Redirect to:
This page is a redirect. The following categories are used to track and monitor this redirect:
|
This Manual of Style (MoS or MOS) is the style manual for all English Wikipedia articles. This primary page is supported by further detailed subpages,...
Click to read more »coordinate the multiple pages which form the Manual of Style guidelines (MoS). The content of those pages is not determined here, but principally at Wikipedia...
Click to read more »talk:MoS#Gender identity: subsidiary articles (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs) Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)#Clarifying MOS:IDENTITY...
Click to read more »exists, about his controversial username. I have suffixed this page with "(MoS)" in order to distinguish the two complaints. (Neutrality | talk | contributions)...
Click to read more »of Style (MoS) for music-related articles and writing about music encourages editors to follow consistent usage and formatting. Other MoS subpages are...
Click to read more »(WP:MOS, or "MoS") guideline, and also touches on the Wikipedia:Article titles ("AT") policy and other related pages. The short-form FAQ about the MoS, which...
Click to read more »the Wikipedia Manual of Style and its subpages (together called the MoS). When a MoS guideline offers a choice of styles, choose one and use it consistently...
Click to read more »The talk pages of Wikipedia:Manual of Style (WP:MOS or MoS) and its sub-guidelines see a comparatively high volume of discussion "churn" compared to talk...
Click to read more »Style (MoS). The case was closed on March 24 after a week of voting by arbitrators. Passing principles include a statement on the status of the MoS guideline...
Click to read more »the following pages: Wikipedia Manual of Style; Television WikiProject MoS; MoS with regard to fiction; Categorisation; Verifiability and citations; Image...
Click to read more »MoS rules on CCP name mulled, XRV axe plea nulled, mass drafting bid pulled: Just three for the history books this month (or not). ← Back to Contents...
Click to read more »(WP:MOS, WP:STYLE) The main page of the Manual of Style. It contains general remarks, summaries of the guidance to be found on certain other MoS pages...
Click to read more »was opened to review alleged disruptive editing on the Manual of Style (MoS) and other pages pertaining to article naming. The workshop phase had been...
Click to read more »discussion/Log/2010 December 12 § MoS:TITLE – keep Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2011 January 3 § MoS: – no consensus "MoS:" deviations of "MOS:", which is a pseudo-namespace...
Click to read more »always be conducted when a page is first proposed for incorporation into the MoS. All reviews are recorded using the {{DocumentHistory}} template in the talk...
Click to read more »discipline-specific line items in some of MoS's sub-guidelines, and provide supporting authority for some decisions in MoS adopted from Chicago and Hart's (which...
Click to read more »The Wikipedia Manual of Style (MoS) is the style guideline for all of Wikipedia's content aimed at readers, though it is written primarily with Wikipedia...
Click to read more »Internet. In my view, they should be contravened only where: (1) the relevant MoS talk page had been notified of the discussion; and (2) editors have generated...
Click to read more »Television WikiProject MoS; Adherence to the MoS with regard to fiction; Wikipedia Manual of Style; Television WikiProject MoS; MoS with regard to fiction;...
Click to read more »Images/Diagrams Captioned Correctly aligned Layout Lead MoS (biography) compliance MoS (dates and numbers) compliance MoS (mathematics) compliance Overlink See also...
Click to read more »Television WikiProject MoS; Adherence to the MoS with regard to fiction; Wikipedia Manual of Style; Television WikiProject MoS; MoS with regard to fiction;...
Click to read more »assigned by the IOC or the Commonwealth Games Federation shall be used. The MoS of WikiProject Olympics may also be observed when editing relevant pages...
Click to read more »was opened to review alleged disruptive editing on the Manual of Style (MoS) and other pages pertaining to article naming. Arbitrator David Fuchs posted...
Click to read more »style throughout. Y-N MoS - copyedit necessary to tighten MoS parameters. Y-N (If yes, then instant fail? for non compliance with MoS) Images Pictures and...
Click to read more »(UTC) Strong keep all MOS and delete redirect all MoS/Mos. Keep per David Levy, basically, on every point. Delete "MoS:" and "Mos:" ones because they do...
Click to read more »only MOS:NUM existed (and MoS:NUM didn't), the search on Wikipedia will still go to the same page whether you type in MOS:NUM, MoS:NUM, mOs:Num, MoS:nUM...
Click to read more »MarcusBritish (talk) (1–5, English, MoS, et al.) Mm40 (talk) (Levels 1–3 and 5 (love my WP:MoS) decent with 4) Patton123 (talk) (Levels 1-5, know MOS well) RC-0722 (talk)...
Click to read more »Ueber, National Basketball Players' Association, Tumbler Shortcuts MOS:THETMMOS:THETM MOS:TMTHEMOS:TMTHE Do not capitalize the word the in a trademark regardless...
Click to read more »really a MoS issue, it is a technical issue. Many of the bullet points simply reiterate the Music MOS, e.g. 7 to 9 could just say "see MOS:MUSIC#Chords...
Click to read more »Television WikiProject MoS; Adherence to the MoS with regard to fiction; Wikipedia Manual of Style; Television WikiProject MoS; MoS with regard to fiction;...
Click to read more »contributor to, MoS discussions. I am also someone who looked for a place to ask questions and found that there was none. I think trying to make WT:MOS such a...
Click to read more »questions at WT:MoS. Darkfrog24 (talk) 22:19, 16 May 2015 (UTC) And that's why you are getting resistance to a single style Q&A page governed by MOS experts....
Click to read more »Sachin Tendulkar has 53 ODI MoM awards and 13 MoS awards including the MoS for 2003 Cricket World Cup. Thus i created this page for capturing the details...
Click to read more »Wikipedia's Manual of Style The Manual of Style (abbreviated as MoS or MOS) is the style guide for all Wikipedia articles. Its goal is to make using Wikipedia...
Click to read more »Television WikiProject MoS; Adherence to the MoS with regard to fiction; Wikipedia Manual of Style; Television WikiProject MoS; MoS with regard to fiction;...
Click to read more »because of MOS." Septentrionalis PMAnderson 23:04, 27 August 2008 (UTC) Some parts of MoS may well be "arbitrary and capricious", but MoS guidelines are...
Click to read more »are lists, but the MoS allows that. And what do you mean by "ugly subsections" specifically? I'll bring the units in line with MoS as per your comment...
Click to read more »Article or Featured List status as possible. Maximizing MoS compliance, particularly MoS Numbers and MoS Math. Cleaning up tagged articles. Organization of...
Click to read more »a few editors to commentate on various disputes in the MoS, almost as if it were like the MoS equivalent of the Hadith. I don't think that we should have...
Click to read more »multiple people, Wikipedia has a house style. Our WP:Manual of Style (WP:MOS, or MoS) is an internal guideline laying out the house style of this encyclopedia...
Click to read more »types of names and titles, or abbreviations thereof: Shortcuts MOS:MAJORWORKMOS:MAJORWORK MOS:ITALICTITLEMOS:ITALICTITLE Officially named series of major...
Click to read more »Images/Diagrams Captioned Correctly aligned Layout Lead MoS (biography) compliance MoS (dates and numbers) compliance MoS (mathematics) compliance Overlink See also...
Click to read more »Project related tasks Create a Basketball MoS, a la; Wikiproject Football MoS Organize project page Article related tasks The creation of standard infoboxes...
Click to read more »vector u defined by u = v − v0, ... Shortcuts MOS:DEFMOS:DEF MOS:MATH#DEFSYMBOLMOS:MATH#DEFSYMBOL MOS:MATH#IFFMOS:MATH#IFF In definitions, the symbol...
Click to read more »refer to them by their full title. I double-checked the MoS and that is indeed the guidance of MOS:MILTERMS (point 2). HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts...
Click to read more ») Note that the main Manual of Style page is not in the list of required MoS pages. It may, however, be a useful page to look at if you have questions...
Click to read more »amount appears in an article, indicate it like this: "[[S$]]100" (result: "S$100"). Subsequently, the "S" may be omitted (for example, "$100") unless this would...
Click to read more »how this could be a valid exception to the MoS but it just isn't. MoS says not to do the ALLCAPS thing and MoS compliance is a FA criterion. --John (talk)...
Click to read more »Style. MoS concerns shouldn't qualify for deletion.--hkr Laozi speak 01:52, 24 October 2010 (UTC) Note that none of the issues I raised above are MoS, they...
Click to read more »Wikipedia Manual of Style; Adherence to the Television WikiProject MoS; Adherence to the MoS with regard to fiction; Categorisation; Verifiability and citations;...
Click to read more »to change consensus at WT:MOS. So, it's basically a form of WP:FORUMSHOP geared especially for WP:FACTION building against MoS bits, exactly like the page...
Click to read more »spacing between number and unit. Again see WP:MOS. :: Kevinalewis : (Talk Page) 15:38, 6 March 2006 (UTC) MoS has nothing to do with a debate made specifiacally...
Click to read more »propose it at WT:MOS. Such issues need to be considered and addressed even if the guideline doesn't end up becoming part of the MoS. A WikiProject guideline...
Click to read more »the MOS. kwami (talk) 07:00, 23 September 2008 (UTC) We should seek to have it defined. I would be interested in opinions on the matter from the MoS participants...
Click to read more »03:42, 23 March 2011 (UTC) No consensus for this just transcludes two other MoS Gnevin (talk) 20:51, 15 March 2011 (UTC) Comment: Can Gnevin give us more...
Click to read more »2007 (UTC) Keep. MoS and MOS are commonly used pseudo-namespaces. --- RockMFR 20:28, 5 March 2007 (UTC) Whish really isn't that good as MOS is an article...
Click to read more »first letter of every page name. Shortcuts MOS:DABPRIMARYMOS:DABPRIMARY MOS:PRIMARYTOPICMOS:PRIMARYTOPIC MOS:DABPRIMARYTOPICMOS:DABPRIMARYTOPIC A link...
Click to read more »more detail." for which MOS-AM is a subpage, so the bottom line is that t's unclear by the criteria of 1b as currently stated if MoS-AM applies or not.陣内Jinnai...
Click to read more »MoS is followed, the League will not copyedit articles that do not comply with the requirements of specific layout guidelines (such as WP:FICT, MOS:FILM...
Click to read more »breaches WP:MOSBOLD. Flag icons should not be displayed on chart tables, as per MOS:FLAG, nationalities should not be emphasized. All of these example tables...
