Redirect to:
Stand-alone lists (also referred to as list articles) are articles composed of one or more embedded lists, or series of items formatted into a list. Almost...
Click to read more »article in a magazine that contrinutes to notability Lonely planet - a listicle entry - not significant coverage Katherine Elena Photography - personal...
Click to read more »blurbed in a listicle is not a notability criterion, no. It doesn't matter if it's "more than just local news" or not, because it's a listicle and not substantive...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Similar to Sektor, reception relies solely on listicles and unreliable sources. Fails WP:GNG, article is pure FANDOM material...
Click to read more »being about him is a 62-word blurb in a "10 consultants who avoid the BS" listicle, but even that doesn't actually say anything genuinely substantive about...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:GNG - only mentioned in listicle sources such as "Dumbest Monsters Ever" and "Weakest Monsters Ever" - lacks...
Click to read more »of chart placement, gold disk or widespread dissemination. Sourced to a listicle of strangest records on Spotify and an apparently broken link. Fails WP:GNG;...
Click to read more »opinion, that would depend on the amount and quality of content in listicle(s). A "listicle" is by definition an article, and the same criteria like for any...
Click to read more »not just about her, it is just a listicle about "stars of Polish business", and the quality is mediocre, as that listicle is, unsurprisingly, a summary of...
Click to read more »Lizardfolk, not enough to merit their own article, and mostly appear in listicles. They are described better on the D&D Wikia anyway. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 08:31...
Click to read more »Everything noteworthy about this character (which tends to be passing mentions/listicles about his in-fictional-universe context) can be adequately explained in...
Click to read more »ScreenRant listicle about Poketubers that contains a bare-minimum, 107-word description of Groth's channel. Three ScreenRant blog spam listicles about memes...
Click to read more »ZXCVBNM (TALK) 20:03, 8 November 2020 (UTC) Delete. Reception is limited to listicles that he was voted n-th something, which a recent RSN discussion are not...
Click to read more »article cited in the article, there's this Gizmodo listicle, this CBC article, and this ComicsAlliance listicle. I recognize that two of those are pretty weak...
Click to read more »proprietary listicle, referenced only to that listicle itself with no evidence of outside reliable source analysis about the significance of the listicle. As...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Name-dropped in a few clickbait/listicle articles like Mashable and AV Club, or passing mentions in the greater...
Click to read more »notability. No sign of reliable sources after a quick search, only a few listicles. Remagoxer (talk) 17:38, 15 February 2022 (UTC) Note: This discussion...
Click to read more »2015 (UTC) Listicles are still articles and still coverage. In this case reliable, indpendent coverage. The huffingtonpost article/listicle certainly does...
Click to read more »establish notability. The only thing it has is a trivial, hyperfocused listicle that has no real worth. TTN (talk) 00:07, 23 December 2019 (UTC) Note:...
Click to read more »also routine listicles or short mentions. Gizmodo is another listicle entry too short to be WP:SIGCOV, same with The Gamer- another listicle. My WP:BEFORE...
Click to read more »Pokémon. This was a squeaker, but the main problem was the questionable listicles, and other sources. (non-admin closure) JTZegers (talk) 17:53, 8 September...
Click to read more »the reception are single sentence mentions from reviews or entries in listicles (UGO Networks ranked C. Viper at #21 on their list of "Fighting Games'...
Click to read more »sources, Polygon is just a name mention, PCGamesN is barely a paragraph in a listicle, Eurogamer appears to have more content at a glance but is really half...
Click to read more »non-issue to begin with. WP:Listicle relates to stand-alone lists appearing as articles on Wikipedia. There is nothing at WP:Listicle about list-based articles...
Click to read more »holiday film listicles are incomplete in scope and focus on the most recent films at the time of the online publication of the listicle. By compiling...
Click to read more »X listicles. I don't believe they sufficiently demonstrate notability. Pretty much every other mention is a trivial mention or one other listicle not...
Click to read more »films" are listicles. I'm getting tired of seeing Wikipedia constantly state, in its own voice, that because a listicle (or a few listicles) included something...
Click to read more »published content about the band once in a listicle, while failing to provide the date on which that listicle was purportedly published. But even if it...
Click to read more »this listicle, aside from trying and failing to include everything in a too-extensive medium. You may as well try out a non-referenced listicle of every...
Click to read more »✗plicit 04:03, 4 December 2021 (UTC) Delete, no coverage other than listicles. Swordman97 talk to me 22:11, 4 December 2021 (UTC) Relisted to generate...
Click to read more »listicle with trivia content, another IGN's listicle, listicle with a short content, dualshockers' listicle with trivia content, Gamepro's listicle,...
Click to read more »(talk) 13:23, 26 December 2024 (UTC) I don't think a classic Buzzfeed listicle article would be WP:BUZZFEEDNEWS, that would be WP:BUZZFEED. Is everything...
Click to read more »of other featured lists to create the lead and tables. This is my first listicle I'm submitting to do so, and I would love a peer review. Thank you! Thanks...
Click to read more »review on IGN and a listicle on comics affected by the MCU, so there might be a weak case for a keep, depending on your view on listicles. --Killer Moff-...
Click to read more »is notable in the academic sense. The contents are mostly rolling up listicles and similar non-RS, or sources that label specific characters in passing...
Click to read more »magazine's listicle of 100 "hot unsigned bands" -- but this is not a notability-clinching "award" in and of itself, and even the listicle doesn't contain...
Click to read more »the reception is either trivial mentions from reviews of the game, or listicles like "top 20 game babes". There isn't anything that seems to be an indepth...
Click to read more »precedent, based on the Ken Rosenberg RFC, is that video game character listicle entries are alone insufficient to substantiate a full article. Serge has...
Click to read more »stars" in a local-interest listicle, which is not in and of itself a notability-clinching award -- and other than that listicle, three of the other four...
Click to read more »very short review from Contactmusic.com and a mention of the song in this listicle from diffuser.fm. The single did not chart anywhere and I don't see any...
Click to read more »if mentioned in reliable independent secondary sources. Listicles are not awards. Listicles based on subjective attributes (e.g. attractiveness) are...
Click to read more »one [2] just only states that the creator hates her. Others were just listicles/rankings and passing mentions. I couldn't find even more sources per WP:BEFORE...
Click to read more »notability. Forbes is a listicle by a contributor, not editorial staff, is questionable and more of a fluffy blurb, a listicle and the rest are mentions...
Click to read more »referred to in the context of its parent game or franchise. This excludes listicles (ex. "Top 50 best Super Smash Bros. Characters). A character is not notable...
Click to read more »notability-supporting source at all. A fifth (Boston Spirit) is a short blurb in a listicle in a local interest magazine. And while the other two would be fine for...
Click to read more »here at all is the "25 best small companies to work for" listicle, but one blurb in a listicle is not substantive enough to get a company over CORPDEPTH...
Click to read more »The article sourcing is very weak, a couple name-check mentions, and a listicle (5 quick facts about Lane Allen, Betty White's Husband). Online all I could...
Click to read more »addition of sources, but they are both fluff pieces. One is a Huffington Post listicle about shows that Drake enjoyed watching, and the other is a "where are...
Click to read more »not reliable. MakeUseOf is unreliable per WP:VG/S, and that article is a listicle regardless. If a 30 word WP:STUB is all we can get out of this, I think...
Click to read more »evidence of standalone notability and all reception is from bundled together listicles that do nothing but say she's hot, sexy, and (until a few months ago)...
Click to read more »not reliable (nor is it sigcov of him). A mention of his podcast in a listicle is also not sigcov of him. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 04:22, 26 September 2022 (UTC)...
Click to read more »consensus. -- Tavix (talk) 18:21, 19 November 2023 (UTC) Wikipedia:ListicleWikipedia:Listicle → Wikipedia:Stand-alone lists (talk · links · history ·...
Click to read more »help? --Jayron32 12:04, 5 September 2023 (UTC) That's just a clickbait listicle. The website earns money every time someone clicks an Amazon link on the...
Click to read more »discussions. TTN (talk) 13:58, 31 December 2016 (UTC) Delete A single listicle in WP:RS does not confer notability. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 04:02,...
Click to read more »websites aren't notability builders. Chicago Business is a short blurb in a listicle, so it would be fine for additional verification of facts if the rest of...
Click to read more »That's a listicle so I don't think it's enough. CBR is also Valnet which is unreliable. PARAKANYAA (talk) 18:39, 16 November 2024 (UTC) Yeah, listicle + Valnet...
Click to read more »either of those things, being named as an influential person in webmedia listicles, giving a TEDx talk -- are not instant notability freebies that would...
Click to read more »September 2021 (UTC) Delete per nom. There is no pressing need for a separate "listicle" comprising just the two most recent strikes.TheTimesAreAChanging (talk)...
Click to read more »namechecks or in the context of Novara Media - the GQ listicle doesn't count of course, because listicle. I do not think this person is independently notable...
Click to read more »Reception section of Bulbasaur is almost entirely trivial coverage from listicles regurgitated as minor quotes. It fails WP:GNG and does not demonstrate...
Click to read more »coverage in these sources is exceptionally brief - a few sentences in a listicle about "the x most popular Youtube channels". I am not convinced that this...
Click to read more »event, "Top 7 Second Life-like games" listicle entry, "Best open world games for Android phones and tablets" listicle entry). Waxworker (talk) 17:55, 20...
