as an event—both need considering. Shortcuts WP:NLISTWP:NLIST WP:LISTNWP:LISTN Notability guidelines also apply to the creation of stand-alone lists and...

listn.to: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • Spamcheck • blacklist hits • MER-C X-wiki • gs • Reports: Links on...

fails LISTN, mostly unreferenced OR/FANCRUFT. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 00:53, 22 August 2020 (UTC) Delete: Fails WP:LISTN. Meets...

The "delete" arguments are substantially stronger. They notably invoke WP:LISTN, which is prima facie a strong argument, because the article contains no...

FENS · JSTOR · TWL) A list of fiction books about manuscripts. fails WP:LISTN, not discussed as a seperate class—it's a rather set index type of list...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Topic fails WP:LISTN and none of its entries appear to be individually notable people. – Joe (talk)...

source. To me the article sounds like a lot of WP:OR and a violation of WP:LISTN as I've never seen any source that classifies cities by "This category does...

Only lists a bunch of minor supporting characters. Therefore, fails WP:LISTN. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 04:37, 20 October 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:LISTN as these people have not been discussed in detail as a group or set by any...

(UTC) Delete Unreferenced and fails WP:LISTN. LibStar (talk) 02:38, 1 August 2022 (UTC) Delete - Fails LISTN. -Indy beetle (talk) 22:24, 2 August 2022...

been mentioned once in a list in a single book), and the topic fails WP:LISTN. It is also completely duplicative of Demon lord (Dungeons & Dragons), though...

daughter list of List of American police officers killed in the line of duty. LISTN says that we can spin off daughter lists without regard to notability as...

per WP:LISTN. Not a single notable entry on the list. Ajf773 (talk) 09:04, 9 November 2021 (UTC) Not sure what you're talking about here. WP:LISTN clearly...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) No notable entries, fails WP:LISTN Ajf773 (talk) 08:13, 20 August 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:LISTN. Additionally, unsourced since its creation in 2004, ends for some reason...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:LISTN; 99.9% unsourced. See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of fictional...

guideline for this discussion is WP:LISTN. Narky Blert (talk) 15:47, 15 February 2018 (UTC) Then it fails WP:LISTN. Ajf773 (talk) 21:29, 15 February 2018...

(talk to me • see what I've done) 04:43, 26 May 2019 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:LISTN, WP:LISTCRUFT, WP:OR, WP:INDISCRIMINATE, etc. – John M Wolfson (talk • contribs)...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:LISTN. All current sources are primary. A WP:BEFORE search turns up unreliable...

(talk) 21:01, 5 March 2021 (UTC) Delete - does not appear to comply with WP:LISTN. Any useful information that could be found (of which there is nothing currently...

WP:ALLPLOT and WP:OR. Only lists a bunch of minor enemies. Therefore, fails WP:LISTN. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 04:30, 20 October 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) LISTN failure and useless list. JavaHurricane 03:00, 9 July 2020 (UTC) Delete...

Necrothesp (talk) 12:01, 23 January 2020 (UTC) Delete, this article fails WP:LISTN, as it is sourced entirely to primary sources. Since none of the listed...

enough to pass WP:LISTN. — pythoncoder  (talk | contribs) 23:41, 14 February 2019 (UTC) Keep. Sources in the article demonstrate WP:LISTN. With respect to...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:LISTN, there are no sources that group sister tennis players together that I can...

‎ The result was keep rebuilt as a list. If the list turns out to fail LISTN/LISTPURP, no prejudice against renomination, but the consensus here is confident...

deleting the other two per WP:NOT. Most of this is basically fancruft with no LISTN/encyclopedic value. Keep arguments in the last deletion discussion (2006)...

fictional non-notable gadgets. Fancruft. Fails WP:GNG, WP:NFICTION and WP:LISTN. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 14:24, 5 December 2019...

dating back to 2002 prodded with "Pure WP:OR with zero sources; fails WP:LISTN. Does not have an associated article (Science fiction sitcom redirects here)...

WP:LISTN. I'm neutral on the move. Fine as is, it seems. K.e.coffman (talk) 01:09, 9 September 2018 (UTC) Keep per WP:GNG and also I agree that WP:LISTN...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:LISTN; I could not find any reliable sources discussing these clubs. The references...

Focus 17:47, 13 November 2021 (UTC) I also like to remind people that WP:LISTN is two paragraphs long, please read the second paragraph and not just quote...

evidence that it passes WP:LISTN. SSSB (talk) 12:45, 2 December 2020 (UTC) Delete - Still do not see how this satisfies WP:LISTN. Cannot see anything near...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:LISTN. No sources appear to specifically document objects in the New General Catalogue...

was delete. The "delete" !votes have the stronger policy-based arguments. LISTN is not met. Randykitty (talk) 08:55, 18 April 2021 (UTC) [Hide this box]...

really one about content (and no consensus to apply WP:TNT), and the sole WP:LISTN argument is without other support (and arguably rebutted by Arxiloxos)....

articulate any reason why the principle underlying the article's existnce (i.e. LISTN) is not fulfilled. The assertion that the article content is also covered...

Delete both In this case, the articles are fancruft that fail WP:GNG or WP:LISTN. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 21:16, 1 June 2022 (UTC) Delete both neither article has reliable...

like this list as well, but I have to agree with those that say if fails LISTN. Black Kite (talk) 23:14, 13 August 2020 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Doesn't meet WP:LISTN or WP:GNG. This has been unsourced and in CAT:NN for 6 years. Boleyn (talk)...

(UTC) Delete per WP:LISTN. Unsourced and slightly promotional as well. Ajf773 (talk) 09:43, 26 November 2022 (UTC) Delete fails WP:LISTN.LibStar (talk) 01:50...

on the postage stamps of Israel, no argument as to why this list meets LISTN have been provided. The notability of the listed people do not make the...

(talk / contribs) 15:45, 21 October 2021 (UTC) Keep The topic passes WP:LISTN – see NY Post or BBC, for example. The data is simpler than that for universities...

this page.‎ The result was keep. Consensus clear that article passes WP:LISTN. (non-admin closure) Ifnord (talk) 23:58, 17 February 2019 (UTC) AfDs for...

to link to. It seems to me to be a LISTN slam-dunk.— alf laylah wa laylah (talk) 20:28, 31 January 2014 (UTC) LISTN also says the event should be notable...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Newly created article that fails WP:LISTN and WP:INDISCRIMINATE. Is partly a cutout of this article List of last survivors...

'deprod per WP:DEPROD' summaries in my watchlist. List fails WP:LISTPURP/WP:LISTN; it's a collection of generic (WP:MILL, if you want to make a terrible pun)...

have been discussed as a group by reliable sources that I found, fails WP:LISTN Eddie891 Talk Work 17:27, 17 July 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...

made to this page.‎ The result was keep. Consensus was to keep (citing WP:LISTN). (non-admin closure) -- Dane talk 04:13, 14 April 2019 (UTC) [Hide this...

WP:LISTN (Lightburst you haven't even explain how this is actually meets the policy). Ajf773 (talk) 02:16, 18 December 2019 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:LISTN....

I agree 100% this should be deleted. PROD nominator says this fails WP:LISTN. I say it also fails WP:INDISCRIMINATE as it is a summary-only description...

July 2022 (UTC) Delete Oddly specific list of fictional X that fails WP:LISTN. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 15:40, 18 July 2022 (UTC) Delete - There are no sources...

page.‎ The result was no consensus. Both the keep and delete side cited WP:LISTN for their arguments, with the keep side arguing that notable series are...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:LISTN. Additionally, this article is since its creation in 2003 mainly unsourced...

evidence that WP:LISTN is satisfied. Exemplo347 (talk) 20:34, 1 July 2017 (UTC) Delete -- WP:PROMO (with all the ext links) and WP:LISTN failure. K.e.coffman...

the WP:GNG and WP:LISTN. Rorshacma (talk) 21:14, 22 June 2020 (UTC) Delete Yuck this article; it isn't needed, doesn't meet LISTN (and the five-letter...

showing this fails WP:LISTN. For the US page, the nature of the content is very similar, and searches for sources to meet LISTN also turn up nothing substantial...

—Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 21:58, 15 May 2014 (UTC) Keep. It seems to satisfy WP:LISTN. There are a few "list of ..." citations in the article. I guess I'd prefer...

discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:26, 22 April 2017 (UTC) Delete See WP:LISTN and WP:LSC. Wikipedia is not a directory, and lists on Wikipedia should...

ever been discussed as set in reliable sources, so it seems it fails WP:LISTN. Very little is referenced so there is almost nothing to merge and a redirect...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Article fails WP:GNG and list fails WP:LISTN. There isn't WP:SIGCOV to cite much of the statements here, and much of...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:LISTN. Unsourced and abandoned since its creation in 2003, tagged as such since...

Delete- since this is sourced entirely to primary sources, it fails WP:LISTN. As for merging, the proposed target is already choc-a-bloc full of badly...

