justifiably suitable for an article on Wikipedia. Shortcuts WP:NOTCLEANUPWP:NOTCLEANUP WP:SURMOUNTABLEWP:SURMOUNTABLE A common maxim is that "Articles for deletion...

edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was speedy keep. per WP:NOTCLEANUP. (non-admin closure) jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 23:12, 16 July 2017...

Nightvour (talk) 02:59, 14 July 2020 (UTC) speedy keep in the name of WP:NOTCLEANUP. I doubt this is WP:TNT-bad, and serching shows it endless explained and...

cleanup (to "start over"). Other relevant essays on this topic are WP:NOTCLEANUP and WP:Deletion is not cleanup vs. WP:Using deletion as cleanup (opposing...

current arguments and WP:DINC and WP:NOTCLEANUP. Fierysea13 (talk) 09:20, 9 August 2026 (UTC) keep per WP:NOTCLEANUP --Lenticel (talk) 00:14, 12 August...

addition I add WP:NOTCLEANUP Lubbad85 (☎) 19:52, 16 April 2019 (UTC) Please provide examples of WP:GNG and explain how WP:NOTCLEANUP applies here. Otherwise...

current arguments and WP:DINC and WP:NOTCLEANUP. Fierysea13 (talk) 09:20, 9 August 2026 (UTC) keep per WP:NOTCLEANUP --Lenticel (talk) 00:14, 12 August...

it's ready for main space. -Mabeenot (talk) 06:04, 13 July 2010 (UTC) WP:NOTCLEANUP. No article should be deleted for being of poor quality. If it really...

further edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was keep per WP:NOTCLEANUP and WP:SNOW. (non-admin closure) {{u|Sdkb}} talk 08:13, 18 June 2020 (UTC)...

The fact is the subject is notable and the afd is not warranted. WP:NOTCLEANUP Lubbad85 (☎) 23:44, 16 April 2019 (UTC) Lubbad85, then add the sources...

Laterthanyouthink (talk) 22:07, 28 October 2022 (UTC) Keep. AFD is WP:NOTCLEANUP and draft space is just an elephants' graveyard. SpinningSpark 13:35,...

resistance to apartheid. WP:NOTCLEANUP applies as well. Also oppose draftifying. Park3r (talk) 07:47, 18 October 2022 (UTC) WP:NOTCLEANUP kind of does apply here...

Armour, from the 9th to the 17th Century Armour and Weapons See also WP:NOTCLEANUP. Andrew🐉(talk) 11:18, 24 June 2021 (UTC) Delete: per. nom. Djm-leighpark...

The nominator calls out the promotional or advertising feel, but WP:NOTCLEANUP Lightburst (talk) 01:42, 13 October 2019 (UTC) Throwing buzzwords without...

Consensus was the subject passes WP:GNG. Consensus was also that per WP:NOTCLEANUP, the article can stay. (non-admin closure) Rollidan (talk) 19:55, 3 December...

made to this page.‎ The result was keep. Early close per WP:SNOW and WP:NOTCLEANUP. (non-admin closure) VQuakr (talk) 07:22, 8 March 2018 (UTC) The Shape...

have tried to speedy delete this an unambiguous spam. I'm all for WP:NOTCLEANUP but this is such a mess I'm for deleting per WP:TNT. Shawn in Montreal...

Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 21:23, 13 November 2021 (UTC) Obvious keep - per WP:NOTCLEANUP. Notable article. This seems simply disruptive behavior from the proposer...

here. FlotillaFlotsam (talk) 03:38, 27 June 2017 (UTC) Keep AfD is WP:NOTCLEANUP. Newimpartial (talk) 00:29, 28 June 2017 (UTC) 16:34, 8 July 2017 (UTC)...

improvement. However that is not a valid reason for deletion, please see WP:NOTCLEANUP. This company is traded on NASDAQ. That alone is not a reason to keep...

Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 14:08, 30 July 2021 (UTC) Keep per WP:NEXIST and WP:NOTCLEANUP. Andrew🐉(talk) 16:20, 30 July 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...

discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:08, 24 December 2013 (UTC) Keep. WP:NOTCLEANUP. Clearly a notable topic. We did and do have worse-quality articles hanging...

Thanks, j⚛e deckertalk 15:42, 15 June 2014 (UTC) Speedy close per WP:NOTCLEANUP. Ivanvector (talk) 21:36, 19 June 2014 (UTC) Relisted to generate a more...

(talk) 16:21, 21 December 2016 (UTC) Keep per WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES and WP:NOTCLEANUP. Secondary school that we have evidence exists. TonyBallioni (talk) 04:18...

made to this page.‎ The result was keep. The consensus is that Afd is WP:NOTCLEANUP Mark Arsten (talk) 20:40, 9 August 2012 (UTC) Abimilku (edit | talk |...

experience and an admin for over eight - should be aware of WP:NOEFFORT and WP:NOTCLEANUP. However, the nomination of this article for deletion is, in fact, based...

2019 (UTC) Keep per WP:NOTCLEANUP article should be improved and WP:PRESERVE Wm335td (talk) 17:09, 12 October 2019 (UTC) NOTCLEANUP presupposes the notability...

discussions. Lightburst (talk) 01:42, 15 December 2019 (UTC) Keep WP:NOTCLEANUP and sources do exist WP:NEXIST. Notable. The CBC covers it Lightburst...

further edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was keep per WP:NOTCLEANUP. Bmusician 03:41, 28 March 2012 (UTC) Global storm activity of mid 2010...

and starting it over. For any lesser degree of problematic content, WP:NOTCLEANUP applies. Vanamonde (Talk) 02:46, 7 September 2020 (UTC) [Hide this box]...

per WP:LISTPURP. The external links can obviously be removed. See WP:NOTCLEANUP and WP:ATD. Nominator also misunderstands what "coatrack" means here....

Mormonism Arthistorian1977 (talk) 06:17, 10 August 2015 (UTC) Keep. WP:NOTCLEANUP; WP:BEFORE. Wrong forum to propose a merge. VQuakr (talk) 07:21, 10 August...

discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:54, 11 January 2011 (UTC) Comment - Per WP:NOTCLEANUP and WP:BEFORE the nominator has not given valid reasons to propose deletion...

consensus there). It may need massive trimming but that falls under WP:NOTCLEANUP (non-admin closure) Dronebogus (talk) 18:50, 13 November 2022 (UTC) [Hide...

just depressing--5VH9 (talk) 03:49, 6 December 2007 (UTC) Keep.:Per WP:NOTCLEANUP. Deletion is not a way to improve an article. Improving it is.-Carados...

cancelled sequel, spinnoffs, and comics. This is a classic case of WP:NOTCLEANUP. Qwaiiplayer (talk) 14:28, 1 February 2022 (UTC) It is not convincing...

flowing dreams (talk page) 06:33, 14 October 2019 (UTC) Keep This is a WP:NOTCLEANUP case; there's no way we're deleting an article about a major video codec...

Keep We keep subjects with SIGCOV. One of the top prospects for MLB. WP:NOTCLEANUP Lightburst (talk) 02:02, 18 December 2019 (UTC) Keep Several of the sources...

2012 (UTC) Keep, notable, encyclopedic, and educational topic. Also, WP:NOTCLEANUP. — Cirt (talk) 00:22, 28 October 2012 (UTC) Nothing in the article survives...

articles is to try to spruce them up before nominating them, as AfD is WP:NOTCLEANUP. That said, this did give the article the needed TLC so there shouldn't...

text indicates this feature is a significant pass in the Alps, and WP:NOTCLEANUP also applies. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 03:57, 1 August 2021 (UTC) The...

Delete. Although some of the nominator's arguments might fall under WP:NOTCLEANUP, and it's difficult to search for reliable sources due to him sharing...

discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 05:35, 29 January 2017 (UTC) Comment, WP:NOTCLEANUP. Coolabahapple (talk) 05:44, 29 January 2017 (UTC) Note: This debate has...

Television. Please see WP:BEFORE, WP:SOFIXIT, WP:FIXTHEPROBLEM and WP:NOTCLEANUP. Andrew (talk) 14:24, 4 October 2014 (UTC) Keep Per Andrew above. MrScorch6200...

this page.‎ The result was speedy keep. Withdrawn by nominator per WP:NOTCLEANUP. (non-admin closure) jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 21:17, 22 September...

the article, which are illegitimate reasons to propose deletion per WP:NOTCLEANUP and WP:BEFORE. Therefore I am taking it to AfD because there are a few...

deletion discussions. North America1000 20:50, 6 November 2019 (UTC) Keep WP:NOTCLEANUP. The article needs an ambitious editor, not deletion. WP:PRESERVE Lightburst...

ordinary editing, not deletion per WP:ATD; WP:BEFORE; WP:IMPERFECT; WP:NOTCLEANUP; WP:PRESERVE; &c. Andrew D. (talk) 00:14, 14 June 2019 (UTC) Keep I have...

of interest to Pakistani expatriate investors. A rare article where WP:NOTCLEANUP actually applies. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 16:12, 26 March 2020 (UTC)...

notability", indicates poor quality as the reason for deletion. According to WP:NOTCLEANUP, that is not a criterion for deletion. Meanwhile, according to WP:BEFORE...

contains in-app A/B tests and user survey forms.[1]" - Anyway AFD is NOTCLEANUP and if anyone disagrees with the closure(s) then they should head to DRV...

think tank and is notable. WP:ATD The article could use an editor. but WP:NOTCLEANUP. Wm335td (talk) 21:11, 1 January 2020 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

No further edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was keep. NOTCLEANUP applies for the nomination. In absence of any argument supporting deletion...

discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 21:20, 13 November 2021 (UTC) Keep - WP:NOTCLEANUP; if there is good, eventually sourceable, content in the article, it should...

have not quite demonstrated the non-viability of this page, and as such NOTCLEANUP applies. In discussing this, and similar, pages in the future, it will...

page, this should be done rather than deleting the page." See also WP:NOTCLEANUP. Andrew🐉(talk) 14:02, 11 December 2020 (UTC) My nomination was not in...

public transport company of a European city of 300,000 is unnotable? WP:NOTCLEANUP. No such user (talk) 11:33, 31 January 2018 (UTC) (Redacted) The reason...

Wales (same thing) invented maintenance tags. And of course Afd is WP:NOTCLEANUP. Sorry that's my best advice. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 09:21, 25 November...

perform any checks himself? And merger isn't deletion - see WP:SK and WP:NOTCLEANUP. Andrew D. (talk) 07:22, 27 March 2015 (UTC) Keep. This is quite an important...

discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:42, 8 April 2015 (UTC) Keep AfD is WP:NOTCLEANUP, if the article sucks then it needs improvement not deletion. The article...

sourced to a doubtful source and containing mostly obsolete terms but WP:NOTCLEANUP applies. There is a possible argument that this article and List of eponymous...

April 2017 (UTC) Keep, nominator does not want article deleted and as WP:NOTCLEANUP... Coolabahapple (talk) 00:12, 29 April 2017 (UTC) The above discussion...

——SerialNumber54129 09:17, 26 October 2018 (UTC) Speedy Keep per WP:NOTCLEANUP, WP:BEFORE and WP:MAD. Andrew D. (talk) 10:27, 26 October 2018 (UTC) Note:...

therefore not appropriate and the rest is a matter of ordinary editing per WP:NOTCLEANUP. Andrew🐉(talk) 12:45, 17 July 2020 (UTC) WP:ITSIMPORTANT is not a particularly...

| contribs) 15:47, 4 February 2020 (UTC) Keep current year event. WP:NOTCLEANUP Lightburst (talk) 02:54, 9 February 2020 (UTC) The above discussion is...

