Redirect to:
This page is a redirect. The following categories are used to track and monitor this redirect:
|
Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Dates and numbers/Three proposals for change to MOSNUM and Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Dates and numbers/Date Linking RFC. For consensus...
Click to read more »discussions at WT:MOSNUM. Thank you! (moved from WT:MOSNUM) Three issues have been causing disruption on this talk page and on MOSNUM itself, and it is...
Click to read more »below and instead participate in discussions at WT:MOSNUM. Thank you! Shortcut WP:MOSNUM/RFCWP:MOSNUM/RFC The use of date autoformatting presently available...
Click to read more »sections compatible with Wikipedia:Manual of Style (dates and numbers) (MOSNUM): General article-level enabling fixes involve delinking all dates and date...
Click to read more »js&action=raw&ctype=text/javascript'); importScript("User:Ohconfucius/script/MOSNUM_utils.js"); function ohc_fix_unambiguous_dates() { // resolvable ambiguous...
Click to read more »available: Not yet established, but will be closely based on User:Ohconfucius/MOSNUM_dates.js – which has already been used on thousands of articles, specifically...
Click to read more »13 August 2013 (UTC) I no longer see the links in my Toolbox for your MOSNUM dates scripts in Firefox 22 and IE10, although I can still see your Fix...
Click to read more »space inbetween. For example, change blah blah [2]. to blah blah.[2] Per WP:MOSNUM, there should be a no-break space - between a number and the unit...
Click to read more »changes to WP:MOSNUM#Which units to use Several changes to WP:MOSNUM#Unit conversions New subsections: WP:MOSNUM#Avoiding ambiguities and WP:MOSNUM#Unnecessary...
Click to read more »You’ve probably come here because there is a battle raging on Talk:MOSNUM over the linking of dates and the autoformatting of dates. Or perhaps the issue...
Click to read more »WP:MOSNUM, please spell out source units of measurements in text; for example, "the Moon is 380,000 kilometres (240,000 mi) from Earth. Per WP:MOSNUM, there...
Click to read more »you rather be up against a formidable one? He rammed through the current MOSNUM policy without a proper consensus and the years of endless bickering that...
Click to read more »prose (paragraph form). Does one list make an article list-weighty? Per WP:MOSNUM, at Units of measurement, numbers with SI units of measure should have conversions...
Click to read more »captions. Captions shortend.--JK the unwise 10:07, 2 June 2006 (UTC) Per WP:MOSNUM, at Units of measurement, numbers with SI units of measure should have conversions...
Click to read more »numbers into WP:MOSNUM#Large numbers, with changes Added three paragraphs to WP:MOSNUM#Units of measurement Added to WP:MOSNUM#Conventions: "The {{nowrap}}...
Click to read more »might be terms that should be replaced with specific dates/times. Per WP:MOSNUM, there should be a non-breaking space - between a number and the...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Manual of Style (dates and numbers) WP:MOSNUM#Year numbering systems was substantially changed. Added to WP:MOSNUM#Numbers as figures or words: "other quasi-continuous...
Click to read more »The MOSNUM had a section completely re-written recently, and many people expressed concerned about it needing copy-editing. The section is the one about...
Click to read more »changes to WP:MOSNUM#Numbers as figures or words Several changes to WP:MOSNUM#Decimal points WP:MOSNUM#Unit symbols changed to WP:MOSNUM#Unit names and...
Click to read more »separated by thin spaces to the right of the decimal. This defies both WP:MOSNUM and international standards Gerry Ashton (talk) 18:40, 9 October 2008 (UTC)...
Click to read more »Please ensure that the lead adequately summarizes the article. Per WP:MOSNUM, there should be a non-breaking space - between a number and the...
Click to read more »reorder/rename the last few sections to follow guidelines at WP:GTL. Per WP:MOSNUM, at Units of measurement, numbers with SI units of measure should have conversions...
Click to read more »disagreement over the implementation of a previous RfC. After a recent RFC, MOSNUM states that years ("1795") and month-day combinations ("February 24") should...
Click to read more »centuries can be linked if they provide context for the article. Per WP:MOSNUM, there should be a non-breaking space - between a number and the...
Click to read more »discussion: here on my talk page at Wikipedia talk:MOSNUM where Tony mentions ISO (which as Mosnum says we don't follow), but may mean the SI people (BIMP...
Click to read more »from old to new. The MOSNUM page currently reflects guidance suggesting the new instead of the old template. With all that said, MOSNUM is insuffcient for...
Click to read more »for example, link January 15, 2006, but do not link January 2006. Per WP:MOSNUM, when doing conversions, please use standard abbreviations: for example...
Click to read more »centuries can be linked if they provide context for the article. Per WP:MOSNUM, there should be a non-breaking space - between a number and the...
Click to read more »to MOSNUM and attempts to resolve them" (and related concerns by Arb. Vassyana) are laudable, but my experience in that forum suggests that MOSNUM talk...
Click to read more »that's left is the section with the quotes in ==Applications==. Per WP:MOSNUM, at Units of measurement, numbers with SI units of measure should have conversions...
Click to read more »30 May 2006 at 02:26 UTC All the following are minor suggestions: Per WP:MOSNUM, at Units of measurement, numbers with SI units of measure should have conversions...
Click to read more »Image:Flag of Nunavut.svg need(s) proper image copyright tags. Per WP:MOSNUM, at Units of measurement, numbers with SI units of measure should have conversions...
Click to read more »WP:MOSNUM, please spell out source units of measurements in text; for example, "the Moon is 380,000 kilometres (240,000 mi) from Earth. Per WP:MOSNUM, when...
Click to read more »centuries can be linked if they provide context for the article. Per WP:MOSNUM, please spell out source units of measurements in text; for example, "the...
Click to read more »that are too short and that should be either expanded or merged. Per WP:MOSNUM, at Units of measurement, numbers with SI units of measure should have conversions...
Click to read more »looked properly at the new criteria, though. "forty-five" and "47"? See MOSNUM. And "In 47 seasons" depends on the year this was written. Would it be repetitious...
Click to read more »infobox; remember that these suggestions are not generated manually) Per WP:MOSNUM, there should be a non-breaking space - between a number and the...
Click to read more »Summary:Infobox work (task I and task II) and some formating per Wikipedia:MOSNUM within U.S. articles Edit period(s) (e.g. Continuous, daily, one time run):daily...
Click to read more »please see WP:FUC. Several images are missing fair use rationales. Per WP:MOSNUM, there should be a non-breaking space - between a number and the...
Click to read more »infobox; remember that these suggestions are not generated manually) Per WP:MOSNUM, there should be a non-breaking space - between a number and the...
Click to read more »jarring, and some people find it ambiguous. Along with other wording in MOSNUM which already deprecates other kinds of numerical dates as ambiguous, the...
Click to read more »centuries can be linked if they provide context for the article. Per WP:MOSNUM, there should be a non-breaking space - between a number and the...
Click to read more »handled differently? More WP:MOSNUM, check throughout: ... from 24% to 60%, apparently depending ... Another WP:MOSNUM, no spaces before %, ... have...
Click to read more »question (due to possible javascript errors/uniqueness of articles). Per WP:MOSNUM, there should be a non-breaking space - between a number and the...
Click to read more »is shown on WP:LEAD, and should adequately summarize the article. Per WP:MOSNUM, there should be a non-breaking space - between a number and the...
Click to read more »Image:WrightPPCCScheme2.jpg need(s) proper fair use rationales. Per WP:MOSNUM, at Units of measurement, numbers with SI units of measure should have conversions...
Click to read more »dates/times. Per WP:WIAFA, Images should have concise captions. Per WP:MOSNUM, there should be a non-breaking space - between a number and the...
Click to read more »WP:MOSNUM, please spell out source units of measurements in text; for example, "the Moon is 380,000 kilometres (240,000 mi) from Earth. Per WP:MOSNUM, at...
Click to read more »several editors, both there and at MOSNUM, and uncertainty as to how exactly the data would inform such strategy. At MOSNUM talk, the reluctance of MediaWiki...
Click to read more »suggestions, I will note those I fix here as I do them. For now I fixed WP:MOSNUM issues (added "a non-breaking space...between a number and the unit of measurement"...
Click to read more »major change to the MOSNUM text (related to the choice of units and unit symbols to be used on wikipedia) was uploaded at WP:MOSNUM on 7 June 2008; for...
Click to read more »might be terms that should be replaced with specific dates/times. Per WP:MOSNUM, there should be a non-breaking space - between a number and the...
Click to read more »This is already correct per WP:MOSNUM. KV5 (Talk • Phils) 23:34, 29 March 2009 (UTC) Could you please elaborate? MOSNUM says "Comparable quantities should...
Click to read more »(UTC) I am not sure what the MOSNUM problem is. I suspect that you want "ninety-seventh" changed to "97th", but MOSNUM states that "numbers greater than...
Click to read more »is shown on WP:LEAD, and should adequately summarize the article. Per WP:MOSNUM, when doing conversions, please use standard abbreviations: for example...
Click to read more »Any ideas for an ideal list? Dual Freq 05:00, 29 May 2006 (UTC) Per WP:MOSNUM, at Units of measurement, numbers with SI units of measure should have conversions...
Click to read more »having been made only after months of dealing with his stonewalling at MOSNUM. 2009-05-22T07:36:12 – 2009-05-22T09:25:25 – Ohconfucius engaging in campaigning...
Click to read more »a bot to ensure consistency of date formats in articles in line with WP:MOSNUM. Arbitrator Jclemens, along with six other arbitrators, indicated they would...
Click to read more »down and only one American plane was damaged", should be "eight" per WP:MOSNUM. Fixed. —Ed!(talk) 19:41, 7 November 2011 (UTC) "Davis' unit underwent patrol...
Click to read more »- Numbers at the beginning of a sentence should be spelled out. (per WP:MOSNUM) Same as above with "28 years later, third baseman (later left fielder)...
Click to read more »centuries can be linked if they provide context for the article. Per WP:MOSNUM, there should be a non-breaking space - between a number and the...
Click to read more »infobox; remember that these suggestions are not generated manually) Per WP:MOSNUM, there should be a non-breaking space - between a number and the...
Click to read more »edits are single purpose to add those changes back again contray to WP:MOSNUM. User talk:217.87.98.171 User talk:217.87.99.127 This anonymous user then...
Click to read more »Fear) The Reaper") Wikipedia:Manual of Style (dates and numbers) In WP:MOSNUM#Non-breaking spaces, changed "Wikipedia recommends the use of a non-breaking...
