Redirect to:
This page is a redirect. The following categories are used to track and monitor this redirect:
|
On Wikipedia, notability is a test used by editors to decide whether a given topic warrants its own article. Information on Wikipedia must be verifiable;...
Click to read more »Shortcut WP:FS NOTABWP:FS NOTAB The existence of many figure skating related articles have resulted in many stub articles. The following are guidelines...
Click to read more »its own forum. Fernando Rizo T/C 17:47, 14 August 2005 (UTC) De;ete. Non-notab;e neo;ogism. -- BD2412 ta;k 17:49, August 14, 2005 (UTC) Delete -- for the...
Click to read more »history | links | watch | logs) Self-promo-spam.Zero chance of passing any notab. guideline any-time, in the near-future.A CSD was declined by Ronhjones...
Click to read more »Completely non notable. Phantasmo 19:44, 20 January 2006 (UTC) Deletenon notab. Mukadderat 19:54, 20 January 2006 (UTC) Delete, nn, and I'm a pretty hardcore...
Click to read more »| talk | history | links | watch | logs) In progress article about non notab le software written by a member of the company that created it. Non notable...
Click to read more »subject to a thrashing by army personel along with several others.Won a non-notab. award.Articles by him are present, about him are absent! Winged Blades...
Click to read more »views) – (View log) Originally a vanity/advertising article, despite having notab tags applied since April 2007, its notablity still has not been proven....
Click to read more »discussions. Dan arndt (talk) 13:14, 5 February 2017 (UTC) Delete. non notab le , and basically promotional. DGG ( talk ) 04:12, 6 February 2017 (UTC)...
Click to read more »association. Chris Cunningham (talk) 15:02, 12 December 2007 (UTC) Delete. Not notab.e -- Mikeblas (talk) 15:57, 12 December 2007 (UTC) Delete, takes more than...
Click to read more »watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log) Non notable organisation. Tagged notab since June 2008, with no significant additions. 595 Google hits. This looks...
Click to read more »protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) I placed a notab and sources tag on this article in September 2007 - still no new information...
Click to read more »except directory listing to confirm that the firm exists! Hence it fails WP:NOTAB, and ends up and as unreferencerable WP:ADVERT Trident13 (talk) 20:31, 19...
Click to read more »much no google hits other than Wikipedia and mirrors. Therefore, it's not notab--no, wait, instead of "not notable", I meant to say "original research"...
Click to read more »logs | views) (delete) – (View log) Everyone so far agrees, a borderline notab case. What does the community think ? Triwbe (talk) 06:56, 2 June 2009 (UTC)...
Click to read more »mostly Irish but also UK publications. Reference breadth covers Basic WP:NOTAB criteria, CEO of a national retailer, and if he's quoted in UK publications...
Click to read more »protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) I placed notab and sources tags on this article in September - no additions since. Seems...
Click to read more »originally commercially written article that doesn't in any way pass WP:NOTAB. Rgds, --Trident13 (talk) 00:07, 25 December 2013 (UTC) Delete no RS, vanity...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) I fail to see how he clinches WP:GNG.Notab. is not inherited.Is a recipient of few non-notable local awards. Winged...
Click to read more »operating as an advertising agency. It has worked for some notable clients, but notab ilitry is not inherited. I assume that the Alistair Campbell mentioend is...
Click to read more »links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log) Having been tagged Notab from Dec 2007, with no references and only 278 Ghits, this actor would seem...
Click to read more »comfortable trying to evaluate them in this field, so since there seem to be notab;e performers, I bring it here for consensus DGG ( talk ) 22:18, 29 June...
Click to read more »Thanks, SoWhy 07:49, 15 July 2017 (UTC) Redirect to List of asanas.No indep notab and/or fails to pass GNG.Winged Blades Godric 03:17, 19 July 2017 (UTC)...
Click to read more »(talk) 10:28, 18 August 2012 (UTC) Comment - does this article now pass WP:NOTAB? Yes. But does it suffer from a series of conflicts associated with the...
Click to read more »06:54, 23 March 2008 (UTC) Very speedy delete. Not even close to being notab;e. I'm finding that the {{underconstruction}} tag is being abused by those...
Click to read more »history | links | watch | logs) Self-promo-spam.Zero chance of passing any notab. guideline any-time, in the near-future. Winged Blades Godric 16:44, 19...
Click to read more »GodricOn leave 10:03, 8 October 2017 (UTC) Yes, he probably ought to be notab le, but experience is it can be difficult to show for newspaper editors...
Click to read more »merit a mention under Swindon#Government but no evidence of independent notabity found. • Gene93k (talk) 14:44, 6 February 2008 (UTC) The above discussion...
Click to read more »protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log) Notabity for this tiny UHF TV station in a minor market is not confirmed. Ecoleetage...
Click to read more »(UTC) Redirect to Brechin#Education. There must be some effort to show notab, none has been shown. WP is not a directory of transient information of...
Click to read more »article policy. Kelly Martin 02:40, May 18, 2005 (UTC) Delete, doesnt ind notab. and its goal is the same as any other US Christian school. —Preceding unsigned...
Click to read more »schools are notable. --BaronLarf 20:16, May 17, 2005 (UTC) Delete doesnt ind notab Gazpacho 20:22, 17 May 2005 (UTC) Delete. Useless collection of generic...
Click to read more »Keep for the usual reasons. R Calvete 20:17, 2005 May 17 (UTC) Keep, inds notab Gazpacho 20:23, 17 May 2005 (UTC) Delete. Useless collection of generic...
Click to read more »zellin 23:58, May 17, 2005 (UTC) vote changed see below Delete doesnt ind notab Gazpacho 00:07, 18 May 2005 (UTC) Keep, notable enough for WP. I should...
