This page is a redirect. The following categories are used to track and monitor this redirect:
|
encyclopedia article or a Wikipedia policy, as it has not been reviewed by the community. Shortcuts WP:MADEUPWP:MADEUP WP:ONEDAYWP:ONEDAY WP:1DAYWP:1DAY...
Click to read more »delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log) Easily fails WP:MADEUP; see "The Mall Challenge was invented by Adam Clash, Julian Mellor and Xavier...
Click to read more »about a drinking game. Possibly WP:MADEUP. Contested prod. Alksub 21:26, 22 October 2007 (UTC) Delete per WP:MADEUP. A Google search gives back nothing...
Click to read more »WP:MADEUP, WP:V, WP:N and WP:NEO. Highest Heights (talk) 15:50, 6 June 2009 (UTC) Delete per WP:Madeup. I think it's high time that a CSD:Madeup policy...
Click to read more »WP:MADEUP. (I know of no speedy deletion criteria that this satisfies). Jujutacular talkcontribs 21:18, 30 July 2009 (UTC) Delete. WP:NEO, WP:MADEUP, or...
Click to read more »views) (delete) – (View log) Delete as WP:MADEUP Mayalld (talk) 14:55, 7 January 2009 (UTC) Delete as MADEUP. Why was it not speedied as a non-notable...
Click to read more »WP:MADEUP WuhWuzDat 00:12, 28 November 2009 (UTC) Speedy delete, category A7. Sam Blacketer (talk) 00:13, 28 November 2009 (UTC) Delete per WP:MADEUP Jarkeld...
Click to read more »2008 (UTC) Delete Word madeup on a podcast - while still more notable than 99% of everything else that falls under WP:MADEUP - that is not difficult...
Click to read more »July 2011 (UTC) Speedy madeup. Falcon8765 (TALK) 01:42, 31 July 2011 (UTC) Alas, you cannot speedily delete something madeup (not including blatant hoaxes)...
Click to read more »WP:MADEUP Ironholds (talk) 19:31, 17 July 2009 (UTC) Delete. This is a drinking game - and based on precedent, even if it wasn't falling under WP:MADEUP...
Click to read more »(UTC) Delete WP:MADEUP Drawn Some (talk) 16:28, 1 May 2009 (UTC) Strong Delete - seriously a made-up game. Fails WP:OR, WP:N and WP:MADEUP. Sjones23 (talk...
Click to read more »per WP:MADEUP. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 02:02, 28 May 2009 (UTC) Delete, WP:MADEUP. Also, what...
Click to read more »are not verifiable. —Snigbrook 11:36, 4 January 2009 (UTC) Delete per WP:MADEUP. Graymornings(talk) 12:05, 4 January 2009 (UTC) Delete, unsourceable. Juzhong...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable game. Violates WP:N; Violates WP:MADEUP (Wikipedia is not for something made up one day). mhking (talk) 03:25, 22...
Click to read more »protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) Delete: per WP:DICT and WP:MADEUP. --ÐeadΣyeДrrow (Talk | Contribs) 14:13, 16 February 2008 (UTC) Delete....
Click to read more »(View log) WP:MADEUP Ironholds (talk) 11:44, 10 May 2009 (UTC) Delete by letting it get sucked out the vent the money came through. WP:MADEUP. Drawn Some...
Click to read more »as WP:MADEUP. Majorclanger (talk) 17:56, 23 January 2010 (UTC) Delete: Per WP:NEO. Joe Chill (talk) 18:17, 23 January 2010 (UTC) Delete. Madeup. — RHaworth (talk ·...
Click to read more »discussions. -- Raven1977 (talk) 23:38, 1 January 2009 (UTC) Delete per WP:MADEUP... no relevant hits. —Erik (talk • contrib) 23:41, 1 January 2009 (UTC)...
Click to read more »5 October 2007 (UTC) Delete per WP:MADEUP. Zchris87v 05:51, 5 October 2007 (UTC) Speedy delete also per WP:MADEUP and non-notability. şœśэїŝәқιￆṱᾅἻқￂ...
Click to read more »write this, clear case of WP:NOT#SCHOOL WP:MADEUP--Jac16888 19:20, 17 October 2007 (UTC) Delete per WP:MADEUP. Cosmo0 19:45, 17 October 2007 (UTC) Delete...
Click to read more »Rationale is WP:MADEUP. No sources indicate widespread use of this term. —KuyaBriBriTalk 17:48, 27 April 2011 (UTC) Delete. Indeed madeup. Szzuk (talk)...
Click to read more »Delete, WP:MADEUP. Ironholds (talk) 21:45, 30 December 2009 (UTC) Speedy Delete G3. Pure vandalism and blatant hoaxes. Otherwise, delete as WP:MADEUP. Шизомби...
Click to read more »to this page. The result was delete. SNOW close as suggested--clearly madeup, clearly nonnotable. DGG ( talk ) 02:00, 29 October 2009 (UTC) Stalin (Card...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non notable sport, Delete, per WP:MADEUP WuhWuzDat 18:27, 25 November 2009 (UTC) Speedy delete I am even having trouble...
Click to read more »"Kate Dorito", for example). Smacks of WP:MADEUP. Gr1st (talk) 21:45, 4 May 2008 (UTC) Delete Not so much Madeup certainly appears to apply. LegoTech·(t)·(c)...
Click to read more »26 December 2007 (UTC). Delete, WP:MADEUP. Chris Cunningham (talk) 13:23, 26 December 2007 (UTC) Delete per WP:MADEUP as well. Only links are to it's website...
Click to read more »2010 (UTC) Delete per WP:MADEUP. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 14:28, 19 September 2010 (UTC) Delete - Can you say... WP:MADEUP by an WP:SPA! It brings me...
Click to read more »drinking game. PROD removed by author. WP:MADEUP applies. ttonyb (talk) 01:26, 29 May 2011 (UTC) Delete WP:MADEUP pretty much sums it up, this is not what...
Click to read more »2009 (UTC) Delete: per WP:MADEUP. Joe Chill (talk) 20:00, 24 July 2009 (UTC) Delete and redirect to pirate memory games as madeup. Bigdaddy1981 (talk) 20:18...
Click to read more »07:23, 11 May 2008 (UTC) Delete per WP:NEO and a rather pure case of WP:MADEUP. Good Ol’factory (talk) 07:35, 11 May 2008 (UTC) Speedy Delete Should have...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Appears to be WP:MADEUP. No evidence that this is not a game played by any number of drunken or...
Click to read more »November 2007 (UTC) Delete, again per WP:MADEUP. --Nehwyn (talk) 21:39, 28 November 2007 (UTC) Delete WP:MADEUP Carter | Talk to me 04:06, 29 November 2007...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable madeup game. PROD denied by anon IP. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 16:53, 24 September...
Click to read more »notability. Loggerjack (talk) 16:59, 3 December 2011 (UTC) Delete per WP:MADEUP. Lugnuts (talk) 17:51, 3 December 2011 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Violates WP:MADEUP - this isn't even WP:OR, it's purely author-creation (i.e. no research has...
Click to read more »Non-notable slang term where WP:MADEUP applies. ArcAngel (talk) 18:01, 8 November 2009 (UTC) Speedy delete per WP:MADEUP. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and...
Click to read more »-- Wikipedical 18:42, 22 September 2007 (UTC) Delete beats WP:MADEUP. In fact, WP:MADEUP doesn't even beat paper. Pursey Talk | Contribs 18:52, 22 September...
Click to read more »are. WP:MADEUP alledged cocktail. Shawis (talk) 23:40, 29 December 2007 (UTC) Delete: no concrete sources; most likely, as the nom says, MADEUP. David...
Click to read more »(UTC) Delete, as per WP:MADEUP, no RS can be found. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 19:55, 22 March 2010 (UTC) Snow Delete. WP:MADEUP, WP:OR. — Rankiri (talk)...
Click to read more »vandalism (see Terrible Golf Association). This is just something someone madeup one day, and the founder, according to the talk page, is "looking for exposure"...
Click to read more »WP:MADEUP, WP:OR, WP:NFT. End of. Doc StrangeMailboxLogbook 05:18, 12 October 2008 (UTC) Strong delete — this is shit that someone just WP:MADEUP. MuZemike...
Click to read more »without improvement or pertinent rationale. Concern was: Not notable - See WP:MADEUP, WP:GNG. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 13:45, 26 May 2011 (UTC) Note: This debate...
Click to read more »delete WP:MADEUP violation without sources. --WngLdr34 (talk) 18:51, 24 September 2009 (UTC) Delete There is no speedy delete criteria for madeup things/ideas...
Click to read more »17:28, 3 December 2011 (UTC) Delete: Per WP:MADEUP. SL93 (talk) 18:07, 3 December 2011 (UTC) Delete per WP:MADEUP, defefinitely. I agree that this should...
Click to read more »Certainly fails WP:GNG and could probably be deleted per WP:NEO, WP:NOT, WP:MADEUP, or a host of others. I see it was PRODded with no explanation a while back...
Click to read more »the Scrubs context. FlowerpotmaN·(t) 23:48, 12 July 2009 (UTC) Delete. Madeup. Doctorfluffy (wanna get fluffed?) 01:24, 13 July 2009 (UTC) Note: This...
Click to read more »Chill (talk) 01:51, 13 February 2010 (UTC) Delete: Another reason why WP:MADEUP should by a CSD category. Yes it exists, yes, someone has named it, but...
Click to read more »history | links | watch | logs) Per WP:MADEUP. Kleuske (talk) 13:14, 7 March 2018 (UTC) Delete. I support MADEUP drafts being speediable. Menno X (talk ·...
Click to read more »FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Not notable, WP:MADEUP-type content. Prezbo (talk) 02:00, 11 November 2009 (UTC) Delete: Per WP:MADEUP. Joe Chill (talk) 02:54, 11 November...
Click to read more »presumably, just WP:MADEUP. Glenfarclas (talk) 06:56, 7 February 2010 (UTC) Delete I was unable to find coverage of the game. Most likely madeup. Jujutacular T · C...
Click to read more »15:13, 4 May 2009 (UTC) Delete WP:MADEUP Drawn Some (talk) 15:49, 4 May 2009 (UTC) Delete Definitely violates WP:MADEUP, you might almost be able to make...
Click to read more »(UTC) I would class it as WP:MADEUP, instead of WP:HOAX. However, both warrant speedy deletion. Speedy Delete per WP:MADEUP. I found The Constitutional...
Click to read more »contributors. VQuakr (talk) 03:05, 11 May 2011 (UTC) Delete according to WP:MADEUP. The article is well-written and interesting, but Wikipedia is not the place...
Click to read more »encyclopedic content. Ctempleton3 (talk) 06:03, 1 April 2008 (UTC) Delete per WP:MADEUP and WP:NOR. Vivio TestarossaTalk Who 06:18, 1 April 2008 (UTC) Strong Delete...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This seems to be a non-notable drink just WP:MADEUP one day. I can't read the first citation, but the second one says nothing...
Click to read more »WP:MADEUP. Deprodded. Weregerbil 07:36, 26 August 2007 (UTC) Delete - WP:MADEUP, per nom. Giggy\Talk 07:37, 26 August 2007 (UTC) Delete - WP:MADEUP. --Hirohisat...
Click to read more »(delete) – (View log) No indication of notability; seems to be purely WP:MADEUP material. Prod removed without comment or improvement. ~Matticus UC 10:42...
Click to read more »The Seeker 4 Talk 19:51, 27 March 2009 (UTC) Delete as non-notable neologism and WP:MADEUP. KuyaBriBriTalk 19:53, 27 March 2009 (UTC) Delete, I'm finding no google...
Click to read more »and deleted as vandalism. A cursory search makes it apparent this is WP:MADEUP at best. §FreeRangeFrog 17:11, 18 February 2009 (UTC) Delete per Frog -...
Click to read more »9 November 2020 (UTC) Delete, WP:MADEUP applies.-gadfium 01:38, 9 November 2020 (UTC) Delete per the above. WP:MADEUP. --TheSandDoctor Talk 04:21, 9 November...
