reliable secondary sources for the topic can be cited. Shortcuts WP:LSCWP:LSC WP:SELCRITWP:SELCRIT WP:LISTCRITWP:LISTCRIT WP:LISTCRITERIAWP:LISTCRITERIA...

Reporting statistics of link lsc.wiksign.org; 0 records. lsc.wiksign.org: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • Spamcheck...

Reporting statistics of link lsc.wikisign.org; 0 records. lsc.wikisign.org: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • Spamcheck...

Reporting statistics of link lsc.org.uk; 0 records. lsc.org.uk: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • Spamcheck • blacklist...

apollo.lsc.vsc.edu: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • Spamcheck • blacklist hits • MER-C X-wiki • gs • Reports:...

the LSC up to even more attacks"? Subsequent developments 2. The following sentence confused me a bit: "Since the Court struck down the limitation LSC has...

sentences. The abbreviation of LSC should come at its first mention in the lead, not in the second section of the article. "LSC" is used in the lead but the...

further edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was Delete as per WP:LSC. Pastor Theo (talk) 01:38, 25 July 2009 (UTC) List of Shinto shrines in the...

in Montreal (talk) 01:26, 22 April 2017 (UTC) Delete See WP:LISTN and WP:LSC. Wikipedia is not a directory, and lists on Wikipedia should group together...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) List is entirely subjective and thus fails WP:LSC and is almost certainly copyright of the Irish Independent hence failing...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Unencyclopedic list. Fails WP:LSC. No discernible uniform criteria. Evaluation appears entirely subjective...

SYNTH content. Deletion arguments were backed by reference to policy such as LSC and OR. The keep side mostly relied on assertion and failed to effectively...

else's gem. Legacypac (talk) 05:34, 22 February 2018 (UTC) Delete Per WP:LSC a list article require a selection criteria which is unambiguous, objective...

article to be kept, only the subject. This is per established guidelines (WP:LSC): Lists are created when the subject is notable but "every entry in the list...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Unencyclopedic list. Fails WP:LSC. No discernible uniform criteria. Evaluation appears entirely subjective...

Wikipedia policy (per WP:LSC). -- Notecardforfree (talk) 21:10, 3 January 2016 (UTC) Keep - perfectly legitimate stand-alone list per WP:LSC and WP:STANDALONE...

appears potentially notable (PowerMAN), making it hard to think of any WP:LSC which would work for an article like this. I also have a more general argument...

page.‎ The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 15:49, 23 August 2010 (UTC) L.S.C. Oakeshott (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs |...

Delete the subject of this list is far to broad and indiscriminate; fails WP:LSC.-- danntm T C 01:52, 7 March 2016 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

bunch of past unnotable concerts put together, i.e. the past schedule. WP:LSC (you have a "complete list" that is not short and full of non-notable entries)...

fence on this one. Could you perhaps comment on the article in light of WP:LSC? And do you think this falls into WP:INDISCRIMINATE? This might help clarify...

system. Eumat114 (Message) 07:37, 14 July 2020 (UTC) A source check excluding LSC posts, Facebook, and YouTube yield mostly irrelevant results. Eumat114 (Message)...

WP:LISTPEOPLE and WP:LSC advise that we shouldn't have lists of people who are non-notable themselves, and most of these names are redlinks. (WP:LSC specifically...

America1000 03:37, 18 November 2015 (UTC) Keep. The selection criteria satisfy WP:LSC, and there are reliable sources upon which this list can be substantiated...

notability for each entry as long as the scope of the list is manageable, see WP:LSC. There are also likely to be several notable synagogues on that list; the...

exist does not overcome the policy violations pursuant to WP:LSC and WP:SALAT. Per WP:LSC, the selection criteria for this list are ambiguous and subjective...

they do not provide any consistent list inclusion criteria (required per WP:LSC or actually take the form of a list. Typically they each discuss 2-3 films...

an indiscriminate collection of information, see wp:IINFO, WP:NOTDIR, WP:LSC, WP:SALAT. Interesting only to those who created the list. Maashatra11 (talk)...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Unencyclopedic list. Fails WP:LSC. No discernible uniform criteria. Evaluation appears entirely subjective...

like a list or in list format but even if it is intended to be it fails WP:LSC. Most of the links just consist of links to other poorly formatted WP:SAL...

enough for its own article. The entire list fails WP:SALAT, WP:CSC and WP:LSC. I can't imagine how "this list contributes to the state of human knowledge"...

discussions. Musa Talk  13:30, 10 November 2015 (UTC) Delete, per nom and WP:LSC. -- Notecardforfree (talk) 17:58, 10 November 2015 (UTC) Delete - Nothing...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) List fails WP:LSC. The list has no defineable criteria for inclusion, save the claim that each...

linked referenced to a place to buy the movies. No indication of meeting WP:LSC or WP:Verifiability. Prof. Mc (talk) 12:46, 22 June 2016 (UTC) * Weak keep...

objects with an external link to the most relevant database at the bottom? WP:LSC seems to suggest this course of action and directly contradicts what we came...

an indiscriminate collection of information. See wp:IINFO, WP:NOTDIR, WP:LSC, WP:SALAT. p.s. List of Turkish pop music performers is redirecting to "List...

claimed reason for notability, so there's no way to establish a useful WP:LSC. Lists (and by extension to an extent, comparisons) of mostly non-notable...

(talk) 04:27, 5 September 2015 (UTC) Delete: Fails WP:SALAT, WP:CSC and WP:LSC. Per WP:CSC, every entry in the list is supposed to meet the notability criteria...

this page.‎ The result was speedy keep. I can see how WP:NOTESAL and WP:LSC indeed apply, my mistake for not considering them when actually creating...

are to either sales pages or (for the free entries) download pages. Per WP:LSC, list entries should either have articles or a reasonable expectation of...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) A sea of red links, fails WP:LSC. Mattg82 (talk) 01:07, 28 January 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...

actors#O as not all entries there are bluelinked, and roles indicate WP:LSC is likely satisfied; with ECP applied to prevent tendentious recreation....

are bound to be many more.--TM 17:06, 20 August 2014 (UTC) Per Wikipedia:LSC#Selection_criteria ""Creation guide" lists—lists devoted to a large number...

Shawn in Montreal (talk) 11:02, 15 November 2015 (UTC) Delete per nom and WP:LSC. I don't there is any way to create objective selection criteria here. --...

Unnecessary and trivial list —Latchem 04:35, 1 August 2016 (UTC) Delete: WP:LSC suggests asking "If this person/thing/etc., wasn't an X, would it reduce...

"List of ..." software articles, where entries meet the first criteria of WP:LSC (each entry meeting the notability criteria). If there's no article and no...

May 2023 (UTC) Juli Wolfe (talk · contribs) Onatic (talk · contribs) ProfLSC (talk · contribs) Not1Soul (talk · contribs) JesseL0vesT0ast (talk · contribs)...

November 2022 (UTC) Delete as this is a list which does not meet the WP:LSC guideline. Bruxton (talk) 16:24, 4 December 2022 (UTC) The above discussion...

'cult following'. ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk) 12:20, 30 March 2024 (UTC) Delete: Per WP:LSC, selection criteria should be unambiguous, objective, and supported by reliable...

gathered in the past month, and no significant coverage was cited. It fails WP:LSC, and has no WP:Notability basis. Toast (talk) 02:50, 6 November 2022 (UTC)...

all WP software lists now contain only notable, bluelinked items, per WP:LSC. If the redlinked items were removed, this list would only have 2 items.Dialectric...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) In accordance with WP:LSC, don't believe that this list is encyclopedically useful, it is an incomplete...

list is likely to be notable per WP:LISTN. The list seems to also pass WP:LSC, particularly as most of the items are blue links. However, I looked at a...

2C_images.2C_or_media_files. It also violateds Wikipedia:LSC: selection criterea states that "Selection criteria should be unambiguous...

definable subject.Pincrete (talk) 19:08, 22 May 2016 (UTC) Delete. Per WP:LSC, lists must have unambiguous selection criteria. As RJaguar3 explains above...

2015 (UTC) Keep. This list has clearly defined selection criteria, per WP:LSC. Additionally, the narrow scope of the list complies with WP:SALAT. The argument...

with a couple of words next to each bluelink. Don't think this passes WP:LSC. Not all of the entires are notable, (notice how some of those bluelinks...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Unencyclopedic list. Fails WP:LSC. No discernible uniform criteria. Evaluation appears entirely subjective...

or AFD though. Bearcat (talk) 03:20, 25 January 2016 (UTC) Delete per WP:LSC because the selection criteria will necessarily be subjective. -- Notecardforfree...

Rhino131.   // Timothy :: talk  15:44, 17 November 2020 (UTC) Delete. Per WP:LSC, a list of every character atman or any of his allies has encountered would...

Ethics, Race and Technology Institution University of Denver Instructor ProfLSC Wikipedia Expert Ian (Wiki Ed) Subject Sociology Course dates 2026-01-05...

source does not mention the artist or title or censorship at all), per WP:LSC - "Selection criteria should be unambiguous, objective, and supported by...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) List fails WP:LSC. The list has no defineable criteria for inclusion, save the claim that each...

