Redirect to:
This page is a redirect. The following categories are used to track and monitor this redirect:
|
secured. Shortcuts WP:ENTWP:ENT WP:ENTERTAINERWP:ENTERTAINER WP:NACTORWP:NACTOR WP:NMODELWP:NMODEL WP:COMEDIANWP:COMEDIAN This guideline applies to actors...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Single significant role, fails WP:NACTOR and sources don't meet WP:GNG criteria. Ravensfire (talk) 22:12, 8 April...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) May not meet WP:NACTOR or WP:NBIO. Had been tagged with {{Notability|Bio}} since February 2016...
Click to read more »reliable sources presented. Nothing found in a WP:BEFORE search. Fails WP:NACTOR and WP:BIO. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 19:58, 1 July 2021 (UTC) Note: This...
Click to read more »JSTOR · TWL) WP:BLP of a voice actor, not reliably sourced as passing WP:NACTOR. As always, the notability test for an actor is not simply the ability to...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Two films WP:NACTOR, but no reliable sources for WP:GNG. Sources, both in English and Telugu...
Click to read more »the article do not discuss the subject in depth. To be notable under WP:NACTOR, he would need to have had significant roles in two notable films. He appears...
Click to read more »role on One Tree Hill. That's pretty much the definition of meeting WP:NACTOR. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 20:24, 8 August 2018 (UTC) Note: This discussion...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) fails WP:NACTOR , she has got only one significant role. Princepratap1234 (talk) 13:08,...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NACTOR, Fails WP:GNG Barrettmagic Talk 13:04, 17 October 2021 (UTC) Blocked sock...
Click to read more »WP:TRIVIALMENTIONS and no WP:SIGCOV. Fails WP:NACTOR. If someone could please find reliable sources to satisfy GNG or NACTOR kindly update this article. TheBirdsShedTears...
Click to read more »FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable actor. Probably meet WP:TOOSOON, fails WP:NACTOR, WP:GNG DMySon 04:37, 13 July 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...
Click to read more »this page. The result was keep. Consensus was that the subject passes WP:NACTOR. (non-admin closure) Rollidan (talk) 19:25, 11 October 2019 (UTC) [Hide...
Click to read more »helpful that would help the article meet GNG. The subject also fails WP:NACTOR. ─ The Aafī on Mobile (talk) 20:29, 22 November 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion...
Click to read more »fails WP:GNG. Minor roles in Television and films that does not satisfy WP:NACTOR. Previously deleted as speedy under A7. DMySon (talk) 07:14, 3 October 2021...
Click to read more »show titles. So, fails WP:GNG, and with one major role, seems to fail WP:NACTOR as well. Note for anyone else researching, that there are probably many...
Click to read more »JSTOR · TWL) Some good coverage here but I don't think this passes GNG or WP:NACTOR. ─ The Aafī (talk) 15:15, 10 October 2022 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NACTOR with one credit to her name. Although there are numerous articles that mention...
Click to read more »unreliable blog post contains some information about her.) Looking at WP:NACTOR, none of the criteria are met since Godspell (film) seems to have been her...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Does not meet WP:NACTOR notability guidelines as he has not played any significant roles in film...
Click to read more »significant roles in notable productions. Looks like a failure of WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 16:42, 31 May 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion...
Click to read more »free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable actress, per WP:NACTOR. Only had a few minor roles and there seems to be little significant coverage...
Click to read more »have also noticed this given the tags on the page. May just barely meet WP:NACTOR #1 though I'm not too familiar with the work he's done and couldn't guarantee...
Click to read more »this as I do not feel this meets WP:NACTOR at any case because there is just one significant lead role and NACTOR needs several! ─ The Aafī (talk) 04:24...
Click to read more »(talk) 06:48, 9 August 2019 (UTC) Comment She's an actress, so the WP:SNG WP:NACTOR would apply. I am checking to see what she has appeared in - on stage, she...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NACTOR. She has had minor roles in TV shows. Princepratap1234 (talk) 19:37, 17...
Click to read more »(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) per WP:NACTOR. Bradford (Talk) 02:31, 30 April 2022 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...
Click to read more »Can't find qualifying coverage online. Would appear to fail WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR.(NPP action) Usedtobecool ☎️ 18:01, 20 September 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion...
Click to read more »such as Facebook and YouTube are therefore unacceptable. Also fails WP:NACTOR as he does not have multiple significant roles in notable productions per...
Click to read more »(UTC) Speedy Keep As it passes WP:NACTOR. Brascoian (talk to me) 06:07, 24 June 2021 (UTC) Delete per nom. Fails NACTOR. When you get roles like "Cafe Customer"...
Click to read more »(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) per WP:NACTOR. Bradford (Talk) 03:57, 17 May 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) The article still fails to satisfy WP:NACTOR (one of the reason proposed in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Losliya Mariyanesan...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) No lead roles to qualify for WP:NACTOR and not enough coverage for WP:GNG or WP:BASIC. Nomadicghumakkad (talk)...
Click to read more »RAJU(T) 17:24, 4 October 2018 (UTC) Delete - certainly doesn't pass WP:NACTOR, and absent press about her and Penn, nothing in-depth about herself, so...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NACTOR. Is nominated for a prize, but has not won it (yet). Depends on when the...
Click to read more »March 2015 (UTC) Delete – Fails WP:NACTOR – Margin1522 (talk) 18:12, 20 March 2015 (UTC) Delete per nom. Fails WP:NACTOR, WP:TOOSOON. Cavarrone 04:40, 23...
Click to read more »actress. lack of independent reliable resources. Does not meet WP:GNG, WP:NACTOR DMySon 11:34, 19 February 2020 (UTC) Delete as per nom. Hughesdarren (talk)...
Click to read more »role is his named role in The Umbrella Academy, which in turn fails WP:NACTOR for which Criteria 1 requires multiple notable productions. Jalen D. Folf...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non notable actor who doesn’t satisfy WP:NACTOR as they haven’t had any significant roles in movies or won any notable awards...
Click to read more »discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 19:30, 14 April 2019 (UTC) Keep He meets WP:NACTOR. He has had significant roles in numerous TV series. Yes the article could...
Click to read more »reliable resources which are independent of the subject. Fails WP:GNG, WP:NACTOR DMySon (talk) 02:09, 25 July 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...
Click to read more »The result was keep. As noted by Irn, meeting GNG is sufficient even if NACTOR or MUSICBIO aren't met, see WP:BASIC. I don't think we have consensus that...
Click to read more »free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) The subject clearly fails WP:NACTOR. It is a promotional article as the subject participated in the recently...
Click to read more »WP:BLP of an actress, with no properly sourced notability claim per WP:NACTOR. As always, the notability test for an actress is not just the ability to...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) The notability of the article subject, per WP:NACTOR, has been disputed multiple times by multiple users, leading to deletion...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) I couldn't find evidence that he meets WP:NACTOR or WP:GNG. Minor coverage, mainly in unreliable sources or promotional material...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Didn't play multiple films. Fails WP:NACTOR, Fails WP:GNG. WP:TOOSOON. Trakinwiki (talk) 06:36, 15 October 2021 (UTC)...
Click to read more »April 2019 (UTC) Delete Fails NACTOR. --qedk (t 桜 c) 18:41, 26 April 2019 (UTC) Keep This person meets both WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR Lubbad85 (☎) 03:05, 30 April...
Click to read more »namesakes. Saqib (talk) 14:59, 29 September 2018 (UTC) Keep easily passes WP:NACTOR with many prominent roles in nationally broadcast television series such...
Click to read more »Atlantic indicted, clear pass of NACTOR. matt91486 (talk) 21:10, 11 August 2019 (UTC) Delete Not notable fails WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR. Most sources are primary...
Click to read more »free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) The actor fails WP:GNG, WP:NACTOR and doesn't contained any single reliable resource except IMDBPri2000 (talk)...
Click to read more »No indication of notability. References do not show WP:SIGCOV, fails WP:NACTOR GermanKity (talk) 09:53, 26 May 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...
Click to read more »hence fails to satisfy GNG. She fails to satisfy any criterion from WP:NACTOR. A before search mostly links me to her social media accounts. Celestina007...
Click to read more »Previously moved to draft. Republish without fixing the issue. Fails WP:GNG, WP:NACTOR GermanKity (talk) 11:42, 10 June 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...
Click to read more »these productions to meet NACTOR requirements. -- Ab207 (talk) 14:32, 23 February 2022 (UTC) Delete Not yet passes WP:NACTOR. DMySon (talk) 17:28, 23 February...
Click to read more »credits in only Wasting Away and The Motel Life aren't enough to satisfy WP:NACTOR. Clarityfiend (talk) 07:40, 1 May 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...
Click to read more »sources and WP:NACTOR for lack of significant roles. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 20:56, 18 October 2018 (UTC) Keep meets criteria #1 of WP:NACTOR with multiple...
Click to read more »page. The result was no consensus. As has been pointed out here, GNG and NACTOR require more than one source/role in order to justify keeping an article...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Borderline failure to attain WP:NACTOR. We don't see significant roles in multiple productions. The award won seems...
Click to read more »any criterion from WP:NACTOR as they have not featured or played significant lead roles in multiple movies as required by NACTOR neither have they won...
Click to read more »Ascii002Talk Contribs GuestBook 00:22, 28 August 2014 (UTC) Delete per WP:NACTOR. CutestPenguin discuss 06:32, 31 August 2014 (UTC) Relisted to generate...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR, and the veracity of the information in the article should be questioned...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NACTOR not enough coverage. Sanketio31 (talk) 17:27, 17 April 2021 (UTC) Note:...
