Redirect to:
This page is a redirect. The following categories are used to track and monitor this redirect:
|
This Manual of Style (MoS or MOS) is the style manual for all English Wikipedia articles. This primary page is supported by further detailed subpages,...
Click to read more »available: I will put it somewhere soon Function overview: Fix headers per WP:MOSHEAD Links to relevant discussions (where appropriate): Edit period(s): Continuous...
Click to read more »Comments by Sjones23 Also, articles should not be linked in headers per WP:MOSHEAD. The cultural reference section could use a little expansion with additional...
Click to read more »Battle section is not correct, it should be "Account of the battle" per WP:MOSHEAD The use of three quote boxes in a row impacts upon the look of the article...
Click to read more »the Classes and Weapons section (which, by the way, is a violation of WP:MOSHEAD) is pretty game guide-y. The Controls section is total game guide material...
Click to read more »class; the heading "Subordinate Units" is incorrectly capitalised per WP:MOSHEAD. It should just be "Subordinate units"; the template at the bottom of the...
Click to read more »presentation suggestions from me as I have no content knowledge: per WP:MOSHEAD the capitalisation of the "German Plans" and "Soviet Plans" headers is...
Click to read more »telegraphic and used lower-case letters to start most of the words. WP:MOSHEAD explains the guidelines. I hope these suggestions prove helpful. If so...
Click to read more »WPCleaner. An example is this. The bot will fix examples that violate WP:MOSHEAD. An example is shown below. Before: == Example == ==== Example ==== After:...
Click to read more »{{main}}. Heading "The heliopause" should be renamed to Heliopause per WP:MOSHEAD and mentioned above. Heading "The scattered disc" should be renamed to...
Click to read more »the individual subsections into paragraphs or bulletted lists. Per WP:MOSHEAD, headings should not include the article's name without a good reason,...
Click to read more »better {{citeweb}}. Also, headings should be in sentence case, per WP:MOSHEAD, rather than title case. Hope this helps for now. – ukexpat (talk) 14:59...
Click to read more »of the article title, it's better to recast heads and subheads per WP:MOSHEAD. Something like "Since 1990" would be preferred to "Contemporary Ballarat"...
Click to read more »and the others. Just "BET", "BET Hip Hop", and so on would be fine. WP:MOSHEAD has details. Done Overlinking The linking is a bit irregular. It's good...
Click to read more »want a noun phrase for a heading rather than an adjective phrase per WP:MOSHEAD (which subsumes the rules for article titles), but this isn't a big deal...
Click to read more »think this makes sense (like a cast section in an article on a movie). WP:MOSHEAD says to avoid the use of "The" in headers ("The 1950 season", could this...
Click to read more »(See [[<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:MOSHEAD#Section_headings">WP:MOSHEAD</a>]]), as well as accessibility problems, especially with...
Click to read more »"Military operators" could simply become "Civilian" and "Military". WP:MOSHEAD has the guidelines. WP:MOSBOLD suggests limiting bolding to a few exceptional...
Click to read more »2006 (UTC) Object. Many instances of Using Titlecase for Sub-Headings: WP:MOSHEAD says rather to "Capitalise the first letter of the first word and any proper...
Click to read more »in section headings, nor should such headings lead with "The," per WP:MOSHEAD. The navigation box should go at the bottom, or be removed (I prefer removal...
Click to read more »head to "Recreation" and the "Course of the trail" head to "Course". WP:MOSHEAD has the guidelines. Done. Lead "as well as Route 44/55, NY 299, and NY...
Click to read more »should be renamed "See also" and moved above the references as per WP:MOSHEAD. Its subsections should be eliminated as well. --Spangineer[es] (háblame)...
Click to read more »reformatted the headers, which should be Level 2 rather than Level 4, per WP:MOSHEAD. I think that, as there are four references, there need not be two columns...
