Redirect to:
This page is a redirect. The following categories are used to track and monitor this redirect:
|
Wikipedia is a free online encyclopedia. The amount of information on Wikipedia is practically unlimited, but Wikipedia does not aim to contain all knowledge...
Click to read more »also refer to: Wikipedia:Persondata Wikipedia:Database reports Wikipedia:NOTDB This page is a list of project pages associated with the same title or shortcut...
Click to read more »Square Thing (talk) 11:15, 15 August 2022 (UTC) Please could you address WP:NOTDB and WP:NLIST concerns. For example, where are the independent, non-database...
Click to read more »as the content of the list is not notable as a group. Seems to fail WP:NOTDB. -- mikeblas (talk) 15:35, 12 September 2024 (UTC) Note: This discussion...
Click to read more »JSTOR · TWL) I propose merging to Urban agglomerations in India because of WP:NOTDB. A cut-off at a million is chosen for no set reason, and there is nothing...
Click to read more »as the content of the list is not notable as a group. Seems to fail WP:NOTDB. No specific statement of inclusion criteria. mikeblas (talk) 16:25, 12...
Click to read more »as the content of the list is not notable as a group. Seems to fail WP:NOTDB. No explanation of inclusion criteria. mikeblas (talk) 16:12, 12 September...
Click to read more »been open a month and I see two main point of disagreements: a) Whether WP:NOTDB applies and b) Whether there is sufficient sourcing to be able to improve...
Click to read more »Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 09:56, 20 April 2024 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTDIR and WP:NOTDB. No analysis or summary is offered; the article is just a long bulleted...
Click to read more »it alphabetically. Regardless, these types are not allowed because of WP:NOTDB| A merge into the main list would be useless, there's nothing useful to...
Click to read more »it alphabetically. Regardless, these types are not allowed because of WP:NOTDB| A merge into the main list would be useless, there's nothing useful to...
Click to read more »deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 11:03, 2 October 2023 (UTC) Delete - WP:NOTDB this is a one-of-a-kind list of the 110th Congress (2007-2009). It was created...
Click to read more »additional coverage in reliable sources, only passing mentions. Essentially NOTDB vio, aside from the two unsourced sentences in the lead. QuietHere (talk...
Click to read more »WP:NLIST. I have not found significant coverage of this topic. Also fails WP:NOTDB; including all of the results for all of the mayoral elections would make...
Click to read more »(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:NOTDB makes it so that lists that are WP:FORK'd from other lists, just to be arranged...
Click to read more »Virginia judicial election articles for 1978, 1980, and 1982 all fail WP:NOTDB. voorts (talk/contributions) 05:14, 26 May 2024 (UTC) Note: This discussion...
Click to read more »it alphabetically. Regardless, these types are not allowed because of WP:NOTDB|. If the reader wants all the Rajya Sabha members that've ever served, they...
Click to read more »(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:NOTDB issue, which also probably fails WP:GNG. Edward-Woodrow • talk 23:20, 1...
Click to read more »Sofia-province. NP2026 (talk) 20:07, 7 May 2026 (UTC) Delete per nomination, WP:NOTDB. MitYehor📘^talk 08:50, 7 May 2026 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »and Companies. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 01:18, 28 December 2023 (UTC) Delete as WP:NOTDB and failing WP:NLIST for lack of secondary WP:SIGCOV (this has not been...
Click to read more »fails GNG. NP2026 (talk) 20:14, 7 May 2026 (UTC) Delete per nomination, WP:NOTDB. MitYehor📘^talk 08:48, 7 May 2026 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) From a contested PROD. Per WP:NOTDB, this is a collection of information that belongs in quite a few other pages...
Click to read more »(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:NOTDB, if the reader wants an encyclopedic list of Serbian localities, then can...
Click to read more »fails GNG. NP2026 (talk) 20:05, 7 May 2026 (UTC) Delete per nomination, WP:NOTDB. MitYehor📘^talk 08:50, 7 May 2026 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »it alphabetically. Regardless, these types are not allowed because of WP:NOTDB and WP:NLIST HerrHeulsuse (talk) 13:13, 8 August 2026 (UTC) Note: this discussion...
Click to read more »2025 (UTC) Once again, Wikipedia is not about everything. Along with that, NOTDB says that Wikipedia is not a collection of data for something like this...
Click to read more »it alphabetically. Regardless, these types are not allowed because of WP:NOTDB and WP:NLIST HerrHeulsuse (talk) 13:13, 8 August 2026 (UTC) Note: this discussion...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV. Also fails WP:NOTDB. I would also support a redirect to Badminton at the 1975 SEAP Games. Sportsfan...
Click to read more »Sofia-province. NP2026 (talk) 20:12, 7 May 2026 (UTC) Delete per nomination, WP:NOTDB. MitYehor📘^talk 08:49, 7 May 2026 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »Sofia-province. NP2026 (talk) 20:12, 7 May 2026 (UTC) Delete per nomination, WP:NOTDB. MitYehor📘^talk 08:49, 7 May 2026 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »because it is the only squad list for a Sultan Azlan Shah Cup year page. WP:NOTDB may apply as well, and I am not opposed to deletion either – the creator...
Click to read more »propose merging to List of states and union territories of India because WP:NOTDB. This just lists Indian states by a numeral characteristic, which is not...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Per WP:NOTSTATS, WP:NOTDB and WP:NOTDIRECTORY. Fails WP:NLIST. Some parts of the whole statistics...
Click to read more »material. Oaktree b (talk) 13:22, 1 October 2025 (UTC) Delete not notable, WP:NOTDB, not human-written (almost certainly unreviewed LLM-generated content):...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Violation of WP:NOTDB, fails GNG, and why the heck would anyone care about a list of six-man football...
