Redirect to:
This page is a redirect. The following categories are used to track and monitor this redirect:
|
[Edit this panel]...
Click to read more »of the LOCE with several editors together, both here and here (see bottom of discussion). Having weighed up the ponits, I feel that the LOCE should be...
Click to read more »Proofread denied by Happy‑melon (19:39, 17 January 2008 (UTC)) – WP:LOCE/C#1 - Presence of {{refimprove}} tag.. an important topic to have a copy-edit...
Click to read more »Subpages. Since many of the LOCE pages are inactive archives, execution could be streamlined by creating an index of all LOCE pages to monitor, and changing...
Click to read more »7242 grand total = 30985 new rollover words = 985 barnstar = old school LOCE Y total-articles = 40 total-words = 27718 bonus-words = 8905 rollover-words...
Click to read more »could use a good cleaning up, and so I have added it to the requests at WP:LOCE, but I'd like to get suggestions from the wider community. The ultimate goal...
Click to read more »what you want (line by line) - see WP:LOCE. Ruhrfisch ><>°° 23:44, 3 April 2008 (UTC) The article already has a LOCE request. Unfortunately, I cannot wait...
Click to read more »candidate. It was suggested in the FAC to submit a request for a copyedit to the LOCE and I have decided to do so. Thanks for any help. Hello32020 (talk) 22:08...
Click to read more »Proofread denied by Happy‑melon (19:43, 17 January 2008 (UTC)) – WP:LOCE/C#3 - Presence of {{Primarysources}} tag.. Its been nominated for FA status, but...
Click to read more »Cleanup Y total-words = 19232 new rollover words = 4232 barnstar = Old School LOCE Y total-words = 2041 new rollover words = 41 barnstar = Modest Y total-words...
Click to read more »mostly? prove it. At this point it's clear to me you need a copyedit from WP:LOCE. Four dab links including "spin off", "plus size" x2 and "cosmetic". "pop...
Click to read more »Proofread denied by Happy‑melon (19:51, 17 January 2008 (UTC)) – WP:LOCE/C#4 - full protection indicates article is not stable.. Good article candidate...
Click to read more »from someone not familiar with the subject. I'd suggest going to the WP:LOCE before renominating just to be sure everything is covered. I think I fixed...
Click to read more »the page. Rinse, lather, repeat. Will be used initially to distribute the LOCE roll call. Does it support {{bots}}/{{nobots}}? MaxSem(Han shot first!) 15:36...
Click to read more »A peer reviewer suggested the article should receive a once over by the LOCE just before we resubmit for FAC. The article has been through two FA nominations...
Click to read more »GA or FA stutus soon. I was recommended to come here by a member of the LOCE. We need copyediting for flow, tone of voice, grammar, spelling, paragraph...
Click to read more »deletion (glossary) Help, my article got nominated for deletion! Smoked Out, Loced Out (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)...
Click to read more »g., up to Section X) and update as necessary. Consider placing the {{WP:LoCE:In Progress}} template on the article's discussion page. Move completed articles...
Click to read more »inconsistencies in formatting citations. I'm going to have it go through LOCE for punctuation and prose, and ask someone to assist with going over references...
Click to read more »has reached GA, and I'm seeing if I have material for an FA. It will go to LOCE in its near future, but any feedback you can give me on prose, content, style...
Click to read more »get 'oppose' votes because of a couple of stray commas. I listed it at the LOCE a few weeks ago, but there's no sign of it being seen as a GA anytime this...
Click to read more »first studio album" or something. Perhaps you could have a look into WP:LOCE for a really thorough copyedit. Avoid using # to mean "number" per MOS:HASH...
Click to read more »0 grand total = 34013 new rollover words = 4013 barnstars = (old school) LOCE Y equal 4th place, 5k+ articles (2) Y total-articles = 8 total-words = 8997...
Click to read more »copyediting variety; it may be helpful, at this point, to simply drop by WP:LOCE and ask for someone to go through the article looking for any stylistic quirks...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Peer review/volunteers and LOCE/Members for lists of copyeditors who can help you. I noticed it is listed at LOCE, but that will take forever - contact...
Click to read more »presence" is less clear (assume it is also Osgood). Have you asked at WP:LOCE for a copyedit? I think the appearance section is fine. On my computer at...
Click to read more »think it needs a solid once over by a copyeditor, perhaps someone from WP:LOCE. Also, it may help to invite someone unassociated with the article to go...
Click to read more »{{historical}} is used for something that once got off the ground IMO like WP:LOCE, and Wikipedia:Building Wikipedia membership(I just chose these ones randomly)...
Click to read more »looks pretty good. I am a terrible copyeditor myself. Have you tried WP:LOCE to see if anyone can take a critical look at the text? Good luck! --Jayron32|talk|contribs...
Click to read more »late at FAC. Get a copyedit from WP:PRV or asking an editor listed at WP:LOCE Many of the subsections in Premier are only one paragraph long and should...
Click to read more »Done In general it could do with a thorough copyedit (perhaps see if WP:LOCE can help) before it could be submitted at WP:GAN... All the best. The Rambling...
Click to read more »but noticed some spelling concerns too - i.e. "scount" for "scout" The WP:LOCE can do copyedits or you can ask at WP:PRV in the copyedits section. Reading...
Click to read more »needs a copyedit for grammar and to read / flow more smoothly. Try asking WP:LOCE or one of the copyeditors at WP:PRV Watch out for unclear language: example...
Click to read more »on how to improve the prose; I feel this is the best place for it, as the LOCE backlog is huge. Thanks, Sceptre (talk) 22:04, 8 July 2008 (UTC) Comments...
Click to read more »you asked for help with a copy edit? Try asking someone from WP:PRV or WP:LOCE for help. Once the article is as polished as you can get it, I would then...
Click to read more »contribs) 17:27, 13 January 2008 (UTC) It's in the middle of a PR and a LOCE request, couldn't you have waited a while? I wasn't planning on nominating...
Click to read more »the warning template, the copyediting issue - if need be, head over to WP:LOCE. - Done Corn.u.co.pia ♥ Disc.us.sion 07:54, 6 June 2008 (UTC) Year ranges...
Click to read more »February 2008 (UTC) Filed a request at WP:LOCE. Sephiroth BCR (Converse) 19:36, 7 February 2008 (UTC) LOCE can be very backlogged; you may need to be...
Click to read more »1815." Looks like you need a good copyedit, perhaps put in a request at WP:LOCE? " Hinde attended Indiana Asbury University at Greencastle, Indiana for"...
Click to read more »You may be looking for Wikipedia:Local Embassy or Wikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors....
Click to read more »deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log) Suspected sockpuppets TravisLocesCandiceMichelle (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user ·...
Click to read more »edit ask one of the volunteers at WP:PRV or one of the editors listed at WP:LOCE Please use my examples as just that - these are not an exhaustive list and...
Click to read more »improvements, but do not have the time to do a copyedit. Have you asked at WP:LOCE? Since you already know this needs a copyedit, I will not point out errors...
Click to read more »expanded and updated. It also has received an excellent copy edit from WP:LOCE. Currently, the article is still rated as start class, but it seems that...
Click to read more »at GAN was prose, so really once other issues are gelled getting the WP:LOCE or somebody to run through it would be best (I'll try, but I don't have much...
Click to read more »July 2008 (UTC) Oppose I kind of wish you had contacted someone over at LOCE, because this article has several prose issues. And, major work needs to...
Click to read more »understanding is that WP:LOCE is very slow, but asking an editor listed at WP:PRV or asking on the talk page of an editor listed at LOCE should be faster. DoneWatchdogb...
Click to read more »the article again and see if their concerns have been addressed. The WP:LOCE can do copyedits or you can ask at WP:PRV in the copyedits section. I would...
Click to read more »the MoS as the model for the article. Will see if someone can copyedit. LoCE seems dead, though, so may take awhile unfortunately :( Items 3-5 fixed....
