with the public festival. However, if and when a film does pass normal NFILM criteria, these awards are acceptable to note in its article if they can...

meet WP:NFILM. Onel5969 TT me 16:28, 25 July 2021 (UTC) Speedy delete: per nom. Kolma8 (talk) 18:35, 26 July 2021 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:NFILMS Nitesh003...

sources that discuss the film non-trivially. Does not pass WP:GNG and WP:NFILMS. --Ashleyyoursmile! 19:28, 14 March 2021 (UTC) Delete The movie has not...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Not notable porn film. No evidence it passes WP:NFILMS. Cavarrone (talk) 22:11, 15 December 2011 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFILMS Jenyire2 22:03, 1 March 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...

other edits outside this topic. Comment. While various "keep" votes cite NFILMS #3, there is no verifiable support for the notion that the various honors...

considerations aside, "if" these awards are verifiable this film would pass WP:NFILMS. Cavarrone (talk) 20:00, 3 August 2012 (UTC) Keep per WP:HEY, in accordance...

reliable sources to indicate that this film has had any coverage to pass WP:NFILMS. It was deproded by the original author, and after being reprodded by a...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) May not fulfill WP:NFILMS. Sources, when translated into English, seem to be mostly news of its release...

sorry Gshrotriya but there's a clear consensus that this doesn't meet WP:NFILMS at this time. Ron Ritzman (talk) 02:00, 17 April 2011 (UTC) Bhobhar - The...

TWL) Newly released film. No evidence that it satisfies any aspects of WP:NFILMS. PROD declined without explanation by a single purpose account that is likely...

directory WP:DIR. NFILMS does not really apply to awards ceremonies so it was not necessary for me to bring NFILMS into the nomination. NFILMS applies to films...

references were found there's no assertion of notability in the article per WP:NFILMS. Filing Flunky (talk) 14:07, 1 December 2011 (UTC) Note: This debate has...

based on my review of the references above and in the article. passess WP:NFILMS per 2 notable actors and coverage in media. User:GSS Can you write a table...

that flies in the face of NFILMS here. --DBigXrayᗙ 16:05, 17 November 2018 (UTC) Special notability guidelines, such as NFILMS, are alternatives to the...

July 2021 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:NFILM DonaldD23 talk to me 13:19, 30 July 2021 (UTC) Delete - does not pass WP:NFILMS and WP:GNG. Google search turned...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Contested PROD that fails both WP:N and WP:NFILMS. According to the official website, this film was screened at two minor...

(UTC) Delete Fails WP:NFILM Donaldd23 (talk) 12:24, 12 July 2021 (UTC) Strong Delete Found only one trivial mention. Fails WP:NFILMS Mehmood.Husain (talk)...

award appears to be from a minor and local horror film festival. Fails WP:NFILMS. Steamroller Assault (talk) 23:37, 6 July 2010 (UTC) Note: This debate has...

unsourced; stub; will release in 2019. Doesn't seem to pass either WP:GNG or WP:NFILMS. Regards, SshibumXZ (talk · contribs). 00:11, 4 October 2018 (UTC); edited...

seemingly user-moderated site. Doesn't seem to qualify either WP:GNG or WP:NFILMS. P.S. — A draft of the same name exists at Draft:Target (2018 film). Regards...

(UTC) Redirect to Kanshi Ram: Movie is not notable on its own. it fails WP:NFILMS. The article on the subject of the biopic can have a couple of lines about...

the two AVN wins for Best Gonzo Series should be enough for it to pass WP:NFILMS. Erpert Who is this guy? | Wanna talk about it? 11:38, 21 February 2013...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) I can't find much to say this article do meet WP:NFILMS. Redirect can be better just that I can't find where. Safari ScribeEdits...

notability. Nate • (chatter) 07:25, 4 August 2009 (UTC) Keep. Easily passes WP:NFILMS, with several reviews, notable director, notable producer, notable writers...

FENS · JSTOR · TWL) A porno series that appears to not satisfy WP:GNG or WP:NFILMS. No notable contributions to the genre. Only one significant award (Best...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Does not appear to meet WP:NFILMS. Singularity42 (talk) 02:19, 14 July 2011 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...

with this not passing NFILM. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 23:28, 30 July 2021 (UTC) Delete - fails WP:NFILMS and WP:GNG. Except the...

released then article can be re created. As of now this film does not pass WP:NFILMS and the article should be deleted. No point in sending to draft as nothing...

this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 03:25, 27 April 2021 (UTC) Delete - Fails WP:NFILMS and WP:GNG. I'm seeing lack of substantial coverage in multiple reliable...

film's box-office performance: Daily Pakistan These are sufficient for WP:NFILMS and WP:GNG. --Skr15081997 (talk) 13:03, 29 June 2017 (UTC) Keep – Meets...

Delete per nom, a non-notable movie, fails NFILM. Kolma8 (talk) 20:58, 3 February 2021 (UTC) Delete - Fails WP:NFILMS. Ashleyyoursmile! 13:25, 4 February 2021...

(UTC) Keep I've added several cites about the movie. It also fulfills WP:NFILMS. It was re-released at a film festival and has been the subject of critical...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) No source cited. Fails WP:NFILMS Jenyire2 20:37, 5 March 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...

NFILMS vary by a mile and at any case, you ought to know that other stuff exists.~ Winged BladesGodric 03:47, 26 April 2018 (UTC) Keep--Passes NFILMS...

third-party reviews. No sources cited other than IMDb. Clearly fails WP:NFILM. Numberguy6 (talk) 01:44, 12 January 2023 (UTC) Delete - I find no significant...

porncruft. It clearly fails WP:NFILM. Porn industry sources count for little since the deprecation of WP:PORNBIO, and NFILM is not met with what we have...

be Africa's highest film honour, If so, this film would seem to meet WP:NFILMS#Other_evidence_of_notability criterion "The film has received a major award...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non notable film, fails WP:NFILM as only things found in a WP:BEFORE are film database sites, promotional...

FENS · JSTOR · TWL) No indication as to why this was deprodded, so Fails WP:NFILM, no sources here or to be found. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 18:42, 6 September...

release at New Year's, other wikis, and film database sites. Seems to fail WP:NFILM. Donaldd23 (talk) 23:33, 1 October 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...

criterion 3 of NFILM. and was endorsed by User:Donaldd23 and User:Kolma8. PROD removed without providing a reason nor addressing any of the NFILM or GNG concerns...

FOARP (talk) 08:36, 23 June 2020 (UTC) Nice find, I knew it likely passes NFILMS, but I wasn't ready to invest time into finding sources. HandsomeBoy (talk)...

not seeing evidence of attained WP:NFILM notability. AllyD (talk) 06:54, 26 July 2021 (UTC) Delete: Fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. Nothing notable on a WP:BEFORE...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This is yet another film article that fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. Someone created the repository of ENTIRE Malayalam-language...

JSTOR · TWL) Appears to fail WP:NFILM as no reviews found in a BEFORE. Previously deleted via PROD in 2009 for failing WP:NFILM. Article was recreated in 2017...

FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Lack of independent reliable resources. does not pass WP:NFILM Priyanjali singh (talk) 07:16, 2 September 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails GNG and NFILMS. Heart (talk) 02:12, 3 June 2021 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Does not meet WP:NFILM and significant RS coverage not found. Awards are not significant. K.e.coffman...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) No evidence of notability meeting WP:NFILMS; content largely uncited; closest to RSes are a pile of reviews saying it's...

2021 (UTC) Keep, not only does it meet WP:GNG, but it easily passes WP:NFILM as well. There is a Variety review cited in the article [[1]], and there...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable film. Fails WP:GNG & WP:NFILMS. Lack of significant coverage of reliable sources. — Zawl 10:59, 3 February...

about a non-notable film, with no RS mentions found; fails WP:GNG / WP:NFILM. Previous PROD was removed by creating editor without leaving a comment...

people who place work in the public domain, but this fails WP:GNG and WP:NFILMS. Upload it to commons and call it a day. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 03:14, 22 December...

