includes a list of people with the name Torrance Shortcuts WP:NNAMEWP:NNAME WP:APONOTEWP:APONOTE WP:APOEXAMPLEWP:APOEXAMPLE A name article usually contains...
Click to read more »found below, the article can stay as a basic surname list following WP:NNAME. I've moved it to Levchuk, removed the OR etymology, and added the list...
Click to read more »Perfectly acceptable set index article, satisfies every condition of WP:NNAME. AllTheUsernamesAreInUse (talk) 15:08, 17 February 2025 (UTC) Keep– This...
Click to read more »PROD removed. This name fails WP:NNAME as having no Wikipedia articles about people with the name, and having failed NNAME fails WP:GNG as having no WP:SIGCOV...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) PROD removed. This name fails WP:NNAME and WP:GNG (no WP:SIGCOV, hardly any reliable sources outside of simple...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) PROD removed. Namecruft that fails WP:NNAME, WP:NOTDICT and WP:GNG. No reliable sources outside of databases, and even...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This surname fails WP:NNAME as there are not at least two notable people with the name, nor is it otherwise...
Click to read more »back in 2004. Uncle G (talk) 20:06, 28 February 2025 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:NNAME and WP:NOTDICT, no sources found outside of random baby name websites. Brief...
Click to read more »(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Per WP:NNAME, If at least two articles matching the surname or given name of the subject...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) PROD removed. This name fails WP:NNAME and WP:NOTDICT. Being in a top 10 list for one year does not establish notability...
Click to read more »FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NNAME. Nobody of this name has an article, much less the two recommended minimum by NNAME. Clarityfiend (talk) 10:57, 15...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) PROD removed. Fails WP:NNAME, WP:NOTDICT and WP:GNG. Has no WP:SIGCOV, as I cannot find any reliable...
Click to read more »December 2020 (UTC) Keep This is a standard name article that meets WP:NNAME as it has two notable bearers. There's no violation of WP:NAMELIST here...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) I make the AFD because the PROD was reverted. WP:NNAME: If at least two articles matching the surname or given name of the subject...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NNAME and has no WP:SIGCOV. I can't seem to find any reliable and relevant sources...
Click to read more »the other content and added sourced information about the surname. Per WP:NNAME though there isn't anyone currently with an article the article is sourced...
Click to read more »JSTOR · TWL) Contested PROD. No notable people with this surname; fails WP:NNAME. Jalen Folf (talk) 05:49, 13 November 2019 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...
Click to read more »been made. There is no evidence that this name is notable; it fails WP:NNAME. It is poorly written, poorly sourced and goes into excessive detail about...
Click to read more »Daniela or Paula or Josephine or Gabriela or similar articles that meet WP:NNAME), if the male equivalent article (Mael (name)) is kept, at the very least...
Click to read more »20 March 2019 (UTC) Keep - as per User:MarkZusab and User:GN-z11. See WP:NNAME: a properly sourced article on a name - and this one is - can be notable...
Click to read more »CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 05:57, 28 February 2019 (UTC) Delete per nom. APONOTE, aka WP:NNAME, applies. Clarityfiend (talk) 20:20, 28 February 2019 (UTC) Delete - Lacks...
Click to read more »no Wikipedia articles about people with the name, so therefore fails WP:NNAME. I can't seem to find any reliable sources establishing notability, either...
Click to read more »as a disambiguation. Xx236 (talk) 06:22, 15 June 2022 (UTC) Keep per WP:NNAME. SpinningSpark 17:04, 15 June 2022 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »this is the sole use of 'Praneuf' anywhere on Wikipedia.en, so it fails WP:NNAME, which requires at least two articles on surname bearers for a family to...
Click to read more »(talk) 13:27, 9 August 2025 (UTC) The relevant policy on name lists is WP:NNAME. Bookworm857158367 (talk) 03:06, 10 August 2025 (UTC) That page says: "This...
Click to read more »surface, falls apart on further examination. First of all, the name fails WP:NNAME. More importantly, almost nothing comes up when I google anything with "Goettems"...
Click to read more »Same case as Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Agra (given name), fails WP:NNAME and WP:NOTEVERYTHING. Geschichte (talk) 20:47, 28 February 2024 (UTC) Note:...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NNAME. Nobody of that name is as of yet notable. Clarityfiend (talk) 09:33, 18...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NNAME, with only one notable bearer (Ovie Alston is short for Overton). Clarityfiend...
