This page is a redirect. The following categories are used to track and monitor this redirect:
|
On Wikipedia, notability is a test used by editors to decide whether a given topic warrants its own article. For people, the person who is the topic of...
Click to read more »FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Does not appear to satisfy any of the four points on WP:NARTIST or the points on WP:BASIC. – DarkGlow • 19:50, 5 September 2021 (UTC) Note:...
Click to read more »TWL) I originally PRODed the article with reason: "The subject fails WP:NARTIST and WP:GNG." It was dePRODed by BenjaminSmithChef, saying: "person is notable...
Click to read more »free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This artist does not meet WP:NARTIST. She has not been a substantial part of a significant exhibition, or won...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) GNG and NARTIST fail. ThatMontrealIP (talk) 01:19, 29 September 2019 (UTC) Note: This discussion...
Click to read more »reference to him beyond works for sale on auction sites and similar: fails WP:NARTIST Ingratis (talk) 23:21, 9 January 2023 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...
Click to read more »free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) No WP:RS to satisfy GNG or NARTIST. Additionally, her exhibitions listed are in User:Theredproject/Predatory...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) I do not believe this person meets WP:NARTIST and WP:BEFORE has not found any references to add. Tacyarg (talk) 14:48...
Click to read more »to establish the notability of this artist. Does not meet WP:GNG nor WP:NARTIST criteria for inclusion. The current article sourcing consists of three...
Click to read more »therefore meets WP:NARTIST. Netherzone (talk) 13:01, 14 February 2021 (UTC) Keep, Article shows signs of satisfying WP:GNG and WP:NARTIST. Alex-h (talk) 12:19...
Click to read more »JSTOR · TWL) I'm unable to find any coverage that would indicate that WP:NARTIST or WP:BIO are met. SmartSE (talk) 14:46, 30 August 2022 (UTC) Note: This...
Click to read more »free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) I'm not seeing a pass of WP:NARTIST or WP:GNG for this young painter. The coverage is all interviews in hyper-local...
Click to read more »free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Article subject fails WP:NARTIST. The article cites some sources, but said sources are all WP:PRIMARY, unreliable...
Click to read more »further edits should be made to this page. The result was keep. Passes WP:NARTIST and WP:GNG with adequate WP:RS (non-admin closure) ~ Amkgp 💬 14:43, 11...
Click to read more »Society's group shows in 1983-4, but these are insufficient for the WP:NARTIST criteria. Searches find little beyond cloned articles (example); searches...
Click to read more »clearly meetsWP:NARTIST part 4.d. as well as GNG. Please have a look at that. Possibly (talk) 18:41, 2 December 2020 (UTC) Keep, meets WP:NARTIST, in addition...
Click to read more »to show they meet WP:GNG, and nothing in the article shows they pass WP:NARTIST. Onel5969 TT me 03:09, 18 June 2017 (UTC) Citation has been added to article...
Click to read more »WP:NARTIST; I disagree. Although Mosley's work is apparently held in some German museums, NARTIST requires more than that. Specifically, NARTIST dictates...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:GNG and WP:NARTIST. Nothing in the article or elsewhere online can be found to contribute...
Click to read more »presumption of notability of NARTIST is overridden by the actual failure to meet GNG, and simply suggests that NARTIST, like so many SNGs, is too loose...
Click to read more »I think you have a typo in your sentence: "NARTIST does not trump NARTIST" -- I think you mean NARTIST does not trump GNG, in which case it is my understanding...
Click to read more »free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) I don't see them passing WP:NARTIST. Paradoctor (talk) 11:38, 23 September 2025 (UTC) Note: This discussion...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Puff page doesn't pass GNG or NARTIST Tarletonic (talk) 13:27, 12 January 2023 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...
Click to read more »reliable sources, meets none of the notability criteria for artists per WP:NARTIST or WP:GNG. He says he's acclaimed, the title of his online portfolio is...
Click to read more »hint of notability per WP:GNG or WP:NARTIST. Phil Bridger (talk) 09:27, 8 June 2021 (UTC) Delete. Fails WP:NARTIST and WP:SIGCOV.4meter4 (talk) 19:50,...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:GNG. This might pass WP:NARTIST, but no independent sources could be found that would make this pass the...
Click to read more »Mexican-American murals and Chicano art, but found nothing. Fails GNG and NARTIST. Netherzone (talk) 22:59, 5 August 2026 (UTC) Relisted to generate a more...
Click to read more »Saint Petersburg Philharmonic Orchestra web site: link. Probably passes WP:NARTIST. More sources likely exist in Russian. K.e.coffman (talk) 21:58, 28 January...
Click to read more »for notability per WP:GNG nor WP:NARTIST. Netherzone (talk) 16:55, 30 December 2021 (UTC) Delete. Fails WP:NARTIST Deathlibrarian (talk) 04:32, 31 December...
Click to read more »applies here, the subject is notable only for one event. Not meeting WP:NARTIST. Large part of the content is unsourced and appear to be original research...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) PROMO page that fails NARTIST. Commercial artist doing his job. Could not verify the museum collections...
Click to read more »this page. The result was keep. Consensus was that the subject passes WP:NARTIST. (non-admin closure) Rollidan (talk) 17:52, 24 March 2022 (UTC) [Hide this...
Click to read more »discouraged, as it was a good attempt... but have a look at WP:GNG and WP:NARTIST as these are the key policies for determining what is kept and what is...
Click to read more »JSTOR · TWL) WP:BLP of an artist, with no strong claim of notability per WP:NARTIST and no reliable source coverage to support it. The only claim of notability...
Click to read more »There's no evidence of anything approaching notability as set out at WP:NARTIST. ~dom Kaos~ (talk) 18:19, 16 October 2020 (UTC) Changing my vote to keep...
Click to read more »meets criteria 4d of WP:NARTIST, the article should be kept. Netherzone (talk) 13:18, 3 April 2021 (UTC) Keep He meets WP:NARTIST as having several collections...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) fails WP:NARTIST and WP:GNG Dom from Paris (talk) 11:16, 31 January 2018 (UTC) Note: This...
Click to read more »· m · c) 14:36, 2 April 2022 (UTC) Delete This artist does not meet WP:NARTIST. I cannot find any sources that show exhibitions or collections. Most of...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Appears to fail WP:NARTIST/WP:NCREATIVE. [1] and [2] are the best refs available, and they don't look...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) There are no WP:RS to establish WP:NARTIST. All the exhibitions are at vanity galleries, and many are 404s. The page...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Tagged for notability since 2010. Fails WP:NARTIST and WP:GNG. - UtherSRG (talk) 14:18, 3 August 2023 (UTC) Note: This discussion...
Click to read more »within the meaning of WP:NARTIST. He has won some critical attention, but it has not been significant enough to meet NARTIST; a paragraph here and a paragraph...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Subject fails WP:NARTIST and WP:ANYBIO. Many of these sources are not independent of the subject...
Click to read more »museums criteria 4 of WP:NARTIST is met. CT55555 (talk) 11:34, 3 April 2022 (UTC) Keep - This article is a clear WP:NARTIST and WP:GNG pass. Mags Harries...
Click to read more »Multiple awards and gallery showings also contribute to notability. Passes WP:NARTIST and WP:PROF. -AuthorAuthor (talk) 04:23, 26 November 2019 (UTC) AuthorAuthor...
Click to read more »Article about a music composer which does not seem to meet WP:GNG or WP:NARTIST. Searches are difficult but have come up with little to demonstrate notability...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) GNG and NARTIST fail. The only significant claim to fame is one painting in the Virginia...
Click to read more »made to this page. The result was Keep. Consensus that she passes WP:NARTIST, despite COI concerns. (non-admin closure) Devonian Wombat (talk) 10:27...
Click to read more »artist at the beginning of her career who does meet criteria #4 of WP:NARTIST as her work is in several notable museum collections. I added content +...
Click to read more »illustrator/artist who combines images found on Tumblr does not meet WP:GNG nor WP:NARTIST criteria for inclusion. The citations consist of primary sources (interviews)...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NARTIST. ∯WBGconverse 15:10, 9 October 2019 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...
Click to read more »Does not meet criteria for WP:NARTIST nor WP:GNG. Netherzone (talk) 16:33, 3 February 2021 (UTC) Delete GNG and NARTIST fail. Possibly (talk) 16:58, 3...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This artist does not meet WP:GNG nor WP:NARTIST criteria for notability. There are no significant exhibitions, museum collections...
Click to read more »This artist does not meet WP criteria for notability per WP:GNG nor WP:NARTIST. The article sourcing consists of churnalism from human interest listicles...
Click to read more »find any coverage in reliable sources that indicates that WP:BIO or WP:NARTIST are met. SmartSE (talk) 14:53, 30 August 2022 (UTC) Note: This discussion...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:GNG and WP:NARTIST Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 16:29, 29 February 2020 (UTC) Note: This...
Click to read more »WP:NARTIST. Samanthany (talk) 00:40, 27 August 2022 (UTC) Delete - I'm not finding that this artist meets our notability requirements for WP:NARTIST. The...
Click to read more »Gallery is a Vanity Gallery and there are insufficient WP:RS to satisfy NARTIST. Theredproject (talk) 21:52, 2 June 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Article about an artist that doesn't meet WP:NARTISTS or WP:SIGCOV at most. Jamiebuba (talk) 10:30, 29 December 2022 (UTC) Note:...
Click to read more »times, and the subject still does not meet notability criteria for WP:NARTIST, nor WP:GNG. The references/sources are mentions (a couple sentences),...
Click to read more »should expect a GNG pass because it looks like he has arguments under WP:NARTIST 4 b) and 4 d). Turning directly to GNG, here are some independent and in-depth...
Click to read more »Relevant guidance is at WP:NARTIST. General Ization Talk 03:09, 27 June 2017 (UTC) Thanks, sorry, meant to say I also checked NARTIST and see zero evidence...
