Redirect to:
This page is a redirect. The following categories are used to track and monitor this redirect:
|
discussions (such as at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion). Shortcuts WP:NNCWP:NNC WP:NLISTITEMWP:NLISTITEM WP:NOTEWORTHYWP:NOTEWORTHY The criteria applied...
Click to read more »(UTC) Promoted File:NNC-US-1795-G$5-Turban Head (small eagle).jpg --Armbrust The Homunculus 17:54, 4 October 2015 (UTC) Promoted File:NNC-US-1795-G$5-Turban...
Click to read more »findingaids.cul.columbia.edu/ead/nnc-rb/ldpd_6911127. * Links added in this diff: findingaids.cul.columbia.edu/ead/nnc-rb/ldpd_6911127 (11, 11, 10, 1)...
Click to read more »(UTC) Promoted File:NNC-US-1795-G$10-Turban Head (small eagle).jpg --Armbrust The Homunculus 18:27, 6 October 2015 (UTC) Promoted File:NNC-US-1797-G$10-Turban...
Click to read more »(UTC) Promoted File:NNC-US-1796-G$2½-Turban Head (no stars).jpg --Armbrust The Homunculus 04:35, 24 September 2015 (UTC) Promoted File:NNC-US-1796-G$2½-Turban...
Click to read more »(UTC) Promoted File:NNC-US-1849-G$20-Liberty Head (Twenty D.).jpg --Armbrust The Homunculus 20:55, 8 October 2015 (UTC) Promoted File:NNC-US-1866-G$20-Liberty...
Click to read more »(UTC) Promoted File:NNC-US-1849-G$1-Liberty head (Ty1).jpg --Armbrust The Homunculus 00:47, 21 September 2015 (UTC) Promoted File:NNC-US-1854-G$1-Indian...
Click to read more »outreach materials NNC created several years ago are also regularly requested and used nationwide. Those who have specifically contacted NNC requesting these...
Click to read more »Promoted File:NNC-US-1879-G$4-Stella Pattern (Flowing Hair).jpg --Armbrust The Homunculus 20:33, 28 September 2015 (UTC) Promoted File:NNC-US-1880-G$4-Stella...
Click to read more »Necrothesp and NNC. Buckshot06 (talk) 23:58, 12 November 2020 (UTC) Delete, completely unsourced, lacks all evidence of notability. WP:NNC is never a reason...
Click to read more »diameter) NNC-US-1834-G$2½-Capped Head (reduced) NNC-US-1834-G$5-Classic Head NNC-US-1835-G$2½-Classic Head NNC-US-1839-G$10-Liberty Head (old style) NNC-US-1840-G$5-Liberty...
Click to read more »diameter) NNC-US-1834-G$2½-Capped Head (reduced) NNC-US-1834-G$5-Classic Head NNC-US-1835-G$2½-Classic Head NNC-US-1839-G$10-Liberty Head (old style) NNC-US-1840-G$5-Liberty...
Click to read more »Smithpith is likely personally connected to the author of several books on NNC, as a quick google search shows smithpith is the publicly available email...
Click to read more »Promoted File:NNC-US-1877-G$50-Half Union gold pattern (J-1546).jpg --Armbrust The Homunculus 17:56, 31 October 2015 (UTC) Promoted File:NNC-US-1877-G$50-Half...
Click to read more »The content is covered by WP:NNC more than WP:N. Torc2 (talk) 19:36, 7 January 2008 (UTC) WP:NNC over-rides WP:N? WP:NNC still says [the] topic is notable...
Click to read more »diff - COIBot UserReport - en:Special:Contributions/NNC. 02:17:24, Wed Feb 20, 2008 en:user:NNC <-> i65.photobucket.com (0%/5.88%/0% - Added link: i65...
Click to read more »diameter) NNC-US-1834-G$2½-Capped Head (reduced) NNC-US-1834-G$5-Classic Head NNC-US-1835-G$2½-Classic Head NNC-US-1839-G$10-Liberty Head (old style) NNC-US-1840-G$5-Liberty...
Click to read more »of any policy-based deletion rationale is sufficient reason to keep. WP:NNC is clear that individual entries (e.g., in a list) need not be individually...
Click to read more »blacklist. Link is not on the whitelist. Link is not on the monitor list. NNcNannara (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · blacklist hits · Edit filter...
Click to read more »Jclemens (talk) 05:11, 16 May 2011 (UTC) I think you are misinterpreting WP:NNC. All NNC means is that the List of fictional ducks does not have to be reproduced...
Click to read more »verifiable material from the encyclopedia is because it is insignificant." WP:NNC within WP:N, which references "noteworthy" material. Wikipedia:Notability...
Click to read more »blacklist. Link is not on the whitelist. Link is not on the monitor list. NNcNannara (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · blacklist hits · Edit filter...
Click to read more »Cheers, — CharlieEchoTango — 02:56, 6 November 2011 (UTC) Actually, per WP:NNC, it's entirely plausible to have lists of content which does not individually...
Click to read more »schools are notable, but should not always get their own article per WP:NNC. A high school must have notable content to warrant a seperate page. In this...
Click to read more »real, and if so what network does NNC belong to? I've never heard of it, and searching for neither NNC TV nor NNC TV Alaska brought up relevant results...
Click to read more »encyclopedic value. — Cirt (talk) 20:21, 24 September 2015 (UTC) Promoted File:NNC-US-1854-G$3-Indian Princess Head.jpg --Armbrust The Homunculus 03:47, 26...
Click to read more »the moment, and if the most appropriate article doesn't want it (per WP:NNC) there's no justification for it having its own article. There's not enough...
Click to read more »content for the article Warped Tour. The information is covered under WP:NNC but is too large to merge with the main article. Merger to one central article...
Click to read more »or WP:GNG. Clarityfiend (talk) 07:56, 1 December 2014 (UTC) Delete per WP:NNC and the sources extension of WP:GNG. I don't generally like to fall all the...
Click to read more »Merge per Bubba73 and WP:NNC. Jclemens (talk) 20:36, 29 December 2011 (UTC) Comment Could you please explain your reference to NNC ? What I am discussing...
Click to read more »(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:NNC Dan Koehl (talk) 20:58, 24 January 2017 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...
Click to read more »Maryland, Baltimore County. You may be able to argue that it falls under WP:NNC, but after cleaning up the content, it presents little more information than...
Click to read more »needing an AfD) to List of Unification Church affiliated organizations per WP:NNC, where it can be built up and broken out again if sufficient sourcing is...
Click to read more »content for the article Warped Tour. The information is covered under WP:NNC but is too large to merge with the main article. Merger to one central article...
Click to read more »content for the article Warped Tour. The information is covered under WP:NNC but is too large to merge with the main article. Merger to one central article...
Click to read more »content for the article Warped Tour. The information is covered under WP:NNC but is too large to merge with the main article. Merger to one central article...
Click to read more »(talk) 01:04, 24 September 2008 (UTC) Merge both into Swaminarayan per WP:NNC. Jclemens (talk) 01:22, 24 September 2008 (UTC) Merge both Hariprasad Pande...
Click to read more »November 2020 (UTC) Keep per Necrothesp and WP:NNC. Buckshot06 (talk) 05:50, 13 November 2020 (UTC) Again, WP:NNC is not an argument to keep a list, it is an...
Click to read more »single article with past editions and its participants. Keep per WP:ATD & WP:NNC - Article just isn't citing notability sufficiantly. Needs more work to cite...
Click to read more »notability of neither the list nor the list elements is required per WP:NNC. Most of the list is written using WP:Real world wording, but some parts...
Click to read more »within the list are notable in line with WP:NNC. Buckshot06 (talk) 23:07, 13 November 2020 (UTC) Buckshot06, WP:NNC only applies to individual items in an...
Click to read more »June 2009 (UTC) Merge to the artist's page. Seems to be allowable per WP:NNC, no reason to remove it just because it may not meet independent notability...
Click to read more »Gene93k (talk) 16:54, 15 September 2010 (UTC) Merge to Beast Wars per WP:NNC. Don't know if enough would survive the merge to merit its own section, but...
Click to read more »There's no reason to delete this outright when it would be appropriate per WP:NNC in a clearly notable parent topic. Jclemens (talk) 22:38, 15 May 2011 (UTC)...
Click to read more »alcoholic beverage, so I'm OK with a list of variants that meet V but not N, per NNC. However, this list in its current form is almost worthless, uncited, and...
Click to read more »a row, under its former name, OpenERP, in 2012 and 2013. According to WP:NNC and WP:ARTN, the above should be sufficient to establish notability, even...
Click to read more »not enough sources (as yet) to validate an independent article, but per WP:NNC there is verification to substantiate inclusion in a general survey article...
Click to read more »Keep as meeting WP:WEB, or failing that, merge into 30 Days of Night per WP:NNC. No particular reason to delete it. Jclemens (talk) 06:56, 4 January 2009...
Click to read more »(UTC) Keep per Necrothesp and WP:NNC. Buckshot06 (talk) 23:56, 12 November 2020 (UTC) As has been explained before: WP:NNC is not an argument to keep (or...
Click to read more »discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:14, 4 May 2010 (UTC) Merge to Boba Fett per WP:NNC. Looking at that article, there's no length-based reason that a mere stub...
Click to read more »the relationship. Beyond that, the bulk of this article is covered by WP:NNC. The Beatles/Sullivan connection is flawed WP:OTHERSTUFF logic - the Beatles...
Click to read more »anthropomorphism article. Moezilla doesn't have to be notable to merge, per WP:NNC. --Pixelface (talk) 14:58, 7 May 2008 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »notability of neither the list nor the list elements is required per WP:NNC. Most of the list is written using WP:Real world wording, but some parts...
Click to read more »fruitless.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 19:59, 11 February 2011 (UTC) Please go read WP:NNC and internalize it. Notability only applies to standalone articles. Not to...
Click to read more »suggesting incorporating some of the information into other articles as per WP:NNC. Finnusertop (talk) 10:51, 19 February 2014 (UTC) Delete An overly wordy...
Click to read more »reliable sources but not necessarily independent. The distinction is made at WP:NNC which states that the notability guidelines don't apply to content. TerriersFan...
Click to read more »for Drawn Some's ingenious argument here, I'd like to draw attention to WP:NNC and User:Uncle G/On notability#Dealing with non-notable things.—S Marshall...
