Redirect to:
This page is a redirect. The following categories are used to track and monitor this redirect:
|
individuals will use one of the following boilerplates: Shortcut WP:NONCOMWP:NONCOM There are many different kinds of non-commercial licenses, but generally...
Click to read more »which one of the tags in this section applies. They will be deleted. {{Db-noncom}} — Images under a non-commercial use license. {{subst:nld}} — for an image...
Click to read more »PD-BritishGov licence" FASTILY 02:35, 12 October 2019 (UTC) Delete all per WP:NONCOM. AlbanGeller (talk) 07:20, 12 October 2019 (UTC) The above discussion is...
Click to read more »{{Db-moved}} {{Db-multiple}} {{Db-negublp}} {{Db-nocontent}} {{Db-nocontext}} {{Db-noncom}} {{Db-nonsense}} {{Db-notwebhost}} {{Db-nouser}} {{Db-person}} {{Db-redircom}}...
Click to read more »self-acknowledged copyvio. This would be the article equivalent to {{db-noncom}}. So tagged. MER-C 08:23, 5 December 2006 (UTC) The above discussion is...
Click to read more »website are for research and educational use only," which runs up against WP:NONCOM. I'll tag it at Commons. It's a great image, though--actually it was featured...
Click to read more »" An educational-only license is not free enough for Wikipedia; see WP:NONCOM for example. —Bkell (talk) 20:20, 16 September 2012 (UTC) The above discussion...
Click to read more »(UTC) This image is ineligible. SOHO images are copyrighted and are {{db-noncom}} material! This is noted on the bottom of {{PD-USGov-NASA}}. Can someone...
Click to read more »taken a wide berth on some of those (especially entrepreneur as failing WP:NONCOM), and I think the academic papers are WP:PRIMARY, but I'd have to read them...
Click to read more »declined or noncom; that takes two edits (one to rm, then one to add) because a full-page edit shows a template only, and not a section, for both noncom and declined...
Click to read more »redirected by Carnildo to {{permission}} and then was redirected to {{db-noncom}} by me since they were all uploaded after 2005-05-19. If this is the incorrect...
Click to read more »Generic license. "NonCommercial" is not free enough for Wikipedia; see WP:NONCOM. —Bkell (talk) 03:39, 18 March 2013 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »use." A non-profit-only license is not free enough for Wikipedia; see WP:NONCOM. —Bkell (talk) 02:20, 29 September 2012 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »Unported License. "NonCommercial" is not free enough for Wikipedia; see WP:NONCOM. So this image can be used only in accordance with the Wikipedia non-free...
Click to read more »ineligible. JAXA images are for non-commercial use only. Tagged as {{db-noncom}}. MER-C 09:24, 6 August 2007 (UTC) The JAXA copyright notice holds for...
Click to read more »CSDWarnBot/intro CSDWarnBot/nn-warn CSDWarnBot/noimage-warn CSDWarnBot/noncom-warn CSDWarnBot/nonsense-warn CSDWarnBot/norat-warn CSDWarnBot/pagemove-warn...
Click to read more »2/noimage-warn Template:db-noncom: User:Android Mouse Bot 2/noncom-warn Template:db-ccnoncom: User:Android Mouse Bot 2/noncom-warn Template:db-unksource:...
Click to read more »be deleted, and Template:Cc-by-nd-nc be made a redirect to Template:Db-noncom. User:dbenbenn 00:44, 8 April 2006 (UTC) Image:Pm_sq_tupper.jpg -- uploader...
Click to read more »Unported License. "NonCommercial" is not free enough for Wikipedia; see WP:NONCOM. However, this image may be able to be used on Wikipedia if it satisfies...
Click to read more »(UTC) Delete. Non-commercial licenses are not free enough for Wikipedia: WP:NONCOM. —Bkell (talk) 09:31, 13 March 2013 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »let it be used for noncommercially. Even if this account were true, the noncom restriction would bar us from treating it as free content. ×Meegs 13:10...
Click to read more »which one of the tags in this section applies. They will be deleted. {{Db-noncom}} — Images under a non-commercial use license. {{subst:nld}} — for an image...
Click to read more »being "free for non-commercial use" can automatically qualify it for {{db-noncom}} status. howcheng {chat} 20:43, 22 June 2007 (UTC) Image:Saint Mort.jpg...
Click to read more »Template:Db-nocontext-notice Template:Db-noimage-notice Template:Db-noncom-notice Template:Db-nonsense-notice Template:Db-notability-notice Template:Db-person-notice...