Click to read more »2020 (UTC) Delete: Barely found anything about the podcast aside from a listicle. ASTIG😎 (ICE T • ICE CUBE) 05:20, 23 September 2020 (UTC) The above discussion...
Click to read more »here. The lack of references probably indicates that inclusion on the listicle Indrek pointed out suffices here. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk)...
Click to read more »JSTOR · TWL) Pure trivia Tvx1 22:54, 8 August 2017 (UTC) Delete Unsourced listicle from an editor who persistently makes low quality/pointless articles. JamesG5...
Click to read more »The only source which could contribute to notability is the TVOvermind listicle. Everything else is either a brief mention or affiliated with Garretson...
Click to read more »Russian superheroes as a group. Dronebogus (talk) 12:50, 23 June 2023 (UTC) "Listicle" has been used as to be non-serious in discussions on Wikipedia, but I...
Click to read more »scratch. TTN (talk) 16:00, 23 July 2022 (UTC) Comment: An AfD for a similar listicle over at The Story of Saiunkoku resulted in the character list being redirected...
Click to read more »Music article. power~enwiki (π, ν) 21:00, 17 September 2018 (UTC) One listicle with just 25 songs on it is not enough sourcing to support something like...
Click to read more »fictional section. That's just absurd and something that belongs on a Buzzfeed listicle, not Wikipedia. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 14:19, 23 November 2022 (UTC)...
Click to read more »the group is mentioned literally a single time with no context #5 Junk listicle deemed unreliable Not even taking into account that CBR is a trash website...
Click to read more »the New York Times mention is really just a stubby couple sentences in a listicle about productivity apps, while The Unofficial Apple Weblog doesn't strike...
Click to read more »with any sort of mention of this individual. Not even a name drop in a listicle or anything. This is arguably A7; he's just a run-of-the-mill amateur Soundcloud...
Click to read more »WP:SIGCOV. It relies mostly on primary and CBR sources. Most are either listicles, rankings and passing mentions. WP:BEFORE shows nothing but full of trivial...
Click to read more »independent search for sources yielded a trivial mention in a Playbill listicle and a user comment in Queerty. No strong evidence of passing WP:BASIC or...
Click to read more »fails to establish notability. It is only supported by a single trivial listicle. Seems like both previous AfDs were multi-nomination messes. TTN (talk)...
Click to read more »paragraph unattribute article from 'The News Minute', and a reference in a listicle on what was at the time Fusion and is now Splinter News. I don't think...
Click to read more »puff-piece; Newsweek (and other publications) earn a commission for "best of" listicles, which rules out the majority of the sources. UGA (The University of Georgia...
Click to read more »reliable and non-trivial coverage appears to be the 2012 AVN fresh faces listicle. An independent search for RS coverage yields only brief mentions and cast...
Click to read more »coverage is in Slate, the other coverage is either in unreliable sources or listicles. The vast majority of the cited sources are from a brief period of a few...
Click to read more »businessman seems to boil down to "got named as a local business leader in a listicle"; his notability as a politician begins and ends at "district chair for...
Click to read more »agree that the references are sufficient. I typically take a dim view of listicle entries as sources, but the three different best-podcast listings do amount...
Click to read more »not reliable. MakeUseOf is unreliable per WP:VG/S, and that article is a listicle regardless. If a 30 word WP:STUB is all we can get out of this, I think...
Click to read more »the end :P 1) TheGamer 2020 - not a listicle: "Fate/Grand Order: My Servants Have My Back" 2) ScreenRant 2020 listicle - but I think it counts for NLIST:...
Click to read more »hodge-podge of mentions of local blogs/newspapers mentioning the business in listicles, and should be trimmed significantly. But I do think there's enough coverage...
Click to read more »free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Largely uncited, unsourced, listicle of cruft, trivia, and miscellaneous items. Wikipedia is not a dumping ground...
Click to read more »Mississippi 02:46, 1 May 2022 (UTC) Delete Only relevant GNews result is a listicle published on a forum. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 07:18, 4 May 2022 (UTC) The...
Click to read more »September 2021 (UTC) Delete All of the vogue references are brief mentions in listicles with titles such as 'Vogue India picks 55 of the best looks from Lakmé...
Click to read more »a rule/line in the sand: If the topic's article depends upon "Top X" listicles, the subject matter is likely best covered within an existing article...
Click to read more »01:59, 13 December 2019 (UTC) Delete - If the only means of reception is a listicle (an extremely focused on at that), the article doesn't need to exist. TTN...
Click to read more »I don't think these count towards notability. 2 is a short entry in a listicle, 3 is an interview, so both don't count. Sources 4 and 8 are duplicates...
Click to read more »(South Florida Sun Sentinel 30 November 2002), and it was also part of a listicle. Geschichte (talk) 20:13, 10 October 2021 (UTC) Keep as per the reliable...
Click to read more »left with is one promotional sentence and a single link to a mention in a listicle. Searching google news gives exactly 0 hits and other searches turn up...
Click to read more »FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Minor comic book character, reception limited to two listicles. I've PRODDED this with "he coverage (references, external links, etc...
Click to read more »blurbs, and one is a glancing namecheck of the subject's existence in a listicle -- and the only one that actually has any substance to it is just supporting...
Click to read more »releases. The subject hasn't one any notable awards outside of the usual listicle style top 50 or top 25 which are all puffery and hardly accolades. Ferkingstad...
Click to read more »and WP:MEDRS, as is evident from the poor sources used here (BuzzFeed listicle, really...) and the lack of anything substantive for "melolagnia" on Google...
Click to read more »are not support for notability at all, and the only reliable source is a listicle -- which means that source is fine for use but not in and of itself enough...
Click to read more »as paid programming, and a fifth is a 13-word blurbette in a magazine listicle, which is not substantive enough to get him over the bar all by itself...
Click to read more »(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Listicle that duplicates information already present in the main Hereford article...
Click to read more »free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) A couple of interviews and a listicle are all that this article is based on. The article fails SIGCOV, and should...
Click to read more »changed - the reception section is entirely either trivial mentions or listicles, and this article fails WP:GNG on its own. Hopefully another AfD will...
Click to read more »article are a blog[1], things written by the article subject[2][3][4], listicles of lgbt pride flags which name-drop Roxie as creator of a genderqueer...
Click to read more »Yet another generic local business with only routine coverage and minor listicle mentions in local news. It's not encylopedic to catalogue brief local event...
Click to read more »a few months in 2006. The refs are mostly to local news, except for a listicle piece in PC World. PROD declined in 2006 on grounds of notability but it...
Click to read more »standard for inclusion. While the sourcing is somewhat better than the Nike listicle, it still suffers from the same problems - a vast, near infinite list with...
Click to read more »Especially not when the only source for that is just two sentences in a listicle. I think this section should be either expanded to include actually notable...
Click to read more »the dreaded Comic Book Resources (for what it's worth, this one is not a listicle piece, and actually reads with some decent insight). There have to be some...
Click to read more »https://screenrant.com/star-sapphire-green-lantern-comic-origin-powers-explained/ listicle; is this even a reliable source? https://www.cbr.com/green-lantern-sta...
Click to read more »decent sources identified in a search (one appearance in possibly reliable listicle, but that's not enough alone. No evidence of notability. Josh Milburn (talk)...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) A one-off magazine listicle turned into a Wikipedia article. I see it's reprinted in a couple places...
Click to read more »strongest source I'm finding is a "10 worst Hallmark movies of all time" listicle that gives this film one 90-word blurb of attention, which is not enough...
Click to read more »passing mentions at game reviews. WP:BEFORE shows nothing at Google, but listicles/rankings. GreenishPickle! (🔔) 01:46, 13 January 2024 (UTC) Note: This...
Click to read more »origin of a story. Its main claim to fame was being named in a PC Mag 2005 listicle. There are no worthwhile redirect targets. If someone finds more (non-English...
Click to read more »could fit well, perhaps by splitting Yoichi into a new section in the listicle. Jumpytoo Talk 04:53, 24 February 2022 (UTC) Redirect to List of Ring characters#Shizuka...
Click to read more »relationship to "Csabo" The books listed are all self published. And a Listicle from the Toronto Sun calling one of his paintings "one of the World's 10...
Click to read more »WatchMojo is a site that publishes Internet videos consisting of ranking listicles. The site is considered generally unreliable due to poor fact checking...
Click to read more »him. However, I can't. Between citing Business Insider's "20 under 20" listicle for facts that don't pertain to him and not being able to find anything...
Click to read more »GreenishPickle! (🔔) 00:31, 1 July 2023 (UTC) This article overrelies mostly on listicles, and some of the cited sources that do not entirely say what they are...
Click to read more »Cohen), and all I found with a WP:BEFORE is this one-seventh of a HuffPost listicle and more news of the sort that doesn't go beyond what the article already...
Click to read more »(talk) 22:30, 16 June 2022 (UTC) I did, and all I found were clickbait listicles from unreliable sources, fandom wikis, Reddit, and bootlegs of the pilot...
Click to read more »However, the listicle would still be quite significant if we were talking about a character list that needed reception. In this case, the listicles are entirely...
Click to read more »comic itself. The only sources I found on GNews were random grab-bag listicles from The Verge and Kotaku Australia, neither of which is a harbinger of...
Click to read more »The Kotaku source is better than nothing, but it's three sentences in a listicle. The article also has grammatical errors and cites Wikipedia a couple of...