Click to read more »2016 (UTC) A person doesn't pass NACTOR just because one editor asserts that she passes NACTOR — she passes NACTOR when reliable source coverage is present...
Click to read more »be a case of WP:TOOSOON, but currently doesn't meet either WP:GNG or WP:NACTOR. Also, written in a highly promotional tone. Onel5969 TT me 16:26, 1 November...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) An actress who fails NACTOR. Also does not have any significant coverage thus failing GNG. Kichu🐘 Need...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NACTOR. The film, that she is supposed to start her career with, is yet to be released...
Click to read more »another promotional article by the same user. Does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NACTOR too. I am 100% sure this is WP:UPE. ItcouldbepossibleTalk 13:29, 22 February...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NACTOR.. Does not have significant roles in multiple notable stage performances...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NACTOR. No coverage found. – FenixFeather (talk)(Contribs) 17:18, 4 October 2018...
Click to read more »been in one thing. That would fail WP:NACTOR. NickCT (talk) 18:45, 5 December 2014 (UTC) Delete: fails WP:NACTOR, and I cannot find sufficient coverage...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NACTOR. —hueman1 (talk • contributions) 12:19, 23 July 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion...
Click to read more »Bakazaka/WP:NACTOR based on new sources added. originalmesshow u doin that busta rhyme? 01:26, 5 August 2018 (UTC) Keep: meets WP:NACTOR. K.e.coffman...
Click to read more »BLP, Fails NACTOR & GNG –Davey2010Talk 15:06, 17 November 2016 (UTC) Delete Unable to find anything to substantiate notability. Fails WP:NACTOR.Paste Let’s...
Click to read more »unreliable sources. They are an actor but I don’t see any criterion from WP:NACTOR satisfied as they haven’t won any significant award neither have they taken...
Click to read more »AFD, some participants noted that the subject meets WP:NACTOR, but let remind you that WP:NACTOR is the *additional* criteria for WP:BASIC, which I am...
Click to read more »article. Creator's username is same as the subject title. Now fails WP:NACTOR, WP:GNG DMySon (talk) 16:41, 28 July 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...
Click to read more »weak case could be made for NACTOR, too. Dflaw4 (talk) 11:15, 4 February 2020 (UTC) Weak Keep - She meets WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR, and has had recurring and...
Click to read more »certainly is notable and passes WP:NACTOR. --Oakshade (talk) 20:27, 29 November 2016 (UTC) I haven't mentioned NACTOR because I know she passes it however...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NACTOR and WP:GNG. Princepratap1234 (talk) 18:48, 27 November 2021 (UTC) Note:...
Click to read more »passing NACTOR can show notability. In order to establish NACTOR, we use the additional criteria of reliable sources to show the subject passes NACTOR. Notability...
Click to read more »Consensus, including from nominator, that she is presumed notable per WP:NACTOR - the support from other editors in this discussion transforms that presumption...
Click to read more »free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NACTOR. Coverage appears to be limited to mere-mentions and interviews (generally...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:GNG, WP:NACTOR and WP:ANYBIO. I failed to locate any significant coverage of reliable sources...
Click to read more »edits should be made to this page. The result was keep. Consensus that NACTOR (and by a slightly smaller majority, GNG) are met Nosebagbear (talk) 22:43...
Click to read more »Only one notable role (aka it's "too early" for this article), fails WP:NACTOR CapnZapp (talk) 17:20, 8 February 2022 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...
Click to read more »meets neither WP:MMABIO nor WP:NACTOR. Htanaungg (talk) 09:07, 19 September 2021 (UTC) Delete. Fails WP:SIGCOV and WP:NACTOR.4meter4 (talk) 00:22, 21 September...
Click to read more »won a non notable award (Made in Rwanda Awards) hence doesn’t satisfy WP:NACTOR. A before search shows subject lacks in-depth significant coverage in reliable...
Click to read more »(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) fails NACTOR, no coverage and hasn't had any major roles. Praxidicae (talk) 16:10, 18...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NACTOR and WP:GNG. A before search returns with social media links, and some vanity...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Clearly fails WP:NACTOR. ManaliJain (talk) 14:22, 3 September 2022 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NACTOR. Antila333 (talk) 11:19, 14 March 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Subject does not meet NACTOR or NAUTHOR. Likely best known as NYT writer/executive. A BEFORE search shows...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Appears to fail WP:NACTOR. — Mikehawk10 (talk) 21:29, 26 September 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion...
Click to read more »looking at the subject's IMDb listing, there is no way the subject meets WP:NACTOR. Article should be deleted as subject is not a notable British actor. --IJBall...
Click to read more »FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Does not fulfill WP:NACTOR. Fastester (talk) 10:02, 26 April 2016 (UTC) This guideline (WP:NACTOR) seems very not clear. How many "significant...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non notable actor with no evidence of meeting WP:NACTOR. The only film he probably worked and played a main role in is Pappur Biye...
Click to read more »credit but does not play a major or significant role in them so per WP:NACTOR subject does not seem to qualify also. Celestina007 (talk) 18:11, 29 January...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Article fails WP:NACTOR; he’s only had some significant roles in a The Brady Bunch TV movie from...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) doesn't pass WP:NACTOR and WP:GNG IndyNotes (talk) 16:17, 15 October 2022 (UTC) Note: This discussion...
Click to read more »referring to WP:GNG or WP:NACTOR here, Bearian? Thanks! VickKiang (talk) 05:27, 17 November 2022 (UTC) To clarify, I was referring to NACTOR. Her performances...
Click to read more »multiple notable productions nor does she meet any other criteria under WP:NACTOR. When searching, the best sources that I could find were this blog post...
Click to read more »clarify what "clear fail of WP:GNG if not WP:NACTOR" mean? Does the subject - from your perspective - fail NACTOR? Thanks and regards, Biwom (talk) 20:36,...
Click to read more »only ever appeared in one (barely notable) TV series, therefore fails WP:NACTOR also. (Note, if doing your own searches, be careful with the results, as...
Click to read more »then (ping me) 19:21, 26 December 2019 (UTC) Strong keep. Huge pass of WP:NACTOR because she did major characters in About a Girl (TV series), Edgemont (TV...
Click to read more »2020 (UTC) Delete an actor who doesn't appear to be notable. Fails both WP:NACTOR and WP:GNG. The Mirror Cracked (talk) 19:26, 22 January 2020 (UTC) Note:...
Click to read more »deletion discussions. MT TrainTalk 09:02, 31 May 2018 (UTC) Delete as per WP:NACTOR – only has one "significant" role: on the TV series On My Block where she's...
Click to read more »WP:NACTOR; I can only assume that the article creator is a close, close relation Spiderone 22:46, 16 January 2021 (UTC) Delete Terribly fails WP:NACTOR,...
Click to read more »FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:BLP of an actor, not properly sourced as passing WP:NACTOR. The primary notable claim here is a two-episode guest role in a television...
Click to read more »there's no consensus to delete as the article is clearly notable w/ WP:NACTOR (non-admin closure) Dusti*Let's talk!* 05:11, 7 April 2019 (UTC) [Hide this...
Click to read more »JSTOR · TWL) PROD contested by author. Actress does not meet the specific WP:NACTOR criteria nor is there significant coverage to satisfy WP:GNG. Two existing...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) I do not think this person meets WP:NACTOR. Per NACTOR, they must have multiple significant roles in notable productions...
Click to read more »Also do not believe the subject's career achievements meet the criteria of NACTOR. J04n(talk page) 14:40, 11 November 2014 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...
Click to read more »improved, expanded and sourced since nomination and the sources as well as the NACTOR side of things hasn't been refuted so I'm assuming the nom's happy with...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NACTOR: only significant credit appears to be in It Follows. Clarityfiend (talk)...
Click to read more »free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Does not appear to meet WP:NACTOR or WP:GNG. Hitro talk 07:24, 4 March 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...
Click to read more »delete. Consensus seems to be that the subject has not yet satisfied GNG or NACTOR, but may do so in the near future. It would seem that the consensus is therefore...
Click to read more »not had any significant roles as of now and sources fails to establish WP:NACTOR. Also, the reliable sources provided are only just a review about the movies...
Click to read more »Passed WP:NACTOR with significant roles in multiple notable TV series (Wingin' It and Ride). StAnselm (talk) 19:50, 3 March 2017 (UTC) NACTOR is passed...
Click to read more »seeing from the cited sources or elsewhere online how this can pass WP:NACTOR or WP:GNG. Edwardx (talk) 16:10, 15 September 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Minor actress, fails NACTOR and GNG. Only minor TV guest roles, no significant coverage ‡ El cid, el...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Minor contributions - does not meet WP:NACTOR Peter Rehse (talk) 23:33, 8 March 2017 (UTC) Delete not enough significant...
Click to read more »(UTC) Delete fails NACTOR and GNG DarjeelingTea (talk) 03:31, 14 April 2017 (UTC) Delete non notable movie maker. Fails WP:NACTOR. Searching provides...
Click to read more »is that GNG is not met - the keep arguments on that point are vague - so NACTOR is the only guideline that could justify the inclusion (under WP:N a topic...
Click to read more »listings, fluff pieces and one promo interview. Does not appear to meet WP:NACTOR. Elmidae (talk · contribs) 22:24, 16 July 2019 (UTC) CONFRONTING DELETION...