Click to read more »works, such as lists of texts, discographies and filmographies. Shortcut MOS:LISTORDERMOS:LISTORDER Items should normally be listed in chronological order...
Click to read more »follow one part of MOS:NUMBERSIGN does not follow the other part which says When using the abbreviations, write Vol., No., or Nos.. The MoS is pretty clear...
Click to read more »the lead at all, just a death date. Shortcuts MOS:FIRSTBIOMOS:FIRSTBIO MOS:OPENPARABIOMOS:OPENPARABIO MoS guidelines for opening paragraphs and lead sentences...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Deletion review Wikipedia:Deletion discussions Image use basics MoS Images Sourcing:References and Verifiabilty Reliable sources noticeboard...
Click to read more »To use both classes, combine them as class="wikitable sortable". Shortcut MOS:HEADERSMOS:HEADERS Table captions and column and row headers should be succinct...
Click to read more »02:30, 24 April 2008 (UTC) Keep the MoS for historical purposes and delete the rest. Add a notice to project page and MoS page about them being predated by...
Click to read more »see discussion Death Note, see discussion Fate/stay night, see discussion: MoS violations, excessive plot, undersourced, excessive non-free images, missing...
Click to read more »to FAC, and ask Epbr123 (talk · contribs) to do a final MoS check; there are quite a few MoS issues. Getting those issues out of the way pre-FAC will...
Click to read more »keep the focus of each tip narrow and to express it simply and briefly. MoS related Wikipedia:Simplified Manual of Style – an overview of commonly used...
Click to read more »There is not usually room to do this in both inches and centimetres, as the MoS prefers. Always put height before width. Collection or whereabouts (optional...
Click to read more »edit summary to see WP:GEO. [Editorial note: MOSNUM and the main page of MOS are now in need of housecleaning to ensure consistency in duplicated sections...
Click to read more »standards (as stated in the MoS and as states so virulently by the project's opposers), nominations there have to be dead on. The MoS is indeed a very important...
Click to read more »under-referenced. And there are some MoS concerns. Majoreditor (talk) 22:46, 25 February 2008 (UTC) What is MoS? Thanks for your help! We'll get working...
Click to read more »The "MOS:" ones are used all the time, but the others are just claptrap. Same with misspelled versions of the "MOS:" one, like "MoS:" and "Mos:"; we...
Click to read more »exceptions for specific cases discussed below. Shortcuts MOS:SENTENCECAPSMOS:SENTENCECAPS MOS:LISTCAPSMOS:LISTCAPS Wikipedia uses sentence case for sentences...
Click to read more »2008 (UTC) Remove per above, sourcing needs shecking and Lead and general MoS requirements.Yobmod (talk) 10:43, 21 November 2008 (UTC) The above discussion...
Click to read more »an article may contain Urdu or other transliterations in regional script(s) such as Shahmukhi, Perso-Arabic, Naskh etc., where applicable or relevant...
Click to read more »articles in accordance to the MOS and consensus.) The guidelines at the WP:MMA were rewritten to be in accordance with WP:MOS and related Manual of Styles...
Click to read more »useful. Note that all style guides conflict on some points; the Wikipedia MoS and naming conventions are a consensus-based balance between them, drawing...
Click to read more »fully MoS-compliant. We're looking for professional standards of English, with the emphasis on brevity and clarity. We do not expect 100% MoS-compliance...
Click to read more »for an in-project ACR: Increase the Citation density. I know all of the MoS stuff says "one per paragraph", but an article that sticks to that bare minimum...
Click to read more »in-line citations. The writing is uneven and choppy. There are also numerous MoS concerns. For example, sections such as "Expanded universe" are nothing more...
Click to read more »per SMcCandlish [1], 2017: If MoS does not already have a rule on something, then it almost certainly doesn't need one. MOS is very well-developed now,...
Click to read more »other editors have edited this article so I need to know if the prose, flow, MoS etc are fine. Thanks in advance. Thanks, indopug (talk) 19:48, 28 April 2008...
Click to read more »well as general MOS guidelines -- Matthewedwards (talk · contribs · count · email) 05:40, 20 May 2008 (UTC) Support removal Too many MoS breaches like the...
Click to read more »come to a clear consensus. Another worth further consideration. eSports MoS starter issues for consensus building – New discussion about eSports article...
Click to read more »related to Japan, please follow the conventions described below. Shortcut MOS:JAENGMOS:JAENG The English Wikipedia is an English-language encyclopedia...
Click to read more »The MoS deprecates fancy quotation marks such as those used in "Drumming ability and appreciation". I see other minor errors or breaks with the MoS throughout...
Click to read more »extra guidance for Korea topics that the main MOS does not cover. MOS:KO should not contradict the main MOS; if you believe it does, please post on the...
Click to read more »wikitables as they are what the MoS says, which is backed up by consensus and if not WP:ACCESS then MOS:LIST and MOS:WHENTABLE which recommend tables...
Click to read more »locations that do not merit inclusion in "Destinations". To comply with MOS:DTT, and promote accessibility on the part of our readers who use assistive...
Click to read more »04:17, 14 July 2008 (UTC) I Support the A-class rating though I'm not an MoS expert. Since this article cannot go to MilHist review have you inquired...
Click to read more »Phillipino, Philippino, or Philipino are simply wrong. Shortcuts MOS:PHILNAMESMOS:PHILNAMES MOS:PHNAMESMOS:PHNAMES Names of historical figures (roughly those...
Click to read more »"Help edit the article so that it may someday conform to MoS." which shows that it is non MoS compliant. |CanadianDude1| 02:31, 19 May 2014 (UTC) Blister...
Click to read more »it clear that WP:Wikivoice is not being used. Shortcuts MOS:PBUHMOS:PBUH MOS:SAWWMOS:SAWW MOS:MUHAMMADMOS:MUHAMMAD Honorifics for Muhammad should generally...
Click to read more »of work needed. Fundamentally, the the basic lack of citations, but also MoS issues. Incorrect WP:DASHes everywhere, some of the section headings are...
Click to read more »fully MoS-compliant. We're looking for professional standards of English, with the emphasis on brevity and clarity. We do not expect 100% MoS-compliance...
Click to read more »Delist. The article is poorly written and under-referenced. There are also MoS issues; for example, the lead should be better-developed. Majoreditor (talk)...
Click to read more »Per MoS, remove the link in the bold title in the first sentence of the lead. Make sure there are non-breaking spaces after all numbers. Per MoS (?),...
Click to read more »still be cut down, but arguing that this violates the MoS is a bit of a stretch, given that the MoS does not really have a specific limit, especially for...
Click to read more »22:53, 11 April 2013 (UTC) Comments I have the following concerns: Prose/MoS: and five video albums > and five [[Home video|video albums]] While there...
Click to read more »do. Also, using the example article in the MoS to trump the explicit wording of the MoS doesn't fly. The MoS is quite clear defining what a list article...
Click to read more »Appraisal of Manual of Style (music) MoS as of 6 April 2010 by Jubilee♫clipman 18:32, 17 April 2010 (UTC) e@ 91.92.248.103 (talk) 08:33, 18 August 2024...
Click to read more »begin "MOS", 35 begin "MoS" and 39 start "Mos", totalling 36% of the subset or 0.008% of all titles), this includes two titles (MOS:PARTIAL and MOS:PARTIALMATCH)...
Click to read more »original. For an .ogg file, a Vorbis quality setting of 0 (roughly 64kbit/s) is usually sufficient. To do this, you can open the file using Audacity,...
Click to read more »formats are explicitly permitted by the MoS. For example, 1999-10 for October 1999 is not cromulent with the MoS, and indeed use of numbers to represent...
Click to read more »violate it !Voting in an RfC on a MoS talk page about a proposal to merge several outlying MoS pages into an existing MoS page. Associated incivilities at...
Click to read more »Style#Spaces in endash. On 11 December, User:Sławomir Biały editing the MoS's rules for spacing en dashes [1]. This was reverted, and he began a discussion...
Click to read more »style guidelines, and does not require substantial copy-editing to be fully MoS-compliant. The article must comply with the style guide on writing about...
Click to read more »citation styles, numerous ciation needed tags, WP:LEAD underdeveloped, and MoS cleanup needed. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 04:07, 27 August 2008 (UTC) Comment Definitely...
Click to read more »do not modify it. (50/2/0); final Andre (talk) 08:46, 23 July 2007 (UTC) MoRsE (talk · contribs) - It has now been some time since my last attempt to...
Click to read more »style guidelines, and does not require substantial copy-editing to be fully MoS-compliant. A5. The article/list contains appropriately licensed supporting...
Click to read more »table, there are unspaced em dashes in the award notes, which go against the MoS. Making them en dashes is probably the easiest fix. Changed to en dash The...
Click to read more »scientific literature caesium should be used, as recommended by IUPAC. Shortcut MOS:ARCHAICMOS:ARCHAIC Older sources use many archaic variants (such as shew...
Click to read more »that Wikipedia does not have the same space constraints as paper. Shortcut MOS:SOURCEABBRMOS:SOURCEABBR Avoid making up new abbreviations, especially acronyms...
Click to read more »second para of Background Other MoS violations noticed such as periods in image captions that aren't complete sentences (see MOS:CAPTIONS) Awkward: "After the...
Click to read more »which goes against the MoS. --Gonnym (talk) 13:46, 3 January 2020 (UTC) Keep - the nomination is based on a misreading of MOS:NUMERO, "An exception is...
Click to read more »articles, such as which text should use boldface or italic type. Shortcuts MOS:BMOS:B MOS:BOLDMOS:BOLD Boldface (text like this) is common in articles, but is...
Click to read more »Style (MoS) deprecates fancy quotation marks. In addition, the two quotations in this section are shorter than four lines, the minimum that the MoS recommends...
Click to read more »"tags" - [23], [24] Unlinking dates - [25] WP:EDITWAR WP:MOS WP:MOS#Italics WP:MOS#Images MOS:FILM WP:CITE WP:OWN WP:CONS Discussion about Ed's use of...
Click to read more »found in favor of the MoS. I take on board your point that the IPSO cases are just a sample and not a comprehensive vetting of MoS's output, but that is...
Click to read more »According to him, it currently fails in "Major aspects:" "Prose quality:" and "MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:", this should...
Click to read more »is a dead link is concerning. There are inconsistencies other more minor MoS fails too, but the lack of supporting citations is the main worry. (Please...