Click to read more »In WP:MOSNUM#Large numbers, removed "The prefix "giga-" and its symbol G should be limited to computing and scientific contexts." In WP:MOSNUM#Which units...
Click to read more »/* */ /** ------------------------------------------------------------------------- */ /// REGEX utility functions function ohc_regex_to_string(s) { str...
Click to read more »21:05, 13 September 2013 (UTC Delete or replace it with a redirect to WP:MOSNUM. WP:FALKLANDSUNITS has outlived its usefulness. It is now a cause of contention...
Click to read more »dates/times. Per WP:WIAFA, Images should have concise captions. Per WP:MOSNUM, there should be a non-breaking space - between a number and the...
Click to read more »infobox; remember that these suggestions are not generated manually) Per WP:MOSNUM, there should be a non-breaking space - between a number and the...
Click to read more »there might be a small bit of room for comprehensiveness there. Per WP:MOSNUM, at Units of measurement, numbers with SI units of measure should have conversions...
Click to read more »might be terms that should be replaced with specific dates/times. Per WP:MOSNUM, there should be a non-breaking space - between a number and the...
Click to read more »WP:MOS. Seddon69 (talk) 22:47, 4 March 2008 (UTC) Notes: see WP:DASH and WP:MOSNUM, these endashes should be unspaced: Paka dropped 250 – 300 mm (10 – 12 in)...
Click to read more »All-Bran :-) Maybe that's just me. "scored 8 goals" - eight goals, per MOSNUM I would put the references in two columns as there's plenty of them Overall...
Click to read more »an issue that had been extensively discussed on Talk:MOSNUM and which was later adopted as a MOSNUM guideline against Omegatron’s wishes. I will grant Omegatron...
Click to read more »at Melbourne University, but what exactly was I being asked to check? WP:MOSNUM, don't begin sentence with number: 13 years later Scott, by now ... Changed...
Click to read more »Specifically, Image:X360_Logo.png need(s) proper fair use rationales. Per WP:MOSNUM, there should be a non-breaking space - between a number and the...
Click to read more »section: WP:MOS#Blazon Wikipedia:Manual of Style (dates and numbers) In WP:MOSNUM#Other date ranges, removed: "The form 1996–present should be avoided in...
Click to read more »Some are 30mm some 30-mm some 30 mm. It needs a bit of consistency per WP:MOSNUM, something some FAC regulars pick up on. So, only a couple of issues really...
Click to read more »footnotes, preferably in the cite.php format recommended by WP:WIAFA. Per WP:MOSNUM, at Units of measurement, numbers with SI units of measure should have conversions...
Click to read more »July 2007 (UTC) Every one of the 52 letters Cantor wrote to ... check WP:MOSNUM on 52. Fixed Ling.Nut 03:27, 23 July 2007 (UTC) Very strange to see his...
Click to read more »version, User:Civil Engineer III and I have discussed this before) Per WP:MOSNUM, there should be a no-break space - between a number and the unit...
Click to read more »surrounded rediscovery). Sabine's Sunbird talk 17:57, 11 July 2006 (UTC) Per WP:MOSNUM, there should be a non-breaking space - between a number and the...
Click to read more »used for hex, per the Unicode standard Decimal is not prefixed, per WP:MOSNUM The plan is to eventually add some kind of standard explanation of the columns...
Click to read more »centuries can be linked if they provide context for the article. Per WP:MOSNUM, there should be a non-breaking space - between a number and the...
Click to read more »Template_talk:Infobox_company#Replacing_full_stop_with_comma_at_the_num_employees_field WP:MOSNUM Edit period(s): One time run Estimated number of pages affected: Thousands...
Click to read more »the exact meaning of its representations." Gregorian calendar ISO 8601 WP:MOSNUM Wikipedia:Date formattings "ISO FAQ's Date and Time Format". Iso.org. Retrieved...
Click to read more »violent drug-related and economic, social, and health problems are ) Per WP:MOSNUM, at Units of measurement, numbers with SI units of measure should have conversions...
Click to read more »length of the current manual. In alphabetical order, they are User:A. di M./MOSNUM and User:Tony1/Beginners' guide to the Manual of Style Fourteen Requests...
Click to read more »lacking here: "There have been four 4-time winners at catcher". Per WP:MOSNUM, adjacent, non-comparable quantities should be formatted differently. Indeed...
Click to read more »centuries can be linked if they provide context for the article. Per WP:MOSNUM, there should be a non-breaking space - between a number and the...
Click to read more »should avoid a short cut like this because when displayed within the WP:MOSNUM, as it was, it can give the wrong impression that only metric units should...
Click to read more »from the frontline" Abraham, B.S. (talk) 11:27, 27 August 2008 (UTC) WP:MOSNUM: dates again, either link them all or none at all. (By that I mean those...
Click to read more »Numbers over ten should be written in numeric form, per WP:MOSNUM. This isn't necessary, MOSNUM also states: or may be rendered in words if they are expressed...
Click to read more »infobox; remember that these suggestions are not generated manually) Per WP:MOSNUM, there should be a non-breaking space - between a number and the...
Click to read more »blah blah [2]. to blah blah.[2] Done. TimL 03:54, 29 May 2006 (UTC) Per WP:MOSNUM, at Units of measurement, numbers with SI units of measure should have conversions...
Click to read more »considered reliable sources. Giants2008 (17-14) 02:58, 22 March 2009 (UTC) Dates shouldn't be linked per WP:MOSNUM. Dabomb87 (talk) 17:56, 22 March 2009 (UTC)...
Click to read more »the article. Per WP:WIAFA, Images should have concise captions. Per WP:MOSNUM, there should be a non-breaking space - between a number and the...
Click to read more »vs "eleven appearances and score three goals" inconsistent approach to MOSNUM here. "outfit" sounds very tabloid newspaper to me. "at OM is also " OM...
Click to read more »thought I should draw some comment from those watching this FAC. The WP:MOSNUM#Units of measurement guideline says that for scientific articles, the main...
Click to read more »earlier this year, primarily for making indiscriminate changes related to WP:MOSNUM. Like that user, this IP starts almost every mainspace edit summary with...
Click to read more »fun at MOSNUM debating the intricacies of this specific section of the MOS. For User:SoLando the link to the MOS is WP:MOSNUM#Dates and WP:MOSNUM#Autoformatting...
Click to read more »(UTC) Understood; MOSNUM is ambiguous, and either requires this or prohibits it depending on how you read it :) I've asked at WT:MOSNUM#Currencies. - Dank...
Click to read more »Negligence of MOS, which includes but not limited to date formats, dashes, WP:MOSNUM, etc. Overreliance on Bollywood Hungama and paucity of reliable sources...
Click to read more »spells them out (tenth, sixteenth, etc.) while in others, it uses numerals. MOSNUM says to use numerals, but I'd be happy with either, as long as it's consistent...
Click to read more »contributions, obviously created because of the current animosity at WT:MOSNUM, in order to be able to point fingers and strike comments. Dan Comments...
Click to read more »split the opening sentence into two and noted where adelaide is. Check WP:MOSNUM. I have a feeling numbers such as "50" should be in word form. A minor point...
Click to read more »article; per WP:MOS-L and WP:BTW, create links to relevant articles. Per WP:MOSNUM, there should be a non-breaking space - between a number and the...
Click to read more »be "and position players" "40 wins, 43 losses, and two ties" - 2 per WP:MOSNUM "which was good for fifth place" - WP:JARGON, there are better ways of expressing...
Click to read more »Put (MLS) after "Major League Soccer". "stayed for 2 seasons" -> two (per MOSNUM). "for a 2-goal" same. "appeared 5 times for" same, etc. You can see the...
Click to read more »"he supported a 290 ft (88 m). dam"). Those all need to be removed per WP:MOSNUM. Lead Parallel structure needed: "one of which wanted to irrigate" and "the...
Click to read more » (no-break space) between numbers and their units of measure, per WP:MOSNUM. Years without full dates generally aren't linked, per WP:CONTEXT. The last...
Click to read more »it says that this is the correct way that it should be written (per WP:MOSNUM). I pointed this out to Moriori on my talk page. He that believes that it...
Click to read more »free use image that can go on the top right corner of this article. Per WP:MOSNUM, please spell out source units of measurements in text; for example, "the...
Click to read more »name?) Dates such as "July of 1186" cannot have "of" in between, per WP:MOSNUM. The first three paragraphs need a few more citations. A few grammatical...
Click to read more »23:26, 1 January 2008 (UTC) I was thinking of five to be in line with WP:MOSNUM that numbers from zero to nine are spelt out, and although that says for...
Click to read more »awards from 15 nominations"-->Beck has received 6 awards from 15 nominations—MOSNUM says that comparative quantities should either all be spelled out or all...
Click to read more »linking years that often don't provide WP:CONTEXT, needs (see WP:MOSNUM), repetition of title in headings WP:MSH, doesn't follow WP:LAYOUT, filled...
Click to read more »No conditions or time-line have been set for closing the poll. Wikipedia:Mosnum/proposal on YYYY-MM-DD numerical dates is apparently not a poll. However...
Click to read more »"offences against MOSNUM". MOSNUM is not and will never be infallible. Like I said, the point is not to quash discussion about changing MOSNUM, but to curtail...
Click to read more »might be terms that should be replaced with specific dates/times. Per WP:MOSNUM, there should be a non-breaking space - between a number and the...
Click to read more »modern-day presidents. Sorry to be a bore, but could the documentation follow MOSNUM? "1m18s, 34kbps", all jammed together, should be spaced properly: "1 m 18 s...
Click to read more »--ROGER DAVIES talk 07:49, 8 March 2008 (UTC) I've been smacked down by WP:MOSNUM so many times I thought it would be more painless to try and fix that stuff...
Click to read more »long per WP:LEAD. Check for dead links (e.g. ref 11) "6 of its top 10 " MOSNUM. "As of November 2008"... well it's December 2012, is this list up to date...
Click to read more »there's any doubt that this article was created merely as a response to a WP:MOSNUM dispute, please search the debate archives (especially Wikipedia talk: Manual...
Click to read more »Cyclonebiskit 13:59, 6 March 2009 (UTC) "4.9 m (16 ft) storm surge" - WP:MOSNUM says to spell out the main units and abbreviate the secondary units. Fixed...