Shellwood (talk) 09:40, 8 June 2026 (UTC) Keep – Obviously notable, WP:NOTCLEANUP applies here. Svartner (talk) 11:57, 8 June 2026 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

John Elmer McKeen MaskedSinger (talk) 17:42, 4 July 2019 (UTC) Keep - WP:NOTCLEANUP. TH1980 and MaskedSinger stubs are a very important part of our encyclopedia...

Plenty of sources are available: [1], [2], [3], [4], [5]. AfD is not WP:NOTCLEANUP. Pburka (talk) 22:11, 14 May 2013 (UTC) The "plenty of sources" that you've...

March 2020 (UTC) Keep as a clearly important survey of radio sources. WP:NOTCLEANUP applies here. See also WP:BEFORE. Could probably be merged into a general...

delsorted, nom is indeffed as a sock, and deletion is about notability, (WP:NOTCLEANUP). My quick opinion is she fails the GNG, though.Thanks,L3X1 ◊distænt write◊...

October 2019 (UTC) Keep There is an awful lot of puffery here but WP:NOTCLEANUP applies. There are sources that are of borderline reliability, but there...

22 September 2019 (UTC) Keep per WP:RS I have been adding sources. WP:NOTCLEANUP. Notable company asses GNG Lightburst (talk) 18:01, 22 September 2019...

Keep—Meets WP:GNG (Sufficient:1 2 3; other:4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12). WP:NOTCLEANUP—An article that claims the subject "... has recorded over 10,000 songs"...

Practice or Do women need special secure services?. See WP:IMPERFECT and WP:NOTCLEANUP. Andrew D. (talk) 09:33, 24 February 2019 (UTC) Relisted to generate a...

[5][6][7] and many more. WP:NRVE. So why was this brought to deletion?. WP:NOTCLEANUP. Schmidt, Michael Q. 15:47, 21 May 2015 (UTC) MichaelQSchmidt-well I couldn't...

deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 18:14, 1 July 2019 (UTC) Keep - WP:NOTCLEANUP but some of the issues have already been addressed since nomination. ~Kvng...

references establish notability, but whether notability can be established (WP:NOTCLEANUP) and editors are expected to search for sources before nominating an article...

the winner. Oaktree b (talk) 02:47, 10 February 2022 (UTC) Keep per WP:NOTCLEANUP Has generated coverage in Zimbabwean media including [1], [2], [3], and...

this page.‎ The result was keep. The subject is notable, deletion is WP:NOTCLEANUP, and there is no consensus that the article is so hopelessly irreparable...

to be enlightened. Keep deletion is WP:NOTCLEANUP. --Calthinus (talk) 18:22, 31 July 2018 (UTC) Keep NOTCLEANUP, and the usual concerns about how an eighteen-edit...

New York Times, and The Reading Teacher. The nominator should review WP:NOTCLEANUP and WP:BEFORE. pburka (talk) 18:55, 4 April 2023 (UTC) Keep per pburka...

discussions. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 21:07, 23 June 2020 (UTC) Keep: Per WP:NOTCLEANUP. With reliable sources indicated above, the article easily passes WP:GNG...

20:52, 24 October 2020 (UTC) Keep. Obviously (self?)-promotional but WP:NOTCLEANUP applies. Meets WP:ANYBIO#1 "...received a well-known and significant award...

- the article desperatly need to be expanded beyond "X is Y", but WP:NOTCLEANUP. - The Bushranger One ping only 02:36, 26 February 2013 (UTC) The above...

06:53, 26 October 2019 (UTC) Keep There is an obvious COI issue but WP:NOTCLEANUP applies. A long profile in the Berkshire Eagle, which is a definite WP:RS...

postdlf (talk) 19:16, 25 September 2020 (UTC) Keep per WP:ATD and WP:NOTCLEANUP. Expansion, restructuring, &c. are not done by deletion. The topic clearly...

parts, but these are surmountable problems and AfD is not for cleanup WP:NOTCLEANUP. As diffusion of innovation and lateral diffusion are subtopics within...

WP:Permastub for a dead guy that is non-promotional. This is the reason WP:NOTCLEANUP was written. Cheerio042 (talk) 20:15, 4 July 2019 (UTC) Striking blocked...

Die Presse [1], Kleine Zeitung [2], Tiroler Tageszeitung [3]. AFD is WP:NOTCLEANUP. Iffy★Chat -- 10:08, 3 October 2021 (UTC) Draftify per WP:TOOSOON and...

Street Journal. I hope someone will add references to the article, but WP:NOTCLEANUP Lightburst (talk) 02:57, 31 March 2020 (UTC) Keep per WP:NEXIST and sources...

schools are notable enough is an editing question, see wp:deadline and wp:notcleanup walk victor falk talk 23:02, 12 February 2011 (UTC) Comment So are you...

the geology of this feature in detail. See also WP:ATD; WP:BEFORE; WP:NOTCLEANUP; WP:NOTPAPER; WP:PRESERVE. Andrew D. (talk) 10:06, 13 February 2019 (UTC)...

Ancient World. StrayBolt (talk) 21:41, 8 February 2019 (UTC) Keep - WP:NOTCLEANUP Added some RS and minor clean up. Needs more work but doesn't need to...

to find if the band is covered in reliable sources. Violations of WP:NOTCLEANUP and WP:BEFORE. See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Big! (Betty Who...

any issues with its current state. In other words, see WP:ATD and WP:NOTCLEANUP. postdlf (talk) 16:58, 25 April 2013 (UTC) Jurist (edit | talk | history |...

no recent discussion of the supposed issue(s) on its talk page. See WP:NOTCLEANUP, WP:BEFORE, WP:CRUFTCRUFT, &c. Andrew🐉(talk) 19:28, 1 August 2021 (UTC)...

discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 23:45, 7 September 2011 (UTC) Keep per WP:NOTCLEANUP (AfD is not cleanup). Crystal ball arguments about the future quality...

to deletion – merger to Pez – per the policy WP:PRESERVE. See also WP:NOTCLEANUP. Andrew🐉(talk) 19:07, 10 April 2021 (UTC) Andrew Davidson, WP:THEREMUSTBESOURCES...

hospitals in Canada and so deletion is not appropriate per WP:NEXIST; WP:NOTCLEANUP; &c. Creating pages for discussions like this is counterproductive because...

improvement. However that is not a valid reason for deletion, please re-read WP:NOTCLEANUP. Company passes WP:CORP. A few examples of significant coverage in independent...

08:00, 3 August 2022 (UTC) This is not a good deletion rationale. See WP:NOTCLEANUP and WP:NODEADLINES. ~Kvng (talk) 21:56, 4 August 2022 (UTC) If I had said...

contribs) 04:01, 4 January 2018 (UTC) Nomination withdrawn per WP:SNOW and WP:NOTCLEANUP; the sources found by Shelbystripes are sufficient. jd22292 (Jalen D....

Keep Obvious alternatives to deletion per WP:PRESERVE, WP:BEFORE and WP:NOTCLEANUP. Andrew D. (talk) 18:18, 15 January 2017 (UTC) Comment Bear in mind that...

sources suiable for WP:V. Why not choose add them rather than delete?? WP:NOTCLEANUP. Schmidt, Michael Q. 09:28, 2 November 2015 (UTC) Note: This debate has...

better can come out of it. Deletion discussions are almost always WP:NOTCLEANUP, except then they are. Pete AU aka Shirt58 (talk) 09:28, 25 January 2022...

effort that received substantial coverage. [[Easily passes WP:GNG and WP:NOTCLEANUP also applies in terms of the dead links. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 21:37...

covered by multiple sources; article is stubby now but can be expanded, WP:NOTCLEANUP and all that. Perhaps this article could be merged back into the main...

nomination just seems to be some vague musing. See WP:ATD; WP:BEFORE and WP:NOTCLEANUP. Andrew🐉(talk) 09:58, 30 June 2020 (UTC) Keep. Notable activist who coined...

April 2022 (UTC) Keep this is a glossary, not a dictionary, and AfD is WP:NOTCLEANUP Dronebogus (talk) 13:12, 24 April 2022 (UTC) Keep This serves much the...

list. It's true that the list is currently a WP:LINKFARM, but AfD is WP:NOTCLEANUP. - The Bushranger One ping only 21:59, 14 July 2012 (UTC) Debatable whether...

Thanks, North America1000 17:30, 6 September 2020 (UTC) Keep per WP:NOTCLEANUP. This is clearly a thing as we are increasingly surrounded by a plethora...

never should become articles based on notability standards. AFD is WP:NOTCLEANUP. Regarding the existence of a category, see WP:CLN; the browsing systems...

com/reviews/cartoon_network_universe_fusionfall_pc_review/ AFD is WP:NOTCLEANUP. There's plenty enough sourcing to easily meet the GNG here. Sergecross73...

✗plicit 14:47, 11 April 2022 (UTC) Keep per WP:HEY, WP:BEFORE and WP:NOTCLEANUP. I have added an additional source and cleaned up the rest. Highly regarded...

articles. — JFG talk 15:02, 29 January 2017 (UTC) Snow keep Please read WP:NOTCLEANUP. No fewer than seven significant sources are right there in front of you...

ordinary matter for editors to resolve through normal processes. AFD is WP:NOTCLEANUP, yet fixable problems are ultimately what all of the deletion! votes are...

diverse sourcing before being moved to mainspace, but that's covered by WP:NOTCLEANUP. VQuakr (talk) 06:22, 10 October 2017 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

nomination not advance any further/new argument, it actually violates WP:NOTCLEANUP. Sergecross73 msg me 18:09, 23 October 2022 (UTC) Keep No reason for deletion...

17 February 2014 (UTC) WP:BEFORE, not to mention WP:VAGUEWAVE and WP:NOTCLEANUP.— alf laylah wa laylah (talk) 13:03, 17 February 2014 (UTC) The above...

sourcing; if a song proves unverifiable, just remove it (see, e.g., WP:NOTCLEANUP). Whether this is a useful list in addition to her discography is another...

online advertising industry. The nominator should read WP:NOEFFORT and WP:NOTCLEANUP, which are considered invalid reasons for deletion. postdlf (talk) 03:19...

actors and trim any non-notable entries. Please also note that AFD is WP:NOTCLEANUP. Which means you never nominate content at AFD purely based on its current...

Coolabahapple (talk) 02:10, 26 July 2017 (UTC) Comment, this may be covered by WP:NOTCLEANUP but anyway, from the lead "This is not a complete list of all active,...

per statements above. The article definitely needs work, but AfD is WP:NOTCLEANUP. Best, GPL93 (talk) 14:27, 23 February 2022 (UTC) Thank you for your advice...

baseless accusations of me erecting coatracks. Also, you're violating WP:NOTCLEANUP as well. The deletion process is not for article issues that could be...

citation papers she meets WP:NPROF. AfC is not mandatory and AfD is WP:NOTCLEANUP. pburka (talk) 16:56, 24 May 2023 (UTC) Keep, per David Eppstein and Pburka...

shortly. --TheSandDoctor (talk) 05:44, 17 July 2017 (UTC) Keep per WP:NOTCLEANUP. The conversational "Q&A" tone needs to be removed, but there seems to...

deletion. Here's some books to get you started. See also WP:BEFORE and WP:NOTCLEANUP. Whole Building Life Cycle Assessment Life Cycle Assessment in the Built...

original research is typically solved with removals and rewrites per WP:NOTCLEANUP. Darkknight2149 18:58, 23 October 2020 (UTC) Delete - Topic fails to establish...

