This page is a redirect. The following categories are used to track and monitor this redirect:
|
it, though exceptions may apply. Substantive edits to this page should reflect consensus. Shortcuts WP:LLMWP:LLM WP:NEWLLMWP:NEWLLM WP:NOLLMWP:NOLLM...
Click to read more »confronted with the WP:NOLLM guideline is some variation of the following: Thank you for your concern. However, please understand that WP:NOLLM is a guideline...
Click to read more »Gurkubondinn as a NOLLM violation, then moved back to mainspace by its creator (with an AI generated edit summary). Probable NOLLM violation, dubious...
Click to read more »[[WP:NOLLM]] cleanup, see [[WP:AINB#User:TheRealBasti]]. To reinstate changes, [[WP:LLMPRVOBJ]] should be followed. [[WP:NOLLM]], see...
Click to read more »free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Created in violation of WP:NOLLM. Quoting GnomingStuff: since v1, note WP:AISIGNS e.g. undue emphasis on...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) LLM Generated. WP:NOLLM applies, as does WP:DRAFTOBJECT since this is a disputed draftification...
Click to read more »11:45, 2 August 2026 (UTC) Delete as failing NCORP, and also failing WP:NOLLM. This is basically a lightly-paraphrased copy of the incontrovertibly LLM-generated...
Click to read more »as AI generated, then moved back to mainspace by its creator. Probable NOLLM vio, dubious notability. Athanelar (talk) 05:10, 9 July 2026 (UTC) Note:...
Click to read more »the prose in this article. Rather than unilaterally draftify this as a NOLLM violation, I thought given the evident effort in its creation it would be...
Click to read more »Relevant report and discussion are viewable on the talk page. [[WP:NOLLM]] cleanup, see [[WP:AINB#User:MaduraiSelvam]] Each individual row below tracks...
Click to read more »free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Created in violation of WP:NOLLM. Quoting GnomingStuff: since v1, note WP:AISIGNS e.g. undue emphasis on...
Click to read more »11:45, 2 August 2026 (UTC) Delete as failing NCORP, and also failing WP:NOLLM. This is basically a lightly-paraphrased copy of the incontrovertibly LLM-generated...
Click to read more »FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This is almost certainly LLM-generated, and fails WP:NOLLM. Most of the references are either WP:NEWSORGINDIA or just links to the...
Click to read more »Basketball, and Algeria. JTtheOG (talk) 20:29, 29 April 2026 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOLLM. ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 21:02, 29 April 2026 (UTC) Delete per nom. Obvious...
Click to read more »information that is not in them, the most likely explanation for which is WP:NOLLM violation. For example, neither of the first two refs is meaningfully about...
Click to read more »03:53, 17 July 2026 (UTC) Delete, fails NOLLM. ‑‑gurkubondinn 07:38, 17 July 2026 (UTC) Delete per nom, nollm. Accesscrawl (talk) 12:35, 17 July 2026...
Click to read more »in solidarity, Chloe (talk) 22:28, 2 July 2026 (UTC) Delete as failing NOLLM. This seems to be an LLM translation of an LLM-generated text: Diff/1342571834...
Click to read more »AfD discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:03, 3 August 2026 (UTC) Delete, fails NOLLM. The user is almost certainly not being honest about their llm use, see...
Click to read more »otherwise) as failing NOLLM, Reywas92's analysis is sound and I agree with it. ‑‑gurkubondinn 22:04, 1 August 2026 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOLLM. sources do not...
Click to read more »11:45, 2 August 2026 (UTC) Delete as failing NCORP, and also failing WP:NOLLM. This is basically a lightly-paraphrased copy of the incontrovertibly LLM-generated...
Click to read more »GrinningIodize (talk) 20:33, 20 April 2026 (UTC) Delete: Apparent violation of WP:NOLLM; strong indications of AI writing ~Darth StabroTalk • Contribs 20:36, 20...
Click to read more »AfD discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:03, 3 August 2026 (UTC) Delete, fails NOLLM. The user is almost certainly not being honest about their llm use, see...
Click to read more »01:41, 14 July 2026 (UTC) Delete per the nom, and as likely failing WP:NOLLM. Some of the more glaring AISIGNS are WP:AIATTR, WP:AIREDCAT, WP:AILEGACY...
Click to read more »20:08, 2 June 2026 (UTC) Speedy delete with no reservations, for failing NOLLM. No quarters for robot text, put it in the bin and keep it there. No comment...
Click to read more »the subject, only that the article itself is LLM generated and fails the NOLLM guideline. The Rod Chapman generation was clearly copied from a chatbot:...
Click to read more »April 2026 (UTC) +1 Harryb7 (talk) 19:11, 19 April 2026 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOLLM. ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 19:49, 19 April 2026 (UTC) Draft It's possible...
Click to read more »Alexis Jazz (talk or ping me) 18:12, 12 June 2026 (UTC) Delete, also fails NOLLM and NBIO. ‑‑gurkubondinn 21:27, 12 June 2026 (UTC) Delete per reasons above...
Click to read more »Blue-Sonnet (I'm listening) 13:51, 10 July 2026 (UTC) Delete as failing WP:NOLLM, WP:NBIO and GNG. Blue Sonnet has basically said everything I wanted to...
Click to read more »(talk) 01:16, 21 July 2026 (UTC) Delete per nom. It is a violation of WP:NOLLM. Phrases like "The Finnish public broadcaster Yle described the round as"...
Click to read more »"eyeballing"). --gurkubondinn 10:55, 28 May 2026 (UTC) Delete as failing NOLLM. The user has gone right back to submitting more AI-generated material and...
Click to read more »Shellwood (talk) 18:38, 25 June 2026 (UTC) Delete as not meeting the WP:NOLLM guideline. The article was created by an editor that currently lacks the...
Click to read more »Delete per NOLLM. Not sure if this would have survived even without the use of an LLM. Accesscrawl (talk) 14:37, 22 July 2026 (UTC) Delete per NOLLM. RossEvans19...
Click to read more »7 May 2026 (UTC) Delete: High suspicion that this article violates WP:NOLLM. I personally couldn't find any evidence that this article meets WP:N.「NuggFrog」...
