Redirect to:
It's official! Everybody wants to have their name in Wikipedia! But namechecking is not cool. Adding names to articles or lists of people when you have...
Click to read more »article has had a previous nomination (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Namechecking; full disclosure: the original AfD was started by me, again after Paul...
Click to read more »definite transaction between the advertiser and the entertainer, whereas namechecking is done entirely "voluntarily" - the ubiquity, of, say, Cristal champagne...
Click to read more »JSTOR · TWL) Promotional article by a pair of WP:SPAs. Sources are mere namechecks (e.g. author affiliation for an article which does not mention the subject...
Click to read more »presentation in the form of a biographical article. That a person receives a namecheck in a larger article about a subject that involves that person does not...
Click to read more »Of the four sources here, two are brief blurbs, and one is a glancing namecheck of the subject's existence in a listicle -- and the only one that actually...
Click to read more »alumni in the institution's article. Here is some advice: don't do it! Namechecking is the practice of listing the names of unimportant individuals in another...
Click to read more »referenciness but when you look into it the supposed references are just namechecks taken from a single piece of churnalism that was picked up by a few outlets...
Click to read more »the person exists — but of the four sources here, three of them just namecheck his existence rather than being coverage of him, and the fourth is a primary...
Click to read more »namecheck his existence in the process of being about something other than him. And all I can find on a Google search is one more glancing namecheck of...
Click to read more »Too obscure -- just a namecheck of a band one of whose members (not famous in her own right) is married to a celeb -- and adds nothing to what's given...
Click to read more »free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) The only cited source is a namecheck. Guy (Help!) 23:47, 28 March 2014 (UTC) Keep. Meets WP:POLITICIAN as a...
Click to read more »WP:GNG or WP:CORPDEPTH: three of the four references here are glancing namechecks of the owner's existence in primary sources, i.e. the self-published websites...
Click to read more »website about itself, and the only real media source is a one-line glancing namecheck of its existence in an article about something else, not coverage about...
Click to read more »self-published website of a non-notable past winner); one is a brief namecheck of its existence in an article that's about another non-notable past winner...
Click to read more »non-trivial "more than just a namecheck" source in play. Bearcat (talk) 15:05, 1 July 2019 (UTC) Yes, most of the sources do just namecheck Bayes' presence on the...
Click to read more »sources is a raw table of election results and the other is a glancing namecheck of his existence in an article that isn't otherwise about him) WP:BLP...
Click to read more »namecheck of the service's existence in a press release about Lord Dampnut's meeting itinerary for January 25, and the third is a glancing namecheck of...
Click to read more »non-notability: (a) glancing namechecks of its existence in coverage of the poets who appeared on it, (b) glancing namechecks of its existence in "what's...
Click to read more »shown here, three are glancing namechecks of his existence in coverage of other people and one is a glancing namecheck of his existence in a "hot bachelors"...
Click to read more »articles just because we can technically verify their existence via glancing namechecks of their existence in reliable source coverage about other things, or...
Click to read more »been able to recover, and the only live link is just a brief glancing namecheck of her existence in an article whose core subject is her successor in...
Click to read more »three footnotes here, however, one is a Facebook post, one is a glancing namecheck of his existence in an article about something else entirely, and the...
Click to read more »which is not support for notability; one is a book which glancingly namechecks his existence on one page without being about him in any non-trivial sense...
Click to read more »hits (one of which is dead but was waybackable) both just glancingly namecheck his existence as a provider of soundbite in articles about other things...
Click to read more »Twitter account worth following, sourced only to a listicle that glancingly namechecks his existence without being about him, is not a claim of notability in...
Click to read more »covering him in the context of quitting another job, three just glancingly namecheck his existence in the process of failing to be about him, and only one...
Click to read more »subject of just one of them (CBS Denver) — all of the other three merely namecheck his existence as a bit player or soundbite-giver in coverage that's about...
Click to read more »Findagrave entries, a glancing namecheck of his existence in an article about somebody else, and two citations to single page namechecks in a book that has this...
Click to read more »in the context of her past work as a local radio host, and a glancing namecheck of her existence in a newspaper blurb about her joining Sportsnet -- a...
Click to read more »Google News search, literally the only new source I can find is a glancing namecheck of her existence in an article about a venue she played in 2011. As always...
Click to read more »failing to even acknowledge Mr. Macdonald-King's existence; #2 through #5 namecheck Mr. Macdonald-King but fail to be substantively enough about him to get...
Click to read more »aren't support for notability at all and community hyperlocals glancingly namechecking his existence in articles that aren't substantively about him. Absolutely...
Click to read more »ProQuest search to locate it — and as I suspected, it's a one-line glancing namecheck of her existence in an article that isn't even slightly about her otherwise...
Click to read more »substantive coverage in which Ciano is the subject; all of them merely namecheck his existence while not being about him in any meaningful or non-trivial...
Click to read more »book on vanity press lulu.com and blogs. There is a namecheck in one reliable sources and a namecheck in a rather less reliable source, and that is it as...
Click to read more »delete. Sasquatcht|c 23:16, 15 September 2005 (UTC) Too obscure -- just a namecheck of a band one of whose members (not famous in her own right) is married...
Click to read more »offer here is that it exists, and the only source cited is a glancing namecheck of it in an article that provides a broad overview of the lineup of one...
Click to read more »JSTOR · TWL) CEO of some non-notable company. cited references are either namechecks in newspapers or self published articles in some newspapers. this is some...
Click to read more »label. Google turns up nothing other than gig listings and the occasional namecheck. Guy (Help!) 07:35, 4 April 2018 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...
Click to read more »(page was speedy deleted a few days ago).. the subject has received some namecheck type of press coverage and nothing substantial at all so fails to meet...
Click to read more »LinkedIn résumé), one is a glancing namecheck of his existence in purely routine election coverage, one is a glancing namecheck of his existence in an article...
Click to read more »none of these sources appear to be actually about the site, they just namecheck it. That was why it was deleted last year, and it does not seem to have...
Click to read more »when they happen. I only found out about this one because of Hasirpad's namecheck. In any case as I performed no administrative actions in this particular...
Click to read more »exactly zero evidence of reliable source coverage apart from a glancing namecheck of her existence in an article that isn't about her. As usual, an actress...
Click to read more »only reference that's anything like a reliable source just glancingly namechecks his existence a couple of times in an article that isn't about him. Nothing...
Click to read more »sourcing -- but all I can find on a search for other sources is a glancing namecheck of this film's existence on one page of a biography of its most famous...
Click to read more »doesn't get over WP:GNG either as the only source here is a glancing namecheck of his existence in coverage of the other musician he sessioned for. Literally...
Click to read more »would require much more reliable source coverage than just one brief namecheck of his existence in one article that isn't about him. Bearcat (talk) 19:17...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:BLP, resting entirely on a single namecheck of his existence in a news blurb about the election of his successor rather...
Click to read more »over WP:GNG for it — of the five references shown, three of them just namecheck the subject's existence while failing to be about him in any substantive...
Click to read more »anywhere outside of local media in North Bay and Timiskaming are passing namechecks of her existence in the context of her candidacy. So yes, WP:BEFORE has...
Click to read more »JSTOR · TWL) I don't think this passes WP:WEB. The sources listed are namechecks at best, nothing substantive that's actually about this website apart...
Click to read more »is the subject. It cites only one independent source, which is a mere namecheck. Google doesn't provide much more. I don't think there are sufficient...
Click to read more »prospect of being anything else. All sources discussing him do so as a namecheck in relation to Berkeley Models. The title is very specific and probably...
Click to read more »WP:NMEDIA, but must state more than just "it exists and here's a glancing namecheck of it in one source about the parent company to prove it". If we had the...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) While the BLP cites some RS but they merely namecheck or quote the subject. I couldn't find the solid coverage which discuss...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Written by the firm's PR, all sources are namechecks, directories or based on press releases. Guy (Help!) 07:49, 3 June 2018...
Click to read more »table of election results from an election he didn't win and a glancing namecheck on one page of a book about somebody else, which isn't enough coverage...
Click to read more »more reliable source coverage than just a directory entry and a glancing namecheck of its existence in one table of a 15-page paper on the magmatism of the...
Click to read more »that he exists and sources the fact to a directory entry, a glancing namecheck of his existence in a WP:BLOG entry about something else, and his commercial...
Click to read more »referenced entirely to primary sources except for a single glancing namecheck of his existence in a news article that isn't about him, of a single-market...