Click to read more »rationale for deletion. Per WP:DELREASON, WP:NEXIST, WP:ARTN, WP:ATD, WP:NNC, and WP:HANDLE, you need a better reason to nominate something than "fails...
Click to read more »but agree this could probably be appropriately covered elsewhere per WP:NNC. Jclemens (talk) 18:19, 26 June 2010 (UTC) Delete unless the article can...
Click to read more »RedHat Linux, SCO Linux, etc). References can be improved. According to WP:NNC, "Notability is a property of a subject and not of a Wikipedia article"....
Click to read more »of course. sst✈discuss 12:33, 18 November 2015 (UTC) Replaced with File:NNC-US-1933-G$20-Saint Gaudens.jpg --Armbrust The Homunculus 20:29, 24 November...
Click to read more »Dumelow (talk) 07:05, 11 August 2025 (UTC) "The British lost 2 members of the NNC killed and at least 14 wounded." - I don't think that "and at least 14 wounded"...
Click to read more »1/24th regiment during the battle, yellow is 2/24th regiment, green is the NNC (Natal Native Contingent), blue is the British mounted contingent Hopefully...
Click to read more »cited above. Individual list elements need not be notable, either, per WP:NNC. While a quick look might suggest that the delete side has the stronger arguments...
Click to read more »indication of importance". "This..is a lower standard than notability." WP:NNC states that, "The notability guidelines do not apply to article...content"...
Click to read more »fulfill criteria of inclusion as standalone article, but we may consider WP:NNC. Hitro talk 17:57, 13 August 2009 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...
Click to read more »14:20, 11 September 2020 (UTC) ↑WP:DELREASON, WP:NEXIST, WP:ATD, WP:ARTN, WP:NNC, and WP:HANDLE. Darkknight2149 17:05, 11 September 2020 (UTC) Delete: With...
Click to read more »improved. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:06, 3 March 2017 (UTC) Speedy Keep: Per WP:NNC, notability is not associated with the quality of an article. There are whole...
Click to read more »notable. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 21:09, 29 May 2008 (UTC) Please read WP:NNC. Notability applies to topics, not article content. Text does not have to...
Click to read more »of just a part of the Spoken word article. It should be bound more by WP:NNC instead of anything else. Besides, aren't articles generally given five days...
Click to read more »Major coverage in newspapers proves notability. Notability allows, per WP:NNC, the article to cover her political work in full, even if it's not the source...
Click to read more »L'Aquatique[talk] 05:01, 21 October 2008 (UTC) Merge to Transport Tycoon per WP:NNC and VG's reasoning above. Jclemens (talk) 19:00, 22 October 2008 (UTC) The...
Click to read more »unless someone can explain why his inclusion in such a list would violate WP:NNC. Jclemens (talk) 20:06, 24 August 2010 (UTC) That's a redirect to List of...
Click to read more »very few are there WP:GNG, also it should not be judged on the basis og WP:NNC. I think it should be moved to draft for further improvements and untill...
Click to read more »reliable sources but not necessarily independent. The distinction is made at WP:NNC. TerriersFan (talk) 00:31, 6 May 2009 (UTC) Merge/redirect to Grand Erie...
Click to read more »and WP:SAL do not mention buses or anything transport related, while WP:NNC clearly states most lists do not have to satisfy GNG. Adam mugliston Talk ...
Click to read more »aren't in the article, per WP:DELREASON, WP:NEXIST, WP:ATD, WP:ARTN, and WP:NNC. The crux of this nomination is "Unnecessary article split that goes into...
Click to read more »objection to mentioning the podcast in some other appropriate article per WP:NNC. Jclemens (talk) 01:32, 18 June 2010 (UTC) Do Not Delete Currently ranked...
Click to read more »clearly part of a notable franchise, so the best I can see is a merge per WP:NNC. However, since a merge is an editorial decision, Keep is the logical result...
Click to read more »on-going interest and need to reference public sector institutions. As per WP:NNC, "...no amount of improvements to the Wikipedia content will suddenly make...
Click to read more »notability of neither the list nor the list elements is required per WP:NNC. Per WP:TOOLONG, an article being to large (in this case making an article...
Click to read more »2008 (UTC) StrongSpeedy Keep Notability does not apply to content per WP:NNC. This is a high quality list, and the information is encyclopedic. Debate...
Click to read more »institutions all over the world. So I think the article should be deleted(WP:NNC). Unatnas1986 (talk) 08:00, 8 March 2014 (UTC) Delete without merging as...
Click to read more »narrator's voice has been produced by AI: https://www.youtube.com/shorts/RwFbYIC_nnc It is quite good. Does anyone spot what software has been used? 147.235.202...
Click to read more »the two Joes note is extremely rare and, prior to being discovered in the NNC, the 20 Joe was unknown as denomination. Original A five-note complete denomination...
Click to read more »but the body places more uncertainty on this figure. The infobox has 20 NNC + 3 officers/NCOs There's a bit of inconsistency in the sources, I've tried...
Click to read more »(talk) 15:06, 27 January 2012 (UTC) Merge to Ultima Online per WP:ATD and WP:NNC. Deletion is unnecessary, as discussions of major plot elements can easily...
Click to read more »Merge to the author's page per WP:ATD: content can be included there per WP:NNC, and the title is presumably a reasonable search term so should redirect...
Click to read more »and WP:SAL do not mention buses or anything transport related, while WP:NNC clearly states most lists do not have to satisfy GNG. Adam mugliston Talk ...
Click to read more »contribs) Jenx222 (talk) k.lee Kornfan71 (talk) KhoikhoiPossum (talk) Melab-1 NNcNannara Moonwolf14 —Noldoaran (Talk) Piet Delport (talk · contribs) User:Pimp_slap_the_funk...
Click to read more »article does not have sufficient sources to merit retention. However, per WP:NNC it would be informative, as I've mentioned above, to include some minimal...
Click to read more »a row, under its former name, OpenERP, in 2012 and 2013. According to WP:NNC and WP:ARTN, the above is sufficient to establish notability. --Princethezeroth...
Click to read more »As part of the main Late Night article, this should be covered under WP:NNC. Torc2 (talk) 02:18, 22 January 2008 (UTC) Merge all verifiable, sourced...
Click to read more »personally find interesting. It is based upon Notability guidelines. See also: WP:NNC, where it states, "Notability guidelines do not apply to content within articles...
Click to read more »description of why each was notable and obviously a source. Although WP:NNC insists that entries of a list are notable, which of course in this case...
Click to read more »enough coverage for a separate article but no reason not to merge per WP:NNC. Alzarian16 (talk) 14:35, 27 August 2010 (UTC) Merge per the others. Not...
Click to read more »have two lists, no need to have unsourced information, but note that per WP:NNC, sourcing that meets WP:V, including primary sourcing, is sufficient to keep...
Click to read more »December 2025 (UTC) Merge to University of Sydney. Per S5A-043. Argument on WP:NNC is pretty good and convincing. Servite et contribuere (talk) 01:52, 26 December...
Click to read more »(UTC) Promoted File:NNC-US-1795-G$5-Turban Head (small eagle).jpg --Armbrust The Homunculus 17:54, 4 October 2015 (UTC) Promoted File:NNC-US-1795-G$5-Turban...
Click to read more »content in those articles (apart from the University). Article content per WP:NNC has a different standard to a stand-alone article. Best to take any further...
Click to read more »characters. Crisco 1492 (talk) 02:08, 4 June 2011 (UTC) Note that per WP:NNC, notability does not apply to portions of a list or article. Jclemens (talk)...
Click to read more »well, that the WP:NNC says that "Notability guidelines do not apply to content within an article?" Does that mean what it says? WP:NNC goes on to say that...
Click to read more »"notable", just make sure the content meets V and we'll be fine, per Wp:NNC. Jclemens (talk) 23:33, 20 October 2010 (UTC) Keep but I would prefer to...
Click to read more »(or "prohibit", for that matter) anything. Please educate yourself on WP:NNC--specifically, that it is an option to limit certain lists to notable entries...
Click to read more »meet V, there's no need for each element of the contents to meet N, per WP:NNC, so we're left without any good argument to delete this. Jclemens (talk)...
Click to read more »discussion of this credential is probably appropriate in that article per WP:NNC. But from what I have gathered, the credential itself is not notable enough...
Click to read more »notability--even when they discuss trivial matters like graduation or dating--WP:NNC. There are many people whose parents or boyfriends are much more famous than...
Click to read more »11:25, 1 March 2012 (UTC) merge selectively to Key & Peele per WP:ATD and WP:NNC. A sketch show can indeed have notable characters, but these aren't them...
Click to read more »yet. Jclemens (talk) 17:12, 31 July 2008 (UTC) Comment Note that per WP:NNC I prefer that if the TV IV article is kept, but the IVy awards are not, that...
Click to read more »Fabrictramp | talk to me 14:45, 4 May 2009 (UTC) Merge to 20kLUtS per WP:NNC. The novel is clearly notable and older, hence there's a reasonably good...
Click to read more »stand-alone article, but, as John says, this should be kept somewhere, per WP:NNC. Ty 07:00, 30 March 2008 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved as an archive...
Click to read more »WP:SALAT (particularly for what the "SA" part of the acronym refers to) and WP:NNC. There's certainly no consensus on removing all information on bus routes...
Click to read more »encouragement to expand the article to non-controversy related material. Per WP:NNC we don't have to limit the article to solely what's covered in reliable sources...
Click to read more »presenting information to readers in broader context where possible, and WP:NNC, which is also part of the notability guideline, teaches us that we need...
Click to read more »September 2008 (UTC) A merge to Auke Bay would be better than deletion, per WP:NNC and WP:ATD. Jclemens (talk) 17:21, 25 September 2008 (UTC) Relisted to generate...
Click to read more »find it distressing that a split for size reasons removes the concept of WP:NNC. -Verdatum (talk) 21:55, 2 January 2008 (UTC) Keep, three games and two movies...
Click to read more »content for the article Warped Tour. The information is covered under WP:NNC but is too large to merge with the main article. Merger to one central article...
Click to read more »Afraid it's an NN con, but no objection to merging the content somewhere per NNC. Jclemens (talk) 05:14, 10 July 2010 (UTC) Comment - The Yahoo search of...
Click to read more »non-notable, I did not challenge this despite the fact it was at odds with WP:NNC - I might still anyway add a few more reviews. The format of the reception...
Click to read more »by definition, always. Also true, always, by definition, is NNC > N > ATD, because WP:NNC doesn't simply support your argument, it literally IS your argument...