Click to read more »free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This artist does not meet WP:NARTIST. He has not been a substantial part of a significant exhibition, or won...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Does not pass NARTIST. No significant critical studies or works in major museums.. DGG ( talk...
Click to read more »free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This artist does not meet WP:NARTIST. She has not been a substantial part of a significant exhibition, or won...
Click to read more »towards retention of the article, since the subject meet #4 criterion of WP:NARTIST. (non-admin closure) BhikhariInformer 📮 (Ping me or else I won't see...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable entrepreneur that fails WP:NARTIST. The sources in the article, as well, as other sources found for WP:BEFORE...
Click to read more »April 2021 (UTC) Keep Easily meets WP:NARTIST.--- Possibly (talk) 16:55, 1 April 2021 (UTC) Keep: Meets WP:NARTIST with collections in Bibliothèque nationale...
Click to read more »discussions. Shellwood (talk) 01:42, 17 June 2020 (UTC) Delete Subject fails WP:NARTIST. Another case where article author Mitzi.humphrey included herself in the...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NARTIST. Theroadislong (talk) 11:19, 24 February 2024 (UTC) Note: This discussion...
Click to read more »in independent sources either as an actor (WP:ACTOR) or an artist (WP:NARTIST) Boneymau (talk) 23:34, 29 December 2017 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NARTIST I can find no in-depth coverage, only primary sources and passing mentions...
Click to read more »discussions. XOR'easter (talk) 16:23, 10 September 2018 (UTC) Delete - Fails WP:NARTIST. Jmertel23 (talk) 17:18, 10 September 2018 (UTC) Delete per above. Capitals00...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) As is the article fails WP:ANYBIO, WP:NARTIST and WP:GNG article created by a probable COI user (same name as subject]...
Click to read more »Subject meets WP:NARTIST and WP:GNG. Netherzone (talk) 22:52, 12 April 2017 (UTC) Keep - Included in several major collections. Meets WP:NARTIST & WP:GNG. --Jack...
Click to read more »WP:BLP1E case, does not hold any encyclopedic value. No where near WP:NARTIST or WP:GNG. Hitro talk 09:40, 21 May 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non notable painter. No WP:RS to VERIFY GNG or NARTIST. FriDaInformation (talk) 16:51, 8 June 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion...
Click to read more »but I'm uncertain if he meets our notability criteria for artists WP:NARTISTS. I couldn't find any work in notable gallery or museum collections; he...
Click to read more »free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This artist does not meet WP:NARTIST. She has not been a substantial part of a significant exhibition, or won...
Click to read more »substantiates notability. Fails GNG & NARTIST. Netherzone (talk) 20:09, 17 March 2020 (UTC) Delete per nom fails WP:GNG and WP:NARTIST.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk)...
Click to read more »Frank Gallucci, Nicole Pizzato does not meet the requirements of the WP:NARTIST Vexations (talk) 12:16, 2 June 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...
Click to read more »BD2412 T 05:46, 27 December 2020 (UTC) Delete. Does not meet GNG, NPROF or NARTIST. A search turned up little. Possibly (talk) 05:49, 27 December 2020 (UTC)...
Click to read more »her gallery exhibits rise to the level of significance called for by WP:NARTIST. Further, limited coverage in independent sources. There is the Minnesota...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Successful artist but doesn't meet WP:NARTIST or WP:GNG. It has been in CAT:NN for over 11 years so hopefully we can...
Click to read more »publisher and she has several works in major public collections. Meets WP:NARTIST. She's also mentioned in a general book about West Virginia as "the state's...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) GNG and NARTIST fail. He is in two collections. One is a hospital in the UK, and the other...
Click to read more »evidence of meeting WP:GNG or WP:NARTIST Sionk (talk) 18:52, 11 June 2024 (UTC) Delete This artist does not meet WP:NARTIST. She has not been a substantial...
Click to read more »Lettler, the subject would meet the subject-specific notability guideline WP:NARTIST if the museum collections check out though. Have you considered that? Vexations...
Click to read more »yesterday, since I also can't find anything except local coverage of him. WP:NARTIST doesn't seem to be met, either. The only ref in the article, almost since...
Click to read more »free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This artist does not meet WP:NARTIST. She has not been a substantial part of a significant exhibition, or won...
Click to read more »JacobTheRox(talk | contributions) 11:34, 13 December 2025 (UTC) Delete. Fails WP:NARTIST. Aneirinn (talk) 11:39, 13 December 2025 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...
Click to read more »to meet WP:NARTIST. Coolabahapple (talk) 02:40, 4 November 2020 (UTC) Delete - The subject of the article does not pass WP:GNG nor WP:NARTIST criteria for...
Click to read more »PROD, as a search did not find SIGCOV or relevant accomplishments to meet NARTIST.ThatMontrealIP (talk) 14:49, 2 August 2020 (UTC) For the record, and in...
Click to read more »of her name? Nevertheless, the subject of the article does not meet WP:NARTIST, WP:PROF, WP:NAUTHOR or WP:GNG. Netherzone (talk) 12:35, 1 May 2021 (UTC)...
Click to read more »(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails NARTIST. Having a local paper write an article about someone vandalizing a statue...
Click to read more »languages found no sources that would satisfy the GNG. None of the WP:NARTIST criteria appear to be met either, in my view. Too soon, perhaps. (NPP action)...
Click to read more »free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Does not appear to meet WP:NARTIST or WP:GNG, sourced to blogs and dead links, largely created and maintained...
Click to read more »free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This artist does not meet WP:NARTIST. I can't find any reliable sources for this person beyond their personal...
Click to read more »Meets WP:GNG and passes WP:NARTIST. -AuthorAuthor (talk) 06:58, 30 September 2022 (UTC) Keep. Clearly passes WP:GNG and WP:NARTIST with multiple independent...
Click to read more »@MetricMaster, I believe you are misunderstanding the WP:NARTIST SNG. He clearly meets criteria #4d of NARTIST: The person's work (or works) has: (a) become a...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) non-notable artist, no coverage that would meet NARTIST or NACADEMIC/PROF in persian or english. Praxidicae (talk) 15:42, 15 June...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NARTIST. ∯WBGconverse 18:37, 1 December 2019 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...
Click to read more »India. DoubleGrazing (talk) 15:23, 9 January 2023 (UTC) Delete: Fails WP:NARTIST. Cannot remain with this paucity of referencing. Fails WP:BIO...
Click to read more »22 February 2022 (UTC) Delete. Coverage is not sufficient to meet NBIO/NARTIST. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 12:36, 23 February...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This subject fails WP:NARTIST as well as WP:GNG because he lacks significant coverage by unrelated third-party...
Click to read more »added three verified ones), so meets WP:NARTIST. Curiocurio (talk) 13:53, 19 April 2021 (UTC) Keep meets WP:NARTIST, kudos to @Curiocurio: for finding the...
Click to read more »16 March 2021 (UTC) Delete - Does not meet criteria for WP:GNG nor WP:NARTIST. No record of exhibitions in notable venues, no museum collections, very...
Click to read more »free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This artist does not meet WP:NARTIST. I cannot find any reliable sources online for this artist. The references...
Click to read more »the subject satisfies WP:NARTIST or WP:GNG. SuperMarioMan ( talk ) 18:50, 30 October 2015 (UTC) Delete Fails GNG and NARTIST. I could find nothing of...
Click to read more »any related WP:NARTIST. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 23:08, 12 January 2024 (UTC) Delete: As per nom. failed WP:GNG or any related WP:NARTIST. Youknowwhoistheman...
Click to read more »reason: "none of these sources are independent; doesn't pass WP:GNG or WP:NARTIST (even the recent press releases celebrating her art can only say that one...
Click to read more »free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) I don't believe she meets WP:NARTIST. I didn't find anything significant about her on a search, and the cz.wiki...
Click to read more »free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Subject fails WP:NPROF, WP:NARTIST, and WP:ANYBIO. As the citations show, she publishes stuff but there's...
Click to read more »or other writing, no collections, monographs. Fails the WP:GNG and WP:NARTIST. The link with Gabo and Pevsner implied in the connection to the Realistic...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Does not pass WP:NARTIST. Contested PROD. shoy (reactions) 17:41, 19 September 2016 (UTC) Note:...
Click to read more »free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:BIO, WP:SIGCOV, WP:NARTIST scope_creepTalk 12:59, 5 December 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...
Click to read more »sources. I see no evidence from this persons career that they would satisfy NARTIST/director/producer/whatever you want to call it as there's no coverage of...
Click to read more »through the promotion to assess the notability accurately. Seems to be an NARTIST fail. I asked the deleting admin to look at the old version and they said...
Click to read more »JSTOR · TWL) Searched in multiple places but can't find anything to pass WP:NARTIST, WP:GNG or even WP:V. See Google, Google Books, DDG etc. Draft:Anukul Charan...
Click to read more »free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non notable painter fails NARTIST and GNG, for lack of independent RS. Florence Biennale is a Vanity exhibition...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NARTIST. Theroadislong (talk) 08:31, 25 March 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion...
Click to read more »independent reliable sources, does not meet WP:GNG, doesn't appear to meet WP:NARTIST. In addition to reviewing the citations at this article and the linked...
Click to read more »and work, is sufficient to satisfy WP:NARTIST WP:SINGER. Nosebagbear (talk) 12:37, 5 August 2019 (UTC) WP:NARTIST isn't the requirement. See Wikipedia:Notability...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NARTIST. non notable artist Theroadislong (talk) 22:25, 30 May 2021 (UTC) Note:...
Click to read more »Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 22:20, 18 March 2022 (UTC) Delete fails WP:BIO and WP:NARTIST. Potential COI editing is a concern. LibStar (talk) 23:33, 24 March 2022...
Click to read more »for WP:NARTIST criterion 4. AllyD (talk) 06:57, 16 October 2020 (UTC) Keep per the sources provided by Deus et lex. Complies with WP:NARTIST and WP:GNG...
Click to read more »A preponderance of Vanity Galleries and insufficient WP:RS to satisfy NARTIST. I couldn't verify the claims of inclusion in the Triennale de Paris or...
