Redirect to:
This page is a redirect. The following categories are used to track and monitor this redirect:
|
needed to support the creation of a new article. Shortcut WP:MASSCREATEWP:MASSCREATE Any large-scale automated or semi-automated content page creation task...
Click to read more »do not have enough sources or they need better sources and also the WP:MASSCREATE issues, so draftifying all of them to draft namespace to give them time...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Mass-created article in violation of WP:MASSCREATE/WP:MEATBOT, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Carlossuarez46 for...
Click to read more »census records, created in violation of the GNG sourcing requirement of WP:MASSCREATE. –dlthewave ☎ 14:51, 19 May 2026 (UTC) Note: this discussion has been...
Click to read more »minute (21:27 UTC, 21 November 2013). If this was not a WP:MASSCREATE violation (and WP:MASSCREATE was in force then) then nothing ever will be. Please see...
Click to read more »census records, created in violation of the GNG sourcing requirement of WP:MASSCREATE. –dlthewave ☎ 14:50, 19 May 2026 (UTC) Note: this discussion has been...
Click to read more »of significant coverage in reliable sources. Part of a violation of WP:MASSCREATE/WP:MEATBOT by Carlossuarez46 - see this ARBCOM case for details and this...
Click to read more »Reactor!). Additionally, this was an article created in violation of WP:MASSCREATE, as can clearly be seen from the fact that Carlossuarez46 created at least...
Click to read more »merging content into an article about a broader subject (e.g., plasmid). WP:MASSCREATE, the policy on mass creation of articles WP:WikiProject Tree of Life...
Click to read more »the tens of thousands of such pages made in bulk in contradiction of WP:MASSCREATE. While the coordinates of the only one of these that has them do point...
Click to read more »census records, created in violation of the GNG sourcing requirement of WP:MASSCREATE. –dlthewave ☎ 14:49, 19 May 2026 (UTC) Note: this discussion has been...
Click to read more »census records, created in violation of the GNG sourcing requirement of WP:MASSCREATE. –dlthewave ☎ 14:51, 19 May 2026 (UTC) Note: this discussion has been...
Click to read more »census records, created in violation of the GNG sourcing requirement of WP:MASSCREATE. –dlthewave ☎ 14:50, 19 May 2026 (UTC) Note: this discussion has been...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Mass-created article made in violation of WP:MASSCREATE/WP:MEATBOT based on the 2006 Iranian census, see Wikipedia:Arbitratio...
Click to read more »they seem to conflict with the spirit of creating articles en masse (WP:Masscreate). Have compared to article for Amaeka to the content of the articles within...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NPLACE and violates the WP:MASSCREATE GNG source requirement. Sourced only to maps and census records. This...
Click to read more »something I don't understand - MASSCREATE includes a definition, whatever you think about it, it is already policy." MASSCREATE says "While no specific definition...
Click to read more »rationale from the previous AfD: Mass-created article made in violation of WP:MASSCREATE/WP:MEATBOT based on the 2006 Iranian census, see Wikipedia:Arbitratio...
Click to read more »(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Masscreated LUGSTUB. No evidence of an WP:NSPORTS pass. FOARP (talk) 10:23, 24 April...
Click to read more »definition at WP:MASSCREATE" when MASSCREATE explicitly says there is no definition. WhatamIdoing (talk) 16:52, 6 November 2022 (UTC) WP:MASSCREATE exists and...
Click to read more »(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Masscreated LUGSTUB. The existence of this article casts serious doubt on Cricinfo...
Click to read more »they seem to conflict with the spirit of creating articles en masse (WP:Masscreate). Have compared to article for Amaeka to the content of the articles within...
Click to read more »location would not meet it. This page was mass-created in violation of WP:MASSCREATE (which was in force in at the time) by Carlossuarez46. On the same day...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Mass-created article made in violation of WP:MASSCREATE/WP:MEATBOT based on the 2006 Iranian census, see Wikipedia:Arbitratio...
Click to read more »(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Masscreated LUGSTUB. No sign of a WP:NSPORT pass, only claim to notability is having...
Click to read more »state that at this point in time it will be declined as a violation of WP:MASSCREATE as there has been no consensus shown to indicate it is a desired task...
Click to read more »(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Masscreated LUGSTUB. No credible assertion of notability under WP:NSPORT. I see some...
Click to read more »(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Masscreated LUGSTUB. Sole claim to notability is playing for Lahore. Having possibly...
Click to read more »(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Masscreated LUGSTUB, fails WP:NSPORT. Two sources were found in my WP:BEFORE, both...
Click to read more »(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Masscreated LUGSTUB with no credible assertion of notability under WP:NSPORTS. FOARP...
Click to read more »(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Masscreated LUGSTUB. The highly generic name makes this one practically impossible...