13:00, 9 February 2018 (UTC) Delete fails to satisfy the criteria under WP:NFILMS or WP:GNG. Dan arndt (talk) 14:29, 9 February 2018 (UTC) Deleteas per nom...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable film. Fails WP:GNG & WP:NFILMS. Lack of significant coverage of reliable sources. — Zawl 11:13, 3 February...

result was delete due to lack of significant coverage failing to meet WP:NFILM and WP:GNG Seddon talk 23:18, 12 September 2021 (UTC) [Hide this box] New...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This is yet another film article that fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. Someone created the repository of ENTIRE Malayalam-language...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Appears to fail WP:NFILM, no reviews found in a BEFORE. PROD removed with "deprod; may be notable;...

writers names. Wgolf (talk) 16:33, 31 March 2015 (UTC) Delete fails WP:NFILMS Flat Out let's discuss it 12:42, 1 April 2015 (UTC) Keep: Three of the items...

complete lack of in-depth coverage for this movie to show that it passes WP:NFILMS. I just don't see where this is ultimately notable and considering that...

directory-like listing for an unremarkable film series. Does not meet WP:NFILM and significant RS coverage not found. Awards are not significant. First...

JSTOR · TWL) This was previously up for deletion via PROD for failing WP:NFILM but was removed with reason Notable article --- Released malayalam movie...

this film hasn't started . It is a WP:TOOSOON case. The articles fails WP:NFILMS. Skr15081997 (talk) 13:01, 9 April 2014 (UTC) Redirect redirect to director...

JSTOR · TWL) This is yet another film article that fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. The general WP:NFILM notability guideline states: "If a topic has received significant...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Doesn't qualify WP:NFILMS. Regards, SshibumXZ (Talk) (Contributions). 06:05, 31 March 2018 (UTC) Note:...

made to this page.‎ The result was delete. Delete for now as failing WP:NFILM. We can revisit after the release date in June, but we can't keep the AfD...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable film, fail of WP:GNG and WP:NFILM. nearlyevil665 11:41, 27 April 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...

notability. A WP:BEFORE search came back with nothing in line with WP:GNG or WP:NFILM. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 18:44, 14 May 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

fails WP:NFILM Spiderone 20:15, 25 September 2020 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:NFILM Donaldd23 (talk) 20:40, 25 September 2020 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:NFILM. KidAd...

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFILM. PROD was removed saying that many sources exist, but I wasn't able to find anything to pass GNG and NFILM. Kolma8 (talk) 15:09...

I can't find anything to show that this short film ultimately passes WP:NFILM. The film seems to exist, but it hasn't received any coverage in reliable...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This is yet another film article that fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. Someone created the repository of ENTIRE Malayalam-language...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NFILM and WP:NFOE. Lack of detailed reviews in reliable media. The references...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This is yet another film article that fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. Someone created the repository of ENTIRE Malayalam-language...

be made to this page.‎ The result was no consensus. Whether it passes WP:NFILM isn't a sure thing, but after nearly a month of discussion there seems to...

Prodded, but was removed without any reason given. Fails WP:GNG, and WP:NFILM. Nothing significant shows up in a BEFORE search (for Ramayan Mitzoid, to...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NFILM as not a single review is available for the film. Also fails WP:SIGCOV Chirota...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Lot of PR stuff, but does not appear to meet WP:NFILM or WP:GNG. Onel5969 TT me 14:00, 14 October 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This is yet another film article that fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. Someone created the repository of ENTIRE Malayalam-language...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This is yet another film article that fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. Someone created the repository of ENTIRE Malayalam-language...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This is yet another film article that fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. Someone created the repository of ENTIRE Malayalam-language...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Subject fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. A BEFORE search did not reveal reliable sources. I don't find...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NFILM. The article makes its own case for lack of notability: "As of August 2026...

discussions. Shellwood (talk) 00:22, 27 June 2021 (UTC) Delete: Fails WP:NFILM – Kickstarter is of course a sell-added project on a fundraiser and the...

Non-notable. The creator is blocked for using multiple accounts. Fails GNG/NFILM. Kolma8 (talk) 21:57, 17 September 2021 (UTC) Delete: I don't think just...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. Nothing notable on a WP:BEFORE Kolma8 (talk) 15:20, 9 January...

appear to have any reviews or significant coverage, so meets neither WP:NFILM nor WP:GNG. I do note that it has received an award and a nomination but...

NFILM, and after some searching I could not find any reliable coverage of this. Anonymous 7481 (talk) 01:46, 29 June 2021 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:NFILM...

like as Category! A porno series that appears to not satisfy WP:GNG or WP:NFILMS Guilherme Burn (talk) 11:36, 28 March 2018 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non notable film, appears to fail WP:NFILM as nothing of substance was found in a WP:BEFORE that could help support...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This is yet another film article that fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. Someone created the repository of ENTIRE Malayalam-language...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non notable film, appears to fail WP:NFILM as no reviews or anything other than film database sites, videos, and other...

marketing. Only independent sources here are capsule reviews. Fails WP:NFILM and is probably eligible for WP:G11 given the WP:PUFFERY. – FenixFeather...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This is yet another film article that fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. References: Unsourced. Kolma8 (talk) 18:25, 20 December 2020...

FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This is yet another copycat film article that fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. Someone created the repository of ENTIRE Malayalam-language...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This is yet another film article that fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. Someone created the repository of ENTIRE Malayalam-language...

a major award is more than likely going to receive coverage. That's why NFILMS has major awards in there. The same is not true for many awards. Hyper local...

TWL) Non notable film, nothing found in a WP:BEFORE to help this pass WP:NFILM. PROD removed by article creator without adding any explanation or citations...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) I don't believe this short film meets WP:NFILM. I wasn't able to find any sources on my initial BEFORE search for PROD...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NFILMS; 3rd place award in the student section of a film festival does not make...

TWL) I can't find any reviews nor any indication of meeting WP:GNG or WP:NFILM in searches relating to this film. It does not appear to meet any of the...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This is yet another film article that fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. Someone created the repository of ENTIRE Malayalam-language...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This is yet another film article that fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. Someone created the repository of ENTIRE Malayalam-language...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Lacks WP:NFILM and WP:SIGCOV Jenyire2 11:41, 10 February 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This is yet another film article that fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. Someone created the repository of ENTIRE Malayalam-language...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NFILM and the WP:GNG. Significant RS coverage not found, what comes up is passing...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This is yet another film article that fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. Someone created the repository of ENTIRE Malayalam-language...

September 2021 (UTC) Delete: Fails GNG/NFILM. Kolma8 (talk) 21:59, 17 September 2021 (UTC) Delete. Fails GNG and NFILM. 4meter4 (talk) 23:23, 22 September...

February 2017 (UTC) Delete Fails NFILM/GNG/NWEB. Lourdes 10:37, 11 February 2017 (UTC) Delete - Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFILM. I was unable to find significant...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NFILM. ––FormalDude (talk) 14:42, 18 December 2022 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Doesn't meet WP:NFILMS or WP:GNG - seems to be WP:TOOSOON Boleyn (talk) 07:12, 11 April 2013 (UTC)...

routine coverage, and WP:BEFORE failed to find anything that demonstrated GNG/NFILM. I don't speak Telugu, which is holding me back from declaring this at PROD...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. Nothing notable on a WP:BEFORE that I was able to find. The...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This is yet another film article that fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. Someone created the repository of ENTIRE Malayalam-language...

the article should not be moved back into mainspace before meeting WP:NFILMS has been ascertained. (non-admin closure) Randykitty (talk) 14:16, 13 March...

references. No sources. Just an extended plot summary for a porn film that fails NFILMS and the GNG. All GNews and GBooks hits are spurious or, at best, trivial/passing...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NFILM, and lacks reliable sources. I searched, but couldn't find. Kailash29792...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This is yet another film article that fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. Someone created the repository of ENTIRE Malayalam-language...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This is yet another film article that fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. Someone created the repository of ENTIRE Malayalam-language...

