This page is a redirect. The following categories are used to track and monitor this redirect:
|
that does not breach the rules on undue weight. Shortcuts WP:MILPEOPLEWP:MILPEOPLE WP:MILPERSONWP:MILPERSON WP:SOLDIERWP:SOLDIER WP:NSOLDIERWP:NSOLDIER The...
Click to read more »battle with battleships or battlecruisers. Please be sure to observe WP:MILPEOPLE and other guidelines at WikiProject Biography. Please see the main page...
Click to read more »killed in an air incident. Also fails notability guidelines under WP:MILPEOPLE as he was only a air commodore and the awards he received were not the...
Click to read more »considerable debate whether or not this award met the criteria for WP:MILPEOPLE (which it itself merely an essay), or if the cited coverage was substantial...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Contested PROD. Not notable, fails WP:MILPEOPLE. He has not won the MOH, nor multiple DSCs, nor was he a flag officer...
Click to read more »I don't find him anywhere near the qualification standards under WP:MILPEOPLE. This "Officer of Legion of Honour" doesn't seem like an award either...
Click to read more »to fail WP:ONEEVENT and do not seem to otherwise satisfy WP:GNG or WP:MILPEOPLE. This seems similar to several other recent AfDs (here, here, and here)...
Click to read more »TWL) Contested PROD. Non notable serviceman. Doesn't meet criteria of WP:MILPEOPLE. I note he only died in the last two weeks and I wonder if the article...
Click to read more »there. Under WP:GNG she seems to meet the minimum criteria. Under WP:MILPEOPLE, she meets criteria #3 by holding a flag rank. I will admit that I do...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Does not meet notability standards. See WP:MILPEOPLE and article talk page. – S. Rich (talk) 03:37, 7 December 2014 (UTC) Note:...
Click to read more »discussion. The lack of sourcing and an assertion of notability from MILPEOPLE that general officers are usually notable. The overarching policy is the...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:MILPEOPLE. Seemed to be an otherwise non-notable cartographer. One biographical...
Click to read more »any of the criteria in WP:MILPEOPLE. AustralianRupert (talk) 06:21, 20 August 2010 (UTC) Delete: per nom, fails WP:MILPEOPLE. The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »Military Operations during the 1999 Kargil War (WP:MILPEOPLE #4), as a Lieutenant General WP:MILPEOPLE #2 also applies. His role as chairman of the Pakistan...
Click to read more »September 2009. Prod rationale this time around was "Non notable per WP:MILPEOPLE, see recent AFDs, such as those for Henry Blomberg and Daniel Martin....
Click to read more »WP:Reliable sources. Military record is commendable, but doesn't meet WP:MILPEOPLE. Proposed deletion contested by another editor with a new account. Norvoid...
Click to read more »flag, general or air officer, or their historical equivalents" from WP:MILPEOPLE.(non-admin closure) So said The Great Wiki Lord. (talk) 13:04, 10 September...
Click to read more »(talk) 17:09, 19 August 2010 (UTC) Delete: doesn't satisfy guidance at WP:MILPEOPLE and my searches don't indicate notability in other regards. I'm happy...
Click to read more »multiple awards of the Distinguished Service Cross (United States). See WP:MILPEOPLE. (GregJackP (talk) 14:37, 27 March 2010 (UTC)) Note: This debate has been...
Click to read more »been any significant coverage otherwise. The subject does not meet WP:MILPEOPLE or the general notability guidelines, and this appears to be a classic...
Click to read more »fail WP:ONEEVENT and does not seem to otherwise satisfy WP:GNG or WP:MILPEOPLE. This seems similar to several other recent AfDs (here, here, here, and...
Click to read more »achieve notability defined by WP:MILPEOPLE.--obi2canibetalk contr 11:52, 11 July 2015 (UTC) Delete per WP:MILPEOPLE and WP:SNOW. Bearian (talk) 00:00...
Click to read more »is worthy of discussion. Original prod concern was "Non notable per WP:MILPEOPLE, see recent AFDs, such as those for Henry Blomberg and Daniel Martin....
Click to read more »sacrifice, but I do not believe that our current policies (WP:GNG and WP:MILPEOPLE) are satisfied in this case. A mention of the subject in a related article...
Click to read more »WP:BIO and WP:MILPEOPLE and thus be notable (such as Jason Dunham). The reverse could also be true, where an individual fails MILPEOPLE but passes GNG...
Click to read more »notability of this person seems doubtful. It seems the subject fails WP:MILPEOPLE, unless his role in the USS Indianapolis incident could be considered...
Click to read more »(talk) 21:04, 5 July 2010 (UTC) Delete: no notability established per WP:MILPEOPLE. bahamut0013wordsdeeds 21:22, 5 July 2010 (UTC) Delete: the fact that...
Click to read more »JSTOR · TWL) No indication of notability. Does not meet criteria of WP:MILPEOPLE. NtheP (talk) 09:36, 4 July 2010 (UTC) Keep This is a classic example...
Click to read more »level? Corps? Division? Buckshot06 (talk) 00:01, 8 November 2015 (UTC) WP:MILPEOPLE has guidelines. For someone of this rank, being awarded something like...
Click to read more »Fences&Windows 07:53, 30 April 2010 (UTC) Delete. Doesn't satisfy WP:MILPEOPLE - the Distinguished Service Medal is one or two steps below automatic...
Click to read more »Gene93k (talk) 16:51, 7 July 2010 (UTC) Delete: lack of notability per WP:MILPEOPLE and WP:GNG. Seems like a fairly typical Army officer, no notable awards...
Click to read more »No indication or evidence that he meets notability requirements of WP:MILPEOPLE or WP:GNG. PKT(alk) 11:15, 5 June 2018 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...
Click to read more »2014 (UTC) Delete per WP:MILPEOPLE as a proven extension to WP:GNG on top of the usual standard search evaluations. #5 of MILPEOPLE does discuss "significant...
Click to read more »was killed in an air crash. Also fails notability guidelines under WP:MILPEOPLE as he was only a squadron leader. The crash itself might pass notability...
Click to read more »are independent of the subject, AND he does not meet the criteria of WP:MILPEOPLE Peacemaker67 (send... over) 10:31, 26 January 2013 (UTC) Keep. I had no...
Click to read more »have to argue that there is insufficient notability. Brennan fails WP:MILPEOPLE and WP:NOTMEMORIAL; even I have to admit that a Bronze Star isn't enough...
Click to read more »award appears to be the Silver Star - does not meet requirements of WP:MILPEOPLE. GregJackP (talk) 21:29, 25 May 2010 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...
Click to read more »-- Necrothesp (talk) 11:27, 5 November 2011 (UTC) Not according to WP:MILPEOPLE, which is why the article is here, but I do appreciate the input. I have...
Click to read more »fail WP:ONEEVENT and does not seem to otherwise satisfy WP:GNG or WP:MILPEOPLE. This seems similar to several other recent AfDs (here, here, and here)...
Click to read more »keep Wolcott, but he doesn't meet but I can't see how to get him past WP:MILPEOPLE. Niteshift36 (talk) 04:23, 29 March 2010 (UTC) Partly I am saying keep...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Doesn't meet the qualifications of WP:MILPEOPLE Staffwaterboy Critique Me 15:38, 7 September 2010 (UTC) Delete - Does...
Click to read more »14:26, 21 September 2015 (UTC) Keep. An Air Marshal is notable under WP:MILPEOPLE #3, and clicking on the "Find sources" links above show plenty of sources...
Click to read more »-- Kendrick7talk 21:33, 21 April 2010 (UTC) Delete: not notable per WP:MILPEOPLE in my opinion. — AustralianRupert (talk) 12:00, 17 April 2010 (UTC) The...
Click to read more »Bir Protik, the fourth highest military award in Bangladesh. Fails WP:MILPEOPLE. Only source I can find is the PR release found in a few newspapers by...
Click to read more »but I can't find reliable sources. Also, doesn't appear to reach WP:MILPEOPLE. Comments on Talk:Ivan Sergeychik welcome; I have no expertise in this...
Click to read more »recipients of gallantry awards across all countries are laid out in WP:MILPEOPLE. For the purposes of establishing a subject's notability under WP:ANYBIO#1...
Click to read more »discussions. Delete: doesn't seem like notability was established per WP:MILPEOPLE. The awards are there (though none of the 3rd part sources mention them)...
Click to read more »cleanup tags dated 2010 and 2015, likely for no sources on a BLP. Per WP:MILPEOPLE, he is notable in principle, having achieved the rank of LTG. So I leave...
Click to read more »FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:GNG, does not meet guidelines found in WP:MILPEOPLE. BLP article that has no hope of going anywhere beyond stub status. Article...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:MILPEOPLE. Military duties not notable; written works are either not published or...
