more »already used in the article I find it to be far past the threshold of GNG/NPEOPLE. --— Rhododendrites talk | 20:07, 9 April 2014 (UTC) Keep - Notorious...
Click to read more »GNG. Oaktree b (talk) 01:54, 15 December 2022 (UTC) Delete - Lacks WP:NPEOPLE and WP:SIGCOV Pranesh Ravikumar (talk) 03:30, 15 December 2022 (UTC) The...
Click to read more »wanting to bludgeon the point but I totally disagree with you because WP:NPEOPLE clearly states just under the WP:BASIC criteria that also says "See also:...
Click to read more »08:56, 18 August 2020 (UTC) Delete: Subject does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NPEOPLE. WP:BEFORE didn't show anything that addressed the subject directly and...
Click to read more »kept for who was on crews for many, many years), and the person fails WP:NPEOPLE and WP:NSPORTS. (It's also worth mentioning that the Snowball Derby is...
Click to read more »environmentalist, received notable award for his work, the subject meets WP:NPEOPLE. Rath Butcher (talk) 07:07, 24 May 2023 (UTC) Keep - He has good WP:SIGCOV...
Click to read more »sure your general assessment of the sources as a whole is correct but WP:NPEOPLE indicates that persons meeting the following criterion may be considered...
Click to read more »2020 (UTC) Keep I think these sources establish notability WP:GNG, WP:NPEOPLE: [40], [41], [42]. WP:BASIC allows for "If the depth of coverage in any...
Click to read more »FENS · JSTOR · TWL) The article does not meet WP:GNG or WP:BASIC. From WP:NPEOPLE: "For people, the person who is the topic of a biographical article should...
Click to read more »Delete The article does not meet WP:GNG, WP:CREATIVE or WP:BASIC. From WP:NPEOPLE: "For people, the person who is the topic of a biographical article should...
Click to read more »Delete In my opinion, the article's content does not correspond to WP:NPEOPLE. Neither does it refer to any reliable sources. ThegaBolt (talk) 18:46...
Click to read more »directors and was a C-level executive there. I'm not sure there is an NPEOPLE subheading for business executives, but I think she seems encyclopedic...
Click to read more ». It voids as well. And not only BLP, but the subject satisfy GNG and NPEOPLE as well. And why? Because he has been published into multiple secondary...
Click to read more »(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:NPEOPLE minor role character. Graywalls (talk) 23:55, 30 September 2020 (UTC) Note:...
Click to read more »playing bass in an unsigned punk band are way below the standard for WP:NPEOPLE. ~dom Kaos~ (talk) 11:40, 7 December 2017 (UTC) Delete. Looks like a hoax...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NPEOPLE, non-notable violinist. Created by SPA who has had many articles deleted...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NPEOPLE and WP:GNG. Most of the movies she acted in are non-notable, selected few...
Click to read more »in any sources I found. Coverage is only trivial. Fails WP:GNG, and WP:NPEOPLE - specifically WP:CREATIVE. ProofRobust 19:50, 20 November 2022 (UTC) Battle...
Click to read more »mentions. Subject does not appear to meet the standards of WP:ACADEMIC, WP:NPEOPLE, or WP:GNG. KDS4444Talk 09:10, 12 November 2015 (UTC) Speaking as the person...
Click to read more »received significant coverage in reliable sources, no other criterion of WP:NPEOPLE is met, and the article is shamelessly promotional. Salvio Let's talk about...
Click to read more »determination regarding whether the significant coverage aspect of WP:NPEOPLE is fulfilled. Others put out an argument based on WP:ANYBIO#1, but I find...
Click to read more »failing WP:GNG with zero indi third party substantial sources, let alone WP:NPEOPLE - only passing mentions or non-indi sources. A quick search finds passing...
Click to read more »no notability outside of her relationship with Lady Gaga and fails WP:NPEOPLE and WP:MUSICBIO. SplashScreen (talk) 14:41, 11 July 2012 (UTC) No, that...