2016. A WP:BEFORE search turned up nothing, not even the plot. Fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. Narky Blert (talk) 21:56, 31 August 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

(talk) 18:21, 13 December 2012 (UTC) Delete As PROD endorser. Fails WP:NFILMS so badly that I feel dizzy. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 18:33, 13 December 2012...

passing mentions.[1][2][3] Fails WP:NFILM. --Worldbruce (talk) 19:23, 9 July 2021 (UTC) Delete per above, fails NFILM. Anonymous 7481 (talk) 19:00, 10 July...

directory-like listing for an unremarkable film series. Does not meet WP:NFILM and significant RS coverage not found. Awards are not significant. First...

anything to suggest it passes either WP:GNG or WP:NFILM. Delete - No notability and completely fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. CruzRamiss2002 (talk) 05:37, 29 March...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFILM. The only reference in the article that speaks of the film in any detail...

reviews could be considered "nationally known critics" as required by WP:NFILM. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 00:00, 1 August 2022 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) No evidence that WP:NFILM is met. (Disputed PROD). SmartSE (talk) 17:10, 12 December 2011 (UTC) Delete...

from reliable sources, fails GNG and NFILM. Anonymous 7481 (talk) 16:07, 8 July 2021 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:NFILM Donaldd23 (talk) 12:30, 12 July 2021...

2012 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:NFILM. Hipocrite (talk) 19:19, 7 May 2012 (UTC) Delete: no indication that the topic meets WP:NFILM (however as its title is...

WP:GNG and WP:NFILM so that deletion is unnecessary in my view, Atlantic306 (talk) 22:25, 13 September 2020 (UTC) Keep. passes WP:NFILM.Pharaoh of the...

this page.‎ The result was delete. Clear consensus that this film fails WP:NFILM. Just Chilling (talk) 22:26, 18 July 2019 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This is yet another film article that fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. Someone created the repository of ENTIRE Malayalam-language...

article from a site - [1] and a few passing mentions, it therefore fails WP:NFILMS.Hzh (talk) 14:56, 20 June 2018 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non notable film, appears to fail WP:NFILM as nothing of substance was found in a WP:BEFORE that could help support...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) The film fails WP:NFILM. I have found no reliable sources that would cover the film in depth. Less...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This is yet another film article that fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. Someone created the repository of ENTIRE Malayalam-language...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This is yet another film article that fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. Someone created the repository of ENTIRE Malayalam-language...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG; unable to find any reviews, significant analysis or awards....

discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 19:21, 7 July 2021 (UTC) Delete, fails NFILM and maybe GNG. I found no coverage outside of tv listings and databases...

incubated solely because it was expected that upon release it would pass WP:NFILMS. Well, a quick look around Google indicates that significant coverage never...

notability. Fails WP:GNG. - MrX 17:10, 9 July 2014 (UTC) Delete: Fails WP:NFILMS. Lugia2453 (talk) 17:59, 9 July 2014 (UTC) Coupla comments: Is TorrentFreak...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This is yet another film article that fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. Someone created the repository of ENTIRE Malayalam-language...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This is yet another film article that fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. No references. Thanks, Kolma8 (talk) 16:39, 20 December 2020...

wikiquote template there that leads nowhere. I don't believe this meets WP:NFILMS. §FreeRangeFrog 00:06, 2 December 2012 (UTC) Delete If not a hoax, possibly...

Tigraan (talk) 12:18, 17 February 2015 (UTC) Delete: fails WP:WEB and WP:NFILMS. "This short film was released on June 30,2014 on Youtube and Facebook By...

is listed but not commented on, and a music credit for R.E.M.. Fails WP:NFILMS, WP:GNG. Yappy2bhere (talk) 06:55, 10 February 2010 (UTC) Keep. I can't...

December 2020 (UTC) Delete per nom. Fails WP:NFILM. Kolma8 (talk) 10:39, 1 January 2021 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:NFILM Donaldd23 (talk) 14:39, 1 January 2021 (UTC)...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NFILM, and lacks reliable sources. I searched, but couldn't find any except this...

should be made to this page.‎ The result was Delete. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFILM. (non-admin closure) AmirŞah 11:01, 16 November 2022 (UTC) [Hide this box]...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NFILMS and WP:GNG Jenyire2 06:19, 15 February 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

WP:SK1 and subsequent discussion shows consensus that the film meets both WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. (non-admin closure) Alpha3031 (t • c) 11:36, 2 May 2019 (UTC)...

08:32, 26 September 2016 (UTC) Delete: appears to be failing WP:GNG and WP:NFILMS. Anup [Talk] 22:44, 30 September 2016 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

search failed to even reveal the plot, beyond this passing mention. Fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. Narky Blert (talk) 17:48, 6 August 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. Nothing notable on a WP:BEFORE. PROD was removed by an IP user...

independent references. Current refs include a cast listing. Does not meet WP:NFILMS I, Jethrobot drop me a line 21:48, 29 June 2011 (UTC) Note: This debate...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails NFILM and the GNG, and violates WP:NOTDIR. "Best Solo Release" (aka something...

edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was delete. Consensus that NFILM is not met Nosebagbear (talk) 13:43, 14 January 2021 (UTC) [Hide this box]...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non notable film, appears to fail WP:NFILM. Only thing found besides database entries and videos was the article that...

FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Nothing in my WP:BEFORE search shows that this passes WP:NFILM or WP:GNG. It is a short video released by Leicester City Council but there...

site of an animated film festival that does not have a WP page. Fails WP:NFILMS. Johanna (formerly BenLinus1214)talk to me!see my work 20:12, 7 November...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) May not meet WP:NFILM notability. Also no references used. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping...

significant coverage in reliable sources and no evidence of satisfying WP:NFILM. Current sources are either announcements or passing mentions and I can't...

TWL) Can't find any reviews, or other evidence that the movie passes WP:NFILM. BubbaJoe123456 (talk) 19:44, 20 October 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Film appears to fail WP:NFILM as nothing was found in a BEFORE to meets the notability guidelines. DonaldD23...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This is yet another film article that fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. Someone created the repository of ENTIRE Malayalam-language...

Keep - Obvious keep. Regardless of the current sourcing, the film meets WP:NFILM. #1 to be exact, as the film was widely distributed and has received full-length...

2021 (UTC) Delete no coverage, fails NFILM. Anonymous 7481 (talk) 15:04, 4 July 2021 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:NFILM Donaldd23 (talk) 18:55, 4 July 2021 (UTC)...

now recreated by the original creator. However, this fails WP:GNG or WP:NFILM, it has a IMDb link (non-RS, non-SIGCOV) and a database-like entry with...

making WP:NFILM criteria 1 likely met. WP:NFILM criteria 2 is not satisfied but that is not mandatory, given WP:GNG is definitely met and WP:NFILM criteria...

actor. —Cryptic 15:34, 17 February 2015 (UTC)) Delete: fail WP:WEB and WP:NFILMS. Dai Pritchard (talk) 16:22, 17 February 2015 (UTC) Note: This debate has...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Short film doesn't meet WP:NFILM, would redirect to director, but they don't have a page either. Onel5969...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) no evidence of meeting WP:NFILMS. no awards won or critical acclaim. LibStar (talk) 03:14, 3 February 2012...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This is yet another film article that fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. References: #1 and #2 are dead. #3 - is a short mixed review;...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NFILM. That two of the actors appeared in Karate Kid does nothing to establish...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Does not meet any of the WP:NFILMS criteria and only has local secondary coverage. Cassandra 73 (talk) 16:28...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NFILM. There is also a 1958 film with the same name which makes searching for...

a single reference only providing cast and crew info. Does not meet WP:NFILMS I, Jethrobot drop me a line 21:47, 29 June 2011 (UTC) Note: This debate...

(UTC) Retain Comment: The film complies notability guidelines given in WP:NFILM. The pageviews for this article since its creation is: 98,813. In my opinion...

would show that this has received any coverage that would show it passes WP:NFILMS. It's pretty much your standard non-notable mass produced horror film. Tokyogirl79...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) fails WP:NFILMS, prob a hoax Tassedethe (talk) 22:29, 30 June 2010 (UTC) Delete. Appears...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NFILM Legacypac (talk) 22:29, 28 May 2017 (UTC) Keep has reviews in reliable sources...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG as nothing notable on a WP:BEFORE that I can find. PROD was removed...

FENS · JSTOR · TWL) A porno series that appears to not satisfy WP:GNG or WP:NFILMS based on WP:BEFORE and reference present in article. TheSandDoctor (talk)...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. Nothing notable on a WP:BEFORE. Kolma8 (talk) 16:59, 25 May...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Article fails WP:NFILM and does not have any references. Dr vulpes (💬 • 📝) 08:16, 4 October 2022...