Click to read more »'essay' we have on the notability requirements for military biographies, WP:MILPEOPLE, and whether it should be promoted to a guideline. The discussion is currently...
Click to read more »copyedited the stub. Bearian (talk) 20:33, 17 June 2010 (UTC) I looked at WP:MILPEOPLE, and I think he passes due to factors: 2. Were awarded their nation's...
Click to read more »(Victoria Cross, Medal of Honor) automatically qualify the recipient (see WP:MILPEOPLE for general guidelines); the British Empire Medal by itself isn't enough...
Click to read more »Delete - Mid ranking officer, fails to achieve notability defined by WP:MILPEOPLE.--obi2canibetalk contr 11:10, 11 July 2015 (UTC) The above discussion...
Click to read more »Gene93k (talk) 12:41, 17 April 2010 (UTC) Delete: not notable per WP:MILPEOPLE and I wouldn't have thought that the beauty contest makes her notable...
Click to read more »and Arabic. –Ammarpad (talk) 16:20, 18 February 2018 (UTC) keep per WP:MILPEOPLE, He was the Commander of the Liwa Fatemiyoun. Saff V. (talk) 07:17, 19...
Click to read more »Gene93k (talk) 14:50, 20 October 2010 (UTC) Delete: no notability. Fails WP:MILPEOPLE, and is missing even the absolute basics of a biography. bahamut0013wordsdeeds...
Click to read more »or WP clones), and no assertations of notability (fails WP:GNG and WP:MILPEOPLE). Additionally, seems to be a pretty close copy of his entry on Find a...
Click to read more »crew, what makes this individual more notable than the rest? Fails WP:MILPEOPLE. bahamut0013wordsdeeds 11:37, 3 June 2010 (UTC) Keep Subject has written...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:BLP1E, WP:GNG, WP:SUSTAINED, WP:MILPEOPLE. All coverage clusters in a ten-month window in 2025–2026 around one milestone...
Click to read more »both good." The applicable policy is WP:MILPEOPLE. Chris Troutman (talk) 23:32, 26 January 2014 (UTC) WP:MILPEOPLE is an essay, not a policy. The policy...
Click to read more »Delete - Mid ranking officer, fails to achieve notability defined by WP:MILPEOPLE.--obi2canibetalk contr 18:36, 6 July 2015 (UTC) Delete no sign of notability...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) No indication of notability per WP:MILPEOPLE or WP:BIO as a businessman. Speedied twice recently as Major Randeep Hundal...
Click to read more »Delete - Mid ranking officer, fails to achieve notability defined by WP:MILPEOPLE.--obi2canibetalk contr 18:36, 6 July 2015 (UTC) Delete - the subject lacks...
Click to read more »WP:MILMOS/N. Anotherclown (talk) 10:01, 13 January 2011 (UTC) Delete: Fails WP:MILPEOPLE, a mustang who commanded one destroyer during non-combat operations isn't...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non Notable mid level Civil Servant. Fails WP:MILPEOPLE WP:SOLDIER Uncletomwood (talk) 17:24, 25 June 2016 (UTC) Note: This debate...
Click to read more »hits [1], but not enough to pass WP:GNG in my opinion. Doesn't meet WP:MILPEOPLE, either. — AustralianRupert (talk) 11:18, 24 April 2010 (UTC) The above...
Click to read more »received much military awards, highest award for valour etc. Fails as per WP:MILPEOPLE. Note: This debate has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion...
Click to read more »sufficient for notability has not been accepted by the community; indeed, WP:MILPEOPLE itself merely reads that normally individuals holding these positions...
Click to read more »reference for the appropriate individuals to be included is detailed at WP:MILPEOPLE. tedder (talk) 02:20, 14 April 2012 (UTC) Addendum- in reality, this doesn't...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Does not meet notability per WP:MILPEOPLE. Article is WP:NOTMEMORIAL. – S. Rich (talk) 23:12, 23 January 2014 (UTC)...
Click to read more »(talk) 18:40, 25 November 2010 (UTC) Delete: per nom; fails WP:BLP, WP:MILPEOPLE, WP:GNG, and WP:BAHAD. Gosh, I never even knew that Wikipedia:WikiProject...
Click to read more »(UTC) Delete: as a major general, the subject would possibly pass WP:MILPEOPLE (please note, this is not a binding policy though), however, there is...
Click to read more »(talk) 21:33, 27 June 2012 (UTC) Keep Per military nobility guidelines, WP:MILPEOPLE: "Held a rank considered to be a flag, general or air officer, or their...
Click to read more »only the highest award recipients are notable in of themselves per WP:MILPEOPLE Sadads (talk) 00:37, 17 June 2011 (UTC) Delete. Third-level gallantry...
Click to read more »(talk) 17:30, 24 August 2010 (UTC) Delete: doesn't seem to satisfy WP:MILPEOPLE. If he really is Mayor of Tupelo (Mississippi or Oklahoma?), then he might...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails notability guidelines under WP:MILPEOPLE as he was not a member of a state military. Cossde (talk) 17:02, 15 December...
Click to read more »"Argent Medal of Honor"? If it is a national award for valor, then WP:MILPEOPLE demonstrates that this individual may have notability. bahamut0013wordsdeeds...
Click to read more »Necrothesp (talk) 14:39, 16 July 2015 (UTC) Delete. Fails draft guideline MILPEOPLE. Highest rank lieutenant colonel. No combat command or significant other...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) No claim of notability. Nothing to indicate WP:MILPEOPLE is met. MB 03:34, 24 July 2019 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Does not meet WP:MILPEOPLE criteria. – S. Rich (talk) 02:06, 14 December 2013 (UTC) Note: This debate...
Click to read more »28 February 2011 (UTC) Delete: fails WP:GNG, WP:BIO, WP:ARTIST, and WP:MILPEOPLE. No proof of notability, massive NPOV and COI issues, the only three RSs...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) The article fails WP:GNG and WP:MILPEOPLE. — dain- talk 18:49, 20 January 2013 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...
Click to read more »for the subject's notability here is not WP:MILPEOPLE, which is inconclusive, but WP:GNG, with WP:MILPEOPLE and WP:BLP1E not contradicting a notability...
Click to read more »(talk) 04:02, 16 December 2010 (UTC) Delete: unsourced BLP, fails WP:MILPEOPLE and WP:ATHLETE. Being a candidate for college football awards, a possible...
Click to read more »Delete - Mid ranking officer, fails to achieve notability defined by WP:MILPEOPLE.--obi2canibetalk contr 18:35, 6 July 2015 (UTC) Delete cant see anything...
Click to read more »Delete - Mid ranking officer, fails to achieve notability defined by WP:MILPEOPLE.--obi2canibetalk contr 18:44, 6 July 2015 (UTC) Delete no sign of notability...
Click to read more »July 2011 (UTC) Delete as self-promotion and not meeting WP:GNG or WP:MILPEOPLE. Zero independent coverage. Page is a clear copyright violation, taken...
Click to read more »• Gene93k (talk) 23:22, 3 July 2010 (UTC) Comment: doesn't satisfy WP:MILPEOPLE, and currently is completely unreferenced. However, the professional golf...
Click to read more »suffering from NPOV, tone, and probable COI issues. Certainly fails WP:MILPEOPLE and has nothing distinguishing for his military service (most of the so-called...
Click to read more »was the commanding officer of a major ship of the fleet--thus passes WP:MILPEOPLE. If that doesn't work, I would think being the first woman in the history...
Click to read more »sources can be found, I think he has just enough notability to squeak by WP:MILPEOPLE (a few commands of notable aviation units, though I'm loathe to stop Coastie-bashing...
Click to read more »delete: if you know me, you know I disgree with the awards clause of WP:MILPEOPLE; and I thin that a DFC is enough. However, for a BLP, even I can't say...
Click to read more »2011 (UTC) Delete: unverfified and unreferenced BLP. Utterly fails WP:MILPEOPLE, and even if his ancestry could be confirmed, notability is not inherited...
Click to read more »really my area and I tend to defer such things to Moonriddengirl :) WP:MILPEOPLE supports your point about a presumption of notability for General officers...
Click to read more »academic book, of limited impact. Doesn't meet WP:NPROF; doesn't meet WP:MILPEOPLE. - WPGA2345 - ☛ 01:48, 1 December 2018 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...
Click to read more »you've ever been at an AfD like this before, you know I think that WP:MILPEOPLE is too stringent on notability from valor awards, and I feel that a Silver...
Click to read more »don't discuss the subject in any real detail and the subject fails WP:MILPEOPLE, too. WP:BASIC says "trivial coverage of a subject by secondary sources...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:MILPEOPLE Sulaimandaud (talk) 09:41, 5 June 2017 (UTC) Move I suggest moving the...
Click to read more »The Bronze Star, however, is not an honour that gets a person over WP:MILPEOPLE in and of itself — and the only other potential claim of notability here...
