otherwise be properly sourced as having enough production coverage to pass NFF criteria below. It is also common for films to claim "nominations" for film...

usually expected for an event to be notable." It must not be forgotten that WP:NFF is not policy, it is an editorial guideline, and as a guideline, is "...best...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) The film is unreleased and does meet WP:NFF, the original editor deleted the WP:PROD but did not address the fact that...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Film is in pre-production, WP:NFF. BOVINEBOY2008 18:53, 20 July 2011 (UTC) Delete, as it is not notable at...

de-prodded with the reason “refs say filming began in April 2010. per WP:NFF it is enough to keep the article, as this is a notable film starring notable...

Delete or Incubate until NFF is passed Article itself indicates that filming is set to start in August, 2010. Fails WP:NFF. ɠǀɳ̩ςεΝɡbomb 20:48, 21 June...

is unreleased. For these reasons, clearly the film doesn't meet with WP:NFF.  ||  Orbit Wharf  💬 09:07, 16 October 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

Delete - WP:NFF and no reliable sources beyond the one mention above found. -- Dane talk 20:02, 8 December 2016 (UTC) Delete - WP:NFF - Fails WP:NFF as the...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Upcoming film with no coverage, does not meet WP:NFF, deproded with no explanation BOVINEBOY2008 14:33, 10 August 2013 (UTC) Note:...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Per WP:NFF, no sources to confirm that film has started. In fact, one says that Farhan...

casting announcement, does not have significant coverage beyond that, per WP:NFF, should be moved to draft until topic receives more coverage BOVINEBOY2008...

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 10:00, 13 October 2021 (UTC) Delete: Fails WP:NFF IMO, specifically "films that have already begun shooting, but have not yet...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable future film. WP:NFF calls for the deletion of articles on films which have not started principal...

and improved by @Fenix down:. GiantSnowman 18:28, 8 September 2015 (UTC) NFF Women's League Squad 2015 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links |...

Non-notable future film, does not meet WP:NFF BOVINEBOY2008 14:14, 11 June 2014 (UTC) Keep Delete per WP:NFF. It's already missed its May 2 release date...

compelling argument in this discussion is that this future film fails WP:NFF because there is no evidence that the production itself is notable. This...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable future film... Fails WP:NFF... - Adolphus79 (talk) 02:01, 5 November 2009 (UTC) Delete the production...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Per WP:NFF. Andrew Base (talk) 08:15, 8 December 2019 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...

production but may not meet the notability guidelines for future films (NFF) and the general notability guidelines (GNG). The priority should be to improve...

third party coverage to justify one of those "occasional exceptions" to WP:NFF.--Kubigula (talk) 22:20, 10 April 2011 (UTC) Superman (film project) (edit |...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NFF, nothing found to pass GNG. Per NFF, "... films that have already begun shooting, but have...

this page.‎ The result was delete. With the comment that the part of WP:NFF that says ...should not have their own articles unless the production itself...

JSTOR · TWL) Upcoming film whose production is not yet notable under WP:NFF. Draftification was reverted by article creator with little improvement....

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non notable future film, fails WP:NFF as production wasn't notable. Should be deleted or moved to draftspace until...

eloquently explained, WP:NFF and common sense requires deletion. Johnuniq (talk) 11:22, 26 May 2009 (UTC) Delete. According to WP:NFF: Films that have not...

JSTOR · TWL) Unreleased film since 2017 whose production does not meet the WP:NFF guidelines. No coverage found apart from announcements, press releases, and...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable future film. WP:NFF calls for the deletion of articles on films which have not started principal...

16:58, 3 July 2010 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:NFF. Lugnuts (talk) 09:21, 3 July 2010 (UTC) Delete. Fails WP:NFF and the author is a notorious serial sockpuppet...

(delete) – (View log) Future film, fails WP:NFF and WP:CRYSTAL. TN‑X-Man 16:58, 28 July 2008 (UTC) Delete Per WP:NFF and WP:CRYSTAL. Can be recreated when it...

canceled.) This is reflected in WP:NFF. Erik (talk | contrib) (ping me) 16:42, 12 February 2017 (UTC) Keep per WP:NFF, film is in post-production, a citation...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Subject fails WP:NFF which says. "films that have not been confirmed by reliable sources to have...

WP:NFILM, WP:NFF or even WP:V. No trace of this film found outside Wikipedia. • Gene93k (talk) 01:58, 30 May 2021 (UTC) Delete fails WP:NFF. Donaldd23 (talk)...

to release also has not generated significant coverage in RSs. Fails WP:NFF. Gab4gab (talk) 16:27, 30 April 2017 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...

film has not begun production, fails WP:NFF. Koala15 (talk) 15:16, 27 July 2015 (UTC) Delete per nom, fails WP:NFF. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 18:02, 27...

of the time; hence the reason for WP:NFF. Girolamo Savonarola (talk) 01:10, 21 August 2008 (UTC) I'm aware of NFF, but do not feel that it applies in this...

like the other two articles from the same user. Delete - hoax, fails WP:NFF. See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dhoom 3 (film), Wikipedia:Articles...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Unsourced future film failing WP:NFF, no evidence of notability. PROD was removed by original editor, without...

links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log) Apparently fails WP:NFF. No prejudice towards recreation when verification of the shoot commencing...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NFF, nothing found to pass GNG. Per NFF, "... films that have already begun shooting, but have...

I sent you to NFF, then I posted on your talkpage about NFF, then I stated NFF as the reason for this AfD, I'm very familiar with NFF. To suggest that...

further edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was delete per WP:NFF and WP:SNOW. - Mgm|(talk) 10:15, 28 October 2008 (UTC) Universal Soldier...

Delete: Does not meet NFF yet. No scheduled release date either. -- Ab207 (talk) 16:46, 14 July 2022 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:NFF. LibStar (talk) 03:45,...

satisfy notability. RJaguar3 | u | t 13:43, 30 April 2011 (UTC) Delete per WP:NFF. This is a future movie which has not even started filming yet. As such,...

WP:NFF. —Kww(talk) 14:50, 7 May 2010 (UTC) Delete per development hell, I mean WP:NFF.--70.80.234.196 (talk) 15:11, 7 May 2010 (UTC) Delete per WP:NFF and...

page.‎ The result was keep. As pointed out, individual notability overrules NFF, which is what I believe this discussion focuses on. –Juliancolton | Talk...

(delete) – (View log) Clear failure of WP:NFF Ros0709 (talk) 21:25, 7 October 2008 (UTC) Delete agree per WP:NFF BigDuncTalk 21:29, 7 October 2008 (UTC)...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NFF. Principal photography has not begun, detailed articles of development hell...

or merge discussion. Masum Reza📞 08:19, 21 July 2019 (UTC) Merge per WP:NFF, because to keep is to intentionally mislead readers into thinking a film...

made to this page.‎ The result was delete. Textbook case of applying WP:NFF Dennis - 2¢ 20:39, 25 October 2014 (UTC) Idhayam Murali (2015 film) (edit |...

delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log) Delete per WP:NFF, films which have not yet commenced principal photography should not have...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This "maybe upcoming movie" fails WP:NFF and WP:CRYSTAL. According to the article, it is unknown whether this film...

29 October 2008 (UTC) Strong Delete as per WP:NFF Antivenin 18:09, 29 October 2008 (UTC) Delete per WP:NFF. Bsimmons666 (talk) Friend? 20:13, 29 October...

does not pass WP:NFF. 1l2l3k (talk) 22:56, 5 November 2018 (UTC) Keep Principal photography has begun, so it does actually pass NFF. JustaFilmFan (talk)...

Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:38, 22 February 2017 (UTC) Comment fails WP:NFF --Domdeparis (talk) 15:42, 22 February 2017 (UTC) As this piece is talking...

protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log) Per WP:NFF. Hasn't even begun filming yet; no references whatsoever. Ghits -- website...

Fabrictramp | talk to me 06:03, 7 December 2008 (UTC) Delete for failing WP:NFF. There is virtually no news coverage other than casting, that too significantly...

TWL) per WP:NFF, nothing really notable about the production so far. SoSaysChappy (talk) 04:00, 1 September 2009 (UTC) Delete per WP:NFF. JohnCD (talk)...

TWL) Future film that has yet to enter main production, does not meet WP:NFF, move back to draft space until filming begins BOVINEBOY2008 16:34, 16 April...

FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Based on the previous deletion nominations based on WP:NFF and a perpetual lack of references, let's have one final discussion and then...

page.‎ The result was delete. Once production has got far enough to meet WP:NFF an article can be considered, but that looks to be some time away. JohnCD...

word on the movie's release date. Fails WP:NFF. Iowateen (talk) 00:55, 18 July 2009 (UTC) Delete. WP:NFF. Niteshift36 (talk) 03:53, 22 July 2009 (UTC)...