Times, and a blog which hints that the film made little impact. Fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. Narky Blert (talk) 15:01, 5 September 2020 (UTC) Note: This...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Disputed PROD. Fails WP:NFILM. All references and actors cited are for the 2013 film. There are no supporting...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non notable film with only 1 review found, but WP:NFILM requires 2 reviews. No others found. Tagged for notability since January...

concerns around WP:NFILM and WP:GNG; needs more reviews to pass really Spiderone 14:19, 12 September 2020 (UTC) Delete fails WP:NFILM.VocalIndia (talk)...

WP:GNG and WP:NFILM. I initially WP:PRODed it with the following rationale: "A film that does not appear to pass the WP:GNG or WP:NFILM. It is currently...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Does not meet WP:NFILM and significant RS coverage not found. Awards are not significant. For AfDs...

FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This doesn't appear to meet any of the criteria at WP:NFILMS. Being shown at various film festivals is not enough to show notability...

tagged for 2 years, let alone anything that would show notability. Fails WP:NFILM. Web search found directory level info, IMDb (which appears to be source...

this page. The result was redirect‎ to List of Hindi films of 1962. if NFILMS needs updating to reflect the working consensus, please open that discussion...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NFILM, and lacks reliable sources. I searched, but couldn't find. Kailash29792...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This is yet another film article that fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. Someone created the repository of ENTIRE Malayalam-language...

WP:NFILM. Donaldd23 (talk) 12:12, 5 April 2021 (UTC) Delete per nom. Fails WP:NFILM. Kolma8 (talk) 21:23, 8 April 2021 (UTC) Delete per WP:NFILM. Riteboke...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NFILM. The only sources that i could find are database or list-type books. PROD...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Appears to fail WP:NFILM, nothing found in a BEFORE except database sites. DonaldD23 talk to me 02:33...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG; article was sent to draft by User:CommanderWaterford about half...

[1][2][3][4], and there are reviews - [5][6][7][8], should qualify under WP:NFILMS. Hzh (talk) 16:35, 5 July 2018 (UTC) Withdraw in the light of the reviews...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) No indication of notability found to meet WP:NFILM. Htanaungg (talk) 15:47, 2 November 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NFILMS and the GNG. No nontrivial coverage, no sourcing. PB videos have been treated...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFILM. Three sources listed #1 and #3 are to the same page, which is a movie database...

Fails WP:NFF due to lack of information about production, and fails WP:NFILM by defaut as no sources have been produced to assert the film's encyclopedic...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Appears to fail WP:NFILM, zero reviews found in a BEFORE. PROD removed by creator, with the justification...

(UTC) Delete - not notable per WP:NFILM. P,TO 19104 (talk) (contribs) 17:15, 29 December 2020 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:NFILM Donaldd23 (talk) 14:56, 1 January...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This is a ten word film article that fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. Kolma8 (talk) 19:18, 22 December 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable film failing WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. Notability tagged since 2017. Nothing found in a WP:BEFORE to...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Film appears to fail WP:NFILM as it does not appear to have received any coverage in independent, reliable...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Crappy bot article that doesn't meet WP:NFILM nor GNG.  » Shadowowl | talk 16:54, 21 July 2018 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

directory-like listing for an unremarkable film series. Does not meet WP:NFILM and significant RS coverage not found. Awards are not significant. For AfDs...

WP:NFILM Donaldd23 (talk) 12:19, 24 January 2021 (UTC) Delete per above. 777burger talk contribs 21:43, 24 January 2021 (UTC) Delete per WP:NFILM. No...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NFILM. No critic reviews or other significant coverage. Lennart97 (talk) 21:54...

ResonantDistortion 23:10, 7 September 2024 (UTC) Keep RD's two sources clinch NFILMS, and there's no earthly reason we would delete an article about an early...

not ROUTINE. You have misunderstood NFILM. The sources I pointed out above satisfy WP:NFSOURCES, which is NFILM's main criteria. You are referring to...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non notable film, appears to fail WP:NFILM as only 1 reliable review was found in a WP:BEFORE (Sify) that could help...

(talk) 03:07, 16 December 2021 (UTC) Delete No coverage to meet WP:GNG or WP:NFILM. A contender for WP:FREAKY though. Qwaiiplayer (talk) 13:43, 16 December...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) No claim to notability. Fails WP: NFILMS. Admiral Caius (talk) 18:01, 14 January 2014 (UTC) Note: This debate has...

this page.‎ The result was delete. Consensus is that the film fails WP:NFILM. Just Chilling (talk) 10:37, 19 July 2019 (UTC) AfDs for this article: Articles...

supported claim of notability per WP:NFILM. • Gene93k (talk) 16:13, 22 April 2017 (UTC) Delete - Fails WP:NFILM.CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 19:34, 25 April 2017...

the plot, which the article lacks, let alone any RS coverage. Fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. (A previous version of this article was speedied in 2015, with...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. Nothing notable on a WP:BEFORE . Was dePROD'ed without an explanation...

2016 (UTC) Strong delete for lack of notability and for failing GNG and NFILMS. Whatever it will be released in months, in years or maybe never is the...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This is yet another film article that fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. Someone created the repository of ENTIRE Malayalam-language...

pack, "We invite you to hear this"). The listing at BFI is empty. Fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. Narky Blert (talk) 20:18, 1 December 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

failed to find even so much as the plot, which the article lacks. Fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. Narky Blert (talk) 06:01, 4 September 2020 (UTC) Note: This...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails NFILM. Low-budge movie without evidence of any impact. Most of article is promotional...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NFILM, lacks sources, lacks categories. Dr vulpes (💬 • 📝) 06:05, 24 September...

FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable parody film. No coverage that would meet WP:NFILM. DePRODed because of the involvement of Vanilla Ice, but my WP:BEFORE found...

a copy of the one-line plot-summary in IMDb, and that was all. Fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. Narky Blert (talk) 20:57, 9 September 2020 (UTC) Note: This...

page.‎ The result was speedy keep. Nom withdrawn, no other deletes, meets NFILM; close per WP:SKCRIT (non-admin closure) Britishfinance (talk) 10:58, 2...

Fails GNG/NFILM. Nothing notable found. Kolma8 (talk) 04:58, 21 July 2021 (UTC) Delete - barely even meets WP:V let alone WP:GNG or WP:NFILM, failed to...

JSTOR · TWL) Non notable film, nothing found in a WP:BEFORE to pass WP:NFILM. Donaldd23 (talk) 16:46, 1 February 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...

not apply to film. No indication of significance, does not pass GNG nor NFILM. Eostrix  (🦉 hoot hoot🦉) 16:15, 28 May 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) I can't see that this movie meets WP:NFILM. There are several notable films by this title, but my search for sources...

per WP:NFILM. This article has zero sources. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 18:52, 19 February 2021 (UTC) Delete non notable fan film that fails WP:NFILM. Donaldd23...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Upcoming documentary failing WP:NFILMS as well as WP:GNG as on now. PROD was contested without providing reason...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Couldn't find any notability as stated in WP:NFILM. Htanaungg (talk) 04:18, 30 August 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...

websites so I have linked to the nearest thing instead). No evidence of WP:NFILM or WP:GNG. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 09:40, 24 July 2021 (UTC) Note: This...

FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NFILM... Written as an essay, surely not like a WP article, so aside from it failing NFILM WP:TNT might be needed. Kolma8...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFILM. The citations are basically listings (incl on producer's site) or passing...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NFILM, and lacks reliable sources. I searched, but couldn't find many. Only a...

Nomination withdrawn — per the added reviews by Ffranc. The article now passes NFILM. Thanks! (non-admin closure) 𓃦LunaEatsTuna (💬) 21:46, 28 June 2022 (UTC)...

discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 06:37, 8 July 2021 (UTC) Delete fails WP:NFILM, lacks significant coverage in reliable independent sources. The Films.lk...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NFILM, and lacks reliable sources. I searched, but only found passing mention...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) No claim to notability. Fails WP: NFILMS. Admiral Caius (talk) 18:04, 14 January 2014 (UTC) Note: This debate has...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NFILM. The article makes its own case for lack of notability: "As of August 2026...

sources. Clarityfiend (talk) 03:28, 25 January 2014 (UTC) Delete - Fails WP:NFILMS, no Wikified links to actors, actresses and key people and companies in...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. Nothing notable on a WP:BEFORE . Was dePROD'ed without an explanation...

film festival [1], but this does not meet the "major award" criteria of WP:NFILM and it does not appear to meet any of the other criteria either. Laplorfill...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. Nothing notable on a WP:BEFORE. PROD was removed by an IP user...

