Redirect to:
This page is a redirect. The following categories are used to track and monitor this redirect:
|
Look up libel in Wiktionary, the free dictionary. The goal of Wikipedia is to create an encyclopedic information source adhering to a neutral point of...
Click to read more »that libel that gets out into the mainstream as a result of us is severely damaging to our reputation. Note that "libel" in this case means libel against...
Click to read more »subject, blood libels. Textbook definitions of blood libel say it is against Jews. Non of the sources used to back up non-Jewish blood libels in the article...
Click to read more »--Conti|✉ 17:08, May 26, 2005 (UTC) Merge and redirect to Blood libel#Blood libel against Jews. RickK 18:18, May 26, 2005 (UTC) Merge and redirect but...
Click to read more »Rhodes" would just be "Jewish community". Not sure how to reword "Blood libel against the Jews in the Ottoman Empire" - maybe just "Jews in the Ottoman...
Click to read more »page. The result was delete. Sandstein 07:34, 9 August 2016 (UTC) Blood libel (novel usage) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch |...
Click to read more »result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 14:43, 13 December 2006 (UTC) Taqiyya Libel (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)...
Click to read more »material removed as per WP:BLP." Slander_and_libel#Defamation_per_se describes four instances of libel that are already defamatory by default. Allegations...
Click to read more »The result was Delete. Luigi30 (Taλk) 02:45, 13 January 2011 (UTC) Blood libel (U.S. political term) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links |...
Click to read more »Reporting statistics of link editions-libel.fr; 0 records. editions-libel.fr: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr •...
Click to read more »merging presented, per WP:ATD Courcelles 00:26, 16 October 2011 (UTC) Blood Libel at Deir Yassin (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch |...
Click to read more »reasonably good overview of the subject? The article is about the blood libel, not the history of Jews in Rhodes; this section is meant only as a brief...
Click to read more »some local Christian communities by the early 20th century while the blood libel likely came there in the early 19th century ." It definitely shows the writers...
Click to read more »page. The result was keep. v/r - TP 16:36, 19 December 2011 (UTC) The Libel Tourist (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs |...
Click to read more »--greenrd (talk) 19:26, 22 September 2010 (UTC) See also Libel tourism#Laws addressing libel tourism and Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act...
Click to read more »December 2025 by Wehwalt (talk) 11:20, 21 October 2025 (UTC) The Littlehampton libels were a series of letters sent to numerous residents of Littlehampton, in...
Click to read more »violation of Wikpedia practices. And also to consider whether his accusation of libel against User:Theresa knott has any basis in fact and whether raising baseless...
Click to read more »pedophile will be suppressed promptly, to avoid issues of privacy and possible libel. You should raise your concerns only by email to the oversight team; questions...
Click to read more »The Rhodes blood libel was an instance of the blood libel against Jews in which the Jews of the island of Rhodes were accused of the ritual murder of a...
Click to read more »is libelous is not a legal threat. The policy on defamation is to delete libel as soon as it is identified. If you believe that you are the subject of...
Click to read more »propose it for deletion. However, it is acceptable to blank an article for libel or privacy reasons as an emergency measure, as described in the policy on...
Click to read more »and later receive a letter from the subject's attorney accusing them of libel. An editor can conflate an article into something libellous by confusing...
Click to read more »to the use of capitals. Thus "English Libel Law" should be "English libel law", "Libel Suit" should be "Libel suit", etc. Bolding should not be used...
Click to read more »libelous. See Libel and slander#Criminal libel. -- Mwalcoff 01:55, 29 July 2007 (UTC) But, you can bring civil charges under the tort of libel. (JosephASpadaro...
Click to read more »complicated than "republication of libel is libel." What is undoubtable, though, is that each repetition of libel is actionable. That means the plaintiff...
Click to read more »hinges on the blood libel and whether the blood libel is noteworthy. I don't think the value of this article hinges on the blood libel (and thus the article...
Click to read more »only a simple description without the details of the attack. Wikipedia:Libel Wikipedia:Harassment Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons Wikipedia:Criteria...
Click to read more »This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made...
Click to read more »viewpoints 2) misrepresented user views on Talk pages and maliciously spread libel about users on the Talk pages of various other users 3) engaged in rapid...
Click to read more »each appeal should follow this process: Direct appeals containing threats, libel, and abusive language to Tool Admins for UTRS ban Determine whether this...
Click to read more »vandalize![dubious – discuss] We here at Wikipedia do not care if you post libel in the sandbox, so do it![dubious – discuss] We do not care if you place...
Click to read more »of a libel creates another libel and labeling such artist within said framework, including but not limited to "Vandalism" constitutes further libel. (Special...
Click to read more »post-classical invective is libel; see this website: [2]. Currently, libel redirects to Slander and libel. I would vote to Redirect to Libel (poetry). Chick Bowen...
Click to read more »sue wikipedia for libel. Assuming it's libel it should still be speedied ASAP. Kappa 00:20, 16 Dec 2004 (UTC) Speedily Deleted as "libel, continuing Sollog...
Click to read more »(UTC) Strong delete This is slander libel gkhan 18:50, August 15, 2005 (UTC) Noyt quite slander (actually libel - slander's spoken). The cited article...
Click to read more »Delete. Offensive hoax, libel. jni 07:24, 3 Jan 2005 (UTC) Delete. vanity hoax. Cleduc 07:54, 3 Jan 2005 (UTC) Speedy as libel. "...banned from the Childrens...
Click to read more »possible publicity stunt. SWAdair | Talk 09:31, 20 Jan 2005 (UTC) Possible libel as well. NN. Delete. Dbiv 12:25, 20 Jan 2005 (UTC) Delete. Main claim to...
Click to read more »understanding that stating facts is an absolute defense against charges of libel/slander in the US. So, if I call Mary Walker a whore (as in, paid money...
Click to read more »18:46, Jan 10, 2005 (UTC) Brachioproctic? Cute. Delete as joke, potential libel. Shimeru 23:56, Jan 10, 2005 (UTC) Speedy has already been speedied twice...
Click to read more »000 articles and 40 million words in total. Shortcut WP:OFAQ#LIBELWP:OFAQ#LIBEL You can simply delete wrong or hurtful information yourself. However, because...
Click to read more »personal attack. -- Antaeus Feldspar 23:05, 20 Dec 2004 (UTC) Speedy Delete as libel. Delete, the school's notable, not its headmaster. Wyss 23:37, 20 Dec 2004...
Click to read more »article and article as it stands does not appear to be a violation of WP:LIBEL. I am less inclined to believe the arguments that it seriously merits inclusion...
Click to read more »Sixteen articles were promoted to featured status last week: Rhodes blood libel (nom), Edwin Taylor Pollock (nom), Uranium (nom), Abbas Kiarostami (nom)...
Click to read more »in the case of a prosecution for criminal libel the maxim is "the greater the truth, the greater the libel". 81.147.143.222 (talk) 17:34, 29 April 2017...
Click to read more »Educate editors about WP:BLP, WP:LIBEL and defamation Actively monitor biography pages and remove a narrow set of potential libel from BLP pages. Develop and...
Click to read more »sue the UK in a UK court for a tort (which I assume libel is, under UK law). And ironically a libel or slander suit is far easier to win in the UK than...
Click to read more »watch | logs | views) – (View log) Totally unencyclopedic, plus possible libel issues. —Animum (etc.) 00:57, 26 October 2007 (UTC) I have used credible...
Click to read more »libeled if the group was libeled. Here is the summary judgement where the judge denied the appeal (the appeal said only an individual can be libeled,...
Click to read more »activities include the malicious posting of abusive comments, physical threats, libel, and attempts to disclose the private information of Wikipedians. In order...
Click to read more »rule-set, an essay about some basic aspect of Wikipedia norms and practices. Libel, a Wikipedia policy about how it is the responsibility of all to ensure...
Click to read more »(UTC) Evidence Single purpose libel/vandalism only accounts, see contributions. See [1] for a summary of original libeling. Comments Now editing with account...
Click to read more »against good Wiki habits. The definition of libel is simple, and comes from the Wiki trusted, NPOV source: Libel and slander are two forms of defamation (or...
Click to read more »material may be warned and blocked. See the blocking policy and Wikipedia:Libel. Editors should remove any negative material that is either unsourced or...
Click to read more »Search, and more . In the news More on kidnapping, vandalism commentary, libel suit, and more . WikiProject report WikiProject Years . Discussion report...
Click to read more »sighted unless they are found to contain vandalism, copyright violations, or libel. FlaggedRevisions thereby functions as a low-level filter against obvious...
Click to read more »vandalism. DE : No obvious vandalism. RU : No obvious vandalism, no obvious libel towards living persons, no obvious faults in look, no obviously false statements...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary & Wikipedia:Alternative outlets Wikipedia:Libel, Wikipedia:Attack page and Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons Wikipedia:No...
Click to read more »insufficient notability; single event; biographical of living person; potential libel; off-topic; cited sources insufficient/plot-only; scandal; unverifiable...
Click to read more »valuable service by protecting the Foundation from "legally actionable libel". Yet many of French's new claims appear to be in conflict with the evidence...
Click to read more »networks/channels/stations) and several other topics with WP:MOS, WP:HOAX, WP:LIBEL, WP:OVERLINK as well unconfirmed, libelous and fake information related...
Click to read more »incessant claims of libel are effectively one notch short of a legal threat, i.e., intimidation against other editors. I understand that libel is a serious issue...
Click to read more »talk:Jimbo Wales/Archive 149#Why is the Arbitration Committee undeleting libel instead of oversighting it?, and while there has been quite a bit to sift...
Click to read more »requested at OTRS Ticket:2010012310027541 that it be deleted as a vandalism/libel magnet; possibly doesn't meet WP:BIO. No opinion from me. Stifle (talk)...
Click to read more »JSTOR · TWL) I think that the way this article is presented could constitute libel. It is the media and complainents who are labeling these men as the "Skullcap...