Click to read more »elsewhere. power~enwiki (π, ν) 19:19, 5 June 2018 (UTC) Delete fails WP:MILPEOPLE as well as WP:ANYBIO. The "Legionnaire of the Year" award was not a national...
Click to read more »a major force commander in a war, that Aitken satisfies WP:BIO and WP:MILPEOPLE (role in a significant event, general/flag rank and commander of a substantial...
Click to read more »01:53, 24 October 2010 (UTC) Delete: no notability per WP:BIO and WP:MILPEOPLE. bahamut0013wordsdeeds 01:53, 24 October 2010 (UTC) Delete - not notable...
Click to read more »24 November 2016 (UTC) Also, achieved the rank of Major General, so WP:MILPEOPLE also applies.Naraht (talk) 00:47, 26 November 2016 (UTC) Relisted to generate...
Click to read more »this is backed up by his entry at Military Times[1]. So he passes WP:MILPEOPLE. Also, he had a notable ship named after him. This article needs to be...
Click to read more »§ 17:33, 14 June 2010 (UTC) Weak keep: I'm on the borderline with WP:MILPEOPLE, the saving grace being his significant perticipation in notable battles...
Click to read more »important commands/roles, no significant advances, no awards, etc.) per WP:MILPEOPLE. There's also some gaps in his history that lend me to think his duties...
Click to read more »Delete: unreferenced, possible hoax (as per above) and fails guidance in WP:MILPEOPLE. — AustralianRupert (talk) 11:58, 17 April 2010 (UTC) The above discussion...
Click to read more »conducted an extensive campaign, I think it safe to say he passed WP:MILPEOPLE, specifically "Held a rank considered to be a flag, general or air officer...
Click to read more »(which is nearly copied in whole or part by the article itself), or WP:MILPEOPLE. --RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 13:32, 21 December 2009 (UTC) Delete - No...
Click to read more »(talk) 20:49, 1 June 2013 (UTC) Delete - Article fails to meet WP:GNG, WP:MILPEOPLE. — -dainomite 21:10, 1 June 2013 (UTC) Delete Kumioko (talk) 22:49,...
Click to read more »2010 (UTC) Delete unfortunately does not pass WP:N, in my opinion, or WP:MILPEOPLE. — AustralianRupert (talk) 10:37, 11 June 2010 (UTC) Conditional Keep...
Click to read more »retired Commander. No evidence of notability. Fails WP:BASIC, WP:ANYBIO, WP:MILPEOPLE. His philately work could hold some water but no WP:SIGCOV and poorly...
Click to read more »The Silver Star is the 3rd highest military honor of the U.S. Per WP:MILPEOPLE, regrettably they are not notable. All of articles contain the same format...
Click to read more »killed him self and 13 others. Also fails notability guidelines under WP:MILPEOPLE as he was not a member of a state military. The incident itself might...
Click to read more »Delete: Easily lacks notability as a lawyer and as a Marine, failing WP:MILPEOPLE and WP:GNG. The cases he's tried are marginal at best, and the one that...
Click to read more »really judge if he mees WP:ARTIST or not. However, he surely fails WP:MILPEOPLE. Mere participation in battles isn't enough, and the information about...
Click to read more »Delete Peerage doesn't connote notability. The subject doesn't pass WP:MILPEOPLE and I'm not convinced the spare routine coverage merits WP:GNG. Chris...
Click to read more »(Adjutant-General) of the Maryland National Guard. He meets the third criterion of WP:MILPEOPLE as a notable military figure as he was a general officer. He also was...
Click to read more »regarding the whole of the service, I would suggest that it is similar to WP:MILPEOPLE #3, "Held the top-level military command position of their nation's armed...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:MILPEOPLE notability guidance. – S. Rich (talk) 23:46, 2 August 2014 (UTC) Automated...
Click to read more »23:48, 14 June 2017 (UTC) Strong keep: The subject clearly passes WP:MILPEOPLE. The article needs work/improvement; not a nomination in AfD. For the...
Click to read more »Wikipedia is not a memorial and Galoff does not appear to be notable under WP:MILPEOPLE. A Stop at Willoughby (talk) 05:23, 29 December 2009 (UTC) Note: This...
Click to read more »perhaps you could express this in terms of meeting the guidance of WP:MILPEOPLE? If these are the highest national awards then this would be a good rationale...
Click to read more »John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:35, 11 December 2019 (UTC) Keep meets WP:MILPEOPLE#5 as the commander of a submarine he also played an important role in...
Click to read more »certainly nothing wrong or invalid about disagreeing with the threshold of WP:MILPEOPLE. While I'm an advocate of that essay and would like to see it restored...
Click to read more »Rhododendrites talk \\ 14:48, 9 November 2015 (UTC) Keep Subject passes #5 of WP:MILPEOPLE. According to this, Order of the Patriotic War award is only given to...
Click to read more »30 July 2020 (UTC) Speedy Keep Dragunsky is notable per WP:GNG and WP:MILPEOPLE with significant coverage in Russian sources, being a colonel general...
Click to read more »(talk) 22:34, 29 December 2010 (UTC) Delete: as is, the article fails WP:MILPEOPLE and WP:GNG. I don't think that there is any sufficient claim to notability...
Click to read more »article in Wikipedia because he does not meet the criteria listed for WP:MILPEOPLE. Akihiko Saito is listed under Foreign Hostages in Iraq and his capture...
Click to read more »Military Cross is a third-level decoration, far from the expectations of WP:MILPEOPLE. I simply do not see a place in the notability guidelines for "everyone...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Subject fails WP:BIO1E, WP:ANYBIO, and WP:MILPEOPLE. There are reliable sources that examine the subject briefly, but only...
Click to read more »December 2016 (UTC) Delete Doesn't meet notability as an airman under WP:MILPEOPLE, with a highest rank of captain and...fairly normal awards for a lot of...
Click to read more »officer has not commanded in combat at a significant rank, failing WP:MILPEOPLE/SOLDIER. Many, many, many, Indian Army captains have served on the Siachen...
Click to read more »8600 people. 2. Neither of the medals he received qualifies him for WP:MILPEOPLE. He was not high ranking and it appears that he didn't serve an important...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Delete. The subject fails WP:MILPEOPLE as well as WP:GNG. The sources listed are either self-published (Gateway...
Click to read more »--Skr15081997 (talk) 11:51, 3 June 2014 (UTC) Keep: WP:ANYBIO and/or WP:MILPEOPLE would apply as the article's subject was awarded Ashok Chakra, India's...
Click to read more »(UTC) Conditional keep: I'd say that he has the notability to keep per WP:MILPEOPLE (and possibly as a political candidate), but the COI, POV, and just horribly...
Click to read more »for us to presume notability. Let's also remember Goode also fails WP:MILPEOPLE. Chris Troutman (talk) 15:05, 18 May 2016 (UTC) Relisted to generate a...
Click to read more »Bergman socks, per Softlavender. Agree it does not meet WP:MILNG or WP:MILPEOPLE, as decorations are only of service medal and campaign medal types. Nor...
Click to read more »close to the subject. The subject's military service does not satisfy WP:MILPEOPLE, his service as a teacher and principal does not satisfy WP:SCHOLAR and...
Click to read more »politician, military officer or diplomat. Fails WP:POLITICIAN; WP:MILNG; WP:MILPEOPLE; WP:DIPLOMAT; WP:NRVE. Five bedroom bedroom B&B built by descendant of...
Click to read more »20:29, 5 October 2010 (UTC) Delete: Absolutely not notable. Fails WP:MILPEOPLE completely. Being on a game show and only winning two rounds is not notability...
Click to read more »--Pgallert (talk) 10:28, 16 June 2010 (UTC) Delete. Clearly fails WP:MILPEOPLE and WP:POLITICIAN by a country mile. Herostratus (talk) 14:26, 16 June...
Click to read more »21:18, 6 February 2010 (UTC)) Delete. Does not satisfy any criteria at WP:MILPEOPLE. WWGB (talk) 04:48, 7 February 2010 (UTC) Delete per NOTNEWS, other guidelines...
Click to read more »notable ex-Royal Navy officer and now businessman. Fails WP:BASIC and WP:MILPEOPLE NtheP (talk) 13:51, 1 September 2010 (UTC) Delete. Notability not established...
Click to read more »(which currently is redirected to the article on Falavi Doctrine). WP:MILPEOPLE accepts notability as established if an individual has "Held a rank considered...
Click to read more »(UTC) Making sure I address editors concerns, WP:GNG is amply met, so WP:MILPEOPLE doesn't figure in at all. WP:BLP1E instructs that in cases of a significant...
Click to read more »important enough, but that is the state of affairs here. They fail under WP:MILPEOPLE. Niteshift36 (talk) 16:25, 7 January 2010 (UTC) The above discussion is...
