Redirect to:
This page is a redirect. The following categories are used to track and monitor this redirect:
|
be a database. Wikipedia articles should not be: Shortcut WP:NOTPLOTWP:NOTPLOT Summary-only descriptions of works. Wikipedia treats creative works (including...
Click to read more »WP:GNG is certainly relevant. The point about the article violating WP:NOTPLOT has some merit, since the plot section does dominate the article. However...
Click to read more »NOTPLOT applies only to how we describe fictional elements on Wikipedia--that is, not entirely in universe. A non-Wikipedia page can't fail NOTPLOT because...
Click to read more »fictional element. Claritas § 22:29, 12 December 2012 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTPLOT. - MrX 22:53, 12 December 2012 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails to satisfy WP:GNG and WP:NOTPLOT. Terence7 (talk) 19:13, 26 March 2012 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...
Click to read more »Krakoa; this discussion does not preclude later retargetting. Policy (WP:NOTPLOT) and practice hold that when we cannot write a reliably sourced article...
Click to read more »May 2022 (UTC) Redirect to Heroes (season 2)#ep1. Article violates WP:NOTPLOT and there is not enough coverage of the development, design, reception...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) The topic fails WP:GNG and WP:NOTPLOT. Fiction should be summarized per WP:WAF if there are no reliable sources...
Click to read more »completely in universe. Claritas § 22:26, 12 December 2012 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTPLOT. - MrX 22:52, 12 December 2012 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:GNG and WP:NOTPLOT, according to prodder Avilich (talk · contribs). Changes made by the deprodder...
Click to read more »free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Topic fails WP:GNG and WP:NOTPLOT. Rather than describe the topic summary style per WP:WAF, it was split...
Click to read more »FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Pure fiction cruft without any notability. Fails WP:NOTPLOT/WP:NOTWIKIA. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 22:18, 15 September 2017 (UTC) Note: This debate...
Click to read more »characters with no coverage outside of passing mentions. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NOTPLOT. TTN (talk) 16:25, 30 December 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:GNG and WP:NOTPLOT. Coverage is widely just passing mentions, definitely not enough to establish...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Another case of WP:NOTPLOT, the refs in the reception section are all brief mentions, when the character...
Click to read more »Gene93k (talk) 23:25, 21 December 2012 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTDIR, WP:NOTPLOT, and WP:NLIST - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 05:40, 22 December 2012 (UTC) Delete...
Click to read more »of season episodes with plot summaries. Violates WP:NOTDIRECTORY and WP:NOTPLOT. BenTels (talk) 20:05, 17 August 2012 (UTC) Note: List of My Three Sons...
Click to read more »In-universe, minimally sourced. No way to source most of this. WP:IINFO, WP:NOTPLOT. Last AFD closed in 2007 as no consensus. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters...
Click to read more »believe this article fails under WP:NOTPLOT. Rublamb (talk) 17:31, 15 August 2025 (UTC) @Rublamb it fails NOTPLOT because the article is still all plot...
Click to read more »Just a collection of plot summaries with no relevant commentary, fails WP:NOTPLOT. Avilich (talk) 22:21, 27 December 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...
Click to read more »that ever existed goes against WP:IINFO and particularly WP:NOTPLOT. Fan wikias are better suited to such a task.Folken de Fanel (talk) 03:05...
Click to read more »fantasy. Pokelego999 (talk) 19:46, 21 July 2023 (UTC) Delete - Per WP:NOTPLOT. This page is basically all plot and neither significance nor sources....
Click to read more »particular topic. postdlf (talk) 22:11, 7 November 2012 (UTC) Merge Per WP:NOTPLOT. There has been previous precedent on merging or deleting articles that...
Click to read more »AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 02:41, 20 February 2017 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTPLOT. In response to Shinnosukeandme (who is also the article creator) stating...
Click to read more »15:11, 19 August 2022 (UTC) Delete or redirect - The article fails WP:NOTPLOT and has no references to meet WP:GNG or WP:LISTN. It is not a valid WP:SPINOUT...
Click to read more »Games#Setting. Goustien (talk) 20:16, 27 January 2022 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:NOTPLOT and WP:GNG. Avilich (talk) 22:00, 27 January 2022 (UTC) Redirect And note...
Click to read more »SEED warships and spacecraft, do we really need unreferenced Fancruft WP:NOTPLOT lists here on wikipedia? Both of the ones mentioned go against policy as...
Click to read more »in-universe way only, then we can't write about it without running afoul of WP:NOTPLOT, so we should delete - is that right? Are there any policies stating that...
Click to read more »timelines. Dream Focus 16:10, 29 January 2011 (UTC) Strong delete: WP:NOTPLOT: "Plot-only description of fictional works." Pure "fictional histories"...
Click to read more »coverage from any reliable secondary sources for any of the episodes. WP:NOTPLOT also applies as there is nothing but plot summaries within the article...
Click to read more »this concept is adequately covered in the Gundam Wiki and violates WP:NOTPLOT on Wikipedia. It appears to be non-notable, and all sources are WP:PRIMARY...
Click to read more »fails WP:NLIST as no source discusses the entries as a group, and fails WP:NOTPLOT as the article consists entirely of plot trivia. Was deprodded on the promise...
Click to read more »being two pages long, seems to be a pure plot summary, and that fails WP:NOTPLOT. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 09:27, 31 December 2022...
Click to read more »place to "collect" plot for decades of story. However, there is still WP:NOTPLOT, and this is this article's current downfall. If it was accompanied by...
Click to read more »claim it back online! Cheers! SNN95 (talk) 12:04, 6 October 2013 (UTC) WP:NOTPLOT. Give me one source that gives this article notability. DragonZero (Talk ·...
Click to read more »notability, but it's still a policy that prohibits dictionary entries. WP:NOTPLOT is a policy prohibiting articles that are solely plot summaries, regardless...
Click to read more »article on a television character is written WP:INUNIVERSE and fails WP:NOTPLOT.4meter4 (talk) 04:34, 23 January 2026 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...
Click to read more »| logs) Copied from wikia. Should remain only there. Nominating as WP:NOTPLOT. Galobtter (talk) 15:17, 10 November 2017 (UTC) The above discussion is...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) No refs on the page for many years and WP:NOTPLOT. Could redirect to List of Catch-22 characters as AtD JMWt (talk) 09:34...
Click to read more »fiction-related deletion discussions. MT TrainTalk 17:48, 9 April 2018 (UTC) Delete, notplot. Szzuk (talk) 19:08, 14 April 2018 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »Wars film. WP:NOTPLOT is the closest reason I could find for deletion Skamecrazy123 (talk) 17:34, 27 April 2017 (UTC) Delete - WP:NOTPLOT is a valid reason...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) One big plot summary of the show (WP:NOTPLOT), WP:REDUNDANT to Prison Break#Series overview. – sgeureka t•c 18:23, 30...
Click to read more »you can do attach the reference to primary material, you've failed WP:NOTPLOT. The book sources mention nothing pertinent about the character, so they...
Click to read more »deletion. Jclemens (talk) 08:00, 31 December 2012 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTPLOT + fails WP:LISTN.Folken de Fanel (talk) 02:25, 6 January 2013 (UTC) "There...
Click to read more »January 2013 (UTC) Delete The article is completely unsourced, violates WP:NOTPLOT, fails our notability guideline. I don't see the point of a redirect, as...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NOTPLOT lacking any sources besides primary ones. A pure plot summary list. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ...
Click to read more »suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. This page clearly fails WP:NOTPLOT: Wikipedia treats creative works (including, for example, works of art...
Click to read more »either notable or not notable. I doubt a laundry list of WP:N, WP:WAF, WP:NOTPLOT would change anything in your eyes. If you fail to address that assertion...
Click to read more »FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Merely a plot summary of the Rithmatist series, WP:NOTPLOT sandgemADDICT yeah? 12:40, 6 February 2016 (UTC) The article creator has...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Article appears to miss the boat on both the WP:NOTPLOT and the WP:GNG dimensions. It is entirely a plot regurgitation with but...
Click to read more »Contributions • Email) 21:00, 18 April 2017 (UTC) Delete most pointedly per WP:NOTPLOT "Summary-only descriptions of works". --SmokeyJoe (talk) 03:11, 19 April...
Click to read more »18:29, 8 August 2012 (UTC) Delete Per WP:NOTPLOT JoeGazz84 ♦ 19:32, 12 August 2012 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTPLOT and ordinary community best practice, as...
Click to read more »Wikia. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:54, 1 September 2013 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTPLOT - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 18:01, 1 September 2013 (UTC) The above discussion...
Click to read more »Gene93k (talk) 19:22, 5 February 2012 (UTC) Delete per nom. and per WP:NOTPLOT. JohnCD (talk) 16:05, 13 February 2012 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »The One with the Jam, which preexisted this draft. Generally violates WP:NOTPLOT. —/Mendaliv/2¢/Δ's/ 23:39, 24 March 2016 (UTC) The above discussion is...
Click to read more »perspective on the topic, it becomes impossible to to meet either WP:WAF or WP:NOTPLOT. If the resources do not give details on the respective fictional elements...
Click to read more »search for sources did not find any sources of note, it fails WP:GNG and WP:NOTPLOT, and is written in in-universe style. An article that is more fitting for...
Click to read more »(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:NOTPLOT - article is entirely plot. No usable content to merge into Darren Shan...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Article is little more than a WP:NOTPLOT violation, consisting solely of overly-lengthy plot summaries and no encyclopaedic...
Click to read more »October 2009 (UTC) I'm looking for a little clarification here. While WP:NOTPLOT clearly is policy, nothing in that policy requires the deletion of articles...
Click to read more »makes it fundamentally useless to fulfilling NOTPLOT. TTN (talk) 01:04, 19 November 2020 (UTC) Wp:NOTPLOT is unfindable in my end. Just a heads up. Jhenderson...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) An example of pure WP:NOTPLOT and WP:OR. List is almost entirely unreferenced, one of the few references...
Click to read more »Content is essentially limited to an incompetently written plot summary (WP:NOTPLOT). Substantial coverage in third-party sources is not apparent. Two of the...
Click to read more »fictional universe. Unsourced fancruft, consisting only of plot summary (WP:NOTPLOT). Such content is unsuited to Wikipedia and belongs on fan wikis. Sandstein...