7-12, 1987), The Philadelphia Enquire (May 12, 1988). Enough to pass WP:NFILMS. Cavarrone (talk) 21:26, 19 March 2012 (UTC) Keep Found same sources as...

not properly referenced as having any notability claim that would pass WP:NFILM. As always, every film is not automatically entitled to have a Wikipedia...

see WP:NFILM met. Celestina007 (talk) 00:14, 11 July 2021 (UTC) Delete, fails NFILM and even GNG. The current citations do not satisfy NFILM as IMDb...

04:25, 11 July 2021 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:NFILM Donaldd23 (talk) 12:26, 12 July 2021 (UTC) Delete FAILS WP:NFILM Nitesh003 (talk) 14:46, 12 July 2021 (UTC)...

this page.‎ The result was delete. Unanimity that all three films fail WP:NFILM. Just Chilling (talk) 22:51, 20 July 2019 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles...

but nothing even as thorough as the IMDb 4-line plot summary. Fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. Narky Blert (talk) 19:18, 10 September 2020 (UTC) Note: This...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This is yet another film article that fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. References: None. Kolma8 (talk) 19:06, 20 December 2020 (UTC)...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This is yet another film article that fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. References: All three references are the database entries. Kolma8...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable short film, fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. It's described as a runner up in a competition for amateur local...

contrast User:Lugnuts, I see no available sources that indicate notability per NFILMS, GNG, and WP:NFO. According to one source, Zafranovic made this film as...

to this page.‎ The result was delete. Seems no real argument this passes NFILMS and that is the standard we apply. if you think my reading of this in the...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NFILM, and lacks reliable sources. Kailash29792 (talk) 09:38, 31 December 2020...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. Nothing notable on a WP:BEFORE. This is essentially a WP:1S...

up nothing at all except the usual listings sites and scraoes. Fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. Narky Blert (talk) 16:24, 2 August 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. Nothing notable on a WP:BEFORE. I tried to PROD it, but an IP-only...

is yet another film article that fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. The REDIFF review would not pass per WP:NFILM as it fails "full-length reviews by two or...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. Nothing notable on a WP:BEFORE. PROD was removed by an IP user...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. Nothing notable on a WP:BEFORE Kolma8 (talk) 11:08, 16 January...

mere existence of two reviews automatically guarantees notability via WP:NFILM indicates a very superficial and inaccurate reading of that guideline. After...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This is yet another film article that fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. References: One negative REDIFF review. Kolma8 (talk) 18:37...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This is yet another film article that fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. References: All two references are the database entries. Kolma8...

Delete - fails NFILM and GNG. Cannot find any reviews or other coverage. ‡ El cid, el campeador talk 13:07, 7 July 2021 (UTC) Delete, fails NFILM and GNG. Research...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NFILM. No awards, no national distribution, few reliable sources with reviews...

WP:NFILM is a different nation/people group than the English speaking world. Altogether, it's enough to pass WP:SIGCOV and criteria 1 and 5 of WP:NFILM.4meter4...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This is yet another film article that fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. References: #1 is to iTune; #2 will not pass for a reliable...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) No sources, fails WP:NFILM. All plot as well, no encyclopedic value. Kirbanzo (talk) 23:50, 7 September...

search for the Hindi title, सती नर्मदा, fared no better. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFILM. Narky Blert (talk) 16:57, 21 April 2021 (UTC) Comment by nom. As a curiosity...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Article does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NFILM. No sources in the article. WP:BEFORE showed promos, directory listings...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. Nothing notable on a WP:BEFORE. The only reference in the article...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) A non notable film, Fails WP:NFILM. Citterz (talk) 18:34, 23 March 2021 (UTC) Struck the nomination rationale...

- A search only comes up with IMDB and Facebook - which according to WP:NFILM are not reliable sources - and thus does not satisfy the notability guidelines...

that a 1996 film is "really old"), but nothing of any substance. Fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. Narky Blert (talk) 05:50, 5 September 2020 (UTC) Note: This...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This film doesn't qualify WP:NFILM or WP:GNG. I had moved it to drafts so that it could be improved but the...

FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non notable film by a non notable director. It fails WP:NFILM that requires a film to be "widely distributed and has received full-length...

6 July 2021 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:NFILM Donaldd23 (talk) 13:04, 6 July 2021 (UTC) Delete per above, fails NFILM. Anonymous 7481 (talk) 16:20, 7 July...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Appears to fail WP:NFILM, could find nothing other than database listings and non-independent sources...

discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 23:58, 2 March 2017 (UTC) Delete per WP:NFILM. If there is any info that can be merged somewhere that is fine but I couldn't...

discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 16:04, 27 June 2021 (UTC) Delete fails WP:NFILM. Anonymous 7481 (talk) 16:20, 27 June 2021 (UTC) Delete. There are many...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Zero significant coverage. Fails WP:NFILM. IMDb is unreliable as a source per this discussion. Jalen Folf (talk) 17:29...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Could not find sources for passing WP:NFILM. Trying an individual nomination instead to see whether it gives a better...

(UTC) Delete Does not meet NFILM, not much at IMDB page. Royal Autumn Crest (talk) 18:04, 10 June 2021 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:NFILM Donaldd23 (talk) 21:02...

14:26, 2 July 2021 (UTC) Delete - fails GNG, and I argue it also fails NFILM. NFILM says: "The film is widely distributed and has received full-length reviews...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This is yet another film article that fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. Ref: 1 is primary 2 is dead 3 is dead 4 is a REDIFF review fails...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable film fails WP:NFILM. Appears to be a WP:PROMOTION violation by a WP:SPA. GretLomborg (talk)...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This is yet another film article that fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. References: All three references are the database entries +...

WP:BEFORE except film database sites and videos. No reviews found. Fails WP:NFILM. This was removed without explanation nor any improvement to the article...

newspapers; therefore meets WP:NFILM. -- Ab207 (talk) 05:27, 15 March 2021 (UTC) Keep as clearly passes criteria one of WP:NFILM as reviewd in at least two...

corroborate the one in the article; nothing resembling WP:RS. Fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. Narky Blert (talk) 15:02, 5 June 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NFILM by a mile.Non-notable documentary.Part of a promotional walled garden around...

must satisfy RS - and this one doesn't, as any translation shows. Fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. Narky Blert (talk) 18:07, 5 September 2020 (UTC) Note: This...

over a period of years. The article doesn't make any claim to passing WP:NFILM. It's screened at several film festivals, but that in and of itself isn't...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFILMS. The article's only reference is in a Telegu cinema database. I am finding...

no WP:SIGCOV at all so does not meet WP:GNG. I can't see a passing of WP:NFILM either. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 18:50, 3 July 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. Nothing notable on a WP:BEFORE. This is essentially a WP:1S...

an apparently unreleased film, with no indication of notability per WP:NFILM. No significant coverage online in WP:Reliable sources, just lots of marketing...

FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Promo entry on an unremarkable movie; does not meet WP:NFILM. The awards listed -- "8th Best Film" -- is not significant. No encyclopedically...

film does not currently meet the notability requirements as outlined in WP:NFILM and, by extension, WP:GNG. TheSandDoctor Talk 07:45, 8 November 2020 (UTC)...

TWL) Non notable film, nothing found in a WP:BEFORE to help it pass WP:NFILM. Only things found were film database sites and promotional material. PROD...