Click to read more »the scope of this AFD (would require a centralized discussion and radio notabity guidelines). Jon513 11:24, 13 August 2006 (UTC) Comment The station doesn't...
Click to read more »(GregJackP (talk) 02:22, 10 April 2010 (UTC)) Delete does not appear to be notab- hey! Who voted while I was writing it out? Hmph. ALI nom nom 02:24, 10...
Click to read more »salubrious, doesn't count as a second point or hence create a chain to pass WP:NOTAB. Rgds, --Trident13 (talk) 07:33, 22 November 2010 (UTC) Delete The argument...
Click to read more »school on the planet. CDThieme 05:19, 17 May 2005 (UTC) Delete, doesn't ind notab Gazpacho 05:38, 17 May 2005 (UTC) Keep and expand. Just because an article...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) nonnotablle "technology company" I placed notab lity tg in september. Today I dooir ito ikts talk page and I see for several...
Click to read more »(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) fails notabity guidelines; this man may have been a successful jobbing actor, but the...
Click to read more »Cabayi (talk) 11:38, 5 December 2018 (UTC) Delete still no demonstration of notabity.John Pack Lambert (talk) 17:16, 8 December 2018 (UTC) Relisted to generate...
Click to read more »to sources irrelevent to the subject, just to create the impression of notabity (like ref #5 "awards 1973", that has nothing to do with the series). It...
Click to read more »the level of a top art competition. Mere entry clearly is not a sign of notabity. Most of our articles on such competitors are sub-stubs that mention the...
Click to read more »kungming·2 | (Talk·Contact) 07:46, 13 November 2006 (UTC) Delete - non notab=ple as per WP:BIO, don't think an internet flame war and '15 minutes of...
Click to read more »requesting that Phil Bridger follows WP:CIV and WP:NPA, may I direct him to WP:NOTAB - Any Biography: (1) The person has received a well-known and significant...
Click to read more »Bailey.John Z (talk) 15:11, 1 November 2008 (UTC) Thanks John Z. Mets acad./notab. criterion #6 (highest-level elected or appointed academic post at an academic...
Click to read more »This is a first draft to establish notabity criteria for articles written about architecture or architects. It is not intended to be a guideline for all...
Click to read more »(which I have PROD'ed), Where Are You (Bee Gees song) which does claim notabity in that it was the first Maurice Gibb song to be recorded, Remembering...
Click to read more »non-notable. If you think it notable, then provide references by which its notabity can be established.Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 18:20, 27 December 2007...
Click to read more »unverifiable articles, not unverified articles. A quick google check verifies the notabity of this road. Bhoeble 15:34, 21 December 2005 (UTC) Keep Notable road in...
Click to read more »2005 (UTC) Keep R Calvete 20:19, 2005 May 17 (UTC) Delete, doesnt ind notab Gazpacho 20:21, 17 May 2005 (UTC) Delete. Useless collection of generic...
Click to read more »article about a musician who does not meet any of the qualifications for notabity in WP:MUSIC except for possibly #1 (subject of coverage multiple non-trivial...
Click to read more »links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log) Contested PROD. fails notabity criteria. does not satisfy WP:ATHLETE. Did not appear in fully professional...
Click to read more »then this. Spartaz Humbug! 06:48, 18 April 2014 (UTC) Delete Fails the notabity requirements for porn actors.John Pack Lambert (talk) 18:17, 19 April 2014...
Click to read more »the article could be improved, I would not have nominated it; 1. I added notab tags and no references have been supplied, 2. I searched for refs myself...
Click to read more »connection with a rezoning battle. He does not appear to have achieved notabity as a community activist or as a third-party candidate for congress. --MelanieN...
Click to read more »significant national and now international (BBC News) coverage, so would pass WP:NOTAB. Plus, if we delete at present, where do we redirect? The article for Christie...
Click to read more »Delete Although Badmonkey raises some good points about how we assess the notabity of internet radio stations, how else can we do it? We simply can't just...
Click to read more »2009 (UTC) Good There's definitely a few good references now to give him notab. Mr.knowitall2020 Note that the above comment was actually entered by Mr...
Click to read more »barely three months on a radio station that itself is only just above the notabity waterline; I've flagged this for {{importance}} several times now, but...
Click to read more »there are many appearances, but some of these actually demonstrate non-notabity. Series such as Z-Cars employ many actors in very short parts; the non-memorability...
Click to read more »even if WP:BASIC has been (arguably) met, it only established presumed notab[ility]. However, the subject fails WP:ANYBIO and WP:VICTIM. Apart from the...
Click to read more »per WP:CORP. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 15:37, 13 March 2014 (UTC) Keep Notabity proved, sufficient and reliable sources provided. Demetriosakadimman 16:38...
Click to read more »declined by DGG (talk · contribs) because the article "seems to assert notabity" (edit summary). I contest this. Two publications were deemed notable enough...
Click to read more »with COI for a long time. No RS. Fails WP:ORGIN and can not pick up any notabity from the franchiser per WP:INHERITORG. Many sister country articles have...
Click to read more »on the WS. I think what Brian is pointing to is that for purposes of WP notabity, the test is not that he make the majors. It is sufficient under those...
Click to read more »International and printed film magazines such as Starburst are strong signs of notabity that together with the other rs reviews mean WP:GNG is passed, irrespective...
Click to read more »be corrected. It may even be that not every past president of BD meets notabity requirements (ref WP:NOTINHERITED and the table at the article), though...
Click to read more »—David Eppstein (talk) 06:54, 10 February 2022 (UTC) Delete. No evidence of notabity. Xxanthippe (talk) 07:47, 10 February 2022 (UTC). *Delete for reasons given...