Click to read more »the topics about this species, but I am sure there is much to improve. A MoS review would be very welcome as well. Thanks, Daniel Cavallari (talk) 22:57...
Click to read more »(姬), indicating descent from the Zhou royal family. Shortcuts MOS:PINYINMOS:PINYIN MOS:NONPINYINMOS:NONPINYIN English Wikipedia uses Hanyu Pinyin without...
Click to read more »fixing poor wikicode cannot exist. If the code's author is MoS-unaware, then s/he is not know what s/he is doing. You ever have to think, instead him/her....
Click to read more »minimal amount of coding within each article. Shortcuts MOS:INFOBOXPURPOSEMOS:INFOBOXPURPOSE MOS:IBPMOS:IBP The purpose of an infobox is to summarize, but...
Click to read more »Watch article reassessment page Result: Delist. While the finer points of MoS are not all GA requirements, this article doesn't even meet WP:LEAD, which...
Click to read more »detail on the reasons the article, for example, does not comply with the MoS would be very useful. The review seems rushed and isn't particularly helpful...
Click to read more »goes to a disambiguation page. You probably want it to go to Uruguayan. The MoS generally frowns on orphan paragraphs such as "Mediocre peaked at #10 on...
Click to read more »nationale. This automatically produces italic rendering in accordance with MOS:FOREIGNITALIC. Shortcut WP:FRENCHNAMESWP:FRENCHNAMES French proper names...
Click to read more »logical. Read MOS on final periods in captions: see the flower one. I hope the "University Act" was different from the "University of S. Act". Confusing...
Click to read more »expanded a bit of the history secton, and renamed a section to comply with WP:MoS, I can confidently say it's ready. Maxim(talk) 20:38, 1 October 2007 (UTC)...
Click to read more »Food and Drink WikiProjects and task forces. This would be similar to the MoS guidelines for biographies or legal articles. Restaurant notability guidelines...
Click to read more »WikiProject Utah, WikiProject Geology and Mav. Not a single inline citation. Some MoS issues, and the prose could use some copyediting. Wouldn't pass GA as it...
Click to read more »well-written. Linking and MoS issues. Overlinking: "high school" and "USA" (common terms); doesn't the MoS say to use "US" or "U.S.", not the triple? Why...
Click to read more »creation of this type of article in the WP:MoS discussion archives. I have removed the article from the MoS Style template plus put Category:Signpost articles...
Click to read more »far too many citation needed tags, a copyedit is needed, I spotted a few MoS violations, and the focus, coverage and lead are problematic. EyeSereneTALK...
Click to read more »italics? What makes these players more notable than any other? Thses are both MoS issues, the former, is specified [[here, and I don't consider it a major...
Click to read more »doesn't really address my concerns around MoS compliance. Could you re-read the two extracts from the MoS above - on minimising the use of quiotations...
Click to read more »of the MoS. If I, personally, feel that these clash, the MoS 'wins'. Obviously an ACR is more complex, but this seems to me to be a straight MoS issue...
Click to read more »protected, retired. A 2004 promotion, this article is largely uncited, needs MoS and WP:ACCESSIBILITY cleanup, and includes external jumps. SandyGeorgia (Talk)...
Click to read more »Epbr123's support of the MoS. giggy (:O) 08:36, 9 June 2008 (UTC) SlimVirgin, if you are satisfied with Epbr123's response, but still have issues with MOS and...
Click to read more »section should summarise the entire article, currently its far too brief. WP:MoS issues: album name should be given as Love in Motion not Love In Motion....
Click to read more »may be useful. If plurals are needed for such words, English plurals (in -s) are preferred. It should never be implied that there is any formal distinction...
Click to read more »Language(s): Python using the Python Wikipediabot Framework Function Summary: Rename pages with hyphens in numeric ranges to use en dashes instead per the MOS...
Click to read more »see discussion Death Note, see discussion Fate/stay night, see discussion: MoS violations, excessive plot, undersourced, excessive non-free images, missing...
Click to read more »any others, but you may want to check. Background The WP Manual of Style (MoS) says, "Avoid sandwiching text between two images that face each other"....
Click to read more »article should strive to take naïve readers as far as possible. Shortcut MOS:v.MOS:v. Legal case names are always italicized (Plessy v. Ferguson). In article...
Click to read more »grasp of a very complex and intractable set of issues. Comments on prose, MoS compliance, sourcing, clarity, and any other aspect are welcome. Many thanks...
Click to read more »word usage in Hawaii, as well as how to treat specific subjects. Shortcut MOS:OKINAMOS:OKINA Orthography refers to the correct spelling of a language....
Click to read more »represent the genre(s) specified by a majority of mainstream reliable sources. Shortcuts MOS:TVNATIONALITYMOS:TVNATIONALITY MOS:TVCOUNTRYMOS:TVCOUNTRY...
Click to read more »personally find anything less at times too small. The infobox also violates MoS:L (South Park is linked in the lead-in and the infobox, they're almost practically...
Click to read more »been following the great MOS debate, so I guess I am here because I voted in some related RMs. I supported many of Tony1's excellent proposals to lower...
Click to read more »Dublin; Douglas, Cork or Rialto, Dublin. Shortcuts MOS:DERRYMOS:DERRY MOS:LONDONDERRYMOS:LONDONDERRY MOS:LDERRYMOS:LDERRY To avoid constant renaming of articles...
Click to read more »film articles. See also MOS:SECTIONORDER. Shortcuts MOS:FILMLEADMOS:FILMLEAD MOS:FILMLEDEMOS:FILMLEDE MOS:FILMGENREMOS:FILMGENRE MOS:FILMCOUNTRYMOS:FILMCOUNTRY...
Click to read more »RfC • Arbcom • Del log • Block log • Prot log • Newb Log • PP • SPP • RC AfD • CfD • TfD • CSD • RfA • AN/I • 3RR • MoS • Cleanup • FAC • VP • Signpost...
Click to read more »than we can be reasonably expected to fix here. As well as prose, there are MoS issues (incorrect reference placement, suspect capitalisation, hyphens rather...
Click to read more »issues, mix ups in hyphens, MOS:CAPS#All caps issues, WP:DASH issues (no unspaced emdashes), punctuation problems on WP:MOS#Captions and I found a long...
Click to read more »correct MoS issues. Do let me know if you see any specific MoS issues -- ¿Amar៛Talk to me/My edits 18:05, 21 November 2007 (UTC) Quick example of MoS issue:...
Click to read more »about what Wikipedia:Manual of Style and its sub-guidelines (hereafter "MoS") should say, or how/whether something they say should be applied to a particular...
Click to read more »and it looks like DYK is out of touch with the MoS, specifically WP:MOS#Ellipses. Can we follow the MoS for this article (hopefully they'll realize and...
Click to read more »2014 (UTC)) Comments by DragonZero Use the VG release template correctly MoS:Caps The Best is not a retitle. It is a label. Reference Overkill. Place...
Click to read more »again am seeing MoS errors and problems with flow. Before spending the time on a full review, I suggest strongly that Gyrobo review MoS before bringing...
Click to read more »captions, where duplicate links are generally useful and recommended in MoS. importScript('User:Ucucha/duplinks.js'); // [[User:Ucucha/duplinks]] Advisor...
Click to read more »to them. This is the previous run at about 6 edits a minute. The latest MoS states that popular country and city names such as the United States, India...
Click to read more »page Result: Delist. This is in need of a substantial copy-edit, as well as MoS and referencing fixes. Geometry guy 19:04, 18 January 2008 (UTC) Many sections...
Click to read more »examples. The MoS abbreviation is US not U.S. Went and changed these and think all are now fixed. A few I changed to United States to comply with MoS as well...
Click to read more »change all three instances to 2.4 metres (7.9 ft). The Manual of Style (MoS) advises against repeating the words of the article title in the section...
Click to read more »Juntung. Lacking inline citations, outdated (most as of dates are dated), and MoS cleanup needed. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 01:01, 11 August 2008 (UTC) I have to...
Click to read more »clear and concise, without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors: B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists: Is it factually...
Click to read more »(talk) 17:41, 13 June 2019 (UTC) Ah. Then we may have a problem. The MoS, in MOS:ACCIM, states "Images that are not purely decorative should include an...
Click to read more »(talk) 10:35, 19 January 2016 (UTC) Source review: Formatting is as per MoS, the references are reliable, no dead links and spot checks reveals no evidence...
Click to read more »about MoS belong in a separate venue from MoS talk pages, such as, I guess, WP:VPP or WP:VPR. MoS talk pages are for discussion about how to improve MoS, just...
Click to read more »of the text and the section should be removed. Question. Is this in the MoS? I've seen other articles (especially ones on the State Assembly) that have...
Click to read more »CBB • Dir • Clean • Fix • FC • Del • HelpDesk • Infoboxes • Magic wds • MoS • Nav temps PeerRvw • PicsReq • Policies & Guidelines • RefDesk • RfC • SPost...
Click to read more »the relevant MoS? =Nichalp «Talk»= 18:38, 10 October 2008 (UTC) I do not think it is stated anywhere in the MoS. However, generally the MoS is moving away...
Click to read more »5 June 2018 (UTC) Move to MOS:AMENG to allow for a useful shortcut that is not confusing. WP:MOSAMENG, WP:MOS:AMENG and MoS:AMENG would also be unobjectionable...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Incorrect WP:MoS on film titles, and WP: NFF violation as principal photography on the film...
Click to read more »to be MOS:ALT, they would also, similar to you, expect to be taken to a MoS page. If we don't restrict "MOS:" shortcuts to MoS pages, the MoS becomes...
Click to read more »institutions is subject to guidelines on conflict of interest. Shortcut MOS:IUPACMOS:IUPAC Per WP:ENGVAR, the type of English used to write an article...
Click to read more »looks into the MoS; they will never escape. I presume the "misleading impression" is that by being only one character different from WP:MOS it is too easily...
Click to read more »Dissertation Full Text, and more. MoMA Collection MoMA Archives Editing Wikipedia Wiki Markup Cheatsheet Wikipedia Manual of Style (WP:MOS) WP:Notability (people)...
Click to read more »with MOS guidelines, let alone the FA criteria. — Wackymacs (talk ~ edits) 19:46, 8 July 2008 (UTC) Move to FARC, still largely uncited, no lead, MoS issues...