Click to read more »coverage that I can find is this piece in the Irish Examiner. In this "listicle" we find the subject listed together with another 50 Twitter users. I can...
Click to read more »profession) -- the reliability of which hinges on it being picked up as a listicle by mainstream sources (like the other citation, a Billboard post). I don't...
Click to read more »Some are primary sources affiliated with the subject and some are blog/listicle-type articles that don't appear reliable. This one appears to be the only...
Click to read more »beyond just the purely local, for it — one blurb in a local newspaper listicle about all the namesakes of all the area schools is not enough coverage...
Click to read more »WP:NCORP. Most of the references are narrow product reviews mostly in listicles. Per WP:PRODUCTREV, Reviews that narrowly focus on a particular product...
Click to read more »Would of said redirect but for some reason Reiko is not listed in the listicle so she would need to be added. Jumpytoo Talk 04:50, 24 February 2022 (UTC)...
Click to read more »not reliable. MakeUseOf is unreliable per WP:VG/S, and that article is a listicle regardless. If a 30 word WP:STUB is all we can get out of this, I think...
Click to read more »JSTOR · TWL) Very much lacking in coverage; no charting, one paragraph in a listicle, lots of being-talked-about by (surprise) the originator in an interview...
Click to read more »not considered super-reliable in the best of times, and it's part of a listicle. The others are definitely unreliable sources. I would be happy to be proven...
Click to read more »JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable superhero who fails WP:GNG. I only found one listicle he appears in. His series appears similarly non-notable. ZXCVBNM (TALK)...
Click to read more »present in the article are plot. All I could find in a before was #9 in a listicle with one paragraph of non-plot commentary, but other than that, it's just...
Click to read more »noting they have just released an online single and being mentioned in a listicle in Paste Magazine counting as "Has been the subject of multiple, non-trivial...
Click to read more »that's actually a genuinely reliable source is just a short blurb in a listicle which quotes him speaking about himself rather than being written about...
Click to read more »FENS · JSTOR · TWL) They have one mention in children's book. And online listicles. Can anybody explain how is this notable? MitYehor📘^talk 23:38, 25 August...
Click to read more »article is kept, then it needs a massive source cleanup. Several include listicles on supposed secret societies and others are just local stories about some...
Click to read more »references cited in the 2nd nomination are (in order):404, one paragraph in a listicle, also 404, a very short Washington Post article that barely goes beyond...
Click to read more »find that addresses the subject of the podcast directly is this PC Mag listicle, which doesn't even include 100 words of content dedicated to the podcast...
Click to read more »which I've found searching as far as I can - seems to be confined to "listicle"-style articles, rather than any serious analysis of what makes these particular...
Click to read more »role. Of the six footnotes here, #1 is a 44-word blurb about him in a listicle; #2 and #3 are both one-off glancing mentions of his name in articles that...
Click to read more »site, but that still would leave even just one source - and that being a listicle ,not even a GNG-appropriate source - for this. --Masem (t) 03:21, 26 July...
Click to read more »article has been debunked before as reliable source coverage. It is a listicle of one writer's opinion. Other claims of notability are not only poorly...
Click to read more »the sources cited are passing mentions of the subject, the last being a listicle. Bearian (talk) 04:57, 25 October 2024 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »supported at this time. The JPost source is a start, and the most prominent listicle honors describe her as a 'future leader', but it appears to be WP:TOOSOON...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) I've AfD'ed this listicle two and half years ago, but no consensus. Maybe this time it's different...
Click to read more »user-generated content; 2. TMZ article: trivial mention; 3. Most popular porn star listicle previously dismissed at AfD; 4. AVN press release: not independent; 5....
Click to read more »PORNBIO has been deprecated. She was also ranked #99 in a 2017 Complex listicle, "The Top 100 Hottest Porn Stars (Right Now)"[6]. Cheers, gnu57 19:36,...
Click to read more »Silicon India also doesn't appear reliable, and the mention is just a listicle. Pentest looks borderline to me, and may accept user submitted content...
Click to read more »of coverage. I found a paragraph each in a few sources: book 1, book 2, listicle. Considering the large number of disk analyzer programs, and how the books...
Click to read more »—ajf (talk) 21:07, 6 March 2015 (UTC) There are six citations in the article: A listicle on a non-obviously notable tech site (I don't think this is notable) A...
Click to read more »at the sources, the first reference is just a listicle or a curated roundup of fashion updates. Listicles are usually brief and surface-level, so they...
Click to read more »namecheck of his existence in an article about somebody else, a blurb in a listicle about the winners of a minor local award that isn't a notability clincher...
Click to read more »link. The third is an interview. The fourth is inclusion in a top 100 listicle. The fifth is about her appointment, the coverage is probably based on...
Click to read more »plot summaries for issues where it appeared, and the usual mentions in listicle garbage, neither of which would allow it to pass the WP:GNG. About the...
Click to read more »indication of WP:ANYBIO the only accolade they have is a mention in a listicle for variety magazine. The entire page is essentially built on marcomms...
Click to read more »independent coverage. Grappling Insider is clearly not RS. ESPN is casual listicle-style hype promoting upcoming bouts broadcast by ESPN, not independent...
Click to read more »(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This listicle is completely unsourced and fails WP:LISTN, as it consists of a bunch of...
Click to read more »previous nomination of Alex, the reception for this character is entirely listicles and therefore made up of WP:TRIVIAL mentions. Literally everything else...
Click to read more »developer, less so the game. WP:BEFORE on the game found this listicle entry [2] and this listicle entry [3], but nothing enough to base an article on. ~ A412...
Click to read more »The two sources currently cited are a school directory and a WP:ROUTINE listicle. BhikhariInformer (talk) 02:24, 4 February 2026 (UTC) Note: This discussion...
Click to read more »work on this one, but the only significant coverage I can find is one listicle about it on Comic Book Resources. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 🛸 03:47, 24 February...
Click to read more »software. No evidence of any significant coverage. WP:BEFORE reveals a listicle and not much else. Jfire (talk) 01:16, 15 October 2023 (UTC) Note: This...
Click to read more »movieweb source is a poor quality listicle. bleedingcool entry is a review of a single toy. cbr is another weak listicle. IGN is not even a review but a...
Click to read more »enough of a chance. A quick perusal of available sources reveal a ton of listicle articles (many of which are entirely based-on Reddit posts) and zero hits...
Click to read more »source not produced and published by Gilbert or Polygon is this Buzzfeed listicle, which is largely a collection of screenshots and other images. I couldn't...
Click to read more »WP:ORGCRITE for significant coverage. There was also a profile in a CNN listicle [2] which I believe also does not pass muster but is worth mentioning separately...
Click to read more »independent RS (i.e., Linkedin, company websites). Inclusion in a HuffPost listicle is not WP:SIGCOV since it doesn't tell you anything about her, and anyway...
Click to read more »fails to establish notability. Sources added after the PROD are two junk listicles and a bunch of topical pop culture stuff about the character's casting...
Click to read more »The 2005 MacWorld listicle,[100] expanded to the 2005 also-MacWorld dedicated article.[101][102] Years later, 2013 MacLife listicle,[103] expanded into...
Click to read more »coverage about the band: there's one "13 bands you might have forgotten" listicle that features a mere blurb's worth of content about this band, and three...
Click to read more »GNG. Rhino131 (talk) 14:26, 12 August 2022 (UTC) Delete: I found a few listicles, but there simply is not enough coverage in reliable sources to prove...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Reception is limited to a single listicle. Fails WP:GNG. Per ATD-R, could redirect to List of Sin City characters...
Click to read more »her move into the tech industry. She is covered similarly in a USA Today listicle from the same day. The latter was syndicated into a lot of local newspapers...
Click to read more »Reception or sources discussing this manga. I found a brief bit in a TheGamer listicle, but that was all I could find during a search. Doesn't seem to pass the...
Click to read more »Keep (as creator) – There's a few listicles in the citations (TheGamer is never useful, the IGN and GamingBolt listicles also stand out), but despite that...
Click to read more »claiming to be a "magazine" [1], this extremely questionable listicle [2], this similar listicle [3], and several Reddit posts. Not a good look. WeirdNAnnoyed...
Click to read more »which looks impressive, until the source check shows it is based half on listicles and half on trivial (one-sentence) mentions in passing. WP:FANCRUFT? --Piotr...
Click to read more »articles about him. The only reference here is a short blurb in a Buzzfeed listicle, not a reliable or notability-bolstering source. Bearcat (talk) 19:00,...
Click to read more »the article are either non-independent sources or trivial coverage (a listicle, audition information and a Q&A). Ytoyoda (talk) 13:41, 6 April 2021 (UTC)...
Click to read more »paying attention: if all you have are passing mentions and some online listicles after beefing up the article, that's a warning sign. One of the examples...
Click to read more »photographs named to one newspaper's unencyclopedic "best photographs of 2010" listicle — and the source for that claim is not an article about him, but just a...
Click to read more »not reliable. MakeUseOf is unreliable per WP:VG/S, and that article is a listicle regardless. If a 30 word WP:STUB is all we can get out of this, I think...
Click to read more »student sources, a self-published WordPress zine and two Screen Rant listicles for sources. I'm unsure about the reliability of Hyperreal Film Club....
Click to read more »biography on the App's author at Dosse-Via Trenou. Sources are mostly listicles. Also noting that the article creator attempted to remove the AFD tag...
Click to read more »[1] [2], the first one is a list of upcoming shows, and the second is a listicle of which only a few sentences are about the theatre in question. The website...