Click to read more »help at WP:PRV or from one of the editors listed at WP:LOCE (ask on the editor's talk page, LOCE is very slow / dead?). Hope this helps, Ruhrfisch ><>°°...
Click to read more »[6] Ask for a copyeditor at WP:PRV or ask one of the people listed at WP:LOCE on their talk page. What about the next year's or next Starrcade? How did...
Click to read more »1087 grand total = 30,127 new rollover words = 127 barnstar = old school LOCE Y tie 4th place, total articles (32) Y 3rd place, oldest articles (22) Y...
Click to read more »resolved. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 22:21, 13 May 2008 (UTC) The talk page has a WP:LOCE tag? SandyGeorgia (Talk) 21:49, 13 May 2008 (UTC) Yes, it was a holdout from...
Click to read more »2008 (UTC) There are people who will do copyedits listed at WP:PRV and WP:LOCE - I would ask on someone's talk page for help. Ruhrfisch ><>°° 01:09, 29...
Click to read more »extreme I block all these vandals I was in MOTD and WP:ACID and even the LOCE The only edit that I ever thought was hard Was when I reverted an editor's...
Click to read more »be found by asking at WP:PRV or by asking one of the people listed at WP:LOCE directly. A co-production between France and Canada, it is based on the Beechwood...
Click to read more »Run Already has a bot flag (Y/N): Y Function Details: See User:MelonBot/LOCE Note that the number of edits requested above assumes that archiving will...
Click to read more »think 1c, 1d, and 2 are close to addressed. 1a still needs work, it's on the LOCE list. Quadzilla99 13:34, 29 April 2007 (UTC) I'm not sure on the use of hyphen...
Click to read more »The article needs a copyedit to clean up the lead a bit - see WP:PRV or WP:LOCE for copyediting help Refs look better Hope this helps, Ruhrfisch ><>°° 03:39...
Click to read more »A-class nomination and has recently had a copyedit from a member of the LOCE. I'd previously refrained from nominating purely because it's shorter than...
Click to read more »WP:PRV, although it is now dead, looking at the list of participants at WP:LOCE may yield others. Ruhrfisch ><>°° 03:58, 4 July 2008 (UTC) Thanks, I got...
Click to read more »February 2008 (UTC) Oppose for now - Numerous prose issues raised above. LOCE recommended, but any copyedit should pick up the majority of the blatant...
Click to read more »agree. I am not an expert copyeditor - see if you can find someone at WP:LOCE or on the new Peer Review volunteers list for another opinion. Here are some...
Click to read more »(UTC) Note: Prior to the FAC restart, a copy-edit request was made at WP:LOCE on 13 March. 52 Pickup (deal) 06:45, 19 March 2008 (UTC) Support I've added...
Click to read more »Demography - I usually see this called Demographics Hope this helps, perhaps ask for a copyedit from the WP:LOCE Ruhrfisch ><>°° 16:55, 8 April 2008 (UTC)...
Click to read more »bring it to the LOCE. There are quite a few places that need it. — MusicMaker5376 17:11, 15 April 2008 (UTC) I don't think the LOCE helped at Wicked...
Click to read more »copyedit from someone at WP:PRV or by asking one of the reviewers at WP:LOCE As I noted at my review of Dol Goldur, Howe's illustration is used in the...
Click to read more »please ask here. Biggest problem is the need for a copyedit - while WP:LOCE is dead (alas), you can ask for help at WP:PRV. I would try and address some...
Click to read more »Copy Editors (LOCE). The table with number of 747's made is geared more towards what the recent orders are, hence the order. The LOCE review did not...
Click to read more »proofreading before being published on the portal page. While I am not in the WP:LOCE, feel free to contact me if you want to rotate the items, and I'll have a...
Click to read more »could use a copy-edit throughout. You may wish to engage someone from WP:LOCE for assistance. It is typically understood that plot summaries are self-referencing...
Click to read more »Chwech 21:56, 11 December 2007 (UTC) Okay, I'll be around. Someone from LoCE should also proofread following a copyediting. --Kenneth M Burke (talk) 22:24...
Click to read more »That's halfway, there's a lot to do here. I suggest a good copyedit from WP:LOCE to ensure neutral prose. I suggest you also make sure you consider writing...
Click to read more »Note: this page is automatically archived using YiFeiBot_2; completed requests are archived after 24 hours. Manual archiving is normally unnecessary. Please...
Click to read more »people giving testimony? I hope you will or have taken the article to WP:LOCE. I was more concerned with the overall structure and content of the article...
Click to read more »from the LoCE but that seems rather dead ATM so I've dropped a message to another editor from PR to look it over (I will note that one LoCE editor did...
Click to read more »by an editor new to the text. Please see both Peer review/volunteers and LOCE/Members for lists of people who can help. Do not hesitate to contact a few...
Click to read more »thorough copyedit; if you don't feel comfortable doing this yourself, then WP:LOCE might be able to help. For some further examples: It was watched by 603,000...
Click to read more »immaculate in terms of grammar. I'd request the services of someone at WP:LOCE to look over this article. To be honest, this article needs a lot of work...
Click to read more »Dartmouth College. Attention to prose is also needed; listing the article at WP:LOCE may be helpful before approaching FAC. See WP:MOS#Captions on punctuation...
Click to read more »other words, copy-editing is required. Try requesting a copy-edit from WP:LOCE - that is, when the article complies with the style (and content) requirements...
Click to read more »yet ready for FAC in my opinion, and at least needs a copyedit - ask at WP:LOCE or the copyeditor volunteers at WP:PRV. Here are some points to consider...
Click to read more »have made the changes as suggested. This article has been copy-edited, by LOCE, to get it to GA-status. Is there another resource to copy-edit more thoroughly...
Click to read more »she/her/hers) the plot summaries are fairly confusing. Can I call on LOCE to help? LOCE is (sadly) defunct, although you might try asking some of the poeple...
Click to read more »- Talk 20:11, 1 April 2008 (UTC) This article is currently listed at the LOCE for copyediting, still has MOS errors, and according to the list above, still...
Click to read more »The League of Copyeditors is perpetually backlogged with requests for articles to be copyedited. Before requesting a copyedit, editors should be aware...
Click to read more »WP:PRV or leave a message on the talk page of one of the users lsted at WP:LOCE I think what is there is generally good, just needs some polish, perhaps...
Click to read more »Strong support. I am completely amazed by Happy-melons work with the WP:LOCE project. I stumbled into it and haven't yet done much with their huge backlog...
Click to read more »templates and Wikipedia:Citing sources). A copyedit is in order (see WP:LOCE). There are many {{citation needed}} tags and neutrality disputed tags. Although...
Click to read more »could use a copyedit - ask at WP:PRV or one of the editors listed at WP:LOCE Avoid jargon - photo caption uses "CoL" and an External link is just "Drexel"...
Click to read more »the characters that are being included. I've requested a copy-edit at WP:LOCE, but as it will be done some time next year, we probably need to hire a copy-editor...
Click to read more »comments about it from other people, I suggest submitting the article to WP:LOCE. Hope this helps. Gran2 14:36, 16 June 2007 (UTC) I've just noticed that...
Click to read more »2009-09-18 21:40:51 (UTC): User Richjerk321 (talk - contribs; 8) to Smoked Out, Loced Out (diff - undo) - Link: thatkush.com/tag/three-6-mafia/. * Links added...
Click to read more »thorough copyedit. If nothing else please take it to WP:PR/WP:BIOPR or WP:LOCE before bringing it here. I could quickly find 5 more bad grammar/usage errors...
Click to read more »highway) article has had an open LOCE request pending since it passed the ACR. Imzadi1979 (talk) 00:26, 16 May 2008 (UTC) Yes, LOCE is not really functioning...
Click to read more »the fix-suggestions! Geuiwogbil 04:45, 12 August 2007 (UTC) Listed at WP:LOCE. I'm still willing to address any more particular comments if you have them...