Click to read more »your chatbot may have interpreted this, the nomination is for failing WP:NOLLM and has nothing to do with notability or lack thereof. Also, please only...
Click to read more »just make sure you follow the relevant policies, WP:NOLLM and WP:CLOP. Those are really important. NOLLM says that you have to be very careful with ChatGPT;...
Click to read more »still violate WP:NOLLM, a la WP:YESPROMO WP:Yes, you have to follow NOLLM – being a "guideline" and not a "policy" does not make WP:NOLLM optional Humorous...
Click to read more »discussions. The latter summary seems to predate English Wikipedia's WP:NOLLM policy, instituted in March 2026, which now outright prohibits some kinds...
Click to read more »‑‑gurkubondinn 14:57, 28 July 2026 (UTC) Redirect, the current article fails WP:NOLLM. ‑‑gurkubondinn 14:57, 28 July 2026 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »in mainspace. Paprikaiser (talk) 19:45, 25 June 2026 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOLLM -- this user has pumped out several of these articles, sometimes minutes...
Click to read more »10:42, 2 May 2026 (UTC) Delete per a sound nomination rationale. Per WP:NOLLM, translated content that did not follow the LLM-assisted translation policy...
Click to read more »FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Looks like it's AI-generated and thus in breach of WP:NOLLM. The main reason for this is the nonsensical citations - e.g. ref 3 is supposed...
Click to read more »Wikipedia's policies. Rajugiri23 (talk) 13:10, 22 July 2026 (UTC) Delete as WP:NOLLM violation. In Special:Permalink/1363161728, I see the following signs of...
Click to read more »(talk) 00:19, 9 May 2026 (UTC) Delete (or draftify) – Appears to violate WP:NOLLM. Difficult to give the benefit of the doubt here. Cheers, Suriname0 (talk)...
Click to read more »deletion) on a topic with no apparent notability, thus failing WP:GNG and WP:NOLLM. The article itself is full of social activism jargon and the sources are...
Click to read more »11:45, 2 August 2026 (UTC) Delete as failing NCORP, and also failing WP:NOLLM. This is basically a lightly-paraphrased copy of the incontrovertibly LLM-generated...
Click to read more »- it wasn't released as a single and didn't chart. I'm also getting WP:NOLLM vibes from the writing, which seems to do its damnedest to emphasize the...
Click to read more »11:45, 2 August 2026 (UTC) Delete as failing NCORP, and also failing WP:NOLLM. This is basically a lightly-paraphrased copy of the incontrovertibly LLM-generated...
Click to read more »article or at least wikilinks are done with the help of AI, which violates WP:NOLLM." ~2026-26910-86 (talk) 22:31, 3 May 2026 (UTC) Here2rewrite (talk) 22:35...
Click to read more »Humbug! 06:18, 11 July 2026 (UTC) Delete Likely AI-generated list (fails WP:NOLLM) that is sourced entirely to non-independent sources (the schools themselves)...
Click to read more »modification. ロドリゲス恭子 (talk) 00:47, 9 August 2026 (UTC) Delete as failing NOLLM after the expansion in Diff/1293050933 (the user's talk page is rather colourful)...
Click to read more »modification. ロドリゲス恭子 (talk) 00:47, 9 August 2026 (UTC) Delete as failing NOLLM after the expansion in Diff/1293050933 (the user's talk page is rather colourful)...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This is AI-generated and fails WP:NOLLM, see for example WP:AIBOLD and WP:MARKDOWN in previous revisions (and in...
Click to read more »LLM. M kuhner (talk) 12:44, 24 July 2026 (UTC) Delete pure puffery, per NOLLM. Accesscrawl (talk) 18:52, 25 July 2026 (UTC) Delete It may become notable...
Click to read more »2026 (UTC) Delete per nom. In addition this looks AI-generated (see WP:NOLLM) and lots of sources are spam link to sites selling crypto stuff. Lijil...
Click to read more »AI-generated articles. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 22:48, 19 June 2026 (UTC) Delete as failing NOLLM. The user also created Draft:Battle of Şcheia (1486) in article space, which...
Click to read more »discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 17:09, 13 May 2026 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOLLM; see my response to cyclopia above. —Em-as-in-emily (talk) 18:50, 13 May...
Click to read more »policies and guidelines, including those specific to AI use such as WP:NOLLM. An approved request for bot approval is required by policy for (almost)...
Click to read more »nom and WP:NEWLLM. मल्ल (talk) 16:46, 15 July 2026 (UTC) Delete, fails NOLLM and per nom. ‑‑gurkubondinn 22:16, 19 July 2026 (UTC) The above discussion...
Click to read more »AI-generated, as well as the comments above. In the spirits of WP:AITALK and WP:NOLLM, I have collapsed those comments, and kindly request that you express your...
Click to read more »guideline. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 20:51, 21 June 2026 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOLLM (article is less than a week old) and obvious AI tells. And yes, the sources...
Click to read more »lists, citing sources for information that's not in them, in general a WP:NOLLM violation. ~ A412 talk! 14:11, 4 June 2026 (UTC) Note: this discussion has...
Click to read more »to be added. Nocturnal781 (talk) 00:16, 13 May 2026 (UTC) Delete as WP:NOLLM violation. If nothing else, you'd think that the user who created the article...
Click to read more »(talk) 06:13, 26 June 2026 (UTC) Delete, because this also likely fails WP:NOLLM. The user has been inserting text wrapped in markdown codeblocks in DIff/1361215034...
Click to read more »notability. 🄻🄰 15:41, 15 May 2026 (UTC) Delete per oaicites being a clear WP:NOLLM violation. ~ A412 talk! 15:42, 15 May 2026 (UTC) Delete. Even without the...
Click to read more »Speedy delete per WP:G15 (LLM-generated pages without human review) and WP:NOLLM. ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 18:41, 22 April 2026 (UTC) Delete per nom. Bearian...
Click to read more »middle-school class report than a Wikipedia article. Should be deleted per WP:NOLLM. I will admit there is potential for an article on this topic, but this...