Click to read more »(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Masscreated LUGSTUB. No sign of significant coverage anywhere of the kind need to...
Click to read more »(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Masscreated LUGSTUB. No evidence of a WP:NSPORTS pass - only claim to notability...
Click to read more »(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Masscreated LUGSTUB. No evidence of an WP:NSPORTS pass - sole claim to notability...
Click to read more »(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Masscreated LUGSTUB. Fails WP:NSPORTS. It seems Altaf later became a lower-league...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Mass-created article made in violation of WP:MASSCREATE/WP:MEATBOT based on the 2006 Iranian census, see Wikipedia:Arbitratio...
Click to read more »(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Masscreated LUGSTUB with no indication of notability beyond having played three matches...
Click to read more »(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Masscreated LUGSTUB. No evidence of a WP:NSPORT pass - sole claim to notability is...
Click to read more »Time filed: 23:36, Saturday, July 20, 2024 (UTC) Function overview: WP:MASSCREATE the remaining 3200 out of 6700 Croatian naseljes (settlements), which...
Click to read more »algorithms? Wikiguythatlikesbiology (talk) 00:15, 19 July 2026 (UTC) Per WP:MASSCREATE you would need consensus from the community to create a bot like that...
Click to read more »names? That's not WP:EDIT. Editors are encouraged to WP:BE BOLD, and WP:MASSCREATE applies to content pages, not redirects. — Guarapiranga ☎ 05:27, 27...
Click to read more »overwhelmed by mass-creation of articles in what is anyway a violation of WP:MASSCREATE/WP:MEATBOT. We saw this with Carlossuarez46's GNIS/Iranian stubs, we saw...
Click to read more »WP:MEATBOT and amend WP:MASSCREATE to the top 20 article creators of the month. If one enters the top 20, they must apply per MASSCREATE, if one edits bot-like...
Click to read more »WP:MASSCREATE allows. Please follow the instructions there". A note at ANI that says something like "Hey, so-and-so has been violating MASSCREATE. I told...
Click to read more »suitable location, as mass creation requires an affirmative consensus per WP:MASSCREATE and to avoid creating WP:FAIT issues. Of these articles, the majority...
Click to read more »(talk) 18:30, 23 December 2021 (UTC) Yes, I have seen arguments that WP:MASSCREATE and WP:MEATBOT have this covered, but something specific would be useful...
Click to read more »between the fish species discussion is the existence of the policy WP:MASSCREATE, which requires consensus to exist for their mass creation. BilledMammal...
Click to read more »mass creation. As I see it we have three issues: whether this is a WP:MASSCREATE/WP:MEATBOT violation (and if it's unclear, how those policies should be...
Click to read more »hours of their own volunteer time to clean up after someone else's WP:MASSCREATE violations. ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 10:54, 23 April 2021 (UTC) Redirect...
Click to read more »February 2022 (UTC) Celestina007 This behaviour has been a breach of WP:MASSCREATE/WP:MEATBOT for a large number of years. Simple stub creation is not the...
Click to read more »Closing statement for Article Creation at Scale RFC. Panel close by: -- RoySmith (talk) 20:41, 4 November 2022 (UTC) Katietalk 22:51, 4 November 2022 (UTC)...
Click to read more »good argument anyway. Firstly, because it's like saying when someone WP:MASSCREATEs bad articles other editors shouldn't complain but should just improve...
Click to read more »list structure from another-language Wikipedia, this is edging toward WP:MASSCREATE. —Alalch E. 17:19, 25 February 2023 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...
Click to read more »WP:BEFORE is the correct way to go for normally created articles. (For masscreated ones I'd support a different approach, though, but that's another discussion)...
Click to read more »2022 (UTC) @North8000: Yes, it is actually written into policy at WP:MASSCREATE, probably as a result of the above linked discussion. Note that bot approval...
Click to read more »the intersection of policies and guidelines dealing with mass creation (MASSCREATE/MEATBOT) still fail to address this effectively, despite a few people...
Click to read more »suspectible to the extremes. Maybe we need to start enforcing WP:MEATBOT/WP:MASSCREATE or add explicit guidance into WP:N to that effect to handle database-like...
Click to read more »for mass creation is for bots and other semi-automated creation at WP:MASSCREATE. So while 406 would be considered "large" its not going to be automated...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Mass-created article made in violation of WP:MASSCREATE/WP:MEATBOT based on the 2006 Iranian census, see Wikipedia:Arbitratio...
Click to read more »of significant coverage in reliable sources. Part of a violation of WP:MASSCREATE/WP:MEATBOT by Carlossuarez46 - see this ARBCOM case for details and this...