Click to read more »Excessively niche, mostly OR, does not meet notability requirements; WP:NOTPLOT. JJLiu112 (talk) 22:54, 6 November 2022 (UTC) Automated comment: This AfD...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:GNG and WP:NOTPLOT. Third party coverage is limited to trivial mentions, nothing substantial...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This article fails WP:NOTPLOT. DJ Autagirl (talk) 21:22, 7 September 2015 (UTC) Automated comment: This...
Click to read more »free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fictional prison. Fails WP:NOTPLOT, no indication of notability. The only ref doesn't support the claim it...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This article fails WP:NOTPLOT. DJ Autagirl (talk) 21:20, 7 September 2015 (UTC) Automated comment: This...
Click to read more »JSTOR · TWL) Contains only plot summary from the Discworld novels (WP:NOTPLOT). Such content belongs in fan wikis; Wikipedia treats fiction from a real-world...
Click to read more »(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:NOTPLOT. The author has a fairly sizable corpus and is notable, but an arbitrary...
Click to read more »JSTOR · TWL) Trivial character with no coverage to meet WP:GNG and WP:NOTPLOT. TTN (talk) 18:28, 7 January 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...
Click to read more »JSTOR · TWL) Same as the currently five active AfDs on the topic, fails WP:NOTPLOT. This is not justified as a spinout when summary style writing can easily...
Click to read more »(UTC) Delete - it fails WP:GNG by a wide margin, and the content fails WP:NOTPLOT too. Crossroads -talk- 19:42, 13 June 2020 (UTC) Delete a non-notable fictional...
Click to read more »(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Per WP:NOTPLOT, articles must not only consist of plot summary. This is nothing but plot...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This article fails WP:NOTPLOT. DJ Autagirl (talk) 21:21, 7 September 2015 (UTC) Automated comment: This...
Click to read more »SephyTheThird (talk) 15:33, 10 May 2015 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:N, and WP:NOTPLOT. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 14:40, 11 May 2015 (UTC) Delete per arguments...
Click to read more »(talk) 10:43, 13 March 2018 (UTC) Delete Pure fiction-cruft, fails WP:NOTPLOT.ZXCVBNM (TALK) 17:12, 13 March 2018 (UTC) Delete. Normally, I would say...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Contains only plot summary from novels (WP:NOTPLOT). Such content belongs in fan wikis; Wikipedia treats fiction from a real-world...
Click to read more »14 years, so obviously no one wants to work on it to make it not fail NOTPLOT. – sgeureka t•c 13:14, 20 February 2020 (UTC) Delete & Redirect to Wildcats...
Click to read more »world (it's not even mentioned in Chuck (TV series)), article fails WP:NOTPLOT. Its in-universe relevance (main antagonist for one season) and significant...
Click to read more »in-universe style. JTST4RS (talk) 09:54, 12 October 2013 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTPLOT but mostly because of lack of reliable sources. - Knowledgekid87 (talk)...
Click to read more »―Susmuffin Talk 13:31, 30 January 2020 (UTC) Delete - Fails WP:GNG and WP:NOTPLOT. TTN (talk) 13:59, 30 January 2020 (UTC) Delete Like our armies in Middle-earth...
Click to read more »(t) 17:16, 19 December 2012 (UTC) Delete - per Masem, this violates WP:NOTPLOT, and there are more appropriate places to discuss the artifacts. Claritas...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This article fails WP:NOTPLOT. DJ Autagirl (talk) 21:19, 7 September 2015 (UTC) Automated comment: This...
Click to read more »article, this isn't it. Rather, it's a pure plot summary that violates WP:NOTPLOT. If the book isn't notable enough for its own article, the city in the...
Click to read more »satisfy the GNG? postdlf (talk) 15:07, 8 August 2012 (UTC) WP:IINFO and WP:NOTPLOT are not just "rules of thumb to follow as long as is feasible". WP:AVOIDSPLIT...
Click to read more »―Susmuffin Talk 13:31, 30 January 2020 (UTC) Delete - Fails WP:GNG and WP:NOTPLOT. TTN (talk) 13:59, 30 January 2020 (UTC) Delete The battle is not really...
Click to read more »I'm not sure if the journal constitutes a reliable source. However! WP:NOTPLOT tells us not to have articles that are summary-only descriptions of works...
Click to read more »deletion/Quiet Council of Krakoa, does not meet WP:GNG, please see WP:NOTPLOT. Was redirected several times, which is probably the best outcome, but...
Click to read more »(UTC) Delete. Copy of content from a page redirected due to being a WP:NOTPLOT violation. Attribution could be fixed, and the userpage similarly redirected...
Click to read more »JSTOR · TWL) Article seems to be about a non-notable TV series (plus some WP:NOTPLOT as well). BenTels (talk) 21:41, 20 July 2012 (UTC) Note: This debate has...
Click to read more »05:49, 31 August 2016 (UTC) Limited merge to Elf deities, is mostly a WP:NOTPLOT problem. Sandstein 07:14, 3 September 2016 (UTC) The above discussion...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Not notable book, appears to fail WP:BOOK and WP:NOTPLOT being an unsourced, summary-only article. Could not find secondary sources...
Click to read more »years ago, but it's still one big plot summary of its parent show (WP:NOTPLOT). Its "Filming" section largely overlaps with Prison Break#Filming, and...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Overly in-depth plot information that fails WP:NOTPLOT and WP:GNG. None of the non-primary sources constitute significant coverage...
Click to read more »mentions related to a singular TV series, would fail WP:SIGCOV and WP:NOTPLOT. Jontesta (talk) 23:54, 17 October 2022 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...
Click to read more »free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fictional deities. Fails WP:NOTPLOT and of course also WP:N: only in-universe plot summary, no third-party...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This article fails WP:NOTPLOT. DJ Autagirl (talk) 21:17, 7 September 2015 (UTC) Automated comment: This...
Click to read more »merge. The bulk of the article is a repetition of in-universe events (WP:NOTPLOT). There's no actual development or reception. The references that are there...
Click to read more »so where is the secondary coverage about these terms ? What about WP:NOTPLOT ? What can't it be in a main article ?Folken de Fanel (talk) 08:09, 30...
Click to read more »WP:verify notability or provide any context or significance that is WP:NOTPLOT. Shooterwalker (talk) 17:06, 16 July 2011 (UTC) The above discussion is...
Click to read more »Demonata but merging the entire summary here would be excessive per WP:NOTPLOT. --Colapeninsula (talk) 13:55, 16 June 2014 (UTC) Note: This debate has...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NOTPLOT as just plot and cast list. Fails WP:GNG as no significant coverage. Unnecessary...
Click to read more »substantial coverage to create a notable article that would pass WP:GNG and WP:NOTPLOT. (Again, don't confuse this with six real life modern battles, also called...
Click to read more »of sources to WP:verify notability or provide any information that's WP:NOTPLOT. Shooterwalker (talk) 17:04, 16 July 2011 (UTC) The above discussion is...
Click to read more »FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Unnecessary article split that fails WP:GNG and WP:NOTPLOT. Per WP:WAF, this should have been summarized in the main article rather...
Click to read more »written in an in-universe style and Wikipedia articles are supposed to be WP:NOTPLOT. No sources can be found that fix these problems. Shooterwalker (talk)...
Click to read more »almost entirely derived from the fictional works under discussion (WP:NOTPLOT), and unsupported by third-party sources (WP:GNG). Colapeninsula (talk)...
Click to read more »JSTOR · TWL) Same as the currently five active AfDs on the topic, fails WP:NOTPLOT. This is not justified as a spinout when summary style writing can easily...
Click to read more »better. Raymond3023 (talk) 04:48, 5 January 2018 (UTC) Delete. Fails WP:NOTPLOT, content is only in-universe plot summaries, nothing about the impact of...
Click to read more »FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Unsourced in-universe fancruft; WP:V, WP:LISTN, WP:NOTPLOT. The only exception is the section about series protagonist Haruhi Suzumiya...
Click to read more »original research. Contains only detailed in-universe plot-summary (WP:NOTPLOT). Such content is better suited to the WH40K fan wikis. Sandstein 06:38...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This article fails WP:NOTPLOT. DJ Autagirl (talk) 21:08, 7 September 2015 (UTC) Automated comment: This...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This article fails WP:NOTPLOT. DJ Autagirl (talk) 21:15, 7 September 2015 (UTC) Automated comment: This...
Click to read more »that violates the WP:NOTPLOT policy.Folken de Fanel (talk) 12:26, 8 January 2013 (UTC) How does stubbing the article violate WP:NOTPLOT? Diego (talk) 12:30...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) List of fictional organizations. This fails WP:NOTPLOT and WP:GNG for lack of (cited) third-party coverage. Compare the discussion...
Click to read more »forward but I also can't see that they fail WP:RS. I disagree that WP:NOTPLOT applies to a plot element central to multiple films, video games, books...
Click to read more »2009 (UTC) Delete, per WP:NOTPLOT. -- Goodraise (talk) 21:58, 15 April 2009 (UTC) Delete: no reliable sources, WP:NOTPLOT. JamesBurns (talk) 02:32, 16...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Comics character. Fails WP:N, WP:NOTPLOT. The articles cites no in-depth third party coverage, and the article ist...
Click to read more »Delete due to insufficient reception in third party sources to pass WP:NOTPLOT or WP:GNG. Shooterwalker (talk) 02:27, 14 August 2020 (UTC) The above discussion...
Click to read more »of plot summary, in a perfect unholy union of failing WP:V, WP:N and WP:NOTPLOT. Now I follow media coverage of Game of Thrones somewhat closely, having...
Click to read more »or serious discussion to meet notability requirements for films/TV. WP:NOTPLOT would suggest that merging the plot summary might not be necessary or a...
Click to read more »FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Overly in-depth plot dump that fails WP:GNG and WP:NOTPLOT. WildStorm and List of Wildstorm titles are sufficient to handle any fictional...
Click to read more »discussions. Toughpigs (talk) 23:57, 21 January 2020 (UTC) Delete for WP:NOTPLOT and WP:NORESCUE. – sgeureka t•c 22:34, 22 January 2020 (UTC) Delete per...
Click to read more »Consists only of plot summary of a comics series, i.e., fancruft. Per WP:NOTPLOT, a policy, articles must not consist only of "summary-only descriptions...
Click to read more »WP:NOTABLE article, with insufficient material to create an article that is WP:NOTPLOT. Shooterwalker (talk) 07:25, 20 June 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...
Click to read more »info? In conjunction with the CBR source this is still failing Wikipedia:NOTPLOT since I see no analysis or developmental info beyond just mere plot summary...
