Redirect to:
This page is a redirect. The following categories are used to track and monitor this redirect:
|
Wikipedia is the product of the contributions of millions of editors, each one bringing something different to the table, whether it be researching skills...
Click to read more »an approved Bot. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 00:56, 17 March 2019 (UTC) See WP:MASSCREATION, which has now been expanded to include portals. — The Transhumanist ...
Click to read more »current guideline for creating articles with a bot is set out at WP:MASSCREATION meaning consensus is required to ensure that they comply with Wikipedia's...
Click to read more »alternative list of the same thing with more data see Wikiscan The WP:MASSCREATION of articles that uses any sort of automation requires community approval...
Click to read more »— JJMC89 (T·C) 22:17, 14 April 2017 (UTC) Needs wider discussion. Per WP:MASSCREATION, please seek a wider venue to propose creation of such categories, such...
Click to read more »— SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ≼ 17:59, 4 March 2016 (UTC) Because that's what WP:MASSCREATION says to do. Anomie⚔ 01:49, 5 March 2016 (UTC) This sounds OK to do, as...
Click to read more »3 April 2021 (UTC) WP:MASSCREATION applies to this article's creation, and should be understood by the creator. WP:MASSCREATION does not only apply to...
Click to read more »in fact notable villages. These were mass created in violation of WP:MASSCREATION, which was required per this discussion the previous year for this exact...
Click to read more »creation makes me think that this might be a symptom of WP:GNIS and WP:MASSCREATION. ✶Quxyz✶ (talk) 20:16, 17 March 2026 (UTC) Yes to the first, no to the...
Click to read more »creation of new portals", and the Bot Approvals Group expanded the WP:MASSCREATION section of the bot policy to expand the restrictions on mass creation...
Click to read more »when creating multiple portals you must comply with WP:MEATBOT and WP:MASSCREATION. For a simple portal, simply add a specific subcategory of Category:Portals...
Click to read more »between 2 and 10 per minute. I've asked them to stop to discuss it, per WP:MASSCREATION. The user has responded, but has not stopped since being asked. [26]...
Click to read more »equivalent to SIMBAD or NED for objects within the Solar System. Per WP:MASSCREATION, the systematic creation of articles on astronomical objects based on...
Click to read more »through a bot per requests made by editors. Needs wider discussion. Per WP:MASSCREATION, please establish consensus for this mass redirect creation at WP:VPR...
Click to read more »22:18, 2 February 2018 (UTC) Needs wider discussion.. Please review WP:MASSCREATION. For something of this scale, there needs to be a consensus at WP:VPR...
Click to read more »no evidence of WP:GNG being passed, its creation was a failure of WP:MASSCREATION/WP:MEATBOT, and consensus has been against the creation of these one-sentence...
Click to read more »others like it, and change the guideline (If of course there isn't a WP:MASSCREATION decision that supersedes WP:NASTCRIT about certain objects like these...
Click to read more »(talk) 12:26, 12 May 2015 (UTC) Needs wider discussion. Although WP:MASSCREATION doesn't specifically call out redirects, I'd say we need more than one...
Click to read more »say that s/he had to justify it, Tigraan, I merely asked. However WP:MASSCREATION does suggest that such rapid semi-automated page creations need advanced...
Click to read more »requires preapproval for mass article or article category creation (WP:MASSCREATION). An editor cannot simply 'cross the street' to avoid R.F., because R...
Click to read more »(UTC) As the discussions are only about "organi(s/z)ations" and per WP:MASSCREATION, we cannot approve the bot for an an open-ended task, as suggested by...
Click to read more »-166.137.210.39 (talk) 14:28, 17 April 2013 (UTC) Comment - Per WP:MASSCREATION, I have added notes at Village pump (proposals), WikiProject Lists and...
Click to read more »is sufficient, though. The biggest problems were all violations of WP:MASSCREATION#Mass_article_creation, which is already policy. Will a second rule deter...