Click to read more »copyedit from a fresh pair of eyes. changed wording. have applied for ce to WP:LOCE I would use exact dates (when known), instead of vague time terms so More...
Click to read more »15 April 2008 (UTC) Oppose, the article needs a large copyedit. Ask the LOCE Sceptre (talk) 16:58, 17 April 2008 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »I do not have any for sure ones. Another place to look is at the old WP:LOCE - the group is defunct, but the editors listed there might help with a copyedit...
Click to read more »seems informal for an encyclopedia. It needs some general help. Maybe WP:LOCE. References and Original Research: Full bibliographic information needed...
Click to read more »Geometry guy 22:54, 4 April 2011 (UTC) I've requested a copy-edit from WP:LOCE... Gran2 17:36, 8 April 2011 (UTC) I'm glad they are stepping in. Feel free...
Click to read more »by an editor new to the text. Please see both Peer review/volunteers and LOCE/Members for lists of people who can help. Do not hesitate to contact a few...
Click to read more »afraid I don't do copy edits unless it is a topic I know something about. WP:LOCE and WP:PRV are places to ask for a copyedit. Another trick is to print the...
Click to read more »interest (sports just isn't my thing). I would recommend listing this at WP:LOCE to see if you can get someone else to help out. Mangostar (talk) 20:06, 6...
Click to read more »album, her involvement was attached to media scrutiny. Have you asked WP:LOCE? I will not ask the project for now. User:Esprit15d is conducting a copy...
Click to read more »prose, I added the article to the list of FACs needing a copyedit at WP:LOCE. UnaLaguna 18:26, 14 August 2007 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »great with punctuation so I don't want to make changes. Make a request at WP:LOCE or you could contact Unimaginative Username and ask him/her to take a look...
Click to read more »addressed. Although this article has been previously copy-edited by the LOCE, I will re-submit it for someone else to have a crack at it. If it doesn't...
Click to read more »seeing Sally again? Probably needs another copyedit in my opinion - try WP:LOCE... The Rambling Man (talk) 16:46, 15 February 2008 (UTC) Response to comments...
Click to read more »field,[12] so-predicting a ..." are an improvement, you need to head to WP:LOCE for some help with the English grammar in the lead. At the moment, it's seriously...
Click to read more »the 1st FAC, IMO it doesn't need a copy-edit. I refuse to put it up at WP:LOCE because I'd be waiting nearly a year for it to get copy-edited. D.M.N. (talk)...
Click to read more »and Wikipedia:Peer review/volunteers. It has been listed at WP:LOCE for some time.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 21:38, 29 May 2008...
Click to read more »immediately indicates a copyedit would be of use. I suggest asking at WP:LOCE for some assistance. "...interfered on Sid's behalf, signalling a disqualification...
Click to read more »the 2008 section, as it's only March. Copyedit might be in order from WP:LOCE. However, it's backlogged, so it might be best to approach someone who has...
Click to read more »the Mild (talk) 24529 12264.5 460 37253.5 7253.5 5 0 10858 4 Old school LOCE BlueMoonset (talk) 229 0 2053 2282 2282 1 0 229 0 Minor Miniapolis (talk)...
Click to read more »needs a little work. If this passes, which looks likely, I'd keep it on the LOCE list and move it from the FAR/FAC section to the section for proofreading...
Click to read more »xDanielx T/C\R 22:01, 22 June 2008 (UTC) As a result of the recent MFD the LOCE has been marked as historical. Now, the LOCErequest template can be seen...
Click to read more »by an editor new to the text. Please see both Peer review/volunteers and LOCE/Members for lists of people who can help. Do not hesitate to contact a few...
Click to read more »changed that particular sentence and have requested a copyedit from the LOCE. Dylan (talk) 06:12, 27 December 2007 (UTC) Are all the references checked...
Click to read more »including the new #ifexist limit. On the template network I'm working on (at WP:LOCE/R), I don't think the #ifexist count can be brought below 100 without this...
Click to read more »(cricketer) - same as Benaud Mattinbgn (talk · contribs) Warwick Armstrong - at LoCE George Giffen - the next one! Dweller (talk · contribs) - although I normally...
Click to read more »could be good to improve some of the wording, as can be requested at WP:LOCE/R. But since you're a native English speaker (unlike me) it might not be...
Click to read more »could do with a brief copyedit to improve flow. Any sugestions? Suggest WP:LOCE for copyeditors. The Rambling Man (talk) 06:44, 16 June 2008 (UTC) Tried...
Click to read more »Y Dhtwiki (talk) 16329 8164.5 7864 32357.5 2357.5 7 7 6026 2 Old school LOCE Y A.JulianEditor (talk) 15221 6795 0 22016 2016 4 4 853 0 Tireless Contributor...
Click to read more »by an editor new to the text. Please see both Peer review/volunteers and LOCE/Members for lists of people who can help. Do not hesitate to contact a few...
Click to read more »Diligence Y Dhtwiki (talk) 23686 11843 3785 39314 9314 17 17 4119 0 Old school LOCE Y Newyorkadam (talk) 205 0 0 205 205 5 0 67 0 Minor Y OctaviusPublius (talk)...
Click to read more »mentioned above? I'm trying to beat down the number of #ifexist calls on WP:LOCE/R, and I don't think it's going to be possible without this update. Happy‑melon...
Click to read more »related to the article needing a good copyedit. I suggest you head over to WP:LOCE and place a request. Hope these comments have been useful, if you'd like...
Click to read more »the privilege. Re c/e: I haven't requested a copyedit because I find the LOCE too slow; I had an article on FAC (now FA) two months ago and they haven't...
Click to read more »field,[12] so-predicting a ..." are an improvement, you need to head to WP:LOCE for some help with the English grammar in the lead. At the moment, it's seriously...
Click to read more »by an editor new to the text. Please see both Peer review/volunteers and LOCE/Members for lists of people who can help. Do not hesitate to contact a few...
Click to read more »(as evidenced by the large number of backlogged requests). Much like the LOCE, it's probably better not to get peoples hopes up and instead have them pound...
Click to read more »moment, the article just isn't ready for the FA star. Suggest contacting the LOCE or asking at WT:VG if this FAC isn't successful. dihydrogen monoxide (H20)...
Click to read more »accusing people of bullying. This surrounds the possible deletion of WP:LOCE, see the MFD. Also, please see his userpage comment, as well as these two...
Click to read more »and capable copyeditor to go over the article (try asking one of the WP:LOCE members). I still have the following concerns: GameFAQs is not reliable....
Click to read more »immaculate in terms of grammar. I'd request the services of someone at WP:LOCE to look over this article. To be honest, this article needs a lot of work...
Click to read more »educates, not only the jurors, but the judge as well." is a bit long. The LOCE will help you with that, though. "thirty year old" should have hyphens between...
Click to read more »filled out? What's wrong with a single page to list requests like the WP:LoCE? Dev920 (Have a nice day!) 16:12, 29 March 2007 (UTC) I'm not sure I've seen...
Click to read more »suggestions later. GrahamColmTalk 22:13, 19 April 2008 (UTC) I've added it to the LOCE's request list, but it might take a while there. Did some wording changes...
Click to read more »there were concerns about the tone of the article. I put in a request at WP:LoCE for a copyedit, but since nobody did a copyedit during the FAC, it has now...
Click to read more »10 April 2008 (UTC) I'm currently reviewing a potential FA candidate for LOCE duties, and I come across the phrase "split up" pretty frequently. I've consulted...
Click to read more »to learn and see how they apply. Spend a little time with WP:CU and/or WP:LoCE just to round out your Wikixperience. Considering you've been editing for...
Click to read more »2007 Tamil people Brought to standard January 2007, effort from Venu62, WP:LoCE and *many* others. The Adventures of Tintin Brought to standard, FAR Aug/Sep...