Delete Fails WP:NFF with no indication it will ever be released. DonaldD23 talk to me 12:31, 5 January 2023 (UTC) Delete, fails WP:NFF. When will it be...

that the production meets WP:NFF guidelines. -- Ab207 (talk) 15:02, 16 October 2021 (UTC) Delete - Fails to meet WP:NFF.Barrettmagic Talk 13:39, 17 October...

does not pass WP:NFF. 1l2l3k (talk) 22:57, 5 November 2018 (UTC) Keep Principal photography has begun, so it does actually pass NFF. JustaFilmFan (talk)...

Prematurely created article. Direct contravention of policy guideline at WP:NFF which states "Films that have not been confirmed by reliable sources to have...

proof of notability. 野狼院ひさし u/t/c 06:22, 1 February 2015 (UTC) Comment WP:NFF says "Films that have not been confirmed by reliable sources to have commenced...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable future film, does not meet WP:NFF BOVINEBOY2008 12:45, 3 May 2014 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...

for. CalendarWatcher (talk) 01:10, 12 November 2008 (UTC) Delete. Fails WP:NFF. Although sources indicate production has begun, the article provides no...

appears to fail WP:NFF as production doesn't appear to be notable. Delete or move to draft until release. Previously deleted for failing WP:NFF in May 2021,...

2022 (UTC) Move to draft: WP:NFF, this is an unreleased film without the substantial coverage that would allow it to meet NFF. Move to draft with the OP...

WP:NFF NuclearWarfare contact meMy work 22:48, 4 October 2008 (UTC) Delete. Unreferenced hearsay. Even if absolutely true, convincingly fails WP:NFF per...

links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log) Apparently fails WP:NFF. No prejudice towards recreation when verification for commencement of shooting...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) delete per WP:NFF, principle photography hasn't begun, the director hasn't even been named...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Appears to fail WP:NFF as production does not appear to be notable. Should be deleted or (preferably)...

page.‎ The result was keep. Consensus reached is that the article passes WP:NFF. (non-admin closure) Curbon7 (talk) 05:14, 12 September 2021 (UTC) [Hide...

Consensus seems to be that the article does not yet require an article (per WP:NFF), but a valid reason has been given to incubate it for future publishing...

fails NFF, delete for that reason and possible SALT for 12 months. Darrenhusted (talk) 10:53, 11 April 2009 (UTC) Delete but not salt - per WP:NFF, but...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable future film. WP:NFF calls for the deletion of articles on films which have not started principal...

should be made to this page.‎ The result was delete. As unsatisfactory as WP:NFF is vis a vis our verifiability policy, it is a notability guideline that...

JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NFF. Information should be merged to X-Men (film series) as has always been the case until filming underway - WP:NFF is a good guideline...

—PC78 (talk) 19:41, 29 October 2008 (UTC) Delete as WP:Crystal failing WP:NFF. However, bring it back when there is more than rumour. With the cast as...

further edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was keep. As noted, the NFF guideline cannot trump the GNG and TOOSOON is an essay not a guideline or...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable future film, per WP:NFF, coverage is only about the announcement of the film, all articles are just...

was Delete. There is consensus that the article at this time runs afoul of NFF. However, the article will be stored at the incubator. Xymmax So let it be...

FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Prod contested by an IP without an explanation. Fails WP:NFF - no reliable sources showing that principal photography is underway, and...

10:14, 7 March 2008 (UTC) Delete per WP:NFF. Doctorfluffy (talk) 23:21, 8 March 2008 (UTC) Delete per WP:NFF. Coffee4me (talk) 21:42, 9 March 2008 (UTC)...

an essay that some can agree on or not. Per the notability guideline WP:NFF, it satisfies the caveat that production must have begun on the project to...

production of the film has not received significant coverage from sources, per WP:NFF BOVINEBOY2008 15:58, 18 July 2022 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...

page.‎ The result was redirect to Yorgos Lanthimos. If/when it meets wp:nff it can be broken out again -- RoySmith (talk) 13:57, 7 March 2014 (UTC) The...

TWL) Article is still in pre-production, WP:NFF BOVINEBOY2008 19:48, 16 July 2011 (UTC) Delete Per WP:NFF. Lugnuts (talk) 08:37, 17 July 2011 (UTC) Note:...

several levels: at the least, does not appear to adequately satisfy all of WP:NFF, even if filming has started. Notability on other, more common grounds is...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Does not satisify WP:NFF. Unable to find sources using terms like 'Elza India film' or 'Elza India...

‎ The result was keep. Consensus is that WP:GNG trumps WP:TOOSOON and WP:NFF. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 18:23, 1 November 2021 (UTC) [Hide this box] New...

Delete Fails WP:NFILM and WP:NFF DonaldD23 talk to me 14:38, 28 November 2021 (UTC) Delete - Fails GNG and WP:NFF. Per NFF, "Films that have not been confirmed...

non-notable. This film appears to be in the pre-production stages, so it fails WP:NFF. Additionally, the whole of this article (except for a rather unnecessary...

not begun casting, let alone filming. Therefore, the film clearly fails WP:NFF, which states "films that have not been confirmed by reliable sources to...

NawlinWiki (talk) 03:23, 25 September 2010 (UTC) Delete. Per the guideline at WP:NFF, future films that haven't even started principal photography should not...

JSTOR · TWL) The film has not yet entered production. It does not meet WP:NFF. BOVINEBOY2008 10:10, 30 August 2013 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...

has commenced. Ethanlu121 (talk) 11:56, 14 March 2016 (UTC) Delete per WP:NFF: "Films that have not been confirmed by reliable sources to have commenced...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NFF, nothing found to pass GNG. Per NFF, "... films that have already begun shooting, but have...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NFF, nothing found to pass GNG. Per NFF, "... films that have already begun shooting, but have...

filming, no article per WP:NFF.—Kww(talk) 12:51, 22 August 2009 (UTC) Delete - likely hoax or hopeful rumour; certainly fails WP:NFF. JohnCD (talk) 15:04,...

discussions. —PC78 (talk) 21:05, 6 August 2008 (UTC) Delete. Explicity fails WP:NFF. PC78 (talk) 21:06, 6 August 2008 (UTC) Delete per the notability guidelines...

IMDB; fails WP:NFF. Mr. Vernon (talk) 02:29, 27 August 2008 (UTC) Speedy Delete Article has already been deleted once and still fails WP:NFF. Also, the speedy...

11:35, 12 January 2009 (UTC) Delete: per WP:NFF. Schuym1 (talk) 00:35, 13 January 2009 (UTC) Delete. WP:NFF. Doctorfluffy (robe and wizard hat) 00:52,...

(UTC) Obvious keep. Easily meets general notability guidelines, rendering NFF moot. [1], [2], [3], [4], [5]... I could easily go on. Powers T 16:54, 5...

further edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was delete. Fails WP:NFF at this time. No prejudice to future recreation with suitable reliable third-party...

that is the reason for it being unreleased. I feel the article fails WP:NFF: Additionally, films that have already begun shooting, but have not yet been...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NFF, Film is in early stages of Pre-Production, filming will not commence until...

TWL) Non-notable upcoming film, no independent secondary coverage, per WP:NFF BOVINEBOY2008 11:50, 8 June 2016 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...

Article deleted already because the film was in pre-production and failed WP:NFF. It was recreated by the original author, this time claiming the film is...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NFF, was already deleted once in an AFD (http://en.wikipedia...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NFF, nothing found to pass GNG. Per NFF, "... films that have already begun shooting, but have...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NFF, also WP:TOOSOON. Charles Turing (talk) 14:04, 30 April 2016 (UTC) Relisted...

delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log) Delete per WP:NFF future film that has not started principle photography Mayalld (talk) 16:09...

(UTC) Delete: non-notable film hasn't started filming yet, thus fails WP:NFF. Not finding any reliable source coverage of this movie. Baileypalblue (talk)...

starting principal photography. Fails WP:NFF. Tassedethe (talk) 14:50, 27 September 2009 (UTC) Delete: Per WP:NFF. Joe Chill (talk) 17:34, 27 September 2009...

to this page.‎ The result was keep. Consensus is that this film passes WP:NFF by virtue of the coverage. (non-admin closure) Tim Song (talk) 02:34, 8 December...

apparently unreleased) film, fails WP:GNG / WP:NFILM. Previously PRODded on WP:NFF grounds, but this was removed (without justification, IMO), hence this AfD...

Savonarola (talk) 07:59, 17 August 2008 (UTC) Delete, fails notability per WP:NFF.  Esradekan Gibb  "Talk" 11:39, 17 August 2008 (UTC) Delete. Fails film notability...