(AfD), I fail to see how this list meets our inclusion criteria. Fails WP:LISTN due to lack of coverage on these individuals as a group or set and also...

delete. There is clear consensus at this time that this article fails the WP:LISTN notability guidelines. TheSandDoctor Talk 06:45, 15 November 2020 (UTC)...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Doesn't meet WP:LISTN or WP:GNG - random cut off point and not a notable topic in itself (top...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:LISTCRUFT/WP:FANCRUFT/OR/SYTH/LISTN and no RS to meet GNG. Per all the rest of the preceedence. Sad can't speedy...

on human opinion has no doubt caused them to disregard WP:SYNTH and WP:LISTN, therefore this will be redirected for the timebeing. If you feel that there...

WP:LISTN and WP:NOTDIR. The organisation itself isn't notable either. Ajf773 (talk) 08:27, 27 April 2021 (UTC) Delete As per nom and per WP:LISTN and...

03:04, 12 February 2018 (UTC) Delete Cannot find any sources to satisfy WP:LISTN. How did this fly under the radar for a decade? Lizard (talk) 03:26, 12...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:LISTN and WP:NOT. Fram (talk) 08:24, 8 August 2022 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

need of this page and most of the entries on this page easily fails WP:LISTN. Tessaracter (talk) 11:29, 14 July 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...

12:33, 23 November 2013 (UTC) Delete. I don't see how this satisfies WP:LISTN. It belongs on a fansite, where they don't care about notability. NinjaRobotPirate...

discussions. Paul McDonald (talk) 01:30, 24 September 2012 (UTC) Keep passes WP:LISTN--the topic of "returning coaches" is often discussed in primary media outlets...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Does not appear to meet WP:LISTN. – DarkGlow (✉) 15:51, 8 November 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...

feature of a business any more than any other location (contrary to WP:LISTN and possibly WP:NOTDIRECTORY point 6). There are four citations given, one...

WP:OSE reason. Fails under the policy WP:NOTDIR and notability guideline WP:LISTN. CBS527Talk 04:24, 5 March 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...

list of works that mention University of Santo Tomas. Such a list fails WP:LISTN, and the article fails WP:GNG/WP:IPC. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus|...

made to this page.‎ The result was keep. Close as consensus that it passes LISTN with the subjects of the list having been discussed as a combined group...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:LISTN, WP:IINFO because the list has no evidence of independent notability and...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Delete: List does not meet WP:LISTN Subject has not been discussed as a group or set by independent reliable...

entries for a category, but the article does not cite sources that prove WP:LISTN. Also, as a related page List of fictional half-demons was deleted in December...

WP:USEFUL, WP:LISTN--Dangermouse600 (talk) 00:39, 2 January 2016 (UTC) WP:USEFUL explains that "it's useful" isn't a good argument, and WP:LISTN explains why...

convinced that this topic has gained enough independent coverage to satisfy WP:LISTN. I also think WP:NOTDIR applies. Spiderone 20:58, 9 September 2020 (UTC)...

2016 (UTC) Delete. Fails WP:LISTN. Totally trivial list. Ajf773 (talk) 04:28, 30 November 2016 (UTC) Delete. Fails WP:LISTN. Totally trivial list.Where...

of D&D gods by race, no indication this passes WP:GNG, WP:NFICTION, WP:LISTN, pure WP:PLOT based on WP:PRIMARY. See also related AfDs: Wikipedia:Articles...

~Ruyaba~ {talk} 16:12, 10 February 2019 (UTC) Keep. The article meets WP:LISTN. Wile most of the coverage focuses on the recent success of the egg picture...

reasons for deletion per policy. Furthermore, this should be kept per WP:LISTN, which tells us that "a list topic is considered notable is if it has been...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Doesn't meet WP:LISTN - not notable as a group DannyS712 (talk) 15:44, 20 May 2020 (UTC) Note:...

CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 06:59, 14 October 2020 (UTC) Delete, no evidence of a WP:LISTN pass, sourcing consists exclusively of primary sources and a search brought...

legislative chamber articles. Regarding the first question, as noted by people WP:LISTN is based on the notability of the list topic not that of the individual...

WP:NOTSTATS. Ajf773 (talk) 10:44, 11 February 2019 (UTC) Keep. Passes WP:LISTN. [1][2] "It gets vandalized" is not a valid reason to delete a page. — pythoncoder ...

coverage in RS that discuss "fictional comics" as a thing is presented, per WP:LISTN. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 10:38, 24 June 2019 (UTC) Delete- poorly...

LISTN is expressly limited to standalone lists, so no, it could not be applied to eliminate any alumni sublists within an article. Second, as LISTN itself...

this show the problems of using WP:LISTN as a guideline to prove notability... the topic is notable, but with WP:LISTN saying that not every individual...

delete. The keep !votes seem to be some mixture of ILIKEIT and dismissing LISTN out of hand. People on stamps may be inherently notable, but that is a potential...

list to be notable it must be discussed as a group as stated in LISTN. Regarding WP:LISTN This is not a case of a complex and cross-categorization list...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) No evidence this passes WP:GNG/WP:NFICTION/WP:LISTN. See also arguments presented in related, and already ended with 'delete'...

reliable sources, so I see no indication that this article could ever pass WP:LISTN. As this content is unsourced at the time of writing this, a merge is also...

unreferenced, out-of-date, ill-defined, and (most importantly) non-notable per WP:LISTN. GiantSnowman 10:38, 21 January 2018 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...

that line, this article must fall short of those standards. It fails WP:LISTN for multiple reasons: Firstly, the list has no navigational purpose as the...

FENS · JSTOR · TWL) A list of nn redlinks (one nn blue link). Fails WP:LISTN does not have WP:SIGCOV in WP:RS discussing this as a group. If there was...

this article is located at Demonym#Suffixation. The adjectives fail WP:LISTN and WP:NOTDICT. The sub-articles should probably be deleted if this one...

Editors show near-unanimous consensus to keep the list because it meets WP:LISTN, and argue that the high utility of the list is a stronger consideration...

anything other than their website. Not a notable sub-topic, doesn't meet WP:LISTN or WP:GNG. Boleyn (talk) 17:50, 17 August 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

updating and is probably out of date already. I can't see any evidence of WP:LISTN and it fails on WP:LISTCRUFT #1, #3, #11, #12 amongst others. Spiderone...

FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This is totally unreferenced, and what makes it meet WP:LISTN/WP:NFICTION? Anyway, the list is a mess since it also lists 'real' deities...

discussions. Shellwood (talk) 12:00, 19 January 2020 (UTC) Keep per WP:LISTN, specifically "Lists that fulfill recognized informational, navigation,...

made to this page.‎ The result was keep. The consensus is that it meets WP:LISTN. (non-admin closure) So said The Great Wiki Lord. (talk) 16:53, 23 March...

effectively a List of deities in Lin Carter's works, a topic which also fails WP:LISTN. This content belongs on fan wiki, not here. Not a valid redirect target...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Contested WP:PROD. List fails WP:LISTN, as it hasn't been "discussed as a group or set by independent reliable...

the entries. Fully WP:OR. No assertion of notability for the list per WP:LISTN. — JFG talk 16:44, 31 August 2018 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Notability concerns - doesn't appear to meet WP:LISTN. Only source is RSSSF. power~enwiki (π, ν) 05:57, 3 October 2020 (UTC) Note:...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:LISTN without any sources concluding these results - full of original research...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Does not meet WP:LISTN as almost all of these buildings are not notable and none of them are notable...

looks like a random collection of country links that fail notability WP:LISTN and WP:LISTVERIFY. No significant coverage in published reliable sources...

JSTOR · TWL) The list article seems weird and might not comply with WP:LISTN. Abishe (talk) 02:43, 5 March 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Doesn't meet WP:LISTN or WP:GNG. Has been in CAT:NN for over 8 years; hopefully we can now resolve...

"policy" in different sentences to LISTN as a more general usage (there's other potential possibilities than LISTN etc). Nosebagbear (talk) 15:05, 25...

deletion discussions. MT TrainTalk 05:48, 1 May 2018 (UTC) Delete per WP:LISTN. The remaining articles listed in the See Also section could also be flagged...

here for this subject to meet the WP:LISTN. Let'srun (talk) 18:25, 7 June 2024 (UTC) Delete per nom fails WP:LISTN.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 21:35...

Delete per nom. Clarityfiend (talk) 08:14, 22 February 2020 (UTC) Fails WP:LISTN: "One accepted reason why a list topic is considered notable is if it has...

(i.e. more than name-dropped) in their parent city's article. Fails WP:LISTN, WP:NOT#PLOT and appears WP:INDISCRIMINATE (check for the words "unknown"...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Doesn't meet WP:LISTN or WP:GNG. Has been in CAT:NN for over 7 years; hopefully we can now resolve...

every week and serves no purpose except arguably a navigational purpose. WP:LISTN strongly states that lists are not inherently notable and that sources must...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:LISTN without any sources concluding these results - full of original research...

JSTOR · TWL) What makes this list of fictional characters pass WP:NFICTION/WP:LISTN? It seems unreferenced outside links two to primary sources (comics), too...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Does not satisfy WP:LISTN or warrant a standalone article considering the small size of the list....

