Redirect to:
believe do qualify to the not original research category of the No original research policy. This page is not policy, and should not be applied as if it were...
Click to read more »WP:NOTOR argument, it is certainly correct that it is allowable to compile information from multiple sources to meet GNG. However, nowhere in NOTOR does...
Click to read more »Guide to deletion (glossary) Help, my article got nominated for deletion! Notting Hill College (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch |...
Click to read more »right? Wrong. Bart133 (t) 22:42, 14 September 2005 (UTC) Delete. Nott nottable. -Splashtalk 23:19, 14 September 2005 (UTC) Delete nn --TimPope 21:09,...
Click to read more »undo) - Link: www.mercuriocalama.cl/prontus4_nots/antialone.html?page=http://www.mercuriocalama.cl/prontus4_nots/site/artic/20081020/pags/20081020000728.html...
Click to read more »(receiver, archives) 19:12, 15 November 2008 (UTC) Delete per WP:ADVERT, WP:NOTOR, WP:NOTWEBHOST and (possibly WP:COI) Doc StrangeMailboxLogbook 19:14, 15...
Click to read more »current recognizability of a person. Notibility is based on someone's contributions and does not wain with time. Notibility is part of history, fame is part...
Click to read more »show and thats about it when it commes to her notibility. Once this EP gets out and if it gets any notibility by real sources then this page might be untill...
Click to read more »notibility shown as per WP:N requirements. Has had 6 months to give sources/notibility.--Dacium 02:41, 29 January 2007 (UTC) Delete - fails WP:ORG. MER-C 06:00...
Click to read more »almost no online references. I don't believe Wikipedia policy establishes notibility based on Google hits (which, in my own opinion, seems questionable particluarly...
Click to read more »The result was no consensus. No consensus between Keep and Merge to 1958 Notting Hill race riots#Depiction in media, defaulting to keep with a strong recommendation...
Click to read more »article name. Fails WP:BIO, No assertion of notibility (claims to be Film Producer without asserting any notible works)--155.144.251.120 04:57, 18 January...
Click to read more »that provides helpful guidelines. In addition, Accessibility dos and do nots is a quick summary of the most important guidelines for editors. WikiProject...
Click to read more »company notible (although that too can be a factor in making something notible), but rather the work the company is doing that makes them notible. The Company...
Click to read more »expressing puzzlement, generalizing what WP:NOTOR suggests only in the context of "expert material"? (This is not a pure hypothetical -- I've recently had...
Click to read more »assert notibility. Does not meant general notibility requirements for a buisness. No sources, all links are to its own site or nothing notible. No reason...
Click to read more »is not generally classed as original research...". Andrew D. (talk) 16:32, 11 September 2019 (UTC) That's not policy. WP:SYNTH is. Moreover, WP:NOTOR says...
Click to read more »for the same reason. Drett 08:41, 27 July 2006 (UTC) Delete:Not notible, or notible but completely unverifyible.--Musaabdulrashid 09:37, 27 July 2006...
Click to read more »User Lswan72 (talk - contribs; 16) to Notting Hill (film) (diff - undo) - Link: britmovietours.com/bookings/notting-hill-movie-tour/. * Links added in this...
Click to read more »importance not notibility. That is specifically stated to be a lower threashold than notibility so a rejection of A7 is not an endorsement of the notibility of...
Click to read more »the Notting Hill article is simply too prescriptive, and is factually wrong to limit Notting Hill to just North Kensington (which is a part of Notting Hill...
Click to read more »table above illustrates an encyclopedic issue produced with source data and NOTOR Simple calculations. It "translates and synthesizes" the source data, with...
Click to read more »nomination for notibility, so the 2nd AFD was correctly closed as AFD's too quickly. The last keep discussion the concensus was basically that notibility would...
Click to read more »individual not likely to pass notability muster. Carrite (talk) 03:25, 5 August 2010 (UTC) Delete - Individual seems to have no notibility. Her only publication...
Click to read more »2008-09-26 23:21:29 (UTC): User 87.194.19.176 (talk - contribs; 5) to Notting Hill Carnival (diff - undo) - Link: www.mynight.me.uk. * Links added in...
Click to read more »essentially was "compiling facts and information" (term from WP:NOTOR; I do realize that essay is not a policy, but I think it has merit in explaining what I...
Click to read more »08:44, 27 March 2010 (UTC) Keep - There is enough notible information here and the sources are also notible. ~ Joker264 (talk) 12:09, 27 March 2010 (UTC)...
Click to read more »DerbyEdu (talk) 23:21, 5 June 2011 (UTC) Notible Band How can the band be notible ? The band seems to be very notible there article shows very good cited information...
Click to read more »Bpmullins | Talk 15:21, 28 January 2007 (UTC) Delete. No evidence of notibility. No sources. No attempt to meet WP:V or WP:BIO. Since this may be a genuine...
Click to read more »Karate. Ohconfucius 04:58, 23 February 2007 (UTC) Delete Still don't see notibility or any media coverage that isn't focused on the that field "senior instructor...
Click to read more »are all mainly internal references. The 3 external sources to no assert notibility in any way. The first source claims to be for the sentance "Many of the...
Click to read more »ago, over 15 years. He is more notible than many of the people who have articles on this site. Please define 'notible person.' I have seen pages on wikipedia...
Click to read more »21:57:28 (UTC): User 86.153.120.183 t • c • dc • l • ef • b • bl; (1) to Notting Hill (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) (diff !top) - Link:...
Click to read more »links | watch | logs | views) (View AfD) Possible vanity page about a non-notible pornography actress. Keep .... or no Keep? (a funny take on a DOND phrase)...
Click to read more »not, some although less notible still notible stuff in a category 'less notible' and have it so people doing a random search won't find it? I still don't...
Click to read more »different things. This AfD is not about an academic conference. It's pretty rude to suggest that I didn't read WP: NOTOR. In fact, it forwards the point...
Click to read more »01:51, 25 August 2008 (UTC) Delete notible enough to be mentioned in his father's article or his mothers, but not notible enough to be in his own article...
Click to read more »them. Shimaspawn 14:53, 27 February 2007 (UTC) Delete. Maybe they're "nottible", but around here, we're concerned about notability, and there is none...
Click to read more »Laylow is a redirect since 2007 to the Ladbroke Grove section of the Notting Hill article, apparently because the word is a street term for the Ladbroke...
Click to read more »2007 (UTC) Delete Normally I would say let them have more time to show notibility. But in this case the article is reaks of SPAM and advertising. Displaying...
Click to read more »you are not nottable enof.Are the winners of the contest nottable?Why a holle article?--Pixel ;-) 23:32, 20 September 2006 (UTC) Keep - not vanity and...
Click to read more »As a non notible football club. Thε Halo Θ 12:56, 6 August 2006 (UTC) Have any of you ever heard of Bury F.C. Didn't think so, but your not going to delete...
Click to read more »with rep trading. Marskell 10:30, 31 October 2005 (UTC) Delete unless notibility goes into the article and can be verified. The photo caption claims 56...
Click to read more »references/sources to article and additional external links - further clarifying notibility. Please can we close this issue. Regards (212.140.116.162 (talk) 19:47...
Click to read more »lot about this article's notibility but after some research I thought that the article worths creating. She get notibility for her activism of Polio...
Click to read more »history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) Notibility is questionable. Shall we keep? BuickCenturyDriver (Honk, odometer) 01:49...
Click to read more »B.I.G. Notre Dame de Paris · University of Notre Dame · Nótt · Notting Hill · Notting Hill (film) · Nottingham · Nottingham Forest F.C. · Nottinghamshire ·...
Click to read more »Just because i don't know the sales in the US doesn't mean the band isn't nottible.Scubster 20:37, 1 March 2007 (UTC) Note Above user is page creator. EliminatorJR...
Click to read more »about 604,000 Google results. Also, games on Miniclip I think has no notibility because it's just a random flash game but something like Heli Attack has...
Click to read more »Lenahan - Starblind 13:05, 18 January 2007 (UTC) Delete Cannot assert notibility. Fails WP:WEB etc.--Dacium 06:56, 18 January 2007 (UTC) I would suggest...
Click to read more »Nostradamus · Notorious (1946 film) · Notostraca · Notre Dame de Paris · Notting Hill · Notting Hill (film) · Nottingham · Nottingham Forest F.C. · Nottinghamshire ·...
Click to read more »(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Notibility Monopoly31121993 (talk) 16:51, 8 June 2014 (UTC) Note: This debate has...
Click to read more »January 2007 (UTC) Keep but Expand This Wrestler has worked/works for four notible Indy promotions (International Wrestling Cartel, Combat Zone Wrestling...
Click to read more »hall · My Name Is Earl · National Lampoon's Animal House · Leslie Nielsen · Notting Hill (film) · Office Space · Only Fools and Horses · Our Gang · Michael...
Click to read more »rated "mid" and all other biographies "low" importance, unless additional notibility criteria apply. Super Slam events: General articles about Super Slam events...
Click to read more »If the answer is yes and I suspect it is then we should let them be, as notible to Canada.--Kumioko (talk) 14:45, 8 June 2009 (UTC) This AfD nomination...
Click to read more »don't see why this would be overkill. The information is notible to the players which are notible to have an article in the encyclopedia. For those who don't...
Click to read more »although there are some minor concerns over whether the article has some notibility due to their position in the Billboard chart. What I don't like is that...
Click to read more »this is indeed plagiarism. Also it falls WP:NOTOR, WP:NPOV, WP:SOAP and WP:NOTWEBHOST as Wikipedia is not the place to post personal essays. Doc StrangeMailboxLogbook...
Click to read more »April 2011 (UTC) I'm still not seeing the notibility of the event which hasn't even happened yet (hence, can't be notible until it does happen and there...
Click to read more »notible. Its the name CASH line which this article is about that is in dispute. Your quote goes to show that "Cash line" as an entity is not notible which...
Click to read more »unless notibility is established. Nateji77 07:30, 3 September 2005 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify...