Click to read more »should be made to this page. The result was delete. Consensus that GNG/NACTOR are not satisfied Nosebagbear (talk) 13:57, 15 January 2020 (UTC) [Hide...
Click to read more »first is given very low weight for being "per X", but the suggestion that NACTOR has not been met was successfully refuted by MoviesandTelevisionFan. Stifle...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR. The actress has never acted in any films and has only appeared in few television...
Click to read more »through her filmography, while her role in My So-Called Life seems to be WP:NACTOR material, none of the other credited roles appear to meet that criteria...
Click to read more »free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Does not appear to meet WP:NACTOR or WP:GNG. Hitro talk 05:44, 10 April 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) The actor fails WP:NACTOR as acted in two films Katha (2009 film) and Prayanam in non-lead roles....
Click to read more »notability. Mccapra (talk) 17:22, 28 May 2020 (UTC) Delete for failing WP:NACTOR. Even if the abysmal references could be replaced with genuine ones, it...
Click to read more »search. Could maybe meet WP:NACTOR #1 (though doesn't appear likely) but I'll note a precedent per this AfD that an NACTOR pass may still fail BIO (see...
Click to read more »that is this interview in a source that does not look reliable. On the WP:NACTOR front, Legault appears to have had exactly one significant role in a notable...
Click to read more »JSTOR · TWL) WP:GNG DexDor (talk) 19:53, 13 March 2015 (UTC) Keep per WP:NACTOR #2 after reading the entry in the first source which said she had significant...
Click to read more »JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable actress, only few passing mentions. Fails WP:GNG, WP:Nactor DMySon 12:00, 14 May 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Deprodded without rationale. Fails WP:NACTOR, and searches did not turn up enough to show he passes WP:GNG. Onel5969...
Click to read more »free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Lacks notability; fails WP:NACTOR. Bgsu98 (talk) 18:50, 31 July 2022 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...
Click to read more »non-notable actress, model and dancer who does not meet WP:GNG, WP:ANYBIO or WP:NACTOR - no notable roles, contribution or coverage Akhiljaxxn (talk) 17:18, 30...
Click to read more »to meet WP:NACTOR Ravensfire (talk) 17:48, 15 October 2020 (UTC) Delete: Not having significant roles on multiple projects to pass WP:NACTOR - The9Man...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Notability is not justified. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR. DMySon (talk) 09:11, 2 September 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...
Click to read more »a single role which might be viewed as significant. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR. Onel5969 TT me 18:38, 22 November 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NACTOR, Lacks WP:SIGCOV. Most of the coverage is WP:ROUTINE and WP:ADMASQ. Similar...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NACTOR and WP:BASIC. A lot of "appearances" on a WP:BEFORE and some coverage related...
Click to read more »NACTORS doesn't apply to a subject's overall career. Whether they're 'minor' or major, they pass. Nate • (chatter) 20:18, 5 June 2022 (UTC) WP:NACTOR...
Click to read more »previous drama series. Seems to pass WP:NACTOR. —seav (talk) 10:57, 26 September 2015 (UTC) Keep: Per Nactor--Jondel (talk) 11:54, 27 September 2015 (UTC)...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) The article fails WP:NACTOR; none of his roles are significant enough. Hitcher vs. Candyman (talk) 20:00...
Click to read more »passes WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR as above. (Dushan Jugum (talk) 07:29, 3 April 2019 (UTC)). Keep: Definitely satisfies WP:GNG, WP:BIO, WP:NACTOR.--PATH SLOPU (TALK)...
Click to read more »JSTOR · TWL) Only one significant role and some small roles , failing WP:NACTOR Princepratap1234 (talk) 20:20, 24 January 2022 (UTC) Note: This discussion...
Click to read more »qualify as significant enough for WP:NACTOR.Canadianerk (talk) 16:24, 20 October 2021 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:NACTOR and WP:GNG, the only source I found...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR Princepratap1234 (talk) 20:21, 6 September 2021 (UTC) Should not be deleted...
Click to read more »it. Wgolf (talk) 21:19, 13 March 2019 (UTC) Delete. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR; see also WP:BLP1E. Only one IMDb role. — Stevey7788 (talk) 00:57, 14 March...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NACTOR and WP:GNG ( All sources only One TV Serial Sasural Simar Ka 2) PravinGanechari...
Click to read more »TWL) Fails WP:NACTOR according to the article's own filmography section. Played bit pieces, nearly an extra, in the notable films. NACTOR requires "significant...
Click to read more »non notable actor and musician who fails to satisfy any criterion from WP:NACTOR as she hasn’t taken up lead roles in the movies she has featured in or won...
Click to read more »made to this page. The result was Keep. Consensus is that this passes WP:NACTOR and WP:GNG. DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 01:38, 6 July 2017 (UTC) Brenda...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Does not meet WP:NACTOR as far as I can find. The sources I find are mostly to do with harassment...
Click to read more »improvement. Working but Non-notable actor. Does not pass WP:GNG or WP:NACTOR. There are several hits, but all of the trivial sort, or simply mentioning...
Click to read more »dance appearances (what they call Item numbers in Bollywood). She fails WP:NACTOR and lacks independent and in-depth coverage. FitIndia Talk Mail 08:39, 20...
Click to read more »TWL) I do not believe this individual meets the criteria of WP:GNG or WP:NACTOR. She has been in two films, and neither were as a leading role. The references...
Click to read more »2022 (UTC) Delete: No evidence of playing significant roles to meet WP:NACTOR. -- Ab207 (talk) 15:55, 25 January 2022 (UTC) Delete I see dozens of pages...
Click to read more »subject's notability? I'm not seeing any criteria at WP:NACTOR that Jon Simanton fulfills. WP:NACTOR requires multiple significant roles, all of these listed...
Click to read more »to keep said article, we need evidence that the actor meets WP:GNG or WP:NACTOR, which are the applicable standards. Vanamonde (Talk) 20:38, 28 February...
Click to read more »page. The result was keep. Article subject meets the requirements of WP:NACTOR. — Coffee // have a ☕️ // beans // 02:28, 19 December 2017 (UTC) Alice Dwyer...
Click to read more »should be made to this page. The result was keep. Clear consensus that NACTOR (as the appropriate notability grounds) is clearly satisfied (non-admin...
Click to read more »JSTOR · TWL) No evidence found for meeting notability criteria per WP:GNG, WP:NACTOR or WP:ANYBIO. A minor actor with some roles in independent films and music...
Click to read more »result was no consensus. Editors are divided in their assessment of whether NACTOR is met, and as such there is no consensus as to whether this person is notable...
Click to read more »GNG and NACTOR after checking notability. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 19:46, 15 March 2017 (UTC) Delete Per WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR. Comatmebro...
Click to read more »JSTOR · TWL) As far as I can see, he has only had one small role so fails WP:NACTOR. I'm not seeing any evidence that he passes WP:BASIC or WP:ANYBIO or any...
Click to read more »are not him. Praxidicae (talk) 19:22, 24 February 2019 (UTC) Keep per WP:NACTOR: "Has had significant roles in multiple notable films". IMDB gives him above-the-fold...
Click to read more »(justifiable by long discussion open time) to keep the article based on WP:NACTOR C1 (and the information is wp:verifiable). (non-admin closure) ~ Aseleste...
Click to read more »TWL) There are no roles that could be considered significant enough for WP:NACTOR. They are recurring roles but not significant enough in context of the entire...
Click to read more »Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 22:40, 17 April 2021 (UTC) Keep, if we look at WP:NACTOR, it says the subject needs to have significant roles in multiple shows/films...
Click to read more »fundamental disagreement here about whether or not this subject passes WP:NACTOR because of work done since the last AFD in 2019. I see that many accounts...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NACTOR Collaboratio (talk) 12:20, 6 August 2019 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...
Click to read more »role in a US cable TV series this month. As such, he doesn't yet meet WP:NACTOR (which requires multiple significant roles in notable productions). Maybe...
Click to read more »a significant role in the film or shows listed in the article. Fails WP:NACTOR and WP:GNG. GSS 💬 12:35, 21 February 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...
Click to read more »notable actress who doesn’t satisfy WP:NACTOR seeing as she doesn’t apper to satisfy any criterion from NACTOR as she hasn’t & doesn’t feature in any...
Click to read more »significant roles played in multiple notable productions to qualify for WP:NACTOR. Also fails WP:GNG and WP:BLP1E. Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 08:42, 13 January...
Click to read more »wheat here, but doesn't appear underneath it to pass either WP:GNG or WP:NACTOR. Lacks in-depth coverage anywhere unless you count decidedly-not-RS listicles...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Easily fails WP:NACTOR. No significant roles or contributions. – Ploni (talk) 11:36, 3 June 2022...
Click to read more »the main cast at Kumkum Bhagya so there is some notability at WP:NACTOR but even NACTOR requires multiple roles. So we can't use that to establish notability...
Click to read more »credits to satisfy WP:NACTOR. Wikipedia is not a memorial. Clarityfiend (talk) 22:53, 27 April 2019 (UTC) Delete per WP:NACTOR. The subject is an actress...
Click to read more »be move warring. WP:IAR does not apply here, so we are at AfD. Fails WP:NACTOR/WP:NMUSICIAN. References, while in ostensibly reliable sources, are pure...
Click to read more »JSTOR · TWL) Delete this article per WP:NYA and failing all clauses of WP:NACTOR until actor has had significant roles in movie and television. This child...
Click to read more »role in a released film and that was a supporting role.Does not pass WP:NACTOR or WP:GNG at this time. His upcoming film is a University project film here...