Click to read more »child actor galleries. As such, I assert that the article fails WP:GNG, WP:NPEOPLE and WP:NACTOR. Scottyoak2 (talk) 02:40, 3 May 2018 (UTC) Note: This discussion...
Click to read more »FENS · JSTOR · TWL) The article does not meet WP:GNG or WP:BASIC. From WP:NPEOPLE: "For people, the person who is the topic of a biographical article should...
Click to read more »Delete The article does not meet WP:GNG, WP:CREATIVE or WP:BASIC. From WP:NPEOPLE: "For people, the person who is the topic of a biographical article should...
Click to read more »FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non notable individual, does not comply at all with WP:NPEOPLE. Although it contains some references from Chilean mainstream media, it...
Click to read more »Twitter followers, WP:PUFFERY, poor sources. Ultimately just fails WP:NPEOPLE. --— Rhododendrites talk | 19:49, 12 June 2014 (UTC) Delete – Rhododendrites...
Click to read more »article or delete it"; the age of the article precludes WP:BLPPROD. If WP:NPEOPLE is met, that is sufficent for this article, so the discussion needs to...
Click to read more »nom and does not satisfy WP:NACADEMIC. I would say doesn't satisfy WP:NPEOPLE either. – The Grid (talk) 13:36, 9 November 2021 (UTC) Delete because there...
Click to read more »reliable archives and peer-reviewed literature, and passes WP:GNG and WP:NPEOPLE by a mile. Referenced in many books ([16],[17],[18],[19]), as well as national...
Click to read more »TWL) Can't find anything suggesting the topic would meet WP:GNG or WP:NPEOPLE CharlieEchoTango (contact) 10:20, 26 February 2012 (UTC) Note: This debate...
Click to read more »decline. No in-depth coverage of the person at all. Doesn't satisfy WP:NPEOPLE, WP:GNG or WP:ANYBIO. Below is my assessment of the current sources in...
Click to read more »prestigious Yash Bharati for his contribution in literature, he meets WP:NPEOPLE and WP:ANYBIO.--Ajinkyasingh (talk) 16:43, 5 October 2021 (UTC) Thanks...
Click to read more »Notability is not the strongest but I'm confident that it's past the WP:NPEOPLE benchmark. It's not really helpful that lots of people have turned up to...
Click to read more »opinion below. SSSB (talk) 08:53, 18 June 2019 (UTC) Delete - Fails WP:N, WP:NPEOPLE and WP:JOURNALIST (his work for the official F1 website/social media channels...
Click to read more »but that would be a separate article; I don't see enough here to pass WP:NPEOPLE (and then there's WP:BLP, WP:PROMO, and WP:COI....). --— Rhododendrites...
Click to read more »to do more, an article can be warranted, but as of now, doesn't meet WP:NPEOPLE. ~ | twsx | talkcont | ~ 08:05, 14 July 2014 (UTC) Do Not Delete have you...
Click to read more »no notability outside of her relationship with Lady Gaga and fails WP:NPEOPLE and WP:MUSICBIO. SplashScreen (talk) 14:41, 11 July 2012 (UTC) No, that...
Click to read more »for speedy deletion. Unfortunately you do not meet the very strict WP:NPEOPLE or WP:NORG criteria. Further attempts to make these articles will also...
Click to read more »free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Article fails WP:GNG and WP:NPEOPLE. The single source in the article gives no assertion of notability, and...
Click to read more »other Wikipedia badge make a person automatically notable. Basically WP:NPEOPLE, section "Articles on Wikipedians" says that essentially articles about...
Click to read more »only three) best sources that demonstrate how this person meets the WP:NPEOPLE criteria. The sources must show significant coverage, be reliable, independent...
Click to read more »that Colt meets our strict notability criteria (which you can see at WP:NPEOPLE. If you further improve the draft and want me to take another look, please...