Click to read more »(though his name does appear in a comment below the article). The Instinct listicle is marked as "contributor" content: "This post was created by one of our...
Click to read more »wanted to draftify this but 2(d) doesn't apply. The best source is a nw.de listicle; otherwise, Egmont Ehapa is not independent and the rest are not reliable...
Click to read more »sources here are one of its own self-published press releases and three listicles in a magazine, with no indication shown that it's the subject of any significant...
Click to read more »just because you can technically single-source the honour itself to a listicle. And the Medway unitary authority is a local political office under NPOL...
Click to read more »article is an op-ed that only briefly mentions the subject. The Forbes listicle article is not significant coverage, and interviews don't count as independent...
Click to read more »event, "Top 7 Second Life-like games" listicle entry, "Best open world games for Android phones and tablets" listicle entry). Waxworker (talk) 17:55, 20...
Click to read more »April 2018 (UTC) Being named in listicles isn't an "inherent" notability claim in and of itself — but neither of the listicles (The Hill and WSJ) is verifying...
Click to read more »supporting) while the "special appearances" section is removed. The "listicles" section can also be removed as unencyclopedic. Once those are resolved...
Click to read more »encyclopedia". Being named as a Twitter account worth following, sourced only to a listicle that glancingly namechecks his existence without being about him, is not...
Click to read more »Second link: Personal blog. Third link: distinctly lukewarm namecheck in a listicle ("Steve Aylett’s paean to originality is so elliptical that it’s almost...
Click to read more »notability, the other is a blog and the other is one sentence of coverage in a listicle. PARAKANYAA (talk) 08:42, 6 July 2025 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...
Click to read more »(UTC) Delete Lacks significant in-depth coverage in multiple sources. A listicle in a college newspaper is not sufficient. Reywas92Talk 03:37, 3 May 2020...
Click to read more »(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) listicle, fancruft, entirely supported by OR. Disambiguating "most followed" accounts...
Click to read more »kinds of data from different dates, and cites listicles rather than the data itself (so omits what the listicles omit). We have a combination of the number...
Click to read more »FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Almost the entire reception are entirely made of listicles/passing mentions that amount to WP:REFBOMB. Cannot find a single WP:SIGCOV...
Click to read more »WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:19, 30 October 2023 (UTC) Delete The occasional fluff listicle is not enough to base a biography upon. XOR'easter (talk) 17:08, 2 November...
Click to read more »discussed here without a specific conclusion, I found this Ars Technica listicle as a reliable source. There's also this Comix Mix article, but I don't...
Click to read more »consensus that it simply got too tired. This is an example among many similar listicles. Matt Deres (talk) 15:04, 14 February 2016 (UTC) Thanks. I'd also recall...
Click to read more »stores and restaurant counters. Wikipedia's not just a compilation of listicle entries, and more dedicated and in-depth coverage is needed to establish...
Click to read more »single-source the baseline fact that they existed to a blurb in an omnibus listicle. And incidentally, it's entirely unnecessary and inappropriate to provide...
Click to read more »integrating the list into the parent article. Either it's worth having a listicle or it's not worth listing at all, IMO. – PeeJay 23:14, 15 August 2015 (UTC)...
Click to read more »with any discussion and it's barely saying anything... The MSN list is a listicle that is not saying anything. "They ranked her 20th out of gaming's hottest...
Click to read more »in Wikipedia context because it's all press releases. Kuwait Times is a listicle with nothing of value about the subject. VAXIDICAE💉 17:52, 25 March 2021...
Click to read more »were made after him. Reception section in the article is an embarrassing listicle mention ("Comic Book Resources listed the character as part of He-Man:...
Click to read more »one source just provides a blurb's worth of information about him in a listicle about all of this year's mayoral candidates (thus not constituting evidence...
Click to read more »coverage meets WP:LISTN, with the main point of contention being whether the listicle-style coverage in NEWSORG RS publications is sufficiently significant....
Click to read more »notable antagonists. I can't find any sources outside of primary ones and a listicle, and the article already doesn't meet GNG or SIGCOV. Pokelego999 (talk)...
Click to read more »sources, and 25 per cent on a glancing namecheck of her existence in a listicle which isn't substantively about her. This is not the quality of sourcing...
Click to read more »me - plenty of sources, but about non-notable awards, local coverage, listicle and stuff that doesn’t really look in-depth. The article looks to me like...
Click to read more »independent, but not particularly indepth: It a one paragraph entry in a listicle about 19 songs about bad dads. Clearly insufficient for N. Theredproject...
Click to read more »06:25, 30 July 2014 (UTC) Delete. Despite the amusing title, this is a listicle without spark, imagination, or enough coherence to be useful. The Satanic...
Click to read more »variants. No real SIGCOV here, just listicles. QuicoleJR (talk) 21:08, 6 January 2025 (UTC) Redirect as above. Listicles can support notability though, they...
Click to read more »and the only sources that predate that are two blogs and a blurb in a listicle. So she doesn't get an article because candidate, and the sourcing here...
Click to read more »language is an interesting curiosity, it can make good material for a popular listicle on buzzfeed, but has no place in an encyclopedia. – Uanfala (talk) 19:50...
Click to read more »reception/cultural impact could be expanded a lot and maybe remove most of the listicles on that section. BloatedBun (talk) 10:43, 13 May 2022 (UTC) Delist It...
Click to read more »don't know to be honest. ~Styyx Talk? ^-^ 21:51, 2 January 2021 (UTC) A listicle of unnotable games by an unnotable company would likely run afoul of WP:DIRECTORY...
Click to read more »(coverage like the Forbes entry do not focus on the company, and are of a "listicle" type that wouldn't seem to confer notability on every member of the list)...
Click to read more »to have been the series finale for the TV series, but that one top ten listicle that is being used as the sole source appears to be the only bit of coverage...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails GNG. Reception is literally all listicles and trivial coverage. Would be much better off as a section in the list...
Click to read more »WP:TOOSOON. As to why the sources do not contribute to WP:GNG; NZ Herald is a listicle, and Otago Daily Times is a completely insignificant/trivial piece about...
Click to read more »but merely one of several people given short five-question Q&As in a listicle; one is merely a glancing mention of her name in an article whose primary...
Click to read more »Space_station#In_fiction. Really not seeing any references to expand this much beyond listicle of PLOT examples :( --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here...
Click to read more »sources which talk about the album: [1] and [2]. It's also discussed in this listicle. That said, the article is good enough to pass WP:NALBUM. ASTIG😎 (ICE...
Click to read more »Comment. I found this article in Guns & Ammo, but I don't think a single listicle is really enough to demonstrate notability. Plus, this does look like fancruft...
Click to read more »and the most notable thing I could find was a mention in a SimpleFlying listicle. nf utvol (talk) 23:48, 18 March 2025 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »page cites three sources, one of which is a non-SIGCOV single paragraph listicle, the other is a comprehensive book, WP:NFILM does state that Examples of...
Click to read more »de facto list, but it fails WP:NLIST. My BEFORE found only low quality listicles (ex. [1] or [2] which are not very reliable). As an article, it fails...
Click to read more »February 2021 (UTC) Delete: Barely found anything about her aside from a listicle. ASTIG😎 (ICE T • ICE CUBE) 16:00, 8 February 2021 (UTC) Speedy Delete...
Click to read more »coverage to meet NSONG, but I can't find much. There's this and a few listicle entries but not much else. C F A 💬 21:02, 23 August 2024 (UTC) Delete...
Click to read more »character, and none that passes any amount of SIGCOV. There is nothing, but listicles and passing mentions. GlatorNator (ᴛ) 11:38, 8 June 2023 (UTC) Note: This...
Click to read more »not reliable. MakeUseOf is unreliable per WP:VG/S, and that article is a listicle regardless. If a 30 word WP:STUB is all we can get out of this, I think...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This article is just a listicle that is best suited for BuzzFeed or another site and not Wikipedia. I think...
Click to read more »could find to AvoDerm were in pet ownership blog/web pages (low-quality, listicle format). Does not seem to meet notability guidelines. InsomniaOpossum (talk)...
Click to read more »a listicle from AV Club really a RS? Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 21:55, 25 May 2022 (UTC) The AV Club article is not a listicle. matt91486...
Click to read more »frequently used sources in video game character articles are listicles. While listicles are acceptable as ancillary sources, they do not constitute significant...
Click to read more »is fine too). The sourcing is too weak for a full article. GameRank is listicle garbage. No site that puts 20+ lists in a single 24 hour period belongs...
Click to read more »single-sourced stub about every single gay bar that got blurbed in one isolated listicle — but they clearly learned from that, because they're trying much harder...
Click to read more »(talk) 17:58, 27 October 2020 (UTC) No, there appears to be a wealth of listicle dribble and pressreleasitis about her...and the press stuff dried up 15...
Click to read more »sources here that are more than local are a YouTube video and an Expedia listicle which are not reliable or notability-suporting sources at all, and a news...
Click to read more »last AfD, the sources presented were extremely shoddy and entirely from listicles like "Underrated monsters" and "Dumbest monsters ever" as well as a WP:GAMEGUIDE...
Click to read more »04:47, 1 November 2020 (UTC) Redirect: I had already forgotten about this listicle. Looking back on this, I wouldn't do it today. May I just redirect this...
Click to read more »time" sounds like a claim to notability, but is unfortunately sourced to a listicle that just doesn't have the ring of rigour to it. If there's alternative...