Click to read more »#2015040110028951 " Due to the high volume of inaccuracies, falsehoods, and libel that appear on his page directly impacting he (sic) reputation and court...
Click to read more »based on chat logs) and may expose the project to charges of libel (see Wikipedia:Libel for further background). At this moment, I would not exclude the...
Click to read more »redacted out of the public record. Often this is done for good reason - libel, threats of harm or obscene vandalism don't belong here - but it's best...
Click to read more »2005 (UTC) Vanity or libel, I can't decide which Johntex\talk 00:00, 29 September 2005 (UTC) Delete. Whether it is vanity or libel, there is no notability...
Click to read more »this ... whatever it is; whereas the "delete" side advances attack/slander/libel concerns, and/or considers this to be an ephemeral news topic. These are...
Click to read more »have left some dust somewhere on the Internet (or Usenet). An Internet libel case that ends up being mentioned rarely on the internet itself is surely...
Click to read more »Jan 2005 (UTC) Delete hopefully speedily. Dreadfully NPOV, very possibly libel, and certainly not encyclopedic. Starblind 01:55, Jan 9, 2005 (UTC) Yes...
Click to read more »and if you can find evidence that there is libel, is suggest you remove it. Many articles may have libel, but we do not delete them on solely these grounds...
Click to read more »Vanity, libel, or whatever. I wish this was a speedy candidate -- Ferkelparade π 16:30, 26 Nov 2004 (UTC)...
Click to read more »billigerent edit summaries such as "just check the facts!" or "leave out the libel!" Dsol 19:26, 15 November 2005 (UTC) Aside from many reminders of policy...
Click to read more »out by User:Mrschimpf, this article is not about a person. There is no libel, defamation, or nonsense in the article as suggested by nom. v/r - TP 13:10...
Click to read more »articles. As for the point about libel it simply states in tags that one of the reasons for citation is to avoid libel,etc. As the reasons behind the lack...
Click to read more »libary (library) libell (libel) libellous (variant of libelous) libguistic (linguistic) libguistics (linguistics) lible (libel, liable) licence (variant...
Click to read more »not libel. It's not an attack page. It's not very profane. It is funny. Meters (talk) 01:52, 10 February 2017 (UTC) Keep obviously. The word "libel" keeps...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Delete per Wikipedia:Libel. Stubbleboy 23:12, 14 December 2011 (UTC) How does that link apply to this...
Click to read more »face legal consequences for libel in less than 24 hours !) on Talk:Disinfectant The edit dated 00:24, 20 Feb 2004, marked (Libel, slander, good will and....
Click to read more »block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser (log)) Code letter: E 3RR / libel on John McCain: Original addition [1] from 70.190.202.194 (3 edits, last...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Delete per WP:LIBEL: This article is libelous; it accuses a living person of a serious social...
Click to read more »was not notable (lack of sources). The article is now used a source of libel like this. Falastine fee Qalby (talk) 21:16, 7 June 2009 (UTC) Keep - leader...
Click to read more »You are indeed bandying about libel this and libel that. The article concerns a libel case. Ok fine. It's not libel for us to discuss the case in the...
Click to read more »reason. If the nominator believes that a libel has taken place then they should follow the process at WP:libel. asnac (talk) 17:47, 30 June 2013 (UTC)...
Click to read more »We take legal issues, including copyright violations, defamation, and libel very seriously, and are happy to address genuine problems promptly. Jumping...
Click to read more »real knowledge Wikipedia is not an encyclopedia The Wikipedia is rife with libel and violations of copyrights I responded at User:Ta bu shi da yu/Global...
Click to read more »but was forced to resign because of alleged sex scandals. This may be WP:LIBEL and even WP:NOR because not everything has been proven in a court of law...
Click to read more »of WP:CIV and WP:NPA. Libel is not a term to be thrown around lightly. Though I'm no attorney, a quick check of slander and libel makes it seem like my...
Click to read more »this list violates Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons and Wikipedia:Libel. Actually, I think this list, and many of the linked articles, qualify for...
Click to read more »admins can block editing of these users for a time in cases of vandalism, libel, link-spamming, and edit wars Proposal (initiated June 17, 2007) According...
Click to read more »(8) to Maharaj Libel Case (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) (diff !top) - Link: www.pushtipedia.com/wiki/Maharaj-libel-case (R/Xmeta/L-...
Click to read more »less open attempts to smear the subject, and resulting in a libel claim (and needed a libel claim to clean up). Unless and until someone turns up who is...
Click to read more »defense against libel doesnt make sense, we are not a court of law, Wikipedia is governed by its own set of rules and I dont think this is a libel issue anyway...
Click to read more »original research and unverifiable statements, and could lead to libel claims. See Wikipedia:Libel. Material about living persons available solely in questionable...
Click to read more »Possible Fraud and Possible Murder are both not crimes at all, but an Act of Libel or Slander is indeed a crime. "Mutton Fat White Jade" can be searched in...
Click to read more »Nominator(s): SchroCat (talk) 17:52, 16 October 2024 (UTC) The Littlehampton libels are one of those footnotes to footnotes of history. Some mildly insulting...
Click to read more »with its exclusion, primarily because of the country's plaintiff-friendly libel laws. Placating concerns about the move affecting project policies under...
Click to read more »Monahan, Gilwell Park, History of Tamil Nadu, Elliott Smith, and Rhodes blood libel. The following featured pictures were displayed last week on the Main Page...
Click to read more »word speculation, as that is exactly what it is, and it may constitute WP:LIBEL towards some of the members mentioned as being 'likely to be homosexual'...
Click to read more »Court orders user data in libel case, Saudi Wikipedia in the crosshairs, Larry Sanger at it again: Wikipedia's birthday, a cute dog, and nipplefruit....
Click to read more »Search, and more . In the news: More on kidnapping, vandalism commentary, libel suit, and more . WikiProject report: WikiProject Years . Discussion report:...
Click to read more »dedicated few. The longer this page goes unnoticed, the more outrageous the libel becomes. Luckily, it is an orphan. SWAdair | Talk 10:28, 30 Apr 2004 (UTC)...
Click to read more »Section blanking 135: Repeating characters 39: School libel and vandalism 189: BLP vandalism or libel 3: New user blanking articles 132: Removal of all categories...
Click to read more »are one step away from accussing me of harrasment. That is grounds for a libel and slander suit. Consider carefully what you are saying. What happened...
Click to read more »(8) to Maharaj Libel Case (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) (diff !top) - Link: www.pushtipedia.com/wiki/Maharaj-libel-case (R/Xmeta/L-...
Click to read more »JSTOR · TWL) Not notable per Notability Guideline, seems notable only in libel cases. I don't know if this is applied in 1 Event. Not passed in WP:NCORP...
Click to read more »cannot be proven or disproven, the term libel is completely unapplicable in this context. I suggest reading up on libel before using it in your justification...
Click to read more »about notability. If the subject of the article has valid complaints about libel and vandalism, he should go to OTRS or request office action via the WMF...
Click to read more »to the article and finds to his horror that "Wikipedia" has restored the libel. Now he's angry and unsure how to communicate the seriousness of this to...
Click to read more »notability. Cdc 01:37, 11 Jan 2005 (UTC) Speedy Delete as possible vandalism, libel. Wyss 04:21, 11 Jan 2005 (UTC) Delete - She is a porn actress but non-notable...
Click to read more »September 2006 (UTC) POV fork, mainly unreferenced, may infringe on WP:LIBEL. Better left for Groklaw. Electrawn 01:39, 2 September 2006 (UTC) Keep and...
Click to read more »for help if you need it. Libel – Always remove libelous or defamatory material. Err on the side of removing suspected libel. Edit warring to maintain...
Click to read more »discussion was: WP:SNOW Keep. Deeply flawed nomination, not an attack page, not libel, not a legal threat. Beeblebrox (talk) 06:18, 12 March 2017 (UTC) Wikipedia:Please...
Click to read more »Possibly may be speedy deleted because lack of context. --Wikimol 08:01, 4 Jan 2005 (UTC) Speedy Delete as possible libel. Wyss 03:43, 5 Jan 2005 (UTC)...
Click to read more »the article. High probability of libel in this article. Surfbum (talk) 01:22, 2 December 2008 (UTC) Worthless libel attacking an individual. Comment This...
Click to read more »responses. A comment by Anakinjmt is certainly offensive and borderline libel. I have asked for it to be deleted (and been refused). I would like it deleted...
Click to read more »medical students and the police; police protection for the statue of a dog; a libel trial at the Royal Courts of Justice; and the establishment of a Royal Commission...
Click to read more »other rising pop artists. (more...) Recently featured: Hovhannes Bagramyan – Mars – Rhodes blood libel Archive By email More featured articles About...
Click to read more »Current legal policy pages, updated July 3, 2009: Wikipedia:Libel Wikipedia:No legal threats Wikipedia:Office actions...
Click to read more »it being complete fantasy, and disgusting (incest???), there's potential libel for claiming homosexuality without strong evidence. --TommyOliver 22:32...
Click to read more »politician. The jibe was reported in a newspaper, she sued the paper for libel and lost. It would appear that there were no political repercussion, e.g...
Click to read more »debate was speedy delete (20:10, 13 Jun 2005 Geogre deleted "Nutrocity" (Libel page)). - Mailer Diablo 00:48, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC) No google hits; appears...
Click to read more »consensus. Disruptive behavior, such as vandalism, harassment, threats, or libel content Using it as a talk page Advertising WikiProjects. Hiding significant...
Click to read more »book, consider working on related articles like index or publishing or libel. Also consider reading through the Wikipedia policies to get an appreciation...
Click to read more »the so-called "Pallywood" effect. The hoax theory was the subject of a libel case in France in which a judgment was recently issued and is being appealed...
Click to read more »article, I'm talking about just the libel. If you would take a second to look at the article, you would see that the libel has been removed. Aplomado - UTC...
Click to read more »even exempt from the three-revert rule. Libel policy should protect you from defamation. If you feel libelled, follow its advice. Verifiability and reliable...