Click to read more »Google Sites. Mattg82 (talk) 03:22, 20 December 2009 (UTC) Delete per WP:MADEUP. Even the picture in the article underscores that this is just some friends...
Click to read more »free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable neologism; WP:MADEUP, WP:NOTDICT. Purportedly used to insult and annoy other players of certain...
Click to read more »delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log) Delete per WP:MADEUP. Article about a ficticious album. Mayalld (talk) 14:33, 10 February 2009...
Click to read more »(talk) 17:25, 3 February 2011 (UTC) Speedy Delete Textbook example of WP:MADEUP--ThePaintedOne (talk) 18:35, 3 February 2011 (UTC) Speedy Delete No sources...
Click to read more »links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log) Recipe - violates WP:MADEUP and WP:NOTHOWTO. Prod removed by original author. 7 talk | Δ | 23:36...
Click to read more »of including, but by no means limited to, WP:NOR, WP:V and, as above, WP:MADEUP. There isn't a policy for articles containing the term "goth acid disco"...
Click to read more »Contested prod. Fails WP:MADEUP. Delete. Blanchardb -Me•MyEars•MyMouth- timed 10:51, 12 August 2008 (UTC) Strong delete - Fails WP:MADEUP and WP:NEO. Asenine ...
Click to read more »not be notable. This is probably a madeup stuff.--Freewayguy 23:54, 17 October 2008 (UTC) Non-notable: per WP:MADEUP. I couldn't find any sources (reliable...
Click to read more »children. See WP:MADEUP. Ironholds (talk) 00:41, 17 October 2008 (UTC) Ironholds (talk) 00:41, 17 October 2008 (UTC) WP:SNOW Delete: per WP:MADEUP. Schuym1 (talk)...
Click to read more »(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Madeup neogolism... Shadowjams (talk) 09:17, 17 November 2010 (UTC) Delete since...
Click to read more »drinking game has received significant coverage in secondary sources; see WP:MADEUP and WP:GNG. PROD was contested. VQuakr (talk) 18:55, 29 May 2011 (UTC) Delete...
Click to read more »15:49, 26 March 2010 (UTC) Delete per WP:MADEUP. liquidluck✽talk 03:20, 30 March 2010 (UTC) Delete, WP:MADEUP: "Feel free to add your own commandments...
Click to read more »21 December 2009 (UTC) Delete: Per WP:MADEUP. Joe Chill (talk) 18:41, 21 December 2009 (UTC) Delete: WP:MADEUP. I think it may actually be a WP:HOAX,...
Click to read more »said on their user page that they made this up, so page does not pass WP:MADEUP. As well as this there are no google hits, or google dictionary hits so...
Click to read more »watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log) Total invention. Delete per WP:MADEUP. Fences&Windows 01:54, 22 June 2009 (UTC) Delete This appears to be made...
Click to read more »should be made to this page. The result was Speedy delete, WP:SNOW, WP:MADEUP, article states that the term was coined yesterday. NawlinWiki (talk) 20:42...
Click to read more »watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log) Non-notable game. Appears that WP:MADEUP applies. From article, ..."incredibly new, relatively unknown sport, references...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:MADEUP. nuff said. [Belinrahs|talktome⁄ ididit] 16:08, 22 October 2009 (UTC) delete madeup variation of one for the road...
Click to read more »(Britney Spears album) that has been recently deleted in Afd as being WP:MADEUP). The original creator of this article had added to The Unreleased article...
Click to read more »for the phrase. Appears to be WP:MADEUP WP:OR Mayalld (talk) 22:32, 3 January 2008 (UTC) Yes, Delete per WP:MADEUP or even WP:HOAX.Shawn in Montreal...
Click to read more »--Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 22:33, 10 February 2010 (UTC) Delete WP:MADEUP. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 23:38, 10 February 2010 (UTC) Delete – Clearly...
Click to read more »protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log) WP:MADEUP bollocks. Ironholds (talk) 10:52, 30 April 2009 (UTC) Delete Notability...
Click to read more »protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log) See WP:MADEUP Ironholds (talk) 15:38, 27 February 2009 (UTC) Delete. Even the Urban Dictionary...
Click to read more »Contested PROD. Clear lack of verifiabilty. Wikipedia is not for stuff madeup playing online video games one day. MuZemike 14:25, 27 November 2009 (UTC)...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Topic may violate wp:madeup and wp:or. Bubba73 You talkin' to me? 11:51, 18 June 2012 (UTC) Delete Internet...
Click to read more »considering that the inventors are listed as "MP, KK, and JF". Seems WP:MADEUP to me, and a Google search comes up dry. SchuminWeb (Talk) 00:06, 1 May...
Click to read more »sources. Delete. BlueValour (talk) 02:53, 14 April 2008 (UTC) Delete - Per WP:MADEUP and [1]. Fails WP:NOTE. Wisdom89 (T / C) 02:57, 14 April 2008 (UTC) this...
Click to read more »protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) Delete as WP:MADEUP - previously PROD - initial contrib removed PROD Mayalld (talk) 12:05, 14...
Click to read more »Draft:People's Republic of Leon (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) WP:MADEUP Passengerpigeon (talk) 06:50, 16 June 2020 (UTC) Weak Delete - Not much...
Click to read more »watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log) The article admits to failing WP:MADEUP, and thus fails WP:N and WP:V in the process. Is also a WP:DICDEF and is...
Click to read more »watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log) WP:MADEUP. Ironholds (talk) 16:41, 30 April 2009 (UTC) Delete WP:MADEUP or WP:NEO, take your pick. Drawn Some (talk)...
Click to read more »29 July 2009 (UTC) Delete An interesting idea, but it sounds WP:MADEUP. Perhaps madeup here ? No indication of notability. Nosleep break my slumber 20:50...
Click to read more »Probable hoax, or at best a political essay proposing new ideology per WP:MADEUP, unreferenced, can't find a single mention of the word on Google search...
Click to read more »watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log) Delete nn neologism, possibly WP:MADEUP Mayalld (talk) 16:29, 13 March 2009 (UTC) Delete or Redirect - I think the...
Click to read more »are not notable(WP:MADEUP) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rcurtis5 (talk • contribs) 20:33, 20 July 2009 (UTC) Delete. WP:MADEUP Niteshift36 (talk)...
Click to read more »TWL) Contested prod, unreferenced, WP:MADEUP Falcon8765 (TALK) 21:30, 18 August 2010 (UTC) Strong delete WP:MADEUP: "Stone-Cup was created in 2010 by [two...
Click to read more »The writers of WP:MADEUP and WP:SNOW had this article in mind, for sure. OfficeGirl 05:47, 4 September 2007 (UTC) Delete - Per WP:MADEUP, particulary hilarious...
Click to read more »TWL) Don't really know what to make of this one... methinks it might be madeup 2 says you, says two 19:09, 11 November 2010 (UTC) Note: This debate has...
Click to read more »(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:MADEUP, WP:NEOLOGISM, at best one sentence that belongs in the Biopic article....
Click to read more »– (View log) Unreferenced, bordering on Patent nonsense, seem to be WP:MADEUP VivioFateFan (Talk, Sandbox) 01:05, 10 January 2008 (UTC) Delete. Google...
Click to read more »(UTC) Delete Unsourced, no evidence of notability. Fails WP:COI and WP:MADEUP. AndrewWTaylor (talk) 15:43, 16 October 2012 (UTC) Delete. The article admits...
Click to read more »logs | views) (delete) – (View log) WP:MADEUP. Ironholds (talk) 14:21, 1 May 2009 (UTC) Speedy Delete WP:MADEUP babble. Drawn Some (talk) 14:35, 1 May...
Click to read more »Per WP:MADEUP. Warrah (talk) 17:04, 11 November 2009 (UTC) Delete, WP:NFT. NawlinWiki (talk) 17:06, 11 November 2009 (UTC) Delete, per WP:MADEUP. LovesMacs...
Click to read more »WP:MADEUP. Non-notable game / no evidence to support description or actual existence. CultureDrone (talk) 22:19, 23 March 2009 (UTC) Delete. WP:MADEUP,...
Click to read more »(talk) 16:59, 5 June 2008 (UTC) Delete for obvious reasons, but mainly WP:MADEUP. If you want to get into policy, there is no verification that this exists...
Click to read more »(UTC) You beat me to it by a couple of seconds, literally! Delete per WP:MADEUP. -- roleplayer 22:25, 5 July 2009 (UTC) Delete this, man. This is a blatanly...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Delete unsourced article per WP:MADEUP. Article creation said "a very popular game based on tennis. Created by...
Click to read more »Delete per WP:MADEUP or speedy delete per G3, your choice. Clarityfiend (talk) 13:22, 16 June 2012 (UTC) Delete, whether Neologism, Madeup or Hoax is impossible...
Click to read more »2009 (UTC) DeleteWP:MADEUP. Drawn Some (talk) 18:49, 20 May 2009 (UTC) Delete, absolutely no sources that I could find; either WP:MADEUP or WP:HOAX. Lankiveil...
Click to read more »WP:NEO. WP:N. WP:MADEUP. Pburka (talk) 19:13, 6 February 2010 (UTC) Delete. Wikipedia is WP:NOTADICTIONARY and is, of course, WP:MADEUP. ConCompS talk 19:56...
Click to read more »-- Alan Liefting (talk) - 19:56, 20 February 2010 (UTC) Delete per WP:MADEUP. No sources at all (reliable or otherwise), as far as I can find.--Arxiloxos...
Click to read more »new "religion" via ghits. WP:MADEUP/WP:HOAX/bored at school. Mr. Vernon (talk) 16:52, 25 January 2009 (UTC) Delete - Madeup. No sources, at least not on...
Click to read more »per nom. Baileypalblue (talk) 04:17, 25 January 2009 (UTC) Delete: per WP:MADEUP. Schuym1 (talk) 06:02, 25 January 2009 (UTC) Yes, that's the one. Baileypalblue...
Click to read more »views) (delete) – (View log) Delete per WP:MADEUP. Irbisgreif (talk) 12:53, 4 August 2009 (UTC) Delete per WP:MADEUP. There really should be a speedy criterion...
Click to read more »nom. and WP:MADEUP JohnCD (talk) 17:24, 19 February 2008 (UTC) Delete per nom as well. I agree also with the opinion that it is WP:MADEUP --Pmedema (talk)...
Click to read more »G3 as a blatant hoax/WP:MADEUP. - The Bushranger Return fireFlank speed 08:25, 1 December 2010 (UTC) Delete, blatantly WP:MADEUP. Roscelese (talk) 00:10...
Click to read more »protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log) per WP:MADEUP WuhWuzDat 20:48, 21 July 2009 (UTC) Delete as noted. The article even says...
Click to read more »names. It's not listed on BoardGameGeek, and sounds like an unreleased WP:MADEUP card game using the cards from a different game. McGeddon (talk) 12:29,...
Click to read more »variation on Mao (game), likely WP:MADEUP in school one day. <eleland/talkedits> 23:49, 2 January 2008 (UTC) Delete per WP:MADEUP. Master of Puppets Call me MoP...
Click to read more »Oli Filth 19:28, 20 August 2007 (UTC) Delete zero Ghits. Obviously WP:MADEUP Dina 19:53, 20 August 2007 (UTC) This AfD nomination was incomplete. It...
Click to read more »polite. PMDrive1061 (talk) 22:40, 14 May 2009 (UTC) Delete WP:N, WP:RS, WP:MADEUP, WP:Verifiability, etc. In other words, it meets none of the criteria for...
Click to read more »Smacks of WP:MADEUP. Even urbandictionary has no mention of it as a drug. ArakunemTalk 14:30, 7 October 2008 (UTC) Delete - Hoax, WP:NEO, WP:MADEUP, WP:DICDEF...
Click to read more »16:53, 9 May 2009 (UTC) Delete: per WP:MADEUP. Iowateen (talk) 00:03, 10 May 2009 (UTC) Delete per WP:MADEUP. Oh yea and in this edit, the creator removes...