Click to read more »WP:BLP of an actor, who has a potentially valid claim of notability under WP:NACTOR as a cast member in a popular television series, but who isn't properly...
Click to read more »criteria. Creator of article immediately removed Notability tag. Fails WP:NACTOR and WP:GNG GermanKity (talk) 03:30, 31 May 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NACTOR. She has had minor roles in TV shows and some music videos. Princepratap1234...
Click to read more »Google Books and Google News did not turn anything that can help pass WP:NACTOR. Most notable role is in Neighbours but the article's subject only played...
Click to read more »well), and there is also no question that the subject easily clears WP:NACTOR since her breakthrough in Friday the 13th (2009 film). --IJBall (contribs...
Click to read more »are fails to show notability. Fails WP:NACTOR Nitesh003(TALK) 07:54, 20 November 2021 (UTC) Delete fails WP:NACTOR and WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk)...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Actress may not meet WP:NACTOR or the lower WP:GNG. I couldn't find any significant third party coverage...
Click to read more »Clearly this was a mistake on my part. Subject of this article passes WP:NACTOR. (non-admin closure) AleatoryPonderings (talk) 14:22, 13 October 2020 (UTC)...
Click to read more »WP:NACTOR and WP:CREATIVE. A good faith search for information about Vishwam turns up minor roles, but nothing that would indicate (per WP:NACTOR) unique...
Click to read more »or NACTOR, She is passing WP:NACTOR. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.243.187.60 (talk) 13:43, 31 January 2019 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:NACTOR and...
Click to read more »TWL) The article was previously PROD and deleted for not satisfying WP:NACTOR. He acted in a number of Punjabi films but none of them appear to be notable...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NACTOR; he’s only had one significant role in Break Every Chain. The article was...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) The article fails WP:NACTOR; none of her roles are significant enough (though I will admit her role...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR. This actress has only had one role of note, the voice of Helga Pataki on...
Click to read more »false claims in the article of multiple "lead" roles. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR. Onel5969 TT me 13:04, 11 August 2019 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...
Click to read more »Delete: Note that Draft:Romil_Chaudhary exists. This article fails to show WP:NACTOR is met, and the sources don't show WP:GNG is met. Tellychakkar is generally...
Click to read more »who has played some minor roles in a handful of Nigerian films. Fails WP:NACTOR Shoerack (talk) 22:08, 10 January 2023 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Subject does not meet WP:NACTOR, WP:ANYBIO or WP:GNG. The google hits at first give the impression of significant...
Click to read more »meets WP:NACTOR #1. RebeccaGreen (talk) 16:01, 25 January 2019 (UTC) Keep per improvements made by Rebecca during the AfD. She meets WP:NACTOR, and the...
Click to read more »grounds for WP:PROF. And no major lead roles in any films, thus fails WP:NACTOR too. The article is mainly about the controversies and his participation...
Click to read more »WP:NSINGER and WP:NACTOR. Non-notable. --Kemalcan (talk) 18:22, 14 March 2021 (UTC) Delete: Clearly fails WP:GNG, WP:SINGER, and WP:NACTOR. -- LACaliNYC✉...
Click to read more »is more or less acceptable. No significant coverage found. Also fails WP:NACTOR. Less Unless (talk) 13:25, 2 November 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...
Click to read more »TWL) With one borderline significant role (Twin Peaks), does not meet WP:NACTOR, and doesn't meet WP:GNG. Simply a working actress for a few years. Onel5969...
Click to read more »actors who haven't been shown to pass NACTOR, not to keep other articles about actors not properly shown to pass NACTOR. Bearcat (talk) 16:41, 10 January...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NACTOR. Fails WP:BIO, WP:GNG. Is WP:VANISPAMCRUFTISEMENT . Please see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet...
Click to read more »made to this page. The result was Keep as all votes were for Keep per WP:NACTOR also passed WP:GNG. (non-admin closure) Aj Ajay Mehta 007 (talk) 18:48,...
Click to read more »Withdrawn - duffbeerforme has finally presented sources, Subject clearly meets NACTOR and GNG. (non-admin closure) –Dave | Davey2010Talk 14:53, 5 September 2019...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Minor voice actor who fails WP:NACTOR. Not even listed in IMDb. Clarityfiend (talk) 23:19, 26 February 2018 (UTC)...
Click to read more »sources, does not pass WP:NACTOR , WP:GNG. Alex-h (talk) 09:14, 6 May 2020 (UTC) Weak Keep: There is, at most, a very weak WP:NACTOR argument to be made, on...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NACTOR. Appeared as a main cast member in one long running soap opera, but otherwise...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Subject fails WP:NACTOR. Despite lengthy list of credits, notability not established. JimKrause...
Click to read more »this British voice actor. Fails WP:NACTOR and WP:GNG Scr★pIronIV 14:46, 23 April 2018 (UTC) Delete- fails NACTOR, imdb is not a source, and promotional...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Nothing to show this person meets WP:NACTOR or WP:GNG Ravensfire (talk) 17:25, 30 December 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion...
Click to read more »NACTOR & GNG Ofcourse If you or anyone can find anything I'd be more than happy to withdraw but as it stands now she unfortunately fails both NACTOR and...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:GNG and possibly fails WP:NACTOR too: I tried a lot but failed to find significant coverage in independent...
Click to read more »discussions. ChunnuBhai (talk) 08:28, 11 December 2021 (UTC) Delete: Fails WP:NACTOR, no major role. Need to win some important awards and detailed coverage...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) It doesn't meet WP:NACTOR. Only appearances in very small and/or independent productions. None of...
Click to read more »to pass WP:GNG, and with only a single significant role, doesn't meet WP:NACTOR." Gbawden (talk) 06:15, 15 December 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...
Click to read more »FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Does not have multiple significant roles to satisfy WP:NACTOR; mostly minor appearances in series. As a result of this, she does not have...
Click to read more »better. There's no suggestion in the career details of notability per WP:NACTOR either. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:19, 28 September 2022 (UTC) Note: This...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NACTOR 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 10:33, 17 July 2022 (UTC) Note:...
Click to read more »AleatoryPonderings (talk) 20:58, 12 September 2020 (UTC) Delete per WP:NACTOR and WP:GNG. Google, JSTOR, ProQuest, Gale and NYT searches did not yield...
Click to read more »Brother: Kumunity Season 10. Fails WP:NACTOR per nom. SBKSPP (talk) 00:58, 20 April 2022 (UTC) Redirect Fails WP:NACTOR and WP:GNG, brief stint on show. Easily...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NACTOR. No major roles, no significant news coverage. Rogermx (talk) 18:45, 7 March...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NACTOR. Störm (talk) 19:27, 12 November 2019 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NACTOR; none of his roles are significant enough. Hitcher vs. Candyman (talk) 14:12...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NACTOR due to a lack of significant coverage of her roles, as is required by WP:NACTOR, WP:BASIC, and WP:GNG. TheSandDoctor...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Contested PROD. Fails WP:NACTOR and WP:GNG JMHamo (talk) 13:15, 4 July 2015 (UTC) Delete Clearly a different...
Click to read more »referenced as passing WP:NACTOR. The notability claim here is that roles have been had, which is not an automatic free pass over NACTOR #1 in the absence of...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NACTOR. Seems to have only played a handful of minor roles in a few movies/shows...
Click to read more »free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Minor actress who fails WP:NACTOR and WP:ANYBIO due to a lack of significant, notable roles, which is unsurprising...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Does not pass either WP:NACTOR or WP:GNG. Item has been submitted and declined several times without much...
Click to read more »free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Does not appear to meet WP:NACTOR. Most of the content is padding. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 18:27...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:SIGCOV, WP:NACTOR. References are primary, early stage PR, puff pieces. Note tag added several...
Click to read more »free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) No major works to pass WP:NACTOR or no significant coverage to pass WP:GNG. A probable case of WP:TOOSOON...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Believe fails WP:NACTOR, very unsourced BLP - RichT|C|E-Mail 15:38, 30 May 2020 (UTC) Note: This...
Click to read more »role that is not attested by sources in a film once does not satisfy WP:NACTOR even if that film was a Star Wars film. The article doesn't say what creature...
Click to read more »TWL) Fails general notability guideline and no evidence of satisfying WP:NACTOR. GSS (talk|c|em) 13:56, 15 July 2018 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...
Click to read more »potentially pass NACTOR with additional references discovered from an expert on this subject, cleanup is needed. However, this fails NACTOR at this current...
Click to read more »discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 21:30, 8 September 2019 (UTC) Keep. No need for WP:NACTOR. This person satisfies WP:NMUSIC 2 and 10. Her iDOLM@STER character's three...
Click to read more »(UTC) Delete does not meet WP:NACTOR, no citations.Peter303x (talk) 23:59, 16 April 2021 (UTC) Delete: Fails WP:NACTOR and WP:GNG. Seems like a random...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non notable entry. No significant work fails WP:NACTOR — Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.145.186.254 (talk) 18:27, October...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR nothing proves that his roles are significant or that the films are notable...
Click to read more »JSTOR · TWL) Autobiography of an actress who doesn't appear to meet WP:NACTOR criteria for inclusion. ~Anachronist (talk) 05:45, 18 March 2017 (UTC) Note:...
Click to read more »TWL) Fails WP:NACTOR and WP:BASIC for lack of available reliable sources. - MrX 12:23, 13 November 2016 (UTC) Delete as WP:TOOSOON. WP:NACTOR is marginal...