Click to read more »Necrothesp (talk) 21:04, 5 January 2014 (UTC) Delete The award does not provide notabity, and the relevant guideline is NOT MEMORIAL. 'DGG (at NYPL)' (talk) 19:17...
Click to read more »or [3]. But as said before, I’m not an expert here. But with 137k's at G notab. can be assumed. Dewritech (talk) 16:32, 9 June 2010 (UTC) "notability can...
Click to read more »KeepComment in every way meets the notability standards mentioned in WP:NOTAB: As a jeweller and manager of The Birmingham Guild of Handicraft: ”The person...
Click to read more »protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) Delete - No notabity proved. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 12:12, 10 December 2007 (UTC) Note...
Click to read more »of wp:notability, but it's a brand new article. Ability to establish wp:notabity looks unklikely but possible. Too soon to tell for a article that is just...
Click to read more »(UTC) Delete - yes , I agree with this nomination. Person fails the wp:notabity tests and per Hero, someone is attempting to add negative content, it's...
Click to read more »evidence is a PR push in 2006 which got a little bit of coverage. This is not notabity: its a pebble chucked into a pond in Chicago with a total lack of ripples...
Click to read more »independent notability. --Lambiam 12:34, 22 February 2013 (UTC) full of notabity and citations but the article is written like crap. This is because nobody...
Click to read more »to be already notable. DGG (talk) 05:31, 28 February 2008 (UTC) Delete notabity not proved. Could be suitable for Chinese Wiki. Xxanthippe (talk) 09:37...
Click to read more »Delete - one consistent apperance on one TV show doesn't normally pass WP:NOTAB, and this article certainly doesn't. All the sources linked by Acbingham...
Click to read more »WP:ANYBIO, until it can be proven that this person won an award which confers notabity, this assertion is pie in the sky. Advice - the article creator needs to...
Click to read more »TheLongTone (talk) 16:03, 25 January 2018 (UTC) Bang goes that argument for notabity, since both are redlinks.... I rest my case.TheLongTone (talk) 16:04, 25...
Click to read more »December 2012 (UTC) Comment-Although "real world" notability and wiki notabity appear to differ, the use of the Internet I would assume for the majority...
Click to read more »want to write an article, please use the Article Wizard. See also our notabity guideline and our policy on verifiability: Wikipedia content should be...
Click to read more »encyclopedia DGG ( talk ) 08:58, 14 July 2016 (UTC) Keep: Google results show notabity, especially that source from google books. KGirlTrucker81 talk what I'm...
Click to read more »that provide information on these dogs, these sources are not credible. Notabity is only one part of the picture, check out Wikipedia:Reliable sources,...
Click to read more »journals or abstracts of articles by professor taylor. I would say it passes notabity, and thus deserves an article. i know that marginally notable people can...
Click to read more »any other aspect of Wikipedia, but fortunately that something meets the notabity requirements is no reason to necessarily have an article if there is insufficient...
Click to read more »WP:NOTDICT; the tag was removed with the irrelevant rationale; 'meets notabity guidelines'. It is still a dictionary definition, and I believe that the...
Click to read more »Portal New Clnup FAID Hist Feat Rem FAD Log Club {{C}} Nat tm {{NT}} Nat as {{NA}} Comp Lge sn Club sn Nat sn Match Player Stadia Cat Notab Tmplt Ext l...
Click to read more »Portal New Clnup FAID Hist Feat Rem FAD Log Club {{C}} Nat tm {{NT}} Nat as {{NA}} Comp Lge sn Club sn Nat sn Match Player Stadia Cat Notab Tmplt Ext l...
Click to read more »Portal New Clnup FAID Hist Feat Rem FAD Log Club {{C}} Nat tm {{NT}} Nat as {{NA}} Comp Lge sn Club sn Nat sn Match Player Stadia Cat Notab Tmplt Ext l...
Click to read more »Portal New Clnup FAID Hist Feat Rem FAD Log Club {{C}} Nat tm {{NT}} Nat as {{NA}} Comp Lge sn Club sn Nat sn Match Player Stadia Cat Notab Tmplt Ext l...
Click to read more »delete stuff based on personal views. Anyway this has [{WP:RS]], meets WP:Notab;le I will accept whatever decision consensus reaches like last time. Anyway...
Click to read more »Portal New Clnup FAID Hist Feat Rem FAD Log Club {{C}} Nat tm {{NT}} Nat as {{NA}} Comp Lge sn Club sn Nat sn Match Player Stadia Cat Notab Tmplt Ext l...
Click to read more »notability seem to rest upon winning non-notable awards and an inherited notabity from its client list. Cabayi (talk) 14:30, 15 September 2016 (UTC) Comment:...
Click to read more »the Mann the most notable). In this evaluation, we need to remember that notabity is distinct from history. Some chess pieces do have a longer history, whereas...
Click to read more »Portal New Clnup FAID Hist Feat Rem FAD Log Club {{C}} Nat tm {{NT}} Nat as {{NA}} Comp Lge sn Club sn Nat sn Match Player Stadia Cat Notab Tmplt Ext l...
Click to read more »(UTC) Sigh. Keep, the article, when nominated, had sufficient proof of notabity from reliable sources to defeat this attempt. Yes, the subject is irritating...
Click to read more »national club with 4,0000 members. Existence of sources suitable for wp:notabity is likely. North8000 (talk) 19:56, 20 September 2011 (UTC) As I said, I've...
Click to read more »article itself contain enough information to demonstrate that the subject is notab le (or that it has promise to be when other wikipedians start helping to...
Click to read more »Portal New Clnup FAID Hist Feat Rem FAD Log Club {{C}} Nat tm {{NT}} Nat as {{NA}} Comp Lge sn Club sn Nat sn Match Player Stadia Cat Notab Tmplt Ext l...