Click to read more »which repeat the main words of the article title over and over again. WP:MOSHEAD says in part, "Section names should not explicitly refer to the subject...
Click to read more »be tweaked. I think that this should be "27th Infantry advance" per WP:MOSHEAD; Fixed. —Ed!(talk) 09:38, 6 January 2011 (UTC) the caption of the image...
Click to read more »to change the section headings in the article to simplify them per WP:MOSHEAD. Anchors work even if the section title is subsequently changed, provided...
Click to read more »Here are my suggestions for further improvement. Heads and subheads WP:MOSHEAD advises against repeating the main words of the title in the heads and...
Click to read more »and nature," or the former made a subsection of the latter. Also, per WP:MOSHEAD, the article's title shouldn't be repeated in the section headings unless...
Click to read more »screen. Removing the subheads would help solve another problem as well. WP:MOSHEAD says in part, "Section and subsection headings should preferably be unique...
Click to read more »| watch | logs) Propose deleting Category:Articles tagged by WildBot (MOSHEAD) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Propose deleting Category:Articles...
Click to read more »result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:15, 5 October 2024 (UTC) MOSHEAD → MOS:HEAD (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] ...
Click to read more »Try to avoid them in the middle of sentences, where possible. Check WP:MOSHEAD; headings should be in sentence case. Also, spell out "and" rather than...
Click to read more »just be "Background" for simplicity and compliance with point 4 of WP:MOSHEAD. "It aimed at issuing government-funded legal aid to indigent defendants"...
Click to read more »14:44, 19 September 2006 (UTC) Comment: Section headings need to follow WP:MOSHEAD. In addition, there is no discussion of the game's development. For a computer...
Click to read more »Finally take a look at the Manual of Style pertaining to biographies and WP:MOSHEAD for section heading guidelines. Remove the empty category links and the...
Click to read more »he's not a sockpuppet) and I don't understand his actions. He undoes WP:MOSHEAD edits on Best Buy claiming it's vandalism [9], edits others comments on...
Click to read more »the War section: I think that this is incorrectly capitalised, per WP:MOSHEAD it should be "End of the war"; End of the War section: "Radetzky was broken...
Click to read more »2012 (UTC) You're welcome. Just saw this revert. That's at odds with WP:MOSHEAD and wp:Deviations. Headers should be done with '=' for the most part, not...
Click to read more »real editor since I don't add content. He's now skirting 3RR on the WP:MOSHEAD page, including falsely claiming that consensus is on his side. (It's really...
Click to read more »appreciated. SteveO 16:21, 19 July 2006 (UTC) I have contacted them about WP:MOSHEAD and told him that he should try and understand that all articles have to...
Click to read more »themselves are minor annoyances, but there are a lot of those. From WP:MOSHEAD: "Spaces between the == and the heading text are optional". Combined with...
Click to read more »issues that are damaging the Aaron Livesy article. Despite being told of WP:MOSHEAD, several times today (s)he has capitalised words in section headers that...
Click to read more »fixed some of the formatting issues and added section headings per WP:MOSHEAD. It still needs to be wikified and inline citations added, see WP:Referencing...
Click to read more »fix a problem in the linked article: see the second bullet point at WP:MOSHEAD. Subsection names in an article should be unique; otherwise, you can't...
Click to read more »or more length to the sidebar. I read all the relevant guidelines at WP:MOSHEAD and WP:ACCESS#Links and none of it applies to making the search heading...
Click to read more »is nothing that I am aware of that recommends it on the English WP. WP:MOSHEAD States "Spaces between the == and the heading text are optional (==H2==...
Click to read more »of the library should probably be moved to "Academics." In any case, WP:MOSHEAD deprecates using the article's name in section headings, so perhaps "Library"...
Click to read more »comply with some guidelines in spots, including: WP:CAPS, WP:LOWERCASE, WP:MOSHEAD, WP:LEAD, and WP:REFPUNCT. Specifically: A reference should generally come...