Click to read more »misunderstanding and/or misinterpreting WP:NARTIST criteria. The subject of the article fails every point of WP:NARTIST; 1) he is not considered an important...
Click to read more »coverage of him, however, and do not think he meets WP:GNG, WP:ANYBIO or WP:NARTIST. His own website is down. Tacyarg (talk) 07:47, 5 September 2024 (UTC)...
Click to read more »a BEFORE search that this artist passes GNG nor meets the criteria for NARTIST. All I found online were WP mirrors. Bringing it here for the community...
Click to read more »WP:NARTIST, nor WP:BIO. Netherzone (talk) 23:38, 14 October 2019 (UTC) Delete. I agree with User: Netherzone. Does not meet WP:GNG, WP:NARTIST, nor...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Does not meet WP:NARTIST. An unsourced BLP. The article makes claims about how famous his work is...
Click to read more »(UTC) Delete - He makes nice photos but does not meet our criteria for WP:NARTIST nor WPGNG inclusion in the encyclopedia. No record of exhibitions, museum...
Click to read more »other than social media and one photo credit. Does not pass WP:GNG nor WP:NARTIST Netherzone (talk) 15:06, 8 April 2020 (UTC) Delete, No sign of passing...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) I PRODded this with this rationale: Fails WP:NARTIST and WP:GNG. Google hits are wikipedia mirrors, no results in my academic...
Click to read more »criteria for inclusion based on notability guidelines. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NARTIST. The current sourcing is poor, consisting of user-submitted content, a...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Possibly fails WP:NARTIST. The WP:PROMO is so bad I considered using WP:G11 but considering its age...
Click to read more »JSTOR · TWL) I just can't see any indication that this person might meet WP:NARTIST. She has had a small number of minor shows which seem to have attracted...
Click to read more »promotional autobiography does not meet notability guidelines WP:GNG nor WP:NARTIST. There is not enough SIGCOV in RS to support an article. I was able to...
Click to read more »Museum. Passes WP:NARTIST. Onel5969 TT me 20:48, 16 November 2020 (UTC) Keep - Clearly meets notability requirements per WP:NARTIST by way of museum collections...
Click to read more »have just added a Ham&High reference but still do not think she passes WP:NARTIST. Tacyarg (talk) 02:56, 23 July 2022 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...
Click to read more »No collections, museum exhibits or anything else that would satisfy WP:NARTIST Vexations (talk) 11:09, 20 March 2020 (UTC) Delete SIGCOV not found in...
Click to read more »Let's discuss it 07:03, 28 January 2016 (UTC) Keep in mind one part of WP:NARTIST is being notable among one's peers. I'm positive that the hot artists within...
Click to read more »important private clients, but still shows no signs of meeting WP:GNG or WP:NARTIST. After 11 years of waiting for improvement on the situation, I think it's...
Click to read more »our time with this. @Acousmana: I respectfully suggest you actually read NARTIST before you cite it. Theredproject (talk) 04:00, 6 November 2021 (UTC) Keep:...
Click to read more »Museum. [1] Vexations (talk) 21:31, 5 November 2021 (UTC) Speedy Keep meets NARTIST. Also in the Stedelijk [2] This is a waste of time. Theredproject (talk)...
Click to read more »free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This artist does not meet WP:NARTIST. She has not been a substantial part of a significant exhibition, or won...
Click to read more »not turn up enough in-depth coverage to meet WP:GNG, and doesn't meet WP:NARTIST. Onel5969 TT me 18:09, 4 February 2021 (UTC) Delete - This artist does...
Click to read more »artist and academic does not meet notability criteria for WP:NPROF nor WP:NARTIST. At first glance it appears to be well sourced however, after investigating...
Click to read more »notable. Oaktree b (talk) 00:51, 19 December 2021 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:NARTIST. WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 21:51, 19 December 2021 (UTC) Delete - per Vexations...
Click to read more »free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This artist does not meet WP:NARTIST. She has not been a substantial part of a significant exhibition, or won...
Click to read more »extra work, but creator moved it straight back to main space, fails WP:NARTIST. Theroadislong (talk) 16:33, 11 September 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) No WP:SIRS to meet WP:GNG. Fails NARTIST. I was able to verify one museum collection [1] though I'm unsure if this...
Click to read more »newspapers. Fails NARTIST and GNG. APerson (talk!) 13:29, 12 May 2015 (UTC) Delete Nothing but press releases, fails WP:GNG and WP:NARTIST. Joseph2302 (talk)...
Click to read more »I'm not seeing any evidence that this photographer passes WP:GNG or WP:NARTIST, and the page creator has been blocked for suspected undisclosed paid editing...
Click to read more »passes WP:NARTIST. Onel5969 TT me 12:57, 8 April 2021 (UTC) Delete no RS. The artists' own website doesn't have any evidence that he passese NARTIST either...
Click to read more »artist meets WP:NARTIST guideline for inclusion. Netherzone (talk) 14:05, 26 February 2025 (UTC) Keep, agree that this is a WP:NARTIST#4 pass. -- asilvering...
Click to read more »97.122.210 (talk) 06:39, 1 August 2018 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:GNG and WP:NARTIST.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 21:00, 3 August 2018 (UTC) Delete Cannot...
Click to read more »This artist does not meet WP criteria for inclusion per WP:GNG nor WP:NARTIST. Their work has not been included in significant exhibitions nor is it...
Click to read more »on the last comment that raised the possibility of the subject meeting NARTIST. SoWhy 07:01, 10 July 2017 (UTC) Joey B (edit | talk | history | protect |...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) NN artist fails WP:NARTIST . Sourcing may fail GNG as many primaries and listings. WP:NOTPROMO (further...
Click to read more »Delete I was unable to find any coverage of the artist. Doesn't meet WP:NARTIST, WP:BASIC, or WP:GNG. Schazjmd (talk) 16:52, 11 July 2021 (UTC) Delete...
Click to read more »There are no collections or significant exhibition record to pass WP:NARTIST. If others can find SIGCOV in reliable sources I might be open to changing...
Click to read more »though. Star Mississippi 23:33, 5 November 2021 (UTC) Speedy Keep Meets NARTIST. Please do your research WP:BEFORE you nominate. There are plenty of RS...
Click to read more »exhibitions and ect.Mahdiar86 (talk) 12:27, 11 October 2021 (UTC) Also fails WP:NARTIST.Mahdiar86 (talk) 12:32, 11 October 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...
Click to read more »coverage in reliable sources - lack of WP:SIGCOV. Fails WP:BIO and WP:NARTIST. Promotional article, created by a WP:SPA. Edwardx (talk) 21:20, 8 September...
Click to read more »free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Doesn't meet WP:GNG or WP:NARTIST––the best piece of coverage currently cited is this piece in Dallas News...
Click to read more »free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non notable artist. Fails NARTIST, due to lack of independent reliable sources with significant coverage...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) not qualifying WP:NARTIST and No WP:RS, WP:GNG, but has some news articles, I can't understand telegu...
Click to read more »"pizza expert", none of which adds up to notability. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NARTIST. Netherzone (talk) 02:16, 9 December 2024 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) I'm a bit torn on whether this passes WP:NARTIST or not. Her work has been shown in a few galleries, but as temporary exhibitions...
Click to read more »be made to this page. The result was keep. There is consensus that WP:NARTIST is met. (non-admin closure) 11WB (talk) 16:20, 22 December 2025 (UTC) [Hide...
Click to read more »are balanced by nose count, the Delete ones correctly point out that WP:NARTIST must be read in conjunction with WP:BASIC. Giving extra weight to the P&G-based...
Click to read more »Kingsacrificer (talk) 12:40, 17 September 2025 (UTC) Delete – Fails in WP:NARTIST. Svartner (talk) 16:44, 17 September 2025 (UTC) Relisted to generate a...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Current coverage is not enough for WP:NARTIST Setreis (talk) 15:31, 17 March 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails each of the four criteria of WP:NARTIST. Sources do confirm that she exists and does art, but the few media reviews...
Click to read more »free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Doesn't appear to pass WP:NARTIST JC7V (talk) 07:53, 12 December 2018 (UTC) Clint Baclawski is a contemporary...
Click to read more »19:29, 17 March 2026 (UTC) Delete -WP:TOOSOON This artist does not meet WP:NARTIST. She has not been a substantial part of a significant exhibition, or won...
Click to read more »misunderstanding and/or misinterpreting WP:NARTIST criteria. The subject of the article fails every point of WP:NARTIST; 1) he is not considered an important...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Subject fails WP:NARTIST. I accepted this draft (written by a CoI editor) only because I think many...
Click to read more »notice. Thanks, Szzuk (talk) 12:01, 26 April 2018 (UTC) Keep Passes WP:NARTIST#4 with multiple significant awards and important exhibitions supported...
Click to read more »her career will develop enough to sustain an article. Does not pass WP:NARTIST criteria for inclusion. Netherzone (talk) 22:53, 25 October 2021 (UTC)...
Click to read more »public collections holding works by Bennett satisfies criterion 4(d) of WP:NARTIST. This claim needs sourcing though. Vexations (talk) 21:14, 29 August 2019...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NARTIST and WP:NAUTHOR. All of the sources listed in this article are primary,...
Click to read more »that he has a cool name, I'm not finding that he passes WP:GNG for WP:NARTIST criteria for inclusion. Netherzone (talk) 17:31, 7 July 2021 (UTC) Weak...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Tagged for notability since 2010. Fails WP:NARTIST and WP:GNG. - UtherSRG (talk) 14:51, 20 September 2023 (UTC) Note: This...
Click to read more »WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 02:03, 2 December 2022 (UTC) Delete. WP:GNG and WP:NARTIST are not met. As noted by WomenArtistUpdates, the only independent/RS news...
Click to read more »(UTC) Keep several museum shows, while not listed as a criterion at WP:NARTIST demonstrate that Ander has been the subject of significant critical attention...