Click to read more »Sadads (talk) 01:53, 14 September 2010 (UTC) Delete: Seems to fail WP:MILPEOPLE. Performing budgeting and radar timing might or might not be significant...
Click to read more »create this article and never consented to it. A notability tag citing WP:MILPEOPLE was added in 2010 and removed by the article's principal author; the concern...
Click to read more »this search: [1]. I believe that Wheeler satisfies the guidance at WP:MILPEOPLE. AustralianRupert (talk) 07:35, 17 August 2010 (UTC) I agree. With the...
Click to read more »don't believe so. Canterbury Tail talk 23:07, 18 December 2009 (UTC) WP:MILPEOPLE notes that only those awarded a nations highest award are notable, or...
Click to read more »(UTC) Merge or redirect or rename: I don't think the individual meets WP:MILPEOPLE, but the incident seems to be notable. I've asked for some help at WT:OMT...
Click to read more »BLP.T3h 1337 b0y (talk) 02:44, 8 May 2010 (UTC) Rename: per WP:PERP, WP:MILPEOPLE, and WP:BLP1E, the individual isn't notable, but the court martial is...
Click to read more »the concept that all ambassadors should be presumed notable, much as WP:MILPEOPLE does for flag/general officers. (I am aware that the consensus opposes...
Click to read more »father's political opponent speaking at his graduation doesn't satisfy WP:MILPEOPLE or WP:GNG. Chances are pretty good that he will be notable in the distant...
Click to read more »and from president of a country Pakistan ‘Tamgha-i-Khidmat - II’ ( WP:MILPEOPLE – If person has one highest award. He has two highest awards.) are supportive...
Click to read more »was a brigadier general, which appears to satisfy criterion (3) at WP:MILPEOPLE. — Ammodramus (talk) 22:40, 27 November 2015 (UTC) Sure, but the Wombwell...
Click to read more »individual, LtCol Petit doesn't automatically qualify for notability per WP:MILPEOPLE and doesn't seem to have the required coverage in reliable secondary sources...
Click to read more »Last Letters Home. No real independant notability as a person, per WP:MILPEOPLE, WP:NOTNEWS, WP:NOTMEMORIAL, and WP:BIO1E; and precedent per Wikipedia:Articles...
Click to read more »submit it for review when it's ready. Your submission doesn't meet WP:MILPEOPLE, nor does it meet WP:GNG or WP:ANYBIO. Chris Troutman (talk) 03:14, 15...
Click to read more »Gene93k (talk) 19:59, 16 August 2010 (UTC) Delete: sure as heck fails WP:MILPEOPLE, even in the previous iteration. As to the other careers, they seem to...
Click to read more »Whether MILPEOPLE or not is a valid notability guide is irrelevant, because it's not the only cited argument for keeping or deleting. Whether MILPEOPLE is...
Click to read more »they surely meet the GNG. His Air Force career doesn't seem to meet WP:MILPEOPLE (being just short of the general officer minimum to be presumed notable)...
Click to read more »fall into any of the categories that would make him notable under WP:MILPEOPLE (although this is not a guideline). Finally, I don't believe there is...
Click to read more »regular officers of the same rank. They therefore meet the criteria of WP:MILPEOPLE (and yes, I'm aware that it's not an accepted guideline, but it is widely...
Click to read more »sorting/Military for any length of time, then you know I disagree with WP:MILPEOPLE regarding the notability of awards. Per WP:BAHAD, I feel that a Silver...
Click to read more »fishy. Given that the Navy Cross bit was proven false, he would fail WP:MILPEOPLE, even if everything else could be verified. bahamut0013wordsdeeds 18:03...
Click to read more »a Colonel according to Superintendent of police (India) and as per WP:MILPEOPLE is not presumed notable. Domdeparis (talk) 16:54, 13 September 2017 (UTC)...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Does not meet WP:MILPEOPLE criteria. (Although he boasts to have sunk "the first warship by artillery...
Click to read more »misunderstood. Nevertheless, keeping my vote due to the criterion 4 of WP:MILPEOPLE. --СССР (talk) 20:25, 6 May 2020 (UTC) Keep. For all the reasons previously...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:GNG, WP:MILPEOPLE, and WP:ANYBIO. Most of the sources are not both independent and reliable...
Click to read more »(UTC) Redirect to The Real World: Brooklyn per Starblind. He fails WP:MILPEOPLE utterly, and his notability is completely associated with one event. None...
Click to read more »any of the eight criteria we use from the "still considered essay" WP:MILPEOPLE nor GNG. As a sailor (part of the title) the subject is not considered...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) No evidence of notability per WP:MILPEOPLE (Staff sergeant is not a flag or general officer), and apparent failure...
Click to read more »(talk) 02:09, 10 May 2016 (UTC) Very simple. Mirzayev clarifies WP:MILPEOPLE as he was awarded his nation's highest award for valour. Murad Mirzayev...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ehren Watada (2nd nomination). Per WP:PERP, WP:MILPEOPLE, and WP:BLP1E, the individual isn't notable, but the court martial is...
Click to read more »2010 (UTC) Delete: per above, does not demonstrate notability. Fails WP:MILPEOPLE and WP:BAHAD. bahamut0013wordsdeeds 20:38, 22 November 2010 (UTC) Keep...
Click to read more »redirected to 2016 Democratic National Convention. Humayun Khan fails WP:MILPEOPLE. I posit that WP:BLP1E applies: Khan is otherwise a low-profile individual...
Click to read more »not notable as required by Wikipedia:Notability (people) or Wikipedia:MILPEOPLE#People. This looks like a geneology project turned into a Wikipedia article...
Click to read more »think the relevant policy links are: Wikipedia:ATHLETE#Rugby union and WP:MILPEOPLE. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 13:24, 13 February 2011 (UTC) Actually...
Click to read more »8th congressional district election, 2010. Fails WP:POLITICIAN and WP:MILPEOPLE, but I could see him possibly being a valid search term. There is a decent...
Click to read more »the Battle of the Little Big Horn and Wounded Knee). The criteria at WP:MILPEOPLE is obviously intended to cover large, modern militaries, and in several...
Click to read more »discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:02, 17 November 2010 (UTC) Delete: fails WP:MILPEOPLE and the WP:GNG, as well as my own standards. bahamut0013wordsdeeds 20:24...
Click to read more »there. Under WP:GNG she seems to meet the minimum criteria. Under WP:MILPEOPLE, she meets criteria #3 by holding a flag rank. I will admit that I do...
Click to read more »and sailors. Honorable, but nothing close to the criteria listed in WP:MILPEOPLE. Being an activist and choosing to get married on a certain day and notifying...
Click to read more »a joke? Utterly fails notability requirements: WP:GNG, WP:BIO, and WP:MILPEOPLE, and hasn't a single reliable source (thus failing WP:BLP), not to mention...
Click to read more »it is just plain notability: he fails WP:GNG, WP:BIO, WP:BLP, and WP:MILPEOPLE; absolutely nothing he has done sets him aside from all of the other airmen...
Click to read more »details. Notability guidelines for military biographies can be found at WP:MILPEOPLE. Any article related to this task force should be marked by adding parameters...
Click to read more »📔) 04:50, 8 May 2025 (UTC) Keep – The article meets both WP:GNG and WP:MILPEOPLE. The subject is the first Indian woman to lead an all-male UN peacekeeping...
Click to read more »╟─TreasuryTag►senator─╢ 07:58, 16 June 2010 (UTC) Delete. Clearly fails WP:MILPEOPLE and WP:POLITICIAN by a country mile. Herostratus (talk) 14:26, 16 June...
Click to read more »13:47, 19 April 2018 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTNEWS. The subject fails WP:MILPEOPLE and WP:BLP1E, as the subject is only known for this one mishap. This is...
Click to read more »wp:BIO#Any_biography, and as I already explained my stand on WP:MILPEOPLE during the relisting process, MILPEOPLE IMO doesn't apply to Gogozoto. Hope this is more clear...
Click to read more »he fits under criteria 3 of WP:MILPEOPLE, and as an Iron Cross winner, he qualifies under criteria 1 of WP:MILPEOPLE. I will note the delete arguments...
Click to read more »current consensus per WP:MILPEOPLE, though, is that the Air Force Cross doesn't qualify alone for notability. If not in under MILPEOPLE, and his only other...
Click to read more »To my mind, simply having rank / position categories in line with WP:MILPEOPLE notability guidelines makes most sense. — Sasuke Sarutobi (push to talk)...
Click to read more »for the subject's notability here is not WP:MILPEOPLE, which is inconclusive, but WP:GNG, with WP:MILPEOPLE and WP:BLP1E not contradicting a notability...
Click to read more »BLP.T3h 1337 b0y (talk) 02:44, 8 May 2010 (UTC) Rename: per WP:PERP, WP:MILPEOPLE, and WP:BLP1E, the individual isn't notable, but the court martial is...