Click to read more »deletion. The factions and races within it do not have to be notable, per WP:NNC. And I would hardly call two AFDs that closed earlier today a precedent....
Click to read more »--Pak21 08:42, 7 November 2007 (UTC) Fair enough, what is your view on WP:NNC? I actually agree that the subject does not need its own topic, but the content...
Click to read more »read and internalize WP:NNC. Jclemens (talk) 07:26, 16 June 2012 (UTC) I am aware of Wikipedia's notability guideline. WP:NNC isn't refuting anything...
Click to read more »is included in merge, BTW) to the series per the above !votes, per [[WP:NNC]. Jclemens (talk) 23:18, 12 July 2010 (UTC) Merge to his show. The only reason...
Click to read more »therefore notable. Dandy Sephy (talk) 18:27, 3 April 2014 (UTC) Comment: Note WP:NNC indicates that "The criteria applied to article creation/retention are not...
Click to read more »protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) — http://nmd.bg/en/the-nnc/who-are-we/. CSBot reporting at 22:28, 17 December 2011 (UTC) Article tagged...
Click to read more »that's policy: non-notable content is fine in notable articles. Please see WP:NNC. Jclemens (talk) 21:57, 13 January 2023 (UTC) Other content guidelines still...
Click to read more »concludes that some of these stadiums must be themselves notable. Per WP:NNC, individual entries in a list need not be notable, and the nomination statement...
Click to read more »the content seems to belong somewhere as part of a larger article where WP:NNC will apply. So Userfy to preserve content/attribution history for now, or...
Click to read more »Further, your argument that people on this list aren't notable goes against WP:NNC that states "Notability guidelines do not apply to content within articles...
Click to read more »seems beyond question, given the image provided (from a reliable source, the NNC). Not wanting to split hairs, I have amended the description of the image...
Click to read more »into Brossard, Quebec article, the city where this mall located, as per WP:NNC. I agree it may not warrant its own article but the information is verifiable...
Click to read more »article of a company is too long. The SQ article is long! Most importantly, WP:NNC dictates that an article should be kept if the TOPIC is suitable, not an...
Click to read more »notability of a person. Stub or not, inconsequential additions or not. Per WP:NNC The general notability guideline say that : "Significant coverage" means...
Click to read more »(UTC) Promoted File:NNC-US-1849-G$1-Liberty head (Ty1).jpg --Armbrust The Homunculus 00:47, 21 September 2015 (UTC) Promoted File:NNC-US-1854-G$1-Indian...
Click to read more »about the model can go there to do so. If you don’t like the coverage: WP:NNC. If you don’t like the way the article is written then re-write it. It’s...
Click to read more »Blogcruft Drinkadrink (talk) 05:41, 27 January 2009 (UTC) Notability WP:NTEMP WP:NNC PR - The content doesn't even delve into context or dialogue of the content...
Click to read more »respect to Mr Duckworth, I would argue that article would appear to fail WP:NNC, WP:PEOPLE, and if despite these, still WP:GNG Shirt58 (talk) 12:11, 27 June...
Click to read more »specific publication is not suitable for referencing within the article, but WP:NNC and I'm not trying to prove that is is notable. I'm just pointing out that...
Click to read more »I believe that If the sourcing of an article itself needs work, per WP:NNC and WP:PRESERVE, the article does not necessarily justify removal but instead...
Click to read more »list. They do not limit the content of an article". There is more at WP:NNC, "The notability guidelines do not apply to article or list content". This...
Click to read more »separate biography". This is completely irrelevent to this article (see WP:NNC). I can see no good argument for deletion here. -- simxp (talk) 22:49, 9...
Click to read more »article has to be notable, but rather supported by a reliable source, per WP:NNC.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 15:15, 20 August 2021 (UTC)...
Click to read more »its own: a source can be reliable without being notable (which is why WP:NNC doesn't apply here). Passing mentions on other websites don't make a website...
Click to read more »done and written. I know notability doesn't apply to article content WP:NNC and WP:CONTN, but I hope that those editors who believe this article should...
Click to read more »guidelines do not limit content of lists except when it comes to people - see WP:NNC. I have not been able to find a specific guidleline for television but there...
Click to read more »violate WP:BLP? I agree that the position does not confer notability, but WP:NNC says that notability guidelines do not directly limit article content. For...
Click to read more »but of significance, hence not related to AfD. As for reasons cited, WP:NNC: "the notability guideline does not apply to the contents of articles" so...
Click to read more »think the content is not notable, I've merged it into Doctor Eggman, per WP:NNC, WP:BOLD, and WP:MERGE. --Pixelface (talk) 11:53, 10 March 2008 (UTC) If...
Click to read more »had a look for in policy and guidelines, and the closest I've found is WP:NNC. PhilKnight (talk) 21:41, 23 April 2010 (UTC) I think the reason this argument...
Click to read more »notability of neither the list nor the list elements is required per WP:NNC. Most of the list is written using WP:Real world wording, but some parts...
Click to read more »17 July 2011 (UTC) I mentioned WP:WEIGHT Note** this was taken from WP:NNC. And, this article meets WP:FAILN and deletion should be of last resort....
Click to read more »"Nemesis" and delete: as this list of enemies is a violation of WP:VGSCOPE, WP:NNC/WP:UNDUE and WP:NOT#PLOT. Wikipedia is not the place to list every single...
Click to read more »Aviation/Registrations. MilborneOne (talk) 20:15, 2 April 2011 (UTC) WP:N#NNC shows that "notability" applies to articles as a whole, "prominence" is used...
Click to read more »notability and editing policies. Please read our policies at WP:GNG, WP:NNC and WP:NEXIST and Wikipedia:Editing policy (particularly WP:IMPERFECT and...
Click to read more »2015 (UTC) No, you still misunderstand notability vs. article content: WP:NNC. EEng (talk) 13:59, 18 November 2015 (UTC) Pinging User:Charles Matthews...
Click to read more »dictate notability shall not apply to content within articles. See WP:NCC WP:NNC. Not only does this proposal attempt to apply notability to content within...
Click to read more »of NNC that mathematicians (finishing with Ehresmann in 1960) developed calculus the way we know it now. There is no shortage of articles saying NNC is...
Click to read more »objections raised based on the why and how of the coverage seem to fall under WP:NNC and should be handled per WP:DUE as an editing matter. But I would also add...
Click to read more »sure all of this meets notability although the overall channel does. WP:NNC states "The notability guidelines determine whether a topic is notable enough...
Click to read more »argument is a content dispute which should not be raised at AfD. (See WP:N#NNC which explains the difference between content policy and notability, and...
Click to read more »Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 10:10, 3 April 2022 (UTC) WP:NNC would apply. BilledMammal (talk) 08:03, 4 April 2022 (UTC) Merge per BilledMammal...
Click to read more »general, notability isn't necessarily required for article content in WP:NNC, but in the case of lists it's often the primary criterion for inclusion...
Click to read more »a group per WP:NLIST. Notability guidelines do not apply to lists per WP:NNC. SailingInABathTub (talk) 21:29, 24 March 2021 (UTC) Keep: Debated a bit...
Click to read more »image in the Production section has a visible file name in the caption File:NNC-1924-50C-Huguenot-Walloon_Tercentenary_half_dollar_(reverse,_uniface_die_trial)...
Click to read more »opposed than a stand-alone article created from scratch) and is bound by WP:NNC more than WP:FICT; it only needs to meet WP:V, and does so using primary...
Click to read more »to be used when determining whether an article should be stand alone WP:NNC. Lastly -- isn't the community standard found in WP:POLITICIAN? If it is...
Click to read more »agreement on what counts as a "notable" event. Note further (ha ha) that per WP:NNC, lists such as these don't need each entry to meet notability guidelines;...
Click to read more »regardless of any demonstrated notability." Whatever the level of sourcing per NNC on each individual item of this list, GNG concerns, we cannot start to create...
Click to read more »outreach materials NNC created several years ago are also regularly requested and used nationwide. Those who have specifically contacted NNC requesting these...
Click to read more »thing as saying that notability has no content requirements (see WP:ARTN, WP:NNC, WP:NEXIST). Topics need notability to be standalone topics (WP:N lede)...
Click to read more »Content is not a criteron for deletion, notability of subject is (see WP:NNC). AfD is not clean up.--Goldsztajn (talk) 17:20, 24 February 2020 (UTC) Keep...
Click to read more »If it was just an issue of notability, the article should be kept per WP:NNC. But as Carson points out, it's largely original research that could and...
Click to read more »talk page discussion to go more in-depth about this aspect also because WP:NNC (i.e notability criteria dictate whether we cover a topic, not necessarily...
Click to read more »the intention of creating this non-notable item, as a separate page (WP:NNC) meant for some other reason. The article may be redirected to any other...
Click to read more »(UTC) I'd be happy to add some content after the AfD has passed. Per WP:NNC, there is general agreement that this topic and Bug (Starship Troopers) are...
Click to read more »WP:N itself states that this “creates only a presumption of an article.” WP:NNC repeats the point: “Notability alone does not guarantee a stand‑alone page...
Click to read more »Maldives can be expected to produce more. WP:RS is content policy, see WP:N#NNC. Unscintillating (talk) 01:46, 28 March 2011 (UTC) Comment – Actually I...
Click to read more »2007 (UTC) Comment - the policy that should apply to this article is WP:NNC. This is essentially information that could be merged into the main Futurama...
Click to read more »oystercatcher, by Fir0002 Nankeen kestrel, by Fir0002 Fulvous whistling duck, by Nnc.banzai House sparrow, juvenile, by Muhammad Mahdi Karim Spotted dove, by...
Click to read more »blue link, so amounts to a list of notable cricketers and thus meets WP:NNC. The other articles are explicitly lists of players who have played in first...
Click to read more »the first reference to introduce and/or cite the article's name fails WP:NNC. While there might be significant coverage alluding to this southern border...
Click to read more »'405846368') 23:00:29 (5, 5, 5) (EDIT) User:CheMoBot (contribs, talk) edited NNC_63-0532 (diff, hist) Added: 'verifiedrevid' ('' -> '402701166', SET '')...
Click to read more »of Postal codes in the Republic of Ireland thus complying with WP:NCC WP:NNC on notability. I think many of the other citations comply with WP:SELFSOURCE...
Click to read more »characters, which generally goes by the name of "List of X characters". Per WP:NNC, the individual entries need not be notable, and the notability of a "List...