Talk to me • ✍️ Contributions) 15:11, 9 July 2018 (UTC) Keep Passes WP:LISTN as the concept appears in sources such as The Oxford Encyclopedia of Food...

daughter list of List of American police officers killed in the line of duty. LISTN says that we can spin off daughter lists without regard to notability as...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:LISTN without any sources concluding these results - full of original research...

com fail to discuss the subject in any great detail. Fails WP:GNG and WP:LISTN from what I can see. I would oppose a merge unless proper sourcing that...

TenTonParasol 22:02, 18 September 2023 (UTC) Delete WP:LISTN failure in my view. Yes, I know LISTN is unclear on "list of x of y". A list of video games...

article would editorially elongate the article beyond requirement. Per WP:LISTN, "Lists that fulfill recognized informational, navigation, or development...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:LISTN as reliable sources do not discuss this grouping. —Bagumba (talk) 08:41...

JSTOR · TWL) No sources present this as a notable grouping as required by WP:LISTN. This also fails WP:NOTDIR, specifically #6, refers to "non-encyclopedic...

from Paris (talk) 12:36, 20 June 2018 (UTC) Delete as per nom and fails WP:LISTN as the main subject UK street choirs does not have a page. The article creator...

collection of information. No souerces proving encyclopedicity, and fails WP:LISTN. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 22:44, 4 August 2019 (UTC) Keep, but flesh out This...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:LISTN and WP:NOT. Fram (talk) 08:06, 1 August 2022 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

postdlf (talk) 17:20, 3 October 2018 (UTC) Keep. Comment. It is a list. LISTN applies not NTOUR. Szzuk (talk) 19:48, 7 October 2018 (UTC) See WP:JUSTA...

(talk) 19:21, 11 November 2020 (UTC) Delete- Unsurprisingly, this fails WP:LISTN. Surprisingly, this has somehow survived since 2005. Hog Farm Bacon 19:36...

demonstrate either that the content is verifiable or that it passes WP:LISTN. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 02:08, 4 October 2021 (UTC) Note: This...

to this page.‎ The result was keep. Consensus was this subject passes WP:LISTN. (non-admin closure) Rollidan (talk) 17:53, 4 December 2019 (UTC) AfDs for...

deletions. GiantSnowman 08:18, 12 January 2017 (UTC) Delete - Fails WP:LISTN, no indication that the notion of American coaches managing non-american...

There was an overwhelming consensus that this was a notable list per WP:LISTN at the previous AfD. I'm not sure what has changed in a mere 5 months since...

has no sources discussing this grouping as a group, causing it to fail WP:LISTN. I'm honestly amazed at how many of these there were. Rorshacma (talk) 16:05...

enemies that debuted outside the comics). Ok, but how does this meet WP:LISTN? Instead, I am afraid such a categorization meets WP:OR. At best I can suggest...

Various policy issues were raises in this, including whether it met WP:LISTN, WP:TRIVIA, whether TRIVIA was relevant for determining the actual retention...

tournament itself (see WP:IS). I fail to see how this meets WP:GNG or WP:LISTN. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2022 South American Under-17 Women's...

discussions. Rcsprinter123 (quip) @ 21:59, 3 January 2015 (UTC) Delete, fails WP:LISTN and a lot more. Main article about the game covers in too much detail already...

are addressed by merger not deletion. As a list of versions, it passes WP:LISTN – see CBR, for example. Andrew🐉(talk) 10:42, 21 August 2020 (UTC) That...

topic. Almost all of the people in this list are not notable. As per WP:LISTN - One accepted reason why a list topic is considered notable is if it has...

violates WP:NOT. Fails WP:LISTN. There's really nothing more to say. -- ferret (talk) 14:51, 16 October 2021 (UTC) Delete - fails WP:LISTN and falls foul of WP:NOT...

WP:LISTN and WP:CROSSCAT. I don't see significant independent coverage of this specific categorization. While List of data breaches clearly passes LISTN...

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gods (DC Comics). Comic list fancruft. Fails WP:LISTN outside "Top Most Whatever Marvel Gods" listicles that might just as well...

Wikipedia is not a indiscriminate collection of information. The list fails WP:LISTN. Esquivalience t 23:27, 11 June 2015 (UTC) Delete and possible G4. Fails...

- Character lists need to prove themselves to meet either WP:GNG or WP:LISTN. Otherwise, they need to be pruned until they fit in the parent article...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Violation of WP:NOT and doesn't meet WP:LISTN. power~enwiki (π, ν) 05:19, 25 February 2018 (UTC) Delete Kill with fire...

species), although for both topics, WP:LISTN is an issue. The odds are that one list of DC species might pass LISTN, but we don't need two, particularly...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:LISTN and does not meet any purpose of a list under WP:LISTPURP. WP:LISTN - there is a lack of evidence to suggest...

but for a list to have it's own page it still needs to be notable. WP:LISTN is the policy I would refer to. From the sources you provided, two are about...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:LISTN. Also: unsourced since its creation in 2005, very incomplete (even for the...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:LISTN. I'm not seeing a source that discusses the coins as a unit, and not just...

FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Largely unsourced list does not meet the criteria of WP:LISTN. Chetsford (talk) 04:53, 25 February 2018 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...

BenKuykendall (talk) 21:20, 10 June 2020 (UTC) A ham sandwich could past LISTN. LISTN is broken. And it's being applied too casually here anyway. Just because...

verify the content. More importantly, the topic doesn't seem to meet WP:LISTN as I am unable to find any evidence that there are independent sources discussing...

from the games broadcast as Monday Night Football and does not satisfy WP:LISTN are persuasive. RL0919 (talk) 04:37, 3 January 2020 (UTC) [Hide this box]...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:LISTN by a long shot, outside of the real-world analog Impossible color. Better...

2017 (UTC) Delete per WP:LISTN. Content is difficult to verify. Ajf773 (talk) 22:28, 10 February 2017 (UTC) Delete - fails WP:LISTN. Also a case of WP:NOTMIRROR...

October 2021 (UTC) Delete - Does not meet WP:LISTN. Onel5969 TT me 23:05, 11 October 2021 (UTC) Keep Meets WP:LISTN. [1] [2] [3] [4] IRC is not a "messenger"...

49ersBelongInSanFrancisco (talk) 08:05, 3 January 2017 (UTC) Delete - no evidence of WP:LISTN or WP:GNG Spiderone 08:29, 7 January 2017 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...

Wikipedia:LISTPURP, Wikipedia:CSC, Wikipedia:LISTCRITERIA and Wikipedia:LISTN, which states "There is no present consensus for how to assess the notability...

12 January 2022 (UTC) Delete fails WP:LISTN. LibStar (talk) 23:02, 12 January 2022 (UTC) Delete fails WP:LISTN.--Ts12rActalk to me 16:55, 19 January 2022...

encyclopaedic for here? The subjects are not described as a group, failing WP:LISTN. Additionally WP:NOTDATABASE and WP:ROUTINE. Also, mostly unsourced per...

deletion/List of songs about Ahmedabad. The list fails WP:INDISCRIMINATE, WP:LISTN and WP:OR. There is little to nothing worthwhile in this list, be it content...

JSTOR · TWL) List of non-notable child footballers which does not meet WP:LISTN. No navigational purpose since none of the footballers in the list are notable...

topic doesn't even exist), and the list topic itself fails WP:GNG and WP:LISTN. - Aoidh (talk) 00:36, 2 July 2022 (UTC) Delete, no such thing as a "Disney...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) An un-reliably-sourced article that fails WP:LISTN and is comprised of noble-synthesis of data. And, if someone do manage to...

fails WP:LISTN. At most, this might warrant a sentence in the main article. Shooterwalker (talk) 14:11, 16 March 2023 (UTC) Delete fails WP:LISTN I do not...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Topic fails WP:LISTN. Total accumulated votes over a player's career from annual NBA All-Star...

Primefac (talk) 15:34, 24 June 2020 (UTC) Delete. No indiciation of WP:LISTN and looks like it was just a student essay. There's also the issue that...

and being a state governor at some point in time. Fails WP:NLIST and WP:LISTN Legacypac (talk) 21:37, 29 December 2015 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Does not meet WP:LISTN because the topic has not been discussed as a group or set by reliable sources...

FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Wikipedia is not a fan site, list also fails per WP:LISTN and WP:PLOT. Knowledgekid87 (talk) 21:38, 23 June 2013 (UTC) Note: This...

(UTC) Delete. WP:FANCRUFT, listcruft variety. No evidence this meets WP:LISTN. Previous AfD ended at no consensus due to argumentsts that it contains...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Doesn't meet WP:LISTN or WP:GNG. DannyS712 (talk) 10:18, 20 May 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

(talk) 23:52, 17 November 2020 (UTC) Delete: The article does not meet WP:LISTN. The city is not notable for tall buildings. The single reference is to...

a whole, and therefore fails LISTN. Snowmanonahoe (talk) 16:32, 2 May 2023 (UTC) Delete - The key policy here is WP:LISTN, which requires that the set...

CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 20:24, 27 April 2020 (UTC) Delete, this article fails WP:LISTN, as it is sourced to absolutely nothing, and WP:PLOT, since it is written...

Yes, it proves the videos exist. But where are the sources to show WP:LISTN? Seems to me that the handful of entries which actually have coverage in...

usual "list of media that mention the term dark matter", that fails WP:LISTN, WP:INDISCRIMINATE, WP:IPC. The lead suggests that this could be rescued...