Click to read more »reason to delete. AdoTang (talk) 15:47, 2 June 2021 (UTC) Delete - Fails WP:NOTPLOT and has no sources to meet WP:GNG. TTN (talk) 21:40, 3 June 2021 (UTC)...
Click to read more »unsourced content which is purely regurgitation of the books' contents (WP:NOTPLOT). Colapeninsula (talk) 11:20, 22 July 2015 (UTC) Delete There is sufficient...
Click to read more »Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 20:20, 12 August 2022 (UTC) Delete Violation of WP:NOTPLOT. None of current content is salvageable and is WP:OR, so at the very least...
Click to read more »book figure. No third-party sources cited (WP:N). Mostly plot summary (WP:NOTPLOT). Previously covered as part of an article deleted at Wikipedia:Articles...
Click to read more »(talk) 10:44, 13 March 2018 (UTC) Delete Pure fiction-cruft, fails WP:NOTPLOT.ZXCVBNM (TALK) 17:15, 13 March 2018 (UTC) Delete/Redirect to SeaChange...
Click to read more »help the article to be more than a regurgitation of plot that violates WP:NOTPLOT. Since this article also consists in a user's personal summary/interpretation...
Click to read more »this article no longer fulfils our inclusion criteria per WP:LISTN and WP:NOTPLOT. ~ mazca talk 16:57, 7 February 2020 (UTC) AfDs for this article: Articles...
Click to read more »20:14, 28 September 2020 (UTC) Delete per failing WP:FICT, WP:GNG and WP:NOTPLOT. The article, in its current form, is a largely unsourced plot summary...
Click to read more »of routine mentions in broader articles about the show. There's also WP:NOTPLOT and WP:OR concerns here as many of the details of the character seem to...
Click to read more »(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Per WP:NOTPLOT, "Wikipedia articles should not be summary-only descriptions of works."...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This article fails WP:NOTPLOT. DJ Autagirl (talk) 21:18, 7 September 2015 (UTC) Automated comment: This...
Click to read more »needed to meet WP:GNG. The current sources are all primary, so it fails WP:NOTPLOT. TTN (talk) 17:10, 18 October 2020 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »heavily plot details that fail WP:NOTPLOT. Jontesta (talk) 03:33, 22 November 2022 (UTC) Comment sourcing cannot fail WP:NOTPLOT, which reflects only on how...
Click to read more »sourcing in-universe material does not satisfy the guideline. Also see WP:NOTPLOT. TTN (talk) 02:17, 1 September 2019 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...
Click to read more »Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 01:33, 29 August 2020 (UTC) Delete - Fails WP:NOTPLOT and WP:GNG. It lacks reliable sources to establish its notability. TTN...
Click to read more »notice. Thanks, Wifione Message 19:21, 24 January 2013 (UTC) Delete Per WP:NOTPLOT. Anything relevant would be covered on the main page for the series or...
Click to read more »appropriate section. In its current state the article doesn't comply with NOTPLOT, thus failing criterion 3. Majoreditor (talk) 18:20, 22 February 2008 (UTC)...
Click to read more »series. Runch (talk) 14:23, 27 September 2012 (UTC) Delete Both - per WP:NOTPLOT. The information presented in both articles is nothing except for pure...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Trivial fictional topic that fails WP:GNG and WP:NOTPLOT. Previous AfD was 2006, so it's way outdated. TTN (talk) 14:54, 28 October...
Click to read more »FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fictional character. Fancruft, fails WP:GNG and WP:NOTPLOT. No indications of any reliable secondary sources treating this character...
Click to read more »deletion discussions. Dream Focus 02:27, 30 January 2020 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTPLOT and something has got to be wrong when almost all references are directly...
Click to read more »I'd argue that it's an unnecessary content fork, and that it fails WP:NOTPLOT. Advise me if I'm wrong on some points on this nomination, but I just feel...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This article fails WP:NOTPLOT, and may contain original research. DJ Autagirl (talk) 21:05, 7 September...
Click to read more »appearances, and any other real-world information, this article violates WP:NOTPLOT. I assume it could be saved by adding real-world information, if anyone...
Click to read more »February 2012 (UTC) Delete Pure original research and a violation of WP:NOTPLOT created after the material was cut (according to policy and consensus)...
Click to read more »with very little context, and tend to run afoul of the same issue as WP:NOTPLOT. The spirit of policy calls for deleting this material, as does previous...
Click to read more »standards also. Borock (talk) 18:47, 21 April 2015 (UTC) Delete. Per WP:NOTPLOT, articles that consist of only plot summaries don't belong on Wikipedia...
Click to read more »DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 20:35, 20 December 2012 (UTC) Delete Fails per WP:N and WP:NOTPLOT. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 20:53, 20 December 2012 (UTC) Keep Nominator was...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Pretty much entirely WP:NOTPLOT information that slipped under the radar, seems to have been the product...
Click to read more »product itself). Also conflicts with WP:PROMO and WP:INDISCRIMINATE/WP:NOTPLOT. Headphase (talk) 00:00, 23 January 2022 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...
Click to read more »Not enough sources to meet the WP:GNG or verify something that is WP:NOTPLOT. Shooterwalker (talk) 16:23, 27 July 2022 (UTC) The above discussion is...
Click to read more »2017 (UTC) Delete per my PROD: Contains only in-universe content, see WP:NOTPLOT and WP:WAF, and is unsourced, see WP:V. Sandstein 06:31, 15 February...
Click to read more »is a sock account. Much of this is WP:NOTPLOT. — Maile (talk) 18:08, 24 November 2025 (UTC) What does WP:NOTPLOT have to do with a list of companies? That...
Click to read more »20:38, 8 February 2016 (UTC) Redirect to Happy Endings (TV series). Per WP:NOTPLOT, plot-only articles don't belong here, though this could be copied to a...
Click to read more »I have merged only the referenced content as the rest is plot info (WP:NOTPLOT). The section on Variable Geo lightly touches upon the plot details that...
Click to read more »Thanks, North America1000 07:19, 25 March 2018 (UTC) Delete. Violates WP:NOTPLOT. Only in-universe plot summary, no third-party coverage. Sandstein 09:37...
Click to read more »RunningTiger123 (talk) 02:34, 29 November 2024 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:NOTPLOT. Plot summary not put in context using sources. Wikipedia is not FANDOM...
Click to read more »reply here 08:16, 13 October 2020 (UTC) Delete - Topic fails WP:GNG and WP:NOTPLOT. Without real world information from reliable sources, this does not need...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Suffers from issues related to WP:NOTPLOT; while it can source its information to some published sources, it fails...
Click to read more »inclusion criteria - not all BBC radio dramas are notable. WP:NOTEVERYTHING WP:NOTPLOT JMWt (talk) 08:29, 17 May 2024 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...
Click to read more »substantial coverage to create a notable article that would pass WP:GNG and WP:NOTPLOT. Events are already proportionately described in other articles about the...
Click to read more »rid of the sources that violate SIGCOV, we would be in violation of WP:NOTPLOT. Mikeycdiamond (talk) 22:20, 19 September 2025 (UTC) Note: This discussion...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NOTPLOT. Nothing in this article isn't already incorporated (or even can't already...
Click to read more »2022 (UTC) Delete. Consists only of plot summary and therefore fails WP:NOTPLOT, as does Uplift Universe, which I'll nominate for AfD. Sandstein 09:43...
Click to read more »substantial coverage to create a notable article that would pass WP:GNG and WP:NOTPLOT. Events are already proportionately described in the main article about...
Click to read more »kid show and likely won't have any real-world info on them (WP:LISTN, WP:NOTPLOT)? I see this going two ways: either its gets deleted, or turned into a...
Click to read more »free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Doesn't meet WP:BKCRIT or WP:NOTPLOT. Strongest argument for keep might be point 5 of WP:BKCRIT, but I don't...
Click to read more »2020 (UTC) Delete - Only primary sources are available, so it fails WP:NOTPLOT and WP:GNG. TTN (talk) 20:20, 23 September 2020 (UTC) Delete: I prodded...
Click to read more »singular piece of fiction is excessive and basically trying to avoid WP:NOTPLOT. We allow brief comments on characters in a cast list, like 2-3 lines,...
Click to read more »Thanks, North America1000 01:49, 8 October 2016 (UTC) Delete. Fails WP:NOTPLOT as a huge, plot-only article. The place for this sort of thing is Wikia...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This page should be deleted it fails WP:NOTPLOT as it consists only of summary of the plot of a movie and WP:CRYSTAL as...
Click to read more »notability of these characters in aggregate. Cannot meet the standard for WP:NOTPLOT without sufficient real-world context. Shooterwalker (talk) 04:12, 3 June...
Click to read more »with very little context, and tend to run afoul of the same issue as WP:NOTPLOT. The spirit of policy calls for deleting this material, as does previous...
Click to read more »this obscure subtopic notable, and as a whole this fails WP:WAF and WP:NOTPLOT hard. Such content is for fan wikis, not an encyclopedia. Sandstein 18:09...
Click to read more »horror film that is not of any notability. Nominating for deletion under WP:NOTPLOT Binarywraith (talk) 02:19, 2 November 2022 (UTC) Note: This discussion...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Overly in-depth plot content fork that fails WP:NOTPLOT and fails to establish its own notability independent of the main article...
Click to read more »series' main article. This band article is a glorified plot summary (WP:NOTPLOT), with some trivial non-independent commentaries by the producers. Note...
Click to read more »be used to verify any real world analysis or critical thought. Per WP:NOTPLOT and WP:FICT, articles on fictional elements need to contain more than just...
Click to read more »outside of the in universe series. I will also add that this goes against WP:NOTPLOT as nothing has been found reception-wise. I would have no problem if someone...
Click to read more »according to WP:GNG. Jontesta (talk) 20:42, 16 November 2020 (UTC) Delete: WP:NOTPLOT, WP:CONTENTFORK that doesn't meet the WP:GNG. // Timothy :: talk 13:59...
Click to read more »00:07, 26 January 2013 (UTC) Redirect to Star Wars: Battlefront II per WP:NOTPLOT. Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 23:33, 26 January 2013 (UTC) Merge...
Click to read more »contribs) 22:47, 4 January 2016 (UTC) Delete. This belongs on Wikia. Per WP:NOTPLOT, plot-only summaries of works do not belong on Wikipedia. This is also...