Click to read more »establish notability) so that it can be covered in a broader context per WP:NNC. Jclemens (talk) 06:32, 2 December 2011 (UTC) Looking at the sources (e.g...
Click to read more »subject isn't going to be useful as a source on them.) I can't assess https://nnc-frontend.netralnews.com/ali-azhar-d-konten-kreator-surabaya-yang-menguba...
Click to read more »and WP:SAL do not mention buses or anything transport related, while WP:NNC clearly states most lists do not have to satisfy GNG. Adam mugliston Talk ...
Click to read more »complained about Mark Clarke in 2008", and Telegraph. Also see WP:GNG & WP:NNC which states: ...it does not need to be the main topic of the source material...
Click to read more »deleted team list. Occuli (talk) 12:57, 9 September 2008 (UTC) Keep all: WP:NNC is pretty clear: notability requirements are much lower for inclusion within...
Click to read more »the YouTube links. Notability is not concerned with article content, as WP:NNC makes clear. Alzarian16 (talk) 21:34, 18 July 2011 (UTC) Keep Who Wants to...
Click to read more »list of sources but no inline citations is not reason for deletion: see WP:NNC, WP:NRVE. --Colapeninsula (talk) 14:05, 19 July 2012 (UTC) Comment - Regardless...
Click to read more »subject non-notable or slanted (an addressable issue), per WP:ARTN and WP:NNC, topics with coverage merit inclusion. Time to address tone and not delete...
Click to read more »before participating in Afd, seems notable., referring to WP:BEFORE, WP:NNC and WP:SIGCOV. It doesn't seems to violate what Wikipedia is not and also...
Click to read more »yesterday.Dandy Sephy (talk) 17:43, 3 April 2014 (UTC) Comment: Note WP:NNC indicates that "The criteria applied to article creation/retention are not...
Click to read more »also notability does not directly limit article content as stated in WP:NNC. Although the article has improved a bit, it still only has 4 sources 3 of...
Click to read more »--JayJasper (talk) 19:05, 1 June 2012 (UTC) Keep passes WP:Source list and WP:NNC requirements. Cavarrone (talk) 20:58, 5 June 2012 (UTC) Plan C. Keep as an...
Click to read more »not losing interest, meaning the outdated problem is solved. Plus, per WP:NNC, GNG does not have to be satisfied. Adam mugliston Talk 20:38, 24 July...
Click to read more »and WP:SAL do not mention buses or anything transport related, while WP:NNC clearly states most lists do not have to satisfy GNG. Adam mugliston Talk ...
Click to read more »the "notability guidelines do not apply to content within the article" WP:NNC). --Enos733 (talk) 15:41, 17 August 2017 (UTC) Delete-I'm reluctant to support...
Click to read more »there's no reason why this shouldn't be mentioned in the band's article per WP:NNC, and it seems to be fairly important in their history. The title is a plausible...
Click to read more »doesn't apply to sub-articles. Guest9999 (talk) 20:59, 1 March 2008 (UTC) WP:NNC says the contents of articles do not have to be notable, only the topic....
Click to read more »history · transclusions · logs · subpages) This template seems to contradict WP:NNC. Ahecht (TALK PAGE) 17:30, 19 October 2015 (UTC) Delete: factually misleading...
Click to read more »In order for a process to work, you must respect it. Also, please see WP:NNC which states "Notability guidelines give guidance on whether a topic is notable...
Click to read more »NORAD Public Affairs Office at Telephone: (719) 554-2608/6889 and E-mail of [email protected] to verify the below. Albert z chan (talk) 16:42,...
Click to read more »"worthy of notice". Other shortcuts in WP:N that often are mentioned are WP:NNC, WP:NRVE, WP:NTEMP, and WP:LISTN. The lede of WP:N recognizes a number of...
Click to read more »apparently 'trivial' as i did allude to above, shouldn't just be deleted ie. WP:NNC "Notability guidelines do not apply to content within an article" - (also...
Click to read more »subject's own work, but these make up the minority of references and per WP:NNC references to a subject's own work in their biography are encouraged. Per...
Click to read more »and WP:SAL do not mention buses or anything transport related, while WP:NNC clearly states most lists do not have to satisfy GNG. Adam mugliston Talk ...
Click to read more »Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 08:19, 27 March 2013 (UTC) WP:ABOUTSELF and WP:NNC - and an encyclopedic article requires more than just a criticism section...
Click to read more »MrKIA11 (talk) 13:11, 22 April 2009 (UTC) KeepMerge to Master of Orion per WP:NNC if sufficient RS to establish N cannot be found.Per non-trivial magazine...
Click to read more »sources listed above are self-sourced but go to the personnel section WP:NNC, my understanding is that these entries need not be notable (only article...
Click to read more »Miproxifene Miproxifene phosphate MRL-37 Nafoxidine Nitromifene NNC 45-0095 NNC 45-0320 NNC 45-0781 NNC 45-1506 Ormeloxifene Ospemifene Panomifene Pipendoxifene...
Click to read more »Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 08:53, 20 November 2013 (UTC) Per WP:NNC and WP:NRV, "Notability is a property of a subject and not of a Wikipedia...
Click to read more »SSSIs, then it doesn't work any more to say just "the SSSI" referring to the NNC SSSI. I changed this to just "The Wash"; if that's not correct, please tweak...
Click to read more »Read the magazine once and you’ll figure out their editorial style. WP:NNC and WP:ARTN apply. Funny how on Kätlin Aas’s AfD that same one sentence set-up...
Click to read more »Statυs (talk) 14:58, 5 June 2012 (UTC) Keep meets WP:NLIST, WP:Source list and WP:NNC requirements. Every item of the list is notable. The belonging of every item...
Click to read more »take a number 17:08, 19 March 2012 (UTC) Keep Two-step rationale: 1) per WP:NNC, non-notable content can be included in an article about a notable topic...
Click to read more »but do not apply to nor limit content within articles or lists (per WP:NNC). In Belize's case, WP:NOPAGE may be particularly relevant, given current...
Click to read more »weight, or turn pages through every article. Regarding summarization, per WP:NNC: "Notability guidelines do not apply to content within an article." —ADavidB...
Click to read more »notable, because it's not Eric Ress that's being nominated for deletion. WP:NNC is very clear that it's the article that needs to be notable, not every individual...
Click to read more »inclusion and exclusion of various types of information. Remember, per WP:NNC, notability guidelines do not limit content within an article, but unsourced...
Click to read more »regardless of any demonstrated notability." Whatever the level of sourcing per NNC on each individual item of this list, we cannot start to create new articles...
Click to read more »confused about WP:NPOV (representing what is in reliable sources, good) and WP:NNC (applying notability standards to article contents, bad). Nonetheless, focusing...
Click to read more »appropriateness of content are separate (though related) questions: see WP:NNC and WP:CONTN. When a newspaper decides to cover a company, that is evidence...
Click to read more »vote: I didn't say every entry in such a list had to be notable, see WP:NNC, but that the subject—the awards as a collection or even multiple individual...
Click to read more »reflected in titles, and 2) Notability does not limit article contents, per WP:NNC. Jclemens (talk) 03:04, 8 February 2011 (UTC) Delete listing everytime someone...
Click to read more »but when you are looking at WP:V that is article content policy, see WP:NNC for more info. And compare with WP:Deletion policy, which also references...
Click to read more »something to be worked out by editing and on the article talk page. See also WP:NNC. Ty 22:49, 5 April 2009 (UTC) Keep Several of the monuments have received...
Click to read more »deletion. Content need not be NOTABLE to be merged, just VERIFIABLE, per WP:NNC, so the nominator's statement is true, but limited in its applicability....
Click to read more »things within the article. That directly contradicts our very long held WP:NNC. In articles we cover what people/entities do that is covered in RS. A politician...
Click to read more »like that. This article fails all five points in WP:GNG, WP:NRVE, and WP:NNC. The ability to stand with it's own article simply isn't there. --Sue Rangell...
Click to read more »notability guidelines for its own article, and a merge to another article per WP:NNC should be forced on it". I agree with a merge at the editors' discretion...
Click to read more »relates to sub-topics as the policy is mute on the topic. See for instance WP:NNC which says that Notability guidelines do not apply to content within an article...
Click to read more »NMK NML NMM NMN NMO NMP NMQ NMR NMS NMT NMU NMV NMW NMX NMY NMZ NNA NNB NNC NND NNE NNF NNG NNH NNI NNJ NNK NNL NNM NNN NNO NNP NNQ NNR NNS NNT NNU NNV...
Click to read more »indicate a de facto policy to accept these lists. (Also, policy-wise: per WP:NNC the content doesn't have to be notable, that applies to the list as a whole...
Click to read more »and WP:SAL do not mention buses or anything transport related, while WP:NNC clearly states most lists do not have to satisfy GNG. Adam mugliston Talk ...
Click to read more »unconnected to your mainspace contributions. But your reading of NNC is unique: NNC does not say that no content guideline can incorporate WP:N for any...
Click to read more »entire list taken together. That comes from the notability guideline at WP:NNC: notability guidelines do not directly limit article content. It's not "indiscriminate"...
Click to read more »notability, is "absolutely trivial", and I don't see that in practice at WP. WP:NNC is the controlling policy, which is on the inclusive side. This content is...
Click to read more »[133][134]--Elvey (talk) 19:58, 10 May 2010 (UTC) Pcap, thanks for pointing us to WP:NNC! Glad to see that what I'd written, "Lack of an article or evidence of notability...
Click to read more »better explanation is given. Per WP:DELREASON, WP:NEXIST, WP:ARTN, WP:ATD, WP:NNC, and WP:HANDLE, WP:GNG is determined only by the existence of sources, not...
Click to read more »character is noteworthy enough for material to be presented there where WP:NNC will apply. 2604:2000:8FC0:4:68BA:3B32:8613:8B6D (talk) 03:56, 14 February...
Click to read more »"Notability guidelines do not apply to content within an article". Read through WP:NNC and WP:NPOSSIBLE. --NqcRz (talk) 16:00, 28 February 2017 (UTC) Take a breath...
Click to read more »López (diff). Links: web.archive.org/web/20060910135946/wm2006.sportbild.de/nncs/fussball/2006/03/02/2585300008.html. 2007-11-17 19:04:40: User de:X-Weinzar...