Click to read more »keep the stubification. The subject is notable, but it needs to pass the NOLLM guideline. ‑‑gurkubondinn 21:58, 27 July 2026 (UTC) Redirect to National...
Click to read more »of every source and claim, and thus should be deleted per WP:TNT and WP:NOLLM, with no prejudice against a human-written article on this topic in the...
Click to read more »Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 12:44, 26 April 2026 (UTC) Delete WP:ESSAY and WP:NOLLM all in one. Dr vulpes (Talk) 01:35, 27 April 2026 (UTC) Comment Another...
Click to read more »autoconfirmed. Draft created also appears to be wholly LLM generated - NOLLM was a flag issue with articles created by this sockmaster. Netstars22 (talk...
Click to read more »given the apparent COI. If so, I think this deletion would fall under WP:NOLLM. The only way this would not be LLM output is if the author of the article...
Click to read more »the prose in this article. Rather than unilaterally draftify this as a NOLLM violation, I thought given the evident effort in its creation it would be...
Click to read more »discussions. ‑‑gurkubondinn 16:25, 2 July 2026 (UTC) Delete for failing WP:NOLLM. Or speedily delete under WP:G15, the Nasnews source does not exist, and...
Click to read more »this one. PA Uploader (talk) 12:35, 29 July 2026 (UTC) Delete - for WP:NOLLM, WP:NPOL and not meeting WP:GNG. ChrysGalley (talk) 09:37, 30 July 2026...
Click to read more »packets, but others don't. The title case is also a dead giveaway. Fails WP:NOLLM. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 23:23, 20 June 2026 (UTC) Delete Could probably have...
Click to read more »output of an LLM, the Legacy section particularly so. As such, violates WP:NOLLM. I suggest deletion, then redirect to Golden_generation#Netherlands_(1972–1978...
Click to read more »discussions. MrOllie (talk) 21:43, 19 May 2026 (UTC) Delete: as per WP:NOLLM. Even if it were notable, it would be best to apply WP:TNT. JTtheOG (talk)...
Click to read more »Accesscrawl (talk) 20:38, 1 August 2026 (UTC) Delete per the nom and for failing NOLLM. Sentences like international coverage of India's AI sector highlighted...
Click to read more »--Griboski (talk) 19:02, 6 June 2026 (UTC) Speedily delete for failing WP:NOLLM and WP:V. Created with WP:AILIST, WP:MARKDOWN, em-dashes, and invalid Template:Featured...
Click to read more »done. Jumpytoo Talk 02:28, 17 May 2026 (UTC) Delete because it fails WP:NOLLM and WP:LLMT. You must read all of the sources that you cite, full stop....
Click to read more »likely. Commandant Quacks-a-lot (talk) 22:39, 20 July 2026 (UTC) Delete per NOLLM, I'm not sure about salting yet. Accesscrawl (talk) 14:30, 22 July 2026...
Click to read more »notable. PaulT2022 (talk) 03:31, 13 June 2026 (UTC) Delete as failing WP:NOLLM, and per what Asukite said. ‑‑gurkubondinn 09:23, 16 June 2026 (UTC) Delete...
Click to read more »AfD discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 20:25, 30 April 2026 (UTC) Delete, fails NOLLM. --Gurkubondinn 01:57, 1 May 2026 (UTC) Delete yet another belated vindication...
Click to read more »2026 (UTC) Also, please don't use LLMs to write talk page comments. See WP:NOLLM. In solidarity, asilvering (talk) 16:28, 5 August 2026 (UTC) Please stop...
Click to read more »AfD discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:03, 3 August 2026 (UTC) Delete, fails NOLLM. The user is almost certainly not being honest about their llm use, see...
Click to read more »ways the original sources did not. For these reasons, as outlined in WP:NOLLM, using large language models to generate or rewrite article content is not...
Click to read more »notability. I opened this AfD purely because the current article itself is a WP:NOLLM violation, not because of the subject of the article. Since it needs a TNT...
Click to read more »free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Potential violation of WP:NOLLM. Author disclosed LLM generation in initial page creation: WP:LLM disclosure:...
Click to read more »28 July 2026 (UTC) Speedy delete under G15, this most likely fails WP:NOLLM. References nr. 2, nr. 3 and nr. 4 in Diff/1366506722 return 404 not found...
Click to read more »effort is made. SenshiSun (talk) 19:13, 30 April 2026 (UTC) Delete, fails NOLLM. Enough said. --Gurkubondinn 01:54, 1 May 2026 (UTC) Delete Creator has...
Click to read more »contribs) 17:18, 28 June 2026 (UTC) Delete as failing NOLLM, oppose merging because that would also fail NOLLM. No comment on notability, but the currently existing...
Click to read more »by an undisclosed paid editor and likely AI-generated in violation of WP:NOLLM. I declined G15 given the current version of the article doesn't contain...
Click to read more »12 July 2026 (UTC) LLM text is not permitted on Wikipedia (see Wikipedia:NOLLM) and has to be removed when found. We could move the article to a draft...
Click to read more »models' tendency to hallucinate, and is therefore largely prohibited by WP:NOLLM. AI cleanup is typically done at the AI noticeboard (AINB), but is carried...
Click to read more »beginning in February of this year. If there is a better example of why WP:NOLLM is needed, I haven't seen it. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 22:19, 18 June 2026 (UTC)...
Click to read more »Diff/1362885210 had not been removed then I would have said that this fails the WP:NOLLM guideline as well. ‑‑gurkubondinn 09:33, 8 July 2026 (UTC) Comment: Kingsherpa...
Click to read more »such as "underscores" and "widely recognized". So basically delete per WP:NOLLM. --not-cheesewhisk3rs ≽^•⩊•^≼ ∫ (pester) 08:15, 29 May 2026 (UTC) Note:...
Click to read more »Thanks, Spartaz Humbug! 08:10, 30 June 2026 (UTC) Delete as failing WP:NOLLM. No comment on notability of the subject. ‑‑gurkubondinn 08:37, 30 June...
Click to read more »Geschichte (talk) 21:34, 5 July 2026 (UTC) Delete as failing WP:NOLLM, being CV-cruft, GNG, ANYBIO, and all of the above. ‑‑gurkubondinn 12:29...