Click to read more »Portal New Clnup FAID Hist Feat Rem FAD Log Club {{C}} Nat tm {{NT}} Nat as {{NA}} Comp Lge sn Club sn Nat sn Match Player Stadia Cat Notab Tmplt Ext l...
Click to read more »whose regular job put him in the media just barely enough to pass our notabity guideline because it was public facing work, but really is no different...
Click to read more »Portal New Clnup FAID Hist Feat Rem FAD Log Club {{C}} Nat tm {{NT}} Nat as {{NA}} Comp Lge sn Club sn Nat sn Match Player Stadia Cat Notab Tmplt Ext l...
Click to read more »Portal New Clnup FAID Hist Feat Rem FAD Log Club {{C}} Nat tm {{NT}} Nat as {{NA}} Comp Lge sn Club sn Nat sn Match Player Stadia Cat Notab Tmplt Ext l...
Click to read more »Portal New Clnup FAID Hist Feat Rem FAD Log Club {{C}} Nat tm {{NT}} Nat as {{NA}} Comp Lge sn Club sn Nat sn Match Player Stadia Cat Notab Tmplt Ext l...
Click to read more »when I tagged as these articles for CSD they did not show any claim to notab. The fact that the editor later added the required information meant that...
Click to read more »is Cad and the Dandy, created by user Josephgallos. I don't question WP:NOTAB, but persistent revision by Josephgallos - and nearly breaking the three...
Click to read more »Divisiones Regionales de Fútbol which is a "grey area" in terms of club notabity with some clubs meeting and other clubs failing to meet WP:GNG. FC L'Escala...
Click to read more »Portal New Clnup FAID Hist Feat Rem FAD Log Club {{C}} Nat tm {{NT}} Nat as {{NA}} Comp Lge sn Club sn Nat sn Match Player Stadia Cat Notab Tmplt Ext l...
Click to read more »Portal New Clnup FAID Hist Feat Rem FAD Log Club {{C}} Nat tm {{NT}} Nat as {{NA}} Comp Lge sn Club sn Nat sn Match Player Stadia Cat Notab Tmplt Ext l...
Click to read more »AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 14:38, 16 March 2009 (UTC) Manga can't inherit the notabity of its author nor the notability of another manga of that same author....
Click to read more »November 2009 (UTC) Comment. I would suggest that those seeing to reflect notabity take a deep breath, read WP:BAND carefully, and either add sources reflecting...
Click to read more »(talk) 11:33, 22 June 2017 (UTC) Strong delete I am not convinced by the notab. arguments.Pure promotional work. Winged Blades Godric 12:56, 22 June 2017...
Click to read more »learned editors and readers of the action deemed it important by its sheer NOTABITY. Please take your lame personal, provincial, out-dated criticism elsewhere...
Click to read more »Wikipedia is not a gazetteer of political parties. No record or proof of notabity. Not on Register of Political Parties. Fails GNG. Clear COI and promotional...
Click to read more »Lourdes covered this better than I could. I will expand on only one point. "notabity" has a general English definition and a Wikipedia technical definition...
Click to read more »that if the manga article is kept, then that alone should justify the notabity of the author. And having stubs on Wikipedia doesn't go against policy...
Click to read more »have a thing here that political candidature does not assert wikipedia notabity, and I have seen the reasons for that and support that position, this is...
Click to read more »actually have all of its sources without regard to the common sense issues of notabity then there isn't any point in discussing it with you. You have every right...
Click to read more »Portal New Clnup FAID Hist Feat Rem FAD Log Club {{C}} Nat tm {{NT}} Nat as {{NA}} Comp Lge sn Club sn Nat sn Match Player Stadia Cat Notab Tmplt Ext l...
Click to read more »won't matter. Trebor 20:48, 8 January 2007 (UTC) Delete No references of notabity and horribly written.--Sefringle 07:50, 8 January 2007 (UTC) Keep. I dont...
Click to read more »h-index which is what we often use to assist us in an evaluation of academic notabity. I have done a quick look at Google Scholar and doing "Ping Li" AND Psychology...
Click to read more »maintaining Wikipedia, ignore it. SillyLilies (talk) 07:25, 3 May 2015 (UTC) NotabIlity only for the Rich? When you search google news, you will find news...
Click to read more »Albermarle is simply a shop. That its products may be notable does not confer notabity. By way of analogy Super Mashriq, my local corner shop, sells Worcester...
Click to read more »protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD) I placed notab and sources tags on this article in September - no additions since. Seems...
Click to read more »protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD) Delete - No notabity proved. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 12:12, 10 December 2007 (UTC) Note...
Click to read more »Portal New Clnup FAID Hist Feat Rem FAD Log Club {{C}} Nat tm {{NT}} Nat as {{NA}} Comp Lge sn Club sn Nat sn Match Player Stadia Cat Notab Tmplt Ext l...
Click to read more »my reasons listed above. Death, for both of them, brought them into the notabity. Since Wikipedia is supposedly supposed to cover the event, then we can...
Click to read more »association. Chris Cunningham (talk) 15:02, 12 December 2007 (UTC) Delete. Not notab.e -- Mikeblas (talk) 15:57, 12 December 2007 (UTC) Delete, takes more than...
Click to read more »(talk) 11:33, 22 June 2017 (UTC) Strong delete I am not convinced by the notab. arguments.Pure promotional work. Winged Blades Godric 12:56, 22 June 2017...
Click to read more »watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View AfD) Non notable organisation. Tagged notab since June 2008, with no significant additions. 595 Google hits. This looks...
Click to read more »barely three months on a radio station that itself is only just above the notabity waterline; I've flagged this for {{importance}} several times now, but...