Click to read more »August 2007 (UTC) Strong delete per WP:MADEUP. --Targeman 14:53, 4 August 2007 (UTC) Speedy delete per WP:MADEUP & WP:HOAX. Askari Mark (Talk) 18:28, 4...
Click to read more »IP, possibly the article creator. This article violates WP:NOT#OR and WP:MADEUP, has no real world notability, and is also an example of blatant WP:SOAP...
Click to read more »making it. Hobit (talk) 01:47, 14 July 2008 (UTC) Strong delete per WP:MADEUP. No chance of surviving here. Ten Pound Hammer Farfel and his otters • (Broken...
Click to read more »to be made up. Jonesy (talk) 09:19, 8 February 2009 (UTC) Delete per WP:MADEUP. Ironholds (talk) 09:45, 8 February 2009 (UTC) Delete. I think this could...
Click to read more »Lugia2453 (talk) 17:50, 12 October 2012 (UTC) Delete original research and WP:MADEUP --Anbu121 (talk me) 18:03, 12 October 2012 (UTC) Delete on grounds of fictitious/invented...
Click to read more »JaGatalk 17:52, 23 February 2009 (UTC) Speedy Delete Per A1, G1, and WP:MADEUP — Preceding unsigned comment added by ErikTheBikeMan (talk • contribs) Speedy...
Click to read more »(UTC) Delete: Per WP:MADEUP. SL93 (talk) 23:04, 30 April 2012 (UTC) Delete I'm not sure how this would fail a PROD, considering WP:MADEUP and WP:GNG Ducknish...
Click to read more »DMacks (talk) 23:57, 2 May 2013 (UTC) Speeedy Delete - Wikipedia is not for MADEUP things. - MrX 00:00, 3 May 2013 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...
Click to read more »neologism that smacks of WP:MADEUP. --Orange Mike | Talk 18:47, 28 April 2011 (UTC) Delete - In agreement with Orangemike above. WP:MADEUP is the clincher here...
Click to read more »Google [1]. Cassandra 73 (talk) 20:47, 26 February 2010 (UTC) Delete: Per WP:MADEUP. Joe Chill (talk) 00:21, 27 February 2010 (UTC) Delete per WP:NEO. Armbrust...
Click to read more »WP:V and is likely WP:MADEUP 2 says you, says two 19:35, 9 November 2010 (UTC) Delete. No sources, self-described as WP:MADEUP. —chaos5023 (talk) 19:41...
Click to read more »one day. Ice Cold Beer (talk) 18:42, 8 January 2008 (UTC) Delete per WP:MADEUP and WP:NOTE. —Travistalk 18:58, 8 January 2008 (UTC) Delete per nom. I suggest...
Click to read more »qualifies under G2, almost certainly fails WP:MADEUP, no references whatsoever to prove that it doesn't fail WP:MADEUP... The article's history is littered with...
Click to read more »July 2010 (UTC) I'm going to nip this one in the bud, as it's totally WP:MADEUP. I'm sure Dickie's a great guy,[1] but until someone writes about this drink...
Click to read more »FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This is clearly WP:NEO, and I really think it is WP:MADEUP. I skipped CSD for AFD this time. — Timneu22 · talk 16:30, 13 May 2010 (UTC)...
Click to read more »Certainly fails WP:MADEUP. --lifebaka (Talk - Contribs) 20:27, 11 December 2007 (UTC) Delete. I concur, its a classic WP:MADEUP violation. Guys, since...
Click to read more »WP:N now or ever. Erechtheus (talk) 02:37, 24 May 2008 (UTC) Delete WP:MADEUP, WP:NN. Esradekan Gibb "Talk" 09:51, 24 May 2008 (UTC) Comment I found...
Click to read more »day. —Travistalk 20:18, 26 November 2007 (UTC) Delete per WP:NEO and WP:MADEUP. JohnCD (talk) 20:41, 26 November 2007 (UTC) Delete per WP:NEO and WP:NFT...
Click to read more »here we are. No refs, and I couldn't find anything relevant--probably WP:MADEUP. Ravenna1961 (talk) 23:14, 23 November 2007 (UTC) Delete, no sources are...
Click to read more »possibly you-tube spam WuhWuzDat 03:10, 4 January 2010 (UTC) Delete per WP:MADEUP. Note to closing admin: The creator of this article also created articles...
Click to read more »I can't. Nomination withdrawn the instant someone shows this isn't WP:MADEUP Shirt58 (talk) 01:34, 19 May 2018 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...
Click to read more »game that has the hallmarks of being WP:MADEUP. Someone has removed some of the more obvious indicators of madeup-ness (e.g. personal names) but with nothing...
Click to read more »this word matches the username of the article creator. Violation of WP:MADEUP. Delete. Blanchardb -Me•MyEars•MyMouth- timed 01:18, 4 September 2008 (UTC)...
Click to read more »apparent or asserted significance or importance of comic/movie. Fails WP:MADEUP,WP:FICTION,WP:MOVIE . Recommend Delete. Michael Devore 19:50, 9 September...
Click to read more »further edits should be made to this page. The result was delete as WP:MADEUP and WP:NFT; early closure per WP:SNOW. KrakatoaKatie 04:25, 22 April 2008...
Click to read more »is WP:MADEUP (even if not in school). — Timotab Timothy (not Tim dagnabbit!) 21:53, 4 September 2007 (UTC) Delete but not speedy, as WP:MADEUP is a (small)...
Click to read more »JSTOR · TWL) Made up non-notable neologism. Only self-published sources. WP:MADEUP. Three editors' PROD-tags removed without explanation ╟─TreasuryTag►sundries─╢...
Click to read more »different drink), but no "Green Army" that I can find. Recommend delete per WP:MADEUP. Mr. Vernon (talk) 05:45, 21 August 2012 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...
Click to read more »Oore (talk) 01:40, 29 April 2008 (UTC) Strong delete per WP:NEO and WP:MADEUP. Plus, the only Ghits are for Neil Charlet (presumably the article creator)...
Click to read more »creator without reason) about a non-notable card game. It may even violate WP:MADEUP, as I can't find anything on Google about it. THE AMERICAN METROSEXUAL 16:57...
Click to read more »03:51, 22 March 2020 (UTC) Delete per WP:MADEUP. Crossroads -talk- 03:58, 22 March 2020 (UTC) Delete WP:MADEUP or, at best, unverifiable (failing WP:V)...
Click to read more »will. flaminglawyer 08:27, 1 February 2009 (UTC) Delete per nom and WP:MADEUP. --Mr. Vernon (talk) 08:42, 1 February 2009 (UTC) Delete. Complete WP:BOLLOCKS...
Click to read more »(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:MADEUP. There's no evidence in google that this exists - there are numerous 'quick...
Click to read more »скоморохъ ѧ 14:17, 31 January 2008 (UTC) Delete both, possible speedy G3. WP:MADEUP. The author can't even render the title of the second article correctly...
Click to read more »these terms are (at best) non notable neologisms, and in all probability WP:MADEUP Mayalld (talk) 21:55, 25 September 2008 (UTC) Move to Nepali Diaspora. Mystache...
Click to read more »free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This article does not pass WP:MADEUP as is filled with primary souces and austenasia only shows 20,000 results...
Click to read more »Huon (talk) 23:02, 25 April 2008 (UTC) Delete as something that was just madeup. Bfigura (talk) 23:06, 25 April 2008 (UTC) Delete Unless reliable sources...
Click to read more »JSTOR · TWL) The article is about an obscure and possibly falling under WP:madeup word, which as of now is not even mentioned in the article. Instead the...
Click to read more »WP:MADEUP. Possibly meets speedy criteria Rackabello 04:25, 24 May 2007 (UTC) Speedy Delete and Salt Rackabello 04:34, 24 May 2007 (UTC) Speedy madeup Kangaru99...
Click to read more »hoax, made-up game Passportguy (talk) 18:46, 5 May 2009 (UTC) Delete WP:MADEUP but if a decision is made to keep it should be spelled "frisbee". Drawn...
Click to read more »Unreferenced article, for which no references can be found. Appears to be WP:MADEUP or extremely non-notable. I42 (talk) 09:04, 28 February 2010 (UTC) Note:...
Click to read more »discospinster talk 00:16, 23 June 2007 (UTC) Delete Not even a neologism, it's WP:MADEUP (except it was made up at work, not school). Masaruemoto 01:59, 23 June...
Click to read more »GregJackP (talk) 23:17, 20 May 2010 (UTC) Delete per nom. Meets or exceeds WP:MADEUP. ----moreno oso (talk) 23:35, 20 May 2010 (UTC) Delete: I found zero sources...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Seems like WP:MADEUP, unless someone can verify otherwise. -- 李博杰 | —Talk contribs email 11:35...
Click to read more »one day. TNXMan 15:08, 8 November 2009 (UTC) Delete per WP:HOAX and/or WP:MADEUP. Speedy under G3 (for vandalism and blatant hoaxes) was declined. A Stop...
Click to read more »delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log) WP:MADEUP position in a WP:MADEUP country. If bits of the USA had decided to go off and do their...
Click to read more »Unsourced article about a non-notable, non-English neologism. Fails WP:MADEUP. - MrX 14:44, 26 March 2013 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included in...
Click to read more »Delete as original prodder. Per nom and the article, quite clearly fails WP:MADEUP. Tim Song (talk) 17:17, 18 September 2009 (UTC) Delete Obviously made-up;...
Click to read more »(talk) 19:41, 15 November 2016 (UTC) Delete, fails WP:NEO and really WP:MADEUP. I don't think it's a plausible redirect. ansh666 19:48, 15 November 2016...
Click to read more »if anything WP:MADEUP at its worst. Interchangeable|talk to me|what I've changed 00:35, 26 July 2011 (UTC) Delete I don't think MADEUP comes under speedy...
Click to read more »January 2009 (UTC) Speedy Delete G11 - pure self-advertisement for some WP:MADEUP stuff that likely violates WP:COPYRIGHT as well. -- AnmaFinotera (talk ·...
Click to read more »views) (delete) – (View log) Appears to be a made up person. Delete: per WP:MADEUP from this search, this search, and this search. Schuym1 (talk) 06:09, 19...
Click to read more »08:32, 20 August 2008 (UTC) Delete: WP:MADEUP Schuym1 (talk) 12:07, 20 August 2008 (UTC) Strong delete WP:MADEUP This is trash. MattieTK 12:34, 20 August...
Click to read more »watch | logs | views) – (View log) Contested prod. Subject was probably WP:MADEUP in school one day. --tcsetattr (talk / contribs) 18:18, 31 August 2007 (UTC)...
Click to read more »12:53, 11 November 2007 (UTC) Delete as WP:MADEUP. Cosmo0 14:10, 11 November 2007 (UTC) Delete - as per WP:MADEUP. --DAJF 14:20, 11 November 2007 (UTC) Delete...
Click to read more »2012 (UTC) Delete No indication of notability. Looks like a case of WP:MADEUP. AndrewWTaylor (talk) 21:05, 23 February 2012 (UTC) Delete: non-notable...
Click to read more »November 2010 (UTC) Delete - per WP:MADEUP jsfouche ☽☾Talk 22:45, 29 November 2010 (UTC) Speedy delete. It seems WP:MADEUP was made for articles like this...
Click to read more »watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log) Original research. Fails WP:MADEUP: "If you have invented something novel in school, your garage, or the pub...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:MADEUP - non-notable neologism. Ironholds (talk) 07:11, 24 August 2009 (UTC) WP:MADEUP: speedy delete per WP:SNOWBALL....
Click to read more »Delete. A hoax, madeup or unverifiable. Take your pick. Szzuk (talk) 21:40, 23 May 2011 (UTC) Abstain - certainly not a hoax or madeup, as archive.org...
Click to read more »WP:MADEUP, I tend to believe it. AnturiaethwrTalk 01:43, 16 May 2008 (UTC) Speedy Delete, this is something (as said above) that was simply madeup. Izzy007...