Click to read more »permissible? Sb101FV (talk) 06:06, 19 November 2020 (UTC) @Sb101FV: See WP:NONCOM. Wikiacc (¶) 02:06, 20 November 2020 (UTC) Procedural note: Two of the nominated...
Click to read more »Generic license. "NonCommercial" is not free enough for Wikipedia; see WP:NONCOM. —Bkell (talk) 06:33, 19 March 2013 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »this way could be taken to say he was a commissioned officer rather than a noncom (he was a corporal, a junior rank in the grander scheme of things, but the...
Click to read more »jpg: non-commercial restrictions are considered non-free per WP:NONCOM. Nikkimaria (talk) 03:42, 8 January 2023 (UTC) Bleh. I had forgotted that...
Click to read more »Documentation License may be deleted under this criterion. {{Db-f3}}, {{Db-noncom}} Category:Candidates for speedy deletion as files with unacceptable licenses (0)...
Click to read more »which one of the tags in this section applies. They will be deleted. {{Db-noncom}} — Images under a non-commercial use license. {{subst:nld}} — for an image...
Click to read more »history · transclusions · logs · subpages) License template that violates WP:NONCOM. Kelly hi! 15:21, 28 August 2011 (UTC) Speedy delete per T2: Unambiguous...
Click to read more »February 2019 (UTC) Template:Fdw-noncom-deleted (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages) Superseded by Template:db-noncom-notice [Username Needed] 14:37...
Click to read more »June 2011 (UTC) "Noncommercial" is not free enough for Wikipedia. See WP:NONCOM. —Bkell (talk) 15:03, 24 June 2011 (UTC) Unfortunately, this is clearly...
Click to read more »{{duplicate}} F2 {{db-f2}} {{db-fpcfail}} {{db-imagepage}} F3 {{db-f3}} {{db-noncom}} F4 {{db-f4}} {{di-no source}} {{di-no license}} {{di-no source no license}}...
Click to read more »Keep, uploader has now added a PD-release tag, so we can freely remove the noncom statement. Nyttend backup (talk) 01:46, 16 October 2011 (UTC) The above...
Click to read more »Unported license. "Non-Commercial" is not free enough for Wikipedia; see WP:NONCOM. —Bkell (talk) 17:05, 22 September 2012 (UTC) Delete Apart from the non-commercial...
Click to read more »deletions these days have probably noticed a lot of pages tagged with {{db-noncom}} and {{Permission from license selector}}. I just wanted to say, in case...
Click to read more »restricted to non-commercial use only are not free enough for Wikipedia; see WP:NONCOM. —Bkell (talk) 20:13, 2 September 2012 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »FMs with ERPs of 4, 5 and 27 watts: two are commercial and one is a tiny noncom that serves a mining village. But the point is that the categorization coincides...
Click to read more »"noncommercial" part of that license is not free enough for Wikipedia; see WP:NONCOM. It might be the case that this logo is simple enough to fall into the public...
Click to read more »tossed him a note, let's see if he understands this. Should we tag with {{db-noncom}} now or later? hbdragon88 08:30, 10 November 2007 (UTC) Seems that you've...
Click to read more »image could be used on the English Wikipedia with a fair use rationale. (WP:NONCOM) This is allowable only if the original artist transferred the copyright...
Click to read more ») 11:33, 4 March 2007 (UTC) Non-commercial use is not allowed, see {{db-noncom}}. Also, this reminds me of a banned user with an obsession about Jake G...
Click to read more »There appear to be several images at CAT:CSD that were uploaded with {{db-noncom}} in licensing; see Image:Babalogo.gif and Image:1981 Datsun 810.PNG. Am...
Click to read more »hate it. :) How often does orphanbot run? Most of the images in CSD are db-noncom; is there a way to get orphanbot to run faster or more often? Of course...
Click to read more »February 2007 (UTC) Delete, create redirect (without history) to Template:Db-noncom, and delete Category:Copyrighted images from the French Navy too. --Iamunknown...
Click to read more »(UTC) Strong Keep SamFisher5 04:04, 20 June 2006 (UTC) Redirect to {{Db-noncom}} to really drive home the point that such images are not welcome here....
Click to read more »capital offense." Since the last person you were talking was the senior noncom, this sounds like it was him that was arrested. I think, however, that you...
Click to read more »{{db-imagepage}} CSD F2 Image page without a corresponding image. {{db-f3}} {{db-noncom}} CSD F3 "No commercial use" or "by permission" files uploaded after target...