Click to read more »but the main page (www.newsday.co.zw) appears to load fine. This fails WP:NOLLM should be deleted. --gurkubondinn 09:20, 2 June 2026 (UTC) Note: this discussion...
Click to read more »Intellectuals, did not [18]. Fuzheado responded to the AINB case with: the new NOLLM page is a guideline and not firm policy. As such, we should have latitude...
Click to read more »modification. ロドリゲス恭子 (talk) 00:47, 9 August 2026 (UTC) Delete as failing NOLLM after the expansion in Diff/1293050933 (the user's talk page is rather colourful)...
Click to read more »discussions. --gurkubondinn 17:19, 29 May 2026 (UTC) Delete as failing WP:NOLLM, which is easily observed in the contribution history and talk page of the...
Click to read more »others. Phil Bridger (talk) 20:17, 12 June 2026 (UTC) Delete for failing NOLLM, being created unreasonably fast. Nobody writes with such a different level...
Click to read more »clearly disclosed as failing NOLLM, that would be a different thing. But it wasn't, and not all of them are disclosed to be NOLLM failures. The ones that have...
Click to read more »the prose in this article. Rather than unilaterally draftify this as a NOLLM violation, I thought given the evident effort in its creation it would be...
Click to read more »otherwise limited to text which otherwise broke policy/guidelines. The NOLLM guideline was explicitly extended to cover all AI generated text in the...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) LLM-generated in violation of WP:NOLLM, according to the author’s disclosure on the talk page. The author is experienced...
Click to read more »Balabush (talk) 05:40, 26 June 2026 (UTC) Delete as a clearly failing WP:NOLLM, making this a complete nonstarter before even considering notability, which...
Click to read more »recent edits to this article are LLM, please revert or rewrite them, see WP:NOLLM. M kuhner (talk) 19:13, 1 August 2026 (UTC) Hi there, the words were my...
Click to read more »11:45, 2 August 2026 (UTC) Delete as failing NCORP, and also failing WP:NOLLM. This is basically a lightly-paraphrased copy of the incontrovertibly LLM-generated...
Click to read more »least this article should be stubified. But I would prefer delete as per WP:NOLLM. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 11:14, 7 July 2026 (UTC) Note: this discussion has...
Click to read more »subcultures), but the current article is LLM-generated which violates WP:NOLLM. Furthermore, a few of the listed aesthetics here appear to be hallucinated...
Click to read more »‑‑gurkubondinn 18:39, 28 July 2026 (UTC) Delete, this also seems to fail NOLLM in addition to what the nom said. One of the references in the initial revision...
Click to read more »the prose in this article. Rather than unilaterally draftify this as a NOLLM violation, I thought given the evident effort in its creation it would be...
Click to read more »generate or rewrite article content is prohibited for most purposes. See WP:NOLLM for more information. Please do not remove the maintenance template until...
Click to read more »11:45, 2 August 2026 (UTC) Delete as failing NCORP, and also failing WP:NOLLM. This is basically a lightly-paraphrased copy of the incontrovertibly LLM-generated...
Click to read more »Dreamyshade (talk) 04:29, 8 July 2026 (UTC) we have WP:LLMRESP which I added to NOLLM with this in mind, I think expanding that essay to serve as that would be...
Click to read more »recent edits to this article are LLM, please revert or rewrite them, see WP:NOLLM. M kuhner (talk) 19:13, 1 August 2026 (UTC) Hi there, the words were my...
Click to read more »couple of sentences, but to rewrite the whole thing from scratch, because WP:NOLLM prohibits you from writing such a draft in the first place. It still looks...
Click to read more »free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Created in violation of WP:NOLLM. Quoting GnomingStuff: since v1, note WP:AISIGNS e.g. undue emphasis on...
Click to read more »free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Created in violation of WP:NOLLM. Quoting GnomingStuff: since v1, note WP:AISIGNS e.g. undue emphasis on...
Click to read more »Editor has acknowledged AI/LLM use, committed to stop, and will follow WP:NOLLM. Cleanup may still be needed. See Diff/1358512204. AlferedNobel (talk ·...
Click to read more »AfD discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:03, 3 August 2026 (UTC) Delete, fails NOLLM. The user is almost certainly not being honest about their llm use, see...
Click to read more »recent edits to this article are LLM, please revert or rewrite them, see WP:NOLLM. M kuhner (talk) 19:13, 1 August 2026 (UTC) Hi there, the words were my...
Click to read more »recent edits to this article are LLM, please revert or rewrite them, see WP:NOLLM. M kuhner (talk) 19:13, 1 August 2026 (UTC) Hi there, the words were my...
Click to read more »anyone may have had. ‑‑gurkubondinn 15:50, 9 July 2026 (UTC) I removed the nollm tag from the article, but with no prejudice toward an uninvolved admin closing...
Click to read more »cohesive if you don't read it too closely. TL;DR: Fails WP:GNG and possibly WP:NOLLM although I can't prove the latter. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 21:45, 2 May 2026...
Click to read more »Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 10:39, 8 July 2026 (UTC) Delete as failing WP:NOLLM, the user seems to admit to as much in recent edit summaries. The page history...
Click to read more »though these are not independent and thus would not establish notability. WP:NOLLM: The articles look AI-generated and the editor who created them has already...
Click to read more »original draft was likely written with AI. This is indeed contrary to WP:NOLLM. Where I lose you is the conclusion that it must therefore be deleted. We...
Click to read more »recent edit was about a week ago. They've been warned twice for AI since WP:NOLLM took effect, and didn't answer either time. So that's why we're here now...
Click to read more »Another AI-generated "X in Y" article (or in this case, "X and Y"). Fails WP:NOLLM and WP:ESSAY, likely containing WP:OR as well. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 22:26...
Click to read more »those articles can be reassessed in light of WP:GNG without concern for WP:NOLLM. -- LWG talk (VOPOV) 22:32, 21 April 2026 (UTC) Thanks so much! Do you know...
Click to read more »an admin, I would limit the use of AI by following the guidelines of WP:NOLLM and not use AI, especially LLMs, for making content-related additions to...