Click to read more »Fails WP:NCORP with only a single secondary source, a brief one-paragraph namecheck in a Telegraph article about paintballing in general. Other sources are...
Click to read more »organization, and resting almost entirely on sources which just glancingly namecheck his existence — only source #1 passes the "substantively about him" test...
Click to read more »that was never signed, the summit of their fame seems to have been a namecheck in the garage bands section of NME, there are no reliable independent...
Click to read more »a Q&A interview in which he's speaking about himself, and a glancing namecheck of his existence in coverage of something else — so there's only one source...
Click to read more »(UTC) In all of those search locations, I just see a lot of glancing namechecks of his existence in coverage that's fundamentally about the film rather...
Click to read more »published by the local historical society (which thus constitutes a brief namecheck of his existence rather than a source that's substantively about him.)...
Click to read more »election coverage, and none of the other four are about him, but merely namecheck his existence in the process of being about a piece of municipal infrastructure...
Click to read more »actually in real major market daily newspapers, both just glancingly namecheck her existence in the process of failing to be about her. As always, the...
Click to read more »single-market local radio personality, referenced only to a glancing namecheck of his existence in an overall history of one of the radio stations he...
Click to read more »CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 21:24, 13 September 2018 (UTC) Keep - reliable sources namecheck Cinematic Soul to The Temptations, Isaac Hayes, Curtis Mayfield and David...
Click to read more »TWL) WP:BLP of a record producer, referenced solely to a single glancing namecheck of his existence in an article about somebody else. While there are claims...
Click to read more »about this student newspaper. A lot of original research. Copious vanity namechecks. And that is about it. Guy (Help!) 01:52, 18 March 2007 (UTC) Delete as...
Click to read more »WP:BEFORE this nomination, but were not successful. Google search reveals namecheck type of coverage . GNG says we need "Significant coverage which addresses...
Click to read more »database that still isn't a notability maker, and two more just glancingly namecheck Joshua Bassett in passing without being about him or the tour in any non-trivial...
Click to read more »anything better on Google or in ProQuest either: I get the odd glancing namecheck of his existence in coverage of other people, and I get a lot of irrelevant...
Click to read more »present. But what we've got here for sourcing is one news article that namechecks her existence in the process of failing to be about her; one press release...
Click to read more »be notable, there is nothing much to verify this (no mention beyond a namecheck on the sites given), and this does not necessarily confer notability on...
Click to read more »not support for notability at all, and one-third to a one-off glancing namecheck of his existence in an article whose core subject is something else. As...
Click to read more »11 March 2021 (UTC) It's sloppy. You can't determine if it was just a namecheck or if there was actual content. Still a merge for me. Intothatdarkness...
Click to read more »July 2016 (UTC) Merge with PricewaterhouseCoopers. I think he can have a namecheck in the encyclopedia, and his name is a valid search term. Ritchie333 (talk)...
Click to read more »purposes of getting him over WP:GNG: four of the five just glancingly namecheck his existence in lists, and the fifth is a blurb of less than 100 words...
Click to read more »WP:TVSHOW just because it exists -- but the sources are a one-off glancing namecheck of its existence in a Q&A interview with the sponsoring company's CEO...
Click to read more »glancing namechecks of her existence as a giver of soundbite in local media coverage of other things or people, and sources which don't even namecheck her...
Click to read more »more are primary sources that cannot assist notability, one is a brief namecheck of her existence in an article about something else, one features her...
Click to read more »carry his notability per WP:NMUSIC. The only sources here are a glancing namecheck of his existence in the very last paragraph of a Billboard article about...
Click to read more »sourcing to support a WP:GNG claim; the two sources cited here both just namecheck his existence in the process of failing to be substantively about him...
Click to read more »by nom - contains more than a passing mention, and many no more than a namecheck. I searched for his lawfirm, Nolan Auerbach & White, and I can't see how...
Click to read more »older coverage that might not have Googled, I can only find one glancing namecheck of the fact that this show ever existed, which is not enough. Bearcat...
Click to read more »here that's actually fully independent of the organization is a glancing namecheck of its existence on one page of an 875-page historical timeline, which...
Click to read more »written, this is resting entirely on one primary source and one glancing namecheck of his existence on one page of one book. That's not enough. The potential...
Click to read more »the only sources here are one of its own press releases and a glancing namecheck of its existence in a different company's press release, with no evidence...
Click to read more »automatically entitled to have Wikipedia articles the moment one glancing namecheck in an article about something else can be shown to verify that they exist...
Click to read more »(Omnipelagos) that I have no idea what it even is or was, and one glancing namecheck of his existence in a federal government report. This is not how you demonstrate...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:BLP, relying almost entirely on primary and namecheck sources with no reliable source coverage provided, of a child actor turned...
Click to read more »few properly reliable sources (Slate, Washington Post) just glancingly namecheck her existence in coverage which isn't substantively about her at all....
Click to read more »special, and the third is not about him at all, but just offers a glancing namecheck of his existence in an article whose primary subject is somebody else...
Click to read more »primary sources, blogs and podcasts with the exception of a single glancing namecheck of his existence as a soundbite provider in a news article that isn't...
Click to read more »recreated. Two references, both passing mentions. One of them is just a namecheck. Guy (Help!) 19:43, 30 October 2009 (UTC) Strong delete - advertising...
Click to read more »but the sources here are not getting him over WP:GNG: one is a glancing namecheck of his existence in the party's own self-published press release, not...
Click to read more »directory entries and press releases, some mention the company only as a namecheck. This is a tiny company and there is no evidence of any in-depth coverage...
Click to read more »sources here are a census transcript on a genealogy site, and a glancing namecheck of his existence as chairman of the horticultural committee in a 75th...
Click to read more »even in their own hometown media, literally all I can find is a glancing namecheck of their existence in an article about the guy who produced their album...
Click to read more »FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Biographical stub, referenced only to a very short namecheck of the subject's existence in a book, of a person notable only as mayor...
Click to read more »media outlets aren't covering him as a subject, but all just glancingly namecheck his existence as a provider of soundbite in articles about something else...
Click to read more »four sources are real daily newspapers and a book, they all just briefly namecheck Rui Pereira's existence within coverage of other things rather than being...
Click to read more »independent sources do exist, consensus appears to be that they are all namechecks/passing comments. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 13:42, 28 May 2019...
Click to read more »WP:BLP, based entirely on primary sources with the exception of a single namecheck of her existence in an article about her graduating class in university...
Click to read more »fact about the subject's organization while completely failing to even namecheck the subject herself in conjunction with it, which means exactly none of...
Click to read more »better than this, but one obituary in his local newspaper and one short namecheck of his existence in a journal article about an event he happened to be...
Click to read more »folded within 6 months in 2004 [1]. Curiously though, I didn't see a namecheck for Verjee's alleged role with that magazine, even in a Stanford piece...
Click to read more »but even on a ProQuest search I was only able to find a single glancing namecheck of its existence in an article about its network. As always, every television...
Click to read more »notability is not demonstrated by routine casting announcements, or by the namechecking inclusion of her name in "the cast also includes so-and-so and such-and-such"...
Click to read more »acceptable reliable source being cited here at all, and it's just a glancing namecheck of his existence in a blurb about a local gaming meetup in his own hometown...
Click to read more »get him over WP:GNG in lieu -- the only references here are a glancing namecheck of his existence on one page of a book about the presidential candidate...
Click to read more »the sources to claim that he passes WP:GNG, either: many of them just namecheck his existence in coverage about the more notable and more prominent candidates...
Click to read more »WP:NPOL-passing political role — and the only reference here is a primary source namecheck of his existence in the university's own self-published list of its board...
Click to read more »university student media, which isn't GNG-making coverage, and a glancing namecheck of his existence as a giver of soundbite in an article whose subject is...
Click to read more »can never contribute toward notability at all. CBC article: glancing namecheck in an article otherwise not about him. Ottawa Citizen: Q&A-style interview...
Click to read more »three times over) to glancing namechecks of his existence in sources that are not about him -- such as a brief namecheck of his existence as Anna Eshoo's...
Click to read more »election. But there are just two references here, and both of them just namecheck his existence rather than being about him -- which means that nothing...
Click to read more »references here, #2 and #4 are gutted as blogsourcing, while #1 glancingly namechecks her existence in the process of failing to be about her. #3 ain't so bad...
Click to read more »him over WP:GNG — the sources are not about him, but just glancingly namecheck his existence in coverage of other things, so they do not support or bolster...