(UTC) Delete - There's nothing showing this satisfies either WP:GNG or WP:LISTN. Medabots#Characters should be suffiecent to give an overview. I don't see...

articles don't meet the criteria for notability for stand-alone lists at WP:LISTN, which states, "A list topic is considered notable if it has been discussed...

which fails to cite a single source, thus mot meeting either of WP:V or WP:LISTN. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 00:47, 4 October 2021 (UTC) Note: This...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Does not meet WP:LISTN. The article sounds more like a short statistical overview of comic strips...

just a tad wider scope and all the same problems. As a list, it fails WP:LISTN, as an article (which it is not), it would fail WP:GNG/WP:IPC). Another...

that line, this article must fall short of those standards. It fails WP:LISTN for multiple reasons: Firstly, the list has no navigational purpose as the...

notable. Lists still need to meet notability criteria. Please also see WP:LISTN. Spiderone 10:31, 22 December 2016 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Page does not satisfy WP:LISTN and its notability was called into question on ORN. Meatsgains (talk) 05:13...

November 2022 (UTC) Delete all Fails WP:LISTN. LibStar (talk) 23:45, 16 November 2022 (UTC) Delete all per nom, WP:LISTN and WP:NOTIINFO. Ajf773 (talk) 00:57...

actual community practices regarding list notability are described at WP:LISTN which states that "Notability of lists (whether titled as "List of Xs" or...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Seems to fail WP:LISTN. No evidence listing of this product type is anything but an OR-ish CATALOG...

original reaserch. Wikisaurus (talk) 10:42, 25 February 2020 (UTC) From LISTN: "The entirety of the list does not need to be documented in sources for...

warrant a standalone article due to being small in size. Does not meet WP:LISTN/WP:GNG. – DarkGlow • 08:46, 26 July 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...

blue links for history researchers. The topic is very likely to pass WP:LISTN in my view, Atlantic306 (talk) 19:43, 10 June 2022 (UTC) Keep -- a legitimate...

list-article doesn't pass the test for notability of a standalone list WP:LISTN. There is no citation indicating that this is a topic that is covered or...

Wikia. TTN (talk) 21:43, 6 January 2014 (UTC) Delete. Does not satisfy WP:LISTN. Way too overly detailed to be merged into the main article, and anything...

No further edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was keep. per LISTN, following some work. (non-admin closure) >SerialNumber54129...speculates...

non-notable fictional creatures from a fairly minor video game. Fails WP:LISTN. Rorshacma (talk) 02:50, 19 August 2020 (UTC) Delete - The cruftiest cruft...

most ardent fans. The subjects are not described as a group, failing WP:LISTN. Additionally WP:NOTDATABASE and WP:ROUTINE. Of the sources per WP:RS; besides...

nominated/!voted.—Bagumba (talk) 05:09, 15 March 2015 (UTC) Delete all Fails WP:LISTN with no sources that describe this grouping of timeout in a game. WP:NOTSTATS...

article. Garlicolive (talk) 20:50, 10 February 2019 (UTC) Keep Meets WP:LISTN due to the widespread coverage of the topic, most recently in the form of...

(AfD), I fail to see how this list meets our inclusion criteria. Fails WP:LISTN due to lack of coverage on these individuals as a group or set and also...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Does not meet WP:LISTN because the topic has not been discussed as a group or set by reliable sources...

formats, but not which albums are available in what ways as a group; WP:LISTN does not seem to be met. Hog Farm Talk 04:27, 12 July 2021 (UTC) Note: This...

and WP:LISTN Edge3 (talk) 02:51, 9 September 2021 (UTC) Delete- per above. A unsourced list that goes against WP:NOTDIR and fails WP:LISTN. Rorshacma...

think you'd have a better argument if you argued that it doesn't satisfy WP:LISTN, as your current rationale amounts to "I don't like it". NinjaRobotPirate...

you mean WP:LISTN. Above, SSTflyer feels that it does pass WP:LISTN. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 00:12, 20 December 2015 (UTC) Yes, I meant WP:LISTN. By the way...

There's enough coverage of Trump's giving nicknames to people to pass WP:LISTN (in fact, it's been noted that that's a primary method of his). However...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Article fails WP:GNG, WP:RS, and WP:LISTN. This is merely listing department awards for the athletics department at...

passage of WP:LISTN. Tons and tons of sources discussing this as a group. But I don't know if that means this should be kept or that LISTN is broken. Probably...

itself and/or the related commercial products (games). Article fails GNG and LISTN. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 08:46, 3 December 2019...

fails WP:LISTN too Spiderone 17:56, 30 November 2016 (UTC) Strong Delete - Nonsense and ridiculous article.Copyvio, fails WP:GNG & WP:LISTN, has substantial...

tall (or short) as 27m are considered worthy for inclusion. It fails WP:LISTN for multiple reasons: Firstly, the list has no navigational purpose as the...

them as red-light districts per se. As a stand-alone list, this fails WP:LISTN, and most of the entries on this list violate original research and/or synthesis...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Indiscriminate list, not meeting WP:LISTN. Hitro talk 15:50, 1 September 2018 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...

“delete” this is an unsourced cross-categorisation that does not meet WP:LISTN. Mccapra (talk) 20:29, 10 August 2022 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...

another case of WP:LISTCRUFT to appeal to the most ardent NFL fans. Fails WP:LISTN. Additionally WP:NOTDATABASE and WP:ROUTINE. As with sources per WP:RS besides...

(UTC) Comment - I'm not sure if this list of speakers is notable per WP:LISTN requirements that independent sources exist that establish such a list as...

FENS · JSTOR · TWL) List of albums on a non-notable chart. Doesn't meet WP:LISTN or WP:GNG. Boleyn (talk) 07:06, 24 July 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:LISTN. Xinput support is a trivial property of a game. The1337gamer (talk) 11:50...

identified WP:LISTN as the relevant notability guideline for list articles, and the editors who offered analyses of this subject in the context of LISTN have agreed...

00:40, 19 May 2020 (UTC) Delete, no sources whatsoever, so it fails WP:LISTN, no indication of what a “Self-organising school” is or any inclusion criteria...

the other does not. WP:LISTN has no relevance to such lists as should be clear from WP:LISTPURP, WP:CLN, and WP:SALAT (and by LISTN itself, which states...

this specifically include British schools. The topic therefore passes WP:LISTN. Andrew🐉(talk) 09:32, 16 November 2020 (UTC) The only hits for "school"...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Does this meet WP:LISTN or WP:GNG? Number ones would, but list of top ten singles in year x, I don't...

The lack of references, as per WP:LISTN is not an issue, since the underlying concept, POW's, is clearly notable. LISTN also states, "Because the group...

deleted Wikipedia page List of tallest buildings in Jodhpur. This fails WP:LISTN because there are no reliable sources covering these buildings as a group...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Does not meet WP:LISTN and excessive intricate detail cited to primary sources. K.e.coffman (talk)...

radio. DanTheMusicMan2 (talk) 11:57, 2 August 2020 (UTC) Delete per WP:LISTN lists need to establish WP:N by being"discussed as a group or set by independent...

12:44, 15 November 2019 (UTC) Delete Pretty heavily fancruft, fails WP:LISTN.ZXCVBNM (TALK) 18:55, 15 November 2019 (UTC) Delete Completely comprised...

not a set that is covered by reliable independent sources thus failing WP:LISTN. The1337gamer (talk) 19:49, 23 December 2016 (UTC) Note: This debate has...

FENS · JSTOR · TWL) A WP:INDISCRIMINATE list that also does not meet WP:LISTN because the topic has not been discussed as a group or set by reliable sources...

involved in the production of each are themselves notable. Following WP:LISTN, I can't see that either of these have been discussed as a group or set...

has proved inconclusive. Per the absence of any secondary coverage, WP:LISTN is also failed. Per WP:AVOIDSPLIT, this is an unnecessary split about a...

the notability guidelines. Yours does not. See WP:LISTN and wP:GNG Delete - Does not meet WP:LISTN or WP:GNG --allthefoxes (Talk) 18:52, 4 March 2016...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:INDISCRIMINATE and WP:LISTN. Not much else to say besides that. This information can and should be in...

tarring and feathering as an idiom. Unless you can prove that it meets WP:LISTN, but there may not be anything worth keeping anyway. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄)...

coverage that could validate WP:LISTN. Ajf773 (talk) 10:33, 5 September 2017 (UTC) It is not a directory.  Your argument for LISTN is not so easy for me to rebut...

has been discussed as a group or set by independent reliable sources" WP:LISTN - there aren't any references given bonding Welsh cookbooks together, which...

satisfies WP:LISTN as a notable topic. The list has sufficient notability to satisfy WP:LISTN, as demonstrated by the subjects’ notability. If WP:LISTN weren’t...

says "Patencio wrote a book about the Podunk Indians"? Actually no, but LISTN says "Notability of lists (whether titled as "List of Xs" or "Xs") is based...

like many other now-deleted guest star lists, this fails WP:NOTDIR and WP:LISTN, and is redundant to the episode lists, e.g. The Twilight Zone (1959 TV...

actually allowed to have such lists if the group as a whole is notable, per WP:LISTN. The other main reason advanced for deletion was that the page duplicates...

encyclopaedic for here? The subjects are not described as a group, failing WP:LISTN. Additionally WP:NOTDATABASE and WP:ROUTINE. Of the sources per WP:RS, this...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Per WP:LISTN - I can't seem to find any reliable sources discussing these as a group...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:LISTN and WP:NBOOK. While this isn't named as a list, in function, it is a list...

fails WP:LISTN. LibStar (talk) 23:01, 12 January 2022 (UTC) Deleteper nom. Jettew10222 (talk) 15:07, 16 January 2022 (UTC) Delete fails WP:LISTN.--Ts12rActalk...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Trivial fictional minutia, fails WP:LISTN. TTN (talk) 17:23, 24 January 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...