Click to read more »meatpuppetry. @Socratis1357, please don't use AI on Wikipedia in future — see WP:NOLLM and WP:LLMS for more on this. This SPI report appears to have been created...
Click to read more »Speedy delete per WP:G15 (LLM-generated pages without human review) and WP:NOLLM. ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 18:41, 22 April 2026 (UTC) Kindly check the history...
Click to read more »Editor has acknowledged AI/LLM use, committed to stop, and will follow WP:NOLLM. Cleanup may still be needed. Test Article cleanup list 12 open · 23 total...
Click to read more »Dreamyshade (talk) 04:29, 8 July 2026 (UTC) we have WP:LLMRESP which I added to NOLLM with this in mind, I think expanding that essay to serve as that would be...
Click to read more »edits, claimed that WP: NOLLM prohibits unreviewed AI-generated and then incorrectly quoted NOLLM at me: From what I read in WP: NOLLM, "editors must not add...
Click to read more »editor, had been disclosing AI but didn't respond to being made aware of NOLLM. Worth checking it they're still using it, most recent edit is 2 July. Cleanup...
Click to read more »draftspace to mainspace. They are still subject to the restrictions found in WP:NOLLM and are reminded that they are not to use LLMs to create or rewrite articles...
Click to read more »write or edit text for Wikipedia is not allowed, neither in articles WP:NOLLM nor in comments WP:LLMCHAT. You need to stop immediately or you are likely...
Click to read more »make mistakes in your writing, but please forget about using any LLM. WP:NOLLM has more guidance for you. Meadowlark (talk) 03:36, 24 July 2026 (UTC) Yashsurya21 (talk ·...
Click to read more »consequence of how WP:NOLLM has been enacted here. To be clear, I believe this is an institutional problem manifesting through WP:NOLLM, not a problem of...
Click to read more »~ŤheŴubṂachine-840≈ ● ✒️ 00:25, 12 May 2026 (UTC) Delete for failing WP:NOLLM, but not for failing WP:N. I think that the topic itself probably merits...
Click to read more »Wikidata item) (talk) 21:53, 13 July 2026 (UTC) Delete as likely failing NOLLM. In addition to all of the AISIGNS already pointed out by GrinningIodize...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:AI noticeboard/Archive 8#KurdishPAL, on 13 May they were made aware of NOLLM and agreed to not use LLMs. There's 23 articles which could be LLMPRODed...
Click to read more »a LLM policy for 3ish years). But everyone I talk to seems to interpret NOLLM as a total ban regardless of PAGs violations Kowal2701 (talk, contribs)...
Click to read more »this nomination is only about the fact that the article itself fails WP:NOLLM. No prejudice against someone writing a new article about the district....
Click to read more »this user? ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk) 23:22, 16 May 2026 (UTC) WP:AN/I asking for a WP:NOLLM / WP:COMMUNICATE block is probably the next recourse at this point, we've...
Click to read more »free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Created in violation of WP:NOLLM. Quoting GnomingStuff: since v1, note WP:AISIGNS e.g. undue emphasis on...
Click to read more »advice: You cannot use an AI/LLM to generate or rewrite your draft: see WP:NOLLM for more. The first thing you do should be to delete all the parts of your...
Click to read more »Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 21:32, 16 June 2026 (UTC) Delete for failing WP:NOLLM. I don't see anything wrong with someone asking to have an horrendous AI-slopicles...
Click to read more »you are not yet aware, you must not do that in your draft: please see WP:NOLLM for more. Using AI/LLMs to converse with other editors is permitted, but...
Click to read more »(UTC) @BD2412, WP:NOLLM allows copyediting one's own edits with an LLM. It disallows copyediting articles for the reason stated at NOLLM, see Wikipedia:AI...
Click to read more »the task you're attempting is nearly impossible. Further, please see WP:NOLLM. It seems from the comment you left on the draft that you're using AI in...
Click to read more »use LLMs; it's likely to be seen as undercutting your argument. See WP:NOLLM. I don't think it is ever right to print these kinds of numbers without...
Click to read more »Editor has acknowledged AI/LLM use, committed to stop, and will follow WP:NOLLM. Cleanup may still be needed. Thank you for working to understand the rules...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Help, I've been accused of AI! Wikipedia:Yes, you have to follow NOLLM Wikipedia:Yes, that does violate the AI guidelines Some of the search results...
Click to read more »positively; for example instead of banning the usage completely (but WP:NOLLM should stand; it's better if humans write the articles themselves but they...
Click to read more »that according to Gurkubondinn violate WP:NOLLM, while asserting that those uses did not violate WP:NOLLM: Talk:2026 Banana Ball Championship League...
Click to read more »around as a redirect to WP:NOLLM will confuse users NicheSports (talk) 01:26, 16 June 2026 (UTC) Weak Retarget to WP:NOLLM. Yes, there's nothing specific...
Click to read more »which could indicate whether an editor’s submissions may have violated WP:NOLLM and whether further review is needed elsewhere. I personally plan to use...
Click to read more »AfD discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:03, 3 August 2026 (UTC) Delete, fails NOLLM. The user is almost certainly not being honest about their llm use, see...
Click to read more »22:43, 10 July 2026 (UTC) Delete per NOLLM. Accesscrawl (talk) 12:21, 11 July 2026 (UTC) Delete as failing NOLLM. same rationale as when I tagged and...
Click to read more »think some people would object to the Requirements section. Imo the reason NOLLM passed was because it was rooted in LLM-use violating PAGs, some may oppose...
Click to read more »notability. I opened this AfD purely because the current article itself is a WP:NOLLM violation, not because of the subject of the article. Since it needs a TNT...
Click to read more »your draft is forbidden, except for a few very narrow ways - please see WP:NOLLM for more information. Meadowlark (talk) 04:26, 30 July 2026 (UTC) Noted...
Click to read more »packets, but others don't. The title case is also a dead giveaway. Fails WP:NOLLM. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 23:23, 20 June 2026 (UTC) Delete Could probably have...
Click to read more »continue trying to work on this draft, you do not use an AI/LLM. See WP:NOLLM for more information. Meadowlark (talk) 05:12, 29 April 2026 (UTC) Heavywick (talk ·...