Click to read more »"day-month-year" (or "month-day" or "day-month") according to the guidelines at WP:MOSNUM, in which dates will normally match the origin of the artist or band, if...
Click to read more »for the same reason; new account that drops into an ongoing process in WT:MOSNUM to argue the same point, delete others' comments, vote, etc. - Dan Dank55...
Click to read more »been discussed in great depth on MOSNUM well before August 2008 - the problem is that they were only discussed on MOSNUM, so when the time comes to implement...
Click to read more »Generally, the words in bold in the WP:LEAD shouldn't be linked. Per WP:MOSNUM, there should be a non-breaking space - between a number and the...
Click to read more »Make sure you have – between numbers and dates so 1943–44 and in p. 1–4 WP:MOSNUM Some of the dates had "the" in front of them which is unneccessary e.g....
Click to read more »may be an applicable WikiProject guideline to follow: see WP:CITY Per WP:MOSNUM, at Units of measurement, numbers with SI units of measure should have conversions...
Click to read more »the en dashes such as the one in "mid–level trough" should be hyphens. WP:MOSNUM suggests that generally the main units of measurement should be spelled...
Click to read more »Free images are available and we have one lower down in the article. WP:MOSNUM: In the infobox and throughout, you should convert forms of measurement...
Click to read more »the article. Per WP:WIAFA, Images should have concise captions. Per WP:MOSNUM, when doing conversions, please use standard abbreviations: for example...
Click to read more »automated removal of date-autoformatting in articles while the relevant WP:MOSNUM guideline was still in flux, has now been amended. Ohconfucius, who was...
Click to read more »bit strange, too. Gary King (talk) 03:46, 12 January 2009 (UTC) From WP:MOSNUM "Comparable quantities should be all spelled out or all figures: we may...
Click to read more »(converse) 18:13, 27 September 2008 (UTC) "over one-hundred chapters" Per MOSNUM, one hundred should not be hyphenated. Fixed. sephiroth bcr (converse) 18:13...
Click to read more »the prose. Also, it looks like the text could use a couple more links. WP:MOSNUM discusses the usage of conversions, eg. 1 m (3 ft). I added already...
Click to read more »Comment: The dates in the refs need to have consistent date formatting per WP:MOSNUM. Currently you have some with partial links, some with both dates linked...
Click to read more »number of square meters in parentheses for 12 acres (48,562 m2). See WP:MOSNUM) Thanks, AndyZ t 14:45, 14 May 2006 (UTC) Have spent a few hours fixing...
Click to read more »one years later, this had more than tripled to 4392 ... which also has WP:MOSNUM issues). Commons links belong in External links. I don't recommend trying...
Click to read more »infobox; remember that these suggestions are not generated manually) Per WP:MOSNUM, there should be a non-breaking space - between a number and the...
Click to read more »Comments from Dabomb87 (talk · contribs) Dates shouldn't be linked per WP:MOSNUM. The lead is a bit on the short side; a good rule of thumb is to summarize...
Click to read more »infobox; remember that these suggestions are not generated manually) Per WP:MOSNUM, there should be a no-break space - between a number and the unit...
Click to read more »million": I wrote that, changed from ... (1970 AUD), per MOSNUM. I think that's been in MOSNUM a while, but I respect that people don't want to flip back...
Click to read more »might be terms that should be replaced with specific dates/times. *Per WP:MOSNUM, there should be a non-breaking space - between a number and the...
Click to read more »"European car of the year" correctly. Done " quality at 3 stars." see WP:MOSNUM, should be "three stars". Done Worldwide 2011 sales not available?! Check...
Click to read more »is shown on WP:LEAD, and should adequately summarize the article. Per WP:MOSNUM, please spell out source units of measurements in text; for example, "the...
Click to read more »(UTC) Comment, please remove all caps per MOS:CAPS#All caps. Also see WP:MOSNUM regarding linking of month-day combos so user date preferences will work...
Click to read more »suggest peer review to prepare for FAC. WP:MOSBOLD, WP:DASH, WP:FN, and WP:MOSNUM breaches, inadequate WP:LEAD, numerous short choppy sections. SandyGeorgia...
Click to read more »generated manually) Nope. — BrianSmithson 06:04, 18 September 2006 (UTC) Per WP:MOSNUM, there should be a non-breaking space - between a number and the...
Click to read more »to start the lead? Don't bold links in the lead. "5 ... 5 ... one" -> WP:MOSNUM says be consistent, either words or numbers in a sentence for comparable...
Click to read more »block. The issue of date linking/formatting is currently disputed at WP:MOSNUM. The editors performing mass automated edits while a dispute is in progress...
Click to read more »question (due to possible javascript errors/uniqueness of articles). Per WP:MOSNUM, there should be a non-breaking space - between a number and the...
Click to read more »reviewing script. The lead needs expansion per WP:LEAD, nbsp's are needed (WP:MOSNUM), conversions should use standard abbreviations, repetition of title in...
Click to read more »the article. Per WP:WIAFA, Images should have concise captions. Per WP:MOSNUM, there should be a non-breaking space - between a number and the...
Click to read more »paragraph (as a minimum), e.g. horns. The female has 4 nipples. See WP:MOSNUM, normally this would be written as "four". Check the rest of the article...
Click to read more »show: four in the first season, 22 in the second, and 26 in the third." Per MOSNUM, comparable quantities should either all be spelled out or all typed as...
Click to read more »bold for the reasons stated above. I also used the 24hour clock as per WP:MOSNUM. I now Support Woodym555 21:33, 3 October 2007 (UTC) Support. The article...
Click to read more »transitional event like the Stagehand Strike mentioned in the lead? WP:MOSNUM (read it all before approaching FAC, it is exactly the kind of page that...
Click to read more »centuries can be linked if they provide context for the article. Per WP:MOSNUM, there should be a non-breaking space - between a number and the...
Click to read more »patriarchal to patriarchy instead of a wiktionary entry? According to WP:MOSNUM: "Wikipedia has articles on days of the year, years, decades, centuries...
Click to read more »numbers)/Three proposals for change to MOSNUM and Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style_(dates_and_numbers)/Date_Linking_RFC" In WP:MOSNUM#Formatting, added: "The names of...
Click to read more »1) it is a proper noun or 2) it is the first word of the heading. Per WP:MOSNUM, there should be a no-break space - between a number and the unit...
Click to read more »of articles). Per WP:WIAFA, Images should have concise captions. Per WP:MOSNUM, there should be a non-breaking space - between a number and the...
Click to read more »T-bird’s tactic of trying to sound like a moderate in the early days of MOSNUM debate and wheeling & dealing with me on Follow current literature (FCL):...
Click to read more »at all. (I believe the only example would be who in 2005 served) Per WP:MOSNUM, please spell out source units of measurements in text; for example, "the...
Click to read more »using the heading ==Magellan's journey==, use ==Journey==. Done Per WP:MOSNUM, there should be a non-breaking space - between a number and the...
Click to read more »which need clearing up. "The 9-day tour": Should this be "nine-day", per MOSNUM? "6-song": Ditto, should this be "six-song"? "Rihanna would play..." Better...
Click to read more »and WP:CONTEXT. Per WP:WIAFA, Images should have concise captions. Per WP:MOSNUM, there should be a non-breaking space - between a number and the...
Click to read more »should be used between numbers and their units of measurements, per WP:MOSNUM 3(a) The lead does not conform to guidelines presented at WP:LEAD (it should...
Click to read more »unit. Mr.Z-man 17:33, 11 March 2011 (UTC) Relevant guidelines include: mosnum - SI standard "SI units are written according to the SI standard unless...
Click to read more »violates MOSNUM; {{convert/text2|10|wide and|5|ft|m|high}} gives "10 feet wide and 5 ft high (3.0 × 1.5 m)" whereas, by long standing consensus at MOSNUM, the...
Click to read more »'kphr', 'kmh', 'kmhr', 'kmph', 'kmphr', 'km/hr', etc.) with 'km/h'. wp:mosnum says: When unit symbols are combined by division, use a slash to separate...
Click to read more »follow Wikipedia standards not UK ones. If this isn't right, take it to WT:MOSNUM first. Jɪmp 00:43, 21 March 2008 (UTC) Delete There are better conversion...
Click to read more »out" with some more information, and the page needs date formatting per WP:MOSNUM. A) Visuals are fine. B) Images are fine. The number represents the page...
Click to read more »last access date, see WP:CITE/ES Full dates should be wikified, see WP:MOSNUM Miscellaneous is trivia that should be deleted, unencyclopedic Weddings...
Click to read more »links with overseas institutions. Single years are not wikilinked; see WP:MOSNUM and WP:CONTEXT). See also and Further templates belong at the top of the...
Click to read more »number, like in "14 year-old Steinfeld...". In this case you can bend WP:MOSNUM a bit and start it as "Fourteen-year-old Steinfeld...". Giants2008 (27 and...
Click to read more »cover material not mentioned in the main text. Please see WP:LEAD. Per WP:MOSNUM, dates in the main text are no longer autoformatted. I ran a script to de-link...
Click to read more »images are public domain. Slambo (Speak) 13:49, 2 June 2006 (UTC) Per WP:MOSNUM, at Units of measurement, numbers with SI units of measure should have conversions...
Click to read more »chapters are "Rules". Could "one hundred and ninety-five" be 195 per WP:MOSNUM? -Malkinann (talk) 22:33, 22 October 2008 (UTC) Done.Tintor2 (talk) 22:56...
Click to read more »formed through discussion on the talk pages: Too often, editors come to MOSNUM to change things in order to lend legitimacy to their particular way of...
Click to read more »Could you provide a reference for the Song Contest position. Done. per WP:MOSNUM, numbers at the start of a sentence should be spelled out. Done. Just a...
Click to read more »centuries can be linked if they provide context for the article. Per WP:MOSNUM, there should be a non-breaking space - between a number and the...
Click to read more »The third alternative would be one that is currently under discussion at MOSNUM: not linking these at all in the main text, but listing them in a "See also"...
Click to read more »5,308 m² (57,135 sq ft) Senedd was constructed in two phases... " - WP:MOSNUM says to spell out the primary units and abbreviate the secondary units in...
Click to read more »no non-breaking hard spaces between numbers and units of measurment (WP:MOSNUM), and numerous one-sentence paragraphs. The article could use some spit...
Click to read more »"Today, Dubai has emerged as a global city (ranking number 27 ... " WP:MOSNUM, sample: Dubai appoints 8 members in two-term periods to the Federal National...
