Redirect to:
This page is a redirect. The following categories are used to track and monitor this redirect:
|
contributors. This page is not an encyclopedia article or a Wikipedia policy, as it has not been reviewed by the community. Shortcut WP:NOTNPWP:NOTNP...
Click to read more »WP:RECENTISM. Lacks long-term notability and fails WP:EVENTCRIT. also refer WP:NOTNP. The Doom Patrol (talk) 17:01, 18 January 2025 (UTC) Note: This discussion...
Click to read more »20:25, 10 February 2021 (UTC) Delete The article is empty. Also, per WP:NOTNP (by analogy), Wikipedia is not a sports calendar, sports magazine or similar...
Click to read more »not reliable, secondary sources; you could maybe call them news (see WP:NOTNP). I don't think this can stand as an article on its own. It could maybe...
Click to read more »free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) violates WP:PROMOTION, WP:NOTNP, WP:BK along with failing WP:RS Drat8sub (talk) 17:58, 20 May 2020 (UTC)...
Click to read more »discussed there.Hariboneagle927 (talk) 23:30, 21 August 2019 (UTC) Redirect. WP:NOTNP. Agricola44 (talk) 13:51, 23 August 2019 (UTC) Delete clear violation of...
Click to read more »article has not had any coverage apart from a single news cycle. As such, WP:NOTNP . There does not seem to be any addition that would happen here in future...
Click to read more »Notability has to be sustained WP:NSUSTAINED. Wikipedia is not a newspaper. WP:NOTNP JohnMizuki (talk) 10:05, 20 May 2025 (UTC) Draftify. While I consider this...
Click to read more »Your Meme. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 04:16, 3 June 2019 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTNP. No evidence that there has been any significant impact of this meme. If...
Click to read more »California. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 18:14, 16 June 2023 (UTC) Delete - per WP:NOTNP Grahaml35 (talk) 18:57, 16 June 2023 (UTC) Delete. The mere fact that something...
Click to read more »dream of horses (Contribs) (Talk) 05:17, 29 April 2023 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTNP. CastJared (talk) 09:58, 29 April 2023 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:PERP. We don't...
Click to read more »FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Coverage mostly by tabloid media, see WP:RECENT, WP:NOTNP. News articles mentioning the podcast focus on statements made by the people...
Click to read more »NOTNEWS. "Notable from yesterday after their i-league entry", again WP:NOTNP and entry is from 2021-22 not now. There is no independent source describing...
Click to read more »April 2023 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOR, WP:NOTNP, and WP:UNDUE. CastJared (talk) 10:01, 29 April 2023 (UTC) The NOTNP/NOTNEWS argument needs to be defended...
Click to read more »thousand dollars. He received several awards, yes, but WP:NOTNEWS and WP:NOTNP. There is obviously a concerted effort to promote the kid, that the user...
Click to read more »encyclopedic, will bring Facebook fancruft and Gossip driven confrontation with WP:NOTNP --Adamstraw99 (talk) 19:31, 2 October 2018 (UTC) Delete. Dynamic nature...
Click to read more »on the helicopter crash? It was probably an unrelated accident, and WP:NOTNP. This would be like making an article about the Brazilian army truck that...
Click to read more »sources WP:NOTNP WP:V"; "not verifiable by multiple reliable sources WP:NOTNP WP:V See Talk"; "not verifiable by multiple reliable sources WP:NOTNP - See Talk"—BulkData...
Click to read more »at fluff articles. Sumbuddi (talk) 06:00, 18 August 2021 (UTC) Delete WP:NOTNP the individual is not notable in any way and this article should be deleted...
Click to read more »Oblivy (talk) 10:45, 5 May 2023 (UTC) Delete per WP:NLIST, WP:NOTNEWS/WP:NOTNP, WP:BLPNAME, and WP:INDISCRIMINATE. CastJared (talk) 06:46, 4 May 2023 (UTC)...
Click to read more »but general auidence appeal does matter. Otherwise your getting into WP:NOTNP. Especially since its about winning a pageant. Its less about being "esoteric"...
Click to read more »America1000 09:29, 27 August 2016 (UTC) Delete. Fails WP:NOTNEWS and WP:NOTNP. Does not meet WP:GNG -- Millionsandbillions (talk) 17:23, 27 August 2016...
Click to read more »page) this is not the kind of article that this is aimed at. Possibly WP:NOTNP or WP:EVENT could apply here depending on the depth of coverage and whether...
Click to read more »rjw (talk) 03:33, 30 October 2021 (UTC) Delete Not encyclopedic and WP:NOTNP. Simply some investigating officer who came in the news because he investigated...
Click to read more »contest is another major reason to delete; Wikipedia is not a newspaper (WP:NOTNP) and we must not prejudice such events by giving undue weight to one candidate...