Click to read more »have received sufficient independent and in-depth coverage to pass WP:NARTIST. The most in-depth thing here is a blog interview [1], to which I would...
Click to read more »Netherzone (talk) 01:00, 1 July 2022 (UTC) Delete - Does not meet GNG nor NARTIST criteria for notability. A BEFORE search reveals social media, native advertising...
Click to read more »Esquivalience t 17:28, 22 July 2015 (UTC) Delete Subject of the article fails WP:NARTIST and nothing seemed to be notable outside the minor criminal case. WP:BIO1E...
Click to read more »collections, and has at least one work of public art, which is a pass of WP:NARTIST; she may also meet WP:GNG per the sources added by Skynxnex. BTW, this...
Click to read more »The World's Best Contemporary Interior Designers [7]. She also meets WP:NARTIST as her work is included in the collections of several notable museums,...
Click to read more »discussions. Spiderone 20:55, 18 November 2020 (UTC) Weak keep Fails WP:NARTIST, but artists have high notability. ~Cupper (talk) 17:28, 19 November 2020...
Click to read more »not enough about him online or in a newspaper search to support GNG nor NARTIST. He should be mentioned somewhere in the encyclopedia though; I added a...
Click to read more »FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Article about artist which does not seem to meet WP:NARTIST or WP:GNG Speedy was declined because the "french version could be translated"...
Click to read more »the permanent exhibitions of notable museums which means he passes WP:NARTIST and he has coverage in reliable sources such as the Chicago Tribune mentioned...
Click to read more »revealed reviews in ArtForum and Aperture that meet the bare minimum for WP:NARTIST. I also tagged it with various cleanup templates, because regardless of...
Click to read more »deletion.--Geewhiz (talk) 06:57, 27 November 2019 (UTC) Keep passes WP:NARTIST with his works held in multiple notable museums, a few minutes google searching...
Click to read more »not enough in-depth sourcing found to pass WP:GNG, and doesn't meet WP:NARTIST. Onel5969 TT me 18:34, 9 February 2021 (UTC) Keep Pilpeled is a very known...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NARTIST known for one barely notable local event only. Theroadislong (talk) 13:07...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NARTIST. Bbb23 (talk) 14:57, 3 August 2024 (UTC) This seems wrong to me. First...
Click to read more »notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 18:35, 17 May 2017 (UTC) Keep per WP:NARTIST, having 'played a major role in co-creating a significant or well-known...
Click to read more »they do not provide the information required of either WP:NACTOR or WP:NARTIST as pointed out by the nominator and user Possibly, when !voting delete...
Click to read more »artist with matching minor quality references. Nothing that approaches WP:NARTIST.96.127.242.226 (talk) 21:41, 20 July 2018 (UTC) Note: I removed several...
Click to read more »already in the article and has had many notable exhibitions so passes WP:NARTIST and WP:GNG. The recreation after a soft delete was completely valid, thanks...
Click to read more »DCsansei (talk) 12:52, 27 September 2025 (UTC) He is also an automatic WP:NARTIST #4 pass since his work is in the permanent collection of the JCII Museum...
Click to read more »Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 18:57, 14 April 2021 (UTC) Delete fails GNG or NARTIST. The claims are PROMO and misleading: Bembo @ Venice is a vanity gallery;...
Click to read more »in this article. It currently has no references. The subject fails WP:NARTIST. She doesn't appear to be in any major exhibitions or had any of her exhibitions...
Click to read more »Girth Summit (blether) 13:22, 12 April 2022 (UTC) Keep because he meets NARTIST 4(d) but probably TNT to remove the puffery. I added citations to two of...
Click to read more »free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) I don’t see how she meets WP:NARTIST or GNG. Trillfendi (talk) 01:18, 2 January 2019 (UTC) Keep She meets WP:ANYBIO...
Click to read more »the transfer did not include her own works; which would have satisfied NARTIST (4). Ref 8--Fails criterion of intellectual independency and even then...
Click to read more »collections, so a clear pass of WP:NARTIST. Curiocurio (talk) 01:27, 20 January 2023 (UTC) Keep - This artist clearly meets WP:NARTIST by way of their permanent...
Click to read more »concerns that, as it stands, this article does not show that Jagrut meets WP:NARTIST, although the number of sources cited may lead to WP:GNG, out of respect...
Click to read more »coverage exists. Whether it is "significant coverage", I couldn't say. WP:NARTIST, while the subject and his work have been a substantial part of several...
Click to read more »Delete if not speedily, based on lack of notability, failure to meet WP:NARTIST and significant WP:PROMO. No significant exhibitions, and the only evidence...
Click to read more »verify any of the biographical information presented. The subject fails WP:NARTIST. He has not been a substantial part of a significant exhibition, or won...
Click to read more »Delete I read Spanish, but the sourcing doesn't establish that he meets NARTIST despite the claims on the Wiki linked above. There's some conflation with...
Click to read more »verifiable either. Even if they were verifiable they aren't enough for NARTIST. Theredproject (talk) 18:29, 17 May 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...
Click to read more »artist does not appear to meet notability criteria for artists per WP:NARTIST, nor WP:GNG. All of the sources are non-independent or primary. A "Before"...
Click to read more »WP:BEFORE. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NARTIST.4meter4 (talk) 04:44, 27 January 2026 (UTC) Delete- Fails WP:GNG and WP:NARTIST. Those non-WP:RS are an indicative...
Click to read more »not finding any evidence that this artist is notable per WP:GNG nor WP:NARTIST. The article referencing consists of primary sources or directories. What...
Click to read more »Delete There is a tiny amount of coverage, but not enough to meet GNG or NARTIST. There is another Warner Williams (1764— 1848) who might be notable.ThatMontrealIP...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails W:GNG; WP:NARTIST; WP:NORG. Passing mentions in media, articles promoting retail location...
Click to read more »source" tag since 2009 with no resolution in 16 years. Subject fails WP:NARTIST and WP:GNG. My own searches in the Wikipedia Library uncover nothing. RosePickfair...
Click to read more »article is in bad shape, but should not be deleted, as he clearly meets WP:NARTIST and WP:GNG. He was the subject of a BBC documentary. He has work in several...
Click to read more »young artist does not meet WP criteria for notability per WP:GNG nor WP:NARTIST. I am not finding that they have been in significant exhibitions, nor is...
Click to read more »significant coverage conferring notability per WP:GNG, WP:BASIC, or WP:NARTIST. Cielquiparle (talk) 04:01, 10 January 2024 (UTC) Note: This discussion...
Click to read more »Kelob2678 (talk) 09:40, 10 April 2026 (UTC) DeleteThis artist does not meet WP:NARTIST. He has not been a substantial part of a significant exhibition, or won...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:GNG and WP:NARTIST, declined many times at draft and speedy deleted also, so bringing here...
Click to read more »significant coverage, no awards or accolades and no indication of passing WP:NARTIST. Should be deleted. Sophisticatedevening(talk) 18:05, 20 January 2026 (UTC)...
Click to read more »interest in the subject and is therefore not independent. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NARTIST. (This article is also a somewhat apparent paraphrase of the source, but...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:GNG and WP:NARTIST. Edwardx (talk) 09:36, 13 April 2022 (UTC) Keep On the basis of criterion...
Click to read more »3 September 2016 (UTC) @Tomwsulcer: But the subject does not pass WP:NARTIST. The subject is essentially known for acting in 1 movie (not yet released)...
Click to read more »guideline GNG nor do they meet criteria for notable photographers, per WP:NARTIST. Subjective qualities imagined or real do not contribute to notability...
Click to read more »no claim of notability. She fails both WP:GNG and/or WP:NPROF and/or WP:NARTIST. Being the first African-American Woman to earn a PhD in physics from UCBerkeley...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Per WP:GNG and WP:NARTIST. I could not locate reliable sources sufficient enough to meet GNG guidelines...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Not sure this person meets any point of WP:NARTIST. Couldn't find any substantial sources about her on a search. The citations...
Click to read more »(UTC) Delete, fails WP:NARTIST and WP:GNG jolielover♥talk 16:07, 20 February 2025 (UTC) DeleteThis artist does not meet WP:NARTIST. She has not been a substantial...
Click to read more »2 are affiliated and the other 2 are "local artist" stories. Fails WP:NARTIST nothing in a WP:BEFORE search suggests that she meets any of the criteria...
Click to read more »Acted only in one local movie. Not much references as well. Fails WP:NARTIST, WP:MODEL, WP:ENT KCVelaga ☚╣✉╠☛ 10:55, 10 June 2016 (UTC) Note: This debate...
Click to read more »IMHO, the consensus is that the sources simply are not there to meet WP:NARTIST. Just Chilling (talk) 00:38, 8 July 2019 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles...
Click to read more »actually suggest substantial notability, and nothing that would meet WP:NARTIST. The key point, though, is that sources are entirely lacking. Of the 7...
Click to read more »Keep another lazy nomination without a proper WP:BEFORE. Easily passes WP:NARTIST as there is a ton of coverage: [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8]....
Click to read more »achievements or exhibitions that would obviously rise to the level of WP:NARTIST. Dionysodorus (talk) 14:12, 7 September 2025 (UTC) Note: This discussion...
Click to read more »independent coverage required for GNG; nothing found that might meet NARTIST. Will keep searching before !voting. Netherzone (talk) 17:34, 10 June 2023...
Click to read more »and except the two I mentioned, I could not find any, so she fails WP:NARTIST, WP:BASIC and WP:BIO/WP:GNG. I briefly considered merging to Jaja of Opobo...
Click to read more »Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 18:30, 7 October 2022 (UTC) Delete. Fails WP:NARTIST and WP:SIGCOV. Probably a case of WP:TOOSOON; this bio does indicate some...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:GNG and WP:NARTIST. Notability is not inherited. Edwardx (talk) 22:07, 17 September 2023 (UTC)...
Click to read more »verifying the collections, and was unsuccessful. Does not pass WP:GNG nor WP:NARTIST at this time. I did however find that he was in two group shows at the...