Click to read more »free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Poorly written and not particually notible The C of E. God Save The Queen! (talk) 11:05, 19 February 2010...
Click to read more »candidate for office. Until she wins, she would be non-notable, not other claims to notority Wildthing61476 19:35, 20 July 2006 (UTC) I added Noreen, because...
Click to read more »Jun 2005 (UTC) Delete. Appears to be a vanity article. In any case, not notible. -SocratesJedi | Talk 20:34, 24 May 2005 (UTC) Apparently someone speedily...
Click to read more »edits should be made to this page. The result was speedy delete - lots of NOTs apply. -- RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 02:06, 23 April 2008 (UTC) What does...
Click to read more »result of the debate was DELETE. Golbez 07:35, Jun 18, 2005 (UTC) Non-notible, advert with alexa rank of 15,556 [1]. Delete. -SocratesJedi | Talk 06:46...
Click to read more »most notible group.--Skugg 02:22, 13 July 2006 (UTC) Delete student organizations at single universities are rarely notable and the article coes not suggest...
Click to read more »relationships. He spent his last day with Monika Dannemann at her apartment in Notting Hill. The next morning, she found him unresponsive, and he was confirmed...
Click to read more »5/11/Milenko-Ratkovic-Gusarska-epopeja.pdf; another link to establish notibility — Preceding unsigned comment added by Likacen (talk • contribs) 06:03...
Click to read more »Delete per nom. WP is also not a free webhost for resumes. Tychocat 09:56, 26 June 2006 (UTC) Keep has recieved notibility in the past year in both cult...
Click to read more »played the lead in the romantic comedies My Best Friend's Wedding (1997), Notting Hill (1999), and Runaway Bride (1999). Roberts was the first actress to...
Click to read more »which does not make itself noteable. Not other sources or claims to notibility provided.--Dacium 06:45, 18 January 2007 (UTC) Keep, notable enough, given...
Click to read more »--Aoratos 16:58, 4 August 2006 (UTC) No, discussion hasn't looked at the notibility of this independent film company. --HResearcher 10:02, 5 August 2006 (UTC)...
Click to read more »tate was the bass player for Tigertailz, that alone doesn't make this notible. Musaabdulrashid 00:38, 15 September 2006 (UTC) The existence of the article...
Click to read more »me count the nots: Not notable, not verifiable, not covered by any reliable sources. More nots: Not myspace, not a yellow pages and not advertising.Bali...
Click to read more »Apparently self promotion, still reads too much like an Ad, and fails notibility •CHILLDOUBT• 13:21, 17 January 2007 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...
Click to read more »protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log) Notibility R3ap3R.inc (talk) 22:46, 4 April 2009 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...
Click to read more »looks like it comes from a Black Sabbath fan site, it has no proof of notibility and is basically just a description of the song sound of the song. There's...
Click to read more »push. Notibility not shown.--Dacium 21:45, 15 February 2007 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify...
Click to read more »talk | history | links | watch | logs) Which articles are not worthy to be considered notible in my article for Bear Track Products? Is it all of them...
Click to read more »2011 (UTC) As stated above, the documentary cannot verify this clan's notibility per WP:N. I should have explained this in my first comment. I have been...
Click to read more »purely self-referencing with no independent sources demonstrating inherent notibility. Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 15:14, 15 January 2016 (UTC) Delete Nothing...
Click to read more »this. Anyway the club is a branch of a Premiership club which goes with notibility. The C of E. God Save The Queen! (talk) 19:26, 11 April 2010 (UTC) Merge:...
Click to read more »January 2006 (UTC) Dr. Grim is a character in Backwoods Terror, and is non notible because of the fact Backwoods Terror is in the 2-4 week process of being...
Click to read more »variation of WP:Clearly notable, but there hasn't been any demonstration of notality prior to his death (per the first relisting comment), which makes the BLP1E...
Click to read more »debate was no consensus. Tony Sidaway|Talk 21:11, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC) Non-notible. Delete. -SocratesJedi | Talk 02:03, 25 May 2005 (UTC) This is a no-brainer:...
Click to read more »have wikipedia articles, and thus if they are notible enough for an article, they are more than notible enough to be on a list. -Djsasso (talk) 21:44...
Click to read more »liked LESI Professor in the University of Minho in Portugal. If it is notible it should probobly be moved to the Portugese Wikipedia. This page is now...
Click to read more »does not clearly show notibility but author has a lot of published works and some are used in teaching of philsology so that makes him notible enough...
Click to read more »logs | views) – (View log) Subject of article does not meet guidelines for notibility per WP:MUSIC. Does not meet WP:V Nv8200p talk 04:13, 26 January 2007...
Click to read more »Talk:Interfak_big_band --Steven Fruitsmaak | Talk 10:22, 27 July 2006 (UTC) Delete not notible, possible vanity. --Musaabdulrashid 10:32, 27 July 2006 (UTC) Indeed...
Click to read more »coverage. Thanks. Ism schism (talk) 18:41, 5 July 2011 (UTC) comment Notibility is not temporary. WP:NTEMP This is only being covered because of the marriage...
Click to read more »Arsten (talk) 18:54, 26 June 2013 (UTC) I only see two sources and that's not notible so therefore delete unless if this article is improved....
Click to read more »February 2009 (UTC) Weak Keep Google says its a slim to moderate hint of notibility but it does lack 3rd party sources. Pickbothmanlol (talk) 17:04, 13 February...
Click to read more »Joan-of-arc 04:26, 26 August 2006 (UTC) speedy delete no assertion of notibility Musaabdulrashid 04:42, 26 August 2006 (UTC) Strong WP:SNOW delete, WP:NEO...
Click to read more »violates WP:CRYSTAL. With enough information and references provided, and notibility verified, I no longer support deletion. Wooyi 03:28, 5 February 2007 (UTC)...
Click to read more »(UTC) Commment - I have doubts of the notibility of the individual but as I have oft said before whats notible to someone else (european Footbal(American...
Click to read more »the idea of just doing a hard delete for a topic that we've agreed to be notible, and we have things in place to be able to keep articles like this from...
Click to read more »school (not to be confused with Shindo Jinen Ryu - a totally unrelated school Peter Rehse 01:05, 29 January 2007 (UTC) delete No notibility as per WP:N...
Click to read more »were helped by you will remember you when forget-me-nots have withered. Carve your name on hearts, not on marble." - Charles H. Spurgeon Atsme 💬 📧 16:32...
Click to read more »protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) Doesn't seem notible ChrisDHDR 11:05, 11 November 2007 (UTC) Delete - per ad-like, and non-notable...
Click to read more »User 81.149.135.59 t • c • dc • l • ef • b • bl; (5) to Coronet Theatre, Notting Hill (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) (diff !top) - Link:...
Click to read more »claim deletion because they dont consider him on any one point that he is notible .. but this person who is holding multiple roles at one time which is worth...
Click to read more »free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) No sources; also appear not very notible Mdann52 (talk) 15:25, 19 June 2012 (UTC) Note current discussion Wikipedia:Articles...
Click to read more »Article", but not notible. FirefoxMan 23:27, 20 January 2007 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it...
Click to read more »per nom. GreenJoe 21:30, 13 August 2007 (UTC) Delete, fails Wikipedia:Notibility, due to lack of significant coverage in secondary sources; very few Google...
Click to read more »stay. CyberGhostface (talk) 16:24, 9 July 2008 (UTC) Delete I can see no notibility in this film ·Add§hore· Talk/Cont 17:22, 9 July 2008 (UTC) Delete, but...
Click to read more »August 2006 (UTC) This is not a highschool, its a theater of a highschool and it is not currently operational. No claim of notibility. Delete Musaabdulrashid...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Self promotion. Notibility. PabloMartinez (talk) 21:44, 21 February 2018 (UTC) You're right, Pablo...
Click to read more »another hoax article that can't be speedy deleted becuase it makes claims of notority than cannot be verified. Prod, hoax and verify tags removed by author....
Click to read more »like vanity. very commercial sounding. Possibly just notible enough to be encyclopedic, but not enough to have anyone write a NPOV article about it. Should...
Click to read more »as I can see, reads more like a directory listing and doesn't indicate notibility of any kind, Delete Rx StrangeLove 15:20, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC) Delete. Vanity...
Click to read more »am also nominating the following related pages because they too fail notibility: Ben Purkiss (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch |...
Click to read more »the same level of notority in this site.Also, please, check www.josegentile.com for complete bio and articles that may prove notority. also http://www...
Click to read more »look notible, created by User:Jeremyrgeorge which is what the company's leader is. RT | Talk 18:26, 31 January 2008 (UTC) Speedy delete A7 for not asserting...
Click to read more »although it could be notible, hard to tell from the article's text. May be a bad translation from something, or written by someone who is not English. RandomTime...
Click to read more »history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) Not a notible politician. 99DBSIMLR 14:36, 17 May 2007 (UTC) Delete No sources, and...
Click to read more »criticism. AvruchTalk 22:40, 13 November 2007 (UTC) Delete no assertation of notibility ffm 00:11, 14 November 2007 (UTC) Merge and Redirect. The Escape Velocity...
Click to read more »content, and subject is not notable enough for its own article. John Sloan (talk) 00:27, 24 August 2008 (UTC) Delete non notible and also WP:CRYSTAL RockManQ...
Click to read more »delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) Article asserts no notibility whatsoever. It has been orphaned since July 2006, and is written in a...
Click to read more »arfcontribs. 19:57, 24 January 2011 (UTC) Delete as advocacy and a variety of WP:NOTs. The statement that the KJV is the "most accurate" of translations is an...
Click to read more »Delete Not notible. fails WP:WEB etc.--Dacium 01:11, 25 February 2007 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify...
Click to read more »edits should be made to this page. The result was keep. assertion of notibility improved with additional reliable externals - consensus leaning towards...
Click to read more »- WP:NOTOR. Also from that page: "You cannot declare something to be original research merely because the current version of the article does not name...
Click to read more »is not a free webhosting server.--Paul McDonald (talk) 18:19, 15 December 2010 (UTC) Delete - another article on a league of questionable notibility. Does...