Click to read more »either become standalone articles or be redirected to a larger article. WP:NNC states: "The notability guidelines determine whether a topic is notable enough...
Click to read more »seems beyond question, given the image provided (from a reliable source, the NNC). Not wanting to split hairs, I have amended the description of the image...
Click to read more »Template:GABAergics -> 3-Hydrazinopropionic acid CI-966 EF-1502 Guvacine NNC 05-2090 SKF-89976A SL 75102 SNAP-5114 Thiomuscimol 9 Template:GAIS squad...
Click to read more »“Notability guidelines do not apply to content within articles or lists”, WP:NNC. FuzzyMagma (talk) 07:50, 17 May 2025 (UTC) They do apply to articles, which...
Click to read more »you need to look up the definition of "notable", clearly.' (Ignoring WP:NNC) I believe this breaches WP:CIVIL - when I indicated the editor should read...
Click to read more »are attributing motive that is not in evidence. Quoting or paraphrasing WP:NNC in WP:SS is actually a very good idea, and you've brought non-edit-warring...
Click to read more »modulators}}(563) NNC 45-0320 563 {{Estrogen receptor modulators}}(563) NNC 45-0781 563 {{Estrogen receptor modulators}}(563) NNC 45-1506 563 {{Estrogen...
Click to read more »months and hasn't made but less than 100 edits. Reverting their edits per WP:NNC is the correct thing to do. Going forward, the only thing that appears necessary...
Click to read more »deleted are fairly common in my experience. One relevant guideline is WP:NNC, which says that a topic not being notable enough by itself for an article...
Click to read more »2025 (UTC) Introducing a Further Source Supporting WP:GNG, WP:SIGCOV, WP:NNC Introducing a further source: the 2014 Arabian Business feature “Show me...
Click to read more »that's policy: non-notable content is fine in notable articles. Please see WP:NNC. Jclemens (talk) 21:57, 13 January 2023 (UTC) Other content guidelines still...
Click to read more »nmk nml nmm nmn nmo nmp nmq nmr nms nmt nmu nmv nmw nmx nmy nmz nna nnb nnc nnd nne nnf nng nnh nni nnj nnk nnl nnm nnn nno nnp nnq nnr nns nnt nnu nnv...
Click to read more »contrib) 15:24, 5 November 2012 (UTC) If you read WP:NOTE, but especially WP:NNC (within the notability guidelines), I should point out this guidelines explicitly...
Click to read more »have, though I worry that the point, that this piece is not the one in the NNC, is going to get lost. One piece, in gilt brass, was later struck for Philadelphia...
Click to read more »entries themselves do not have to be notable for inclusion according to WP:NNC. However, entries still need verifiable sourcing if they are challenged or...
Click to read more »As for whether the awards are notable, not all of them have to be (per WP:NNC, notability guidelines do not apply to content within an article.) Further...
Click to read more »their old independent pages.) ETA: Thought that it might be worth linking WP:NNC (specific guideline: "The notability guidelines do not apply to contents...
Click to read more »is perfectly fine and appropriate for those jurisdiction articles per WP:NNC, but I do not see a need for individual articles for these departments. Jclemens...
Click to read more »necessarily need to be Wikipedia notable for it to be included as explained in WP:NNC, but it does need reliable sourced. Maybe try asking about this at Wikipedia:WikiProject...
Click to read more »those topics instead. Hut 8.5 19:06, 12 November 2020 (UTC) Keep per WP:NNC: "The notability guidelines do not apply to contents of articles or lists"...
Click to read more »stated that one particular type of software was better than the other. WP:NNC states: "The notability guidelines determine whether a topic is notable enough...
Click to read more »article or stand-alone list," cover all topics, including songs. And per WP:NNC, "Notability is a property of a subject and not of a Wikipedia article. If...
Click to read more »background and you just censoring the background... from the wiki articles. +WP:NNC:"Notability guidelines do not apply to content within an article" --IranianNationalist...
Click to read more »articles can cover aspects of a subject that would not be notable alone, see WP:NNC. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 22:20, 12 April 2021 (UTC) You need proper sourcing...
Click to read more »WP:GNG, its setting does not necessarily meet the same guidelines. While WP:NNC may not restrict the content already in the article, the article itself still...
Click to read more »Even if anyone was to consider your logic there's a flaw in it overall. WP:NNC Notability guidelines do not apply to content within an article. That fact...
Click to read more »lose something... --TK-CP (talk) 10:26, 29 March 2010 (UTC) Please read WP:NNC. Also, content proposals for the Conservapedia article should be discussed...
Click to read more »(49, 1, 1, 1) www.answers.com/cats%26r%3D67&usg=AFQjCNFFqyNncCtKu59csovXgW_GRB8-lg" (49, 225, 2, 1) www.answers.com/jingle%26r%3D67&us...
Click to read more »to the discussion of some individual terms or facts in an article. See WP:NNC "Notability guidelines do not apply to content within an article" just a...
Click to read more »SchuminWeb (Talk) 02:06, 16 August 2011 (UTC) Which is irrelevant, since per WP:NNC, individual entries in a notable topic (which this is) need not be themselves...
Click to read more »have independent notability, but the content would fit fine there per WP:NNC. Note also that delete !votes which do not explain why a merger is not an...
Click to read more »(49, 1, 1, 1) www.answers.com/cats%26r%3D67&usg=AFQjCNFFqyNncCtKu59csovXgW_GRB8-lg" (49, 225, 2, 1) www.answers.com/jingle%26r%3D67&us...
Click to read more »article with the sources used that security deserves at least a mention. WP:NNC means that WP:N is mostly irrelevant to individual sections or sentences...
Click to read more »Necrothesp and NNC. Buckshot06 (talk) 23:58, 12 November 2020 (UTC) Delete, completely unsourced, lacks all evidence of notability. WP:NNC is never a reason...
Click to read more »and reception of Sarah Palin. It fails NOT#NEWS, but can live there per WP:NNC. Jclemens (talk) 07:18, 4 November 2008 (UTC) This appears to have been created...
Click to read more »made by the proposer and Marcocapelle clearly go against policy. See WP:NNC "The criteria applied to the creation or retention of an article are not...
Click to read more »Mandruss is looking for. DES (talk) 21:58, 4 October 2015 (UTC) Also, WP:NNC where it says: "The notability guidelines do not apply to article or list...
Click to read more »2007 (UTC) Comment - the policy that should apply to this article is WP:NNC. This is essentially information that could be merged into the main Futurama...
Click to read more »content for the article Warped Tour. The information is covered under WP:NNC but is too large to merge with the main article. Merger to one central article...
Click to read more »Chubbles (talk) 15:26, 26 September 2008 (UTC) Support within reason. Per WP:NNC anything suitable for a subpage should be includable in the main article...
Click to read more »picky here, that what you said was not strictly true in guidelines per WP:NNC; try and word your third opinion if you give one very carefully. How you...
Click to read more »the two Joes note is extremely rare and, prior to being discovered in the NNC, the 20 Joe was unknown as denomination. Original A five-note complete denomination...
Click to read more »Anotherclown (talk) 21:07, 28 September 2010 (UTC) Citing WP:NNC is rather deceptive in this case. NNC refers to the notability about content within an individual...
Click to read more »and WP:SAL do not mention buses or anything transport related, while WP:NNC clearly states most lists do not have to satisfy GNG. Adam mugliston Talk ...
Click to read more »Notability guidelines do not apply to content within an article Shortcuts: WP:NNC WP:N#NCONTENT WP:NLISTITEM WP:NOTEWORTHY The criteria applied to article...
Click to read more »and WP:SAL do not mention buses or anything transport related, while WP:NNC clearly states most lists do not have to satisfy GNG. Adam mugliston Talk ...
Click to read more »The content is covered by WP:NNC more than WP:N. Torc2 (talk) 19:36, 7 January 2008 (UTC) WP:NNC over-rides WP:N? WP:NNC still says [the] topic is notable...
Click to read more »single article with past editions and its participants. Keep per WP:ATD & WP:NNC - Article just isn't citing notability sufficiantly. Needs more work to cite...
Click to read more »things within the article. That directly contradicts our very long held WP:NNC. In articles we cover what people/entities do that is covered in RS. A politician...
Click to read more »edition is very notable in any sense per Wikipedia:Notability, and per WP:NNC, The notability guidelines determine whether a topic is notable enough to...
Click to read more »though. Artw (talk) 22:21, 26 November 2014 (UTC) Merge into the bio per WP:NNC. Ultrauber (talk) 16:51, 27 November 2014 (UTC) Delete It got hijacked by...
Click to read more »Merge - this is the only reasonable thing to do with material which passes NNC but fails SIGCOV, especially if there's an obvious article to merge it into...
Click to read more »differentiate between content policy and the notability guidelines. See WP:N#NNC. Also see Category:Wikipedia content policies. WP:OR and WP:SYNTH are not...
Click to read more »read and internalize WP:NNC. Jclemens (talk) 07:26, 16 June 2012 (UTC) I am aware of Wikipedia's notability guideline. WP:NNC isn't refuting anything...
Click to read more »deletion. The factions and races within it do not have to be notable, per WP:NNC. And I would hardly call two AFDs that closed earlier today a precedent....
Click to read more »Jclemens (talk) 05:11, 16 May 2011 (UTC) I think you are misinterpreting WP:NNC. All NNC means is that the List of fictional ducks does not have to be reproduced...
Click to read more »specific publication is not suitable for referencing within the article, but WP:NNC and I'm not trying to prove that is is notable. I'm just pointing out that...
Click to read more »cited above. Individual list elements need not be notable, either, per WP:NNC. While a quick look might suggest that the delete side has the stronger arguments...
Click to read more »opposed than a stand-alone article created from scratch) and is bound by WP:NNC more than WP:FICT; it only needs to meet WP:V, and does so using primary...
Click to read more »--Pak21 08:42, 7 November 2007 (UTC) Fair enough, what is your view on WP:NNC? I actually agree that the subject does not need its own topic, but the content...
Click to read more »Merge per Bubba73 and WP:NNC. Jclemens (talk) 20:36, 29 December 2011 (UTC) Comment Could you please explain your reference to NNC ? What I am discussing...
Click to read more »notability guidelines don't apply to article content as explained in WP:NNC, but it still needs to be reliable sourced and encyclopedically relevant...
Click to read more »notability of a person. Stub or not, inconsequential additions or not. Per WP:NNC The general notability guideline say that : "Significant coverage" means...