(UTC) Delete per WP:LISTN. Non notable tournament and winners. Ajf773 (talk) 23:45, 25 August 2020 (UTC) Delete: per nom. Fails WP:LISTN is not discussed...

list. Law journals are collectively notable and therefore satisfy LISTN. Moreover LISTN says that we can spin off daughter lists without regard to notability...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This stand-alone list fails WP:LISTN. GeoffreyT2000 (talk, contribs) 23:32, 18 February 2017 (UTC) Note: This...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Does not meet WP:LISTN. Delete per WP:IINFO. Of the twenty-eight items on the list, twenty-one...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Doesn't meet WP:LISTN or WP:GNG. Has been in CAT:NN for 9 years; hopefully we can now resolve...

09:07, 9 November 2021 (UTC) Not sure what you're talking about here. WP:LISTN clearly states that the individual entries need not be notable if the grouping...

another case of WP:LISTCRUFT to appeal to the most ardent NFL fans. Fails WP:LISTN. Additionally WP:NOTDATABASE and WP:ROUTINE. As with sources per WP:RS besides...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:LISTN. Also: unsourced since creation in 2009, few additions done since then are...

encyclopaedic for here? The subjects are not described as a group, failing WP:LISTN. Additionally WP:NOTDATABASE and WP:ROUTINE. As with sources per WP:RS besides...

competition that ever occurred ever. Treating it as a list also would fail LISTN, I believe. Individual competitions may be verifiable but are they discussed...

Tolkien's works, so this is not a necessary content split. It doesn't pass WP:LISTN. TTN (talk) 14:38, 2 January 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...

information and encourage development. The topic in this case is notable per WP:LISTN as such societies are listed in sources such as The New Zealand Railway...

well-supported argument that even if trivial there is sufficient sourcing to meet WP:LISTN, and no reason to expect that continued discussion would lead to a consensus...

don't need to simply pass WP:GNG. They need to pass the more specific WP:LISTN as well. Tvx1 20:04, 12 February 2016 (UTC) Keep Well-sourced list of wins...

deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 12:36, 14 November 2019 (UTC) Keep - WP:LISTN is easily met on this one. See the following sources: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8.....

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Does not meet WP:LISTN. The article has been moved to draft and declined as an AfC submission several...

encyclopaedic for here? The subjects are not described as a group, failing WP:LISTN. Additionally WP:NOTDATABASE and WP:ROUTINE. As with sources per WP:RS besides...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) List with only one entry. Fails WP:LISTN for not helping in navigation. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 10:07, 26...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Does not meet GNG or LISTN. Natureium (talk) 22:56, 8 March 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...

scope of this list is unclear and possibly too broad, such that it fails WP:LISTN and WP:INDISCRIMINATE. It appears that the current article lists the country...

internet, Google Books, and Google Scholar. We appear to fall short of WP:LISTN, and this title does not seem to make for an appropriate redirect to any...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) No evidence this passes WP:GNG/WP:NFICTION/WP:LISTN. See also arguments presented in related, and already ended with 'delete'...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:LISTN. The only sources I can find that discuss this topic as a unit are wikis...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Trivial cross-categorisation which fails WP:LISTN and is just the same as usual WP:NOTDATABASE-listcruft. See also recent...

that line, this article must fall short of those standards. It fails WP:LISTN for multiple reasons: Firstly, the list has no navigational purpose as the...

substantial media coverage, and meets WP:LISTN. Spirit of Eagle (talk) 03:35, 11 February 2019 (UTC) Keep meets WP:LISTN. It has plenty of secondary source...

article. SportingFlyer T·C 00:20, 11 November 2019 (UTC) Delete. Fails WP:LISTN which requires that the topic has "been discussed as a group or set by independent...

based arguments, the character list appears to be WP:ALLPLOT. Fails WP:LISTN.ZXCVBNM (TALK) 14:10, 13 February 2020 (UTC) Keep (in spite of article quality)...

most ardent fans. The subjects are not described as a group, failing WP:LISTN. Additionally WP:NOTDATABASE and WP:ROUTINE. Of the sources per WP:RS; besides...

(UTC) Keep There is broad agreement that lists of prisons are notable per LISTN, which explicitly does not require individual list entries to be notable...

of this list on Wikipedia. Such a list is reinforced by guidelines at WP:LISTN and WP:CSC. Do you not think that these sources can be used to compile a...

notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 01:32, 21 November 2018 (UTC) Keep: meets WP:LISTN; contains blue-linked entries. K.e.coffman (talk) 01:34, 21 November 2018...

(UTC) Delete WP:INDISCRIMINATE dump of names with no context. Fails WP:LISTN.ZXCVBNM (TALK) 20:17, 5 February 2020 (UTC) Delete per my nom at Wikipedia:Articles...

encyclopaedic for here? The subjects are not described as a group, failing WP:LISTN. Additionally WP:NOTDATABASE and WP:ROUTINE. Of the sources that is not...

result was keep. WP:SNOW closing this early; consensus is clear that WP:LISTN is met. (non-admin closure) power~enwiki (π, ν) 21:39, 28 October 2018 (UTC)...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:LISTN. This just seems completely random and unnecessarily trivial. There is no...

most ardent fans. The subjects are not described as a group, failing WP:LISTN. Additionally WP:NOTDATABASE and WP:ROUTINE. Of the sources that is not...

list fails WP:LISTN, and the article fails WP:GNG/WP:IPC. PS. In case someone is wondering, "Foo University in popular culture" can meet LISTN, of course...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:LISTN does not have WP:SIGCOV in WP:RS discussing this as a group. The city is...

2020 (UTC) Delete per nom and fails WP:LISTN. Abishe (talk) 13:59, 7 April 2020 (UTC) Delete per nom. Fails WP:LISTN. Accesscrawl (talk) 11:41, 8 April 2020...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) No evidence this passes WP:GNG/WP:NFICTION/WP:LISTN. See also arguments presented in related, and already ended with 'delete'...

information; and not sorted according to an arbitrary criterion which fails WP:LISTN. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 13:32, 26 September 2021 (UTC) The other...

RAJU(T) 23:13, 13 August 2018 (UTC) Delete. Can't see how this could pass WP:LISTN, overseas shows dubbed for a particular audience. Ajf773 (talk) 08:07, 14...

America1000 12:52, 24 May 2020 (UTC) Delete. Original research and fails WP:LISTN. Ajf773 (talk) 06:45, 25 May 2020 (UTC) Delete - no assertion of notability...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:LISTN. - MrX 12:40, 29 June 2017 (UTC) Delete Listcruft. The top entry wouldn't...

check confirmed that this article does not meet the requirements of WP:LISTN. QuicoleJR (talk) 18:54, 8 September 2025 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...

topic is quite well done – I especially like the map (right) It passes WP:LISTN as entire books are written about this. See Where the Presidents Were Born...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:LISTN. Not a notable grouping. Also an example of Wikipedia:Listcruft and WP:INDISCRIMINATE...

this notice. Thanks, Kurykh (talk) 04:23, 8 March 2017 (UTC) Delete. WP:LISTN requires that reliable sources discuss the topic as a whole, and I don't...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:LISTN. For some reason stops in 1969, and despite the claim of being complete...

arguing that this clearly meets WP:LISTN, while the delete camp counters by saying this clearly does not meet WP:LISTN. I don't see any particularly killer...

does not indicate WP:LISTN. As far as I can tell, the only similar article is Jane Austen fan fiction, which does indicate WP:LISTN and is limited to sufficiently...

Long established page that satisfies WP:LISTN. Elmssuper 02:52, 30 November 2020 (UTC) Keep, meets WP:LISTN, numerous books cover groups of members of...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:LISTN and WP:NOTDIR. Effectively duplicates the purpose of Paramore discography...

was keep. Uncontested sources. Consensus is that the subject passes WP:LISTN. (non-admin closure) wumbolo ^^^ 11:01, 27 August 2018 (UTC) [Hide this...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) List for the sake of having a list. Fails WP:LISTN, with a total lack of independent, reliable sources that discuss this grouping...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) I don't think this list meets WP:LISTN Some of these athletes who've played for or originated from the CBA are...

indiscriminate list ever since it was split off the main article in 2008. Fails WP:LISTN, these are the sorts of popular culture articles that are a detriment rather...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Blatant failure of WP:LISTN (I can't find anything but Wikipedia mirrors) and of WP:V (many of these...

which fail to cite a single source, thus mot meeting either of WP:V or WP:LISTN, and probably violating WP:OR. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 13:20, 26...

