Redirect to:
This page is a redirect. The following categories are used to track and monitor this redirect:
|
Wikipedia is a free online encyclopedia. The amount of information on Wikipedia is practically unlimited, but Wikipedia does not aim to contain all knowledge...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable school. Abce2|This isnot a test 03:21, 20 October 2009 (UTC) Keep - consensus is that high schools...
Click to read more »Evidence submitted by Abce2|This isnot a test This socking user has been showing up alot. Time for an IP block? Abce2|This isnot a test 02:32, 19 October 2009...
Click to read more »investigate · cuwiki · SI) Evidence submitted by Abce2|This isnot a test Kinda obvious Abce2|This isnot a test 15:20, 26 September 2009 (UTC) Comments by accused...
Click to read more »Evidence submitted by Abce2|This isnot a test One, names. Two vandalising same articles. May I go on? Abce2|This isnot a test 00:33, 13 September 2009...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Dictionary definition. Specifically from WP:ISNOT "Wikipedia is not a dictionary, usage, or jargon guide." This very clearly...
Click to read more »CheckUser (log)) Evidence submitted by Abce2|This isnot a test Okay, I got it backwards. [[1]]. Abce2|This isnot a test 19:14, 3 October 2009 (UTC) Comments...
Click to read more »WP:ISNOT a personal webhost. --Ryan Delaney talk 19:36, 19 August 2005 (UTC) Delete Agree per Ryan Delaney. I presume that the user is allowed to re-create...
Click to read more »WP:ISNOT a genealogy. -Splash 00:34, 9 September 2005 (UTC) Delete. – AxSkov (☏) 10:29, 9 September 2005 (UTC) Delete Splash is right. WP:ISNOT a genealogy...
Click to read more »in the article. Ashibaka (tock) 23:35, 9 October 2005 (UTC) Delete. WP:ISNOT a crystal ball. Tonywalton | Talk 23:37, 9 October 2005 (UTC) Delete. I...
Click to read more »November 2005 (UTC) Article about an album to be released next year. WP:ISNOT a crystal ball. howcheng [ t • c • w • e ] 00:55, 17 November...
Click to read more »history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) WP:ISNOT a genealogical directory. There is nothing notable about this name, and...
Click to read more »of the debate was Delete --Allen3 talk 12:48, August 12, 2005 (UTC) WP:ISNOT a PHP manual. DS 19:59, 5 August 2005 (UTC) Delete or merge with another...
Click to read more »WP:NOT here, like WP:ISNOT a yellow pages directory or something. RasputinAXP talk contribs 19:39, 30 November 2005 (UTC) WP:ISNOT#Wikipedia_is_not_a_propaganda_machine...
Click to read more »laudable goal, but barely an advertisement for a non-notable website. WP:ISNOT a web directory. Al 21:07, August 23, 2005 (UTC) Merge to Abandonware#External...
Click to read more »not a drink recipe book · rodii · 23:10, 6 March 2006 (UTC) Delete per WP:ISNOT (a recipe book) and List of cocktails: "As a normal matter of course, only...
Click to read more »WP is not an exercise book. Nabla 23:15, 2 August 2005 (UTC) Delete WP:ISNOT a how-to. --malathion talk 23:16, 2 August 2005 (UTC) I wrote this, and...
Click to read more »(talk) 10:37, 11 February 2014 (UTC) Comment This article isnot nominated because the person isnot notable but because the article is a mess. Another solution...
Click to read more »Delete - not notable enough. Latinus 19:34, 28 January 2006 (UTC) Delete WP:ISNOT a crystal ball. Just zis Guy, you know? [T]/[C] AfD? 19:36, 28 January...
Click to read more »by Abce2|This isnot a test Besides the similarity in names, all of the users have only intent/edit. Harrassng PMDrive. Abce2|This isnot a test 23:51,...
Click to read more »referenced, so what? It's an ISNOT. A well referenced ISNOT is still not keepable. I don't like things that violate ISNOT, but according to you, every...
Click to read more »- dicdef --JiFish(Talk/Contrib) 15:00, 28 November 2005 (UTC) Delete WP:ISNOT#Wikipedia_is_not_a_dictionary. Demiurge 15:54, 28 November 2005 (UTC) Delete...