Click to read more »reliable sources but not necessarily independent. The distinction is made at WP:NNC which states that the notability guidelines don't apply to content. TerriersFan...
Click to read more »analysis, and fact-checking. (2) On the awards and recognition, I think WP:NNC applies here. The awards and recognition aren't being used in the case to...
Click to read more »(UTC) Keep per Necrothesp and WP:NNC. Buckshot06 (talk) 23:56, 12 November 2020 (UTC) As has been explained before: WP:NNC is not an argument to keep (or...
Click to read more »article of its own. Will Beback talk 19:43, 5 April 2010 (UTC) See WP:NNC. One term with secondary sources should be enough to save them all. Wnt (talk)...
Click to read more »the relationship. Beyond that, the bulk of this article is covered by WP:NNC. The Beatles/Sullivan connection is flawed WP:OTHERSTUFF logic - the Beatles...
Click to read more »— Preceding unsigned comment added by SobakaKachalova (talk • contribs) FYI:WP:NNC Notability guidelines do not apply to content within an article. Stop deleting...
Click to read more »the moment, and if the most appropriate article doesn't want it (per WP:NNC) there's no justification for it having its own article. There's not enough...
Click to read more »stand-alone article, but, as John says, this should be kept somewhere, per WP:NNC. Ty 07:00, 30 March 2008 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved as an archive...
Click to read more »"worthy of notice". Other shortcuts in WP:N that often are mentioned are WP:NNC, WP:NRVE, WP:NTEMP, and WP:LISTN. The lede of WP:N recognizes a number of...
Click to read more »irrelevant because notability does not apply to content within an article (WP:NNC) Nor does a list of people killed by police officers memorialize anyone....
Click to read more »card. --Lenticel (talk) 01:13, 23 September 2016 (UTC) Keep all, shoud WP:NNC should apply to redirects too. Information about the power nine can be added...
Click to read more »the important concepts to a section within Use of force, I believe that WP:NNC might apply here. The article does not become notable because of its scrutiny...
Click to read more »Fabrictramp | talk to me 14:45, 4 May 2009 (UTC) Merge to 20kLUtS per WP:NNC. The novel is clearly notable and older, hence there's a reasonably good...
Click to read more »Gene93k (talk) 16:54, 15 September 2010 (UTC) Merge to Beast Wars per WP:NNC. Don't know if enough would survive the merge to merit its own section, but...
Click to read more »'Nothing in the content of the article makes him seem notable' - See WP:NNC and WP:ARTN. Our opinion on whether a particular subject or various details...
Click to read more »guidelines do not apply to content within an article== Shortcuts WP:NNCWP:NNC WP:NLISTITEMWP:NLISTITEM WP:NOTEWORTHYWP:NOTEWORTHY The criteria applied...
Click to read more »(talk) 15:06, 27 January 2012 (UTC) Merge to Ultima Online per WP:ATD and WP:NNC. Deletion is unnecessary, as discussions of major plot elements can easily...
Click to read more »L'Aquatique[talk] 05:01, 21 October 2008 (UTC) Merge to Transport Tycoon per WP:NNC and VG's reasoning above. Jclemens (talk) 19:00, 22 October 2008 (UTC) The...
Click to read more »where you are coming from, but what you are arguing is essentially that WP:NNC works backwards: once the content of a list is shown to be notable, then...
Click to read more »--Fathermocker (talk) 18:39, 6 October 2008 (UTC) Merge to Zeitgeist the Movie per WP:NNC If it had "its own notability" or "is famed [sic]" then it should have reliable...
Click to read more »Other parts of the article, richly sourced, are additions that fall under WP:NNC. I have found during this discussion reasons that might put the article under...
Click to read more »notability of neither the list nor the list elements is required per WP:NNC. Most of the list is written using WP:Real world wording, but some parts...
Click to read more »notability--even when they discuss trivial matters like graduation or dating--WP:NNC. There are many people whose parents or boyfriends are much more famous than...
Click to read more »NBUMP=451553984 NEFA_(drug)=428773116 NESS-0327=424803248 NGD-4715=451222335 NNC_63-0532=428496550 NS-2359=424915685 NS-2664=424949355 NS-2710=424770500 NS-11394=451607097...
Click to read more »will say again are NOT rules) to the content? Perhaps you should read WP:NNC. Also, let me remind everyone what is stated at the top of WP:FICTION and...
Click to read more »by definition, always. Also true, always, by definition, is NNC > N > ATD, because WP:NNC doesn't simply support your argument, it literally IS your argument...
Click to read more »The list of names, if added to the Responses article, would fall under WP:NNC - which I believe is met. Thus the argument for a merge. DukeEGR93 17:32...
Click to read more »separate biography". This is completely irrelevent to this article (see WP:NNC). I can see no good argument for deletion here. -- simxp (talk) 22:49, 9...
Click to read more »of just a part of the Spoken word article. It should be bound more by WP:NNC instead of anything else. Besides, aren't articles generally given five days...
Click to read more »entire list taken together. That comes from the notability guideline at WP:NNC: notability guidelines do not directly limit article content. It's not "indiscriminate"...
Click to read more »within the list are notable in line with WP:NNC. Buckshot06 (talk) 23:07, 13 November 2020 (UTC) Buckshot06, WP:NNC only applies to individual items in an...
Click to read more »the content seems to belong somewhere as part of a larger article where WP:NNC will apply. So Userfy to preserve content/attribution history for now, or...
Click to read more »Masem (t) 04:18, 17 September 2022 (UTC) Nightscream, WP:N (subsection WP:NNC) states: Content coverage within a given article or list (i.e. whether something...
Click to read more »and reception of Sarah Palin. It fails NOT#NEWS, but can live there per WP:NNC. Jclemens (talk) 07:18, 4 November 2008 (UTC) This appears to have been created...
Click to read more »WP:EVENT criteria. When WP:NOTE was said, I was implying wrongfulness of WP:NNC, not WP:NOTE as a whole for clarification. The problem with that other source...
Click to read more »WP:EVENT criteria. When WP:NOTE was said, I was implying wrongfulness of WP:NNC, not WP:NOTE as a whole for clarification. The problem with that other source...
Click to read more »and WP:SAL do not mention buses or anything transport related, while WP:NNC clearly states most lists do not have to satisfy GNG. Adam mugliston Talk ...
Click to read more »September 2008 (UTC) A merge to Auke Bay would be better than deletion, per WP:NNC and WP:ATD. Jclemens (talk) 17:21, 25 September 2008 (UTC) Relisted to generate...
Click to read more »find it distressing that a split for size reasons removes the concept of WP:NNC. -Verdatum (talk) 21:55, 2 January 2008 (UTC) Keep, three games and two movies...
Click to read more »any articles say about the hall of fame per the notability guidelines WP:NNC "The criteria applied to the creation or retention of an article are not...
Click to read more »cleanup issue. And the characters in the list don't have to be notable, per WP:NNC. Characters in Devil May Cry is already pretty long as it is. This is fine...
Click to read more »there's no reason why this shouldn't be mentioned in the band's article per WP:NNC, and it seems to be fairly important in their history. The title is a plausible...
Click to read more »Maryland, Baltimore County. You may be able to argue that it falls under WP:NNC, but after cleaning up the content, it presents little more information than...
Click to read more »As part of the main Late Night article, this should be covered under WP:NNC. Torc2 (talk) 02:18, 22 January 2008 (UTC) Merge all verifiable, sourced...
Click to read more »article of a company is too long. The SQ article is long! Most importantly, WP:NNC dictates that an article should be kept if the TOPIC is suitable, not an...
Click to read more »MrKIA11 (talk) 13:11, 22 April 2009 (UTC) KeepMerge to Master of Orion per WP:NNC if sufficient RS to establish N cannot be found.Per non-trivial magazine...
Click to read more »aren't in the article, per WP:DELREASON, WP:NEXIST, WP:ATD, WP:ARTN, and WP:NNC. The crux of this nomination is "Unnecessary article split that goes into...
Click to read more »the first reference to introduce and/or cite the article's name fails WP:NNC. While there might be significant coverage alluding to this southern border...
Click to read more »November 2020 (UTC) Keep per Necrothesp and WP:NNC. Buckshot06 (talk) 05:50, 13 November 2020 (UTC) Again, WP:NNC is not an argument to keep a list, it is an...
Click to read more »think the content is not notable, I've merged it into Doctor Eggman, per WP:NNC, WP:BOLD, and WP:MERGE. --Pixelface (talk) 11:53, 10 March 2008 (UTC) If...
Click to read more »Cheers, — CharlieEchoTango — 02:56, 6 November 2011 (UTC) Actually, per WP:NNC, it's entirely plausible to have lists of content which does not individually...
Click to read more »well, that the WP:NNC says that "Notability guidelines do not apply to content within an article?" Does that mean what it says? WP:NNC goes on to say that...
Click to read more »N6-Cyclopentyladenosine=425038207 NBQX=408765621 NCS-382=425000054 NIM811=444021522 NNC_38-1049=415856907 NNK=442050794 NOBIN=440512804 NR58-3.14.3=442036533 NS-398=424846904...
Click to read more »guidelines do not limit content of lists except when it comes to people - see WP:NNC. I have not been able to find a specific guidleline for television but there...
Click to read more »"Nemesis" and delete: as this list of enemies is a violation of WP:VGSCOPE, WP:NNC/WP:UNDUE and WP:NOT#PLOT. Wikipedia is not the place to list every single...
Click to read more »schools are notable, but should not always get their own article per WP:NNC. A high school must have notable content to warrant a seperate page. In this...
Click to read more »There's no reason to delete this outright when it would be appropriate per WP:NNC in a clearly notable parent topic. Jclemens (talk) 22:38, 15 May 2011 (UTC)...
Click to read more »article does not have sufficient sources to merit retention. However, per WP:NNC it would be informative, as I've mentioned above, to include some minimal...
Click to read more »(or "prohibit", for that matter) anything. Please educate yourself on WP:NNC--specifically, that it is an option to limit certain lists to notable entries...
Click to read more »article with the sources used that security deserves at least a mention. WP:NNC means that WP:N is mostly irrelevant to individual sections or sentences...
Click to read more »for Drawn Some's ingenious argument here, I'd like to draw attention to WP:NNC and User:Uncle G/On notability#Dealing with non-notable things.—S Marshall...
Click to read more »edition is very notable in any sense per Wikipedia:Notability, and per WP:NNC, The notability guidelines determine whether a topic is notable enough to...