Click to read more »discussions. --Calathan (talk) 22:10, 3 December 2012 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTPLOT and WP:N issues. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 22:14, 4 December 2012 (UTC) I...
Click to read more »needs real world, third party coverage in order to meet the WP:GNG and WP:NOTPLOT. No, it doesn't stop being a plot summary when some details are repeated...
Click to read more »third party sources to meet the requirements for an article. See also WP:NOTPLOT. While normally I would suggest a merge into either a characters list or...
Click to read more »fancruft filled list: List of Mobile Suit Zeta Gundam mobile weapons (WP:NOTPLOT) - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 21:23, 18 February 2013 (UTC) The above discussion...
Click to read more »03:22, 22 October 2009 (UTC) Delete. Fails WP:ENT, and the article has WP:NOTPLOT problems. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 03:54, 22 October 2009 (UTC) Keep...
Click to read more »even work as a redirect. The article is pure plot summary that fails WP:NOTPLOT. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 20:36, 12 March 2018 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Plot-only article, which violates the WP:NOTPLOT policy. BlackShadowG (talk) 04:22, 27 March 2022 (UTC) Note: This discussion...
Click to read more »September 2009 (UTC) Actually it does require one of those, as stated by WP:NOTPLOT, which is part of the WP:NOT policy. —Farix (t | c) 21:53, 14 September...
Click to read more »notable. The sources are all either primary or unreliable. Article is a NOTPLOT violation. Taylor Trescott - my talk + my edits 19:03, 4 October 2013 (UTC)...
Click to read more »any real-world notability. Everything is in-universe. Fails as per WP:NOTPLOT and WP:GNG. Contested draft. Onel5969 TT me 12:58, 1 April 2023 (UTC) Note:...
Click to read more »part of the article is dedicated to plot summarization which violates WP:NOTPLOT, what little non-plot commentary there is, is either non-sourced, sourced...
Click to read more »with very little context, and tend to run afoul of the same issue as WP:NOTPLOT. The spirit of policy calls for deleting this material, as does previous...
Click to read more »January 2026 (UTC) Redirect to Invasion! (2000 AD)#Soviets / Volgans per WP:NOTPLOT. Kelob2678 (talk) 10:28, 5 January 2026 (UTC) Redirect to Invasion! (2000...
Click to read more »third-party coverage. Even if such coverage could be found, the article fails WP:NOTPLOT and would need a dose of WP:TNT even if the topic were to be deemed notable...
Click to read more »TWL) Contested redirect. Zero real-world notability, delete as per WP:NOTPLOT. Onel5969 TT me 11:57, 27 March 2023 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...
Click to read more »is an overly expansive deep dive into the plot of Eberron that fails WP:NOTPLOT. Eberron#World seems entirely sufficient for the context required for a...
Click to read more »(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:NOTPLOT and WP:NOTGAMEGUIDE 70.29.211.138 (talk) 06:23, 21 January 2010 (UTC) speedy...
Click to read more »discuss Dreyfus as an interesting character. But right now it fails WP:NOTPLOT. --Colapeninsula (talk) 10:25, 21 February 2014 (UTC) Redirect to...
Click to read more »Skynxnex (talk) 16:40, 31 October 2022 (UTC) Merge to list. Fails WP:NOTPLOT and probably can't be improved without third-party sources, which cannot...
Click to read more »Villains" is going to be able to establish anything. As usual, you just ignore NOTPLOT, WAF, and N without even addressing them, so there is no point in arguing...
Click to read more »As it stands, this article is a gross breach of WP:IN-UNIVERSE and WP:NOTPLOT. However, I did find A Breath of Fresh Eyre: Intertextual and Intermedial...
Click to read more »associated fiction. Article consists only of in-universe plot summary (WP:NOTPLOT), and is sourced only to non-independent primary sources (gamebooks, video...
Click to read more »FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Contains only plot summary from fictional works (WP:NOTPLOT). No third-party coverage, no apparent notability of this (sub-)topic (WP:LISTN)...
Click to read more »recounting plot/backstory of the novels in contravention of Wikipedia:NOTPLOT. --Colapeninsula (talk) 14:48, 11 September 2012 (UTC) Merge an abridged...
Click to read more »the article is written in a non-encyclopedic style (WP:GAMEGUIDE and WP:NOTPLOT). User:FlynnR13 brings up a good point - a short character list, focusing...
Click to read more »any verifiable reception, meaning this ends up almost entirely under WP:NOTPLOT. lp0 on fire () 14:31, 7 December 2025 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...
Click to read more »character doesn't have any non-plot information to meet the WP:GNG and WP:NOTPLOT. Redirect is reasonable as a compromise. Shooterwalker (talk) 23:02, 28...
Click to read more »stand on its own apart from the show article, which is both WP:N and WP:NOTPLOT per WP:BEFORE. Most shows do not warrant an article for each individual...
Click to read more »consists of nothing other than plot summary. Wholly unnecessary and fails WP:NOTPLOT. PC78 (talk) 14:44, 15 November 2009 (UTC) Redirect To the Hoodwinked article...
Click to read more »moved to the main article, the vast majority of it fails WP:INDISCRIMINATE/NOTPLOT. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 21:16, 10 August 2020 (UTC) Note: This...
Click to read more »Redirect to Hulk#Alternative versions of Hulk. It currently falls short of NOTPLOT, and is not shown to meet LISTN. QuicoleJR (talk) 13:29, 31 July 2023 (UTC)...
Click to read more »mentions, but no out-of-universe context to create something that is WP:NOTPLOT. And those passing mentions in the plot already occur in other articles...
Click to read more »FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Unnecessary plot dump article split that fails WP:NOTPLOT. The general topic does not establish notability per WP:GNG. Plot info...
Click to read more »and rewritten to focus on coverage in reliable sources and move past WP:NOTPLOT, that would be a good thing, but given its current state I believe WP:TNT...
Click to read more »19:37, 6 December 2009 (UTC) Delete the scope of the article violates WP:NOTPLOT and WP:WAF as it is essentially a plot summary of all the episodes without...
Click to read more »fiction from an out-of-universe perspective (see WP:WAF). Our policy WP:NOTPLOT directs that articles must not only consist of a summary of works of fiction...
Click to read more »FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Unnecessary article split that fails WP:GNG and WP:NOTPLOT. Per WP:WAF, this should have been summarized in the main article rather...
Click to read more »Delete all. Only plot summary sourced to the fiction itself, fails WP:NOTPLOT, WP:N. Sandstein 09:22, 28 July 2018 (UTC) Delete all. I agree with Sandstein's...
Click to read more »this level of detail isn't supported by the sources, and breaks into WP:NOTPLOT territory with the lack of out-of-universe context. Shooterwalker (talk)...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:SIGCOV at all, and even then it wouldn't help with Wikipedia:NOTPLOT, as it's mostly plot details and nothing more. Has one ever considered...
Click to read more »summary at a glance, which doesn't satisfy Wikipedia:ALLPLOT and Wikipedia:NOTPLOT issues. Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 13:05, 20...
Click to read more »to a parent article on the ground that this article has been failing WP:NOTPLOT for 13(!) years now. Any real-world material on this couple can be added...
Click to read more »February 2026 (UTC) Merge to List of Marvel Comics characters: B per WP:NOTPLOT. Kelob2678 (talk) 10:47, 17 February 2026 (UTC) The above discussion is...
Click to read more »Robots in Pop Culture source. Your sources are clearly failing Wikipedia:NOTPLOT and Wikipedia:SIGCOV's definition of trivial sources, with not a single...
Click to read more »would violate WP:ASTONISH. Most of that section should be removed per WP:NOTPLOT besides, and certainly on neutrality grounds - "the courageous Concepcion"...
Click to read more »coverage related to this specific episode. As written, this article fails WP:NOTPLOT and should be deleted unless non-trivial coverage describing/analyzing...
Click to read more »such an article and entirely lacks independent perspective, failing WP:NOTPLOT. (t · c) buidhe 01:48, 28 June 2022 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...
Click to read more »AfDs on these topics, this is an unnecessary plot split that fails WP:NOTPLOT. It does not possess non-trivial coverage needed to establish notability...
Click to read more »information on their creation and reception, not just recount their plots (WP:NOTPLOT). Therefore treating his whole universe in a single article is probably...
Click to read more »the problem, this article doesn't follow Wikipedia's policies such as WP:NOTPLOT and general notability guideline. Articles don't just have to be verifiable...
Click to read more »due to lack of sources with real-world context to pass the WP:GNG and WP:NOTPLOT requirements. There is a list of wonder woman enemies and that would be...
Click to read more »Popular does not equal notable. Not enough in-depth coverage to overcome WP:NOTPLOT and to meet WP:GNG. Onel5969 TT me 13:58, 27 May 2023 (UTC) Note: This...
Click to read more »fiction from an out-of-universe perspective (see WP:WAF). Our policy WP:NOTPLOT directs that articles must not only consist of a summary of works of fiction...
Click to read more »anything to do on Wikipedia. The "article" in itself already violates WP:NOTPLOT as it is only a big plot summary devoid of any secondary information and...
Click to read more »could provide an out of universe context, to meet the standards of WP:NOTPLOT and WP:WAF. Shooterwalker (talk) 00:53, 23 May 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion...
Click to read more »20:52, 6 February 2008 (UTC) Delist due to paucity of real-world context. NOTPLOT asserts that "Wikipedia articles on published works (such as fictional...
Click to read more »ミラP 03:16, 11 January 2020 (UTC) This is a pile of cruft. Delete per WP:NOTPLOT. --Izno (talk) 19:36, 14 January 2020 (UTC) Delete. Some of my earliest...
Click to read more »McQueen, Craig Dean). The article appears to be excessive plot summary (WP:NOTPLOT) and, due to the unsourced mention of internet forums in the lead, I smell...
Click to read more »unaffiliated, real-world context. Cannot be re-written to comply with WP:NOTPLOT or WP:NOTABILITY. Shooterwalker (talk) 00:29, 23 May 2020 (UTC) Note: This...
Click to read more »rationale is spot-on. The article is completely unsourced, violates WP:NOTPLOT, fails our notability guideline for lists. The previous AfD discussions...
Click to read more »can be trimmed without losing anything important." To avoid violating WP:NOTPLOT, the series article could not adequately do justice to the plot summaries...
Click to read more »contribs) 07:44, 23 December 2025 (UTC) Redirect to 28 Days Later per WP:NOTPLOT. Among the three links in the reception section, two are from Variety that...