Click to read more »Portal New Clnup FAID Hist Feat Rem FAD Log Club {{C}} Nat tm {{NT}} Nat as {{NA}} Comp Lge sn Club sn Nat sn Match Player Stadia Cat Notab Tmplt Ext l...
Click to read more »the essence of being encyclopedic, which is in the deletion policy. Non-notabity is the main reason articles are deleted through the VfD process. --BM 23:54...
Click to read more »to be already notable. DGG (talk) 05:31, 28 February 2008 (UTC) Delete notabity not proved. Could be suitable for Chinese Wiki. Xxanthippe (talk) 09:37...
Click to read more »06:54, 23 March 2008 (UTC) Very speedy delete. Not even close to being notab;e. I'm finding that the {{underconstruction}} tag is being abused by those...
Click to read more »merit a mention under Swindon#Government but no evidence of independent notabity found. • Gene93k (talk) 14:44, 6 February 2008 (UTC) The above discussion...
Click to read more »declined by DGG (talk · contribs) because the article "seems to assert notabity" (edit summary). I contest this. Two publications were deemed notable enough...
Click to read more »of wp:notability, but it's a brand new article. Ability to establish wp:notabity looks unklikely but possible. Too soon to tell for a article that is just...
Click to read more »(talk) 10:28, 18 August 2012 (UTC) Comment - does this article now pass WP:NOTAB? Yes. But does it suffer from a series of conflicts associated with the...
Click to read more »Wikipedia is not a gazetteer of political parties. No record or proof of notabity. Not on Register of Political Parties. Fails GNG. Clear COI and promotional...
Click to read more »the Mann the most notable). In this evaluation, we need to remember that notabity is distinct from history. Some chess pieces do have a longer history, whereas...
Click to read more »non-notable. If you think it notable, then provide references by which its notabity can be established.Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 18:20, 27 December 2007...
Click to read more »site, usefully verifying the existence of the book, but not relevant to notabity. The longest story is the one from "Le Parisien", at 375 words, which barely...
Click to read more »logs | views) (delete) – (View AfD) Everyone so far agrees, a borderline notab case. What does the community think ? Triwbe (talk) 06:56, 2 June 2009 (UTC)...
Click to read more »operating as an advertising agency. It has worked for some notable clients, but notab ilitry is not inherited. I assume that the Alistair Campbell mentioend is...
Click to read more »Albermarle is simply a shop. That its products may be notable does not confer notabity. By way of analogy Super Mashriq, my local corner shop, sells Worcester...
Click to read more »(GregJackP (talk) 02:22, 10 April 2010 (UTC)) Delete does not appear to be notab- hey! Who voted while I was writing it out? Hmph. ALI nom nom 02:24, 10...
Click to read more »Thanks, SoWhy 07:49, 15 July 2017 (UTC) Redirect to List of asanas.No indep notab and/or fails to pass GNG.Winged Blades Godric 03:17, 19 July 2017 (UTC)...
Click to read more »thus cannot be made WP:NPOV. Delete without hesitation unless evidence of notabity presented. - brenneman(t)(c) 22:54, 9 January 2006 (UTC) Comment. I'm TheVel...
Click to read more »(UTC) Redirect to Brechin#Education. There must be some effort to show notab, none has been shown. WP is not a directory of transient information of...
Click to read more »links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View AfD) Contested PROD. fails notabity criteria. does not satisfy WP:ATHLETE. Did not appear in fully professional...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) I fail to see how he clinches WP:GNG.Notab. is not inherited.Is a recipient of few non-notable local awards. Winged...
Click to read more »that if the manga article is kept, then that alone should justify the notabity of the author. And having stubs on Wikipedia doesn't go against policy...
Click to read more »views) – (View AfD) Originally a vanity/advertising article, despite having notab tags applied since April 2007, its notablity still has not been proven....
Click to read more »subject to a thrashing by army personel along with several others.Won a non-notab. award.Articles by him are present, about him are absent! Winged Blades...
Click to read more »Bailey.John Z (talk) 15:11, 1 November 2008 (UTC) Thanks John Z. Mets acad./notab. criterion #6 (highest-level elected or appointed academic post at an academic...
Click to read more »the article could be improved, I would not have nominated it; 1. I added notab tags and no references have been supplied, 2. I searched for refs myself...
Click to read more »appearing on a couple of compillations and allmusic is not enough to establish notabity here, and I recommend deletion. Even after clean up, external links (not...
Click to read more »controller at a major airport, IMO. I just can't see it -- no RS to support notabity. SPECIFICO talk 18:28, 10 December 2013 (UTC) Automated comment: This AfD...
Click to read more »protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View AfD) Notabity for this tiny UHF TV station in a minor market is not confirmed. Ecoleetage...
Click to read more »originally commercially written article that doesn't in any way pass WP:NOTAB. Rgds, --Trident13 (talk) 00:07, 25 December 2013 (UTC) Delete no RS, vanity...
Click to read more »discussions. Dan arndt (talk) 13:14, 5 February 2017 (UTC) Delete. non notab le , and basically promotional. DGG ( talk ) 04:12, 6 February 2017 (UTC)...
Click to read more »requesting that Phil Bridger follows WP:CIV and WP:NPA, may I direct him to WP:NOTAB - Any Biography: (1) The person has received a well-known and significant...
Click to read more »links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View AfD) Having been tagged Notab from Dec 2007, with no references and only 278 Ghits, this actor would seem...
Click to read more »WP:ANYBIO, until it can be proven that this person won an award which confers notabity, this assertion is pie in the sky. Advice - the article creator needs to...
Click to read more »to sources irrelevent to the subject, just to create the impression of notabity (like ref #5 "awards 1973", that has nothing to do with the series). It...