Click to read more »organizations or companies directly affilated with the show, a how-to listicle on WikiHow) that are not support for notability at all. The only two sources...
Click to read more »than a listicle. -- RobLa (talk) 21:08, 3 August 2025 (UTC) 2018 United States House of Representatives elections in California is not a listicle. There...
Click to read more »from a minor local-interest organization, and that he was named once in a listicle. And of the eight footnotes, seven are primary sources that aren't support...
Click to read more »submitted and doesn't appear reliable. Five, the Times of India, is a listicle which features every player on the U-17 team. Six is a broken link to a...
Click to read more »https://www.whowhatwear.com/best-online-thrift-stores (too sparse). Patter-song listicle. https://www.miaminewtimes.com/arts/rebag-luxury-handbag-retailer-open...
Click to read more »sources, three are primary (2x own website + 1x press release), and one a listicle/directory on CanadianBusiness.com ; article does not seem to meet WP:NCORP...
Click to read more »the only sigcov here. [2] Passing mention. [3] A trivia coverage from a listicle. [4] trivia coverage. [5] just a passing mention of Juhani being a lesbian...
Click to read more »vapid sources to the point that it's painful to review. Why are we citing listicle-style brief mentions sources like [1][2][3][4] as the basis for an encyclopedia...
Click to read more »regurgitated press release stories, funding/partnership announcements and listicles. Maduant (talk) 18:57, 29 October 2022 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...
Click to read more »isn't adequately referenced, either: one of the two sources here is a mere listicle in which she's one of eight businesspeople to be quoted giving soundbite...
Click to read more »about himself on a podcast. The last is a "five things to know about him" listicle in a digital magazine, but that publication's status as a notability-making...
Click to read more »recaps/summaries in comic sites or brief mentions. It actually has a "Top Ten" listicle all of its own, here, but it consists entirely of just plot information...
Click to read more »thereafter. Present-day coverage was from non-notable sources (Blogger, a listicle, and so on). 💥Casualty • Hop along. • 18:53, 24 December 2024 (UTC) The...
Click to read more »cosplayed. This source is a bit good [1], but it looks like another typical listicle with a short commentary. Nothing else. I may be wrong at Google Scholar...
Click to read more »independent coverage. Grappling Insider is clearly not RS. ESPN is casual listicle-style hype promoting upcoming bouts broadcast by ESPN, not independent...
Click to read more »both killed in the war, and R.S.M. White."), and a brief mention in a listicle on a non-RS site. Since this young man was sadly cut down in his prime...
Click to read more »or former owners. Only source 4 gives one full paragraph about this, a listicle mention for a local lifestyle website that the author likes its mocha....
Click to read more »search of the artist's name, the other a 'buzzfeed community contributor' listicle.) Googling turned up three additional online album reviews by bloggers...
Click to read more »Gamer [1] and some listicles about Lawgivers 2 on Valnet style sites like TheGamer and GameRant: [2][3][4]. Nothing wrong with listicles but it's not sufficiently...
Click to read more »outlets, one just gives them a 33-word blurb in a "songs you need to hear" listicle on CBC Hamilton (which is a local news bureau in a single city, and not...
Click to read more »TWL) Unsourced since 2009. The only source I could find was a Screen Rant listicle. I'm not sure it deserves to be redirected due to how obscure it is. Nighfidelity...
Click to read more »based on that Gawker article. The Artnet listicle did a lot of heavy lifting in the last AfD (more than any listicle should), and that too is just a single...
Click to read more »there is just the one source, currently in the article, which is at best a listicle and of low quality. I would be concerned about merging if we don't have...
Click to read more »Oaktree, can only find press releases, and companies that put every damn listicle they're mentioned in in their Wikipedia article grind my gears. BrigadierG...
Click to read more »in the United States. Do all of them need articles? Merging them into a listicle would be easier to manage and the loss of useful content would be minimal...
Click to read more »single-sourced stub about every single gay bar that got blurbed in one isolated listicle — but they clearly learned from that, because they're trying much harder...
Click to read more »not how frequently any particular fact has been mentioned in WP:RS, listicles or otherwise. asilvering (talk) 17:35, 10 March 2025 (UTC) [Hide this...
Click to read more »lists of the "best" such films and books, as well as more than a few listicles of the same thing. With pruning, this may pass muster. BigHaz - Schreit...
Click to read more »are just narrated listicles and a recording of a convention panel), two podcast interviews (therefore primary sources), a listicle from TheGamer, Simons'...
Click to read more »very little coverage that is about this track specifically (The State listicle)-- 19:55, 9 November 2025 (UTC) Redirect to Cracked Rear View - Sure "Drowning"...
Click to read more »mention the film in a list of titles, others have a short plot summary in a listicle-type article about general Hallmark Christmas films. BOVINEBOY2008 20:27...
Click to read more »reception section is largely based on snippets from unrelated articles and listicles. Nothing strikes me as demonstrating its notability. The article is largely...
Click to read more »delete the combined name article. The reception relies almost entirely on listicles and does not pass WP:SIGCOV. It was clearly created as an end run around...
Click to read more »obituary in the local newspaper and a one-off namecheck of his existence in a listicle of everybody who ever served on the county council at all. That's just...
Click to read more »Delete The table compiled by Praxidicae includes just one source (the listicle in the International Business Times) that might possibly establish notability...
Click to read more »long as to require a split, and this is an excessively short unnecessary listicle. Harrias (he/him) • talk 10:40, 21 November 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion...
Click to read more »rubbish. The closest things to reliable sources that I could find were two listicles. A redirect to the relevant list would be possible. ―Susmuffin Talk 15:19...
Click to read more »Article is promo cited to trivial mentions of the subject, other than the listicle which I question the reliability and independence of. A WP:BEFORE search...
Click to read more »free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Reception relies solely on listicles and unreliable sources, the trivial coverage of the character in any secondary...
Click to read more »local paper around the world may churn out blurb after blurb, listicle after listicle, ranking after ranking, reader poll after reader poll about the...
Click to read more »Fails WP:GNG - the only mention of this creature is in assorted "top-10" listicles (of which literally every monster in D&D is mentioned at some point) and...
Click to read more »coverage for this character to meet WP:GNG unless you count appearances in listicles like this (appearing in last place for the record). A redirect to the...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This is basically an unfinished listicle that will be ever-changing and is essentially copied from the sources....
Click to read more »07:04, 2 May 2020 (UTC) Her coverage in the Maxim list is a two-sentence listicle entry. Quite a few other AVN Hall-of-Famers have been deleted at AfD recently...
Click to read more »this 2013 PhD, although it is a reasonably good start. Inclusion in a listicle is not much progress towards GNG, and the early career award does not contribute...
Click to read more »JSTOR · TWL) Not one secondary source cited, Google search returns one listicle-no popular coverage. Does not appear to be notable. PlotinusEnjoyer (talk)...
Click to read more »is cobbled from a few mentions in passing (from film reviews) and one listicle. So WP:SIGCOV is not met. WP:ATD-R easy solution is to redirect this to...
Click to read more »TWL) Zero sources found in a WP:BEFORE. Google News gave only a single listicle from an unreliable looking site. Google Books gave only print versions...
Click to read more »don't think he has enough coverage to warrant a page, it's really just listicle things and trivial mentions + the creating a champion primary source. ULPS...
Click to read more »stand-alone article. Thus far the absolute best source we seem to have is a listicle in AdWeek, and my search isn't producing anything better. That said, it's...
Click to read more »deletion/American Libraries (collection) (2nd nomination), this de facto listicle has no WP:GNG (all sources are just from IA itself) and per ADR-R should...
Click to read more »and WP:ATD. BOZ (talk) 15:21, 13 March 2020 (UTC) Delete or redirect. Listicle factories do not belong in articles, so there are currently no valid sources...
Click to read more »com, a college aggregator directory. Reference 2 is a Times of India listicle naming ten marine engineering colleges, in which IMI appears as one entry...
Click to read more »27 August 2025 (UTC) Comment. I only found a Beats Per Minute (website) listicle with 127 words of coverage as well as this. Geschichte (talk) 20:50, 27...
Click to read more »a reliable secondary source that says anything significant, and it's a listicle of 10 games chosen by "Colin Spacetwinks" for Giant Bomb. Sources 1 and...
Click to read more »that "Crunchbase Profile". Retrieved April 25, 2016. mundane review or listicle Zukerman, Erez (September 30, 2013). "5 free Web tools to organize your...
Click to read more »single source on this book that discusses it specifically and isn't just a listicle with a brief mention. Cortador (talk) 12:53, 11 October 2024 (UTC) Comment...
Click to read more »myself back when I was keeping an eye on it (I've de-watchlisted it) is listicles like this, this, and this... which didn't convince me that this page was...
Click to read more »not reliable. MakeUseOf is unreliable per WP:VG/S, and that article is a listicle regardless. If a 30 word WP:STUB is all we can get out of this, I think...
Click to read more »submitted from freelancers/outside contributors and then published; 4 is a listicle , 5 is a community college student newspaper, and 6 appears to be paid...
Click to read more »JSTOR · TWL) Entirety of character's reception relies on short quips from listicles, including some unreliable sources. A WP:BEFORE showed no supporting signs...
Click to read more »plot summary rather than any meaningful discussion or analysis. The two listicles provided by Andrew above fall into this category, with one of them being...