Click to read more »publications which refer to those terms". I don't see them. What about WP:NOTPLOT ? Folken de Fanel (talk) 08:16, 30 August 2013 (UTC) Delete Exclusively...
Click to read more »basically nothing more than extended plot summaries, running afoul of WP:NOTPLOT. I agree with the nominator that the articles' titles are implausible as...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Overly in-depth plot information that fails WP:NOTPLOT and WP:GNG. This information belongs on Fandom. Dragonlance#Setting at...
Click to read more »coverage in independent reliable sources. The article also probably fails WP:NOTPLOT because there's little analysis, and none of it referenced, while most...
Click to read more »do not merge. Only in-universe, primary-sourced fancruft, violates WP:NOTPLOT, fails WP:GNG for lack of third-party coverage. Merging crap together does...
Click to read more »cruft and doesn't seem to merit its own article. Fails WP:NOTWIKIA / WP:NOTPLOT and WP:GNG. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 19:58, 19 September 2017 (UTC) Note: This debate...
Click to read more »article that covers the same subject matter, while failing the WP:GNG and WP:NOTPLOT standard for having its own separate reception and real-world context....
Click to read more »Bakuryū Sentai Abaranger characters. I consider one such list fine, despite NOTPLOT issues. – sgeureka t•c 12:30, 29 January 2020 (UTC) Delete, or Merge with...
Click to read more »all meet the standards of WP:WAF, which is the only way not to fail WP:NOTPLOT. All the characters currently have their own articles, so this should at...
Click to read more »2601:241:300:C930:ECAC:B47B:CA09:5F0F (talk) 21:33, 16 December 2018 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTPLOT and there's nothing of value that isn't already included on Dumbledore's...
Click to read more »inconsequential fictional character with no coverage to pass WP:GNG, and fails WP:NOTPLOT. TTN (talk) 14:04, 3 November 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...
Click to read more »October 2020 (UTC) Delete - The article fails to satisfy WP:GNG and WP:NOTPLOT. TTN (talk) 18:26, 9 October 2020 (UTC) Delete as per nom. William Harris...
Click to read more »book. But an article isn’t supposed to be purely plot summary (see WP:NOTPLOT). ~ le 🌸 valyn (talk) 05:44, 18 April 2026 (UTC) Redirect as an alternative...
Click to read more »in a movie, song, television show, or other cultural item." See also WP:NOTPLOT, WP:IPCV and this 2015 RFC on the topic. I find it very unlikely that most...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Delete as per WP:NOTPLOT. Zero in-depth coverage of the character. Would have restored the redirect...
Click to read more »nothing to create enough out-of-universe context to meet the standards of WP:NOTPLOT and WP:WAF. This kind of passing mention is already described in each book's...
Click to read more »article is all plot, with no real world commentary, which is against WP:NOTPLOT. There are no reliable sources, and an internet search (which is difficult...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:SIGCOV, as they're basically wholly plot summary, failing Wikipedia:NOTPLOT, as there's no content in there that shows how the subject has had a real-world...
Click to read more »Toughpigs. — Hunter Kahn 13:07, 2 February 2020 (UTC) Delete. While WP:NOTPLOT is different than WP:GNG, and does not form part of it, being more about...
Click to read more »should be more than just an announced list of cast and crew. Policy WP:NOTPLOT tells us that the encyclopedia should treat creative works in an encyclopedic...
Click to read more »must abide by WP:N. Fictional articles also must abide by WP:WAF and WP:NOTPLOT. This article fails all three. TTN (talk) 17:36, 26 November 2019 (UTC)...
Click to read more »List of Super Friends members#Wendy and Marvin. It's almost all plot (WP:NOTPLOT) and trivial appearance info, not a good basis for a stand-alone article...
Click to read more »information from multiple reliable sources to match the standards of WP:WAF/WP:NOTPLOT and fulfill WP:GNG. TTN (talk) 03:53, 18 November 2020 (UTC) Delete Per...
Click to read more »FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fictional characters. Fancruft, fails WP:GNG and WP:NOTPLOT. No indications of any reliable secondary sources treating these characters...
Click to read more »content split that fails to properly summarize content per WP:WAF and WP:NOTPLOT. The main article can handle whatever little context these characters need...
Click to read more »series), and it appears to be a strange mix of WP:NOTDIRECTORY and WP:NOTPLOT. We don't keep lists for CSI-like resolutions (Who was the murderer?),...
Click to read more »TWL) Zero real-world notability has been established. Delete as per WP:NOTPLOT. Was a redirect to List of supporting Harry Potter characters#Gellert Grindelwald...
Click to read more »in depth sources we would need in order to create an article that is WP:NOTPLOT. Rorshacma (talk) 17:22, 11 October 2012 (UTC) Relisted to generate a more...
Click to read more »Delete because the information presented in this article contradicts WP:NOTPLOT. A simple mention in the Sesame Street is warranted, BUT a full merge is...
Click to read more »this, with no real-world context to have this meet the standard of WP:NOTPLOT. No need to rehash the plot with this level of detail, since that is WP:NOT...
Click to read more »summary with no sources at all is enough to bring it up for discussion WP:NOTPLOT. You went the extra mile, grats. Don't assume a lack of GF on my part or...
Click to read more »28 December 2025 (UTC) Redirect to The Meteor Man (film)#Comic per WP:NOTPLOT. Kelob2678 (talk) 11:37, 28 December 2025 (UTC) Redirect to The Meteor...
Click to read more »JSTOR · TWL) Article is WP:SYNTH of primary sources and does not pass WP:NOTPLOT. If you were to remove the WP:OR comparing the different storylines in...
Click to read more »article violates inclusion policies or guidelines, as here: It fails WP:NOTPLOT (is only plot summary) and WP:LISTN (no indication of coverage of the topic...
Click to read more »editor hat in a hope to help establish consensus: Delete per the policy WP:NOTPLOT. "Wikipedia articles should not be summary-only descriptions of works"...
Click to read more »can be found beyond simply that WP:ITEXISTS and a plot summary, per WP:NOTPLOT. HrafnTalkStalk(P) 14:36, 11 July 2011 (UTC) Delete: unless information...
Click to read more »is not a single sentence in this article that does not run afoul of WP:NOTPLOT, so it violates WP:What Wikipedia is not, and it is sourced entirely to...
Click to read more »[[WP:WHYN|enough to write a full article which also fullfills the requirements of WP:NOTPLOT. Failing that, a merge to List of Marvel Comics characters: M (or B? or...
Click to read more »discussed as a group by independent sources. Only plot summary, fails WP:NOTPLOT.Folken de Fanel (talk) 12:02, 12 October 2013 (UTC) Merge to main world...
Click to read more »(UTC) Delete. Fancruft, describes fictional concept only in-universe (WP:NOTPLOT). Sandstein 09:07, 24 March 2018 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »enough material to support a non-stubby article which also fullfills WP:NOTPLOT (some trimming may be in order on the way there). Therefore I see notability...
Click to read more »enough (name, date of birth, spell, voice acting), without incurring in WP:NOTPLOT when translated into here. All the more-than-relevant information is already...
Click to read more »June 2020 (UTC) Redirect as suggested by the nominator. This violates WP:NOTPLOT because it is an entirely in-universe description of a fictional work....
Click to read more »very specifically meets various deletion policy guidelines. As per WP:NOTPLOT, it should be deleted as a mere plot summary. It does not meet WP:GNG,...
Click to read more »to Hulk. This article is nowhere near meeting GNG, and falls short of NOTPLOT as well. QuicoleJR (talk) 13:25, 31 July 2023 (UTC) Keep or merge with...
Click to read more »the villain of the books) or in a pure plot summary manner. Per both WP:NOTPLOT and WP:NFICT, articles on fictional elements and characters need to have...
Click to read more »summary are enough to write an article which both fullfils WP:WHYN and WP:NOTPLOT. Reception still would not be very long, though, so it may also fit into...
Click to read more »Edison (talk) 21:35, 28 July 2009 (UTC) Delete, per nom, not notable, NOTPLOT. Axem Titanium (talk) 15:39, 30 July 2009 (UTC) Delete for preference or...
Click to read more »William Haggard#Colonel Charles Russell series. Most content is worthless WP:NOTPLOT material; what little real-world content there is can be merged from the...
Click to read more »see little need to retain anything currently due to failing WP:N and WP:NOTPLOT. TTN (talk) 22:51, 25 January 2020 (UTC) Delete looking through the sourcing...
Click to read more »substantial coverage to create a notable article that would pass WP:GNG and WP:NOTPLOT. Granted, this is one of the bigger battles in the novels and frequently...
Click to read more »notability?--Sandor Clegane (talk) 23:34, 26 May 2009 (UTC) Delete per NOTPLOT. Redirect per Boz if this is a conceivable search term. Eusebeus (talk)...
Click to read more »passing mentions that do not meet WP:SIGCOV, or plot summaries that fail WP:NOTPLOT. Jontesta (talk) 03:30, 22 November 2022 (UTC) Redirect to List of The...
Click to read more »FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Made up of entirely unsourced plot summary, fails WP:NOTPLOT. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 20:41, 12 March 2018 (UTC) Delete, the Keep arguments in...
Click to read more »Andrew🐉(talk) 09:08, 6 October 2020 (UTC) Delete - Fails WP:GNG and WP:NOTPLOT. Not sure on the reliability of opinion pieces, but the above article hardly...
Click to read more »numerically as well as in terms of strength of argument, that this is a clear WP:NOTPLOT case and that the fictional organization is not notable independent of...
Click to read more »fictional entities. Almost always, lists of fictional entities devolve into WP:NOTPLOT violations. Here's my favorite example (which was actually worse even before...
Click to read more »real-world notability or importance beyond the works this appears in (WP:NOTPLOT, WP:GNG). It would need quite a few non-trivial sources to convince me...
Click to read more »content split that fails to properly summarize content per WP:WAF and WP:NOTPLOT. The main article can handle whatever little context these characters need...
Click to read more »pass GNG, and the article is nothing but a plot description, so it fails NOTPLOT. As a result, it contains nothing that should be merged. Devonian Wombat...
Click to read more »Invalid recommendation. WP:OTHERSTUFFEXIST is not a valid argument and WP:NOTPLOT does actually require "discussing the reception and significance of notable...
Click to read more »the page stay" while latching onto someone else's comment. See WP:N, WP:NOTPLOT, and WP:WAF. This isn't meant to be an insult at all, but I really think...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Virtually the entire article is plot, so WP:NOTPLOT would apply. There are a couple of short articles in the development section...