Click to read more »is a salvation to be had): Geogre's Law failure, and a general purpose libel page. Geogre 03:04, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC) Delete. No point here. - DS1953 03:49...
Click to read more »(UTC) Delete: Speedy candidate for inappropriate content and a blatant hoax/libel. Geogre 04:36, 6 Mar 2005 (UTC) Comment: The {{subst:vfd}} message in the...
Click to read more »the police, round-the-clock police protection for the statue of a dog, a libel trial at the Royal Courts of Justice, and the establishment of a Royal Commission...
Click to read more »guidelines, and I can't see anything in the article that would raise any libel or privacy concerns. Phil Bridger (talk) 23:11, 7 October 2009 (UTC) Relisted...
Click to read more »User:Tawker Liam Wyatt Mathias Schindler Rundown 00:50 Wayne Crookes sues for libel 04:40 Daniel Brandt unblocking [1] 10:17 Robdurbar, admin wiki-cide. (log...
Click to read more »because deleted pages may contain copyright violations, personal information, libel, and so forth, and making such material publicly available could be illegal...
Click to read more »(UTC) Comment by others: 2) User:Kingofmann has made unjust accusations of libel: [8] [9] Comment by Arbitrators: Strike "unjust", and you'll be more in...
Click to read more »consideration. WP:BLP1E is frequently used to delete articles for this reason. Libel and/or a non-neutral point of view are unacceptable, but luckily they are...
Click to read more »good reason. If there had been a reason, such as copyright violation or libel, to speed up the deletion, it would be happening much more quickly. But...
Click to read more »(talk) 19:41, 25 February 2021 (UTC) Speedy delete This is potentially libel WP:LIBEL. Wikipedia has no place for such things. Take this elsewhere. RationalPuff...
Click to read more »Kntrabssi 16:19, 20 March 2007 (UTC) Comment I deleted a paragraph per WP:LIBEL. No references are given, and it said that the subject attended a "School...
Click to read more »as IMDb sometimes contain speculation, rumor, invented "facts", or even libel. However, Wikipedia articles must never contain such material. Sensational...
Click to read more »(talk) 14:28, 1 March 2010 (UTC) Question: What in the article is potential libel? --A More Perfect Onion (talk) 14:40, 1 March 2010 (UTC) Note - Previous...
Click to read more »desperately need proof that he has a partner -- somebody may consider this libel! Can you all please read, copy-edit, and find cites? Thanks in advance....
Click to read more »edit-warring here. Disputes over the reliability of sources used in articles have a noticeboard here, and libel or unsourced biographical data here....
Click to read more »editor leaving the project, several accusations of libel, and even possibly an instance of actual libel. So my first suggestion is that everybody involved...
Click to read more »has, the law is clear, if you add or repeat libel, then you are responsible as if you had created the libel. Saying "well it is our wikipedia policy that...
Click to read more »candidate for U.S. Senate in 1994, and vocally sued the Boston Globe for libel in 1984. He has received extensive coverage for all four aspects. --ThaddeusB...
Click to read more »13:01, 25 Dec 2004 (UTC) Speedy Delete as a stub without context, possible libel. Wyss 20:24, 25 Dec 2004 (UTC) Speedied: Content was: "Blake Greene, Formerly...
Click to read more »yes). Let's see what I can find: Here's a very brief news article about a libel lawsuit from the Toledo Blade In 2010, the Arab Times reported that Pakistani...
Click to read more »OED's entry for "libel" includes three sub-points for definition 3: The writing or document of the plaintiff containing his allegations and instituting...
Click to read more »The Littlehampton libels were a series of letters sent to numerous residents of Littlehampton, in southern England, over a three-year period between 1920...
Click to read more »contents of the site, represented as "parody", can border on attack or libel, and thus this should be deleted. — KV5 • Talk • 21:13, 6 November 2011...
Click to read more »pulls out the "But they had to specifically prohibit libel enforcement by statute!", yes, but libel is explicitly not protected under the First Amendment...
Click to read more »article--nixie 01:04, 22 Nov 2004 (UTC) Delete. Non-notable, vanity, possible libel (He's also know as a pimp). jni 08:24, 23 Nov 2004 (UTC) Seconded: Delete...
Click to read more »false. Prosecution witnesses cannot sue for libel because someone contests their testimony. There is no libel issue here. Users are free to contest specifics...
Click to read more »Vanity. Iam 03:59, Dec 22, 2004 (UTC) uhm... *Speedy Delete as possible libel or prank. Wyss 22:46, 22 Dec 2004 (UTC) Delete. Vanity. Simon 21:38, Dec...
Click to read more »it's pure libel. Stammer 15:35, 9 May 2007 (UTC) I blanked the page. Call me vandal. Stammer 15:42, 9 May 2007 (UTC) Speedy Delete. Not just libel, but a...
Click to read more »the media: Wikipedia Fertile Ground for Libel: Lawyers.com posted an article about the possibility of libel occurring due to Wikipedia’s open nature...
Click to read more »content dispute. If the school is concerned about libel issues, I would recommend a visit to WP:LIBEL. Gzkn 05:04, 21 November 2006 (UTC) Agree. Closing...
Click to read more »01:57, 2005 Jan 12 (UTC) Delete, not notable, possible hoax. Megan1967 04:05, 12 Jan 2005 (UTC) Speedy Delete as libel. Wyss 07:27, 12 Jan 2005 (UTC)...
Click to read more »delete as vandalism/attack page. Contains unattributed libel. Leuko 22:39, 21 March 2007 (UTC) Uh, libel? --badlydrawnjeff talk 22:49, 21 March 2007 (UTC)...
Click to read more »Yeates' landlord; he was subsequently released and later obtained substantial libel damages from eight newspapers over their coverage of his arrest. Vincent...
Click to read more »exactly is being asked - and in particular, if this is a question about libel laws, clarify which jurisdiction the question relates to. AndyTheGrump (talk)...
Click to read more »to illustrate a point Wikipedia:Etiquette Wikipedia:Harassment Wikipedia:Libel Wikipedia:Neutral point of view WP:NOT#What the Wikipedia community is not...
Click to read more »Keep as mentioned, clean up has been carried out to remove any potential libel. Was a first attempt wiki entry, accepted some naiveity is apparent looking...
Click to read more »experienced editors Mitigates Vandalism, misinformation, poor quality contents, libel Currently any vandalism appears for a few seconds before it gets removed...
Click to read more »(talk) 01:42, 23 May 2005 (UTC) Ooopsie daisy! Criterion #1 + attempted libel. Geogre 03:26, 23 May 2005 (UTC) This page is now preserved as an archive...
Click to read more »practice, is that there will be more and more calls to define such concepts as libel, hate, harassment, mental illness, revisionism and such in ways that probably...
Click to read more »time. Bear in mind that some endorsements contained caveats. PC helps with libel on BLPs-67 endorsements PC is confusing-61 endorsements PC reduces vandalism...
Click to read more »liability or common courtesy, of harm they may cause. This may involve slander, libel, or privacy. Privacy considerations might involve, for example, notorious...
Click to read more »if it was a clear or blatant attempt to make up something, as opposed to libel or a factual error. A hoax is considered notable if it evaded detection...
Click to read more »aftermath of the Seigenthaler incident, was intended to prevent the addition of libel and vandalism, material that needs to be removed in any case. With respect...
Click to read more »who was recently blocked for making legal threats, i.e., an accusation of libel. HafniumDrive created his account after the block on Boundarylayer. He edited...
Click to read more »because of vandalism or POV-pushing, either of which can potentially lead to libel concerns, conflicts of interest, OTRS complaints or legal threats, and public...
Click to read more »"vandalism" of the Mark Ames article, if you think adding a fact about the libel judgement against his newspaper, supported by a citation and a link to a...
Click to read more »blanking articles 11 (hist · log) You/He/She/It sucks 30 (hist · log) School libel and vandalism 50 (hist · log) Shouting 79 (hist · log) New user removing...
Click to read more »comments are either unfounded or ironic and this may constitute an illegal libel against myself or the painter. It is easy to write - without proof - that...
Click to read more »Delete unless verified. Possible fiction - not listed in cases at CyberLibel (a Canadian lawyer's site). --Zigger 19:15, 2004 May 3 (UTC) Delete. No...
Click to read more »are even exempt from the three-revert rule. Libel policy protects you from defamation. If you feel libelled, follow its advice. Verifiability and reliable...
Click to read more »and deliberate attempt to deceptively present false information as fact. Libel, vandalism, and honest factual errors are not considered hoaxes. A hoax...
Click to read more »Megan1967 05:32, 5 Feb 2005 (UTC) Speedy delete as attack page, probable libel. Shimeru 05:33, Feb 5, 2005 (UTC) Delete. I almost speedied this as a candidate...
Click to read more »people/organizations are a small detriment... ask any OTRS user how many slander/libel complaints we get. I just don't see this article being maintained. (eg....
Click to read more »sources. Without specific context for each person listed, the list is a libel lawsuit in the making and is likely in breach of WP:BLP. An indiscriminating...
Click to read more »suspended publication in December 1798 after Johnson was convicted of seditious libel and other contributors had died or retired. (Full article...) Recently featured:...
Click to read more »(UTC) Delete, not notable, possible vanity. Megan1967 00:20, 14 Jan 2005 (UTC) Delete as unencyclopedic, possible libel. Wyss 22:26, 14 Jan 2005 (UTC)...
Click to read more »a reliable valid source can be found for the info. If not, delete it as libel. --Naha|(talk) 00:33, 2 October 2007 (UTC) Delete. Everything important...
Click to read more »--Deathphoenix 21:05, 12 Jan 2005 (UTC) Speedy Delete as vandalism and libel (obvious middle school prank). Wyss 22:48, 12 Jan 2005 (UTC) Speedy delete...
Click to read more »No Google hits. --1pezguy 02:57, Jun 6, 2005 (UTC) Speedy deleted as a libel page. Contents were: "Noah Hurowitz is a crazy anarchist with no friends...