Click to read more »Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 18:55, 9 January 2025 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:NNAME, no sources found online that would suggest anything close to notability...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NNAME with only one valid entry, Sonic the Hedgehog. "Sonic Man" sounds more like...
Click to read more »one given name article exists, and the derivations are unsourced, so WP:NNAME applies. Clarityfiend (talk) 19:44, 18 October 2019 (UTC) Note: This discussion...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) PROD removed. Random name that fails WP:NNAME and WP:NOTDICT. No sources found outside of dictionary definitions, databases...
Click to read more »There is no evidence of notability for this surname. It is an utter WP:NNAME and WP:NOTDICT fail; there are no English Wikipedia or Italian Wikipedia...
Click to read more »meets the notability criteria suggested by Wikiproject Anthroponymy at WP:NNAME. Colin M (talk) 00:54, 2 June 2019 (UTC) You’re gonna be hard-pressed to...
Click to read more »notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 04:25, 27 August 2024 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:NNAME and WP:NOTDICT. Not seeing anything in the source listed at this article...
Click to read more »wise cow (talk) 17:28, 1 April 2021 (UTC) Moo-ve to Cow per WP:COM-MOO-NNAME. -KAP03 (Talk • Contributions • Email) 18:21, 1 April 2021 (UTC) Mooove...
Click to read more »defaultdict(float) for (N0, N1, N2), p in state_before.items(): Nnames = N1 + N2 if Nnames == 0: # if everyone is dead (should not happen with 10 days) state_after[(N0...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NNAME; no enwiki notable entries and the only valid bluelink points to an article...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) PROD removed. Random name that fails WP:NNAME and WP:NOTDICT. No sources found outside of dictionary definitions, databases...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Name page that fails WP:NNAME and WP:NOTDICT and lacks any evidence of notability whatsoever. The only...
Click to read more »articles attached to them. None of the sources attached are reliable. Fails WP:NNAME. Jalen D. Folf (talk) 18:44, 17 August 2019 (UTC) Note: This discussion...
Click to read more »Delete - the closest guidance I could find is the WikiProject essay WP:NNAME - as there's only one person of this surname with an article, it recommends...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) PROD removed. Insignificant name that fails WP:NNAME, WP:NOTDICT and WP:GNG. AllTheUsernamesAreInUse (talk) 00:46, 2 February...
Click to read more »information added in an attempt to address issues are not sufficient. Fails WP:NNAME, as not enough notable persons have this name. Jalen Folf (talk) 06:10,...
Click to read more »TWL) This article was nominated for deletion long ago. This page fails WP:NNAME and WP:NOTDICT. All sources I could find about the name are random name...
Click to read more »Ermolay on English Wikipedia, so the name in its present state fails WP:NNAME, and I cannot find many, if any sources outside of dictionaries and baby...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NNAME and has no WP:SIGCOV; therefore fails WP:GNG as well. This name is extremely...
Click to read more »about people with this name, and it has no WP:SIGCOV, so therefore fails WP:NNAME. I can't find sufficient reliable sources establishing notability, either...
Click to read more »Station1 (talk) 06:12, 2 September 2022 (UTC) Keep. Surname easily passes WP:NNAME, which requests at least two notable persons with the surname (which there's...
Click to read more »that I can see. PianoDan (talk) 17:26, 15 December 2021 (UTC) Delete WP:NNAME generally expects name lists to have at least two entries of people with...
Click to read more »February 29. I can't see evidence of notability for this name; it fails WP:NNAME and the sources I could find are limited to baby name websites and dictionaries...
Click to read more »in 2019, removed without explanation. 100% unnotable surname failing WP:NNAME and WP:INDISCRIMINATE. Of the sources in the article, one does not seem...
Click to read more »62.237.104 (talk) 16:12, 11 December 2018 (UTC) Please have a look at WP:NNAME. A requirement to have a page on the Fronberg surname is for there to be...
Click to read more »standalone list. Therefore, it doesn't fall under the typical criteria at WP:NNAME. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 10:54, 1 November 2025 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...
Click to read more »JSTOR · TWL) I can't find any evidence for this saint's existence. Fails WP:NNAME as well, and virtually all sources I can find are unreliable databases and...
Click to read more »(talk • contribs) 01:29, 5 April 2024 (UTC) Delete Completely fails WP:NNAME, no sources found to indicate that it's not a WP:NOTDICT fail as well. It...
