This page is a redirect. The following categories are used to track and monitor this redirect:
|
not tolerated and may result in a ban. Shortcuts WP:NOTCOMPULSORYWP:NOTCOMPULSORY WP:CHOICEWP:CHOICE Wikipedia is a volunteer community and does not require...
Click to read more »contribs), whose last portal-space contribs were later that month[2]. WP:NOTCOMPULSORY, so no criticism of Kanogul, but the portal has had no maintainer since...
Click to read more »template. Such demands violate the spirit of policies at WP:BURDEN, WP:NOTCOMPULSORY, and WP:BATTLEGROUND. Such demands may be perceived as unreasonable...
Click to read more »You fix it. ~2025-34213-64 (talk) 07:42, 17 November 2025 (UTC) WP:NOTCOMPULSORY. ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 14:43, 17 November 2025 (UTC) Keep. there is...
Click to read more »at large at some point, because ArbCom says that it overrides the WP:NOTCOMPULSORY policy; but when I search for it, all I can find are failed policy proposals...
Click to read more »abandoned after creation. That's no criticism of Metalworker14; WP:NOTCOMPULSORY, and any editor is entitled to move on to other interests. All the subpages...
Click to read more »to get the same results. Fails overwhelmingly, with reference to WP:NOTCOMPULSORY. Moved to second RfC. Fails by a wide margin. Fails nearly unanimously...
Click to read more »before apparently moving on to other things, which is of course fine. WP:NOTCOMPULSORY. Ssolbergj (talk · contribs) did some tweaking the next day, but there...
Click to read more »think it's counterproductive, don't feel the need to comment: see WP:NOTCOMPULSORY. Amisom (talk) 17:37, 22 June 2018 (UTC) Amison, I didn’t mean to imply...
Click to read more »who also created the subpages, and then moved on to other things. WP:NOTCOMPULSORY, so that's fine. However, nobody else did anything with the portal apart...
Click to read more »WP:FIXIT This seems to violate core Wikipedia policy, specifically, WP:NOTCOMPULSORY. It's fine to encourage people to edit, but this title only serves as...
Click to read more »the idea is that one can do as much or little as one wishes (per WP:NOTCOMPULSORY). Therefore people are at liberty to create unreferenced stubs, which...
Click to read more »basically abandoned thereafter. That's no criticism of the editor; WP:NOTCOMPULSORY, so editors are entirely free to move on to other things ... but a decision...
Click to read more »force someone to work on the article, contrary to WP:NOTCLEANUP and WP:NOTCOMPULSORY: "Focus on improving the encyclopedia itself, rather than demanding...
Click to read more »coverage, fulfilling that criterion. @User:Sandstein: Please see WP:NOTCOMPULSORY. It is not the job of other editors to make the case in either direction...
Click to read more »kangaroo court. I'm used to policies and guidelines, as well as WP:NOTCOMPULSORY as far as requiring users to sign up. Shrug.—Bagumba (talk) 02:51, 23...
Click to read more »maintained. Ihcoyc's last portalspace edit was in March 2008.[2] WP:NOTCOMPULSORY, so an editor is entitled to move on to other interests, but the community...
Click to read more »abandoned apart from formatting changes. That's no criticism of Mar4d. WP:NOTCOMPULSORY, so editors are fully entitled to move on to other things. However,...
Click to read more »per WP:NOTCOMPULSORY, it is against Wikipedia policy for a maintainer to be required. North America1000 18:48, 13 April 2019 (UTC) WP:NOTCOMPULSORY says...
Click to read more »2011, one in early 2013, and nothing in the 6 years since then.[1] WP:NOTCOMPULSORY, so editors are free to move on other interests. However portals still...
Click to read more »December 2016 (UTC) On the English Wikipedia, ArbCom has ruled that WP:NOTCOMPULSORY does not apply to admins. Hawkeye7 (talk) 07:39, 23 December 2016 (UTC)...
Click to read more »to bed rather than bringing the nominator more shrubberies. See WP:NOTCOMPULSORY: "Focus on improving the encyclopedia itself, rather than demanding...