Click to read more »incoming mainspace links, which are: Wikipedia:Link rot: 233477 Wikipedia:Libel: 99110 Wikipedia:When to cite: 94504 Wikipedia:Printability: 84788 Wikipedia:Writing...
Click to read more »03:58, 11 Jan 2005 (UTC) Speedy Delete as silly vandalism, prank, possible libel or hoax. Wyss 04:14, 11 Jan 2005 (UTC) Delete -- Definitely a hoax. DCEdwards1966...
Click to read more »that's been extended to libel. I do note that John Seigenthaler Sr. was entirely deleted and restarted on the grounds of libel, at the express fiat of...
Click to read more »Schutz 22:59, 8 February 2006 (UTC) Strong Delete. Unverifiable, and a libel suit waiting to happen. --Aaron 23:06, 8 February 2006 (UTC) Delete. Look...
Click to read more »thebereans.net/cor-theosis.shtml www.ftta.org/ www.contendingforthefaith.org/libel-litigations/mindbenders/index.html www.contendingforthefaith.org/libel-l....
Click to read more »historic record. The result of the debate was speedy deleted by Geogre (Libel page/prank) --cesarb 00:50, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC) This article appears to have...
Click to read more »for defamation", "US ISP has to release identity of anonymous editors in libel case"). The ruling could have broad implications for online privacy and...
Click to read more »page. The result of the debate was speedy delete by R. fiend ("borders on libel"). howcheng {chat} 23:30, 21 December 2005 (UTC) Non-notable "organization...
Click to read more »truth is an absolute defense against libel-proof of a statement's truth means it can absolutely never be considered libel. If someone was indicted for a crime...
Click to read more »misinformation were reverted by the same person. Livingston is suing for libel, invasion of privacy, and for the use of his name and likeness without his...
Click to read more »hold up in court and stating the connection outright would be cause for a libel lawsuit. Again, this isn't at the level, it's just poor phrasing. -- Seth...
Click to read more »{\displaystyle e^{i\pi }\,\!} 18:56, Dec 9, 2004 (UTC) Delete: I think libel pages and insult pages are valid speedies, when they're very clear like...
Click to read more »of policy such as disruptive editing, copyright infringement, vandalism, libel, etc., may be unilaterally blocked by an administrator, while less clear...
Click to read more »reposting Internet libel elsewhere on the Internet is not, in itself, libel. See, for example, Barrett v. Rosenthal in Stephen Barrett#Libel suits filed by...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources Wikipedia:Write the Article First Wikipedia:Libel Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy Wikipedia:Centralized discussion/Lists...
Click to read more »Nettalk 13:12, 3 January 2007 (UTC) Delete - the "concept" - really a vicious libel - is covered extensively in articles related to antisemitism. --Leifern...
Click to read more »scenario, this legitimate search term that is not a hoax, copy vio, or libel can be redirected without having the contribution history deleted. So, really...
Click to read more »there being an article about him. He is forced to check it every day for libel, slander etc. He has now been banned for trying to get the article removed...
Click to read more »5 May 2004 (UTC) Well, it can't be libelous per se, because you can't libel the dead. That said, delete. DS 20:49, 7 May 2004 (UTC) Delete. Cribcage...
Click to read more »possible vanity. Megan1967 01:40, 31 Jan 2005 (UTC) Delete this likely libel or practical joke. Edeans 05:38, 3 Feb 2005 (UTC) This page is now preserved...
Click to read more »for. KleenupKrew (talk) 22:49, 7 April 2008 (UTC) Delete - nonsense and libel mixed in one. No WP:RS. Bearian'sBooties (talk) 01:32, 16 April 2008 (UTC)...
Click to read more »depth references from reliable sources calling him "high-profile", a "top libel lawyer", a "big time attorney", "high-powered", "renowned", a "powerhouse"...
Click to read more »change, but that's going to be a hard one to get done, unless someone actually sues Jimbo Wales for libel. 216.237.179.238 21:07, 6 December 2005 (UTC)...
Click to read more »About view talk edit history watch May 7 The Rhodes blood libel was an instance of the blood libel against Jews in which the Jews of the island of Rhodes...
Click to read more »01:00, Apr 1, 2005 (UTC) 23:19, Mar 26, 2005 Jpgordon deleted Louis Loh (libel) Cute vanity. Smoddy (tgeck) 15:02, 26 Mar 2005 (UTC) Definitely not cute...
Click to read more »list onto the Signpost next time. Now unless you want to charge me with libel, can we put this to rest? Serendipodous 19:07, 8 September 2013 (UTC) I...
Click to read more »suppose it's OK, but he should have to prove it; otherwise people could post libel simply by claiming to be its target. --Trovatore 19:05, 8 October 2005 (UTC)...
Click to read more »Delete. Vanity. --Randy 06:29, 18 Dec 2004 (UTC) Delete, vanity, possible libel or hoax. Wyss 15:15, 18 Dec 2004 (UTC) This page is now preserved as an...
Click to read more »the libel issue. For one thing, what percentage of deleted pages are OTRS deletions? One percent? A tenth of one percent? More to the point, the libel premise...
Click to read more »aspersions Dispute resolution § Resolving user conduct disputes Harassment Libel Avoid personal remarks WikiBullying Candor Competence is required Do not...
Click to read more »as libel The end of the page says the name of the company he worked for, then it explains how it deceives industry inspectors, and then it libels part...
Click to read more »org/wiki/Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons/Noticeboard#DSK_.26_Housekeeper_libel_case User:Bob Drobbs User:ErrantX User:Bus Stop User:Off2riorob User:Epeefleche...
Click to read more »of this. I'm sure he would consider such a nomination "harassment" or "libel."--293.xx.xxx.xx 10:10, 1 April 2006 (UTC) Support I think that this article...
Click to read more »by this title. Delete. Uncle G 00:03, 2005 Jun 20 (UTC) Speedy delete. Libel. Pburka 02:00, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC) Delete attack page. JamesBurns 07:20, 20...
Click to read more »isn't a new editor and they place a veiled legal threat towards claims of libel much as the master claimed. — Berean Hunter (talk) 17:16, 16 November 2012...
Click to read more »South Lansing, NY? In what case was being called a Federalist considered libel? Catholic symbol Wikipedia:Reference_desk/Archives/Humanities/2019 March...
Click to read more »2005 (UTC) Speedied at least twice. Delete, or speedy again as possible libel. Kappa 05:55, 20 Jan 2005 (UTC) Doesn't look libelous to me... but could...
Click to read more »Wikipedian and that person (me) has very little ability to stop the lies and libel. This Star Chamber system allows people to comment on others but they have...
Click to read more »May 2011 (UTC) Keep as a harmless test page that does not contain spam, libel, or other prohibited content. Cunard (talk) 05:33, 24 May 2011 (UTC) Keep...
Click to read more »this list is to enforce NPOV, the actual use (along with accusations of libel and other uncivil behavior) is to enforce the POV of the opinions originally...
Click to read more »preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was speedied (libel, attack page). jni 12:16, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC) Non-notable vanity Evil Monkey∴Hello...
Click to read more »2013 (UTC) Comment As I see it, the attack criterion says "This includes libel, legal threats, material intended purely to harass or intimidate a person...
Click to read more »tell me there is one...)Dr Zen 00:46, 23 Nov 2004 (UTC) This is not libel. Libel cannot involve a subjective statement, period, let alone about a political...
Click to read more »text being licensed to the public under one or several liberal licenses. Libel It is Wikipedia policy to delete libelous revisions from the page history...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Editing policy (watch) Wikipedia:Indefinite blocks (watch) Wikipedia:Libel (watch) Wikipedia:Naming conventions (watch) Wikipedia:Naming conventions...
Click to read more »cuwiki · SI) Code letter: A, B & C Accounts clearly set up to vandalise and libel Ilan Pappé and to attack User:RolandR and User:Rangreen. Behaviour very...
Click to read more »phase showed that the three most endorsed positions were "PC helps with libel on BLPs", "PC is confusing" and "PC reduces vandalism, but so does semi-protection"...
Click to read more »was speedy delete (11:06, 13 Jun 2005 Geogre deleted "Mike Wasdin" (Prank/libel)) - Mailer Diablo 00:46, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC) Notability not established Samw...
Click to read more »objective bias by the article's author. The Church of Scientology brought a libel suit against Time Warner and Behar, and sued Reader's Digest in multiple...
Click to read more »boo-hoo from a student, but I can't quite see pulling the trigger on it for libel, as he left the teacher's name out of it, sort of. Geogre 16:14, 21 Jun...
Click to read more »Viscount Monckton of Brenchley claiming falsely that the Guardian had libeled him on Wikipedia), corporations and journalists, although other Wikipedia-related...
Click to read more »These non notable articles can harm people when they're vandalized with libel but no one spots it. -- Jeandré, 2009-05-29t07:22z This last is either an...
Click to read more »banned from editing heavy metal articles Libel against Wikipedia and Jimbo Libel risk on Paul Staines Libel to be removed? Libellous remark Liel copy...
Click to read more »over a thousand other anonymous edits, many of them vandalism or childish libel, appearing to originate from House of Representatives staffers (see related...
Click to read more »2005 Jan 7 (UTC) Speedy Delete as too short, little context and possible libel. Wyss 04:37, 7 Jan 2005 (UTC) Delete I concur, this sounds like a CSD. --Deathphoenix...
Click to read more »for door-to-door salesmen", not to mention describing him as "the leading libel lawyer". --Demiurge1000 (talk) 06:42, 10 December 2011 (UTC) Keep. I agree...
Click to read more »and complaints about the article being unencyclopedic. The concerns about libel/BLP aren't limited to the article content but also apply to the page history...
Click to read more »connections to the Stephen Colbert elephant incident. Mark Grebner filed a libel suit against one student from Central Michigan University and two students...
Click to read more »court had actually ruled in early October. The ruling originates from a libel suit brought by a TV station owner who had been the subject of an article...