Click to read more »In response to your comment - Wikipedia is not a newspaper. Refer to WP:NOTNP. Guidance for this project was left to those who were interested and although...
Click to read more »They deserve something interesting too", the argument aligning with WP:NOTNP, WP:SOAPBOX, WP:CRYSTAL. Wikipedia is not news and neither it is for promotion...
Click to read more »(talk) 10:03, 14 June 2023 (UTC) Delete: per WP:LASTING and WP:NOTNEWS/WP:NOTNP. CastJared (talk) 10:40, 14 June 2023 (UTC) Delete This does not constitute...
Click to read more »thousand dollars. He received several awards, yes, but WP:NOTNEWS and WP:NOTNP. There is obviously a concerted effort to promote the kid, that the user...
Click to read more »—МандичкаYO 😜 11:14, 24 December 2015 (UTC) Delete - Per WP:NOTNEWS and WP:NOTNP. Even if it is intentional and not an accident, spree killings have unfortunately...
Click to read more »2014 (UTC) "Undid revision 634372105 by Philip Cross (talk) Again, see WP:NOTNP. This is way too much detail." 13:30, 18 November 2014 (UTC) "Undid revision...
Click to read more »article being re-created, but for now, I would follow the advice of WP:NOTNP and WP:RECENT and ignore the concept, and delete the article. Bondegezou...
Click to read more »standalone page as it fails WP:GNG. Wikipedia is not a local newspaper. WP:NOTNP and Wikipedia:News articles though essays make a valid point — the news...
Click to read more »at fluff articles. Sumbuddi (talk) 06:00, 18 August 2021 (UTC) Delete WP:NOTNP the individual is not notable in any way and this article should be deleted...
Click to read more »to delete it. RTredwell (talk) 02:56, 4 December 2022 (UTC) But per WP:NOTNP, Wikipedia is not a newspaper. News stories do not merit articles because...
Click to read more »rjw (talk) 03:33, 30 October 2021 (UTC) Delete Not encyclopedic and WP:NOTNP. Simply some investigating officer who came in the news because he investigated...
Click to read more »to delete it. RTredwell (talk) 02:56, 4 December 2022 (UTC) But per WP:NOTNP, Wikipedia is not a newspaper. News stories do not merit articles because...
Click to read more »20:25, 10 February 2021 (UTC) Delete The article is empty. Also, per WP:NOTNP (by analogy), Wikipedia is not a sports calendar, sports magazine or similar...
Click to read more »but general auidence appeal does matter. Otherwise your getting into WP:NOTNP. Especially since its about winning a pageant. Its less about being "esoteric"...
Click to read more »free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) violates WP:PROMOTION, WP:NOTNP, WP:BK along with failing WP:RS Drat8sub (talk) 17:58, 20 May 2020 (UTC)...
Click to read more »In response to your comment - Wikipedia is not a newspaper. Refer to WP:NOTNP. Guidance for this project was left to those who were interested and although...
Click to read more »page) this is not the kind of article that this is aimed at. Possibly WP:NOTNP or WP:EVENT could apply here depending on the depth of coverage and whether...
Click to read more »In response to your comment - Wikipedia is not a newspaper. Refer to WP:NOTNP. Guidance for this project was left to those who were interested and although...
Click to read more »not reliable, secondary sources; you could maybe call them news (see WP:NOTNP). I don't think this can stand as an article on its own. It could maybe...
Click to read more »sufficient to make a topic notable. This point is made elsewhere such as WP:NOTNP. WP:CRIME states that an article about the perpetrator is merited only if...
Click to read more »NOTNEWS. "Notable from yesterday after their i-league entry", again WP:NOTNP and entry is from 2021-22 not now. There is no independent source describing...
Click to read more »America1000 09:29, 27 August 2016 (UTC) Delete. Fails WP:NOTNEWS and WP:NOTNP. Does not meet WP:GNG -- Millionsandbillions (talk) 17:23, 27 August 2016...
Click to read more »don't have the answers but thought it was interesting enough to note! WP:NOTNP Relevantusername2020 (talk) 00:40, 15 April 2025 (UTC) Explore Wikipedia...
Click to read more »Your Meme. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 04:16, 3 June 2019 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTNP. No evidence that there has been any significant impact of this meme. If...
Click to read more »encyclopedic, will bring Facebook fancruft and Gossip driven confrontation with WP:NOTNP --Adamstraw99 (talk) 19:31, 2 October 2018 (UTC) Delete. Dynamic nature...
Click to read more »article being re-created, but for now, I would follow the advice of WP:NOTNP and WP:RECENT and ignore the concept, and delete the article. Bondegezou...
Click to read more »—МандичкаYO 😜 11:14, 24 December 2015 (UTC) Delete - Per WP:NOTNEWS and WP:NOTNP. Even if it is intentional and not an accident, spree killings have unfortunately...