Planet Zoo - there is room in the target article. A list like this fails WP:LISTN mainly because it is not needed to provide information or assist our readers...

further edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was delete. Fails LISTN. Spartaz Humbug! 14:38, 2 March 2018 (UTC) List of ice hockey clubs playing...

(UTC) Delete all fail WP:LISTN. It's all trivia cruft. Sergecross73 msg me 00:43, 16 May 2024 (UTC) Delete all: fail WP:LISTN, entirely original research...

Ajf773 (talk) 22:46, 20 August 2020 (UTC) Delete - Complete failure of WP:LISTN, and even if it wasn't, it would still be deletable on the grounds that...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Unsourced in-universe fancruft; WP:V, WP:LISTN, WP:NOTPLOT. The only exception is the section about series protagonist...

therefore this will be redirected for the timebeing per WP:SYNTH and WP:LISTN. If you feel that there may be an issue, please see WP:DRV. (non-admin closure)...

JSTOR · TWL) Relatively small and unsourced list that does not meet WP:LISTN, or GNG on a wider scale. – DarkGlow • 21:49, 1 July 2021 (UTC) Note: This...

doesn't meet WP:NTOURS, and? this is a list, the relevant guideline is WP:LISTN ie. are there sources that discuss this group/partial group of entries/...

William Allen Simpson (talk) 17:54, 18 October 2020 (UTC) Keep Meets WP:LISTN. An aggregation of this information is useful, and I don't think it would...

same reasons given in the above AfDs, the list is not notable, fails WP:LISTN does not have WP:SIGCOV in WP:RS discussing this as a group. References...

of TC vessels (Minds...) but I have serious doubts this list passes WP:LISTN/WP:GNG/WP:NFICTION. I have already transwikid it to https://theculture.fandom...

podcast is not notable and so this list does not meet any of the standards of LISTN. Should be redirected to Futility Closet or perhaps even just deleted (Note:...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Not a notable topic, doesn't meet WP:LISTN or WP:GNG. Has been in CAT:NN for over 3 years. Boleyn (talk) 18:18, 21...

anyhow. Ajf773 (talk) 20:20, 12 March 2019 (UTC) Delete Listing fails WP:LISTN. There is already an article on topic of NBA on ABC.—Bagumba (talk) 05:39...

13 December 2015 (UTC) Delete As stated above, this article fails WP: LISTN as no sources discuss this particular data set. The two references used...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Doesn't meet WP:LISTN or WP:GNG. Possible WP:ATD is merge/redirect to Hockey East but I'm not...

FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This is a strange one. I can't see how it meets WP:LISTN or WP:GNG. Boleyn (talk) 07:04, 24 July 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

notable. DGG ( talk ) 21:34, 1 November 2014 (UTC) Delete Clearly fails WP:LISTN.Becky Sayles (talk) 00:10, 2 November 2014 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails LISTN, largely unsourced and without RS discussing the topic as a whole list....

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) I do not see how this achieves notability per WP:LISTN, for instance, which requires discussion "as a group or set by independent...

encyclopaedic for here? The subjects are not described as a group, failing WP:LISTN. Additionally WP:NOTDATABASE and WP:ROUTINE. Of the sources per WP:RS, all...

therefore this will be redirected for the timebeing per WP:SYNTH and WP:LISTN. If you feel that there may be an issue, please see WP:DRV. (non-admin closure)...

(talk) 02:17, 3 January 2016 (UTC) Delete. Does not seem to satisfy WP:LISTN. I checked Google with "Maurice Thatcher" "Cornelius Cole" oldest representatives...

lists that fail WP:LISTN hard.ZXCVBNM (TALK) 20:58, 3 December 2019 (UTC) Delete or prune. I doubt this list is useful and satisfies LISTN through I guess...

therefore this will be redirected for the timebeing per WP:SYNTH and WP:LISTN. If you feel that there may be an issue, please see WP:DRV. (non-admin closure)...

(talk) 17:53, 21 June 2015 (UTC) Keep. Satisfies LISTN. Acts of Congress are notable as a group. LISTN says we can spin off daughter lists (of the parent...

deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:02, 23 April 2015 (UTC) Keep per WP:LISTN, not NLIST, which is not applicable. It is a list of recordings by the artist...

likely to be found) in any other reliable sources (thus failing WP:V and WP:LISTN) and WP:OR (as something that is first published on Wikipedia is OR by definition)...

types of lists do need to demonstrate WP:SIGCOV and do need to pass WP:LISTN, some examples are below but this is not exhaustive: Tagaytay Abbotsford...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:NOTTRIVIA, does not meet WP:LISTN. Along the same lines as Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of United...

Wikia. TTN (talk) 22:09, 3 December 2013 (UTC) Delete. Does not satisfy WP:LISTN. Consists entirely of in-universe plot details. I'm not sure where you find...

(UTC) Delete This is an indiscriminate list of terms that badly fails WP:LISTN. Even the title/purpose of the list is dubious. Most of the items are not...

JSTOR · TWL) largely unsourced article does not meet the criteria of WP:LISTN Chetsford (talk) 04:53, 25 February 2018 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...

Delete as failing WP:LISTN. License type and genre are also an odd intersection. IceWelder [✉] 15:46, 20 February 2021 (UTC) Delete - LISTN problem, and nothing...

therefore this will be redirected for the timebeing per WP:SYNTH and WP:LISTN. If you feel that there may be an issue, please see WP:DRV. (non-admin closure)...

non-notable chart. ARIA is notable - the ARIA Club Chart is not. Doesn't meet WP:LISTN or WP:GNG. Boleyn (talk) 21:07, 24 August 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

list of red-headed people and so WP:LISTN is satisfied. Warden (talk) 18:20, 2 November 2012 (UTC) Keep, as per WP:LISTN—sourced? Yes. Notable? Yeh. —Theopolisme...

unsourced and another quarter unreliably sourced. The article fails WP:LISTN.Synthesis of data. And, if someone do manage to find such trivial list(s)...

February 2016 (UTC) Keep - The relevant guideline for this discussion is WP:LISTN, which states "One accepted reason why a list topic is considered notable...

that the delete !voters present the only policy based arguments. Per WP:LISTN "A list topic is considered notable if it has been discussed as a group...

Oogglywoogly (talk) 04:14, 15 December 2021 (UTC)Oogglywoogly Delete. Fails WP:LISTN due to an apparent lack of independent coverage of either of these intersections...

WP:LISTN (Notability guideline) to determine whether the statistics themselves are notable enough to be summarized in a standalone list. From WP:LISTN (Notability...

discussions. North America1000 17:59, 19 January 2017 (UTC) Delete - fails WP:LISTN, WP:GNG and is unverifiable Spiderone 20:50, 19 January 2017 (UTC) Relisted...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:LISTN. Found no significant coverage of the topic as a group or set in independent...

worse, which reliable work attempts to list "all antiheroes"? Failure of WP:LISTN is a major problem. Note, however, that some content here might be warranted...

WP:LISTN. Also, all but one are unsourced - has anything improved since then? No. SpacedFarmer (talk) 17:56, 17 April 2024 (UTC) Delete. WP per listn. Desertarun...

view, it is very clearly implied at WP:LISTN that navigational lists typically are not required to also meet WP:LISTN. It says right there that such navigational...

Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Paraguay/archive, this also fails WP:LISTN (lack of coverage of these schools as a group) and has no navigational purpose...

lot of unsourced, overly detailed plot information that does not pass WP:LISTN. Rorshacma (talk) 17:52, 4 February 2020 (UTC) Delete Pure FANDOM material...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Doesn't meet WP:LISTN or WP:GNG. No significant coverage, not a topic worthy of merge/redirect...

intersection of "alive" and "something else". Fails WP:NOTDIRECTORY and WP:LISTN (and some OR too, the "recently deceased" is actually from 3 yasrs ago....

there has been enough precedent set to delete these kind of lists. Fails WP:LISTN with big WP:V and WP:BLP issues. Vladimir.copic (talk) 23:23, 21 October...

(and likely inaccurate original research at that). (I am aware that WP:LISTN does not require every entry in a list to be documented in sources to meet...

many people with disabilities Wikipedia:Notability#Stand-alone lists (WP:LISTN) Wikipedia:Too much detail Wikipedia:Fancruft Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not...

items in this list are verifiable, but the list is not notable. Per WP:LISTN, One accepted reason why a list topic is considered notable is if it has...

discussed as a group or set by independent reliable sources" as required by WP:LISTN. (Contested prod) – Arms & Hearts (talk) 22:31, 8 September 2020 (UTC) Note:...