Click to read more »use cleanup of See also, and has some MOS issues (WP:DASH, WP:MOSBOLD, WP:MOSNUM, WP:MSH—easily fixed). The lead could also be expanded. Needs review per...
Click to read more »edit war on this issue. It is somethng that needs to be resolved by WP:MOSNUM and MOS:DISCOG.Shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 22:33, 12 September 2008 (UTC) User:Tony1...
Click to read more »the article. Per WP:WIAFA, Images should have concise captions. Per WP:MOSNUM, there should be a non-breaking space - between a number and the...
Click to read more »above: This is a MOSNUM clean up for other parts of the article; sq mi is the more common/preferred abbreviation and the MOSNUM says to "Avoid using...
Click to read more »after 1 minute and 23 seconds." I'm unsure, try having a look through WP:MOSNUM. I've had a go but haven't had any luck. Mattythewhite (talk) 14:40, 17...
Click to read more »information to claim fair use. Ideas? -- Zanimum 18:55, 13 June 2006 (UTC) Per WP:MOSNUM, there should be a no-break space - between a number and the unit...
Click to read more »— HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 13:48, 3 March 2011 (UTC) A relevant guideline is at: mosnum - Unit symbols "Where English-speaking countries use different units for...
Click to read more »centuries can be linked if they provide context for the article. Per WP:MOSNUM, there should be a non-breaking space - between a number and the...
Click to read more »At first thought, I wanted to object as well on that basis. However, WP:MOSNUM indicates that when in doubt, "Put the source value first and the converted...
Click to read more »instance appears in the "Resignation" section. "23 November, 1730" - WP:MOSNUM#Dates suggests that full dates in this format look like this: 23 November...
Click to read more »an anglophone country is the subject of a poll starting September 10 at MOSNUM talk.] Use Template:birth date and age and Template:death date and age only...
Click to read more »subsection "twenty bodies", but also "30 Americans killed". The Wikipedia:MOSNUM#Numbers as figures or words generally prefers numbers greater than nine...
Click to read more »article start the same way. Likewise the first two sections of History. A WP:MOSNUM problem is the inconsistency "3rd" vs "third". Pick one and stick to it...
Click to read more »previous zero to nine) are spelled out in words. [Now inconsistent with MOSNUM] The previous insistence that ordinals for centuries be expressed in figures...
Click to read more »infobox; remember that these suggestions are not generated manually) Per WP:MOSNUM, there should be a no-break space - between a number and the unit...
Click to read more »think that bold words in the lead could also be linked - see WP:LEAD Per WP:MOSNUM, spell out numbers less than ten, so fix As of 2008, it is known to consist...
Click to read more »infobox; remember that these suggestions are not generated manually) Per WP:MOSNUM, there should be a non-breaking space - between a number and the...
Click to read more »and then to completely rewrite the lead according to the guidelines. WP:MOSNUM#Autoformatting says, "Dates should not be linked purely for the purpose...
Click to read more »dates/times. Per WP:WIAFA, Images should have concise captions. Per WP:MOSNUM, there should be a non-breaking space - between a number and the...
Click to read more »earth and gave us this version of MOSNUM. 4 - Purplebox is a vast improvement over what the current section 4 of MOSNUM offers. While I have some minor...
Click to read more »months ago". Clarified. -- Eraserhead1 <talk> 18:22, 15 January 2012 (UTC) MOSNUM says to use the leading zero (.34, etc). I think it should be "0.50", too...
Click to read more »the medals" (why not "Heer members received 103 of the medals..." per WP:MOSNUM? Likewise: "thirty-four to the Luftwaffe", which seems to me like it should...
Click to read more »largely uncited, and has MOS problems. Twice I went in to make WP:DASH, WP:MOSNUM and WP:UNITS corrections and got Wikimedia Foundation errors, lost my work...
Click to read more »hyphens and endashes in order. You can install User:Ohconfucius/script/MOSNUM dates to keep your date formatting consistent. You can install User:Evad37/duplinks-alt...
Click to read more »that money amounts are from the period cited? Why specify US? I'm sure MOSNUM says US and UK currencies are just $ and pound symbols. US is tagged to...
Click to read more »WP:DASHes versus hyphens in order. You can install User:Ohconfucius/script/MOSNUM dates to keep your dates consistent. You can install User:Evad37/duplinks-alt...
Click to read more »2009 (UTC) Done—Chris!c/t 00:04, 8 December 2009 (UTC) Actually, per WP:MOSNUM the conversion is always abbreviated, so I undid this edit. Dabomb87 (talk)...
Click to read more »place for discussing MOSNUM guidelines is here on WT:MOSNUM. Thanks. Greg L (talk) 18:49, 9 September 2009 (UTC) I just read the MOSNUM talk page myself,...
Click to read more »if it turns out DPH has been using Tor or similar open proxy methods (WT:MOSNUM tends to attract a higher than average number of Tor users) then it is fair...
Click to read more »compliance with WP:LEAD. Wim van Dorst (Talk) 19:47, 18 June 2006 (UTC). Per WP:MOSNUM, there should be a non-breaking space - between a number and the...
Click to read more »infobox; remember that these suggestions are not generated manually) Per WP:MOSNUM, there should be a non-breaking space - between a number and the...
Click to read more »animated television series. --haha169 (talk) 19:20, 9 August 2008 (UTC) WP:MOSNUM says date linking is now optional. I prefer not to link the dates; what...
Click to read more »In particular, don't insert a conversion in the middle of a link, per MOSNUM. - Dank (push to talk) 19:43, 7 September 2011 (UTC) "8.8 cm (3.5 in) SK...
Click to read more »at all. (I believe the only example would be who in 2005 served) Per WP:MOSNUM, please spell out source units of measurements in text; for example, "the...
Click to read more »screenreaders. Minor points such as hyphens being used instaed of en-dashes, MOSNUM fails, Notes and References mixed up. Dead links. The Rambling Man (talk)...
Click to read more »centuries can be linked if they provide context for the article. Per WP:MOSNUM, there should be a non-breaking space - between a number and the...
Click to read more »3, 1992" — Wikilink Gary, dates don't have to be wikilinked at all. See MOSNUM. It's a most undesirable practice, since the developers are impossible to...
Click to read more »but please note that we do not link dates in articles anymore (see WP:MOSNUM); I already fixed this in this article, but keep that in mind for future...
Click to read more »reference to WP:MOSNUM. Oldelpaso 22:28, 21 July 2006 (UTC) Can you expland on that? SP-KP 22:31, 21 July 2006 (UTC) Specifically, WP:MOSNUM#Units_of_measurement...
Click to read more »"Eleven of the 20" looks odd with words and numbers in one sentence. WP:MOSNUM#Numbers as figures or words doesn't mind words over ten being spelled if...
Click to read more »(UTC) Date ranges Date ranges get en dashes rather than hyphens per WP:MOSNUM. The many date ranges, such as 1993-1994, in the tables should be 1993–1994...
Click to read more »conversions of metric units and United States customary units. (see WP:MOSNUM) Done. --maru (talk) contribs 04:05, 9 May 2006 (UTC) Please use the ...
Click to read more »comparative to one another, so spell out "fifteen", rather than 15, per WP:MOSNUM. I would like to see the "#" symbol superscripted or separated from the...
Click to read more »Non-breaking hard spaces needed between numbers and units of measurement, see WP:MOSNUM Attention to Wikilinking will be needed: for example, horticulturists. Thorough...
Click to read more »dates/times. Per WP:WIAFA, Images should have concise captions. Per WP:MOSNUM, there should be a non-breaking space - between a number and the...
Click to read more »magazine articles are generally reliable; dot.com critiques might not be. WP:MOSNUM says that consistent date formatting should be used throughout the main...
Click to read more »In other words, you are doing a service by producing a bibliography. WP:MOSNUM#Format consistency says in part, "Dates in article references should all...
Click to read more »linked if they provide WP:CONTEXT; I guess that's open to interpretation. WP:MOSNUM#Currency – suggests that US$ be used in front of money. This is done further...
Click to read more »written-out words, as per Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Dates and numbers (WP:MOSNUM); their format and context is generally clear enough as to avoid any ambiguity...
Click to read more »long per WP:LEAD. Check for dead links (e.g. ref 11) "6 of its top 10 " MOSNUM. "As of November 2008"... well it's December 2012, is this list up to date...
Click to read more »example "[[April 2005 lunar eclipse]]" will be unchanged. Guidance at wp:mosnum says: The linking of dates purely for the purpose of autoformatting is now...
Click to read more »works= or publisher= fields Remove the linking of stand-alone years, per WP:MOSNUM The "History of the product and advert" is only a history of the advert...
Click to read more »35-MW wind farm in Baia, Tulcea County, that will have... ". References WP:MOSNUM#Format consistency says in part, "Dates in article references should all...
Click to read more »entered (there are likely others, since no full dates are specified). See WP:MOSNUM, solo years shouldn't be wikilinked. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 23:02, 8 July 2007...
Click to read more »and removed the autoformatting to allow your high-value links to breathe. MOSNUM no longer encourages date-linking. No glitches in the formatting, BTW, which...
Click to read more »References The date formatting in the references needs to be consistent per WP:MOSNUM. Either format (m-d-y or yyyy-mm-dd) that you've used is OK, but you have...
Click to read more »(and if you go back further, hundreds) which are currently disputed at WT:MOSNUM. Specifically, he is unlinking full dates and despite a good faith discussion...
Click to read more »at the age of fourteen, he matriculated" Shouldn't it say 14? That's how MOSNUM had it unless they changed since I last looked. Probably. Changed. Acdixon...
Click to read more »infobox; remember that these suggestions are not generated manually) Per WP:MOSNUM, there should be a no-break space - between a number and the unit...
Click to read more »they are consistently d-m-y. Please see the date-formatting section of WP:MOSNUM. Direct quotations such as "I know as a citizen that we are not allowed...
Click to read more »If we're talking about style in Wikipedia, the relevant reference is WP:MOSNUM#Ranges. 1927–1928 is correct, but since it is a pair of consecutive years...
Click to read more »words. Quite a few large numbers in the article are written as words. WP:MOSNUM#Numbers as figures or words is the relevant guideline. "The song charted...
Click to read more »space) between numbers and their units of measurements (as stated in WP:MOSNUM) was created on November 28, 1842 and needs a comma after 1842 It also has...