Click to read more »(talk) 00:29, 8 September 2017 (UTC) Delete -- Reads like a genealogy. WP:ISNOT etc. -- no need for a list of people. Keira1996 01:22, 8 September 2017...
Click to read more »Delete. Probably also CSD A3. Enochlau 03:00, 8 December 2005 (UTC) WP:ISNOT a collection of links. howcheng [ t • c • w • e ] 19:49,...
Click to read more »not; France is unaccountably missing from Official text copyright. But WP:ISNOT seems to apply, so I believe the removal should stand. Comment? Justlettersandnumbers...
Click to read more »debate was Delete. --Doc (?) 08:59, 12 October 2005 (UTC) Neologism, WP:ISNOT UrbanDictionary. Delete — Lomn | Talk / RfC 21:49, 3 October 2005 (UTC)...
Click to read more »detail. Fails WP:N. Wikipedia is not a manual and is not a directory WP:ISNOT. Steve Quinn (talk) 07:24, 28 December 2017 (UTC) Note: This debate has...
Click to read more »relevant Google hits. Fang Aili 19:14, 24 August 2005 (UTC) Speedy, really. WP:ISNOT the White Pages. Flowerparty talk 19:35, 24 August 2005 (UTC) Speedy. I...
Click to read more »Model Cycle 2 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Wikipedia isnot a web host for fantasy Next Top Model shows. Not U5 eligible as editor has...
Click to read more »Abce2|This isnot a test 21:12, 14 September 2009 (UTC) Here;s a quote from one of the founders of Wikipedia about guest books. Abce2|This isnot a test 05:38...
Click to read more »2005 (UTC) Delete, websites in themselves don't really need articles. WP:ISNOT a webdirectory.-Splash 21:11, 10 September 2005 (UTC) The above discussion...
Click to read more »-Splashtalk 22:29, 15 September 2005 (UTC) "Status:Work in progress". WP:ISNOT a crystal ball. DS 21:16, 6 September 2005 (UTC) Delete. Vanity page for...
Click to read more »Your supposed to review the editor, in this case Spongefrog.Abce2|This isnot a test 23:13, 9 October 2009 (UTC) Hehe, yeah, I sort of have to semi-agree...
Click to read more »result of the debate was delete. FCYTravis 00:23, 8 August 2005 (UTC) WP:ISNOT a slang and idiom guide. --malathion talk 09:57, 2 August 2005 (UTC) Yet...
Click to read more »friction? Not encyclopedic. Delete. Ken 03:38, July 30, 2005 (UTC) Delete WP:ISNOT an instruction manual. --malathion talk 03:41, 30 July 2005 (UTC) Summarize...
Click to read more »--Phroziac . o º O (♥♥♥♥ chocolate!) 15:03, 31 December 2005 (UTC) WP:ISNOT GameFAQs. A Non-Returning character in Beyblade. feydey 15:10, 25 December...
Click to read more »result of the debate was DELETE. -Doc (?) 10:48, 15 October 2005 (UTC) WP:ISNOT the Wutzke family bible. DS 21:18, 7 October 2005 (UTC) Delete. WP is not...
Click to read more »about a number of real individuals, I suppose, but still. Delete since WP:ISNOT a genealogy. -Splashtalk 03:30, 25 October 2005 (UTC) Delete per nom Peyna...
Click to read more »December 2005 (UTC) if this is a neologism it is a very minor one, and WP:ISNOT a slang dictionary either. I don't suppose Wiktionary want it, and I don't...
Click to read more »page. The result of the debate was delete. — FireFox 11:19, 28 May '06 WP:ISNOT a directory or list of external links. -SCEhardT 16:10, 23 May 2006 (UTC)...
Click to read more »only external links. --GraemeL (talk) 22:40, 25 November 2005 (UTC) WP:ISNOT a link farm. Just zis Guy, you know? [T]/[C] (W) AfD? 15:33, 25 November...
Click to read more »delete. -- ( drini's vandalproof page ☎ ) 05:59, 23 November 2005 (UTC) WP:ISNOT a crystal ball. We'll need an article on the game eventually, but this ain't...