Click to read more »the tens of thousands of such pages made in bulk in contradiction of WP:MASSCREATE. While the coordinates of the only one of these that has them do point...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Mass-created article made in violation of WP:MASSCREATE/WP:MEATBOT based on the 2006 Iranian census, see Wikipedia:Arbitratio...
Click to read more »for others by posting substandard articles into mainspace (see also WP:MASSCREATE). With regards to ratelimits, there are multiple ones that might apply...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Mass-created article made in violation of WP:MASSCREATE/WP:MEATBOT based on the 2006 Iranian census, see Wikipedia:Arbitratio...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Mass-created article in violation of WP:MASSCREATE/WP:MEATBOT, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Carlossuarez46 for...
Click to read more »these articles, at a rate of dozens each day, without ever following WP:MASSCREATE, was many times brought before ANI and other forums and had a substantial...
Click to read more »need to create many pages, in the format of this manual edit, meaning WP:MASSCREATE would apply. Is there any technical barrier here, or is it simply the...
Click to read more »(versus the linked proposal) at WT:BOTPOL#Proposal relating to/modifying WP:MASSCREATE/WP:MEATBOT. Anomie⚔ 12:06, 16 July 2021 (UTC) Where would one discuss...
Click to read more »creating lots of stubs, but doing so on your main account would violate WP:MASSCREATE anyway, and in general large-scale article creation has been one of the...
Click to read more »direction, while fully complying with policy (particularly WP:N and WP:MASSCREATE). Unfortunately, it wasn't well received. — Guarapiranga ☎ 00:49, 13 July...
Click to read more »nirmal for opening this. For context, I asked them to do so based on WP:MASSCREATE after noticing they were engaged the good faith creation of large numbers...
Click to read more »(Converse accident), as keeping this redirect does not mean we should masscreate redirects of this type. We discourage their creation, but once they are...
Click to read more »(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Masscreated LUGSTUB. Fails WP:NSPORTS. It seems Altaf later became a lower-league...
Click to read more »(Converse accident), as keeping this redirect does not mean we should masscreate redirects of this type. We discourage their creation, but once they are...
Click to read more »I am not seeing a MASSCREATE issue. Creating a lot of similar articles about clearly notable topics is not inherently a MASSCREATE violation. Rlendog...
Click to read more »Crouch, Swale (talk) 21:52, 1 July 2026 (UTC) @HouseBlaster: I'm aware of MASSCREATE and I don't think any of my contributions would violate it. If there were...
Click to read more »created and near-identical - in other words, without consensus they are WP:MASSCREATE violations. There may also be an issue with Lkomdis, but Saqib needs to...
Click to read more »likely in violation of WP:MASSCREATE (~140 articles in less than a week) Giulio 11:18, 17 July 2026 (UTC) I don't think MASSCREATE fits here. That policy...
Click to read more »direction, while fully complying with policy (particularly WP:N and WP:MASSCREATE). Unfortunately, it wasn't well received. — Guarapiranga ☎ 00:49, 13 July...
Click to read more »of nefarious motivations. The ANI you're linking to found that All WP:MASSCREATEd articles (except those not required to meet GNG) must be cited to at...
Click to read more »the actual quality of the articles; but on some interpretations of WP:MASSCREATE's vague 25–50 criterion, I am mass creating articles (though not systematically)...
Click to read more »used against other articles sets that were created in violation of WP:MASSCREATE, even by editors I generally like. ETA - my favoured position is actually...
Click to read more »(UTC) An RFC proposing to move WP:MASSCREATE out of WP:Bot policy has been started at WT:Bot policy#RFC: Sever WP:MASSCREATE from WP:BOTPOL. The mass page...
Click to read more »Reactor!). Additionally, this was an article created in violation of WP:MASSCREATE, as can clearly be seen from the fact that Carlossuarez46 created at least...
Click to read more »database was just plain bad methodology, a breach of WP:NOTDATABASE and WP:MASSCREATE. You can see that the guy who created this article did so only minutes...
Click to read more »else may not be needed. — xaosflux Talk 19:15, 28 February 2023 (UTC) WP:MASSCREATE says Any large-scale automated or semi-automated content page creation...
Click to read more »census records, created in violation of the GNG sourcing requirement of WP:MASSCREATE. –dlthewave ☎ 14:51, 19 May 2026 (UTC) Note: this discussion has been...
Click to read more »in the context of automation, and therefore, until fairly recently, WP:MASSCREATE was part of Wikipedia:Bot policy. Attempts to institute a limit on manual...
Click to read more »they seem to conflict with the spirit of creating articles en masse (WP:Masscreate). Have compared to article for Amaeka to the content of the articles within...
Click to read more »which includes the static info. That is why the request is not a pure MASSCREATE request. B33tleMania12 (talk) 22:29, 26 September 2025 (UTC) And to add...