Click to read more »What is the reason for the seventh nomination? Does the article involve libel? (aeropagitica) (talk) 21:37, 10 June 2006 (UTC) Delete per nom. 152...
Click to read more »status among many Armenians today. (more...) Recently featured: Mars – Rhodes blood libel – Elliott Smith Archive By email More featured articles About...
Click to read more »debate was speedy delete (11:05, 13 Jun 2005 Geogre deleted "Bikehelmet" (Libel page)) - Mailer Diablo 00:45, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC) Delete. Non-notable. One...
Click to read more »for a concern to be mentioned in one policy or guideline. For example, libel is not somehow "less" prohibited merely because that policy is only mentioned...
Click to read more »subject, blood libels. Textbook definitions of blood libel say it is against Jews. Non of the sources used to back up non-Jewish blood libels in the article...
Click to read more »19104 (talk) (contribs) 22:37, 12 September 2020 (UTC) Isn't libel covered by Project:Libel? That applies across all pages, not just the sandbox. Aasim...
Click to read more »speedy. --BradBeattie 14:09, 19 August 2005 (UTC) Speedy as personal attack/libel. Kappa 14:41, 19 August 2005 (UTC) Speedy Delete What the hell was that...
Click to read more »Caliphate Wikipedia:Reference_desk/Archives/Humanities/2019 May 9 Preferring a libel What counts as "defamatory" - example being suggesting someone is homosexual...
Click to read more »Wiki-style! Harro5 04:06, May 21, 2005 (UTC) Delete: Moronia attempting a libel page. Valid speedy delete. Geogre 02:38, 22 May 2005 (UTC) Delete, certainly...
Click to read more »Editors would then go through the article as per following : That the BLP is libel free and does not contain non-public personal information. Submission of...
Click to read more »Lenahan - Starblind 12:48, Feb 8, 2005 (UTC) Speedy Delete, vandalism, libel. Wyss 20:00, 8 Feb 2005 (UTC) Speedy Delete, v. obviously a personal attack...
Click to read more »even say where, or what, it is. -Splash 9 July 2005 03:01 (UTC) Speedy as libel. Pburka 9 July 2005 03:09 (UTC) Speedy delete I agree with the above -mysekurity...
Click to read more »of Euston was named in the press as a client, he successfully sued for libel. The British press never named Prince Albert Victor, and there is no evidence...
Click to read more »information. Jcam 03:23, 12 November 2006 (UTC) Speedy delete - as per potential libel above. Badbilltucker 19:58, 13 November 2006 (UTC) The above discussion...
Click to read more »expect copyright violation by posting contents from other websites or libel or personal information. UY4Xe8VM5VYxaQQ (talk) 16:29, 29 May 2016 (UTC)...
Click to read more »0.129.189 (talk) 14:27, 17 October 2017 (UTC) Is it possible to defame, libel or slander a non-human? -- Jack of Oz [pleasantries] 19:59, 17 October 2017...
Click to read more »and was frequently the subject of controversy. This included a celebrated libel case, following his exclusion from the national team in 1951–52 for "reasons...
Click to read more »Little Mermaid cow's head vandalism legal options regarding defamation/libel/insult/comparable offense in the following situation Do anti-mask, pro-vaccine...
Click to read more »articles from any kind of non-vandalistic edits, including hoaxes, rumor, libel, unverifiable information, etc. If you endorse this statement, please skip...
Click to read more »information. As for BLP, there are numerous precedents of libel lawsuits where the details of the libel are included in the article. Is there any reason why...
Click to read more »decision to delete the entry for Comixpedia - but please do not misstate or libel Comixpedia. Comixpedia.org's use of entries derived from Wikipedia is in...
Click to read more »litigation-happy paranoid person like her may well threaten to sue wikipedia for libel. Do we really need another Daniel Brandt situation? If Controversy over...
Click to read more »forced to admit this under oath, all became part of the subject of several libel lawsuits which Barrett filed. Barrett contends that it is untrue and damaging...
Click to read more »case it has to go because it's not justifiable as an article, and it's a libel trap. Trovatore (talk) 19:00, 15 May 2012 (UTC) This is a very interesting...
Click to read more »obvious copyright violations. It contains legal threats, personal attacks or libel. The protection policy limits pending changes protection to clear-cut cases...
Click to read more »Contains various claims that are completely unverifiable not to mention libel if tied to the examples of existing ships that are given.MartinDK 06:58...
Click to read more »Now how did that happen? It seems to have suffered a fatal accident. (Libel page/vandalism, gone away.) Geogre 02:42, 22 May 2005 (UTC) The above discussion...
Click to read more »small and irregularly shaped. (more...) Recently featured: Rhodes blood libel – Elliott Smith – History of Tamil Nadu Archive By email More featured articles...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This article appears to go against WP:Libel policy. The subject of the article is in legal litigation with Reuters the...
Click to read more »--A. B. (talk) 13:02, 9 December 2007 (UTC) Delete as WP:NEWS, WP:BLP, Libel violations. Bearian'sBooties (talk) 18:55, 9 December 2007 (UTC) The above...
Click to read more »(Newfoundland), if there's some way to get an image without undue OR or risk of libel, a visual depiction of this subculture would help the article a lot Water...
Click to read more »Delete - vanity. Craigy (talk) 12:28, Jun 19, 2005 (UTC) Speedy deleted as a libel page. Geogre 12:47, 19 Jun 2005 (UTC) This page is now preserved as an archive...
Click to read more »you like to change about that? These edits should stand; the charge of libel and slander is baseless given that the information added to the article...
Click to read more »Delete, nn, vanity. VladMV ٭ talk 14:58, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC) Delete, either libel or vanity... Brequinda 10:55, 12 Apr 2005 (UTC) Delete, nn CatCrofts 13:04...
Click to read more »Copyright Infringement/Privacy Laws/Libel/Defamaton/Harassment/Waltham and Lathan Act/CDA, Conversion, Internet Stalking and Harassment, Aiding and Abetting...
Click to read more »harassment of his employees. Nygard responded in the courts by filing a criminal libel suit. He apparently responded on Wikipedia by attacking Bacon through several...
Click to read more »speedily if possible. — Ливай | ☺ 22:40, 4 Feb 2005 (UTC) Speedy delete as libel. Let's not feed the troll for the next five days. - Lucky 6.9 01:48, 5 Feb...
Click to read more »needs to be speedily deleted, as a living person may sue Wikipedia for libel. 64.229.101.119 (talk) 05:22, 7 February 2011 (UTC) Delete - No coverage...
Click to read more »restored it. -- Plutor 17:05, 10 Mar 2005 (UTC) Vanity? Seems more like libel to me. Delete. Edeans 17:52, 14 Mar 2005 (UTC) This page is now preserved...
Click to read more »(UTC) Delete hoax. JamesBurns 04:02, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC) Speedy delete as libel page: Prank/hoax. Geogre 04:50, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC) The above discussion is...
Click to read more »"unsanctioned"? Nobody needs to sanction an article for it to exist. As to Libel, if there's something in the article that shouldn't be there, then remove...
Click to read more »elections, and more . In the news Sanger controversy reignited, Limbaugh libelled, and more . Discussion report Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations...
Click to read more »YES Network bio. Taking a look at the history, there has been a ton of libel against this person from one particular IP address. I don't see any reason...
Click to read more »about how the nice lady 'hasn't done anything worthwhile' turns into a BLP libel issue that is covered in national legal media, and then re-un-re-deleted...
Click to read more »cease-and-desist letters, etc.), usually for libel or defamation. The article also mentions that the Foundation lost the libel case initiated by Louis Bacon. (Category:Wikimedia...
Click to read more »summary of the entire article, and so is intentionally duplicative). Remove libel, nonsense, and vandalism, material that violates copyright and original...
Click to read more »to this page. The result was speedily deleted - as either a hoax or a libel (or both). Docg 15:21, 18 November 2007 (UTC) Edward Vidaurre (edit | talk |...
Click to read more »proven by the courts because there have been complaints by the victim of the libel. I am a Canadian lawyer. 192.197.82.153 16:53, 7 March 2006 (UTC) "...if...
Click to read more »having been submitted with malice. The error was arguably on the level of libel, and the author's wishes for recompense in the form of deletion should be...
Click to read more »complete these tasks, first flesh out this instruction then perform the work. Libel check, it is particularly important to remove unsourced material on articles...
Click to read more »conventions, Disambiguation, Captions) · Image use · Citing Wikipedia · Libel · Wikipedia etiquette · Be bold! Stay cool! · Be nice to newcomers · Alert...
Click to read more »editor who consistently (possibly intentionally) misinterprets WP:CIVIL, WP:LIBEL, WP:CHILD among other policies and use them as a weapon/sophistic reason...
Click to read more »slander). Now, obviously, his claim is false; one could argue that it's libel, but it's certainly not slander! But that's just a technicality, and I don't...
Click to read more »the solution is to nominate him for deletion, not to violate wikipedia's libel rules Saturdayseven 15:00, 17 March 2007 (UTC) Regardless of if Rushton...
Click to read more »controversial and that this list cannot even be accurate, creates BLP and libel concerns, entirely subjective, and not anything remotely encyclopedic. ⇒...
Click to read more »This article is an unreferenced trainwreck of pov, trivia, and potential libel. It fails notability and the subject is not the topic of any reliable secondary...
Click to read more »sentences having ten or more citations), conflating all sorts of religious libels under one banner (an Iranian phrase that appears to actually mean a shameful...
Click to read more »the Italian police "seized a page about Roberto Fiore (due to alleged libel) on wikipedia.it rather than it.wikipedia.org ... the actual article was...
Click to read more »common law jurisdictions, when using the defence of truth again a tort of libel and/or slander, what is the burden of proof for establishing the truth of...
Click to read more »same user is bragging on 85 pages about Margaret Palermo, spreading hate, libel and other forms of personal attacks. The user brags about how she tries...
