Search Results: Wikipedia:MEDFAQ


Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine)/FAQ
Jumat, 2026-02-13 12:48:37

Shortcut WP:MEDFAQWP:MEDFAQ These are some Frequently Asked Questions about Wikipedia's guidelines on sourcing for medical content, manual of style for...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine)
Rabu, 2026-07-08 13:45:19

Wikipedia:Why MEDRS?, an essay about why this guideline exists Wikipedia:MEDFAQ, Frequently Asked Questions about MEDRS Users' Guides to the Medical Literature...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 344
Minggu, 2024-04-07 22:48:36

supplementary guidance, and for background understanding WP:WHYMEDRS and WP:MEDFAQ can be useful. Alexbrn (talk) 15:07, 26 May 2021 (UTC) Support requiring...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 369
Sabtu, 2025-09-27 05:25:52

2022 (UTC) You need to read WP:MEDRS. For background, WP:WHYMEDRS and WP:MEDFAQ are useful. This is just a replay of the same arguments the "lab leak" proponents...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 358
Selasa, 2021-11-16 11:09:37

2021 (UTC) Primary sources are not "completely banned" for WP:BMI: see WP:MEDFAQ for some handy thoughts on this (sadly unfinished). But for COVID-19 and...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Fringe theories/Noticeboard/Archive 90
Senin, 2023-03-13 11:38:45

December 2022 (UTC) NIH's NCCAM has been explicitly addressed here: WP:MEDFAQ: Can I cite NCCAM (now NCCIH)? Yes, but again only with WP:DUE weight. Unlike...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 413
Rabu, 2023-09-13 11:38:28

(talk) 15:19, 5 September 2023 (UTC) Please read WP:MEDRS and maybe WP:MEDFAQ and WP:WHYMEDRS for background. Beliefs in themselves are not biomedical...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 429
Kamis, 2024-08-01 23:23:51

the health effects of LTNs (i.e. not a primary source as linked). See WP:MEDFAQ if WP:MEDRS is too heavy going. Also, we can't smudge research into active...

Click to read more »