Click to read more »or related topics already exist. If you want to refer to policy, WP:MASSCREATION says (emphasis added) It is also strongly encouraged (and may be required...
Click to read more »several of them existing for over a decade, they have not encouraged WP:MASSCREATION of TM redirects (which would require a consensus to create systematically)...
Click to read more »WP:FDB#Bots to create massive lists of stubs applies. Otherwise, WP:MASSCREATION. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 21:06, 18 June 2019 (UTC) The 2nd half of WP:FDB#Bots...
Click to read more »data-based mass creation require consensus first (along the lines of WP:MASSCREATION/WP:MEATBOT). I was under the impression it was a well-known best practice...
Click to read more »the creation of more than 50 portals by semi-automatic means. See WP:MASSCREATION. As this script is semi-automatic, that policy now covers the use of...
Click to read more »page creation went against WP:MEATBOT and at least the spirit of WP:MASSCREATION if not the letter. An appropriate remedy for automated script and semi-automated...
Click to read more »outcome. In particular, there is a policy issue with this task and WP:MASSCREATION. I estimate that over 500 of these articles have been created in November...
Click to read more »Beeblebrox (talk) 00:44, 29 October 2011 (UTC) See WP:MEATBOT and WP:MASSCREATION. ASCIIn2Bme (talk) 11:21, 29 October 2011 (UTC) We should NOT be bothering...
Click to read more »see any use for such stubs, and see them as WP:KITTENS. See also WP:MASSCREATION since these look like script-assisted creations. If you think any of...
Click to read more »Praxidicae, but AFAIK, as I've pointed it to you on my talk page, WP:MASSCREATION excplicitly applies to all "content pages", broadly meaning pages designed...
Click to read more »explicit, as this is a stronger mass creation prohibition than exists at WP:MASSCREATION (which only addresses "reader-facing" items). –xenotalk 11:59, 22 August...
Click to read more »-- Tavix (talk) 02:06, 10 May 2016 (UTC) (edit conflict) I thought WP:MASSCREATION was only limited to articles and categories? Prior to my creation of...
Click to read more »automated one needs to be before even manual action is encroaching upon the masscreation policy. Regarding the discussion, it started somewwhat organically, as...
Click to read more »formulaic stubs which the community has said said we do not want – see WP:MASSCREATION policy. Discussions linked above show this list and siblings are being...
Click to read more »big rush. Crouch, Swale (talk) 16:58, 3 July 2019 (UTC) @Headbomb: WP:MASSCREATION says "It is also strongly encouraged (and may be required by BAG) that...
Click to read more »these are even more blatant failures of that! Moreover, 2009's Wikipedia:MASSCREATION was also ignored – this is exactly the reason we have that. The number...
Click to read more »read somewhere that they'd been warned for this in the past under WP:MASSCREATION grounds. Azealia911 talk 16:45, 9 August 2015 (UTC) (interject) It's...
Click to read more »to biographies. Opabinia regalis (talk) 22:14, 16 May 2017 (UTC) WP:MASSCREATION? -- Tavix (talk) 20:00, 17 May 2017 (UTC) Comment. Here is the problem...
Click to read more »‑ Iridescent 14:43, 4 September 2019 (UTC) Note, just as a reminder, both WP:MASSCREATION and WP:COSMETICBOT (as well as WP:AWB's logic with respect to WP:GENFIXES)...
Click to read more »WP:NASTRO already implemented something like this - based explicitly on WP:MASSCREATION - when they cleaned up minor planets and is appears to work just fine...
Click to read more »3 April 2021 (UTC) WP:MASSCREATION applies to this article's creation, and should be understood by the creator. WP:MASSCREATION does not only apply to...
Click to read more »namespace, Help, maintenance categories, ...) not explicitely covered by WP:MASSCREATION. BOTREQs and BRFAs As of writing, we have... 20 active BOTREQs, please...