Click to read more »Sofia-province. NP2026 (talk) 20:10, 7 May 2026 (UTC) Delete per nomination, WP:NOTDB. MitYehor📘^talk 08:49, 7 May 2026 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »it alphabetically. Regardless, these types are not allowed because of WP:NOTDB| A merge into the main list would be useless, there's nothing useful to...
Click to read more »as the content of the list is not notable as a group. Seems to fail WP:NOTDB. No specific statement of inclusion criteria. mikeblas (talk) 16:17, 12...
Click to read more »it alphabetically. Regardless, these types are not allowed because of WP:NOTDB| A merge into the main list would be useless, there's nothing useful to...
Click to read more »August 2025 (UTC) Delete Interesting? Yes. Encyclopedic? No. BADFORK, and NOTDB, given that there are no sources talking about the subject. And I'm not...
Click to read more »Sofia-province. NP2026 (talk) 20:11, 7 May 2026 (UTC) Delete per nomination, WP:NOTDB. MitYehor📘^talk 08:49, 7 May 2026 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »contribs) 15:46, 20 December 2023 (UTC) Delete under WP:CROSSCAT and WP:NOTDB -- This exactly the kind of complex, intersectional list that makes it so...
Click to read more »as the content of the list is not notable as a group. Seems to fail WP:NOTDB. mikeblas (talk) 13:51, 12 September 2024 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...
Click to read more »as the content of the list is not notable as a group. Seems to fail WP:NOTDB. Indirect statement of inclusion criteria. mikeblas (talk) 16:08, 12 September...
Click to read more »as the content of the list is not notable as a group. Seems to fail WP:NOTDB. mikeblas (talk) 15:46, 12 September 2024 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...
Click to read more »it alphabetically. Regardless, these types are not allowed because of WP:NOTDB| A merge into the main list would be useless, there's nothing useful to...
Click to read more »deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 20:02, 19 June 2025 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTDB. I don't see what a redirect would solve, since a full list of songs is...
Click to read more »significant coverages, they are all superficial. It fails WP:GNG, also WP:NOTDB. Nihonjinatny (talk) 16:38, 28 August 2024 (UTC) The above discussion is...
Click to read more »as the content of the list is not notable as a group. Seems to fail WP:NOTDB. Weak statement of inclusion criteria. mikeblas (talk) 16:29, 12 September...
Click to read more »Felinaex (purr / pawprints) 18:20, 2 June 2026 (UTC) Delete as a failure of WP:NOTDB, containing no prose context; and as wholly redundant in scope to Religions...
Click to read more »as the content of the list is not notable as a group. Seems to fail WP:NOTDB. Weak statement of inclusion criteria. mikeblas (talk) 16:04, 12 September...
Click to read more »as the content of the list is not notable as a group. Seems to fail WP:NOTDB. Stated inclusion criteria does not match title. mikeblas (talk) 15:26,...
Click to read more »as the content of the list is not notable as a group. Seems to fail WP:NOTDB. mikeblas (talk) 15:56, 12 September 2024 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...
Click to read more »it alphabetically. Regardless, these types are not allowed because of WP:NOTDB| A merge into the main list would be useless, there's nothing useful to...
Click to read more »article, even if it was notable. It seems to come under WP:NOTGUIDE and WP:NOTDB. There are 1000+ articles about individual Indian train services (though...
Click to read more »as the content of the list is not notable as a group. Seems to fail WP:NOTDB. mikeblas (talk) 16:31, 12 September 2024 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...
Click to read more »Delete per precedent at C.D. Primeiro de Agosto past squads. This fails WP:NOTDB and doesn't meet WP:NLIST. Toadspike [Talk] 10:35, 27 November 2024 (UTC)...
Click to read more »as the content of the list is not notable as a group. Seems to fail WP:NOTDB. -- mikeblas (talk) 15:48, 12 September 2024 (UTC) Note: This discussion...
Click to read more »as the content of the list is not notable as a group. Seems to fail WP:NOTDB. mikeblas (talk) 16:22, 12 September 2024 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...
Click to read more »helpful. // Timothy :: talk 14:51, 30 January 2024 (UTC) Delete by NLIST or NOTDB. Less detailed tables would have worked with a detailed article on the MATA...
Click to read more »It is debatable how relevant this information would be anyway as per WP:NOTDB. ElooB (talk) 13:06, 21 September 2024 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...
Click to read more »as the content of the list is not notable as a group. Seems to fail WP:NOTDB. mikeblas (talk) 15:52, 12 September 2024 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...
Click to read more »is notable. Jonathan Deamer (talk) 21:05, 1 May 2024 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTDB clearly random trivia with no real importantce Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 10:10...
Click to read more »(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Per WP:NOTDB and WP:NOTSTATS, this should be deleted. This is the type of things you...
Click to read more »as the content of the list is not notable as a group. Seems to fail WP:NOTDB. No inclusion criteria, very weak referencing. mikeblas (talk) 14:43, 12...
Click to read more »except a list of tour dates, which are not inherently worth keeping per WP:NOTDB. Astaire (talk) 17:40, 5 December 2024 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...
Click to read more »as the content of the list is not notable as a group. Seems to fail WP:NOTDB. No specific statement of inclusion criteria. mikeblas (talk) 16:19, 12...
Click to read more »Lists. QuietCicada chirp 13:11, 4 November 2024 (UTC) Delete per NLIST and NOTDB. This is much more suited for something like TV Tropes. ~ Matthewrb Let's...
Click to read more »as the content of the list is not notable as a group. Seems to fail WP:NOTDB. Significant referencing problems. mikeblas (talk) 15:17, 12 September 2024...