Click to read more »November 2007 (UTC) Keep Political hit piece or not, the article isn't libel and there is no reason other than political ones to remove it. --MacGyver07...
Click to read more »libelous to boot. Feco 22:34, 26 Mar 2005 (UTC) Delete on basis of potential libel. The article's very title is problematic in this respect. 23skidoo 00:17...
Click to read more »phase showed that the three most endorsed positions were "PC helps with libel on BLPs", "PC is confusing" and "PC reduces vandalism, but so does semi-protection"...
Click to read more »redirect/article/link. Wikibofh 17:16, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC) Delete: Advertising and a libel page, possibly speedy delete but definite regular delete. Geogre 18:23,...
Click to read more »magazine that doesn't meet WP:GNG, as the only sources available concern libel cases. It also has significant verifiability and promotional problems, as...
Click to read more »--AmateurThinker 16:03, 13 July 2006 (UTC) I am wondering if one can be held libel for what one preceives as misrespresenation in an classified type advertisement...
Click to read more »(UTC) Speedy article admits that it's not notable. It's also borderline libel. Pburka 04:44, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC) Delete attack page. JamesBurns 07:30, 20...
Click to read more »save the Dominion High School article from sure deletion from copyvio and libel. I can't take credit for most of the stuff now on the page, but that was...
Click to read more »make her notable Jack1956 (talk) 16:49, 15 April 2010 (UTC) Strong delete. Libel case waiting to happen. Chris Neville-Smith (talk) 17:27, 15 April 2010...
Click to read more »mention the source on the image page and make it as usable as possible Libel – All editors are responsible for making sure Wikipedia's content is not...
Click to read more »watch | logs | views) – (View log) Someone who was successfully sued for libel. Only one local news story as source. Doesn't meet WP:BIO. NawlinWiki 16:59...
Click to read more »administrator since July 2006, but I recently took a year off because of a libel article about me in Encyclopedia Dramatica, which I'm dealing with off-wiki...
Click to read more »subject. This is a potential libel and slander problem. Bearian 16:04, 21 July 2007 (UTC) Every article is a "potential libel and slander [sic] problem"...
Click to read more »Keep - I'll be darned if I can figure out what the subject feels is "false libel" in the article. Keep per GiftigerWunsch. Beyond My Ken (talk) 19:20, 28...
Click to read more »verifiable about the claimed subsidiaries of the group. Strangely though (can we libel a company??) there might be scope for the business to become notable in...
Click to read more »off and has violated 3RR on Abaddon today, using a claim of 'reverting libel' as justification. Furthermore, Wonderpet has engaged in personal attacks...
Click to read more »doubt face isolation, systematic sanitary reversals, systematic slander, libel, insults, page protections and the usual periodic pattern of bans again...
Click to read more »something on the case at As I Was Going Down Sackville Street#Libel lawsuit. But the libel action was not brought by Beckett's uncle, nor was it brought...
Click to read more »can't recollect any bread suits, but I can certainly remember a lot of libel suits over false and/or reckless charges of mental illness. --Calton 04:01...
Click to read more »and is undoubtedly original research: "infamous anti-Semitic 'protocols' libel", "Hitler's buddy", "just another Arab Muslim intolerance", "as part of...
Click to read more »references to prove someone said those particular quotes. No possibility of libel here. If this was on his user or talk page instead of a side page he made...
Click to read more »December 2012 (UTC) The Sunday Times is suing Lance Armstrong over a lost libel action for publishing doping allegations, a claim now corroborated. What...
Click to read more »convicted of anything, and so there is no slam-dunk defense to a charge of libel. Unlike someone like Bill Cosby, whose page includes stuff about unproved...
Click to read more »Daily Star and The Scotsman were also successfully sued for libel ... I now see the libel papers are not listed in the body - this should be the other...
Click to read more »figure there's nothing to lose by deleting it (even if the accusation of libel is false). — CharlotteWebb 20:56, 7 December 2008 (UTC) Delete as blatantly...
Click to read more »(talk - contribs; 8) to Defamation (diff) * Links added in this diff: www.libel.com// (8, 1, 1, 1) 2009-10-28 00:05:38: User 67.80.239.121 (talk - contribs;...
Click to read more »- anti-vanity? CLW 13:33, 19 September 2005 (UTC) Delete NN and almost libel --Quasipalm 18:50, 19 September 2005 (UTC) Speedy delete as nn-bio. Unless...
Click to read more »2005 (UTC) No, but test pages are, and, at least unofficially, slander/libel pages are. Geogre 02:05, 25 May 2005 (UTC) This page is now preserved as...
Click to read more »The issue here is in a sense the reverse of the BLP issue. There is no libel worry over using the connected source. Peterkingiron (talk) 16:15, 3 May...
Click to read more »me around the site and while in tandem cross posting personal attacks, libel, and legal threats and baiting to the Yahoo SCOX Message Board. Other users...
Click to read more »include, but not be limited to, direct address, short with no content, and libel. Geogre 01:59, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC) This page is now preserved as an archive...
Click to read more »astroturfing is bold-faced, black-letter libel. Fortunately for Wikimedia Foundation's limited resources, the victim of the libel has not expressed an intent to...
Click to read more »articles on people in general (particularly living ones). The twin concerns of libel and self-promotion mean that editors look with great suspicion at new people...
Click to read more »Delete: vanity, nobody in particular. The so-called "landmark case involving libel/slander on Usenet", Simpson vs. Savoie, yields 0 hits. Makes me think it...
Click to read more »are deranged. Is this request being made in a reasonable way? Is this a libel issue, or can this request be treated routinely? This person is a prison...
Click to read more »alleged evidence. In the mean time would like to hear others' ideas about libel. My accusation is clear: Eric Metaxas is operating and has been operating...
Click to read more »(UTC) Saying htat you have been libeled is not a legal threat. Saying you are going to sue for libel, is the threat. Libel is simply a legal word for lying...
Click to read more »add false claims about living people to Wikipedia; you could be sued for libel. Note: If you have a conflict of interest (that is, if you are involved...
Click to read more »(talk) 00:04, 10 April 2008 (UTC) Delete as redundant. There's plenty of libel in user and talk pages already, though. Blackworm (talk) 05:45, 10 April...
Click to read more »professional from doctors and teachers (ratemyprofessors.com) to prostitutes. Libel has never come up with any of them. --Viennese Waltz 08:49, 6 March 2017...
Click to read more »for changes which included Stephen Sedley's quote being changed (which is libel). He removed these without any explanation.[25][26] Then when he did actually...
Click to read more »Wikimedia Foundation privacy policy Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons Libel No original research Verifiability What Wikipedia is not Attack page Relevant...
Click to read more »You have now libeled me as well... Zothip 23:51, 4 February 2006 (UTC) Here are the laws involving Computer Libel and Slander. You libeled me and slandered...
Click to read more »(UTC) Speedy deleted, per the request ... before wikipedia gets sued by libel. - DavidWBrooks 03:37, 19 Mar 2005 (UTC) This page is now preserved as an...
Click to read more »itself records that wiki no longer claims that variant to be accurate. A libel proceeding would be a non-starter for failing to meet the publication as...
Click to read more »Category:Living people to aid in the improved cleanup of vandalism and libel which could be hurtful to living persons. He countermanded early attempts...
Click to read more »because these statements are untrue, then that's libel, folks. You're not doing Wikipedia any favors by libeling someone, or conversely, you're not doing the...
Click to read more »FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Notability in question. Google search mostly turns out a libel case between an Iloilo mayor and the editor and a columnist from the newspaper...
Click to read more »shoestring, compared to its prominence on the Web. Granted, any slander or libel in an edit is generally considered to imperil the offending editor rather...
Click to read more »difficulty in communication. The wikipedia entry has been on the side of libel since its beginning and I only ever edited it to provide links to more current...
Click to read more »06:17, May 31, 2005 (UTC) Delete: Utter trash. It could be deleted as a libel page, as it appears to exist simply to make fun of someone named Audrey...
Click to read more »and elections. In the media: An old scrimmage, politics and purported libel Plus human knowledge and Ozzie places! Special report: Wikipedia editors...
Click to read more »apparently not-very-public person, original research, verifiability, potential libel CHE 19:26, 27 July 2006 (UTC) Delete per the article: "Ciesla has never...
Click to read more »2004 (UTC) Speedy Delete as obvious silly vandalism, prank, or possible libel, last line reads... Kevin (now retired) currently lives in his native South...
Click to read more »your solvency, that would be a libel (sic). If I suggested that you are unfaithful to your wife, that would be a libel. But if I call you a rhinoceros--which...
Click to read more »prank. Zzyzx11 07:58, 18 Feb 2005 (UTC) Delete. Potential personal attack/libel page. Unencyclopedic for sure. jni 08:00, 18 Feb 2005 (UTC) Delete as above...
Click to read more »sub-page (along with the page histories) be permanently deleted per Wikipedia:Libel at the conclusion of this arbitration. I do not know if there is precedent...
Click to read more »Sismob was blocked in April 2011. It appears both users engage in school libel & vandalism. -- Luke (Talk) 00:58, 12 January 2012 (UTC) Accused parties...
Click to read more »character, not training. Does he really need some instructor to tell him not to libel someone on Wikipedia?"). Hari's activity on Wikipedia has been discussed...
Click to read more »talk page. The subject has become angry and is accusing another editor of libel. We need to decide whether the article has a future and then sort it out...
Click to read more »and libel issues. Anything which does not fit into the three cases above is inappropriate, including material that is simple vandalism and not libel, material...
Click to read more »Merkey's article adhere to Wikipedia's stated policies with regard to internet libel "as a courtesy" and place Merkey under his "special protection" as an editor...
Click to read more »for this sort of attack. Usernames and userpages containing statements of Libel or Legal Threats are against policy and should be deleted on sight. See...
Click to read more »wishes to write a response must also not use this right to push forward libel, unsourced allegations about other living people, personal attacks, harassment...
