Redirect to:
This page is a redirect. The following categories are used to track and monitor this redirect:
|
In Wikipedia, the lead section is an introduction to an article and a summary of its most important contents. It is located at the beginning of the article...
Click to read more »section into something like "Commentary" or something similar. Per WP:LEDECITE, the lede doesn't need citations because the information should be in the...
Click to read more »Comments after a quick skim. Typically, ledes do not have citations, per WP:LEDECITE. Are these needed? There are lots of small, one paragraph sections throughout...
Click to read more »after a quick skim: "Breathe" was also released as a single,[5]" Per WP:LEDECITE I don't think a citation is necessary here if the article body has this...
Click to read more »Ranger (talk) 00:47, 3 April 2024 (UTC) Comments after a quick skim: Per WP:LEDECITE, citations are not generally necessary in the lede because the information...
Click to read more »that explain this. Dr vulpes (💬 • 📝) 20:16, 12 April 2023 (UTC) Per WP:LEDECITE, citations are usually not needed in the lede as the information is in...
Click to read more »May 2020 (UTC) No alt-text 14 citations in lede - please remove per WP:LEDECITE. Where is the IPA cited? The stadium couldn't have been that size since...
Click to read more »information should be included and cited in the body of the article, per MOS:LEDECITE "Presidential elections were held in Taiwan on 18 March 2000 to elect the...
Click to read more »a WP:GAR than an FAC. Here's a small list of things I saw quickly: WP:LEDECITE MOS:LEDE says the lede section should be no more than four paragraphs Article...
Click to read more »23 October 2024 (UTC) Solid prose throughout the lede, and following WP:LEDECITE Table is well-formatted. It has properly scoped rows and columns, centered...
Click to read more »(UTC) Comments after a quick skim: I suggest expanding the lede. Per WP:LEDECITE typically the lede doesn't have citations because this information is cited...
Click to read more »compared to a standard article. A couple of tiny things: According to WP:LEDECITE, inline citation is neither required nor prohibited. The general rule however...
Click to read more »compared to a standard article. A couple of tiny things: According to WP:LEDECITE, inline citation is neither required nor prohibited. The general rule however...
Click to read more »drive-by first: Do you need citations in the lede? cf. WP:LEDECITE My interpretation of WP:LEDECITE tells me that I should retain citations only for "material...
Click to read more »alleged crimes. TFD (talk) 00:50, 1 August 2016 (UTC) None, in theory per WP:LEDECITE, as this is a statement in the lede and ledes may summarize the text of...
Click to read more »since there's nothing seemingly contentious here I'd say that hits WP:LEDECITE well. Well, besides the infobox. That introductory price ($1,299) is neither...
Click to read more »what so ever.--BruceGrubb (talk) 14:04, 5 September 2011 (UTC) Per WP:LEDECITE, if the information of the definition is described and cited lower in the...
Click to read more »(UTC) Okay, I'm so sorry I wasn't able to get around to this until now. WP:LEDECITE is properly followed; the one cite in the lede seems to support the Mongolian...
Click to read more »citation to a reliable source that directly supports the material." MOS:LEDECITE, a guideline, says "The verifiability policy advises that material that...
Click to read more »etc) to support that specific statement (in the lede or in the body if LEDECITE is being followed), then that's completely reasonable as a summary statement...
Click to read more »a WP:GAR than an FAC. Here's a small list of things I saw quickly: WP:LEDECITE MOS:LEDE says the lede section should be no more than four paragraphs Article...
Click to read more »footnote, and I don't see any claims here that need citations. Good for LEDECITE. Everything in all body sections is cited, as are both footnotes. I don't...
Click to read more »the blurb as it isn’t that great. NoahTalk 21:12, 4 May 2019 (UTC) WP:LEDECITE Ledes do not need citations as long as the info is supported by citations...
Click to read more »drive-by first: Do you need citations in the lede? cf. WP:LEDECITE My interpretation of WP:LEDECITE tells me that I should retain citations only for "material...
Click to read more »there's no prose in the body, that's a problem. I mean, this is why we want LEDECITE for, for the body to be where references are located and keeping the lede...
Click to read more »normally practice. The lede was a generalized version of the article, per WP:LEDECITE. It didn't say anything that wasn't already stated in the body of the article...
Click to read more »XOR'easter (talk) 20:26, 14 November 2022 (UTC) The guideline for that is WP:LEDECITE. --Hob Gadling (talk) 21:14, 14 November 2022 (UTC) Actually, counterintuitively...
Click to read more »May 2020 (UTC) No alt-text 14 citations in lede - please remove per WP:LEDECITE. Where is the IPA cited? The stadium couldn't have been that size since...
Click to read more »calls him "polarizing". ~ HAL333 05:33, 17 December 2022 (UTC) Per WP:LEDECITE, it appears some sourcing (though more could be included) is present for...
Click to read more »caption should not include information not included in the body, however (eg LEDECITE should apply) Masem (t) 13:08, 17 April 2025 (UTC) I don't think you can...
Click to read more »23 October 2024 (UTC) Solid prose throughout the lede, and following WP:LEDECITE Table is well-formatted. It has properly scoped rows and columns, centered...
Click to read more »points: The lead of an article does not even need any sources - see WP:LEDECITE. The same things are sourced further down in the body of the article. It...
Click to read more »respectable level of quality. Andrew🐉(talk) 11:08, 2 December 2025 (UTC) WP:LEDECITE - we do not require citations in the lede unless we are directly quoting...
Click to read more »citation to a reliable source that directly supports the material." MOS:LEDECITE, a guideline, says "The verifiability policy advises that material that...
Click to read more »footnote, and I don't see any claims here that need citations. Good for LEDECITE. Everything in all body sections is cited, as are both footnotes. I don't...
Click to read more »since there's nothing seemingly contentious here I'd say that hits WP:LEDECITE well. Well, besides the infobox. That introductory price ($1,299) is neither...
Click to read more »(UTC) Okay, I'm so sorry I wasn't able to get around to this until now. WP:LEDECITE is properly followed; the one cite in the lede seems to support the Mongolian...
Click to read more »