Click to read more »directly to the rejecting review and try and show this person passes the WP:NPEOPLE notability criteria. Qcne (talk) 19:12, 19 October 2023 (UTC) I have looked...
Click to read more »special notability criteria, @Mayommugezi. You can find the criteria at WP:NPEOPLE. qcne (talk) 13:59, 28 November 2024 (UTC) 102.85.58.140 (talk · contribs)...
Click to read more »is that because WP:N refers to NPEOPLE in the box of the right, NSOLDER becomes an SNG because it is referred in NPEOPLE. By this logic, every essay that...
Click to read more »November 2021 (UTC) Comment - Supermann posted this message to the WP:NPEOPLE talk page. I believe this is a violation of WP:CANVASS as it's clearly...
Click to read more »is that because WP:N refers to NPEOPLE in the box of the right, NSOLDER becomes an SNG because it is referred in NPEOPLE. By this logic, every essay that...
Click to read more »have declined as: - you did not prove this person is notable under WP:NPEOPLE - many statements are unsourced - you have very little in-line citations...
Click to read more »copyvio; I added a primary sources tag Belinda Tate – Schminnte – Meets NPEOPLE, no copyvio; I added an improve cats tag and rating Özlem Ünsal – Wikishovel...
Click to read more »Your article has been rejected as you do not meet the threshold at WP:NPEOPLE. Qcne (talk) 16:17, 28 August 2023 (UTC) Kadoon2013 (talk · contribs) Draft:Corey...
Click to read more »afraid your sources do not show you are notable under WP:NENTERTAINER or WP:NPEOPLE. Your sources are: An interview, cannot be used to establish notability...
Click to read more »source types would help, or whether this suggests he doesn't yet meet WP:NPEOPLE? Thank you. Ponrajvellai (talk) 14:58, 6 August 2026 (UTC) Given that the...
Click to read more »Podcast links. That leaves.. nothing? No evidence of notability under our WP:NPEOPLE criteria. qcne (talk) 13:02, 5 December 2024 (UTC) You also stated that...
Click to read more »automatic notability. They still need to pass WP:GNG, WP:BLP1E, WP:SOLDIER, WP:NPEOPLE, and/or whichever other guideline is relevant. - The Bushranger One ping...
Click to read more »November 2021 (UTC) Comment - Supermann posted this message to the WP:NPEOPLE talk page. I believe this is a violation of WP:CANVASS as it's clearly...
Click to read more »recognized as a major national competition in India and fails WP:ORG and WP:NPEOPLE notability standards.|discussion]] 26 Aug 2025 – Vanshika Parmar AfDed...
Click to read more »(talk - contribs) to ru:ÐобÑйÑкий ÑлÑÑ (diff). Links: www.npeople.ucoz.ru/publ/2-1-0-12. 2007-09-29 17:52:08: User ru:Ss novgorod (talk -...
Click to read more »(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:NPEOPLE Paradoctor (talk) 07:12, 9 October 2024 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...
Click to read more »however: you need to prove Vinod meets our notability criteria under WP:NPEOPLE. Qcne (talk) 13:06, 29 May 2024 (UTC) Somalipictures (talk · contribs)...
Click to read more »see how she is notable. If you think you can prove notability under WP:NPEOPLE, let me know. Qcne (talk) 15:57, 20 May 2024 (UTC) In the political landscape...
Click to read more »post discussing this person). It looks like Scott may indeed pass our WP:NPEOPLE notability threshold if you say he was covered in multiple newspapers and...
Click to read more »cateria for any of this if not all. WP:GNG WP: BASIC WP: CREATIVE and WP:NPEOPLE [7] [8] [9] and they are good source for WP:GNG and WP: BASIC ( They satisfied...
Click to read more »TWL) This has 4 citations, 2 of which are from YouTube. This fails WP:NPEOPLE as well. In solidarity Dafootballguy Want to talk? 22:32, 28 June 2026...