Click to read more »to the award, and to "records" such as Jenson's ninth. Overall, a great listicle. Harrias talk 08:59, 19 August 2020 (UTC) @Harrias: Have taken action on...
Click to read more »with no real-world notability. I found four sentences in a Mental Floss listicle and occasional passing mentions from pop culture websites such as Newsarama...
Click to read more »a very lengthy plot summary and reception that is limited to a single listicle mention: "Noel Murray of Rolling Stone ranked Dwight 22nd in a list of...
Click to read more »[4] [5]. "Next Impulse Sports" [6] (whatever that is). A BuzzFeed-esque listicle [7]. A Newsweek article [8] which just describes the video contents in...
Click to read more »sourcing consists entirely of localized routine food reviews, neighborhood listicles, and regional entertainment roundups (e.g., Eater Portland, Portland Monthly...
Click to read more »same reaction. WP:BEFORE didn't provide anything else either, and when listicle and extremely brief sources were cleaned out there wasn't anything left...
Click to read more »and creation section about the character but only passing mentions and listicles/rankings. Those merchandise sources doesn't help either with notability...
Click to read more »to routine funding announcements, press releases and mentions in a few listicles. Fails to satisfy NORG. M4DU7 (talk) 07:58, 10 June 2020 (UTC) Note: This...
Click to read more »reception section of the article is overflowing with the often hated listicles (word defined here on Merriam-Webster). While they do come from reliable...
Click to read more »stylishpie.com/top-5-pakistani-celebrities-look-younger-real-age/ resembles a listicle functioning as a clickbait. The website itself states that it is a Pakistan...
Click to read more »lasting encyclopedic notability. Nor does being placed on a dime-a-dozen listicle of "best X under Y age in Z place". Winning a Burton Award is kind of neat...
Click to read more »product looks to have been very briefly featured in a Helsingin Sanomat listicle about startups (link; paywalled), but I'm not seeing any independent analytical...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Blogger with no claim to fame. Mentioned in listicles and PR pieces. Nothing in RS MistyGraceWhite (talk) 15:13, 3 May 2020...
Click to read more »reliable or notability-supporting source, and #2 is a 67-word blurb in a listicle, which is not substantive enough to count as a GNG-supporting source if...
Click to read more »Non-notable pageant. It is true that its winners are sometimes mentioned as listicles, but nothing on the pageant in any source whatsoever. This source categorizes...
Click to read more »For good measure, there's also a few brief mentions of characters in listicles by Complex, here, here and here. With these, the article is, in my opinion...
Click to read more »editors. Futon Critic is just reprinting a CMT press release. This is a listicle from The Boot that mostly quote-mines articles about some of the finalists...
Click to read more »sources is limited to acquisition reports, interviews and brief mentions in listicles. M4DU7 (talk) 18:25, 22 June 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...
Click to read more »doesn't focus on any actual analysis of the character. #3 is a trash CBR listicle that should never even be used on Wikipedia. #4 seems to not be working...
Click to read more »topic. The only non-primary sources being used in the article are little listicle blurbs or extremely passing mentions (the "Superhero Comics" book, for...
Click to read more »an opinion piece, but okay. Las Vegas Sun: entry on an upcoming events listicle. Routine and not substantial. Daily Beast: incidental mention. LA Weekly:...
Click to read more »similar lists, but it'll be OK if the listicle has a bit of text about the company,. Literally every single listicle will have enough content by that metric...
Click to read more »even contain the term “Bulgarian umbrella”. The fourth source is a brief listicle piece that is definitely not a reliable source. Mccapra (talk) 21:42, 16...
Click to read more »WP:NARTIST. The article sourcing consists of churnalism from human interest listicles, user-submitted content, or her own statements about her technique. A...
Click to read more »Nonnotable relatively recently company. Coverage is either local, part of listicles, or driven by school shootings. Perhaps in a few years it will meet NCORP...
Click to read more »legislature boosts her notability at all — and having been named in a "top 40" listicle is also not a notability claim in and of itself, so a 111-word blurb in...
Click to read more »not reliable. MakeUseOf is unreliable per WP:VG/S, and that article is a listicle regardless. If a 30 word WP:STUB is all we can get out of this, I think...
Click to read more »INDISCRIMINATE. Computers can do infinitely many things. Do we really need a listicle to describe all the things we can think computers can do? Second, this...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Beyond coverage in listicles about odd band names, I am unable to find in-depth, significant coverage...
Click to read more »sg/edge-35-under-35/ (too sparse). This is effectively a content-free listicle, as "<foo> Under <bar>" lists tend to be. We can't use https://generationt...
Click to read more »sources. Sources present are trivial mentions, a press release, dubious listicles, and so on. The creator of the article appears to be UPE as well. Madeline (part...
Click to read more »TWL) Non-notable Pokemon with no SIGCOV. Most refs in the article are listicles of "the ___ (creepiest, disturbing, etc) Pokemon". Alternative to deletion...
Click to read more »subject's notability. That looks to be all we have here, along with a listicle on the Cosmo website. Fails WP:GNG/WP:NEO. I don't think there's enough...
Click to read more »puff-piece; Newsweek (and other publications) earn a commission for "best of" listicles, which rules out the majority of the sources. UGA (The University of Georgia...
Click to read more »dictated by listicles. But again, this underrated character is still described in the episode article! We're not scrubbing mention of this listicle author's...
Click to read more »the company itself. CSQ: Not significant. Passing mention of Bezalel in listicle with an entry for the company founder. Apple World Today: Not significant...
Click to read more »a source about the network it aired on, and a random "top 15 whatever" listicle -- and that's after removing Know Your Meme, Vimeo, and Facebook. Further...
Click to read more »coverage didn't exist at all. But if I do that, all that's left is a Buzzfeed listicle and a local human interest piece in her husband's hometown media about...
Click to read more »X-Files spinoff predicted 9/11!" is the sort of take that bubbles up on listicles now and then. It's possible that a decent encyclopedia article on such...
Click to read more »are an interview with a blog (unnamed author), and being mentioned in listicles. Google search does not unearth significant coverage in multiple reliable...
Click to read more »notability requirements, with reception pretty thin and comprised of mostly listicles. Den of Geek ranked him the #1 Tekken character in 2017, but it's not...
Click to read more »reason), and I'm not completely anti-listicle like some editors are, but I'm not seeing much in these listicles. So that's only one good source. That...
Click to read more »Article content is all trivial with the de rigueur collection of reception listicles. Merge/redirect to List of Mortal Kombat characters. sixtynine • whaddya...
Click to read more »someone to create this one day. PS. Given we live in the age of AI-aided listicle churnalism, I expect we could find sources to save this - but given abysmal...
Click to read more »commentary. None of the sources can be found that talks about him besides listicles or passing mention. Sources elsewhere are only trivial mentions in Tekken...
Click to read more »that's just one source. Would love to see notability established for a listicle of all the novelty distros someday. Aaron Liu (talk) 13:20, 3 September...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) The article contains again mostly listicles/rankings and passing mentions. The only useful source per WP:BEFORE was...
Click to read more »we can't assume it's reliable. In any case, the "article" cited is a listicle that has three sentences of content, so it hardly counts as in-depth coverage...
Click to read more »watch | logs) What am I supposed to place in the Reception section if not listicles? Also, why does everyone keep trying to remove draft categories?(Oinkers42)...
Click to read more »Zero WP:SIGCOV. It seems like this article might be also relying to the listicles for ex. "Top 10 satisying character" or included at the list of the worst...
Click to read more »inclusion of her art in a few clickbait listicles. I didn't find significant coverage in my BEFORE, just more listicles that mainly served to link to the subject's...
Click to read more »(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Listicle with minimal coverage (and what it does get is from blog-type websites...
Click to read more »bands that played at a five year anniversary of a music club; 3) part of a listicle; 4) Not particularly in-depth coverage as it is a highlight along with...
Click to read more »mentions Security Scorecard with regard to something else, and Source 3 is a listicle. – Epicgenius (talk) 14:53, 29 June 2024 (UTC) Delete per nom and the analysis...
Click to read more »still concerned this is too much a trivia listicle, but it if it kept, it's ok-ish. It is a much better listicle than most others I've seen. Piotr Konieczny...
Click to read more »(UTC) Those sources are just passing mentions though. 3 sentences in a listicle - or 1/18th of an article if you will - is a hard sell for "significant...
Click to read more »TWL) Non-notable Pokemon with no SIGCOV. Most refs in the article are listicles of "the best __ pokemon". Alternative to deletion is redirecting to the...
Click to read more »mentions in relation to the series' writer and passing mentions in garbage listicles. TTN (talk) 13:32, 8 May 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...
Click to read more »significant independent coverage comparing different BitTorrent clients. (This listicle—which barely does any direct comparison—is the best source I can find.)...
Click to read more »this might be a sufficiently notable topic to justify an article, this listicle is not that. This is exactly the type of article to which WP:TNT applies...
Click to read more »of local papers, with the exception of the game's listing in a Wapost listicle. I would assume a notable youth sports rivalry would have been written...
Click to read more »is obviously poorly written. The reception section is also filled with listicles only without that much commentary. 🍕Boneless Pizza!🍕 (🔔) 12:30, 4 August...
Click to read more »JSTOR · TWL) Rather promotional article, sourced to press releases and listicles - can't find any sourcing that would satisfy CORPDEPTH, so fails NCORP...