Click to read more »Caro7200 (talk) 12:48, 1 April 2020 (UTC) Delete the usual mix of WP:NARTIST fails. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 18:24, 9 April 2020 (UTC) The above discussion...
Click to read more »JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NPROF and WP:SIGCOV. It's possible he passes WP:NARTIST, but I was unable to verify the claims in the article in a WP:BEFORE search...
Click to read more »discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 11:15, 3 August 2018 (UTC) Keep, meets WP:NARTIST, for reasons given by editors above, this can be closed early as a snowy...
Click to read more »article keeps getting nominated for deletion. This artist does not meet WP:NARTIST. He has not been a substantial part of a significant exhibition, or won...
Click to read more »Does not appear to have made contributions significant enough to meet WP:NARTIST. –Ploni (talk) 01:48, 18 May 2022 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) It does not seem to pass WP:GNG or WP:NARTIST. MarioGom (talk) 06:45, 11 October 2022 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...
Click to read more »Pop Chalee's article. Ahalenia (talk) 17:12, 2 April 2021 (UTC)Ahalenia NARTIST is a special notability guideline. One needs to only meet GNG or ANYBIO...
Click to read more »permeant collections of notable museums or national galleries, so it's an WP:NARTIST fail. Also not finding that they meet WP:GNG as what is present in current...
Click to read more »individual is notable per Wikipedia criteria in WP:GNG, WP:NBIO, or WP:NARTIST. The citations are to articles about other things which merely mention...
Click to read more »that of Elvin Jones; WP:NARTIST #1, where a trade magazine ranked the subject amongst the all-time top 500 in his field; WP:NARTIST #3, by playing a consequential...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) No sources besides for Allmusic. Seems to fail NARTIST (although he possibly signed with a label at some point). Google doesn't...
Click to read more »current state of the article, he does meet notability criteria for WP:NARTIST (I added three museum collections). Based on what I could find in an online...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NARTIST. Non-notable person. Graywalls (talk) 22:09, 18 June 2020 (UTC) Note: This...
Click to read more »independent sources that would indicate this person meets WP:NMUSIC, WP:NARTIST, or WP:GNG. Checked Google, GBooks, GNews, Highbeam, and JSTOR. ♠PMC♠ (talk)...
Click to read more »deleted and recreated when and if someone digs up sources to pass GNG or NARTIST Hydromania (talk) 07:12, 24 September 2019 (UTC) Update: I've gone ahead...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NARTIST. No evidence that subject is notable enough for a standalone article, and...
Click to read more »May 2020 (UTC) Delete - The subject of the article does not pass GNG or NARTIST criteria. Netherzone (talk) 02:17, 14 May 2020 (UTC) Delete - I do not...
Click to read more »(talk) 12:33, 22 October 2024 (UTC) Delete - This artist does not meet WP:NARTIST. He has not been a substantial part of a significant exhibition, or won...
Click to read more »the article or elsewhere online - lack of WP:SIGCOV. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NARTIST. Promotional article, created by a WP:SPA. 8 pageviews in 30 days for a...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) article that fails WP:NARTIST and GNG Dom from Paris (talk) 16:37, 8 November 2018 (UTC) Note: This discussion...
Click to read more »FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Prodded long ago, still reads like a resume, fails WP:NARTIST, on indication of in-depth coverage, or that any awards/etc. are major...
Click to read more »independent published sources. The subject does not meet WP:GNG nor WP:NARTIST. Netherzone (talk) 22:45, 22 December 2023 (UTC) Note: This discussion...
Click to read more »academic positions in the practice of art rather than its scholarship, WP:NARTIST is far more likely than WP:PROF as a notability criterion. He had a solo...
Click to read more »a regional newspapers only, fails WP:GNG, WP:BLPNOTE, WP:NACTOR and WP:NARTIST. Note my edits on article review. Flat Out (talk) 03:27, 13 January 2017...
Click to read more »artist, not properly referenced as having any strong claim to passing WP:NARTIST. The attempted notability claim here is that her art has been exhibited...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NARTIST. Theroadislong (talk) 13:19, 26 April 2025 (UTC) Note: This discussion...
Click to read more »sustantiate this person's notability in a BEFORE search. WP:GNG and WP:NARTIST fail. No in-depth coverage in RS over an extented period of time, no reviews...
Click to read more »does not indicate how the individual is notable per WP:GNG, WP:BIO, or WP:NARTIST. I am also unable to find reliable third-party sources that discuss him...
Click to read more »--- Possibly ☎ 16:37, 9 August 2021 (UTC) Delete. Fails WP:SIGCOV and WP:NARTIST.4meter4 (talk) 16:50, 9 August 2021 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable artist. No indication that WP:ANYBIO, WP:NARTIST or WP:GNG are met. In terms of: WP:ANYBIO, I can find no sources to suggest...
Click to read more »10:32, 10 October 2023 (UTC) Keep - This artist meets criteria #4 of WP:NARTIST; his work is included in the permanent collections of several notable museums...
Click to read more »notability. It's been tagged for notabilty for 10 years. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NARTIST. Bringing it here for the community to decide. Netherzone (talk) 23:04...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NARTIST as the awards are either not notable, unverifiable and/or vanity awards...
Click to read more »(talk) 15:10, 19 July 2018 (UTC) Delete Non-notable producer who fails WP:NARTIST and WP:NMUSIC. I will note that article subjects do not inherit notability...
Click to read more »JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable artist created by PR sock. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NARTIST. Joseph2302 (talk) 17:36, 3 June 2015 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...
Click to read more »ThatMontrealIP (talk) 16:16, 16 April 2020 (UTC) Delete fails, WP:GNG, WP:NARTIST and WP:MUSICIAN. Theroadislong (talk) 16:19, 16 April 2020 (UTC) Delete...
Click to read more »or has been collected by notable museums, so the article also fails WP:NARTIST. Vexations (talk) 11:23, 15 October 2018 (UTC) Delete. No sign of notability...
Click to read more »artist, with no credible or properly sourced claim of notability per WP:NARTIST -- as written, this just asserts that she exists, while failing to list...
Click to read more »01:26, 21 March 2020 (UTC) Delete - Artist does not pass WP:GNG nor WP:NARTIST, therefore notability is not established. He seems to have worked for a...
Click to read more »same type: mentions and exhibition bio bits. Overall, I don't believe WP:NARTIST is satisfied. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 00:12, 18 October 2019 (UTC)...
Click to read more »Also Art UK has a profile page: [6]. There is potential for meeting WP:NARTIST here. I've added these new citations to the article. ResonantDistortion...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:GNG and WP:NARTIST. The 2009 Student Academy Award for "The Bronx Balletomane" was given to...
Click to read more »galleries, but none that I looked at had anything biographical. Does not meet NARTIST, unfortunately. Lamona (talk) 23:35, 23 July 2026 (UTC) Delete Did some...
Click to read more »discussions. North America1000 16:22, 7 January 2017 (UTC) Delete Per WP:NARTIST. Comatmebro User talk:Comatmebro 21:15, 7 January 2017 (UTC) Delete per...
Click to read more »coverage of this person in reliable sources to demonstrate that WP:BIO or WP:NARTIST can be met. SmartSE (talk) 10:37, 24 February 2017 (UTC) Delete does not...
Click to read more »the article or elsewhere online - lack of WP:SIGCOV. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NARTIST. Promotional article, created by a WP:SPA. Edwardx (talk) 18:04, 17 July...
Click to read more »Delete – Fails in WP:NARTIST, it merely seems WP:PROMO. Svartner (talk) 16:53, 7 August 2025 (UTC) Delete clearly fails WP:NARTIST, primary and unreliable...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:GNG and WP:NARTIST. The sources that include biographical details are routine coverage of...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:GNG and WP:NARTIST Theroadislong (talk) 09:39, 19 December 2019 (UTC) Note: This discussion...
Click to read more »easily found online; AfD is not clean up. The artist clearly meets WP:NARTIST and WP:GNG. Netherzone (talk) 15:18, 22 October 2025 (UTC) Keep. Appears...
Click to read more »free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) The subject fails to meet WP:NARTIST. Searching in English doesn't reveal any sources that aren't gallery listings...
Click to read more »(UTC) There's not nothing, but I'm not finding coverage that would meet NARTIST. I get a lot of hits for his 2019 solo exhibition (the most complete of...
Click to read more »notice. Although he appears to only have marginal claims against (say) NARTIST #3 and #4c, and coverage of "Italian Newbrow"/"Nuova Arte Italiana" might...
Click to read more »indication that this artist meets WP notability criteria for WP:GNG or WP:NARTIST. She is not regarded as an important figure in street art, nor has she...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) I can't find the sources to show he meets WP:NARTIST or really, any coverage whatsoever of this painter. Courcelles (talk) 20:01...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Doesn't meet WP:NARTIST - RichT|C|E-Mail 18:16, 13 September 2023 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...
Click to read more »July 2020 (UTC) Revised nomination: Subject does not meet WP:GNG and WP:NARTIST, despite the creator's claims that the subject was "born ... to a notable...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) No evidence of this Russian painter passing WP:NARTIST or WP:GNG. The sources are a link to a posthumous retrospective from the...
Click to read more »Delete - This artist does not meet notability criteria per WP:GNG, WP:NARTIST nor WP:NBUSINESSPERSON. Seems to be a commercial artist with a social media...
Click to read more »FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This artist does not meet WP criteria for WP:GNG nor WP:NARTIST. There may be a conflict of interest involved. I had to remove promotional...
Click to read more »insufficient coverage to make up the references. Fails WP:SIGCOV and WP:NARTIST and WP:BIO. scope_creepTalk 14:45, 29 October 2020 (UTC) Delete — basically...
Click to read more »provided do not establish notability of this filmmaker per WP:GNG or WP:NARTIST. ... discospinster talk 18:33, 10 February 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion...