Click to read more »WP:MADEUP applies, likely just called this at a single bar or area. PHARMBOY (TALK) 19:27, 4 October 2008 (UTC) Speedy Delete per G3 as WP:MADEUP Schmidt...
Click to read more »Non-notable game nonsense. ttonyb (talk) 00:04, 4 May 2010 (UTC) Delete: Per WP:MADEUP. Joe Chill (talk) 01:23, 4 May 2010 (UTC) Delete, made up at school one...
Click to read more »free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Lack of WP:NOTABILITY. WP:MADEUP "maneuver". Previously deleted via WP:PROD; given its recreation, I suggest...
Click to read more »12:23, 23 June 2008 (UTC) Delete per WP:MADEUP. -- JediLofty UserTalk 12:27, 23 June 2008 (UTC) Delete per WP:MADEUP. as above. --Killerofcruft (talk) 13:15...
Click to read more »WP:OR or WP:MADEUP, also none of the "references" are verifiable. Vivio TestarossaTalk Who 01:01, 2 October 2008 (UTC) Delete per WP:MADEUP. JJL (talk)...
Click to read more »protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) Seems to be WP:MADEUP. Neither google nor yahoo return any matches to this sport. ARendedWinter...
Click to read more »cholesterol-delivery vehicle available at Denny's. Looks like an example of WP:MADEUP Steamroller Assault (talk) 02:29, 6 January 2009 (UTC) Delete menu item...
Click to read more »anywhere in the world except in the present article. This is close to WP:MADEUP and certainly fails our policies against original research. Pichpich (talk)...
Click to read more »can find. Olaf Davis (talk) 15:45, 1 October 2009 (UTC) Delete Clear WP:MADEUP Violation. --WngLdr34 (talk) 16:37, 1 October 2009 (UTC) Delete. No substantial...
Click to read more »(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:MADEUP Jac16888 Talk 19:02, 19 April 2012 (UTC) Delete Do I really need to bother...
Click to read more »(delete) – (View log) Was prod'ed but creator removed the tag. WP:NOTHOWTO, WP:MADEUP and fails WP:N MS (Talk|Contributions) 01:14, 13 July 2009 (UTC) Strong...
Click to read more »example of why we have WP:MADEUP. No sourcing and no notability. Bfigura (talk) 00:17, 11 May 2008 (UTC) Delete per WP:MADEUP. High school awards? Gravy...
Click to read more »(talk/contribs) 11:10, 5 September 2008 (UTC) Delete. Eh? This must be WP:MADEUP, surely? It sounds like a portmanteau of FYEO and FYI. Those both have disambiguation...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Contested prod. Non-notable neologism, fails WP:Madeup. Moreover the article reads like an opinion piece. De728631 (talk) 21:56...
Click to read more »information about the expression, I am convinced that this is either a hoax or WP:MADEUP, and in either case it should be speedily deleted. At a couple of months...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:MADEUP, anyone? Erpert (let's talk about it) 06:02, 26 July 2010 (UTC) Delete - Madeup one day, no sources indicate sufficient...
Click to read more »Wikipedia it should not be considered false information. Delete per WP:MADEUP Mr. Vernon (talk) 01:38, 2 October 2011 (UTC) Keep Everything was made up...
Click to read more »2010 (UTC) Delete If this isn't WP:MADEUP, then nothing is. We have to dispense with this page, or with WP:MADEUP. Chris the speller (talk) 14:05, 23...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Contested PROD. WP:MADEUP WP:NEOLOGISM. Oh, how I wish we had a speedy deletion criterion for these...
Click to read more »-- Fabrictramp | talk to me 18:55, 1 February 2009 (UTC) Delete per WP:MADEUP, the reason I used for mu initial prod. Ironholds (talk) 19:16, 1 February...
Click to read more »(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:MADEUP, unreferenced, non-notable neologism per WP:NEO, not a trace of it online...
Click to read more »15:20, 1 September 2011 (UTC) Delete WP:MADEUP Andy Dingley (talk) 15:02, 1 September 2011 (UTC) Delete clear madeup case. Hobit (talk) 02:59, 5 September...
Click to read more »for CSD G4. Sancho 20:30, 10 August 2007 (UTC) Very strong delete per WP:MADEUP. --Targeman 20:59, 10 August 2007 (UTC) Delete per nom. Jakew 21:15, 10...
Click to read more »Fabrictramp (talk) 19:05, 11 December 2007 (UTC) Delete as either misguided or WP:MADEUP. Not obviously bad faith, so no speedy G3 candidate. Martijn Hoekstra (talk)...
Click to read more »watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log) Violates WP:CRYSTAL, possibly WP:MADEUP, couldn't find any sources to back up the claim that this series will be...
Click to read more »2011 (UTC) User:Eu-151 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) WP:MADEUP. User space is not for fantasy future sports tournaments. Chris Cunningham...
Click to read more »person? Wow, it must be notable then! Seriously, delete per WP:NFT, WP:MADEUP, etc -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 15:21, 11 May 2010 (UTC) Delete. A web search...
Click to read more »removed, so here we are. IMDb has nothing like this, nor does Google. WP:MADEUP and/or WP:HOAX vandalism. Shawis (talk) 07:36, 7 January 2008 (UTC) Delete...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This appears to be WP:MADEUP. I could find no references to "Majstor series" on Google scholar, Google...
Click to read more »day Chris (talk) 03:57, 3 June 2008 (UTC) delete - extremely obviously WP:MADEUP with no Google hits apart from this page and claim to notability "Kirfrisbean...
Click to read more »—MuffledThud (talk) 21:04, 30 January 2010 (UTC) Obvious delete, it's a WP:MADEUP WP:NEOLOGISM. Zero GHits other than this article. Glenfarclas (talk) 21:10...
Click to read more »(UTC) Delete as WP:MADEUP. Cnilep (talk) 02:30, 23 April 2009 (UTC) Strong delete - not even a protologism, just something madeup yesterday. Wikipedia...
Click to read more »26.120.121 (talk) 13:54, 22 November 2010 (UTC) Delete Non-notable, WP:MADEUP Catfish Jim & the soapdish 14:09, 22 November 2010 (UTC) Delete Non-notable...
Click to read more »what WP:OR and WP:MADEUP really mean, instead of citing them completely nonsensically in every AfD? Do XMPP clients look like a madeup topic? --Cyclopiatalk...
Click to read more »Urban Dictionary. While I find the term interesting, it fails WP:NEO and WP:MADEUP, and apart from UD, there appear to be no relevant Google hits. Acroterion...
Click to read more »CitiCat ♫ 03:16, 27 July 2007 (UTC) violates WP:NOR, WP:V, WP:ATT, WP:RS, WP:MADEUP, WP:NEO, etc. Misterdiscreet 03:26, 21 July 2007 (UTC) Keep and Clean This...
Click to read more »links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log) Classic case of WP:MADEUP. No notability or references. FingersOnRoids♫ 23:11, 22 March 2009 (UTC)...
Click to read more »(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:MADEUP. Author contested prod. OSbornarfcontributionatoration 22:29, 18 January...
Click to read more »removed by author. TheLetterM (talk) 21:15, 14 May 2009 (UTC) Delete WP:MADEUP & WP:NEO both. Drawn Some (talk) 21:18, 14 May 2009 (UTC) Delete. I've put...
Click to read more »nom and also per WP:MADEUP. I didn't find ant WP:RS either.--Kudpung (talk) 16:53, 25 September 2010 (UTC) Delete per WP:MADEUP, WP:NEO. -Reconsider...
Click to read more »notability. TrulyBlue (talk) 12:36, 5 December 2008 (UTC) Delete. WP:N and WP:MADEUP andy (talk) 13:51, 5 December 2008 (UTC) Deletember per lack of notability...
Click to read more »per WP:MADEUP, Wikipedia is not for stuff made up in school one day TonyBallioni (talk) 23:59, 3 January 2008 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOR and WP:MADEUP. Mh29255...
Click to read more »--Remi 01:42, 23 April 2007 (UTC) Delete Looks like WP:MADEUP then. CitiCat 03:43, 23 April 2007 (UTC) Delete Obviously made up, regardless...
Click to read more »free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Subject fails WP:GNG and WP:MADEUP. There is zero indication that the titular subject (the "feudal title" of...
Click to read more »this page. The result was speedy delete. Snow. This is a clear case of MADEUP StarM 00:08, 29 April 2009 (UTC) Lunch guys cool (edit | talk | history |...
Click to read more »article states it was created 6 days ago, on July 2. Textbook case of WP:MADEUP. No references to demonstrate any form of notability whatsoever. It's also...
Click to read more »article's topic does not meet the requirement for notability. (Incidentally, WP:MADEUP does not apply here. The fact that the nominator has duplicated a link to...
Click to read more »21 August 2009 (UTC) Delete Blatant non-notable neologism; see also WP:MADEUP AndrewWTaylor (talk) 11:28, 21 August 2009 (UTC) Delete per WP:NEO, WP:NAD...
Click to read more »2008 (UTC) Delete as WP:OR and WP:MADEUP Mayalld (talk) 21:26, 28 December 2008 (UTC) Strong Delete - per WP:OR, WP:MADEUP, looks like it should have had...
Click to read more »(UTC) Delete. Oh, my. Not even close to satisfying WP:GNG. Blatantly WP:MADEUP. Msnicki (talk) 18:41, 25 September 2011 (UTC) Delete. Only a step away...
Click to read more »but without reliable sources to demonstrate its use, i'm going to wave WP:MADEUP at it.~ mazca talk 11:42, 24 May 2008 (UTC) Delete Almost G3-able in my...
Click to read more »vote in Chicago. Mandsford (talk) 22:19, 13 December 2008 (UTC) Delete WP:MADEUP or WP:NEO, either way, nn term. --Terrillja talk 18:35, 12 December 2008...
Click to read more »possible WP:A11. Savonneux (talk) 07:29, 11 August 2016 (UTC) Delete per WP:MADEUP statistic that nobody uses. Clarityfiend (talk) 09:27, 11 August 2016 (UTC)...
Click to read more »Delete per WP:NFT. blackngold29 21:02, 1 November 2009 (UTC) Delete: Per WP:MADEUP. Joe Chill (talk) 21:16, 1 November 2009 (UTC) Delete. Clearly non-notable...
Click to read more »July 2021 (UTC) Delete Old WP:MADEUP leftover from 2007. Wario-Man talk 09:40, 18 July 2021 (UTC) I assume this is madeup. I can't find anything. delete...
Click to read more »JSTOR · TWL) I wonder if any sources would exist for this. Looks like WP:MADEUP. Anbu121 (talk me) 09:29, 31 October 2012 (UTC) Delete. This is pretty obviously...
Click to read more »in first person. Redfarmer (talk) 11:56, 30 October 2010 (UTC) Delete WP:MADEUP, WP:OR, WP:NOTESSAY, etc. Catfish Jim & the soapdish 13:26, 30 October 2010...
Click to read more »18:51, 19 March 2012 (UTC) Delete per Cullen328; also WP:CRYSTAL and WP:MADEUP. No clear view that it's going anywhere, or that it will get into the news...
Click to read more »15:00, 14 August 2008 (UTC) Delete as methinks the article falls foul of WP:MADEUP. -- JediLofty UserTalk 10:01, 14 August 2008 (UTC) Delete, seems to be original...
Click to read more »car - no brakes? I don't mind 12:11, 7 August 2008 (UTC) Delete per WP:MADEUP. -- JediLofty UserTalk 12:18, 7 August 2008 (UTC) Speedy Delete giving the...
Click to read more »webhost) and a contact (a yahoo email address.) This seems to fall under WP:MADEUP as I can't find any news articles about a new American football league forming...
Click to read more »xsd criterion would be madeup. We should not tolerate this sort of nonsense. DGG ( talk ) 06:30, 1 July 2018 (UTC) Well, Madeup CSD only applies to Articles...