They aren't reviews, nor could I find any. I feel that this film fails WP:NFILM. Donaldd23 (talk) 00:05, 1 October 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) disputed draftification. Fails WP:NFILM 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 15:15, 27 June 2022 (UTC) Note:...

significant coverage in reliable sources and no evidence of satisfying WP:NFILM. GSS (talk|c|em) 14:47, 20 March 2018 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFILM. The only source I could find that would qualify as reliable in the context...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NFILM. The three links provided do not cover the film well. Also, I am not sure...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Per WP:NFILM. Unreleased movie still in production. Insignificant coverage of the film...

actors on the cast (particularly Olivia Newton-John), but looking through WP:NFILM that doesn't appear to actually be a criterion for film notability. signed...

JSTOR · TWL) Film with nothing found in a WP:BEFORE to help it pass WP:NFILM. Donaldd23 (talk) 18:56, 16 September 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...

(talk) 21:22, 18 September 2020 (UTC) Comment possibly the film passes WP:NFILM, the language seriously needs improvement to make it encyclopedic. --☆★Mamushir...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NFILM. Pardon my failure of BEFORE, but I don't see anything in the article that...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Appears to fail WP:NFILM as no reviews found in a BEFORE DonaldD23 talk to me 12:15, 6 September...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NFILM; unreleased, referenced with a few promo links, no significant coverage...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) currently fails WP:NFILM with no meaningful coverage and several months til release. PRAXIDICAE🌈...

based on the notability of the film Beyond Treason, which also fails WP:NFILMS and is currently at AFD. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 03:01, 4 August 2014 (UTC)...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Crappy bot article that doesn't meet WP:NFILM nor GNG. » Shadowowl | talk 12:31, 21 July 2018 (UTC) Comment. This article...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NFILMS. The film was never released commercially, is not historically notable,...

Current refs include IMDB and cast listings elsewhere. Does not meet WP:NFILMS I, Jethrobot drop me a line 21:35, 29 June 2011 (UTC) Note: This debate...

(talk) 02:59, 25 September 2020 (UTC) Delete - concerns around WP:GNG and WP:NFILM; the film exists but there is a complete lack of coverage/reviews Spiderone...

discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 00:08, 29 March 2017 (UTC) Delete per WP:NFILM and WP:SELFPROMOTION. I hope the "bounding" students used a steady-cam....

Non notable movie with a non notable cast and crew. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFILM. Has no references, and searching provides for no coverage in reliable sources...

that this passes WP:GNG or WP:NFILM. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 17:07, 10 August 2020 (UTC) Delete: Fails the GNG and NFILM. No evidence of significant...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Short film, appears to fail WP:NFILM as nothing of note was found in a BEFORE. DonaldD23 talk to me 18:25, 7...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non notable film, fails WP:NFILM. Nothing found in a WP:BEFORE to help it pass. PROD removed because "It's...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This is yet another film article that fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. References: One archived reference to the film database entry...

mention, and the usual collection of listings sites and WP scrapes. Fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. Narky Blert (talk) 19:01, 31 July 2020 (UTC) Delete Non notable...

wasn't able to find where there's coverage enough to justify it meeting NFILM. To be honest, most short films have a big struggle meeting notability guidelines...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Does not meet WP:NFILM criteria. ––FormalDude talk 02:22, 29 August 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

due to concerns around WP:NFILM and WP:GNG Spiderone 18:01, 7 August 2020 (UTC) Delete since subject blatantly fails WP:NFILM. Wikipedia is not a directory...

reliable sources.[1][2] The film exists, but doesn't pass WP:GNG or WP:NFILM. Worldbruce (talk) 04:52, 18 December 2018 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. Nothing notable on a WP:BEFORE. PROD was removed by an IP user...

the end, and doesn't even attempt a notability claim that would pass WP:NFILM. As always, every film is not automatically guaranteed a Wikipedia article...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Absolutely nothing to suggest this meets WP:NFILM or even WP:GNG. I can find no coverage outside of what is provided in the...

sources including a sufficient number of reviews and others to pass WP:NFILMS. No need to waste more time here. Ricky81682 (talk) 02:31, 19 January 2016...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:GNG or WP:NFILM. The refs are: routine announcement from a questionably WP:RS source with...

Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 19:21, 7 July 2021 (UTC) Delete unfortunately this fails NFILM as it has no reliable coverage aside from a review by DVD Talk. No reviews...

as required by WP:NFILM for undistributed films. Quasihuman | Talk 09:47, 22 June 2011 (UTC) Delete this non-notable film (WP:NFILM). It has no reliable...

neccessary specs to statisfy WP:NFILM. Sunshine1191 (talk) 11:30, 29 September 2020 (UTC) Delete - does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NFILM, which are the agreed guidelines...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Does not meet WP:NFILM; significant RS coverage not found. Sourcing is unselective databases or...

with Ab207, G4 may have been prudent in this case and it does not meet WP:NFILM. A S U K I T E  23:28, 11 June 2021 (UTC) Draftify I think it can be improved...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. Nothing notable on a WP:BEFORE. Was tagged for being unsourced...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NFILM. No significant coverage, review or anything. আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 19:41...

July 2018 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:NFILM.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 22:46, 31 July 2018 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:NFILM non notable actors. Non notable film...

WP:GNG. FiddleheadLady (talk) 14:10, 21 July 2021 (UTC) Delete, fails WP:NFILM DonaldD23 talk to me 14:58, 21 July 2021 (UTC) Keep. Fred Olen Ray is a...

as an article once it has been released and the sources required by WP:NFILM exist and can be added. Eluchil404 (talk) 09:08, 3 June 2017 (UTC) Channa...

(talk) 02:56, 25 September 2020 (UTC) Delete - concerns around WP:GNG and WP:NFILM; the article claims that the film was released to mixed reviews but I'm...

WP:NFILM and importantly WP:GNG. No reliable sources have covered this movie. Jupitus Smart 18:04, 12 March 2017 (UTC) Delete. Fails WP:GNG, WP:NFILM. SW3...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) PROD was The only criterion of WP:NFILM that this stands a chance of passing is number 3. I don't, however, believe...

August 2020 (UTC) Delete fails WP:NFILM Donaldd23 (talk) 12:32, 30 August 2020 (UTC) Delete - concerns around WP:NFILM and WP:GNG Spiderone 14:02, 30 August...

discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:41, 22 May 2017 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFILM. Zero sourcing and there is a hint of WP:COI. This probably could have been...

anything to show this film meets WP:GNG, and certainly doesn't meet WP:NFILM. Notable cast members do not generally grant notability. What is missing...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This is yet another film article that fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. References: All three references are the database entries. Kolma8...

2017 film. Robert McClenon (talk) 23:40, 12 April 2017 (UTC) Delete Per WP:NFILM and reasoning mentioned above. Comatmebro User talk:Comatmebro 00:12, 13...

discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 21:19, 6 July 2021 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:NFILM Donaldd23 (talk) 12:31, 12 July 2021 (UTC) Relisted to generate a more thorough...

list of reviews on ImDB took a while, but no joy there. Thus failure of WP:NFILM. No single obvious redirect target, so delete for now. Nosebagbear (talk)...

discussions. Roller26 (talk) 17:03, 30 June 2021 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:NFILM Donaldd23 (talk) 21:31, 30 June 2021 (UTC) Delete - Can only find the film...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NFILM. No independent notability given, and the award appears to be one for participation...

this page.‎ The result was delete. Clear consensus that this film fails WP:NFILM. Just Chilling (talk) 18:14, 20 July 2019 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NFILM, and lacks reliable sources. I searched, but couldn't find. Kailash29792...

While the series is clearly notable, this particular short does not pass WP:NFILM. Onel5969 TT me 13:44, 11 February 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...

20:18, 11 April 2014 (UTC) Delete - Mostly unsourced material, failing WP:NFILMS. ///EuroCarGT 02:39, 12 April 2014 (UTC) Redirect to Adrian_Fulle#Film....

JSTOR · TWL) Doesn't meet WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. Going on Netflix isn't enough for notability. Keep. Passes WP:SIGCOV and WP:NFILM with multiple independent...

which I subsequently attempted to source without success. The work fails WP:NFILMS as I was unable to find substantive third-party coverage of the film itself...

feed. This short film does not appear to meet our standards found at WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 10:18, 21 May 2021 (UTC) Note: This...