Click to read more »Not famous, not verifiable, possible attack page and leaving WP open to libel threats. Stifle 13:36, 26 December 2005 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »usually ignored if the edits being reverted are deemed to be vandalism, libel, or otherwise of significant detriment to the quality of the encyclopedia...
Click to read more »David Irving libel trial. Slim 15:41, Jan 7, 2005 (UTC) As written, it does say that the Rare Books Room is reserved for porn. The libel trial also shows...
Click to read more »obvious copyright violations. It contains legal threats, personal attacks or libel. in addition, checks must be done for straightforward violations of the...
Click to read more »sign - nice (accurately representing the publication's fascist misogeny); Libel (unsupported and gratuitous charge of sexual harassment against editor of...
Click to read more »page. The result of the debate was speedy deleted by Geogre (Prank with libel). Master Thief GarrettTalk 04:40, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC) I am not wholly sure...
Click to read more »may feel oppressed by the repetition of a libel on wikipedia. It may be unwise to put WP via participatory libel into Kessler's sights, as he has proven...
Click to read more »defamation (libel or slander). See Wikipedia's take on it at Defamation: "There are several ways a person must go about proving that libel has taken place...
Click to read more »a defence which protects anyone but a publisher, author or editor from libel claims, and which is explicitly framed to apply to electronic service providers...
Click to read more »the Anglican Church Grammar School as the article is half in-jokes, half libel, and a third half refers right back to the "GNU". JDoorjam 16:35, 12 August...
Click to read more »WP:BLP1E: the only significant coverage of him in reliable sources relates to a libel case against him, which was dismissed (see [1]). That isn't sufficient to...
Click to read more »chives/Language/2010 September 3 Dutch Het Leaving monkhood Slander and libel in online social contexts Language learning Deewa / Pashto differentiate...
Click to read more »sleep, clown will eat me 10:51, 13 March 2006 (UTC) Speedy delete. Possible libel, who knows. Unsourced. ProhibitOnions 12:02, 13 March 2006 (UTC) Yup. Attack...
Click to read more »substantially American libel law differs from British libel law. Under American law (which is all that matters on en:Wikipedia), any libel claim would be dismissed...
Click to read more »Maryam of Semien 1898 - Dreyfus affair: Émile Zola is brought to trial for libel for publishing J'Accuse...! 1900 - Second Boer War: British troops fail...
Click to read more »May 2007 (UTC) Under U.S. law, the estates of dead people cannot sue for libel. Only living people can do that. *** Crotalus *** 08:00, 20 May 2007 (UTC)...
Click to read more »British Airways from 1981 and was successfully sued by Richard Branson for libel as a result of BA's dirty tricks against Virgin Atlantic? ...that Wai-Wai...
Click to read more »head too far above the parapet to maintain that right. As to the claims of libel, the one-line reference to a controversy is reasonably sourced and the source...
Click to read more »with respect to those concerned about libel, in the U.S. the First Amendment protects folks from being sued for libel for expressing religious opinions....
Click to read more »no rush to delete harmless ones before that (harmless = not copyvio or libel, although this one might have BLP issues). jni (delete)...just not interested...
Click to read more »notable. --Sanguinus 10:48, 6 September 2005 (UTC) Speedy deleted as a libel page: "His beliefs are all the more controversial for the intense sexual...
Click to read more »during the past month. Diffs: PenguinChica's POV: [1], [2], [3] Henrigraves' libel/POV, blanking: [4], [5] 24.227.249.193's POV: [6], [7], [8] 24.239.118.87's...
Click to read more »record and formally warned him for libel ŞůṜīΣϹ98¹Speak 23:49, 14 April 2007 (UTC) I don't see how stating a fact is "libel". Perhaps you should look up the...
Click to read more »A6. TheProject 23:44, 6 May 2006 (UTC) Vilification page only. Possible libel. Remove it --Light current 02:29, 6 May 2006 (UTC) Delete - unless it can...
Click to read more »occurred violates not only Wikipedia BLP policies, it potentially violates libel laws in the US, which are applicable in this case. Therefore, the wording...
Click to read more »in the public's face"). In response, Whistler brought a court case for libel against Ruskin. Although Whistler won, the case bankrupted him. Saturn Devouring...
Click to read more »db-bio and nonsense. Jasmol 01:20, 19 November 2005 (UTC) Speedy delete: Libel/slander page. Geogre 02:45, 19 November 2005 (UTC) Speedy delete as an attack...
Click to read more »or any other project of the Foundation, due in part to concern over UK libel laws. Also this week: Jimbo interview — Arbitrator resigns — China revisited...
Click to read more »a personal attack page. Delete. Bearcat 03:17, 6 Mar 2005 (UTC) Delete: libel page, no question about worthiness or inclusion. Geogre 04:48, 6 Mar 2005...
Click to read more »usual "My teacher smells bad" stuff that is too ridiculous to be called libel -- it is actually allegations of corruption against specific school personnel...
Click to read more »pages, and try to make images as useful and reusable as possible. Wikipedia:Libel: It is Wikipedia policy to delete libellous revisions from the page history...
Click to read more »Oversight, meanwhile, is the ability to hide page revisions containing libel, personal informations and in extreme cases, copyright violations; it was...
Click to read more »unfounded and speculative. See the policies noted and the Wikipage for Libel and Slander. Also, AfD pages should be courtesy-blanked if there is no malicious...
Click to read more »order, libel is illegal, the only thing is you go to court to prove it was libel, but the laws were already there making it illegal for you to libel someone...
Click to read more »and need a sandbox. This doesn't seem to be the case here; it borders on libel, in fact. --Rschen7754 (T C) 06:41, 24 December 2009 (UTC) It seems to me...
Click to read more »ensure that material posted on Wikipedia is not defamatory. See Wikipedia:Libel. Passed 6-0 2) Editors may be blocked at the discretion of administrators...
Click to read more »(UTC): User 185.251.22.163 t • c • dc • l • ef • b • bl; (1) to Criminal libel (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) (diff !top) - Link: danjohnsoncriminallaw...
Click to read more »23:41, 5 June 2009 (UTC) SNOW delete, nothing notable once the made-up libel is removed. The only one of the former refs that mentioned him at all was...
Click to read more »Sublime soul (talk · contribs) should be indefblocked as well ... this is blatant libel. Blueboy96 22:28, 17 July 2007 (UTC) He removed the speedy tag that Finngall...
Click to read more »a personal attack. Well, not as adults anyway. PS: the dead cannot be libelled; nor does WP:NPA or WP:CIVILITY apply to them. Happy Sunday! Basket Feudalist...
Click to read more »minor political figure, but certainly more meaningful than the Wikipedia libel vandal whose notoriety we've collectively decided to keep. Carlossuarez46...
Click to read more »libel'?". First Read. NBC News. Retrieved 7 February 2011. "Less than 4 hours after the release of the video, Wikipedia.org's entry on 'blood libel'...
Click to read more »(UTC) Keep. I created this entry as a useful bridge between the significent libel decision of Keith-Smith v Williams and Mr Smith's political activities which...
Click to read more »adding similar unsourced content of the same articles that is bordering on libel. They all edit Scottish articles like include Deveronvale F.C., Whitehills...
Click to read more »or merge - While close to BLP1E, the article details also a subsequent libel action and there was still coverage 21 months after the incident. A rename...
Click to read more »edits outside this topic. Delete I also concur with this assessment; if libel-free biographical articles is an objective of Wiki editorial, this one is...
Click to read more »which may be considered offensive, indecent or objectionable, or to defame, libel or discriminate, (c) download all or a substantial portion of the morgueFile...
Click to read more »invisible, and generally applied to very limited subjects, such as to suppress libel or child pornography, that don't affect power users. through engaging in...
Click to read more »randomly, even after being unblocked the disruptive editor(s) continue. Libel attacks: [1] [2] [3] [4] Disruptive edits: [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11]...
Click to read more »much less. The author also confuses slander and libel. He says Jimbo removed the Seigenthaler libel when it wasn't him. The list goes on. Wikipedia is...
Click to read more »argues that the potential for vandalism should justify deletion because "any libel, defamation, or smear... will be made prominent about the person, and reputation-laundered...
Click to read more »WM Legal has advised oversight on specific edits due to defamation and libel concerns. This person is currently involved in legal matters with the editors...
Click to read more »innocent. The nature of press reporting of his arrest led Jefferies to bring libel action against eight UK newspapers, resulting in the payment to him of substantial...
Click to read more »this time making the article a WP:COATRACK, making unsupported claims of libel against the Houston Press in the edit comments. [5][6] A conversation on...
Click to read more »pages without a strongly compelling reason (such as copyright violation, libel, or publication of private information). There is no compelling reason here...
Click to read more »anything that could appear vaguely relevant to the article would touch on libel or even POV. There's only so many basic oxides and other simple compounds...
Click to read more »E-Commerce Law, allege they "violated the Lanham Act and committed trade libel and commercial disparaging by falsely posting that plaintiff is a support...
Click to read more »publish claims sourced to it, which leaves it in a poor position to discuss a libel suit. Even if there's some precedent to be made about not kowtowing to Berlin...
Click to read more »Wow! The list is good like a Gossip column. Plus without references its Libel too. -Animeshkulkarni (talk) 17:31, 21 January 2012 (UTC) The above discussion...
Click to read more »The writing style is the same, and they both quote the same definition of libel, etc. XOR'easter (talk) 19:02, 27 September 2018 (UTC) Comment I made a...
Click to read more »implying excessive control for personal ends. Calling someone this could be libel, so a whole list of svengalis is just asking for trouble. Totnesmartin 17:25...
Click to read more »Delete --EnSamulili 12:35, 21 Jan 2005 (UTC) Delete very likely hoax and/or libel, and even on the odd chance that it's 100% true, that still does not make...
Click to read more »October 2007 (UTC) Interesting. Before someone starts worrying about a libel case, here's a link to an article in Buffalo Business First magazine reprinted...
Click to read more »appropriate, the page was closer to "silly immature nonsense" than "serious libel"). I don't think there's anything to do here from a SPI perspective, and...