Click to read more »discussion was delete. JPG-GR (talk) 03:09, 30 December 2009 (UTC) Template:Nname (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages) Unused template that...
Click to read more »Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 22:37, 12 December 2018 (UTC) Delete per WP:NNAME: "If at least two articles matching the surname or given name of the subject...
Click to read more »FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Not sure why this was deprodded since it still fails WP:NNAME. It could be redirected to the one person with the name but the parenthetical...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NNAME. I cannot find reliable sources for this name and it is all WP:ROUTINE databases...
Click to read more »inappropriate to create a surname index at this time. Such article would fail WP:NNAME. -- Tavix (talk) 10:48, 30 January 2020 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) PROD removed. This name fails WP:NNAME and WP:GNG. Hardly any information or reliable sources found online....
Click to read more »comes up. I'd say a single notable bearer would be a nice threshold (cf. WP:NNAME). --Joy [shallot] (talk) 11:31, 23 June 2022 (UTC) Comment. Again, I think...
Click to read more »So Wikipedia:WikiProject Anthroponymy/Standards has a section called WP:NNAME that says A name article usually contains either a list of entries that...
Click to read more »trolling? Editing Arthur Phillip article editing problems and documentation nnamed "question" utrageous Table tool TXE making text small Logo Design Article...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) PROD removed. This name fails WP:NNAME, WP:GNG due to lack of reliable sources and WP:SIGCOV, and WP:NOTDICT. All...
Click to read more »(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Per WP:NNAME, If at least two articles matching the surname or given name of the subject...
Click to read more »people with the surname (of which there "at least two" - as discussed in WP:NNAME) would seem a reasonable outcome here. Certainly don't see how outright...
Click to read more »be sought. I oppose creating a name index, such an index would fail WP:NNAME because the murder victim is not notable in her own right. -- Tavix (talk)...
Click to read more »to be created as a single-entry name index, it should be deleted per WP:NNAME. To further drive the point home, {{R from given name}} categorizes redirects...
Click to read more »hatnote would suffice. Kelob2678 (talk) 23:40, 3 February 2026 (UTC) per WP:NNAME, which was brought up below, two is enough. Kelob2678 (talk) 09:08, 4 February...
Click to read more »18 February 2020 (UTC) Two entries are fine for a surname page, see WP:NNAME - and look at the size of the German article, which shows that Rettich is...
Click to read more »20 March 2019 (UTC) Keep - as per User:MarkZusab and User:GN-z11. See WP:NNAME: a properly sourced article on a name - and this one is - can be notable...
Click to read more »the other content and added sourced information about the surname. Per WP:NNAME though there isn't anyone currently with an article the article is sourced...
Click to read more »August 2024 (UTC) Delete The sources are entirely lists and it fails WP:NNAME. I'm failing to see how the article passes WP:NOTDICT. AllTheUsernamesAreInUse...
Click to read more »in some other places" then this article runs afoul of WP:NOTDICT and WP:NNAME and is best deleted. It was also proposed that it could be redirect to Ji...
Click to read more »December 2020 (UTC) Keep This is a standard name article that meets WP:NNAME as it has two notable bearers. There's no violation of WP:NAMELIST here...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This surname fails WP:NNAME as there are not at least two notable people with the name, nor is it otherwise...
Click to read more »meets the notability criteria suggested by Wikiproject Anthroponymy at WP:NNAME. Colin M (talk) 00:54, 2 June 2019 (UTC) You’re gonna be hard-pressed to...
Click to read more »blacklist hits · user page logs · x-wiki · status · Google · StopForumSpam) Nname (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · blacklist hits · Edit filter search ·...
Click to read more »comes up. I'd say a single notable bearer would be a nice threshold (cf. WP:NNAME). --Joy [shallot] (talk) 11:31, 23 June 2022 (UTC) Comment. Again, I think...
Click to read more »this is the sole use of 'Praneuf' anywhere on Wikipedia.en, so it fails WP:NNAME, which requires at least two articles on surname bearers for a family to...
Click to read more »parent category, Category:People of European colonies, the predominate nnaming convention would require Category:People of former Belgian colonies Hmains...
Click to read more »articles attached to them. None of the sources attached are reliable. Fails WP:NNAME. Jalen D. Folf (talk) 18:44, 17 August 2019 (UTC) Note: This discussion...
Click to read more »one given name article exists, and the derivations are unsourced, so WP:NNAME applies. Clarityfiend (talk) 19:44, 18 October 2019 (UTC) Note: This discussion...