Click to read more »article has not had any coverage apart from a single news cycle. As such, WP:NOTNP . There does not seem to be any addition that would happen here in future...
Click to read more »FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Coverage mostly by tabloid media, see WP:RECENT, WP:NOTNP. News articles mentioning the podcast focus on statements made by the people...
Click to read more »campaign, Ghost of Kyiv. Wikipedia is not a newspaper nor is it a diary. WP:NOTNP EatingFudge (talk) 02:27, 19 December 2022 (UTC) Merge or delete, not sufficiently...
Click to read more »discussed there.Hariboneagle927 (talk) 23:30, 21 August 2019 (UTC) Redirect. WP:NOTNP. Agricola44 (talk) 13:51, 23 August 2019 (UTC) Delete clear violation of...
Click to read more »campaign, Ghost of Kyiv. Wikipedia is not a newspaper nor is it a diary. WP:NOTNP EatingFudge (talk) 02:27, 19 December 2022 (UTC) Merge or delete, not sufficiently...
Click to read more »23 January 2021 (UTC) Wait - this probably deserves to be posted, but WP:NOTNP and both the event and article continue to evolve rapidly so it would be...
Click to read more »wikipedia standards. The issue is that Wikipedia is not a newspaper WP:NOTNP and this seems like a haphazard list of recent and not particularly noteworthy...
Click to read more »WP:UNDUE especially for something that was alleged and unproven. Also WP:NOTNP. Not every single event or statement regarding this issue has to be detailed...
Click to read more »April 2023 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOR, WP:NOTNP, and WP:UNDUE. CastJared (talk) 10:01, 29 April 2023 (UTC) The NOTNP/NOTNEWS argument needs to be defended...
Click to read more »(talk) 10:03, 14 June 2023 (UTC) Delete: per WP:LASTING and WP:NOTNEWS/WP:NOTNP. CastJared (talk) 10:40, 14 June 2023 (UTC) Delete This does not constitute...
Click to read more »standalone page as it fails WP:GNG. Wikipedia is not a local newspaper. WP:NOTNP and Wikipedia:News articles though essays make a valid point — the news...
Click to read more »make wikivoice into a primary source. I personally subscribe to the WP:NOTNP interpretation as well - we are not here to be journalists; we are not here...
Click to read more »They deserve something interesting too", the argument aligning with WP:NOTNP, WP:SOAPBOX, WP:CRYSTAL. Wikipedia is not news and neither it is for promotion...
Click to read more »contest is another major reason to delete; Wikipedia is not a newspaper (WP:NOTNP) and we must not prejudice such events by giving undue weight to one candidate...
Click to read more »WP:NOTNOTMEMORIAL WP:NOTNOTNOTNOW WP:NOTNOTNOW WP:NOTNOTVOTE WP:NOTNOTYET WP:NOTNOW WP:NOTNP WP:NOTNT WP:NOTO WP:NOTOBVIOUSSYNTH WP:NOTOC WP:NOTOFFICIAL WP:NOTOMNISCIENT...
Click to read more »Oblivy (talk) 10:45, 5 May 2023 (UTC) Delete per WP:NLIST, WP:NOTNEWS/WP:NOTNP, WP:BLPNAME, and WP:INDISCRIMINATE. CastJared (talk) 06:46, 4 May 2023 (UTC)...
Click to read more »Notability has to be sustained WP:NSUSTAINED. Wikipedia is not a newspaper. WP:NOTNP JohnMizuki (talk) 10:05, 20 May 2025 (UTC) Draftify. While I consider this...
Click to read more »dream of horses (Contribs) (Talk) 05:17, 29 April 2023 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTNP. CastJared (talk) 09:58, 29 April 2023 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:PERP. We don't...
Click to read more »sufficient to make a topic notable. This point is made elsewhere such as WP:NOTNP. WP:CRIME states that an article about the perpetrator is merited only if...
Click to read more »Bottcher's webpage, but based on the Crime and Wikipedia news guidelines WP:NOTNP, since this event happened, flashed all over the news... but no news organizations...
Click to read more »California. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 18:14, 16 June 2023 (UTC) Delete - per WP:NOTNP Grahaml35 (talk) 18:57, 16 June 2023 (UTC) Delete. The mere fact that something...
Click to read more »WP:RECENTISM. Lacks long-term notability and fails WP:EVENTCRIT. also refer WP:NOTNP. The Doom Patrol (talk) 17:01, 18 January 2025 (UTC) Note: This discussion...
Click to read more »news ticker, which we are often at pains to explain it is not (e.g. WP:NOTNP). I would favour the past tense for all events that are not ongoing. If...
Click to read more »Wikipedia. No Swan So Fine (talk) 12:08, 3 February 2023 (UTC) It's not WP:NOTNP. Btw, the Department of Defense statement reads: "Ryder said the balloon...
Click to read more »