December 2010 (UTC) WP:LINKFARM says "except for...lists" and then links to WP:LSC. So I don't think you can use wp:LINKFARM to justify deleting this article...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Per WP:NOTDIR, WP:NOTCATALOG. WP:LSC says Criteria for inclusion should factor in encyclopedic and topical relevance...

don't have articles! Alzarian16 (talk) 15:23, 25 August 2010 (UTC) Keep WP:LSC specifically contemplates such lists: "Every entry in the list fails the...

inclusion, crossing all mediums, all genres, full of WP:OR analysis. Also WP:LSC Selection criteria should be unambiguous, objective, and supported by reliable...

deletion discussions. clpo13(talk) 17:59, 2 January 2016 (UTC) Delete per WP:LSC because inclusion in this list will necessarily be based on subjective and...

ThePlatypusofDoom (talk) 23:34, 1 August 2016 (UTC) Strong Delete as per failure of WP:LSC and WP:V. Plus the potential for BLP vios and the general WP:TNT aspect....

then why not have a list in which to collect all the NN content (per WP:LSC)? Jclemens (talk) 00:12, 24 September 2021 (UTC) @Jclemens: Those are all...

and red links. The list isn't particularly vibrant, so it doesn't meet WP:LSC which says Criteria for inclusion should factor in encyclopedic and topical...

cleanup and a lead section needs to be written following the guidelines at WP:LSC, but it is well sourced and appears to follow WP:SAL#Lists of people. AnemoneProjectors...

07:19:50: User en:Hjp lzu (talk - contribs) to en:Jiangping hu (diff). Links: lsc.amss.ac.cn/ hjplzu.googlepages.com/. 2008-01-19 07:07:41: User en:Hjp lzu...

establish a precedent: WP:WAX. --132 06:31, 23 October 2010 (UTC) To quote WP:LSC: A list is warranted if it is about a notable subject, and "Every entry in...

May 2023 (UTC) Juli Wolfe (talk · contribs) Onatic (talk · contribs) ProfLSC (talk · contribs) Not1Soul (talk · contribs) JesseL0vesT0ast (talk · contribs)...

nominated by the same person, WP:NOTDIR is irrelevant and the list meets WP:LSC as a list on a single topic, all of whose entries are notable. Dricherby...

(talk) 09:19, 22 June 2020 (UTC) Delete. As mentioned above, this violates WP:LSC and is likely an endless and subjective list that adds no real value to the...

functions as an index or directory of its own content." This list meets WP:LSC on grounds that every entry is individually notable. Dricherby (talk) 20:56...

itself. PaleAqua (talk) 15:41, 30 March 2013 (UTC) Keep - Seems to meet WP:LSC, and has third-party sources that do appear to show notability for the subject...

(UTC) I've pruned the inline URLs per WP:ELLIST and the red-linked per WP:LSC, have a look at it, Rojomoke. — Sam Sailor Talk! 11:21, 7 August 2016 (UTC)...

2021 (UTC) Strong Keep - It's a sub-list of the List of windmills, per WP:LSC. Of the mills in the Bailiwick of Guernsey, Vale Mill and Sark Windmill may...

articles for deletion. postdlf (talk) 12:22, 4 August 2017 (UTC) Keep per WP:LSC. If the list becomes too large, we can subdivide if necessary, but that is...

Mucho-Bravado page ( which I previously Prodded as it "fails to meet WP:LSC" which I think remains so). AllyD (talk) 08:34, 4 September 2012 (UTC) The...

internet products (ex. Amazon in recent time, even Bollywood films like LSC) are banned after twitter boycott. So, it's not gonna be different for wikipedia...

can be created to accommodate some of the schools listed here based on WP:LSC?AstrooKai (Talk) 00:09, 11 December 2024 (UTC) Previous AFD is Wikipedia:Articles...

— Timneu22 · talk 22:17, 2 June 2010 (UTC) Delete - Little prospect of LSC being addressed in the future as per the nomination; in particular the criteria...

categories serve different purposes per WP:CLN and WP:LIST. And, per WP:LSC, even the fact that most of the songs on the list are not notable enough...

(UTC) Keep and rename Venice of the East per Phil Bridger; article meets WP:LSC. Miniapolis 14:11, 15 July 2013 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved as...

(talk) 04:28, 5 September 2015 (UTC) Delete: Fails WP:SALAT, WP:CSC and WP:LSC. Per WP:CSC, every entry in the list is supposed to meet the notability criteria...

inclusion per WP:LISTN, WP:LISTCOMPANY, and WP:LSC. In fact, this appears to fail WP:LISTCOMPANY and WP:LSC because none of the references are reliable sources...

discussions. NORTH AMERICA1000 23:04, 14 March 2015 (UTC) Delete per WP:LSC - specifically in section 1 of the common selection criteria: Every entry...

criteria could probably be met. But as is, I think it does not pass all of WP:LSC. Thus, I agree with Chris the Paleontologist. Hoppingalong (talk) 03:22,...

it deleted because very few of the listings is independently notable", WP:LSC says that this is a reason for putting items on a list: "Common selection...

include: ABC News, Variety, Fox News Magazine. Also passes WP:NLIST and WP:LSC. NORTH AMERICA1000 18:07, 10 January 2015 (UTC) Relisted to generate a more...

(talk) 05:56, 23 April 2024 (UTC) Keep Valid list, presumably with defined WP:LSC. Not all entries need to be notable, and the presence of Mormon archaeology...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:LSC/WP:IINFO: no sources are presented to show the significance of this as a...

this has no entry at List of stars in Vela? Doesn't seem like there's an WP:LSC bar to inclusion there and an entry exists in Template:Stars of Vela, unless...

as spammy/indiscriminate, less notable entries should be culled as per WP:LSC. Holzklöppel (talk) 22:16, 31 December 2023 (UTC) edited 03:29, 3 January...

prediction software, if none of the specific programs are notable, there's no WP:LSC to create a notable list. But if the topic that the thing is a list of isn't...

also visit our official website at www.chicagodistrictstuco.weebly.com) LSC member of Curie High School Local School Council, Board Member of the Chicago...

are not unambiguous, objective, and supported by reliable sources, as WP:LSC recommends. Vexations (talk) 18:38, 29 May 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

that and then get back to me. GiantSnowman 12:26, 19 April 2015 (UTC) WP:LSC, a section on that page, addresses this subject, though this is just an observation...

Warden (talk) 19:25, 16 September 2011 (UTC) Keep. This list easily passes WP:LSC with a clearly defined criteria. Flaws in figures and updated data need to...

November 2022 (UTC) Delete. Non-notable fictional characters so this fails WP:LSC and the WP:GNG. The references are about the artists or the actors, not about...

March 2016 (UTC) Keep. The selection criteria for this lost comply with WP:LSC. Any disputes about the individuals that should be included in this list...

TikTok and Social Media Institution University of Denver Instructor ProfLSC Wikipedia Expert Ian (Wiki Ed) Subject Sociology Course dates 2025-09-04...

notable enough for a stand-alone non-redirect Wikipedia article, as per WP:LSC and WP:WTAF. If there's non-notable entries there, remove them if they're...

(95, 12, 1, 1) www.archive.org/details/tobaccoarchives (95, 593, 1, 1) www.lsc.org/tobacco/farming/growing/curing.html (95, 1, 1, 1) www.voanews...

we can ensure that such a list is dependent on secondary sources per WP:LSC and WP:SECONDARY. I've put together a few lists of films featuring common...

list only those extensions that have non-redirect Wikipedia articles per WP:LSC and WP:WTAF. This would only be "indiscriminate information" or "incomplete"...

This most certainly does meet the criteria for standalone lists. Per WP:LSC, the contents of the list are "unambiguous, objective, and supported by reliable...

or have been sponsored in their name than otherwise. It also fulfils WP:LSC by being clear about its objectives. If @Hariboneagle927: is concerned that...

(68) to LSC Communications (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) (diff  !top) - Link: www.bankruptcyobserver.com/bankruptcy-case/LSC-COMMUNICATIONS...

—Tom Morris (talk) 13:28, 4 October 2011 (UTC) Keep meets WP:GNG and WP:LSC. Media coverage in several Russian newspapers, journals, webpages, etc. I...

accurate - "Lawyers employed by the New York City LSC grantees, together with private LSC contributors, LSC indigent clients, and various state and local...

selecting items for a list but it is not the only way as is made clear at WP:LSC and WP:CSC. In particular, CSC#2 says, astonishingly, that a valid selection...

special editions of games notable on their own, so it also does not meet WP:LSC. Axem Titanium (talk) 21:53, 14 July 2022 (UTC) Delete - I'm surprised that...

boxes and other navigational templates." Furthermore this list matches WP:LSC, WP:CSC Selection criteria Selection criteria should be unambiguous, objective...

2009 (UTC) I find it interesting that you left out the exception for WP:LSC when you quoted part of it above. "... The one exception is for list articles...

overlong lists elsewhere on WP. (This obviously doesn't address any WP:RS, WP:LSC, WP:SYNTH issues that the current undocumented-instruction listing has, though...

"dumping ground" if you manage the list correctly. Also, your reading of WP:LSC is incorrect, it specifically allows for Subjective criteria: In cases where...

and a large number of the entries have no sources whatsoever so fail WP:LSC - blatant WP:OR. Acousmana 11:37, 4 August 2022 (UTC) Delete - See my vote...

this list is uncalled for and goes against the spirit of WP:SALAT and WP:LSC. Lists are not meant to be an end run around our inclusion guidelines, and...

argument to avoid. Andrew D. (talk) 19:00, 14 March 2015 (UTC) Delete per WP:LSC - specifically in section 1 of the common selection criteria: Every entry...

tagged it for Expand list. I think the red names are safe to include per WP:LSC - one would expect to see all these names on this list, each member is verifiably...

this comparison requires clean up per WP:WTAF, but not deletion. Per WP:LSC it should not even attempt to encompass all smartphones that ever existed...