Click to read more »double for Hammer. Andy Dingley (talk) 21:30, 14 January 2018 (UTC) WP:NOTCOMPULSORY. Ajf773 (talk) 23:00, 14 January 2018 (UTC) "Focus on improving the...
Click to read more »the code). Pldx1 (talk) 14:20, 13 April 2019 (UTC) Comment – Per WP:NOTCOMPULSORY, the notion of a mandatory maintainer for content is against Wikipedia...
Click to read more »guideline about Wikipedia content as stated above whatsoever. See also WP:NOTCOMPULSORY, where it's stated (in part), "Wikipedia is a volunteer community, and...
Click to read more »Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 08:21, 1 October 2020 (UTC) WP:NOTCOMPULSORY TarkusABtalk/contrib 16:20, 1 October 2020 (UTC) This likewise applies...
Click to read more »hasn't touched any part of it since this edit in February 2011. WP:NOTCOMPULSORY, so the creator is entitled to move on to other interests. But Wikipedia...
Click to read more »00:04, 13 April 2019 (UTC) @Robert McClenon: Regarding updates, WP:NOTCOMPULSORY could be part of the reason why. North America1000 00:08, 13 April 2019...
Click to read more »anything. You wanted comments (see here [2]), I provided some. See WP:NOTCOMPULSORY. -- WV ● ✉ ✓ 15:53, 3 May 2015 (UTC) I'm impressed with how the article...
Click to read more »they wish, including moving on from work which they started. See WP:NOTCOMPULSORY) So what we have here is a choice of a broken (and apparently never-completed)...
Click to read more »they have no interest whatsoever in this portal (and please see WP:NOTCOMPULSORY), so your pipe-dream votes should hold no weight. Aside from a very...
Click to read more »a Wikipedia:Wikibreak from AFD. Just a reminder that AFD work is WP:NOTCOMPULSORY and there are other solid editors active at AFD. If a topic is truly...
Click to read more »prose, and stop assigning responsibilities to others as Wikipedia is WP:NOTCOMPULSORY.—Bagumba (talk) 10:06, 11 January 2017 (UTC) Delete with the same reasoning...
Click to read more »Wikipedia talk:Portal guidelines § Second sentence contradicts WP:NOTCOMPULSORY policy, and should be removed Wikipedia talk:Portal guidelines § Concerning...
Click to read more »a such key agency in the USSR reek of WP:Other stuff exists and WP:NOTCOMPULSORY. Familiarize yourself with Wikipedia policies before patronizing others...
Click to read more »out to do it alone, but sooner or later moved on to other things. WP:NOTCOMPULSORY, so they are entitled to do move on, but this portal has already been...
Click to read more »Kylekieran's last edit to any part of the portal was in August 2012.[3] WP:NOTCOMPULSORY, so editors are entitled to move on. But portals need ongoing maintenance...
Click to read more »circa 2010. This is another fact and a great occasion to invoke WP:NOTCOMPULSORY. And when someone criticized my description of the 2019 versions as...
Click to read more »contribs), whose last edit to the portal was in November 2007[1]. WP:NOTCOMPULSORY, so editors are quite entitled to move on to other interests, and this...
Click to read more »User:Northamerica1000. Due to WP:NOTCOMPULSORY, no one can compulse you to click on this blue link and read again what the WP:NOTCOMPULSORY policy says exactly. But...
Click to read more »to give any assurances on what you plan to do in the future; see WP:NOTCOMPULSORY. But unless some editors give some such credible assurances or can point...
Click to read more »Redolta's last portal-space edit[1] was 18 months ago, in late 2017. WP:NOTCOMPULSORY, so Redolta and every other is fully entitled to edit whenever and wherever...
Click to read more »many purposes it is at the disposal of the Foundation. Of course WP:NOTCOMPULSORY and it is good to have full time staff to drive these things through...
Click to read more »June 6 is not. 77.11.125.202 (talk) 21:07, 18 June 2019 (UTC) See WP:NOTCOMPULSORY. It is his choice whether he wants to close this TfD and if he does...
Click to read more »Pakieditor (talk) 16:19, 10 October 2019 (UTC) Of course, @Pakieditor. WP:NOTCOMPULSORY. Like everyone else here, you're a volunteer. You manage your own time...