(UTC) Keep for the good reasons given by Vaticidalprophet. See also WP:NOTCLEANUP. Andrew🐉(talk) 22:08, 3 February 2021 (UTC) Keep. Nothing has changed...

Applicable policies include: WP:ATD; WP:NEXIST, and WP:PRESERVE. See also WP:NOTCLEANUP. —Jonathan Bowen (talk) 22:10, 28 November 2021 (UTC) Relisted to generate...

30 July 2021 (UTC) Strong keep per Stalwart111 and Aoziwe, and per WP:NOTCLEANUP. Deus et lex (talk) 01:48, 1 August 2021 (UTC) The above discussion is...

become a list of lists but organising that is not a matter for AfD per WP:NOTCLEANUP. Andrew🐉(talk) 16:07, 28 January 2021 (UTC) Keep I don't think BYD's...

further edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was keep. See WP:NOTCLEANUP. Per WP:GNG, it is not necessary that an article contain references to...

per Cullen. Nom does not provide any valid deletion criteria. AfD is WP:NOTCLEANUP, and the article talk page provides no indication of content problems...

guess. Sam Walton (talk) 19:05, 13 December 2014 (UTC) Keep - per WP:NOTCLEANUP. With three game titles, and further media ventures as well, there's enough...

which is now a dead link. The main point in the first nomination is WP:NOTCLEANUP and it is also brought up here. It would be useful if the keep voters...

translation and peacock issues are not severe enough to merit deletion per WP:NOTCLEANUP. VQuakr (talk) 04:58, 15 November 2017 (UTC) Keep Agree with Vquakr. Notability...

attempt to fix surmountable problems (like a lack of references; see WP:NOTCLEANUP for more detail). - Mgm|(talk) 21:46, 28 October 2008 (UTC) Relisted to...

Google books shows several references; the site is notable. Also note WP:NOTCLEANUP. -- 101.119.14.241 (talk) 02:37, 16 November 2013 (UTC) Keep and relist...

therefore not appropriate and the rest is a matter of ordinary editing per WP:NOTCLEANUP. Andrew🐉(talk) 12:44, 17 July 2020 (UTC) WP:ITSIMPORTANT is not a particularly...

October 2020 (UTC) Keep: Invalid argument for deletion. Please see WP:NOTCLEANUP. JavaHurricane 10:52, 31 October 2020 (UTC) Do not speedy keep, merge...

no prospects for improvability. PROD removed with the sole comment WP:NOTCLEANUP - but the only source is a puff piece in a non-RS. There's no evidence...

Given the sources abroad this looks like it passes WP:GNG. Also per WP:NOTCLEANUP, this article should be kept. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 14:26, 12 December...

2022 (UTC) Keep: Half of those aren't real reasons for deletion, see WP:NOTCLEANUP. "Hopeless condition", "it's had a long time to improve" are one of the...

the complaints about cut/paste – see WP:POT and WP:SAUCE. See also WP:NOTCLEANUP. Andrew🐉(talk) 15:57, 20 February 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...

October 2019 (UTC) Keep passes WP:GNG article should be reworked. WP:NOTCLEANUP Lightburst (talk) 20:05, 8 October 2019 (UTC) Keep, Some parts of the...

as well as a tribal king. [1][2]. Meets WP:NPOL. Also mentioning WP:NOTCLEANUP in case that gets brought up.Park3r (talk) 20:46, 1 March 2023 (UTC) strong...

I also don't agree with my own rationale for deletion - keep per WP:NOTCLEANUP. This article's problems are surmountable. Townlake (talk) 14:29, 17 April...

by ordinary editing, not by deletion. See also WP:ATD, WP:BEFORE, WP:NOTCLEANUP, &c. Andrew D. (talk) 21:42, 22 September 2019 (UTC) Keep per Andrew Davidson...

that needs to be cleaned up, that can be fixed. AfD is not clean up. WP:NOTCLEANUP. With all due respect to the new editor who nominated this, I suggest...

and starting it over. For any lesser degree of problematic content, WP:NOTCLEANUP applies. Vanamonde (Talk) 02:46, 7 September 2020 (UTC) Sexual racism...

improvement is not a valid rationale for deletion, see WP:NODEADLINE and WP:NOTCLEANUP. There's also a fair bit of coverage, see: NYTimes profile, SMH 1, SMH...

have this under its other name of Wilmore, Kentucky. See WP:BEFORE, WP:NOTCLEANUP, &c. Andrew🐉(talk) 11:41, 27 January 2021 (UTC) Strongly oppose a merger...

sources. -- Tytrox (talk) 10:32, 2 September 2020 (UTC) Keep: Per WP:NOTCLEANUP. With reliable sources indicated above, the article is good enough to...

discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:55, 11 January 2011 (UTC) Comment - Per WP:NOTCLEANUP and WP:BEFORE the nominator has not given valid reasons to propose deletion...

cleanup. - MrX 02:05, 26 July 2013 (UTC) Keep: much as I hate citing WP:NOTCLEANUP, it would seem to apply here. Seems like lots of WP:RS, though no comment...

tangential mentions of the dam in pop culture, but WP:AFD is ultimately not WP:NOTCLEANUP and is instead concerned with determining notability. While the article...

should be made to this page.‎ The result was speedy keep. WP:SNOW, WP:NOTCLEANUP; this is a level 5 vital article with only two delete votes— the nom (who...

Notion in Ancient Thought by Michael Frede. Please see WP:BEFORE and WP:NOTCLEANUP. Andrew D. (talk) 08:52, 24 May 2015 (UTC) Alternative rename (I voted...

surely needs a ton of fixing up, it's in terrible shape, but AFD is WP:NOTCLEANUP. Sergecross73 msg me 19:20, 1 November 2012 (UTC) Weak keep I'm of mixed...

sources which speak of a "Red Fascism" using that specific phrase. WP:NOTCLEANUP applies.--22:52, 21 February 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...

a 700+ revisions, 5-years-old article are no ground for deletion (WP:NOTCLEANUP). This list seems to meet WP:LISTN, unless Bri is arguing that the entirety...

WP:NOTCLEANUP If a topic is notable, then the current state of the article is not relevant. Park3r (talk) 00:38, 6 April 2023 (UTC) WP:NOTCLEANUP does...

November 2019 (UTC) Keep the article could use a rewrite, however WP:NOTCLEANUP. WP:PRESERVE. The nominator lacks conviction, and acknowledges that there...

what they are. Dondervogel 2 (talk) 07:10, 4 April 2018 (UTC) Keep - WP:NOTCLEANUP. Work it out on appropriate talk pages and WP:REDIRECT if it is decided...

(Speak quickly) (Follow my trail) 10:40, 23 June 2017 (UTC) Keep per WP:NOTCLEANUP. Also WP:CREATIVE suggest that if any of these films have been reviewed...

discussions. Shellwood (talk) 09:17, 15 July 2021 (UTC) Speedy Keep per WP:NOTCLEANUP. This is obviously a spinoff or appendix to Admiralty chart. It seems...

Donaldd23 (talk) 02:32, 15 August 2020 (UTC) Keep per WP:NEXIST and WP:NOTCLEANUP. The tags on the article are reasons to improve it if sources exist, and...

like to further expand their deletion rationale or just withdraw? WP:NOTCLEANUP may be an interesting reading here. Anupmehra -Let's talk! 21:22, 5 February...

the presence of non-notable characters in the article is a matter of WP:NOTCLEANUP. However, even if (individually) notable Greeks were present in Saudi...

2019 (UTC) Keep per all. Article's a bit of a mess, but deletion is WP:NOTCLEANUP. – John M Wolfson (talk | contribs) 02:15, 8 May 2019 (UTC) Speedy keep...

the list's talk page. I don't see a deletion argument, and AFD is WP:NOTCLEANUP. postdlf (talk) 15:32, 17 July 2016 (UTC) Let's just remove the page and...

all. Mangoe (talk) 14:35, 28 January 2026 (UTC) Keep per WP:HEY and WP:NOTCLEANUP. Plenty of in-depth discussion about this village with a 200-year history...

article needs prose/references but the season meets WP:GNG. Wikipedia:NOTCLEANUP applies. Rikster2 (talk) 16:06, 2 August 2021 (UTC) Keep; article needs...

of a stale and erroneous banner tag is not a reason to delete per WP:NOTCLEANUP. You have to read and understand the topic, not its tags. Andrew🐉(talk)...

discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:59, 1 January 2015 (UTC) Speedy keep. WP:NOTCLEANUP: effort would be better spent improving the article. The nominator has...

Weapons of World War II and Infantry Weapons of World War II. See also WP:NOTCLEANUP. Andrew🐉(talk) 08:34, 20 May 2021 (UTC) Weak keep. I can see a bit of...

That the article may need cleaning up is not a reason for deletion, WP:NOTCLEANUP, however the name issue should be resolved. Netherzone (talk) 03:28, 24...

Andrew Davidson indicated, I'd be happy to take a look and reconsider. WP:NOTCLEANUP refers to cleaning up articles by removing problematic text in them, not...

by Reywas92. Ktkvtsh (talk) 19:51, 6 February 2026 (UTC) Keep per WP:NOTCLEANUP. Kelob2678 (talk) 00:53, 10 February 2026 (UTC) The above discussion is...

Immortalized, for example. The rest is then a matter of ordinary editing per WP:NOTCLEANUP and WP:PRESERVE. Andrew🐉(talk) 22:44, 7 September 2021 (UTC) The above...

AFD is not intended to force others to address surmaountable issues.WP:NOTCLEANUP. Perhaps out of consideration toward sources found and offered and per...

WP:PRESERVE. Anonrfjwhuikdzz (talk) 03:16, 16 May 2025 (UTC) Keep. AFD is NOTCLEANUP. Sources from Google and Scholar establish notability: [1] [2] [3]. Both...

discussions. Lightburst (talk) 18:48, 22 November 2019 (UTC) Keep WP:NOTCLEANUP the article needs an editor not deletion. City of Alcoa, Priority Ambulance...

What this leaves is a set of arguments for deletion that are not; WP:NOTCLEANUP, WP:NEGLECT, WP:PLENTY, and WP:OUTDATED are just a start of the points...

.. otherwise it sounds like you're making the mistake outlined in WP:NOTCLEANUP; would you care to elaborate? —/Mendaliv/2¢/Δ's/ 03:59, 30 November 2008...

extended essay in preparing for university studies. See WP:BEFORE; WP:NOTCLEANUP and WP:SOFIXIT. Andrew🐉(talk) 09:54, 13 December 2020 (UTC) It's not...

ordinary editing per WP:ATD, WP:IMPERFECT and WP:PRESERVE. See also WP:NOTCLEANUP. Andrew🐉(talk) 23:09, 29 January 2021 (UTC) Keep A list that aids in...