Click to read more »it, though exceptions may apply. Substantive edits to this page should reflect consensus. Shortcuts WP:LLMWP:LLM WP:NEWLLMWP:NEWLLM WP:NOLLMWP:NOLLM...
Click to read more »This is an essay on the WP:NOLLM guideline. It contains the advice or opinions of one or more Wikipedia contributors. This page is not an encyclopedia...
Click to read more »this nomination is only about the fact that the article itself fails WP:NOLLM. No prejudice against someone writing a new article about the district....
Click to read more »otherwise) as failing NOLLM, Reywas92's analysis is sound and I agree with it. ‑‑gurkubondinn 22:04, 1 August 2026 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOLLM. sources do not...
Click to read more »artificial "intelligence" software on Wikipedia. linked pages {{User:UBX/NoLLM}} This user opposes the use of large language models. linked pages...
Click to read more »11:45, 2 August 2026 (UTC) Delete as failing NCORP, and also failing WP:NOLLM. This is basically a lightly-paraphrased copy of the incontrovertibly LLM-generated...
Click to read more »userspace essays. Alternatively we add a whole bunch of extra text to WP:NOLLM explaining the same, but I'm not sure if that would be popular given how...
Click to read more »that according to Gurkubondinn violate WP:NOLLM, while asserting that those uses did not violate WP:NOLLM: Talk:2026 Banana Ball Championship League...
Click to read more »July 2026 (UTC) Are you aware of Wikipedia's policy regarding LLM's (WP:NOLLM)? Your replies here as well as on your talk page seem to be generated by...
Click to read more »If your comment has not appeared here, you can try purging the cache. Re NOLLM, I started the discussion and draft but didn’t really make it, I probably...
Click to read more »this way and we put them up for AfD and let the community decide whether NOLLM should apply or whether the articles are of sufficient quality that we should...
Click to read more »(talk) 01:16, 21 July 2026 (UTC) Delete per nom. It is a violation of WP:NOLLM. Phrases like "The Finnish public broadcaster Yle described the round as"...
Click to read more »Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 10:39, 8 July 2026 (UTC) Delete as failing WP:NOLLM, the user seems to admit to as much in recent edit summaries. The page history...
Click to read more »cohesive if you don't read it too closely. TL;DR: Fails WP:GNG and possibly WP:NOLLM although I can't prove the latter. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 21:45, 2 May 2026...
Click to read more »notability. 🄻🄰 15:41, 15 May 2026 (UTC) Delete per oaicites being a clear WP:NOLLM violation. ~ A412 talk! 15:42, 15 May 2026 (UTC) Delete. Even without the...
Click to read more »sources), I believe the article was eligible for G15 and violated the WP:NOLLM guideline. Toadspike [Talk] 23:38, 3 May 2026 (UTC) From my reading of WP:G15...
Click to read more »contribs) 17:18, 28 June 2026 (UTC) Delete as failing NOLLM, oppose merging because that would also fail NOLLM. No comment on notability, but the currently existing...
Click to read more »recent edits to this article are LLM, please revert or rewrite them, see WP:NOLLM. M kuhner (talk) 19:13, 1 August 2026 (UTC) Hi there, the words were my...
Click to read more »(talk) 06:13, 26 June 2026 (UTC) Delete, because this also likely fails WP:NOLLM. The user has been inserting text wrapped in markdown codeblocks in DIff/1361215034...
Click to read more »Delete per NOLLM. Not sure if this would have survived even without the use of an LLM. Accesscrawl (talk) 14:37, 22 July 2026 (UTC) Delete per NOLLM. RossEvans19...
Click to read more »keep the stubification. The subject is notable, but it needs to pass the NOLLM guideline. ‑‑gurkubondinn 21:58, 27 July 2026 (UTC) Redirect to National...
Click to read more »middle-school class report than a Wikipedia article. Should be deleted per WP:NOLLM. I will admit there is potential for an article on this topic, but this...
Click to read more »7 May 2026 (UTC) Delete: High suspicion that this article violates WP:NOLLM. I personally couldn't find any evidence that this article meets WP:N.「NuggFrog」...
Click to read more »2026 (UTC) Delete per nom. In addition this looks AI-generated (see WP:NOLLM) and lots of sources are spam link to sites selling crypto stuff. Lijil...
Click to read more »of every source and claim, and thus should be deleted per WP:TNT and WP:NOLLM, with no prejudice against a human-written article on this topic in the...
Click to read more »information that is not in them, the most likely explanation for which is WP:NOLLM violation. For example, neither of the first two refs is meaningfully about...
Click to read more »the subject, only that the article itself is LLM generated and fails the NOLLM guideline. The Rod Chapman generation was clearly copied from a chatbot:...
Click to read more »Basketball, and Algeria. JTtheOG (talk) 20:29, 29 April 2026 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOLLM. ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 21:02, 29 April 2026 (UTC) Delete per nom. Obvious...
Click to read more »others. Phil Bridger (talk) 20:17, 12 June 2026 (UTC) Delete for failing NOLLM, being created unreasonably fast. Nobody writes with such a different level...
Click to read more »given the apparent COI. If so, I think this deletion would fall under WP:NOLLM. The only way this would not be LLM output is if the author of the article...
Click to read more »the prose in this article. Rather than unilaterally draftify this as a NOLLM violation, I thought given the evident effort in its creation it would be...
Click to read more »ways the original sources did not. For these reasons, as outlined in WP:NOLLM, using large language models to generate or rewrite article content is not...
Click to read more »output of an LLM, the Legacy section particularly so. As such, violates WP:NOLLM. I suggest deletion, then redirect to Golden_generation#Netherlands_(1972–1978...
Click to read more »which could indicate whether an editor’s submissions may have violated WP:NOLLM and whether further review is needed elsewhere. I personally plan to use...
Click to read more »01:41, 14 July 2026 (UTC) Delete per the nom, and as likely failing WP:NOLLM. Some of the more glaring AISIGNS are WP:AIATTR, WP:AIREDCAT, WP:AILEGACY...