Click to read more »as the content of the list is not notable as a group. Seems to fail WP:NOTDB. Weakly defined inclusion criteria. mikeblas (talk) 14:05, 12 September...
Click to read more »as the content of the list is not notable as a group. Seems to fail WP:NOTDB. mikeblas (talk) 14:34, 12 September 2024 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...
Click to read more »scenario. I do not believe this topic is notable and does not comply with WP:NOTDB. Qwerty123M (talk) 11:14, 1 February 2026 (UTC) Delete. This article reads...
Click to read more »restructured, but the subject easily passes WP:GNG and I don't see it failing WP:NOTDB or any other part of WP:NOT. --Richard Yin (talk) 09:46, 26 December 2024...
Click to read more »deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 05:17, 15 February 2024 (UTC) Delete. NOTDB, NOTINDISCRIMINATE. These are simply mirrors of primary corporate sources...
Click to read more »existing by itself is not a good page for our readers for various reasons. WP:NOTDB means that random lists should not exist on Wikipedia, because it is not...
Click to read more »17:36, 12 December 2025 (UTC) Delete This strikes me as a failure of WP:NOTDB, since the sourcing is all to state minimum standards and none of the sources...
Click to read more »it alphabetically. Regardless, these types are not allowed because of WP:NOTDB| A merge into the main list would be useless, there's nothing useful to...
Click to read more »as the content of the lists aren't notable as a group. Seems to fail WP:NOTDB. Other problems exist: Verifiability varies, but many of these are poorly...
Click to read more »editor. Fails almost everything: WP:GNG, WP:NOTCATALOG, WP:NOTPROMO, WP:NOTDB , WP:SYNTH and perhaps a few more. A brief discussion at WikiProject Physics...
Click to read more »WP:NOT violations. Rosbif73 (talk) 06:22, 8 August 2024 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTDB. This is the equivalent of copying down all the cities in the airline's...
Click to read more »buttons. So this article is just duplicating an external dataset. Per WP:NOTDB, this list article adds nothing. It shouldn't have been added to the original...
Click to read more »and New Zealand. Shellwood (talk) 10:10, 6 September 2024 (UTC) Delete WP:NOTDB Traumnovelle (talk) 04:09, 9 September 2024 (UTC) Relisted to generate a...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Possibility fails WP:GNG and WP:NOTDB as the article is just his motorsports results with a low amount of sources...
Click to read more »notability (only other sources I could find were primary source interviews) + NOTDB vio. PROD rejected due to number of incoming links, but I don't see why...
Click to read more »list is accurate. — Maile (talk) 22:20, 1 January 2024 (UTC) Delete as WP:NOTDB and per criteria for WP:NLIST. Subject is not discussed as a group or set...
Click to read more »that AfD). Trainsandotherthings (talk) 13:54, 4 July 2024 (UTC) Delete per NOTDB. Did consider a redirect yet the name is too confusing. gidonb (talk) 23:44...
Click to read more »as the content of the list is not notable as a group. Seems to fail WP:NOTDB. Weakly defined inclusion criteria. mikeblas (talk) 14:19, 12 September...
Click to read more »as the content of the list is not notable as a group. Seems to fail WP:NOTDB. Weakly stated inclusion criteria does not match title. mikeblas (talk)...
Click to read more »China (specifically [[Provinces of China#List of provinces|]]) because WP:NOTDB. This just lists Chinese provinces by a numeral characteristic, which is...
Click to read more »it alphabetically. Regardless, these types are not allowed because of WP:NOTDB| A merge into the main list would be useless, there's nothing useful to...
Click to read more »meet NLIST if we are presuming the title to be a qualifyer, violation of NOTDB otherwise. Bobby Cohn 🍁 (talk) 18:48, 25 June 2025 (UTC) So, I can merge...
Click to read more »free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) From a contested PROD. Per WP:NOTDB, this is a collection of information that belongs in quite a few other pages...
Click to read more »Brickyard_400#Past_winners. Combining this information in a massive list violates WP:NOTDB. Carson Wentz (talk) 14:47, 5 February 2024 (UTC) Keep; while there are...
Click to read more »salting. Nate • (chatter) 23:29, 3 November 2024 (UTC) Delete per NLIST and NOTDB, and MrSchimf's comments above. Also, is it starting to snow in here? ~...
Click to read more »✎ 18:53, 18 January 2025 (UTC) Delete. The list of songs falls under WP:NOTDB and the rest of it can go in 2024 Democratic National Convention. Astaire...
Click to read more »(talk) 09:09, 4 September 2024 (UTC) Delete: Per nom, but also because WP:NOTDB. This definitely leans more into an indiscriminate list of Pinterest-related...
Click to read more »as the content of the list is not notable as a group. Seems to fail WP:NOTDB. Contains only events since the end of 2019, only concerts. Completely unreferenced...
Click to read more »debate camps which definitely does not belong in the encyclopaedia (WP:NOTDB and WP:NOTDIRECTORY). However, it could become an actual article. I am seeing...
Click to read more »FENS · JSTOR · TWL) The reason why this list is WP:LISTCRUFT, WP:NOTNEWS, WP:NOTDB and WP:CRIME, for some major Nazi Party figures (per WP:NLIST and WP:GNG)...
Click to read more »article. Wikipedialuva (talk) 11:10, 30 March 2025 (UTC) Delete: Wikipedia:NOTDB - doesn't meet WP:ENCYCLOPEDIC. — ERcheck (talk) 03:38, 30 March 2025 (UTC)...
Click to read more »(Talk) 12:05, 20 August 2024 (UTC) Delete. This is a clear example of WP:NOTDB. To know where Lion Air and its subsidiaries are flying as of August 2024...