Keep. The article was sourced entirely with a primary source, howeverWP:NOTCLEANUP, and WP:RS exists as pointed out by other editors in this thread. Wm335td...

therefore be deleted. Scifilover386 (talk) 18:33, 12 July 2011 (UTC) WP:NOTCLEANUP AFD is not for cleanup. Tag that it needs references. Please withdraw...

much as needed. Chiswick Chap (talk) 14:37, 28 August 2019 (UTC) Keep WP:NOTCLEANUP relevant and notable topic WP:NEXIST. Wm335td (talk) 19:54, 28 August...

(talk) 00:32, 9 December 2019 (UTC) Keep longevity makes him notable. WP:NOTCLEANUP Wm335td (talk) 21:59, 10 December 2019 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

HawkAussie (talk) 03:25, 9 December 2019 (UTC) Keep per HawkAussie; WP:NOTCLEANUP. Lightburst (talk) 15:41, 8 December 2019 (UTC) The above discussion is...

WP:NARTIST. Netherzone (talk) 23:02, 6 November 2021 (UTC) Keep per WP:NOTCLEANUP. Nominator appears to have misunderstood the purpose of AFD. pburka (talk)...

an Iran lobby does exist in the US, then the topic is notable. See WP:NOTCLEANUP and probably WP:LIKELYVIOLATION. --Uncle Ed (talk) 20:02, 12 February...

improvement per our policy WP:IMPERFECT. Please see WP:BEFORE and WP:NOTCLEANUP. Andrew D. (talk) 18:33, 15 January 2017 (UTC) I didn't nominate it because...

issues, which were never a reason for deletion in the first place (WP:NOTCLEANUP). I think the company is just about notable. There's the full-length article...

18:14, 16 May 2025 (UTC) Keep Would appear to pass WP:NCORP, see also WP:NOTCLEANUP. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 02:55, 17 May 2025 (UTC) Weak keep Sources do not establish...

advertisement or resume. Should not have been brought to AfD (and WP:NOTCLEANUP should be compulsory reading). Deus et lex (talk) 11:08, 3 December 2020...

Dz5t 8O12 (talk) 19:51, 9 August 2026 (UTC) That's irrelevant. See WP:NOTCLEANUP. You're welcome to add the sources from the previous AfD yourself. Please...

(UTC) I completely that some of the columns should go, but that’s a WP:NOTCLEANUP issue, not a reason to delete. Sergecross73 msg me 13:48, 15 June 2020...

Bhutan. The article should be renamed instead of deleted per WP:ATD and WP:NOTCLEANUP. DAmik001 (talk) 19:43, 4 May 2026 (UTC) Support I agree rename makes...

2012 (UTC) Keep, significant coverage in secondary sources. Also, WP:NOTCLEANUP. — Cirt (talk) 02:23, 17 October 2012 (UTC) Keep. Publicly traded companies...

over 80 caps for a reasonable rugby nation and European career). WP:NOTCLEANUP in action here also. Just because the article is not sourced, doesn't...

Keep Like --The Pink Oboe says, it's not kennels and not pet sitting. WP:NOTCLEANUP. CallawayRox (talk) 18:08, 9 November 2011 (UTC) Comment: I have cleaned...

articles. » Swpbτ • ¢ 16:18, 11 May 2011 (UTC) Comment No it isn't: WP:NOTCLEANUP. Francis Bond (talk) 04:14, 12 May 2011 (UTC) Well it should be. » Swpbτ...

WP:LISTCRUFT is neither policy nor guideline; it's WP:CRUFTCRUFT. See also WP:NOTCLEANUP. Andrew🐉(talk) 10:36, 30 October 2020 (UTC) Weak Keep - The sources imply...

tagged the article for work and avoided an AFD all together. Remember WP:NOTCLEANUP. Schmidt, Michael Q. 04:38, 4 January 2015 (UTC) The above discussion...

not be deleted as discussed in WP:NOTCLEANUP. - Sangrolu (talk) 13:53, 14 April 2011 (UTC) Keep All WP:NOTCLEANUP. Typical example where the solution...

quite notable and the bundle just requires improvement per WP:ATD; WP:NOTCLEANUP; WP:NOTPAPER; and WP:PRESERVE. Andrew D. (talk) 13:33, 18 March 2019 (UTC)...

but that's not any way to live on an WP:VOLUNTEER project. See also WP:NOTCLEANUP and WP:NODEADLINES. ~Kvng (talk) 17:49, 17 March 2019 (UTC) The above...

PROD by User:Chidgk1 & PROD2 by nom was contested by User:Kvng as WP:NOTCLEANUP which seems to be irrelevant - a term that has no relevant sources cannot...

of the Claddagh. Boleyn (talk) 10:20, 30 August 2021 (UTC) Keep per WP:NOTCLEANUP and WP:BEFORE. The topic needs work but it's easy to find sources such...

been improved. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 07:30, 3 October 2014 (UTC) WP:NOTCLEANUP... but yup. So many many sources missed by the nominator, it was ridiculously...

notice. Thanks, —UY Scuti Talk 17:28, 24 February 2016 (UTC) keep. AfD WP:NOTCLEANUP. Huge parts of the text are factual. 'Advocacy' may be fixed much more...

this trash". I have no opinion on this one (concern could be fixed by WP:NOTCLEANUP, but I'm not sure if it meets the WP:GNG bar). Ansh666 07:00, 8 October...

it. Dream Focus 05:23, 16 July 2019 (UTC) Keep per WP:PRESERVE and WP:NOTCLEANUP. I'm fairly sure that this passes WP:LISTN and so the issue is just one...

a dead link. -- Otr500 (talk) 17:00, 21 June 2020 (UTC) Keep: Per WP:NOTCLEANUP, the article looks outdated & needs some clean up. The only source in...

DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 03:28, 20 January 2013 (UTC) Weak Keep while AfD is WP:NOTCLEANUP, the article (in its current form) clearly falls under WP:NOTPROMOTIONAL...

nomination is contra WP:NOTDUP ("totally replaceable by a category") and WP:NOTCLEANUP (the claim is that it's presently "unreferenced", not that it is unverifiable...

and not a pre-nomination mandate. Please do not take my pointing to WP:NOTCLEANUP as a personal affront, as I have extensive experience dealing with improvable...

Appears to satisfy notability now; while much work is still needed, WP:NOTCLEANUP. - The Bushranger One ping only 09:46, 28 January 2013 (UTC) Keep. This...

with references. I think the WP:ATD, WP:NEXIST, WP:PRESERVE, and WP:NOTCLEANUP policies apply in the case of this artlcle. —Jonathan Bowen (talk) 14:41...

Examiner. The article needs a rewrite with proper references however WP:NOTCLEANUP. Lightburst (talk) 14:32, 27 July 2019 (UTC) I undertook some article...

than just the current state of an article (see WP:BEFORE, WP:ATD, and WP:NOTCLEANUP), so the presence of redlinks and no secondary source citations at present...

in need of an ambitious edit and development. Needs work - not afd WP:NOTCLEANUP Lubbad85 (☎) 20:18, 16 April 2019 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

Thanks, Sandstein 14:54, 15 February 2022 (UTC) Comment I feel like WP:NOTCLEANUP is being disregarded here. The subject of the article is notable, regardless...

Piotrus| reply here 03:17, 22 August 2022 (UTC) @Piotrus, please see WP:NOTCLEANUP ~Kvng (talk) 15:34, 22 August 2022 (UTC) @Kvng But given current state...

WP:GNG. Please review WP:BEFORE. Re: content, formatting, etc, see WP:NOTCLEANUP. --Dennis Bratland (talk) 18:06, 4 July 2019 (UTC) Comment Please read...

the ant, thou sluggard; consider her ways, and be wise". See also WP:NOTCLEANUP. Andrew🐉(talk) 08:54, 10 September 2021 (UTC) Keep. Concur with the above...

(UTC) Keep There's no need for this AfD per WP:ATD, WP:BEFORE and WP:NOTCLEANUP. Andrew🐉(talk) 18:06, 15 May 2021 (UTC) Keep I think relisting this was...

participants aren't obliged to improve the page under discussion. See WP:NOTCLEANUP and WP:NEXIST. pburka (talk) 12:56, 23 August 2020 (UTC) Comment Maybe...

just sending it to AfD with nothing but a two-word reason. See also WP:NOTCLEANUP. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 12:49, 20 September 2022 (UTC) Keep...

it's kept. Olaf Davis (talk) 17:30, 29 December 2009 (UTC) Keep per WP:NOTCLEANUP. The issues that the nominator listed are all editorial-based; the phenomena...

likely to be challenged" qualifier. WP:BEFORE, WP:ATD, WP:PRESERVE, and WP:NOTCLEANUP should together make that clear, and we must read PROVEIT in conjunction...

page, this should be done rather than deleting the page." See also WP:NOTCLEANUP. Andrew🐉(talk) 13:30, 20 October 2020 (UTC) Keep per WP:BEFORE - documentaries...

page, this should be done rather than deleting the page." See also WP:NOTCLEANUP. Andrew🐉(talk) 14:46, 27 April 2021 (UTC) Keep, as per Andrew Davidson...

abuse charges which were later dropped, the section can be removed WP:NOTCLEANUP. The attorney will be no less notable without the section. Contrary to...

Article improvements, not deletion can address the other complaints (WP:NOTCLEANUP). ~Kvng (talk) 15:11, 28 June 2022 (UTC) Relisted to generate a more thorough...

reason for deletion.BabbaQ (talk) 15:38, 4 August 2019 (UTC) Keep WP:NOTCLEANUP Notability has been established with RSs. Lightburst (talk) 20:57, 4 August...

notice. Thanks, -- Scott Burley (talk) 03:58, 5 August 2019 (UTC) Keep: WP:NOTCLEANUP The company is WP:LISTED on the NYSE (roughly 2,800 companies are listed...

WP:GNG and so should be kept for improvement per WP:IMPERFECT; WP:ATD; WP:NOTCLEANUP; &c. Andrew D. (talk) 23:57, 25 March 2019 (UTC) Delete It's a trivial...

(UTC) I can agree that the article is in a poor shape, but again, WP:NOTCLEANUP. A former Chief of the General Staff (Slovenia) certainly passes GNG with...

here. Kailash29792 (talk) 11:21, 19 January 2023 (UTC) Comment - Per WP:NOTCLEANUP and WP:BEFORE, poor sourcing and gaps in verification are reasons to clean...

duo. BD2412 T 14:02, 3 September 2020 (UTC) Keep - Per WP:DELREASON, WP:NOTCLEANUP, and the reasons outline at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Iron...

(UTC) I agree, I don't think it was bad-faith, just a lack of BEFORE/NOTCLEANUP going on. Its in rough shape now, but there's realistic reason to believe...

improving them. See WP:ATD; WP:BEFORE; WP:IMPERFECT; WP:LIGHTBULB; WP:NOTCLEANUP; WP:PRESERVE, &c. Andrew D. (talk) 09:13, 12 July 2019 (UTC) Comment I...

2015 (UTC) Fine, and I will try to do something about it even though WP:NOTCLEANUP.Schmidt, Michael Q. 09:35, 11 May 2015 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...

preferable. Don't disagree that the article could use some love, but WP:NOTCLEANUP. Ford MF (talk) 15:23, 2 September 2019 (UTC) Keep. Subject is notable...

percentage. Netherzone (talk) 19:59, 8 March 2020 (UTC) Keep and fix WP:NOTCLEANUP RS exists. Some editors who came before me have begun cleanup and ThatMontrealIP...