WP:LSC which is the guide for what and how lists and the criteria for such lists are created. --Kim D. Petersen 01:47, 1 January 2014 (UTC) WP:LSC does...

numerical calculations". This would include Excel, Quicken, etc.... See WP:LSC The list has devolved into "anything related to math and computers", including...

policies do not demand complete objectivity in the concept behind a list. WP:LSC says it best, "Selection criteria should be unambiguous, objective, and supported...

split into 4 articles, both from a maintenance and SIGCOV perspective per WP:LSC, "Selection criteria (also known as inclusion criteria or membership criteria)...

Louisville Sailing Club (edit, talk, history, links) — http://saillouisville.org/lsc/. CSBot reporting at 23:12, 11 July 2015 (UTC) West coast training and development...

Navigation, and Development; it has independent sources, which complies with WP:LSC; this list has an important complementary role, including for the creation...

Cordless Larry (talk) 23:48, 22 November 2010 (UTC) Delete per WP:IINFO and WP:LSC for having a non-specific inclusion criteria. A "large and/or significant"...

of whether they are notable for playing it, but I'm not sure. As per WP:LSC: "Selection criteria should be unambiguous, objective, and supported by reliable...

actor's article so we should have a standalone article have a look at WP:LSC - "it is especially important that inclusion be based on reliable sources...

independent reliable sources, and overly specific to begin with see WP:LISTN, WP:LSC, WP:IINFO, and WP:SALAT. Tinkering Gnome (talk) 14:23, 30 August 2019 (UTC)...

based-reason for delete in the nomination. Are there problems with WP:SALAT, WP:LSC, WP:NLIST? Worth emphasising NLIST here: "The entirety of the list does not...

created the article in the first place. I should also think this follows WP:LSC, WP:UCS, and goes with WP:NOT in these circumstances. --WellThisIsTheReaper...

talk | history | links | watch | logs) (diff - DELETED) - Link: allmy.bio/lsc-gacor (R/Xmeta/L) 2024-04-20 19:38:03 (UTC): w:fr:User:Bighoki2881 (t - c;...

coach of Loyola. She also has been an academic advisor, campus minister on LSC and WTC and to Regis Hall residents since 1991 — Preceding unsigned comment...

WP:NPOV. In this specific case, there is no selection criteria, violating WP:LSC. --Enos733 (talk) 21:10, 2 November 2024 (UTC) Keep and rename to "List of...

controversial statement regarding a living individual concerns the fact that the LSC Chair is a former member of the National Front but he has admitted this himself...

"Swedish game developers". Individual item notability is not required (WP:LSC). All this applies to indexes and outlines equally. Also "Sweden" and "game...

article just listed the important statistics and not random ones that fail WP:LSC like number of chess players. AnUnnamedUser (open talk page) 01:23, 8 August...

If the list were made complete it would be immensely long. This fails WP:LSC. — Jkudlick • t • c • s 21:14, 22 May 2016 (UTC) It's meant to be a list...

lists it's often the primary criterion for inclusion as explained in WP:LSC. In many cases, individual entries in such lists seem to be expected to be...

and unsourced additions, constantly becoming an indiscriminate list (WP:LSC), leading to WP:TNT being valid as well. —Ganesha811 (talk) 19:02, 8 October...

selection criteria of such a list should be limited to WP articles per WP:LSC (because the broader list could not meet the third bullet and the second...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Does not meet WP:GNG, WP:NLIST or WP:LSC. The list has a history of WP:FANCRUFT information and is still currently...

Wikipedia:Manual of Style (lists), and as in this case set by WP:LISTPURP, WP:STAND, WP:LSC, WP:LISTNAME, and WP:SALAT. That so much time and energy is spent by sources...

(talk•track) 10:08, 6 August 2014 (UTC) Keep: this list complies with WP:LSC and has no problems that could not be addressed by normal editing. — Dmitrij...

The material is of serious scholarly interest, and the list satisfies WP:LSC. There are various ways to go from here. I don't really accept the argument...

notwithstanding. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 04:07, 21 September 2021 (UTC) Comment per WP:LSC list elements could be all notable, all non-notable, or some combination...

(68) to LSC Communications (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) (diff  !top) - Link: www.bankruptcyobserver.com/bankruptcy-case/LSC-COMMUNICATIONS...

use. The selection criteria for this list are ambiguous and subjective: WP:LSC says that selection criteria for standalone lists must be "unambiguous" and...

with WP:V, and likely WP:OR. This list has no clear selection criteria (WP:LSC), fails to define what constitutes a notable Christmas literature work, and...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Currently does not meet WP:LSC, and unlikely there can be a selection criteria which will is 'unambiguous...

latter half of the article is a list and needs clear list criteria as per WP:LSC, but that's achievable. Bondegezou (talk) 10:07, 14 August 2019 (UTC) I thought...

inclusion criterion on the parent list in order to render it actually usable. WP:LSC suggests that "Every entry meets the notability criteria for its own non-redirect...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Indiscriminate list with an ill-defined WP:LSC and an unfortunate WP:GEOBIAS towards Indian authors. "Where is Justin Bieber...

coupletely unsourced, making it even worse. See wp:IINFO, WP:NOTDIR, WP:LSC, WP:SALAT, the relevant policies or guidelines. This list is interesting...

I shouldve been more specific. No lead section, lots of redlinks per WP:LSC, lists of people are supposed to be comprised of people who are notable because...

"prejudice" phobias (e.g. homophobia), but this article does satisfy WP:LSC (reliable sources describe these as legitimate terms for specific phobias)...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This list is completely subjective and fails WP:LSC. A comparable deletion discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List...

This does, however, need a lot of cleanup; we might want to consult WP:LSC and limit inclusions severely. Iseult Δx parlez moi 19:02, 21 June 2022 (UTC)...

fighter pilots of World War II (even if such a list existed) because of WP:LSC. buidhe 22:57, 9 December 2019 (UTC) On second thought it would be reasonable...

is an admission that this is precisely the sort of list encompassed in WP:LSC: While notability is often a criterion for inclusion in overview lists of...

2015 (UTC) I just realized that NENAL effectively exists in WP:LISTN and WP:LSC/WP:CSC. I don't find a seemingly indiscriminate list of friendly footy tournaments...

per nominator. Setting criteria for such an article is necessary (per WP:LSC), but not attempted and probably impossible for an article with this title...

and valid list topic. Rlendog (talk) 18:28, 17 August 2009 (UTC) Per WP:LSC, it is appropriate to have "list articles that are created explicitly because...

issue is that it's "too niche" (though there needs to be some form of WP:LSC on the page, like maybe removing non-notable software entries; this can be...

respond to my complaint that the list lacks a clear inclusion criterion. WP:LSC requires that the lead section presents an unambiguous statement of the membership...

September 2024 (UTC) Agreed with above that LISTCRITERIA is irrelevant. LSC concerns which items can be members of particular list topics, not whether...

can be found is not sufficient for a list article to survive AFD, see WP:LSC. Additionally, this particular convergence appears too specific to warrant...

for a specific event, the notability requirement need not be met." And WP:LSC notes that one common type of list is that where "Every entry in the list...

(talk) 08:50, 30 April 2024 (UTC) Comment. The nominator is saying that WP:LSC is not satisfied in a meaningful way. Having "theory" included in the title...

Appears to an WP:INDISCRIMINATE collection of events that lacks a clear WP:LSC and is overbroad. Could work better as a category. Niteshift36 (talk) 17:05...

unreasonably so by doing so. Jclemens (talk) 17:43, 18 June 2016 (UTC) WP:LSC also says: "Criteria for inclusion should thus factor in encyclopedic and...

WP:LSC which is the guide for what and how lists and the criteria for such lists are created. --Kim D. Petersen 01:47, 1 January 2014 (UTC) WP:LSC does...

as a set per WP:NLIST; if not, I'm sure more sources an be found. Per WP:LSC (and in particular the comment on BLP in WP:CSC the current list is WP:INDISCRIMINATE...

hence the name is somewhat misleading. In addition, this may also fail WP:LSC; FWIW, it could grow forever into a indiscriminate list of possibly terrestrial...

OR to determine what is common, and what is a misconception, violating WP:LSC. The idea that RS could be deferred to is a common misconception for a few...

and therefore encyclopedic as determined by Wikipedia policy. Fails WP:LSC: LSC requires that "Selection criteria (also known as inclusion criteria or...

supplied by the article. There are no criteria, which are required by WP:LSC, nor sources showing that such a grouping exists. Without these, this seems...

it establishes that the concept of a list of minor planets is notable. WP:LSC suggests that it is acceptable for certain types of lists (e.g. all known...

troubles. If anything, the mosque should not be part of the list per WP:LSC and WP:CSC. The photo also shouldn't be used as an indicator of notability...

wasn't clear enough so that Coinify could potentially be on the list per WP:LSC where not all entries require articles, unless they decide WP:CSC all entries...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Wildly indiscriminate. Violates WP:LSC - As Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and not a directory, repository of links...

Delete. As original nom in 2011, I still contend that this list fails WP:LSC. The criteria for inclusion is unclear. Much of the list is unsourced. There...

MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 09:19, 31 May 2021 (UTC) Draftify both lists. Per WP:LSC, lists need to have a selection criteria which is unambiguous, objective...

Keep the list is focussed and has focussed criteria for inclusion - see WP:LSC Lightburst (talk) 02:54, 8 December 2022 (UTC) Keep Meets WP:LISTN - concept...

precedents for such lists of notable individuals, as clarified in WP:SAL, WP:LSC, WP:LISTNAME, WP:SALAT, and WP:LISTPEOPLE, this list is specifically per...

After taking a look on some independence list guidelines (WP:NLIST, WP:LSC, WP:SALAT, and MOS:PURPLIST), I think it can be an independence list with...

least in part editorial convenience, not some objective criteria. (See WP:LSC.) Content. The History of Russian exploration section, while a commendable...

it as a movie cliche. Fails all the elements of WP:CSC, and also fails WP:LSC (highly subjective). WP:OR WP:V boom delete. Gaijin42 (talk) 16:01, 25 October...

basketball team, which are teams composed of top players? I dont see how WP:LSC can be met without some contrived, long-winded explanation that is never...

Hurricane Wind and Fire stated. Fails WP:NLIST and I feel like it fails WP:LSC as well. If it can be merged with more articles or lists with citable sources...

objective, with each entry supported by one or more references a la WP:LSC. KTC (talk) 23:38, 18 July 2012 (UTC) Delete Not seeing the sourcing which...

talk:TenPoundHammer. And even if there was a category, as some have suggested, per WP:LSC that would not make this list inappropriate. Rlendog (talk) 19:28, 24 February...

think it has sufficient credibility for the list to meet the criteria of WP:LSC as it is confined to a specific sub-set of New Zealand Firemen. I do agree...

exist does not overcome the policy violations pursuant to WP:LSC and WP:SALAT. Per WP:LSC, the selection criteria for this list are ambiguous and subjective...

Science University LFC Nissan FC Ladies OKI FC Winds Ohara Gakuen JaSRA LSC Okayama Yunogo Belle Renaissance Kumamoto FC Shimizu Daihachi SC Pleiades...

least in part editorial convenience, not some objective criteria. (See WP:LSC.) Content. The History of Russian exploration section, while a commendable...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) wp:IINFO, WP:NOTDIR, WP:LSC, WP:SALAT. Wikipedia isnt a repository of loosely associated topics nor a...

—MelbourneStar☆talk 07:33, 19 June 2017 (UTC) Delete per nom. Doesn't meet WP:GNG or WP:LSC AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 16:14, 19 June 2017 (UTC) The above discussion is...

deleted. This one remains, arguably, even more trivial, failing WP:LISTN/WP:LSC. If kept, this needs major cleanup due to unclear inclusion criteria (" cited...

post you say: "Look at WP:LSC". So I do, and I quote you a section of what it says. Next post you say that the example in WP:LSC is WP:LISTCRUFT. Do you...

list this article fails WP:N (the list and many individual entries), WP:LSC, and WP:LISTN. This is a Subheading-structured (stand alone) list of specific...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) See wp:IINFO, WP:NOTDIR, WP:LSC, WP:SALAT, etc. I'm not sure, but I think pop wasn't invented until the 1950's...

(talk) 17:20, 17 September 2019 (UTC) {{resolved}} Legalservicescorp.jpg LSC Logo Article(s) Legal Services Corporation Political appointments by Donald...

history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) — http://www.lsc-online.com/partners.php. CSBot reporting at 07:13, 22 January 2010 (UTC)...

be completely consistent with the MOS for leads of stand-alone lists (WP:LSC). Novaseminary (talk) 02:16, 10 April 2011 (UTC) Please do not redirect this...

essentially a list article, or contains lists, so guidelines such as WP:LSC and WP:CSC apply. And some NOTs, such as WP:CRYSTAL, do apply to some sections...

were gathered, this list would be too long. Every person on it fails WP:LSC. Therefore, it is impractical to have such a list. Also, there is no article...

for now as few of those are able to be the secondary RS acceptable for WP:LSC It's clear from the refideas that yes, he voiced Eggman in the Sonic franchise...

GAA that had as rationale: List is entirely subjective and thus fails WP:LSC and is almost certainly copyright of the Irish Independent hence failing...

LRK LRL LRM LRN LRO LRP LRQ LRR LRS LRT LRU LRV LRW LRX LRY LRZ LSA LSB LSC LSD LSE LSF LSG LSH LSI LSJ LSK LSL LSM LSN LSO LSP LSQ LSR LSS LST LSU LSV...

Nihonjoe 23:40, 26 July 2006 (UTC) Image:Bm110.jpg (talk | delete) and Image:Lsc.gif (talk | delete) Uploaded by Lorieposes (notify). Non-free, trivial, non-encyclopedic...

songs not notable enough for an individual article is appropriate per WP:LSC. The information is not duplicated by the discography, since not all the...

function of the President, especially during trips; – And given that WP:LSC supports hosting an extensive list in a separate article rather than overloading...

for notability purposes and are not required to stay on the list for WP:LSC. Keeping the redirect would create false expectations. AngusWOOF (bark •...

precedents for such lists of notable individuals, as clarified in WP:SAL, WP:LSC, WP:LISTNAME, WP:SALAT, and WP:LISTPEOPLE, this list is specifically per...

the source for that detail? How does keeping that detail comply with WP:LSC? Khiikiat (talk) 13:22, 20 October 2025 (UTC) The more detail in List of...

elsewhere it does raise questions about its notability for inclusion; WP:LSC is a useful point of reference here. The beauty of Geograph is that the photos...

concept of a "housing statute" is vague and somewhat subjective (see WP:LSC, which requires list selection criteria to be "unambiguous" and "objective")...

can be shortened or if stricter selection criteria can be found (per WP:LSC). -- Notecardforfree (talk) 07:13, 7 March 2016 (UTC) Comment: It's a bit...

lead still most definitely needs work. Some further comments: Look over WP:LSC. It explains that the lead for a list should summarize any background information...

not going to mainspace. Its very existence is questionable per WP:OR / WP:LSC, but maybe it could be saved (for instance by deciding only to list the vulns...

reference to- Wikipedia:LSC#Selection_criteria, since this list is about living people, to which the conditions at Wikipedia:LSC#Selection_criteria apply...

only have in common that they are known as "football". This violates WP:LSC (which is a guideline). "In cases where the membership criteria are subjective...

English Wikipedia. The editors often refer to rules WP:WTAF, WP:NOTDIR, WP:LSC in support of this (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9,10, 11, 12, 13, 14 etc.). Consequently...

source to show that they are somehow special. That is also in line with WP:LSC's 'criteria for inclusion should factor in encyclopedic and topical relevance...

This kind of criterion for inclusion on a list is explicitly provided in WP:LSC, which in fact goes on to state that: "Most of the best lists on Wikipedia...

don't care what anyone else says (WP:IAR over WP:CONS) but here goes..... WP:LSC/common sense - when a LISTCRITERIA says "follow the people at the topic article...

wikified than anywhere else. The list is selective and was designed with WP:LSC in mind. Importantly, I don't think WP:NOR applies here at all: where is...

Managed to get to the library for an hour last night. I've added the ELCC and LSC apps/goals to the table and updated players' goals totals in the prose where...

precedent for such lists of notable individuals, as clarified in WP:SAL, WP:LSC, WP:LISTNAME, WP:SALAT, and WP:LISTPEOPLE, this list is specifically per...

lrk lrl lrm lrn lro lrp lrq lrr lrs lrt lru lrv lrw lrx lry lrz lsa lsb lsc lsd lse lsf lsg lsh lsi lsj lsk lsl lsm lsn lso lsp lsq lsr lss lst lsu lsv...

"successful"? That's what we don't have in this list, and what we need per WP:LSC (WP:CSC has good examples of solid criteria). If we are the one who determines...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:LSC. Very indiscriminate list with a concerning lack of topical relevance, completion...

violates WP:INDISCRIMINATE as well. Furthermore, this list also violates WP:LSC's requirement that selection criteria "should be unambiguous, objective, and...

reliable sources” – as presented here [1] and here [2]. Meets WP:CSC and WP:LSC. I think we should keep the list as it gives a broader understanding of the...

2015 (UTC) Convert to List of notable RAF cadets to help compliance with WP:LSC. Lose a WP:NONDEFINING cat, gain a legitimate list: win-win. A2soup (talk)...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) wp:IINFO, WP:NOTDIR, WP:LSC, WP:SALAT. Wikipedia isnt a repository of loosely associated topics nor a...

Optics, image science, and vision (1 in 1) Lasers Congress 2016 (ASSL, LSC, LAC) (1 in 1) Latin America Optics and Photonics (1 in 1) Light, Energy...

issue is that it's "too niche" (though there needs to be some form of WP:LSC on the page, like maybe removing non-notable software entries; this can be...

them. This is a standard method of making lists, per the third option of WP:LSC. Rangoon above seems to disagree with having reliably and secondarily sourced...

There is no established notability to make an exception here, and the WP:LSC proposed by Evelyn is essentially "we know what going too far is when we...

Optics, image science, and vision (1 in 1) Lasers Congress 2016 (ASSL, LSC, LAC) (1 in 1) Latin America Optics and Photonics (1 in 1) Light, Energy...

notability, only that the grouping or set in general has been." and in WP:LSC: "While notability is often a criterion for inclusion in overview lists of...

be other issues with the article as well, especially with regards to WP:LSC. Doniago (talk) 02:56, 17 August 2011 (UTC) Discussion about the issues listed...