Click to read more »history | links | watch | logs) Image copyright tag including a speedy (db-noncom). Also includes a specific author's name on the copyright, is not used currently...
Click to read more »insufficient. Nominator: Please consider placing the template: {{subst:Db-noncom-notice|Wikipedia:Template index/File namespace|header=1}} ~~~~ on the talk...
Click to read more »"© 2008, Province of Negros Occidental". Same image was uploaded as for noncom only. J Milburn (talk) 09:52, 16 July 2009 (UTC) The above discussion is...
Click to read more »educational uses only, then it is not free enough for Wikipedia; see WP:NONCOM for example. —Bkell (talk) 14:52, 17 September 2012 (UTC) It is not clear...
Click to read more »insufficient. Nominator: Please consider placing the template: {{subst:Db-noncom-notice|Wikipedia:Template index/Speedy deletion|header=1}} ~~~~ on the talk...
Click to read more »21:56, 25 August 2010 (UTC) Looks like standard template messages, {{Idw-noncom}} to warn you about a pending deletion of an image you uploaded as the image...
Click to read more »the template is deleted, this name should probably be redirected to {{db-noncom}}. --B 19:37, 24 July 2007 (UTC) No, it definitely should not, because "copyrighted"...
Click to read more »license selector, wich put the image straight on speedy deletion using {{db-noncom}} rather than having it sit around for a false licence tag for months on...
Click to read more »ineligible. JAXA images are for non-commercial use only. Tagged as {{db-noncom}}. MER-C 09:24, 6 August 2007 (UTC) The JAXA copyright notice holds for...
Click to read more »sense to value free content above all, but it further makes sense to value noncom/wikipedia-only licensed content above fair use content. I'm not going to...
Click to read more »Template:Sign2 Template:Userpage warning Template:Add-desc-T Template:Fdw-noncom-deleted Template:No personal comments Template:No-nonfree Template:Fdw-noncom2...
Click to read more »website are for research and educational use only," which runs up against WP:NONCOM. I'll tag it at Commons. It's a great image, though--actually it was featured...
Click to read more »October 2009 (UTC) All this doesn't make the image Public Domain; also see WP:NONCOM. What they are allowing is use under the guise of fair use; you are welcome...
Click to read more »entirely by NASA personnel so is PD. They did upload incorrectly before (noncom). They would also like to remain anonymous, and the image is not published...
Click to read more »category - This image category's template {{Cc-by-nc}} now redirects to {{db-noncom}}. Keeping the category around is just encouraging someone to use it WP:BEANS...
Click to read more »tidy & rename {{Idw-cp}} tidy & rename {{Idw-multi}} tidy & rename {{Idw-noncom}} tidy & rename {{Idw-pui}} tidy & rename {{Idw-sd}} tidy & rename {{Idw-uo}}...
Click to read more »images. Speedy delete the Treasure Logger ones as "by permission" only ({{db-noncom}}. I have tagged them as appropriate. BigDT 18:58, 9 August 2006 (UTC) Image:RudyTHouCoach...
Click to read more »" but non-commercial licenses are not free enough for Wikipedia; see WP:NONCOM. Furthermore, even if this photograph is in the public domain in Canada...
Click to read more »taken a wide berth on some of those (especially entrepreneur as failing WP:NONCOM), and I think the academic papers are WP:PRIMARY, but I'd have to read them...
Click to read more »2007 (UTC) All the image should be gone soon, as I tagged them with {{db-noncom}} (they were uploaded after the cut-off date). That said, most of the images...
Click to read more »with a deletion template as unsuitably licensed and related, such as: {{db-noncom}}, {{nsd}}, {{nld}}, {{nsdnld}}, {{{orfud}}, {{{Non-free logo}}, {{{rfu}}...
Click to read more »2006 (UTC) Keep I get 47 Ghits on him and that seems like a ton for a WWII noncom --Deville (Talk) 00:12, 29 April 2006 (UTC) Only four of them refer to him...
Click to read more »Who knows why? Gamingforfun365 (talk) 00:49, 13 July 2016 (UTC) @KSFT: WP:NONCOM. That's why. Generally, a file shouldn't use a non-commercial license unless...
Click to read more »visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 01:49, 25 February 2012 (UTC) invalid license at flickr - noncom The Evil Spartan (talk) 00:23, 19 May 2008 (UTC) According to the image...