(TALK|CONTRIBS) 14:24, 13 April 2021 (UTC) Speedy keep - WP:BEFORE, WP:NOTCLEANUP etc. I added a few things from no-Wiki. Ingratis (talk) 01:10, 14 April...

Merge into Metropolis_(comics), of course. See WP:ATD; WP:BEFORE; WP:NOTCLEANUP; WP:PRESERVE; &c. Andrew🐉(talk) 11:55, 7 August 2021 (UTC) Delete - I...

coverage. While made in good faith (as the page is a mess, but note WP:NOTCLEANUP), and while the nominator actually bothered to check the sources (which...

or policy. See also WP:ATD, WP:BEFORE, WP:IMPERFECT, WP:PRESERVE, WP:NOTCLEANUP, WP:NOTPAPER, &c. Andrew D. (talk) 09:54, 25 September 2018 (UTC) Speedy...

is certainly notable so meets WP:GNG. Everything else comes under WP:NOTCLEANUP. SpinningSpark 15:11, 23 October 2018 (UTC) Keep To qualify, an article...

notability. If you feel it meets G12 then recommend it for such, but AfD is WP:NOTCLEANUP. The topic is either notable or it is not. I did not cite the number of...

Today's Society, for example. See WP:BEFORE, WP:DRIVEBY, WP:NEXIST, WP:NOTCLEANUP, WP:PRESERVE, &c. Andrew🐉(talk) 11:18, 21 March 2021 (UTC) Agreed with...

bandwidth. DARTHBOTTO talk•cont 21:29, 11 July 2018 (UTC) Keep, AFD is WP:NOTCLEANUP. Additionally, the list of shipyards list is overly long.--Prisencolin...

article/topic. Ktrimi991 (talk) 21:11, 27 December 2018 (UTC) Keep per WP:NOTCLEANUP. Clearly a notable topic; if it needs to be rewritten from scratch then...

(Holla) 13:22, 1 April 2011 (UTC) Keep and add more cowbell. AFD is WP:NOTCLEANUP. Reach Out to the Truth 15:08, 1 April 2011 (UTC) Keep - Beef — it's what's...

Britannica article.[2] “One of South Africa’s most famous voices” [3]. Also WP:NOTCLEANUP. WP:BEFORE should be done before nomination, and it is extremely unlikely...

surprise does seem to focus on the woman and not her invention. AFD is WP:NOTCLEANUP BrigadierG (talk) 15:32, 22 October 2025 (UTC) Keep. WP:DINC - the current...

content of the article is a matter of ordinary editing, not deletion per WP:NOTCLEANUP and WP:IMPERFECT. For an example of a jamboree in a particular place which...

search before nomming. I can suggest that the nominator takes a look at WP:NOTCLEANUP and WP:INDAFD before bringing any more notable Indian films to AFD for...

a WP:TNT argument, though you have not articulated it as such, and WP:NOTCLEANUP is a good retort to that essay anyway. If, instead, you'd like to present...

Prod/AfD to try to force someone to work on the article, contrary to WP:NOTCLEANUP and WP:NOTCOMPULSORY: "Focus on improving the encyclopedia itself, rather...

never said the article needed cleanup, and I'm very well aware of WP:NOTCLEANUP. Jalen Barks (Woof) 15:55, 17 September 2024 (UTC) The above discussion...

the more than robust sources found by the last voter. WP:NEXIST and WP:NOTCLEANUP are relevant here too, because the article needs improvement but that...

is notable. While there are some issues with the article, this is WP:NOTCLEANUP. --hroest 10:56, 17 June 2024 (UTC) Keep. While I accept the reasons for...

Nigeria. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 22:32, 24 March 2026 (UTC) Keep per WP:NOTCLEANUP. Has plenty of hits in Google Scholar[1][2][3]. Kelob2678 (talk) 00:03...

page, this should be done rather than deleting the page." See also WP:NOTCLEANUP. Andrew🐉(talk) 09:45, 9 February 2021 (UTC) Relisted to generate a more...

page, this should be done rather than deleting the page.". See also WP:NOTCLEANUP. My !vote stands. Andrew🐉(talk) 12:19, 8 February 2021 (UTC) Andrew Davidson...

processes contrary to WP:ATD; WP:BEFORE; WP:IGNORINGATD; WP:NEXIST; WP:NOTCLEANUP; &c. The Phantom's cave is covered in detail in sources such as The Phantom...

15:56, 16 October 2025 (UTC) Just remove the out of scope flags (per WP:NOTCLEANUP). Svartner (talk) 19:22, 16 October 2025 (UTC) as per WP:AADD, this is...

showing clear notability per WP:SIGCOV. Some promo tone can be fixed per WP:NOTCLEANUP and WP:PRESERVE. ThilioR O B O T🤖 talk 14:53, 27 October 2025 (UTC) Keep...

consider BLP1E. Guliolopez (talk) 00:26, 26 June 2020 (UTC) Keep: Per WP:NOTCLEANUP. Article should be heavily rewritten. Other than that, it easily passes...

WP:RS in about 20 minutes in the "Further reading" section. Also, note WP:NOTCLEANUP. HausTalk 03:41, 20 February 2012 (UTC) Relisted to generate a more thorough...

there's a sensible alternative to deletion. See WP:BEFORE. See also WP:NOTCLEANUP. Andrew🐉(talk) 08:45, 5 October 2021 (UTC) Keep if more sources can be...

that happens to be present in the article is irrelevant to AfD, per WP:NOTCLEANUP. --Dennis Bratland (talk) 17:32, 18 June 2018 (UTC) In all fairness, the...

it was founded in 1932 but started work in 1934. See WP:NEXIST and WP:NOTCLEANUP. Andrew🐉(talk) 22:40, 14 October 2020 (UTC) Which volume and pages? I...

Octaviyanti Dwi Wahyurini (talk) 11:53, 17 July 2026 (UTC) See WP:NEXIST and WP:NOTCLEANUP. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 13:23, 17 July 2026 (UTC) Keep in view...

Furius (talk) 08:09, 13 August 2021 (UTC) @MaccWiki: Deletion is WP:NOTCLEANUP. SBKSPP (talk) 03:35, 14 August 2021 (UTC) Keep Meets WP:MUSICBIO with...

reason to delete; just some rambling ideas for development contrary to WP:NOTCLEANUP and WP:IGNORINGATD. The topic passes WP:LISTN – see the Iron Manual for...

Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 17:08, 12 July 2021 (UTC) Keep per WP:NOTCLEANUP. The topic seems notable as it has several hits on Scholar (e.g. [1][2][3])...

2025 (UTC) Comment: Insufficient source is not a reason to delete per WP:NOTCLEANUP. Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 13:41, 12 March 2025 (UTC)...

meeting WP:MUSICBIO#8. The article may have COI issues but deletion is NOTCLEANUP. —A. B. (talk • contribs • global count) 01:59, 7 September 2025 (UTC)...

(Speak quickly) (Follow my trail) 10:52, 23 June 2017 (UTC) Keep per WP:NOTCLEANUP. Reliable sources undoubtedly exist for this character, in print as well...

deleted the article needed work, that is not a reason for deletion, see WP:NOTCLEANUP.--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 05:21, 11 February 2015 (UTC) Keep, per WP:SOLDIER...

and over and over and over with the same 10 year argument, which per WP:NOTCLEANUP I'm not buying. - Alexis Jazz 15:27, 30 July 2020 (UTC) Delete- This just...

members dying etc in WP:RS are not indicative of notability as per nom. WP:NOTCLEANUP applies as well. Park3r (talk) 07:10, 23 July 2024 (UTC) Relisted to generate...

Let's discuss it 04:59, 2 October 2011 (UTC) keep—per Cullen328 and WP:NOTCLEANUP. this was just speedily kept four hours ago! what's different now? nominator...

Vietnam project, I daresay, but that would take some work. Anyway, WP:NOTCLEANUP and WP:IMPATIENT also applies regarding the small size or current state...

are for! Iskandar323 (talk) 16:08, 17 October 2021 (UTC) Keep per WP:NOTCLEANUP. FWIW, I consider User:Stevey7788 a great net positive contributor to...

reliable sources. ―Howard • 🌽33 02:48, 20 February 2026 (UTC) Keep per WP:NOTCLEANUP. There's a lot of unreferenced material, and I think it's a problem that...

(talk) 04:58, 17 February 2021 (UTC) Keep - Notability demonstrated. WP:NOTCLEANUP. ~Kvng (talk) 16:32, 21 February 2021 (UTC) Keep - The previous voters...

floors are notable. The article could use development not deletion WP:NOTCLEANUP Lightburst (talk) 19:23, 31 December 2019 (UTC) Nothing in our guidelines...

fame somewhere. Nightfury 11:14, 23 March 2018 (UTC) Keep, AFD is WP:NOTCLEANUP and we do not delete pages for fixable problems. If the consensus for...

irrelevant to either the question of deletion or merger, because AFD is WP:NOTCLEANUP. postdlf (talk) 14:12, 26 June 2015 (UTC) Keep Agree with postdlf. Seems...

encyclopedic. Keep or merge with spiritual crisis. Also note that deletion is WP:NOTCLEANUP. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 17:36, 25 October 2022 (UTC) Keep. Nominator has...

— GhostInTheMachine talk to me 07:02, 2 August 2026 (UTC) Keep See WP:NOTCLEANUP and WP:SOFIXIT. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 18:04, 2 August 2026 (UTC) *Keep in the article...

creative writing. --Coolcaesar (talk) 19:58, 25 June 2020 (UTC) Keep WP:NOTCLEANUP I find that this is an easily definable legal term. In my opinion this...

WP:ENT the article needs development that I am not inclined to do. WP:NOTCLEANUP Lubbad85 (☎) 21:40, 29 April 2019 (UTC) Delete unless AFI award can be...

needs a well-defined criterion of inclusion and cleanup; but AFD is WP:NOTCLEANUP. Usedtobecool ☎️ 09:53, 12 July 2020 (UTC) Delete and redirect to List...

anthology": [3]. AllyD (talk) 13:45, 19 September 2022 (UTC) Keep. WP:GNG, WP:NOTCLEANUP, WP:BEFORE. GScholar finds multiple articles about this book in scholarly...

with access to hard-copy sources unavailable online. WP:IMPERFECT WP:NOTCLEANUP WP:NODEADLINE Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 00:22, 4 March 2013 (UTC) The above...

renomination. Once notable always notable WP:NTEMP WP:PRESERVE WP:ATD WP:NOTCLEANUP Passes WP:PRODUCT Music Gear review prodcut Mentioned in Drum Magazine...

an ambitious editor. WP:NOTCLEANUP. Lubbad85 (☎) 19:18, 29 April 2019 (UTC) Keep. Meets both WP:AUTHOR and WP:GNG. WP:NOTCLEANUP and WP:SNOWBALL also apply...

(UTC) Keep per the Washington Post and other sources found by Barkeep. WP:NOTCLEANUP good work by the ivoters that came before me. Lightburst (talk) 23:24...

diligence by Tokyogirl79 addressed the nominator's concerns.[2] Per WP:NOTCLEANUP We do not usually delete notable topics simply because an improvable article...

whether the one hit song adds up to enough notability. However, per WP:NOTCLEANUP it's unclear whether the community has fully accepted "TNT" as a reason...

for the other issues, they are not a reason to delete the page (see WP:NOTCLEANUP). Cornerstone1949 (talk) 23:32, 25 October 2025 (UTC) Keep However, the...