Click to read more »of Style (MoS) compliance and factual accuracy, while an article that has cleared a GA-class review will likely be in full compliance with MoS and thus...
Click to read more »Manual of Style (MoS). Blockquotes should be used for long quotes. I have changed this in the article to fall in line with the MoS. Links to Commons...
Click to read more »needing in-line citations. The lead is under-developed, and there are some MoS issues such as improperly-formatted citations. I have removed the sections...
Click to read more »was used to refer to great towers" Cheers, Abraham, B.S. (talk) 05:11, 31 October 2009 (UTC) Per MOS:DASH, spaced endashes are "a stylistic alternative to...
Click to read more »Wikipedia Manual of Style; Adherence to the Television WikiProject MoS; Adherence to the MoS with regard to fiction; Categorisation; Verification and citations;...
Click to read more »guide and Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Content guide. Shortcut MOS:MILAPPMOS:MILAPP Many articles may deal extensively, but not exclusively...
Click to read more »present, eliminating the need to read the entire page. Shortcuts MOS:GOODHEADMOS:GOODHEAD MOS:BADHEADMOS:BADHEAD Headings should be descriptive and follow...
Click to read more »of view. Explain how other Wikipedia-wide policies and guidelines (e.g. MOS:ICONS) may apply to cue sports articles in particular, as needed. The overall...
Click to read more »the same articles and made the exact same edits. Both have not used the MoS and failed to provide RS. DUCK comes into play since NV is the postal abbreviation...
Click to read more »minute Already has a bot flag (Y/N): Yes Function Details: According to the MoS, disambiguation pages should not use piped linking for entries (with a few...
Click to read more »subset of articles. This can be started anew, perhaps as a guideline. The MoS is in place to ensure a consistent, professional look to the project, and...
Click to read more »Wikipedia_talk:Edit_summary_legend#Correction fm, fmt, frmt, formatting, MoS, mos, MOS, wf, wfy Meaning: I have applied or adjusted formatting to this article...
Click to read more »into a citation that appears in the Reference section. The Manual of Style (MoS) says to avoid placing images directly below a second-level section head...
Click to read more »style guidelines, and does not require substantial copy-editing to be fully MoS-compliant. The article must comply with the style guide on writing about...
Click to read more »WP:REDNOT. It also adds references in headings, which is a violation of MOS:HEADING: "Citations should not be placed within, or on the same line as,...
Click to read more »I decided to come here and request for one. There are continuation issues, some grammar, and MoS. Thank you! --haha169 (talk) 00:11, 8 May 2008 (UTC)...
Click to read more »the pseudonym Kennilworthy Whisp) for the Comic Relief charity. A lot of MoS breaches "Harry's spiritual ancestor." and "flawed and mortal." the period...
Click to read more »inline citations), but otherwise it may be worth cutting those lists. (see MOS:FOOTERS) That's all I have for now. -- Shudde talk 11:58, 6 July 2015 (UTC)...
Click to read more »inhabit modern Gerakas?! Do not wikilink dates or years or decades. Per WP:MoS. Byzantine, Roman, Greek. Capitals needed! You need assistance in prose....
Click to read more »followed the link to the project. I began learning more about the project, the MoS and so on, and finally joined up in September 2007. How have you contributed...
Click to read more »these should be clearly marked for what they are. Shortcuts MOS:DIAPHONEMICMOS:DIAPHONEMIC MOS:RHOTICMOS:RHOTIC It is often possible to transcribe a word...
Click to read more »prose has proven to be the main issue. The article is not a lengthy one, and MoS issues have been checked. There is a problem with 2 or 3 references (reliability)...
Click to read more »gets my goat, although I have no idea what MOS says. Dudley Miles (talk) 18:56, 7 February 2015 (UTC) The MoS is with you all the way. I, being of the anti-full-stop...
Click to read more »you don't need to know the MOS inside and out. Just read the article and see if it reads well, etc. If you do know the MOS that's a plus, but hardly necessary...
Click to read more »inside the quotes is from Wikipedia:MOS#Quotation_marks. Ruhrfisch ><>°° 04:30, 29 April 2008 (UTC) OK, that trumps CMoS, so I will change the position of...
Click to read more »sources. "In the early hours of the 20th of July 1974" Why bolding? And about MoS rules concerning the way we write dates, read here. "The coup represented...
Click to read more »title, also change the links to it on the pages .... --> (bots do this, see MOS:RENAMESECTION) <!-- When adding table entries, remember to update the total...
Click to read more »but I'll have to oppose on the flags. Daresay most of us have bits of the MoS that we're not keen on, but I don't think this is one that can be ignored...
Click to read more »citation, reference formatting, and general presentational and Manual of Style (MoS) issues, with a view to ensuring that the nomination meets the FA criteria...
Click to read more »only in the body and not the lead. Shortcuts MOS:LEADELEMENTSMOS:LEADELEMENTS MOS:LEADORDERMOS:LEADORDER MOS:INTHELEADMOS:INTHELEAD The lead section may...
Click to read more »been created in the format MO-X.svg, where X is the route number. {{Missouri-road-stub}} v t e {{WikiProject U.S. Roads|state=MO}} Designates the current...
Click to read more »I think some refs are supposed to be just outside of citations per the MoS. This may be outdated so I'll double check. Or maybe it was my misunderstanding...
Click to read more »driving? 02:31, 15 August 2008 (UTC) I generally don't follow all the lame MoS drama, but I thought diacritics were fairly controversial? Or is that only...
Click to read more »"befriended"? "In January 2007, Koechner's Naked Trucker & T-Bones Show". Per MoS, it is recommended to link only full dates (e.g. January 1, 2007). Years...
Click to read more »GA, and impressed with the additions since. I have few nitpicky, mostly MoS related, comments: Lead - I think it might flow better to begin the second...
Click to read more »article to featured article status. I want the article to comply with all MoS guidelines and to be absolutely perfect. Be as harsh as you please and I...
Click to read more »the Manual of Style (MoS) on Organisms (describing the use of bold vs plain text as a matter of editorial discretion), the MoS for Titles (use of italics...
Click to read more »article - in as much as I can - but I'm not exactly 'in' with the whole MoS and content creation lark. I'm hoping that people can look at it and see...
Click to read more »need page numbers. 3 I fixed one issue otherwise no problems found. MoS Look into MOS:Images and WP:SEEALSO. Brad (talk) 09:55, 21 September 2011 (UTC)...
Click to read more »[edit] Shortcut WP:CoMoWP:CoMo Welcome to the WikiProject page for Columbia, Missouri and the surrounding Columbia Metropolitan Area These pages allow...
Click to read more »dates before the MOS is updated is unwise however, simply because such a change is bound to incite a degree of unrest against the MoS cognoscenti thus...
Click to read more »up to Featured Review soon. As far as I know, no major violations of the MoS (though I'm known to be terrible at that). Improvements in grammar, spelling...
Click to read more »table, there are unspaced em dashes in the award notes, which go against the MoS. Making them en dashes is probably the easiest fix. Changed to en dash The...
Click to read more »see discussion Death Note, see discussion Fate/stay night, see discussion: MoS violations, excessive plot, undersourced, excessive non-free images, missing...
Click to read more »(UTC) Template:&numero (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages) MOS:NUMERO clearly states do not use the symbol №. Gonnym (talk) 09:16, 22 February...
Click to read more »for peer review because I am unsure about whether I am abiding by all the MoS guidelines, and whether I have not covered adequate grounds for an appropriate...
Click to read more »see discussion Death Note, see discussion Fate/stay night, see discussion: MoS violations, excessive plot, undersourced, excessive non-free images, missing...
Click to read more »reached GA/FA status for examples. The use of images should comply with WP:MOS#Images and WP:CAPTIONS. If possible, use only free images that are available/applicable...
Click to read more »January 2009 (UTC) Quick comment: Avoid sandwiching text between images per MOS:IMAGES. Shubinator (talk) 23:56, 18 January 2009 (UTC) Finetooth comments:...
Click to read more »Consensus came to favour the MoS's not saying anything on the use of the passive. This redirect got pointed towards a section of a MoS page which had nothing...
Click to read more »Shortcut wp:NRIS info issues MOwp:NRIS info issues MO This is a subpage of Wikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic Places/NRIS information...
Click to read more »to be consistent with the Manual of Style and build upon it wherever the MoS does not provide answers specific to the questions of anthroponymy articles—by...
Click to read more »should contain only key facts of the article's subject, per MOS:INFOBOX. MOS:CAPTION (main MoS entry for captions with formatting recommendations) Wikipedia:Accessibility...
Click to read more »do. Also, using the example article in the MoS to trump the explicit wording of the MoS doesn't fly. The MoS is quite clear defining what a list article...
Click to read more »conventions, see Wikipedia:Naming conventions (video games). Shortcuts MOS:VGLAYOUTMOS:VGLAYOUT MOS:VGORDERMOS:VGORDER In general, the following sections describe...
Click to read more »WrestleView's use as a source, but this article has other issues. There are numerous MoS issues (left-aligned images under level three headers, et al), weak prose...
Click to read more »{{nowrap}} may be appropriate are described. Shortcuts MOS:SINCEMOS:SINCE MOS:DATEDMOS:DATED MOS:NOWMOS:NOW MOS:RECENTMOS:RECENT Except on pages that are inherently...
Click to read more »tomorrow. I don't think there are any other MoS violations in the article. D.M.N. (talk) 19:22, 29 June 2008 (UTC) MOS cleanup carried out by Epbr123 (talk ·...
Click to read more »message please? (in the sources) I'm not sure if your references follow MoS...but I'll leave that up to the more experienced reviewers to decide... Hope...
Click to read more »after units. 2) use a non breaking space (&.n.b.s.p.;) between a number and its unit. Its part of the WP:MoS. I've done one for you. =Nichalp «Talk»= 18:34...
Click to read more »"Category:Wikipedia MoS general guidelines" with general application MoS pages (e.g., capital letters) Populate "Category:Wikipedia MoS specialized guidelines"...
Click to read more »not a complete sentence so no period required. MOS:NUM – naughty mixed date formats in the references. MOS:BOLD – no bold links and no need to bold random...
Click to read more »uploading and including images, see Help:Files. Shortcuts MOS:IRELEVMOS:IRELEV MOS:IMAGERELMOS:IMAGEREL MOS:PERTINENCEMOS:PERTINENCE Images must be significant...