(tag removed without any explanation). The article is premature. Per WP:NFF, films that have not been confirmed by reliable sources to have commenced...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NFF and per WP:CRYSTAL. There should be a speedy criteria for articles like this...

already had been removed, so I brought it here. Fails WP:CRYSTAL and WP:NFF, and given the lack of sources, may be a hoax as well. Xymmax So let it be...

links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log) Explicitly fails WP:NFF. Girolamo Savonarola (talk) 23:21, 27 February 2008 (UTC) Delete. Due to...

director of this film. According to my searches, this is falling short on WP:NFF and WP:GNG. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 14:01, 1 March 2021 (UTC) Note: This...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NFF draftified already once and recopied to mainspace with no improvements by...

never have been created in the first place as it fails WP:NFF. A good example of why WP:NFF exists. Rob Sinden (talk) 18:50, 29 June 2011 (UTC) Delete...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable future film. WP:NFF calls for the deletion of articles on films which have not started principal...

establishing that principal photography has begun for this film, thereby failing WP:NFF. As always I am willing to withdraw if others have better luck at finding...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Per WP:NFF, shooting for the film has not started. - Vivvt (Talk) 12:47, 29 June 2014...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NFF. It's been rumored, and pushed back and debated and "coming soon" and all...

feature films. Also indef full protected. Drop me a note when it meets WP:NFF and I'll unprotect. Jenks24 (talk) 12:56, 15 July 2014 (UTC) Looney Tunes...

PROD, fails WP:NFF. This project has not begun principal photography and should not have its own article per reasoning outlined in NFF. Sources do exist...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Per WP:NFF - "Sources must be used to confirm the start of principal photography after...

deletion discussions. Jupitus Smart 04:06, 11 July 2017 (UTC) Keep per WP:NFF. A major studio film with production just began, it doesn't need to be deleted...

this notice. Thanks, JForget 22:42, 14 August 2009 (UTC) Delete: Per WP:NFF. Joe Chill (talk) 04:19, 15 August 2009 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...

Contested Prod without explanation original reason was "Does not satisfy WP:NFF." This is a future film which has yet to begin principle photography. PRehse...

(UTC) With the citations I added, the film passes the necessities of WP:NFF. Filming has started, it has a set release date, cast and all are well sourced...

little coverage of the film. Fails WP:NFF JDDJS (talk) 04:57, 17 April 2014 (UTC) Delete not even close to WP:NFF GoldenRing (talk) 09:21, 17 April 2014...

Principle photography has not yet begun, therefore the subject does not meet WP:NFF --| Uncle Milty | talk | 22:20, 30 August 2013 (UTC) Delete - Per WP:CRYSTAL...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NFF, nothing found to pass GNG. Per NFF, "... films that have already begun shooting, but have...

name). Fails WP:CRYSTAL and the notability requirements for future films WP:NFF as principal photography has not been confirmed to have started. Tassedethe...

not start production until next month; even when production starts, per WP:NFF "films that have already begun shooting, but have not yet been publicly released...

independent references supplied or found, so no aparrent notability. WP:NFF is clear that films do not need to merely exist in order to be included....

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Per WP:NFF, this film project has not received significant coverage by independent sources...

tag removed without improvement. Films not yet in production don't meet WP:NFF. Accounting4Taste:talk 22:38, 1 August 2008 (UTC) Delete. Contested PROD...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Film appears to fail WP:NFF. Should be deleted or moved to draft until release. DonaldD23 talk to me...

links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log) Explicitly fails WP:NFF. Additionally, has no reliable sourcing. Girolamo Savonarola (talk) 04:58...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Per WP:TOOSOON and WP:NFF, only coverage has been an announcement of the film, no indepth coverage...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Declined PROD. Explicitly fails WP:NFF ("Films that have not been confirmed by reliable sources to have commenced...

Film only just announced, patently fails WP:NFF. I already created this in draftspace anyway until it meets NFF. Rusted AutoParts 05:02, 1 October 2020 (UTC)...

deletion discussions. Ben Ben (talk) 18:46, 6 November 2011 (UTC) Delete. WP:NFF seems to apply here, and there's absolutely no assertion or demonstration...

Non-notable unreleased film, no evidence production ever began on film, per WP:NFF BOVINEBOY2008 23:21, 18 January 2022 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Film that never made it to production, WP:NFF the guideline for films states, films that have already begun shooting, but...

TWL) Film does not meet standards for main space article as described in WP:NFF, all sources provided merely indicate casting/production team announcements...

2014 (UTC) Keep Unreleased yes, but future films may have an article per WP:NFF if principal photography has commenced. And this one is in fact releasing...

further edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was Delete, per WP:NFF. Please notify me (or any admin) if or when the movie is in production and...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Future film whose production does not meet WP:NFF due to lack of independent coverage in reliable sources. Citations are announcements...

February 2015 (UTC) Keep as per WP:NFF. ([2][3][4][5][6])--Antigng (talk) 02:02, 5 February 2015 (UTC) Per WP:NFF, films that have already begun shooting...

film not in production. Fails WP:NFF ttonyb (talk) 03:37, 25 February 2010 (UTC) Delete unnotable film that fails WP:NFF and has no significant coverage...

discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:38, 15 November 2010 (UTC) Delete per WP:NFF. Although the film is real and in pre-production, this article seems to be...

protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log) Fails WP:NFF. No evidence that principal photography has commenced for this film: of the...

begun. Girolamo Savonarola (talk) 21:08, 28 October 2008 (UTC) Delete per WP:NFF and agree with nominator about recreation. Creation of this article was too...

is partly my guessing: absolutely nothing found to back this up; fails WP:NFF. AllyD (talk) 21:03, 2 February 2013 (UTC) Delete Agree with above comment...

the same, I'll also protect this from being recreated prior to it passing NFF. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:05, 1 December 2020 (UTC)...

edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was delete. WP:CRYSTAL and WP:NFF are pretty solid arguments here. It will likely be produced, but until then...

deletion discussions. North America1000 14:29, 17 June 2020 (UTC) Delete per WP:NFF. Way too early, we don't even have a title yet. Hog Farm (talk) 14:37, 17...

deserves its own page. Matt14451 (talk) 15:47, 15 August 2015 (UTC) See: WP:NFF. In order for an article to exist for a film, principal photography must...

failing WP:NFF. No coverage of the unreleased film, yet. Schmidt, Michael Q. 07:43, 2 August 2014 (UTC) Delete Obvious one. Fails WP:NFF and maybe WP:COI...

the original Prod rationale as a future film which fails to meet the WP:NFF guidelines. AllyD (talk) 15:45, 19 January 2013 (UTC) Keep Because it was...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) per WP:NFF, the source used to indicate that filming has begun predates the film start...

of its goal. SL93 (talk) 06:08, 26 June 2013 (UTC) Delete as failing WP:NFF and per Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Chalky_(film). Allow userfication...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NFF, article is in draftspace at Draft:The Gray Man (upcoming film) until it meets NFF criteria. This page is premature...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NFF but principal photography to commence soon Sammanhumagain (talk) 15:46, 7...

discussions. -- I'mperator 20:59, 10 August 2009 (UTC) Delete - fails WP:NFF. JohnCD (talk) 21:03, 10 August 2009 (UTC) Delete. Can't even find this title...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Unreferenced WP:NFF, tagged as such for many months. DMacks (talk) 07:58, 5 April 2014 (UTC)...

WP:MOVIE. Yunshui 雲水 12:54, 2 September 2014 (UTC) DELETE Clearly fails WP:NFF. The filming hasn't begun.--Skr15081997 (talk) 13:48, 2 September 2014 (UTC)...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Contested prod for a film that fails WP:NFF. This film is in "production hell" and it is unlikely to be made. The part...

that stalled before getting of the ground, hence a textbook failure of WP:NFF. Prod removed by author without explanation. PC78 (talk) 11:40, 27 January...

article While the film fails WP:NFF, it also clearly passes WP:GNG, especially with all the post Comic-Con coverage. SNGs like NFF do not take precedence over...

expand through regular editing. I accept the nom feeling it fails WP:NFF, but WP:NFF paragraph three tells us that once filming has commenced we look instead...

FENS · JSTOR · TWL) No evidence the film has entered production: per WP:NFF. Sources provided have nothing to do with this film BOVINEBOY2008 13:33,...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NFF, nothing found to pass GNG. Per NFF, "... films that have already begun shooting, but have...

December 2017 (UTC) If it's currently being animated it explicitly fails WP:NFF. PriceDL (talk) 08:13, 26 December 2017 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...

September 2011 (UTC) Delete While future films might have an article, per WP:NFF, "Films that have not been confirmed by reliable sources to have commenced...

(delete) – (View log) Upcoming film which is still in pre-production; fails WP:NFF. PC78 (talk) 23:23, 5 July 2009 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...