Click to read more »within a WP sentence. See MOS. The article had a thorough copy edit by the LOCE, but I changed this. --Moni3 (talk) 13:37, 24 January 2008 (UTC) First caption:...
Click to read more »brilliant prose" expected of an FA, it needs work. Don't forget to post at WP:LOCE for another look as well.--Jayron32|talk|contribs 17:19, 10 May 2007 (UTC)...
Click to read more »could do with a brief copyedit to improve flow. Any sugestions? Suggest WP:LOCE for copyeditors. The Rambling Man (talk) 06:44, 16 June 2008 (UTC) Tried...
Click to read more »considerable allocation of memory for it to do so. Complicated pages like WP:LOCE/R or even the main page might require hundreds of parser cycles to fully...
Click to read more »All of the summaries badly need copyediting. You may want to ask the WP:LoCE for that since the list is so large. References and Notes should be merged...
Click to read more »project; framing any proposed new structure in terms of a similarity to GOCE/LOCE is likely to repel as many editors as it attracts. (The three people most...
Click to read more »2008 (UTC) Comments by Moni3: I strongly suggest you put the article at WP:LOCE right now to have experienced English writers assist with those elements...
Click to read more »seeing Sally again? Probably needs another copyedit in my opinion - try WP:LOCE... The Rambling Man (talk) 16:46, 15 February 2008 (UTC) Response to comments...
Click to read more »the issues you've raised. I'm afraid I don't know any copy-editors. The LOCE isn't much help either. Once, I left a petition for a copy-edit for, what...
Click to read more »(talk • contribs) 20:36, 16 June 2008 (UTC) My thought was just that WP:LOCE seems to be dead or at least barely functioning, and this was a way to help...
Click to read more »sufficient.Dick G (talk) 12:54, 22 November 2007 (UTC) Done Now listed at WP:LOCE, thanks Dick G (talk) 03:41, 26 November 2007 (UTC) You may wish to browse...
Click to read more »Hymnic (talk) 1 September 2010 Various Livitup (talk) 31 August 2010 Original LOCE Editor. Love the challenge of longer articles. Rahul Choudhary 31 August...
Click to read more »February 2008 (UTC) So far unaddessed comments (the article has been listed at LOCE, so feel free to archive the message once the copyedit request has been carried...
Click to read more »already done so I would recommend getting a fresh set of eyes, perhaps from WP:LOCE, to look it over for copyediting... --Jayron32|talk|contribs 02:16, 18 August...
Click to read more »amazing since they're only as of Nov. 2006, but they're something. As for the LoCE, it says that since the article is current an FAC, then we should wait until...
Click to read more »whether this is the apppropriate place for this, but I have nominate the LOCE project for closure by MFD'ing it. The discussion is here. All comments are...
Click to read more »article needs is a good copyedit from fresh eyes, therefore I contacted WP:LOCE. —Burningclean [Speak the truth!] 01:49, 6 February 2008 (UTC) I have to...
Click to read more »(Procedural note: I am a coordinator emeritus of the WP:GOCE, formerly the LOCE, which is the maintainer of these outdated templates.) It appears that long-time...
Click to read more »article, I'm not sure how to go about that anymore. It has been on the WP:LOCE FAC proofreading list for over 2 months and has been on the top for most...
Click to read more »it. Tony (talk) 01:43, 8 December 2007 (UTC) I've placed a request at WP:LOCE for a copy-edit. Sephiroth BCR (Converse) 03:59, 8 December 2007 (UTC) Comments...
Click to read more »copy-edited. It may take a while for this article to be seen by someone from the LOCE. María (habla conmigo) 14:17, 27 January 2008 (UTC) Comment — I created the...
Click to read more »Deed/archive1 Relisting. Same as before. A request has been put in at WP:LoCE for a copyedit. Brad 12:08, 1 December 2007 (UTC) A script has been used...
Click to read more »Boomtish (talk) 14:13, 29 May 2008 (UTC) Request has been forwarded to the WP:LOCE for general clean-up of prose. Boomtish (talk) 04:14, 11 June 2008 (UTC)...
Click to read more »those, but if you can point out others, I'll try and fix.) I've asked WP:LoCE to look at the article too. Done Except for the very very last sentence...
Click to read more »make it more like narrative. In the mean time, I will drop a line to the WP:LOCE to iron out any informal tone. Dev920 (Have a nice day!) 07:01, 2 September...
Click to read more »content taken from single sources since I first encountered this article at WP:LoCE. Starting over is better than attempting a merge. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 02:38...
Click to read more »by an editor new to the text. Please see both Peer review/volunteers and LOCE/Members for lists of people who can help. Do not hesitate to contact a few...
Click to read more »result was delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 01:49, 19 June 2018 (UTC) Smoked Out, Loced Out (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)...
Click to read more »See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a.[?] Done request in to WP:LoCE You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas....
Click to read more »where I think it's ready, but I'd appreciate a second pair of eyes and a LoCE review to help with a future GA relisting. JonStrines (talk) 13:18, 2 April...
Click to read more »failed FAC and the peer review. Also, two different copyeditors from WP:LOCE have gone over and fully copyedited the article. All prior objections raised...
Click to read more »(UTC) Comments If you haven't done so already I would make a request to WP:LoCE and ask them to review the article. The length as you mentioned is too long...
Click to read more »has gone through two extensive peer reviews, a copyedit drive of the late LOCE and an exhaustive GA review, eventually making it to a GA status. All it...
Click to read more »there have been various minor tweaks, and the article has been through LoCE (thanks to EyeSerene). I can't see anything more to be done to the article...
Click to read more »make comments here. I will not comment on the text for now as there is a LOCE edit in progress banner (and has been for well over a day). However the images...
Click to read more »6 August 2019 (UTC) AmericanAir88, you appear not to be aware that GOCE/LOCE is held by many in extremely low regard, with good reason, and many of those...
Click to read more »MOS point of view on words like that. Done - all instances changed by the LOCE copyeditors. Happy‑melon 14:01, 2 January 2008 (UTC) Although I think the...
Click to read more »copyediting so I decided to take it here to attract the attention of other LoCE members, though I may just end up copyediting this one myself, eventually...
Click to read more »Mmm, if you're out of ideas for copyediting, you might try asking at WP:LoCE; aside from that, the issue is mostly playing with the wording until it sounds...
Click to read more »A-class. I've currently got the article nominated at GA, and also in WP:LoCE to sort out any remaining prose/grammar/punctuation problems. I want to take...
Click to read more »Although i am a member of LoCE, i am requesting someone to go thru the article and fix prose issues which might have escaped my eye. A few months ago,...
Click to read more »problems with grammar etc. (For example, missing full stops) :*A Wikipedia:LoCE request has been made and I will continue to look at the article in the next...
Click to read more »since the League of Copy Editors (LOCE) went historical. For now I am not proposing a revival of the LOCE because the LOCE's focus was somewhat had become...
Click to read more »objections regarding 1a remained unspecific. Also, I renewed my request at the LoCE, after their members only copyedited the lead. Johnnyw talk 22:34, 23 October...
Click to read more »expanded both lead paragraphs and requested copy-editing assistance from the WP:LoCE. I will do a full copy-edit myself as well later. Mr.Z-mantalk¢Review! 00:06...
Click to read more »merged, and severe writing problems. I suggest contacting individual WP:LoCE members. Michaelas10Respect my authoritah 20:46, 10 April 2007 (UTC) Oppose—1a...
Click to read more »Exchange «High» Ljubljana Summer Festival Ljubljana town hall Ljubljana Zoo Loče Logar Valley, Slovenia Loggia Palace Log pod Mangartom Mosque Lower Carniola...
Click to read more »person for such a task, as I gather the League of Copyeditors is defunct. WP:LOCE Any suggestions? --Slp1 (talk) 12:00, 16 July 2008 (UTC) Made changes to...
Click to read more »by an editor new to the text. Please see both Peer review/volunteers and LOCE/Members for lists of people who can help. Do not hesitate to contact a few...