(talk) 17:53, 4 May 2010 (UTC) What I'm primarily considering here is WP:LSC, which states, "In cases where the membership criteria are subjective or...

an article exists, per WP:LSC, none of the names should be included in this article having failed those 3 bullet points at LSC. So why keep a blank list...

pogroms if we couldn't find a list of pogroms including said event? I read WP:LSC differently. Can you show me examples of other lists in wikipedia which would...

21 February 2026 (UTC) I'm not sure where this comes from in policy? WP:LSC makes allowances more than once for non-notable entries and doesn't say anything...

add once it is verfifable. Mjroots (talk) 08:53, 3 November 2009 (UTC) WP:LSC. Items on lists should be individually notable. Items which are not notable...

(UTC) The WP:LIST and WP:LSC guidelines apply specifically to lists such as this one. And the notabiliy guideline links to WP:LSC for cases involving lists...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) I don't believe it passes WP:LSC WP:NLIST., because this is essentially a product "catalog" of a record label...

precedents for such lists of notable individuals, as clarified in WP:SAL, WP:LSC, WP:LISTNAME, WP:SALAT, and WP:LISTPEOPLE, this list is specifically per...

(talk) 05:18, 27 November 2010 (UTC) Well, this is a problem, because per WP:LSC one should come up with a criteria beforehand. The criteria here seem to...

2018 (UTC) Keep There are clear inclusion and exclusion criteria per WP:LSC and each visit is not notable on its own. If the resulting list ends up being...

included in the target, no indication that any of these actors meets WP:LSC. signed, Rosguill talk 22:44, 27 May 2019 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

this has no entry at List of stars in Vela? Doesn't seem like there's an WP:LSC bar to inclusion there and an entry exists in Template:Stars of Vela, unless...

functions as an index or directory of its own content." This list meets WP:LSC on grounds that every entry is individually notable. Dricherby (talk) 20:56...

sure where. Maybe someone could resurrect the attempt to pass WP:NFICT. WP:LSC would work for lists, but it seems a bit specific to speak explicitly about...

WP:LISTN and WP:LSC, and per the above comments. Aoba47 (talk) 14:36, 22 April 2017 (UTC) Delete as article fails WP:LISTN and WP:LSC (per previous comments)...

asp?rec_id=237 (261, 29, 4, 1) www.toffeeweb.com/season/03-04/reserves.asp#lsc (261, 101, 2, 1) www.liverweb.org.uk/reserve_report.asp?rec_id=232 (261,...

other sources (web searches indicate numerous RS candidates) passes the WP:LSC selection criteria test, When establishing membership criteria for a list...

21 February 2026 (UTC) I'm not sure where this comes from in policy? WP:LSC makes allowances more than once for non-notable entries and doesn't say anything...

supplied by the article. There are no criteria, which are required by WP:LSC, nor sources showing that such a grouping exists. Without these, this seems...

grounds. You are actually talking about Selection or Inclusion criteria WP:LSC from the Standalone List Manual of Style. Typically Manual of Style issues...

unsuccessful, and/or listifying to just include items that would satisfy WP:LSC. BastunĖġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ! 14:52, 26 March 2015 (UTC) Scolaire The point also raised...

edu/exhibits/visionaries/?fbclid=IwAR3lHa2v0qkpRbtbRHqfqt1TfcEOJKioSUKkBoOj3OhLscV2p4WSUvPd5fQ William Seeds (talk) 03:24, 10 October 2022 (UTC) @William Seeds:...

establish a precedent: WP:WAX. --132 06:31, 23 October 2010 (UTC) To quote WP:LSC: A list is warranted if it is about a notable subject, and "Every entry in...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) List fails WP:LSC. The list has no defineable criteria for inclusion, save the claim that each...

bit came from WP:SIZE - and I do agree that they can be split this way. WP:LSC was put in too but is not relevant here I think. Dmcq (talk) 10:18, 26 May...

splitting up. The policies and guidelines are WP:TIMELINE, MOS:LIST, WP:LSC (Lists selection criteria), WP:Notability, etc.Richard-of-Earth (talk) 20:40...

further edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was Delete as per WP:LSC. Pastor Theo (talk) 01:38, 25 July 2009 (UTC) List of Shinto shrines in the...

verifiability, no original research and neutral point of view.". Further, WP:LSC states "list definitions should be based on reliable sources" (my emphsis)...

they do not provide any consistent list inclusion criteria (required per WP:LSC or actually take the form of a list. Typically they each discuss 2-3 films...

reliably." Delicious carbuncle (talk) 21:55, 28 November 2009 (UTC) Per WP:LSC - "Don't use a list as a "creation guide" containing a large number of redlinked...

2020-07-29 19:39:22 (UTC): w:sc:User:L2212 (t - c; -1) to w:sc:Limba sarda/LSC (diff  !top) - Link: www.scanomontiferro.it/?lng=it&mod=blog&pg=pagina&doc=1405435452...

(talk) 04:28, 5 September 2015 (UTC) Delete: Fails WP:SALAT, WP:CSC and WP:LSC. Per WP:CSC, every entry in the list is supposed to meet the notability criteria...

discussions. NORTH AMERICA1000 23:04, 14 March 2015 (UTC) Delete per WP:LSC - specifically in section 1 of the common selection criteria: Every entry...

is a list, which is separate from categories and navigation templates. WP:LSC is what applies here, and listings need to be supported by reliable sources...

elsewhere it does raise questions about its notability for inclusion; WP:LSC is a useful point of reference here. The beauty of Geograph is that the photos...

This kind of criterion for inclusion on a list is explicitly provided in WP:LSC, which in fact goes on to state that: "Most of the best lists on Wikipedia...

expected to be found within List of Xanth characters per the criteria at WP:LSC, then instead delete. Hiding T 10:47, 9 June 2009 (UTC) Keep Jenny is quite...

some kind of list, but the inclusion criteria is very vague. It violates WP:LSC policy. Vanjagenije (talk) 23:27, 16 June 2014 (UTC) (PLEASE NOTE The title...

Wikipedia policy (per WP:LSC). -- Notecardforfree (talk) 21:10, 3 January 2016 (UTC) Keep - perfectly legitimate stand-alone list per WP:LSC and WP:STANDALONE...

WP:LISTPURPOSE as an informational list. The selection criteria are clear, WP:LSC has no suggestion of broad inclusion criteria being disqualifying. I apologize...

with a couple of words next to each bluelink. Don't think this passes WP:LSC. Not all of the entires are notable, (notice how some of those bluelinks...

internet products (ex. Amazon in recent time, even Bollywood films like LSC) are banned after twitter boycott. So, it's not gonna be different for wikipedia...

2009 (UTC) I find it interesting that you left out the exception for WP:LSC when you quoted part of it above. "... The one exception is for list articles...

them. This is a standard method of making lists, per the third option of WP:LSC. Rangoon above seems to disagree with having reliably and secondarily sourced...

when a player reaches it. As such, it makes a valid list delimiter under WP:LSC. I could see a problem if this list was too long, but at 260 I don't think...

split into 4 articles, both from a maintenance and SIGCOV perspective per WP:LSC, "Selection criteria (also known as inclusion criteria or membership criteria)...

SYNTH content. Deletion arguments were backed by reference to policy such as LSC and OR. The keep side mostly relied on assertion and failed to effectively...

If the list were made complete it would be immensely long. This fails WP:LSC. — Jkudlick • t • c • s 21:14, 22 May 2016 (UTC) It's meant to be a list...

an indiscriminate collection of information. See wp:IINFO, WP:NOTDIR, WP:LSC, WP:SALAT. p.s. List of Turkish pop music performers is redirecting to "List...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) In accordance with WP:LSC, don't believe that this list is encyclopedically useful, it is an incomplete...

notability for each entry as long as the scope of the list is manageable, see WP:LSC. There are also likely to be several notable synagogues on that list; the...

WP:LISTPEOPLE and WP:LSC advise that we shouldn't have lists of people who are non-notable themselves, and most of these names are redlinks. (WP:LSC specifically...

stepping stone to an expanded prose section. In these lists, you follow WP:LSC, which means you decide what your standards are, and ideally document them...

This does, however, need a lot of cleanup; we might want to consult WP:LSC and limit inclusions severely. Iseult Δx parlez moi 19:02, 21 June 2022 (UTC)...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) List fails WP:LSC. The list has no defineable criteria for inclusion, save the claim that each...

redirect: [[ ]] Libyan Scientific Company Reason: Source (if applicable): www.lsc.com.ly Naiyersheen (talk) 11:47, 22 September 2012 (UTC) Declined. This request...

2015 (UTC) Keep. This list has clearly defined selection criteria, per WP:LSC. Additionally, the narrow scope of the list complies with WP:SALAT. The argument...

WP:CAUTIOUS, but before you do either you might want to take a look at WP:LSC for general guidance and also check to see if this has been previously discussed...

ThePlatypusofDoom (talk) 23:34, 1 August 2016 (UTC) Strong Delete as per failure of WP:LSC and WP:V. Plus the potential for BLP vios and the general WP:TNT aspect....