WP:PROD on the rationale "No evidence that this unreleased film meets the WP:NFF notability guidelines." The Prod notice was removed by an IP without comment...

casting announcements but no evidence that it has started shooting. Fails WP:NFF. Disputed prod. • Gene93k (talk) 13:11, 2 July 2011 (UTC) Note: This debate...

confirmation of the film... hence failure of WP:NFF. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 18:20, 17 January 2009 (UTC) Delete. Fails WP:NFF. No sources confirming this and since...

this article is way ahead of the film being in final production, per WP:NFF. Needs to be deleted and redirected to Pixar until actual production of the...

per nom. --Sc straker (talk) 03:03, 30 January 2008 (UTC) Delete per WP:NFF, as there's no guarantee of an announced film making it to production, especially...

is not sufficient per WP:NFF. samtar (msg) 14:44, 28 September 2015 (UTC) Speedy Keep – Seriously? It clearly passes WP:NFF. The film is scheduled for...

interesting discussion here of the relative merits and applicability of WP:TV, WP:NFF, and WP:GNG. I don't see any agreement on that, but there is a clear consensus...

does not pass WP:GNG or Wikipedia:Notability (films). Article violates WP:NFF, WP:NOTNEWS, and WP:CRYSTALBALL, and WP:FFEXCEPTIONS doesn't give this particular...

notability here as far as NFF goes. My concern is basically this: there's enough to where this could probably squeak by with a NFF keep since there's coverage...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Delete for now for failing WP:NFF and being far TOO SOON. Allow recreation if/when filming commences and if/when...

(UTC) Delete unreleased film where production isn't very notable. Fails WP:NFF DonaldD23 talk to me 19:05, 7 January 2022 (UTC) Delete: I've submitted a...

23:26, 22 December 2008 (UTC) Delete - Per WP:NFF Matt (Talk) 00:26, 23 December 2008 (UTC) Delete per NFF. No prejudice towards recreation after reliable...

announces production. 23skidoo (talk) 14:04, 11 April 2008 (UTC) Delete, WP:NFF - WP:CRYSTAL.  Esradekan Gibb  "Talk" 14:19, 11 April 2008 (UTC) Delete,...

is remake of... ...Red Scarf (1963)..." Being far too premature fails WP:NFF. And we do not have a place where this might be redirected and spoken of...

article yet per WP:NFF BOVINEBOY2008 18:01, 4 December 2011 (UTC) Redirect to Paradise Lost#Films until the film starts production, per WP:NFF. The work that...

protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log) Fails WP:NFF. No prejudice towards recreation when reliable sources can be provided to...

started. Cliff smith talk 08:04, 17 January 2009 (UTC) Keep. May fail WP:NFF, but meets the general notability guideline which overrides it. The discussions...

planned release date and consequently the article appears to fail to meet WP:NFF. PROD quickly removed without explanation (along with all earlier improvement...

6 March 2008 (UTC) Delete per WP:NFF. --brewcrewer (yada, yada) 00:41, 6 March 2008 (UTC) Delete per WP:N -- WP:NFF would've applied if there was some...

planned to start in the mid of 2013" which goes against WP:NFF. I'm not a huge fan of WP:NFF, but articles like this are usually deleted. jonkerz ♠talk...

discussions. Megan Barris (Lets talk📧) 16:46, 26 July 2020 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:NFF. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 17:55, 26 July 2020 (UTC) Delete. There's no sign...

even signed on yet, as they are still in talks. Fails WP:CRYSTAL and WP:NFF. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 20:12, 4 July 2018 (UTC) Meryl has been confirmed Torah28...

several months) about film only claimed to start filming "soon"--fails WP:NFF. Not listed on claimed director's or production-company's IMDB. DMacks (talk)...

thing. Plus sufficient sourcability, this passes WP:GNG and thus passes WP:NFF, Parker. Bonkers The Clown (talk) 05:19, 7 October 2012 (UTC) Keep There's...

exceptions to WP:NFF (See its paragraph #3) but yes, this one is tad too Soon. Schmidt, Michael Q. 10:47, 2 December 2013 (UTC) Delete per WP:NFF and WP:TOOSOON...

2011 (UTC) delete One of several NFF articles created by this same author all in short succession. All are clearly NFF. Gaijin42 (talk) 15:24, 12 December...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Unnotable future film that completely fails WP:NFF. Not enough significant coverage in reliable sources to warrant disregarding...

links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log) Explicitly fails WP:NFF; the second film is still in production, and the director has merely expressed...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NFF. Commencing filming does not make a film notable. Originally moved to Draft:Battle...

(UTC) Keep discussed by multiple reliable sources, meets guidelines for WP:NFF. DonaldD23 talk to me 12:08, 29 October 2021 (UTC) Keep I have no idea where...

WP:NFF lead actress just dropped out, this movie has been nailed with issues causing rescheudle/cancelation issues frmo the start. Textbook case for NFF...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) No official confirmation yet. Fails WP:NFF —Vensatry (Talk) 15:35, 21 April 2016 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...

February 2013 (UTC) Keep, though I disagree that the reasoning is flawed. WP:NFF has been a long-standing guideline over at WikiProject film, as all sorts...

the WP:NFF guideline, which states filming should commence before making an article. Mike Allen 21:21, 24 July 2010 (UTC) Ahhh... but WP:NFF and WP:CRYSTAL...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NFF, Film is in early stages of Pre-Production, filming will not commence until...

incomplete or otherwise undistributed films, so this is getting nom'd under WP:NFF. Jip Orlando (talk) 21:10, 7 March 2018 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...

its shoot in 2019 but lacks significant coverage on production to meet WP:NFF. No scheduled release date and nothing substantial was found in a WP:BEFORE...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This film fails the WP:NFF qualification that it needs since it is a future film. SP013 (talk) 14:54...

tag removed without any improvement to the article, which doesn't meet WP:NFF as a film that seems to have not yet been produced; no reliable sources,...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NFF. Although if things work out this eventually will have an article, so maybe...

national football league could be equated to the English Conference, the NFF would be approximately level with the Isthmian league. The certainly fulfill...

Darrenhusted (talk) 17:41, 1 July 2009 (UTC) I'll delete the word. The "WP:NFF" page I was not aware of. Though I don't agree with the rule, I'll comply...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) The film doesn't meet with WP:NFF guideline. Because this is an unreleased film. It has no release date.  ||  Tajwar...

(delete) – (View log) Slag: Best Enemies fails to meet notability under WP:NFF: future film "in production" with no particular notability to details of...

protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log) Fails WP:NFF, as recent sources indicate that filming will not begin until May 2009 [1]...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Unsourced future film - fails WP:NFF. Has been previously prodded - was unprodded with no comment. Has had {{unref}}...

FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NFF --woodensuperman 14:26, 10 November 2017 (UTC) Delete as a classic example of how WP:NFF applies. This encyclopedia should...

result was Incubate. Consensus appeared to be against notability via WP:NFF ... yet. Article has been moved to the Incubator at Wikipedia:Article Incubator/Gunde...

confirmed production date. Fails WP:NFF. Ros0709 (talk) 21:38, 7 October 2008 (UTC) Delete per nom: fails WP:NFF. And according to IMDb, pre-production...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable unreleased film, per WP:NFF BOVINEBOY2008 09:30, 11 September 2022 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...

2010 (UTC) Delete: Per WP:NFF. According to the article, it's already had some problems with the production. This is why WP:NFF exists; who knows if the...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NFF, nothing found to pass GNG. Per NFF, "... films that have already begun shooting, but have...

made to this page.‎ The result was merge into Margaret Thatcher untill WP:NFF is satisfied. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 12:53, 3 May 2008 (UTC) Thatcher (film)...

watch | logs) Draft article about cancelled film; requesting deletion per WP:NFF. Trivialist (talk) 02:28, 9 August 2019 (UTC) Weak Keep - Keep the draft...

reliable source. Thalapathi (Ping Back) 09:22, 29 May 2011 (UTC) Delete per wp:nff. Asnac (talk) 10:51, 29 May 2011 (UTC) Could you elaborate on why indiaglitz...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) 2016 crystal ball movie. Massive failure of WP:NFF Gaijin42 (talk) 17:18, 13 December 2011 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...

talk 06:25, 21 February 2009 (UTC) Delete all. All three articles fail WP:NFF; moreover, at least two are likely hoaxes. Dhoom 3 (film) has copied the...

FENS · JSTOR · TWL) No evidence main production has begun, does not meet WP:NFF BOVINEBOY2008 20:20, 16 July 2014 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...

views) (delete) – (View log) Unreferenced article on future film, fails WP:NFF and as far as I can tell WP:V as well. Could possibly be recreation of previously...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) The film never entered production. Fails WP:NFF. Koala15 (talk) 05:16, 6 August 2015 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...

isn't scheduled to begin until next February. The article therefore fails WP:NFF at this time, though it may be recreated when the process is farther along...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Lack of WP:RS and WP:NFF. Was un-proded immediately without addressing the concerns. As per (https://www...

notable and verifiable. As such this article is likely to meet WP:GNG. Per WP:NFF the reliable sources appear to indicate principal photography has commenced...

JSTOR · TWL) An unreleased film that does not meet the requirements of WP:NFF. The film began its production sometime in 2017 but delayed since then. This...