Click to read more »notability seem to rest upon winning non-notable awards and an inherited notabity from its client list. Cabayi (talk) 14:30, 15 September 2016 (UTC) Comment:...
Click to read more »or [4]. But as said before, I’m not an expert here. But with 137k's at G notab. can be assumed. Dewritech (talk) 16:32, 9 June 2010 (UTC) "notability can...
Click to read more »Portal New Clnup FAID Hist Feat Rem FAD Log Club {{C}} Nat tm {{NT}} Nat as {{NA}} Comp Lge sn Club sn Nat sn Match Player Stadia Cat Notab Tmplt Ext l...
Click to read more »actually have all of its sources without regard to the common sense issues of notabity then there isn't any point in discussing it with you. You have every right...
Click to read more »incompetent AFC reviewer but then once in mainspace gets tagged for deletion,notab. issues etc.--which should have been well-tackled in the AFC itself. In...
Click to read more »article itself contain enough information to demonstrate that the subject is notab le (or that it has promise to be when other wikipedians start helping to...
Click to read more »and well batted TimFouracre, but personally doesn't presently pass WP:NOTAB. Rgds, --Trident13 (talk) 13:43, 24 February 2012 (UTC) Delete. It seems...
Click to read more »connection with a rezoning battle. He does not appear to have achieved notabity as a community activist or as a third-party candidate for congress. --MelanieN...
Click to read more »evidence is a PR push in 2006 which got a little bit of coverage. This is not notabity: its a pebble chucked into a pond in Chicago with a total lack of ripples...
Click to read more »journals or abstracts of articles by professor taylor. I would say it passes notabity, and thus deserves an article. i know that marginally notable people can...
Click to read more »GodricOn leave 10:03, 8 October 2017 (UTC) Yes, he probably ought to be notab le, but experience is it can be difficult to show for newspaper editors...
Click to read more »(UTC) Delete - yes , I agree with this nomination. Person fails the wp:notabity tests and per Hero, someone is attempting to add negative content, it's...
Click to read more »comfortable trying to evaluate them in this field, so since there seem to be notab;e performers, I bring it here for consensus DGG ( talk ) 22:18, 29 June...
Click to read more »AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 14:38, 16 March 2009 (UTC) Manga can't inherit the notabity of its author nor the notability of another manga of that same author....
Click to read more »2009 (UTC) Good There's definitely a few good references now to give him notab. Mr.knowitall2020 Note that the above comment was actually entered by Mr...
Click to read more »KeepComment in every way meets the notability standards mentioned in WP:NOTAB: As a jeweller and manager of The Birmingham Guild of Handicraft: ”The person...
Click to read more »learned editors and readers of the action deemed it important by its sheer NOTABITY. Please take your lame personal, provincial, out-dated criticism elsewhere...
Click to read more »(which I have PROD'ed), Where Are You (Bee Gees song) which does claim notabity in that it was the first Maurice Gibb song to be recorded, Remembering...
Click to read more »then this. Spartaz Humbug! 06:48, 18 April 2014 (UTC) Delete Fails the notabity requirements for porn actors.John Pack Lambert (talk) 18:17, 19 April 2014...
Click to read more »even if WP:BASIC has been (arguably) met, it only established presumed notab[ility]. However, the subject fails WP:ANYBIO and WP:VICTIM. Apart from the...
Click to read more »November 2009 (UTC) Comment. I would suggest that those seeing to reflect notabity take a deep breath, read WP:BAND carefully, and either add sources reflecting...
Click to read more »Log Club {{C}} Nat tm {{NT}} Nat as {{NA}} Comp Match Player Stadia Cat Notab Tmplt Ext l Association football variants task force Taskforce page Sources...
Click to read more »the level of a top art competition. Mere entry clearly is not a sign of notabity. Most of our articles on such competitors are sub-stubs that mention the...
Click to read more »WP:NOTDICT; the tag was removed with the irrelevant rationale; 'meets notabity guidelines'. It is still a dictionary definition, and I believe that the...
Click to read more »mostly Irish but also UK publications. Reference breadth covers Basic WP:NOTAB criteria, CEO of a national retailer, and if he's quoted in UK publications...
Click to read more »Necrothesp (talk) 21:04, 5 January 2014 (UTC) Delete The award does not provide notabity, and the relevant guideline is NOT MEMORIAL. 'DGG (at NYPL)' (talk) 19:17...
Click to read more »December 2012 (UTC) Comment-Although "real world" notability and wiki notabity appear to differ, the use of the Internet I would assume for the majority...
Click to read more »(UTC) Sigh. Keep, the article, when nominated, had sufficient proof of notabity from reliable sources to defeat this attempt. Yes, the subject is irritating...
Click to read more »significant national and now international (BBC News) coverage, so would pass WP:NOTAB. Plus, if we delete at present, where do we redirect? The article for Christie...
Click to read more »national club with 4,0000 members. Existence of sources suitable for wp:notabity is likely. North8000 (talk) 19:56, 20 September 2011 (UTC) As I said, I've...
Click to read more »TheLongTone (talk) 16:03, 25 January 2018 (UTC) Bang goes that argument for notabity, since both are redlinks.... I rest my case.TheLongTone (talk) 16:04, 25...
Click to read more »International and printed film magazines such as Starburst are strong signs of notabity that together with the other rs reviews mean WP:GNG is passed, irrespective...
Click to read more »have a thing here that political candidature does not assert wikipedia notabity, and I have seen the reasons for that and support that position, this is...
Click to read more »(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) fails notabity guidelines; this man may have been a successful jobbing actor, but the...
Click to read more »Divisiones Regionales de Fútbol which is a "grey area" in terms of club notabity with some clubs meeting and other clubs failing to meet WP:GNG. FC L'Escala...