Click to read more »critical/analytical reviews, notable museum collections. Fails to meet WP:GNG nor WP:NARTIST at this time. Netherzone (talk) 20:33, 16 July 2022 (UTC) My argument to...
Click to read more »enough to substantiate the notability of this photographer per WP:GNG or WP:NARTIST. He certainly has photographed and filmed notable people, but the only...
Click to read more »JSTOR · TWL) Minor penciller/inker. Credits in a database do not satisfy WP:NARTIST, and no evidence of meeting WP:GNG. Does not appear to have created any...
Click to read more »coverage found so far to meet WP:GNG quite clearly and probably also WP:NARTIST. Netherzone (talk) 18:23, 11 March 2025 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...
Click to read more »lack independence. Doesn't appear to meet WP:SIGCOV or the criteria at WP:NARTIST. 4meter4 (talk) 16:03, 9 August 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...
Click to read more »Joan Mitchell grant is good for an artist ($25,000), but neither GNG or NARTIST says anything about grants. If it did, we would have to give articles to...
Click to read more »that the subject meets any of the notability criteria for artists, WP:NARTIST. No work in museum collections, etc. Vexations (talk) 16:42, 29 October...
Click to read more »Coolabahapple (talk) 23:55, 25 July 2020 (UTC) Delete, does not meet WP:NARTIST, and WP:NOTPROMO. Coolabahapple (talk) 00:23, 26 July 2020 (UTC) Keep....
Click to read more »—hueman1 (talk • contributions) 14:15, 11 January 2022 (UTC) Keep Meets WP:NARTIST with sources presented by HueMan. They're reliable enough IMV. SBKSPP (talk)...
Click to read more »Drmies (talk) 20:06, 10 May 2021 (UTC) Delete - meets neither WP:GNG or WP:NARTIST. Onel5969 TT me 03:43, 11 May 2021 (UTC) Note to closing admin there has...
Click to read more »JSTOR · TWL) Tagged for notability since 2010. PROD declined. Fails WP:NARTIST. UtherSRG (talk) 15:21, 3 July 2023 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...
Click to read more »October 2021 (UTC) Delete - Trivial coverage that is not enough to pass WP:NARTIST. I think the nom meant to write "insignificant", not "in significant"....
Click to read more »currently does not use reliable sources. This artist does not meet WP:NARTIST. She has not been a substantial part of a significant exhibition, or won...
Click to read more »No significant media coverage. Fails WP:RS, WP:V, WP:GNG, WP:NMUSIC, WP:NARTIST. --Elton-Rodrigues (talk) 12:31, 21 April 2017 (UTC) Relisted to generate...
Click to read more »delete. Article subject is found to lack the notability required in WP:NARTIST. — Coffee // have a ☕️ // beans // 02:51, 20 December 2017 (UTC) Ellen...
Click to read more »can't find any reliable sources for this artist on line. She fails WP:NARTIST and the article reads like WP:PROMO. The images in the article from the...
Click to read more »free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) BLP subject does not meet WP:NARTIST- notability is largely inherited from his former band Les Têtes Brulées...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Sources do not indicate notability under NARTIST or GNG. No additional sources found, in either English or Farsi, which...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NARTIST and WP:GNG. 4 pageviews in 30 days for an American BLP is very low. Edwardx...
Click to read more »JSTOR · TWL) Borderline - successful artist, but doesn't meet any part of WP:NARTIST or WP:GNG that I can find. Boleyn (talk) 07:37, 31 May 2020 (UTC) Note:...
Click to read more »independent in-depth coverage in reliable sources - lack of WP:SIGCOV. Fails WP:NARTIST. Run-of-the-mill artist. Promotional article, created by a WP:SPA. Edwardx...
Click to read more »TWL) Worked in only two movies, does not meet criteria for WP:GNG or WP:NARTIST. QueerEcofeminist "cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their] 09:04...
Click to read more »wasn't able to find any better sources or any indication of passing WP:NARTIST criteria through WP:BEFORE. Spicy (talk) 01:27, 1 October 2022 (UTC) Note:...
Click to read more »on the article or online, this immediately fails WP:NBIO, WP:GNG and WP:NARTIST. Cocobb8 (💬 talk • ✏️ contribs) 16:38, 8 May 2024 (UTC) Note: This discussion...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Promotional article that fails NARTIST with no indepedent RS that cover the subject in detail. Florence Biennale...
Click to read more »Pack Lambert (talk) 12:08, 20 April 2020 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:GNG and WP:NARTIST Sulfurboy (talk) 02:48, 21 April 2020 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Insufficient WP:RS to satisfy GNG or NARTIST. And a preponderance of Vanity Galleries. Theredproject (talk) 21:47, 4...
Click to read more »21 October 2021 (UTC) Keep per collections found by Vexations. meets NARTIST. --- Possibly ☎ 02:28, 23 October 2021 (UTC) Relisted to generate a more...
Click to read more »Otherwise, it's passing mentions. - Overall I'd assess this as not meeting WP:NARTIST yet, although it may not be far off the mark. (NB, also written by the...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) no evidence for meeting NARTIST - and apparently a paid article in violation of the terms of use. DGG (...
Click to read more »(UTC) Delete - No significant coverage in reliable sources. Fails GNG and NARTIST guidelines for notability. Netherzone (talk) 15:47, 6 July 2020 (UTC) Delete...
Click to read more »better sourcing can be found, it's doubtful he can pass WP:GNG. Fails WP:NARTIST at this time, but I'm holding off on !voting for now to see if book reviews...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Apparent failure of WP:V and WP:NARTIST. The lone source I could find was [1] (PDF p. 17), which does not look...
Click to read more »coverage that we would usually find for a notable artist. Does not pass WP:NARTIST nor WP:GNG. The article is sourced to his own website, and the database...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Doesn't fit in WP:NARTIST, WP:GNG, few news articles with trivial mentions, but no signs of significant...
Click to read more »discussions. Less Unless (talk) 09:16, 7 September 2020 (UTC) Delete per WP:NARTIST, WP:MILL, WP:NOTRESUME, and WP:V. One group exhibit in a museum and some...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) fails WP:NARTIST and WP:GNG Domdeparis (talk) 18:25, 16 January 2018 (UTC) Note: This discussion...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Promotional article that fails GNG and NARTIST/NAUTHOR. There are no independent Reliable Sources that offer significant...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) I don't see see how she passes WP:NARTIST or WP:NACTOR.Trivial mentions/non-mentions in RS.Non-significant roles...
Click to read more »references. Only significant ref is subject's personal website. Fails WP:NARTIST and WP:GNG. Claims to have performed and collaborated with notable artists...
Click to read more »WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 09:32, 19 January 2024 (UTC) Delete fails WP:GNG and WP:NARTIST. Theroadislong (talk) 10:17, 19 January 2024 (UTC) So whatever Wikipedia...
Click to read more »self notable. I doubt he is gaining it from his mother, not satisfied WP:NARTIST and fails WP:GNG. For now it may be WP:TOOSOON DMySon (talk) 14:49, 27...
Click to read more »product he participated in designing are sufficient to qualify for WP:NARTIST, especially in the apparent absence of coverage of him. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 07:58...
Click to read more »much chance that he meets WP:BASIC, and I can't see why he would meet WP:NARTIST either. Also, two sections of the bio are entirely unsourced, and the page...
Click to read more »Comment It seems that the question is whether the recent awards satisfy NARTIST or GNG. Specifically, is winning the Agora Images Agora Awards enough....
Click to read more »has no references, and I could not find any to add. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NARTIST. Netherzone (talk) 14:37, 21 March 2020 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »base name. George Ho (talk) 18:47, 19 September 2023 (UTC) Keep meets WP:NARTIST. New references [1], [2]. Please do WP:BEFORE before nominating any article...
Click to read more »2023 (UTC) Delete I do not see any in-depth coverage and she fails WP:NARTIST. This article's first nomination was closed as a soft delete on 20 September...
Click to read more »was reviewed in RS's, nor in notable exhibitions. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NARTIST. Netherzone (talk) 15:40, 20 October 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...
Click to read more »attention for her views on black people than for her artwork. Fails to meet WP:NARTIST. Vexations (talk) 20:35, 15 June 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...
Click to read more »interview. A BEFORE search did not reveal enough to meet WP:GNG nor WP:NARTIST nor WP:NACADEMIC - what is needed are reviews in notable journals, magazines...
Click to read more »better sources in Persian - non-detectable by me. As it stands, fails WP:NARTIST. Elmidae (talk · contribs) 23:00, 12 August 2019 (UTC) Note: This discussion...
Click to read more »free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This artist does not meet WP:NARTIST. She has not been a substantial part of a significant exhibition, or won...
Click to read more »watercolors" does not seem to meet notability requirements for WP:GNG nor for WP:NARTIST. She did not invent sculptural watercolor, she only trademarked her own...
Click to read more »Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 20:17, 14 October 2021 (UTC) Delete, does not meet WP:NARTIST, have been unable to find works held in wikinotable galleries/museums,...
Click to read more »(talk) 16:34, 9 September 2023 (UTC) Delete - Does not meet WP:GNG nor WP:NARTIST criteria for inclusion. Netherzone (talk) 17:26, 9 September 2023 (UTC)...
Click to read more »anything like enough in the article or elsewhere to pass WP:GNG or WP:NARTIST. Edwardx (talk) 17:55, 15 April 2025 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Promotional article that fails GNG and NARTIST/NAUTHOR. There are no independent Reliable Sources that offer significant...
Click to read more »about Roos to justify a GNG pass, and I don't think she meets any of the NARTIST criteria either. Checked Google, GBooks, GNews, and JSTOR and all I came...
Click to read more »appears that this Calgary-based photographer and academic does not meet NARTIST nor GNG for inclusion. It has been almost entirely edited by single purpose...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Insufficient WP:RS to satisfy GNG or NARTIST. Exhibition history includes Vanity Galleries. Theredproject (talk) 21:48...
Click to read more »February 2020 (UTC) Delete - the subject of this article does not meet GNG, NARTIST nor BIO. Book is self-published and most of the references are dead. Could...