Click to read more »to that; the stub can then link to de.wp. "(1735–1739)": (1735–39) per MOSNUM. "cavalierly, indeed with military emphasis": I don't know what this means;...
Click to read more »understand? « Gonzo fan2007 (talk ♦ contribs) @ 23:54, 6 July 2008 (UTC) See MOSNUM, which no longer encourages date autoformatting and which now prescribes...
Click to read more »centuries can be linked if they provide context for the article. * Per WP:MOSNUM, please spell out source units of measurements in text; for example, "the...
Click to read more »issues that jump most at me. Circeus 05:57, 22 May 2006 (UTC) Fixed - Per WP:MOSNUM, there should be a no-break space - between a number and the unit...
Click to read more »longhouses..." If the sentence starts with a number, spell it out, per WP:MOSNUM Include metric conversions for the size of the rooms. Since the building...
Click to read more »through. I more or less support now, and I just want to see these minor MOSNUM changes. Maxim(talk) 23:42, 14 September 2007 (UTC) Done - Thank you very...
Click to read more »footnotes, preferably in the cite.php format recommended by WP:WIAFA. Per WP:MOSNUM, there should be a no-break space - between a number and the unit...
Click to read more »autoformatting. This could be brushed off as a MOSNUM issue, or issue about how quickly statements in the MOSNUM should be carried out, except that Lightmouse...
Click to read more »in the future. --maclean 05:52, 22 February 2008 (UTC) Notes: there is a MOSNUM issue in the lead, with the century. Please doublecheck the punctuation...
Click to read more »students are enrolled for the 2009–2010 school year."? Please read what MOSNUM says about '60s and the like. Tony (talk) 08:50, 24 April 2010 (UTC) The...
Click to read more »of IEC prefixes. This is a discredited practice that Wikipedia, via WP:MOSNUM, abandoned. We now have project-wide consistency in using the same, familiar...
Click to read more »a member of Wikipedia:WikiProject Alternative music. However, a few WP:MOSNUM fixes are needed: for example, 4 and 7 should be four and seven. CloudNine...
Click to read more »that); sentences that start with numbers (WP:MOSNUM); numbers less than 10 should be spelled out (WP:MOSNUM, sample: Cunningham and Driscoll would become...
Click to read more »articles. I'm not familiar with your link, however I am familiar with WP:MOSNUM and while it does say consistency is the most important thing, it does say...
Click to read more »For example, February 28, 2006, should be come February 28, 2006. Per WP:MOSNUM, at Units of measurement, numbers with SI units of measure should have conversions...
Click to read more »edits onto MOSNUM without consensus. I would remind you that you are rapidly approaching 3RR for revert my change to put that section of MOSNUM back to how...
Click to read more »otherwise have trouble making sure the images meet the WP:V requirement. Per WP:MOSNUM, when a number starts a sentence, it's customary to spell it out rather...
Click to read more »Constantine ✍ 11:18, 28 March 2015 (UTC) Sure thing. What does 936/7 mean? MOSNUM has advice on this. - Dank (push to talk) 11:33, 28 March 2015 (UTC) It...
Click to read more »become better linked as more such alkaloids are added to Wikipedia. Per WP:MOSNUM, please spell out source units of measurements in text; for example, the...
Click to read more »but on the prose and MOSNUM issues, we're moving backwards a bit :) If I get a chance today, I'll clean up some of the MOSNUM errors and have a new look...
Click to read more »hijacking WP:MOSNUM, claiming their point of view reflects consensus when in fact it does not. They are using their modifications to MOSNUM to justify many...
Click to read more »infobox; remember that these suggestions are not generated manually) Per WP:MOSNUM, there should be a non-breaking space - between a number and the...
Click to read more »I'm thinking of something like the quite useful User:Ohconfucius/script/MOSNUM dates.js, which changes and standardises date formats. I don't think AWB...
Click to read more »centuries can be linked if they provide context for the article. Per WP:MOSNUM, there should be a no-break space - between a number and the unit...
Click to read more »infobox; remember that these suggestions are not generated manually) Per WP:MOSNUM, there should be a no-break space - between a number and the unit...
Click to read more »Thanks Hmains 05:33, 10 August 2007 (UTC). This arguement belongs at WP:MOSNUM, not here. The usefulness of year-linking is a matter of opinion. Those...
Click to read more »it's pretty stale at the opening for our readers. Now, the autoformatting: MOSNUM no longer encourages date autoformatting and now prescribes rules for the...
Click to read more »the article. Per WP:WIAFA, Images should have concise captions. Per WP:MOSNUM, there should be a no-break space - between a number and the unit...
Click to read more »(talk) 08:55, 5 November 2021 (UTC) "17 merchant ships ... two destroyers" MOSNUM, no mixing of words/numerals for comparable figures. Done Nick-D (talk)...
Click to read more »Mexico on Thursday, 19 September 1985." Do not wikilink any dates (see WP:MOSNUM) and maintain consistent date formats throughout the article. Make sure...
Click to read more »1999–2001 etc, the closing range could be reduced to two digits (as mandated by MOSNUM and as used all over the home article (1946–53). Have you thought of whipping...
Click to read more »the lead #1 should be "number one" and #21 should be "number 21". Per WP:MOSNUM "in the body of an article, single-digit whole numbers from zero to nine...
Click to read more »section was restored with an edit summary to see WP:GEO. [Editorial note: MOSNUM and the main page of MOS are now in need of housecleaning to ensure consistency...
Click to read more »centuries can be linked if they provide context for the article. Per WP:MOSNUM, when doing conversions, please use standard abbreviations: for example...
Click to read more »lead go to redirects, try [[studio albums]] → [[studio album]]s Done WP:MOSNUM suggests using numbers under ten as words in the body of an article. For...
Click to read more »article is ready now for FA. Well written, is well sourced, complies with MOSNUM, Good lead and is a notable season. Seddon69 (talk) 00:51, 9 January 2008...
Click to read more »specify that the ton in question is the 2000 lb version (as specified by WP:MOSNUM). JIMp talk·cont 10:10, 28 February 2009 (UTC) Template:Sz (talk · history ·...
Click to read more »reference to WP:MOSNUM. Oldelpaso 22:28, 21 July 2006 (UTC) Can you expland on that? SP-KP 22:31, 21 July 2006 (UTC) Specifically, WP:MOSNUM#Units_of_measurement...
Click to read more »generated by the last FAC discussion of this article, I see mention of WP:MOSNUM issues. I don't think they've been completely addressed. The article more...
Click to read more »county municipalities and twelve district municipalities" to comply with WP:MOSNUM. Check for the rest of the article too. As there is one figure exceeding...
Click to read more »for the soon-to-be living dead. Dmoon1 02:08, 30 June 2006 (UTC) Per WP:MOSNUM, there should be a non-breaking space - between a number and the...
Click to read more »bit too clever for a general reader. Various issues over WP:MOSBOLD, WP:MOSNUM, WP:MOSDATE and WP:PUNC have been fixed thanks to Sandy and Tony's advice...
Click to read more »Could we just delete MOSNUM or something, to take care of this? (That's wishful thinking of course). It's not that having a MOSNUM is a bad idea, but MOS...
Click to read more »suggesting an alternative. "having won just six of 42"-> "winning just 6 of 42" (MOSNUM says be consistent within a sentence). "all time" -> all-time. Big gap from...
Click to read more »infobox; remember that these suggestions are not generated manually) Per WP:MOSNUM, there should be a no-break space - between a number and the unit...
Click to read more »I would disagree on that point. Jamie☆S93 23:23, 7 July 2009 (UTC) From MOSNUM: "[c]omparable quantities should be all spelled out or all figures: we may...
Click to read more »bots: IABot, Citation Bot .. WP:CITETOOLS Run some scripts: RefRenamer, MOSNUM, DUPREFS Search for new updates about the topic Check Commons for new images...
Click to read more »facilities include 45 classrooms, 4 computer labs, 3 courtyards – per WP:MOSNUM, numbers from one to nine should be spelled out. Done Numbers spelled out...
Click to read more »the two problem images with your own, quite possibly better, images. WP:MOSNUM#Chronological items says, "12-hour clock times end with dotted or undotted...
Click to read more »and unit; I know it's Commons and not en.WP, and thus not subject to our MOSNUM, but really, ISO says to do it too. And you're right, it should not be "m"...
Click to read more »billion - there should be a nbsp here (and in similar places) Take a look at MOSNUM - I'm seeing some inconsistencies where you spell out the number versus...
Click to read more »is badly named (hiding in the subspace of another template). It violates MOSNUM. It appears to be a part of a single users pet project which nobody else...
Click to read more »encouraged at MOSNUM). This was only a minor reduction in bright blue, though. I've removed London (about eight of them), explicitly mentioned in MOSNUM as unnecessary...
Click to read more »infobox; remember that these suggestions are not generated manually) Per WP:MOSNUM, there should be a no-break space - between a number and the unit...
Click to read more »bodies. The general guidelines WP:NBSP (use of non-breaking spaces), WP:MOSNUM (numbers and dates), and WP:COLOR (use of color) are likely to be particularly...
Click to read more »appearances" I would prefer two substitute appearances, though I realise WP:MOSNUM is a little vague on this. personally, I also would prefer "two", but it...
Click to read more »centuries can be linked if they provide context for the article. Per WP:MOSNUM, there should be a no-break space - between a number and the unit...
Click to read more »centuries can be linked if they provide context for the article. Per WP:MOSNUM, there should be a non-breaking space - between a number and the...
Click to read more »centuries can be linked if they provide context for the article. Per WP:MOSNUM, there should be a no-break space - between a number and the unit...
Click to read more »had" for example Numbers less than 10 are generally spelled out per WP:MOSNUM so fix things like Details of the torture on 7 detainees, labelled 'Prisoner...
Click to read more »(talk) 22:53, 6 January 2012 (UTC) The article doesn't strictly adhere to WP:MOSNUM on spelling out digits, but it's consistent, so the author may have a reason...
Click to read more »some of the lists should be converted to prose (paragraph form). Per WP:MOSNUM, there should be a no-break space - between a number and the unit...
Click to read more »with a £1000 prize." "with the requirement being" "at least 3 years" WP:MOSNUM, numbers under ten should be spelled out. "has been awarded to 64 individuals"...
Click to read more »infobox; remember that these suggestions are not generated manually) Per WP:MOSNUM, there should be a no-break space - between a number and the unit...