November 2017 (UTC) Keep per meeting WP:NFF. Schmidt, Michael Q. 16:44, 11 November 2017 (UTC) @MichaelQSchmidt: WP:NFF indicates that certain films should...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NFF, nothing found to pass GNG. Per NFF, "... films that have already begun shooting, but have...

unreleased film has entered post-production early 2020. It does not meet WP:NFF requirement for future films due to lack of significant coverage on production...

production. Fails WP:NFF. WP:NFILM really doesn't apply yet. Donaldd23 (talk) 14:58, 8 April 2021 (UTC) Delete per nom. Fails NFF... Kolma8 (talk) 21:21...

removed without explanation. Concern was: Film is in pre-production per WP:NFF. BOVINEBOY2008 12:31, 16 August 2011 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...

I'm sorry, but if you want to argue whether or not NFF's clause should be in NFF, then take it to NFF. That's not an appropriate argument to make on this...

Delete, fails notability per WP:NFF.  Esradekan Gibb  "Talk" 05:46, 22 July 2008 (UTC) Delete. Explicity fails WP:NFF. PC78 (talk) 07:32, 22 July 2008...

öBrambleberry of RiverClan 23:05, 25 May 2013 (UTC) Weak Keep - Looking at WP:NFF, I'm on the edge of this one because of the New York Times article linked...

standards is an understatement. –– Lid(Talk) 05:41, 18 May 2008 (UTC) Delete, WP:NFF.  Esradekan Gibb  "Talk" 08:50, 18 May 2008 (UTC) Speedy delete db-nocontext...

independent sources, production has not been particularly notable, per WP:NFF BOVINEBOY2008 19:54, 26 December 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) As per WP:NFF. This movie has been dropped and even before that there was never any considerable...

September 27, 2012 and all the cast & crew is final." That falls short of the WP:NFF criteria regarding principal photography and public release, so I'm bringing...

independent coverage in reliable sources, and its failure is not notable per WP:NFF guidelines. -- Ab207 (talk) 18:36, 7 March 2022 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

17 January 2010 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:NFF. Lugnuts (talk) 09:48, 17 January 2010 (UTC) Delete per WP:V and WP:NFF. My attempts to find anything about this...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NFF. Release date is too far away, no evidence that filming is started. Jeff...

TWL) Fails WP:NFF. Bbb23 (talk) 02:05, 30 May 2012 (UTC) Delete I agree with Bbb23 that Mission: Blacklist (film) is not notable per WP:NFF, which states:...

come out on TV (or even what the proper name of the movie is!). Meets WP:NFF because production is finished. And I'd say an Ed, Edd 'n' Eddy movie qualifies...

sources [1][2][3], essentially meeting WP:NFF. -- Ab207 (talk) 06:35, 31 December 2020 (UTC) Keep: Satisfies WP:NFF. Kailash29792 (talk) 07:03, 31 December...

coverage in general notability guidelines." Irregardless of GNG, it fails WP:NFF Bgwhite (talk) 23:59, 26 May 2012 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...

is a 2009 film: IMDB calls it an "In Development project". Delete per WP:NFF "Films which have not been confirmed by reliable sources to have commenced...

film has not begun production and has not had significant coverage so by WP:NFF, it is WP:TOOSOON for a stand-alone article. BOVINEBOY2008 22:50, 25 September...

seem to meet any of the general notability guidelines yet, particularly WP:NFF SoSaysChappy (talk) 06:22, 17 March 2010 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...

was delete. The consensus is that the sourcing is inadequate to overcome NFF at this time. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 17:47, 2 July...

discussions. —Cliff smith talk 18:26, 11 August 2008 (UTC) Delete per WP:NFF; IMDB isn't a reliable source anyway. Cliff smith talk 18:26, 11 August 2008...

further edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was Delete per WP:NFF. --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 20:29, 21 April 2016 (UTC) Karnan (2017 film) (edit |...

logs | views) (delete) – (View log) Non-notable cancelled film. Fails WP:NFF. PC78 (talk) 03:49, 6 March 2008 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...

areas of Nizampet, Hyderabad"... and indicator that we might look to WP:NFF (paragraph 3). Schmidt, Michael Q. 20:36, 29 September 2015 (UTC) director:(Find...

Films that are in pre-production should not have their own articles per WP:NFF. --Rob Sinden (talk) 11:37, 24 August 2011 (UTC) Keep IT. Film is set to...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Per WP:NFF, this has only recently entered production, and the production itself is...

discussions. —PC78 (talk) 13:46, 21 February 2009 (UTC) Delete - hoax, fails WP:NFF. See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hathyar 10 and Wikipedia:Articles...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) PROD deleted. Per WP:NFF, hasn't entered principal photography. Only reference is passing mention...

despite having lots of coverage it has not yet begun filming and so fails WP:NFF (paragraph 3). We do have plenty of reliable sources speaking about plans...

TWL) An unreleased film by a non-notable film production company fails WP:NFF "Additionally, films that have already begun shooting, but have not yet been...

nothing but this Wikipedia article. If this film attains notability under WP:NFF (as a future film) or WP:MOVIE (after being released), the article can be...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Per WP:NFF, films that have not finished production are not notable unless the production...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:TOOSOON and fails WP:NFF: The article provides no evidence that principal photography has begun. This...

photography has not yet begun (WP:NFF). Delete.  Blanchardb -Me•MyEars•MyMouth- timed 15:57, 3 October 2009 (UTC) Delete: Per WP:NFF. Joe Chill (talk) 15:58, 3...

film does not as yet have the sourcing to allow it as an exception to WP:NFF as a separate article, it is seen that policy DOES allow that it might at...

(UTC) Delete per WP:NFF, WP:CRYSTAL, WP:V and WP:RS. Cliff smith talk 18:22, 14 August 2008 (UTC) Delete per WP:CRYSTAL, WP:RS and WP:NFF. The casting is...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Future film, violates WP:CRYSTAL and WP:NFF GroovySandwich 00:33, 5 August 2011 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...

(View log) Non-notable film, no reliable sources, not yet released, fails WP:NFF and WP:CRYSTAL. Who then was a gentleman? (talk) 19:40, 1 July 2009 (UTC)...

further edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was delete. Per WP:NFF, no prejudice towards recreation when filming begins. seicer | talk | contribs...

also what happened before the release of the Skyfall name, again as per WP:NFF, when there was as much, if not more, media coverage of the subject. - SchroCat...

watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log) Delete non notable film per WP:NFF unreleased films are only notable if the production itself is in some way...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NFF. Production itself is not notable, and seeing as it's no longer on imdb,...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NFF. Not even cast, much less begun filming. WP:CRYSTAL. —Kww(talk) 15:57, 10...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Film is in pre-production: WP:NFF BOVINEBOY2008 17:24, 18 July 2011 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...

(delete) – (View log) About an upcoming documentary which doesn't meet WP:NFF. Though it fails the requirements. ApprenticeFan talk contribs 11:25, 22...

FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Contested PROD. Has not commenced filming so fails WP:NFF. No independent sources to assert notability - indeed, no internet presence...

"proposed project" was not found. Fails WP:NFF. LonelyBeacon (talk) 00:56, 29 December 2007 (UTC) Delete per WP:NFF. Mh29255 (talk) 00:59, 29 December 2007...

balling now obvious. Not even any evidence of limited notability. See WP:NFF Slatersteven (talk) 09:59, 23 November 2017 (UTC) Delete per nom: WP:CRYSTAL...

September 2013 (UTC) Redirect to Don 2#Sequel. Too soon for article per WP:NFF, but a potential search word, which should point where necessary. BOVINEBOY2008...

as reported here. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 08:51, 6 July 2022 (UTC) Delete per WP:NFF, production not particularly notable. Any content that may be relevant can...

J04n(talk page) 12:35, 21 November 2009 (UTC) Delete future film doesn't meet WP:NFF per guidelines. ApprenticeFan talk contribs 12:55, 21 November 2009 (UTC)...

FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Future file WP:NFF Chuunen Baka (talk) 15:59, 18 February 2010 (UTC) Delete as failing WP:NFF. No reliable source evidence found that...

very early in the development process, barely in pre-production. Per WP:NFF, it should be draftified as soon as possible. InfiniteNexus (talk) 01:52...

RayAYang. Unsupported, unsourced article fails WP:Crystal, WP:N, and WP:NFF. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 02:12, 24 August 2008 (UTC) Delete Too far in future...

delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log) Rumour, fails WP:NFF. Jenuk1985 | Talk 23:23, 22 March 2009 (UTC) Redirect to The Mummy (1999...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Lacking significant coverage per WP:NFF, all sources are based on a press release announcement about the the distribution...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Film fails the WP:NFF and it has been restored many times even after failing this and there is...

(talk) 01:15, 17 December 2015 (UTC) Delete per being TOO SOON and failing WP:NFF. After release and if gaining coverage, the article can be resurrected. Schmidt...

production accordingly to WP:NFF — DaxServer (t · m · c) 09:54, 27 March 2023 (UTC) Keep per DaxServer. Film passes WP:NFF and WP:GNG. --SuperSharanya...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Per WP:NFF. PROD was removed, and not enough sources yet to substantiate notability...

Film that has yet to be cast, much less started principal photography. WP:NFF and WP:CRYSTAL. Delete Mr. Vernon (talk) 05:53, 20 August 2008 (UTC) Note:...