Click to read more »info and not notible Waddie96 (talk) 06:19, 5 April 2018 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it...
Click to read more »--LeeHunter 15:08, 28 Oct 2004 (UTC) Delete I do not like using Google as a barometer of notibility, but i this case I think we should delete it. --ShaunMacPherson...
Click to read more »Fails notibility guidelines.--Dacium 22:15, 15 February 2007 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify...
Click to read more »is always notible. Musaabdulrashid 02:40, 16 September 2006 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it...
Click to read more »and Yuming Lai. The notibility of these band members is limited to being in this musical act which does not meet the notibility guidelines. Therefore...
Click to read more »Sjakkalle 07:20, 4 May 2005 (UTC) Delete. Reads like an advert and not at all notible. -SocratesJedi | Talk 04:37, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC) Keep and NPOV the article...
Click to read more »Delete per nom. Philippe Beaudette 21:03, 6 February 2007 (UTC) Delete Not notibility shown (WP:N). Nothing shown to pass WP:ORG or WP:CORP--Dacium 22:33...
Click to read more »name, only things about the album cover come up and therefore it has no notibility. Devin (talk) 08:11, 3 June 2012 (UTC) Delete for now - This is a most...
Click to read more »are inherently notable. Hedley 17:26, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC) Delete. Not sufficiently notible. -SocratesJedi | Talk 18:12, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC) Remark: .808 kiloGoogles...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This page is not meeting notibility guideline of wikipedia, it has no reference, the article should...
Click to read more »2006 (UTC) Speedy Delete - asserts notibility of other people who already have articles (see Fres Oquendo), but not Dave Wride himself. If you look carefully...
Click to read more »The result was delete. Mailer Diablo 14:47, 14 July 2006 (UTC) Not really notible - not a lot can be said about him. I put it up for PROD but someone deleted...
Click to read more »Insearchofintelligentlife (talk) 23:50, 18 April 2008 (UTC) Delete notibility not established. Professor marginalia (talk) 00:19, 19 April 2008 (UTC)...
Click to read more »hits in Google are most all social media or adverts. No evidence of notibility --Nuujinn (talk) 12:46, 21 September 2015 (UTC) Note: This debate has...
Click to read more »was merge with GameFAQs. Sjakkalle (Check!) 09:51, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC) Non-notible. It's about an April Fool's Day prank for GameFAQ. -SocratesJedi | Talk...
Click to read more »standards. Rd232 talk 16:38, 18 February 2010 (UTC) Delete - This person is not notible in his own right, he's serves as a spokesperson for a member of Congress...
Click to read more »delete without prejudice. Unsourced BLP. However, North8000 concedes that notibility is possible so if someone wishes to write a new sourced article it won't...
Click to read more »Slowking Man. It's notible enough that it merits a place here. It has close to 4,000 google hits which is significantly more than a non-notible high school that...
Click to read more »took the assocaiation with the band The Heroin Addicts as a claim of notibility. The band is also undergoing the AfD (see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Film with no citations to establish notibility Mblumber (talk) 15:00, 6 July 2014 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...
Click to read more »does not provide and I cannot find evidence for notibility. The website that bought them out and incorporated them does not itself have an article, not does...
Click to read more »KV5 • Squawk box • Fight on! 22:27, 30 July 2008 (UTC) They might not be that notible, but I own a rare CD copy (it's also on iTunes, but I have a rather...
Click to read more »2010 (UTC) Speedy Delete. CSD A7 candidate. There is no assertion of notibility and no reliable sources provided or that I was able to find. Movementarian...
Click to read more »short list, no criteria for inclusion given. Tagged for possible lack of notibility since July 2010 NtheP (talk) 18:46, 26 April 2011 (UTC) Delete - The only...
Click to read more »done so and has been awarded the funds! 7. Discussion Group discussed notibility of an author of publications. One option is that if someone isn't quite...
Click to read more »deletions. -- the wub "?!" 18:18, 27 August 2007 (UTC) Delete - Lack of notibility. Not worthy of separate article as per WP:CORP. Cocoma 13:22, 28 August...
Click to read more »(UTC) Future conference, just like 1000s of others each , no obvious notibility, If something big happens it can be added later SimonLyall 08:35, 12 March...
Click to read more »(edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) Not notible club player (Gnevin 16:03, 24 November 2006 (UTC)) This AfD nomination...
Click to read more »than text. Look at the screenshot attached to the article. Much of Vox's notibility comes from its use of new web technologies. If this was just a Kings of...
Click to read more »history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) lacks notibility and importance. Former Canadian politician with little influence User:Fishcometsarecool...
Click to read more »(which is I assume what you're getting at with your link to the essay WP:NOTOR), well, no. (1) It's a calculation carried out by an established template;...
Click to read more »Music that sounds similar to early black sabbath Who sang lead in The Notting Hillbilllies "One Way Gal"? 60s Pyschedellic song stuck in my head Why...
Click to read more »2013 (UTC) Delete: After reading the article. Youtube can NOT be used as a refrence. Non-notible subject. NSlightsTalk 22:24, 12 July 2013 (UTC) Note: This...
Click to read more »took the assocaiation with the band The Heroin Addicts as a claim of notibility. The band is also undergoing the AfD (see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The...
Click to read more »be, but simply appears as a place holder for an external link to a non-notible corporation as previously mentioned by the nom. JavierMC 22:28, 15 October...
Click to read more »around long enough to have been correctly sourced to verify and show notibility, but hasn't.--Dacium 02:39, 29 January 2007 (UTC) Delete - fails WP:ORG...
Click to read more »Another Members Name who was not posted. Dominick (TALK) 01:25, 25 May 2006 (UTC) Team roll assures that this is a very notible bio. Give the wikipedia time...
Click to read more »to it. Where did the author say it was not notible? I was the one who left that comment on the talk page, not the author. Roodog2k 17:50, 26 Apr 2005...
Click to read more »MrMacMan 22:47, 15 February 2007 (UTC) Delete No notibility shown.--Dacium 22:55, 15 February 2007 (UTC) Delete not notable. Scottmsg 23:52, 15 February 2007...
Click to read more »online reviews as part of the page to eradicate this problem? The most notible review of the band is to be published on 22 November in the NME magazine...
Click to read more »free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) No sources indicating the notority or existance of the expression Holy Goo (talk) 18:58, 22 November 2017...
Click to read more »the article appears to be the subject. Article content does not display why subject is notible. No sources at all saying she is notable in anyway. TheDarkArchon...
Click to read more »July 2011 (UTC) Keep it is an upcoming film and as yet has not been released. It has notible actors hense they are all on wiki bar 1 it has a big budget...
Click to read more »known as any DIY punk band gets -- are only bands metioned on MTV notible, surely I hope not?). millerc 15:19, 8 Mar 2005 (UTC) Keep. Seems notable. —Xezbeth...
Click to read more »found two sources for external links but that's not going to be enough to meet Wikipedia's notibility guidelines. WisconsinBoyClevelandRocks228844 (talk)...
Click to read more »Keep Tag for sources required, they are needed to establish the claimed notibility--Dacium 04:28, 3 April 2007 (UTC) Borderline keep. Sources, please, but...
Click to read more »August 2008 (UTC) Weak delete Article might assert notibility if it were sourced/verified, but it's not. Yamakiri TC § 08-25-2008 • 20:47:56 20:47, 25 August...
Click to read more »verifiable as notibility it seems is a POV concept that is apt to be abused esp. when censoring controversial ideas. Best we stay way from 'notibility' in my...
Click to read more »nominate also). —Cryptic (talk) 13:53, 25 October 2005 (UTC) Delete non notible comic with no evidence it will ever be released.--Isotope23 16:22, 25 October...
Click to read more »23 February 2007 (UTC) Delete Nothing but a geocities city to claim notibility. Fails Wikipedia:Notability (books)--Dacium 07:23, 23 February 2007 (UTC)...
Click to read more »non-notable theater? over 500 bands played there most of which are extremely nottible. now honestly if you are into music and live in Indiana you're sure to...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Recreation of repeatedly deleted nont notible content.Gtroy (talk) 01:00, 27 September 2011 (UTC) Delete. Sounds like...
Click to read more »(UTC) Delete - Appears to fail WP:Bio, only potential item that attempts notibility is legacy section where decendents married into nobility, but this person...
Click to read more »(UTC) Single year student organisation, zero google hits, no obvious notibility SimonLyall 07:32, 25 October 2006 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...
Click to read more »protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) Does not satisfy our notibility guideline for web content Wikipedia:Notability_(web)—— Eagle101...
Click to read more »(UTC) Non-notable forum. 0zymandias 02:09, 1 June 2006 (UTC) Keep - Is a notible forum connected to dubcnn.com, which is a news network for West Coast hip...
Click to read more »Apparent autobiographic article about a ballet "master" of questionable notibility. Some claims of notability made, but no sources are provided for corroboration...
Click to read more »21 January 2007 (UTC) Delete Wikipedia is not a how-to-guide. No sources (unverifiably, no asserted notibility fails WP:N WP:V). Possible WP:OR issues due...
Click to read more »WP:BIO and the book for failing notibility books guidelines.--Dacium 08:04, 23 February 2007 (UTC) Delete both, while it is not the publisher or who paid for...
Click to read more »him into the Notibility category.--Kumioko (talk) 15:46, 6 August 2009 (UTC) Delete We have consistently held that Brigadier Generals are not necessarily...
Click to read more »01:26, 1 October 2005 (UTC) ad for nn four restaurant chain. No claim of notibility, none found on Google Outlander 16:19, 21 September 2005 (UTC) Delete...
Click to read more »including the Wiki articles and mirrors, see [1]. In my opinion, does not meet notibility Per WP:Bio, "Painters, sculptors, architects, engineers, and other...
Click to read more »Delete per nom --Pboyd04 02:23, 27 December 2005 (UTC) Keep author is a notible vet in the history of video game production. ===Mark Vearrier=== Comment...