Click to read more »effort is made. SenshiSun (talk) 19:13, 30 April 2026 (UTC) Delete, fails NOLLM. Enough said. --Gurkubondinn 01:54, 1 May 2026 (UTC) Delete Creator has...
Click to read more »such as "underscores" and "widely recognized". So basically delete per WP:NOLLM. --not-cheesewhisk3rs ≽^•⩊•^≼ ∫ (pester) 08:15, 29 May 2026 (UTC) Note:...
Click to read more »03:53, 17 July 2026 (UTC) Delete, fails NOLLM. ‑‑gurkubondinn 07:38, 17 July 2026 (UTC) Delete per nom, nollm. Accesscrawl (talk) 12:35, 17 July 2026...
Click to read more »"eyeballing"). --gurkubondinn 10:55, 28 May 2026 (UTC) Delete as failing NOLLM. The user has gone right back to submitting more AI-generated material and...
Click to read more »that was deleted after WP:AfD/Elon Musk and South Africa for failing WP:NOLLM? --gurkubondinn 11:41, 2 June 2026 (UTC) @Gurkubondinn:, it is based on...
Click to read more »reason and because you appeared to use a chatbot to write parts See WP:NOLLM. Mike Turnbull (talk) 12:38, 28 June 2026 (UTC) I want to be clear that...
Click to read more »GrinningIodize (talk) 20:33, 20 April 2026 (UTC) Delete: Apparent violation of WP:NOLLM; strong indications of AI writing ~Darth StabroTalk • Contribs 20:36, 20...
Click to read more »free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Potential violation of WP:NOLLM. Author disclosed LLM generation in initial page creation: WP:LLM disclosure:...
Click to read more »least this article should be stubified. But I would prefer delete as per WP:NOLLM. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 11:14, 7 July 2026 (UTC) Note: this discussion has...
Click to read more »~ŤheŴubṂachine-840≈ ● ✒️ 00:25, 12 May 2026 (UTC) Delete for failing WP:NOLLM, but not for failing WP:N. I think that the topic itself probably merits...
Click to read more »lists, citing sources for information that's not in them, in general a WP:NOLLM violation. ~ A412 talk! 14:11, 4 June 2026 (UTC) Note: this discussion has...
Click to read more »as well as written article text, seem like AI (in contravention of WP:NOLLM and WP:LLMTALK), and while there could be an innocent explanation, when...
Click to read more »11:45, 2 August 2026 (UTC) Delete as failing NCORP, and also failing WP:NOLLM. This is basically a lightly-paraphrased copy of the incontrovertibly LLM-generated...
Click to read more »space to edit WT:NOLLM, but that the user might not have realised that WT:NOLLM was not ECR (only WP:NOLLM is). Their first edit to WT:NOLLM was their 444th...
Click to read more »April 2026) Editor has been warned about the use of AI/LLM content and WP:NOLLM. Dr vulpes (Talk) 03:07, 28 April 2026 (UTC) Same old story: pumps out a...
Click to read more »but the main page (www.newsday.co.zw) appears to load fine. This fails WP:NOLLM should be deleted. --gurkubondinn 09:20, 2 June 2026 (UTC) Note: this discussion...
Click to read more »User:ArchiveEditor01 indefinitely blocked and warned multiple times of WP:NOLLM. Nothing left to do here. guninvalid (talk) (the user who was reported)...
Click to read more »original draft was likely written with AI. This is indeed contrary to WP:NOLLM. Where I lose you is the conclusion that it must therefore be deleted. We...
Click to read more »AfD discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:03, 3 August 2026 (UTC) Delete, fails NOLLM. The user is almost certainly not being honest about their llm use, see...
Click to read more »free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Created in violation of WP:NOLLM. Quoting GnomingStuff: since v1, note WP:AISIGNS e.g. undue emphasis on...
Click to read more »notable. PaulT2022 (talk) 03:31, 13 June 2026 (UTC) Delete as failing WP:NOLLM, and per what Asukite said. ‑‑gurkubondinn 09:23, 16 June 2026 (UTC) Delete...
Click to read more »28 July 2026 (UTC) Speedy delete under G15, this most likely fails WP:NOLLM. References nr. 2, nr. 3 and nr. 4 in Diff/1366506722 return 404 not found...
Click to read more »(talk) 00:19, 9 May 2026 (UTC) Delete (or draftify) – Appears to violate WP:NOLLM. Difficult to give the benefit of the doubt here. Cheers, Suriname0 (talk)...
Click to read more »cleanup, it may pay to have something slightly "smarter". Be wary of WP:NOLLM and avoid modifying the prose this way, but dropping the raw source wikitext...
Click to read more »--Hammersoft (talk) 17:35, 19 July 2026 (UTC) Oppose: despite having had NOLLM explained to the multiple times, they are still wikilawyering about it and...
Click to read more »article, please be aware that this is not allowed on Wikipedia (see WP:NOLLM). I'm sorry to be discouraging, and will note two positive points: you honorably...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) LLM-generated in violation of WP:NOLLM, according to the author’s disclosure on the talk page. The author is experienced...
Click to read more »likely. Commandant Quacks-a-lot (talk) 22:39, 20 July 2026 (UTC) Delete per NOLLM, I'm not sure about salting yet. Accesscrawl (talk) 14:30, 22 July 2026...
Click to read more »Diff/1362885210 had not been removed then I would have said that this fails the WP:NOLLM guideline as well. ‑‑gurkubondinn 09:33, 8 July 2026 (UTC) Comment: Kingsherpa...
Click to read more »text to connect the sentences on each side, we will indeed run afoul of WP:NOLLM and be at risk of WP:SYNTH. I don't necessarily agree with this particular...
Click to read more »guideline. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 20:51, 21 June 2026 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOLLM (article is less than a week old) and obvious AI tells. And yes, the sources...
Click to read more »Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 12:44, 26 April 2026 (UTC) Delete WP:ESSAY and WP:NOLLM all in one. Dr vulpes (Talk) 01:35, 27 April 2026 (UTC) Comment Another...