Click to read more »format; i.e., September 29, 2008 rather than 29 September 2008, per WP:MOSNUM#Format consistency. References The date formatting should all be consistent...
Click to read more »sorts on MOSNUM, weigh in over there after he wakes up? Australian time you see. I don’t perceive an imperative to move the polls off of Talk:MOSNUM since...
Click to read more »the writing and development of the musical; very thin on development. WP:MOSNUM, recorded a 3-LP album ... Incorrect use of WP:MOSBOLD in film and television...
Click to read more »their peak intensity of 65 mph (100 km/h) early on October 7." Also, WP:MOSNUM says to spell out the primary units and to abbreviate the secondary units...
Click to read more »metric system should also have converted values to the US system (see WP:MOSNUM). The should be used between numbers and their units of measurement...
Click to read more »infobox; remember that these suggestions are not generated manually) Per WP:MOSNUM, there should be a non-breaking space - between a number and the...
Click to read more »is shown on WP:LEAD, and should adequately summarize the article. Per WP:MOSNUM, there should be a non-breaking space - between a number and the...
Click to read more »publication date when available. Single years shouldn't be linked. See WP:MOSNUM. En dashes should be used in scorelines. Epbr123 21:10, 18 June 2007 (UTC)...
Click to read more »could be rendered as a single paragraph of straight prose. References WP:MOSNUM#Format consistency says in part, "Dates in article references should all...
Click to read more »million albums in the United States,[2] and over 35 million " 13 million per MOSNUM. Done "number-one", " at number-six on" no hyphen necessary. (The hyphen...
Click to read more »details: The format 'mph' is a popular to indicate 'miles per hour'. wp:mosnum says: When unit symbols are combined by division, use a slash to separate...
Click to read more »look! --Midnightdreary (talk) 19:29, 1 October 2008 (UTC) Notes, per WP:MOSNUM, what is the limit on digits and spelling out numbers? The article has,...
Click to read more »centuries can be linked if they provide context for the article. Per WP:MOSNUM, there should be a no-break space - between a number and the unit...
Click to read more »19:58, 17 May 2009 (UTC) Comments from KV5 "by 12 points to nil" - see WP:MOSNUM regarding comparable quantities, nil is the same as saying zero, of course...
Click to read more »The Manual of Style does indeed refer to all articles. The way I read WP:MOSNUM saying "Very large numbers may be divided up by commas every three places...
Click to read more »infobox; remember that these suggestions are not generated manually) Per WP:MOSNUM, there should be a non-breaking space - between a number and the...
Click to read more »to the article - see Wikipedia:Persondata for more information. Per WP:MOSNUM, there should be a non-breaking space - between a number and the...
Click to read more »started at 15:14, 16 October 2013 (UTC) about the disruption caused at WT:MOSNUM by the Martinvl account was progressing at WP:ANI. By 19:55, 20 October...
Click to read more »infobox; remember that these suggestions are not generated manually) Per WP:MOSNUM, there should be a no-break space - between a number and the unit...
Click to read more »infobox; remember that these suggestions are not generated manually) Per WP:MOSNUM, there should be a non-breaking space - between a number and the...
Click to read more »"scored by .. when he scored..." repetitive. " 9 Test centuries " - nine, per MOSNUM. "centuries until 2016" try "As of June 2017[update], 12 ODI centuries have...
Click to read more »to specify AD/ACE or BC/BCE when phrasing a time period as such? From WP:MOSNUM#Longer periods: "The absence of such an abbreviation [ie: BC/AD or BCE/CE]...
Click to read more »I have gone and done a few little WP:MOS fixes such as WP:DASH and WP:MOSNUM with regards to some of the dates. I have only a couple of minor points...
Click to read more »I changed a few above this, but you should check the entire article. WP:MOSNUM#Numbers as figures or words has details. "and local boy" - Would "local...
Click to read more »be more civil than him or her, not less. First and second lines from WP:MOSNUM#Measurements states: Wikipedia articles are intended for people anywhere...
Click to read more »Non-breaking hardspaces between numbers and units of measurement, per WP:MOSNUM; I did one as a sample. In the Newcomers section, you have a See also stuck...
Click to read more »which was not identified as Highway 119 by highway signs." References WP:MOSNUM#Format consistency says in part, "Dates in article references should all...
Click to read more »with the rendering of conversions particularly as changes evolve at wp:mosnum. Ripping out transclusions would remove that flexibility for no discernible...
Click to read more »city" stupid Easter egg, why not just "in Mexico City"? " 7 fatalities" -> MOSNUM (i.e. seven). The "SS hurricane scale" doesn't need a capital H or last...
Click to read more »Sincerely, Taketa (talk) 20:25, 22 June 2013 (UTC) User:Ohconfucius/script/MOSNUM dates.js will do the trick. -- Gadget850 talk 02:18, 23 June 2013 (UTC)...
Click to read more »probably more examples that anyone actually needs...); they should be WP:MOSNUM#BIRTH and WP:MOSCAPS#ALLCAPS respectively, if there was a need for them...
Click to read more »following measurements (of course using the above no-break space). See WP:MOSNUM. Use standard abbreviations when using symbols (m instead of metre, ft instead...
Click to read more »with the numeral? I think that the word is an acceptable usage under WP:MOSNUM#Numbers as figures or words: "numbers greater than nine are commonly rendered...
Click to read more »that other data is missing that would be fairly easy to find and add. WP:MOSNUM#Format consistency says the date formatting in the citations needs to be...
Click to read more »should be changed to 10 to keep consistency. Actually, according to WP:MOSNUM: "Numbers that begin a sentence are spelled out" -- Hunter Kahn (talk) 17:50...
Click to read more »centuries can be linked if they provide context for the article. Per WP:MOSNUM, there should be a non-breaking space - between a number and the...
Click to read more »04:05, 11 July 2008 (UTC) Comments—The writing's OK. It was overlinked (see MOSNUM, which no longer encourages date autoformatting and which now prescribes...
Click to read more »catch. (Guyinblack25 talk 05:38, 27 June 2009 (UTC)) Comment: Per Wikipedia:MOSNUM#Date_autoformatting, it's no longer desirable to wikilink dates (including...
Click to read more »indie albums aren't mentioned in the infobox? "over 1 million copies" WP:MOSNUM says 1->one. '2x Platinum[10]" there's a "multiplied sign" rather than just...
Click to read more »not "efforts". Overuse of however throughout, also check subsequently. WP:MOSNUM issues, eg, and six to 20 micrometers long. ... More to come, SandyGeorgia...
Click to read more »necessary restraint. — Bellhalla (talk) 11:32, 1 September 2008 (UTC) Bellhala, MOSNUM says that the use of autoformatting is "deprecated". Can you be specific...
Click to read more »break this giant paragraph into two or three paragraphs. References WP:MOSNUM#Format consistency says in part, "Dates in article references should all...
Click to read more »emdashing there Possible overlink issue with greatest hits as well. WP:MOSNUM issues. Spell out numbers less than 10, use numerals for numbers higher...
Click to read more »access date. Some notes like #61 and #134 are incomplete in other ways. WP:MOSNUM says to use consistent date formatting in the notes. Some in the existing...
Click to read more »date parameter on the cite templates when a full date is given (see WP:MOSNUM). The accessdate parameter is automatically linked, by date isn't (dumb...
Click to read more »peak position of number thirteen on Billboard's DVD Sales Chart. - per WP:MOSNUM, thirteen should be in number format The professional wrestling section...
Click to read more »suggested that there was some subversion of the MOSNUM process. Then why not bring this up at MOSNUM? We went through an extensive discussion last month...
Click to read more »is shown on WP:LEAD, and should adequately summarize the article. Per WP:MOSNUM, there should be a non-breaking space - between a number and the...
Click to read more »confusion as to what it means, doesn’t afford you any wiggle room here. MOSNUM has this to say about linking of “dates” or “chronological items”: Linking:...
Click to read more »drew teams from 32 states and four countries"—Comma after Nationals. Per MOSNUM, comparative quantities need to either be both written out "thirty-two states...
Click to read more »article. Done already, I believe this was a script error or bug. Per WP:MOSNUM, there should be a non-breaking space - between a number and the...
Click to read more »is badly named (hiding in the subspace of another template). It violates MOSNUM. It appears to be a part of a single users pet project which nobody else...
Click to read more »to start the lead? Don't bold links in the lead. "5 ... 5 ... one" -> WP:MOSNUM says be consistent, either words or numbers in a sentence for comparable...
Click to read more »in reserve" should be "plus an additional nine F2Fs in reserve" per WP:MOSNUM. Good catch. Likewise "18 Great Lakes BG torpedo bombers with 9 spares"...
Click to read more »Ch'ol-speaking native interpreters...", 2 should be presented as "two" per WP:MOSNUM. Done. Simon Burchell (talk) 12:36, 26 October 2013 (UTC) Repetitive language...
Click to read more »predictions? "a total of 10 storms would form" - I know it's against WP:MOSNUM, but it seems really out of place to have 10 in numbers, but the rest of...
Click to read more »these units weren't spelled out or linked at the first occurrence. Per WP:MOSNUM, they don't need to be linked (since they're not obscure units) although...
Click to read more »"scored by .. when he scored..." repetitive. " 9 Test centuries " - nine, per MOSNUM. "centuries until 2016" try "As of June 2017[update], 12 ODI centuries have...
Click to read more »December 2007 (UTC) Stuck – Discussion should not have forked from WT:MOSNUM#Proposed MOSNUM text for optional autoformatting, per WP:CONSENSUS on "forum shopping"...
Click to read more »wrong way. Fixing these can fix hundreds or thousands of pages at one go. MOSNUM dates.js – a comprehensive tool maintained by User:Ohconfucius based on...
Click to read more »typo glitchs (space before 2003?). Have you read the MoS thoroughly, and MOSNUM? "of 2003", for example, is wrong. Tony (talk) 14:39, 22 October 2008 (UTC)...
Click to read more »WT:MOSNUM regarding the issues of date autoformatting, specifically that while the main editors there believe they have consensus to change the MOSNUM to...
Click to read more »blatantly ignoring WP:MOSNUM and arguing that the article is reverted to his preferred version per WP:BRD despite the fact it violates WP:MOSNUM until a consensus...
Click to read more »inconsistent date formatting in your citations, missing publishers, WP:MOSNUM issues, mix ups in hyphens, MOS:CAPS#All caps issues, WP:DASH issues (no...