Click to read more »to make demands on how other volunteers should spend their time (WP:NOTCOMPULSORY)? 192.76.8.86 (talk) 01:30, 24 May 2023 (UTC) Comment x2 As there appears...
Click to read more »agreements to maintain portals that have not been kept. The argument of WP:NOTCOMPULSORY is true but irrelevant. Keeping a portal is optional; maintaining a...
Click to read more »idea, turn around and demand they do the rest of the work? Do read WP:NOTCOMPULSORY, please, and when you've done so, please decide whether you want to...
Click to read more »the opposition was significantly stronger in terms of policy (see WP:NOTCOMPULSORY) and practical arguments. Editors had issues with using an ultimatum...
Click to read more »input"), and WP:NOTCOMPULSORY limits this RfC's ability to go beyond this. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:13, 5 October 2022 (UTC) Per WP:NOTCOMPULSORY. We cannot force...
Click to read more »anything. You wanted comments (see here [11]), I provided some. See WP:NOTCOMPULSORY. -- WV ● ✉ ✓ 15:53, 3 May 2015 (UTC) I'm impressed with how the article...
Click to read more »often, but forgotten where they were. For the second, there's also WP:NOTCOMPULSORY. MichaelMaggs (talk) 10:29, 22 March 2022 (UTC) I tend to link to WP:SODOIT...
Click to read more »change based on this thread. It should be noted that editing is WP:NOTCOMPULSORY. As the person in question is, no doubt, enjoying all this fuss I would...
Click to read more »--Guy Macon (talk) 00:33, 12 November 2018 (UTC) Well, Wikipedia is WP:NOTCOMPULSORY, so you'll have to run your own cost-benefit analysis on whether or...
Click to read more »to the answer to a question above, where the candidate linked to WP:NOTCOMPULSORY. So we have someone who has been around long enough that we would have...
Click to read more »contribs) 19:07, 4 April 2018 (UTC) @Afrodizifunk3: just so you know WP:NOTCOMPULSORY. MarnetteD|Talk 19:11, 4 April 2018 (UTC) The discussion above is closed...
Click to read more »statement was in fact a lie (meant to deceive). 54129 knows about WP:NOTCOMPULSORY, and so questions Husond's apparent need to deceive, about which the...
Click to read more »You did mention that I was trying your patience, though. Well, WP:NOTCOMPULSORY applies to admins as well, I would imagine. You're a volunteer, right...
Click to read more »or ignore them and work elsewhere, and either way I must invoke WP:NOTCOMPULSORY to do so. Muffinator (talk) 21:32, 11 August 2014 (UTC) (involved editor)...
Click to read more »in the past, there seems to be a distinct lac of volunteers, and WP:NOTCOMPULSORY. Likewise for the "probation officer" approach. And on a more mundane...
Click to read more »a user edits, and what does it mean for it to be "sustainable"? WP:NOTCOMPULSORY, people. User:HumanxAnthro (Nina CortexxCoco Bandicoot) 01:49, 2 July...
Click to read more »experienced" editors. Everyone is volunteering their time here and, per WP:NOTCOMPULSORY, they can choose when to disengage with the project in whole or with...
Click to read more »categorically impossible for me to pile work on you. Please see WP:NOTCOMPULSORY and WP:VOLUNTEER. You are painting me as stubborn for marking a redirect...
Click to read more »opposing editor in the dispute: Oh my. What a tantrum. Oh well, bye...WP:NOTCOMPULSORY That thread makes me want to quit, what a bunch of whinging bullshit...
Click to read more »article with a valid PD image and then want to be left alone per WP:NOTCOMPULSORY. I'd still like to know why the bot tagged the image for deletion when...
Click to read more »with you", which any editor is entitled to do for whatever reason (WP:NOTCOMPULSORY). Instead the only comments they made to object to the principle of...
Click to read more »am a bad Wikipedian for not being a frequent editor: [64] - given WP:NOTCOMPULSORY this comment was pure bullying Falsely claiming that I am topic banned...
Click to read more »would have been better achieved if the subject had responded, but WP:NOTCOMPULSORY. Even some input from someone not involved in the discussion would have...