Click to read more »Delete - the closest guidance I could find is the WikiProject essay WP:NNAME - as there's only one person of this surname with an article, it recommends...
Click to read more »as a disambiguation. Xx236 (talk) 06:22, 15 June 2022 (UTC) Keep per WP:NNAME. SpinningSpark 17:04, 15 June 2022 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 05:57, 28 February 2019 (UTC) Delete per nom. APONOTE, aka WP:NNAME, applies. Clarityfiend (talk) 20:20, 28 February 2019 (UTC) Delete - Lacks...
Click to read more »JSTOR · TWL) Contested PROD. No notable people with this surname; fails WP:NNAME. Jalen Folf (talk) 05:49, 13 November 2019 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NNAME with only one valid entry, Sonic the Hedgehog. "Sonic Man" sounds more like...
Click to read more »Station1 (talk) 06:12, 2 September 2022 (UTC) Keep. Surname easily passes WP:NNAME, which requests at least two notable persons with the surname (which there's...
Click to read more »that I can see. PianoDan (talk) 17:26, 15 December 2021 (UTC) Delete WP:NNAME generally expects name lists to have at least two entries of people with...
Click to read more »So Wikipedia:WikiProject Anthroponymy/Standards has a section called WP:NNAME that says A name article usually contains either a list of entries that...
Click to read more »Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 22:37, 12 December 2018 (UTC) Delete per WP:NNAME: "If at least two articles matching the surname or given name of the subject...
Click to read more »wise cow (talk) 17:28, 1 April 2021 (UTC) Moo-ve to Cow per WP:COM-MOO-NNAME. -KAP03 (Talk • Contributions • Email) 18:21, 1 April 2021 (UTC) Mooove...
Click to read more »Daniela or Paula or Josephine or Gabriela or similar articles that meet WP:NNAME), if the male equivalent article (Mael (name)) is kept, at the very least...
Click to read more »2025 (UTC) Retarget to Kastenholz per Eureka Lott. For what it's worth, WP:NNAME requires two notable holders of the surname and Kastenholz only has one...
Click to read more »(Non-article; only content \"simon peters was found being gay with a boy nnamed andy collalo\") 04:07 Oct 24, 2002 Brion VIBBER deleted "Waring's problem"...
Click to read more »deleted "VNames" (As discussed on VfD) 12:33, 9 Aug 2003 JeLuF deleted "NNames" (As discussed on VfD) 12:32, 9 Aug 2003 JeLuF deleted "PNames" (As discussed...
Click to read more »of medicine/Renaissance and Enlightenment medicine" (content: "hello my nname is bob") 07:31 27 May 2003 Minesweeper deleted "Talk:William Heineman" (redirect...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) PROD removed. This name fails WP:NNAME and WP:NOTDICT. Being in a top 10 list for one year does not establish notability...
Click to read more »PROD removed. This name fails WP:NNAME as having no Wikipedia articles about people with the name, and having failed NNAME fails WP:GNG as having no WP:SIGCOV...
Click to read more »Perfectly acceptable set index article, satisfies every condition of WP:NNAME. AllTheUsernamesAreInUse (talk) 15:08, 17 February 2025 (UTC) Keep– This...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) PROD removed. Namecruft that fails WP:NNAME, WP:NOTDICT and WP:GNG. No reliable sources outside of databases, and even...
Click to read more »been made. There is no evidence that this name is notable; it fails WP:NNAME. It is poorly written, poorly sourced and goes into excessive detail about...
Click to read more »FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Not sure why this was deprodded since it still fails WP:NNAME. It could be redirected to the one person with the name but the parenthetical...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) PROD removed. This name fails WP:NNAME and WP:GNG (no WP:SIGCOV, hardly any reliable sources outside of simple...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NNAME and has no WP:SIGCOV. I can't seem to find any reliable and relevant sources...
Click to read more »Ermolay on English Wikipedia, so the name in its present state fails WP:NNAME, and I cannot find many, if any sources outside of dictionaries and baby...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) PROD removed. Random name that fails WP:NNAME and WP:NOTDICT. No sources found outside of dictionary definitions, databases...
Click to read more »no Wikipedia articles about people with the name, so therefore fails WP:NNAME. I can't seem to find any reliable sources establishing notability, either...