Click to read more »(talk) 21:04, 5 July 2010 (UTC) Delete: no notability established per WP:MILPEOPLE. bahamut0013wordsdeeds 21:22, 5 July 2010 (UTC) Delete: the fact that...
Click to read more »air officers at WP:MILPEOPLE.--obi2canibetalk contr 20:39, 17 December 2014 (UTC) Keep. His rank of air commodore satisfies MILPEOPLE criterion #3, and...
Click to read more »Delete - Mid ranking officer, fails to achieve notability defined by WP:MILPEOPLE.--obi2canibetalk contr 18:44, 6 July 2015 (UTC) Delete no sign of notability...
Click to read more »I think there is enough notability to satisfy WP:GNG, WP:BIO, and WP:MILPEOPLE. Though I have to note, she's probably at the bottom of what I would consider...
Click to read more »TWL) Contested PROD. Non notable serviceman. Doesn't meet criteria of WP:MILPEOPLE. I note he only died in the last two weeks and I wonder if the article...
Click to read more »sacrifice, but I do not believe that our current policies (WP:GNG and WP:MILPEOPLE) are satisfied in this case. A mention of the subject in a related article...
Click to read more »copyedited the stub. Bearian (talk) 20:33, 17 June 2010 (UTC) I looked at WP:MILPEOPLE, and I think he passes due to factors: 2. Were awarded their nation's...
Click to read more »Necrothesp (talk) 14:39, 16 July 2015 (UTC) Delete. Fails draft guideline MILPEOPLE. Highest rank lieutenant colonel. No combat command or significant other...
Click to read more »Policy-wise it fails WP:MILPEOPLE in my opinion and is a BLP issue. — AustralianRupert (talk) 19:34, 8 May 2010 (UTC) Weak Delete per WP:MILPEOPLE, but his authorship...
Click to read more »myself at the time. MickMacNee (talk) 16:19, 12 December 2010 (UTC) WP:MILPEOPLE is what it finally ended up as. MickMacNee (talk) 16:22, 12 December 2010...
Click to read more »23:48, 14 June 2017 (UTC) Strong keep: The subject clearly passes WP:MILPEOPLE. The article needs work/improvement; not a nomination in AfD. For the...
Click to read more »(UTC) Comment Failure of WP:MILPEOPLE is not a valid reason for deletion. Famous military people (who meet WP:MILPEOPLE) tend to be notable but notability...
Click to read more »both good." The applicable policy is WP:MILPEOPLE. Chris Troutman (talk) 23:32, 26 January 2014 (UTC) WP:MILPEOPLE is an essay, not a policy. The policy...
Click to read more »achieve notability defined by WP:MILPEOPLE.--obi2canibetalk contr 11:52, 11 July 2015 (UTC) Delete per WP:MILPEOPLE and WP:SNOW. Bearian (talk) 00:00...
Click to read more »(UTC) Comment Failure of WP:MILPEOPLE is not a valid reason for deletion. Famous military people (who meet WP:MILPEOPLE) tend to be notable but notability...
Click to read more »Military Operations during the 1999 Kargil War (WP:MILPEOPLE #4), as a Lieutenant General WP:MILPEOPLE #2 also applies. His role as chairman of the Pakistan...
Click to read more »§ 17:33, 14 June 2010 (UTC) Weak keep: I'm on the borderline with WP:MILPEOPLE, the saving grace being his significant perticipation in notable battles...
Click to read more »sufficient for notability has not been accepted by the community; indeed, WP:MILPEOPLE itself merely reads that normally individuals holding these positions...
Click to read more »September 2009. Prod rationale this time around was "Non notable per WP:MILPEOPLE, see recent AFDs, such as those for Henry Blomberg and Daniel Martin....
Click to read more »history | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions] article is WP:N per WP:MILPEOPLE Requesting undelete dating back to the deletion done on June 26 21:48...
Click to read more »FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:GNG, does not meet guidelines found in WP:MILPEOPLE. BLP article that has no hope of going anywhere beyond stub status. Article...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Does not meet notability per WP:MILPEOPLE. Article is WP:NOTMEMORIAL. – S. Rich (talk) 23:12, 23 January 2014 (UTC)...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails notability guidelines under WP:MILPEOPLE as he was not a member of a state military. Cossde (talk) 17:02, 15 December...
Click to read more »politician, military officer or diplomat. Fails WP:POLITICIAN; WP:MILNG; WP:MILPEOPLE; WP:DIPLOMAT; WP:NRVE. Five bedroom bedroom B&B built by descendant of...
Click to read more »No indication or evidence that he meets notability requirements of WP:MILPEOPLE or WP:GNG. PKT(alk) 11:15, 5 June 2018 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...
Click to read more »keep Wolcott, but he doesn't meet but I can't see how to get him past WP:MILPEOPLE. Niteshift36 (talk) 04:23, 29 March 2010 (UTC) Partly I am saying keep...
Click to read more »notability of this person seems doubtful. It seems the subject fails WP:MILPEOPLE, unless his role in the USS Indianapolis incident could be considered...
Click to read more »(Victoria Cross, Medal of Honor) automatically qualify the recipient (see WP:MILPEOPLE for general guidelines); the British Empire Medal by itself isn't enough...
Click to read more »wrote a page on Raymond P. Ayres," - We have a general precedent (WP:MILPEOPLE), albeit not a guideline, that presumes inherent notability for any person...
Click to read more »like him. Fails MILPEOPLE. bahamut0013wordsdeeds 17:59, 18 May 2010 (UTC) Delete: regretfully the article does not meet WP:MILPEOPLE and there has been...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Doesn't meet the qualifications of WP:MILPEOPLE Staffwaterboy Critique Me 15:38, 7 September 2010 (UTC) Delete - Does...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Does not meet notability standards. See WP:MILPEOPLE and article talk page. – S. Rich (talk) 03:37, 7 December 2014 (UTC) Note:...
Click to read more »level? Corps? Division? Buckshot06 (talk) 00:01, 8 November 2015 (UTC) WP:MILPEOPLE has guidelines. For someone of this rank, being awarded something like...
Click to read more »any of the criteria in WP:MILPEOPLE. AustralianRupert (talk) 06:21, 20 August 2010 (UTC) Delete: per nom, fails WP:MILPEOPLE. The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »present article is whether it meets the criteria at WP:PERSON and WP:MILPEOPLE. — Cheers, Steelpillow (Talk) 08:00, 23 March 2016 (UTC) But you are right...
Click to read more »Gene93k (talk) 14:50, 20 October 2010 (UTC) Delete: no notability. Fails WP:MILPEOPLE, and is missing even the absolute basics of a biography. bahamut0013wordsdeeds...
Click to read more »are independent of the subject, AND he does not meet the criteria of WP:MILPEOPLE Peacemaker67 (send... over) 10:31, 26 January 2013 (UTC) Keep. I had no...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) No claim of notability. Nothing to indicate WP:MILPEOPLE is met. MB 03:34, 24 July 2019 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...
Click to read more »-- Necrothesp (talk) 11:27, 5 November 2011 (UTC) Not according to WP:MILPEOPLE, which is why the article is here, but I do appreciate the input. I have...
Click to read more »was the commanding officer of a major ship of the fleet--thus passes WP:MILPEOPLE. If that doesn't work, I would think being the first woman in the history...
Click to read more »Bir Protik, the fourth highest military award in Bangladesh. Fails WP:MILPEOPLE. Only source I can find is the PR release found in a few newspapers by...
Click to read more »the Battle of the Little Big Horn and Wounded Knee). The criteria at WP:MILPEOPLE is obviously intended to cover large, modern militaries, and in several...
Click to read more »have to argue that there is insufficient notability. Brennan fails WP:MILPEOPLE and WP:NOTMEMORIAL; even I have to admit that a Bronze Star isn't enough...
Click to read more »multiple awards of the Distinguished Service Cross (United States). See WP:MILPEOPLE. (GregJackP (talk) 14:37, 27 March 2010 (UTC)) Note: This debate has been...
Click to read more »(talk) 17:09, 19 August 2010 (UTC) Delete: doesn't satisfy guidance at WP:MILPEOPLE and my searches don't indicate notability in other regards. I'm happy...
Click to read more »WP:Reliable sources. Military record is commendable, but doesn't meet WP:MILPEOPLE. Proposed deletion contested by another editor with a new account. Norvoid...
Click to read more »30 July 2020 (UTC) Speedy Keep Dragunsky is notable per WP:GNG and WP:MILPEOPLE with significant coverage in Russian sources, being a colonel general...
Click to read more »I don't find him anywhere near the qualification standards under WP:MILPEOPLE. This "Officer of Legion of Honour" doesn't seem like an award either...