Click to read more »JSTOR · TWL) Subject does not meet any of the notability criteria of WP:NACTOR. The article states they have a single role to date; normally I would redirect...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NACTOR, WP:GNG. The actress has acted into only two films and has received some...
Click to read more »nominations or awards, article looks more like resume, Article fails WP:NACTOR and is basically WP:TOOSOON..Why was it not deleted 3 years back is unbelievable...
Click to read more »in porn stars, but I do not quite see how the person passes WP:GNG or WP:NACTOR. Note that some of the films she supposedly acted in have Wikipedia articles...
Click to read more »search for coverage leads me to believe that the subject clearly fails WP:NACTOR. — Blablubbs (talk • contribs) 12:23, 17 August 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion...
Click to read more »TWL) The actress has only one significant role in Pilu (TV series) (WP:NACTOR requires multiple significant roles), rest of them are reality show appearances...
Click to read more »delete at this time. The article subject falls within the letter of WP:NACTOR, which suggests that perhaps the criteria need to be tightened. bd2412 T...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NACTOR and WP:GNG. I can only find one interview, in something called Rivetting...
Click to read more »TWL) WP:APPARENTCOI article on a non notable actor who fails to meet WP:NACTOR as they are yet to take significant lead roles in multiple movies neither...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable person who fails WP:NACTOR. SamHolt6 (talk) 03:53, 9 September 2017 (UTC) Additional sources including...
Click to read more »(UTC) No criterion in WP:NACTOR can be passed just by asserting that he satisfies an NACTOR criterion — an actor gets past NACTOR by having a reasonable...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Does not have multiple major roles, fails WP:NACTOR. Article was redirect to single major role, but keeps being pushed into...
Click to read more »No evidence she played a significant role in Kala Varam Aaye. Fails WP:NACTOR and a case of WP:TOOSOON. GSS 💬 17:33, 18 June 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion...
Click to read more »(UTC) NACTOR is not automatically passed just because an actor has had roles — every actor would always get an automatic free pass over NACTOR if simply...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NACTOR. It is one of many promotional articles created for Bigg Boss (Tamil TV...
Click to read more »Quis separabit? 03:51, 5 March 2017 (UTC) Keep I think he does pass WP:NACTOR, The Doris Day Show was nominated for 2 golden globes and he played one...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Contested prod. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR. None of the sources provided in the article are reliable sources that are...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NACTOR as well as WP:SIGCOV. ManaliJain (talk) 14:37, 8 April 2022 (UTC) Note:...
Click to read more »satisfy any criterion from WP:NACTOR as they have no taken up lead roles in multiple movies they featured in as required by NACTOR. A before search links me...
Click to read more »him doesn't reveal sources that establish notability. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 10:50, 25 March 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Borderline notability, fails WP:NACTOR. Article under an incorrect name since the real name Farah Karimaee has...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NACTOR with no sources at all. Sheldybett (talk) 16:44, 3 June 2019 (UTC) Note:...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) I could not establish that he meets WP:NACTOR or WP:GNG. Boleyn (talk) 19:34, 1 December 2018 (UTC) Delete - The only...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Doesn't seem to pass WP:NACTOR , Being wife of an Indian Musician doesnt pass this for an stand alone Article...
Click to read more »independent coverage by reliable sources required for WP:GNG. Whether he meets WP:NACTOR probably comes down to your interpretation of 'significant roles', 'multiple'...
Click to read more »independent refs. Fails WP:NACTOR Velella Velella Talk 13:29, 26 August 2018 (UTC) Delete - lacks sufficient coverage and fails WP:NACTOR --Adamstraw99 (talk)...
Click to read more »I suppose, if one looks at the bare minimum, she just barely passes WP:NACTOR (which is why this is just a soft delete). However, when looking at the...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Does not pass WP:NACTOR. Lacks in depth significant coverage in reliable sources and doesn’t scale...
Click to read more »major role in any of the television shows listed in the article so fails WP:NACTOR as well. GSS (talk|c|em) 07:44, 25 February 2017 (UTC) Note: This debate...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Article fails WP:NACTOR; none of his roles are significant enough. Hitcher vs. Candyman (talk) 00:37...
Click to read more »COI. More concerning though is that the article subject does not meet WP:NACTOR – at best, we have one possibly "significant role" on a sketch comedy TV...
Click to read more »be made to this page. The result was delete. per consensus, WP:BIO, WP:NACTOR, WP:GNG. Doczilla @SUPERHEROLOGIST 23:01, 19 December 2021 (UTC) [Hide this...
Click to read more »page. The result was keep. Consensus is that subject clearly passes WP:NACTOR (non-admin closure) Smartyllama (talk) 17:29, 25 May 2018 (UTC) Brigitte...
Click to read more »films and has not received significant media coverage either. Fails WP:NACTOR. Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails GNG and fails both criteria under WP:NACTOR. Furthermore, their most noteworthy contribution, the Peloton ad, is already...
Click to read more »and his acting career has not yet reached the level required to pass WP:NACTOR. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 21:59, 4 July 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion...
Click to read more »FENS · JSTOR · TWL) No indication this subject meets either WP:BASIC or WP:NACTOR. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 20:18, 15 June 2019 (UTC) Note: This discussion...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NACTOR. Mostly one-off appearances or very minor roles. The "recurring role" in...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Subject, a retired child actor, fails both WP:NACTOR and WP:BASIC – e.g. only one or two passing mentions in Variety, The Hollywood...
Click to read more »recurring role and a main role in a miniseries), so not enough to satisfy WP:NACTOR in my opinion. There is no WP:SIGCOV about her career, therefore she does...
Click to read more »free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Not a notable actor. Fails WP:NACTOR. I can't see lead roles or any significant work. Cinzia007 (talk) 12:52...
Click to read more »removed. PROD reason was No independent reliable resources, Fails WP:GNG, WP:NACTOR Geraldo Perez (talk) 02:01, 16 June 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NACTOR no major roles done Tulkijasi (talk) 07:27, 1 June 2021 (UTC) Note: This...
Click to read more »WP:NACTOR. As always, actors are not automatically entitled to have Wikipedia articles just because they've been in stuff -- even just to pass NACTOR #1...
Click to read more »multiple reliable sources, fails WP:GNG. Also doesn't seem to have passed WP:NACTOR. —UY Scuti Talk 13:24, 12 January 2016 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...
Click to read more »third-party source found and the article only list one source. Thus fails WP:NACTOR and the much lower WP:GNG. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 03:01...
Click to read more »films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions. fails WP:NACTOR, WP:GNG. DMySon 04:24, 30 July 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...
Click to read more »Fails WP:GNG due to lack of significant coverage. Also does not pass WP:NACTOR. Could be WP:TOOSOON. AmirŞah 00:36, 12 November 2022 (UTC) Note: This discussion...
Click to read more »one role in a TV serial), thus failing WP:NACTOR. —usernamekiran(talk) 18:34, 29 September 2018 (UTC) WP:NACTOR is an entirely different standard. Irrelevant...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Delete - Fails WP:NACTOR he has done only 2 uncredited supporting roles in Indian television shows...
Click to read more »Keep The subject is meeting WP:NACTOR. Bapinghosh (talk) 19:27, 23 August 2021 (UTC) Delete Doesn't qualify WP:NACTOR. Sources are either not independent...
Click to read more »(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:NACTOR is not met, none of the parts appear to be of any signifigance. I couldn't...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) May not meet WP:NACTOR, WP:GNG. – robertsky (talk) 03:36, 20 July 2022 (UTC) Note: This discussion...
Click to read more »she played a significant role in films listed in the article. Fails WP:NACTOR and WP:GNG. The article was created by an undisclosed paid editor who has...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NACTOR, WP:V. It is one of many promotional articles created for Bigg Boss (Tamil...
Click to read more »sources hence falls short of WP:GNG. Furthermore she is an actor but WP:NACTOR isn’t satisfied & a singer, but no criterion from WP:SINGER is satisfied...
Click to read more »2018 (UTC) Delete - Fails WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR. GSS (talk|c|em) 06:38, 9 September 2018 (UTC) Delete-Fails WP:NACTOR by a mile or so.∯WBGconverse 13:28, 12...
Click to read more »FENS · JSTOR · TWL) The subject worked only in two reality shows. Fails WP:NACTOR . Needs more significant coverage. And does not pass WP:GNG. DMySon (talk)...
Click to read more »not meet criteria for an article" is not a valid reason. Article meets WP:NACTOR, "Has had significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows...
Click to read more »the article except Jat Jatin and Chauhar which are not notable. Fails WP:NACTOR and general notability guideline. GSS (talk|c|em) 08:01, 31 May 2017 (UTC)...
Click to read more »an WP:NACTOR pass. This is staking notability entirely on one regular role, but if you're going for "notable because he's been in stuff" NACTOR requires...
Click to read more »reliable sources, and no significant roles in notable productions to meet WP:NACTOR. Ab207 (talk) 11:40, 25 December 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...
Click to read more »free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Does not appear to pass WP:NACTOR, with results returning, at most, passing mentions. TheSandDoctor Talk 19:18...
Click to read more »discussions. Curbon7 (talk) 11:32, 2 August 2021 (UTC) Keep: Passes WP:NACTOR. Voiced the lead roles in the English dubs for March Comes in Like a Lion...
Click to read more »JSTOR · TWL) A working actress, but truly zero significant roles. Fails WP:NACTOR and WP:GNG. Onel5969 TT me 20:49, 2 February 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:GNG ,WP:NMODEL and WP:NACTOR .Did not have has had significant roles in any of the TV serials and was...