Click to read more »WP:RESUME.4meter4 (talk) 16:15, 9 October 2025 (UTC) Delete: Doesn't meet WP:NPEOPLE, can't find any reliable independent sources which are talking specifically...
Click to read more »will aid in NPeople. Author of a 2011 New York Times Bestseller book. Was also a reality tv show guest in 2006. If more is needed for NPeople please let...
Click to read more »TWL) This has 4 citations, 2 of which are from YouTube. This fails WP:NPEOPLE as well. In solidarity Dafootballguy Want to talk? 22:32, 28 June 2026...
Click to read more »that Janhrach brought up last time still exist, "Does not seem to pass NPEOPLE. I see only passing mentions in independent sources. [32] is an interview...
Click to read more »subject at all. The article doesn't show that it meets either WP:GNG or WP:NPEOPLE. If this is the best sourcing available we're going to have to delete the...
Click to read more »instead. Their rationale follows: Nominating for deletion per WP:GNG and WP:NPEOPLE. The subject does not demonstrate sustained, significant coverage in reliable...
Click to read more »Talk! 20:40, 2 February 2023 (UTC) Delete per nom. It seems to fail WP:NPEOPLE due to lack of significant coverage about the subject themselves, rather...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Does not seem to past WP:GNG and WP:NPEOPLE, a BEFORE search yields nothing but primary sources. Seawolf35 (talk -...
Click to read more »other Wikipedia badge make a person automatically notable. Basically WP:NPEOPLE, section "Articles on Wikipedians" says that essentially articles about...
Click to read more »the subject does meet Wikipedia’s notability guideline for people (WP:NPEOPLE) and the general notability guideline (WP:GNG): 1. Independent, non-trivial...
Click to read more »coverage is about single kidnapping incident. Doesnt match WP:GNG and WP:NPEOPLE.~2025-40198-86 (talk) 16:32, 22 December 2025 (UTC) I feel they are only...
Click to read more »it meets either WP:GNG or WP:NPEOPLE. - MrOllie (talk) 22:07, 29 July 2023 (UTC) I have reviewed WP:GNG and WP:NPEOPLE. Over the next few days, asap...
Click to read more »recognized as a major national competition in India and fails WP:ORG and WP:NPEOPLE notability standards.|discussion]] 13 Aug 2025 – Akola Education Society...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Nominating for deletion per WP:GNG and WP:NPEOPLE. The subject does not demonstrate sustained, significant coverage in reliable...
Click to read more »WP:NBEAUTY, having not won one of the Big Four beauty pageants, fails WP:NPEOPLE and WP:GNG as well. Sources found no significant coverage in multiple reliable...
Click to read more »and from my brief searching, there seems insufficient to pass GNG or WP:NPEOPLE for a standalone article so a redirect to the family's page seems an appropriate...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non notable person, fails WP:GNG and WP:NPEOPLE, BEFORE searches bring up one blog and a bunch of stuff about an actor...
Click to read more »and reliable sources that gives her significant coverage per WP:GNG, WP:NPEOPLE ~2025-40198-86 (talk) 07:46, 14 December 2025 (UTC) Comment: I haven't...
Click to read more »suggest PsychoticIncall read our WP:NOTABILITY guidelines, especially WP:NPEOPLE and WP:NEVENT. BastunĖġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ! 10:41, 8 September 2024 (UTC) Delete lack...
Click to read more »Tuesden (talk) 17:12, 17 December 2025 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:GNG and WP:NPEOPLE. And looks promotional as previously told ~2025-40198-86 (talk) 16:29,...
Click to read more »Radhaswamisatsangdinod (talk • contribs) 06:51, 12 October 2025 (UTC) You should read WP:NPEOPLE, to understand the notability guidelines for biographies. Zuck28 (talk)...