Click to read more »meet WP:GNG, and nothing verifiable in the article indicates he passes WP:NARTIST. Onel5969 TT me 13:34, 23 April 2018 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...
Click to read more »But nothing on why he is notable to have an article here! WP:GNG or WP:NARTIST. QueerEcofeminist "cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their] 09:12...
Click to read more »decisions independently, something that is implicitly recognized in WP:NARTIST. https://www.portrait.gov.au/content/so-fine-carol-mcgregor, a statement...
Click to read more »article is ref-bombed with subject's own website and youtube links. fails wp:nartist. 晚安 (トークページ) 03:23, 4 May 2022 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...
Click to read more »07:16, 25 December 2018 (UTC) Delete on account of subject failing WP:NARTIST and WP:GNG. -The Gnome (talk) 12:36, 26 December 2018 (UTC) The above discussion...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Very poor refs for a BLP. Fails WP:SIGCOV and WP:NARTIST scope_creepTalk 14:36, 18 March 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...
Click to read more »Couldn't find anything more about them. So, fails to fulfil WP:GNG, WP:NARTIST QueerEcofeminist "cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their] 09:20,...
Click to read more »March 2020 (UTC) Delete - does not pass notability requirements. GNG & NARTIST fail. Netherzone (talk) 14:43, 21 March 2020 (UTC) Delete. Extraordinary...
Click to read more »of local exhibits (like [1] [2]) that are insuficient for WP:GNG or WP:NARTIST. power~enwiki (π, ν) 16:46, 4 October 2018 (UTC) Note: This discussion...
Click to read more »notable, we would be seeing obituaries, but there are none. Clearly fails WP:NARTIST and WP:GNG. Edwardx (talk) 11:21, 28 March 2020 (UTC) Article now edited...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Promotional article that fails GNG and NARTIST/NAUTHOR. There are no independent Reliable Sources that offer significant...
Click to read more »seems to have had some success, but I couldn't verify that he meets WP:NARTIST or WP:GNG. French article also seems of dubious notability. Boleyn (talk)...
Click to read more »| logs) Non-notable artist. Does not have coverage under WP:GNG or WP:NARTIST. Recreated after draftification — DaxServer (t · m · e · c) 17:04, 16 August...
Click to read more »is not notable (and it is not a WP:RS); no evidence of meeting the WP:NARTIST criteria. AllyD (talk) 07:17, 24 June 2023 (UTC) Delete I've searched for...
Click to read more »is appearing on billboard's finalist for 2017 Latin music awards. Fails Nartist and WP:NMUSIC. Article consists of an unsourced claim to having developed...
Click to read more »(and I think that's quite unlikely), he does not appear to meet either WP:NARTIST or the GNG. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 06:32, 28 April 2022 (UTC) The above...
Click to read more »confirmed, although tend to think being in a children's museum is not what NARTIST means. Also interesting, when I google the alternate name I come up with...
Click to read more »"several" means two or more (at least that is how the criteria for WP:NARTIST has been interpreted for years. Also found this coverage in what looks...
Click to read more »Usedtobecool ☎️ 13:20, 22 September 2021 (UTC) Delete fails WP:GNG and WP:NARTIST. Additionally, the article contradicts the sources which highlight his...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NARTIST - one selfpub source and one dead link Mdann52 (talk) 15:37, 27 September...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NARTIST. Participated in a TV contest and did not even get to the finals. Performed...
Click to read more »with only primary sources for attesting notability. Fail of WP:GNG and WP:NARTIST. nearlyevil665 07:20, 30 April 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...
Click to read more »ThatMontrealIP (talk) 18:52, 27 March 2020 (UTC) Delete - Does not seem to pass NARTIST nor MUSICIAN guidelines. Netherzone (talk) 00:36, 28 March 2020 (UTC) Note:...
Click to read more »multiple sources, we don't get there on GNG. Let's try NARTIST. We might get there on NARTIST#3, "The person has created or played a major role in co-creating...
Click to read more »involved with? at the moment it is a delete from me as not meeting WP:NARTIST or WP:GNG. Coolabahapple (talk) 05:00, 9 February 2022 (UTC) Relisted to...
Click to read more »03:32, 8 June 2026 (UTC) Delete - Subject does not meet WP:GNG nor WP:NARTIST notability criteria for inclusion. They have requested deletion per WP:BLPREQUESTDELETE...
Click to read more »mentions in some gossipy leaflets, but nothing substantial for GNG or NARTIST. Drmies (talk) 22:44, 17 April 2018 (UTC) Redirect to Sonia Manzano as...
Click to read more »article. Proded and then deproded because "exhibition at museum passes WP:NARTIST", however there aren't any citations for exhibitions. I cannot find any...
Click to read more »dozen museum collections. I could go on, but that is enough to satisfy WP:NARTIST --Theredproject (talk) 13:27, 9 April 2018 (UTC) Strong Keep Mary Mark...
Click to read more »America1000 02:32, 15 October 2016 (UTC) Delete: does not appear to meet WP:NARTIST. Most available sourcing is WP:ABOUTSELF. Safehaven86 (talk) 01:56, 17...
Click to read more »article currently does not suggest that the subject is notable (WP:GNG, WP:NARTIST). There is no Portuguese interwiki, which is a REDFLAG, nor did I find...
Click to read more »been in a group exhibition, so I fail to see how this passes GNG or WP:NARTIST (or why this and source 2 disagree on their pronouns) Reywas92Talk 03:03...
Click to read more »1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 14:04, 16 June 2020 (UTC) Delete - Does not pass GNG nor NARTIST. Netherzone (talk) 19:46, 16 June 2020 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »exhibitions , collections in notable museums or national galleries. Fails WP:NARTIST and WP:GNG. Netherzone (talk) 23:53, 19 April 2025 (UTC) Delete - Couldn't...
Click to read more »subject fails WP:GNG and WP:NBIO; the subject also meets no criterion of WP:NARTIST. Dclemens1971 (talk) 15:41, 9 September 2024 (UTC) Note: This discussion...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails to satisfy WP:NARTIST and WP:GNG (given most sources provide WP:ROUTINE coverage. Allan Nonymous...
Click to read more »The Work of Brody Neuenschwander ISBN 9077362592. He clearly meets WP:NARTIST. Netherzone (talk) 21:23, 23 September 2019 (UTC) There might be a lot...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Promotional article that fails GNG and NARTIST/NAUTHOR. There are no independent Reliable Sources that offer significant...
Click to read more »an interesting history, but isn't sufficient to support a claim per WP:NARTIST, which requires either a significant exhibition, significant critical attention...
Click to read more »Interestingly, there is another David Barnes (artist) who ,actually meets WP:NARTIST by being in several museum collections.--- Possibly (talk) 18:35, 6 April...
Click to read more »article for an artist who does not meet our notability criteria GNG nor NARTIST. Just wondering...possible UPE/PR? Netherzone (talk) 21:18, 24 October...
Click to read more »The rest isn't much better. Delete: It's WP:TOOSOON. Does not meet WP:NARTIST or GNG yet. Princess of Ara 14:47, 31 December 2021 (UTC) The above discussion...
Click to read more »search does not reveal significant coverage in reliable sources to meet WP:NARTIST or WP:GNG. Search found social-media, press releases, name-checks or WP-mirrors...
Click to read more »Delete - lots of hits, just none for this Bert Jacobs. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NARTIST. Onel5969 TT me 12:51, 5 November 2015 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails NARTIST. The exhibitions are not in significant venues, and/or are in vanity galleries...
Click to read more »free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This artist does not meet WP:NARTIST. I can't find any reliable sources to supprt the article. It currently...
Click to read more »Netherzone (talk) 23:12, 25 March 2022 (UTC) Keep - This artist meets WP:NARTIST criteria #4 and WP:GNG criteria for inclusion. A very quick online WP:BEFORE...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NARTIST. This article is a recreation of an AI-generated draft that was declined...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NARTIST and GNG. This 2009 article was created by a user listed as Rubenochoa....
Click to read more »an interesting history, but isn't sufficient to support a claim per WP:NARTIST, which requires either a significant exhibition, significant critical attention...
Click to read more »its creation in 2014. Unclear that the subjects meets WP:SIGCOV or WP:NARTIST. 4meter4 (talk) 14:03, 14 August 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Promotional article that fails GNG and NARTIST/NAUTHOR. There are no independent Reliable Sources that offer significant...
Click to read more »work or that it is held in public museum collections. Does not pass WP:NARTIST Netherzone (talk) 18:09, 10 March 2020 (UTC) Delete no WP:RS, and external...
Click to read more »discussions. Mccapra (talk) 07:10, 26 February 2020 (UTC) Delete - Fails NARTIST, BIO AND GNG. The sole reference is a spam link for a ministry. Netherzone...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This article appears to fail both WP:NARTIST and WP:GNG. The sources currently are two blog posts by the article subject...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Promotional article that fails GNG and NARTIST/NAUTHOR. There are no independent Reliable Sources that offer significant...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NARTIST and WP:GNG. Paul Vaurie (talk) 21:53, 31 August 2023 (UTC) Note: This discussion...
Click to read more »to verify the claims of collections, as that would most clearly satisfy NARTIST. I could not. All I could find was one painting he personally gave to the...
Click to read more »(talk) 15:02, 23 April 2022 (UTC) Delete This artist does not meet WP:NARTIST. He has not been a substantial part of a significant exhibition, or won...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Appears to fail WP:NARTIST. No secondary coverage of him personally can be found, and his work does...
Click to read more »free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This artist does not meet WP:NARTIST. She has not been a substantial part of a significant exhibition, or won...
Click to read more »not clear-cut. Deb (talk) 18:49, 9 March 2016 (UTC) Speedy Keep per WP:NARTIST 4(d) Artists whose works are in the collection of the National Gallery...
Click to read more »(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails NARTIST. None of the exhibitions are in significant venues. Many of the venues...