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Per WP:NOTDIR, WP:NOTCATALOG. WP:LSC says Criteria for inclusion should factor in encyclopedic and topical relevance...

and unsourced additions, constantly becoming an indiscriminate list (WP:LSC), leading to WP:TNT being valid as well. —Ganesha811 (talk) 19:02, 8 October...

some kind of list, but the inclusion criteria is very vague. It violates WP:LSC policy. Vanjagenije (talk) 23:27, 16 June 2014 (UTC) (PLEASE NOTE The title...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) List is entirely subjective and thus fails WP:LSC and is almost certainly copyright of the Irish Independent hence failing...

lead still most definitely needs work. Some further comments: Look over WP:LSC. It explains that the lead for a list should summarize any background information...

we can ensure that such a list is dependent on secondary sources per WP:LSC and WP:SECONDARY. I've put together a few lists of films featuring common...

inclusion per WP:LISTN, WP:LISTCOMPANY, and WP:LSC. In fact, this appears to fail WP:LISTCOMPANY and WP:LSC because none of the references are reliable sources...

and a large number of the entries have no sources whatsoever so fail WP:LSC - blatant WP:OR. Acousmana 11:37, 4 August 2022 (UTC) Delete - See my vote...

itself. PaleAqua (talk) 15:41, 30 March 2013 (UTC) Keep - Seems to meet WP:LSC, and has third-party sources that do appear to show notability for the subject...

fence on this one. Could you perhaps comment on the article in light of WP:LSC? And do you think this falls into WP:INDISCRIMINATE? This might help clarify...

Orange Suede Sofa (talk) 23:45, 22 August 2014 (UTC) Herostratus, see WP:LSC for slightly more help. I don't think it will help you very much, since the...

this list is uncalled for and goes against the spirit of WP:SALAT and WP:LSC. Lists are not meant to be an end run around our inclusion guidelines, and...

notable enough for a stand-alone non-redirect Wikipedia article, as per WP:LSC and WP:WTAF. If there's non-notable entries there, remove them if they're...

that and then get back to me. GiantSnowman 12:26, 19 April 2015 (UTC) WP:LSC, a section on that page, addresses this subject, though this is just an observation...

other sources (web searches indicate numerous RS candidates) passes the WP:LSC selection criteria test, When establishing membership criteria for a list...

of whether they are notable for playing it, but I'm not sure. As per WP:LSC: "Selection criteria should be unambiguous, objective, and supported by reliable...

like a list or in list format but even if it is intended to be it fails WP:LSC. Most of the links just consist of links to other poorly formatted WP:SAL...

1, 1) www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/species/fish/salmon.htm (5468, 249, 1, 1) www.lsc.usgs.gov/fhb/leaflets/82.asp (5468, 6, 1, 1) www.wogameandfish...

special editions of games notable on their own, so it also does not meet WP:LSC. Axem Titanium (talk) 21:53, 14 July 2022 (UTC) Delete - I'm surprised that...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This list is completely subjective and fails WP:LSC. A comparable deletion discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List...

1. Classic WP:LISTCRUFT. 2. A category masquerading as a list. Fails WP:LSC, the vast majority of people on this list are not notable as veterans, this...

notable for being HIV positive (eg Ryan White and Rebekka Armstrong), per WP:LSC, rather than merely being notable and being verifiably HIV positive. There...

page.‎ The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 15:49, 23 August 2010 (UTC) L.S.C. Oakeshott (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs |...

objects with an external link to the most relevant database at the bottom? WP:LSC seems to suggest this course of action and directly contradicts what we came...

precedent for such lists of notable individuals, as clarified in WP:SAL, WP:LSC, WP:LISTNAME, WP:SALAT, and WP:LISTPEOPLE, this list is specifically per...

concept of a "housing statute" is vague and somewhat subjective (see WP:LSC, which requires list selection criteria to be "unambiguous" and "objective")...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Indiscriminate list with an ill-defined WP:LSC and an unfortunate WP:GEOBIAS towards Indian authors. "Where is Justin Bieber...

songs not notable enough for an individual article is appropriate per WP:LSC. The information is not duplicated by the discography, since not all the...

be completely consistent with the MOS for leads of stand-alone lists (WP:LSC). Novaseminary (talk) 02:16, 10 April 2011 (UTC) Please do not redirect this...

Wikipedia:Manual of Style (lists), and as in this case set by WP:LISTPURP, WP:STAND, WP:LSC, WP:LISTNAME, and WP:SALAT. That so much time and energy is spent by sources...

(talk) 09:19, 22 June 2020 (UTC) Delete. As mentioned above, this violates WP:LSC and is likely an endless and subjective list that adds no real value to the...

—Tom Morris (talk) 13:28, 4 October 2011 (UTC) Keep meets WP:GNG and WP:LSC. Media coverage in several Russian newspapers, journals, webpages, etc. I...

are not unambiguous, objective, and supported by reliable sources, as WP:LSC recommends. Vexations (talk) 18:38, 29 May 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

I shouldve been more specific. No lead section, lots of redlinks per WP:LSC, lists of people are supposed to be comprised of people who are notable because...

November 2022 (UTC) Delete as this is a list which does not meet the WP:LSC guideline. Bruxton (talk) 16:24, 4 December 2022 (UTC) The above discussion...

"prejudice" phobias (e.g. homophobia), but this article does satisfy WP:LSC (reliable sources describe these as legitimate terms for specific phobias)...

article in that discussion still stands but also per WP:L, WP:LISTN, WP:LSC. GR86 (📱) 00:42, 27 January 2023 (UTC) Keep: I've changed my !vote to keep...

coach of Loyola. She also has been an academic advisor, campus minister on LSC and WTC and to Regis Hall residents since 1991 — Preceding unsigned comment...

gathered in the past month, and no significant coverage was cited. It fails WP:LSC, and has no WP:Notability basis. Toast (talk) 02:50, 6 November 2022 (UTC)...

America1000 03:37, 18 November 2015 (UTC) Keep. The selection criteria satisfy WP:LSC, and there are reliable sources upon which this list can be substantiated...

hence the name is somewhat misleading. In addition, this may also fail WP:LSC; FWIW, it could grow forever into a indiscriminate list of possibly terrestrial...

selecting items for a list but it is not the only way as is made clear at WP:LSC and WP:CSC. In particular, CSC#2 says, astonishingly, that a valid selection...

list this article fails WP:N (the list and many individual entries), WP:LSC, and WP:LISTN. This is a Subheading-structured (stand alone) list of specific...

it deleted because very few of the listings is independently notable", WP:LSC says that this is a reason for putting items on a list: "Common selection...

troubles. If anything, the mosque should not be part of the list per WP:LSC and WP:CSC. The photo also shouldn't be used as an indicator of notability...

talk:TenPoundHammer. And even if there was a category, as some have suggested, per WP:LSC that would not make this list inappropriate. Rlendog (talk) 19:28, 24 February...

"successful"? That's what we don't have in this list, and what we need per WP:LSC (WP:CSC has good examples of solid criteria). If we are the one who determines...

precedents for such lists of notable individuals, as clarified in WP:SAL, WP:LSC, WP:LISTNAME, WP:SALAT, and WP:LISTPEOPLE, this list is specifically per...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Unencyclopedic list. Fails WP:LSC. No discernible uniform criteria. Evaluation appears entirely subjective...

precedents for such lists of notable individuals, as clarified in WP:SAL, WP:LSC, WP:LISTNAME, WP:SALAT, and WP:LISTPEOPLE, this list is specifically per...

December 2010 (UTC) WP:LINKFARM says "except for...lists" and then links to WP:LSC. So I don't think you can use wp:LINKFARM to justify deleting this article...

don't have articles! Alzarian16 (talk) 15:23, 25 August 2010 (UTC) Keep WP:LSC specifically contemplates such lists: "Every entry in the list fails the...

per nominator. Setting criteria for such an article is necessary (per WP:LSC), but not attempted and probably impossible for an article with this title...

discussions. Musa Talk  13:30, 10 November 2015 (UTC) Delete, per nom and WP:LSC. -- Notecardforfree (talk) 17:58, 10 November 2015 (UTC) Delete - Nothing...

inclusion, crossing all mediums, all genres, full of WP:OR analysis. Also WP:LSC Selection criteria should be unambiguous, objective, and supported by reliable...

deletion discussions. clpo13(talk) 17:59, 2 January 2016 (UTC) Delete per WP:LSC because inclusion in this list will necessarily be based on subjective and...

list only those extensions that have non-redirect Wikipedia articles per WP:LSC and WP:WTAF. This would only be "indiscriminate information" or "incomplete"...

2010 (UTC) Delete - As agreeing inclusion criteria in the lead (as per WP:LSC) is being actively resisted then there seems little to stop this article...

numerical calculations". This would include Excel, Quicken, etc.... See WP:LSC The list has devolved into "anything related to math and computers", including...

can be found is not sufficient for a list article to survive AFD, see WP:LSC. Additionally, this particular convergence appears too specific to warrant...