Click to read more »(UTC) Delete Sources are a crowdsourced database, a blog, and a bare namecheck. If that's all there is, this person isn't notable. —valereee (talk) 14:53...
Click to read more »verification that they existed. The only sources here, however, are a glancing namecheck in a county history book that features no substantive content about him...
Click to read more »is a good catch. clearly promotional stuff. not a notable career. only namecheck in the News. I dont consider The Express Tribune because it is affiliated...
Click to read more »office) alongside that. And since the only source here is a single glancing namecheck of his existence in a transcript of a legislative debate, WP:GNG has not...
Click to read more »actor's notability -- and even the few real media sources mostly just namecheck his existence in coverage of other things, with the only source that's...
Click to read more »independent ones -- and the closest thing to a solid source, Slate, just namechecks her existence briefly without being about her in any substantive way....
Click to read more »results, or news articles about the elections themselves which merely namecheck his existence, so none of them are substantive coverage of him — and the...
Click to read more »FENS · JSTOR · TWL) 46 hits on Google, of which the only thing past a namecheck in a RS seems to be this. Guy (help! - typo?) 07:53, 8 September 2020...
Click to read more »whose former content is entirely unverifiable, a third is a glancing namecheck of his existence in an article that isn't about him, and the blog is the...
Click to read more »from a genuine media outlet independent of the party is just a glancing namecheck of his existence in an article whose core subject is something else, which...
Click to read more »primary source content self-published by her own team, one is a glancing namecheck of her existence in a sports blog entry that isn't about her, and one...
Click to read more »tables of election results but for a single news article in which he's a namecheck and not the subject, of a person notable only as a non-winning candidate...
Click to read more »primary sources that aren't support for notability at all and glancing namechecks of his existence in coverage of other things or people, not to any strong...
Click to read more »familiarize yourself with WP:GNG and WP:V because no article can pass GNG with namecheck or single source discussing him. Greenbörg (talk) 16:16, 11 October 2017...
Click to read more »councillors in non-global cities But this is referenced to just one glancing namecheck of her existence in a local newspaper article that isn't about her to...
Click to read more »illegal Russian music stores that skirt actual copyright issues, at that), namechecks of her existence in coverage of other things or people that aren't her...
Click to read more »citations at gScholar, but they do not discuss the book, they merely namecheck. The 4 reviews range form polite to negative, AHR: "both the conception...
Click to read more »well-sourced, either — of the four sources here, three of them just glancingly namecheck her existence as a soundbite provider in the process of failing to be...
Click to read more »coverage that focuses specifically on them (as opposed to just glancingly namechecking them in coverage of the band) -- however, the only music-related footnote...
Click to read more »sources — but the only reference being cited here at all is a glancing namecheck of his existence in a 122-word blurb about one of his two bands, not a...
Click to read more »three references here, two are primary sources, and the third is a brief namecheck of his existence in an article about something completely irrelevant to...
Click to read more »about himself in the first person on an unreliable blog, and a glancing namecheck of his existence in a news article about somebody else -- which means...
Click to read more »a blog, an entry for her company in a business directory, a glancing namecheck of her existence in an article that isn't substantively about her, or...
Click to read more »substantive coverage of him as a topic in his own right — they just glancingly namecheck his existence in the process of being about other people or events he...
Click to read more »name garners just 16 hits total, and every last one of those is a mere namecheck of his existence in an article whose main subject is Arkells, The Sheepdogs...
Click to read more »itself. But the references here are one primary source and one glancing namecheck of his existence as a giver of soundbite in an article whose subject is...
Click to read more »entry into the production pipeline is technically verifiable to glancing namechecks of its existence in coverage of the network's overall announcement of...
Click to read more »election and thus fails to make her special, and #4 through #6 all just namecheck her existence in the process of being coverage of something else — so...
Click to read more »beyond the purely local are not substantively about Brown, but merely namecheck his existence in coverage of the incumbent he ran against. And there's...
Click to read more »here (two pieces of routine reportage of election results, one glancing namecheck of his existence in an article about somebody else, a blurb in a listicle...
Click to read more »sources here, of which one is self-published and two more just trivially namecheck his existence in passing while being fundamentally about something other...
Click to read more »sources present in the article are about Lacoste, but rather all simply namecheck his existence briefly within coverage of other people. This is not how...
Click to read more »comprises media coverage about other things which happens to glancingly namecheck the subject's existence in the process of failing to be about the subject...
Click to read more »glancing namecheck of their existence in an article about the head of their record label, not assisting GNG because not about them. #4 = glancing namecheck of...
Click to read more »Wikipedia. Almost all the citations in this article relate to the briefest of namechecks in tech articles about a GTA 5 update. His leak of a license/serial key...
Click to read more »instead: one article deadlinks and one just contains a single glancing namecheck of his existence in an article not otherwise about him. Which leaves just...
Click to read more »band this band once performed with, while completely failing to even namecheck this band's existence at all in the process. That's not how sourcing a...
Click to read more »parts, not leading roles, and of the five footnotes, three just briefly namecheck Tomás Matos's existence in articles that aren't about Tomás Matos in any...
Click to read more »MySpace. And for sourcing, all we have here is the MySpace profile, a brief namecheck of his existence in a non-notable directory entry for a non-notable band...
Click to read more »organization's own primary source content about itself, or a glancing namecheck of his existence as a soundbite-giver in an article that is substantively...
Click to read more »source for that claim is not an article about him, but just a glancing namecheck of his existence in the caption to the photograph. This is not enough...
Click to read more »Searches of the usual "find sources" types found little else, only one namecheck.[1]. Two sources is multiple, but one would expect a notable director...
Click to read more »sourcing here to get her over WP:GNG -- the sole source is a glancing namecheck of her existence in a "what's on TV tonight" blurb that isn't about her...
Click to read more »because diplomat — if you have to park the sourcing entirely on a simple namecheck of his existence in a news blurb which is actually about the appointment...
Click to read more »#2 just because they exist — but the only reference here is a glancing namecheck of his existence as a giver of soundbite in an article about an event...
Click to read more »biographical information, with its only footnote being a one-off glancing namecheck of his existence as a giver of soundbite in a magazine article that wasn't...
Click to read more »from The Star (Kenya)), but even that source just provides a glancing namecheck of his existence rather than being about him. A person does not get an...
Click to read more »But the only reference present here at all is a nine-year old glancing namecheck of his existence as a giver of soundbite in an article whose primary subject...
Click to read more »WP:INVALIDBIO. Si Trew (talk) 11:22, 17 January 2016 (UTC) Delete kind of like a namecheck. Legacypac (talk) 22:01, 17 January 2016 (UTC) The above discussion is...
Click to read more »doing: it's basically a prosified résumé, single-sourced to a glancing namecheck of his existence on one page of a book about somebody else. That's not...
Click to read more »cited here are not about Ferguson, but virtually all just blurbingly namecheck Ferguson's existence as a provider of soundbite in an article about someone...
Click to read more »not support for notability at all: staff profile of course, a glancing namecheck of his existence in an organizational blog that isn't about him, a transcript...
Click to read more »having of roles to clear WP:GNG — but two of the three sources here just namecheck his existence a single time in coverage of the show, without containing...
Click to read more »of the four references, two are primary sources and the other two just namecheck his existence in the process of failing to be about him. This is not what...
Click to read more »aren't about him in the manner necessary to clear WP:GNG, but merely namecheck his existence as a provider of soundbite in an article whose subject is...
Click to read more »only of a single statement that he exists and sourced only to a glancing namecheck of his existence in an article that isn't about him. While this could...
Click to read more »unverifiable, and the one that's actually retrievable is just a glancing namecheck of his existence in an article that's primarily about somebody else. And...
Click to read more »strong, but everything else is a blog, a primary source or a glancing namecheck of his existence in a source that isn't about him. Neither diplomats nor...
Click to read more »coverage about André Larivière — it's based on sources that glancingly namecheck André Larivière in the process of being about something else, which is...
Click to read more »doubting everything about a country I might not like or don't understand. "Namecheck," uh, no. These sources rely on Nextshark as a source. Without it, they...
Click to read more »TWL) Entirely unable to find sources other than various Wikipedia forks, namechecks on various music websites, obituaries, and videos when I search in English...
Click to read more »local officeholders -- the only source actually present here is a brief namecheck of his existence in a very general history of why this town gets to call...
Click to read more »special case: it cites just four sources, of which one is a glancing namecheck of her existence in an article that isn't about her, and another is her...