Click to read more »comprehension, but saw several typos ("it's" for "its" was one) - can ask at WP:LoCE or WP:PRV References need to be more detailed in terms of information given...
Click to read more »suggest putting it through a peer review at WP:FILMREV, and applying to WP:LOCE for a copyedit. Best of luck! Maralia (talk) 01:27, 10 March 2008 (UTC) Comments...
Click to read more »October 2010 (UTC) Weak oppose; I appreciate your effort as part of the LOCE, but my personal criteria require more significant contributions to audited...
Click to read more »copyediting skills on this; should I go to the LoCE?--Clyde (talk) 17:41, 25 May 2007 (UTC) It may take awhile for the LoCE to come along, probably even after this...
Click to read more »You might enlist the help of someone at the League of Copyeditors. See WP:LoCE. I encourage you to do more research and to continue working on this article...
Click to read more »move toward FA. I would suggest that you have the League of Copyeditors WP:LoCE go over this page or a trusted wikipedian copyeditor. There are many awkward...
Click to read more »thing I would like to see from him is more detail on his affiliation with WP:LOCE (possibly a separate page documenting specific involvement). TonyTheTiger...
Click to read more »linking to Newport." Should be "a 24-hour service". It's worth taking to WP:LoCE, and having another go with later on. Chwech 19:56, 22 March 2008 (UTC) Oppose...
Click to read more »by an editor new to the text. Please see both Peer review/volunteers and LOCE/Members for lists of people who can help. Do not hesitate to contact a few...
Click to read more »there were concerns about the tone of the article. I put in a request at WP:LoCE for a copyedit, but since nobody did a copyedit during the FAC, it has now...
Click to read more »Since I'm no english major may-be you could ask one of the members of WP:LoCE to run through the article? Yes, we've already asked and are waiting. Good...
Click to read more »(UTC) It does need further copyediting. Ryan has submitted a request at WP:LoCE (an MHL request should also be considered). I don't know whether the ship's...
Click to read more »article. I try to help out where I can and made many improvements to the WP:LoCE project when I sought their help with Biman Bangladesh Airlines. → AA (talk)...
Click to read more »prose issues (even if only minor and therefore not requiring a request at WP:LoCE) haven't been identified ;-). I'll address the linkage later. And finally...
Click to read more »requester Hello. I was looking for different lists of copyeditors besides WP:LOCE. I'm listed in one of them but I forgot where it is. :P Thanks, RyRy (talk)...
Click to read more »could probably use some work in that regard. Done (not copyediting, but LOCE, It has a copyedit sign, but I may do what you ask. Hope these comments are...
Click to read more »as I went, but more remains to be done. You might find a copyeditor at WP:LoCE or WP:PRV. I hope this helps. If you found this review useful, please consider...
Click to read more »through the Automated Peer Reviewer. Consider submitting the article to WP:LoCE, the League of Copy Editors. Perhaps the production section could be expanded...
Click to read more »All of the summaries badly need copyediting. You may want to ask the WP:LoCE for that since the list is so large. References and Notes should be merged...
Click to read more »projects/collaborations, which I think are largely uncontroversial ({{WP LoCE}}, {{UFAIDnom}}, {{PUSRD-SA}}, {{SGCOTWP}}, {{Landscape}}, {{Incu-grad}}...
Click to read more »copyediting, so the only thing I can do now is wait until someone from the LoCE comes to help :( No-Bullet (Talk • Contribs) 19:18, 5 January 2007 (UTC)...
Click to read more »WillowW, JayHenry, citation cleanup by Maralia, and dual copy edits by LOCE members Scartol and Galena11. Thank you in advance for reading the article...
Click to read more »you can check that here: [66] (if he was locked, it would be marked as "Loced: yes", see this example: [67]). Vanjagenije (talk) 18:33, 18 April 2015...
Click to read more »criteria this article may not have made, it was this. I have tried at WP:LOCE a long time ago, but it's inactive and well, I doubt if I could fix it in...
Click to read more »proofreading before being published on the portal page. While I am not in the WP:LOCE, feel free to contact me if you want to rotate the items, and I'll have a...
Click to read more »The page went through a peer review last month and was looked over by the LoCE this last week. It's on to FAC from here. The page would appreciate any help...
Click to read more »colloquial phrases and where the flow is a little awkward. I'd recommend having LoCE or an independent copy editor give it a go over. Very suprised to see such...
Click to read more »knight re copy. DCGeist helped out tonight, have also left a note at WP:LoCE. + Ceoil 01:18, 13 January 2007 (UTC) Thanks for the update: I had a look...
Click to read more »to raise her child" mildly strange reading, would suggest a request at WP:LOCE to rephrase this and others. I tried my own hand at it.--TonyTheTiger...
Click to read more »improve it, Tony, the article has seen four major c/es, two with help from the LOCE. I would have thought that after such extensive surgery, prose and c/e stuff...
Click to read more »are looking for, but i think this may be it. I have been working with the LoCE for a while. Navou banter 18:31, 14 April 2007 (UTC) Neutral- I would love...
Click to read more »important points, each of which have been met or exceeded. Article posted to WP:LoCE (now GoCE), from which it recieved extensive copyediting by Lukobe and Adacore...
Click to read more »makeover. Sarvagnya 20:53, 20 November 2007 (UTC) Request was submitted to WP:LOCE. Seams they are pretty backlogged at the moment [1]. --snowolfD4 ( talk /...
Click to read more »transwiki issues are cleaned up for sure. I think it should be sent through WP:LoCE as well... but a lot of work has been poured into this article; that much...
Click to read more »dates. A full copyedit should be done. You might find a copyeditor at WP:LoCE or WP:PRV. However there is a backlog so general proofreading etc by any...
Click to read more »by an editor new to the text. Please see both Peer review/volunteers and LOCE/Members for lists of people who can help. Do not hesitate to contact a few...
Click to read more »by an editor new to the text. Please see both Peer review/volunteers and LOCE/Members for lists of people who can help. Do not hesitate to contact a few...
Click to read more »criteria this article may not have made, it was this. I have tried at WP:LOCE a long time ago, but it's inactive and well, I doubt if I could fix it in...
Click to read more »content taken from single sources since I first encountered this article at WP:LoCE. Starting over is better than attempting a merge. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 02:38...
Click to read more »looking for. --Kmsiever 00:43, 20 October 2007 (UTC) I just added it to WP:LoCE/p in the FAC section. Hopefully, that will make a difference. --Kmsiever...
Click to read more »hand, there are some worthy projects using tags in mainspace as i.e. WP:LoCE and I think that it is justified and positive. But as I said, it is my personal...
Click to read more »Copy Editors (LOCE). The table with number of 747's made is geared more towards what the recent orders are, hence the order. The LOCE review did not...
Click to read more »evil in itself, so that should be fine). I've also posted a request for WP:LoCE to look the article over for POV/structure issues, and I've asked Extraordinary...
Click to read more »preluded the game's release. I've done dab and linkchecks, and a member of the LoCE has reviewed the text for copyedits. I know that there's a larger number...
Click to read more »by an editor new to the text. Please see both Peer review/volunteers and LOCE/Members for lists of people who can help. Do not hesitate to contact a few...
Click to read more »17:19, 25 May 2007 (UTC) I'm still awaiting a third party copy-edit by the LoCE. There's a huge backlog there as well. Anyway, your decision whether to support...
Click to read more »sure lots of work has gone into this—it's worth persevering; take it to WP:LoCE for a copyedit. Chwech 21:21, 22 March 2008 (UTC) The remainder of these...
Click to read more »etc. Copyedit needed by other editors: The article has been through WP:LOCE and has had extensive attention from 2 different copyeditors, as well as...
Click to read more »heavily from copyedit problems. Since then, two separate editors (one from the LoCE even) have CE'd this article. Also since then, a good reliable source article...