Click to read more »assuming it was still on offer in August 2024. I agree that WP:IINFO/WP:NOTDB is probably a bigger issue. FOARP (talk) 11:32, 15 August 2024 (UTC) Delete...
Click to read more »large fanbase. - Altenmann >talk 13:49, 29 March 2024 (UTC) Delete, per WP:NOTDB. Even the wikipedia "article" (sub-section of a larger article) has a very...
Click to read more »to merge the lead but the the full list of awards is a violation of WP:NOTDB and doesn't pass WP:NLIST. (I'll note that the aforementioned proposal wasn't...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:LISTN, WP:LISTPURP and WP:NOTDB. Primarily consists of hundreds of redlinks to non-notable laws which in...
Click to read more »FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Largely unencyclopedic article, pretty clear case of WP:NOTDB. Seems like something that should be on wikivoyage. OrbitalVoid49 (talk)...
Click to read more »encyclopedic topic and more an editorialized aggregation of negative material. WP:NOTDB – The article increasingly resembles an indiscriminate catalog of statements...
Click to read more »User:Hamterous1 (discuss anything!🐹✈️) 13:41, 27 May 2024 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTDB. This is just a collection of passenger data for a few random years. It...
Click to read more »(talk) 16:28, 8 August 2024 (UTC) Delete the list of destinations. Per WP:NOTDB we shouldn't be maintaining a database of every place this airline has flown...
Click to read more »Olympians" meets WP:NLIST while being compliant with WP:NOT (and its subunits WP:NOTDB and WP:NOTDIR). The wording of these guideline has, regrettably, been wikilawyered...
Click to read more »it alphabetically. Regardless, these types are not allowed because of WP:NOTDB| A merge into the main list would be useless, there's nothing useful to...
Click to read more »everything on this page. FOARP (talk) 16:20, 5 August 2024 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTDB. This is no more than Emirates SkyCargo's destination map in list form....
Click to read more »it alphabetically. Regardless, these types are not allowed because of WP:NOTDB| A merge into the main list would be useless, there's nothing useful to...
Click to read more »China (specifically [[Provinces of China#List of provinces|]]) because WP:NOTDB. This just lists Chinese provinces by a numeral characteristic, which is...
Click to read more »merged into the actor's article. I think it violates WP:NOTNEWS and WP:NOTDB since most of the arguments in favour of keeping the article can be seen...
Click to read more »(talk) 02:54, 18 September 2025 (UTC) Delete - Fails WP:NOR, WP:LISTN, WP:NOTDB. Far too open-ended and undefined to be a proper list. Attempts to make...
Click to read more »context-less list of names and ages of the dead, which runs afoul of WP:NOTDB and WP:NOTMEMORIAL. There's been a long tradition of not keeping lists like...
Click to read more »WP:NOT violations. Rosbif73 (talk) 06:00, 17 August 2024 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTDB. Wikipedia isn't supposed to be a mirror of airline databases like FlightConnections...
Click to read more »it alphabetically. Regardless, these types are not allowed because of WP:NOTDB| A merge into the main list would be useless, there's nothing useful to...
Click to read more »it alphabetically. Regardless, these types are not allowed because of WP:NOTDB| A merge into the main list would be useless, there's nothing useful to...
Click to read more »it alphabetically. Regardless, these types are not allowed because of WP:NOTDB| A merge into the main list would be useless, there's nothing useful to...
Click to read more »about this series. This shouldn't even be renamed to a series because of WP:NOTDB, so we shouldn't immediately try to be as inclusive as possible. This is...
Click to read more »it alphabetically. Regardless, these types are not allowed because of WP:NOTDB| A merge into the main list would be useless, there's nothing useful to...
Click to read more »as the content of the list is not notable as a group. Seems to fail WP:NOTDB. mikeblas (talk) 14:37, 12 September 2024 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...
Click to read more »it alphabetically. Regardless, these types are not allowed because of WP:NOTDB| A merge into the main list would be useless, there's nothing useful to...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:GNG, concerning WP:LISTCRUFT and WP:NOTDB issues. Absolutiva 01:08, 2 January 2026 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...
Click to read more »it alphabetically. Regardless, these types are not allowed because of WP:NOTDB| A merge into the main list would be useless, there's nothing useful to...
Click to read more »seems to me this is a valid yet excessively detailed list that fails WP:NOTDB on its face but is also a valid list, so I'm not really sure what to suggest...
Click to read more »please place my !vote firmly in the delete column under WP:NOTMEMORIAL and NOTDB. There is simply no policy basis for these articles to have been created...
Click to read more »should stay as Bills-Titans rivalry per WP:NOTDB. NotJamestack (talk) 13:09, 1 September 2025 (UTC) WP:NOTDB isn't a disqualifier for such a change. It...
Click to read more »December 2025 (UTC) Delete this article. It is a patent violation of WP:NOTDB, and has accuracy concerns to boot: it does not appear to accurately reflect...
Click to read more »encyclopedic JuniperChill (talk) 21:04, 3 July 2024 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTDB and WP:NOTADVERT. MK at your service. 03:09, 4 July 2024 (UTC) (To be clear...
Click to read more »this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:39, 30 September 2025 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTDB. I'm unconvinced by the sources offered above. What we have here is a random...
Click to read more »setting the precedent of adding a non-noteble topic will make Wikipedia:NOTDB problems in the future. Mikeycdiamond (talk) 10:44, 2 June 2025 (UTC) I...
Click to read more »March 2024 (UTC) Delete as egregious eclipse cruft. And if you like, per WP:NOTDB and as a WP:CROSSCAT. Does it matter if an eclipse 1000 years ago was visible...