Click to read more »Trinidad and Tobago portal, than spending time here. Unfortunately WP:NOTCOMPULSORY does not seem to apply here, and clearly there are those that enjoy...
Click to read more »effectively even if the "defence" is poor or non-existent - per WP:NOTCOMPULSORY. Sansdtein should have been satisfied with redacting TParis' comment...
Click to read more »respond to something, assuming you have no WP:MESS to clean up (WP:NOTCOMPULSORY / WP:VOLUNTEER). However, restoring the edit without waiting for discussion—noting...
Click to read more »can be criticised for their non-participation, in part due to the WP:NOTCOMPULSORY argument, but also since the above discussion cannot reasonably be said...
Click to read more »gravely misunderstand the basic nature of Wikipedia's policies (WP:NOTCOMPULSORY, WP:OWNBEHAVIOR, etc.) (B) I don't like Armatura threatened to report...
Click to read more »sort of "required" maintainer goes squarely against the grain of WP:NOTCOMPULSORY, part of the WP:NOT policy page, where it states, "Wikipedia is a volunteer...
Click to read more »14:14, 6 July 2015 (UTC) Support ArbCom has already struck down WP:NOTCOMPULSORY for admins. The amount of activity required is not great, and if it...
Click to read more »enforcing this? Sergecross73 msg me 18:56, 26 May 2016 (UTC) Please read WP:NOTCOMPULSORY. WikiP is a voluntary organization not a "professional" one. I am sorry...
Click to read more »norm that the community expects editors to follow) it goes against WP:NOTCOMPULSORY. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 17:50, 19 April 2020 (UTC) I'd like to find...
Click to read more »Blueboar (talk) 12:21, 13 July 2016 (UTC) Because Wikipedia is WP:NOTCOMPULSORY and WP:There is no deadline. There are any number of reasons why an...
Click to read more »(talk) 22:00, 30 December 2012 (UTC) I'm a stalwart proponent of WP:NOTCOMPULSORY etc: indeed no one is required to proactively do anything. The point...
Click to read more »encyclopedia. --▸∮truthious ᛔandersnatch◂ 03:14, 8 June 2012 (UTC) *yawn*. WP:NOTCOMPULSORY, I don't have to be doing it as long as you to be doing it right. Thank...
Click to read more »BHG made arguments about needing volunteers that to me go against WP:NOTCOMPULSORY.[195]—Bagumba (talk) 21:17, 20 December 2019 (UTC) BrownHairedGirl makes...
Click to read more »consume vast swathes of their time, effectively going counter to WP:NOTCOMPULSORY not to mention the stress that it engenders. Current word length: 1058;...
Click to read more »pending expansion. Applicable policies include WP:ATD, WP:NONENG; WP:NOTCOMPULSORY; WP:NOTPAPER; &c. Andrew🐉(talk) 18:50, 1 November 2020 (UTC) I'd be...
Click to read more »minimize non-free use. --Masem (t) 16:23, 5 June 2020 (UTC) Per WP:NOTCOMPULSORY, Wikipedia editors are volunteers who are entitled to be as lazy as...
Click to read more »delete portal tracking categories. NA1K's repeated bogus claims taht WP:NOTCOMPULSORY bans any requirement for a portal to have a named maintainer. And now...
Click to read more »the community and Arbitration Committee. How does that uphold the WP:NOTCOMPULSORY policy? I don't think editors are ever required to do things they don't...
Click to read more »i noted the lack of interest from WikiProjects. Bagumba invokes WP:NOTCOMPULSORY, but chooses to omit the subsequent discussion ([7], several posts by...
Click to read more »to keep. To address the first concern, I would like to point to WP:NOTCOMPULSORY and (again) to WP:COI. That is, you are not required to spend any of...
Click to read more »force someone to work on the article, contrary to WP:NOTCLEANUP and WP:NOTCOMPULSORY: "Focus on improving the encyclopedia itself, rather than demanding...
Click to read more »double for Hammer. Andy Dingley (talk) 21:30, 14 January 2018 (UTC) WP:NOTCOMPULSORY. Ajf773 (talk) 23:00, 14 January 2018 (UTC) "Focus on improving the...