Click to read more »purposes, which is incompatible with our free licensing requirements (see WP:NONCOM). BigNate37(T) 07:17, 1 August 2012 (UTC) Lame. I'll just remove it then...
Click to read more »on the three file pages. They were all nominated for deletion with {{db-noncom}} (preview it on any file page to see what it displays there). PrimeHunter...
Click to read more »it really is that black and white. Attempts to introduce middle-ground (noncom, for Wikipedia use, "logos" etc) have been strongly resisted. This image...
Click to read more »because I am marking most of the images in Category:FOTW images with {{Db-noncom}}, and I have run across a few that have the proper fair use tags, so I...
Click to read more »specified this info. Thanks, Curran (talk) Note to others: There is a {{db-noncom}} tag in there but I removed it to stop the tagging of the Help Desk for...
Click to read more »([1]) or see WP:CSD. --ais523 08:55, 9 February 2007 (UTC) Redirect to {{db-noncom}}{{permission}}; if the images have invalid copyright terms, they should...
Click to read more »Serendipodous 23:18, 22 June 2006 (UTC) That would be {{Db-unfree}} {{Db-noncom}}. Jkelly 23:30, 22 June 2006 (UTC) I'm somewhat flummoxed; I thought Wikipedia...
Click to read more »3, without allowing for later versions, may be deleted. {{db-f3}}, {{db-noncom}} F3 states clearly for Wikipedia only images will be deleted on sight....
Click to read more »Catholic equivalent of a "commissioned officer"; priests are basically the "noncoms and privates" of the Catholic hierarchy, and prelates are the officers...
Click to read more »extremely complex for such an easy task. The images should be tagged with {{db-noncom}} so that they can be deleted. Wikipedia allows others to reuse and reproduce...
Click to read more »Image:Cleovictoria.JPG under a different license, it can be deleted using the tag {{db-noncom}}. BigDT 00:23, 24 July 2006 (UTC) how do I tag this image 201b_03b.jpg...
Click to read more »self-acknowledged copyvio. This would be the article equivalent to {{db-noncom}}. So tagged. MER-C 08:23, 5 December 2006 (UTC) The above discussion is...
Click to read more »material with a no commercial use restriction as non-free content. See WP:NONCOM for details. Monty845 02:46, 16 July 2012 (UTC) I added the NC disclaimer...
Click to read more »you. 3. Place a speedy-deletion tag on the image - I recommend the {Db-noncom} tag. I guess that means I need to beg an admin to delete it for me. Pretty...
Click to read more »Soundvisions1 (talk) 18:39, 14 February 2011 (UTC) Thanks, Sound: I just saw WP:NONCOM. As I said, I know very little about this area, and I don't mean to muddy...
Click to read more »2006 (UTC) Keep I get 47 Ghits on him and that seems like a ton for a WWII noncom --Deville (Talk) 00:12, 29 April 2006 (UTC) Only four of them refer to him...
Click to read more »jpg: non-commercial restrictions are considered non-free per WP:NONCOM. Nikkimaria (talk) 03:42, 8 January 2023 (UTC) Bleh. I had forgotted that...
Click to read more »Author07 16:20, 2 July 2007 (UTC) The correct copyright tag would be {{db-noncom}}. Sadly, your image will be deleted soon because Wikipedia does not accept...
Click to read more »(<nowiki>update cat</nowiki>), (<nowiki>add cat</nowiki>), (<nowiki>rm noncom, new licence given</nowiki>), (<nowiki>Logo of the North Queensland Broomball...
Click to read more »may be copyright infringement... " So why not put similar boilerplate on noncom-licensed stuff and be done with it? Stubbornness? Inertia? Sacred Walesian...
Click to read more »capital offense." Since the last person you were talking was the senior noncom, this sounds like it was him that was arrested. I think, however, that you...
Click to read more »that it was incorrectly tagged from the beginning. The uploader used {{db-noncom}}, which would indicate that if we could use it at all it would only be...
Click to read more »this way could be taken to say he was a commissioned officer rather than a noncom (he was a corporal, a junior rank in the grander scheme of things, but the...
Click to read more »(talk) 10:46, 26 December 2024 (UTC) File upload request declined. Per WP:NONCOM, non-commercial licenses are prohibited. NotAGenious (talk) 12:07, 26 December...
Click to read more »Since it is not used it must be deleted ("One-article minimum"). ::::{{Db-noncom}} should be inserted somewhere First 4 lines (Edit) are {{non-free reduce}}...
Click to read more »