Click to read more »independent notability. --Lambiam 12:34, 22 February 2013 (UTC) full of notabity and citations but the article is written like crap. This is because nobody...
Click to read more »whose regular job put him in the media just barely enough to pass our notabity guideline because it was public facing work, but really is no different...
Click to read more »there are many appearances, but some of these actually demonstrate non-notabity. Series such as Z-Cars employ many actors in very short parts; the non-memorability...
Click to read more »on the WS. I think what Brian is pointing to is that for purposes of WP notabity, the test is not that he make the majors. It is sufficient under those...
Click to read more »accurately predicted and their path very well described. Instead the issues are notabity and whether the topic is encyclopedic. As an event which will occur in...
Click to read more »salubrious, doesn't count as a second point or hence create a chain to pass WP:NOTAB. Rgds, --Trident13 (talk) 07:33, 22 November 2010 (UTC) Delete The argument...
Click to read more »with COI for a long time. No RS. Fails WP:ORGIN and can not pick up any notabity from the franchiser per WP:INHERITORG. Many sister country articles have...
Click to read more »except directory listing to confirm that the firm exists! Hence it fails WP:NOTAB, and ends up and as unreferencerable WP:ADVERT Trident13 (talk) 20:31, 19...
Click to read more »maintaining Wikipedia, ignore it. SillyLilies (talk) 07:25, 3 May 2015 (UTC) NotabIlity only for the Rich? When you search google news, you will find news...
Click to read more »encyclopedia DGG ( talk ) 08:58, 14 July 2016 (UTC) Keep: Google results show notabity, especially that source from google books. KGirlTrucker81 talk what I'm...
Click to read more »and well batted TimFouracre, but personally doesn't presently pass WP:NOTAB. Rgds, --Trident13 (talk) 13:43, 24 February 2012 (UTC) Delete. It seems...
Click to read more »—David Eppstein (talk) 06:54, 10 February 2022 (UTC) Delete. No evidence of notabity. Xxanthippe (talk) 07:47, 10 February 2022 (UTC). *Delete for reasons given...
Click to read more »appearing on a couple of compillations and allmusic is not enough to establish notabity here, and I recommend deletion. Even after clean up, external links (not...
Click to read more »h-index which is what we often use to assist us in an evaluation of academic notabity. I have done a quick look at Google Scholar and doing "Ping Li" AND Psychology...
Click to read more »per WP:CORP. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 15:37, 13 March 2014 (UTC) Keep Notabity proved, sufficient and reliable sources provided. Demetriosakadimman 16:38...
Click to read more »proper rationale. As it is, I happen to think the article satisfies general notabity right now in the absence of any of these supposed guidelines defining what...
Click to read more »most public speakers have something to speak about, and we can look for notabity in that field. In her case, it's as a business networking expert. I'm not...
Click to read more »the article appealing in the abstract, in the lack of solid evidence of notabity. Just furnish the evidence. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 05:17, 19 March...
Click to read more »attempt to search for others. My conclusion is that the sources to support notabity do not exist. Her own articles are obviously WP:PRIMARY, but so are the...
Click to read more »Cabayi (talk) 11:38, 5 December 2018 (UTC) Delete still no demonstration of notabity.John Pack Lambert (talk) 17:16, 8 December 2018 (UTC) Relisted to generate...
Click to read more »article about a musician who does not meet any of the qualifications for notabity in WP:MUSIC except for possibly #1 (subject of coverage multiple non-trivial...
Click to read more »there would simply need to be one example showing that the article meets notabity guidelines. Correct? Examples have been shown — Preceding unsigned comment...
Click to read more »there would simply need to be one example showing that the article meets notabity guidelines. Correct? Examples have been shown — Preceding unsigned comment...
Click to read more »independent sources. Self-published sources are only acceptable after notabity has been established, and usually only permitted for personal details that...
Click to read more »any other aspect of Wikipedia, but fortunately that something meets the notabity requirements is no reason to necessarily have an article if there is insufficient...
Click to read more »site, usefully verifying the existence of the book, but not relevant to notabity. The longest story is the one from "Le Parisien", at 375 words, which barely...
Click to read more »the article appealing in the abstract, in the lack of solid evidence of notabity. Just furnish the evidence. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 05:17, 19 March...
Click to read more »attempt to search for others. My conclusion is that the sources to support notabity do not exist. Her own articles are obviously WP:PRIMARY, but so are the...
Click to read more »most public speakers have something to speak about, and we can look for notabity in that field. In her case, it's as a business networking expert. I'm not...
Click to read more »my reasons listed above. Death, for both of them, brought them into the notabity. Since Wikipedia is supposedly supposed to cover the event, then we can...
Click to read more »school on the planet. CDThieme 05:19, 17 May 2005 (UTC) Delete, doesn't ind notab Gazpacho 05:38, 17 May 2005 (UTC) Keep and expand. Just because an article...
Click to read more »(UTC) While I am a severe anti-deletionist, I have to notice that of many notabity issues, the bios are among the most controversial subjects, where wikipedians...
Click to read more »proper rationale. As it is, I happen to think the article satisfies general notabity right now in the absence of any of these supposed guidelines defining what...
Click to read more »comments placed on his talkage. I am convinced that Dwell does meet WP:NOTAB for companies, but the effort required to both create a suitable article...
Click to read more »in English or German that would enable this person to presently pass WP:NOTAB Rgds, --Trident13 (talk) 02:41, 1 December 2010 (UTC) File:Södermalm.JPG...
Click to read more »Log Club {{C}} Nat tm {{NT}} Nat as {{NA}} Comp Match Player Stadia Cat Notab Tmplt Ext l Association football variants task force Taskforce page Sources...