Click to read more »the article. Per WP:WIAFA, Images should have concise captions. Per WP:MOSNUM, there should be a non-breaking space - between a number and the...
Click to read more »incorrect about the article, please drop a note on my talk page. Per WP:MOSNUM, there should be a no-break space - between a number and the unit...
Click to read more »that's how it works but i could be wrong; in game two summary Wikipedia:MOSNUM#Numbers as figures or words says the general rule is "render numbers over...
Click to read more »it's alright to use that template. You could use User:Ohconfucius/script/MOSNUM dates to change the dates quickly. Support. If you have time could you have...
Click to read more »dates should be formatted correctly and wikilinked as per WP:MOSNUM#Dates and WP:MOSNUM#Autoformatting and linking.Done That's me for now. Woodym555 13:04...
Click to read more »June 2008 (UTC) Notes: I found more MoS errors than expected (WP:MSH, WP:MOSNUM, WP:MOSDATE, WP:MOSBOLD), so I recommend asking Epbr123 (talk · contribs)...
Click to read more »reads well. I have a few suggestions for improvement. Recent changes to WP:MOSNUM deprecate the autoformatting of full dates. I ran a script to unlink the...
Click to read more »lead is quite choppy. And repetitive (“most common”). There are also WP:MOSNUM issues throughout. A thorough MOS review is needed for things like image...
Click to read more »needed to be endashes; there is possibly an issue in relation to Wikipedia:MOSNUM#Numbers_as_figures_or_words as some numbers greater than 10 are spelt when...
Click to read more »relevant info in lead.--A Y Arktos\talk 00:29, 21 June 2006 (UTC) Per WP:MOSNUM, there should be a non-breaking space - between a number and the...
Click to read more »adds nothing that couldn't be better covered in the "Casting" section. WP:MOSNUM, consider switching 166–177 to 166–77. WP:NBSP and WP:PUNC issues abound...
Click to read more »Association of America's (BAA) 11 teams during its inaugural season"—Per MOSNUM, comparative quantities should be written the same way: "One of the Basketball...
Click to read more »the article. Per WP:WIAFA, Images should have concise captions. Per WP:MOSNUM, there should be a no-break space - between a number and the unit...
Click to read more »Do NOT be overly precise in generating numbers or percentages. Follow WP:MOSNUM#Decimal points and WP:NOT#STATS when presenting percentages with decimal...
Click to read more »table? "18 weeks, by Capitol for 17 weeks and by RCA Victor for nine week" MOSNUM, 18/17/9 or eighteen/seventeen/nine. "Bing Crosby (pictured in 1951) was...
Click to read more »those sentences be recast to avoid starting sentences with a number (see WP:MOSNUM)? I saw at least one instance of the use of "current" terminology: "Today...
Click to read more »capitalization of words outside of the first one and proper nouns. Per WP:MOSNUM, there should be a no-break space ( ) between numbers and their units...
Click to read more »There are lots of linked dates, all of which should be delinked per WP:MOSNUM Issues relating to the map in the infobox: Firstly, it could be vectorised...
Click to read more »resignation after eleven years in charge. Should it be eleven or 11 - see WP:MOSNUM? Done Is there a reference for The Steels have always played their games...
Click to read more »discographies use "#2" versus "number two." Also, certified gold by who? WP:MOSNUM states that one-digit numbers like this should be spelled out. Added the...
Click to read more »sentences. All of the date ranges need to be revisited per WP:DASH and WP:MOSNUM. Per WP:MOS#Images, text shouldn't be squished between two images. Mixed...
Click to read more »"1:30 EDT (17:30 GMT)": 01:30, if you're using a 24-hour clock, per WP:MOSNUM. Done GABHello! 22:20, 20 November 2015 (UTC) "From 1995 ... the CIA received...
Click to read more »MOSNUM, and external link concerns appear to be addressed, except that I'm not sure you've used the correct symbol for a negative sign (see WP:MOSNUM;...
Click to read more »infobox; remember that these suggestions are not generated manually) Per WP:MOSNUM, there should be a no-break space - between a number and the unit...
Click to read more »should be an en dash instead. I'd prefer "winter of 1943", if that's okay. MOSNUM says: "2005–06 (unspaced) generally denotes a two-year range; 2005/06 may...
Click to read more »doesn't.) The first instant of currency should be [[Pound Sterling|£]] per WP:MOSNUM. The dates should be wikilinked correctly. I notice On 27 April 2006 in...
Click to read more »don't mind the repetition, it's inevitable. A relevant guideline is at: mosnum - Unit symbols "Where English-speaking countries use different units for...
Click to read more »page. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 00:02, 29 December 2007 (UTC) Note; there are WP:MOSNUM issues in the lead (regarding spelling out numbers), and I found basic copyedit...
Click to read more »gave it a run-through and made changes per WP:DASH, WP:MSH, WP:UNITS, WP:MOSNUM, WP:GTL and WP:CONTEXT. The first occurrence of relevent terms should be...
Click to read more »kib/mib/etc. usage during the MOSNUM consensus debates were calling his edits disruptive. Its all archived on the MOSNUM talk page as well as...
Click to read more »interrupter: "on 8 November 2007". It's fine without the auto-lemon blue date, but MOSNUM says to use the raw format prevalent in the country of origin. "Australian...
Click to read more »"The franchise has had thirty-four players selected as captains"→34 per WP:MOSNUM. KV5 (Talk • Phils) 12:50, 9 April 2009 (UTC) Fixed. Dabomb87 (talk) 12:57...
Click to read more »and I'm glad to help. The guidelines about the date formatting live at WP:MOSNUM#Format consistency. If you prefer yyyy-mm-dd for any reason, you can make...
Click to read more »storms, seven hurricanes, and three major hurricanes, i.e. those" Per WP:MOSNUM, write comparative quantities consistently (either spell them all out or...
Click to read more »Bannister to win the innaguaral BBC Sportsperson of the Year award." Per WP:MOSNUM, we can't begin sentences with numbers. Done "In 1960 Dimmock presented...
Click to read more »after Crossroads" or "Legacy" and might be a bit more inclusive. Per WP:MOSNUM#Autoformatting, dates should no longer be autoformatted. Preparation "The...
Click to read more »I hope that it does solve the issue. "forty-four awards from fifty-six" MOSNUM would prescribe 44 from 56. Cowlibob fixed it. If awards aren't even notable...
Click to read more »rendered in words if they are expressed in one or two words" according to WP:MOSNUM. PiracyFundsTerrorism (talk) 19:09, 10 August 2009 (UTC) "had a limited...
Click to read more »discussion. User Gerry Ashton is being disruptive to make a point. Here on WT:MOSNUM, there is a debate about bringing the formatting of numbers on some of Wikipedia’s...
Click to read more »of. Thanks. Joseph A. Spadaro (talk) 03:43, 16 April 2016 (UTC) See WP:MOSNUM#Ranges. Normally a 2-year range is written 1953–54; see the article for...
Click to read more »please tell me ... I like to link it. We have a semi-recent change to WP:MOSNUM that says that we don't put a converted unit inside the link, on the theory...
Click to read more »infobox; remember that these suggestions are not generated manually) Per WP:MOSNUM, there should be a non-breaking space - between a number and the...
Click to read more »Hawkeye7 (talk) 03:01, 15 January 2013 (UTC) "%": There's an argument that WP:MOSNUM would prefer "per cent", but I don't think it's all that important. I can't...
Click to read more »the article. Per WP:WIAFA, Images should have concise captions. Per WP:MOSNUM, there should be a non-breaking space - between a number and the...
Click to read more »FAC nomination over whether # versus number is correct according to WP:MOSNUM. (I was trying to avoid the confusion (and usually lack of response) of...
Click to read more »this period contained between 50-150 pit houses" also take the en dash. WP:MOSNUM#Unit conversions says in part, "Generally, conversions to and from metric...
Click to read more »believe that there is actually some leeway on this point in the MOS); WP:MOSNUM states "numbers greater than nine, if they are expressed in one or two words...
Click to read more »incomplete. Some have dates in ISO format, while others are in m-d-y format. WP:MOSNUM allows you to pick a preferred format for the dates in the notes but insists...
Click to read more »-DePiep (talk) 15:18, 12 December 2015 (UTC) Note: they do not follow WP:MOSNUM re × punctuation & unit symbols: {{convert/2|20|x|30|ft|m}} → {{convert/2|20|x|30|ft|m}}...
Click to read more »beginning of a 5-day battle...", IMO this should be "five-day battle" per WP:MOSNUM. Fixed. —Ed!(talk) 15:10, 25 November 2011 (UTC) "...fought relentlessly...
Click to read more »humans. And if the dates that populate the |date= fields comply with WP:MOSNUM, they can equally be parsed easily by machine. Also it's the multiple insertions...
Click to read more »English, that works for me, but we'll have some converting to do. Per WP:MOSNUM (unless someone has changed it), don't include conversions inside links;...
Click to read more »that in MOSNUM but I'm not really bothered either way. I will take a look at the refs now. Woody (talk) 20:58, 7 September 2010 (UTC) WP:MOSNUM states:...
Click to read more »I meant is that MOSNUM policies should be decided on by a special committee. looie496 (talk) 20:44, 15 November 2008 (UTC) Why MOSNUM specifically?--Kotniski...
Click to read more »Redundancy at the start, and the comma usage could be reduced. Some WP:MOSNUM issues as well. 1c: This is the big one. No inline citations, and the References...
Click to read more »don't worry too much, it's not a big deal. "Eight miles (13 km)" - per WP:MOSNUM, both units should either be abbreviated or spelled out - Comparable quantities...
Click to read more »Grafikm (AutoGRAF) 23:56, 13 May 2006 (UTC) I also edited measurements to conform with WP:MOSNUM... :) -- Grafikm (AutoGRAF) 14:31, 21 May 2006 (UTC)...
Click to read more »improvement: The imperial units should all be converted to metric as well per WP:MOSNUM. I like to use the {{convert}} template for these, and I converted the first...
Click to read more »indie albums aren't mentioned in the infobox? "over 1 million copies" WP:MOSNUM says 1->one. '2x Platinum[10]" there's a "multiplied sign" rather than just...
Click to read more »Wikipedia article has no link in sidebar to Commons Time out Unable to add MOSNUM script Sending a GA article to Afd Wikipedia:Help_desk/Archives/2022 December...
Click to read more »95%) use international DF. Until the whole autoformatting thing came up at MOSNUM, I hadn't realised that the US military uses international DF. It's written...