Thanks, ✗plicit 01:35, 18 June 2021 (UTC) Delete - Fails the WP:GNG and WP:NFILM. The article lists three "critical reviews", but in one of them I can't...

recently recreated. A direct to DVD film, which fails both WP:GNG and WP:NFILM. Onel5969 TT me 17:10, 25 August 2018 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NFILMS. The only evidence that this film even existed is an IMDB listing, a few...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NFILM. Sources for the 1973 film not found, unlike Alam Ara, the 1931 film. Merry...

significant coverage in reliable sources and no evidence of satisfying WP:NFILM" which is still true. The four sources are two press releases, one listing...

(talk) 03:00, 25 September 2020 (UTC) Delete - concerns around WP:GNG and WP:NFILM; we will need more than database listings and cinema showtimes to establish...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NFILM. Its 2020 but the film's principle photography is not started yet. In 2017...

is a non-notable documentary that relies on primary sources. It fails WP:NFILMS, as it lacks critical reviews, awards, or wide release. NinjaRobotPirate...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This is yet another film article that fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. References: All three references are the database entries. Kolma8...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NFILM: Copy of recently deleted article and no better sources to support notability...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Does not appear to satisfy WP:NFILMS. PROD declined without explanation by an IP. Safiel (talk) 02:08, 12 September...

discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:07, 10 July 2021 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:NFILM Donaldd23 (talk) 12:27, 12 July 2021 (UTC) Relisted to generate a more thorough...

Delete fails WP:NFILM. Only sources I found were wikis and databases. Anonymous 7481 (talk) 22:47, 27 June 2021 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:NFILM Donaldd23 (talk)...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Appears to fail WP:NFILM, no reviews found in a BEFORE. All currents sources are database sites....

original author without addressing the underlying concern. Appears to fail WP:NFILMS. I am unable to locate any significant reliable source coverage to establish...

not satisfy wp:nfilm or wp:sigcov --☆★Mamushir (✉✉) 17:03, 19 September 2020 (UTC) Delete due to concerns around WP:GNG and WP:NFILM Spiderone 19:16...

marketing. Only independent sources here are capsule reviews. Fails WP:NFILM and is probably eligible for WP:G11 given the WP:PUFFERY. – FenixFeather...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Doesnt meet WP:NFILM Zazzysa (talk) 16:44, 18 July 2017 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...

or reviews; nothing that comes remotely close to the requirements of WP:NFILM. Dorsetonian (talk) 20:08, 24 March 2018 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This is yet another film article that fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. References: None. Kolma8 (talk) 18:24, 20 December 2020 (UTC)...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This is yet another film article that fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. References: One, which is dead. Article was tagged for verification...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Appears to fail WP:NFILM as I couldn't find any reviews in a BEFORE. PROD removed with "AFD it if...

coverage in RS. NickCT (talk) 13:56, 21 July 2021 (UTC) Delete, fails WP:NFILM DonaldD23 talk to me 14:57, 21 July 2021 (UTC) Keep. Major mainstream film...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) A film that fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. The general notability guideline states: "If a topic has received...

policy based reasons for deletion and consensus that the film passes WP:NFILM (non-admin closure) Alpha3031 (t • c) 11:38, 2 May 2019 (UTC) [Hide this...

and the principal photography has also ended, meets the criteria of WP:NFILMS. 14:49, 27 March 2013 (UTC) Keep per adequately meeting WP:NF. While certainly...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This is yet another film article that fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. References: One reference that mentioned the movie in passing...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NFILM, like most Woody Woodpecker shorts. A basic BEFORE search found no significant...

TWL) A short film, never released in theaters, no indication it meets WP:NFILM, and nothing in searches to show it passes WP:GNG. Onel5969 TT me 18:26...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFILM. The citations are basically listings or passing mentions. WP:BEFORE did...

be notable, as I cannot find anything in a WP:BEFORE to help it pass WP:NFILM. Donaldd23 (talk) 16:18, 20 June 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...

and WP:NFILM are passed and deletion is unnecessary in my view, Atlantic306 (talk) 21:37, 22 September 2020 (UTC) Keep - Also meets WP:NFILM WP:GNG --...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non notable film, appears to fail WP:NFILM. Nothing found in a WP:BEFORE, Wikipedia is not an IMdB mirror. (Previously...

this page.‎ The result was keep. Consensus is that the subject passes WP:NFILM as it has multiple independent critical reviews. (non-admin closure) Curbon7...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NFILM, does not have categories, claims to be in development but does not mention...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NFILM, as tagged since March 2012. The article was deprodded by Patar knight,...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Crappy bot article that doesn't meet WP:NFILM nor GNG. » Shadowowl | talk 16:56, 21 July 2018 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

coverage from WP:RS, no significant review or anything. Fails WP:GNG, WP:NFILM. আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 12:16, 26 August 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

Non notable documentary, nothing found in a WP:BEFORE to help it pass WP:NFILM. Prior AfD ended in "no consensus". Donaldd23 (talk) 00:39, 3 February 2021...

independent reliable sources to pass WP:GNG, and certainly doesn't meet WP:NFILM. Onel5969 TT me 03:41, 26 September 2018 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. Nothing notable on a WP:BEFORE. Anton.bersh (talk) 08:00, 5...

have won. Even if there were, not significant awards. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFILM. Onel5969 TT me 12:15, 11 July 2018 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...

2020 (UTC) Delete fail WP:NFILM . NO evidence of notability Samat lib (talk) 22:43, 24 October 2020 (UTC) Delete per WP:NFILM and nom. Roller26 (talk)...

TWL) Non notable fan film, nothing found in a WP:BEFORE to help it pass WP:NFILM. Tagged for notability since May 2017. Previous AfD was no consensus. Donaldd23...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NFILM, and lacks reliable sources. I searched, but couldn't find. Kailash29792...

beautiful when someone hands us the perfect WP:CRYSTAL to go along with WP:NFILMS. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 08:30, 3 January 2013 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...

25 May 2021 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:NFILM Donaldd23 (talk) 13:08, 25 May 2021 (UTC) Delete: per nom. Fails GNG and NFILM. Nothing here to support notability...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This is yet another film article that fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. References: One reference, mentioning the film in passing. Kolma8...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. Nothing notable on a WP:BEFORE Kolma8 (talk) 22:43, 6 February...

TWL) Non notable film, nothing found in a WP:BEFORE to help it pass WP:NFILM. Tagged for notability since June 2017. PROD removed because "deprodding...

(talk) 03:03, 25 September 2020 (UTC) Delete - concerns around WP:GNG and WP:NFILM; the database listings prove that the film exists but there is nothing to...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails NFILM. No SIGCOV. No reviews on Rotten Tomatoes. Passing mentions here and there...

well-developed articles, but notability is not WP:INHERITED. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFILM. Narky Blert (talk) 18:58, 12 May 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Does not meet criteria of WP:NFILM. I am unable to find multiple reliable sources discussing this film. Proposed...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NFILM. Has no sources. » Shadowowl | talk 16:16, 25 July 2018 (UTC) Note: This...

Non-notable film Nördic Nightfury 08:41, 21 February 2017 (UTC) Delete - fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. DrStrauss talk 09:30, 21 February 2017 (UTC) Comment – @Nordic...

without explanation. Concern was: No notability claims. Appears to fail WP:NFILMS. BOVINEBOY2008 21:49, 11 August 2011 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...

sources and see no evidence that this fan film is notable according to WP:NFILM or the general notability guideline. Current article is just an unsourced...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Doesn't meet WP:NFILM or WP:GNG. Boleyn (talk) 08:51, 21 June 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails NFILM and the GNG not to mention WP:INDISCRIMINATE. Little more than an commentary-free...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NFILM, and lacks reliable sources. I searched, but couldn't find. Kailash29792...

no other reasons to assume that it might be notable in any way. Fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. Regards SoWhy 16:15, 19 July 2019 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Created by a UPE. Fails WP:NFILM – multiple reviews are required – here, awards in non-notable ROTM festivals...

opinions to keep are somewhat weak but there is an overall view that WP:NFILM is met. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:22, 31 July 2026 (UTC) [Hide this box]...

Wikipedia:WikiProject Animation it fits under Films in the hierarchy, so WP:NFILMS? - see also [the Project Animation Style Guide] Flat Out (talk) 02:11, 6...