Click to read more »Portal New Clnup FAID Hist Feat Rem FAD Log Club {{C}} Nat tm {{NT}} Nat as {{NA}} Comp Lge sn Club sn Nat sn Match Player Stadia Cat Notab Tmplt Ext l...
Click to read more »Delete Although Badmonkey raises some good points about how we assess the notabity of internet radio stations, how else can we do it? We simply can't just...
Click to read more »kungming·2 | (Talk·Contact) 07:46, 13 November 2006 (UTC) Delete - non notab=ple as per WP:BIO, don't think an internet flame war and '15 minutes of...
Click to read more »the essence of being encyclopedic, which is in the deletion policy. Non-notabity is the main reason articles are deleted through the VfD process. --BM 23:54...
Click to read more »its own forum. Fernando Rizo T/C 17:47, 14 August 2005 (UTC) De;ete. Non-notab;e neo;ogism. -- BD2412 ta;k 17:49, August 14, 2005 (UTC) Delete -- for the...
Click to read more »much no google hits other than Wikipedia and mirrors. Therefore, it's not notab--no, wait, instead of "not notable", I meant to say "original research"...
Click to read more »hyperlink I put in my first reply will take you to the page which explains notabity guidelines for people.Charles (talk) 21:11, 17 September 2014 (UTC) I would...
Click to read more »entire series, with a section about each of the books. Please read our notabity guideline for books. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 07:19, 25 May 2016 (UTC)...
Click to read more »thus cannot be made WP:NPOV. Delete without hesitation unless evidence of notabity presented. - brenneman(t)(c) 22:54, 9 January 2006 (UTC) Comment. I'm TheVel...
Click to read more »'Wiener Connector' Here is what my reviewer said: " Im not doubting the the notabity of the subject, as I know there many articls on wikpedia simur to the one...
Click to read more »so it might as well go there directly.DGG 20:43, 24 April 2007 (UTC) is notabity still in question? Regarding notability, this WSJ article and some referenced...
Click to read more »that provide information on these dogs, these sources are not credible. Notabity is only one part of the picture, check out Wikipedia:Reliable sources,...
Click to read more »unverifiable articles, not unverified articles. A quick google check verifies the notabity of this road. Bhoeble 15:34, 21 December 2005 (UTC) Keep Notable road in...
Click to read more »accurately predicted and their path very well described. Instead the issues are notabity and whether the topic is encyclopedic. As an event which will occur in...
Click to read more »the scope of this AFD (would require a centralized discussion and radio notabity guidelines). Jon513 11:24, 13 August 2006 (UTC) Comment The station doesn't...
Click to read more »article that says a person is a corporate CEO is a plausible claim of notabity. If you have done a good faith search for reliable sources about the person...
Click to read more »Portal New Clnup FAID Hist Feat Rem FAD Log Club {{C}} Nat tm {{NT}} Nat as {{NA}} Comp Lge sn Club sn Nat sn Match Player Stadia Cat Notab Tmplt Ext l...
Click to read more »Portal New Clnup FAID Hist Feat Rem FAD Log Club {{C}} Nat tm {{NT}} Nat as {{NA}} Comp Lge sn Club sn Nat sn Match Player Stadia Cat Notab Tmplt Ext l...
Click to read more »org/wiki/Old_school_jazz_dance Old school jazz dance]</ref> from [[Birmingham]], UK, notab...') 13:01, April 27, 2011 McAvock - history of the name in Ireland (hist)...
Click to read more »won't matter. Trebor 20:48, 8 January 2007 (UTC) Delete No references of notabity and horribly written.--Sefringle 07:50, 8 January 2007 (UTC) Keep. I dont...
Click to read more »Completely non notable. Phantasmo 19:44, 20 January 2006 (UTC) Deletenon notab. Mukadderat 19:54, 20 January 2006 (UTC) Delete, nn, and I'm a pretty hardcore...
Click to read more »published by independent sources. That is what, for Wiki purposes, defines notabity (not your, or my, subjective view -- though many of those who comment on...
Click to read more »film about one of the greatest jazz musicians. The biggest problem is not notabity, but rather that the draft is full of unreferenced original research. Cullen328...
Click to read more »the key issue of this thread. Does the absence of a Wiki bio trump WP:NOTABITY? I say no. In my opinion WP:SAL, Manual of Style guideline, does not take...
Click to read more »purpose (the fact that they are from two different writers further supports notab.). Thanks very much! --Pollymod (talk) 01:34, 7 January 2010 (UTC) Nice...
Click to read more »has commented on it then it has no significance. Sorry for saying "no notabity" instead. TFD (talk) 03:09, 12 December 2012 (UTC) I agree. It's a typical...
Click to read more »published by independent sources. That is what, for Wiki purposes, defines notabity (not your, or my, subjective view -- though many of those who comment on...
Click to read more »so it might as well go there directly.DGG 20:43, 24 April 2007 (UTC) is notabity still in question? Regarding notability, this WSJ article and some referenced...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) nonnotablle "technology company" I placed notab lity tg in september. Today I dooir ito ikts talk page and I see for several...
Click to read more »be corrected. It may even be that not every past president of BD meets notabity requirements (ref WP:NOTINHERITED and the table at the article), though...
Click to read more »delete stuff based on personal views. Anyway this has [{WP:RS]], meets WP:Notab;le I will accept whatever decision consensus reaches like last time. Anyway...
Click to read more »separately, which is REALLY weird. In portrait mode it appears on three lines: Notab … Nonmetallic … article ilty of … compounds and … dispute … elements … d...
Click to read more »25 December 2024 (UTC) Hi, my draft page Ardi Pulaj was deleted due to notabity almost an hour ago..while he is notable enough in Albania.. 81.26.207.141...
Click to read more »