Nifboy (talk) 03:48, 1 November 2009 (UTC) Keep AFD is not cleanup. WP:NOTCLEANUP Discuss things on the talk page, don't waste our time here. Some of the...

sources. BabbaQ (talk) 09:29, 2 March 2020 (UTC) Keep per WP:NMUSIC WP:NOTCLEANUP Lightburst (talk) 01:35, 4 March 2020 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

matter of ordinary editing, not deletion per WP:ATD, WP:PRESERVE, WP:NOTCLEANUP, &c. Andrew D. (talk) 23:42, 19 April 2019 (UTC) Teaching 21st Century...

Plus, the nominator doesn't appear to have done a WP:BEFORE. Afd is WP:NOTCLEANUP. NemesisAT (talk) 20:40, 22 October 2021 (UTC) Keep - Usedtobecool's arguments...

article is not a valid reason to support deleting it. WP:NODEADLINES WP:NOTCLEANUP. ~Kvng (talk) 13:20, 4 November 2017 (UTC) Keep – using google, you can...

don't delete articles because they are poor – see WP:IMPERFECT and WP:NOTCLEANUP. And we don't delete articles to feed demons. For an example of an external...

years with attention from dozens of editors. See also WP:NEXIST and WP:NOTCLEANUP. Andrew🐉(talk) 21:53, 29 November 2020 (UTC) Keep Long established page...

possible. KhantWiki (talk) 23:09, 11 August 2025 (UTC) Keep – See WP:NOTCLEANUP and WP:NEXIST. The voters above have demonstrated notability, and some...

either frivolous contrary to WP:POINT or a misunderstanding of AfD per WP:NOTCLEANUP. Andrew🐉(talk) 15:19, 26 October 2021 (UTC) Keep The nominator says "probably...

that we can update these when they are 100+ years old. WP:ATD and WP:NOTCLEANUP. Lightburst (talk) 23:19, 6 November 2019 (UTC) Delete - per nom, no evidence...

of arguments not to make in deletion discussions. See WP:NOEFFORT, WP:NOTCLEANUP, WP:SUSCEPTIBLE. postdlf (talk) 23:51, 16 September 2012 (UTC) Keep -...

others is not done, AFD is not the place for such ultimatums. See WP:NOTCLEANUP. It is on my list though of things I am willing to do as real world events...

neglected is a reason to use some WP:BEFORE and fix, not delete. See WP:NOTCLEANUP. To Johnny338: Simply lacking citations does not automatically make a...

deletion here – merger into the article about the subject. See WP:BEFORE, WP:NOTCLEANUP; WP:IGNORINGATD; &c. Furthermore, I see that there is talk of a previous...

discussions. Shellwood (talk) 00:17, 28 February 2026 (UTC) Keep. AfD is WP:NOTCLEANUP and this award-winning musician is clearly notable per sigcov, e.g. [1]...

Comment Why not redirect to Sentience#Eastern religion pro tem, per WP:NOTCLEANUP? Richard Pinch (talk) 12:00, 20 September 2008 (UTC) Comments While I...

the dog. wooF 15:34, 10 April 2019 (UTC) Keep per [1]. As they say, WP:NOTCLEANUP and a case for WP:TNT hasn't been made. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 15:12...

the subject. Staszek Lem (talk) 22:47, 19 June 2017 (UTC) Keep per WP:NOTCLEANUP and WP:NOEFFORT. The topic is clearly notable but, as it is inherently...

2019 (UTC) Keep Some relevant policies that apply WP:BEFORE WP:ATD WP:NOTCLEANUP The fact that it is unreferenced is not cause for deletion per WP:NEXIST...

mention how both Little Mac and Glass Joe have their own articles. WP:NOTCLEANUP.ZXCVBNM (TALK) 09:40, 6 February 2020 (UTC) Merge to a properly trimmed...

19:10, 26 March 2026 (UTC) Keep per WP:NPOL, he was the king of Laos, WP:NOTCLEANUP. Kelob2678 (talk) 21:27, 26 March 2026 (UTC) Keep. This book says he was...

4 February 2021 (UTC) @Johnpacklambert:, you really need to read WP:NOTCLEANUP and WP:IMPATIENT. The fact an article is a stub is not a valid reason...

suspect I will get beaten up over this nomination. On the one hand, WP:NOTCLEANUP is valid, but that's not a free pass to avoid complying with WP:V indefinitely...

02:07, 20 October 2015 (UTC) Keep - Not a valid deletion rationale, WP:NOTCLEANUP, there's a precedent for these types of articles existing. List of video...

(sources counting toward GNG) rather than procedural detail (such as NOTCLEANUP, which is really only applicable as a counter to arguments that ignore...

literally thousands of sources out there. See WP:NEXIST, WP:NOEFFORT and WP:NOTCLEANUP. Andrew🐉(talk) 22:15, 17 October 2020 (UTC) Delete. It may well be notable...

comments below this notice. Thanks, ミラP 23:12, 9 October 2019 (UTC) Keep. WP:NOTCLEANUP notable author per Worldcat. Wm335td (talk) 17:39, 12 October 2019 (UTC)...

Article needs development but that is unlikely to happen in draft space. WP:NOTCLEANUP. ~Kvng (talk) 23:52, 5 July 2023 (UTC) Keep per sources added by Mark...

improved. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 01:22, 27 June 2020 (UTC) Keep Per WP:NOTCLEANUP. Would not be opposed to an overall merge to some Universe of Nineteen...

04:08, 16 April 2019 (UTC) Keep subject is WP:GNG. in addition I add WP:NOTCLEANUP Lubbad85 (☎) 19:51, 16 April 2019 (UTC) Please provide details to your...

Wikipedia, and it does. We need more portals not less. In addition WP:NOTCLEANUP a need for repairs is not a reason to delete. Wm335td (talk) 16:24, 12...

— 2406:3003:2077:1E60:C998:20C6:8CCF:5730 (talk) 13:23, 13 July 2022 (UTC) WP:NOTCLEANUP. If the subject is notable, the article should be kept. Park3r (talk)...

policies are WP:ATD, WP:NOTPAPER, WP:PRESERVE, &c. while WP:BEFORE and WP:NOTCLEANUP tell us that AfD is not a place to bring editing suggestions. Andrew D...

non-notable chef.John Pack Lambert (talk) 01:05, 9 August 2019 (UTC) Keep: WP:NOTCLEANUP I have begun a cleanup and also added awards, and formatted the page....

Today Show [2]. Missvain (talk) 22:22, 23 January 2020 (UTC) Keep WP:NOTCLEANUP the subject has a very large following for his VLOG on Youtube and especially...

there is not sufficient justification to delete all. Also deletion is WP:NOTCLEANUP. Please look for more productive ways to improve the encyclopedia. ~Kvng...

of ordinary editing, not deletion, per WP:IMPERFECT, WP:BEFORE and WP:NOTCLEANUP. Andrew D. (talk) 23:24, 10 February 2016 (UTC) Andrew Davidson, I wasn't...

D. Usopp (talk) 12:47, 22 August 2025 (UTC) Keep Per WP:NEXIST and WP:NOTCLEANUP. [1] [2][3][4] all point to standalone notability for the device, and...

the list is definitely lacking in its current state, however, AfD is WP:NOTCLEANUP and article content does not determine notability. TipsyElephant (talk)...

should be considered as well as a significant restructure, but AfD is WP:NOTCLEANUP. Qwaiiplayer (talk) 16:00, 11 July 2023 (UTC) The above discussion is...

Neutral POV rewrite (I started to add refs and rewrite a bit), however WP:NOTCLEANUP Seems this subject meets our general notability guidelines. Lightburst...

13:28, 7 December 2017 (UTC) I beleive The Bushranger is making a WP:NOTCLEANUP argument. ~Kvng (talk) 15:54, 7 December 2017 (UTC) Which is not policy...

2024 (UTC) @TheTechie, Do you have a suggested improvement? Also, WP:NOTCLEANUP. ~Kvng (talk) 15:51, 23 April 2024 (UTC) Why not merge it to the timeline...

You might want to withdraw and re-nominate separately. Additionally, WP:NOTCLEANUP quite relevant to this nomination. —/Mendaliv/2¢/Δ's/ 07:09, 1 December...

July 2018 (UTC) Keep Here's a reference. Please see WP:BEFORE and WP:NOTCLEANUP. Andrew D. (talk) 21:55, 13 July 2018 (UTC) Homeowner association is clearly...

(you've been keeping be busy). Apparently it is a lot easier to ignore WP:NOTCLEANUP, WP:BEFORE and WP:NPOSSIBLE and send improvable topics to AFD and expect...

simply improve the article rather than going through this process, per WP:NOTCLEANUP. An easy keep based on the sources found by the previous voters, and it...

football. Hey man im josh (talk) 13:01, 21 December 2023 (UTC) AfD is WP:NOTCLEANUP. Additionally, the Wakeyleaks scandal (not the 2016 season) still has...

(talk) 02:19, 19 January 2015 (UTC) That suggestion is contrary to WP:NOTCLEANUP, WP:FIXTHEPROBLEM and WP:BEFORE. "I will withdraw the nomination if you...

WP:BEFORE in this case (see User:Ritchie333/saves - I know all about WP:NOTCLEANUP - indeed I came across this article when declining an A7 tag on it), just...

notable band's album is to redirect when necessary) or WP:NEXIST or WP:NOTCLEANUP. Regardless, this entire time the album has had plenty of reviews from...

an unreferenced article for this highly notable theatre but Afd is WP:NOTCLEANUP and there is no reason on earth for us to be wasting time with this discussion...

4 years ... come on. This is not in doubt. Deletion, as they say, is NOTCLEANUP; or for those who don't like that essay, WP:DEL4, which is presumably...

Television page 157, and others. The article lacks references, but WP:NOTCLEANUP and it can be fixed into a solid article with some effort.ZXCVBNM (TALK)...

WP:DEL-REASON, WP:BEFORE, and WP:NEXIST. I would also cite WP:NODEADLINE and WP:NOTCLEANUP. The proper thing is to try to improve the article first, and that's how...

for you to get WP:TENDENTIOUS The writing may be promotional however WP:NOTCLEANUP This subject easily passes WP:ANYBIO (1. The person has received a well-known...

Huffington Post ]. The writing in the article may be promotional however WP:NOTCLEANUP [ Wm335td (talk) 20:31, 9 August 2019 (UTC) All of the coverage of her...

WP:ATD and WP:PRESERVE apply and so deletion is not appropriate. See WP:NOTCLEANUP. Andrew🐉(talk) 19:43, 10 August 2021 (UTC) Exploitation of women redirects...

before I got halfway. Dr Aaij (talk) 16:42, 21 June 2019 (UTC) AFD is WP:NOTCLEANUP. See also policy at WP:ATD, and WP:BEFORE. postdlf (talk) 17:03, 21 June...

@Nairspecht: Thank you, but I wish to elucidate with two advices: 1) per WP:NOTCLEANUP and WP:DINC, the threat of deletion is not supposed to be used to force...

notable achievements in their home country (see also WP:NEXIST and WP:NOTCLEANUP). The group also has two somewhat more robust album articles and possibilities...

matter of ordinary editing, not deletion, per WP:ATD, WP:IMPERFECT, WP:NOTCLEANUP, &c. Andrew D. (talk) 13:41, 4 May 2019 (UTC) This article was not nominated...

source very easily, so the lack of verification is a case of WP:SOFIXIT/WP:NOTCLEANUP. It hasn't been edited much? Well, there's no deadline. I don't see how...