Click to read more »showcasing of unreferenced planned events, products, or releases Raw data WP:NOTDB WP:RAWDATA The indiscriminate listing of data Directory WP:NOTDIRECTORY...
Click to read more »Square Thing (talk) 11:15, 15 August 2022 (UTC) Please could you address WP:NOTDB and WP:NLIST concerns. For example, where are the independent, non-database...
Click to read more »unexplained statistics", or an "exhaustive log of software updates" (what NOTDB applies to)? BeanieFan11 (talk) 16:21, 13 May 2024 (UTC) With the present...
Click to read more »with barely any substance. "Series" articles are flawed at best, and WP:NOTDB at the most egregious. Rivalry articles should and do tell a story about...
Click to read more »as the content of the list is not notable as a group. Seems to fail WP:NOTDB. mikeblas (talk) 16:31, 12 September 2024 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...
Click to read more »However, even if we discontinue this practice, we are still left with the NOTDB argument, which is my main argument. Sunnya343 (talk) 16:33, 22 March 2024...
Click to read more »database can be reliable and provide in-depth information. What the WP:NOTDB policy says to avoid is Statistics that lack context or explanation. And...
Click to read more »specific coverage on the game individually. Might as well be a failure at WP:NOTDB as well. Propose re-establishing the redirect back to List of Roblox games...
Click to read more »deleted outright. Reywas92Talk 23:21, 19 August 2024 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTDB. This is just the airline's route map in list form. Also an exhaustive list...
Click to read more »article. Chiswick Chap (talk) 17:47, 30 April 2024 (UTC) Delete. Fails WP:NOTDB; Wikipedia is not a repository for bibliographical data. The issue of notability...
Click to read more »(UTC) Delete, first because it seems to not pass WP:NLIST, but also per WP:NOTDB type of concerns. Also telling here is the sole opening prose of this list:...
Click to read more »policy/guideline perspective. Arguments for Option 1 are grounded in GNG and NOTDB, a notability guideline and policy, respectively. Option 2's arguments are...
Click to read more »aside "...and I believe the intersection of lists of sportspeople with NOTDB is ripe for a community-wide RfC". Creating an RfC focused on one specific...
Click to read more »said about a place other than its name, coordinates, and population. WP:NOTDB and WP:NOTEVERYTHING apply here. If more information can be found about...
Click to read more »August 2025 (UTC) list of members seems particularly egregious. see WP:NOTDB, but most of the individuals listed are not notable by themselves. Bluethricecreamman...
Click to read more »presence of that prose does not change the fact that the list goes against WP:NOTDB. Sunnya343 (talk) 01:51, 2 April 2024 (UTC) Keep - The list mentioned also...
Click to read more »to be a list of "people named in file", which would also make this a WP:NOTDB reason to delete. The C of E God Save the King! (talk) 12:25, 1 March 2026...
Click to read more »been open a month and I see two main point of disagreements: a) Whether WP:NOTDB applies and b) Whether there is sufficient sourcing to be able to improve...
Click to read more »context with explanations from RS; I would thus recommend removing it per WP:NOTDB. Removed. EF5 20:55, 13 February 2025 (UTC) The sectioning could use improvement:...
Click to read more »generally argued that the lists are unencyclopedic per WP:NOTGUIDE, WP:NOTDB, and WP:NOTDIRECTORY; that they regularly include unverified information;...
Click to read more »it alphabetically. Regardless, these types are not allowed because of WP:NOTDB|. If the reader wants all the Rajya Sabha members that've ever served, they...
Click to read more »as the content of the list is not notable as a group. Seems to fail WP:NOTDB. -- mikeblas (talk) 15:35, 12 September 2024 (UTC) Note: This discussion...
Click to read more »fails GNG. NP2026 (talk) 20:05, 7 May 2026 (UTC) Delete per nomination, WP:NOTDB. MitYehor📘^talk 08:50, 7 May 2026 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »as the content of the lists aren't notable as a group. Seems to fail WP:NOTDB. Other problems exist: Verifiability varies, but many of these are poorly...
Click to read more »2025 (UTC) Once again, Wikipedia is not about everything. Along with that, NOTDB says that Wikipedia is not a collection of data for something like this...
Click to read more »(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:NOTDB, if the reader wants an encyclopedic list of Serbian localities, then can...
Click to read more »Virginia judicial election articles for 1978, 1980, and 1982 all fail WP:NOTDB. voorts (talk/contributions) 05:14, 26 May 2024 (UTC) Note: This discussion...
Click to read more »deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 20:02, 19 June 2025 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTDB. I don't see what a redirect would solve, since a full list of songs is...
Click to read more »created as a redirect in mainspace, this is a violation of WP:V. Based on WP:NOTDB, the policy page that Wikipedia should not be hosting unexplained, indiscriminate...
Click to read more »deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 05:17, 15 February 2024 (UTC) Delete. NOTDB, NOTINDISCRIMINATE. These are simply mirrors of primary corporate sources...
Click to read more »should stay as Bills-Titans rivalry per WP:NOTDB. NotJamestack (talk) 13:09, 1 September 2025 (UTC) WP:NOTDB isn't a disqualifier for such a change. It...
Click to read more »FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Largely unencyclopedic article, pretty clear case of WP:NOTDB. Seems like something that should be on wikivoyage. OrbitalVoid49 (talk)...
Click to read more »additional coverage in reliable sources, only passing mentions. Essentially NOTDB vio, aside from the two unsourced sentences in the lead. QuietHere (talk...
Click to read more »deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 11:03, 2 October 2023 (UTC) Delete - WP:NOTDB this is a one-of-a-kind list of the 110th Congress (2007-2009). It was created...