Click to read more »presented are inadequate and the film roles provided are not enough to meet WP:NACTOR. I have found no substantial coverage that would make the subject pass WP:GNG...
Click to read more »articles [4][5] Thsmi002 (talk) 07:16, 7 January 2018 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:NACTOR. References provided to support keep are all primary sources sourced to...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Doesn't pass WP:NACTOR and WP:GNG. At best may be a redirect to Years and Years (TV series) ☆★Mamushir...
Click to read more »advertorial article about an actress and model with no strong claim to passing WP:NACTOR or WP:NMODEL. The strongest claim here, that she was the face of a luxury...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NACTOR and WP:GNG. Plays supporting roles only. The references included are mere...
Click to read more »evidence of notability, Fails NACTOR & GNG –Davey2010Talk 08:35, 21 August 2015 (UTC) It seems she actually passes NACTOR so I've amended that but I still...
Click to read more »page. The result was delete. No evidence of notability via WP:GNG or WP:NACTOR. j⚛e deckertalk 03:41, 5 July 2012 (UTC) Tanuj Mahashabde (edit | talk |...
Click to read more »WP:BASIC Arthistorian1977 (talk) 22:47, 21 January 2017 (UTC) Delete per WP:NACTOR. Playing in a few low-budget films doesn't constitue notability, especially...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Subject of the article fails WP:NACTOR. He only played a minor role in Nandanavanam 120km perhaps WP:TOOSOON Wikic¤l¤gyt@lk...
Click to read more »in-depth sources to show she passes WP:GNG, and definitely doesn't meet WP:NACTOR Onel5969 TT me 23:49, 19 August 2017 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...
Click to read more »campaign. Remaining references are mention. Does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NACTOR Whiteguru (talk) 23:37, 19 December 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Autobiography of a non notable actor. Fails WP:NACTOR, and WP:GNG. —usernamekiran(talk) 18:50, 7 February 2018 (UTC) Relisted...
Click to read more »JSTOR · TWL) Not enough in-depth coverage to pass WP:GNG, and doesn't meet WP:NACTOR. Onel5969 TT me 15:40, 22 February 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NACTOR as they are yet to feature in lead roles neither have they won any significant...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) He does not yet meet WP:GNG or WP:NACTORS, from what I can see. May well just be a case of WP:TOOSOON Shawn in Montreal...
Click to read more »doesn’t demonstrate notability. The subject’s acting career doesn’t pass WP:NACTOR. As a politician, he was appointed (not elected) to a local council and...
Click to read more »homosexual mainstream film, passes WP:NACTOR, thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 22:14, 2 June 2019 (UTC) Delete Fails NACTOR; I deem A306's claim to notability to...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NACTOR due to fewer major roles that she starred in and nothing else. Sheldybett...
Click to read more »free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails both WP:NBOX and WP:NACTOR. PRehse (talk) 15:54, 12 October 2018 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...
Click to read more »error on his part does not affect consideration of this topic meeting WP:NACTOR. But thanks for pointing out the noob's error. Schmidt, Michael Q. 12:09...
Click to read more »NACTOR, no RS. Spyder212 (talk) 04:47, 27 April 2019 (UTC) Delete only minor film roles and one-episode television roles so does not pass WP:NACTOR as...
Click to read more »JSTOR · TWL) At WP:BIO, Angel Theory fails the criteria for notability at WP:NACTOR. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 20:54, 19 March 2021 (UTC) Note: This...
Click to read more »JSTOR · TWL) Non notable actor with no indication of satisfying either WP:NACTOR or WP:GNG. The subject is only known for playing Hanuman in Ramayan and...
Click to read more »significant coverage jumping out of a Google search, arguably could satisfy WP:NACTOR ("Has had significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows...
Click to read more »Thanks, North America1000 08:27, 2 July 2021 (UTC) Keep per Wikipedia:NACTOR. Djflem (talk) 04:09, 3 July 2021 (UTC) Relisted to generate a more thorough...
Click to read more »actor with one TV episode and one acting job in a 14-minute film. Fails WP:NACTOR. No independent, reliable references that are about him. His sister's article...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) End-to-end WP:PROMO. Fails WP:GNG, WP:NACTOR. Lacks WP:RS/WP:RSP. Possible WP:COI/WP:UPE. Creator of this page has also...
Click to read more »discussions. Shellwood (talk) 18:38, 9 October 2019 (UTC) Keep. The subject meets NACTOR outside of the Iris context: major characters in Dance with Devils, Izetta:...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) One role in The Great Debaters doesn't satisfy WP:NACTOR. He does get a substantial (if negative) mention in The New York Times film...
Click to read more »May 2020 (UTC) Delete – clear WP:NACTOR fail. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 03:30, 29 May 2020 (UTC) Delete per NACTOR, GNG. Wikipedia is not the place to...
Click to read more »sources and fails WP:NACTOR. GSS (talk|c|em) 13:28, 18 September 2018 (UTC) Delete per lack of reliable sources and failing NACTOR. StrikerforceTalk 14:20...
Click to read more »he does not met WP:NACTOR. --Kemalcan (talk) 12:22, 30 January 2021 (UTC) Keep. Not sure why people are stating he fails WP:NACTOR, when according to...
Click to read more »free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Does not appear to satisfy WP:NACTOR, and has no WP:SIGCOV. – DarkGlow (✉) 21:25, 16 January 2021 (UTC) Note:...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Sype doesn't appear to meet WP:NACTOR. Article was previously redirected to Monster Math Squad by a bold edit...
Click to read more »WP:NACTOR. Alex-h (talk) 12:38, 9 August 2020 (UTC) Delete non notable --Devokewater@ 12:44, 9 August 2020 (UTC) Delete since subject fails WP:NACTOR and...
Click to read more »free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Doesn't appear to meet WP:NACTOR, which would require roles in multiple notable productions. FalconK (talk)...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Does not meet WP:NACTOR or WP:GNG. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 15:32, 14 December 2018 (UTC) Delete one...
Click to read more »15:19, 23 March 2015 (UTC) Delete—fails WP:NACTOR. Chander 16:38, 23 March 2015 (UTC) Delete as fails WP:NACTOR and WP:GNG, Cant find any evidence of notability...
Click to read more »notable actress, Google brings up mentions but nothing substantial, Fails NACTOR & GNG. –Davey2010Talk 21:55, 25 October 2016 (UTC) Note: This debate has...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR: I can't find anything in reliable sources to support/verify her role in...
Click to read more »free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) I admit the article passes WP:NACTOR since Mondesir has had significant roles in Seventeen Again, Grave Encounters...
Click to read more »notice. Thanks, RL0919 (talk) 18:18, 28 September 2019 (UTC) Delete - WP:NACTOR is not met ☆ Bri (talk) 23:15, 28 September 2019 (UTC) Keep passes WP:ANYBIO...
Click to read more »of an actor and musician, not properly referenced as passing either WP:NACTOR or WP:NMUSIC. The only notability claim as a musician is that he was a member...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NACTOR and WP:GNG. A search for references yielded poor results; I really only...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable Indian actress, fails WP:NACTOR. John B123 (talk) 12:40, 5 September 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Does not meet criteria of WP:GNG or WP:NACTOR. He has appeared in bit parts in a lot of shows but nothing substantive...
Click to read more »criteria of WP:NACTOR. Searching found nothing helpful beyond current sources. Gab4gab (talk) 18:15, 19 November 2016 (UTC) Delete. Fails NACTOR. Arun Kumar...
Click to read more »FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Not enough to meet WP:GNG, acting roles don't meet WP:NACTOR and a handful of state level amateur events don't meet WP:NSPORT Ravensfire...
Click to read more »rationale, "fixed typo", without improvement. Fails both WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR. Onel5969 TT me 03:55, 16 April 2017 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...
Click to read more »the WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR. -- LACaliNYC✉ 21:16, 3 February 2019 (UTC) Delete. Actors are not handed an automatic free pass over WP:NACTOR just because they've...
Click to read more »sources in the future. Lamona (talk) 03:14, 5 April 2022 (UTC) Keep per WP:NACTOR/WP:BASIC - she appears to be better known as Chesca Salcedo, and has coverage...
Click to read more »article is a non notable actor as do not satisfy any criterion from WP:NACTOR as they haven’t featured in multiple lead roles nor won any significant...
Click to read more »delete. Looks like the consensus is that the topic does not in fact satisfy NACTOR Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 20:35, 4 February 2020 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to...
Click to read more »filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:12, 11 July 2012 (UTC) WP:NACTOR states a notable actor: "Has had significant roles in multiple notable films...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NACTOR with sparse and unnotable credits. Clarityfiend (talk) 14:26, 20 July 2026...
Click to read more »actor, not properly referenced as having any strong claim to passing WP:NACTOR. As always, actors do not all get an automatic free notability pass just...
Click to read more »have been in one small series. No indication of being notable. Fails WP:NACTOR. scope_creepTalk 14:48, 7 July 2022 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NACTOR and WP:GNG plus WP:TOOSOON. ManaliJain (talk) 06:56, 9 February 2022 (UTC)...
Click to read more »be made to this page. The result was keep. Consensus was they pass WP:NACTOR. (non-admin closure) Onel5969 TT me 17:49, 22 March 2019 (UTC) [Hide this...
Click to read more »JSTOR · TWL) Insufficient reliable sources to show that this person meets WP:NACTOR. I moved the article to Draft:Madhumita G Das, but author recreated the...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR: Does not appear to be a notable person. A Google search for "N P Suhaid"...