Click to read more »nothing of substance; the couple I did find were just directory entries or namechecks. This article looks like it was written by Andy Brooks from his own records...
Click to read more »WP:GNG instead — of the four sources here, #2 and #3 both just passingly namecheck his basic existence rather than providing any substantive coverage of...
Click to read more »N; 4 is a namecheck N; 5 is a namecheck N; 6 is a namecheck N; 8 is a namecheck N; 9 is passing in primary race coverage N; 13 is a namecheck N; 14 is...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:BLP of a mayor, citing only one passing namecheck in somebody else's (deadlinked) obituary for sourcing. The municipality...
Click to read more »WP:ROUTINE concert listing for them playing Lee's Palace in 2007, and a brief namecheck in an article about bassist Morgan Phillips writing a short play for SummerWorks...
Click to read more »to any significant degree, as the vast majority of them are glancing namechecks of his existence in coverage about other things — and besides the anon...
Click to read more »which is not a notability-assisting source at all, and one glancing namecheck of his existence in an article that isn't about him in any non-trivial...
Click to read more »include: Citations lacking significant coverage – Citations that briefly namecheck the fact that the subject exists, but are not actually about the subject...
Click to read more »writing in an article about something else, thus falling in the "glancing namecheck of his existence" class of sourcing that doesn't assist passage of WP:GNG...
Click to read more »(Entertainment Focus) is an entirely unreliable site, two just glancingly namecheck Hilsenteger's existence in the process of not being about him, and the...
Click to read more »to her own self-published website about herself and 1/4 to a glancing namecheck of her existence in a blog post whose subject is a very general phenomenon...
Click to read more »glancingly namecheck his existence, because just having roles is not a "get out of WP:GNG" card. But three of those four links are just cursory namechecks, not...
Click to read more »councillors in non-global cities But this is referenced to just two glancing namecheck of her existences in local media pieces that aren't about her to any non-trivial...
Click to read more »-- this is based on just two pieces of media coverage which both just namecheck his existence in the process of being about something or somebody else...
Click to read more »technical verification that she once attended a gala, and a glancing namecheck of her existence in the footnotes of an unreliable source article that...
Click to read more »a primary source which cannot assist notability at all, or a glancing namecheck of his existence in almost-exclusively local coverage that isn't about...
Click to read more »about the ancestors rather than him, one of the other two is a glancing namecheck of his existence on a blog, and the other is a corporate press release...
Click to read more »anything at all here is not substantive coverage of the band, but a glancing namecheck of their existence in an article about one of the compilation albums....
Click to read more »externally recognized as significant. But the only sources here are a brief namecheck of his existence in a non-notable and unreliable blog and a very short...
Click to read more »specialist franchising industry newsletters, most of which just briefly namecheck Doug Williamson as a giver of soundbite in an article that is not about...
Click to read more »19 July 2017 (UTC) Delete cited sources (The Nation for example) only namechecking the subject. nothing in RS which could demonstrate the notability of...
Click to read more »himself and his own work, one is a 50-word blurb and one is a glancing namecheck of his existence in a film's cast and crew list. All of which means that...
Click to read more »gnews but it is pretty weak tea. Lots of series reviews/previews that namecheck the character and actress and move along. Nothing you could call significant...
Click to read more »development of the city, and on and so forth. But this just cites one glancing namecheck of his existence in a news story about an event, and then uses primary...
Click to read more »can see the only of the citations in the article that do any more than namecheck the subject are links to Youtube and to an interview with him by a web...
Click to read more »interview in which he's speaking about himself, and the other is a glancing namecheck of his existence in a blurb about somebody else. These are not the kinds...
Click to read more »the ones that are reliable sources mostly aren't about him, but merely namecheck his existence in coverage of events. So none of this is enough to claim...
Click to read more »her candidacy was special: seven of the eight footnotes just glancingly namecheck her existence in the process of being about other things, which means...
Click to read more »member which doesn't say anything more about this band than a glancing namecheck of its existence in an overview of his entire career. This is not enough...
Click to read more »type that any candidate for any office could always show, and a glancing namecheck of his existence in a source that isn't about him. This is nowhere close...
Click to read more »notability-supporting source at all; and the two that come from actual media just namecheck his existence without being about him to any non-trivial degree, so that...
Click to read more »Regarding the book mentioned in the external links it only gives her a namecheck with a date and place of birth in a list of Texas porn stars, regards...
Click to read more »in the entire article, further, are not about him, but just glancingly namecheck his existence in the process of being about a nightclub event he helped...
Click to read more »sources meet the criteria for establishing notability. Merely having some namechecks type of press coverage (given their abundance, these days) does not makes...
Click to read more »affiliated organizations, blogs, dead links or sources which just briefly namecheck him as a giver of soundbite in an article about a subject other than himself...
Click to read more »former, and the very few which were actually written by other people just namecheck his existence without being about him to any non-trivial degree. And the...
Click to read more »WP:BLOG, and one piece in a major market newspaper which doesn't even namecheck Moore's existence at all, but is here merely to verify a purely tangential...
Click to read more »notable person and not specifically about the collective beyond perhaps a namecheck. ShelbyMarion (talk) 19:43, 9 May 2019 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »the role is nonexistent, and you otherwise have to use a quick glancing namecheck of his existence in an article that wasn't about him and a wedding announcement...
Click to read more »consists of the town's own primary source website about itself, a glancing namecheck of her existence in an article about her nephew, and just one article...
Click to read more »March 2016 (UTC) Picked back up? This was created in 2009 by Agravert to namecheck Alex Gravert and is the only thing this user ever did. Oh and there are...
Click to read more »actually count as reliable sources rather than primary ones all just namecheck her existence and still aren't about her to the degree required — they...
Click to read more »the only sources here are a single casting announcement and a glancing namecheck of this show's existence in an article about its lead actress being cast...
Click to read more »(The Times and the Daily Record) are not about her, but just glancingly namecheck her existence as a person who was victimized by the actual subject of...
Click to read more »coverage" does, however, have to be more than just a single glancing namecheck of her existence as a giver of soundbite in, or the bylined author of...
Click to read more »WP:NPOL pass — and the referencing is a mix of primary sources and glancing namechecks of his existence in media coverage of other things, which is not enough...
Click to read more »sources that cannot assist in building notability at all, one glancing namecheck of his existence in a source that isn't about him, and one blurb of reliable...
Click to read more »candidacy announcement, the raw table of election results and a glancing namecheck of his existence in coverage of the MP he was campaign manager for, is...
Click to read more »represent real media coverage are not about him, but just glancingly namecheck his existence in coverage of the primary as a whole. There's only one...
Click to read more »Oliver Goldsmith (company) has been created, with the Claire Goldsmith namecheck which I feel is sufficent. Mabalu (talk) 11:26, 12 July 2017 (UTC) OK...
Click to read more »networking and/or music PR platforms), two are blogs and one is a glancing namecheck of his existence in a WP:ROUTINE concert listing. There's one source here...
Click to read more »that cannot support notability at all, and the fifth is just a glancing namecheck of his existence in routine local coverage of the basic fact that the...
Click to read more »WP:BEFORE search for other sources, all I can find is a couple of glancing namechecks of his existence as a giver of soundbite in articles about other things...
Click to read more »that it exists. The references here are two primary sources, a glancing namecheck of its existence in a blog entry about the general concept of cooperative...
Click to read more »WP:GNG for them either, as four of the five footnotes just glancingly namecheck his existence in the process of not being about him to any non-trivial...
Click to read more »a real reference added to it but for a now-deadlinked primary source namecheck of his existence in a list of the sergeants at arms on Congress's own...
Click to read more »articles (one in a good newspaper and one in a pennysaver) that just namecheck this guy's existence in the process of failing to be about him. Plus all...
Click to read more »actually to a real newspaper is not an article about him, but a glancing namecheck of his existence in the caption to a photograph on an article that otherwise...
Click to read more »other source here is a casting announcement for a future series, which namechecks Tait's existence amid a list of 20 actors cast in parts in that series...
Click to read more »even on a deep database search the only source I can find is a glancing namecheck of his existence in an article about a band he worked with as an engineer...
Click to read more »her own self-published primary sources, and 25 per cent on a glancing namecheck of her existence in a listicle which isn't substantively about her. This...
Click to read more »album is not actually out yet, references are about other artists but namecheck this one in passing. Guy (Help!) 09:21, 24 June 2010 (UTC) Note: This...
Click to read more »various publications, and the only two sources that clear that bar are a namecheck of his existence as a provider of soundbite in an article about a concept...