Click to read more »especially if they help show that someone meets the standards at WP:MILPEOPLE. Anyone can edit Findagrave, so it's not a reliable source. Ian.thomson...
Click to read more »reference for the appropriate individuals to be included is detailed at WP:MILPEOPLE. tedder (talk) 02:20, 14 April 2012 (UTC) Addendum- in reality, this doesn't...
Click to read more »2016 (UTC) Delete Does not meet any of the eight listed criteria at WP:MILPEOPLE nor does there appear to be "significant coverage [of him] in multiple...
Click to read more »certainly nothing wrong or invalid about disagreeing with the threshold of WP:MILPEOPLE. While I'm an advocate of that essay and would like to see it restored...
Click to read more »flag, general or air officer, or their historical equivalents" from WP:MILPEOPLE.(non-admin closure) So said The Great Wiki Lord. (talk) 13:04, 10 September...
Click to read more »Rhododendrites talk \\ 14:48, 9 November 2015 (UTC) Keep Subject passes #5 of WP:MILPEOPLE. According to this, Order of the Patriotic War award is only given to...
Click to read more »close to the subject. The subject's military service does not satisfy WP:MILPEOPLE, his service as a teacher and principal does not satisfy WP:SCHOLAR and...
Click to read more »a Colonel according to Superintendent of police (India) and as per WP:MILPEOPLE is not presumed notable. Domdeparis (talk) 16:54, 13 September 2017 (UTC)...
Click to read more »(Adjutant-General) of the Maryland National Guard. He meets the third criterion of WP:MILPEOPLE as a notable military figure as he was a general officer. He also was...
Click to read more »don't believe so. Canterbury Tail talk 23:07, 18 December 2009 (UTC) WP:MILPEOPLE notes that only those awarded a nations highest award are notable, or...
Click to read more »important commands/roles, no significant advances, no awards, etc.) per WP:MILPEOPLE. There's also some gaps in his history that lend me to think his duties...
Click to read more »and Arabic. –Ammarpad (talk) 16:20, 18 February 2018 (UTC) keep per WP:MILPEOPLE, He was the Commander of the Liwa Fatemiyoun. Saff V. (talk) 07:17, 19...
Click to read more »or WP clones), and no assertations of notability (fails WP:GNG and WP:MILPEOPLE). Additionally, seems to be a pretty close copy of his entry on Find a...
Click to read more »award appears to be the Silver Star - does not meet requirements of WP:MILPEOPLE. GregJackP (talk) 21:29, 25 May 2010 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ehren Watada (2nd nomination). Per WP:PERP, WP:MILPEOPLE, and WP:BLP1E, the individual isn't notable, but the court martial is...
Click to read more »Delete Peerage doesn't connote notability. The subject doesn't pass WP:MILPEOPLE and I'm not convinced the spare routine coverage merits WP:GNG. Chris...
Click to read more »fail WP:ONEEVENT and does not seem to otherwise satisfy WP:GNG or WP:MILPEOPLE. This seems similar to several other recent AfDs (here, here, and here)...
Click to read more »8600 people. 2. Neither of the medals he received qualifies him for WP:MILPEOPLE. He was not high ranking and it appears that he didn't serve an important...
Click to read more »area, but it is pretty clear O'Brien doesn't meet WP:PERPETRATOR or WP:MILPEOPLE. MickMacNee (talk) 15:36, 10 December 2009 (UTC) Keep Article has reliable...
Click to read more »-- Kendrick7talk 21:33, 21 April 2010 (UTC) Delete: not notable per WP:MILPEOPLE in my opinion. — AustralianRupert (talk) 12:00, 17 April 2010 (UTC) The...
Click to read more »2014 (UTC) Delete per WP:MILPEOPLE as a proven extension to WP:GNG on top of the usual standard search evaluations. #5 of MILPEOPLE does discuss "significant...
Click to read more »that she is unlikely to achieve any of the eight listed criteria at WP:MILPEOPLE. ~dom Kaos~ (talk) 14:04, 16 July 2020 (UTC) His comment doesn't apply...
Click to read more »retired Commander. No evidence of notability. Fails WP:BASIC, WP:ANYBIO, WP:MILPEOPLE. His philately work could hold some water but no WP:SIGCOV and poorly...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:MILPEOPLE Sulaimandaud (talk) 09:41, 5 June 2017 (UTC) Move I suggest moving the...
Click to read more »Gene93k (talk) 16:51, 7 July 2010 (UTC) Delete: lack of notability per WP:MILPEOPLE and WP:GNG. Seems like a fairly typical Army officer, no notable awards...
Click to read more »28 February 2011 (UTC) Delete: fails WP:GNG, WP:BIO, WP:ARTIST, and WP:MILPEOPLE. No proof of notability, massive NPOV and COI issues, the only three RSs...
Click to read more »Wikipedia is not a memorial and Galoff does not appear to be notable under WP:MILPEOPLE. A Stop at Willoughby (talk) 05:23, 29 December 2009 (UTC) Note: This...
Click to read more »December 2016 (UTC) Delete Doesn't meet notability as an airman under WP:MILPEOPLE, with a highest rank of captain and...fairly normal awards for a lot of...
Click to read more »discussions. Delete: doesn't seem like notability was established per WP:MILPEOPLE. The awards are there (though none of the 3rd part sources mention them)...
Click to read more »notable ex-Royal Navy officer and now businessman. Fails WP:BASIC and WP:MILPEOPLE NtheP (talk) 13:51, 1 September 2010 (UTC) Delete. Notability not established...
Click to read more »present article is whether it meets the criteria at WP:PERSON and WP:MILPEOPLE. — Cheers, Steelpillow (Talk) 08:00, 23 March 2016 (UTC) But you are right...
Click to read more »they surely meet the GNG. His Air Force career doesn't seem to meet WP:MILPEOPLE (being just short of the general officer minimum to be presumed notable)...
Click to read more »14:26, 21 September 2015 (UTC) Keep. An Air Marshal is notable under WP:MILPEOPLE #3, and clicking on the "Find sources" links above show plenty of sources...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Subject fails WP:BIO1E, WP:ANYBIO, and WP:MILPEOPLE. There are reliable sources that examine the subject briefly, but only...
Click to read more »WP:MILMOS/N. Anotherclown (talk) 10:01, 13 January 2011 (UTC) Delete: Fails WP:MILPEOPLE, a mustang who commanded one destroyer during non-combat operations isn't...
Click to read more »area, but it is pretty clear O'Brien doesn't meet WP:PERPETRATOR or WP:MILPEOPLE. MickMacNee (talk) 15:36, 10 December 2009 (UTC) Keep Article has reliable...
Click to read more »this is backed up by his entry at Military Times[2]. So he passes WP:MILPEOPLE. Also, he had a notable ship named after him. This article needs to be...
Click to read more »it is just plain notability: he fails WP:GNG, WP:BIO, WP:BLP, and WP:MILPEOPLE; absolutely nothing he has done sets him aside from all of the other airmen...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) The article fails WP:GNG and WP:MILPEOPLE. — dain- talk 18:49, 20 January 2013 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...
Click to read more »elsewhere. power~enwiki (π, ν) 19:19, 5 June 2018 (UTC) Delete fails WP:MILPEOPLE as well as WP:ANYBIO. The "Legionnaire of the Year" award was not a national...
Click to read more »really my area and I tend to defer such things to Moonriddengirl :) WP:MILPEOPLE supports your point about a presumption of notability for General officers...
Click to read more »redirected to 2016 Democratic National Convention. Humayun Khan fails WP:MILPEOPLE. I posit that WP:BLP1E applies: Khan is otherwise a low-profile individual...
Click to read more »killed him self and 13 others. Also fails notability guidelines under WP:MILPEOPLE as he was not a member of a state military. The incident itself might...
Click to read more »13:47, 19 April 2018 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTNEWS. The subject fails WP:MILPEOPLE and WP:BLP1E, as the subject is only known for this one mishap. This is...
Click to read more »• Gene93k (talk) 23:22, 3 July 2010 (UTC) Comment: doesn't satisfy WP:MILPEOPLE, and currently is completely unreferenced. However, the professional golf...
Click to read more »2010 (UTC) Delete unfortunately does not pass WP:N, in my opinion, or WP:MILPEOPLE. — AustralianRupert (talk) 10:37, 11 June 2010 (UTC) Conditional Keep...
Click to read more »regular officers of the same rank. They therefore meet the criteria of WP:MILPEOPLE (and yes, I'm aware that it's not an accepted guideline, but it is widely...
Click to read more »Delete: unreferenced, possible hoax (as per above) and fails guidance in WP:MILPEOPLE. — AustralianRupert (talk) 11:58, 17 April 2010 (UTC) The above discussion...
Click to read more »really judge if he mees WP:ARTIST or not. However, he surely fails WP:MILPEOPLE. Mere participation in battles isn't enough, and the information about...