Click to read more »Relies heavily on primary sources and is almost entirely a plot summary, WP:NOTPLOT. The remaining sources do not establish notability. Also, does not seem...
Click to read more »summary/mentions of the fact that this entity appeared in media x (WP:NOTPLOT), and their treatment of this location meets WP:SIGCOV? Piotr Konieczny...
Click to read more »--Rtkat3 (talk) 00:32, 7 November 2024 (UTC) Delete WP:INDISCRIMINATE and WP:NOTPLOT are failed by this list, since it is totally unreferenced. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ)...
Click to read more »descriptions, that does not solve the issue of the subject being able to pass WP:NOTPLOT. Rorshacma (talk) 17:00, 1 January 2024 (UTC) That's an essay, not a policy—in...
Click to read more »(talk) 05:17, 8 June 2016 (UTC) Delete. Per my previous nomination: Per WP:NOTPLOT, a policy, articles must not contain only plot summary. This cruft here...
Click to read more »I could only really find fandom coverage. The article also violates WP:NOTPLOT, as only his role in the films is written about. I don't think this article...
Click to read more »definitely do, if they pass WP:LISTN. However, this doesn't, as it fails WP:NOTPLOT.ZXCVBNM (TALK) 22:04, 24 October 2019 (UTC) I can and have voted keep on...
Click to read more »related articles need sources with significant real world details to meet WP:NOTPLOT and WP:WAF, so it is not like there is nothing more than my opinion behind...
Click to read more »such lists, but hundreds have also been deleted over time as well. WP:NOTPLOT should be followed in that the lists needs to correspond to the proper...
Click to read more »of trivia which could also be added to the main article. Fails WP:N, WP:NOTPLOT, MOS:PLOT. No indication that these characters as a group, or any of them...
Click to read more »August 2024 (UTC) Redirect to Time Lords, maybe merge. Currently failing WP:NOTPLOT and probably WP:GNG, but has a lot of referenced content, albeit overwhelmingly...
Click to read more »of notability (WP:GNG) otherwise. The many sources just repeat plot (WP:NOTPLOT) plus give some trivial casting info, but nothing that would justify a...
Click to read more »not the topic here. ЭLСОВВОLД talk 15:08, 7 February 2008 (UTC) Comment. NOTPLOT asserts that "Wikipedia articles on published works (such as fictional...
Click to read more »Redirect to Features of the Marvel Universe#Mystical artifacts, per WP:NOTPLOT and WP:GNG, current sources are a mix of primary sources and passing mentions...
Click to read more »points. Dunarc (talk) 22:52, 26 March 2018 (UTC) Delete. Plotcruft, see WP:NOTPLOT. No apparent notability because of no sources. Do not merge unsourced content...
Click to read more »and "in-universe". -- Toughpigs (talk) 00:29, 15 January 2020 (UTC) WP:NOTPLOT and WP:WAF. These dictate how we treat fiction. If the source cannot do...
Click to read more »with all these articles and is the same FANCRUFT/unsourced/INDISCRIMINATE/NOTPLOT/etc. every single time the redirect(s) are removed. Magitroopa (talk) 04:21...
Click to read more »guideline that apples to fiction, but will be instructive by analogy is WP:NOTPLOT. When we talk about a book, we do not have an entire article with the soul...
Click to read more »source from Spain merely names the film in a photo caption. Policy WP:NOTPLOT tells us that the encyclopedia should treat creative works in an encyclopedic...
Click to read more »just a list of plots that have mentioned it. Wikpiedia articles are WP:NOTPLOT details, and there's no third party coverage that will allow us to give...
Click to read more »could stay if intended to be developed into a proper article, but see WP:NOTPLOT, WP:WAF, and note that promotional external links are very unlikely to...
Click to read more »works should never be spun out into subarticles. Massive violation of NOTPLOT. Axem Titanium (talk) 14:55, 31 July 2009 (UTC) Keep (merge) and fix. The...
Click to read more »2020 (UTC) Merge to List of Days of Our Lives characters (1990s), no WP:NOTPLOT-failing stand-alone article necessary per WP:NOPAGE. No prejudice against...
Click to read more »but it's mostly just describing the game plot and play experience, so WP:NOTPLOT, and WP:INDISCRIMINATE apply. --Colapeninsula (talk) 13:32, 6 July 2023...
Click to read more »misunderstood our notability guidelines? Anyhow, I'm going to !vote delete per WP:NOTPLOT here. Like I have said several times before on other AFD's, reception is...
Click to read more »real-world perspective (WP:FICT). It should not only be plot summaries (WP:NOTPLOT). Spinixster (chat!) 01:39, 3 October 2023 (UTC) I'm not allowed to discuss...
Click to read more »deletion-related claim made above (the nominator certainly didn't make one) is WP:NOTPLOT, which is ridiculous to read as forbidding articles just because they contain...
Click to read more »of the plot, which is what NOTPLOT discourages. RunningTiger123 (talk) 12:33, 5 May 2022 (UTC) Redirect Due to WP:NOTPLOT. MrsSnoozyTurtle 08:25, 5 May...
Click to read more »it's that this article is 95% plot summary and thus has been failing WP:NOTPLOT and WP:WAF#Summary style approach for over 14(!) years. It's obvious that...
Click to read more »thrown in. Wikipedia doesn't exist to catalog the plots of things (WP:NOTPLOT), and there's no other reason for this article. Nobody has argued keep...
Click to read more »to pass WP:GNG. It should be summarized in the main per WP:WAF and WP:NOTPLOT. The retention of content is unnecessary due to it being 100% plot information...
Click to read more »about the cultural item which merely mentions the subject." See also WP:NOTPLOT, WP:IPCV and this 2015 RFC on the topic Cakelot1 (talk) 12:54, 18 April...
Click to read more »(WP:CANTFIX, the section just after WP:PRESERVE, makes that point). (See also WP:NOTPLOT, WP:WAF.) An editor interested in the subject; knowledgeable in our guidelines...
Click to read more »no commentary. GNG does not mention, let alone require, commentary. WP:NOTPLOT states we should cover "development, design, reception, significance, and...
Click to read more »nowhere near enough to convince me this needs a stand-alone article (WP:NOTPLOT, WP:GNG, WP:SPINOUT). – sgeureka t•c 08:39, 31 January 2020 (UTC) Keep:...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) The fictional world of a book series. Per WP:NOTPLOT, part of the policy WP:NOT, articles must not be "summary-only descriptions...
Click to read more »appearances in other works are trivia. Despite third-party coverage, fails WP:NOTPLOT as a whole. Sandstein 19:14, 11 August 2022 (UTC) The above discussion...
Click to read more »needs a whole new separate wikiproject. Further, this project verges on WP:NOTPLOT, WP:INUNIVERSE problems. -- 65.92.181.190 (talk) 06:57, 4 November 2012...
Click to read more »to allow for a full article which fullfills the requirements of both WP:NOTPLOT and WP:WHYN. Therefore notability is established and there is no reason...
Click to read more »search) together can provide enough commentary to fullfill WP:WHYN and WP:NOTPLOT. Much of the commentary is related to the relationship with Lex Luthor...
Click to read more »Appears to be pretty much entirely in-universe content that violates WP:NOTPLOT with no indication of wider cultural significance. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 13:30...
Click to read more »WP:NOT, specifically the sections that Wikipedia is not a dictionary and WP:NOTPLOT. —Farix (t | c) 11:57, 17 February 2010 (UTC) Merge or Delete Merge it...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Zero real-world notability. Delete as per WP:NOTPLOT. Would have redirected, but that is no longer an option since the redirect...
Click to read more »reverted so I am putting this up for AfD. The article appears to be WP:NOTPLOT of the type that is fitting for Wikia but not Wikipedia. The section on...
Click to read more »be covered here is simply plot elements, with nothing deeper, violating NOTPLOT as discussed above.--Yaksar (let's chat) 04:34, 4 June 2013 (UTC) Relisted...
Click to read more »balance of plot summary, appearance history and commentary fullfilling WP:NOTPLOT which will be long enough to fullfil WP:WHYN and therefore WP:GNG. Daranios...
Click to read more »no rationale. Article is entirely non-notable WP:FANCRUFT that fails WP:NOTPLOT. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 17:46, 17 September 2017 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...
Click to read more »independent from the toys (WP:N). Content is all in-universe plot summary (WP:NOTPLOT). Sandstein 19:25, 9 June 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...
Click to read more »significantly trimmed, would still be a non-stubby article which also fullfills WP:NOTPLOT. Therefore, WP:WHYN and thus WP:N is fullfilled. It is not relevant with...
Click to read more »WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 22:03, 2 January 2026 (UTC) Redirect to Perdita Durango per WP:NOTPLOT. The two reviews in the article are about the film, the book is the primary...
Click to read more »deletion required. Jclemens (talk) 02:42, 12 February 2013 (UTC) Delete WP:NOTPLOT and WP:OR. The article focuses entirely on in-universe aspects of the topic...
Click to read more »October 2013 (UTC) WP:BURO even if your assertion was true, but ... WP:NOTPLOT and WP:WHYN clearly observe that if the only content we can source is plot...
Click to read more »Another contested redirect - zero real world notability. Delete as per WP:NOTPLOT. Would have restored redirect, but recent ANI discussions have taken that...
Click to read more »look at the reviewer's suggestions (and I'd also suggest reviewing WP:NOTPLOT and WP:OR). /wia /talk 00:57, 14 May 2015 (UTC) ILikeGreenBikes (talk ·...
Click to read more »11 August 2009 (UTC) Wikipedia talk:What Wikipedia is not/Archive 29#WP:NOTPLOT replacement. I don't see consensus in any shape or form in removing WP:PLOT...
Click to read more »TTN (talk) 12:43, 29 January 2020 (UTC) Neutral I fully agree with nom's NOTPLOT concerns, but (1) this is a show with 7 seasons where I actually expect...
Click to read more »into this page...or trim them all down, what a ridiculous violation of WP:NOTPLOT. (Along with many of the 60 other articles on the show's characters). Reywas92Talk...
Click to read more »element, yes, but the current article goes into way too much plot (WP:NOTPLOT) to really need a stand-alone article. Better re-start from within the...
Click to read more »discussion about a character is "in-universe", other guidelines, such as WP:NOTPLOT apply. WP:GNG is a guideline, not a policy, although it's a very powerful...