Click to read more »Olympians" meets WP:NLIST while being compliant with WP:NOT (and its subunits WP:NOTDB and WP:NOTDIR). The wording of these guideline has, regrettably, been wikilawyered...
Click to read more »WP:NOT violations. Rosbif73 (talk) 06:22, 8 August 2024 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTDB. This is the equivalent of copying down all the cities in the airline's...
Click to read more »of data taken from airline and airport websites doesn't run afoul of WP:NOTDB. If this standard can't be met for an airport, its table should be replaced...
Click to read more »this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:39, 30 September 2025 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTDB. I'm unconvinced by the sources offered above. What we have here is a random...
Click to read more »source as a "not-look-dubious media outlet", so please, read WP:DUE & WP:NOTDB. Butterscotch Beluga (talk) 17:03, 12 October 2024 (UTC) Lack of inclusion...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV. Also fails WP:NOTDB. I would also support a redirect to Badminton at the 1975 SEAP Games. Sportsfan...
Click to read more »it alphabetically. Regardless, these types are not allowed because of WP:NOTDB| A merge into the main list would be useless, there's nothing useful to...
Click to read more »free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) From a contested PROD. Per WP:NOTDB, this is a collection of information that belongs in quite a few other pages...
Click to read more »merged into the actor's article. I think it violates WP:NOTNEWS and WP:NOTDB since most of the arguments in favour of keeping the article can be seen...
Click to read more »WP:NLIST. I have not found significant coverage of this topic. Also fails WP:NOTDB; including all of the results for all of the mayoral elections would make...
Click to read more »the intent of the proposal is "anglocentrism". I personally see it as WP:NOTDB issue. Edward-Woodrow :) [talk] 12:21, 16 September 2023 (UTC) @Edward-Woodrow...
Click to read more »Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 09:56, 20 April 2024 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTDIR and WP:NOTDB. No analysis or summary is offered; the article is just a long bulleted...
Click to read more »everything on this page. FOARP (talk) 16:20, 5 August 2024 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTDB. This is no more than Emirates SkyCargo's destination map in list form....
Click to read more »Felinaex (purr / pawprints) 18:20, 2 June 2026 (UTC) Delete as a failure of WP:NOTDB, containing no prose context; and as wholly redundant in scope to Religions...
Click to read more »sources (without necessarily citing them though) into this one table. WP:NOTDB is to stop you from just copy-pasting statistics from wherever into articles...
Click to read more »explanatory advice, analogous to the non-bolded text in the other elements of the NOTDB list. It is not the actual thing that is disallowed by the policy. The thing...
Click to read more »please place my !vote firmly in the delete column under WP:NOTMEMORIAL and NOTDB. There is simply no policy basis for these articles to have been created...
Click to read more »is notable. Jonathan Deamer (talk) 21:05, 1 May 2024 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTDB clearly random trivia with no real importantce Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 10:10...
Click to read more »presence of that prose does not change the fact that the list goes against WP:NOTDB. Sunnya343 (talk) 01:51, 2 April 2024 (UTC) Keep - The list mentioned also...
Click to read more »that AfD). Trainsandotherthings (talk) 13:54, 4 July 2024 (UTC) Delete per NOTDB. Did consider a redirect yet the name is too confusing. gidonb (talk) 23:44...
Click to read more »to be a list of "people named in file", which would also make this a WP:NOTDB reason to delete. The C of E God Save the King! (talk) 12:25, 1 March 2026...
Click to read more »database can be reliable and provide in-depth information. What the WP:NOTDB policy says to avoid is Statistics that lack context or explanation. And...
Click to read more »list is accurate. — Maile (talk) 22:20, 1 January 2024 (UTC) Delete as WP:NOTDB and per criteria for WP:NLIST. Subject is not discussed as a group or set...
Click to read more »(Talk) 12:05, 20 August 2024 (UTC) Delete. This is a clear example of WP:NOTDB. To know where Lion Air and its subsidiaries are flying as of August 2024...
Click to read more »debate camps which definitely does not belong in the encyclopaedia (WP:NOTDB and WP:NOTDIRECTORY). However, it could become an actual article. I am seeing...
Click to read more »17:36, 12 December 2025 (UTC) Delete This strikes me as a failure of WP:NOTDB, since the sourcing is all to state minimum standards and none of the sources...
Click to read more »(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Per WP:NOTDB and WP:NOTSTATS, this should be deleted. This is the type of things you...
Click to read more »(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:NOTDB issue, which also probably fails WP:GNG. Edward-Woodrow • talk 23:20, 1...
Click to read more »material. Oaktree b (talk) 13:22, 1 October 2025 (UTC) Delete not notable, WP:NOTDB, not human-written (almost certainly unreviewed LLM-generated content):...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:LISTN, WP:LISTPURP and WP:NOTDB. Primarily consists of hundreds of redlinks to non-notable laws which in...
Click to read more »Brickyard_400#Past_winners. Combining this information in a massive list violates WP:NOTDB. Carson Wentz (talk) 14:47, 5 February 2024 (UTC) Keep; while there are...
Click to read more »unexplained statistics", or an "exhaustive log of software updates" (what NOTDB applies to)? BeanieFan11 (talk) 16:21, 13 May 2024 (UTC) With the present...
Click to read more »propose merging to List of states and union territories of India because WP:NOTDB. This just lists Indian states by a numeral characteristic, which is not...
Click to read more »significant coverages, they are all superficial. It fails WP:GNG, also WP:NOTDB. Nihonjinatny (talk) 16:38, 28 August 2024 (UTC) The above discussion is...
Click to read more »to one or two specific databases, violating WP:GNG, WP:SPORTCRIT, and WP:NOTDB. I looked at a randomly selected subset and they were all of the exact form:...