Click to read more »regardless of any demonstrated notability." Whatever the level of sourcing per NNC on each individual item of this list, we cannot start to create new articles...
Click to read more »encountered them at DRV trying to apply some bizarre interpretation of WP:NNC, despite trying to explain patiently several times that their interpretation...
Click to read more »sources--such as Valnet--can be used to flesh out appropriate details, per WP:NNC and thus easily making an article by, for example, copying tidbits from reviews...
Click to read more »notable. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 21:09, 29 May 2008 (UTC) Please read WP:NNC. Notability applies to topics, not article content. Text does not have to...
Click to read more »sources listed above are self-sourced but go to the personnel section WP:NNC, my understanding is that these entries need not be notable (only article...
Click to read more »weight, or turn pages through every article. Regarding summarization, per WP:NNC: "Notability guidelines do not apply to content within an article." —ADavidB...
Click to read more »personally find interesting. It is based upon Notability guidelines. See also: WP:NNC, where it states, "Notability guidelines do not apply to content within articles...
Click to read more »covered in an article do not each have to be WP-notable on their own (see WP:NNC), a RS does not have to be WP-notable—that is, it does not have to merit...
Click to read more »their old independent pages.) ETA: Thought that it might be worth linking WP:NNC (specific guideline: "The notability guidelines do not apply to contents...
Click to read more »doesn't apply to sub-articles. Guest9999 (talk) 20:59, 1 March 2008 (UTC) WP:NNC says the contents of articles do not have to be notable, only the topic....
Click to read more »anthropomorphism article. Moezilla doesn't have to be notable to merge, per WP:NNC. --Pixelface (talk) 14:58, 7 May 2008 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »14:20, 11 September 2020 (UTC) ↑WP:DELREASON, WP:NEXIST, WP:ATD, WP:ARTN, WP:NNC, and WP:HANDLE. Darkknight2149 17:05, 11 September 2020 (UTC) Delete: With...
Click to read more »notability of neither the list nor the list elements is required per WP:NNC. Per WP:TOOLONG, an article being to large (in this case making an article...
Click to read more »Even if anyone was to consider your logic there's a flaw in it overall. WP:NNC Notability guidelines do not apply to content within an article. That fact...
Click to read more »"notable", just make sure the content meets V and we'll be fine, per Wp:NNC. Jclemens (talk) 23:33, 20 October 2010 (UTC) Keep but I would prefer to...
Click to read more »yet. Jclemens (talk) 17:12, 31 July 2008 (UTC) Comment Note that per WP:NNC I prefer that if the TV IV article is kept, but the IVy awards are not, that...
Click to read more »In order for a process to work, you must respect it. Also, please see WP:NNC which states "Notability guidelines give guidance on whether a topic is notable...
Click to read more »lose something... --TK-CP (talk) 10:26, 29 March 2010 (UTC) Please read WP:NNC. Also, content proposals for the Conservapedia article should be discussed...
Click to read more »rationale for deletion. Per WP:DELREASON, WP:NEXIST, WP:ARTN, WP:ATD, WP:NNC, and WP:HANDLE, you need a better reason to nominate something than "fails...
Click to read more »deleted team list. Occuli (talk) 12:57, 9 September 2008 (UTC) Keep all: WP:NNC is pretty clear: notability requirements are much lower for inclusion within...
Click to read more »the intention of creating this non-notable item, as a separate page (WP:NNC) meant for some other reason. The article may be redirected to any other...
Click to read more »June 2009 (UTC) Merge to the artist's page. Seems to be allowable per WP:NNC, no reason to remove it just because it may not meet independent notability...
Click to read more »If it was just an issue of notability, the article should be kept per WP:NNC. But as Carson points out, it's largely original research that could and...
Click to read more »needing an AfD) to List of Unification Church affiliated organizations per WP:NNC, where it can be built up and broken out again if sufficient sourcing is...
Click to read more »Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 08:19, 27 March 2013 (UTC) WP:ABOUTSELF and WP:NNC - and an encyclopedic article requires more than just a criticism section...
Click to read more »Cool Hand Luke 23:34, 1 December 2007 (UTC) Perhaps, but I refer you to WP:NNC. Once RealClimate has been established as notable in its own right, as is...
Click to read more »contrib) 15:24, 5 November 2012 (UTC) If you read WP:NOTE, but especially WP:NNC (within the notability guidelines), I should point out this guidelines explicitly...
Click to read more »notability of neither the list nor the list elements is required per WP:NNC. Most of the list is written using WP:Real world wording, but some parts...
Click to read more »(talk) 01:04, 24 September 2008 (UTC) Merge both into Swaminarayan per WP:NNC. Jclemens (talk) 01:22, 24 September 2008 (UTC) Merge both Hariprasad Pande...
Click to read more »WP:GNG, its setting does not necessarily meet the same guidelines. While WP:NNC may not restrict the content already in the article, the article itself still...
Click to read more »(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:NNC Dan Koehl (talk) 20:58, 24 January 2017 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...
Click to read more »Keep as meeting WP:WEB, or failing that, merge into 30 Days of Night per WP:NNC. No particular reason to delete it. Jclemens (talk) 06:56, 4 January 2009...
Click to read more »Major coverage in newspapers proves notability. Notability allows, per WP:NNC, the article to cover her political work in full, even if it's not the source...
Click to read more »15 September 2009 (UTC) Retraction: Retracting crossed out section per WP:NNC Additions to Arguement: citing a source Notability is not temporary. The...
Click to read more »complained about Mark Clarke in 2008", and Telegraph. Also see WP:GNG & WP:NNC which states: ...it does not need to be the main topic of the source material...
Click to read more »article has to be notable, but rather supported by a reliable source, per WP:NNC.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 15:15, 20 August 2021 (UTC)...
Click to read more »Blogcruft Drinkadrink (talk) 05:41, 27 January 2009 (UTC) Notability WP:NTEMP WP:NNC PR - The content doesn't even delve into context or dialogue of the content...
Click to read more »to be used when determining whether an article should be stand alone WP:NNC. Lastly -- isn't the community standard found in WP:POLITICIAN? If it is...
Click to read more »As for whether the awards are notable, not all of them have to be (per WP:NNC, notability guidelines do not apply to content within an article.) Further...
Click to read more »article of its own. Will Beback talk 19:43, 5 April 2010 (UTC) See WP:NNC. One term with secondary sources should be enough to save them all. Wnt (talk)...
Click to read more »Afraid it's an NN con, but no objection to merging the content somewhere per NNC. Jclemens (talk) 05:14, 10 July 2010 (UTC) Comment - The Yahoo search of...
Click to read more »have two lists, no need to have unsourced information, but note that per WP:NNC, sourcing that meets WP:V, including primary sourcing, is sufficient to keep...
Click to read more »subject non-notable or slanted (an addressable issue), per WP:ARTN and WP:NNC, topics with coverage merit inclusion. Time to address tone and not delete...
Click to read more »and WP:SAL do not mention buses or anything transport related, while WP:NNC clearly states most lists do not have to satisfy GNG. Adam mugliston Talk ...
Click to read more »take a number 17:08, 19 March 2012 (UTC) Keep Two-step rationale: 1) per WP:NNC, non-notable content can be included in an article about a notable topic...
Click to read more »also notability does not directly limit article content as stated in WP:NNC. Although the article has improved a bit, it still only has 4 sources 3 of...
Click to read more »Aviation/Registrations. MilborneOne (talk) 20:15, 2 April 2011 (UTC) WP:N#NNC shows that "notability" applies to articles as a whole, "prominence" is used...
Click to read more »something to be worked out by editing and on the article talk page. See also WP:NNC. Ty 22:49, 5 April 2009 (UTC) Keep Several of the monuments have received...
Click to read more »very few are there WP:GNG, also it should not be judged on the basis og WP:NNC. I think it should be moved to draft for further improvements and untill...
Click to read more »therefore notable. Dandy Sephy (talk) 18:27, 3 April 2014 (UTC) Comment: Note WP:NNC indicates that "The criteria applied to article creation/retention are not...
Click to read more »apparently 'trivial' as i did allude to above, shouldn't just be deleted ie. WP:NNC "Notability guidelines do not apply to content within an article" - (also...
Click to read more »is perfectly fine and appropriate for those jurisdiction articles per WP:NNC, but I do not see a need for individual articles for these departments. Jclemens...
Click to read more »notable (but they must of course be verifiable), only the main subject (WP:NNC). I also don't see any BLP issue here, there is not even a single potentially...
Click to read more »standard does not automatically disqualify a claim in an article, per WP:NNC. George W. Bush is not wiki-notable for being a painter but I definitely...
Click to read more »separate article has, since WP:N does not apply to article content per WP:NNC. Debate 木 10:25, 26 June 2008 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved as...
Click to read more »discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:14, 4 May 2010 (UTC) Merge to Boba Fett per WP:NNC. Looking at that article, there's no length-based reason that a mere stub...
Click to read more »on-going interest and need to reference public sector institutions. As per WP:NNC, "...no amount of improvements to the Wikipedia content will suddenly make...
Click to read more »indicate a de facto policy to accept these lists. (Also, policy-wise: per WP:NNC the content doesn't have to be notable, that applies to the list as a whole...
Click to read more »vote: I didn't say every entry in such a list had to be notable, see WP:NNC, but that the subject—the awards as a collection or even multiple individual...
Click to read more »differentiate between content policy and the notability guidelines. See WP:N#NNC. Also see Category:Wikipedia content policies. WP:OR and WP:SYNTH are not...
Click to read more »fruitless.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 19:59, 11 February 2011 (UTC) Please go read WP:NNC and internalize it. Notability only applies to standalone articles. Not to...
Click to read more »of Postal codes in the Republic of Ireland thus complying with WP:NCC WP:NNC on notability. I think many of the other citations comply with WP:SELFSOURCE...
Click to read more »subject's own work, but these make up the minority of references and per WP:NNC references to a subject's own work in their biography are encouraged. Per...
Click to read more »but agree this could probably be appropriately covered elsewhere per WP:NNC. Jclemens (talk) 18:19, 26 June 2010 (UTC) Delete unless the article can...
Click to read more »encouragement to expand the article to non-controversy related material. Per WP:NNC we don't have to limit the article to solely what's covered in reliable sources...
Click to read more »10 September 2007 (UTC) It's covered by the section I linked above: WP:NNC. If the Harry Potter list is considered as part of List of fictional books...