Click to read more »you've ever been at an AfD like this before, you know I think that WP:MILPEOPLE is too stringent on notability from valor awards, and I feel that a Silver...
Click to read more »2011 (UTC) Delete: unverfified and unreferenced BLP. Utterly fails WP:MILPEOPLE, and even if his ancestry could be confirmed, notability is not inherited...
Click to read more »21:18, 6 February 2010 (UTC)) Delete. Does not satisfy any criteria at WP:MILPEOPLE. WWGB (talk) 04:48, 7 February 2010 (UTC) Delete per NOTNEWS, other guidelines...
Click to read more »fishy. Given that the Navy Cross bit was proven false, he would fail WP:MILPEOPLE, even if everything else could be verified. bahamut0013wordsdeeds 18:03...
Click to read more »Military Cross is a third-level decoration, far from the expectations of WP:MILPEOPLE. I simply do not see a place in the notability guidelines for "everyone...
Click to read more »this search: [2]. I believe that Wheeler satisfies the guidance at WP:MILPEOPLE. AustralianRupert (talk) 07:35, 17 August 2010 (UTC) I agree. With the...
Click to read more »crew, what makes this individual more notable than the rest? Fails WP:MILPEOPLE. bahamut0013wordsdeeds 11:37, 3 June 2010 (UTC) Keep Subject has written...
Click to read more »fall into any of the categories that would make him notable under WP:MILPEOPLE (although this is not a guideline). Finally, I don't believe there is...
Click to read more »The Silver Star is the 3rd highest military honor of the U.S. Per WP:MILPEOPLE, regrettably they are not notable. All of articles contain the same format...
Click to read more »officer has not commanded in combat at a significant rank, failing WP:MILPEOPLE/SOLDIER. Many, many, many, Indian Army captains have served on the Siachen...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) No indication of notability per WP:MILPEOPLE or WP:BIO as a businessman. Speedied twice recently as Major Randeep Hundal...
Click to read more »Last Letters Home. No real independant notability as a person, per WP:MILPEOPLE, WP:NOTNEWS, WP:NOTMEMORIAL, and WP:BIO1E; and precedent per Wikipedia:Articles...
Click to read more »is worthy of discussion. Original prod concern was "Non notable per WP:MILPEOPLE, see recent AFDs, such as those for Henry Blomberg and Daniel Martin....
Click to read more »and sailors. Honorable, but nothing close to the criteria listed in WP:MILPEOPLE. Being an activist and choosing to get married on a certain day and notifying...
Click to read more »(talk) 22:34, 29 December 2010 (UTC) Delete: as is, the article fails WP:MILPEOPLE and WP:GNG. I don't think that there is any sufficient claim to notability...
Click to read more »John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:35, 11 December 2019 (UTC) Keep meets WP:MILPEOPLE#5 as the commander of a submarine he also played an important role in...
Click to read more »24 November 2016 (UTC) Also, achieved the rank of Major General, so WP:MILPEOPLE also applies.Naraht (talk) 00:47, 26 November 2016 (UTC) Relisted to generate...
Click to read more »only the highest award recipients are notable in of themselves per WP:MILPEOPLE Sadads (talk) 00:37, 17 June 2011 (UTC) Delete. Third-level gallantry...
Click to read more »conducted an extensive campaign, I think it safe to say he passed WP:MILPEOPLE, specifically "Held a rank considered to be a flag, general or air officer...
Click to read more »The Bronze Star, however, is not an honour that gets a person over WP:MILPEOPLE in and of itself — and the only other potential claim of notability here...
Click to read more »individual, LtCol Petit doesn't automatically qualify for notability per WP:MILPEOPLE and doesn't seem to have the required coverage in reliable secondary sources...
Click to read more »Gene93k (talk) 12:41, 17 April 2010 (UTC) Delete: not notable per WP:MILPEOPLE and I wouldn't have thought that the beauty contest makes her notable...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non Notable mid level Civil Servant. Fails WP:MILPEOPLE WP:SOLDIER Uncletomwood (talk) 17:24, 25 June 2016 (UTC) Note: This debate...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:MILPEOPLE. Military duties not notable; written works are either not published or...
Click to read more »(UTC) Redirect to The Real World: Brooklyn per Starblind. He fails WP:MILPEOPLE utterly, and his notability is completely associated with one event. None...
Click to read more »(UTC) Merge or redirect or rename: I don't think the individual meets WP:MILPEOPLE, but the incident seems to be notable. I've asked for some help at WT:OMT...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Does not meet WP:MILPEOPLE criteria. – S. Rich (talk) 02:06, 14 December 2013 (UTC) Note: This debate...
Click to read more »think the relevant policy links are: Wikipedia:ATHLETE#Rugby union and WP:MILPEOPLE. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 13:24, 13 February 2011 (UTC) Actually...
Click to read more »hits [56], but not enough to pass WP:GNG in my opinion. Doesn't meet WP:MILPEOPLE, either. — AustralianRupert (talk) 11:18, 24 April 2010 (UTC) The above...
Click to read more »father's political opponent speaking at his graduation doesn't satisfy WP:MILPEOPLE or WP:GNG. Chances are pretty good that he will be notable in the distant...
Click to read more »(which is nearly copied in whole or part by the article itself), or WP:MILPEOPLE. --RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 13:32, 21 December 2009 (UTC) Delete - No...
Click to read more »(UTC) Delete: as a major general, the subject would possibly pass WP:MILPEOPLE (please note, this is not a binding policy though), however, there is...
Click to read more »(talk) 04:02, 16 December 2010 (UTC) Delete: unsourced BLP, fails WP:MILPEOPLE and WP:ATHLETE. Being a candidate for college football awards, a possible...
Click to read more »Delete: Easily lacks notability as a lawyer and as a Marine, failing WP:MILPEOPLE and WP:GNG. The cases he's tried are marginal at best, and the one that...
Click to read more »the concept that all ambassadors should be presumed notable, much as WP:MILPEOPLE does for flag/general officers. (I am aware that the consensus opposes...
Click to read more »Sadads (talk) 01:53, 14 September 2010 (UTC) Delete: Seems to fail WP:MILPEOPLE. Performing budgeting and radar timing might or might not be significant...
Click to read more »and from president of a country Pakistan ‘Tamgha-i-Khidmat - II’ ( WP:MILPEOPLE – If person has one highest award. He has two highest awards.) are supportive...
Click to read more »Bergman socks, per Softlavender. Agree it does not meet WP:MILNG or WP:MILPEOPLE, as decorations are only of service medal and campaign medal types. Nor...
Click to read more »(talk) 17:30, 24 August 2010 (UTC) Delete: doesn't seem to satisfy WP:MILPEOPLE. If he really is Mayor of Tupelo (Mississippi or Oklahoma?), then he might...
Click to read more »Stoneman Douglas High School shooting) Fails WP:VICTIM and WP:ANYBIO and WP:MILPEOPLE. Maybe later it will, but not yet. See WP:CRYSTAL. Looks like we have...
Click to read more »cleanup tags dated 2010 and 2015, likely for no sources on a BLP. Per WP:MILPEOPLE, he is notable in principle, having achieved the rank of LTG. So I leave...
Click to read more »2010 (UTC) Delete: per above, does not demonstrate notability. Fails WP:MILPEOPLE and WP:BAHAD. bahamut0013wordsdeeds 20:38, 22 November 2010 (UTC) Keep...
Click to read more »(talk) 18:40, 25 November 2010 (UTC) Delete: per nom; fails WP:BLP, WP:MILPEOPLE, WP:GNG, and WP:BAHAD. Gosh, I never even knew that Wikipedia:WikiProject...
Click to read more »(talk) 02:09, 10 May 2016 (UTC) Very simple. Mirzayev clarifies WP:MILPEOPLE as he was awarded his nation's highest award for valour. Murad Mirzayev...
Click to read more »discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:02, 17 November 2010 (UTC) Delete: fails WP:MILPEOPLE and the WP:GNG, as well as my own standards. bahamut0013wordsdeeds 20:24...
Click to read more »not notable as required by Wikipedia:Notability (people) or Wikipedia:MILPEOPLE#People. This looks like a geneology project turned into a Wikipedia article...
Click to read more »"Argent Medal of Honor"? If it is a national award for valor, then WP:MILPEOPLE demonstrates that this individual may have notability. bahamut0013wordsdeeds...
Click to read more »sources can be found, I think he has just enough notability to squeak by WP:MILPEOPLE (a few commands of notable aviation units, though I'm loathe to stop Coastie-bashing...
Click to read more »perhaps you could express this in terms of meeting the guidance of WP:MILPEOPLE? If these are the highest national awards then this would be a good rationale...
Click to read more »received much military awards, highest award for valour etc. Fails as per WP:MILPEOPLE. Note: This debate has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion...