Click to read more »TWL) Contested redirect. Zero real-world notability. Delete as per WP:NOTPLOT. Onel5969 TT me 18:09, 17 April 2023 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...
Click to read more »28 June 2007 (UTC) Keep. After looking at one of the articles, I think NOTPLOT is being misapplied. That policy cites articles that are "solely a summary...
Click to read more »my owner:Online 19:52, 31 October 2017 (UTC) Delete Seems to violate WP:NOTPLOT as entirely plot summary with no IRL significance indicated. The former...
Click to read more »WP:V. Cyan Gardevoir (used EDIT!) 21:18, 25 August 2012 (UTC) Keep - WP:NOTPLOT requires reliable source information on 1. reception, 2. significance,...
Click to read more »allow to write more that a "Summary-only descriptions of works" per WP:NOTPLOT I see no reason for this article to be kept. As for the other Star Wars...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Zero real world notability. Fails as per WP:NOTPLOT. Onel5969 TT me 22:29, 31 January 2023 (UTC) Keep featured in a national...
Click to read more »Comment. "Look at pages for other books" is a WP:OTHERSTUFF argument. WP:NOTPLOT does require that at least one source that contains something more than...
Click to read more »represents in the series to fullfill the requirements of both WP:WHYN and WP:NOTPLOT. The nomination reads a lot like it was considering only the current state...
Click to read more »Redirect to Scorpion (disambiguation)#Comics. The content and topic fail WP:NOTPLOT, and the "keep" opinions fail to establish the topic's notability throuch...
Click to read more »think Template:Elendil family tree is probably on the wrong side of WP:NOTPLOT/WP:WAF--these family trees are not about real people, but that was not...
Click to read more »thus can not be used to support any sort of real world notability. Per WP:NOTPLOT and WP:FICT, articles on fictional elements need to show some sort of real...
Click to read more »large. The same problem repeats throughout the page. See WP:SALAT and WP:NOTPLOT. This has been discussed on the talk page for years. Others have been were...
Click to read more »His_Dark_Materials#Settings, otherwise Delete. A plot-summary article that violates WP:NOTPLOT and thus does not establish notability through significant coverage in...
Click to read more »sources a full article can be written, which fullfils both WP:WHYN and WP:NOTPLOT. E.g. The Gothic World of Anne Rice and Joss Whedon Vs. the Horror Tradition...
Click to read more »notable.Bali ultimate (talk) 01:00, 22 October 2009 (UTC) Delete Violates WP:NOTPLOT as an extensive plot summary of Mobile Suit Gundam Seed Destiny with no...
Click to read more »summary of his role, and I wouldn't really consider it SIGCOV per Wikipedia:NOTPLOT. The IGN source is similarly just a plot summary of Red Hood's past appearances...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NOTPLOT and WP:GNG, overly expansive in-universe plot dump that should have been...
Click to read more »about Tom Westman, it's about his role in Survivor. It reminds me of wp:NOTPLOT. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Northernhenge (talk • contribs)...
Click to read more »was time enough for the D&D wikiproject to research sources. WP:N and WP:NOTPLOT have also been around for years, so don't try to act as if these were suddenly...
Click to read more »plot summary can be a justification for deletion because of policy WP:NOTPLOT. However notability is the biggest issue. Your cinema blend link provides...
Click to read more »discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:04, 29 August 2015 (UTC) Delete. Per policy, WP:NOTPLOT, our articles must be more than mere summaries of the contents of fiction...
Click to read more »is a remnant of the Pokemon cruft wars, a particular battlefront of WP:NOTPLOT. There is nothing to be gained by discussion every discovered remnant....
Click to read more »enough (name, date of birth, spell, voice acting), without incurring in WP:NOTPLOT when translated into here. All the more-than-relevant information is already...
Click to read more »real world information to be considered significant per WP:WAF and WP:NOTPLOT. If the source regurgitates the plot or offers up a passing mention, it...
Click to read more »09:44, 2 February 2013 (UTC) Delete The policy-based reasoning here is WP:NOTPLOT. Should we have a list of dead comic book characters? No more than we should...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Violates WP:NOTPLOT and WP:NOR (there is no official timeline for Zelda except the release...
Click to read more »descriptions of plot elements from a fictional work, thus violating WP:NOTPLOT and WP:WAF. Note: that the nominator is a sockpuppet doesn't magically...
Click to read more »enough (name, date of birth, spell, voice acting), without incurring in WP:NOTPLOT when translated into here. All the more-than-relevant information is already...
Click to read more »beyond a mere plot summary, per WP:NOTPLOT. Some of the keep !votes are entirely based on a rejection of the WP:NOTPLOT policy and as such should be discarded...
Click to read more »Ason was her first released film. It does not meet WP:NFILM. Policy WP:NOTPLOT tells us that the encyclopedia should treat creative works in an encyclopedic...
Click to read more »enough (name, date of birth, spell, voice acting), without incurring in WP:NOTPLOT when translated into here. All the more-than-relevant information is already...
Click to read more »of our fictional articles, especially list articles that are walking WP:NOTPLOT violations (which I forgot to mention, woops!). This list is one such....
Click to read more »summary and provides no real world context or commentary, which violates WP:NOTPLOT. —Farix (t | c) 20:29, 9 May 2016 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...
Click to read more »believe so. Plot summary alone being the content of an article violates WP:NOTPLOT. "Wikipedia treats creative works (including, for example, works of art...
Click to read more »disparate bullet points. If you rewrote it as prose, it would still fail NOTPLOT because there is no third party coverage that adds any out-of-universe...
Click to read more »May 2012 (UTC) As it stands, it's misnamed. the Manual of style and WP:NOTPLOT are advice on how to write an article on fiction; they have nothing to...
Click to read more »part Background), we would have a non-stubby article which fullfils WP:NOTPLOT and has enough based on secondary source to fullfil WP:WHYN, i.e. a notable...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Unnecessary plot information that fails WP:NOTPLOT and maybe GAMEGUIDE if you stretch it a bit. None of the few non-primary...
Click to read more »fictional setting. Consists almost only of a summary of the fiction (WP:NOTPLOT), has almost no inline references (WP:V) and cites no sources that are...
Click to read more »real-world notability of the character, all of it is in-universe. As per WP:NOTPLOT, this does not meet notability criteria. Onel5969 TT me 19:22, 27 March...
Click to read more »19 September 2016 (UTC) You'll see that the primary thing I quoted was NOTPLOT. WAF is a means of making sure NOT is followed, so it is not just a stylistic...
Click to read more »20 November 2020 (UTC) Delete: "Summary-only descriptions of works" WP:NOTPLOT is WP:WWIN. Article sources do not meet WP:GNG or WP:FICTION, they are...
Click to read more »detail", and doesn't allow to build an article that wouldn't violate WP:NOTPLOT. Four ways Jack Vance influenced Dungeons & Dragons is from a blacklisted...
Click to read more »enough (name, date of birth, spell, voice acting), without incurring in WP:NOTPLOT when translated into here. All the more-than-relevant information is already...
Click to read more »Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 01:33, 29 August 2020 (UTC) Delete - WP:NOTPLOT and fails to establish notability per WP:GNG. TTN (talk) 21:33, 29 August...
Click to read more »just other plot summaries, cast lists, or very trivial mentions. Per WP:NOTPLOT and WP:NFICT, fictional elements need some sort of indication of real life...
Click to read more »selective merge to Michael Moorcock. The in-universe content is OR and WP:NOTPLOT. The section about influences on other works is better placed in the writer's...
Click to read more »on: a plot summary is only a little more important than an image. See WP:NOTPLOT--ColinFine (talk) 09:31, 22 April 2018 (UTC) gdoo1 i dont know how this...
Click to read more »being two pages long, seems to be a pure plot summary, and that fails WP:NOTPLOT. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 09:27, 31 December 2022...
Click to read more »there's substantial discussion of the work within the plot summary. WP:NOTPLOT is very explicitly only forbidding/discouraging articles that consist solely...
Click to read more »single source outside of Tolkien, or paid licensed works. Wikipedia is WP:NOTPLOT and articles based on primary sources can't meet fundamental guidelines...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) As per WP:NOTPLOT and WP:NOTPAPER, this article reads like a high school book review, relying...
Click to read more »possible here. ~Mable (chat) 21:04, 17 February 2016 (UTC) Exactly. WP:NOTPLOT: "Summary-only descriptions of works. Wikipedia treats fiction in an encyclopedic...
Click to read more »most of them are plot recaps, and relying solely on them would violate WP:NOTPLOT. The only source that really provides non-plot details is The A.V. Club...
Click to read more »Almost entirely an indiscriminate list, fails WP:INDISCRIMINATE and WP:NOTPLOT. There is a sentence or two of cited content, but this can be added to...
Click to read more »suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. This page clearly fails WP:NOTPLOT: Wikipedia treats creative works (including, for example, works of art...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This article fails WP:NOTPLOT. DJ Autagirl (talk) 21:08, 7 September 2015 (UTC) Automated comment: This...
Click to read more »(talk) 02:54, 16 October 2018 (UTC) And those articles are full of WP:NOTPLOT problems too anyway. --Izno (talk) 02:58, 16 October 2018 (UTC) The above...
Click to read more »the real world history of a fictional work) is somehow a violation of WP:NOTPLOT, and that's just not how that works. There have even been several nominations...
Click to read more »Redirect to Survivor 42. WP:BLP1E, WP:SUSTAINED, WP:PAGEDECIDE, WP:CRUFT, WP:NOTPLOT... etc. etc. etc. Take your pick. -- Maddy from Celeste (WAVEDASH) 20:58...
Click to read more »I'd argue that it's an unnecessary content fork, and that it fails WP:NOTPLOT. Advise me if I'm wrong on some points on this nomination, but I just feel...
Click to read more »from the parent work for there to be an article that does not violate WP:NOTPLOT. The suggested sourcing is not enough to counteract that. Even if it technically...
Click to read more »June 2010 (UTC) There's only a consensus for WP:NOTPLOT as long as people !vote "Delete per WP:NOTPLOT" in AFDs. It's a good example of a "descriptive"...
Click to read more »light work! Herostratus (talk) 22:21, 12 September 2019 (UTC) WP:WAF & WP:NOTPLOT. TTN (talk) 22:33, 12 September 2019 (UTC) OK. If you want to play throwing...