Click to read more »to keep. To address the first concern, I would like to point to WP:NOTCOMPULSORY and (again) to WP:COI. That is, you are not required to spend any of...
Click to read more »as a portal maintainer because I wanted to, and particularly per WP:NOTCOMPULSORY, nothing more. There is no "game" here. The assessments for Ghana-related...
Click to read more »rot noted above. If Antony-22's interests have moved on, then per WP:NOTCOMPULSORY that's fine, a choice they are entitled to make without reproach. But...
Click to read more »cases. BeFriendlyGoodSir (talk) 23:19, 14 December 2023 (UTC) Per WP:NOTCOMPULSORY, I am tired of working on this page today. I will refrain unless I am...
Click to read more »to bed rather than bringing the nominator more shrubberies. See WP:NOTCOMPULSORY: "Focus on improving the encyclopedia itself, rather than demanding...
Click to read more »may need to step away until this MFD is finished. 6) Remember that WP:NOTCOMPULSORY and you can log off so as not to see the userbox. MarnetteD|Talk 21:48...
Click to read more »field. – PharyngealImplosive7 (talk) 03:49, 5 September 2025 (UTC) WP:NOTCOMPULSORY: your time is voluntary WP:TFD#REASONS: it is redundant to a better-designed...
Click to read more »the idea is that one can do as much or little as one wishes (per WP:NOTCOMPULSORY). Therefore people are at liberty to create unreferenced stubs, which...
Click to read more »them, take it up at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard. Wikipedia:NOTCOMPULSORY also applies here, as you're free from not debating with them. If they...
Click to read more »Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 08:21, 1 October 2020 (UTC) WP:NOTCOMPULSORY TarkusABtalk/contrib 16:20, 1 October 2020 (UTC) This likewise applies...
Click to read more »guideline about Wikipedia content as stated above whatsoever. See also WP:NOTCOMPULSORY, where it's stated (in part), "Wikipedia is a volunteer community, and...
Click to read more »coverage, fulfilling that criterion. @User:Sandstein: Please see WP:NOTCOMPULSORY. It is not the job of other editors to make the case in either direction...
Click to read more »just to find out it's all being scrapped... but alas, that's why WP:NOTCOMPULSORY I think elements of all of these articles could be incorporated elsewhere...
Click to read more »understand the reason given in the answer to Q10, additionally keeping WP:NOTCOMPULSORY in mind, and noting that any decision made now will be perceived as...
Click to read more »pending expansion. Applicable policies include WP:ATD, WP:NONENG; WP:NOTCOMPULSORY; WP:NOTPAPER; &c. Andrew🐉(talk) 18:50, 1 November 2020 (UTC) I'd be...
Click to read more »for this, or numerous other kinds of templates for that matter (WP:NOTCOMPULSORY)? Dl2000 (talk) 02:03, 2 October 2013 (UTC) Comment Am I wrong that...
Click to read more »editing or moved on to other topics, and the portal rotted for years. WP:NOTCOMPULSORY, so any editor is fully entitled to move on without reproach, but that's...
Click to read more »November 2022 (UTC) isaacl: it’s true bureaucrats have a pocket veto in WP:NOTCOMPULSORY, however there would be no way for a single bureaucrat to prevent all...
Click to read more »the community and Arbitration Committee. How does that uphold the WP:NOTCOMPULSORY policy? I don't think editors are ever required to do things they don't...
Click to read more »84.101 (talk) 23:58, 10 January 2014 (UTC) 3) Policy. See also, WP:NOTCOMPULSORY, and in particular WP:CHOICE, which trumps essays (and also methinks...
Click to read more »00:13, 4 January 2016 (UTC) @Viriditas: I basically have to invoke WP:NOTCOMPULSORY on that. The fight over this went on pretty much all day every day for...
Click to read more »73 (talk • contribs) 05:59, 19 November 2014 (UTC) Wikipedia is WP:NOTCOMPULSORY, every editor can contribute in the manner that is most appropriate...
Click to read more »manage to make all things perfect at once, knowing that Wikipedia is NOTCOMPULSORY. Actually the 5 groups of categories proposed for discussion here come...