Click to read more »a joke? Utterly fails notability requirements: WP:GNG, WP:BIO, and WP:MILPEOPLE, and hasn't a single reliable source (thus failing WP:BLP), not to mention...
Click to read more »article in Wikipedia because he does not meet the criteria listed for WP:MILPEOPLE. Akihiko Saito is listed under Foreign Hostages in Iraq and his capture...
Click to read more »academic book, of limited impact. Doesn't meet WP:NPROF; doesn't meet WP:MILPEOPLE. - WPGA2345 - ☛ 01:48, 1 December 2018 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Delete. The subject fails WP:MILPEOPLE as well as WP:GNG. The sources listed are either self-published (Gateway...
Click to read more »July 2011 (UTC) Delete as self-promotion and not meeting WP:GNG or WP:MILPEOPLE. Zero independent coverage. Page is a clear copyright violation, taken...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Does not meet WP:MILPEOPLE criteria. (Although he boasts to have sunk "the first warship by artillery...
Click to read more »20:29, 5 October 2010 (UTC) Delete: Absolutely not notable. Fails WP:MILPEOPLE completely. Being on a game show and only winning two rounds is not notability...
Click to read more »8th congressional district election, 2010. Fails WP:POLITICIAN and WP:MILPEOPLE, but I could see him possibly being a valid search term. There is a decent...
Click to read more »Gene93k (talk) 19:59, 16 August 2010 (UTC) Delete: sure as heck fails WP:MILPEOPLE, even in the previous iteration. As to the other careers, they seem to...
Click to read more »(which currently is redirected to the article on Falavi Doctrine). WP:MILPEOPLE accepts notability as established if an individual has "Held a rank considered...
Click to read more »misunderstood. Nevertheless, keeping my vote due to the criterion 4 of WP:MILPEOPLE. --СССР (talk) 20:25, 6 May 2020 (UTC) Keep. For all the reasons previously...
Click to read more »01:53, 24 October 2010 (UTC) Delete: no notability per WP:BIO and WP:MILPEOPLE. bahamut0013wordsdeeds 01:53, 24 October 2010 (UTC) Delete - not notable...
Click to read more »delete: if you know me, you know I disgree with the awards clause of WP:MILPEOPLE; and I thin that a DFC is enough. However, for a BLP, even I can't say...
Click to read more »I think there is enough notability to satisfy WP:GNG, WP:BIO, and WP:MILPEOPLE. Though I have to note, she's probably at the bottom of what I would consider...
Click to read more »academics) it is a notice of a tenured appointment by the university, for WP:MILPEOPLE (notability of military personnel) it may be the public announcement of...
Click to read more »2016 (UTC) Delete Does not meet any of the eight listed criteria at WP:MILPEOPLE nor does there appear to be "significant coverage [of him] in multiple...
Click to read more »(UTC) Making sure I address editors concerns, WP:GNG is amply met, so WP:MILPEOPLE doesn't figure in at all. WP:BLP1E instructs that in cases of a significant...
Click to read more »(talk) 21:33, 27 June 2012 (UTC) Keep Per military nobility guidelines, WP:MILPEOPLE: "Held a rank considered to be a flag, general or air officer, or their...
Click to read more »for us to presume notability. Let's also remember Goode also fails WP:MILPEOPLE. Chris Troutman (talk) 15:05, 18 May 2016 (UTC) Relisted to generate a...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) No evidence of notability per WP:MILPEOPLE (Staff sergeant is not a flag or general officer), and apparent failure...
Click to read more »Stoneman Douglas High School shooting) Fails WP:VICTIM and WP:ANYBIO and WP:MILPEOPLE. Maybe later it will, but not yet. See WP:CRYSTAL. Looks like we have...
Click to read more »important enough, but that is the state of affairs here. They fail under WP:MILPEOPLE. Niteshift36 (talk) 16:25, 7 January 2010 (UTC) The above discussion is...
Click to read more »any of the eight criteria we use from the "still considered essay" WP:MILPEOPLE nor GNG. As a sailor (part of the title) the subject is not considered...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:MILPEOPLE notability guidance. – S. Rich (talk) 23:46, 2 August 2014 (UTC) Automated...
Click to read more »don't discuss the subject in any real detail and the subject fails WP:MILPEOPLE, too. WP:BASIC says "trivial coverage of a subject by secondary sources...
Click to read more »--Skr15081997 (talk) 11:51, 3 June 2014 (UTC) Keep: WP:ANYBIO and/or WP:MILPEOPLE would apply as the article's subject was awarded Ashok Chakra, India's...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:GNG, WP:MILPEOPLE, and WP:ANYBIO. Most of the sources are not both independent and reliable...
Click to read more »(108 days) A Bruce A. Wright (34 days) Pass subject would have passed WP:MILPEOPLE when that was still acceptable. I don't know that I would agree subject...
Click to read more »wrote a page on Raymond P. Ayres," - We have a general precedent (WP:MILPEOPLE), albeit not a guideline, that presumes inherent notability for any person...
Click to read more »that she is unlikely to achieve any of the eight listed criteria at WP:MILPEOPLE. ~dom Kaos~ (talk) 14:04, 16 July 2020 (UTC) His comment doesn't apply...
Click to read more »(UTC) Conditional keep: I'd say that he has the notability to keep per WP:MILPEOPLE (and possibly as a political candidate), but the COI, POV, and just horribly...
Click to read more »regarding the whole of the service, I would suggest that it is similar to WP:MILPEOPLE #3, "Held the top-level military command position of their nation's armed...
Click to read more »(talk) 20:49, 1 June 2013 (UTC) Delete - Article fails to meet WP:GNG, WP:MILPEOPLE. — -dainomite 21:10, 1 June 2013 (UTC) Delete Kumioko (talk) 22:49,...
Click to read more »military) Medal of Honor recipients where we can assume notability - see WP:MILPEOPLE. The articles Forest of Argonne and Meuse-Argonne Offensive should help...
Click to read more »the box at top of Category:Recipients of the Legion of Merit and see WP:MILPEOPLE. It appears you are mentioned at the end of Meal, Combat, Individual ration...
Click to read more »Schazjmd (talk) 20:59, 27 February 2024 (UTC) Delete Subject fails GNG. WP:MILPEOPLE is no longer the rule here. Chris Troutman (talk) 21:11, 27 February 2024...
Click to read more »then according to MILPEOPLE, it would need to be Albania's highest reward for valor, yes. Unless you've got a reason why MILPEOPLE shouldn't apply to...
Click to read more »WP:MILPEOPLE as a guideline. It's not. --Mkativerata (talk) 20:34, 29 April 2010 (UTC) Endorse per Mkativerata, and as (s)he put it, WP:MILPEOPLE is a...
Click to read more »then according to MILPEOPLE, it would need to be Albania's highest reward for valor, yes. Unless you've got a reason why MILPEOPLE shouldn't apply to...
Click to read more »encyclopedia. I am afraid this is not likely to be acceptable - see WP:MILPEOPLE for Wikipedia's notability standard for articles like this. JohnCD (talk)...
Click to read more »(talk | contribs) . . (4,859 bytes) (-35) . . (tag notability IAW WP:MILPEOPLE; remove white space) (undo | thank) I either want this page removed entirely...
Click to read more »troutman (Declined) Draft:Cdr.Donald "Crash" Crowe RCAF Pass - Fails WP:MILPEOPLE (and a dozen other guidelines). Chris troutman (Declined) Draft:The Democratz...
Click to read more »recollections are not sufficient for verification purposes. Also see WP:MILPEOPLE and WP:BIO. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 20:31, 29 July 2014 (UTC) Wikipedia talk:Articles...
Click to read more »criticism is more properly aimed at the policy behind WP:ONEEVENT and WP:MILPEOPLE rather than this particular deletion. This is not the place for that argument...
Click to read more »any background there's nothing to write an article about. The essay WP:MILPEOPLE (which is generally followed in AfD discussions) recommends that only...
Click to read more »March 2011 (UTC) And there's a notability essay for military people, WP:MILPEOPLE, that mentions only the top decorations. I'm still interested on input...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:BLP1E, WP:GNG, WP:SUSTAINED, WP:MILPEOPLE. All coverage clusters in a ten-month window in 2025–2026 around one milestone...
Click to read more »📔) 04:50, 8 May 2025 (UTC) Keep – The article meets both WP:GNG and WP:MILPEOPLE. The subject is the first Indian woman to lead an all-male UN peacekeeping...
Click to read more »create this article and never consented to it. A notability tag citing WP:MILPEOPLE was added in 2010 and removed by the article's principal author; the concern...
Click to read more »Schazjmd (talk) 20:59, 27 February 2024 (UTC) Delete Subject fails GNG. WP:MILPEOPLE is no longer the rule here. Chris Troutman (talk) 21:11, 27 February 2024...
Click to read more »