Wikipedia is a free online encyclopedia. The amount of information on Wikipedia is practically unlimited, but Wikipedia does not aim to contain all knowledge...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Written like an advertisement (violation of WP:NOTSOAP), does not have a single source and does not establish the notability....
Click to read more »future totalitarian states. Delete per WP:NOTWEBHOST, WP:NOTESSAY, and WP:NOTSOAP. Cunard (talk) 01:28, 23 December 2011 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »10 December 2011 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTWEBHOST, WP:NOTESSAY, and WP:NOTSOAP. Cunard (talk) 01:30, 23 December 2011 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »call quits on pig-meat. Delete per WP:NOTWEBHOST, WP:NOTESSAY, and WP:NOTSOAP. Cunard (talk) 01:30, 23 December 2011 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »Are egos just too large? Delete per WP:NOTWEBHOST, WP:NOTESSAY, and WP:NOTSOAP. Cunard (talk) 01:36, 23 December 2011 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »10 December 2011 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTWEBHOST, WP:NOTESSAY, and WP:NOTSOAP. Cunard (talk) 01:29, 23 December 2011 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »build cities for either human beings or cars Delete per WP:NOTWEBHOST, WP:NOTSOAP, and WP:NOTESSAY. Cunard (talk) 01:35, 23 December 2011 (UTC) The above...
Click to read more »Wikipedia listing. Simple Bob (talk) 00:19, 18 June 2010 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTSOAP.--70.80.234.196 (talk) 02:17, 18 June 2010 (UTC) Delete per 70.80. RussianReversal...
Click to read more »a region. Redtigerxyz Talk 16:49, 28 January 2010 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTSOAP. This is really a coatrack and the topic is covered in an encyclopaedic...
Click to read more »(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:NOTSOAP: judging by its creator's username, the article's principal purpose appears...
Click to read more »meets our standards for a bio. (Oh except Scientology is evil - but see WP:NOTSOAP.) Scott Mac 23:13, 26 December 2010 (UTC) Scott, "apostate" is a term of...
Click to read more »Beethoven, Lady Gaga, &c. which violates WP:NOTOPINION, WP:NOTFORUM, WP:NOTSOAP, &c. Warden (talk) 12:40, 9 March 2013 (UTC) Warden (talk) 12:40, 9 March...
Click to read more »There isn't a policy that says "all essays must be nice" but there is WP:NOTSOAP - if it's not useful towards building an encyclopedia and it's just a personal...
Click to read more »--Closeapple (talk) 09:59, 19 September 2014 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTNEWS, WP:NOTSOAP, possibly WP:COATRACK for Hate crime laws in the United States, and possibly...
Click to read more »subject can not be developed while adhering to WP:V, WP:NPOV, WP:BLP, and WP:NOTSOAP. Icewhiz (talk) 09:40, 5 February 2019 (UTC) Delete I'm not seeing indications...
Click to read more »yet more undisclosed paid advocacy, should be deleted on sight per WP:NOTSOAP (speedy criterion G11). Overtly promotional tone, promotional intent –...
Click to read more »lack of independent reliable sources, which is also a WP:BLP concern. WP:NOTSOAP is policy as well - the only bio possible here (and a very brief one at...
Click to read more »policy but bad marketing. Dcoetzee 20:19, 25 April 2012 (UTC) Wikipedia:NOTSOAP#Wikipedia_is_not_a_soapbox Very clearly not allowed. -- The Red Pen of...
Click to read more »of interest. I'm dead set against criticism articles per WP:POVFORK, WP:NOTSOAP, and a couple of other policies, but frankly I haven't given much thought...
Click to read more »lack of independent reliable sources, which is also a WP:BLP concern. WP:NOTSOAP is policy as well - the only bio possible here (and a very brief one at...
Click to read more »violates WP:BLP; therefore, I do not base my MfD nomination on BLP, but on WP:NOTSOAP, WP:NOTBLOG, and WP:UP#POLEMIC. WP:UP#POLEMIC prohibits: Very divisive...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Written like an advertisement (violation of WP:NOTSOAP), does not have a single source and does not establish the notability....
Click to read more »to them quickly/succinctly. Source (if applicable) [Precedents]: EG WP:NOTSOAP, MOS:HEAD, WP:HASH 71.197.244.119 (talk) 23:50, 14 April 2012 (UTC) Redirect...
Click to read more »a region. Redtigerxyz Talk 16:49, 28 January 2010 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTSOAP. This is really a coatrack and the topic is covered in an encyclopaedic...
Click to read more »Wikipedia listing. Simple Bob (talk) 00:19, 18 June 2010 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTSOAP.--70.80.234.196 (talk) 02:17, 18 June 2010 (UTC) Delete per 70.80. RussianReversal...
Click to read more »(UTC) Fine, if you want: WP:NOTESSAY, WP:NOTBLOG, and slightly less WP:NOTSOAP, WP:CRYSTAL, and WP:NOTNEWS. Also remember that articles like 911 conspiracy...
Click to read more »subject can not be developed while adhering to WP:V, WP:NPOV, WP:BLP, and WP:NOTSOAP. Icewhiz (talk) 09:40, 5 February 2019 (UTC) Delete I'm not seeing indications...
Click to read more »meets our standards for a bio. (Oh except Scientology is evil - but see WP:NOTSOAP.) Scott Mac 23:13, 26 December 2010 (UTC) Scott, "apostate" is a term of...
Click to read more »(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:NOTSOAP: judging by its creator's username, the article's principal purpose appears...
Click to read more »yet more undisclosed paid advocacy, should be deleted on sight per WP:NOTSOAP (speedy criterion G11). Overtly promotional tone, promotional intent –...
Click to read more »--Closeapple (talk) 09:59, 19 September 2014 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTNEWS, WP:NOTSOAP, possibly WP:COATRACK for Hate crime laws in the United States, and possibly...
Click to read more »to be statements made by various groups which might be a problem per WP:NOTSOAP. I am interested in hearing the opinions of others on this. Thanks in adavnce...
Click to read more »content in line with policy or whether their purpose here contravenes WP:NOTSOAP and results in repeated violation of the content policies. It is my contention...
Click to read more »SNG allowing us to establish notability on such grounds would open the NOTSOAP gates. Finally - the BLP concern - our article on Phelps containd at least...
Click to read more »(UTC) Fine, if you want: WP:NOTESSAY, WP:NOTBLOG, and slightly less WP:NOTSOAP, WP:CRYSTAL, and WP:NOTNEWS. Also remember that articles like 911 conspiracy...
Click to read more »if they didnt say so directly. Only about two delete votes appeal to WP:notsoap and that policy seems almost entirely geared to external matters rather...
Click to read more »SNG allowing us to establish notability on such grounds would open the NOTSOAP gates. Finally - the BLP concern - our article on Phelps containd at least...
Click to read more »to appeal for redaction/deletion). Whatever the intent, it violates the NOTSOAP prong of WP:UPNOT, and is either casting aspersions on Wikipedia editors...
Click to read more »in two minds whether this is spamming in contravention of WP:COI and WP:NOTSOAP or just about acceptable - what do others think? JohnCD (talk) 15:40, 26...
Click to read more »fail the UNDUE subsection of the Neutral Point of View policy and the NOTSOAP subsection of the What Wikipedia is Not policy and should not be included...
Click to read more »