Click to read more »simply expected to generate in that election's local media, one glancing namecheck of his existence as a giver of soundbite in an article that isn't about...
Click to read more »station, which is sourceable only to its own Facebook and a one-line namecheck of its existence in a nationwide list of "this week's events in radio"...
Click to read more »association it's directly affiliated with, and the other is a glancing namecheck of its existence in a newspaper article that isn't about it — which means...
Click to read more »notability besides having existed. The only sources here are glancing namechecks of her existence in two books that aren't about her beyond mentioning...
Click to read more »(UTC) Delete. The sources listed above are not about Acanac, but simply namecheck its existence briefly within coverage of other things. We do not keep...
Click to read more »self-published website of a university he works for. Several others glancingly namecheck his existence in the process of not being about him in any non-trivial...
Click to read more »only one that qualifies as a reliable source at all is just a glancing namecheck of his existence as a provider of soundbite rather than an article that's...
Click to read more »to his own self-published social networking profiles, and two glancing namechecks of his existence in newspaper articles about other things. This is not...
Click to read more »reliable sources are not substantively about him, but just glancingly namecheck his existence in coverage of other things. Not even one footnote here...
Click to read more »that doesn't bolster notability at all, except for a single glancing namecheck of his existence in a Huffington Post article about something else, so...
Click to read more »an article that's based solely on two primary sources and one glancing namecheck of his existence in an article about somebody else. Bearcat (talk) 04:13...
Click to read more »the bar — even the two sources which are present in the article merely namecheck his existence rather than being about him in any meaningful way. Delete...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Nothing more than namechecking. Fails WP:NWEB. Störm (talk) 05:59, 2 January 2018 (UTC) Note: This debate...
Click to read more »independent sources that discuss the person in depth. G'search does produce namecheck type of press coverage (most of which already cited in the BLP) which...
Click to read more »http://www.dnjournal.com/archive/lowdown/2014/dailyposts/20140912.htm Namechecks his existence a single time in the caption to a photograph. Contributes...
Click to read more »15:19, 1 December 2021 (UTC) Delete. I checked. All the sources just namecheck him. Fails WP:SIGCOV. 72.239.12.56 (talk) 01:55, 3 December 2021 (UTC)...
Click to read more »represent reliable source coverage about him — they all just briefly namecheck his existence, while failing to have him as their subject — and nothing...
Click to read more »had its own native department store, sometimes with regional branches. namecheck here About the only online RS in any depth is this obit of the onetime...
Click to read more »based mainly on primary sources, with a small smattering of glancing namechecks of its existence in reliable source coverage of other things, which means...
Click to read more »glancing namechecks of his existence in sources that aren't about him. And even some, although admittedly not all, of the glancing namechecks are in blogs...
Click to read more »any content about her except for a glancing namecheck of her name on a site that contains glancing namechecks of every single person running as a candidate...
Click to read more »The sources that have been added to support that assertion just briefly namecheck him, while completely failing to constitute coverage of him that's substantive...
Click to read more »that aren't support for notability, except for a single brief glancing namecheck of his existence as a provider of soundbite in a news article that isn't...
Click to read more »candidacy — the only reference being cited here at all is a glancing namecheck of his existence as a giver of soundbite in an article about somebody...
Click to read more »her in the sense required to get her over WP:GNG, but (a) glancingly namecheck her existence in coverage of other things, (b) feature her talking about...
Click to read more »establish his notability. Of the 17 footnotes here, nine of them glancingly namecheck his existence within articles that aren't about him; three of them are...
Click to read more »board, and more often than not aren't even about him, but just briefly namecheck his existence in the process of being about something else. We're not...
Click to read more »three sources for that are unreliable and the third is just a glancing namecheck of his existence in coverage of something other than him, which means...
Click to read more »which I searched for in ProQuest and found that it's just a glancing namecheck of his existence in an article which isn't about him in any non-trivial...
Click to read more »to write "he exists, the end" and single-source the fact to a glancing namecheck of his existence in an article whose core subject is his successor. Bearcat...
Click to read more »allowed to exist at all. But the only source present here is a glancing namecheck of his existence, in the context of handing somebody an envelope, and...
Click to read more »databases, and the two that are marginally acceptable still just briefly namecheck Ross Jennings' existence in the process of being primarily about other...
Click to read more »link: 404. Second link: Personal blog. Third link: distinctly lukewarm namecheck in a listicle ("Steve Aylett’s paean to originality is so elliptical that...
Click to read more »just find mentions, not substantive coverage - but there are sufficient namechecks that this may be a wheat vs. chaff issue. Needless to say, the article...
Click to read more »establishing that she would pass GNG; the footnotes are a photograph, a glancing namecheck of her existence in an article on the broad phenomenon of women in municipal...
Click to read more »The Globe and Mail, don't count for very much as they both glancingly namecheck the show's existence in the process of failing to be about the show. They'd...
Click to read more »reliable source coverage by other people, and the third is a glancing namecheck of his existence in an article about somebody else. None of these are...
Click to read more »and the references here are not about the songs as songs, but merely namecheck their existence in the process of being fundamentally about the entire...
Click to read more »anything prior to the criminal charge is one primary source and one glancing namecheck of his existence in an article that's fundamentally about something else...
Click to read more »being independently analyzed or discussed in the third, and a glancing namecheck of his existence in a source whose primary subject is somebody else. The...
Click to read more »an automatic WP:NPOL pass just for existing, and with two sources that namecheck her existence in the process of being about subjects other than her, one...
Click to read more »independent or significant coverage. For example [1] is a routine transfer namecheck, this and similar articles are routine match reports, and this local news...
Click to read more »[4]. However it isn't clear whether these amount to more than passing namecheck/synopses. AllyD (talk) 22:00, 3 January 2012 (UTC) Note: This debate has...
Click to read more »that does not constitute support for notability at all, a brief glancing namecheck of his existence in a news article about somebody else, or a source that...
Click to read more »WP:NMUSIC. The article is written in the first person, cites a single brief namecheck in a book, and rests his notability on having very briefly been in a notable...
Click to read more »himself, a piece of his own bylined writing about other things, a glancing namecheck of his existence as a giver of soundbite in an article about something...
Click to read more »--Hirolovesswords (talk) 19:13, 20 July 2015 (UTC) Most of the sourcing here just namechecks his existence in the process of failing to be about him — and the media...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Most of the coverage namechecks him. Fails WP:SIGCOV. Knud Truelsen (talk) 11:57, 3 April 2022 (UTC) Note:...
Click to read more »cited here at all — I was able on a ProQuest search to find a glancing namecheck of the label's and album's existence in a "concert listings" blurb for...
Click to read more »Only sourced to databases. Non database coverage is only this routine namecheck that has one sentence about him and player roster listing. Kges1901 (talk)...
Click to read more »([1], since it hasn't actually been linked in the article) is a glancing namecheck of his existence in a piece that isn't about him, which means it's also...
Click to read more »sources, and the only two that are actually real media are a glancing namecheck of his existence in an article that isn't about him and a very short blurb...
Click to read more »do not count as support for notability at all, and one is a glancing namecheck of his existence in a blurb that isn't about him, and the only source...
Click to read more »WP:NPOL, and the article is referenced to primary sources and glancing namechecks of his existence in articles that are not about him, which are not notability-building...
Click to read more »source in the article that's substantively about him, and not just a namecheck that lists him in passing, then he definitely doesn't have enough notability...
Click to read more »evaluate whether his "mention" in it is substantive, or merely a glancing namecheck. But in its existing form, the article isn't stating anything except that...
Click to read more »notability-building in the first place — the strongest source is a glancing namecheck of the film's existence in a fairly short blurb about the filmmaker's...
Click to read more »at first glance. The New York Times article used as the first ref is a namecheck and has no depth; on the other hand this W Magazine article has lots of...
Click to read more »establishing notability, and the only other source here is a glancing namecheck of his existence in his own employer's announcement of a network affiliation...
Click to read more »exists". And the referencing here consists of three sources that glancingly namecheck his existence in the process of being about a transit extension, and one...
Click to read more »the other five are media, there's one (City Pages) that just briefly namechecks his existence in the context of having been a member of a non-notable...
Click to read more »an article on English Wikipedia, unless meet GNG. Search produce some namecheck type of press coverage but doesn't produce any coverage and substantial...
Click to read more »FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable cosmetic dentist. Most of the sources namecheck him or briefly quote him. Some sources like [1], [2], [3] cover him in...