Click to read more »you. Heading "The Special Air Service" to "Special Air Service" per WP:MOSHEAD I'm not sure how that heading is contrary to MOS:HEAD; perhaps you could...
Click to read more »the very least it needs to be retitled to "Summits and passes" per WP:MOSHEAD. I changed the heading. I've debated how to do this myself. The problem...
Click to read more »section title "Garden and Landscape" is incorrectly capitalised. Per WP:MOSHEAD, I think it should be "Garden and landscape"; Done. Hchc2009 (talk) 17:44...
Click to read more »{talk / contribs / physics / books} 20:19, 1 October 2011 (UTC) Per WP:MOSHEAD and Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style#Images in sections, it would be pretty...
Click to read more »lead. I have also changed some of the section headings to comply with WP:MOSHEAD. I think the tone of the article needs a little more work it has the feel...
Click to read more »TN‑X-Man 16:28, 30 July 2008 (UTC) The Manual of Style for sections WP:MOSHEAD doesn't really say one way or the other, actually. TN‑X-Man 16:32, 30 July...
Click to read more »find it at the moment. – ukexpat (talk) 17:05, 12 January 2011 (UTC) WP:MOSHEAD says "no links", and the rationale would apply to both wikilinks and external...
Click to read more »TN‑X-Man 16:28, 30 July 2008 (UTC) The Manual of Style for sections WP:MOSHEAD doesn't really say one way or the other, actually. TN‑X-Man 16:32, 30 July...
Click to read more »appropriate; and we use sentence case for headings as described at WP:MOSHEAD. But first concentrate on the notability issue, the formatting can be cleaned...
Click to read more »and == == combinations, which despite the single equal sign error (WP:MOSHEAD), did maintain the Table of Contents with subdirectories. When BG19bot...
Click to read more »Manual of Style considerations in my comments below. Heads and subheads WP:MOSHEAD says the heads should generally avoid referring to the subject of the article...
Click to read more »2010 (UTC) I have made a few minor formatting changes - headings per WP:MOSHEAD; hiding the categories while it's in user space. – ukexpat (talk) 20:12...
Click to read more »Sacraments got inserted into "Church and Papal Authority" (see also WP:MOSHEAD). It wasn't there a month ago. Gimmetrow 05:25, 15 February 2008 (UTC)...
Click to read more »interesting history. The current guidelines (WP:LOWERCASE, WP:CAPS, WP:MOSHEAD) merely state the rules, but early versions argue in support of the rules...
Click to read more »be in all caps. We use sentence case for headings - take a look at WP:MOSHEAD. You probably need a proper infobox in place of the current lead paragraph...
Click to read more »Totally irrelevant -- all that is about article titles. What you need is WP:MOSHEAD. C'mon, do it right. Nomoskedasticity (talk) 23:58, 13 January 2014 (UTC)...
Click to read more »of the library should probably be moved to "Academics." In any case, WP:MOSHEAD deprecates using the article's name in section headings, so perhaps "Library"...
Click to read more »14:44, 19 September 2006 (UTC) Comment: Section headings need to follow WP:MOSHEAD. In addition, there is no discussion of the game's development. For a computer...
Click to read more »paragraphs and sections. Also, we use sentence case for section titles, see WP:MOSHEAD. Hope this helps. – ukexpat (talk) 17:45, 17 March 2010 (UTC) {{tl}} -...
Click to read more »2006 (UTC) Object. Many instances of Using Titlecase for Sub-Headings: WP:MOSHEAD says rather to "Capitalise the first letter of the first word and any proper...
Click to read more »2010 (UTC) I have made a few minor formatting changes - headings per WP:MOSHEAD; hiding the categories while it's in user space. – ukexpat (talk) 20:12...
Click to read more »thumbnail, and some of the section headings are done incorrectly, see WP:MOSHEAD. The lead could do with some more work; it should summarise the article...