Click to read more »Hemlock Martinis (talk) 19:14, 5 September 2009 (UTC) Delete Definitely WP:MADEUP. Jujutacular talkcontribs 19:26, 5 September 2009 (UTC) Delete and could...
Click to read more »14 August 2009 (UTC) Speedy Delete per WP:MADEUP. Bearian (talk) 18:33, 14 August 2009 (UTC) Is WP:MADEUP a criterion for speedy deletion? I looked at...
Click to read more »somebody just made up one day.Glendoremus (talk) 05:54, 6 April 2017 (UTC) WP:MADEUP indeed! Amisom (talk) 12:35, 6 April 2017 (UTC) Delete -- It's close to...
Click to read more »search term. KuroiShiroi (contribs) 18:09, 16 May 2009 (UTC) Delete WP:MADEUP. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Many otters • One hammer • HELP) 20:10...
Click to read more »January 2017 (UTC) Delete. Even the article's content indicates it is WP:MADEUP. We didn't like the old name of the place. There is no such village in Bhind...
Click to read more »September 2008 (UTC) Delete. Completely agree that this is synthesis and WP:MADEUP. Doctorfluffy (robe and wizard hat) 21:25, 25 September 2008 (UTC) Delete...
Click to read more »IP). WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 12:39, 20 October 2008 (UTC) Delete per WP:MADEUP. Esradekan Gibb "Talk" 12:45, 20 October 2008 (UTC) Delete per WP:NFT...
Click to read more »Google Translate. No indication that this has been covered in RS, may be WP:MADEUP. Jclemens (talk) 05:18, 4 November 2021 (UTC) Delete an unheard of term...
Click to read more »binary matrices (a two-dimensional object). The subject seems to be WP:MADEUP/WP:OR. Sławomir Biały (talk) 12:15, 2 August 2013 (UTC) Note: This debate...
Click to read more »and WP:MADEUP all in one. Failed to find reliable sources. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 01:38, 10 October 2010 (UTC) Delete - Appears to be madeup, I found...
Click to read more »15:35, 14 July 2008 (UTC) delete - per WP:MADEUP. LonelyBeacon (talk) 20:12, 14 July 2008 (UTC) I think WP:MADEUP only applies to things made up by editors...
Click to read more »contested PROD. Fails WP:MADEUP, WP:GNG, among others. Glenfarclas (talk) 05:56, 1 February 2010 (UTC) Delete: Per WP:MADEUP. Joe Chill (talk) 07:34...
Click to read more »Delete. Neologism WP:MADEUP, dictionary definition WP:NOTDICTIONARY. Vicenarian (T · C) 20:49, 28 May 2009 (UTC) Delete - WP:MADEUP, WP:NOTDICTIONARY. Highest...
Click to read more »Not sure if this is WP:MADEUP but seems to fail WP:N for sure. — Timneu22 · talk 15:04, 3 July 2010 (UTC) Keep Not WP:MADEUP, but an interesting tourist...
Click to read more »FENS · JSTOR · TWL) suggest deleting page under WP:NEO, WP:NOTDICT and WP:MADEUP. Basically, it's a pure dicdef, with no substantial prose except the definition...
Click to read more »(View log) Unverifiable, unreferenced potential neologism. Possibly WP:MADEUP. CultureDrone (talk) 22:03, 15 July 2008 (UTC) Delete. I wouldn't be surprised...
Click to read more »views) (delete) – (View log) Alleged new sport. Fractionally better than MADEUP - they have created a website. But not (yet) notable. — RHaworth (Talk |...
Click to read more »One ping only 00:51, 2 October 2011 (UTC) Strong delete - WP:ESSAY, WP:MADEUP, very probable copyvio. - The Bushranger One ping only 00:51, 2 October...
Click to read more »made up one day. —KuyaBriBriTalk 19:11, 31 May 2012 (UTC) Delete per WP:MADEUP. There is nothing to indicate that this supposed sport actually exists in...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Deprodded by article creator. Essentially, WP:MADEUP.-- Syrthiss (talk) 17:12, 16 June 2010 (UTC) Delete Gsearches return many...
Click to read more »drinking game. Joe Chill (talk) 00:24, 9 September 2009 (UTC) Delete - madeup drinking game that I can not find any reliable sources that discuss it....
Click to read more »further edits should be made to this page. The result was Delete per WP:MADEUP and WP:SNOWBALL. -- 09:28, 30 August 2007 (UTC) Quadicle (edit | talk |...
Click to read more »03:52, 11 July 2010 (UTC) Delete. "A new form of conservative thought." WP:MADEUP, anyone? Erpert (let's talk about it) 06:38, 11 July 2010 (UTC) Delete -...
Click to read more »per Peridon. Strikerforce (talk) 22:42, 26 March 2011 (UTC) Delete per WP:MADEUP. Even Urban Dictionary comes up with unrelated definitions of the term....
Click to read more »(talk) 20:04, 10 October 2011 (UTC) Delete - WP:OR, WP:FRINGE, probably WP:MADEUP. - The Bushranger One ping only 22:22, 10 October 2011 (UTC) delete—the...
Click to read more »Delete per WP:MADEUP. Empty Buffer (talk) 10:31, 13 July 2010 (UTC) (edit conflict) I don't think this actually qualifies for WP:MADEUP; it's in pretty...
Click to read more »find sources... while "Penny rugby" does not. Delete, but not speedy as MADEUP isn't good enough for speedying except for blatant hoaxes. Still, there's...
Click to read more »watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log) non notable game, fails WP:MADEUP WuhWuzDat 20:44, 3 August 2009 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved as...
Click to read more »the above, and very probably per WP:MADEUP Mayalld (talk) 15:13, 28 October 2008 (UTC) Made up?!? - it's not madeup, see! Proof! [1] We have to do something...
Click to read more »Mayalld (talk) 15:47, 20 February 2008 (UTC) Delete It is a WP:NEO and WP:MADEUP. --Pmedema (talk) 15:51, 20 February 2008 (UTC) Delete. Unreferenced nonsense...
Click to read more »(View log) Delete. No evidence of notability. Seems to be a WP:HOAX and WP:MADEUP. In fact, the article itself states, "The game rules, for field hack, were...
Click to read more »03:32, 4 August 2009 (UTC) Delete, per WP:MADEUP. WuhWuzDat 03:35, 4 August 2009 (UTC) Delete per WP:MADEUP. ThemFromSpace 03:46, 4 August 2009 (UTC)...
Click to read more »(talk) 11:19, 26 May 2009 (UTC) Delete This term is useful but WP:NEO and WP:MADEUP and WP:ISNOTURBANDICTIONARY. Drawn Some (talk) 11:55, 26 May 2009 (UTC)...
Click to read more »(View log) Contested prod. Non-notable local celebration; falls under WP:MADEUP WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 19:57, 23 December 2008 (UTC) Comment - Loved it...
Click to read more »protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log) WP:MADEUP as per the article itself giving date when it was made up as 14 November...
Click to read more »October 2009 (UTC) Delete per WP:MADEUP --Pontificalibus (talk) 16:54, 13 October 2009 (UTC) Delete: Per WP:MADEUP. Joe Chill (talk) 20:48, 13 October...
Click to read more »The result was Speedy delete a7, nonnotable organized event. Also per WP:MADEUP; author's argument against deletion was " I believe that the creation of...
Click to read more »—Thryduulf (talk) 21:59, 8 July 2009 (UTC) Delete as self-avowedly WP:MADEUP and violation of WP:CRYSTAL. Whoa! Was that a snowball that just rushed...
Click to read more »January 2010 (UTC) Delete per nom and WP:MADEUP. Favonian (talk) 16:35, 6 January 2010 (UTC) Delete WP:MADEUP. -- Alexf(talk) 16:37, 6 January 2010 (UTC)...
Click to read more »already. TuorEladar (talk) 17:06, 20 April 2020 (UTC) Speedy delete - WP:MADEUP, or in the alternative, WP:MILL and WP:SPAM. Bearian (talk) 15:31, 21 April...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) unencyclopedic steaming pile of WP:OR, also WP:MADEUP WuhWuzDat 02:31, 27 November 2009 (UTC) Speedy delete: appears to be a hoax...
Click to read more »Delete as WP:MADEUP and unsourced. Dbromage [Talk] 06:07, 20 August 2007 (UTC) Delete. Must've been a slow days for these folks. WP:MADEUP Realkyhick 06:17...
Click to read more »badly, may not be notable. iBen 03:01, 11 February 2010 (UTC) Delete per WP:MADEUP. Appears to be about someone's unpublished manga. Also fundamentally unencyclopedic...
Click to read more »Zchris87v 01:32, 16 August 2007 (UTC) Delete Fails: WP:V, WP:N, WP:CRYSTAL, WP:MADEUP, and sounds to me like a WP:HOAX. --Nenyedi TalkDeeds@ 01:58, 16 August...
Click to read more »(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:MADEUP explains it all, I think. Irbisgreif (talk) 23:50, 16 August 2009 (UTC)...
Click to read more »Duffbeerforme (talk) 20:00, 5 December 2008 (UTC) Delete. Entirely non-notable. WP:MADEUP clearly applies here. Plus, the title made me think it was some kind of...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Contested prod. WP:MADEUP. Wikipedia is not a database of invented drink recipes. <>Multi-Xfer<> (talk)...
Click to read more »(View log) Non-notable game or sport played at only one school. To quote WP:MADEUP: "Wikipedia is not for things that you or your friends made up. If you have...
Click to read more »(UTC) Delete per WP:MADEUP. —Erik (talk • contrib) - 01:10, 6 August 2008 (UTC) Speedy delete per Wikipedia:Notabilty & WP:MADEUP. Not a source in the...
Click to read more »to fall under WP:MADEUP. -Lilac Soul (talk • contribs • count) 13:45, 13 March 2009 (UTC) Delete unsourced and unsourcable WP:MADEUP chess variant. Andrew...
Click to read more »notable, delete. --Triwbe (talk) 20:28, 4 June 2010 (UTC) Delete: Per WP:MADEUP. Joe Chill (talk) 20:41, 4 June 2010 (UTC) Delete. Article fails to establish...
Click to read more »29 January 2010 (UTC) Delete As per WP:MADEUP Simonm223 (talk) 20:16, 29 January 2010 (UTC) Delete WP:MADEUP 2 says you, says two 21:11, 29 January 2010...
Click to read more »it unverifiable.--BelovedFreak 16:15, 4 March 2010 (UTC) Delete - per WP:MADEUP. PDCook (talk) 16:28, 4 March 2010 (UTC) Delete Based on the description...
Click to read more »delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log) Delete as WP:MADEUP Mayalld (talk) 21:47, 8 January 2009 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...
Click to read more »discussions. -- ThaddeusB (talk) 19:31, 17 May 2009 (UTC) Delete as WP:NEO or WP:MADEUP. This is what Urban Dictionary is for. Drawn Some (talk) 20:00, 17 May 2009...
Click to read more »hints of WP:MADEUP Catfish Jim and the soapdish (talk) 13:36, 22 October 2010 (UTC) Delete No references at all, sounds a bit of WP:MADEUP. DARTH SIDIOUS...
Click to read more »10:45, 11 June 2008 (UTC) Delete WP:MADEUP & WP:OR. Esradekan Gibb "Talk" 11:38, 11 June 2008 (UTC) Delete WP:MADEUP at the shore one day. Andrew Lenahan...
Click to read more »history | links | watch | logs) WP:NOTWEBHOST. WP:NOTADICTIONARY. Probably WP:MADEUP too. Adam9007 (talk) 00:27, 3 April 2019 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log) Delete as WP:MADEUP unable to verify the claims made in this article Mayalld (talk) 08:56, 23...
Click to read more »WP:MADEUP. CSD A7 has been declined on procedural grounds, so here we are... No such user (talk) 16:11, 27 November 2009 (UTC) Delete: Per WP:MADEUP. Joe...
Click to read more »WP:MADEUP. Joe Chill (talk) 22:20, 27 January 2010 (UTC) Delete - Nothing was found related on search engines and it's not notable. Also per madeup--Bsadowski1...