(talk) 13:32, 8 June 2010 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:NFF. Lugnuts (talk) 17:31, 8 June 2010 (UTC) Delete: Per WP:NFF. Joe Chill (talk) 17:36, 8 June 2010 (UTC)...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NFF. Still not in production, and only news bits are "rumors" of who will be...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Film has not entered production per WP:NFF. I would boldly redirect, but there is no obvious location to point towards;...

(UTC) Delete fails WP:NFF. Chander For You 15:56, 8 August 2014 (UTC) @Chanderforyou: If you knew that the article doesn't meet WP:NFF then why had you created...

discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 09:38, 21 July 2021 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:NFF DonaldD23 talk 12:58, 21 July 2021 (UTC) Delete: per nom. There is not enough...

the grounds "No evidence that this film has attained notability as per WP:NFF." The Prod was removed today without comment but with the addition of two...

keep. The nominator's challenge was twofold: first, that the film fails WP:NFF, and the rough consensus is that this limb of the challenge has been refuted...

Non notable future film, nothing found in a WP:BEFORE to help this pass WP:NFF. Only things found were database sites and articles on the actors. Not enough...

hell for some time. PC78 (talk) 20:46, 1 August 2008 (UTC) Delete per WP:NFF: "Films that have not been confirmed by reliable sources to have commenced...

have a meeting of WP:NFF (paragraph 3). Schmidt, Michael Q. 05:45, 7 August 2015 (UTC) Comment From what I understand, passing WP:NFF is not a pass for notability...

JSTOR · TWL) Filming has not begun per every citation in the article, per WP:NFF this should not have a mainspace article, there is already an exact copy...

and has not had extensive coverage in media. Does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NFF. PRODded by another editor, seconded by me; PROD removed by creating editor...

(UTC) Keep it is in post-production. G-hits and cast seem to satisfy WP:NFF. GtstrickyTalk or C 22:05, 22 December 2008 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...

production that happen not to have been titled at any given time. Fails WP:NFF and completely uncited. —Largo Plazo (talk) 11:18, 28 February 2014 (UTC)...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Future film fails WP:NFF and WP:GNG. SnottyWong chat 22:04, 22 September 2010 (UTC) Delete as article...

Laurent is dead 08:20, 16 September 2014 (UTC) Delete Precisely why we have WP:NFF. Betty Logan (talk) 08:35, 16 September 2014 (UTC) Delete per the notability...

unreleased film which apparently completed its shoot in 2018. Does not meet WP:NFF requirement for future films due to lack of significant coverage on production...

find reliable secondary sources. Fails WP:NFF. AvN 17:03, 1 May 2009 (UTC) Delete - seriously fails WP:NFF. Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 17:09, 1 May...

(talk) 02:49, 8 July 2015 (UTC) Delete as being TOO SOON and failing WP:NFF. This project is still alive and, while available sourcing suggests that...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable unreleased film per WP:NFF BOVINEBOY2008 10:01, 11 September 2022 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...

article for a film that has yet to be filmed and looks like it fails WP:NFF. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 00:56, 17 February 2015 (UTC) Note: This debate has...

further edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was Delete. Fails WP:NFF. Malinaccier (talk) 01:36, 18 June 2008 (UTC) Idhu Malai Nerathu Mayakkam...

be made to this page. The result was no consensus‎. Suggest discussion on NFF wording continue elsewhere and be clarified, if needed. Star Mississippi...

—PC78 (talk) 17:03, 14 February 2009 (UTC) Keep. Not sure how this fails WP:NFF as filming clearly started and the production seems notable. There's a decent...

It is now scheduled to begin filming in February. Page goes against WP:NFF since filming has not begun and who knows if it ever will. —Mike Allen 12:26...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Article fails WP:NFF as all sources are about casting and film starting production, but the production...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Prod (fails WP:NFF) was contested by the article's author without explanation, so setting up...

Not notable per WP:Notability (films) (specifically but not limited to WP:NFF). Article was PRODed previously (as One of us (film)) but then recreated...

about upcoming film which hasn't commenced principal photography; fails WP:NFF. AllyD (talk) 21:08, 10 May 2013 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Lacking significant non-routine coverage per WP:NFF, move back to draft until independent coverage is found BOVINEBOY2008 09:47...

clamshells• Otter chirps • HELP!) 01:03, 2 August 2008 (UTC) Delete per WP:NFF: "Films that have not been confirmed by reliable sources to have commenced...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Per WP:NFF, films which have not commenced principal photography are not considered...

or blogs. Film has not received critical comentary. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFF. As there is no current article on X-Strike Studios, this one "might" at...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:NFF - upcoming film, no release date set, while there's a decent number of sources...

films must meet WP:NFF, and this one fails. Donaldd23 (talk) 19:30, 12 April 2021 (UTC) Draftify: as mentioned by Donaldd23, fails WP:NFF defcon5 (talk) 07:00...

coverage has been produced about the production of the upcoming film, so WP:NFF is failed. Additionally, the film has yet to receive the widespread coverage...

delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log) Falls under WP:NFF (no principal photography), but I can't find much evidence that this film...

further edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was Delete per WP:NFF. Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 17:12, 20 March 2008 (UTC) Tracy (film) (edit |...

no suggestion that the film has approached final rendering stage. Per WP:NFF, this should be deleted, or, at minimum, redirect to a subhead under Pixar...

whole. Guest9999 (talk) 16:02, 24 January 2009 (UTC) Delete Does not meet WP:NFF standards. The first three links for the cast do not link to the actors in...

requirements of WP:NFF in about 6 weeks. Til then.... Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 09:45, 11 January 2009 (UTC) Speedy delete per guidelines at WP:NFF. Bearian (talk)...

that the author might be able to to improve it to show meeting CRYSTAL and NFF if userfied. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 23:04, 7 March 2010 (UTC) Note to Admin...

and directors. The article clearly fails WP:NFF. Tolly4bolly 17:35, 10 May 2013 (UTC) Delete per WP:NFF: No indication they've started principal photography...

Delete per WP:NFF. There are recent news that the movie is shelved. --Anbu121 (talk me) 21:05, 22 November 2012 (UTC) Delete per WP:NFF Lugnuts Dick Laurent...

21 August 2008 (UTC) Delete per WP:NFF. Stifle (talk) 14:03, 21 August 2008 (UTC) Delete per WP:CRYSTAL and WP:NFF. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 23:03, 24 August...

JSTOR · TWL) An unreleased film that does not meet the requirements of WP:NFF. This source says the shoot was planned to start in February 2019 but no...

JSTOR · TWL) Nonnotable future film. Article was created WP:TOOSOON. Fails WP:NFF since production is not notable. Must be deleted or drafted until further...

until filming starts, per WP:NFF. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 04:18, 13 January 2012 (UTC) Redirect per Metropolitan90. WP:NFF clearly applies here. --AussieLegend...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Per WP:NFF. Jamez42 (talk) 22:07, 22 June 2018 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...

(View log) I'm nominating Krrish Returns for deletion because it fails WP:NFF.There is no single source available on Internet to say 'Krrish Returns' production...

links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log) Apparently fails WP:NFF; no evidence that filming has commenced, and scant evidence to suggest that...

views) (delete) – (View log) Film which has not begun filming: delete per WP:NFF I42 (talk) 22:16, 14 June 2009 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...

references heather walls (talk) 10:22, 27 July 2012 (UTC) Delete per WP:NFF Ducknish (talk) 14:19, 27 July 2012 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...

made to this page.‎ The result was redirect to Anurag Kashyap. Fails WP:NFF - no prejudice to recreation once it passes. ansh666 07:57, 14 December 2017...

JSTOR · TWL) Nonnotable future film. Article was created WP:TOOSOON. Fails WP:NFF since production is not notable. Must be deleted or drafted until further...

further edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was Delete per WP:NFF. --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 20:26, 21 April 2016 (UTC) Kammarasambhavam (edit |...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) De-PROD'ed. WP:TOOSOON and fails WP:NFF for a future film lacking a notable production. A draft at Draft:X=Prem exists...

{IE: WP:GNG is met)... but it may fail WP:NFF. However, if it can be confirmed that filming has begun, WP:NFF (paragraph 3) would be met and this brand...

discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:34, 22 February 2013 (UTC) Delete per WP:NFF and lack of coverage. The thing seems to exist,[1] but as it is not to be...

• Gene93k (talk) 20:33, 30 June 2013 (UTC) Delete per WP:CRYSTAL and WP:NFF. MarnetteD | Talk 20:55, 30 June 2013 (UTC) Comment Articles can be kept...

[1] Pichpich (talk) 19:14, 20 June 2013 (UTC) Delete per last part of WP:NFF. Ansh666 20:29, 20 June 2013 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included in...

announced and that's it, so an article at this point is inapropriate per WP:NFF. Maybe userfy rather than delete. PC78 (talk) 11:49, 11 January 2009 (UTC)...

to have begun principal photography, unclear notability per WP:NFILM (WP:NFF). ... discospinster talk 23:36, 16 May 2019 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...

be deleted (NFF doesn’t apply post-release). However, this is rare, as big budget, multi-star films that tank still receive coverage. NFF has an excellent...

delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log) Appears to fail WP:NFF. No prejudice towards recreation when shooting can be verified to have commenced...