Click to read more »Thryduulf (talk) 15:16, 1 October 2023 (UTC) No per WP:NOTGUIDE and WP:NOTDB. These are things that change all the time. There are websites which do...
Click to read more »restructured, but the subject easily passes WP:GNG and I don't see it failing WP:NOTDB or any other part of WP:NOT. --Richard Yin (talk) 09:46, 26 December 2024...
Click to read more »It is debatable how relevant this information would be anyway as per WP:NOTDB. ElooB (talk) 13:06, 21 September 2024 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...
Click to read more »(talk) 09:09, 4 September 2024 (UTC) Delete: Per nom, but also because WP:NOTDB. This definitely leans more into an indiscriminate list of Pinterest-related...
Click to read more »assuming it was still on offer in August 2024. I agree that WP:IINFO/WP:NOTDB is probably a bigger issue. FOARP (talk) 11:32, 15 August 2024 (UTC) Delete...
Click to read more »Lists. QuietCicada chirp 13:11, 4 November 2024 (UTC) Delete per NLIST and NOTDB. This is much more suited for something like TV Tropes. ~ Matthewrb Let's...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Possibility fails WP:GNG and WP:NOTDB as the article is just his motorsports results with a low amount of sources...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Per WP:NOTSTATS, WP:NOTDB and WP:NOTDIRECTORY. Fails WP:NLIST. Some parts of the whole statistics...
Click to read more »there was coverage, I'm guessing it would be a speedy delete per WP:NOT/WP:NOTDB/WP:NOTPROMO/WP:NOTWHOSWHO/WP:BLP1E/WP:LOWPROFILE. If the media cared enough...
Click to read more »August 2025 (UTC) list of members seems particularly egregious. see WP:NOTDB, but most of the individuals listed are not notable by themselves. Bluethricecreamman...
Click to read more »salting. Nate • (chatter) 23:29, 3 November 2024 (UTC) Delete per NLIST and NOTDB, and MrSchimf's comments above. Also, is it starting to snow in here? ~...
Click to read more »Delete per precedent at C.D. Primeiro de Agosto past squads. This fails WP:NOTDB and doesn't meet WP:NLIST. Toadspike [Talk] 10:35, 27 November 2024 (UTC)...
Click to read more »China (specifically [[Provinces of China#List of provinces|]]) because WP:NOTDB. This just lists Chinese provinces by a numeral characteristic, which is...
Click to read more »and Companies. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 01:18, 28 December 2023 (UTC) Delete as WP:NOTDB and failing WP:NLIST for lack of secondary WP:SIGCOV (this has not been...
Click to read more »except a list of tour dates, which are not inherently worth keeping per WP:NOTDB. Astaire (talk) 17:40, 5 December 2024 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...
Click to read more »article. Wikipedialuva (talk) 11:10, 30 March 2025 (UTC) Delete: Wikipedia:NOTDB - doesn't meet WP:ENCYCLOPEDIC. — ERcheck (talk) 03:38, 30 March 2025 (UTC)...
Click to read more »August 2025 (UTC) Delete Interesting? Yes. Encyclopedic? No. BADFORK, and NOTDB, given that there are no sources talking about the subject. And I'm not...
Click to read more »contribs) 15:46, 20 December 2023 (UTC) Delete under WP:CROSSCAT and WP:NOTDB -- This exactly the kind of complex, intersectional list that makes it so...
Click to read more »March 2024 (UTC) Delete as egregious eclipse cruft. And if you like, per WP:NOTDB and as a WP:CROSSCAT. Does it matter if an eclipse 1000 years ago was visible...
Click to read more »specific coverage on the game individually. Might as well be a failure at WP:NOTDB as well. Propose re-establishing the redirect back to List of Roblox games...
Click to read more »(UTC) Delete, first because it seems to not pass WP:NLIST, but also per WP:NOTDB type of concerns. Also telling here is the sole opening prose of this list:...
Click to read more »January 2025 (UTC) yeah wtf that's def WP:BLPCRIME issue... honestly also WP:NOTDB issue too Bluethricecreamman (talk) 15:54, 2 January 2025 (UTC) they were...
Click to read more »WP:NOT violations. Rosbif73 (talk) 06:00, 17 August 2024 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTDB. Wikipedia isn't supposed to be a mirror of airline databases like FlightConnections...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Violation of WP:NOTDB, fails GNG, and why the heck would anyone care about a list of six-man football...
Click to read more »deleted outright. Reywas92Talk 23:21, 19 August 2024 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTDB. This is just the airline's route map in list form. Also an exhaustive list...
Click to read more »to merge the lead but the the full list of awards is a violation of WP:NOTDB and doesn't pass WP:NLIST. (I'll note that the aforementioned proposal wasn't...
Click to read more »because it is the only squad list for a Sultan Azlan Shah Cup year page. WP:NOTDB may apply as well, and I am not opposed to deletion either – the creator...
Click to read more »helpful. // Timothy :: talk 14:51, 30 January 2024 (UTC) Delete by NLIST or NOTDB. Less detailed tables would have worked with a detailed article on the MATA...
Click to read more »meet NLIST if we are presuming the title to be a qualifyer, violation of NOTDB otherwise. Bobby Cohn 🍁 (talk) 18:48, 25 June 2025 (UTC) So, I can merge...
Click to read more »However, even if we discontinue this practice, we are still left with the NOTDB argument, which is my main argument. Sunnya343 (talk) 16:33, 22 March 2024...
Click to read more »notability (only other sources I could find were primary source interviews) + NOTDB vio. PROD rejected due to number of incoming links, but I don't see why...
Click to read more »article, even if it was notable. It seems to come under WP:NOTGUIDE and WP:NOTDB. There are 1000+ articles about individual Indian train services (though...