Click to read more »14:40, 28 January 2008 (UTC) It was copyedited by User:Scartol from the LoCE...but it may need a quick recheck after I addressed some other concerns....
Click to read more »12:24, 18 December 2007 (UTC) Response to Oppose: I've put it forward to the LoCE. ISD (talk) 12:41, 18 December 2007 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »issues; do you agree now that it needs a copy-edit? Maybe you should ask the LoCE? I also find all the albums' critical acclaim a mostly generic "brilliant"...
Click to read more »redirect by Sandstein on 16 Jun 2018; discussion 04 Jun 2018 – Smoked Out, Loced Out AfDed by TheGracefulSlick was closed as delete by RoySmith on 19 Jun...
Click to read more »tried to take that into account. To remedy this I suggest asking the WP:LoCE to go over the article. They do good work. KnightLago (talk) 03:02, 13 June...
Click to read more »WP:PEACOCK I have removed the named terms and I have requested a visit from WP:LOCE.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 01:32, 24 May 2008 (UTC) WP:SS/criterion...
Click to read more »by an editor new to the text. Please see both Peer review/volunteers and LOCE/Members for lists of people who can help. Do not hesitate to contact a few...
Click to read more »Tru. 1741 0 1741 1741 1 Minor Matty.007 16145 0 16145 1145 7 Old school LOCE Way2veers 1624 0 1624 1624 1 Minor Milesandkilometrestogo (talk) 2153 2004...
Click to read more »Ankit MaityTalkContribs 22505 9300 1552 33357 3357 5 4 10661 2 Old school LOCE Y Stfg (talk) 17540 8770 1747 28057 8057 11 8 5475 1 Tireless Contributor...
Click to read more »Punctuation and grammar needs further work. Consider asking for a review at WP:LoCE. Done – Artichoke2020 (talk) 22:59, 18 May 2008 (UTC) The 'history' could...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Peer review/volunteers and LOCE/Members for lists of copyeditors who can help you. I noticed it is listed at LOCE, but that will take forever - contact...
Click to read more »)--Kylohk 10:04, 21 July 2007 (UTC) Oh, and now, kudos to MSJapan of the LoCE for copyediting the article for me while I was fast asleep.--Kylohk 01:23...
Click to read more »So I'll both support and urge another round of copyediting. (Maybe at the LoCE?) For example, the phrase: "His family moved when he was five to Dungog…"...
Click to read more »I suggest an independent copyedit before approaching FAC. Perhaps the WP:LoCE will help. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 18:56, 3 August 2007 (UTC) Removed a good...
Click to read more »members. --AnonEMouse (squeak) 13:35, 5 July 2007 (UTC) As far as I know the LoCE doesn't concentrate on MOS issues like that - they concentrate on prose....
Click to read more »(UTC) Keep, has now been cited and copyedited; appreciate the help from the LoCE. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 15:02, 5 January 2007 (UTC) Keep--Dwaipayan (talk) 15:22...
Click to read more »4 February 2008 (UTC) comment - Have you thought about listing it at WP:LoCE? -Malkinann (talk) 15:17, 4 February 2008 (UTC) Endorse fail - I would say...
Click to read more »article, I'm not sure how to go about that anymore. It has been on the WP:LOCE FAC proofreading list for over 2 months and has been on the top for most...
Click to read more »February 2008 (UTC) Filed a request at WP:LOCE. Sephiroth BCR (Converse) 19:36, 7 February 2008 (UTC) LOCE can be very backlogged; you may need to be...
Click to read more »nearly doubled, from 48 to 93 as I write. I also listed the article at WP:LoCE, where someone will hopefully take an interest in it. There's still more...
Click to read more »ruling = about this landmark ruling. I'm going to list this article at WP:LoCE to see if we can convince a copyeditor to take a red pen to it. SandyGeorgia...
Click to read more »from the LoCE but that seems rather dead ATM so I've dropped a message to another editor from PR to look it over (I will note that one LoCE editor did...
Click to read more »Navigation Main project page (talk) WP:LOCE Copyediting requests (talk) WP:LOCE/R Request criteria (talk) WP:LOCE/C Participant list (talk) WP:LOCE/M...
Click to read more »request with LOCE. I have lost count how many times I have gone over this article so, if there are still problems with it and the LOCE will not answer...
Click to read more »14:40, 28 January 2008 (UTC) It was copyedited by User:Scartol from the LoCE...but it may need a quick recheck after I addressed some other concerns....
Click to read more »asking for an urgent job. Tony 03:54, 6 January 2007 (UTC) IMO, the LoCE can be most effective on an article that meets all the other criteria - best...
Click to read more »some comments yourself and ask for comments in return. I also know that LoCE is also quite busy so it takes a while. Ruhrfisch ><>°° 19:34, 18 February...
Click to read more »entire article should probably be reviewed.[1] I requested a copyedit at WP:LoCE before Cas Liber went through - is it still needed? SandyGeorgia (Talk) 14:20...
Click to read more »writer, it's always great to get the pros. Have you considered joining the LoCE (if you haven't already)? Lemme get this straight: You enjoy finding sources...
Click to read more »symbols altogether? I know that the quill and broom are the "symbols" of the LoCE, and that it's really hard to find something else that is good to symbolize...
Click to read more »examples taken at random. Tony 05:20, 5 July 2007 (UTC) I was asked by the LoCE to check the article for copyediting, and I corrected the few errors there...
Click to read more »seems informal for an encyclopedia. It needs some general help. Maybe WP:LOCE. References and Original Research: Full bibliographic information needed...
Click to read more »above, I advise seeking a copyeditor to go over the text. Although the WP:LOCE is defunct, you can try and see if any members of the FA-Team or peer review...
Click to read more »had a heavy copy edit by a established copy editor and a former member of LOCE. First and last points are the only essential part that may need be fixed...
Click to read more »(talk) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Aichik (talk) 35354 0 0 35354 5354 101 0 Old school LOCE Lemmoid (talk)Lemmoid 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 —Theopolisme (talk) 11553 2476.5 0 14029...
Click to read more »other. This should bend each core's path around each other, potentially locing each other's core in an orbit around each other held together by the surrounding...
Click to read more »suggestions later. GrahamColmTalk 22:13, 19 April 2008 (UTC) I've added it to the LOCE's request list, but it might take a while there. Did some wording changes...
Click to read more »round up a couple of non-contributors to do a final check. The lead time at LoCE is unfortunately far too long to be helpful here. Did you notice any other...
Click to read more »somewhere), I'll find it eventually. And yes, it should be [[3 February]]. LoCE is broken beyond repair, hundreds of articles are in the backlog. Asking...
Click to read more »was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:31, 9 March 2023 (UTC) Template:WP LoCE (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages) Similar temlate to Template:WikiProject...
Click to read more »sure lots of work has gone into this—it's worth persevering; take it to WP:LoCE for a copyedit. Chwech 21:21, 22 March 2008 (UTC) The remainder of these...
Click to read more »highway) article has had an open LOCE request pending since it passed the ACR. Imzadi1979 (talk) 00:26, 16 May 2008 (UTC) Yes, LOCE is not really functioning...
Click to read more »it. Tony (talk) 01:43, 8 December 2007 (UTC) I've placed a request at WP:LOCE for a copy-edit. Sephiroth BCR (Converse) 03:59, 8 December 2007 (UTC) Comments...
Click to read more »the article also needs a good copyedit, consider making a request to the LoCE. Things such as "In September 2007" should have a comma after the 2007. I...
Click to read more »Richhoncho was redirected by Febodyed on 18 Aug 2006 10 Jun 2016 – Smoked Out, Loced Out (song) PRODed by Richhoncho was deleted 13 Jun 2016 – Sleeping with...
Click to read more »needs a little work. If this passes, which looks likely, I'd keep it on the LOCE list and move it from the FAR/FAC section to the section for proofreading...