Keep Subject is notable. Passes WP:GNG and WP:NARTIST relevant policy WP:NOTCLEANUP an editor can remove the promotional feel, but that is not a good deletion...

be done rather than deleting the page." See also WP:IGNORINGATD and WP:NOTCLEANUP. Andrew🐉(talk) 14:27, 11 November 2020 (UTC) If it is easy to find coverage...

nominating any notable topic for removal from these pages. And please check WP:NOTCLEANUP. AFD is not a venue to insist that someone else fix addressable issues...

Thanks, Dori ☾Talk ☯ Contribs☽ 23:11, 24 September 2012 (UTC) Keep per WP:NOTCLEANUP, though as others have noted, it does need a significant cleanup. WP:CRYSTALBALL...

length are. A lack of sources is a problem however that is a WP:SOFIXIT/WP:NOTCLEANUP issue; it should be remembered that, WP:BLPs excepted, sources are not...

CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 23:47, 13 April 2020 (UTC) Keep per WP:ATD; WP:BEFORE; WP:NOTCLEANUP; WP:NOTPAPER; WP:PRESERVE; &c. The nomination doesn't seem to present...

article is simply that it's difficult to know where to start. But yeah, WP:NOTCLEANUP. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 09:51, 6 September 2018 (UTC) Comment It is...

Usurper to Emperor, for example. See also WP:BEFORE; WP:IGNORINGATD; WP:NOTCLEANUP. Andrew🐉(talk) 12:31, 9 November 2020 (UTC) Redirect to List of Roman...

to notability. Look at WP:ARTN and WP:NOTCLEANUP. — Toughpigs (talk) 16:44, 21 October 2020 (UTC) WP:NOTCLEANUP specifically mentions TNT as a justification...

quality. Haleth (talk) 10:13, 13 January 2021 (UTC) Speedy Keep per WP:NOTCLEANUP, as well explained by Haleth above. Andrew🐉(talk) 10:44, 13 January 2021...

(UTC) Speedy Keep If the language is promotional, it can be fixed but WP:NOTCLEANUP says that such issues shouldn't be raised here. Since nobody has voted...

(UTC) Keep, no valid argument for deletion has been presented. AFD is WP:NOTCLEANUP; we do not delete content for fixable problems. postdlf (talk) 20:17,...

AFD is not cleanup. Qrsdogg (talk) 05:17, 12 March 2011 (UTC) From WP:NOTCLEANUP "With that said, if an article is so bad that it is harmful in its current...

project and its readers. Being WP:UGLY does not mean it has to go. WP:NOTCLEANUP. WP:WIP. WP:DEADLINE. Schmidt, Michael Q. 08:37, 1 January 2015 (UTC)...

article :-( ---- Kailash29792 (talk) 16:11, 23 January 2012 (UTC) AFD is WP:NOTCLEANUP. We don't use deletion processes as an ultimatum like that, and we certainly...

(UTC) Keep - Delete argument based on current state of the article - WP:NOTCLEANUP. Grammy nom and sources turned up so far appear to establish notability...

(talk) 15:54, 15 February 2025 (UTC) Keep per WP:NBOOK, WP:HEY and WP:NOTCLEANUP. Kudos to MCE89. pburka (talk) 04:23, 16 February 2025 (UTC) Delete: There...

(TALK|CONTRIBS) 16:19, 8 August 2026 (UTC) Keep per sources presented by @Jishara. NOTCLEANUP. Khalitate (talk) 05:18, 9 August 2026 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

in the Philippines? No. Now, I can see an arguement for keep per, WP:NOTCLEANUP, as it could be argued that if the non-notable hotels are removed from...

Lonely Planet. ISBN 9781787011663. Keep The article should be reworked WP:NOTCLEANUP. A WP:BEFORE search turns up many sources WP:NEXIST and the article has...

America. Hemiauchenia (talk) 19:19, 14 September 2023 (UTC) Keep per WP:NOTCLEANUP. Yes, the article is written badly (sorry Pi314m, but your prose almost...

which is completely inappropriate as a reason for deletion. AFD is WP:NOTCLEANUP. postdlf (talk) 17:29, 30 November 2011 (UTC) I'm in a hurry right now...

Keep - obviously notable as a record label, and meets GNG. AfD is WP:NOTCLEANUP. What should have happened is a discussion on the talk page about whether...

deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 18:39, 1 March 2025 (UTC) Keep per WP:NOTCLEANUP and WP:NOTDUP. "Significant" was probably just an attempt at saying "notable"...

approach. AfD is not a suitable place to second-guess this per WP:ATD and WP:NOTCLEANUP. Andrew🐉(talk) 17:42, 16 November 2020 (UTC) Delete, since some users...

are issues with the article, deletion shouldn't be the solution, see WP:NOTCLEANUP.--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 19:32, 1 November 2014 (UTC) Delete. There...

be done rather than deleting the page." See also WP:ITSACASTLE and WP:NOTCLEANUP. Andrew🐉(talk) 19:33, 24 September 2021 (UTC) Celebrated Castles in Belgium...

policy and a failure to follow WP:BEFORE. See also WP:IMPERFECT and WP:NOTCLEANUP. Andrew D. (talk) 23:45, 15 August 2019 (UTC) I gotta speak up for the...

bit of a promotional tone is not a reason for deletion. Deletion is WP:NOTCLEANUP. 103.6.159.91 (talk) 10:41, 27 March 2016 (UTC) You seem to be arguing...

6 June 2020 (UTC) SPEEDY KEEP No valid reason given for deletion. WP:NOTCLEANUP WP:INCOMPLETE You can't delete it because you are upset it would require...

Popular culture. jolielover♥talk 16:34, 3 November 2025 (UTC) Keep – Per WP:NOTCLEANUP. The article has a valid scope; it should be properly filtered/referenced...

authors of sigcov pertain to, like not even to the slightest. AfD is WP:NOTCLEANUP. 1brianm7 (talk) 21:28, 27 July 2026 (UTC) Comment: this survived the...

(talk) 14:56, 11 November 2022 (UTC) I went ahead and fixed that per WP:NOTCLEANUP. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 15:36, 11 November 2022 (UTC) Keep: I retargeted...

given for deletion. WP:IDON'TLIKEIT is not a valid reason. AFD is WP:NOTCLEANUP. Dream Focus 18:26, 12 February 2021 (UTC) added Keep vote and would like...

encyclopedic manner currently. But it easily could be, and AFD is WP:NOTCLEANUP. The nomination itself is fundamentally wrong - its meets the WP:GNG....

2019 (UTC) Keep an article needing a rewrite is not AfD material. WP:NOTCLEANUP. Passes GNG with reliable sources. Wm335td (talk) 19:33, 2 November 2019...

went with an WP:ATD and removed promotional content, and since AfC is WP:NOTCLEANUP, I am not sure how that criteria would still apply so the !vote was puzzling...

to standard, but note that it's currently a bit cruft-y. But AFD is WP:NOTCLEANUP and the article is not so bad as to be a candidate for WP:TNT. It is clear...

→Davey2010→→Talk to me!→ 22:38, 26 April 2013 (UTC) WP:JNN, WP:SOFIXIT, WP:NOTCLEANUP. - The Bushranger One ping only 23:14, 26 April 2013 (UTC) (edit conflict)...

If the article has a promotional tone, it can be reqworked however WP:NOTCLEANUP. Wm335td (talk) 19:37, 2 October 2019 (UTC) Comment Hi Wm335td, can you...

not seeing a reason to delete in the nomination, just some rambling WP:NOTCLEANUP. And the topic is notable, of course. Apart from the world record, there's...

Jamesrichards12345 (talk) 12:25, 3 November 2017 Weak keep. First, AFD is WP:NOTCLEANUP. Second, Inquisitr has covered Sanders' switch to Disney here. Coverage...

encompassing English games is indeed nonsensical, but deletion is WP:NOTCLEANUP. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 13:40, 25 September 2023 (UTC) Keep and I support this reasoning...

direct coverage because of this. Article is not in great shape but WP:NOTCLEANUP. Coverage in WP:RS [1][2][3] (South Africa's highest paid banking CEO)...

deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:52, 6 January 2013 (UTC) Per WP:NOTCLEANUP and WP:BEFORE, this one is an easy keep, as both Google News and Google...

policies WP:ATD; WP:NOTPAPER and WP:PRESERVE therefore apply. See also WP:NOTCLEANUP. Andrew🐉(talk) 13:35, 2 June 2021 (UTC) Keep as above—on top of Andrew's...

which seems a strange way to judge an article's notability. See also WP:NOTCLEANUP. – Arms & Hearts (talk) 14:50, 3 June 2013 (UTC) Relisted to generate...

WP:DEL-REASON. AfD is not a mechanism to improve articles (WP:AFD, WP:BEFORE, WP:NOTCLEANUP). b) In case WP:N should be raised: the field of classical double-bass...

editing policy and this is not done by deletion – see WP:ATD, WP:BEFORE; WP:NOTCLEANUP; WP:PRESERVE; &c. Andrew D. (talk) 09:05, 13 September 2019 (UTC) Compiling...

tinkering with the title would be done by a move, not by deletion. See WP:NOTCLEANUP. Andrew🐉(talk) 10:00, 6 September 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...

We don't delete things just because they need to be re-written. See WP:NOTCLEANUP, WP:IMPERFECT and WP:PRESERVE.--S Marshall Talk/Cont 18:26, 30 January...

covering all the various positions in the household. See also WP:ATD, WP:NOTCLEANUP, WP:PRESERVE, &c. Andrew D. (talk) 09:31, 29 April 2019 (UTC) See WP:BURDEN...

February 2009 (UTC) Well since we're quoting Wikipolicy, I could quote WP:NOTCLEANUP in saying that an article doesn't necceserely need to be well written/well...

doesn't, and 2) that's not a valid deletion rationale. Please see WP:NOTCLEANUP. Sergecross73 msg me 11:09, 29 May 2026 (UTC) Keep. WP:IDONTLIKEIT deletion...

discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:41, 30 April 2025 (UTC) Comment Per WP:NOTCLEANUP, I have begun to add references to the article and fix the language. I...

literature, but it was dePRODded by Kvng (talk · contribs) citing WP:NOTCLEANUP. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 21:58, 17 November 2023 (UTC) Delete. The simplest...

continuance. Keep --DSmythSoCal (talk) 00:42, 21 April 2015 (UTC) Keep per WP:NOTCLEANUP, this is a WP:NPOV issue that can be fixed by a rewrite of the disputed...

Deleting an article is not a substitution for working on it; see WP:NOTCLEANUP.--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 05:58, 19 February 2015 (UTC) Relisted to generate...

2017 (UTC) Wow. An unfortunate mis-statement, when in my ignoring WP:NOTCLEANUP I began immediately doing so after your deletion nomination and inspecting...

Formatting those into footnotes is a cleanup and not a deletion issue (WP:NOTCLEANUP). Books as offline sources are verifiable and don't have to be online...

nomination openly states that it doesn't want to delete the article. Per WP:NOTCLEANUP, AfD is not the right place to request help developing an article. 99%...

this sit here? - thewolfchild 12:47, 1 October 2013 (UTC) Please read WP:NOTCLEANUP. If you are that concerned about the quality of this article, improve...

but the "not" that is much more appropriate to this discussion is WP:NOTCLEANUP. There is therefore no actionable argument for deletion and it should...