18:24, 30 June 2021 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:NFILM Donaldd23 (talk) 21:31, 30 June 2021 (UTC) Delete fails NFILM. Anonymous 7481 (talk) 22:18, 2 July 2021...

notable short 3 minute film, nothing found in a WP:BEFORE to help it pass WP:NFILM. Should redirect to director Jacqueline Wright where it is already mentioned...

JSTOR · TWL) Nothing is written about the movie, fails WP:BASIC and WP:NFILM Flat Out (talk) 23:55, 6 February 2017 (UTC) Strong Delete - A quick look...

underground notoriety on the review circuit, it pretty thoroughly fails WP:NFILM. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 04:35, 17 December 2020 (UTC)...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NFILM and the GNG. Only claim of notability is that the studio that made this...

stand alone article. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFILM.Kolma8 (talk) 06:19, 5 May 2021 (UTC) Delete fails WP:NFILM Donaldd23 (talk) 20:06, 10 May 2021 (UTC)...

(talk) 05:01, 10 July 2021 (UTC) Withdrawing as I clearly misinterpreted WP:NFILM in this instance. Curbon7 (talk) 20:43, 11 July 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non notable film, appears to fail WP:NFILM as only one review (rediff) was found DonaldD23 talk to me 16:30, 22 January...

Tokyogirl79 (talk) 03:44, 15 October 2011 (UTC)tokyogirl79 Delete fails WP:NFILMS. 11coolguy12 (talk) 07:37, 15 October 2011 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...

NFILM and GNG. I could find no coverage for this after some extensive research. Anonymous 7481 (talk) 02:15, 30 June 2021 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:NFILM...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Appears to fail WP:NFILM Mvcg66b3r (talk) 00:48, 23 July 2022 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...

Non notable film, nothing found in a WP:BEFORE search to help it pass WP:NFILM. Wikipedia is not IMdB. Donaldd23 (talk) 20:21, 19 December 2020 (UTC) Note:...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NFILM. The film has not been released yet. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 04:40, 7 December...

directory-like listing for an unremarkable film series. Does not meet WP:NFILM and significant RS coverage not found. Awards are not significant. For an...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:TOOSOON, WP:GNG and WP:NFILM. Ad Orientem (talk) 20:42, 17 November 2017 (UTC) Note: This debate has...

significant coverage; no reviews available on digital archives. Fails WP:NFILM. Jalen Folf (talk) 01:17, 18 October 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...

party sources. Only myspace and some unreliable sources found. Fails WP:NFILMS. Jim Carter (from public cyber) 09:40, 7 September 2014 (UTC) Delete not...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NFILM & WP:GNG. Didn't won any award, have no review from any independent source...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable film which does not meet WP:NFILM requirements. No citations apart from an IMDb link. Could not find any reliable...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Can't find evidence that this meets WP:NFILM. No reviews or later critical commentary located on a search of Google,...

internet for WP:BEFORE, there is really nothing to support that it meets WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. The original play that the film is based of probably does have...

2021 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:NFILM Donaldd23 (talk) 15:52, 29 January 2021 (UTC) Delete - meets neither WP:GNG or WP:NFILM. Onel5969 TT me 16:54, 29 January...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NFILM due to no sources proving notability. Also has persisting neutrality issues...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This seems to fail WP:NFILM as there is very little coverage other than the film festival listing and...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Crappy bot article that doesn't meet WP:NFILM nor GNG. » Shadowowl | talk 14:32, 21 July 2018 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

RS reviews available, fails WP:NFILM. --Ab207 (talk) 12:19, 7 September 2020 (UTC) Delete due to concerns around WP:NFILM and WP:GNG Spiderone 14:10, 12...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) I'm not finding much to indicate a passing of NFILM, let alone GNG. Other than the review in the article, the only thing I've...

reliable sources that are independent of the subject and no sign of passing WP:NFILM. PROD-contested by an anonymous IP whom I'm assuming is the article creator...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This is yet another film article that fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. Unsourced. Not much comes on a g-search. Kolma8 (talk) 18:41...

notability, no significant coverage from independent sources - fails WP:NFILMS. MikeWazowski (talk) 17:42, 29 July 2011 (UTC) Delete Maybe it has a release...

deletion discussions. Loafiewa (talk) 20:05, 1 July 2021 (UTC) Delete fails NFILM and WP:BEFORE. The large number of awards won by this appear to be non-notable...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Subject fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. Only one cited source focuses on this subject. Most everything...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NFILM, and lacks reliable sources. I searched, but couldn't find. Kailash29792...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Per WP:NFILMS this is not yet notable as it has not received extensive coverage from third-party...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Does not meet WP:NFILM. Orville1974 (talk) 18:04, 31 May 2019 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...

the subject. Most of sources doesn't qualify as WP:RS. Fails WP:GNG, WP:NFILM. আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 20:35, 28 December 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

September 2021 (UTC) Keep passes WP:NFILM per above.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 20:21, 8 September 2021 (UTC) Keep WP:NFILM is clearly met here Yaxı Hökmdarz...

"obscure", and the usual collection of listings sites; but nothing RS. Fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. Narky Blert (talk) 18:35, 4 August 2020 (UTC) Delete Agree with...

low-budget film by one Paul TT Easter, this film does not as yet meet WP:NFILM. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:33, 25 May 2016 (UTC) Note: This debate has...

film series, not reliably sourced as having a solid claim to passing WP:NFILM. The notability claim being made here is that two of the films won short...

"full-length" reviews, and NFILM requires both. ‡ Єl Cid of ᐺalencia ᐐT₳LKᐬ 17:02, 9 April 2019 (UTC) WP:GNG can be passed separately from WP:NFILM and if the reviews...

deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 07:50, 4 July 2021 (UTC) Delete fails NFILM. There is nothing to suggest that this made-for-TV documentary is particularly...

for speedy deletion as copyvio, fixed and tag removed but still fails WP:NFILM. DrStrauss talk 21:36, 21 August 2017 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) No indication of how this might meet WP:NFILM. There are some reviews of the film but their reliability is questionable...

film for which I declined a speedy and PRODed afterward. Does not meet WP:NFILM. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 03:12, 30 November 2014 (UTC) Delete. I just can't...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Does not appear to meet the criteria at WP:NFILM. Has not won any major awards or received significant coverage in reliable...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Crappy bot article that doesn't meet WP:NFILM nor GNG. » Shadowowl | talk 16:45, 21 July 2018 (UTC) Delete - a Google...

four minor DVD awards, I can't find any evidence that the film meets WP:NFILM -- nor does the article provide any. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:45, 31...

FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non notable film with no major cast members. Fails WP:NFILM with no reviews from notable publications as well as WP:N due to the paucity...

TWL) Unaired, cancelled television project. Epically fails WP:GNG and WP:NFILMS. Recreated after previous deletion at AfD. Delete and Salt. Safiel (talk)...

Spider) 07:58, 31 July 2021 (UTC) Keep, passes WP:NFILM DonaldD23 talk to me 11:20, 31 July 2021 (UTC) NFILM requires significant coverage by independent sources...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Appears to fail WP:NFILM as no reviews found in a BEFORE. All current citations are databases or...

2020 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:NFILM Donaldd23 (talk) 19:07, 27 September 2020 (UTC) Delete - concerns around WP:GNG and WP:NFILM Spiderone 06:31, 28 September...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Appears to fail WP:NFILM. Only 1 review found in a BEFORE. Tagged for notability. PROD removed with...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This is yet another film article that fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. The general notability guideline states: "If a topic has received...

but not in the strongest sites as far as reviews go. It's enough to pass NFILM, but just barely. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 19:37, 27...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG nothing of note found on the web Domdeparis (talk) 12:53, 23...

been contested. My remarks were: Does not meet the inclusion standard WP:NFILMS; not presently a notable film. (See, e.g., the 17 Google hits.)  Glenfarclas ...

Maryland. InvadingInvader (talk) 18:32, 25 October 2022 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:NFILM DonaldD23 talk to me 20:20, 25 October 2022 (UTC) Delete - It got a couple...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. Nothing notable on a WP:BEFORE. This is essentially a WP:1S...

maybe-this-might-still be notable criteria trump the failure to satisfy NFILMS, the failure to meet the GNG, and the complete absence of reliable sources...