Click to read more »touched by my noodly appendage 12:44, 1 April 2008 (UTC) You got Epbr123 to MoS clean it up, so that's a start. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 20:43, 1 April 2008 (UTC)...
Click to read more »expect so. Stable? No ongoing edit wars. MoS-compliant? It was split into short sections and a lead created to meet MoS-requirements. It can easily be unsectioned...
Click to read more »the cite template does the arranging automatically. The Manual of Style (MoS) no longer recommends the autoformatting of full dates. Please see WP:UNLINKDATES...
Click to read more »the lowercase epsilon to the lunate epsilon? Done "108 – 1010 M−1 s−1" Per the MoS, this shouldn't be allowed to wrap in the browser. You might want to...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reference_desk/Archives/Miscellaneous/2018 June 15 Is this on some MoS? Wikipedia:Reference_desk/Archives/Miscellaneous/2018 June 16 Is the reality...
Click to read more »pages, see Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Disambiguation pages. Shortcuts MOS:BTWMOS:BTW MOS:BUILDMOS:BUILD Wikipedia is based on hypertext, and aims to "build...
Click to read more »text, distracting the reader (example). Shortcuts MOS:DECORMOS:DECOR MOS:DECORATIONMOS:DECORATION MOS:ICONDECORATIONMOS:ICONDECORATION Icons should serve...
Click to read more »something out of it. This is explicit in the math MoS, which A-class articles should attempt to follow. The MoS suggests examples and in informal introduction...
Click to read more »first sentence of the third paragraph shouldn't be unspaced according to the MoS. It should be spaced or made into a larger em dash. In ref 2, the publisher...
Click to read more »varying levels of consensus. Wikimedia help page The Manual of Style (MoS or MOS) is an in-depth guide that provides standards on how to format Wikipedia...
Click to read more »refs here. Not an MoS nor an ACR requirement. But done anyway. by being trampled to death by elephants.[30][29] Same as above. Not an MoS nor an ACR requirement...
Click to read more »Otto4711 (talk) 16:30, 21 December 2007 (UTC) Comment. I don't see any MoS or citation style problem with the references, although I think it would...
Click to read more »Brianboulton. There is no ambiguity in that section of MoS; it correctly distinguishes between what MoS recommends for in-article text and what people do in...
Click to read more »is simply unacceptable in any article, never mind an FL. Add in the many MoS glitches already mentioned and there is serious work to be done. To offer...
Click to read more »the articles are using language acceptable for their field...language that MoS editors aren't familiar with and didn't bother to ask about. I have some...
Click to read more »1a, 1b, and MoS issues. Quite a bit more work is needed to get this up to FA quality for a song. There are plenty of general prose and MoS problems, but...
Click to read more »Also check out MoS. - Tutmosis 20:31, 9 November 2006 (UTC) Not much more to add. The lead needs rewriting in accordance with the MoS. And, besides the...
Click to read more »April 2007 (UTC) The images are autothumbed, which is recommended by the WP:MoS. You can set the thumbnail size in special:preferences =Nichalp «Talk»= 07:27...
Click to read more »MoS. In effect, this article fails criteria A1 and A4. Sorry, but at the moment the article is not quite up to A-Class standard. Cheers, Abraham, B.S...
Click to read more »things needing attention. Dylan 06:07, 3 December 2007 (UTC) MoS problems I've noticed various MoS violations: I see a number of typographical errors (e.g...
Click to read more »expanded under the reasoning that I'm "a net detriment to project MoS" without asking MoSgoers beyond my accuser. Even editors with whom I've butted heads...
Click to read more »(international and USA) Revision as of 18:44, 3 October 2005 "revert contra-MoS edits, addition of unsourced trivia, etc." Revision as of 08:43, 3 October...
Click to read more »(UTC) The references are there, but needs to be organised in accordance to MoS. See Wikipedia:Cite sources. Avoid presenting the images in the form of a...
Click to read more »fully MoS-compliant. We're looking for professional standards of English, with the emphasis on brevity and clarity. We do not expect 100% MoS-compliance...
Click to read more »precise method can hardly be considered a GA requirement, especially as the MoS is unclear on what "logical quotation" actually means. Although I don't consider...
Click to read more »Soaper1234 JuneGloom07 Meena Burberry47 Taylor2317 edit Shortcut WP:EE/MOSWP:EE/MOS This is a style guide for EastEnders articles. It includes guidelines and...
Click to read more »English Wikipedia's Manual of Style (MoS) is a guideline, or a set of "best practices" supported by consensus. The MoS is not a collection of hard rules...
Click to read more »sections—some insisting that "Publication history" must come first, and the Novels MoS advises Lead => Plot => Characters => Major themes => Style => Background...
Click to read more »Shortcuts WP:AFC/SWP:AFC/S WP:WPAFC/SWP:WPAFC/S The following data sets show the comparison of the last three months for the number of submissions per...
Click to read more »the salvageable material from MOS:PN into MOS:CAPS. Some of MOS:PN would not be retained in MOS:CAPS because it is non-MoS material about article titles...
Click to read more »is happening in the picture. the section "illeism, malapropism..." etc. MoS states that there should not be wikilinks in section headings/ DONE references...
Click to read more »potential. I have a few suggestions for improvement. Layout The Manual of Style (MoS) advises against sandwiching text between two images. Many of the images...
Click to read more »that it takes a long time to learn the ins and outs of the Manual of Style (MoS) and that not everybody has trained to be a professional proofreader or copyeditor...
Click to read more »Woefully under-referenced. 2) In-text links for external links, contrary to MoS. 3)Sections of it look an aweful lot like a directory. 4)Lack of citations...
Click to read more »they sound fine to me; as I said it's also against MoS as well. Good work so far! Cheers, Abraham, B.S. (talk) 23:17, 14 March 2009 (UTC) Oh, I follow!...
Click to read more »25 February 2008 (UTC) External links should be at the end, per Wikipedia:MoS#External_links.—RJH (talk) 21:46, 28 February 2008 (UTC) This has been done...
Click to read more »Thryduulf (talk) 23:38, 15 December 2016 (UTC) I agree with you; the MoS doesn't, but the MoS is more concerned pednatry than being useful to readers. Still...
Click to read more »fujiken.mo-blog.jp/itonatto/2008/01/post_af85.html (R/Xmeta/L- removed) 2009-10-22 08:13:17 (UTC): s:ja:User:210.196.240.152 (t - c; 10) to s:ja:愛國百人一首...
Click to read more »for this, but this is the standard layout as laid out at the WP:FOOTBALL MoS that is used on every football article we have. This has gone through FAC...
Click to read more »topic, consistency would be nice- I'd go with the former, as it's what the MoS recommends. J Milburn (talk) 15:27, 23 July 2011 (UTC) I changed the citation...
Click to read more »Just two additional remarks: A picture would be nice. The are problems with MoS, such as the wikilinking of single years.--Yannismarou 19:20, 8 May 2007...
Click to read more »rescue Collins created a media sensation."). There are also quite a few MoS problems and the other notes is nothing but trivia. Nikki311 23:09, 21 June...
Click to read more »regards to the MOS before, it is not a free pass to continue to be inconsistent. -- Netoholic @ 22:03, 29 July 2014 (UTC) Then the MoS is what should...
Click to read more »see discussion Death Note, see discussion Fate/stay night, see discussion: MoS violations, excessive plot, undersourced, excessive non-free images, missing...
Click to read more »the ultimate goal will be FAC so I hope this review will shake out more MOS and other overlooked issues. --Brad (talk) 22:51, 15 October 2008 (UTC) Tenative...
Click to read more »I think this can avoid FAR, but it needs someone to dig in and fix the MOS and sourcing issues very soon. --MASEM (t) 15:15, 22 December 2009 (UTC)...
Click to read more »wasn't "I don't like the MoS", but rather to explain what the applicable rule in the MoS is. I personally far prefer the MoS version ("We Love..."). —...
Click to read more »mistakes, etc... Mercenary2k April 18, 2006 7:56 PM Small issue, but per WP:MoS there should be no wiki-links in headings (like Six-Day War). Thanks, AndyZ t...
Click to read more »reasonably well written. a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate...
Click to read more »article. Thus, a second link is unnecessary. Shortcuts WP:MORMONWP:MORMON MOS:MORMONMOS:MORMON Generally, members of a Latter Day Saint denomination may...
Click to read more »comprehensive biography of Booth's entire life and his effect upon the U.S. It complies with MoS, Layout, Lead, image use, etc., and, I hope my colleagues will...
Click to read more »punctuation,[1] like this.[2] As for units, I've fixed the lead to comply with WP:MoS, try to make the rest similar (abbreviate only the conversion, and use ...
Click to read more »--WillC 23:47, 14 June 2009 (UTC) Needs a bit of work on the writing. Does the MoS say not to put quotes in italic face just because they're quotes? Not sure...
Click to read more »article passes WP:GNG it should pass irrespective of WP:MOS issues. AfC does not focus on MoS. While the company may be notable, the refs on the draft...
Click to read more »paras. Its easier to read and according to the MoS. 'Canberry' & 'meeting place' should be italicised. (MoS) Years: 1820 etc should be wikified. History...
Click to read more »not need gaps. Fix these things (I did some tweaks in the lead). Read WP:MoS, and have a look also here. "While the initial band was riding on the new...
Click to read more »WP:MOS recommends adding titles, can you point it out to me? If so then I will withdraw my objection. Paul August ☎ 22:41, 23 June 2006 (UTC) Our MoS, quite...
Click to read more »comes first) unless MOS becomes a list of rules longer than Wikipedia itself, specifying rules in all possible cases. Although MoS is heading that direction...
Click to read more »has not inadvertently been overlooked. Short description Lead section per MoS should summarise the rest, Refs not obligatory, but usefulif lead may be...
Click to read more »edit) from [1]. Ssilvers (talk) 03:50, 23 May 2008 (UTC) Image talk:Hawara MoS 1911.210.1.JPG (history · last edit) from [Royal Museum of Scotland]. Nomination...
Click to read more »and is ready for FAC. JGHowes talk 03:11, 28 March 2009 (UTC) Comment - MoS compliance may require attention; see here for an example. –Juliancolton | Talk...
Click to read more »and paste this, but there's no need for page titles in quotes unless the MoS specifically calls for it. – John M Wolfson (talk • contribs) 21:00, 21...