2021 (UTC) Strong Keep - It's a sub-list of the List of windmills, per WP:LSC. Of the mills in the Bailiwick of Guernsey, Vale Mill and Sark Windmill may...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Does not meet WP:GNG, WP:NLIST or WP:LSC. The list has a history of WP:FANCRUFT information and is still currently...

an article exists, per WP:LSC, none of the names should be included in this article having failed those 3 bullet points at LSC. So why keep a blank list...

of WP:NOT#DIRECTORY. --Dirk Beetstra T C 10:32, 10 November 2009 (UTC) WP:LSC Maybe I'm being dumb here, but isn't there already a fairly clear guideline...

notability, only that the grouping or set in general has been." and in WP:LSC: "While notability is often a criterion for inclusion in overview lists of...

verifiability, no original research and neutral point of view.". Further, WP:LSC states "list definitions should be based on reliable sources" (my emphsis)...

with WP:V, and likely WP:OR. This list has no clear selection criteria (WP:LSC), fails to define what constitutes a notable Christmas literature work, and...

those with Wikipedia articles—a perfectly permissible thing in light of WP:LSC. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 21:57, 21 December 2024 (UTC) Relisted to generate...

are to either sales pages or (for the free entries) download pages. Per WP:LSC, list entries should either have articles or a reasonable expectation of...

actor's article so we should have a standalone article have a look at WP:LSC - "it is especially important that inclusion be based on reliable sources...

of WP:NOT#DIRECTORY. --Dirk Beetstra T C 10:32, 10 November 2009 (UTC) WP:LSC Maybe I'm being dumb here, but isn't there already a fairly clear guideline...

enough for its own article. The entire list fails WP:SALAT, WP:CSC and WP:LSC. I can't imagine how "this list contributes to the state of human knowledge"...

or AFD though. Bearcat (talk) 03:20, 25 January 2016 (UTC) Delete per WP:LSC because the selection criteria will necessarily be subjective. -- Notecardforfree...

reliably." Delicious carbuncle (talk) 21:55, 28 November 2009 (UTC) Per WP:LSC - "Don't use a list as a "creation guide" containing a large number of redlinked...

2010 (UTC) Delete - As agreeing inclusion criteria in the lead (as per WP:LSC) is being actively resisted then there seems little to stop this article...

— Timneu22 · talk 22:17, 2 June 2010 (UTC) Delete - Little prospect of LSC being addressed in the future as per the nomination; in particular the criteria...

entry has to have its own stand-alone article, please take a look at WP:LSC. It's possible that a discography section might be OK to add to the musicians...

November 2022 (UTC) Delete. Non-notable fictional characters so this fails WP:LSC and the WP:GNG. The references are about the artists or the actors, not about...

Rhino131.   // Timothy :: talk  15:44, 17 November 2020 (UTC) Delete. Per WP:LSC, a list of every character atman or any of his allies has encountered would...

unreasonably so by doing so. Jclemens (talk) 17:43, 18 June 2016 (UTC) WP:LSC also says: "Criteria for inclusion should thus factor in encyclopedic and...

Delete the subject of this list is far to broad and indiscriminate; fails WP:LSC.-- danntm T C 01:52, 7 March 2016 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

respond to my complaint that the list lacks a clear inclusion criterion. WP:LSC requires that the lead section presents an unambiguous statement of the membership...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Wildly indiscriminate. Violates WP:LSC - As Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and not a directory, repository of links...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) A sea of red links, fails WP:LSC. Mattg82 (talk) 01:07, 28 January 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...

expected to be found within List of Xanth characters per the criteria at WP:LSC, then instead delete. Hiding T 10:47, 9 June 2009 (UTC) Keep Jenny is quite...

then why not have a list in which to collect all the NN content (per WP:LSC)? Jclemens (talk) 00:12, 24 September 2021 (UTC) @Jclemens: Those are all...

overlong lists elsewhere on WP. (This obviously doesn't address any WP:RS, WP:LSC, WP:SYNTH issues that the current undocumented-instruction listing has, though...

include: ABC News, Variety, Fox News Magazine. Also passes WP:NLIST and WP:LSC. NORTH AMERICA1000 18:07, 10 January 2015 (UTC) Relisted to generate a more...

TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 14:46, 31 October 2013 (UTC) The one in WP:LSC itself, if you cared to read beyond your quote: "In cases where the membership...

linked referenced to a place to buy the movies. No indication of meeting WP:LSC or WP:Verifiability. Prof. Mc (talk) 12:46, 22 June 2016 (UTC) * Weak keep...

fighter pilots of World War II (even if such a list existed) because of WP:LSC. buidhe 22:57, 9 December 2019 (UTC) On second thought it would be reasonable...

articles for deletion. postdlf (talk) 12:22, 4 August 2017 (UTC) Keep per WP:LSC. If the list becomes too large, we can subdivide if necessary, but that is...

Shawn in Montreal (talk) 11:02, 15 November 2015 (UTC) Delete per nom and WP:LSC. I don't there is any way to create objective selection criteria here. --...

or have been sponsored in their name than otherwise. It also fulfils WP:LSC by being clear about its objectives. If @Hariboneagle927: is concerned that...

think it has sufficient credibility for the list to meet the criteria of WP:LSC as it is confined to a specific sub-set of New Zealand Firemen. I do agree...

all WP software lists now contain only notable, bluelinked items, per WP:LSC. If the redlinked items were removed, this list would only have 2 items.Dialectric...

deleted. This one remains, arguably, even more trivial, failing WP:LISTN/WP:LSC. If kept, this needs major cleanup due to unclear inclusion criteria (" cited...

were gathered, this list would be too long. Every person on it fails WP:LSC. Therefore, it is impractical to have such a list. Also, there is no article...

the possibilities at WP:CSC are not exhaustive; let's use the general WP:LSC then - Would I expect to see this person or thing on a list of X? Indeed...

this comparison requires clean up per WP:WTAF, but not deletion. Per WP:LSC it should not even attempt to encompass all smartphones that ever existed...

This most certainly does meet the criteria for standalone lists. Per WP:LSC, the contents of the list are "unambiguous, objective, and supported by reliable...

latter half of the article is a list and needs clear list criteria as per WP:LSC, but that's achievable. Bondegezou (talk) 10:07, 14 August 2019 (UTC) I thought...

controversial statement regarding a living individual concerns the fact that the LSC Chair is a former member of the National Front but he has admitted this himself...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) See wp:IINFO, WP:NOTDIR, WP:LSC, WP:SALAT, etc. I'm not sure, but I think pop wasn't invented until the 1950's...

1. Classic WP:LISTCRUFT. 2. A category masquerading as a list. Fails WP:LSC, the vast majority of people on this list are not notable as veterans, this...

list topic is notable, but that each entry on the list is notable. (See WP:LSC). Lists are (with some exceptions) essentially a navigation aid to existing...

Appears to an WP:INDISCRIMINATE collection of events that lacks a clear WP:LSC and is overbroad. Could work better as a category. Niteshift36 (talk) 17:05...

list is likely to be notable per WP:LISTN. The list seems to also pass WP:LSC, particularly as most of the items are blue links. However, I looked at a...

precedent for such lists of notable individuals, as clarified in WP:SAL, WP:LSC, WP:LISTNAME, WP:SALAT, and WP:LISTPEOPLE, this list is specifically per...

MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 09:19, 31 May 2021 (UTC) Draftify both lists. Per WP:LSC, lists need to have a selection criteria which is unambiguous, objective...

"Swedish game developers". Individual item notability is not required (WP:LSC). All this applies to indexes and outlines equally. Also "Sweden" and "game...

can be shortened or if stricter selection criteria can be found (per WP:LSC). -- Notecardforfree (talk) 07:13, 7 March 2016 (UTC) Comment: It's a bit...

created the article in the first place. I should also think this follows WP:LSC, WP:UCS, and goes with WP:NOT in these circumstances. --WellThisIsTheReaper...

LRK LRL LRM LRN LRO LRP LRQ LRR LRS LRT LRU LRV LRW LRX LRY LRZ LSA LSB LSC LSD LSE LSF LSG LSH LSI LSJ LSK LSL LSM LSN LSO LSP LSQ LSR LSS LST LSU LSV...

Mucho-Bravado page ( which I previously Prodded as it "fails to meet WP:LSC" which I think remains so). AllyD (talk) 08:34, 4 September 2012 (UTC) The...

March 2016 (UTC) Keep. The selection criteria for this lost comply with WP:LSC. Any disputes about the individuals that should be included in this list...

for fighting" – nope.) We don't need lists of everything, and I think WP:LSC (and probably WP:NOR) points towards deleting this list. --Tryptofish (talk)...

tagged it for Expand list. I think the red names are safe to include per WP:LSC - one would expect to see all these names on this list, each member is verifiably...

The material is of serious scholarly interest, and the list satisfies WP:LSC. There are various ways to go from here. I don't really accept the argument...

February 2014 (UTC) The criteria for inclusion are a content issue (per WP:LSC), distinct from the evaluation of notabililty. -- Trevj (talk · contribs)...

notwithstanding. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 04:07, 21 September 2021 (UTC) Comment per WP:LSC list elements could be all notable, all non-notable, or some combination...

as well. As for "Notable alumini", I think what you're looking for is WP:LSC, in particular WP:CSC. Individual entries of such a list do not have to have...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Currently does not meet WP:LSC, and unlikely there can be a selection criteria which will is 'unambiguous...

categories serve different purposes per WP:CLN and WP:LIST. And, per WP:LSC, even the fact that most of the songs on the list are not notable enough...

Cordless Larry (talk) 23:48, 22 November 2010 (UTC) Delete per WP:IINFO and WP:LSC for having a non-specific inclusion criteria. A "large and/or significant"...