Click to read more »January 2018 (UTC) Delete Web Browser games are rarely notable. Cannot find notible references Lee Vilenski(talk) 13:23, 4 January 2018 (UTC) Keep The subject...
Click to read more »article claims only 1000 copies of the album were ever produced.. far from notible. Alan - talk 03:53, 26 April 2011 (UTC) Relisted to generate a more thorough...
Click to read more »is not for directions on how to get to the local powerlines. Bfigura (talk) 04:10, 26 April 2009 (UTC) Delete not notable and lots of other nots as well...
Click to read more »person is not notible enough for an article. Being on a reality show, especially Who Wants to be a Superhero? does not yield the notibility for an article...
Click to read more »that this punk band even exists — despite claims in the article of some notority. No references on Google. Suspect promotional hype. — C Maylett 21:51,...
Click to read more »This page appaears to be a non-notible vanity page. I was about to go and wikify it, but thought to run a short search through amazon and google for links...
Click to read more »notable). -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 01:59, 29 July 2006 (UTC) Comment: since notibility is in question, I went ahead and checked several search engines. Google...
Click to read more »of sites unrelated to the musician which means that he isn't all that notible. Joker264 (talk) 02:45, 28 March 2010 (UTC) Delete, fails WP:MUSIC, also...
Click to read more »wikinewbie Barek, but I'm glad you pointed out WP:ORG to me and mentioned notibility. It's an important issue. Since you've convinced me to remove the "Prominent...
Click to read more »its history. --Mereda 13:51, 11 August 2006 (UTC) Delete per nom. Non-notible. Notice the author did mention the competition to appear NPOV and legit...
Click to read more »23 March 2010 (UTC) Slow Delete The information provided here is barely notible. If perhaps more information was added then that would make me change my...
Click to read more »anti-war piece for a minor newspaper Oswax 19:45, 25 September 2005 (UTC) Notibility is increasing.Dvt62 20:47, 25 September 2005 (UTC) speedy as A7 vanity...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) doesn't seem very notible. just a dime a dozen guitar player.. previously tagged for notability Alan...
Click to read more »Delete, and no merge into Hermit crab. I suggest preserving the Dos and Do Nots in WP:BJAODN. "Don't drop crab..." Hmmm, I didn't know that! ;) –- kungming·2...
Click to read more »the university page. A few sentences seem salvigable. Else Delete, not notibility.--Dacium 06:38, 15 February 2007 (UTC) Delete it is no more notable...
Click to read more »part of many teams who have moved the web along, but really nothing of notibility on his own accord. Pnm (talk) 20:29, 13 February 2011 (UTC) Keep work...
Click to read more »Contested prod of a non-notable game. Removing user claims the article is "notible [sic] enough to deserve the debate" of AfD, but both a Google and Google...
Click to read more »TWL) Unsourced article, which fails WP:GNG.. I can't see how this passes notibility. JMHamo (talk) 00:42, 17 January 2015 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...
Click to read more »log) Article about a student organization that makes no assertion of notibility or has any third party references. 99DBSIMLR 12:29, 29 May 2007 (UTC)...
Click to read more »nonnotable. NawlinWiki 12:14, 6 August 2006 (UTC) Delete per WP:BIO as not notible. Thε Halo Θ 13:00, 6 August 2006 (UTC) Delete — per nom. --AbsolutDan...
Click to read more »(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) No notibility Tyw7 (☎ Contact me! • Contributions) 12:36, 16 May 2018 (UTC) Note: This...
Click to read more »2023. DJ Ace (August 21, 2019). "General Levy and Fiona Compton Talk Notting Hill Carnival 2019". BBC Radio 1Xtra. Retrieved February 11, 2023. Nicholas...
Click to read more »outside this topic. Do not Delete per WP:N I found it on IMDB pro... which means it will appear on imdb soon... so it is notible. I also emailed great...
Click to read more »these claims. You claim it should be deleted as it is not a notible cricket website but it is a notible cricket gaming website wouldn't you agree? Many cricket...
Click to read more »log) I do not see the notibility that will ever come of this article, this appears to be a house in the RpG Dungeons and Dragons. I do not see any notability...
Click to read more »Family Fortunes", places Robert Langmead at number 44 and establishes his notibility as an entrepreneur. Diginerd84 (talk) 11:28, 1 February 2011 (UTC) Comment...
Click to read more »I asked for help on that talk page, but to no avail. I believe he is notible, however, there is a lack of independent online sources to confirm this...
Click to read more »the above reasons.TH1980 (talk) 00:49, 12 October 2018 (UTC) Delete non-notible and lacking in available sources. Dreamy Jazz 🎷 talk to me | my contributions...
Click to read more »(UTC) Comment. I've listed additional references so as to establish his notibility which, I hope, should resolve the issue. MadMax 16:10, 18 December 2006...
Click to read more »history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) Non Notible local pro wrestling event Butttown 02:18, 29 March 2007 (UTC) delete per...
Click to read more »have some notibility. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Freedomface (talk • contribs) 14:57, 5 March 2009 (UTC) See Wikipedia:ADVERT#How_not_to_be_a_spammer...
Click to read more »notes indicate that because the book is for sale, it must be notible. However, that is not the case for Wikipedia. I have been unable to find a single...
Click to read more »however, so I tend to be a little more forgiving. It may well become notible once the game is released as well, as a few reviews are usually enough...
Click to read more »04:23, 22 January 2007 (UTC) Delete Most of article is not verifiable and no assertion of notibility is made. Best thing to published mentions is passing...
Click to read more »sustain an article. Fails general notability, WP:AUTHOR and WP:BASIC. Notibility is not inherited. Jbh (talk) 11:05, 6 April 2015 (UTC) Keep - Some of the...
Click to read more »(UTC) Delete, nom says it all mikm 01:28, 3 April 2007 (UTC) Delete No notibility. Not verifiable. No reliable sources.--Dacium 04:45, 3 April 2007 (UTC)...
Click to read more »non-notable stub Red Dalek 09:29, 3 October 2006 (UTC) Will be expanded soon, notible as part of controversial Adult at 14 season. --Fabio 09:30, 3 October 2006...
Click to read more »YouTube-only artist. NawlinWiki 03:45, 2 April 2007 (UTC) Delete No notibility. Not Verifiable out side of it self since no reliable sources--Dacium 04:41...
Click to read more »during that time. -- saberwyn 23:25, 17 January 2007 (UTC) Delete No notibility asserted.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 155.144.251.120...
Click to read more »WP:GNG Alex-h (talk) 09:16, 30 March 2021 (UTC) Delete: Doesn't meet notibility criteria. Fails GNG & NFOOTBALL. TheDreamBoat (talk) 10:55, 30 March 2021...
Click to read more »delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) Spanish TV channel, not notible in english Wikipedia RT | Talk 21:49, 18 January 2008 (UTC) Comment....
Click to read more »26 January 2007 (UTC) Delete Being published does not mean notibility. No assertion of notibility. The game of the same name seems alot more common.--Dacium...
Click to read more »Google, spoof of Body Mass Index, formula is not recognized in any computer science text, fails "general notibility guidelines" WP:NOTABILITY, and is possible...
Click to read more »NetMovers own website. Syrthiss (talk) 15:29, 11 April 2012 (UTC) Added more notible sources, I will also be adding more shortly. Friskuk (talk) 16:56, 11 April...
Click to read more »sources... It also has 32, not 3 locations. Addionne (talk) 13:57, 24 July 2008 (UTC) Keep It's not the chain that makes it notible but the person who owns...
Click to read more »references given, no assertion of notibility. ElectricEye (talk) 11:52, 19 November 2006 (UTC) Delete - Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. MER-C 12:10, 19...
Click to read more »though. Punkmorten 23:18, 9 November 2006 (UTC) Article expanded, should be notible enough right now. SportsAddicted | discuss 04:32, 10 November 2006 (UTC)...
Click to read more »logs | views) - (View log) Does not meet notability requirements. ↪Lakes (Talk) 20:08, 13 January 2007 (UTC) Keep He is notible enough to save from deletion...
Click to read more »protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log) Notibility not established. Only reference link is broken. I would have nominated for...
Click to read more »better job – Gurch 08:41, 28 May 2006 (UTC) Keep - it's a school, it's notible. If it infringes copyright, do something about it. Copyright is beyond...
Click to read more »website. EeepEeep (talk) 21:55, 24 February 2010 (UTC) Strong keep Very notible internet personality and a regular panelist on TWiT. RandomTime 23:17,...
Click to read more »Root2 01:34, 19 January 2007 (UTC) Delete Utter rubbish. No asserted notibility. No sources. Unvarifiable etc. etc.--155.144.251.120 02:01, 19 January...
Click to read more »(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) notibility? no good coverage as the software/project is now defunct. Alan - talk...
Click to read more »Reads like a glossary, rather than a list of creature types. very few are notible. Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 19:58, 14 January 2018 (UTC) Delete per...
Click to read more »delete this it is well sourced, notable and factual and appears to pass all NOTS. –Ammarpad (talk) 11:28, 29 January 2018 (UTC) Keep obvious keeper. Mdmadden...
Click to read more »Delete There isn't enough notability on this guy, which is a violation of notibility guidelines. Most of what I saw has been stated well by Paul. James-the-Charizard...
Click to read more »Reddit. --N Shar 01:55, 29 January 2007 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:WEB no notibility shown. Not verifiable outside of itself.--Dacium 02:46, 29 January 2007 (UTC)...
Click to read more »contained This text. As the article is now, it is much more notable, but not notible enough, delete per nom and TParis00ap RT | Talk 17:21, 10 October 2009...
Click to read more »a conference. Not enough information on her - yet. All I am finding are blogs, etc. Once her book is published, she may become notible then, but I don't...
Click to read more »--Fabrictramp | talk to me 22:38, 9 January 2009 (UTC) Delete doesn't meet notibility requirments agreed upon for minor league baseball players. Hardnfast (talk)...
Click to read more »February 2006 (UTC) Delete Advertisement. As Camillus said, if it had any notibility, it wouldn't be using MySpace and Wikipedia as main methods of promotion...