Click to read more »COI promotional article on a non notable actor who fails to satisfy WP:NACTOR and lacks in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources independent...
Click to read more »to this page. The result was keep. Consensus is that this person passes NACTOR. (non-admin closure) Onel5969 TT me 13:43, 26 January 2016 (UTC) Jeff MacKay...
Click to read more »Philippines. Very easily satisfies WP:NACTOR. Ross-c (talk) 21:44, 26 April 2015 (UTC) Keep the bar set by WP:NACTOR is pretty low for notability. arguably...
Click to read more »(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) per WP:NACTOR. In addition to that, the only 3 sources there are speak in general about...
Click to read more »JSTOR · TWL) Not enough in-depth coverage to pass WP:GNG, and doesn't meet WP:NACTOR. Onel5969 TT me 04:22, 16 March 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...
Click to read more »address the heart of WP:NACTOR which fundamentally is a guide to help determine if this person could meet WP:GNG. Even if they meet NACTOR, the second step is...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Actor fails WP:NACTOR as she has not had a lead role in two or more notable films. A BEFORE (JSTOR...
Click to read more »free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Unsourced BLP that fails WP:NACTOR. BangJan1999 19:30, 27 July 2017 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) No indication of notability, fails WP:NACTOR, WP:GNG. DMySon (talk) 02:21, 31 October 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion...
Click to read more »works are in non lead roles and also doesn't seem notable. So fails WP:NACTOR. Chirota (talk) 23:25, 16 April 2021 (UTC) Withdrawn by nominator - Per...
Click to read more »result was delete. No evidence of notability presented under WP:GNG or WP:NACTOR. j⚛e deckertalk 14:34, 4 July 2012 (UTC) Jheel Mehta (edit | talk | history |...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non notable actress who falls short of WP:NACTOR A before I conducted shows her mentioned in trivial gossipy scandals of...
Click to read more »this page. The result was speedy keep. per SK1 - I've made my points on NACTOR as well as the "LOOK AT WHERE THEY ARE NOW" sources so many times at this...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Subject does not meet WP:NACTOR (or WP:BASIC) – biggest role to date is on Cloak & Dagger (TV series), but...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non notable actor. Fails WP:GNG, and WP:NACTOR. An anon de-PRoD'ed the article, the only award won by te actor is not much...
Click to read more »so that multiple roles enable WP:NACTOR to be passed. Atlantic306 (talk) 17:06, 23 May 2016 (UTC) Keep passes NACTOR. Megalibrarygirl (talk) 01:56, 24...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR: No significant coverage in independent reliable sources and I don't see...
Click to read more »WP:NACTOR and no reliable source coverage to support it. His roles so far appear to be minor ones, not "major" roles for the purposes of clearing NACTOR...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Simply does not meet either WP:GNG or WP:NACTOR. Onel5969 TT me 08:48, 30 December 2019 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NACTOR and WP:GNG.It is case of WP:TOOSOON and is currently not notable VanishingRainbow...
Click to read more »per WP:NACTOR. Hmlarson (talk) 23:53, 10 May 2018 (UTC) Keep as per @Atlantic306:. Ross-c (talk) 06:49, 11 May 2018 (UTC) Keep, meets WP:NACTOR as significant...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NACTOR and WP:GNG. Only minor roles in few series TheChronium 14:01, 15 August...
Click to read more »to keep, failed to give any specific examples of sources which meet WP:NACTOR -- RoySmith (talk) 17:19, 20 January 2019 (UTC) AfDs for this article: Articles...
Click to read more »Has been deleted twice before. Nothing done of note since last AfD. Fails NACTOR and GNG. Onel5969 TT me 20:10, 12 December 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Appears to fail WP:NACTOR. – Ploni (talk) 16:39, 23 June 2022 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...
Click to read more »film and television. Fails WP:BASIC with no secondary sources, fails WP:NACTOR for lacking "significant roles". Not seeing any press coverage. McGeddon...
Click to read more »on him (which I cannot be arsed to link), Plus as noted below he meets NACTOR anyway, Consensus is to keep (non-admin closure) –Davey2010Talk 21:58, 28...
Click to read more »JSTOR · TWL) A few minor roles in film and television, doesn't pass WP:NACTOR, and there is virtually no in-depth coverage of her in independent, reliable...
Click to read more »meets WP:NACTOR, article now reflects this, thanks to Lonehexagon. Coolabahapple (talk) 13:13, 13 April 2018 (UTC) Delete fails WP:NACTOR, only minor...
Click to read more »not very notable and he's a participant in a reality show. It fails WP:NACTOR and WP:GNG Coderzombie (talk) 12:18, 10 March 2018 (UTC) Note: This discussion...
Click to read more »Unsourced article of a lesser known Mexican actor. Seems to fail WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR. Only source provided is a random magazine article, which talks about a...
Click to read more »TWL) Created as a redirect to a now deleted page. Appears to fail NMUSIC/NACTOR. Background: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Asad Ali Palijo, [1], [2] KH-1...
Click to read more »WP:NACTOR. Clarityfiend (talk) 07:20, 7 May 2020 (UTC) Weak Keep: The subject has also had main roles in a number of plays, so I think WP:NACTOR is met...
Click to read more »FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:BLP of an actor, not reliably sourced as passing WP:NACTOR. The notability claims here are bit parts (mostly as unnamed characters)...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NACTOR; he’s only had one significant role in Election. The Film Creator (talk)...
Click to read more »unsourced WP:BLP (and has been since its creation) that does not pass WP:NACTOR (no "significant" – e.g. main cast in a TV series – roles). --IJBall (contribs...
Click to read more »explain which parts of WP:NACTOR and WP:AUTHOR you think Klein passes, because I'm not following your argument? WP:NACTOR seems particularly peculiar...
Click to read more »keep because she meets NACTOR. So now we’re in a situation where we have to decide if career specific notability guidelines (NACTOR) is greater than the...
Click to read more »role in a lot of movies and shows, but that is not enough to satisfy WP:NACTOR as far as I'm aware. TryKid [dubious – discuss] 14:32, 6 October 2022 (UTC)...
Click to read more »supporting roles in a number of other films too, so he might just pass WP:NACTOR. He appears to be an up and coming actor, so I'd be willing to let the article...
Click to read more »free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Declined at Afc. Doesn't meet nactor, npov, wp:aud nor sigcov. scope_creepTalk 19:14, 17 September 2021 (UTC)...
Click to read more »FENS · JSTOR · TWL)(in Japanese) Fails WP:BASIC. Doesn't seem to meet WP:NACTOR--180.172.239.231 (talk) 03:23, 28 July 2014 (UTC) Comment - I completed...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:GNG, WP:SINGER, WP:WP:NACTOR. All citations are just passing single mention only. No SIGCOV anywhere...
Click to read more »creation in 2009. Fails WP:NACTOR (only notable role was supporting role on Harper's Island, which alone does not satisfy NACTOR), and fails WP:GNG outright...
Click to read more »subject passes NACTOR, but he definitely passes GNG for his time period. —usernamekiran(talk) 05:35, 23 April 2019 (UTC) Keep Passes WP:NACTOR, WP:GNG, WP:BASIC...
Click to read more »free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) No indication of meeting WP:NACTOR. No significant coverage at Google News or Google Books. Cyphoidbomb (talk)...
Click to read more »TWL) While a working actress, simply doesn't meet the criteria as per wp:nactor. Similarly, while she has had some press, all of the in-depth coverage is...
Click to read more »waste of time. Although unsourced, a before search doesn’t show either WP:NACTOR nor WP:ENT met. Celestina007 (talk) 19:36, 23 June 2021 (UTC) Note: This...
Click to read more »wikipedia article) and the upcoming film is a music video so passing WP:NACTOR is doubtful." CoolSkittle (talk) 11:43, 24 April 2019 (UTC) Note: This discussion...
Click to read more »and India. ––FormalDude (talk) 05:31, 4 January 2023 (UTC) Keep: Passes NACTOR and GNG. Somebodyidkfkdt (talk) 14:22, 4 January 2023 (UTC) Hello Somebodyidkfkdt...
Click to read more »but not by a wide margin. Notability is not relational. Consensus is that NACTOR is met and that GNG is met through some of the available, unchallenged sources...
Click to read more »such, she barely passes WP:NACTOR. Onel5969 TT me 17:40, 9 October 2017 (UTC) Keep This is a notable actress per WP:NACTOR: "Has had significant roles...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Does not satisfy WP:NACTOR Emperork 🐋🐰 21:46, 4 December 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NACTOR squarely.No significant coverage can be located.Has partook in a few television-serials...
Click to read more »WP:NACTOR. Onel5969 TT me 22:48, 8 May 2019 (UTC) They Literally do though. They mention her other writings and appearances, and she DOES pass NACTOR -...
Click to read more »fails WP:NMMA and there's no evidence she's a notable acress that meets WP:NACTOR. Mdtemp (talk) 21:31, 6 February 2016 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...
Click to read more »for WP:NACTOR. duffbeerforme (talk) 10:59, 1 May 2020 (UTC) duffbeerforme do you know of any reliable sources that could confirm this? WP:NACTOR is useless...
Click to read more »Appeared in several notable movies with minor roles, none of which justify WP:NACTOR: King Arthur: Legend of the Sword, Artemis Fowl, Jurassic World: Fallen...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NACTOR. Trivial unreliable tabloid-style coverage, created by account with pattern...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Actor does not meet WP:NACTOR, let alone WP:BASIC. Need to prove it meets these, not just invoke them...