Click to read more »was (is?) involved in the Center for Irish Music, but that is a simple namecheck. Lamona (talk) 23:04, 17 July 2026 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »BenKuykendall (talk) 03:23, 25 November 2018 (UTC) Those sources may namecheck harmony search, but are, as the critique section establishes, about "nature-inspired...
Click to read more »that a lot of the sources being cited here aren't about him, but merely namecheck him in passing while being fundamentally about somebody or something else...
Click to read more »resting its claim of notability entirely on a single source which merely namechecks their existence, then that source does have to be a list of award winners...
Click to read more »coverage, and even those two aren't about him as a subject, but just briefly namecheck his existence in the process of being about something else. This is not...
Click to read more »circumstances, and one of the three that are real media is just a glancing namecheck of his existence as a giver of soundbite in an article about something...
Click to read more »self-published content about itself, and the other two both just glancingly namecheck this company's existence in the process of being about something or someone...
Click to read more »the sources are not reliable either except the Daily Times which only namechecking her. doesn't meet WP:ACTORS at the moment. Saqib (talk) 05:47, 13 July...
Click to read more »with. Two of the three sources here are a primary source and a glancing namecheck of his existence in an article whose core subject is something else, neither...
Click to read more »primary sources that cannot support notability at all, one is a glancing namecheck of her existence in a source that isn't about her, and the last is one...
Click to read more »unreliable source, which isn't support for notability, and a brief glancing namecheck of her existence in a reliable source article about something other than...
Click to read more »source at all) and a bunch of articles about the film which glancingly namecheck her existence in the cast list while failing to actually say a single...
Click to read more »World, which can be accessed from TWL, but again, those do not go beyond namechecks, not nearly enough to even beginning to evaluate against the other criteria...
Click to read more »that actually represent real journalism in media outlets just glancingly namecheck her existence in the process of being about other things, which means...
Click to read more »much clearer indication of what it is they do). References, while solid, namecheck this within a wider discussion and Le Nouvel Observateur appears to be...
Click to read more »notability, are you really really saying that a namecheck in an 80-word potted bio of an MP and a namecheck in one news story [1] amount to "significant...
Click to read more »notability at all, and the one reference that is still live is just a glancing namecheck of her existence in an article about somebody else, not coverage that's...
Click to read more »because they exist — and the sources here are not about him, but merely namecheck his existence as a giver of soundbite in articles about other things or...
Click to read more »company and was a Lloyds shareholder is not notable. Passing mentions only (namechecks) in sources, no in-depth coverage or historical notability established...
Click to read more »deletion discussions. MT TrainTalk 16:04, 26 February 2018 (UTC) Delete namechecking in few news stories for being chairman of the Rice Exporters Association...
Click to read more »committee secretaries. And as the sources go, two of the four are glancing namechecks of her existence in sources that are not fundamentally about her, and...
Click to read more »footnotes here aren't getting her over WP:GNG: the first just briefly namechecks her existence in the process of being primarily about other people, the...
Click to read more »encyclopaedic merit. The sources are a slang dictionary (which we are not) and a namecheck in a minor journal. This is not a subject of any objectively discernible...
Click to read more »actually are real media are not substantively about him, but just glancingly namecheck his existence in coverage of other things except for one article that's...
Click to read more »contextless linkfarm of external links, there are two articles which just namecheck her existence as a giver of soundbite, two articles where she's the bylined...
Click to read more »of a GNG-satisfying volume of sourcing. All of the sourcing here just namechecks his existence as Sarah Palin's predecessor in an article about Palin,...
Click to read more »a ProQuest search for older sourcing, and while I did find a glancing namecheck of its existence in an article about its network, I found nothing which...
Click to read more »sources his existence to one obituary in the local newspaper and a one-off namecheck of his existence in a listicle of everybody who ever served on the county...
Click to read more »(one book and one improperly cited newspaper article) both just briefly namecheck Donald Walker without being about him in any sense, which is not the kind...
Click to read more »get him over WP:GNG in lieu — as noted, three of the four sources just namecheck his existence in coverage of other things while failing to be substantively...
Click to read more »2006 (UTC) Delete blatant vanity. I already deleted one of these vanity namecheck articles and I feel an attack of WP:ROUGE coming on... Guy 11:01, 27 September...
Click to read more »the Wall Street Journal "Tech Essentials" column, and it's a legitimate namecheck, but ultimately it's just Richard Branson mentioning that he has one,...
Click to read more »the Torontoist reference isn't about Neill-Wycik, but just glancingly namechecks Neill-Wycik's existence in the process of being about the general phenomenon...
Click to read more »If he played for a club in the top-level Cypriot league, at least a namecheck of him would certainly exist, even in web portals of questionable reliability...
Click to read more »author and not the subject, and a piece of media content which glancingly namechecks his existence but is not about him. And on a Google News search, he gets...
Click to read more »2020 (UTC) Redirect to Pee-wee's Playhouse as I found a few sources namechecking her participation there, though nothing else. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)...
Click to read more »minority that were written by other people are not about him, but just namecheck his existence as a reporter who happened to have done some coverage of...
Click to read more »that glancingly namechecks her existence, one newspaper op-ed where she's the bylined author and not the subject, and one glancing namecheck of her existence...
Click to read more »are not about Jimmy Dale in any substantive sense, but all just briefly namecheck Jimmy's existence in the process of being mainly about Dick -- so it can't...
Click to read more »count as reliable sources aren't actually about her, but just glancingly namecheck her existence in coverage of other topics. This is different enough from...
Click to read more »article, most of the coverage is about his company's products/instruments. Namechecks doesn't qualify under WP:GNG. Knud Truelsen (talk) 12:31, 3 April 2022...
Click to read more »three primary sources and two pieces of routine local coverage which just namecheck his existence while not actually being about him. So WP:SIGCOV has not...
Click to read more »article or section of an article on computer-generated crosswords, a namecheck for Mr Albert there seems sensible since MelanieN has found a good source...
Click to read more »about him to support an article -- but the references here are glancings namecheck of Ritchey's existence in an unreliable source list of Owen's songs, and...
Click to read more »listicle doesn't contain any information about the band beyond a simple namecheck of their existence. And as for sourcing, the 21 footnotes here also include...
Click to read more »these are passing mentions. None of them is about the subject. Some just namecheck it and others just briefly mention what it is. Mccapra (talk) 12:27, 8...
Click to read more »of the sources here are not substantively about Giugliano, but merely namecheck his existence within coverage that is about other things or people — the...
Click to read more »and even the few that are acceptable reliable sources are mostly just namechecking his existence within coverage of the council as a whole. There aren't...
Click to read more »the same two links, more primary sources, and some sources that briefly namecheck the subject's existence without being about him in any non-trivial sense...
Click to read more »for the purposes of getting him over WP:GNG — I get a lot of glancing namechecks of his existence as a giver of soundbite in articles about other things...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Coverage is just brief mentions/namechecks. Fails WP:NORG. Amon Stutzman (talk) 00:03, 5 July 2022 (UTC) Delete sources...
Click to read more »its brief mention of the group; The Cut gives the group no more than a namecheck. Additional searching for independent coverage of the group by reliable...
Click to read more »he's the speaker and not the subject; there are sources which glancingly namecheck his existence without being about him to any non-trivial degree; and there...
Click to read more »article, and it's referenced to a mix of primary sources and glancing namechecks of his existence in media coverage of other things, not to any evidence...
Click to read more »even on a WP:BEFORE search for other sources I get a lot of glancing namechecks of his existence in coverage of other things, but virtually nothing that's...
Click to read more »of the seven which are actually about a Canadian actor all seven just namecheck his existence and exactly zero of them are substantively about him. And...
Click to read more »her publication's own self-published content about itself, or glancing namechecks of her existence in coverage whose subject is somebody other than her...
Click to read more »primary sources that fail to be reliable or independent, or glancing namechecks of his existence in articles which fail to be about him in a substantive...
Click to read more »part of a general article on the game. There's far too much emphasis on namechecking members of the community, just keep the major developments and don't...
Click to read more »JSTOR · TWL) An article with no real sources: passing mentions (e.g. namechecks in stories about people crowdfunding) and press releases are about it...
Click to read more »pretty weaksauce at best: two obituaries of the lead singer, one glancing namecheck of their existence in an article that isn't about them, one library directory...
Click to read more »affiliated with and two are glancing namechecks of his existence in sources that aren't about him (and one of the two namechecks, further, is a personal career...