Click to read more »importance of this person. Agent 86 01:51, 18 January 2007 (UTC) Delete Only notibility is his rank, of which many thousands of people had. Collided with another...
Click to read more »Delete as CSD A7. This is an article about a person that seems to lack notibility. Article has been tagged with {{db-person}}. Wiki you now, Wiki you later...
Click to read more »WP:CORP criteria Samw 00:43, 24 February 2007 (UTC) Delete Don't see notibility for WP:CORP standards.--Dacium 01:11, 24 February 2007 (UTC) Delete -...
Click to read more »television and radio broadcast is notible whether it be a long or short career. Actors and artistic performers should not be deleted by armchair critics...
Click to read more »(UTC) Delete Fails WP:WEB, not shown notibility.--Dacium 21:53, 15 February 2007 (UTC) Delete. Not quite notable yet, which is not strange since it has only...
Click to read more »trivial significance to the subject. No other criteria from Wikipedia's notibility criteria are satisfactorily met. This AfD nomination was incomplete. It...
Click to read more »worked with notable people, despite what a quick Google search says. Per Notibility guidelines for musicians at Wikipedia:Notability (music): Has released...
Click to read more »--GraemeL (talk) 12:07, 23 August 2005 (UTC) Merge to Santana Moss, his notible brother Roodog2k 18:32, 26 August 2005 (UTC) Delete or Merge as noted above...
Click to read more »'true crime' website article. --killing 22:57, 4 April 2007 (UTC) Delete Notibility is questionable... anyway It doesn't have any sources and so isn't verifiable...
Click to read more »Starblind 16:16, Jun 17, 2005 (UTC) Keep If it's in IMDB then it is notible, 'non-notible' is being used too often as a heavey club to destroy articles. --ShaunMacPherson...
Click to read more »third-party sources. ThemFromSpace 03:01, 24 June 2009 (UTC) Delete Fails notibility, budget makes it suspect. Kurt (talk) 04:16, 24 June 2009 (UTC) Delete...
Click to read more »this company and Google comes up with over 4,400. Until it attains more notibility and more third party ref., it doesn't stand on it's own yet. JavierMC...
Click to read more »2007 (UTC) Delete Unsourced. Does not show how it had media/published information. does not establish any notibility for WP:ORG standards.Dacium 03:46...
Click to read more »April 2007 (UTC) Keep Media mentions seem non trivial and enough to show notibility.--Dacium 04:37, 3 April 2007 (UTC) Speedy delete Advertising, lists fake...
Click to read more »(UTC) Delete League might be notible (and should be part of it's own AfD if that that's in dispute) but the team is not. Nicko (Talk•Contribs) 13:59,...
Click to read more »fails WP:BIO based on no indepedantly noteable reviews that assert any notibility or awards. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 155.144.251.120...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) It's not one of Yes's notible songs. It was never a single and it never won any awards. It has...
Click to read more »frequent topics. It's very laboured. Maybe I'm not understanding something here. There are three "nots" in one sentence. Tony (talk) 02:22, 9 April 2008...
Click to read more »September 2021 (UTC) Merge into Supreme Sikh Society of New Zealand as not notible on his own NealeWellington (talk) 01:21, 10 September 2021 (UTC) Delete...
Click to read more »include Bitterne Park to complete set, but can't yet find anything else notible about the school. Burdfield 21:56, 23 April 2007 (UTC) Delete unless non-trivial...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reference_desk/Archives/Language/2008 August 26 Japanese music venue website Notting Hill Carnival Null and void Please translate the following text from English...
Click to read more »Joyous 06:30, Feb 27, 2005 (UTC) Not notable, while the station certainly exists this article neither establishes notibility, or is interesting in any way...
Click to read more »contact me if you want to form a group whose goal it is to make it so not notible cannot be used as a sole criterion for deleting an article. --ShaunMacPherson...
Click to read more »22:02, 11 May 2006 (UTC) Keep - Notible presenter on a very well known TV show. I removed the AfD tags because they were not done corectly (only the tag was...
Click to read more »deletions. -- Pete.Hurd 03:33, 22 January 2007 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:BIO. Notibility not asserted. WP:COI as per nomination. Pioneering family of 1945!? right...
Click to read more »Not notible. Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 15:36, 5 February 2018 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not...
Click to read more »Redirect as above--not notable but could be a search term. JJL (talk) 19:06, 30 June 2013 (UTC) I agree with Mdtemp; I found no notibility for this one and...
Click to read more »1000s of web pages out there. We don't need a stub article about a non notible forum. Aeon 02:37, 30 May 2006 (UTC) Delete, at best it could be an external...
Click to read more »A previous prod, the reason was Very minor poet and philanthropist, not notible (sic). I feel this fits to afd more. No opinion from my side. Tone 20:57...
Click to read more »Metropolis (London nightclub) Ministry of Sound Moth Club Night Tales Notting Hill Arts Club Omeara Peckham Audio Phonox Studio 338 The Beams The Book...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) No explination as to why the film is notible. Wintonian (talk) 05:35, 3 June 2010 (UTC) Speedy Delete Looks like an...
Click to read more »I've added the CSD tag. Claim that he is a "politician" doesn't assert notibility because there is no indication he's ever run for office. Last time I checked...
Click to read more »7 May 2010 (UTC) Keep I don't see why he should be redirected, he is a notible person.Turco85 (Talk) 12:34, 8 May 2010 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...
Click to read more »Notities over succulenten [2] The first article I was able to find in an archive here: [3] and even though I cannot read Dutch, this article does not...
Click to read more »watch | logs | views) – (View log) Subject of article does not meet guidelines for notibility per WP:BIO. Nv8200p talk 04:20, 23 February 2007 (UTC) Delete...
Click to read more »the WP:NOTs. Angus McLellan (Talk) 20:00, 3 May 2006 (UTC) Delete as how-to. Brian G. Crawford 21:10, 3 May 2006 (UTC) Keep Wikipedia is not paper; this...
Click to read more »delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log) Unknown notibility, french TV show contestent? RT | Talk 15:45, 4 January 2009 (UTC) Delete;...
Click to read more »Kichu🐘 Need any help? 00:09, 29 March 2021 (UTC) Delete: Doesn't meet notibility criteria. Fails GNG. TheDreamBoat (talk) 11:03, 30 March 2021 (UTC) Draftify...
Click to read more »dont see any sources, and if they had them the claim to notibility made in the article is not very strong. Musaabdulrashid 21:50, 8 September 2006 (UTC)...
Click to read more »not the one off segment. Misleading. he has no awards as I can find and the "aint it funny" website mentioned seems to no longer exist. Not notible at...
Click to read more »(UTC) Delete unless it can be rewritten and given contextual reason for notibility. Maybe transfer to Wiktionary.--William Thweatt Talk | Contribs 00:29...
Click to read more »November 2008 (UTC) No content demonstrating how the song passes the notibility inclusion guidelines, as well as a lack of sources, thereby failing the...
Click to read more »Oppose the image on quality if you wish but opposing it on the grounds of notibility is ridiculous. If he is notable to have an article in WP then he's notable...
Click to read more »I have no idea what I saw for the references and they do not meet Wikipedia's notibility guidelines nor is this article notable. WisconsinBoyClevelandRocks228844...
Click to read more »Delete There is no information provided supporting any sort of notability, notority, or significant history and is therefore WP:NN Яεñ99 (talk) 06:39, 13 August...
Click to read more »Thanks, Quarl (talk) 08:04, 23 February 2007 (UTC) Delete Where is the notibility? There are thousands of papers like that. No wide spread usage or acceptance...
Click to read more »Song not notable. Orfen User Talk | Contribs 20:23, 16 May 2007 (UTC) Delete — No references that prove it is a single and it is otherwise not notible. –...
Click to read more »myspace isn't notible displays pure ignorance. it is THE BIGGEST networking and advertising tool on the planet, how can you get any more notible than that...
Click to read more »and was based on quite a popular phenominon of the time. Seems pretty notible to me. (I even have in the back of my mind a memory of the previews for...
Click to read more »Andelin is widely recognized for his work at a level that would make him a nottable sculptor. 2 of the sources are essentially his website and an add source...
Click to read more »Makary Potocki. --Deathphoenix 14:25, 31 January 2006 (UTC) Does not appear to meet notibility guidelines for deceased people. Are "noble" people inherently...
Click to read more »used words and it was madeup on 26 Dec 2009. No google hits to assert notibility. ~~ GB fan ~~ talk 21:13, 3 January 2010 (UTC) Speedy delete per nom....
Click to read more »notices (and later by vandalizing my user page and that of User:Hadal). If notibility is shown, I will change my stance. Carrp | Talk 03:54, 11 Feb 2005 (UTC)...
Click to read more »September 2021 (UTC) Merge into Supreme Sikh Society of New Zealand as not notible on his own NealeWellington (talk) 01:22, 10 September 2021 (UTC) Delete...
Click to read more »is red-linked so merging is not an option. There is no indication this is a notable game, therefore it fails the notibility inclusion criterion stated...
Click to read more »(UTC) Keep- There's no doubting its notibility and I can't see what reason there is to delete. Cleanup tag needed, afd not. J.J.Sagnella 16:27, 18 January...
Click to read more »Russian Mafia as the Cammora is of the Mafia and in my opinion certainly a notible topic. 209.213.71.78 12:47, 17 May 2005 (UTC) This page is now preserved...
Click to read more »protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log) Seems not notible- no scrces apart from an MTV article. Complaints that it was written...
Click to read more »Google search results justifies its notibility. [1] Revws (talk) 13:45, 25 April 2010 (UTC) They clearly do not, if you look they are either self publiushed...
Click to read more »willing to change my nomination if anyone can find how it fits into Book notibility guidelines, but I was unable to find anything.Coffeepusher (talk) 16:10...
Click to read more »version of Amazon: http://www.spectreworld.com.au, Gamecast complys with the Notible rules so I dont see why Gamecast has been nominated for deletion. Delete...