This grouping has not been described as a set by secondary sources, and WP:LISTN is not met here. PROD was removed by the creator so bringing this to AfD...

that everyone try to take a look there occassionally). I'm not seeing a WP:LISTN pass: Emporis seems to be the only source listing these besides here, and...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:LISTN and violates WP:DIRECTORY. The main Southern Poverty Law Center already...

encyclopaedic for here? The subjects are not described as a group, failing WP:LISTN. Additionally WP:NOTDATABASE and WP:ROUTINE. Of the sources per WP:RS; as...

not a collection of indiscriminate information and third this fails WP:LISTN. Ajf773 (talk) 02:12, 28 October 2018 (UTC) Delete - this is taking lists...

on GBooks. References can be found e.g., 1, 2, 3. This is a pss for WP:LISTN and WP:NEXIST. FOARP (talk) 08:35, 16 November 2020 (UTC) That first one...

believe this list fails the notability requirement for lists described at WP:LISTN, namely "One accepted reason why a list topic is considered notable is if...

of D&D gods by race, no indication this passes WP:GNG, WP:NFICTION, WP:LISTN, pure WP:PLOT based on WP:PRIMARY. See also related AfDs: Wikipedia:Articles...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Does not meet WP:LISTN; this is something resembling a template, from what I can make of it. It...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:LISTN, a really poorly cited list of trivial WP:CRUFT. Recent discussion at WT:VG...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Not a notable concept. Doesn't meet WP:LISTN or WP:GNG. Has been in CAT:NN for over 5 years. Boleyn (talk) 06:29, 21...

WP:CLT for Category:Royal weddings and its subcats. It probably meets WP:LISTN too, though I didn't do any searches so I can't prove that. ansh666 02:50...

discussions. —David Eppstein (talk) 07:22, 23 January 2020 (UTC) Keep per WP:LISTN, as two or more people with enwiki articles have held this chair. ミラP 21:27...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Doesn't seem to pass WP:LISTN. Having trouble finding sources that indicate that accidents at Herschend...

discussing tall buildings in Indore as a group to show this topic passes WP:LISTN, all the results I can find are database websites. Seems to be a collection...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:LISTN. While I can find coverage consisting of news articles that individual high...

might be potentially useful in future if other elections are mentioned and LISTN is demonstrated, I can't see how it is useful in its current form. Perhaps...

therefore this will be redirected for the timebeing per WP:SYNTH and WP:LISTN. If you feel that there may be an issue, please see WP:DRV. (non-admin closure)...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NOTTRAVEL and WP:LISTN. Nothing notable about this stand alone list other than a potential travel...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:LISTN and WP:GNG. LISTN describes notability for these sorts of lists as "if it has been...

Delete Fails WP:LISTN and general notability standards. Staticspector (talk) 17:02, 27 July 2026 (UTC) Delete - doesn't pass WP:LISTN and fails WP:NOT...

tall buildings in Kanpur that would demonstrate that this topic passes WP:LISTN. Most of the information in this article is unsourced, and seems to have...

reliable independent in-depth sources, such as WP:VG/RS. Does not meet WP:LISTN and does not warrant a WP:SPLIT from any parent article. At best, individual...

April 2025 (UTC) Redirect to the main article, doesn't seem to satisfy WP:LISTN. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 09:32, 26 April 2025 (UTC) Keep: and merge Monsterverse#Cast_and_characters...

encyclopaedic for here? The subjects are not described as a group, failing WP:LISTN. Additionally WP:NOTDATABASE and WP:ROUTINE. Of the sources per WP:RS; one...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:LISTN. While Screen Junkies is a notable channel and this series of theirs is...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NOTDIR and WP:LISTN as the guest stars are only loosely associated with each other and the show...

specific topic of "fiction books related to the state of Montana" fails WP:LISTN. Almost every book listed here is non-notable itself, with only a few of...

Clarityfiend (talk) 14:16, 12 December 2022 (UTC) Delete. Doesn't meet WP:LISTN. On a list level, which of the high-ranking Nazis were, say, germanized...

Completely unreferenced, entirely WP:OR. I also doubt the topic passes WP:LISTN. Di (they-them) (talk) 05:11, 14 June 2023 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...

(non-)argument. Axem Titanium (talk) 19:23, 27 July 2018 (UTC) Keep Passes WP:LISTN. Here's a selection of sources. Andrew D. (talk) 07:14, 27 July 2018 (UTC)...

Significant discussion, with particular focus on WP:NOTMEMORIAL and WP:LISTN. There does not seem to be significant disagreement that the subject of...

delete. WP:POVFORK to draw attention to subjects who do not meet the WP:LISTN criteria. RL0919 (talk) 06:39, 6 September 2021 (UTC) [Hide this box] New...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails to meet WP:LISTN and doubtful each individual record would have sources. Also detailed at...

trail) 04:30, 29 June 2017 (UTC) Delete can't see how this can pass WP:LISTN. Ajf773 (talk) 02:07, 30 June 2017 (UTC) Relisted to generate a more thorough...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:LISTN; and quite likely is nothing but WP:NOTSTATS (with bland and obvious statistical...

encyclopaedic for here? The subjects are not described as a group, failing WP:LISTN. Additionally WP:NOTDATABASE and WP:ROUTINE. Also, mostly unsourced per...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Unsourced and fails WP:LISTN notability. Could possibly be merged to Florida State Seminoles men's golf...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) A list that does not meet WP:LISTN and has no navigational purpose as it only contains Joe Root and there is...

Pure fancruft that fails WP:LISTN.ZXCVBNM (TALK) 03:30, 5 December 2019 (UTC) Delete. Pure PLOT. Fails GNG/NFICTION/LISTN.Kacper IV (talk) 12:28, 5 December...

The Football Pocket Bible, The Oxford Dictionary of Nicknames) per WP:LISTN. Perhaps it's WP:INDISCRIMINATE. pburka (talk) 18:23, 22 August 2020 (UTC)...

- lists of football transfers are generally regarded as notable per WP:LISTN, because reliable sources tend to discuss this as a group. Mentoz86 (talk)...

recipients. Significant and independent RS coverage not found. Does not meet WP:LISTN. K.e.coffman (talk) 22:58, 20 January 2018 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...

encyclopaedic for here? The subjects are not described as a group, failing WP:LISTN. Additionally WP:NOTDATABASE and WP:ROUTINE. Of the sources per WP:RS; besides...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Borderline, but I don't think this meets WP:LISTN or WP:GNG. There is an alternative of selective merge/redirect to Montreal...

there is nothing about this list to make it encyclopedic, so it fails WP:LISTN. Add to that the fact that it is largely unsourced, and it also fails WP:GNG...

government website which only gives a basic list of prime ministers. Blatant WP:LISTN fails, and also trivial statscruft which fails WP:NOTDIRECTORY. RandomCanadian...

has been a significant pioneer in computing and so the topic passes WP:LISTN. For example, see Early British computers. Andrew D. (talk) 19:41, 20 March...

discussions. Fuddle (talk) 17:27, 28 May 2020 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTDIR and WP:LISTN as these libraries are not individually notable. Ajf773 (talk) 20:16, 28...

that its a kid show and likely won't have any real-world info on them (WP:LISTN, WP:NOTPLOT)? I see this going two ways: either its gets deleted, or turned...

discussion, I find that there is consensus to delete this list as failing WP:LISTN. In theory, of course, editors with an interest in doing so could create...

discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 19:29, 14 May 2018 (UTC) delete fails WP:LISTN and is the definition of WP:INDISCRIMINATE. Could have thousands of entries...

Battlestar Galactica (2004 TV series) - The important guide here is WP:LISTN. I see no reliable, independent sources at all treating the Battlestars...

was keep. The majority presented cogent arguments that the topic meets WP:LISTN and is not simply a travel directory. This does not exclude the possibility...

unsourced, fails WP:LISTN, and is based completely on WP:OR. Rorshacma (talk) 18:10, 27 November 2022 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:LISTN and WP:IINFO. Objects...

Indiscriminate list article lacking sources that establish notability per WP:LISTN. The article is little more than a spam magnet. - MrX 13:04, 18 November...

Fails WP:SYNTH, likely fails WP:LISTN. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 10:03, 8 August 2021 (UTC) Delete WP:SYNTH and WP:LISTN issues aside, I consider listing...

FENS · JSTOR · TWL) I don't see how this unreferenced list meets WP:NLISTWP:LISTN/WP:NFICTION/GNG. Deprodded with a link to [1] which suggests there is potential...

have not investigated WP:LISTN for any list of TV shows set in a specific real-world location, this combined list fails LISTN. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 21:55...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:LISTN, too specific of a topic to warrant an article and borders on original research...

WP:NOR. DavidLeighEllis (talk) 20:39, 13 August 2013 (UTC) Delete - fails WP:LISTN (not discussed in reliable sources as a set). Ansh666 01:10, 14 August 2013...

Ajf773 (talk) 01:50, 9 May 2020 (UTC) Please see the comment below regarding LISTN WhisperToMe (talk) 05:44, 9 May 2020 (UTC) Comment: The archdiocese managed...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NCORP, WP:LISTN, WP:NOT WP:NCORP and WP:LISTN are failed due to the lack of any significant coverage in...

pass WP:LISTN. Like I mentioned earlier, they're so oft-mentioned, people would probably WP:IAR keep GMs (and owners) anyways, even if LISTN wasn't demonstrated...

been "discussed as a group or set by independent reliable sources", as WP:LISTN requires. It is little more than a cherry-picking of negative news stories...