Click to read more »encyclopedic JuniperChill (talk) 21:04, 3 July 2024 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTDB and WP:NOTADVERT. MK at your service. 03:09, 4 July 2024 (UTC) (To be clear...
Click to read more »context-less list of names and ages of the dead, which runs afoul of WP:NOTDB and WP:NOTMEMORIAL. There's been a long tradition of not keeping lists like...
Click to read more »(talk) 02:54, 18 September 2025 (UTC) Delete - Fails WP:NOR, WP:LISTN, WP:NOTDB. Far too open-ended and undefined to be a proper list. Attempts to make...
Click to read more »editor. Fails almost everything: WP:GNG, WP:NOTCATALOG, WP:NOTPROMO, WP:NOTDB , WP:SYNTH and perhaps a few more. A brief discussion at WikiProject Physics...
Click to read more »(UTC) Should we consider taking both articles to WP:AFD then due to WP:NOTDB, as you suggested on talk? Or should we try to narrow their coverage first...
Click to read more »wouldn't be notable under GNG is likely a combination of WP:NOTDIC, WP:NOTDB, WP:INDISCRIMINATE, and WP:5P1. The problem is that all of those are mostly...
Click to read more »FENS · JSTOR · TWL) The reason why this list is WP:LISTCRUFT, WP:NOTNEWS, WP:NOTDB and WP:CRIME, for some major Nazi Party figures (per WP:NLIST and WP:GNG)...
Click to read more »with barely any substance. "Series" articles are flawed at best, and WP:NOTDB at the most egregious. Rivalry articles should and do tell a story about...
Click to read more »and New Zealand. Shellwood (talk) 10:10, 6 September 2024 (UTC) Delete WP:NOTDB Traumnovelle (talk) 04:09, 9 September 2024 (UTC) Relisted to generate a...
Click to read more »as the content of the list is not notable as a group. Seems to fail WP:NOTDB. No specific statement of inclusion criteria. mikeblas (talk) 16:19, 12...
Click to read more »December 2025 (UTC) Delete this article. It is a patent violation of WP:NOTDB, and has accuracy concerns to boot: it does not appear to accurately reflect...
Click to read more »alternate solution. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 15:24, 16 August 2023 (UTC) NOTDB requires the context to be from independent sources. Almost all of the prose...
Click to read more »context with explanations from RS; I would thus recommend removing it per WP:NOTDB. Removed. EF5 20:55, 13 February 2025 (UTC) The sectioning could use improvement:...
Click to read more »seems to me this is a valid yet excessively detailed list that fails WP:NOTDB on its face but is also a valid list, so I'm not really sure what to suggest...
Click to read more »scenario. I do not believe this topic is notable and does not comply with WP:NOTDB. Qwerty123M (talk) 11:14, 1 February 2026 (UTC) Delete. This article reads...
Click to read more »✎ 18:53, 18 January 2025 (UTC) Delete. The list of songs falls under WP:NOTDB and the rest of it can go in 2024 Democratic National Convention. Astaire...
Click to read more »User:Hamterous1 (discuss anything!🐹✈️) 13:41, 27 May 2024 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTDB. This is just a collection of passenger data for a few random years. It...
Click to read more »said about a place other than its name, coordinates, and population. WP:NOTDB and WP:NOTEVERYTHING apply here. If more information can be found about...
Click to read more »setting the precedent of adding a non-noteble topic will make Wikipedia:NOTDB problems in the future. Mikeycdiamond (talk) 10:44, 2 June 2025 (UTC) I...
Click to read more »explanatory advice, analogous to the non-bolded text in the other elements of the NOTDB list. It is not the actual thing that is disallowed by the policy. The thing...
Click to read more »In my mind as much information as possible should be there (within WP:NOTDB reason, obviously)—but the policy of no own research (and un-cited info...
Click to read more »article. Chiswick Chap (talk) 17:47, 30 April 2024 (UTC) Delete. Fails WP:NOTDB; Wikipedia is not a repository for bibliographical data. The issue of notability...
Click to read more »buttons. So this article is just duplicating an external dataset. Per WP:NOTDB, this list article adds nothing. It shouldn't have been added to the original...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:GNG, concerning WP:LISTCRUFT and WP:NOTDB issues. Absolutiva 01:08, 2 January 2026 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...
Click to read more »encyclopedic value as to override our policies on indiscriminate info, NOTDB, BALANCE, NOTNEWS, and OR. WP:BALANCE is part of NPOV WP:V, WP:RS and WP:NPOV...
Click to read more »in my closure recommended a community-wide RfC about the intersection of NOTDB and NOTDIR with lists of sportspeople. I also explicitly noted that there...
Click to read more »become exhaustive under that criteria, and would violate WP:NOTDIR and WP:NOTDB. I'm not sure what the solution is there, but it should start with discussion...
Click to read more »irrelevant. Basically violations of WP:INDISCRIMINATE, WP:NOTDATABASE, WP:NOTDB, WP:NOTGOSSIP, WP:RECENTISM and WP:NOTNEWS. Despite reverts with proper...
Click to read more »there was coverage, I'm guessing it would be a speedy delete per WP:NOT/WP:NOTDB/WP:NOTPROMO/WP:NOTWHOSWHO/WP:BLP1E/WP:LOWPROFILE. If the media cared enough...
Click to read more »class, as a lot of information in the article might be in violation of WP:NOTDB and should be sourced to secondary independent sources. Additionally, not...
Click to read more »to one or two specific databases, violating WP:GNG, WP:SPORTCRIT, and WP:NOTDB. I looked at a randomly selected subset and they were all of the exact form:...
Click to read more »