Click to read more »author of the article thought up and decided to share with Wikipedia. WP:MADEUP. Mr. Vernon (talk) 03:44, 27 August 2008 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »notability. --kelapstick (talk) 19:36, 19 February 2009 (UTC) Delete: it's MADEUP -- not finding this anywhere. Baileypalblue (talk) 00:38, 20 February 2009...
Click to read more »GouramiWatcher (Gulp) 22:13, 7 June 2012 (UTC) Speedy delete as patent nonsense (madeup). --AJHingston (talk) 22:34, 7 June 2012 (UTC) Speedy delete per above.--Dwaipayan...
Click to read more »elsewhere), and all that. Goochelaar 09:29, 22 August 2007 (UTC) Delete per WP:MADEUP. Seth Bresnett • (talk) 11:40, 22 August 2007 (UTC) Delete per all reasons...
Click to read more »(UTC) Delete as violating WP:NEO and/or WP:MADEUP. Bearian (talk) 15:03, 10 December 2007 (UTC) Delete WP:MADEUP This is an obvious joke. The images and...
Click to read more »(talk) 08:26, 20 July 2009 (UTC) Delete, non-notable neologism and/or WP:MADEUP. Usrnme h8er (talk · contribs) 11:44, 20 July 2009 (UTC) Delete. Even the...
Click to read more »(UTC) Draft:Gucci Monster (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) WP:MADEUP, appears to be a joke. Home Lander (talk) 18:14, 8 April 2018 (UTC) Delete...
Click to read more »(UTC) Delete per WP:NFT ffm 16:26, 17 September 2007 (UTC) Delete Per WP:MADEUP. i said 00:38, 18 September 2007 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:MADEUP seems to apply. As far as I can tell, this only one guy uses this. Note...
Click to read more »watch | logs | views) – (View log) No google hits on edpwn so likely WP:MADEUP; prod removed NeilN 00:48, 22 October 2007 (UTC) The above discussion is...
Click to read more »Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 17:00, 25 January 2010 (UTC) Delete: Per WP:MADEUP. Joe Chill (talk) 19:56, 25 January 2010 (UTC) Delete But I did laugh out...
Click to read more »yeah... definitely madeup. Might need to put it as a Wikipedia hoax subpage? (If it's fine to archive it, it's a strange case of MADEUP). It should be noted...
Click to read more »2 September 2007 (UTC) Delete per WP:N, WP:V, and probably WP:OR and WP:MADEUP while we're at it. Iain99 17:21, 2 September 2007 (UTC) Delete I find it...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Seems very WP:MADEUP. No sources found besides Wiki. If not MADEUP, very "slang" like. Tofutwitch11 (TALK) 19:54, 3...
Click to read more »It also exists. Collect (talk) 12:14, 2 July 2009 (UTC) Delete per WP:MADEUP. No results on Google Books, Google News, Google Scholar. Google Web returns...
Click to read more »protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log) Per WP:MADEUP. No sources, seems like the author has just made it up for fun. ErikTheBikeMan...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails the spirit of WP:MADEUP. If jorkyball was a notable game, there would be GNews hits on matches,...
Click to read more »any reliable sources, which is the problem. I think this is a case of WP:MADEUP. An interesting move but there seems to be no consensus on what, if anything...
Click to read more »Zero real-world pickup for this supposed alternative name. Probably WP:MADEUP. Chris Cunningham 07:57, 10 September 2007 (UTC) Delete - appears on Google...
Click to read more »2016 (UTC) Speedy delete along with Viktor Tasic and Nikola Djokic: WP:MADEUP obviously. The "director" and the "actor" are 13-year olds. And yeah, I'm...
Click to read more »Draft:Excentristicle (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Per WP:MADEUP. Other (nonsensical) drafts by the same author to follow. Kleuske (talk)...
Click to read more »further edits should be made to this page. The result was speedy delete. WP:MADEUP. Possible WP:HOAX, see creator's sandbox. Not a snowball's chance. The Bushranger...
Click to read more »(talk) 04:15, 21 April 2009 (UTC) Speedy Delete; violates WP:NOTAFORUM & WP:MADEUP --mhking (talk) 04:35, 21 April 2009 (UTC) Speedy delete. Made up and copyvio[1]...
Click to read more »watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log) Delete per WP:NEO, WP:OR and WP:MADEUP Mayalld (talk) 12:51, 11 August 2008 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »is something that is appropriate for a topic of this nature and it's WP:MADEUP!!! I could comment alot on what your thoughts are on Wikipedia, but lets...
Click to read more »talk about hot dog club. the wub "?!" 09:35, 20 July 2009 (UTC) Delete, WP:MADEUP per nom, that said I don't think there is a safe way to phrase a CSD for...
Click to read more »made to this page. The result was Speedy delete g1 (nonsense), WP:NEO, WP:MADEUP, WP:SNOW. NawlinWiki (talk) 16:30, 20 March 2013 (UTC) Imaginejokes (edit |...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:MADEUP Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 05:23, 5 April 2010 (UTC) The above discussion...
Click to read more »page.[2] —Farix (t | c) 00:17, 19 April 2010 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:COI, WP:MADEUP, WP:RS. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 10:12, 19 April 2010 (UTC) Delete. Couldn't...
Click to read more »protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log) See WP:MADEUP Ironholds (talk) 20:44, 12 April 2009 (UTC) Speedy delete as blatant nonsense...
Click to read more »neologism RadioFan (talk) 20:06, 4 July 2009 (UTC) Delete: seems to be WP:MADEUP..South Bay (talk) 04:02, 5 July 2009 (UTC) Delete Unreferenced neologism...
Click to read more »Delete ⁓ Unsourced Dziban303 (talk) 16:10, 25 February 2016 (UTC) Delete WP:MADEUP region; basically just another suburban region filling in blanks west of...
Click to read more »(talk) 13:10, 16 August 2010 (UTC) Delete - no sources, none found, WP:MADEUP, fails WP:V. JohnCD (talk) 13:19, 16 August 2010 (UTC) Delete An original...
Click to read more »(talk) 11:55, 19 August 2008 (UTC) Delete - and the winner of this weeks WP:MADEUP award goes to... Birthday game! -- JediLofty UserTalk 12:00, 19 August 2008...
Click to read more »flight or flight number is not the subject of the article. For example: Madeup Airline Flight 123 was a passenger flight from Somewhere to Somewhere Else...
Click to read more »to the term (other than a clothing store). Possibly WP:NEOLOGISM or WP:MADEUP. WWGB (talk) 13:57, 7 July 2009 (UTC) Delete, non-notable neologism. Yes...
Click to read more »this is something WP:MADEUP. Zetawoof(ζ) 22:35, 25 December 2008 (UTC) Delete not sourced, future event, no company given. WP:MADEUP Empire3131 (talk) 22:50...
Click to read more »further edits should be made to this page. The result was Delete per WP:MADEUP. GlassCobra 19:34, 25 November 2008 (UTC) Irish Pong (edit | talk | history |...
Click to read more »15:03, 18 August 2008 (UTC) Delete- Another WP:BOLLOCKS moment. WP:NOT#MADEUP. --Evb-wiki (talk) 15:06, 18 August 2008 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log) No results for this in search; WP:MADEUP. Delete Mr. Vernon (talk) 05:57, 19 August 2008 (UTC) The above discussion...
Click to read more »history | links | watch | logs) As long as not tagged as an essay, vios. WP:MADEUP UnitedStatesian (talk) 21:44, 13 December 2018 (UTC) Delete as hoax? Seriously...
Click to read more »March 2009 (UTC) Delete the nominator sums it up nicely, this fails WP:MADEUP. Tavix (talk) 20:16, 24 March 2009 (UTC) Strong delete per nom. I also searched...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Delete, per WP:MADEUP WuhWuzDat 00:10, 28 November 2009 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:MADEUP Ironholds (talk) 10:22, 24 August 2009 (UTC) Delete per nom. --Lithorien...
Click to read more »hits that correspond to content. Alai 21:53, 25 December 2005 (UTC) Delete madeup. KI 22:57, 25 December 2005 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved as an...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:MADEUP W. D. Graham 16:56, 9 April 2013 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »references there is no indication this is a notable gang. For all we know WP:MADEUP could apply. Simonm223 (talk) 04:01, 27 September 2009 (UTC) The above discussion...
Click to read more »shows. Whpq (talk) 11:50, 19 January 2014 (UTC) Delete. Old (2011) fantasy/madeup/unverfiable, posted by an account that never edited elsewhere, long inactive...
Click to read more »logs | views) – (View log) Non-notable game some kids made up. Violates WP:MADEUP. OfficeGirl 04:04, 11 September 2007 (UTC) Delete until such time as there...
Click to read more »(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:MADEUP thing that was allegedly created last week →Στc. 01:15, 30 October 2011...
Click to read more »count. Michaelmas1957 02:47, 7 June 2012 (UTC) Delete per WP:NEO and WP:MADEUP. The article has no references, and I couldn't find any independent sources...
Click to read more »further edits should be made to this page. The result was speedy delete. WP:MADEUP and WP:G3 Reaper Eternal (talk) 14:29, 13 August 2012 (UTC) Asyiengarian...
Click to read more »encyclopedic hoax MrShamrock (talk) 11:43, 3 February 2009 (UTC) Delete as WP:MADEUP. Article has repeatedly been speedy deleted and promptly recreated with...
Click to read more »ideology. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 04:04, 10 August 2015 (UTC) Delete per WP:MADEUP and WP:NOTWEBHOST. — Bilorv(talk)(c)(e) 12:22, 18 August 2015 (UTC) The...
Click to read more »'sorearse' (as in, red arse, sore arse).... I think we're looking at a WP:MADEUP and/or WP:HOAX. Eliz81(talk)(contribs) 04:11, 28 August 2007 (UTC) Delete—yes...
Click to read more »fails WP:MADEUP, WP:CRYSTAL, WP:COI and probably a host of other guidelines. 69.181.249.92 (talk) 17:23, 14 July 2010 (UTC) Speedy delete Madeup nonsense...
Click to read more »someone extremely non-notable); I could not find any related to this. Per WP:MADEUP it seems. The only mention is on Wikipedia itself. Gary King (talk) 16:05...
Click to read more »watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log) This looks like a WP:HOAX or WP:MADEUP. Only 4 Gsearch hits for the term. — LinguistAtLarge • Talk 19:47, 20 February...
Click to read more »Delete WP:DICTDEF, does not establish notability outside of WP:OR and/or WP:MADEUP, WP:NEOLOGISM (although I recognize it is a generic concept of fellow, the...
Click to read more »log) no references found or provided supporting notability, therefore WP:MADEUP NeilN 00:10, 15 October 2007 (UTC) Delete: NN something that was made up...
Click to read more »isnotdave (talk/contribs) 19:26, 20 November 2017 (UTC) Delete looks WP:MADEUP to me. VQuakr (talk) 01:34, 21 November 2017 (UTC) {{Db-a11}}! 165.91.13...
Click to read more »protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log) Per WP:MADEUP. nneonneotalk 02:32, 14 April 2008 (UTC) G1 Appears to be blatant nonsense...
Click to read more »violates WP:NOR mhking (talk) 11:59, 4 May 2009 (UTC) Delete WP:NEO, WP:MADEUP Drawn Some (talk) 15:50, 4 May 2009 (UTC) Delete. Millennium production...
Click to read more »page. The result was Speedy delete g11, advertising, not to mention WP:MADEUP. NawlinWiki (talk) 19:55, 12 December 2011 (UTC) Lord of the smoke rings...
Click to read more »Draft:Pun Master (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Per WP:MADEUP. Not a chance that this might be a viable article some day. Kleuske (talk)...
Click to read more »| —Talk contribs email 05:38, 13 October 2009 (UTC) Delete: WP:OR & WP:MADEUP. Skarebo (talk) 09:02, 13 October 2009 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »references found in a google search. This appears to be something they madeup at school one day. A new name 2008 (talk) 20:30, 9 February 2009 (UTC) The...