Click to read more »presentation suggestions from me as I have no content knowledge: per WP:MOSHEAD the capitalisation of the "German Plans" and "Soviet Plans" headers is...
Click to read more »should be renamed "See also" and moved above the references as per WP:MOSHEAD. Its subsections should be eliminated as well. --Spangineer[es] (háblame)...
Click to read more »Template:WP:MOSDATE, Template:WP:MOSNUM Wikipedia:Manual of Style (headings) Template:WP:MOSHEAD Wikipedia:Manual of Style (links) Template:WP:MOS-L Wikipedia:Manual of...
Click to read more »head to "Recreation" and the "Course of the trail" head to "Course". WP:MOSHEAD has the guidelines. Done. Lead "as well as Route 44/55, NY 299, and NY...
Click to read more »the individual subsections into paragraphs or bulletted lists. Per WP:MOSHEAD, headings should not include the article's name without a good reason,...
Click to read more »just be "Background" for simplicity and compliance with point 4 of WP:MOSHEAD. "It aimed at issuing government-funded legal aid to indigent defendants"...
Click to read more »2012 (UTC) You're welcome. Just saw this revert. That's at odds with WP:MOSHEAD and wp:Deviations. Headers should be done with '=' for the most part, not...
Click to read more »{{main}}. Heading "The heliopause" should be renamed to Heliopause per WP:MOSHEAD and mentioned above. Heading "The scattered disc" should be renamed to...
Click to read more »which repeat the main words of the article title over and over again. WP:MOSHEAD says in part, "Section names should not explicitly refer to the subject...
Click to read more »fix a problem in the linked article: see the second bullet point at WP:MOSHEAD. Subsection names in an article should be unique; otherwise, you can't...
Click to read more »of main sections an H3 level heading (=== Subsection name ===), see WP:MOSHEAD. – ukexpat (talk) 19:41, 28 January 2010 (UTC) Resolved I cannot find the...
Click to read more »Try to avoid them in the middle of sentences, where possible. Check WP:MOSHEAD; headings should be in sentence case. Also, spell out "and" rather than...
Click to read more »and the others. Just "BET", "BET Hip Hop", and so on would be fine. WP:MOSHEAD has details. Done Overlinking The linking is a bit irregular. It's good...
Click to read more »Sacraments got inserted into "Church and Papal Authority" (see also WP:MOSHEAD). It wasn't there a month ago. Gimmetrow 05:25, 15 February 2008 (UTC)...
Click to read more »the very least it needs to be retitled to "Summits and passes" per WP:MOSHEAD. I changed the heading. I've debated how to do this myself. The problem...
Click to read more »Comments by Sjones23 Also, articles should not be linked in headers per WP:MOSHEAD. The cultural reference section could use a little expansion with additional...
Click to read more »in section headings, nor should such headings lead with "The," per WP:MOSHEAD. The navigation box should go at the bottom, or be removed (I prefer removal...
Click to read more »screen. Removing the subheads would help solve another problem as well. WP:MOSHEAD says in part, "Section and subsection headings should preferably be unique...
Click to read more »Battle section is not correct, it should be "Account of the battle" per WP:MOSHEAD The use of three quote boxes in a row impacts upon the look of the article...
Click to read more »you. Heading "The Special Air Service" to "Special Air Service" per WP:MOSHEAD I'm not sure how that heading is contrary to MOS:HEAD; perhaps you could...
Click to read more »better {{citeweb}}. Also, headings should be in sentence case, per WP:MOSHEAD, rather than title case. Hope this helps for now. – ukexpat (talk) 14:59...
Click to read more »class; the heading "Subordinate Units" is incorrectly capitalised per WP:MOSHEAD. It should just be "Subordinate units"; the template at the bottom of the...
Click to read more »course, but it would attract even more attention, albeit primarily from the MOSheads I guess. Cheers, ——Serial Number 54129 15:29, 28 March 2024 (UTC) "And...
Click to read more »