Click to read more »- David Oberst 00:19, 25 February 2007 (UTC). Delete No notibility for the model is shown. Not verifiable either.--Dacium 01:10, 25 February 2007 (UTC)...
Click to read more »prize' (not even a runner-up) in a logo competion), as well as one run-of-the-mill quality certification. All this doesn't seem to add up to notibility. --Tikiwont...
Click to read more »August 2006 (UTC) Comment: I think the criteria for deletion is over notibility not the quality of the article. How is this neighborhood notable to the...
Click to read more »contest he could possibly claim notibility. Gorkymalorki 03:39, 3 August 2007 (UTC) Speedy Delete Not only is Wikipedia NOT the Youtube user directory, this...
Click to read more »12:55, 6 July 2006 (UTC) Non-notable band from Canada. Unsourced and notibility tags had been placed June 23rd with no additions or talks. Lsjzl 20:49...
Click to read more »copyedit per the Guild of Copy Editors. I was the editor who brought the notibility issues to the attention to the Wikipedia communitty. Geraldshields11 (talk)...
Click to read more »television and radio broadcast is notible whether it be a long or short career. Actors and artistic performers should not be deleted by armchair critics...
Click to read more »comic in question. It may be a good comic, but I don't see evidence of notibility. Carrp | Talk 03:00, 11 Feb 2005 (UTC) Oppose on grounds that it appears...
Click to read more »wording poorly above. I apologize for that, I had not finished my coffee when I wrote it. If notibility cannot be established, the article should be merged...
Click to read more »non-notable tagteam from England. Very little to suggest that they are notible personalities. Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 12:40, 19 January 2018 (UTC)...
Click to read more »Delete as non-notable. -- MarcoTolo 02:14, 22 January 2007 (UTC) Delete No notibility WP:Nshown, doesn't pass WP:MUSIC for his music.--Dacium 03:24, 22 January...
Click to read more »discussions usually last five days he has plenty of time to source and expand notibility. War wizard90 23:53, 4 March 2007 (UTC) delete - I tend to follow SL economics...
Click to read more »production and inclusion on IMDB is notible whether it be a long or short career. Actors and artistic media creators should not be deleted by armchair critics...
Click to read more »uses the book or what its significance to the orgonization is. Fails notibility standards since Hubbard didn't write it (it is an edited version of his...
Click to read more »2007 (UTC) The album Music in the Stone does meet the requirements as a notible album as the terms say. It actually meets it in more than one way. It has...
Click to read more »free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) The page does not meet wikipedia's notibility. It contain information from unlear source Ruhi55 (talk) 15:17...
Click to read more »as "notibility" —— Eagle (ask me for help) 06:36, 20 July 2006 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify...
Click to read more »links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) This article does not extablish why it is a notible school. Icestorm815 21:37, 24 September 2007 (UTC) Note: This...
Click to read more »could be 10,000 people or more to be listed who really don't have any notibility.--Dacium 06:33, 15 February 2007 (UTC) Delete non notable. --[|.K.Z|][|...
Click to read more »higher quality. I don't know, maybe I can get this to FA in the future but not for a while. So any comments at all would be good. Gran2 17:04, 14 June 2007...
Click to read more »(talk) 09:24, 1 September 2010 (UTC) Delete per nom. Also, to add to the WP:NOTS, genealogical entries.--NortyNort (Holla) 12:23, 1 September 2010 (UTC) Note:...
Click to read more »Adabow (talk) 02:18, 19 August 2013 (UTC) Keep it is informative as well as notible — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jackie'sWorld (talk • contribs) 12:59...
Click to read more »google search. EDIT: I think suborders (which this is) are inheretantly notible enough for inclusion. Martijn Hoekstra 20:35, 7 November 2007 (UTC) Merge...
Click to read more »merge' is not a valid option as a merge involves preserving the page history. Petros471 22:22, 21 September 2006 (UTC) Main claim of notority is being...
Click to read more »protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log) Notibility issues: this site is ranked 1,681,443 on Alexa http://www.alexa...
Click to read more »created more then these but you guys know the ins and outs and can's and can nots with CU. Unbroken Chain (talk) 14:29, 12 May 2020 (UTC) @Unbroken Chain:...
Click to read more »Hiding T 10:13, 6 October 2009 (UTC) Keep Agree that the article fulfills notibility and would only require that an editor properly reference the awards. Good...
Click to read more »Or a professional senior cup, take England as an example, a player has notibility when he has played in the League Cup or FA Cup or even the Football League...
Click to read more »Curator of Botany at Te Papa for 16 years. Specialises in taxa - forget me nots, plantains, foxgloves, hebes. Has attended a couple of workshops with Giantflightlessbirds...
Click to read more »Zymo Research due to Zymo being a smaller company. Zymo's products are notible as you can see: http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&q=zymo+researc...
Click to read more »Weak Keep. Needs a lot more information and sources to support claim of notibility.--Joebengo 18:41, 8 April 2007 (UTC) Keep. The current version of the...
Click to read more »is that it is a "dictionary definition", not because of it lacking in notibility. Thoughts? --Coin945 (talk) 07:46, 4 December 2011 (UTC) Note: This debate...
Click to read more »site. Doc Strange (talk) 19:26, 12 January 2008 (UTC) DeleteSince it's not notible, only allow recreation when there is more information. —Preceding unsigned...
Click to read more »protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) Non-Notible album/artist - not charted on any chart - unreferenced article HarryHall86 09:23...
Click to read more »Wikipedia is not for stuff you and your friends thought up one day. --Selket Talk 04:43, 23 February 2007 (UTC) Delete Where is notibility shown? All i...
Click to read more »is just the Exec of the Wellington Regional Chamber of Commerce then not notible enough,. - SimonLyall 10:23, 19 October 2006 (UTC) Indeed. But what was...
Click to read more »Wikipedia, Wiki Commons, and Wikidata, starting with Aotearoa's native forget-me-nots. In her presentation Avocadobabygirl pointed out that where Te papa staff...
Click to read more »Xoloz 15:05, 22 June 2006 (UTC) Non-notable local politician. Does not meet notibility under WP:BIO Nv8200p talk 12:11, 17 June 2006 (UTC) Delete nn Matthew...
Click to read more »February 2008 (UTC) Delete While the article is somewhat humorous, it lacks notibility. Iepeulas (talk) 17:21, 19 February 2008 (UTC) Delete as utter tripe....
Click to read more »news blurbs on him regarding his "pay to drive faster" program, but its nots very substantial (mostly non RS blogs) and can be classified as WP:SINGLEEVENT...
Click to read more »You say keep, but why? It doesn't really seem to quite meet the general notibility guideline with only more of a passing mention in it's only source... Spiesr...
Click to read more »Any player who played for this team is notible enough for their own article, and thus is more than notible enough for this list. -Djsasso (talk) 22:27...
Click to read more »and do not substantiate notability for an encyclopeia article. -- Whpq (talk) 15:42, 26 June 2009 (UTC) Delete - This article is too many "nots" to list...
Click to read more »'webumentarian' even less.—Stombs 04:44, 24 December 2005 (UTC) Save It is quite a notible term. It is a term much like 'bloging' and 'podcast'. It's roots come from...
Click to read more »submission, which I think are very few, it would be good to establish the notibility of music sales increasing after death. Something like this, I suggest...
Click to read more »technical, or cultural significance: a live entertainment agency based in Notting Hill, London. Hyper Agency is a booking agent for DJ's and Celebrities...
Click to read more »G.R.A.M. should really AfD all these with One Be Lo beacuse if he has notibility his albums are allowed pages no matter there current sales as per MP:MUSIC...
Click to read more »The term does not appear to exist outside of Wikipedia. -Branddobbe 02:42, 22 January 2007 (UTC) Delete neolegism with no shown notibility/popularity of...
Click to read more »so far presented any hard, positive evidence or proof of this entity's notibility. I have found such material lacking in Internet Archive, Google Search...
Click to read more »Kentucky much less any hard, positive evidence or proof of this entity's notibility. Like Hog Farm, I have found only clickbait from its Wikipedia entry and...
Click to read more »(UTC) Article is about a candidate for public office. Article does not show enough notority to warrant inclusion outside of the fact she is a candidate for...
Click to read more »have had a look at Google and on first impressions, I am dubious to the notibility of this article, but I may be wrong. I want to know what the wider community...
Click to read more »much as I am an X-Men fan, this article is necessarily of too little notibility even to fans of the X-books to merit a full Wikipedia article. Outside...
Click to read more »relationship with Diego Maradona. Apart from that what is her independet notality? For now article is quite poorly sourced. Dawid2009 (talk) 16:44, 12 March...
Click to read more »piece with references to Dat Piff, not reliable. Could not find significance coverage in RS to verify notibility. Meatsgains (talk) 17:07, 23 December...
Click to read more »sourced due in no small part to the fact that the 'college' in question is not notible. This article promotes a specific biased political view and seems impossible...
Click to read more »Stitchbird2 - she's continuing to work on species pages/subspecies of NZ forget-me-nots. At the Ada Lovelace day editathon she worked on a person article for the...
Click to read more »nom. --Coredesat talk. ^_^ 20:01, 10 August 2006 (UTC) Delete per both WP:NOTs already mentioned (with that few companies do we really need a list anyway...
Click to read more »non notible. Thε Halo Θ 11:16, 13 August 2006 (UTC) Delete. "She is best known for being in background scenes..." Uh, we call that an extra, not an actress...
Click to read more »history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) Notibility is questionable. I get hits on google outside wikipedia for this person...
Click to read more »protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) Subject of article does not meet notibility guidelines of WP:BIO-Nv8200p talk 00:54, 30 December 2006 (UTC) Delete...
Click to read more »--128.229.114.117 21:30, 17 August 2005 (UTC) Merge with Don and Mike. Not notible enough for his own article. --Kevin McManus 21:48, August 19, 2005 (UTC)...
Click to read more »title i was going to add this afd to the architecture list, but no:)), as notibility is shaky without more sources it would be good if/when this is deleted...