Click to read more »(talk | contribs) 02:35, 15 January 2022 (UTC) @AssumeGoodWraith: Per WP:NOTPLOT, Wikipedia aims to treat video games in an encyclopedic manner, discussing...
Click to read more »which are all fictional primary sources. Those sections can't pass WP:NOTPLOT without original research. Rjjiii (talk) 22:25, 8 November 2024 (UTC) At...
Click to read more »franchise is. Pure plot summary and least of appearances - fails WP:GNG. WP:NOTPLOT, WP:NOTCATALOGUE, WP:FANCRUFT... --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus|...
Click to read more »14 September 2012 (UTC) As the WP:WAF guideline explains, and the WP:NOTPLOT policy more generally states, articles need to be more than just a collection...
Click to read more »both to 1984 itself (no secondary sources). This basically violates WP:NOTPLOT as a summary-only description, with no sourced analysis. Anything that...
Click to read more »much disruption over. etc, etc. Polls have been done on these things. WP:NOTPLOT was nearly deleted earlier this year (a majority voted that it shouldn't...
Click to read more »WP:NOTPLOT is a policy, and obviously failed too. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 03:36, 31 December 2022 (UTC) Piotrus WP:NOTPLOT restricts...
Click to read more »right now. The arguments that those are proper splits are ridiculous. WP:NOTPLOT is completely against that kind of content. These are lists of minutia...
Click to read more »(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Per WP:NOTPLOT, a policy, articles must not contain only plot summary. This here is nothing...
Click to read more »(UTC) Notability is not Wikipedia:INHERITED, and Wikipedia is Wikipedia:NOTPLOT; if this isn't discussed critically by secondary sources, it shouldn't...
Click to read more »removal of PLOT. That said, your option on Pixelface's talk page (notcopy vs notplot) is worth exploring which I will start there. However, I am still concerned...
Click to read more »doesn't supercede actual policy like WP:NOTPLOT).Folken de Fanel (talk) 11:59, 8 January 2013 (UTC) NOTPLOT is an editing rule rather than a notability...
Click to read more »reference from an independent reliable secondary source. Delete as per WP:NOTPLOT. Zero real world notability, everything is in-universe. Onel5969 TT me...
Click to read more »Eternal Champion series. The information drawn from these falls short of WP:NOTPLOT which states that Wikipedia treats creative works ... in an encyclopedic...
Click to read more »than that. We are over WP:N. Unless I'm missing something, GAMEGUIDE and NOTPLOT are about how we write the article, they don't restrict sources or add...
Click to read more »overlooking the fact that NOTPLOT outright states that what you're arguing for does not overrule NOTPLOT. To cite NOTPLOT in a bit more depth: "Wikipedia...
Click to read more »the films. Rorshacma (talk) 04:25, 8 September 2019 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTPLOT and WP:JUSTPLOT. The article does not support any secondary commentary...
Click to read more »coverage, but that's not apparent from the article. In-universe style: Per WP:NOTPLOT, a policy, an article must not consist of "summary-only descriptions of...
Click to read more »2014 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Angela Fong and the article has WP:NOTPLOT problems. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 03:54, 22 October 2009 (UTC) Keep...
Click to read more »the episodes articles could be eligible for redirect/deletion under WP:NOTPLOT. Rambo's Revenge (talk) 22:21, 2 March 2009 (UTC) I think they need a cleanup...
Click to read more »it's fictional history). Which means that this article also violates WP:NOTPLOT in that there are only three short sentences in the whole article (13,267...
Click to read more »forward but I also can't see that they fail WP:RS. I disagree that WP:NOTPLOT applies to a plot element central to multiple films, video games, books...
Click to read more »sound as strict as they make it out to be and also so many link of WP:NOTPLOT going on that you would think sock puppetry is almost going on. Jhenderson...
Click to read more »weapons...WP:NOTPLOT is policy, to ignore it would require way more than a mere AfD.Folken de Fanel (talk) 18:15, 19 January 2013 (UTC) Yes, NOTPLOT is policy...
Click to read more »2 June 2022 (UTC) Avlich, I have seen you multiple times mis-state WP:NOTPLOT in order to try and secure a deletion while ignoring content and sources...
Click to read more »You would also know that, per Masem's comments, these all violated WP:NOTPLOT. Nothing has been deleted, despite your POINTy insistence on using that...
Click to read more »experienced enough to deal with notability questions. In most cases, WP:NOTPLOT is at stake, so is it reasonable to condemn policy discussions to confidentiality ...
Click to read more »non-independently notable aspects of a notable topic can be fine. DGG's reference to NOTPLOT missing the mark, too, I think, because the same rationale applies whether...
Click to read more »help the article to be more than a regurgitation of plot that violates WP:NOTPLOT. Since this article also consists in a user's personal summary/interpretation...
Click to read more »WP:INDISCRIMINATE or indicate which of the four examples it falls under (NOTPLOT, NOTLYRICS, NOTSTATS, or NOTCHANGELOG)? TipsyElephant (talk) 23:32, 28...
Click to read more »18:29, 8 August 2012 (UTC) Delete Per WP:NOTPLOT JoeGazz84 ♦ 19:32, 12 August 2012 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTPLOT and ordinary community best practice, as...
Click to read more »makes it fundamentally useless to fulfilling NOTPLOT. TTN (talk) 01:04, 19 November 2020 (UTC) Wp:NOTPLOT is unfindable in my end. Just a heads up. Jhenderson...
Click to read more »Delete; fancruft, no third-party sources, in-universe content only (WP:NOTPLOT). Sandstein 22:56, 31 October 2016 (UTC) Comment I just want to remind...
Click to read more »redirect to Will & Grace (season 9). Zero secondary source material, WP:NOTPLOT. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 11:11, 10 November 2017 (UTC) The "Zero secondary source...
Click to read more »rabbit. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 07:23, 25 August 2019 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTPLOT and WP:JUSTPLOT. The article is just a list of character summaries that...
Click to read more »article. And what we have here is a notability-failing plot summary: see WP:NOTPLOT. What reliable, independent sources discuss the topic here ("Alternative...
Click to read more »single episode? Dimadick (talk) 15:40, 13 August 2015 (UTC) Delete WP:NOTPLOT we shouldn't have a complete and comprehensive synopsis on Wikipedia. --...
Click to read more »besides the mobile weapons article that I have tagged for deletion due to WP:NOTPLOT.ZXCVBNM (TALK) 13:16, 6 September 2017 (UTC) Merge with Category:Gundam...
Click to read more »Shooterwalker (talk) 16:04, 4 October 2020 (UTC) I have been seeing WP:NOTPLOT as the latest thing thrown around lately by the same users, after the litany...
Click to read more »third-party sources and contains not a word that is not plot summary. WP:NOTPLOT mandates deletion. Sandstein 15:21, 23 June 2025 (UTC) @Sandstein, you...
Click to read more »you can do attach the reference to primary material, you've failed WP:NOTPLOT. The book sources mention nothing pertinent about the character, so they...
Click to read more »October 2009 (UTC) I'm looking for a little clarification here. While WP:NOTPLOT clearly is policy, nothing in that policy requires the deletion of articles...
Click to read more »notable. The sources are all either primary or unreliable. Article is a NOTPLOT violation. Taylor Trescott - my talk + my edits 19:03, 4 October 2013 (UTC)...
Click to read more »since the list discussed here violates at least two major policies, WP:NOTPLOT and WP:V, and doesn't even meet the notability guideline. On the contrary...
Click to read more »(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Per WP:NOTPLOT, "Wikipedia articles should not be summary-only descriptions of works."...
Click to read more »2010 (UTC) Delete Almost entirely plot points, which is a violation of WP:NOTPLOT, with no secondary information. There is clearly a level of original research...
Click to read more »this article no longer fulfils our inclusion criteria per WP:LISTN and WP:NOTPLOT. ~ mazca talk 16:57, 7 February 2020 (UTC) AfDs for this article: Articles...
Click to read more »that violates the WP:NOTPLOT policy.Folken de Fanel (talk) 12:26, 8 January 2013 (UTC) How does stubbing the article violate WP:NOTPLOT? Diego (talk) 12:30...
Click to read more »reference, and remove the "trivia". This is, perhaps, more in the spirit of WP:NOTPLOT, although I'd certainly argue the table as it currently exists is a summary...
Click to read more »20 July 2011 (UTC) Note, WP:IINFO and WP:NOTPLOT or WP:PLOT all link to the same thing. Also the NOTPLOT thing has been changed since this AFD started...
Click to read more »how many sources, it still violates site policy by running afoul of WP:NOTPLOT. かんぱい! Scapler (talk) 08:13, 11 February 2011 (UTC) Also, putting them...
Click to read more »others above. 220.255.1.88 (talk) 09:56, 22 June 2012 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTPLOT Snuge purveyor (talk) 19:32, 22 June 2012 (UTC) I showed that you purveyor...
Click to read more »just a permastub once you remove all this needless fluff that fails WP:NOTPLOT. There is no particular need to list every single minor usage in media...
Click to read more »2022 (UTC) Delete. Consists only of plot summary and therefore fails WP:NOTPLOT, as does Uplift Universe, which I'll nominate for AfD. Sandstein 09:43...
Click to read more »characters is incredibly poor. Wikipedia is not a plot repository - WP:NOTPLOT, we should not be replicating the plot of a film split across multiple...
Click to read more »related articles need sources with significant real world details to meet WP:NOTPLOT and WP:WAF, so it is not like there is nothing more than my opinion behind...
Click to read more »WP:NOTPLOT because of one sentence is a misreading of that policy and would deem it pointless entirely. This article is a prime example of a WP:NOTPLOT violation...
Click to read more »was time enough for the D&D wikiproject to research sources. WP:N and WP:NOTPLOT have also been around for years, so don't try to act as if these were suddenly...
Click to read more »WP:NLISTWP:LISTN, WP:NOTDIRWP:IINFO, WP:NOTPLOT etc.Folken de Fanel (talk) 01:00, 4 January 2013 (UTC) I'll give you WP:NOTPLOT, but I thought I made it clear...
Click to read more »case for a merge as very little of the present content would survive a WP:NOTPLOT-minded pruning, and the Private Eye article already has the single sentence...
Click to read more »about development and uses that makes these entries something more than WP:NOTPLOT? Similar summary information seems to be available through IANA, so why...
Click to read more »usually, there is no conflict because if something fails WP:CRYSTAL or WP:NOTPLOT then the subject is not likely to be notable either. However, recent broad...
Click to read more »