December 2013 (UTC) Keep. Clear failure of WP:BEFORE and apparently of WP:NOTCLEANUP. In addition to the information mentioned by Mjroots, the first ship is...

it. --SaTnamZIN (talk) 04:48, 9 January 2026 (UTC) Comment - AfD is WP:NOTCLEANUP - if sources exist and it is notable it should not be draftified but given...

in Eighteenth-Century London. See WP:ATD; WP:BEFORE; WP:IMPERFECT; WP:NOTCLEANUP; WP:PRESERVE, &c. Andrew D. (talk) 08:26, 14 July 2019 (UTC) Keep, as...

Exactly how this is sliced and diced is comparatively unimportant. See WP:NOTCLEANUP and WP:PRESERVE. My !vote stands. Andrew🐉(talk) 09:44, 1 May 2021 (UTC)...

Prince of Thieves (talk) 17:58, 17 March 2018 (UTC) Keep, AFD is WP:NOTCLEANUP. If the consensus for that page is not to include archives that do not...

not help the article. West Eddy (talk) 16:25, 1 May 2012 (UTC) See WP:NOTCLEANUP: AfD is not for clean-up. Northamerica1000(talk) 07:21, 2 May 2012 (UTC)...

--Sk8erPrince (talk) 15:19, 27 September 2016 (UTC) You should read WP:NOTCLEANUP, and WP:BEFORE on this one. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 15:50, 27 September...

January 2019 (UTC) Keep Meet WP:GNG as multiple sources exist and WP:NOTCLEANUP --Shrike (talk) 13:40, 27 January 2019 (UTC) Keep. Deletion is not cleanup...

(talk) 03:57, 26 February 2026 (UTC) Keep The topic is clearly notable, WP:NOTCLEANUP. A quick search in Google Scholar reveals papers such as Textbooks, nationalism...

anyway; only its blanked summaries of the talks look that way. WP:ATD, WP:NOTCLEANUP, AND WP:DINC apply just as much to draftification as to outright deletion...

09:29, 24 September 2021 (UTC) Please remember that this venue is WP:NOTCLEANUP. As the nominator, you have the same (or perhaps greater) obligation to...

Hijiri 88 (聖やや) 23:57, 30 June 2018 (UTC) Keep Agree with Andrew re WP:NOTCLEANUP. That said, I revised and trimmed the article enough to be convinced there's...

page, this should be done rather than deleting the page." See also WP:NOTCLEANUP. Andrew🐉(talk) 07:52, 7 September 2021 (UTC) Delete not withstanding...

content to distinguish it from Vandals, but deletion is not cleanup (WP:NOTCLEANUP). I would also add that there's no deadline here (WP:NODEADLINE). One...

policies and delete it. Trumpetrep (talk) 16:21, 14 March 2026 (UTC) WP:NOTCLEANUP. If they are noteworthy enough for Wikipedia, then the article should...

news about it given on the article, article is on a bad shape but WP:NOTCLEANUP Warm Regards, Miminity (talk) (contribs) 00:51, 5 August 2024 (UTC) Keep...

The features in the tables need sources, yes, but that seems like a WP:NOTCLEANUP issue, since at worst those can just be removed should someone wish to...

WP:TNT. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 00:33, 3 April 2022 (UTC) WP:NOTCLEANUP Dronebogus (talk) 05:24, 3 April 2022 (UTC) Keep – per others here. United...

drive-by violation of WP:NOTCLEANUP. Hold on tight please, ting, ting! Andrew🐉(talk) 10:35, 7 July 2021 (UTC) Delete - NOTCLEANUP indeed, there is nothing...

accepting that the character is notable, there must be a limit to WP:NOTCLEANUP. The article has zero sources, it consists of completely in-universe plot...

available at newspapers.com, but am unable to check right now. AfD is WP:NOTCLEANUP. NemesisAT (talk) 08:25, 12 February 2022 (UTC) Merge/Redirect to Magic...

interest with the subject. ArchiWiki1987 02:20, 30 April 2019 (UTC) Keep WP:NOTCLEANUP article is sourced and shows the subject meets GNG Lubbad85 (☎) 15:16...

nom's concerns but these improvements can be handled outside AfD - WP:NOTCLEANUP, WP:NODEADLINES. ~Kvng (talk) 15:25, 24 February 2024 (UTC) Relisted to...

rewrite. ~EDDY (talk/contribs)~ 20:51, 28 January 2020 (UTC) Keep WP:NOTCLEANUP. Clean up the article because she meets our notability guideline. Lightburst...

'90s pop culture. Caro7200 (talk) 12:53, 1 June 2020 (UTC) Keep per WP:NOTCLEANUP - The article definitely needs to have a fair amount of original research...

page, this should be done rather than deleting the page." See also WP:NOTCLEANUP. Andrew🐉(talk) 17:19, 1 February 2021 (UTC) Relisted to generate a more...

I've added can stay. –Davey2010Talk 10:39, 12 August 2020 (UTC) Keep WP:NOTCLEANUP — Alexis Jazz (talk or ping me) 18:22, 12 August 2020 (UTC) Keep - I see...

11:54, 16 April 2019 (UTC) Keep subject is WP:NFOOTY develop the bio, WP:NOTCLEANUP Lubbad85 (☎) 19:39, 16 April 2019 (UTC) Given the change in status for...

25 October 2025 (UTC) Keep. Meets GNG with [1], [2], [3]. AFD is WP:NOTCLEANUP, the article should be cleaned up to use better sourcing but that is not...

30 August 2013 (UTC) Keep but clean up extensively per above - see WP:NOTCLEANUP. Ansh666 01:28, 31 August 2013 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

content seemed rather tendentious so I rewrote it. See WP:ATD and WP:NOTCLEANUP. Andrew D. (talk) 10:37, 3 January 2019 (UTC) Keep numerous hits on the...

gets wide coverage, but the structure does not have notability.Keep WP:NOTCLEANUP. passes WP:NGEO Artificial features related to infrastructure (for example...

article does suggest WP:TNT still might apply, so consider this a weak WP:NOTCLEANUP keep if no one's done any work on it when this is closed. – Arms & Hearts...

broke an official policy with the nomination, but I would refer to WP:NOTCLEANUP - If there's good, eventually sourceable, content in the article, it should...

WP:TNT so let's put some maintenance tags on it and keep it for now per WP:NOTCLEANUP and WP:NODEADLINES. ~Kvng (talk) 15:13, 21 October 2023 (UTC) Can you...

current arguments and WP:DINC and WP:NOTCLEANUP. Fierysea13 (talk) 09:20, 9 August 2026 (UTC) keep per WP:NOTCLEANUP --Lenticel (talk) 00:14, 12 August...

2024 (UTC) Keep per WP:SUSTAINED and PARAKANYAA's sources. Afd is WP:NOTCLEANUP. Sorry—not trying to SHOUT. StonyBrook babble 20:23, 28 February 2024...

NEWLLM actually applies here the way it might to an April 2026, or if NOTCLEANUP is still more relevant. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 01:52, 27 April 2026 (UTC) Note:...

subject is notable or not, but the first thing that comes to mind is WP:NOTCLEANUP. Let me see what reliable sources come up, and whether WP:NOTESSAY or...

something cannot be kept and it's typically not a first resort (WP:ATD, WP:NOTCLEANUP, WP:PRESERVE). When filing an AfD, the purpose of the rationale is to...

The Banner talk 16:57, 4 June 2014 (UTC) To which I need only respond WP:NOTCLEANUP and WP:SUSCEPTIBLE. postdlf (talk) 18:09, 4 June 2014 (UTC) I did not...

yourself rather than bring notable topics to AFD for others to work on. WP:NOTCLEANUP. Cheers, Schmidt, Michael Q. 05:45, 22 November 2015 (UTC) Keep for career...

in those things she it listed as being part of. AFD is not cleanup. WP:NOTCLEANUP If there is a very easy problem to fix, then just fix it, don't waste...

an entire page because it might get out of hand? Leaving aside the WP:NOTCLEANUP fatal flaw in your argument, the evidence has already been raised that...

coverage to meet the WP:GNG. True, it's in terrible shape, but AFD is WP:NOTCLEANUP. Sergecross73 msg me 15:13, 8 March 2014 (UTC) I disagree. The mere fact...

notice. Thanks, North America1000 04:11, 16 April 2019 (UTC) Keep WP:NOTCLEANUP Lubbad85 (☎) 19:53, 16 April 2019 (UTC) I agree that AFD is not for cleanup...

it can be improved with more context (e.g. years, genres, etc.). WP:NOTCLEANUP applies. Clarityfiend (talk) 11:19, 27 May 2022 (UTC) The above discussion...

coverage in reliable sources. We have some cleanup issues, however WP:NOTCLEANUP. WP:NTEMP is also relevant, since it was once notable it will always be...

article on WP that covers this topic. As for WP:TNT I'd counter with WP:NOTCLEANUP -- hoping someone will someday provide content isn't good for the project...

promotional, deletion is not a substitute for further neutralization, see WP:NOTCLEANUP. Whether the content can be merged into a larger subject, is a matter...

article could use an experienced editor to clean up and develop. But WP:NOTCLEANUP Lightburst (talk) 21:30, 8 November 2019 (UTC) Comment: This judge is...

(UTC) Keep subject passes WP:NFOOTY the article should be developed. WP:NOTCLEANUP Lubbad85 (☎) 19:45, 16 April 2019 (UTC) How does this meet NFOOTY? What...

egregious directory information that I don't think belonged. (But even so: WP:NOTCLEANUP.) There are other references that discuss this topic, like [1], [2], [3]...

could be improved (separate into broad subjects, etc.) but that is [WP:NOTCLEANUP|not a reason for deletion]. Richard-of-Earth (talk) 20:39, 15 November...

Faso–Canada relations article. I know you don't like essays, but I think WP:NOTCLEANUP is apropos. Pburka (talk) 19:06, 4 August 2013 (UTC) Clean-up does not...

for your favorite sport... and nominators need to know that AfD is WP:NOTCLEANUP for your least-favorite article. You haven't given any reason why this...

may add inappropriate content, such as spam (see WP:SUSCEPTIBLE and WP:NOTCLEANUP), and regardless it's laughable to think that the addition of a half dozen...

industry. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 12:13, 20 May 2017 (UTC) Keep: per WP:NOTCLEANUP. --Guy Macon (talk) 16:29, 21 May 2017 (UTC) Keep: The nominator, (Burning...

notice. Thanks, czar · · 05:35, 12 August 2013 (UTC) Keep basically per WP:NOTCLEANUP. Her claims of notability are credible and in large part verifiable, we...

improvements you are requesting. Don't let perfect be the enemy of good, WP:NOTCLEANUP, WP:DEMOLISH. ~Kvng (talk) 23:21, 5 August 2025 (UTC) It's not a surmountable...

(UTC) Delete. Sure, there may be some merit to the topic, and whilst WP:NOTCLEANUP is a valid concern, what we have here is pure OR, with some hideously...

seems to indicate that you've never read WP:NRVE or are unaware of WP:NOTCLEANUP or WP:IMPATIENT... and I know that that is untrue. If an acceptable notability...