Click to read more »user-generated content, a blog, but that is it, zero SIGCOV. Does not pass GNG nor NARTIST. Netherzone (talk) 17:34, 8 October 2020 (UTC) The above discussion is...
Click to read more »could presumably be fixed or removed, but I don't see how they meet WP:NARTIST. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 19:57, 8 August 2018 (UTC) Elmidae (talk ·...
Click to read more »a site selling her self published books. This artist does not meet WP:NARTIST. WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 00:05, 25 January 2022 (UTC) Note: This discussion...
Click to read more »was unable to find anything that substantiates notability. Fails GNG and NARTIST. No SIGCOV in reliable sources, could only find social media, blogs, listings;...
Click to read more »graphic designer to have an article, as they do not yet meet WP:GNG nor WP:NARTIST. He may be ready in a number of years if independent significant coverage...
Click to read more »in-depth coverage to show they meet WP:GNG, and they don't seem to meet WP:NARTIST. Onel5969 TT me 17:51, 13 December 2020 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »the subject of this article. Does not pass criteria for WP:GNG nor WP:NARTIST. The article seems to mainly have been developed by WP:SPAs with sourcing...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Promotional article that fails GNG and NARTIST/NAUTHOR. There are no independent Reliable Sources that offer significant...
Click to read more »satisfy WP:BASIC, nor do the sources that I can find. Sea appears to fail WP:NARTIST, as well, so I don't see a reason to presume notability. The article in...
Click to read more »free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This artist does not meet WP:NARTIST. She has not been a substantial part of a significant exhibition, or won...
Click to read more »that the subject meets the WP:GNG, therefore whether or not he meets WP:NARTIST is irrelevant. – Joe (talk) 17:23, 18 January 2018 (UTC) Silas Birtwistle...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Does not appear to meet WP:BASIC, WP:NPOL, or WP:NARTIST. ― Tartan357 Talk 03:28, 3 June 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...
Click to read more »My search didn't find anything to show that WP:GNG, WP:NAUTHOR, or WP:NARTIST is met. Papaursa (talk) 23:06, 14 May 2019 (UTC) The above discussion is...
Click to read more »TWL) This Youtuber does not meet WP criteria for WP:GNG, WP:NACTOR or WP:NARTIST. The article sourcing consists of blogs, user-submitted content or non-independent...
Click to read more »free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This artist does not meet WP:NARTIST. A portion of the article was edited by the artist's sister. I cannot find...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NARTIST. ∯WBGconverse 10:09, 2 August 2018 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...
Click to read more »indicate this person meets WP criteria for WP:ACTOR or WP:CREATIVE, WP:NARTIST. It seems they are an actor who was also part of a gallery. I'm bringing...
Click to read more »enough material has been found (and added to the article) to satisfy WP:NARTIST and probably GNG. Netherzone (talk) 23:13, 16 March 2021 (UTC) Thanks for...
Click to read more »There was one press-release type item, but that's it. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NARTIST. The article had been largely crafted by a COI editor (now blocked for...
Click to read more »ago, but still not properly sourcing any meaningful claim to passing WP:NARTIST. As always, artists are not "inherently" notable enough for Wikipedia articles...
Click to read more »(talk) 12:18, 4 October 2014 (UTC) Delete It seems clear this does not meet NARTIST. DGG ( talk ) 06:03, 13 October 2014 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable to meet WP:NARTIST. Does not pass WP:ANYBIO, either. Htanaungg (talk) 03:37, 1 November 2021...
Click to read more »sourcing and what I found in a BEFORE search to indicate they do not meet WP:NARTIST nor WP:GNG. It seems they had a work in one group show at a notable venue...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Cant seem to find any evidence that he meets WP:NARTIST or WP:GNG. Zocke1r (talk) 21:28, 29 January 2018 (UTC) Note: This discussion...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Doesn't meet WP:GNG, WP:NARTIST. Even if all of the cited sources are reliable (not clear that this is...
Click to read more »free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This artist does not meet WP:NARTIST. She has not been a substantial part of a significant exhibition, or won...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Doesn't meet WP:NARTIST or WP:GNG. Boleyn (talk) 07:37, 26 July 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion...
Click to read more »03:56, 6 July 2015 (UTC) Delete non-notable artist, fails WP:GNG and WP:NARTIST. Flat Out (talk) 04:55, 6 July 2015 (UTC) Delete non-notable artist - recreating...
Click to read more »2020 (UTC) Delete - Does not pass notability criteria for WP:GNG nor WP:NARTIST]]. After searching I could find nothing on this photographer other than...
Click to read more »(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) NARTIST and GNG fail. There are a few slim articles but most sourcing is primary...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) The subject fails the GNG as well as WP:NARTIST. Internet research didn't show ant significant coverage by reliable secondary...
Click to read more »that award is to be considered notable, it would need to be through WP:NARTIST, not PROF. —David Eppstein (talk) 02:23, 11 December 2021 (UTC) So we'd...
Click to read more »for deletion. Maybe in a few years, but at this time does not pass WP:NARTIST. Netherzone (talk) 16:10, 2 January 2020 (UTC) Delete artist is not yet...
Click to read more »Delete A few sources, so there might be more, but unlikely. Fails GNG/NARTIST as is. South Nashua (talk) 19:50, 9 July 2017 (UTC) Note: This debate has...
Click to read more »noted in the other !votes. -- Whpq (talk) Keep - meets criteria for WP:NARTIST by way of the museum collections. Netherzone (talk) 19:10, 6 March 2021...
Click to read more »(UTC) I kind of agree with Netherzone here, but perhaps we can update WP:NARTIST a bit an explain what an emerging artist is, what an established artist...
Click to read more »above. --BCD 05:25, 28 September 2016 (UTC) Delete -- does not meet WP:NARTIST nor WP:NAUTHOR. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:30, 28 September 2016 (UTC) The above...
Click to read more »those that do are of questionable reliability and independence. Fails WP:NARTIST and the GNG. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 06:28, 2 March 2022 (UTC) The above...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Industrial designer who seems to fail WP:NARTIST. I was able to find a couple of interviews with him on ProQuest, but nothing...
Click to read more »of this artist, who doesn't therefore meet WP:GNG. I took a look at WP:NARTIST, which lets artists qualify if "The person is known for originating a significant...
Click to read more »I am not seeing anything more in-depth. This may not be enough for WP:NARTIST, but I keep thinking that such catalogue entries would be enough for WP:SPORTBIO...
Click to read more »Babymissfortune 05:40, 6 January 2018 (UTC) Delete - does not appear to meet WP:NARTIST criteria.--Rpclod (talk) 15:01, 6 January 2018 (UTC) Comment - If kept...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Promotional article that fails GNG and NARTIST/NAUTHOR. There are no independent Reliable Sources that offer significant...
Click to read more »other here, but I think it's very likely that Luscalov meets WP:GNG or WP:NARTIST for his screenwriting work. There are mentions of Luscalov in Scînteia...
Click to read more »"nominations" are not the same as notable awards received. Does not pass GNG nor NARTIST. Netherzone (talk) 15:58, 6 July 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This person does not appear to meet WP:GNG or WP:NARTIST. Of the sources in the article, three are from Wellesley College, where...
Click to read more »Delete - Another COI/AUTOBIO of a non-notable artist. Does not pass GNG nor NARTISt. Netherzone (talk) 00:29, 11 July 2020 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »article is actually a hosted blog) nor verifiable information to pass WP:NARTIST. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 02:35, 1 May 2017 (UTC) Delete A textbook vanity...
Click to read more »any of the WP:NPROF factors and I don't see that he meets any of the WP:NARTIST factors either. Oblivy (talk) 05:48, 4 February 2025 (UTC) Delete and Salt:...
Click to read more »delete unless enough independent reliable sources can be found to meet WP:NARTIST. I just ran it thru Earwigs and it's 90% copyright violation, WP:COPYVIO...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Does not meet GNG or NARTIST. Sourced to his own website and copies of PR that end with a call to follow...
Click to read more »shows outside of the private gallery circuit that might make her meet WP:NARTIST. --- Possibly ☎ 02:25, 18 September 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...
Click to read more »(UTC) Delete Nomination for a Primetime Emmy is does not cross the bar for NARTIST. The sources do not cover him in significant detail for him to pass GNG...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:GNG and WP:NARTIST with no reliable secondary sources, just a tweet and a Flickr photo. Can't...
Click to read more »coverage in reliable sources - lack of WP:SIGCOV. Fails WP:BIO and WP:NARTIST. Run-of-the-mill artist. Promotional article. Edwardx (talk) 13:38, 15...
Click to read more »selection for Taiwan at the 2015 Venice Biennale to demonstrate that WP:NARTIST criterion 4 is met. AllyD (talk) 08:18, 8 November 2021 (UTC) Keep Sources...
Click to read more »(UTC) Delete No evidence in article or in searches of notability under WP:NARTIST or WP:GNG. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 18:23, 4 May 2018 (UTC) The above...
Click to read more »Rogermx (talk) 13:14, 24 June 2020 (UTC) Delete. No evidence he passes NARTIST. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 13:48, 24 June 2020...
Click to read more »search to indicate that this artist is notable. Does not meet WP:GNG nor WP:NARTIST criteria for inclusion. As mentioned in the nom, this may be a COI creation...
Click to read more »to Spider) 15:18, 15 April 2025 (UTC) Delete – Fails in WP:GNG and WP:NARTIST. Svartner (talk) 15:44, 15 April 2025 (UTC) Delete Per nom ,Insufficient...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NARTIST and WP:GNG. This article has been created by a WP:SPA, all the sources...
Click to read more »used for promotional purposes. No evidence of notabily, fails GNG and NARTIST. Netherzone (talk) 18:21, 12 November 2020 (UTC) Delete a non-notable artist...
Click to read more »notability criteria per WP:NARTIST nor WP:GNG. Netherzone (talk) 16:10, 15 June 2026 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:GNG and WP:NARTIST. Best sources in the article...
Click to read more »