TWL) Fails WP:NFF. Star Trek "fan" film crowdfunded by Kickstarter. Coverage in reliable sources is pretty scarce. General practice per NFF is to not create...

contrib) - 13:18, 27 July 2008 (UTC) Unsure. If you apply the letter of WP:NFF, then this film is not planned to go into production until next year ([1]...

update was in 2018. Lacks significant coverage on production to meet WP:NFF guidelines for future films. Cited sources are interviews and announcements...

and no notability. Does not seem to meet guidelines for films, esp. WP:NFF. PROD was declined. Mr. Vernon (talk) 07:00, 24 August 2012 (UTC) Note: This...

film doesn’t need to be titled to have an article, it does need to pass WP:NFF, which it does. Seriously, this article has to be deleted because it doesn’t...

No reliable sources indicate principal photography has begun, so fails WP:NFF. gnfnrf (talk) 22:19, 28 November 2008 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...

fails notability per WP:NFF.  Esradekan Gibb  "Talk" 11:52, 20 July 2008 (UTC) Delete Crystal ballery. Fails WP:V, WP:RS and WP:NFF Doc StrangeMailboxLogbook...

December 2010 (UTC) Delete: Appears to be made up. Even if not, it fails WP:NFF. —Mike Allen 03:17, 2 December 2010 (UTC) Delete per WP:CRYSTAL. DARTH SIDIOUS...

Delete/salt and redirect to James Bond in film#Bond 25 (2019). It clearly fails WP:NFF since filming has not begun. Point #5 of WP:CRYSTAL states "Wikipedia is...

notice it will pass WP:NFILM, but it fails WP:NFF at this point in time. Both are strict to pass, but WP:NFF is incredibly strict in its guidelines.Tokyogirl79...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Per WP:NFF: "Similarly, films produced in the past which were either not completed or...

article meets WP:GNG, there was a consensus presuming non-notability under WP:NFF. No policy-based argument for notability was presented. joe deckertalk to...

irrelevant now. Passes WP:NFF easily. M4DU7 (talk) 14:28, 11 June 2021 (UTC) Keep The film's production is covered substantially, meets WP:NFF. -- Ab207 (talk)...

photography. Fails WP:NFF. Previously deleted via PROD. Bluemask (talk) 09:51, 26 August 2009 (UTC) Speedy delete and salt fails WP:NFF. Wikipedia is not...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This TV program is not satisfying WP:NFF. Jeni Wolf (talk) 06:01, 21 April 2022 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...

remover how WP:NFF applies very well, so I'll repeat it here: Hope you don't mind, Steve! I figured it would be of good use to have WP:NFF fleshed out in...

Gene93k (talk) 01:42, 26 January 2011 (UTC) Delete per WP:CRYSTAL and WP:NFF. Not even an official announcement has been made about this film--Sodabottle...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails to meet WP:NFF as the film is not yet in production. Guy546(Talk) 02:23, 5 August 2010 (UTC)...

evidence main production has begun and no secondary coverage, does not meet WP:NFF BOVINEBOY2008 18:12, 25 January 2016 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Filming has not yet begun, per WP:NFF BOVINEBOY2008 11:28, 9 April 2017 (UTC) Redirect: Film's shooting will begin...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Per WP:NFF Jamez42 (talk) 21:52, 22 June 2018 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...

--CyberGhostface (talk) 18:45, 10 April 2008 (UTC) Delete per WP:CRYSTAL and WP:NFF. Has not been completed and nothing about the production of this film is...

links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log) Another textbook WP:NFF. Not in production; not even a confirmed cast list. I42 (talk) 22:12, 14...

TexasAndroid (talk) 18:00, 9 June 2009 (UTC) Delete completely fails WP:NFF and WP:CRYSTAL. Not even in production yet and Wikipedia isn't a rumor mill...

per nom as there is no references that the film was ever released. Fails NFF. Kolma8 (talk) 11:41, 6 March 2021 (UTC) Delete Sources fails in meeting...

June 2008 (UTC) Delete, fails WP:NFF.  Esradekan Gibb  "Talk" 01:33, 18 June 2008 (UTC) Delete Indeed it fails both WP:NFF and WP:CRYSTAL. GizzaDiscuss ©...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:NFF. I'm not finding any sources announcing that actual production has begun...

unreleased film article created in 2015 has no coverage on production to meet WP:NFF requirements. Does not confirm the filming which is the bare minimum requirement...

19:00, 24 December 2011 (UTC) Delete: Per WP:NFF. SL93 (talk) 01:21, 25 December 2011 (UTC) Delete per WP:NFF and WP:TOOSOON. --Sp33dyphil ©hatontributions...

guideline's requirement of significant, independent coverage, and, per WP:NFF, "films that . . . have not yet been publicly released . . . should generally...

pass WP:GNG as these are in-depth coverage of the film. Applicable is WP:NFF: Films that have not been confirmed by reliable sources to have commenced...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NF and possibly WP:NFF. The article says that shooting began in May (without a source). I did find...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Per WP:NFF, if this movie is actually being made, it's too soon to have an article....

JSTOR · TWL) Unfinished film since 2012 whose failure is not notable per WP:NFF guidelines. Coverage is mostly announcements, press releases, and non-RS...

delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log) Article fails WP:NFF. Available sources for this production are all at least 18 months old and...

2008 (UTC) Delete without prejudice per WP:NFF. Cliff smith talk 17:18, 17 August 2008 (UTC) Delete per WP:NFF. PC78 (talk) 18:31, 17 August 2008 (UTC)...

protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log) Fails WP:NFF. According to this article (dated May 2008) the first draft of the screenplay...

further edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was delete per WP:NFF. PeterSymonds (talk) 15:59, 25 July 2008 (UTC) Mirchi (film) (edit | talk |...

received any noteworthy coverage to support production being notable. Fails WP:NFF Donaldd23 (talk) 00:25, 14 December 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...

consensus has formed for returning the article to draftspace per the WP:NFF guideline. (non-admin closure) 11WB (talk) 15:54, 15 November 2025 (UTC)...

C 03:45, 18 March 2008 (UTC) Delete, WP:NFF.  Esradekan Gibb  "Talk" 03:53, 18 March 2008 (UTC) Delete, WP:NFF, WP:CRYSTAL, etc etc. Lankiveil (speak to...

(UTC) Delete per WP:NFF. Big Bird (talk • contribs) 14:53, 17 August 2011 (UTC) Redirect for now to the one place where per WP:NFF and WP:FUTURE this film...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NFF - too soon for an article. st170e 14:47, 5 February 2017 (UTC) Note: This...

log) No confirmation that film has started principle photography; fails WP:NFF. Prod contested by IP editor without comment. Fabrictramp | talk to me 17:55...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Doesn't meet with WP:NFF. Because principal photography doesn't commenced yet. Besides, no release...

that film is in active production, with sequences being rendered. Per WP:NFF, this film article exists way too early and should be deleted and instead...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Production has not started. Violates WP:NFF. —Mike Allen 05:14, 2 February 2010 (UTC) Delete per WP:HAMMER Shadowjams...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Too soon for an article: per WP:NFF: "Films that have not been confirmed by reliable sources to have commenced...

probably WP:NOT#CRYSTAL or WP:NFF. Accounting4Taste:talk 16:16, 29 February 2008 (UTC) Delete per notability guidelines and WP:NFF - Fritzpoll (talk) 16:22...

Per WP:NFF, the single source is extremely unreliable (a forum), even if a reliable source were provided the article would still fail WP:NFF, without...

Fails WP:NFF. Not even in Preproduction. WP:TOOSOON. Darkwarriorblake (talk) 14:17, 30 December 2012 (UTC) Delete. Obviously fails WP:NFF. Would have...

but all the refs confirm the film is not out of pre-production and thus WP:NFF is a valid argument for deletion. If anything, it would seem to have gone...

--Tito Dutta (talk) 09:53, 19 September 2016 (UTC) Yes Titodutta, it fails WP:NFF and is thus too soon even with recent coverage because filming has not yet...

deleted at AfD twice before as failing WP:CRYSTAL. The article still fails WP:NFF as there is no reliable source evidence that principal filming has begun...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Per WP:NFF the film has not begun principal photography and should not have its own...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Unreleased film, fails WP:NFF: "films that have already begun shooting, but have not yet been publicly...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non notable future film, fails WP:NFF as production wasn't notable. Should be deleted or moved to draft until release...

protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log) WP:NFF "Films that have not been confirmed by reliable sources to have commenced...

deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:58, 23 September 2014 (UTC) delete WP:NFF Gaijin42 (talk) 02:30, 24 September 2014 (UTC) Type:(Find sources: Google...