Trump? -- Scjessey (talk) 11:40, 12 June 2016 (UTC) keep per WP:LISTN, WP:LSC and WP:CSC the set of "HRC controversies" is notable and has been discussed...

use. The selection criteria for this list are ambiguous and subjective: WP:LSC says that selection criteria for standalone lists must be "unambiguous" and...

selection criteria of such a list should be limited to WP articles per WP:LSC (because the broader list could not meet the third bullet and the second...

criteria could probably be met. But as is, I think it does not pass all of WP:LSC. Thus, I agree with Chris the Paleontologist. Hoppingalong (talk) 03:22,...

claimed reason for notability, so there's no way to establish a useful WP:LSC. Lists (and by extension to an extent, comparisons) of mostly non-notable...

cleanup and a lead section needs to be written following the guidelines at WP:LSC, but it is well sourced and appears to follow WP:SAL#Lists of people. AnemoneProjectors...

Keep the list is focussed and has focussed criteria for inclusion - see WP:LSC Lightburst (talk) 02:54, 8 December 2022 (UTC) Keep Meets WP:LISTN - concept...

incident that composes that statistic of thousands. Specifically see the WP:LSC guideline: "Short, complete lists of every item that is verifiably a member...

incident that composes that statistic of thousands. Specifically see the WP:LSC guideline: "Short, complete lists of every item that is verifiably a member...

(UTC) Keep and rename Venice of the East per Phil Bridger; article meets WP:LSC. Miniapolis 14:11, 15 July 2013 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved as...

Trump? -- Scjessey (talk) 11:40, 12 June 2016 (UTC) keep per WP:LISTN, WP:LSC and WP:CSC the set of "HRC controversies" is notable and has been discussed...

for a specific event, the notability requirement need not be met." And WP:LSC notes that one common type of list is that where "Every entry in the list...

for now as few of those are able to be the secondary RS acceptable for WP:LSC It's clear from the refideas that yes, he voiced Eggman in the Sonic franchise...

for fighting" – nope.) We don't need lists of everything, and I think WP:LSC (and probably WP:NOR) points towards deleting this list. --Tryptofish (talk)...

it establishes that the concept of a list of minor planets is notable. WP:LSC suggests that it is acceptable for certain types of lists (e.g. all known...

are bound to be many more.--TM 17:06, 20 August 2014 (UTC) Per Wikipedia:LSC#Selection_criteria ""Creation guide" lists—lists devoted to a large number...

basketball team, which are teams composed of top players? I dont see how WP:LSC can be met without some contrived, long-winded explanation that is never...

February 2014 (UTC) The criteria for inclusion are a content issue (per WP:LSC), distinct from the evaluation of notabililty. -- Trevj (talk · contribs)...

notable for being HIV positive (eg Ryan White and Rebekka Armstrong), per WP:LSC, rather than merely being notable and being verifiably HIV positive. There...

(talk•track) 10:08, 6 August 2014 (UTC) Keep: this list complies with WP:LSC and has no problems that could not be addressed by normal editing. — Dmitrij...

inclusion criterion on the parent list in order to render it actually usable. WP:LSC suggests that "Every entry meets the notability criteria for its own non-redirect...

Delete. As original nom in 2011, I still contend that this list fails WP:LSC. The criteria for inclusion is unclear. Much of the list is unsourced. There...

"List of ..." software articles, where entries meet the first criteria of WP:LSC (each entry meeting the notability criteria). If there's no article and no...

used as a reason for keeping the article. It actually justifies point 4. WP:LSC which says, “Selection criteria should be unambiguous, objective, and supported...

(Reasons for deletion include, but are not limited to, the following). WP:LSC is a guideline, which means you're expected to follow it aside from the occasional...

objective, with each entry supported by one or more references a la WP:LSC. KTC (talk) 23:38, 18 July 2012 (UTC) Delete Not seeing the sourcing which...

policies do not demand complete objectivity in the concept behind a list. WP:LSC says it best, "Selection criteria should be unambiguous, objective, and supported...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) wp:IINFO, WP:NOTDIR, WP:LSC, WP:SALAT. Wikipedia isnt a repository of loosely associated topics nor a...

list topic is notable, but that each entry on the list is notable. (See WP:LSC). Lists are (with some exceptions) essentially a navigation aid to existing...

unsuccessful, and/or listifying to just include items that would satisfy WP:LSC. BastunĖġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ! 14:52, 26 March 2015 (UTC) Scolaire The point also raised...

on the talk page. There is not one universal set for all articles, see WP:LSC. SpinningSpark 17:54, 21 July 2014 (UTC) Thanks. So, you are saying that...

pogroms if we couldn't find a list of pogroms including said event? I read WP:LSC differently. Can you show me examples of other lists in wikipedia which would...

violates WP:INDISCRIMINATE as well. Furthermore, this list also violates WP:LSC's requirement that selection criteria "should be unambiguous, objective, and...

2018 (UTC) Keep There are clear inclusion and exclusion criteria per WP:LSC and each visit is not notable on its own. If the resulting list ends up being...

also visit our official website at www.chicagodistrictstuco.weebly.com) LSC member of Curie High School Local School Council, Board Member of the Chicago...

TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 14:46, 31 October 2013 (UTC) The one in WP:LSC itself, if you cared to read beyond your quote: "In cases where the membership...

this page.‎ The result was speedy keep. I can see how WP:NOTESAL and WP:LSC indeed apply, my mistake for not considering them when actually creating...

while a link was given to "purpose" (WP:LISTPURP), no link was given to WP:LSC ("criteria") or, better yet, WP:CSC, "selection criteria". And the simplest...

since now-blocked User:Novonium created it in June 2012. And it fails WP:LSC (as noted since last August). It's just one big mess that hasn't been fixed...

cgi?id=130997&d=415&h=417&f=416 (86, 81, 11, 1) www.legalservices.gov.uk/LSC_Corp_plan_A4.pdf (86, 2, 1, 1) 2008-04-18 13:39:35: User Georgeko (talk -...

it as a movie cliche. Fails all the elements of WP:CSC, and also fails WP:LSC (highly subjective). WP:OR WP:V boom delete. Gaijin42 (talk) 16:01, 25 October...

2015 (UTC) I just realized that NENAL effectively exists in WP:LISTN and WP:LSC/WP:CSC. I don't find a seemingly indiscriminate list of friendly footy tournaments...

when a player reaches it. As such, it makes a valid list delimiter under WP:LSC. I could see a problem if this list was too long, but at 260 I don't think...

wikified than anywhere else. The list is selective and was designed with WP:LSC in mind. Importantly, I don't think WP:NOR applies here at all: where is...

should be mentioned for sure, but everything else probably should go per WP:LSC and WP:NOTEVERYTHING, or split off into it's own article. Of course, deciding...

and valid list topic. Rlendog (talk) 18:28, 17 August 2009 (UTC) Per WP:LSC, it is appropriate to have "list articles that are created explicitly because...

last living Currier and Ives staff member. WP:CROSSCAT also applies. Per WP:LSC, "as Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and not a directory, repository of links...

only have in common that they are known as "football". This violates WP:LSC (which is a guideline). "In cases where the membership criteria are subjective...

boxes and other navigational templates." Furthermore this list matches WP:LSC, WP:CSC Selection criteria Selection criteria should be unambiguous, objective...

policies exist that address these concerns for bibliographies: WP:LISTN and WP:LSC. These clearly trumped the others. So it remained to find good sources for...

the two guidelines most closely on point. At WP:LIST and the related WP:LSC. From these guidelines I realized that the major problem for these lists...

article just listed the important statistics and not random ones that fail WP:LSC like number of chess players. AnUnnamedUser (open talk page) 01:23, 8 August...

essentially a list article, or contains lists, so guidelines such as WP:LSC and WP:CSC apply. And some NOTs, such as WP:CRYSTAL, do apply to some sections...

criteria per WP:LSC. The lists of unusual things links to the joke page Wikipedia:Unusual articles as an example of what does not meet WP:LSC. Regarding the...

Kingofaces43, the List guidelines are at WP:SAL, and notability discussion is at WP:LSC. See List of psychologists; if the content was only a list, I would understand...

that the "keep" votes "gloss[ed] over" relevant policies and guidelines. WP:LSC and WP:SALAT were directly on point, and the closing admin acted well-within...

source does not mention the artist or title or censorship at all), per WP:LSC - "Selection criteria should be unambiguous, objective, and supported by...

criteria per WP:LSC. The lists of unusual things links to the joke page Wikipedia:Unusual articles as an example of what does not meet WP:LSC. Regarding the...

(Reasons for deletion include, but are not limited to, the following). WP:LSC is a guideline, which means you're expected to follow it aside from the occasional...

used as a reason for keeping the article. It actually justifies point 4. WP:LSC which says, “Selection criteria should be unambiguous, objective, and supported...

sufficient knowledge of guidelines and site policy such as WP:LIST and WP:LSC. The community has promoted several candidates in the last month that have...

Hærhjemmeværnet (da) • Ingeniørregimentet (da) • JRCC (da) • Konstabel (da) • LSC (da) • Landmilitsen (da) • Livgarden til hest (da) • Livgardens Tambourkorps...

Talk:Animal_Farm_in_popular_culture#Removing_Unreliably_Sourced_Items_Per_WP:LSC. The question is: If a TV show (or other item) quotes some famous line from...

solution. Nederlandse Leeuw (talk) 21:17, 26 May 2023 (UTC) What would the WP:LSC be? I'm skeptical it's a legitimate concept, in my experience it's used inconsistently...

deletion Deletion arguments were a lack of an encyclopaedic scope WP:NOT & WP:LSC with unsourced WP:RS original research WP:OR being added as a result as well...