Click to read more »namespace, Help, maintenance categories, ...) not explicitely covered by WP:MASSCREATION. BOTREQs and BRFAs As of writing, we have... 20 active BOTREQs, please...
Click to read more »namespace, Help, maintenance categories, ...) not explicitely covered by WP:MASSCREATION. BOTREQs and BRFAs As of writing, we have... 20 active BOTREQs, please...
Click to read more »--Fæ (talk) 07:42, 17 March 2014 (UTC) Needs wider discussion.: Per WP:MASSCREATION, this should be advertised at WP:VPR and the talk pages of relevant WikiProjects...
Click to read more »77000 new pages. I have submitted a request for bot approval. Per WP:MASSCREATION I am submitting an RfC here to gauge support, opposition and otherwise...
Click to read more »page creation went against WP:MEATBOT and at least the spirit of WP:MASSCREATION if not the letter. An appropriate remedy for automated script and semi-automated...
Click to read more »part, as these are not bot-created portals, so are not covered by WP:MASSCREATION. It was not my intention to use a WP-specific term of art. UnitedStatesian...
Click to read more »content pages include creating the pages in small batches right from WP:MASSCREATION. AddWittyNameHere 02:22, 31 August 2022 (UTC) Yes; the relevant line...
Click to read more »bot that wants to create articles on a large scale needs to follow WP:MASSCREATION. If you oppose a bot creating BLP stubs on footballers, then oppose that...
Click to read more »no evidence of WP:GNG being passed, its creation was a failure of WP:MASSCREATION/WP:MEATBOT, and consensus has been against the creation of these one-sentence...
Click to read more »enough MI5 directors to qualify as "mass") is not a good thing per WP:MASSCREATION. Better to just list them all in one place. 64.160.39.210 (talk) 06:35...
Click to read more »aren't perma stubs with no chance at improvement? Per WP:FAIT and WP:MASSCREATION it's expected that there will be a very large and well attended consensus...
Click to read more »(talk) 21:08, 31 May 2013 (UTC) To be /really/ specific, refer to WP:MASSCREATION, which I guess is actually the 'applicable' policy for what I was 'bringing...
Click to read more »take a lot of work to fix.Azylber (talk) 16:49, 17 May 2012 (UTC) WP:MASSCREATION? --92.6.200.56 (talk) 17:38, 17 May 2012 (UTC) Azylber, I am listening...
Click to read more »in fact notable villages. These were mass created in violation of WP:MASSCREATION, which was required per this discussion the previous year for this exact...
Click to read more »others like it, and change the guideline (If of course there isn't a WP:MASSCREATION decision that supersedes WP:NASTCRIT about certain objects like these...
Click to read more »creation – user blocked one month for disruptive editing; unapproved WP:MASSCREATION using AI WP:ANI#User:xxxxxxxxx making paid/ChatGPT edits – non-native...
Click to read more »Yeah, AWB can easily do this, but the only problem is that as per WP:MASSCREATION, any mass article creation task requires approval at WP:BRFA. The same...
Click to read more »contribs) 15:48, 8 March 2018 (UTC) Hi there Amirh123, I think that WP:MASSCREATION might apply in this case. Also, due to copyright restrictions, Wikipedia...
Click to read more »or leave a message on my talk page 18:21, 16 August 2021 (UTC) See WP:MASSCREATION; bots can only create articles with pre-approval. ProcrastinatingReader...
Click to read more »(UTC) I think it is likely to be obvious when it is happening; though WP:MASSCREATION has a guideline "anything more than 25 or 50". BilledMammal (talk) 11:55...
Click to read more »formulaic stubs which the community has said said we do not want – see WP:MASSCREATION policy. Discussions linked above show this list and siblings are being...
Click to read more »(talk) 16:09, 20 January 2018 (UTC) We can if there is consensus per WP:MASSCREATION. It would have to be a good reason though. — HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 19:38...
Click to read more »of them in a short period of time, we ask that you to go through WP:MASSCREATION to ensure the community isn't all-of-a-sudden swamped with an massive...
