Wikipedia is a free online encyclopedia. The amount of information on Wikipedia is practically unlimited, but Wikipedia does not aim to contain all knowledge...
Click to read more »are just blog articles. Therefore, my vote is under the grounds of WP:NOTABLOG. JTZegers (talk) 18:18, 3 May 2025 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »JSTOR · TWL) Cannot find any sources that are independent of the subject. WP:NOTABLOG Nixleovel (talk) 04:38, 24 June 2025 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...
Click to read more »fsfeurope.org/projects/gplv3/barcelona-moglen-transcript#lgpl (1113, 51, 1, 1) notablog.notafish.com/index.php/2005/04/21/26-why-the-wikimedia-projects-should...
Click to read more »--Soumyabrata (talk • subpages) 09:58, 5 March 2020 (UTC) Delete. Wikipedia is WP:NOTABLOG, no valid reason to userify. --Gonnym (talk) 12:02, 5 March 2020 (UTC)...
Click to read more »start cleaning up all these multiple forks for one word variations. WP:NOTABLOG. --Gonnym (talk) 07:40, 6 February 2020 (UTC) Merge per Gonnym, but with...
Click to read more »February 2013 (UTC) There is, actually. The following excerpt is from WP:NOTABLOG: Wikipedians have their own user pages, but they should be used primarily...
Click to read more »org/projects/gplv3/barcelona-moglen-transcript#lgpl (1872, 111, X, X R/X/L) notablog.notafish.com/index.php/2005/04/21/26-why-the-wikimedia-projects-should...
Click to read more »-> calculated overlap Notafish <-> notablog.notafish.com (U->L: 100% - L->U 42.1% -> ratio 42.1%). Link: notablog.notafish.com: Linksearch en (insource)...
Click to read more »are just blog articles. Therefore, my vote is under the grounds of WP:NOTABLOG. JTZegers (talk) 18:18, 3 May 2025 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »JSTOR · TWL) Cannot find any sources that are independent of the subject. WP:NOTABLOG Nixleovel (talk) 04:38, 24 June 2025 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...
Click to read more »