Click to read more »style guidelines, and does not require substantial copy-editing to be fully MoS-compliant. A5. The article contains supporting visual materials, such as...
Click to read more »in the article. Per WP:Air MoS, specs need to be for a specific variant, not just "Lancaster", and with a cited reference(s). Expand all units in text...
Click to read more »March 2007 (UTC) The lead is short. Per WP:LEAD it needs expansion. Per WP:MoS inline citations go straight after the pm; not before. The article is full...
Click to read more »change the text of the MoS. People opposing the new text here and at WT:MOS are split between "Don't change the text of the MoS because it is already perfectly...
Click to read more »Shortcuts MOS:BOXINGMOS:BOXING WP:BOXING/MOSWP:BOXING/MOS This is a style guide for biographical articles about professional and amateur boxers, as established...
Click to read more »see discussion Death Note, see discussion Fate/stay night, see discussion: MoS violations, excessive plot, undersourced, excessive non-free images, missing...
Click to read more »suggestions! Here they are: Linking of years is not consistent I'm afraid. Per WP:MoS a date should be linked if it includes day and month. If not "there is consensus...
Click to read more »editors have raised the need for copyediting, with one objection due to MoS problems - dashes and punctuation. I am not a native English speaker and...
Click to read more »22:07, 27 June 2007 (UTC) Just a couple of Manual of Style related issues. MoS:Times It needs to be correctly formatted throughout. In the cite web template...
Click to read more »grown to an external link farm, listy prose, external jumps in the text, and MoS cleanup is needed. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 11:47, 30 July 2008 (UTC) I second...
Click to read more »simply said "Read MoS" with no further explanation. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 19:00, 3 January 2013 (UTC) Comment - Here's the MoS section about discographies:...
Click to read more »The use of "We" in "Duration of the process" is not encyclopedic. (See WP:MoS#Avoid_first-person_pronouns_and_one.) There are a number of very short paragraphs...
Click to read more »WT:MOSTENSE, but we generally don't even create those, for a MOS:FOO that's just a section in the MoS page in question, or we'd have over 100 new such redirects...
Click to read more »April 2011 (UTC) An interesting article. I did a light copyedit of it for MoS compliance and grammar, though there are still a few sentences and clauses...
Click to read more »the MoS prescribes. Done. Bibliography should be in alphabetical order, I believe. I've done this, but could you point me in the direction of the MoS for...
Click to read more »hard it is to find sites regarding indy promotions. Plus per the wrestling MoS it says that the promotion's website is the best one to use. I'm willing...
Click to read more »the page creation. Editors who were uninvolved in the kerfuffle around WP:MoS policy might want to note that all the delete votes are from other folks...
Click to read more »eyes who could help identify any potential obstacles to passing the FAC (MoS mistakes, grammar and flow, issues with comprehensiveness or neutrality,...
Click to read more »be an actual MoS section or page about footnotes, and “MOS” shortcuts redirecting to regular policies and “WP” shortcuts leading to MoS articles are not...
Click to read more ») Note that the main Manual of Style page is not in the list of required MoS pages. It may, however, be a useful page to look at if you have questions...
Click to read more »Cycle~ (talk) Very similar editing patterns (both in pages edited and lack of MoS knowledge). Cycle~ (talk) 16:16, 4 May 2009 (UTC) Comments by accused parties...
Click to read more »a technical standpoint (grammar, MoS, etc...) the article was solid. That said, it doesn't completely meet the MOS standards. There are a few paragraphs...
Click to read more »possible misspellings of common heading names for Wikipedia articles. See MOS:APPENDIX for more information. Bold for an entry indicates that the misspelling...
Click to read more »Help:Editing; for guidance on writing style, see Manual of Style. Shortcuts MOS:ORDERMOS:ORDER MOS:SECTIONORDERMOS:SECTIONORDER A simple article should have, at least...
Click to read more »sixteen written out, twelve written out and thrity written out. (From WP:MoS: "Within a context or a list, style should be consistent (either “There were...
Click to read more »Reference 1 needs an en dash to replace the hyphen in the title per the MoS. Giants2008 (Talk) 22:35, 10 May 2013 (UTC) Done. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:45...
Click to read more »really offer any argument other than insisting on a rigid adherence to the MoS. Flowerparty☀ 01:54, 26 June 2009 (UTC) Nuclear (edit | talk | history |...
Click to read more »filled bonding MOs (2a1, 1b11b2, 3a1), and one filled non-bonding MO (1b21b1), resulting in the average O-H bond order of 1.5. In the simple MO solution (also...
Click to read more »style guidelines, and does not require substantial copy-editing to be fully MoS-compliant. A5. The article contains supporting visual materials, such as...
Click to read more »to a new editor, mostly due to the mass of Manual of Style (MoS) reading. While the MoS contains good information, it is way more than an average editor...
Click to read more »peer review because it might need fixing for minor grammar mistakes and MoS errors. I hope to send this to FAC one day. The article is currently undergoing...
Click to read more »with the dates. Further MoS issues: "The next phase of the war began in 1000, when Basil". Do not wikilink single years per MoS. "In the ensuing battle...
Click to read more »overrule the MoS here? Note that I've started a conversation about it here. Apterygial 08:57, 19 June 2009 (UTC) There is an example given on the MOS page which...
Click to read more »2007 (UTC) Suggested FA criteria concerns are LEAD (2a), stub sections and MoS issues (2), prose (1a), and images (3). Marskell 13:44, 6 August 2007 (UTC)...
Click to read more »got a mix of long cites and short cites in the text. I don't know what the MoS says about that, if anything, but I find it easier to read and edit an article...
Click to read more »is going to need a lot of MoS cleanup; you may want to work with Epbr123 (talk · contribs) or someone knowledgeable in MoS to help correct the deficiencies...
Click to read more »"finishing atop the The article currently fails Accessibility standards. See MOS:DTT for further information– use the scope row tags on the "Winner" section...
Click to read more »list was promoted by The Rambling Man 18:42, 9 May 2012 [6]. Nominator(s): Mo Rock...Monstrous (leech44) 20:00, 29 March 2012 (UTC) I am nominating this...
Click to read more »any who disagree), and should thus be enshrined in the MoS as "how it's done". They forget that MoS is a prescriptive and proscriptive internal guideline...
Click to read more »prepped, etc. The history mentioned above would be appropriate here. See the MoS for additional suggestions on the content needed here. A reception section...
Click to read more »claims about the MoS which were demonstrated to be false, and claimed things about the size that was demonstrated by myself following MoS guidelines to show...
Click to read more »supported by the MoS and the task is very specific. --Cybercobra (talk) 07:49, 13 November 2009 (UTC) There are plenty of things supported by the MoS that are...
Click to read more »kept my B's and H's straight :-) ). Did a bit more copyediting also for MoS:MUSIC - type stuff. I'd feel funny about deleting the keys from the list...
Click to read more »have these verified values changed. Here is proposed, that CheMoBot adds (a) parameter(s) to the infoboxes in mainspace that have verified or watched values...
Click to read more »Wikipedia's fundraising messages and financial status. Discussion report MoS rules on CCP name mulled, XRV axe plea nulled, BLPPROD drafting bid pulled...
Click to read more »19:17, 11 March 2007 (UTC) Citations go after the pun mark; not before (per MoS). You start with a phrase maybe not adequate for starting a biography: "Although...
Click to read more »WP:LAYOUT) the article and cite it properly (per WP:CITE). Check also WP:MoS; it could be useful. I don't think a review is now very useful; the article...
Click to read more »list candidates/List of Atlanta Thrashers draft picks/archive1 Nominator(s): Mo Rock...Monstrous (leech44) 20:00, 29 March 2012 (UTC) I am nominating this...
Click to read more »"to promptly extract information". Yes, that's much better, thanks "he'd"—MoS says no contractives. Fixed The images are tiny. Some are full of detail...
Click to read more »for Old Norse. In Modern English, these are merely optional ligatures, so MoS splits them into oe and ae. For Latin- or Greek-derived words, use e or ae/oe...
Click to read more »consistent: here you wikilink month and year; in other cases you don't. Per WP:MoS, we wikilink only year-date-month. Maybe it would be better to merge "family"...
Click to read more »number figures 1-9 into words per MoS. --Efe (talk) 03:49, 20 January 2009 (UTC) Done Santana's Supernatural is 1999's longest-running album. --Efe (talk)...
Click to read more »think that only MOS:UNLINKDATES should be kept. The issue with the MoS is formatting, linking the years doesn't format anything, so delete MOS:UNLINKYEARS...
Click to read more »Seems pretty stable 2 Fails miserably with compliance with the MoS (read the entire WP:MoS, WP:Date, WP:NPOV, WP:LEAD, WP:GTL, etc.). Feel free to read...
Click to read more »Meets all criteria but sure can be improved a bit. 1a:yes 1b:y Several MoS issues 2a:y 2by Only consists of Primary sources 2c:y 3a:y I'm not sure about...
Click to read more »well-written article or improve a preexisting one. Shortcuts MOS:REALWORLDMOS:REALWORLD MOS:FICTIONALMOS:FICTIONAL Articles about fiction, like all Wikipedia...
Click to read more »hyphen. Para 3: past or present tense? Not both. ("is"). Each episodeS? Done See MOS on spelling out numbers and spaced em dashes. Tone unencyclopedic:...
Click to read more »Sports event experience The reference basically do not follow the format of MoS and also there are many dead/invalid links. [1] Coloane 15:53, 2 January...
Click to read more »more depth in RIVALRIES. - "summarize ... most important points" as per MoS "named after Princess Alexandra." - Lose this as it is mentioned in the History...
Click to read more »also serious concerns throughout about MoS, relevance and structure. These can be addressed by reading the MoS carefully and ensuring that the article...
Click to read more »logs | views) (delete) – (View log) Repeat of page Ganesha replete with WP:MOS problems (page creator SIGNED article) and no sources. ←Spidern→ 05:33, 2...
Click to read more »may be used with consistency in each article, in line with MOS:DATETIES. As prescribed by MOS:DATERET, where an article has evolved using predominantly...
Click to read more »See also is rather long. Are there no external links to link but one? Per MoS, usage of bold text should be avoided in body of the article. Just one of...
Click to read more »treated with common sense, and exceptions may apply. Substantive edits to this page should reflect consensus. Shortcuts WP:MOSINWP:MOSIN MOS:INDIAMOS:INDIA...