Click to read more »1 league championship and have appeared in the playoffs 23 times." Per MOSNUM, comparative quantities should be written the same way. If you still want...
Click to read more »the article. Abraham, B.S. (talk) 01:02, 16 August 2008 (UTC) MOS Per WP:MOSNUM, dates should either be linked completely, or not linked at all. There are...
Click to read more »a general Epson site that seems to say nothing about the 99p stores. WP:MOSNUM says to use the same format for all of the dates in the reference section...
Click to read more »[252] Arguing against MOSNUM prescriptions when it favours metric measures [253] and arguing for MOSNUM prescriptions when MOSNUM favours Imperial. | See...
Click to read more »(Moon)と暁 (Sunrise) 11:25, 29 April 2009 (UTC) "eighteen" but "28"? See WP:MOSNUM on spelling out. Changed. 月 (Moon)と暁 (Sunrise) 11:25, 29 April 2009 (UTC)...
Click to read more »generally reserved for official company names like "Procter & Gamble". WP:MOSNUM has changed since this article passed GA. It now says, "Dates are not linked...
Click to read more »might be a slow-ish process. Hog Farm Talk 00:05, 20 March 2021 (UTC) WP:MOSNUM, the article mentions 3,000 soldiers (with comma), but $3000 and $6000 (without...
Click to read more »heaviest Japanese attack had been by nine fighters and 24 bombers..." per WP:MOSNUM. Done. Hawkeye7 (talk) 23:02, 26 January 2013 (UTC) "That month nine P-40s...
Click to read more »to the article - see Wikipedia:Persondata for more information. Per WP:MOSNUM, there should be a non-breaking space - between a number and the...
Click to read more »unambiguity in an encyclopedia). The same discussion is taking place there WT:MOSNUM. Of course I don't agree with the reversion. Sarenne 22:01, 16 May 2007...
Click to read more »Truco (talk · contribs) Change instances of "number 1" to number one per WP:MOSNUM Done The longest spell at the top was achieved by Bryan Adams's song "(Everything...
Click to read more »in 1925,[2] and that of Dr George Ford in 1930.[2][5] See WP:CITE Per WP:MOSNUM, use numbers for 10 and less and spell out numbers above ten. So ..collection...
Click to read more »should be preferred in the main article text. Do not link dates, per WP:MOSNUM. Articles should be categorized in the correct subcategory at Category:Firefly...
Click to read more »in:15 mi/1 cm:9 km" - I'm not sure what the map conventions are, but the WP#MOSNUM convention is generally to spell out the primary units. My inclination is...
Click to read more »only three (once each in the lead, infobox and body of the article) WP:MOSNUM says to spell out numbers under ten (two not 2, second not 2nd) Would it...
Click to read more »batteries to the Western Front", should be "six artillery batteries" per WP:MOSNUM Done - Dumelow (talk) 13:48, 27 December 2012 (UTC) Similar to the above...
Click to read more »the article. Per WP:WIAFA, Images should have concise captions. Per WP:MOSNUM, there should be a non-breaking space - between a number and the...
Click to read more »accordance with MOSNUM. --Ohconfucius ¡digame! 09:33, 1 July 2011 (UTC) You are infringing WP:DATERET -> WP:DATERET is part of MOSNUM -> your edits are...
Click to read more »The only real difference between the MOSTM issue and the binary prefixes MOSNUM issue is that the latter has finally gained critical mass due to a couple...
Click to read more »check all others. The Rambling Man (talk) 19:39, 11 January 2013 (UTC) WP:MOSNUM needs to be applied, e.g. "In addition, there were 6 storms" should be "six...
Click to read more »dates/times. Per WP:WIAFA, Images should have concise captions. Per WP:MOSNUM, there should be a non-breaking space - between a number and the...
Click to read more »provided in the footnotes? G.A.S 06:33, 17 July 2008 (UTC) According to WP:MOSNUM, "In the body of an article, single-digit whole numbers from zero to nine...
Click to read more »article, all the cite dates were consistent, in day month year form. Per WP:Mosnum/proposal on YYYY-MM-DD numerical dates, there is a lot of disagreement about...
Click to read more »1997 in film looks like a link to 1997, which should not be linked per WP:MOSNUM. When I click on the link, it takes me to an article that does not seem...
Click to read more »and full sentences have punctuation inside the quotation marks, etc. WP:MOSNUM - There seems to be some inconsistency in the way that ages are written...
Click to read more »text 31 APRIL text 19 JANUARY text 23 JULY text 19 OCTOBER text 14 FEBRUARY text 30 APRIL text text 9 APRIL text 3 OCTOBER text 4 NOVEMBER text 4 AUGUST...
Click to read more »07:15, 19 May 2008 (UTC) "... of 25 disposals and nine tackles" While WP:MOSNUM says that numbers under ten should be written as words, where you have a...
Click to read more »chose to maintain a population density of 4-5 animals per hectare. A few WP:MOSNUM mixups on spelling out vs. digits, examples: Anywhere from one to twenty-one...
Click to read more »summaries to the argument that geography is "scientific" for the purposes of MOSNUM. I could go on and on. I bring this up here now because he now one again...
Click to read more »and units of measurement (see WP:DASH and WP:MOSNUM), but there is more to be done. Also, per WP:MOSNUM, solo years should not be wikilinked; there is...
Click to read more »Numbers over ten should be written in numeric form, per WP:MOSNUM. This isn't necessary, MOSNUM also states: or may be rendered in words if they are expressed...
Click to read more »stadium. Changed to italics. Rlendog (talk) 23:06, 18 November 2008 (UTC) Per MOSNUM, every number in this statement "They have played 18 Opening Day games there...
Click to read more »- This sentence doesn't make sense. Notes Citation 33 is incomplete. WP:MOSNUM#Formatting consistency says in part, "Dates in article references should...
Click to read more »choose yyyy-mm-dd (e.g., 2009-10-12) or m-d-y (e.g., October 12, 2009), WP:MOSNUM says to be consistent. fixed - --Scott Free (talk) 01:02, 21 August 2009...
Click to read more »ten should be written out in words, so use 'four' instead of '4' per WP:MOSNUM (but see 'exceptions'). I'm sorry I didn't notice this earlier! done by...
Click to read more »Washington, D.C. article by Gene Nygaard (see User_talk:AndyZ#Reverted_your_MOSNUM_edit). The comment at first I found slightly strong and accusatory; after...
Click to read more »unused white. I've removed the autoformatting: it's no longer encouraged by MOSNUM, and I can assure you that no one minds US date formatting—especially when...
Click to read more »to the article - see Wikipedia:Persondata for more information. Per WP:MOSNUM, there should be a non-breaking space - between a number and the...
Click to read more »Interesting. See new lede.Kaisershatner 19:00, 19 May 2006 (UTC) Per WP:MOSNUM, underneath the Units of measurement section, numbers need conversions into...
Click to read more »Updated to this millenium Gary King (talk) 17:38, 2 May 2008 (UTC) I think MOSNUM says that "nineteenth" should be 19th Done Gary King (talk) 17:49, 2 May...
Click to read more »use non-breaking spaces between numbers and the words that follow per WP:MOSNUM. Such as 14 yard rush. My issues have been addressed.↔NMajdan•talk 22:01...
Click to read more »not modify the archive below and instead participate in discussions at WT:MOSNUM. Thank you! Please see proposed revision to the guideline in the quotation...
Click to read more »track articles that use one of the two possible date formats per Wikipedia:MOSNUM#Full date formatting. (The other variant does not seem to have a category...
Click to read more »2007 (UTC) Delete unless stops auto-subst'ing, and uses , per WP:MOSNUM; if these problems fixed, then weak keep. — SMcCandlish [talk] [cont] ‹(-¿-)›...
Click to read more »please provide the metric equivalent per MOS. Done, thanks. (MECU) Per WP:MOSNUM, you should use the same level of precision for these two numbers. You use...
Click to read more »think "slave trade" should be lower-case in the second section subhead. MOSNUM generally recommends against full-date formatting. I ran a script to unlink...
Click to read more »Cole • t • c 02:20, 27 January 2009 (UTC) Links to prior RFCs: WT:MOSNUM/RFC and WP:MOSNUM/RFC, please note these are distinct RFCs (one is not the talk page...
Click to read more »opinion. You'll run into resistance at FAC over use of the word "ton", since MOSNUM says not to use it: "Use long ton or short ton and not just ton; these units...
Click to read more »please. Done --Admrb♉ltz (t • c • log) 19:15, 24 August 2008 (UTC) Read MOSNUM on spelling out numbers; needs a consistent boundary. Done --Admrb♉ltz...
Click to read more »as a lead artist, 18 as a featured artist, two charity singles and five" MOSNUM 52/18/2/5. Done Cross-check the maths and cross-check with the infobox,...
Click to read more »editor; Gonzalo, a businessman; and Morgana, a photographer. There are WP:MOSNUM issues (incorrect spelling out vs. digits), incorrect use of WP:HYPHENs...
Click to read more »guarantees due to how many reviews I conduct. Also consider reading WP:MOSNUM, which has guidelines on when to use figures and when to spell numbers out...
Click to read more »guideline appears to be contradicted by the WP:MOSNUM guideline. While I personally tend to like the WP:MOSNUM rules where only the first usage is linked...
Click to read more »06:38, 18 May 2007 (UTC) Fixes needed: Please see WP:MOSBOLD. Also see WP:MOSNUM and WP:CONTEXT; solo years and As of years need not be wikilinked. Georgia...
Click to read more »I've made threads on the MOSNUM (see here) and I've talked to him on my talk page (here), but he refuses to engage at WT:MOSNUM, and doesn't even bother...
Click to read more »(talk) 01:31, 30 March 2010 (UTC) It's best to follow MOSNUM if you're headed for FAC, and MOSNUM says: "Use long ton or short ton and not just ton; these...
Click to read more »Have a look, for starters, at WP:MOSNUM and WP:DASH. Why are some solo years wikilinked? See WP:CONTEXT and WP:MOSNUM. Has this article had a peer review...
Click to read more »Double check for typos; things like ". [33]." and "profit.[19]." Per WP:MOSNUM, at Units of measurement, numbers with SI units of measure should have conversions...
Click to read more »example, what is Island Records? An independent record label?) Several WP:MOSNUM fixes needed. 12 -> twelve etc. Which U.S. chart? Mention the Billboard...
Click to read more »