Click to read more »--Griboski (talk) 19:02, 6 June 2026 (UTC) Speedily delete for failing WP:NOLLM and WP:V. Created with WP:AILIST, WP:MARKDOWN, em-dashes, and invalid Template:Featured...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This is AI-generated and fails WP:NOLLM, see for example WP:AIBOLD and WP:MARKDOWN in previous revisions (and in...
Click to read more »those articles can be reassessed in light of WP:GNG without concern for WP:NOLLM. -- LWG talk (VOPOV) 22:32, 21 April 2026 (UTC) Thanks so much! Do you know...
Click to read more »Speedy delete per WP:G15 (LLM-generated pages without human review) and WP:NOLLM. ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 18:41, 22 April 2026 (UTC) Delete per nom. Bearian...
Click to read more »Thanks, Spartaz Humbug! 08:10, 30 June 2026 (UTC) Delete as failing WP:NOLLM. No comment on notability of the subject. ‑‑gurkubondinn 08:37, 30 June...
Click to read more »‑‑gurkubondinn 14:57, 28 July 2026 (UTC) Redirect, the current article fails WP:NOLLM. ‑‑gurkubondinn 14:57, 28 July 2026 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »Wikidata item) (talk) 21:53, 13 July 2026 (UTC) Delete as likely failing NOLLM. In addition to all of the AISIGNS already pointed out by GrinningIodize...
Click to read more »nom and WP:NEWLLM. मल्ल (talk) 16:46, 15 July 2026 (UTC) Delete, fails NOLLM and per nom. ‑‑gurkubondinn 22:16, 19 July 2026 (UTC) The above discussion...
Click to read more »generated via an LLM. LLM use for copy is prohibited on wikipedia. See WP:NOLLM. It's also forbidden to generate talk page comments. It is impossible to...
Click to read more »Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 21:32, 16 June 2026 (UTC) Delete for failing WP:NOLLM. I don't see anything wrong with someone asking to have an horrendous AI-slopicles...
Click to read more »Balabush (talk) 05:40, 26 June 2026 (UTC) Delete as a clearly failing WP:NOLLM, making this a complete nonstarter before even considering notability, which...
Click to read more »discussions. --gurkubondinn 17:19, 29 May 2026 (UTC) Delete as failing WP:NOLLM, which is easily observed in the contribution history and talk page of the...
Click to read more »- it wasn't released as a single and didn't chart. I'm also getting WP:NOLLM vibes from the writing, which seems to do its damnedest to emphasize the...
Click to read more »I'm trying to make is that once the LLM text is removed, which post-WP:NOLLM can be boldly done by anyone, there isn't a need to speedy delete anymore...
Click to read more »use LLMs; it's likely to be seen as undercutting your argument. See WP:NOLLM. I don't think it is ever right to print these kinds of numbers without...
Click to read more »article or at least wikilinks are done with the help of AI, which violates WP:NOLLM." ~2026-26910-86 (talk) 22:31, 3 May 2026 (UTC) Here2rewrite (talk) 22:35...
Click to read more »wary of entering yet another tiring, extended discussion about revising NOLLM, so soon after the last one.) —In solidarity with Wiki Workers United ·...
Click to read more »12 July 2026 (UTC) LLM text is not permitted on Wikipedia (see Wikipedia:NOLLM) and has to be removed when found. We could move the article to a draft...
Click to read more »May 2026 (UTC) @Tranngocanhvn: You should read the following first: WP:NOLLM and WP:LLMCHAT. Then, read the summary of our content and behaviour guidelines...
Click to read more »irisChronomia / Talk 15:24, 13 July 2026 (UTC) In addition to WP:DUCK and WP:NOLLM that others have mentioned, I think this person has also violated WP:NOTHERE...
Click to read more »free to steal or adapt. It's a bit obsolete now since I wrote it before WP:NOLLM when attitudes towards AI were a bit more positive. -- LWG talk (VOPOV)...
Click to read more »Speedy delete per WP:G15 (LLM-generated pages without human review) and WP:NOLLM. ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 18:41, 22 April 2026 (UTC) Kindly check the history...
Click to read more »by an undisclosed paid editor and likely AI-generated in violation of WP:NOLLM. I declined G15 given the current version of the article doesn't contain...
Click to read more »LLM. M kuhner (talk) 12:44, 24 July 2026 (UTC) Delete pure puffery, per NOLLM. Accesscrawl (talk) 18:52, 25 July 2026 (UTC) Delete It may become notable...
Click to read more »195} ~2026-76101-8 (talk) 23:21, 2 April 2026 (UTC) @19815 Please read WP:NOLLM. You are not allowed to add text generated by a large language model to...
Click to read more »AI-generated, as well as the comments above. In the spirits of WP:AITALK and WP:NOLLM, I have collapsed those comments, and kindly request that you express your...
Click to read more »start again. You cannot use AI/LLMs to generate Wikipedia articles: see WP:NOLLM for more. Presently your draft looks like it's been either written or heavily...
Click to read more »strict limits on use of LLMs on Wikipedia even if carefully managed: see WP:NOLLM. Don't use them to write article text, or to write talk page or noticeboard...
Click to read more »(they/them) (talk page) (contributions) 02:34, 2 June 2026 (UTC) oh and see WP:NOLLM nhals8 (rats in the house of the dead) 02:37, 2 June 2026 (UTC) I admitted...
Click to read more »are AI-edited and parts are AI-generated -- which both would violate WP:NOLLM, but just for the record. Going down WP:AISIGNS with what we have: Promotional...
Click to read more »sources wholesale. Courtesy ping: Jako96, since you were the one that left WP:NOLLM warnings on the user's talk page, do you believe that the diff I refer to...
Click to read more »sources), I believe the article was eligible for G15 and violated the WP:NOLLM guideline. Toadspike [Talk] 23:38, 3 May 2026 (UTC) From my reading of WP:G15...
Click to read more »WP:NOTHERE if they are using LLMs for talk page responses, violating WP:NOLLM and not being forthright about its use. Dclemens1971 (talk) 03:25, 3 May...
Click to read more »decade are not a matter that needs administrator attention. Please see WP:NOLLM and WP:SOFIXIT. Sorry about your evening, and good luck with cleaning up...
Click to read more »