Click to read more »census records, created in violation of the GNG sourcing requirement of WP:MASSCREATE. –dlthewave ☎ 14:50, 19 May 2026 (UTC) Note: this discussion has been...
Click to read more »minute (21:27 UTC, 21 November 2013). If this was not a WP:MASSCREATE violation (and WP:MASSCREATE was in force then) then nothing ever will be. Please see...
Click to read more »exceed the ordinary acceptable rate of article creation (25 to 50 per WP:MASSCREATE). Please be concrete, specific, and unmistakble about both the permitted...
Click to read more »number of articles on Malaysian constituencies, likely in violation of WP:MASSCREATE (~311 articles since 13 July). On 14 July I asked them politely to slow...
Click to read more »(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Masscreated LUGSTUB with no credible assertion of notability under WP:NSPORTS. FOARP...
Click to read more »19 July 2024 (UTC) Please see Wikipedia talk:Bot policy#RFC: Sever WP:MASSCREATE from WP:BOTPOL. WhatamIdoing (talk) 18:53, 19 July 2024 (UTC) I blocked...
Click to read more »corrected if Sarefo intends to create these pages manually and/or seek WP:MASSCREATE permission, but I do not see any evidence that that is the case. Ethmostigmus...
Click to read more »(talk) 20:53, 2 May 2023 (UTC) Also: Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)#WP:MASSCREATE and WP:MEATBOT; Wikipedia talk:Criteria for speedy deletion#CSD for AI...
Click to read more »database was just plain bad methodology, a breach of WP:NOTDATABASE and WP:MASSCREATE. You can see that the guy who created this article did so only minutes...
Click to read more »to AfC. Gusfriend (talk) 07:04, 25 January 2023 (UTC) I think per WP:MASSCREATE, consensus should be obtained for the mass creation of redirects. Levivich...
Click to read more »would be a lot of empty categories. While not technically covered by WP:MASSCREATE (user-visible categories are, but hidden categories are not), if someone...
Click to read more »editor dumping nearly 200 identical poor articles in violation of WP:MASSCREATE just so they can claim the 7 millionth article. The less attention we...
Click to read more »location would not meet it. This page was mass-created in violation of WP:MASSCREATE (which was in force in at the time) by Carlossuarez46. On the same day...
Click to read more »list structure from another-language Wikipedia, this is edging toward WP:MASSCREATE. —Alalch E. 17:19, 25 February 2023 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...
Click to read more »February 2025 (UTC) There have been many discussions about this. Further WP:MASSCREATE is against consensus, but there has never been consensus to do anything...
Click to read more »which is also a policy. But then again, who still cares about polices? WP:MASSCREATE or WP:MEATBOT are two, that could be applied a bit more but there is fierce...
Click to read more »manpower to do. As for rate limiting, not sure how that would work. Even WP:MASSCREATE requires manual oversight, and creation is easier to track technically...
Click to read more »these articles, at a rate of dozens each day, without ever following WP:MASSCREATE, was many times brought before ANI and other forums and had a substantial...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NPLACE and violates the WP:MASSCREATE GNG source requirement. Sourced only to maps and census records. This...
Click to read more »generally, mass-creating pages in articlespace is a BAD idea. See WP:MASSCREATE. Cremastra (talk) 20:50, 19 December 2023 (UTC) from a quick read of that...
Click to read more »creation. – Uanfala (talk) 10:38, 22 April 2023 (UTC) The problem is that WP:MASSCREATE gives only half a definition of what is mass-creation: it does (somewhat)...
Click to read more »rationale from the previous AfD: Mass-created article made in violation of WP:MASSCREATE/WP:MEATBOT based on the 2006 Iranian census, see Wikipedia:Arbitratio...
Click to read more »WP:BEFORE is the correct way to go for normally created articles. (For masscreated ones I'd support a different approach, though, but that's another discussion)...
Click to read more »bots and humans. Restoring 11k user talk pages doesn't fall under WP:MASSCREATE because they aren't articles, but I think following that guidance would...
Click to read more »generated items under discussion. A smoother process for handling poor WP:MASSCREATE situations would be beneficial. CMD (talk) 14:35, 16 May 2023 (UTC) Maybe...
Click to read more »me. This volume of editing may also require community approval per WP:MASSCREATE. Toadspike [Talk] 07:51, 31 May 2025 (UTC) @Toadspike Tbh, I reluctantly...
Click to read more »Oppose basically per JoelleJay, particularly the evidence that their MASSCREATE/socking/evading behaviour was carrying on as recently as spring 2024....
Click to read more »I am trying to get a hold on the autopatrolled rights of editors who masscreate stubs and while I was checking some of the top ten article creators and...
Click to read more »