Click to read more »Apparently self-created article violating WP:N, WP:COI, WP:VSCA and WP:MADEUP. Every "source" refers back to author's website. -- Dougie WII 08:13, 9...
Click to read more »February 2009 (UTC) Speedy delete - I'd bet my last paycheck this is a WP:MADEUP case. - Vianello (talk) 18:39, 21 February 2009 (UTC) The above discussion...
Click to read more »(UTC) Draft:AyaBollah (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Per WP:MADEUP. Kleuske (talk) 13:15, 7 March 2018 (UTC) Delete per nom. ALH (talk) 20:28...
Click to read more »watch | logs) Not to bite the newcomer, but this is an utterly hopeless WP:MADEUP thing I'm afraid. Adam9007 (talk) 01:08, 3 February 2019 (UTC) The above...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) non-notable and WP:MADEUP. Ironholds (talk) 08:03, 25 October 2009 (UTC) Delete: I can't find significant...
Click to read more »notable. SoccerTrackFarm3264 (talk) 04:24, 3 June 2022 (UTC) Speedy delete WP:MADEUP Reywas92Talk 01:01, 3 June 2022 (UTC) Delete preferably speedy, like most...
Click to read more »discussions. North America1000 03:42, 29 April 2016 (UTC) Delete as WP:MADEUP. (Native speaker here). No such user (talk) 19:44, 1 May 2016 (UTC) Note:...
Click to read more »page. The result was Speedy delete, WP:SNOW, admitted violation of WP:MADEUP - "so together they decided one thursday morning (9.2.2012) to bring back...
Click to read more »sources e.g. [1] [2]. -Atmoz (talk) 18:39, 13 March 2009 (UTC) Delete per WP:MADEUP. Lugnuts (talk) 20:51, 13 March 2009 (UTC) Delete A student's thesis is...
Click to read more »cards. ... discospinster talk 16:26, 24 August 2017 (UTC) Delete per WP:MADEUP. I couldn't find any off-wiki evidence of this game and the use of WP:FAKE...
Click to read more »made to this page. The result was delete. WP:NEO, WP:NOTDICTIONARY, WP:MADEUP The Bushranger One ping only 19:04, 28 February 2011 (UTC) Earthstorical...
Click to read more »including Wikipedia. LovesMacs (talk) 06:50, 21 November 2008 (UTC) Delete. WP:MADEUP on Reddit a few weeks ago, hence non-notable. Zetawoof(ζ) 09:28, 21 November...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This is clearly WP:MADEUP or WP:NOTABLE such as the other articles. How did this stay on the site...
Click to read more »(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:MADEUP Shirt58 (talk) 13:46, 13 January 2012 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »edits should be made to this page. The result was speedy delete. Either WP:MADEUP or a WP:HOAX; speedy deleted per G3. The Bushranger One ping only 04:25...
Click to read more »possible hoax. IrishGuy talk 20:30, 22 October 2007 (UTC) Delete fails WP:MADEUP. --Ioeth (talk contribs friendly) 20:31, 22 October 2007 (UTC) The above...
Click to read more »Made-up holiday / hoax Passportguy (talk) 18:54, 4 May 2009 (UTC) Delete WP:MADEUP Drawn Some (talk) 19:00, 4 May 2009 (UTC) Delete - unsourced nonsense. JohnCD...
Click to read more »reference material. Haruth (talk) 01:07, 26 March 2010 (UTC) Delete per WP:MADEUP. I can find lots of significant coverage for games, organisations, and programs...
Click to read more »removed, thus listed here. Article on a NN game created by article author. WP:MADEUP Travelbird (talk) 11:07, 28 January 2011 (UTC) Speedy as spam, or just delete...
Click to read more »of pepper" that someone allegedly grew in their yard once. No ghits. WP:MADEUP. Mr. Vernon (talk) 02:33, 23 August 2008 (UTC) Speedy Delete Its nonsense...
Click to read more »logs | views) (delete) – (View log) Non-notable drinking game. Violates WP:MADEUP, WP:V, and WP:N. Mr Senseless (talk) 21:18, 27 February 2008 (UTC) Delete...
Click to read more »~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 04:12, 20 January 2012 (UTC) Snow delete per WP:MADEUP. Ammodramus (talk) 04:45, 20 January 2012 (UTC) The above discussion is...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Wikipedia is not for madeup things --Σ talkcontribs 00:09, 3 September 2011 (UTC) Delete per nom. —...
Click to read more »Fribbulus Xax (talk) 21:42, 17 July 2009 (UTC) Strong Delete as per WP:MADEUP; WP:COI; WP:FICTION. -Falcon8765 (talk) 21:45, 17 July 2009 (UTC) Speedy...
Click to read more »(talk) 18:59, 30 March 2014 (UTC) This is all very amusing and ironic but WP:MADEUP (Wikipedia is not for things made up one day) seems relevant here, which...
Click to read more »Fails WP:N. Joe Chill (talk) 18:53, 24 June 2010 (UTC) Delete sounds kinda madeup. JBsupreme (talk) ✄ ✄ ✄ 03:19, 25 June 2010 (UTC) The above discussion is...
Click to read more »vanispamcruftisement. MER-C 11:30, 13 October 2007 (UTC) Delete - WP:NOT#MADEUP /Blaxthos 17:27, 13 October 2007 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:MADEUP and WP:COI. OSborn arfcontribs. 02:24, 31 March 2011 (UTC) COI Note the...
Click to read more »ridiculous: Urban dictionary and IMDB, which doesn't even mention it. WP:MADEUP. P. D. Cook Talk to me! 17:39, 13 September 2010 (UTC) The above discussion...
Click to read more »links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log) Non-notable neologism, WP:MADEUP. Irbisgreif (talk) 12:58, 4 August 2009 (UTC) I speedied it while Irbisgrief...
Click to read more »(delete) – (View log) Per the article: "A word that was created in 2009". WP:MADEUP, WP:NEO, WP:N, WP:V. Author contested the PROD. I42 (talk) 06:35, 25 July...
Click to read more »to. --Non-Dropframe talk 01:29, 4 July 2015 (UTC) Delete; nonnotable, WP:MADEUP. Trivialist (talk) 01:51, 4 July 2015 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »Appears to be about a non-notable neologism (WP:NEO and WP:NOR), or a WP:MADEUP game. Prod was removed by an anon. Feinoha Talk, My master 04:34, 12 June...
Click to read more »links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log) Either a WP:HOAX, WP:MADEUP or a wholly non-notable game. LinguistAtLarge • Msg 08:24, 5 February...
Click to read more »WilliamH (talk) 14:07, 12 July 2008 (UTC) Delete. Sounds like it also fails WP:MADEUP. AnturiaethwrTalk 15:28, 12 July 2008 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »Bradjamesbrown (talk) 05:46, 21 January 2010 (UTC) Delete, non-notable and WP:MADEUP. IAR to speedy delete may be appropriate as well, but at this point WP:SNOW...
Click to read more »RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 02:11, 30 June 2009 (UTC) Delete per nom and per WP:MADEUP. The few Google hits I found are about different subjects. THE AMERICAN...
Click to read more »protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log) WP:MADEUP. SchuminWeb (Talk) 15:58, 14 September 2008 (UTC) Delete It's apparently...
Click to read more »results. Nat Gertler (talk) 13:53, 6 March 2014 (UTC) Delete appears to be WP:MADEUP. No evidence this is a popular or well-known drink. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind...
Click to read more »19:42, 2 August 2011 (UTC) Delete - seems to be the very definition of WP:Madeup Exit2DOS • Ctrl • Alt • Del 09:41, 4 August 2011 (UTC) Note: This debate...
Click to read more »delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log) Non-notable, WP:MADEUP, almost WP:CB ukexpat (talk) 21:27, 2 April 2008 (UTC) Withdrawn, nominated...
Click to read more »individual made up. I'm going to invoke WP:SNOW and delete this now. WP:MADEUP is not a speedy criteria. Ironholds (talk) 06:43, 10 January 2009 (UTC)...
Click to read more »essentially unverifiable. Kevin (talk) 11:10, 14 June 2008 (UTC) Delete, WP:MADEUP, WP:BOLLOCKS & WP:RS. Esradekan Gibb "Talk" 11:59, 14 June 2008 (UTC)...
Click to read more »criteria.--brewcrewer (yada, yada) 20:57, 16 May 2008 (UTC) Delete per WP:MADEUP ~ Ameliorate U T @ 22:19, 16 May 2008 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »2008 (UTC) Delete per nom and per WP:NEO. This appears to be entirely WP:MADEUP, happy to be proven wrong. Keeper | 76 19:21, 24 January 2008 (UTC) Sorry...
Click to read more »a quickly growing sport. 7 00:29, 5 November 2009 (UTC) Delete Per WP:MADEUP. Warrah (talk) 02:52, 5 November 2009 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »No further edits should be made to this page. The result was delete. WP:MADEUP The Bushranger One ping only 04:17, 15 June 2012 (UTC) Wagner Speed (edit |...
Click to read more »Dougofborg(talk) 11:56, 29 April 2009 (UTC) Speedy Delete Looks like WP:MADEUP and at least WP:OR -- Alexf(talk) 12:07, 29 April 2009 (UTC) The above discussion...
Click to read more »WP:NEO. Niteshift36 (talk) 23:18, 3 July 2009 (UTC) Delete. WP:NEO, WP:MADEUP, WP:N. I42 (talk) 16:33, 4 July 2009 (UTC) Delete: Per WP:N. Iowateen (talk)...
Click to read more »27 November 2015 (UTC) Delete Clear case of WP:OR, WP:FRINGE and/or WP:MADEUP. jni (delete)...just not interested 21:50, 30 November 2015 (UTC) The above...
Click to read more »protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log) Per WP:MADEUP; the phrase "in the baron waste lands of Victoria Hall flat B1" about says...
Click to read more »blue520 11:23, 18 February 2010 (UTC) Speedy delete – per CSD G3. Also WP:MADEUP and WP:NOTDICTIONARY. XXX antiuser eh? 11:24, 18 February 2010 (UTC) The...
Click to read more »this notice. Thanks, North America1000 19:59, 14 May 2016 (UTC) Delete. WP:MADEUP, quite literally. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 01:28, 15 May 2016 (UTC) The above...
Click to read more »No further edits should be made to this page. The result was delete. WP:MADEUP The Bushranger One ping only 01:23, 2 October 2011 (UTC) Full 2014 FIFA...
Click to read more »Wikipedia is not a television guide. Also, it's unsourced and appears to be WP:MADEUP. Call me Keenan (talk) 22:57, 4 March 2014 (UTC) Speedy delete per nom;...
Click to read more »CitrouillesTally-ho! 09:04, 9 April 2008 (UTC) Delete as hoax and as per WP:MADEUP. --Bonadea (talk) 09:18, 9 April 2008 (UTC) Comment Can Christopher Hirano...
Click to read more »(talk) 13:43, 16 October 2009 (UTC) Speedy delete Under WP:DICTDEF, WP:MADEUP and WP:HOAX. Simonm223 (talk) 15:35, 16 October 2009 (UTC) Speedy delete...
Click to read more »delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log) Micronation. MADEUP. — RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 17:37, 17 August 2008 (UTC) Speedy delete...
Click to read more »March 2014 (UTC) Delete Unsourced article about a game that falls under WP:MADEUP. Probably could have been speedily deleted under A7 (no indication of importance)...
Click to read more »(See e.g. [1]) But the "John Thomson Club" itself seems to be just WP:MADEUP and lacks any independent reliable sourcing. As for the similar lists relating...
Click to read more »further edits should be made to this page. The result was speedy delete. WP:MADEUP Trevor MacInnis (Contribs) 02:03, 24 July 2009 (UTC) AfDs for this article:...
Click to read more »come up with references that can prove this, then please do so. Per WP:MADEUP. Gary King (talk) 17:28, 19 February 2008 (UTC) Speedy Delete and tagged...