Click to read more »like that. This article fails all five points in WP:GNG, WP:NRVE, and WP:NNC. The ability to stand with it's own article simply isn't there. --Sue Rangell...
Click to read more »stated that one particular type of software was better than the other. WP:NNC states: "The notability guidelines determine whether a topic is notable enough...
Click to read more »article or stand-alone list," cover all topics, including songs. And per WP:NNC, "Notability is a property of a subject and not of a Wikipedia article. If...
Click to read more »deemed enough to establish Montevideo cuisine as an independent topic. Per wp:NNC all this information doesn't require notability to be included in another...
Click to read more »SET '') 13:35:14 (5, 4, 4) (EDIT) User:Beetstra (contribs, talk) edited NNC_38-1049 (diff, hist) Added: 'ChEMBL' ('' -> '97170', SET '') 13:37:53 (5...
Click to read more »deemed enough to establish Montevideo cuisine as an independent topic. Per wp:NNC all this information doesn't require notability to be included in another...
Click to read more »enough coverage for a separate article but no reason not to merge per WP:NNC. Alzarian16 (talk) 14:35, 27 August 2010 (UTC) Merge per the others. Not...
Click to read more »Merge - this is the only reasonable thing to do with material which passes NNC but fails SIGCOV, especially if there's an obvious article to merge it into...
Click to read more »Further, your argument that people on this list aren't notable goes against WP:NNC that states "Notability guidelines do not apply to content within articles...
Click to read more »into Brossard, Quebec article, the city where this mall located, as per WP:NNC. I agree it may not warrant its own article but the information is verifiable...
Click to read more »Merge to the author's page per WP:ATD: content can be included there per WP:NNC, and the title is presumably a reasonable search term so should redirect...
Click to read more »fulfill criteria of inclusion as standalone article, but we may consider WP:NNC. Hitro talk 17:57, 13 August 2009 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...
Click to read more »there is content suitable for merging elsewhere (WP:ATD) in which case WP:NNC will apply and any concerns over issues finding SIGCOV of pedimental sculpture...
Click to read more »and WP:SAL do not mention buses or anything transport related, while WP:NNC clearly states most lists do not have to satisfy GNG. Adam mugliston Talk ...
Click to read more »confer notability on art galleries—as well as on artists and artwork. At WP:NNC we find "The criteria applied to the creation or retention of an article...
Click to read more »blue link, so amounts to a list of notable cricketers and thus meets WP:NNC. The other articles are explicitly lists of players who have played in first...
Click to read more »invasion "On 24 January the Natal Native Contingent at the post mutinied." The NNC abbreviation can be used here. Done "Effete" is a very niche word, I wonder...
Click to read more »talk page discussion to go more in-depth about this aspect also because WP:NNC (i.e notability criteria dictate whether we cover a topic, not necessarily...
Click to read more »reflected in titles, and 2) Notability does not limit article contents, per WP:NNC. Jclemens (talk) 03:04, 8 February 2011 (UTC) Delete listing everytime someone...
Click to read more »2008 (UTC) StrongSpeedy Keep Notability does not apply to content per WP:NNC. This is a high quality list, and the information is encyclopedic. Debate...
Click to read more »characters, which generally goes by the name of "List of X characters". Per WP:NNC, the individual entries need not be notable, and the notability of a "List...
Click to read more »unless someone can explain why his inclusion in such a list would violate WP:NNC. Jclemens (talk) 20:06, 24 August 2010 (UTC) That's a redirect to List of...
Click to read more »background and you just censoring the background... from the wiki articles. +WP:NNC:"Notability guidelines do not apply to content within an article" --IranianNationalist...
Click to read more »2015 (UTC) No, you still misunderstand notability vs. article content: WP:NNC. EEng (talk) 13:59, 18 November 2015 (UTC) Pinging User:Charles Matthews...
Click to read more »but when you are looking at WP:V that is article content policy, see WP:NNC for more info. And compare with WP:Deletion policy, which also references...
Click to read more »Polyamorph, WP:V, which contains WP:BURDEN, is a part of content policy, see WP:N#NNC. As the nutshell at WP:N states, "Notability does not directly affect the...
Click to read more »Content is not a criteron for deletion, notability of subject is (see WP:NNC). AfD is not clean up.--Goldsztajn (talk) 17:20, 24 February 2020 (UTC) Keep...
Click to read more »have to be listed. This seems to be the conclusion from the following: WP:NNC.... in part saying If the subject has not been covered outside of Wikipedia...
Click to read more »"Notability guidelines do not apply to content within an article". Read through WP:NNC and WP:NPOSSIBLE. --NqcRz (talk) 16:00, 28 February 2017 (UTC) Take a breath...
Click to read more »relates to sub-topics as the policy is mute on the topic. See for instance WP:NNC which says that Notability guidelines do not apply to content within an article...
Click to read more »discussion of this credential is probably appropriate in that article per WP:NNC. But from what I have gathered, the credential itself is not notable enough...
Click to read more »Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 08:53, 20 November 2013 (UTC) Per WP:NNC and WP:NRV, "Notability is a property of a subject and not of a Wikipedia...
Click to read more »Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 10:10, 3 April 2022 (UTC) WP:NNC would apply. BilledMammal (talk) 08:03, 4 April 2022 (UTC) Merge per BilledMammal...
Click to read more »suggesting incorporating some of the information into other articles as per WP:NNC. Finnusertop (talk) 10:51, 19 February 2014 (UTC) Delete An overly wordy...
Click to read more »Maldives can be expected to produce more. WP:RS is content policy, see WP:N#NNC. Unscintillating (talk) 01:46, 28 March 2011 (UTC) Comment – Actually I...
Click to read more »Read the magazine once and you’ll figure out their editorial style. WP:NNC and WP:ARTN apply. Funny how on Kätlin Aas’s AfD that same one sentence set-up...
Click to read more »not enough sources (as yet) to validate an independent article, but per WP:NNC there is verification to substantiate inclusion in a general survey article...
Click to read more »WP:SALAT (particularly for what the "SA" part of the acronym refers to) and WP:NNC. There's certainly no consensus on removing all information on bus routes...
Click to read more »meet V, there's no need for each element of the contents to meet N, per WP:NNC, so we're left without any good argument to delete this. Jclemens (talk)...
Click to read more »NMK NML NMM NMN NMO NMP NMQ NMR NMS NMT NMU NMV NMW NMX NMY NMZ NNA NNB NNC NND NNE NNF NNG NNH NNI NNJ NNK NNL NNM NNN NNO NNP NNQ NNR NNS NNT NNU NNV...
Click to read more »objection to mentioning the podcast in some other appropriate article per WP:NNC. Jclemens (talk) 01:32, 18 June 2010 (UTC) Do Not Delete Currently ranked...
Click to read more »notable (but they must of course be verifiable), only the main subject (WP:NNC). I also don't see any BLP issue here, there is not even a single potentially...
Click to read more »Also keep in mind that Notability is not temporary. also please see WP:NNC and read " if the source material exists, even very poor writing and referencing...
Click to read more »a group per WP:NLIST. Notability guidelines do not apply to lists per WP:NNC. SailingInABathTub (talk) 21:29, 24 March 2021 (UTC) Keep: Debated a bit...
Click to read more »there is content suitable for merging elsewhere (WP:ATD) in which case WP:NNC will apply and any concerns over issues finding SIGCOV of pedimental sculpture...
Click to read more »RedHat Linux, SCO Linux, etc). References can be improved. According to WP:NNC, "Notability is a property of a subject and not of a Wikipedia article"....
Click to read more »and WP:SAL do not mention buses or anything transport related, while WP:NNC clearly states most lists do not have to satisfy GNG. Adam mugliston Talk ...
Click to read more »notability and editing policies. Please read our policies at WP:GNG, WP:NNC and WP:NEXIST and Wikipedia:Editing policy (particularly WP:IMPERFECT and...
Click to read more »confused about WP:NPOV (representing what is in reliable sources, good) and WP:NNC (applying notability standards to article contents, bad). Nonetheless, focusing...
Click to read more »inform you that you have waisted your time. I advise reading WP:NEXIST and WP:NNC. Sourcing in an article is irrelevant to determining notability. The presence...
Click to read more »notability guidelines for its own article, and a merge to another article per WP:NNC should be forced on it". I agree with a merge at the editors' discretion...
Click to read more »institutions all over the world. So I think the article should be deleted(WP:NNC). Unatnas1986 (talk) 08:00, 8 March 2014 (UTC) Delete without merging as...
Click to read more »better explanation is given. Per WP:DELREASON, WP:NEXIST, WP:ARTN, WP:ATD, WP:NNC, and WP:HANDLE, WP:GNG is determined only by the existence of sources, not...
Click to read more »17 July 2011 (UTC) I mentioned WP:WEIGHT Note** this was taken from WP:NNC. And, this article meets WP:FAILN and deletion should be of last resort....
Click to read more »a row, under its former name, OpenERP, in 2012 and 2013. According to WP:NNC and WP:ARTN, the above should be sufficient to establish notability, even...
Click to read more »that seem to have been ignored in nominating this article for deletion: WP:NNC "Notability guidelines do not apply to content within an article" The reason...
Click to read more »before participating in Afd, seems notable., referring to WP:BEFORE, WP:NNC and WP:SIGCOV. It doesn't seems to violate what Wikipedia is not and also...
Click to read more »description of why each was notable and obviously a source. Although WP:NNC insists that entries of a list are notable, which of course in this case...
Click to read more »clearly part of a notable franchise, so the best I can see is a merge per WP:NNC. However, since a merge is an editorial decision, Keep is the logical result...
Click to read more »deletion. Content need not be NOTABLE to be merged, just VERIFIABLE, per WP:NNC, so the nominator's statement is true, but limited in its applicability....
Click to read more »Also keep in mind that Notability is not temporary. also please see WP:NNC and read " if the source material exists, even very poor writing and referencing...
Click to read more »improved. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:06, 3 March 2017 (UTC) Speedy Keep: Per WP:NNC, notability is not associated with the quality of an article. There are whole...
Click to read more »11:25, 1 March 2012 (UTC) merge selectively to Key & Peele per WP:ATD and WP:NNC. A sketch show can indeed have notable characters, but these aren't them...
Click to read more »requirement for the subject of the article, not the article content per WP:NNC. So it's fine to mention that this subject held a councillors position and...
Click to read more »