Click to read more »being shown here, and all I can find on a Google News search is glancing namechecks of his existence, not coverage that's substantively about him at all....
Click to read more »commissioned for their own office building) and the third is a glancing namecheck of its existence in an article that is in no way substantively about it...
Click to read more »it looked fine, but what there is seems to be very passing mentions, namechecks in lists, etc. At best, too soon. The most extensive mention is here -...
Click to read more »source isn't substantively about her, but merely contains a two-sentence namecheck of her within a list of capsule reviews of several art shows. Being able...
Click to read more »person associated with the group who has ever been quoted in RS) whihc namecheck this group. It does not seem to have been a 501(c) anything, it rose without...
Click to read more »references that are appropriately reliable virtually all just passingly namecheck him rather than being about him per se. So he doesn't get to claim WP:GNG...
Click to read more »talent? And absent that, literally all I can find otherwise is glancing namechecks of her existence rather than coverage that's about her in any non-trivial...
Click to read more »I still believe the subject fails to meet GNG. G'search does produce namecheck type of press coverage which longstanding practice holds cannot be used...
Click to read more »sourced on the surface, every last one of the 15 citations here either (a) namechecks her existence in the process of failing to be about her, or (b) sources...
Click to read more »subject in drag not accompanied by an actual article, and three glancing namechecks of his existence in articles that weren't about him to any substantive...
Click to read more »a (deadlinked but recoverable) Tiny Desk Concert, which just briefly namechecks his participation in the surrounding text without saying anything substantive...
Click to read more »sources are even substantively about her, as some of them just casually namecheck her existence within coverage of other people or things. And the article...
Click to read more »Presse and Voir, and came up completely empty except for (a) one glancing namecheck of his "notoriously awful" video for "D-Natural est mon nom", and (b)...
Click to read more »do are not about the subject at all, the only one which is more than a namecheck is the univeristy student newspaper article on the undergraduate poetry...
Click to read more »any reason to believe that Gallatin gets anything more than a glancing namecheck on one or two pages rather than having any sort of "key role" (if he really...
Click to read more »notability, because the subject is talking about himself), a glancing namecheck of his existence in an article that's about one of the other actors in...
Click to read more »officials may or may not. But four of the references here are just glancing namechecks of his existence in articles where he is not the subject, and one is a...
Click to read more »reliable sources are not substantively about her, but all just glancingly namecheck her existence within coverage of other people. This is not how you make...
Click to read more »failing to distinguish him as more notable than the norm), and a glancing namecheck of his existence in a summary of the history of a television station he...
Click to read more »WP:PRIMARYSOURCES that aren't support for notability at all with glancing namechecks of his existence in news stories that aren't about him in any meaningful...
Click to read more »mention of his name, but fails to contain anything more than a glancing namecheck of his existence. It's not enough to add sources in which his name appears...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) The subject received some press coverage (namechecking) but i don't see him meeting the WP's notability criterial. Saqib (talk)...
Click to read more »writing where he's the bylined author and not the subject, a glancing namecheck of his existence in a source whose primary subject is somebody else, a...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) 93 unique Google hits including directories, namechecks, self-published and crowdfunders, but not reliable independent sources...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Promotional bio, limited coverage (few namechecks), fails WP:GNG. Störm (talk) 08:36, 23 April 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion...
Click to read more »one, the Chilean Roland without the "C", I found and added a couple of namecheck sources, but there is not really much out there. --- Possibly ☎ 09:18...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Spammy article based entirely on namechecks in primary sources, written by two accounts with no other contributions...
Click to read more »the subject) of a couple of pieces of writing for and a brief glancing namecheck of her existence in a short blurb announcing the appointment of 16 new...
Click to read more »is borderline for notability. I don't think that everybody who gets a namecheck in a few minor books on spirituality should automatically be considered...
Click to read more »like this, only able to find this non-independent press release and a namecheck in a local news article. Kges1901 (talk) 13:29, 23 June 2023 (UTC) Note:...
Click to read more »of an artwork it commissioned for its own head office) and a glancing namecheck of its existence in an article that isn't about it? Bearcat (talk) 22:59...
Click to read more »notability at all, and even the few that are real media mostly still just namecheck AJ Mattioli's existence without being about AJ Mattioli to any non-trivial...
Click to read more »notable. No in-depth coverage found for this organization. Just one or two namechecks. Fails WP:ORG. Greenbörg (talk) 09:14, 9 August 2017 (UTC) Redirect to...
Click to read more »of NMUSIC's award criterion -- and the sourcing consists of glancing namechecks of their existence and one semi-advertorialized piece on an unreliable...
Click to read more »some evidence of promotional editing. The sources in the article are namechecks and press releases. WP:BEFORE adds a small number of tabloid articles...
Click to read more »with rather clear connections to the subject. The sourcing consists of namechecks, press releases and directory entries, and fails WP:CORPDEPTH. It is,...
Click to read more »this article is based far too strongly on primary sources and glancing namechecks of his existence in coverage of other things, and not nearly enough to...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) No in-depth coverage. Namechecks only. Fails WP:GNG. Greenbörg (talk) 08:21, 25 August 2017 (UTC) Note:...
Click to read more »the nomination, which isn't enough all by itself, I only got glancing namechecks of his existence as a participant in junior curling competitions rather...
Click to read more »three articles (two in Now and one in the Toronto Star) that glancingly namecheck her existence in the process of being about something else. Exactly none...
Click to read more »sources which are real media mostly aren't about him, but just glancingly namecheck his existence in the process of being primarily about something or someone...
Click to read more »with), unreliable ones (Canadian Railway Observations), and glancing namechecks of his existence in media coverage that isn't substantively about him...
Click to read more »absolutely nothing whatsoever to do with this film, and a brief glancing namecheck of this film's existence in a short blurb about its producer later securing...
Click to read more »tank he works for. Google turns up only Cato publications and occasional namechecks. As far as I can see, the sum total claim to notability appears to be...
Click to read more »self-published company website, one YouTube clip of him speaking, and one glancing namecheck of his existence in an article that isn't about him. This is not enough...
Click to read more »Merge to New York City secession movement per Dugwiki. Effectively a namecheck for the idea will do, so more of a smerge. Angus McLellan (Talk) 23:15...
Click to read more »cites a raw primary source table of election results and two glancing namechecks of her existence in articles that are not about her, which is not how...
Click to read more »articles that are substantively about her, either, but just hits glancing namechecks of her existence in coverage of other things. If you're shooting for "notable...
Click to read more »relatively few references that are actually reliable sources all just namecheck that she exists in the process of being about the band. This is not how...
Click to read more »JSTOR · TWL) no notable career. and no in depth coverage in the RS, just namechecking which is not enough to establish the notability of the subject. some...
Click to read more »references here are all blogs and self-published press releases and glancing namechecks of its existence in coverage of performers who studied there, not real...
Click to read more »or run of the mill coverage. Except the Irish Times one, which merely namechecks them ar the originator or the data which the story is about. I dont think...
Click to read more »it comprises two articles about other people that happen to glancingly namecheck Nora Radest's existence and a radio interview in which Nora Radest is...
Click to read more »survived 13 years without good sourcing. I could not find anything beyond namechecks in Google Books, mostly for photography credits.ThatMontrealIP (talk)...
Click to read more »just briefly namechecks him as a provider of soundbite and one Forbes article that completely fails to contain even a glancing namecheck of Peter Wall...
Click to read more »websites of the town council and his own campaign, and a single glancing namecheck of his existence in an article about the municipal budget vote. The only...
Click to read more »significant press coverage" -- the only source here is a one-sentence namecheck of her existence as a "what happened elsewhere" coda to an article that's...
Click to read more »a subject of any of the remainder, instead being limited to glancing namechecks of his existence in articles about other things. A writer does not automatically...
Click to read more »that can be found in Izvestiya is a namecheck in the rowing team roster from 1952. That's it, just one namecheck. Kges1901 (talk) 02:33, 4 July 2023 (UTC)...
Click to read more »independent sources, and I can't find anything other than directories and namechecks. That's a particular problem because much of what they promote is woo...
Click to read more »right. Even on a WP:BEFORE search of ProQuest, I just get one glancing namecheck of its existence in local human interest coverage of a collector geek...
Click to read more »with one exception: https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/226680.pdf, a mere namecheck. Guy (Help!) 23:04, 15 August 2019 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) merely namechecking in the RS doesn't makes one notable enough to warrant a WP entry. none...