14:52, 28 December 2011 (UTC) Delete: Per WP:NFF. SL93 (talk) 21:05, 28 December 2011 (UTC) Delete. Clear WP:NFF. --Legis (talk - contribs) 00:54, 29 December...

now per WP:NFF. While apparently completed, its not having a set release date and, in lacking significant pre-release coverage, fails WP:NFF. And with...

notability either. kollision (talk) 14:07, 20 June 2010 (UTC) Delete per WP:NFF. Barebones database entries are not significant or reliable coverage for...

Preceding unsigned comment added by Ghostboy1997 (talk • contribs) Delete per WP:NFF. Ansh666 00:53, 12 June 2013 (UTC) Delete - the only coverage is the Lights...

FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Upcoming film that does not meet the requirements of WP:NFF. No reliable independent coverage of the film production yet, only announcements...

JSTOR · TWL) Future film. Fails under Wikipedia:Notability (films) and WP:NFF. Has not even finished casting yet. Triwbe (talk) 12:25, 9 June 2010 (UTC)...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails the WP:NFF guideline in the sense that filming has not begun (plans to in June 2011)...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Unreleased film, fails WP:NFF: "films that have already begun shooting, but have not yet been publicly...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NFF. Attempted redirect as an WP:ATD but that was objected to. Filming has begun...

and who generates waffle to keep interest alive. Should be deleted per WP:NFF: "Films that have not been confirmed by reliable sources to have commenced...

deserve a standalone article because it touches on WP:CRYSTAL and violates WP:NFF. Michitaro (talk) 15:51, 13 May 2012 (UTC) Delete Technically a copyvio since...

an enormous amount of sources for this film. I know that the norm of WP:NFF is to delete articles that haven't yet started filming, but there are a lot...

26 March 2019 (UTC) Speedy keep Article satisfies the stipulation in WP:NFF that it must have begun/completed filming before being in mainspace. Film...

and this has no coverage to overcome WP:NFF. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 01:38, 14 July 2013 (UTC) Delete per WP:NFF; unable to find sufficient coverage to satisfy...

discussions. —JohnCD (talk) 11:24, 14 April 2009 (UTC) Delete per nom. and WP:NFF. JohnCD (talk) 11:26, 14 April 2009 (UTC) Delete without prejudice as "pre-production"...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NFF. Content can be merged to Mallrats#Sequel. Rob Sinden (talk) 08:37, 10 April...

FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Film hasn't begun principle photography, hence fails WP:NFF. ɠǀɳ̩ςεΝɡbomb 18:58, 28 April 2010 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...

have the persistent and enduring coverage to merit being an exception ro WP:NFF paragraph 3. Schmidt, Michael Q. 22:14, 20 December 2013 (UTC) Note: This...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Incorrect WP:MoS on film titles, and WP: NFF violation as principal photography on the film begins only in October Krimuk|90...

(delete) – (View log) Production has not yet started, therefore fails WP:NFF. JD554 (talk) 08:16, 24 April 2009 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...

Unsourced rumour about a future film. IMDb has no mention of it. Per WP:NFF, Films which have not been confirmed by reliable sources to have commenced...

film. Fails WP:NFF Donaldd23 (talk) 16:00, 28 February 2021 (UTC) Delete When is a film not a film? When it’s not a film. Fails WP:NFF Hildrethgazzard...

further edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was delete per WP:NFF. PeterSymonds (talk) 15:56, 25 July 2008 (UTC) Rajneeti (edit | talk | history |...

happen at all. PTJoshua (talk) 16:24, 15 July 2011 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:NFF. Lugnuts (talk) 17:41, 15 July 2011 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...

Angeline (film) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)​ Fails WP:NFF. There is no citations or any sources to find. CastJared (talk) 23:44, 17...

WP:NFF. Also I note that the Plot section of the article is a copy of what's in IMDb. PKT (talk) 20:37, 8 January 2008 (UTC) Delete, fails WP:NFF. Note...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Contested prod. Detetion request is per WP:NFF. According to [1], filming hasn't started, and won't start for months. Funnyfarmofdoom...

delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log) Textbook WP:NFF. Speedy Delete. I42 (talk) 22:10, 14 June 2009 (UTC) Delete (a PROD tag would...

Contested {{prod}} with no reason given. Pretty blatant violation of WP:NFF. Matt (talk) 10:06, 17 May 2009 (UTC) Comment: User responded to the prod...

DMySon (talk) 11:55, 12 February 2022 (UTC) Delete WP:TOOSOON, fails WP:NFF DonaldD23 talk to me 14:28, 12 February 2022 (UTC) Delete as it is not yet...

future film, lacking significant coverage by independent sources per WP:NFF and WP:GNG, move to draft until it receives appropriate coverage BOVINEBOY2008...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NFF BOVINEBOY2008 13:40, 23 September 2013 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Upcoming film, no suggestion that it meets WP:NFF. ("Films that have not been confirmed by reliable sources to have commenced...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) No announcement of production start date, fails WP:NFF Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 18:37, 2 April 2013 (UTC) Withdrawing...

FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Unreferenced article about an unreleased film, fails WP:NFF notability guideline. No references found in Google News and Books. - MrX...

verifiable as notable in the near future as it has not started shooting, per WP:NFF. PROD quickly removed so raising for wider discussion. I note that this article...

15 August 2017 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:V and WP:NFF. Recreate if/when it's released, or it meets WP:NFF. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 07:10, 16 August 2017...

here! Soxred93 | talk bot 03:10, 25 April 2008 (UTC) Delete per WP:V and WP:NFF. Also, I slowed the article down to 33⅓RPM and it's actually just a normal...

Talk 16:40, 14 July 2021 (UTC) Delete Non-notable future film, fails WP:NFF Donaldd23 (talk) 17:30, 14 July 2021 (UTC) Keep The film Lalitham Sundaram...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Per WP:NFF. Jamez42 (talk) 22:19, 22 June 2018 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...

WP:NFF and TOO SOON or Incubate. Allow undeletion/recreation once this verifiable project is released and IF it receives the coverage to meet WP:NFF. And...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Per WP:NFF, films that have not been publicly released yet should not have an article...

links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log) Explicitly fails WP:NFF. Due to possible, unforeseen issues with budgeting, scripting, and casting...

coverage, this one does not quite qualify as a possible exception to WP:NFF. NOTE: It is to be granted that because of the writer and director being...

23 June 2022 (UTC) While the draft is better, I don't think it meets WP:NFF yet, needs a lot more work before coming to mainspace. -- Ab207 (talk) 16:39...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Delete per WP:NFF as a film that has not yet commenced principal photography—or, alternately...

not meet WP:NFF. It feel like there is an uptick in these kinds of articles. MarnetteD|Talk 02:49, 4 January 2015 (UTC) delete -Fails WP:NFF. Anupmehra...

(delete) – (View log) Contested prod. Article is about a future film, fails WP:NFF. TN‑X-Man 16:33, 30 June 2008 (UTC) Delete - needs to make it farther than...

not (yet) having enough enduring coverage to (yet) be an exception to WP:NFF. Not (yet) included in the sources added by User:Vigyani, I found reliable...

doesn't meet WP:NF Mayalld (talk) 10:39, 5 August 2008 (UTC) Delete per WP:NFF. --Falcon Darkstar Kirtaran (talk) 10:57, 5 August 2008 (UTC) Note: This...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) No evidence filming ever commenced, per WP:NFF BOVINEBOY2008 06:50, 2 October 2025 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...

(or even first-party) to warrant an article for this future film per WP:NFF and WP:NF. BOVINEBOY2008 07:36, 16 October 2010 (UTC) Note: This debate has...

links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log) Explicitly fails WP:NFF; no cast or crew have yet been announced, so principal photography is clearly...

2016 (UTC) Keep - WP:GNG, WP:NFF - Subject has received significant coverage in reliable independent sources. It meets WP:NFF since the principle shooting...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Appears to fail WP:NFF. Should be deleted or moved to DRAFT until release PROD removed. DonaldD23...

sustain an article. Fails general notability and WP:NF. Not released WP:NFF Jbh (talk) 10:57, 6 April 2015 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...

14:51, 7 May 2019 (UTC) Delete fails WP:NFF. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 16:42, 7 May 2019 (UTC) Delete fails WP:NFF. — Preceding unsigned comment added by...

deletion discussions. GSS (talk|c|em) 16:52, 7 May 2018 (UTC) Delete fails WP:NFF as it is due to be released on 11 May 2018, though this could be worked around...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NFF. Also, WP:TOOSOON. Needs to be deleted or moved to DRAFT until release. AShiv1212...

further edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was Delete per WP:NFF. This film was stopped in 1998 due to lack of funding and has never gotten...

was keep. Production began in April 2007, so it meets the threshold for WP:NFF; the three third-party articles in references, plus the ELs given in this...

completed and receiving coverage as soon-to-release film, this passes WP:NFF. (IE: See Times of India, March 26 2013) A little diligence shows that sources...