Click to read more »fellow of a major research society). I don't think the R&D World magazine listicle [2] counts towards WP:GNG or anything else, because it is not a significant...
Click to read more »chart, which doesn't even mention the specific episode. The other is a "listicle" that basically just lists the personal top ten favorites of someone who...
Click to read more »you slice it. TheGamer also has an entire listicle devoted to him, and while generally speaking listicles should be avoided, the entire thing is about...
Click to read more »05:44, 11 January 2023 (UTC) These links are passing mentions, profiles or listicle articles and are not signifcant, and the first one is not reliable. IMDB...
Click to read more »source transferred to the larger article to help with WP:V--at least that listicle appears to be independent, although only a passing mention. -2pou (talk)...
Click to read more »connected sources, an interview with the owner, listings, including a listicle of 100...'s in Inc., name checks or sources that do not mention the company...
Click to read more »TV series)#Seasons, as he was on two seasons. The only reference is a listicle titled "Top 10 Worst Bachelors", which is clearly insufficient. [1] is...
Click to read more »current list of random works in which the theme appears? No. Do I think this listicle is salvageable? No. WP:TNT applies. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus|...
Click to read more »technologies" and got a ton of listicles, so creating a list like this is definitely not an original idea. Listicles are not reliable sources, but all...
Click to read more »first blog is in Wikipedia's spam blacklist, and the second blog offers a listicle with no significant coverage of the article subject. — Newslinger talk...
Click to read more »one of the top 5 most searched for porn actresses on Pornhub, and this listicle of 10 popular porn actresses. But those are all pretty low-quality, and...
Click to read more »from scholarly books/sources and should be cleaned up all the trivial listicles that doesn't have valuable commentary to the character. GreenishPickle...
Click to read more »guess is acceptable through a category system, but having an article (listicle...) is pointless. List of foo-type media set in Foo-land is almost never...
Click to read more »his name. The Globalgrind article appears to the product of a top ten listicle content farm (cf. WP:WATCHMOJO and their ilk), the Forbes article is by...
Click to read more »searching, even as a single string, but his name mostly seems to pop up in listicles ("best Big Brother alliances") that I don't think meet SIGCOV. He's got...
Click to read more »its run or after the fact (outside a couple "how rich is Pat Sajak?" listicles), suggesting a violation of WP:SUSTAINED and therefore, of WP:GNG. Ten...
Click to read more »the Cloud", which appears to be a personal blog. The others are random listicles about "viral" sheet music that only mention Stump/Faerie's Aire in passing...
Click to read more »Smash sources, but most of it is just oddly specific listicles. I'd be fine with using listicles if there were whole articles dedicated to or using Falco...
Click to read more »certification itself) have the song as its primary subject, rather they are listicles concerning the album or the band's discography as a whole. Furthermore...
Click to read more »outside of being the usual n-th something in a low-quality plut summarizing listicle here or there. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 06:24...
Click to read more »fictional nations on real islands. I don't support a merge because this listicle is mostly unsourced and the obvious target is already full of unsourced...
Click to read more »straight business directory entry and a "6 best massage schools in Toronto" listicle in an unreliable blog, which is not a GNG-worthy source and wouldn't be...
Click to read more »to me, Billy / Transmissions 20:24, 25 January 2024 (UTC) Delete, silly listicle, not notable. Fans who google the question can get exactly the same list...
Click to read more »about two communities named Buzzard Roost in Mississippi as part of a listicle of weird MS place names, but the page had lots of image and my internet...
Click to read more »substance to any of them either – just because the song exists or was in a listicle like this doesn't mean they have coverage that justifies presence on Wikipedia...
Click to read more »substance to any of them either – just because the song exists or was in a listicle like this doesn't mean they have coverage that justifies presence on Wikipedia...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) A one-off magazine listicle turned into a Wikipedia article. I see it's reprinted in a couple places...
Click to read more »missed in the sweep. RPGFan, a reliable source, has included it in several listicles that don't provide enough for notability. QuietCicada chirp 15:25, 18...
Click to read more »down to whether she is notable for being included in various early career listicle-type articles, including Forbes 30 under 30 and a similar (but perhaps...
Click to read more »cruft was added. The only part relevant to the modern day is a Kotaku listicle. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 15:00, 10 May 2024 (UTC) I'm open to that if someone wants...
Click to read more »Tridentine Mass. Anyone looking up "Latin Mass" will want that page, not a listicle of Masses celebrated in Latin. The fact that several liturgies may be celebrated...
Click to read more »Delete. Two citations are just to the image and the other one is in a listicle. (KYM doesn't even have an entry.) SWinxy (talk) 20:08, 9 May 2023 (UTC)...
Click to read more »Eventflare article is definitely not reliable, being little more than a Listicle advertisement. The International Christian University article is dubiously...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This compilation of listicles article is superfluous. It simply gather's tables from the three existing...
Click to read more »find suitable sources. The sources currently used in the article are listicles and lightly rehashed press releases; I can't find anything giving the...
Click to read more »be sponsored content. The only other mentions I see are things like "listicles", or articles with headlines like "5 apps for productivity", which do...
Click to read more »FENS · JSTOR · TWL) They have one mention in children's book. And online listicles. Can anybody explain how is this notable? MitYehor📘^talk 23:38, 25 August...
Click to read more »encyclopedic coverage. Even the “Reception” part is mostly built from review or listicle-style articles, which are not strong independent analysis. So it fails...
Click to read more »(UTC) Merge to List of Dead or Alive characters. The reception is 100% listicles, so in-depth coverage required by GNG is not met. WP:FANCRUFT, sadly....
Click to read more »subject and is written as a part of what appears to be a short blurb, listicle-style series on their website, calling the depth of coverage into question...
Click to read more »Like the previous noms, reception is lackluster and consists entirely of listicles in what little is there. Fails WP:GNG. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 12:49, 9 November...
Click to read more »like this, and it's not the job of an encyclopaedia to replicate a lazy listicle clickbait article. Bondegezou (talk) 10:30, 14 November 2016 (UTC) Delete...
Click to read more »candidate, is parked on primary sources (and a local-interest magazine listicle) rather than reliable or notability-making ones. And no, the fact that...
Click to read more »work in the case of some like the Medic. Most of the sourcing here is listicles, and when you look deeper under the hood there's no commentary to satisfy...
Click to read more »cleanup. Clarityfiend (talk) 01:43, 24 October 2023 (UTC) So, another listicle? This AFD is not designed to strongarm a cleanup, I genuinely feel this...
Click to read more »profession) -- the reliability of which hinges on it being picked up as a listicle by mainstream sources. --— Rhododendrites talk \\ 05:10, 12 January 2015...
Click to read more »article the usual fictional bio/powers, and a reception limited to a single listicle mention from a "Generally unreliable" source (Sportskeeda); my BEFORE yields...
Click to read more »and Fox News sources are just interviews, and the Popdust link is just a listicle in the context of MTV shows. I have found no proof of the Annie Awards...
Click to read more »lesser MK characters whenever they're not pumping out the usual substandard listicle content. sixtynine • whaddya want? • 18:00, 10 April 2023 (UTC) I mean...
Click to read more »single event, although there's a lot of reliance on person's quotes. The listicle article isn't in-depth. That gives marginal 2 sources that came about from...
Click to read more »also looked in "local" Waterford news sources - and could only find this "listicle" - where the subject is only mentioned in passing. Will continue with BEFORE...
Click to read more »FENS · JSTOR · TWL) They have one mention in children's book. And online listicles. Can anybody explain how is this notable? MitYehor📘^talk 23:38, 25 August...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) BLP of a young comedian sourced to listicles and passing mentions. Mccapra (talk) 08:48, 11 November 2021 (UTC) Note:...
Click to read more »not meet WP:ORGCRITE, WP:GNG. All provided sources are mere-mentions, listicles, or database entries. The closest to in-depth coverage is [1], but even...
Click to read more »article looks good, the The Stranger articles look good, and the Flavorwire listicle looks good. I think the Seattle Post-Intelligencer post is a blog post...
Click to read more »fails WP:NSONG or WP:GNG, the current refs are unreliable databases, short listicle reviews, or routine announcements that IMO fail the WP:SIGCOV requirements...
Click to read more »a 34-word blurbette in a "many blurbettes about many different albums" listicle — which means that it's not substantive enough to constitute a magic GNG...
Click to read more »few sentences in a "13 of the creepiest, most messed-up YouTube videos" listicle [2], but this is not enough for notability per WP:GNG. Also I feel like...
Click to read more »indiscriminate list of games featuring werewolves. Even if you ignore the listicle part of this article and paraphrase the lead paragraph, it would offer...
Click to read more »article discussing the song's sample in depth, American Songwriter top-five listicle listing the song as a must-listen "deep cut", and so on). Has a WP:BEFORE...
Click to read more »little commentary I found is in this CBR listicle, others are just plot summary and mention in other listicles. Neocorelight (Talk) 02:28, 8 July 2024...
Click to read more »99.9% cruft with one reception source, and even that is a meaningless listicle. 💥Casualty • Hop along. • 23:44, 24 June 2024 (UTC) Keep or merge with...
Click to read more »known awards.Darkm777 (talk) 03:26, 18 April 2025 (UTC) Delete per nom. Listicles are not enough to pass WP:ANYBIO. Gheus (talk) 02:05, 19 April 2025 (UTC)...