Click to read more »elections, and more . In the news: Sanger controversy reignited, Limbaugh libelled, and more . Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations...
Click to read more »lawyer for one of the major media outlets, and is often involved in major libel issues, of which she appears to be an expert. She's presented for PLI, a...
Click to read more »which would serve no purpose other than opening Wikipedia to chraagers of libel. Happy New Year. JAAGTalk 16:09, 1 January 2010 (UTC) So far all the living...
Click to read more »sick of dealing with fighting users (or don't bother with it at all) and libel concerns, nothing special about this one and the 'history' is completely...
Click to read more »please remove that (but be careful!). For serious legal issues, including libel, please send an email to info-en-qwikipedia.org. If your edit does not fall...
Click to read more »condemnation of the government in order to force his own prosecution for libel, so that he could raise evidence in defense of Dreyfus that had been suppressed...
Click to read more »(UTC) A tabloid newspaper that has been frequently successfully sued for libel shouldn't be used as a reliable source for that allegation. One Night In...
Click to read more »rare, for posting material that had to be suppressed (e.g., death threats, libel). CU blocks are relatively common and are for sockpuppetry. Originator was...
Click to read more »ETC), and also (b) legal concerns and the potential violation of Wikipedia:Libel ("For this reason, all contributors should recognize that it is their responsibility...
Click to read more »can say that it's all essentially verging on stupidity or contemptuous libel. I will now edit out some of the particularly harsh lies, and will hope...
Click to read more »like William Westmoreland or Ariel Sharon; or better yet, discussed in libel and slander? Smerdis of Tlön June 30, 2005 20:44 (UTC) delete Groeck 30...
Click to read more »(talk|contribs) 23:24, 13 September 2009 (UTC) Allegations of records of libel, bullying and harassment should be referred to Wikipedia:Requests for oversight...
Click to read more »does -- then article feedback will also allow prohibited material such as libel, personal details, copyright violations, spam, and violations of our living...
Click to read more »(talk) 18:41, 17 June 2009 (UTC) We already have Apple Inc. litigation#Libel dispute with Carl Sagan. Uncle G (talk) 04:59, 18 June 2009 (UTC) Yes, I...
Click to read more »then the article cannot possibly libel him. As it happens, there is indeed such a person, and the article does not libel him. The original text appeared...
Click to read more »are libelous) can and will be removed from the page history per Wikipedia:Libel. howcheng {chat} 22:31, 6 January 2006 (UTC) Comment: OK, I just walked...
Click to read more »poem is about real events or events purported to be real, then it can be libel just as anything else can. If it's something that no reasonable person would...
Click to read more »Sidaway 16:54, 26 July 2007 (UTC) Statement by Videmus Ommia is bordering on libel. While I did initiate the page, it was not done to promote a regional book...
Click to read more »organized crime topic where most newspapers fear to tread, if only to avoid libel suits, and opened it up so that the whole world could see it and smell it...
Click to read more »unreferenced statements that at best are fangush, and at worst could be libel. With respect to the subject, I'd rather see the article deleted if we can't...
Click to read more »the page. The body of the article is not only nonsense, but borderline libel. JGardner 19:37, 15 November 2006 (UTC) peter cramp is real, and he loves...
Click to read more »histories. A blatant attack is one obviously intended to denigrate, threaten, libel, insult, or harass someone. Removal of vandalism. Suppression may be occasionally...
Click to read more »sock-puppet, I am a maize-based snack. 22:29, 23 May 2005 (UTC) Isn't there a libel clause for speedy deletion? Delete anyway. DJ Clayworth 04:31, 24 May 2005...
Click to read more »is no evidence to link this man to the crime. This link could also have libel issues, I'd strongly recommend removing it. Removed the link and his name...
Click to read more »this has taken a turn for the worse, as I feel that I have been libeled, or almost libeled, by Skipsmith here: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php...
Click to read more »- ongoing stupidity --R Lee E Speedy delete candidate for an attempted libel page. ("Attempted" because it's trying to use accusations of homosexuality...
Click to read more »both a catastrophic fire and a cholera epidemic? ...that the Rhodes blood libel — the accusation that the Jews of Rhodes ritually murdered a Christian boy...
Click to read more »standard of verifiability in articles about living people, so as to avoid libel. These exceptions do not contradict the position espoused in this essay...
Click to read more »Bacon's choice to pursue the matter in the UK instead of the US as a case of libel tourism, a representative of his solicitors said that the reason was that...
Click to read more »team yet. Besides, it's a BLP containing no sourced material, possibly libel. Kosm1fent Won't you talk to me? 21:13, 26 July 2011 (UTC) Delete - fails...
Click to read more »this content removed as I do not wish a site that allows lynch mobs and libel and defacement of information to act as a repository for our culture. There's...
Click to read more »border on libel, is uncivil, we have a problem. βcommand 15:19, 17 April 2008 (UTC) Betacommand, do you often make off-hand comments about libel? That treads...
Click to read more »Wikipedia namespace that would explain what constitutes libel (in addition to the existing libel article and how to avoid it (not easy, as the current AP...
Click to read more »misleading with "it wasn't copied there." Now, this is a very mild libel. But it is libel. libel, n. In popular use: Any false and defamatory statement in conversation...
Click to read more »howcheng [ t • c • w • e ] 19:31, 19 December 2005 (UTC) Libel. Defamation. Nonsense. Identifying individuals by name and alleging irrationality...
Click to read more »debate was Delete. Ëvilphoenix Burn! 00:44, 17 April 2006 (UTC) Delete libel, unsourced, from query at info-en@. -- Jeandré, 2006-04-09t12:03z Delete...
Click to read more »in the Quebec City mosque shooting? Beckett and bikes Beckett sued for libel by his uncle Is sending one's deceased testicles (as a gift) to someone...
Click to read more »there is actual libel, then the legal or moral implications of repeating libel merely assumes the conclusion. So, what is the libel you are identifying...
Click to read more »Usenet newsgroup alt.religion.scientology. Because the anti-Scientologists libeled me before I ever posted there. When I leave they become even worse with...
Click to read more »Gutiérrez, neither of whom have verified socialist views! I'm concerned about Libel right now. Please, delete. — Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs) 01:38, 28 August...
Click to read more »claim of illegal actions has not been established and may be considered libel. Occasionally edited by an anonymous editor whom I believe may be the subject...
Click to read more »it's a BLP violation so egregious it's well over the line into outright libel. There is a lone secondary source which in turn was picked up by the BBC...
Click to read more »should called as such rather than leaving it open to interpretation (and libel). Megan1967 02:09, 13 Mar 2005 (UTC) Delete -- Infrogmation 06:35, 14 Mar...
Click to read more »non-public personal information, a child disclosing their age, or possible libel), request oversight instead. Administrators should take care not to speedily...
Click to read more »delete the history, not the content. That's for things like copyvio or libel. I see no reason at all to delete the history here. Can the D&R people explain...
Click to read more »that a redirect can be libel, unless the targets title and synopsis doesnt clarify the matter. I havent seen any mention of libel wrt to redirects, so if...
Click to read more »that "the accused" is him, which if it were to be considered libel, is contributory libel on Wikipedia's part. We might as well put his name in the article...
Click to read more »deleted in August 2015 based on salacious speculation, which could contravene libel, which is why it was stricken by the previous admin, @Timotheus Canens (see...
Click to read more »incivility does not usually rise to the level of libel, regardless of whether it's false or hurtful. Libel requires an attack on a character to the point...
Click to read more »significantly reduce vandalism and defamation, thus addressing the issue of libel. Would reduce copyright violations, vandalism, legal threats, personal attacks...
Click to read more »you are particularly pleased? Why? I've been protecting Wikipedia from libel lawsuits since day one, as demonstrated here. Have you been in editing disputes...
Click to read more »newspaper-article sources for this claim, Guerrero has already sued for libel 72 of his former colleagues at USC who signed an open letter concerning...
Click to read more »entry on this topic (it should be at ro:Baron local) This article is a libel magnet too. It's not too hard to find one Romanian editorialist or another...
Click to read more »controversial claims about Ayers. I believe many of these claims are outright libel, in fact. It is quite true that these comments are made on a talk page,...
Click to read more »physician and adjunct college teacher. I don't see how deletion of a bio can be libel; in fact, the contra is true. Bearian (talk) 00:44, 22 December 2007 (UTC)...
Click to read more »need to actually vote twice. Patent vanity, not notable, could be seen as libel/attack page. I wonder how Barfooz speedies vanity pages given he does not...
Click to read more »am in litigation over the matter of libel. Already, in these recent opposition statements, some of that same libel is re-stated, here, on Wikipedia. I...
Click to read more »British Airways from 1981 and was successfully sued by Richard Branson for libel as a result of BA's dirty tricks against Virgin Atlantic? ...that Wai-Wai...
Click to read more »comment from others), this section must be deleted as a potential commercial libel. Peterkingiron (talk) 21:24, 19 June 2009 (UTC) The above discussion is...
Click to read more »takes one vandal among those millions of articles to get a severe case of libel on our hands. Having articles on every person who makes the papers for a...
Click to read more »legitimate sources or claims to importance, it's probably a living-persons/libel policy violation first and foremost. Rividian (talk) 02:30, 8 June 2008...
Click to read more »other) I firmly believe the article(as it stands) opens wiki to possible libel/slander charges. Because the article slanders(negative light), by mentioning...
Click to read more »actress and had never been involved with pornography. That itself verges on libel. Second, the subject spent four years as a cast member on Happy Days, a...
Click to read more »material may be warned and blocked. See the blocking policy and Wikipedia:Libel. Administrators encountering biographies that are unsourced and controversial...
Click to read more »pieces of this biography. This was edited by someone that is trying to libel this subject. Californiawikisooth 08:31, 10 October 2006 (UTC) Comment:...
Click to read more »in any country and the right is commonly subject to limitations, as with libel, slander, obscenity and incitement to commit a crime. The right to freedom...
Click to read more »