Click to read more »dated a decade or more later than his term as mayor both just glancingly namecheck his existence, but are not about him strongly enough to count as GNG-passing...
Click to read more »and the only BBC citations here are glancing namechecks of his existence in listicles that namecheck every candidate in the election he's running in...
Click to read more »one of them is local to his own city and many of them just glancingly namecheck his existence rather than being about him. Nothing here is substantive...
Click to read more »that was referring to Tim Louis the jazz musician was just a glancing namecheck in an article that wasn't about him. So the RS coverage of his music that...
Click to read more »(UTC) Weak Delete - the subject received some coverage in the RS like namechecking but I don't see the subject has notable career therefore I suggest the...
Click to read more »subject-specific inclusion standard — it consists almost entirely of glancing namechecks of his existence in coverage of other things, not coverage in which he's...
Click to read more »some non-notable series for which he has received some press coverage (namechecking) but I am unable to locate coverage which discusses him directly and...
Click to read more »career is referenced almost entirely to primary sources and glancing namechecks of his existence in news articles that aren't about him, none of which...
Click to read more »currently cited: one is a profile in a trade magazine, one appears to be a namecheck, the other two appear to be primary sources (and perhaps not independent)...
Click to read more »he has received press coverage but i failed to find anything beyond namechecking news stories which doesn't make the subject notable enough to warrant...
Click to read more »appropriately reliable sources are not about Koehler per se, but merely namecheck him within the context of the band. So nothing here demonstrates that...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) No more than a couple namechecks in match reports, fails GNG. Dr. Duh 🩺 (talk) 06:58, 2 October 2022 (UTC)...
Click to read more »reliable independent sources. A search finds directories, press releases, namechecks and nothing more. Guy (Help!) 23:41, 2 February 2019 (UTC) Note: This...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:ORG. Existing sources are simply namechecks; WP:BEFORE revealed nothing better. John from Idegon (talk) 05:05, 17...
Click to read more »Hindustan Times piece also does not help with sigcov since it's doesn't even namecheck the subject; the NTU alumni story cannot be considered independent nor...
Click to read more »demonstrating the subject's notability (it relies too strongly on glancing namechecks of his existence in articles about other people, and not nearly enough...
Click to read more »almost entirely from her own hometown media, except for a brief glancing namecheck of her existence in a human interest piece about her parents-in-law. There's...
Click to read more »discount those, we can drop another four: two blurbs, a one-off glancing namecheck of his existence in an article about somebody else and a piece of his...
Click to read more »talking about himself in the first person and the other is a glancing namecheck of his existence in an interview with somebody else — but that's not the...
Click to read more »more unreliable sources, the only thing I found was a brief glancing namecheck of the song's existence as a song getting played on a radio station in...
Click to read more »the references are a mix of primary sources, unreliable blogs, glancing namechecks of his existence in coverage that is not fundamentally about him, and...
Click to read more »about himself in the first person on blogs and podcasts, and a glancing namecheck of his existence in the internal newsletter of a professional trade organization...
Click to read more »mix of tabloid tattle and vanispamcruftisement. Most of the sources are namechecks and not about the subject, with the one equivalent of a WP:TABLOID piece...
Click to read more »film, which contains no content about his performance beyond a glancing namecheck of his existence in its cast list. But an actor doesn't get over NACTOR's...
Click to read more »coverage that might not have googled I still only get a couple of glancing namechecks of its existence in event calendar listings, which isn't enough. Bearcat...
Click to read more »JSTOR · TWL) WP:BLP, based half on primary sources and half on glancing namechecks of her existence in media coverage which isn't about her, of a person...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Sources are one press release and two namechecks. The usual sites have no professional reviews of this movie. I don't think...
Click to read more »shown here at all, with the only listed reference being a single glancing namecheck of her existence, as a personal influence on the speaker's ideas, in an...
Click to read more »the local theatre sources, two of the three sources you provided merely namecheck her existence a single time without being about her — and the one article...
Click to read more ») And for media sourcing, what we have is two obituaries, a glancing namecheck of his existence in a list of people, and a local history book: but the...
Click to read more »can find is a single article in a community hyperlocal which briefly namechecks this show's existence in the process of being more about the host's other...
Click to read more »2017 (UTC) Delete he is often quoted in news stories but mostly are namecheckings.. and since he is a local office holder who fails to meet WP:Politician...
Click to read more »are not support for notability, and both of the other two just briefly namecheck her as a giver of soundbite in articles that aren't about her, which is...
Click to read more »to get it back up to snuff: all I get on a ProQuest search is glancing namechecks of its existence in coverage of either Blue Rodeo or Crash Vegas, not...
Click to read more »actually getting him over WP:GNG. The New York Times source is a glancing namecheck of his existence in an article that's primarily about somebody else; the...
Click to read more »which one is his own self-published campaign website, one is a glancing namecheck of his existence in a blog post about his opponent, one is a YouTube video...
Click to read more »Chart references, for example, aren't articles about the band, but merely namecheck it in "local scene news" columns that blurb numerous unrelated and mostly...
Click to read more »sources, literally the only thing I can find anywhere is this, which namechecks the film's existence a single time in the process of calling the filmmaker's...
Click to read more »entirely to either the organization's own web page about itself, or glancing namechecks of its existence on the still self-published website of the city housing...
Click to read more »and Dawn) . one doesn't mention the subject, while the other one only namechecking. Saqib (talk) 18:07, 31 July 2017 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...
Click to read more »just for existing — but the referencing here consists of one glancing namecheck of his existence in an article about somebody else, and one of his own...
Click to read more »self promotional autbio. cited sources do not pass RS.. he has been namechecking in a few news stories though. --Saqib (talk) 10:01, 27 July 2017 (UTC)...
Click to read more »office: the sources are all either extremely short blurbs or glancing namechecks of Kunal Sehrawat's existence in coverage that isn't about him, which...
Click to read more »him to an article that relies entirely on primary sources and glancing namechecks of his existence in coverage of other people. Bearcat (talk) 17:53, 4...
Click to read more »TWL) most of the cited sources are not reliable. reliable ones only namechecking the subject. Saqib (talk) 07:42, 6 June 2017 (UTC) Note: This debate...
Click to read more »and was sourced properly, two of the four sources here just glancingly namecheck her existence as a bystander in coverage of someone else, and one is a...
Click to read more »(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Namechecks only appeared when I done my searches. No significant coverage. Fails...
Click to read more »December 2017 (UTC) Delete non notable product WP:PRODUCT. Unreasonably namechecking and inheriting of notability against WP:NOTINHERITED. –Ammarpad (talk)...
Click to read more »search through google news reveals lots of trivial coverage (such as namechecks and one-sentence mentions), but I can't find a second source that gives...
Click to read more »I can't find the coverage it would take; all I'm getting is glancing namechecks of its existence in coverage of other things or people, not anything that's...
Click to read more »found absolutely nothing of value. I was able to find two brief glancing namechecks of its existence in blurbs about Oliver Gruner, but nothing that was about...
Click to read more »And even the two extralocal Toronto Star hits consist of one glancing namecheck of his existence within an event calendar, and one article covering him...
Click to read more »platforms, one is a short blurb on a WordPress blog, and one is a glancing namecheck of his existence in coverage about somebody else. Nothing stated here...
Click to read more »where to look for sourcing on a Mexican novela of this age; I found some namecheck references in news articles but nothing substantial. Unlike television...
Click to read more »9 December 2017 (UTC) Delete no in depth coverage in RS except few namechecking and apparently no notable career. --Saqib (talk) 12:43, 9 December 2017...
Click to read more »that do not count as support for notability at all, two are glancing namechecks of his existence in coverage of other things or people (one of which,...
Click to read more »older media coverage that wouldn't google, I just get a lot of glancing namechecks of its existence in event calendar listings with no discernible evidence...
Click to read more »non-WP:SPA content. Referenciness is provided by self-published sources, namechecks and press releases. WP:BEFORE finds no independent coverage. Guy (help...
Click to read more »as two separate footnotes for no obvious reason) are just a glancing namecheck of his existence in a news blurb about his predecessor -- and the only...
Click to read more »2006 through to 2013. Although there are clumps there, she does get a namecheck and/or quite a few words on her every few weeks. Some of it, from a quick...
Click to read more »half of the sources are primary ones, and the other half are glancing namechecks of his existence in articles that aren't about him, which means he doesn't...
Click to read more »of the sources in the article are not about the company - some merely namecheck one of the founders (e.g. the ACM conference in which Smaragdakis was...
Click to read more »