This page is a redirect. The following categories are used to track and monitor this redirect:
|
memorial site for more information. Shortcuts WP:NNHWP:NNH WP:NOTNOTHEREWP:NOTNOTHERE WP:!!HEREWP:!!HERE Some users may be interested in building an encyclopedia...
Click to read more »are not WP:NOTHERE, you does useful contributions to e.g. WP:TEA and WP:NOTNOTHERE allows peoples to go round simply nominating and contributing to WP:APD...
Click to read more »goals and doing our best to adhere to them at all times. It's OK to be WP:NOTNOTHERE and propose changes in good-faith without feeling the need to attach a...
Click to read more »don't create articles you are WP:NOTHERE. As is clearly stated in WP:NOTNOTHERE, there are other ways of building an encyclopedia. Those who only write...
Click to read more »look at WP:NOTNOTHERE and that he is the one that appears to be not here to build an encyclopedia. Then he told me to look at WP:NOTNOTHERE, which I had...
Click to read more »information, he could replace the source but he instead deletes large stuff. WP:NOTNOTHERE and possible sock of User:ÖmerKocaTürk [[66]] [[67]] [[68]] Shadow4dark...
Click to read more »WP:EDITCOUNTITIS: 18,138 to articlespace...16, 227 with AWB. While the user is NOTNOTHERE, they are too fast, too furious with the tool. Not sure a Tban is necessary:...
Click to read more »disruptive editing), and "Focusing on niche topic areas" is in the WP:NOTNOTHERE rather than "not here", anyway. Sockpuppetry is historic; editor was already...
Click to read more »look at here. Not suggesting that TheStrayDog is not here or either WP:NOTNOTHERE; but a couple of things are slightly bothersome. The user was blocked...
Click to read more »we're not friends, but I still think WP:NOTHERE is unfair. I think WP:NOTNOTHERE applies here, specifically the section which reads: "Difficulty in good...
Click to read more »(~five years' tenure, >3.5K edits, no blocks) says they are very much WP:NOTNOTHERE. — O Fortuna semper crescis, aut decrescis 13:17, 21 June 2017 (UTC) Refusing...
Click to read more »– even extremely unpopular opinions – in a non-disruptive manner? WP:NOTNOTHERE. If the (impartial) feedback here is (a), then please give me specific...
Click to read more »chat/contributions 15:50, 10 September 2016 (UTC) Strong Oppose per WP:NOTNOTHERE and WP:AGF Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (talk) 23:37, 10 September 2016 (UTC) [redacted due to...
Click to read more »elsewhere on my good faith efforts to cleanup. I'd also suggest reading WP:NOTNOTHERE and in particular "Focusing on particular processes: A user may have an...
Click to read more »accusation was fallacious. Baphy93 (talk) 03:37, 29 August 2015 (UTC) IMHO, WP:NOTNOTHERE. Baphy93 (talk) 04:08, 29 August 2015 (UTC) It is frustrating that after...
Click to read more »tired of seeing this constantly popping up. Honestly ST's edits scream WP:NOTNOTHERE more than anything, we all have our own ways of doing things, and some...
Click to read more »(UTC) I would be careful about making that accusation, Chris - see WP:NOTNOTHERE. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 20:59, 26 February 2018 (UTC) The discussion above...
Click to read more »WP:NOTHERE block? -Roxy the grumpy dog. wooF 15:18, 7 July 2021 (UTC) WP:NOTNOTHERE -Heterodox2021 — Preceding undated comment added 16:08, 7 July 2021 (UTC)...
Click to read more »considered "NOTHERE" by most. However, the explanatory supplement WP:NOTNOTHERE also states that expressing extremely unpopular opinions is allowed in...
Click to read more »an article since June 2013. Which means that however much they were WP:NOTNOTHERE nearly six years ago, that's clearly not the case now. ——SerialNumber54129...
Click to read more »lot of useful work even if some people don't appreciate it's value WP:NOTNOTHERE says in part "A user may have an interest in creating stubs, tagging articles...
Click to read more »thought was for Utopia or WP:NOTNOTHERE and not for SageRad's head. I think all might do well to re-read WP:NOTNOTHERE incidentally. I will keep quiet...
Click to read more »fringe voices, so as to impart the mainstream view of his work. Per WP:NOTNOTHERE, focusing on a niche area, in my case the natural sciences, doesn't mean...
Click to read more »wikipedia to be considered wp:CIR. My edits are also in line with WP:NOTNOTHERE. Remember to always WP:AGF Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (talk) 20:51, 11 September 2016 (UTC)...
Click to read more »Wikipedia. Johnuniq (talk) 03:37, 1 June 2020 (UTC) Not really, per WP:NOTNOTHERE. Differences that arise where both users are in good faith hoping to improve...
Click to read more »Even if it’s not the same user, it’s clear that the individual is WP:NOTNOTHERE. See their user page: User:Dashingdumps. --— Saqib (talk I contribs) 10:01...
Click to read more »editors is the crux of the issue here. Please note the section Wikipedia:NOTNOTHERE, where exceptions are listed. I think it would be perfectly reasonable...
Click to read more »are not WP:NOTHERE, you does useful contributions to e.g. WP:TEA and WP:NOTNOTHERE allows peoples to go round simply nominating and contributing to WP:APD...
Click to read more »WP:AGF. While this is obviously a niche topic area, my understanding of WP:NOTNOTHERE is that diversity in interests is to be welcomed. We're here to build...
Click to read more »attacks on me in DRV over a declined ArbCom case is not appropriate. WP:NOTNOTHERE calls out my work of cleanup as necessary and valuable. Legacypac (talk)...
Click to read more »WP:AGF. While this is obviously a niche topic area, my understanding of WP:NOTNOTHERE is that diversity in interests is to be welcomed. We're here to build...
Click to read more »attacks on me in DRV over a declined ArbCom case is not appropriate. WP:NOTNOTHERE calls out my work of cleanup as necessary and valuable. Legacypac (talk)...
Click to read more »2023 (UTC) You left out "to its own rules", which makes it about as WP:NOTNOTHERE as it gets. Sennalen (talk) 13:46, 6 April 2023 (UTC) Not really, you're...
Click to read more »WP:NOTNOTBUREAUCRACY WP:NOTNOTBURO WP:NOTNOTCENSORED WP:NOTNOTFACEBOOK WP:NOTNOTHERE WP:NOTNOTMEMORIAL WP:NOTNOTNOTNOW WP:NOTNOTNOW WP:NOTNOTVOTE WP:NOTNOTYET...
Click to read more »completely wrong about me not being here to write an encyclopedia. WP:NOTNOTHERE I learned about this article's deletion by chance. I'm not a regular contributor...
Click to read more »(UTC) Nope. Admins cannot block me. I'm free. Also, I am WP:HERE and WP:NOTNOTHERE. 172.58.204.15 (talk) 18:45, 2 April 2023 (UTC) Contrary to what you choose...
Click to read more »completely wrong about me not being here to write an encyclopedia. WP:NOTNOTHERE I learned about this article's deletion by chance. I'm not a regular contributor...
Click to read more »