Click to read more »worldwide film festival coverage and international theatrical distribution = notibility. Also, 2 more art shows added (another in Los Angeles, and New York) take...
Click to read more »UlTiMuS 04:41, 26 August 2006 (UTC) Speedy Delete I dont see how it asserts notibility, it says hes underground --Musaabdulrashid 04:47, 26 August 2006 (UTC)...
Click to read more »Comment the group is a small student society, not an established organisation of any kind. Hence, the notibility issue... Additionally, the articles you've...
Click to read more »with Te Papa specialists. User:Stitchbird2 is working hard on Forget-me-nots. User:Ambrosia10 promised to help with interlinking via Wikidata and Wikicommons...
Click to read more »verifiability issues. MER-C 03:07, 15 November 2006 (UTC) Delete per notibility issues. Wikipediarules2221 04:11, 15 November 2006 (UTC) Delete - As per...
Click to read more »relative does not establish notability. Doczilla 06:47, 9 June 2007 (UTC) Delete, per nom and the article fails to provide notibility. Nikki311 13:04...
Click to read more »Insufficient coverage to establish nottability. -- Whpq (talk) 16:13, 26 September 2011 (UTC) Delete. Simply being open source is not an exemption from notability...
Click to read more »schools/universities notible and articles like this school one are not? Notibility alone seems too subjective to delete an article over. --ShaunMacPherson...
Click to read more »pretty notible band, however; if it is to stay, some better references will be needed as the source links for the article link to purchase websites not written...
Click to read more »meant to believe the whole article comes from an interview? Even then no notibility is shown at all to pass WP:BIO, nor is the book passing notbility books...
Click to read more »2005 (UTC) Delete I'd argue that popularity doesn't neccisarily make notibility. This article is Exhibit A.--InShaneee 20:45, 21 Feb 2005 (UTC) Delete...
Click to read more »counts here). No claims to notibility, no sources to show what makes it notable. And before anyone says it, high schools are not automatically notable. TJ...
Click to read more »reason here, and probably fails about a half-dozen WP:NOTs including "Not an indiscriminate etc etc", "Not a directory" ... 23skidoo (talk) 19:33, 31 October...
Click to read more »advertised as BSoD, rather than Bastard Sons of Dial-up, which would affect notibility through Google, Yahoo, etc. --58.6.64.79 07:15, 8 August 2006 (UTC) Delete...
Click to read more »at Te Papa about what they might want to do after finishing the forget-me-nots project. Now looking at the next piece of work. #EditingForEditing editathon...
Click to read more »an election does not cause a person to lose nobility IMO. Somitho 05:40, 17 December 2006 (UTC) Delete Neither does it make one notible. Pastordavid 06:46...
Click to read more »people in Croke Park last Saturday than where at the super bowl . Very Notible (Gnevin 21:17, 8 February 2007 (UTC)) Now, it is a valid stub. Keep. Shyam...
Click to read more »Have Nots, enjoy basketball and strip clubs, and are indicated by a black indicator! In the manual it actually says "Elites (white)" and "Have Nots (black)"...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails to meet the nottability guidelines for companies and organizations, WP:NCORP Vexations (talk)...
Click to read more »gives no change for authors to respond who might not be aware of the full requirements of notibility and verifiability. I think the nomination should...
Click to read more »Qxz 04:11, 22 February 2007 (UTC) Comment Most Bio's fail WP:BIO for notibility. Looks like he is starting from A, could be a loooong list.--Dacium 04:28...
Click to read more »protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log) None notible athlete, fails WP:BIO. Page is just for advertsing. Also important to note...
Click to read more »it was a well known board game and is the entire basis of this game be notibility? --InvaderC1 08:24, 23 June 2007 (UTC) No, Battletech's notability only...
Click to read more »HisSpaceResearch. Redfarmer (talk) 12:43, 3 January 2008 (UTC) Keep, lack of notibility not established in nomination for deletion. Also, I revised the article...
Click to read more »that last less than a year, need to really do something specific to be notible. Lee Vilenski(talk) 13:21, 4 December 2017 (UTC) Delete - The three members...
Click to read more »article as it is, is a joke, it's not even a stub. But I believe Holly Body definitely is notible enough. There are not many awards in world of porn, there...
Click to read more »log) Quite a few published papers, but I don't know if this counts as notibility. RT | Talk 21:42, 9 February 2009 (UTC) Weak delete - Notability for scholars...
Click to read more »11:33, 27 March 2010 (UTC) Weak Keep and Expand - This website is barely notible based on looking at the article, though a Google search for the site name...
Click to read more »he ever played first team football so therefore doesnt pass wikipedia notibility Telfordbuck (talk) 18:24, 3 February 2013 (UTC) Note: This discussion...
Click to read more »verifiability, no sources, no WP:NN. This article dosen't relate to WP:CBALL. The notibility however is in question. - Wrapper 15:44, 9 October 2007 (UTC) Delete WP:NFT...
Click to read more »talk page asking for more information about the only possible point of notibility (the proported Mayer technique) at articles talk page and recieved no...
Click to read more »first month) - Peripitus (Talk) 00:50, 22 January 2007 (UTC) Delete No notibility shown or found. Fails WP:ORG and WP:CORP (since WP:SCHOOL doesnt apply)...
Click to read more »demonstrates any notibility. --Salix alba (talk) 12:41, 7 February 2008 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify...
Click to read more »Tropical Cyclone 18:37, 2 August 2008 (UTC) Delete no reliable sources or notibility ·Add§hore· Talk/Cont 18:52, 2 August 2008 (UTC) Delete - Sadly no (apparent)...
Click to read more »Any player who played for this team is notible enough for their own article, and thus is more than notible enough for this list. -Djsasso (talk) 22:27...
Click to read more »Sikh communities around the world. Being part of this minority and being notible in a large Global Comapany should be acknowledged. —Preceding unsigned...
Click to read more »(UTC) Delete regretfully. Article is interesting though. Recreate after notibility and importance are established. --Starionwolf 18:28, 12 June 2006 (UTC)...
Click to read more »can meet those. Looking at myspace and not seeing any indcation that the band has acheived any level of notority is just an indicator that nothing is being...
Click to read more »"Being a meme" is not grounds for deletion-K@ngiemeep! 07:49, 23 February 2007 (UTC) Whoops I thought it was. Eitherway i don't see notibility.--Dacium 08:12...
Click to read more »television and radio broadcast is notible whether it be a long or short career. Actors and artistic performers should not be deleted by armchair critics...
Click to read more »importantly, my articles were unsourced, and the band and album do not meet notibility guidelines, I therefore felt I should put them up for deletion. Again...
Click to read more »the debate was delete. Titoxd(?!? - help us) 00:31, 3 May 2006 (UTC) Non-notible web content as per WP:WEB. The site has the following URLs http://thefriendsociety...
Click to read more »No sources, nothing with in the article to say why it's important and notible since all it states is that it's a street named after Summer and that it...
Click to read more »page. The result was delete. DS 16:42, 4 March 2007 (UTC) Questionable notibility on this one. I'm leaning toward deletion. BuickCenturyDriver (Honk, contribs...
Click to read more »protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) Questionable notibility and no references. I tried to find some info on google but I didnt come...
Click to read more »WP:BIO - rhmoore 06:35, 12 August 2006 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:BIO as non notible. Thε Halo Θ 11:03, 12 August 2006 (UTC) Delete per above, non notable....
Click to read more »Europe. A local company notable in its own country and not worldwide doesn't mean it lacks the notibility. Rather than referring it to lack of notabilty, help...
Click to read more »Stitchbird2 - working on her project of botany articles on NZ forget-me-nots, getting into Wikidata and supporting Te Papa institution Wikipedia work...
Click to read more »February 2007 (UTC) Delete all Can't be speedied. Fails WP:BIO, no notibility shown. Not verifiable outside of itself. And most importantly is blantent WP:COI...
Click to read more »(UTC) Delete No shown notibility as per WP:N. Not verifiable outside of itself. Has had 2 years to show media attention/notibility and hasn't.--Dacium 02:45...
Click to read more »sources which do not help support a claim of notibility.--Joebengo 18:39, 8 April 2007 (UTC) Strong Delete This woman certainly is not notable because...
Click to read more »Jun 4, 2005 (UTC) I'm not sure what ought to be done with this article. Submitted to request community review on the notibility of this article. It is...
Click to read more »article itself. This might be a valid field, but it shouldn't be here until notibility can be asserted through indpendent reliable sources. Mr Senseless (talk)...
Click to read more »August 2009 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOT. Wikipedia is not for something you made up in school one day. (My favorite of all the "nots"!) --Gimme danger (talk) 03:23...
Click to read more »not meet WP:N. I don't want to offend or take away from the personal notibility of an individual but this is an Encyclopedia... —Preceding unsigned comment...
Click to read more »discussions. —I, Jethrobot drop me a line 20:12, 29 June 2011 (UTC) The notibility of the comic is the niche market of BDSM related subject matter that removed...
Click to read more »Google news archive and the web for any sources that would indicate some notibility for her, but while some of the factual data can be verified this way I...
Click to read more »Existance is notibility. Plenty of small towns etc which have no notibility besides existing are in here along with schools. Wiki's not paper as long...
Click to read more »what is, rather than what is not, unless there is a good reason to include the "is nots". That Montgomery, Alabama is not connected to Sweden is of zero...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Article does not meet Wikipedia:Notibility(books) guidelines DHHornfeldt (talk) 16:07, 10 January 2021...
Click to read more »Urge contributor to merge this info into the parent article article, not notible enough for separate page.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by...
Click to read more »history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) The notibility of this artist has been questioned since November. I tried to find some...
Click to read more »me know about this song, even thank him if he did it with an unproven notority subject. If I put somethin on wikipedia.org and people deletes my articles...
Click to read more »Karmafist 00:58, 31 August 2005 (UTC) I guess I just don't understand the notibility system here on Wikipedia. On the Allentown, PA page it has as a famous...