Click to read more »style guidelines, and does not require substantial copy-editing to be fully MoS-compliant. A5. The article contains supporting visual materials, such as...
Click to read more »neither assess MoS compliance at all except for some key matters. I'm hard-pressed to find any FA anywhere that doesn't have at least some MoS problems, because...
Click to read more »thorough look at the article FrB.TG! Really value your inputs on FA prose/MoS standards for BLPs. I regularly refer to your work when drafting mine tbh...
Click to read more »Oppose, unprepared - Please go through your article and ensure it meets our MoS guidelines (image captions, use of hyphens and dashes jump out at me). This...
Click to read more »section, squeezed text, single-sentence paragraphs, clunky unpolished prose, MoS issues etc. These are the things that a peer review is meant to iron out...
Click to read more »It was created so that the date link at NTFS (which is recommended by the MoS) doesn't have a redlink. This is a reasonable concern; it may be better to...
Click to read more »is correct usage of the term under the circumstances. For the sake of the MoS I would suggest going with the later, but I will not hold this against you...
Click to read more »that end'"." The MoS suggests that quotes of "more than about 40 words" should be formatted as block quotations. I can see why the MoS suggest that, but...
Click to read more »Manual of Style (MoS) conventions. I like using the {{convert}} template for this because it's versatile and "knows" the correct MoS spellings, abbreviations...
Click to read more »should be sorted, use {{Unsorted list}}. Shortcuts MOS:LISTBASICSMOS:LISTBASICS MOS:PROSEMOS:PROSE MOS:USEPROSEMOS:USEPROSE Prose is preferred in articles...
Click to read more »use AmE dates. There is a strong national tie and should use BrE date per MoS especially as that this is what the original contributor used [1][2][3][4]...
Click to read more »these articles are in quite bad condition, need cleanup, references, fixing MoS and so on. Here is a short draft with some quick stuffs how to improve the...
Click to read more »comprehensive, well cited, there's no need for a sort function, and I cannot see any MoS faults. Nicely compliments Mary Pickford, which was a fascinating read. WFCforLife...
Click to read more »MoS breach: "It is noted". Just say it, as long as you cite this assertion in the main text somewhere. MoS breach: "currently" (Have you read MoS?)...
Click to read more »it featured? — Wackymacs 02:11, 27 December 2005 (UTC) Needs a copyedit. MoS units: 8 MHz --> 8 MHz Lead needs to be a little longer Round Rock,...
Click to read more »good idea to refer to something as a policy if it isn't one. WP:NEO is a MoS guideline. - Che Nuevara 12:49, 7 October 2007 (UTC) Just another name for...
Click to read more »mistakes here and there. Careful copyediting is good. The Manual of Style (MoS) generally deprecates paragraphs of only one or two sentences. Two solutions...
Click to read more »(discuss) 22:14, 23 July 2019 (UTC) An FA needs to be fully MoS compliant. The MoS states, under MOS:ACCIM: "Images that are not purely decorative should include...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Completely uncited and not within MoS. Mr.weedle (talk) 14:38, 4 May 2014 (UTC) Delete as a duplication of Live...
Click to read more »the Terminology and Subdivisions sections), prose issues, and a number of MoS violations. To take two examples, uncited factual statements include "The...
Click to read more »has been cherished in Macedonia for centuries". There are also some minor MoS concerns. Majoreditor (talk) 22:35, 21 June 2009 (UTC) Question. Can someone...
Click to read more »not a complete sentence so no period required. MOS:NUM – naughty mixed date formats in the references. MOS:BOLD – no bold links and no need to bold random...
Click to read more »- Talk 18:25, 25 June 2008 (UTC) Oppose Unreferenced, not comprehensive, MoS issues. Please familiarize yourself with the Featured Article criteria. Nishkid64...
Click to read more »See also Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Korea-related articles (MOS:KO). Both WP:NCKO and MOS:KO are applied together for topics that are significantly related...
Click to read more »issues you bring up. Albrecht (talk) 01:53, 4 January 2009 (UTC) Just a few MoS issues that stick out: An endash (–) is required between date ranges used...
Click to read more »seems to be very short and I believe it fails WP:LEAD. I spotted a few other MoS issues, like refs inside punctuation, or stepping "out of article" in "Myths...
Click to read more »parties: This is unlikely to have any effect on the problem; all of MOS is {{guideline}}s and the situation is worse there. Reduction to {{essay}} might help...
Click to read more »Before the MoS change to lower case all bird names, parrots of the genus Amazona all had the "Amazon" in their name capitalised by default, e.g. White-fronted...
Click to read more »Women's cricket and Youth cricket"—why the caps? MoS breach. Please remove two instances of "cricket". MoS breach in "1960/1" and numerous others: the closing...
Click to read more »scene for the topic. The prose and MoS-compliance need considerable work. There are a lot of minor grammar and MoS issues. The article needs a thorough...
Click to read more »5 September 2006 (UTC) Oppose Quotes should not be in italics, per the MoS. Wikipedia articles have a lead section - which is basically the introduction...
Click to read more »sense, and exceptions may apply. Substantive edits to this page should reflect consensus. Shortcuts WP:MOSTUNINGSWP:MOSTUNINGS MOS:TUNINGSMOS:TUNINGS...
Click to read more »just comment and was almost gonna support, but found quite a few prose and MoS issues that I'm opposing for now. Let me know if these issues are fixed....
Click to read more »the WP:MOS#Ellipses, so you might want to work with Epbr123 (talk · contribs) to comb through the article for MoS issues; he's very good at MoS cleanup...
Click to read more »"Wikipedia's independence" or "Wikimedia's pile of dosh"? Discussion report MoS rules on CCP name mulled, XRV axe plea nulled, BLPPROD drafting bid pulled...
Click to read more »war. Please advise the editor to stop, or take a step back and read the MoS. Conferring with the editor would alleviate the situation. Okay, before we...
Click to read more »style guidelines, and does not require substantial copy-editing to be fully MoS-compliant. A6. The article contains supporting visual materials, such as...
Click to read more »mentioned without listing any actual recreations of it. Shortcuts MOS:POPCULTMOS:POPCULT MOS:CULTURALREFSMOS:CULTURALREFS Cultural references about the article's...
Click to read more »resolving "the tension that surrounds MOS and the role of those who seek to retain its authority"; that belongs on MoS Talk, or perhaps the Village Pump....
Click to read more »throughout. In addition to a multitude of minor MoS problems (see my edit summaries for lots of little MoS fixes needed), there is extensive WP:OVERLINKing...
Click to read more »15:50, 17 October 2015 (UTC) So now if an infobox violates the MOS, we should "go to the MoS and complain"? I'm done here - I'll let the director/delegates...
Click to read more »statements, or confusing/conflicting information), mostly compliant with the MoS, and abides the central policies of citing to verifiable reliable sources...
Click to read more »some places, but could editors give it another look? I mainly spotted minor MoS issues. Geometry guy 17:55, 27 April 2008 (UTC) Delist. It's improved, but...
Click to read more »The basic transcription of Usama ibn Ladin is not used. Shortcuts MOS:IBNMOS:IBN MOS:BINTMOS:BINT Note on ibn and bint: the Arabic words ابن or بن (transl...
Click to read more »just completely ignore the MOS-nuts who have some sort of vendetta against date links....". (Most of this was duplicated at MoS talk at the time.) Tony (talk)...
Click to read more »10 August 2008 (UTC) Suggested FA criteria concerns are referencing (1c), MoS (2), and images (3). Marskell (talk) 13:12, 14 August 2008 (UTC) In my view...
Click to read more »19:56, 13 August 2007 (UTC) Some thoughts... The plot is far too long. The MoS currently suggests between 400 and 700 words. The sentence below the cast...
Click to read more »and pieces as I have time. My first concern is considerable confusion wrt MOS:APPENDIX; it's hard to tell what's what. On See also, should those links...
Click to read more »pope. --Keerllston 02:02, 16 December 2007 (UTC) PS: "Cite error 4"? Oppose MOS breaches and more. Plenty of reasons why this can't pass FA (or GA before)...
Click to read more »use should follow MOS and be annotated with with the state's name Fasach Nua (talk) 21:21, 28 November 2010 (UTC) I notice that the MoS says that "However...
Click to read more »sentence. Likewise, the Manual of Style demands that "[m]id-sentence, per the MoS main page, the word the should in general not be capitalized in continuous...
Click to read more »20:32, 12 February 2008 (UTC) Comment. A cursory glance reveals some issues: MoS concerns: Full stops are used for image captions despite caption not being...
Click to read more »not) It is reasonably well written. a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): Prose and layout issues...
Click to read more »citations (other then a hyperlink here and there, which is a no-n according to MoS anyway. As this looks more of a former state article then a history one,...
Click to read more »specific record label related articles. Shortcuts WP:MOS RECORD LABELWP:MOS RECORD LABEL WP:MOS RLWP:MOS RL The article name should be the title of the record...
Click to read more »above issues, I'd like to add: Cleanup banners and citation needed tags MoS problems Poor writing in some areas. Example: the beginning of the Colonial...
Click to read more »sports templates in accordance with MOS:NUMBERSIGN Automatic, Supervised, or Manual: Automatic Programming language(s): AWB Source code available: WP:AWB...
Click to read more »explain what an encyclical is. Latin names should be in italics per the MoS. The reference should be properly formatted, idealy using cite web or at...
Click to read more ».but help is on the way! Kaisershatner 15:01, 2 March 2007 (UTC) Per WP:MoS single years like "in 1790" should not be linked. Only full dates: "in January...
Click to read more »aspect of our MoS takes precedence here. - SchroCat (talk) 13:35, 3 March 2014 (UTC) There's no discrepancy between different parts of the MoS, on this issue...
Click to read more »received their own solo comic books, Nick Fury, Agent of S.H.I.E.L.D. and Doctor Strange. Shortcut MOS:COMICSVOLUMEMOS:COMICSVOLUME Where a comic-book series...
Click to read more »Nominator(s): Candyo32 22:01, 6 September 2010 (UTC) In transforming the discog from this to this, I now believe that the article satisfies the discography MoS...
Click to read more »(50/14/9); Ended Mon, 22 Jan 2007 13:40:44 UTC BozMo (talk · contribs) – This is a self nomination by BozMo. I am not a saint, not the best ever editor either...