Click to read more »encyclopedia. --▸∮truthious ᛔandersnatch◂ 03:14, 8 June 2012 (UTC) *yawn*. WP:NOTCOMPULSORY, I don't have to be doing it as long as you to be doing it right. Thank...
Click to read more »January 2024 (UTC) You have not offered a compromise, and it is WP:NOTCOMPULSORY for me to edit the article Law of India. I intend to withdraw from this...
Click to read more »pictures-robots). The baby seems dead, but I will use the famous WP:NOTCOMPULSORY to avoid looking further. A great case of Let the dead bury the dead...
Click to read more »in the article. On the other hand, fulfilling such a request is WP:NOTCOMPULSORY. Whether material should stand on a page while verifiability of a translation...
Click to read more »00:13, 4 January 2016 (UTC) @Viriditas: I basically have to invoke WP:NOTCOMPULSORY on that. The fight over this went on pretty much all day every day for...
Click to read more »groups of users to do certain things - they should "request" - per WP:NOTCOMPULSORY. Recent mass revocations of outdated general sanctions (the first initiated...
Click to read more »BHGbot 4. And since I am a volunteer like any other editor, then per WP:NOTCOMPULSORY I am free to make my own decision about whether to open a WP:BRFA request...
Click to read more »long-term problems. And for three years, you hadn't been pro-active. WP:NOTCOMPULSORY, so if your priorities and interests had moved elsewhere, then that's...
Click to read more »we'll see each other at ANI. Banedon (talk) 00:54, 17 May 2017 (UTC) WP:NOTCOMPULSORY is required reading here. You're asking Jayron here (for example) to...
Click to read more »aren't being violated. It's primarily non-COI issues related to WP:NOTCOMPULSORY, WP:IDHT, WP:BLUDGEON, and, today, WP:ASPERSIONS. BC1278 is turning...
Click to read more »(and regretably I will not be attempting to fix them myself per WP:NOTCOMPULSORY, due to unnecessarily unpleasant previous memories of unsuccessfully...
Click to read more »2016 (UTC) WP:SOFIXIT. -Kudzu1 (talk) 05:04, 29 December 2016 (UTC) WP:NOTCOMPULSORY. Masem is free to criticize the article's state, that doesn't mean that...
Click to read more »place to complain about that would normally be WP:ERRORS, and, per WP:NOTCOMPULSORY, I'm not yet sure I want to bother to do that, given the difficulty...
Click to read more »Info on this can be found in Breakthrough's News article (but per WP:NOTCOMPULSORY and WP:BNO I'm currently rather reluctant to try to do this myself due...
Click to read more »Ho Cap'n!⚓ 03:55, 27 January 2021 (UTC) @CaptainEek: Of course, WP:NOTCOMPULSORY. But before I start unpacking the case of WP:TROUT, you unprotected...
Click to read more »go to bed, and I'm not sure I want to spend time on it today (per WP:NOTCOMPULSORY and WP:BNO if necessary). Maybe the CNs will get fixed as Americans...
Click to read more »groups of users to do certain things - they should "request" - per WP:NOTCOMPULSORY. Recent mass revocations of outdated general sanctions (the first initiated...
Click to read more »so I almost certainly won't be attempting to do so myself (per WP:NOTCOMPULSORY and WP:BNO).Tlhslobus (talk) 03:18, 6 August 2018 (UTC) The discussion...
Click to read more »long-term problems. And for three years, you hadn't been pro-active. WP:NOTCOMPULSORY, so if your priorities and interests had moved elsewhere, then that's...
Click to read more »not included in the Impacts section. I feel neither willing (per WP:NOTCOMPULSORY) nor properly able to fix it myself. And quite likely the problem will...
Click to read more »Thanks for the suggestion. I may try it later, but probably not (per WP:NOTCOMPULSORY, WP:BNO, etc), tho anybody else who wanted to have a go would almost...
Click to read more »acknowledged by wikipedia should be determined by consensus." It is WP:NOTCOMPULSORY for us to do so. Morbidthoughts (talk) 23:34, 15 August 2021 (UTC) A...
Click to read more »You fix it. ~2025-34213-64 (talk) 07:42, 17 November 2025 (UTC) WP:NOTCOMPULSORY. ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 14:43, 17 November 2025 (UTC) Keep. there is...