Click to read more »the media, and I don't see how Mitsubishis appearing in the media are notible enough to have an article devoted to it. Karrmann 17:26, 6 July 2007 (UTC)...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) no visible notibility Mandavi (talk) 15:14, 10 April 2017 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...
Click to read more »the article is a stub, and with only one reference, it is not eligible for the notibility guidelines unless the article has improvements and better sourcing...
Click to read more »by owner of current version, none-notible, advertisement.-- 9cds(talk) 09:06, 6 July 2006 (UTC) Delete per nom. Not notable. DarthVader 09:19, 6 July...
Click to read more »03:24, 22 January 2007 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:BIO by miles and miles, no notibility.--Dacium 03:45, 22 January 2007 (UTC) Delete Per WP:N and WP:BIO - IMDB...
Click to read more »Somerville and this is the first I've heard of this term. It seems as if its notibility is limited to a very small area. Carbonite | Talk 15:05, 23 November 2005...
Click to read more »software appears to have developed no other following, and fails the general notibility guideline. There is no claim of historical or technical significance and...
Click to read more »Article purposes are somewhat vague, and without references, there's no notibility ground. ♫ Melodia Chaconne ♫ 16:24, 26 January 2007 (UTC) Delete All -...
Click to read more »and therefore needs to reach wikipedia standard. I cannot decide on its notibility per WP:N. However, I believe that the phenomenon of users attempting to...
Click to read more »sufficient notability ThemFromSpace 01:56, 24 June 2009 (UTC) Delete Fails notibility and is written in-universe fan fictionish. I don't think it could be sourced...
Click to read more »(Wikipedia:Notability (software)) but it doesnt pass general standards like notibility or reliable external sources--Dacium 04:56, 3 April 2007 (UTC) Delete...
Click to read more »blog. Ravenswing 17:02, 1 November 2010 (UTC) Delete. Website is non-notible, lacks sufficient coverage. Kaldari (talk) 18:44, 1 November 2010 (UTC)...
Click to read more »(UTC) Keep the article please everyone should support these article, it is notible.Wizkizayo (talk) 23:25, 14 June 2019 (UTC) Save the article, Don't delete...
Click to read more »have been speedily deleted for wp:nn. It doesn't even make any claims to notibility. Bendž|Ť 17:57, 9 July 2007 (UTC) Comment Actually, it does make claims...
Click to read more »article about CFC's awards since the existance of this award is of (minor) notibility, and Collingwood have a lot of club awards. Probably omit individual player...
Click to read more »Ritzman (talk) 13:17, 15 September 2009 (UTC) Delete per nom, and all the NOTs. Ohconfucius (talk) 14:29, 15 September 2009 (UTC) Delete He failed in his...
Click to read more »WP:BEFORE, this article needs citations, not deletion. riffic (talk) 09:56, 25 April 2011 (UTC) Delete nothing notible found anywhere, insufficient coverage...
Click to read more »events. Ñot sure about others. --Soman (talk) 14:39, 6 January 2010 (UTC) Delete: Sounds like a friends and family group to me. Certainly not a party...
Click to read more »(UTC) delete - no meat to this—can't really be called an article, and notibility is also in question as mentioned above. Vegalo 11:58, 17 May 2006 (UTC)...
Click to read more »example of pro-extinction rhetoric or something like that. Thus, per notibility guidelines, this article should be deleted, with limited relevant material...
Click to read more »include all other possible exclusive nots, if you're an athiest, put up an athiest tag, and we'll KNOW you're not a chrisian, ect. Wintermut3 18:07, 3...
Click to read more »article. --Dwiki 05:50, 8 September 2006 (UTC) Weak Keep There is a bit of notority with his Lemon Demon work, especially Ultimate Showdown of Ultimate Destiny...
Click to read more »played the lead in the romantic comedies My Best Friend's Wedding (1997), Notting Hill (1999), and Runaway Bride (1999). Roberts was the first actress to...
Click to read more »self proclaimed of course, I would know when a pro wrestling article is not notible at all. — Moe ε 03:08, 18 January 2006 (UTC) Below was for FCW Heavyweight...
Click to read more »protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) Does not meet notibility req's, improper references 99DBSIMLR 14:36, 14 May 2007 (UTC) Keep...
Click to read more »understand what will be merged from this article because the book has no notibility at all and also the article don't give any information about this book...
Click to read more »for notability. Arjun 01:13, 19 January 2007 (UTC) Delete Does not assert notibility. It needs to have links to media reviews/awards or something to...
Click to read more »asteriods into earth. Possible destruction of our civilization I think is notible. Try searching for other terms, perhaps 'astroterrorism' has a more known...
Click to read more »CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 17:13, 21 June 2019 (UTC) Delete Notibility of band is poor, and existing material is not enough for a standalone article per WP:BAND. 1989...
Click to read more »MattyFridays 15:34, 2 January 2007 (UTC) Delete or provide more proof of notibility. --ElectricEye (talk) 01:49, 3 January 2007 (UTC) weak Keep the article...
Click to read more »not appropriate for nominators to speculate about notability. Notability research should be done WP:BEFORE nomination. Subject appears to be notible -...
Click to read more »used in the article is directly related with the subject person. The notibility is not clear. Non of the sources used in the document are reliable sources...
Click to read more »28 October 2011 (UTC) Keep I think WP:GNG is just met here, and his notibility is backed by this citation[2]. – Phoenix B 1of3 (talk) 19:10, 28 October...
Click to read more »2006 (UTC) Spam. Less than 400 google hits there is nothing intinsacly notible about tripod sites.Geni 19:43, 19 March 2006 (UTC) All of the following...
Click to read more »history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) Notibility - Davandron | Talk 00:23, 15 May 2007 (UTC) Keep Numerous references on...
Click to read more »"Advert for non-notible (0 Google hits) fancruft add-on for Warcraft, speedy notice removed once.". The only problem is, that is not a speedy criterion...
Click to read more »Garrie 04:04, 3 April 2007 (UTC) Delete No establishment of notibility. No sources at all. Not verifiable.--Dacium 04:16, 3 April 2007 (UTC) Delete unless...
Click to read more »FENS · JSTOR · TWL) No sources. No evidence of notibility Dutyscenee (talk) 20:25, 14 November 2011 (UTC) Not a keep or delete right now - Some of the things...
Click to read more »multiple newspapers (who thought it was a real story) does qualify as notible. Turlo Lomon (talk) 15:41, 23 April 2009 (UTC) Keep per Turlo. Ikip (talk)...
Click to read more »combined with the main GDI article. Peptuck 19:14, 25 April 2007 (UTC) Keep Notible game. Lots of sources for background story. Keeps the base article from...
Click to read more »because the references are scarce does not make it non-notible. I would state that any names military operations is notible and should qualify to have an article...
Click to read more »Entourage. Author removed {{Notability}} tag with the comment This actress is notible as she was cast on the hit show "Entourage," which is a topic that is notable...
Click to read more »DELETE!----Keetoowah 19:41, 23 Jan 2005 (UTC) At very best a marginal notible. I found google hits for a syndicated column but no author of books on...
Click to read more »delete per above. This is a lot of WP:NOTs all rolled into one, just far more blatant than some of the other WP:NOT articles we get on AfD.Tokyogirl79 (talk)...
Click to read more »2012 (UTC) Either redirect to Rock of Ages or delete. The character is not notible. — Preceding signed comment added by Cymru.lass (talk • contribs) 01:57...
Click to read more »is one of the highest rated gaming podcasts, so I think he is definetly notible. That fact should be added to the article though. Also, it does need a...
Click to read more »teams that are missing from the list, and a lot that are entered and are not notible (such as Team BAD, or Slater & Rhyno). There is no way to source an article...
Click to read more »article's talk page are reprehensible, but ultimately irrelvent to the notibility of the subject. I find the notability argument weak, but sufficient. Likewise...
Click to read more »television and radio broadcast is notible whether it be a long or short career. Actors and artistic performers should not be deleted by armchair critics...
Click to read more »per everyone above-K@ngiemeep! 02:31, 16 February 2007 (UTC) Delete Notibility is not verified. I would remove my vote if someone is claiming to be working...
Click to read more »with 10,000 plays in the first week, which I feel should make him more notible, and eligible for a Wiki Page. Thank you for your time, and effort with...
Click to read more »substance. Speaking of the EXPN page, he placed 7th, not too impressive considering his notority is supposedly based on his success as a skateboarder...
Click to read more »Lilithborne 01:15, 10 September 2006 (UTC) Delete Not only are references and /true/ descriptions of notibility lacking, but Google seems to strike out with...
Click to read more »Delete per nom. Not only fails WP:NPOV and WP:V, but it's also little more than a gallery of images which also fails of the WP:NOTs. 23skidoo 03:53,...
Click to read more »television and radio broadcast is notible whether it be a long or short career. Actors and artistic performers should not be deleted by armchair critics...
Click to read more »indepedant sources establish notibility in anyway. Can't justify that he is internet phenomenon with no proof at all. Majority (if not everything) is taken from...
Click to read more »material. –Pakman044 21:14, 30 April 2007 (UTC) Delete Fails to have notibility. WP:WEB failure. Include comment in Star Trek: Armada II and delete.--Dacium...
Click to read more »Corpx 03:06, 3 May 2007 (UTC) Delete There used to be guidlines under WP:Notibility (software) but this went under. For mine WP:WEB and WP:N apply in general...
Click to read more »Fingers-of-Pyrex 01:19, 10 August 2007 (UTC) Agree - If this person were listed on notible people in the other articles, I may have said disagree. --Mnemnoch 02:21...
Click to read more »expandible (at least for its time), runs DOS. All that aside, it was a highly notible landmark in palmtops at the time, and a moneymaker for HP right up until...
Click to read more »User 81.149.135.59 t • c • dc • l • ef • b • bl; (5) to Coronet Theatre, Notting Hill (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) (diff !top) - Link:...
Click to read more »you have not from the talk page already. MuZemike (talk) 17:56, 15 September 2008 (UTC) Delete - GodsAndMortals said it all - Game is not notible. Nor, is...
Click to read more »