Click to read more »created algorithmically without first establishing a consensus per WP:MASSCREATION. Their uncivil behaviour when the problem finally got to AN is a failure...
Click to read more »issue. The bot has been doing this for almost 6 years, which predates MASSCREATION by about 3 years. Given those factors this is a non-issue. Werieth (talk)...
Click to read more »creating articles on a large scale, make sure you are familiar with WP:MASSCREATION and WP:NASTRO. You will also want the people at WP:ASTRO to give their...
Click to read more »Beeblebrox (talk) 00:44, 29 October 2011 (UTC) See WP:MEATBOT and WP:MASSCREATION. ASCIIn2Bme (talk) 11:21, 29 October 2011 (UTC) We should NOT be bothering...
Click to read more »at the village pump (policy)), the article number that classifies for masscreation was not really defined, but 25-50 was not opposed. Yet also the ones...
Click to read more »(UTC) Oh, I found that, [[1]] -Lemonaka 09:54, 4 March 2023 (UTC) Per MASSCREATION and WP:SEMIAUTOMATED, I request permission to mass-create articles pertaining...
Click to read more »the station(s) are in into the bot’s interface. I am aware of the WP:MASSCREATION policy, but I think because these are redirects and not articles, it...
Click to read more »several people accused me of violation of Wikipedia rules, namely WP:MASSCREATION and WP:MEATBOT. Therefore I removed myself from Wikipedia:Seven million...
Click to read more »concluding that? Any reference? nirmal (talk) 02:23, 6 March 2023 (UTC) WP:MASSCREATION. Izno (talk) 02:25, 6 March 2023 (UTC) In the linked discussion, several...
Click to read more »creation makes me think that this might be a symptom of WP:GNIS and WP:MASSCREATION. ✶Quxyz✶ (talk) 20:16, 17 March 2026 (UTC) Yes to the first, no to the...
Click to read more »(talk) 00:38, 12 January 2026 (UTC) Well, redirects aren't covered by MASSCREATION specifically, but they are still subject to BOTPOL overall, which does...
Click to read more »in a discussion before. Courtesy pings to Uanfala. I am not against masscreation of stubs, I believe Esculenta would be a good example of who would be...
Click to read more »the thousands and then forgot about them? Based on the policy at WP:MASSCREATION, it seems the community has decided that this is not how these articles...
Click to read more »difference between writing and reviewing. The issues that led to the WP:MASSCREATION policy, but possible with any text anywhere. CMD (talk) 02:10, 3 December...
Click to read more »of stubs. The Lugnuts stubs were created ignoring the policies of WP:MASSCREATION, WP:MEATBOT or WP:BOTUSE. Those are policies and should have been enforced...
Click to read more »note that Ponor appears to be using a script (PAWS) to facilitate the masscreation. Cremastra (talk) 20:23, 26 March 2025 (UTC) So not "can't" but "aren't...
Click to read more »with mass-created articles as long as they are approved beforehand (WP:MASSCREATION). I think as long as a species verifiably exists and has at least a brief...
Click to read more »¢ 😼 07:53, 8 July 2023 (UTC) Support Their deletion would disencourage masscreation of microstubs based on databases. It would save a lot of time for the...
Click to read more »other namespaces should be processed is a good question. And while WP:MASSCREATION applies more to actual articles than redirects, as a BAGger I'd still...
Click to read more »04:51, 9 May 2024 (UTC) However, they’re not exempt from our rules on WP:MASSCREATION and WP:FAIT; indeed, the biggest issues we have had with mass creation...
Click to read more »21:14, 22 April 2023 (UTC) @Trey Maturin, while we had major issues with masscreation, MEATBOT, which is within a policy and in my opinion would fit for AI...
Click to read more »04:51, 9 May 2024 (UTC) However, they’re not exempt from our rules on WP:MASSCREATION and WP:FAIT; indeed, the biggest issues we have had with mass creation...
Click to read more »