ASTIG😎 (ICE T • ICE CUBE) 16:39, 15 May 2020 (UTC) Delete, this fails WP:LISTN, coverage consisting of the website of one of the people who worked on the...

then (ping me) 15:11, 14 September 2018 (UTC) Delete. Seems to fail WP:LISTN and WP:OR because half the items on the list doesn't cite any sources. --Tyw7...

JSTOR · TWL) The article consists entirely of WP:GAMEGUIDE material and WP:LISTN does not appear to be met as no reliable, secondary source ever discusses...

dedicated article. XOR'easter (talk) 18:44, 23 January 2020 (UTC) Keep per WP:LISTN, as two or more people with enwiki articles have held this chair. ミラP 21:27...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:LISTN, no evidence that being one of the "most reviewed places" on Google Maps...

to delete, as it indicates that the list is likely to be notable per WP:LISTN. The list seems to also pass WP:LSC, particularly as most of the items are...

group rather than individual entries or the topic itself. Does not meet WP:LISTN as a stand-alone list. Does not warrant a WP:CFORK from the parent article...

—/Mendaliv/2¢/Δ's/ 12:57, 5 January 2014 (UTC) Delete. This does not satisfy WP:LISTN, and it is way too crufty. If someone wants to copy it over to Wikia, they...

WP:INDISCRIMINATE and WP:ALLPLOT. Better off on FANDOM than Wikipedia, and fails WP:LISTN.ZXCVBNM (TALK) 21:17, 4 March 2020 (UTC) Delete - Overly in-depth fan article...

WP:MUSTBESOURCES argument. LibStar (talk) 15:54, 24 May 2016 (UTC) Keep Per LISTN, "Lists that fulfill recognized informational, navigation, or development...

grouping of items (the group not mentioned by sources) and therefore fails WP:LISTN. -KAP03 (Talk • Contributions • Email) 21:47, 21 April 2020 (UTC) -KAP03...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:LISTN. Also: abandoned and extremely incomplete (in case you wonder: the Cook...

sources to demonstrate that 'the list' is a notable subject as required by WP:LISTN. It merely indiscriminately links to articles without any context whatsoever...

there are plenty at a league level. Moreover, there's no indication per WP:LISTN that this particular group of players have been discussed as a group. I...

peripheral, a detail rarely mentioned within their own articles. While LISTN doesn't really have guidance on "List of X of Y", there's zero sourcing...

site, and this is a non-encyclopaedic cross-categorisation that fails WP:LISTN. Like that article, this also lacks inline citations and relies on three...

of "clubs and societies of Royal College, Colombo", as required per WP:LISTN. Sources that discuss individual clubs and societies, while great for individual...

encyclopaedic for here? The subjects are not described as a group, failing WP:LISTN. Additionally WP:NOTDATABASE and WP:ROUTINE. Of the sources per WP:RS that...

Michael Belisle (talk) 05:32, 27 April 2016 (UTC) Keep The topic passes WP:LISTN. See The Political Junkie Handbook, for example. Andrew D. (talk) 06:37...

100,000s of potential entries. Additionally, there's no real way to meet LISTN for this as it's just a general "list of data". -- ferret (talk) 13:14,...

Trillfendi (talk) 20:00, 10 February 2019 (UTC) Keep - Have you checked WP:LISTN? I would need to see a stronger argument in order to support this AfD. Skirts89...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:LISTN (and WP:V for the most part). I can't find any evidence that this is a common...

WP:LISTN although fairly amusing and remarkable that this has lasted so long!! Spiderone 17:56, 4 October 2020 (UTC) Delete - old joke, fails LISTN, this...

18:07, 29 November 2016 (UTC) Delete as per WP:NOTDIR, WP:NOTTRAVEL and WP:LISTN. Ajf773 (talk) 17:29, 29 November 2016 (UTC) Delete per Ajf773. The topic...

Lists of awards articles do not need to meet notability requirements per WP:LISTN, however, the list itself must meet this criteria just as any other list...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:LISTN does not have WP:SIGCOV in WP:RS discussing this as a group. The city is...

mainly distilled from Supplementum Epigraphicum Graecum and so passes WP:LISTN. The creator of this page also created List of ancient Macedonians and seemed...

that line, this article must fall short of those standards. It fails WP:LISTN for multiple reasons: Firstly, the list has no navigational purpose as the...

6 November 2016 (UTC) Keep - Meets WP:LISTN. N. GASIETAtalk 18:38, 6 November 2016 (UTC) How does it meet LISTN? There aren't any articles that discuss...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Extremely specific list, certainly fails WP:LISTN. Eagles 24/7 (C) 16:19, 24 January 2024 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...

WP:LISTN. People arguing delete above have not argued that Tarkhans are non-notable as a group, which is the threshold for list notability per WP:LISTN:...

are all just that, lists of mentions. Like others, however, it fails WP:LISTN, WP:GNG and Wikipedia:IPC, and sports a lot of unreferenced mentions. I...

TWL) Originally researched stuff that is non-reliably sourced and fails WP:LISTN. And, if someone do manage to find such trivial list(s) in high-school/undergrad...

list seems to be putting the cart before the horse. No clear claim to WP:LISTN. I wouldn't be opposed to moving the article to draftspace in order to repurpose...

the benefit. Jclemens (talk) 03:13, 4 January 2013 (UTC) Delete, fails WP:LISTN, I don't see any significant coverage of artifacts in Dragonlance as a whole...

which fail to cite a single source, thus mot meeting either of WP:V or WP:LISTN, and probably violating WP:OR (along with some outrageously unencyclopedic...

discussions. Rusf10 (talk) 04:49, 16 June 2019 (UTC) Delete Merge to Fort Lee. WP:LISTN does say that the individual items in a list need not be notable for the...

DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 15:01, 5 June 2012 (UTC) Delete List not notable per WP:LISTN. Also lacking inclusion criteria. --Muhandes (talk) 15:46, 5 June 2012 (UTC)...

strong consensus here and here. Also as per WP:IINFO and failure of WP:LISTN. The list has no navigational purpose. Spiderone 21:22, 25 November 2020...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable grouping that fails to meet the WP:LISTN. Let'srun (talk) 19:08, 2 May 2024 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) As per WP:LISTN, I haven't been able to find reliable sources which discuss the topic of...

notability argument. I suggest there is a case for keeping this article under WP:LISTN. How Google StreetView is killing the competition does discuss street view...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) At the very least, this seems to fail WP:LISTN. "Micronation currency" doesn't appear to be a notable concept on its own...

WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 22:27, 3 September 2023 (UTC) Delete This list does not meet LISTN. It also does not have a navigational purpose since these characters do...

itself (all of which is unsourced WP:OR), and there is no indication of WP:LISTN. LaundryPizza03 (talk) 20:40, 12 March 2018 (UTC) Delete Pure WP:LISTCRUFT...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Doesn't meet WP:LISTN or WP:GNG. Information not reliable and not worth a merge. Boleyn (talk)...

JSTOR · TWL) Well, for starters, I don't think this qualifies under WP:LISTN; "rock instrumentals" is not a notable group or subject of discussion. But...

mutiple sources which cover the topic substantively. The list now passes WP:LISTN. While not conceding that this topic is "ambiguous," we have no policy which...

encyclopaedic for here? The subjects are not described as a group, failing WP:LISTN. Additionally WP:NOTDATABASE and WP:ROUTINE. Of the sources per WP:RS; one...

therefore this will be redirected for the timebeing per WP:SYNTH and WP:LISTN. If you feel that there may be an issue, please see WP:DRV. (non-admin closure)...

expired, but that's an editing issue not a deletion issue. Surpasses WP:LISTN--Paul McDonald (talk) 13:22, 6 December 2021 (UTC) Delete, though it is...

sources. The individual entries needn't be notable in themselves. (See WP:LISTN.) List of notable items: The list topic need not be notable in itself. Nevertheless...

automatically satisfies LISTN, because that is how LISTN works. If X satisfies GNG, then list of X automatically satisfies LISTN. If this seems odd, bear...

Spirit of Eagle (talk) 07:24, 17 January 2017 (UTC) Keep The topic passes WP:LISTN while the nomination is WP:NOTENCYCLOPEDIC. Andrew D. (talk) 13:36, 17 January...

(power~enwiki, π, ν) 02:43, 24 September 2021 (UTC) Delete per nom and WP:LISTN. KidAd • SPEAK 04:10, 24 September 2021 (UTC) Keep my only issue with the...

invention. This article has many refs, but nothing jumps out as meeting WP:LISTN. Perhaps it could be renamed and rescued, and even merged with the two deleted...

another case of WP:LISTCRUFT to appeal to the most ardent NFL fans. Fails WP:LISTN. Additionally WP:NOTDATABASE and WP:ROUTINE. As with sources per WP:RS besides...

encyclopaedic for here? The subjects are not described as a group, failing WP:LISTN. Additionally WP:NOTDATABASE and WP:ROUTINE. Of the sources per WP:RS, barring...

indiscriminate laundry list of works that violates MOS:TRIVA, WP:IPC and WP:LISTN. WP:ATD-R suggests that for now, we could just redirect this to...

pass WP:LISTN anyhow). Ajf773 (talk) 17:50, 14 January 2018 (UTC) "...appears to be a list article of red-links so it doesn't pass WP:LISTN anyhow":...