Click to read more »August 2008 (UTC) Delete total rubbish...err..I mean, fails WP:V, WP:N, WP:MADEUP and probably many many more.... :-) CultureDrone (talk) 17:47, 1 August...
Click to read more »discussions. -- Jclemens-public (talk) 18:39, 8 November 2010 (UTC) Delete per WP:MADEUP. The citations are spurious. Glenfarclas (talk) 02:55, 9 November 2010...
Click to read more »AMERICAN METROSEXUAL (talk) 22:07, 11 January 2009 (UTC) Delete per either WP:MADEUP or WP:NOTWEBHOST. Doc StrangeMailboxLogbook 23:00, 11 January 2009 (UTC)...
Click to read more »delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) Seems to be completely WP:MADEUP. After several searches, the only reference (other than a site that shows...
Click to read more »but this isn't. §FreeRangeFrog 05:54, 3 December 2012 (UTC) Delete as WP:MADEUP. --BDD (talk) 19:14, 3 December 2012 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »major fiction series. —C.Fred (talk) 16:31, 7 April 2008 (UTC) Delete WP:MADEUP WP:FANCRUFT for Runescape. I wouldn't even consider a merge or even a redirect...
Click to read more »Strongly suspect this term is the invention of the author, nom under WP:MADEUP. Unable to find any other references to it AlasdairGreen27 (talk) 14:27...
Click to read more »of notability and no references to establish. Definitely OR, likely WP:MADEUP. <>Multi-Xfer<> (talk) 04:39, 24 August 2009 (UTC) Speedy deleting as pure...
Click to read more »delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log) Violation of WP:MADEUP, I believe. Sole author responded to prod by saying "A new and upcoming...
Click to read more »InsertCleverPhraseHere 02:16, 25 March 2016 (UTC) Speedy delete as WP:MADEUP (WP:CSD#A11). So tagged. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 02:34, 25 March 2016 (UTC)...
Click to read more »links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) As per the earlier prod, it is WP:MADEUP. The prod was contested in an anons second edit. Martijn Hoekstra (talk)...
Click to read more »found in searching. -- Whpq (talk) 17:46, 18 January 2008 (UTC) Delete - WP:MADEUP Nanonic (talk) 18:09, 19 January 2008 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »usage. Rob Banzai (talk) 17:11, 7 May 2008 (UTC) Speedy delete. Violates WP:MADEUP. Anthony Rupert (talk) 17:15, 7 May 2008 (UTC) Delete. This does have the...
Click to read more »article's author. No references, no Google hits in this context. Fails WP:MADEUP. Acroterion (talk) 03:03, 2 June 2008 (UTC) Delete. This is clearly a neologism...
Click to read more »links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log) WP:HOAX, probably WP:MADEUP. -Lilac Soul (talk • contribs • count) 20:25, 10 March 2009 (UTC) Speedy...
Click to read more »neologisms. JohnCD (talk) 21:19, 1 August 2008 (UTC) Delete. Not quite WP:MADEUP [1] [2], but still a non notable WP:NEO. --AmaltheaTalk 12:19, 2 August...
Click to read more »phrase a non-notable person has made up, and therefore is a violation of WP:MADEUP. WackyWace talk to me, people 14:24, 12 June 2010 (UTC) The above discussion...
Click to read more »before and I should have salted the doggoned thing. I'm invoking WP:BOLD, WP:MADEUP and WP:SNOW and I'm going to delete it and salt it. --PMDrive1061 (talk)...
Click to read more »encyclopedic or notable. --Haemo 02:16, 2 June 2007 (UTC) Delete - definitely WP:MADEUP. -- MarcoTolo 04:01, 2 June 2007 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »Starblind 11:31, 4 September 2013 (UTC) Delete. Unreferenced and likely WP:MADEUP. De728631 (talk) 12:12, 4 September 2013 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Seems WP:MADEUP. No Google hits at all for "Wirieg Azqud" or "KWOWUSRDGD". Suffusion of...
Click to read more »views) (delete) – (View log) Original research. May also fall under WP:MADEUP. Article was originally PROD'ed, but the PROD was removed by an anonymous...
Click to read more »category). --Orange Mike | Talk 21:42, 24 February 2009 (UTC) Delete per WP:MADEUP --Artene50 (talk) 06:25, 25 February 2009 (UTC) The above discussion is...
Click to read more »article creator is the same as the person who invented the word. Fails WP:MADEUP. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Acb314 (talk • contribs) 14:48, 31...
Click to read more »delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log) WP:NEO and WP:MADEUP. No ghits at all. Mr. Vernon (talk) 03:28, 27 August 2008 (UTC) Delete per...
Click to read more »Nancy talk 18:39, 24 January 2009 (UTC) Delete, per nomination and WP:MADEUP. --Mr. Vernon (talk) 18:41, 24 January 2009 (UTC) Delete, hoax. Pyrrhus16...
Click to read more »with this name - an actor, a bicyclist, an exec in Brazil. No mafiosi. WP:MADEUP. Mr. Vernon (talk) 04:44, 23 August 2008 (UTC) Speedy Delete The only other...
Click to read more »JamesBurns (talk) 03:17, 16 April 2009 (UTC) Delete WP:MADEUP (about to find out if "madeup" is a redirect yet).Bali ultimate (talk) 03:36, 16 April...
Click to read more »free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Delete. Dubious source, WP:MADEUP User234 (talk) 08:53, 8 November 2009 (UTC) Comment: Same reasoning as AfD...
Click to read more »advertisment. Barras || talk 16:25, 2 August 2009 (UTC) Delete: per WP:MADEUP..South Bay (talk) 21:40, 2 August 2009 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »September 2009 (UTC) Delete Can't find anything to show this is more than WP:MADEUP. Jujutacular talkcontribs 14:08, 9 September 2009 (UTC) The above discussion...
Click to read more »Wikia reality series. Must we say anymore, because we all know this is a WP:MADEUP violation. Nilocia (talk) 20:09, 28 August 2010 (UTC) Delete as below. Nolelover...
Click to read more »Vandenberg 02:55, 31 August 2007 (UTC) Delete or redirect to Airsoft; strong WP:MADEUP vibe here. Eleland 21:04, 31 August 2007 (UTC) Merge to a page on Airsoft...
Click to read more »March 2009 (UTC) Delete, I cannot find WP:RS sources either. Smacks of WP:MADEUP, as all I can find are either Wikipedia mirrors, translations, or the one...
Click to read more »a hoax. GrooveDog (talk) 20:28, 12 July 2007 (UTC) Delete; nonsense. WP:MADEUP. — Coren (talk) 20:29, 12 July 2007 (UTC) Speedy delete, nonsense, hoax...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Unreferenced notation article up for PROD as WP:MADEUP... Except I already deleted it via PROD this time last year. Jclemens (talk)...
Click to read more »(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:MADEUP Highest Heights (talk) 18:40, 13 December 2009 (UTC) Was it really "made...
Click to read more »delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log) Delete as WP:MADEUP Mayalld (talk) 13:49, 13 March 2009 (UTC) Delete, not notable, WP:NFT says...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Confusingly written, but clearly WP:MADEUP and WP:OR. This is not a published theory. Catfish Jim & the soapdish 20:17...
Click to read more »article, exceptionally unlikely to have any validity, per WP:HOAX and/or WP:MADEUP. Take your pick. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 05:15, 24 June 2012 (UTC) Speedy...
Click to read more »August 2009 (UTC) Strong delete – complete lack of verifiability. Likely madeup. MuZemike 16:11, 21 August 2009 (UTC) Delete. Completely unverifiable, possible...
Click to read more »material, as well. MuZemike (talk) 07:01, 10 October 2008 (UTC) Delete per WP:MADEUP. Stifle (talk) 12:53, 10 October 2008 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »discussions. -- (X! · talk) · @166 · 02:58, 1 August 2009 (UTC) Delete: Per WP:MADEUP. Joe Chill (talk) 15:20, 1 August 2009 (UTC) Speedy delete unreferenced...
Click to read more »notability. Pastor Theo (talk) 01:18, 8 May 2009 (UTC) Speedy delete per WP:MADEUP. We really need a speedy criterion for made-up junk. Ten Pound Hammer and...
Click to read more »neologism/protologism per WP:NEO not found in online dictionaries of slang, possibly WP:MADEUP Mayalld (talk) 09:26, 22 April 2009 (UTC) Delete per Mayalld's nom CultureDrone...
Click to read more »Strong delete. We still don't have a speedy criterion that satisfies WP:MADEUP??? Erpert Who is this guy? | Wanna talk about it? 18:48, 8 January 2011...
Click to read more »as unsourced neologism - no verifiable sources, and appears to fail WP:MADEUP. --bonadea contributions talk 20:36, 14 July 2009 (UTC) Delete per all above...
Click to read more »(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:MADEUP. No indications of any widespread use of this name for a card game. Prod...
Click to read more »Blanchardb -Me•MyEars•MyMouth- timed 02:19, 27 May 2009 (UTC) Speedy delete per WP:MADEUP and WP:WHYCANTMADEUPCRAPLIKETHISBEDELETED. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters...
Click to read more »naturally. ╟─TreasuryTag►contribs─╢ 16:30, 12 May 2009 (UTC) Delete WP:MADEUP. Except for the part about Bigupunukuhu. Drawn Some (talk) 16:46, 12 May...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) As far as I can tell this is WP:MADEUP and does not have any notability. Noiratsi (talk) 18:55, 6 January 2013...
Click to read more »SwisterTwister talk 22:11, 24 August 2016 (UTC) Speedy Delete - This is a clear hoax/madeup/notwebhost combined with an unattributed copy/paste from French Bulldog...
Click to read more »played that game. Alexius08 (talk) 11:42, 23 October 2008 (UTC) Delete as WP:MADEUP. McWomble (talk) 12:02, 23 October 2008 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »Otterathome (talk) 16:19, 2 June 2009 (UTC) Speedy delete per the otter, WP:MADEUP. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat •...
Click to read more »logs | views) (delete) – (View log) WP:NAD applies here. Possibly made up WP:MADEUP. No sources. DFS454 (talk) 18:49, 28 February 2009 (UTC) Speedy delete as...
Click to read more »hopeless draft about something that seems to be completely non-notable and WP:MADEUP at best. Adam9007 (talk) 21:45, 9 November 2020 (UTC) Delete - Close enough...
Click to read more »Bonfire of vanities (talk) 04:04, 19 July 2009 (UTC) Delete. Seems like WP:MADEUP to me. Jafeluv (talk) 20:39, 19 July 2009 (UTC) Delete. Definate WP:NEO...
Click to read more »The Banner talk 21:36, 25 June 2014 (UTC) Delete - fails, for starters, WP:OR, WP:MADEUP, and WP:NEO. Bearian (talk) 16:44, 26 June 2014 (UTC) The above discussion...
Click to read more »(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:MADEUP, or otherwise non-notable neologism. Ironholds (talk) 03:11, 9 September...
Click to read more »deletion D.Lazard (talk) 10:42, 4 March 2017 (UTC) Delete - yes, also fails WP:MADEUP. The Armands Strazds article doesn't look too notable either. Blythwood...
Click to read more »title=User_talk:Dvbutcher&diff=383522432&oldid=383522242 Non-notable and WP:MADEUP. Catfish Jim and the soapdish (talk) 23:11, 7 September 2010 (UTC) Speedy...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Completely unsourced, WP:Crystal, WP:MADEUP Austrian (talk) 13:20, 26 August 2009 (UTC) Delete Non-notable fan film...
Click to read more »..Cheers. Imperat§ r(Talk) 01:51, 19 December 2008 (UTC) Speedy per WP:MADEUP. Graymornings(talk) 02:09, 19 December 2008 (UTC) G3 Ironically, I have...
Click to read more »very nice webpage, it almost seems like an unusually flashy breach of WP:MADEUP. Writer's argument on the talk page is that it will one day be notable,...
Click to read more »