Click to read more »people giving testimony? I hope you will or have taken the article to WP:LOCE. I was more concerned with the overall structure and content of the article...
Click to read more »Springs Massacre - prior to its March GA nomination this article went through LoCE, since then it has undergone a major overhaul in FAC. Copy editing is essentially...
Click to read more »would definitely like this article to remain FA, and recommend help from WP:LoCE. Ceoil 22:14, 11 May 2007 (UTC) Comment Why not just delist it? It never...
Click to read more »there have been various minor tweaks, and the article has been through LoCE (thanks to EyeSerene). I can't see anything more to be done to the article...
Click to read more »has reached GA, and I'm seeing if I have material for an FA. It will go to LOCE in its near future, but any feedback you can give me on prose, content, style...
Click to read more »the fix-suggestions! Geuiwogbil 04:45, 12 August 2007 (UTC) Listed at WP:LOCE. I'm still willing to address any more particular comments if you have them...
Click to read more »heavily from copyedit problems. Since then, two separate editors (one from the LoCE even) have CE'd this article. Also since then, a good reliable source article...
Click to read more »looking for. --Kmsiever 00:43, 20 October 2007 (UTC) I just added it to WP:LoCE/p in the FAC section. Hopefully, that will make a difference. --Kmsiever...
Click to read more »to look for. The article has undergone a pretty thorough copy edit by the LoCE, as well as others, fixing a lot of the grammar. Since I've been one of the...
Click to read more »Wikipedian Y Avgr8 (talk) 32364 5186.5 0 37550.5 7550.5 13 7 7259 2 Old school LOCE Y Yellow Dingo (talk) 546 273 0 819 819 2 2 306 0 Minor Y Prof. Squirrel...
Click to read more »February 2008 (UTC) So far unaddessed comments (the article has been listed at LOCE, so feel free to archive the message once the copyedit request has been carried...
Click to read more »17:19, 25 May 2007 (UTC) I'm still awaiting a third party copy-edit by the LoCE. There's a huge backlog there as well. Anyway, your decision whether to support...
Click to read more »above, I advise seeking a copyeditor to go over the text. Although the WP:LOCE is defunct, you can try and see if any members of the FA-Team or peer review...
Click to read more »nice reviewers came to the page and made edits without commenting on the LOCE tag to correct any prose or other problems. In addition, I have followed...
Click to read more »could use a copy-edit throughout. You may wish to engage someone from WP:LOCE for assistance. It is typically understood that plot summaries are self-referencing...
Click to read more »try contacting one of the editors at WP:1FAPQ#Project resources instead. LoCE has been extremely slow to respond in the last few months, and might not...
Click to read more »Mmm, if you're out of ideas for copyediting, you might try asking at WP:LoCE; aside from that, the issue is mostly playing with the wording until it sounds...
Click to read more »templates and Wikipedia:Citing sources). A copyedit is in order (see WP:LOCE). There are many {{citation needed}} tags and neutrality disputed tags. Although...
Click to read more »not very good at it either. Try to find a good copyeditor to help you. WP:LoCE might be helpful. There are some POV issues. I take from your user name and...
Click to read more »You might enlist the help of someone at the League of Copyeditors. See WP:LoCE. I encourage you to do more research and to continue working on this article...
Click to read more »peer review) but failed due to concerns about the tone of the article. WP:LoCE has a huge backlog, so I'd appreciate it if someone could lend a hand since...
Click to read more »the MoS as the model for the article. Will see if someone can copyedit. LoCE seems dead, though, so may take awhile unfortunately :( Items 3-5 fixed....
Click to read more »A-class nomination and has recently had a copyedit from a member of the LOCE. I'd previously refrained from nominating purely because it's shorter than...
Click to read more »thing and use that source. I suggest you request a copyedit from the WP:LoCE, rewrite and add the sections mentioned above, get another peer review, and...
Click to read more »4 February 2008 (UTC) comment - Have you thought about listing it at WP:LoCE? -Malkinann (talk) 15:17, 4 February 2008 (UTC) Endorse fail - I would say...
Click to read more »was OK. But I will close the LoCE request. —Rob (talk) 22:10, 13 May 2008 (UTC) That's a holdover from a time when the LOCE actually worked, and when we...
Click to read more »evil in itself, so that should be fine). I've also posted a request for WP:LoCE to look the article over for POV/structure issues, and I've asked Extraordinary...
Click to read more »person for such a task, as I gather the League of Copyeditors is defunct. WP:LOCE Any suggestions? --Slp1 (talk) 12:00, 16 July 2008 (UTC) Made changes to...
Click to read more »what you want (line by line) - see WP:LOCE. Ruhrfisch ><>°° 23:44, 3 April 2008 (UTC) The article already has a LOCE request. Unfortunately, I cannot wait...
Click to read more »brilliant prose" expected of an FA, it needs work. Don't forget to post at WP:LOCE for another look as well.--Jayron32|talk|contribs 17:19, 10 May 2007 (UTC)...
Click to read more »the issues you've raised. I'm afraid I don't know any copy-editors. The LOCE isn't much help either. Once, I left a petition for a copy-edit for, what...
Click to read more »copyediting skills on this; should I go to the LoCE?--Clyde (talk) 17:41, 25 May 2007 (UTC) It may take awhile for the LoCE to come along, probably even after this...
Click to read more »certainly haven't found anything misspelled. I'll submit the article to the LoCE when the peer review finishes, thank you. --Fbv65edel / ☑t / ☛c || 01:30...
Click to read more »thing and use that source. I suggest you request a copyedit from the WP:LoCE, rewrite and add the sections mentioned above, get another peer review, and...
Click to read more »Galena11 05:29, 3 January 2007 (UTC) This article is in very bad shape - the LoCE tag on the talk page implies that the entire article was reviewed, and the...
Click to read more »could use a good cleaning up, and so I have added it to the requests at WP:LOCE, but I'd like to get suggestions from the wider community. The ultimate goal...
Click to read more »Dev920 (Have a nice day!) 21:49, 11 August 2007 (UTC) I listed it for the WP:LoCE.~ZytheTalk to me! 21:54, 11 August 2007 (UTC) Would anyone who's already...
Click to read more »inconsistencies in formatting citations. I'm going to have it go through LOCE for punctuation and prose, and ask someone to assist with going over references...
Click to read more »Deed/archive1 Relisting. Same as before. A request has been put in at WP:LoCE for a copyedit. Brad 12:08, 1 December 2007 (UTC) A script has been used...
Click to read more »other words, copy-editing is required. Try requesting a copy-edit from WP:LOCE - that is, when the article complies with the style (and content) requirements...
Click to read more »make it more like narrative. In the mean time, I will drop a line to the WP:LOCE to iron out any informal tone. Dev920 (Have a nice day!) 07:01, 2 September...
Click to read more »etc. Copyedit needed by other editors: The article has been through WP:LOCE and has had extensive attention from 2 different copyeditors, as well as...
Click to read more »move toward FA. I would suggest that you have the League of Copyeditors WP:LoCE go over this page or a trusted wikipedian copyeditor. There are many awkward...
Click to read more »"Parintins" (content was: '{{delete}}') 20:17, 7 Oct 2004 Michael Snow deleted "Loce" (content was: '{{db|empty}}') 20:17, 7 Oct 2004 Michael Snow deleted "Light...
Click to read more »August 2008 (UTC) Update - I've contacted several members of the former LoCE to request a copyedit of the article, and am currently awaiting a reply.--EclipseSSD...
Click to read more »I suggest an independent copyedit before approaching FAC. Perhaps the WP:LoCE will help. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 18:56, 3 August 2007 (UTC) Removed a good...
Click to read more »was a WP:GA before we got 10 promoted in June and July. I could put a WP:LOCE tag on it, but do not recall that getting editorial assistance with any other...
Click to read more »comments about it from other people, I suggest submitting the article to WP:LOCE. Hope this helps. Gran2 14:36, 16 June 2007 (UTC) I've just noticed that...