Click to read more »best shot is a listicle-type article from TheGamer which is a good start but generally provides no guidance on the genre: [7]. The listicle type seems to...
Click to read more »here has any salvage value. Morever, Jpxg's sources are no good. A few listicles doesn't really help much for determining notability for something like...
Click to read more »from TechRadar, Softpedia, and Windows Central. There are also dozens of listicles that include the software such as articles by The Windows Club, Digital...
Click to read more »after doing WP:BEFORE + reception section were only filled with ranking/listicles sources. GreenishPickle! (🔔) 20:28, 30 June 2023 (UTC) Note: This discussion...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:WikiProject Board and table games/Sources), besides, it's a 6 minutes long listicle that IMHO isn't WP:SIGCOV. Of course, this is just my opinion, many thanks...
Click to read more »https://yebhitheekhai.com/l-for-love-is-love/ (too sparse). This is a listicle of poems. https://lambdaliterary.org/2019/12/imagining-a-world-with-qu...
Click to read more »Coverage seems limited to plot summaries and passing mentions on junk listicles from what I can see. The two non-primary sources in the article contain...
Click to read more »Mario character because they’ve been mentioned half a dozen times in listicles. Dronebogus (talk) 00:55, 14 February 2023 (UTC) Merge per Zxcvbnm. All...
Click to read more »an internet forum, that only seems to be mentioned (or regurgitated as listicles) on other internet forums and blogs does not meet the criteria of WP:GNG...
Click to read more »merged to a listicle of Goshen mayors or a history article. Unscintillating (talk) 21:48, 26 November 2017 (UTC) We do not keep "listicles" that contain...
Click to read more »three sentences announcement, ref 8 is a database, whereas ref 9 is a listicle listing the cast (non-SIGCOV). Was submitted (not even shortlisted for...
Click to read more »and List of Pokémon (441–493)#Probopass. Refbombed links to mentions in listicles does not constitute significant coverage for the general notability guideline...
Click to read more »League Soccer team seasons}}, to create a unified navbox for links to all listicles on U.S. and Canadian club seasons. An example of what this could look...
Click to read more »FENS · JSTOR · TWL) They have one mention in children's book. And online listicles. Can anybody explain how is this notable? MitYehor📘^talk 23:38, 25 August...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:REDUNDANT Outdated listicle originally by long banished user. Better served by European Nomenclature...
Click to read more »few books as a supporting character. No reception (aside from a single listicle entry)/development, just the usual plot summary. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul...
Click to read more »indication of WP:SIGCOV to satisfy WP:N. It's literally just a splattering of listicles, as much as I hate to use the term. Kung Fu Man (talk) 02:19, 4 April...
Click to read more »a Good Article. Much of the reception is either trivial coverage from listicles or content farm style articles, and standards have increased significantly...
Click to read more »discussed it, but it also does not add to notability and is part of this listicle. I checked Japanese sources, and found only passing mentions of the game's...
Click to read more »WP:GNG. No particular coverage outside of trivial mentions in trashy listicles from what I can see. TTN (talk) 14:21, 20 July 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion...
Click to read more »Strangest Buildings in the World Dream Focus 16:45, 16 January 2024 (UTC) Listicles......don't......count. And in any case, as I said immediately above, the...
Click to read more »meaningful way to subcategorize. The sources offered above are worthless listicles which don't count toward any sort of notability. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos)...
Click to read more »Reception for the Hammer Bro's is absolutely terrible and sourced mainly to listicles. I don't believe there's a single reference in the article that is WP:SIGCOV...
Click to read more »whatever else the company has to say about itself. Calcalist is just a brief listicle entry; the other provided sources are either routine coverage or else just...
Click to read more »infographic (not significant coverage), a "Most Successful Indian Entrepeneurs" listicle (also not significant coverage), and some more routine coverage of a company...
Click to read more »before 2022 (because LLMs weren't really a thing then, so there is far less listicle spam), and/or by adding a compulsory "magazine" term to the search (because...
Click to read more »blog that quotes the subject. This one from Red Online appears to be a listicle. The lone "Keep" voter from that AfD was subsequently blocked, FWIW. All...
Click to read more »Chris Kreider 21:58, 26 October 2006 (UTC) Keep This type of list/article (listicle?) is pretty common for videogame series. It needs to be cleaned up and...
Click to read more »AfD are permanent dead links and look like they likely were low-quality listicles. Search turns up nothing useful. -- Maddy from Celeste (WAVEDASH) 11:48...
Click to read more »exists, but the referencing is almost entirely to primary sources and listicles, not real media coverage that is substantively about him. For example...
Click to read more »nomination. Creative Boom looks reasonably reliable, but a scant paragraph in a listicle isn't exactly significant coverage. The web design book isn't talking about...
Click to read more »review. I know it's CBR, but this is an actual review as opposed to a listicle (where he definitely shows up in a few as well). Dinobot comes up in several...
Click to read more »nom's assessment of the sources: press releases, softball interviews, listicles, and other trivial coverage. One primary source confirming they are registered...
Click to read more »contribute encyclopedic value to the listicle. Except for the minor issue with the lede image, all images present in the listicle have suitable captions. Sourcing...
Click to read more »this into a list. WP:USRD merged most farm to market road articles into "listicles", where each section of a list is a mini-article. (See WP:USRD/RCS.) Something...
Click to read more »FENS · JSTOR · TWL) They have one mention in children's book. And online listicles. Can anybody explain how is this notable? MitYehor📘^talk 23:38, 25 August...
Click to read more »games according to being set in Rome. I searched and only turned up this listicle at Paste Magazine. Happy to change my !vote if others turn up, but I'm...
Click to read more »nom. Topic also seems to fail LISTN as the only sources are 'top 10' listicles. Avilich (talk) 16:50, 25 October 2021 (UTC) Delete – per the nominator...
Click to read more »sourcing consists entirely of localized routine food reviews, neighborhood listicles, and regional entertainment roundups (e.g., Eater Portland, Portland Monthly...
Click to read more »found a few more reliable sources which talk about the album: [5], [6] and listicle [7]. ASTIG😎 (ICE T • ICE CUBE) 12:54, 18 April 2021 (UTC) Relisted to...
Click to read more »in-depth source of information I was able to find. Mentioned in a lot of 'listicles' (e.g. 1 2, 3) but their reliability is questionable, and they don't have...
Click to read more »the reception of the article is solely based on trivial mentions and listicles. In fact, it is unintentionally ironic that a section about how he is...
Click to read more »Source called Togepi "a fatty", another source ranked in 93rd place in a listicle, etc. Nothing of substance. Sergecross73 msg me 12:33, 23 April 2022 (UTC)...
Click to read more »standards, and I have serious doubts. Most of the sources in the article are listicles, all of them are industry publications. A search for additional sources...
Click to read more »photographs that happen to have her in them; and one is just a short blurb in a listicle from a non-notable and unreliable food blog in which random people were...
Click to read more »WP:SIGCOV. Zero commentary to the both characters. It relies mostly on listicles and passing mentions at the reception section. Some of the source were...
Click to read more »doesn't help), and sources on the article are either primary sources, or listicle-style articles with titles like "15 classic Disney film death scenes that...
Click to read more »singing[2], and a mention in an Cromosoma X (Spanish-language LGBT site) listicle [3]. Cheers, gnu57 00:18, 27 April 2020 (UTC) Delete a non-notable pornographic...
Click to read more »items that could be added is unfeasibly large. It’s just an overblown listicle. Mccapra (talk) 21:09, 29 May 2026 (UTC) Delete Literally, we are WP:NOTTVTROPES...
Click to read more »TWL) Could this be a proper article? Probably. But the current TVTropic listicle is not the way to do it. Like dozens of similar lists of trivial mentions...
Click to read more »useful, it should have been a subpage of some project, not a standalone listicle. - UtherSRG (talk) 16:53, 25 June 2026 (UTC) One possibility: what if we...
Click to read more »[1] - and that's Forbes, so probably paid for. Outside of that we have listicles [2], a two-part promotional "diary" [3][4], and plenty of board membership...
Click to read more »2023 (UTC) I note especially the presence of quite a few unsourced name listicles, which should be reconsidered even if sourced. CMD (talk) 02:17, 29 July...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) He is rich, and is therefore included in listicles of rich people, usually placing 70+ in his countries top 100. Nothing...
Click to read more »real world coverage of the character. Mentions are limited to trivial listicles. TTN (talk) 13:10, 4 May 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...
Click to read more »things they didn't even actually *say*. What's left is a WP:REFBOMB of listicles, with only Sterling's statements offering any actual commentary about...
Click to read more »consists of trivial mentions pulled from reviews and brief mentions in listicle articles that otherwise contain most or all other characters as well. The...
Click to read more »the only music-related footnote here is a "10 best death metal singers" listicle in an unreliable source, which is not sufficient to claim passage of NMUSIC...
Click to read more »the podcast a bronze award. The show has been mentioned in quite a few listicles from outlets such as Esquire, The Guardian, Radio Times, The Daily Mail...
Click to read more »a gameplay mechanic in the game in Game Rant [1] and some even briefer listicle-type assessments of the game in TheGamer [2] and Sportskeeda [3]. But I...
Click to read more »December 2007, but from what it's sourcing it sounds like it may be a listicle or other non-significant coverage. Other sources are from a festival program...
Click to read more »search revealed were social media and what looked to be blog posts, and one listicle. Nothing on Google Books but a single name-check mention. Google news found...
Click to read more »