Click to read more »search for, find and add that source within 30 days. In view of WP:NOTCOMPULSORY, there is no reason to assume that anyone will do that, not even the...
Click to read more »time that their action can be challenged. It's a trivial result of WP:NOTCOMPULSORY, not a counter to the way G5 works. Endorse * Pppery * it has begun...
Click to read more »one who mentioned that anyone 'should' do anything, I'm well aware of NOTCOMPULSORY. Djmaschek only referred to the material as unsourced, so I assumed...
Click to read more »definition of Wikipedia:Be bold. As for "I shouldn't have to fix it, see WP:NOTCOMPULSORY. AdmiralCarl (talk) | :) 00:53, 1 February 2026 (UTC) Every Wikipedia...
Click to read more »(UTC) Fma12, you're not required to deal with anyone (WP:DISENGAGE, WP:NOTCOMPULSORY, and in case someone persistently messages you after a request not to...
Click to read more »people refrain from editing. The first is clearly their right per WP:NOTCOMPULSORY, and for the second nobody is under any obligation to follow Tamzin's...
Click to read more »January 2024 (UTC) You have not offered a compromise, and it is WP:NOTCOMPULSORY for me to edit the article Law of India. I intend to withdraw from this...
Click to read more »idea, turn around and demand they do the rest of the work? Do read WP:NOTCOMPULSORY, please, and when you've done so, please decide whether you want to...
Click to read more »a Wikipedia:Wikibreak from AFD. Just a reminder that AFD work is WP:NOTCOMPULSORY and there are other solid editors active at AFD. If a topic is truly...
Click to read more »Dicklyon (talk) 23:21, 29 May 2025 (UTC) There's WP:SILENCE (and WP:NOTCOMPULSORY), but at the same time, I think there's enough of a quorum here where...
Click to read more »just to find out it's all being scrapped... but alas, that's why WP:NOTCOMPULSORY I think elements of all of these articles could be incorporated elsewhere...
Click to read more »to make demands on how other volunteers should spend their time (WP:NOTCOMPULSORY)? 192.76.8.86 (talk) 01:30, 24 May 2023 (UTC) Comment x2 As there appears...
Click to read more »mean that, nothing prevents it. Nothing could prevent it because WP:NOTCOMPULSORY is both policy and a fundamental truth of human existence. I'm not sure...
Click to read more »cases. BeFriendlyGoodSir (talk) 23:19, 14 December 2023 (UTC) Per WP:NOTCOMPULSORY, I am tired of working on this page today. I will refrain unless I am...
Click to read more »anything. GeogSage (⚔Chat?⚔) 03:56, 20 January 2025 (UTC) Wikipedia is WP:NOTCOMPULSORY, so even a "non-retired" editor might never edit again. And if someone...
Click to read more »(talk) 07:43, 19 January 2026 (UTC) While that may be an essay, WP:NOTCOMPULSORY is a policy: Wikipedia is a volunteer community and does not require...
Click to read more »taken away. The bottom line is that making edits to Wikipedia is WP:NOTCOMPULSORY. No-one is not entitled to demand that I make edits in the draftspace...
Click to read more »04:15, 7 January 2025 (UTC) Wikipedia is a volunteer service and WP:NOTCOMPULSORY. I have other WP:OBLIGATION in real life. 𝙳.𝟷𝟾𝚝𝚑 (𝚃𝚊𝚕𝚔) 08:40...
Click to read more »alleged profane quote), then the next source is his death. I know WP:NOTCOMPULSORY but I haven't a clue why somebody would suggest an article as bad as...
Click to read more »behavior unless it descends into tendentious axe grinding. After all, WP:NOTCOMPULSORY is a section of our very important policy WP:NOT, which says Editors...
Click to read more »But if you don't improve the article - who will?: Per the policy WP:NOTCOMPULSORY: Wikipedia is a volunteer community and does not require Wikipedians...
Click to read more »time that their action can be challenged. It's a trivial result of WP:NOTCOMPULSORY, not a counter to the way G5 works. Endorse * Pppery * it has begun...
Click to read more »