Click to read more »FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NACTOR and WP:GNG VanishingRainbow (talk) 12:46, 25 December 2014 (UTC) Delete as per nom fails NACTOR + GNG. –Davey2010 Merry...
Click to read more »these soon. gidonb (talk) 14:04, 27 September 2018 (UTC) Also passes WP:NACTOR for significant roles in multiple television shows and musical productions...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Does not meet WP:NACTOR, sources present in the article are mostly unreliable Megan B.... It’s all...
Click to read more »free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Does not appear to meet WP:NACTOR or WP:GNG - sourced largely to IMDb and brief mentions, article has been...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Doesn't meet WP:NACTOR. Perhaps, WP:TOOSOON. — Tulsi 24x7 04:20, 4 October 2022 (UTC) Note: This...
Click to read more »FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This is an entirely unsourced article that fails WP:NACTOR. The article's only credits are minor roles in ten films, with no in-depth...
Click to read more »(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) per WP:NACTOR. Bradford (Talk) 02:14, 29 April 2022 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...
Click to read more »reference notability or some sort of notability guideline, including GNG or NACTOR. To delete: 3 and to keep: 6. (There is also a delete "per Narky Blert"...
Click to read more »article is premature. No clear indication that the subject fully meets WP:NACTOR yet, with significant roles in multiple notable films. There may have been...
Click to read more »the WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR. WP:TOOSOON applies. -- LACaliNYC✉ 21:22, 3 February 2019 (UTC) Keep per Atlantic306's argument. WP:NACTOR would seem to be satisfied...
Click to read more »before for the same reasons: WP:BEFORE gives only supporting roles, fails WP:NACTOR CommanderWaterford (talk) 17:07, 10 May 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion...
Click to read more »WP:NACTOR. — CutestPenguinHangout 19:13, 13 September 2014 (UTC) Delete toosoon. Can't see significant coverage in third party sources. Fails WP:NACTOR....
Click to read more »describing is GNG.. NACTOR is a valid path to notability, independently. -Mushy Yank. 10:50, 15 February 2025 (UTC) No. An actor meets NACTOR if he has GNG-worthy...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) fails WP:NACTOR. enough evidence of multiple significant roles. too early in her career...
Click to read more »paywalls Atlantic306 (talk) 12:54, 14 May 2018 (UTC) Keep as passes WP:NACTOR with prominent main roles in Can't Buy Me Love (film) and the cult classic...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) I think it fails WP:NACTOR and written in promotional way. Princepratap1234 (talk) 09:43, 26 May 2020...
Click to read more »reliability (not much in a literal sense). Besides, I did realise that WP:NACTOR was only an additional criteria, and if any of the criteria points are met...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR; lacks significant independent coverage and relies on routine media mentions...
Click to read more »to a lesser extent, Kabali, so I think a weak case could be made for WP:NACTOR. As for sources, there are some Times of India articles online, but I am...
Click to read more »free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails the requirements of WP:NACTOR. Hasn't had any significant roles in notable films or television series...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable actor. No reliable sources. Fails WP:NACTOR as has not had significant roles in multiple notable films etc. Tassedethe...
Click to read more »JSTOR · TWL) Non notable actress. only 1 significant role, doesn't meet WP:NACTOR. Doesn’t have reliable news coverage. IndaneLove (talk) 10:54, 30 March...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non notable actor who fails to satisfy WP:NACTOR as they have not taken significant lead roles in movies they have featured...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NACTOR References are all TV listing gossip columns in non WP:RS sources. Fancruft...
Click to read more »or WP:NACTOR. West Eddy (talk) 01:52, 11 May 2012 (UTC) Delete I agree with the nomination. Definitely does not meet the criteria from WP:NACTOR: 1. Has...
Click to read more »qualify for inclusion. Furthermore subject is an actress but I don’t see WP:NACTOR satisfied as well. A BEFORE only directs me to her social media pages &...
Click to read more »they are passing mentions and some don't even mention her name. Fails WP:NACTOR and WP:GNG. Most of her roles aren't named and she is billed as mother of...
Click to read more »in a minor role in The Tango Lesson is verifiable but wouldn't meet WP:NACTOR. The rest appears sourced to a blog post; I can't find any other information...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) A non-notable actor who does not meet WP:NACTOR or WP:ANYBIO - no notable roles, contribution or coverage - eight out of...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NACTOR Dougweller (talk) 10:00, 7 February 2013 (UTC) Delete Not notable. No major...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NACTOR by a wide margin. Clarityfiend (talk) 04:01, 10 April 2018 (UTC) Note: This...
Click to read more »of mostly minor roles in non-notable films doesn't add up to meeting WP:NACTOR. Now, if it could be validated that he has a large cult following, he could...
Click to read more »article is good enough to pass WP:NACTOR. ASTIG😎 (ICE T • ICE CUBE) 16:00, 10 February 2021 (UTC) Keep: passes NACTOR as she has multiple significant roles...
Click to read more »article is good enough to pass WP:NACTOR. ASTIG😎 (ICE T • ICE CUBE) 16:00, 5 May 2021 (UTC) Keep Meets WP:NACTOR per Astig's argument. The sources in...
Click to read more »December 2016 (UTC) Keep: Satisfies WP:NACTOR. --βα£α(ᶀᶅᶖᵵᵶ) 13:39, 16 December 2016 (UTC) comment: You are citing WP:NACTOR, which she does not satisfy. No...
Click to read more »having a Wikipedia article. Autobiography of actor who does not meet WP:NACTOR; a couple of the films where he may have had a leading role have Wikipedia...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NACTOR and WP:GNG. Her second film mentioned in the article is not released. -...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NACTOR; none of his roles are significant enough, including his collaborations...
Click to read more »free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Subject clearly fails. WP:NACTOR. Does not have notable roles in any movies. Other than being a participant...
Click to read more »(UTC) Keep - The reviews I have added for her theater work help support WP:NACTOR notability. Beccaynr (talk) 01:41, 30 May 2022 (UTC) Relisted to generate...
Click to read more »sites do not necessarily merit notability). Clearly fails WP:ANYBIO and WP:NACTOR. While it is quite possible she may become more well known in the future...
Click to read more »page. The result was keep. Delete comments focus around not meeting WP:NACTOR but there seems to be a consensus of meeting WP:GNG. Seddon talk 01:03,...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NACTOR. Has not had significant roles or a large fan base. SPA removed Notability...
Click to read more »roles in notable TV programmes/Films would push them over the NACTOR threshold, Meets NACTOR & BASIC. –Davey2010Talk 21:15, 21 August 2018 (UTC) The subject...
Click to read more »14:32, 29 June 2020 (UTC) Delete as a non-notable person failing WP:GNG/WP:NACTOR with insufficient reliable independent in-depth sources. Having looked at...
Click to read more »(UTC) Keep. Part of the principal cast in three notable films, satisfies WP:NACTOR. Also starred in Broadway productions. See also [1]. --Michig (talk) 08:49...
Click to read more »Vikram has been changes into a redirect to Vikram (actor). Also fails WP:NACTOR. Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related...
Click to read more »2020 (UTC) Keep. The subject passes WP:BASIC and the first criterion of WP:NACTOR. He played a major role in Sugar Rush, a film currently occupying the fourth...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Does not meet WP:GNG, WP:NACTOR, appears to likely have been created for pay without proper disclosure....
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NACTOR, with no roles of any particular note. Clarityfiend (talk) 08:27, 11 April...
Click to read more »Dallender for any of the criteria of WP:NACTOR. userdude 03:47, 21 March 2020 (UTC) Keep: The subject passes WP:NACTOR—she had a lead role in I Spit on Your...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) I can see no indication of notability fails WP:NACTOR, WP:BIO WP:GNG. It has been undersorced for years as a WP:BLP and has probable...
Click to read more »2025 (UTC) Delete – Fails in WP:NACTOR. Svartner (talk) 13:44, 13 September 2025 (UTC) Keep: Easily passes WP:NACTOR. Zuck28 (talk) 23:54, 14 September...
Click to read more »in multiple TV Shows, lack of SIGCOV in reliable sources. Failing GNG & NACTOR both. Zuck28 (talk) 12:47, 14 February 2026 (UTC) Note: This discussion...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Subject does not meet WP:NACTOR as he has not had significant roles in multiple productions. PROD removed...
Click to read more »notable actor only doing few shows doesn’t make him notable it fails WP:NACTOR and GNG. Also adding unreliable sources don’t count. There are lack of reliable...
Click to read more »discussions. Everymorning talk 16:55, 29 June 2015 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:NACTOR. Also possible autobiography. Joseph2302 (talk) 17:29, 29 June 2015 (UTC)...
Click to read more »come up with anything that would add to GNG. The subjects also fails WP:NACTOR. ─ The Aafī (talk) 08:02, 14 November 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...
Click to read more »made to this page. The result was delete. Consensus that neither GNG nor NACTOR (yet) are satisfied, due to sources failing to meet reliable/Sig Cov, and...
Click to read more »RAJU(T) 08:13, 22 April 2020 (UTC) Keep: I think the subject passes WP:NACTOR, with either main or supporting roles in a number of notable films, like...
Click to read more »in-depth coverage to meet WP:GNG, and doesn't come close to meeting WP:NACTOR. Onel5969 TT me 10:51, 26 March 2019 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...
Click to read more »FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Only sourced to Filmreference, a blog. Does not meet WP:NACTOR -- Deepfriedokra 09:15, 27 August 2019 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...
Click to read more »