Click to read more »give the opportunity to everyone willing to contest the addition to the MoS to do it. -- Magioladitis (talk) 14:05, 10 July 2014 (UTC) @Magioladitis:...
Click to read more »continues to be played today.)." The special situation section of that MoS (MOS:CAPLENGTH) includes a video game cover as an example of a full-sentence...
Click to read more »article should be written from an out-of-universe perspective. Shortcut MOS:NOVELPLOTMOS:NOVELPLOT An article about a novel should include a concise...
Click to read more »editors to an article needing a cleanup. Shortcuts MOS:PUFFERYMOS:PUFFERY MOS:PEACOCKMOS:PEACOCK MOS:FLOWERYMOS:FLOWERY Words such as these are often used...
Click to read more »to vi:Mô hình Gaussian hỗn hợp; so it might be speedily deleted under WP:A2. —teb728 t c 22:04, 24 October 2014 (UTC) Speedy Delete per teb728's reasoning...
Click to read more »Bellhalla (talk) 05:41, 5 December 2008 (UTC) Comment - references satisfy MoS. —Ed 17 (Talk / Contribs) 02:04, 6 December 2008 (UTC) Support - —Ed 17 (Talk...
Click to read more »also section, portal link, etc). I also removed a few sortname templates, MoS inconsistencies, etc. Please discuss if you disagree with any of the edits...
Click to read more »talk:WikiProject Football/Archive 152#MOS:DATETOPRES in April. The question is, can a project just ignore the manual of style? If the MoS is not appropriate, should...
Click to read more »subject, given the widespread nationalism found on Wikipedia. There are some MoS issues, as outlined below: Thanks for your comments! About the lead: one...
Click to read more »Manual of Style. Here are my suggestions: Section heads The Manual of Style (MoS) advises against repeating the main words of the article title in the section...
Click to read more »critical and basic sections for an anime series that are called for in the MoS and that are required to have considered addressing the major aspects of...
Click to read more »cuestionable verifiability (including primary ones), damaged prose and outdated MoS addressing. It is kind of similar to Anuel AA. If you want to improve or...
Click to read more »(UTC) Oh yes, it is FA material! ;-) A few minor points, though: Per the MoS, section headings generally shouldn't begin with "The". A few more inline...
Click to read more »uncited, is listy towards the end, could use cleanup of See also, and has some MOS issues (WP:DASH, WP:MOSBOLD, WP:MOSNUM, WP:MSH—easily fixed). The lead could...
Click to read more »unformatted citations and the External links could use a trim. There are also MoS issues that could be addressed if the article is cited. SandyGeorgia (Talk)...
Click to read more »needs to be backed up by a cite. Quotes shouldn't be in italics per the MoS. The article also needs a good copyedit.--Peta 03:19, 2 August 2006 (UTC)...
Click to read more »Wikipedia's guidelines for formatting dates (MOS:DATEFORMAT) set out the three date formats acceptable for use in Wikipedia articles, namely: Day–month–year...
Click to read more »that before, whatever the MoS says" is an IAR argument -- which, again, is perfectly fine, but is not the same as saying "the MoS supports this". The textbook...
Click to read more »sortable lists, and isn't regarded as WP:OVERLINK, but I can't lay hands on the MoS authority for it. You are inconsistent between St John's-wort at Coldfall...
Click to read more »but only 21 items are given in the one reference provided. Other concerns: MoS says that the intro paragraph does not need separate referencing unless there...
Click to read more »explain their reasons when commenting. Agree; lacks references, contains MoS breaches, and is written rather choppily. –Juliancolton | Talk 01:41, 12...
Click to read more »more nomination like this. One point: where space is short, why not do the MoS suggestion and make the closing years in a range two digits (provided the...
Click to read more »century very short MOS:LEAD which does not sufficiently summarize the content the structure of the article should be improved per MOS:LAYOUT; reviewer offered...
Click to read more »information provided, and no sources. Also, it goes completely against the MoS, and has no proper background provided. Saying things like, 'The creator...
Click to read more ») Note that the main Manual of Style page is not in the list of required MoS pages. It may, however, be a useful page to look at if you have questions...
Click to read more »comments. Cowlibob (talk) 23:12, 9 August 2014 (UTC) De link Washington D.C, MoS advises against linking big cities.♦ Dr. Blofeld 15:04, 23 August 2014 (UTC)...
Click to read more »only full dates (November 24, 2006). I don't know why, but that is what WP:MoS demands. Bibliography is not enough (and you donot provide ISBNs). We need...
Click to read more »T-34's history sheds some light). But what other terms need explication? Units format: 76.2mm is only used in adjectival phrases, which the MOS doesn't...
Click to read more »recently rewritten the entire article to a point where I believe it follows the MoS. I believe I also need someone's second opinion. However, I still don't know...
Click to read more »small caps" is stated quite plainly in the two main MoS pages on markup: MOS:BADEMPHASIS and MOS:SMALLCAPS. Furthermore, my rationale is not that they...
Click to read more »about his life and art. Any pictures of him? Please, also read carefully WP:MoS, in order to see how we write and wikilink years and dates. In any case,...
Click to read more »(UTC) Delete - this probably should have been PRODded. Contravenes most of MoS, uses second person pronouns, NN, is a recipe for goodness' sake. —Vanderdecken∴...
Click to read more »better had at WP:FICT, WP:V or the appropriate MoS subpage/Wikiproject. For what it’s worth, the MoS is a guideline and is subordinate to WP:V, which...
Click to read more »concerns have been addressed. As for the accessibility issues, if the relevant MoS guidelines don't prohibit rowspans (they apparently do not), then I don't...
Click to read more »case where the Wikipedia Manual of Style (MOS) and these standards conflict, that editor should follow the MOS and let USRD know so this document can be...
Click to read more »addition, the lead is rather short and skimpy. Early life is weak. As per WP:MoS, His Death should be Death. This is also heavily filled with lists. AndyZ...
Click to read more »a personal heuristic. There appear to be many redundant links. (C.f. WP:MoS#Wikilinking.) Jupiter, for example, is linked 8 times, and not always consistently...
Click to read more »to use bold links (per MOS) but we are supposed to use bold headers in tables (per MOS) which results in bold links. Thus MOS is in conflict with itself...
Click to read more »referencing. Quality of the prose may be distinctly unencyclopedic, and MoS compliance non-existent; but the article should satisfy fundamental content...
Click to read more »article(s) • Random article talk page (RJL templates • WP:AURD guidelines • MOS guidelines) Or convert a non-standard road junction list – 0 article(s) • Random...
Click to read more »sidebars (like the one at Big Brother (U.S. TV series)) hide text by default which shouldn't be done per MOS:DONTHIDE. TheDoctorWho (talk) 00:57, 24 April...
Click to read more »(and if so, what?) Also, are there enough references, does it conform to MoS etc. Thanks, IdiotSavant (talk) 04:50, 28 July 2008 (UTC) Ruhrfisch comments:...
Click to read more »lack of inline citations, problems with the first two images and prose and MoS flaws all over the place. For example, Genesis of Test cricket is filled...
Click to read more »Shortcut WP:S-EDTWP:S-EDT The WikiProject Scouting editing conventions is a series of supplements to the Wikipedia:Policies and guidelines and the Wikipedia:Manual...
Click to read more »09er (talk) 16:30, 23 July 2008 (UTC) "The 36 year old" I think that per WP:MoS you need hyphens here. And here:"29 year old". "The decision to move into...
Click to read more »here: Wikipedia:MOS#Punctuation_inside_or_outside. Done Calvin • 999 And misused quotation marks: "as bracingly huge and catchy as it is, "S&M" doesn’t deviate...
Click to read more »case that the template violates the MOS? Maury Markowitz (talk) 19:45, 14 March 2019 (UTC) It's not really a MoS problem, it's to do with your choice...
Click to read more »equipment it holds. The "colour" section (which should be color according to MoS) could use a cite The huge coverage of every kind of equipment holder is...
Click to read more »(UTC) Comment – The headings are not formatted properly. Please read the WP:MoS for details. 2) Single paragraphs in each heading do not make a FA. Expand...
Click to read more »May 2009 (UTC) I think that the MoS and PLOT guidelines intersect with both the criterion 1 (well-written and follows MoS, eg "length of a plot summary...
Click to read more »the standard way of doing it. If the MoS says something else, perhaps it ought not to, but in any event the MoS is just a guideline, not policy, and Cite...
Click to read more »wait until the CfD closes before approving this request, unless there is an MoS page or something which already states that this is the norm. Martinp23 16:06...
Click to read more »introducing the bibliography. Where was the list obtained from? Not sure what the MoS says, but with dates in the references, would it be better to state the month...
Click to read more »Blatantly fails WP:DIRECTORY. Wikipedia is not an Electronic program guide. Per MoS style guideline, avoid statements that will date quickly. See also Wikipedia:Articles...
Click to read more »the text. All the refs are after the punctuation, as I was told to do per MoS in the T-26 article. I will add a non-breaking space, however. EDIT: I took...
Click to read more »logs · subpages) Maybe speediable per T2. Not complying with persnickety MoS recommendations is not "vandalism" or anything else people would receive...
Click to read more »arcs sourced by the One Piece Wikia!! Pure WP:PLOT that repeats the more MoS appropriate List of One Piece chapters and List of One Piece episodes. --...
Click to read more »life. It fails criteria 3 in that it has no images. There are some little MOS fixes needed but i think Oldelpaso has fixed some of these including ndashes...
Click to read more »Mo ainm (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki ·...
Click to read more »Blatantly fails WP:DIRECTORY. Wikipedia is not an Electronic program guide. Per MoS style guideline, avoid statements that will date quickly. See also Wikipedia:Articles...
Click to read more »2010 (UTC) A one page book on how to create books... While books on the MoS and other wikipedia-related things could be created, I don't think it makes...
Click to read more »Reference 1 needs an en dash to replace the hyphen in the title per the MoS. Giants2008 (Talk) 22:35, 10 May 2013 (UTC) Done. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:45...
Click to read more »Suggested FA criteria concerns are referencing (1c), stub paragraphs and MoS issues (2). Marskell 08:40, 11 August 2007 (UTC) Remove The problems identified...
Click to read more »the MOS/Layout issues as well as fixing refs. Prince of Canada t | c 06:06, 11 October 2008 (UTC) Suggested FA criteria concerns are lead (2a), MoS (2)...
Click to read more »