Click to read more »Geometry guy 22:54, 4 April 2011 (UTC) I've requested a copy-edit from WP:LOCE... Gran2 17:36, 8 April 2011 (UTC) I'm glad they are stepping in. Feel free...
Click to read more »make comments here. I will not comment on the text for now as there is a LOCE edit in progress banner (and has been for well over a day). However the images...
Click to read more »please ask here. Biggest problem is the need for a copyedit - while WP:LOCE is dead (alas), you can ask for help at WP:PRV. I would try and address some...
Click to read more »6 August 2019 (UTC) AmericanAir88, you appear not to be aware that GOCE/LOCE is held by many in extremely low regard, with good reason, and many of those...
Click to read more »would definitely like this article to remain FA, and recommend help from WP:LoCE. Ceoil 22:14, 11 May 2007 (UTC) Comment Why not just delist it? It never...
Click to read more »clarification. Still has major NPOV and referencing issues, but I think LoCE has done all it can. Cricketgirl 20:44, 7 September 2007 (UTC) Chechnya mass...
Click to read more »she/her/hers) the plot summaries are fairly confusing. Can I call on LOCE to help? LOCE is (sadly) defunct, although you might try asking some of the poeple...
Click to read more »14 February 2007 (UTC) Short-term plan: request external copyeditor in WP:LoCE? A new WikiProject consists of what so-called self-proclaimed the prose experts...
Click to read more »already done so I would recommend getting a fresh set of eyes, perhaps from WP:LOCE, to look it over for copyediting... --Jayron32|talk|contribs 02:16, 18 August...
Click to read more »would highly recommend that the article be professionally copyedited (see WP:LoCE) and peer-reviewed before being resubmitted as a FAC. Abecedare 03:08, 21...
Click to read more »third tallest buildings in the United States" You are good. Are you an WP:LOCE participant?--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 01:32, 25 June 2008...
Click to read more »of WP:LoCE for that very reason! I know I'm heavy handed with commas, and have, believe it or not, already pruned many out! Unfortunately LoCE is heavily...
Click to read more »expanded and updated. It also has received an excellent copy edit from WP:LOCE. Currently, the article is still rated as start class, but it seems that...
Click to read more »Since I'm no english major may-be you could ask one of the members of WP:LoCE to run through the article? Yes, we've already asked and are waiting. Good...
Click to read more »Dartmouth College. Attention to prose is also needed; listing the article at WP:LOCE may be helpful before approaching FAC. See WP:MOS#Captions on punctuation...
Click to read more »(UTC) It does need further copyediting. Ryan has submitted a request at WP:LoCE (an MHL request should also be considered). I don't know whether the ship's...
Click to read more »Since I'm no english major may-be you could ask one of the members of WP:LoCE to run through the article? Yes, we've already asked and are waiting. Good...
Click to read more »wording 2008-09-03 23:46:00 2 Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)/Archive 53 WP:LOCE up for MFD 2008-06-17 18:23:00 1 Wikipedia:Village pump (miscellaneous)/Archive...
Click to read more »thorough copyedit; if you don't feel comfortable doing this yourself, then WP:LOCE might be able to help. For some further examples: It was watched by 603,000...
Click to read more »(UTC) It does need further copyediting. Ryan has submitted a request at WP:LoCE (an MHL request should also be considered). I don't know whether the ship's...
Click to read more »(UTC) It does need further copyediting. Ryan has submitted a request at WP:LoCE (an MHL request should also be considered). I don't know whether the ship's...
Click to read more »on how to improve the prose; I feel this is the best place for it, as the LOCE backlog is huge. Thanks, Sceptre (talk) 22:04, 8 July 2008 (UTC) Comments...
Click to read more »(cricketer) - same as Benaud Mattinbgn (talk · contribs) Warwick Armstrong - at LoCE George Giffen - the next one! Dweller (talk · contribs) - although I normally...
Click to read more »the extensive prose problems, so rather than list more, I suggest that WP:LoCE be contacted, or an independent copyedit be done after 1b is addressed. The...
Click to read more »merged, and severe writing problems. I suggest contacting individual WP:LoCE members. Michaelas10Respect my authoritah 20:46, 10 April 2007 (UTC) Oppose—1a...
Click to read more »comments about it from other people, I suggest submitting the article to WP:LOCE. Hope this helps. Gran2 14:36, 16 June 2007 (UTC) I've just noticed that...
Click to read more »had a heavy copy edit by a established copy editor and a former member of LOCE. First and last points are the only essential part that may need be fixed...
Click to read more »through the Automated Peer Reviewer. Consider submitting the article to WP:LoCE, the League of Copy Editors. Perhaps the production section could be expanded...
Click to read more »the extensive prose problems, so rather than list more, I suggest that WP:LoCE be contacted, or an independent copyedit be done after 1b is addressed. The...
Click to read more »would highly recommend that the article be professionally copyedited (see WP:LoCE) and peer-reviewed before being resubmitted as a FAC. Abecedare 03:08, 21...
Click to read more »(UTC) It does need further copyediting. Ryan has submitted a request at WP:LoCE (an MHL request should also be considered). I don't know whether the ship's...
Click to read more »at GAN was prose, so really once other issues are gelled getting the WP:LOCE or somebody to run through it would be best (I'll try, but I don't have much...
Click to read more »I do not have any for sure ones. Another place to look is at the old WP:LOCE - the group is defunct, but the editors listed there might help with a copyedit...
Click to read more »DiligenceY Dhtwiki (talk) 17474 8737 3990 30201 201 2 2 11171 3 Old school LOCE Reidgreg (talk) 4986 2493 1441 8920 920 2 2 3995 0 Working WikipedianY Moriwen...
Click to read more »nearly doubled, from 48 to 93 as I write. I also listed the article at WP:LoCE, where someone will hopefully take an interest in it. There's still more...
Click to read more »Marcocapelle (talk) 09:56, 17 May 2026 (UTC) Merge although I'd have preferred to loce Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2026_May_13#Literary_characters first...
Click to read more »peer review) but failed due to concerns about the tone of the article. WP:LoCE has a huge backlog, so I'd appreciate it if someone could lend a hand since...
Click to read more »important points, each of which have been met or exceeded. Article posted to WP:LoCE (now GoCE), from which it recieved extensive copyediting by Lukobe and Adacore...
Click to read more »knight re copy. DCGeist helped out tonight, have also left a note at WP:LoCE. + Ceoil 01:18, 13 January 2007 (UTC) Thanks for the update: I had a look...
Click to read more »first studio album" or something. Perhaps you could have a look into WP:LOCE for a really thorough copyedit. Avoid using # to mean "number" per MOS:HASH...
Click to read more »entire article should probably be reviewed.[8] I requested a copyedit at WP:LoCE before Cas Liber went through - is it still needed? SandyGeorgia (Talk) 14:20...
Click to read more »A-class. I've currently got the article nominated at GA, and also in WP:LoCE to sort out any remaining prose/grammar/punctuation problems. I want to take...
Click to read more »preluded the game's release. I've done dab and linkchecks, and a member of the LoCE has reviewed the text for copyedits. I know that there's a larger number...
Click to read more »That's halfway, there's a lot to do here. I suggest a good copyedit from WP:LOCE to ensure neutral prose. I suggest you also make sure you consider writing...
Click to read more »A-class. I've currently got the article nominated at GA, and also in WP:LoCE to sort out any remaining prose/grammar/punctuation problems. I want to take...
Click to read more »User_edits_to_Wikipedia (links here) 582 6291 User_html-4 (links here) 582 6292 WP_LoCE (links here) 582 6293 WikiProject_Indian_Premier_League/class (links here)...
Click to read more »Like Vibes - (8133) - keep - closed 23:23, 19 June 2018 (UTC) Smoked Out, Loced Out - (3919) - delete - closed 01:49, 19 June 2018 (UTC) Enchanted (Aretha...
Click to read more »