Click to read more »FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NNAME. Nobody of this name has an article, much less the two recommended minimum by NNAME. Clarityfiend (talk) 10:57, 15...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) I make the AFD because the PROD was reverted. WP:NNAME: If at least two articles matching the surname or given name of the subject...
Click to read more »back in 2004. Uncle G (talk) 20:06, 28 February 2025 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:NNAME and WP:NOTDICT, no sources found outside of random baby name websites. Brief...
Click to read more »information added in an attempt to address issues are not sufficient. Fails WP:NNAME, as not enough notable persons have this name. Jalen Folf (talk) 06:10,...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NNAME. I cannot find reliable sources for this name and it is all WP:ROUTINE databases...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) PROD removed. Fails WP:NNAME, WP:NOTDICT and WP:GNG. Has no WP:SIGCOV, as I cannot find any reliable...
Click to read more »standalone list. Therefore, it doesn't fall under the typical criteria at WP:NNAME. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 10:54, 1 November 2025 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) PROD removed. This name fails WP:NNAME and WP:GNG. Hardly any information or reliable sources found online....
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Name page that fails WP:NNAME and WP:NOTDICT and lacks any evidence of notability whatsoever. The only...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) PROD removed. Random name that fails WP:NNAME and WP:NOTDICT. No sources found outside of dictionary definitions, databases...
Click to read more »surface, falls apart on further examination. First of all, the name fails WP:NNAME. More importantly, almost nothing comes up when I google anything with "Goettems"...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) PROD removed. This name fails WP:NNAME, WP:GNG due to lack of reliable sources and WP:SIGCOV, and WP:NOTDICT. All...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) PROD removed. Insignificant name that fails WP:NNAME, WP:NOTDICT and WP:GNG. AllTheUsernamesAreInUse (talk) 00:46, 2 February...
Click to read more »in some other places" then this article runs afoul of WP:NOTDICT and WP:NNAME and is best deleted. It was also proposed that it could be redirect to Ji...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NNAME and has no WP:SIGCOV; therefore fails WP:GNG as well. This name is extremely...
Click to read more »There is no evidence of notability for this surname. It is an utter WP:NNAME and WP:NOTDICT fail; there are no English Wikipedia or Italian Wikipedia...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NNAME; no enwiki notable entries and the only valid bluelink points to an article...
Click to read more »in 2019, removed without explanation. 100% unnotable surname failing WP:NNAME and WP:INDISCRIMINATE. Of the sources in the article, one does not seem...
Click to read more »August 2024 (UTC) Delete The sources are entirely lists and it fails WP:NNAME. I'm failing to see how the article passes WP:NOTDICT. AllTheUsernamesAreInUse...
Click to read more »notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 04:25, 27 August 2024 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:NNAME and WP:NOTDICT. Not seeing anything in the source listed at this article...
Click to read more »Same case as Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Agra (given name), fails WP:NNAME and WP:NOTEVERYTHING. Geschichte (talk) 20:47, 28 February 2024 (UTC) Note:...
Click to read more »Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 18:55, 9 January 2025 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:NNAME, no sources found online that would suggest anything close to notability...
Click to read more »(talk • contribs) 01:29, 5 April 2024 (UTC) Delete Completely fails WP:NNAME, no sources found to indicate that it's not a WP:NOTDICT fail as well. It...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NNAME. Nobody of that name is as of yet notable. Clarityfiend (talk) 09:33, 18...
Click to read more »hatnote would suffice. Kelob2678 (talk) 23:40, 3 February 2026 (UTC) per WP:NNAME, which was brought up below, two is enough. Kelob2678 (talk) 09:08, 4 February...
Click to read more »TWL) This article was nominated for deletion long ago. This page fails WP:NNAME and WP:NOTDICT. All sources I could find about the name are random name...
Click to read more »name *= *([^<]*)", removed_lines)[1]; nname := get_matches("\| ?name *= *([^<]*)", added_lines)[1]; oname != nname ) ) This only returns true if the new...
Click to read more »notability for this name. Redirecting. Can be spun back out once it meets WP:NNAME." TSventon (talk) 00:01, 7 August 2026 (UTC) Prior to the change, the article...
Click to read more »people with the surname (of which there "at least two" - as discussed in WP:NNAME) would seem a reasonable outcome here. Certainly don't see how outright...
Click to read more »school attack Reason: Name of the perpetrator of the attack, alternate nname for the attack Source (if applicable): Salutations25 (talk) 02:31, 15 October...
Click to read more »