Click to read more »the subject does meet Wikipedia’s notability guideline for people (WP:NPEOPLE) and the general notability guideline (WP:GNG): 1. Independent, non-trivial...
Click to read more »- No sufficient coverage, Article is only a short paragraph, Fails WP:NPEOPLE. --- PaulGamerBoy360 (talk) 22:12, 5 May 2023 (UTC) Note: This discussion...
Click to read more »Deltaspace42 (talk • contribs) 13:00, 10 July 2026 (UTC) Delete Doesn't meet WP:NPEOPLE & WP:GNG, as others have mentioned. I also agree that AI is likely being...
Click to read more »(talk) 17:34, 5 December 2023 (UTC) Delete: Not much WP:SIGCOV and fails WP:NPEOPLE. Seawolf35 T--C 00:11, 6 December 2023 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Does not seem to pass NPEOPLE. I see only passing mentions in independent sources. [21] is an interview...
Click to read more »(UTC) Delete: No indication of notability, Does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NPEOPLE Seawolf35 T--C 18:48, 27 November 2023 (UTC) Delete. In addition to the...
Click to read more »sure your general assessment of the sources as a whole is correct but WP:NPEOPLE indicates that persons meeting the following criterion may be considered...
Click to read more »September 2023 (UTC) Delete, not much indication that he passes WP:GNG and WP:NPEOPLE, as of the moment. Could have a future entry though. Seawolf35 (talk) 15:25...
Click to read more »TWL) I'm not seeing the sort of independent coverage required to meet WP:NPEOPLE, nor does this person's jobs meet WP:ANYBIO or WP:NPOL. Of the third party...
Click to read more »has primary sources. Google search found no reliable coverage. Fails WP:NPEOPLE and WP:GNG. Creater probaly has a COI. Xzkdeng (talk) 08:35, 25 February...
Click to read more »fuzzy. I am also fairly certain that deletion is supported through an NPEOPLE rationale, as this is someone with very limited SIGCOV outside of some...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) No indication of passing WP:GNG of WP:NPEOPLE, most substantial part of article was a copyvio and I can find no indication...
Click to read more »(UTC) Hi @Sandy2205. It is not clear how Tanneeru meets the strict WP:NPEOPLE criteria. Only people who meet the criteria set out in that links can have...
Click to read more »am afraid that is not opinion, that is Wikipedia policy. Please read WP:NPEOPLE. Qcne (talk) 20:18, 22 May 2024 (UTC) Briannemartindale, you're wrong....
Click to read more »meets our special definition of a notable person, which can be found at WP:NPEOPLE. I would also recommend reading Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Amir_Tsarfati...
Click to read more »(UTC) The criteria for the notability of individuals can be found at WP:NPEOPLE. Shantavira|feed me 13:32, 22 September 2023 (UTC) Hello, LWSimpson. I...
Click to read more »threshold. Thank you! EditorUK2025 (talk) 13:57, 4 December 2025 (UTC) See WP:NPEOPLE for the guidelines on the notability of people. A 'profile interview' would...
Click to read more »If you feel that your hard copy sources do show that Richard passes WP:NPEOPLE or WP:NENTERTAINER, then I would encourage you to be bold and create the...
Click to read more »must be about topics that pass our notability policy, in this case WP:NPEOPLE. We require multiple published reliable independent sources to establish...
Click to read more »environmentalist, received notable award for his work, the subject meets WP:NPEOPLE. Rath Butcher (talk) 07:07, 24 May 2023 (UTC) Keep - He has good WP:SIGCOV...
Click to read more »you appeal problems with submissions of drafts. You should read the WP:NPEOPLE and WP:BLP carefully. Ahri Boy (talk) 00:20, 15 January 2025 (UTC) @Lanak20:...
Click to read more »Patrol and/or AfD. A request to become more familiar with WP:GNG and WP:NPEOPLE and to consider using the WP:AFC process for new articles (and to not create...
Click to read more »