Click to read more »not have any content of its own and is merely a catalogue. Violates WP:ISNOT. Instead of an article, a category may be considered. Cheers AKS 08:51,...
Click to read more »result of the debate was delete. – Robert 20:17, 21 December 2005 (UTC) WP:ISNOT a FAQ (explicitly). Just zis Guy, you know? [T]/[C] AfD? 17:44, 15 December...
Click to read more »preceding. Chick Bowen 17:43, 14 January 2006 (UTC) Delete the lot, WP:ISNOT a crystal ball. Or a fansite. Or the Online Reposiitory of Gamecruft, for...
Click to read more »of notability, and an internet search comes up with nothing Abce2|This isnot a test 03:12, 13 September 2009 (UTC) Comment I came up with the following...
Click to read more »per nom. PJM 15:20, 4 January 2006 (UTC) Delete vanispamcruftisement. WP:ISNOT a crystal ball. Or a promotional mechanism. Or, indeed, interested in this...
Click to read more »the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 04:21, 21 November 2005 (UTC) WP:ISNOT the Yellow Pages. howcheng [ t • c • w • e ] 18:02, 15 November...
Click to read more »are fully applicable to this one: Official policy: WP:ISNOT a...slang and idiom guide, WP:ISNOT#Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information...
Click to read more »the debate was delete. – Robert 01:01, 8 December 2005 (UTC) NN bio. WP:ISNOT a memorial service. howcheng [ t • c • w • e ] 20:25, 2 December...
Click to read more »September 2005 (UTC) Delete nn DV8 2XL 20:20, 1 September 2005 (UTC) Delete WP:ISNOT a crystal ball. The first and only complete-sounding version "has no real...
Click to read more »delete, as per nominator. «LordViD» 14:03, 13 December 2005 (UTC) Delete WP:ISNOT a howto. Just zis Guy, you know? [T]/[C] AfD? 15:08, 13 December 2005 (UTC)...
Click to read more »religious propaganda. -- Kjkolb 21:50, 27 October 2005 (UTC) Delete per nom. WP:ISNOT a soapbox and the Morning Star lot don't lok to be particularly notable...
Click to read more »6 October 2005 (UTC) I think the term starcruft is in order here... WP:ISNOT a game guide. Delete Usrnme h8er 08:12, 30 September 2005 (UTC) Delete....
Click to read more »Delete per nom. —HorsePunchKid→龜 06:02, 12 November 2005 (UTC) Delete. WP:ISNOT a dictionary—even of established words. encephalon 08:33, 12 November 2005...
Click to read more »(UTC) Young comedian who performs around Pittsburgh. Not yet notable. WP:ISNOT a web host. Delete. --howcheng [ t • c • w • e ] 00:50, 3...
Click to read more »debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 05:44, 27 January 2006 (UTC) Delete - WP:ISNOT a collection of Punjabi slang. the iBook of the Revolution 22:39, 21 January...
Click to read more »06:19, 15 December 2005 (UTC) delete - non notable and advertisement, WP:ISNOT a link repository. -Drdisque 06:27, 15 December 2005 (UTC) This afd nomination...
Click to read more »on copyright problems - Akamad 09:47, 15 November 2005 (UTC) Delete. WP:ISNOT a forum for reviews. As the page is ill-suited for WP anyway, irrespective...
Click to read more »October 2005 (UTC) Strong Delete Official policy: WP:ISNOT a...slang and idiom guide, WP:ISNOT#Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information...
Click to read more »(UTC) Delete per nom, copyvio. Will 00:41, 16 January 2006 (UTC) Delete WP:ISNOT a howto. And this is original "research". Just zis Guy, you know? [T]/[C]...
Click to read more »These appear to be related to someone with that surname, however. Since WP:ISNOT a genealogy any more than it is a dictionary, it can be deleted on either...
Click to read more »wiki on the Internet. Joel7687 12:38, 19 October 2005 (UTC) Delete, WP:ISNOT a web directory. 179 unique Google hits after you remove the home domain...
Click to read more »strongly of copyvio, though I can't track it down. Whether or not it is, WP:ISNOT a how-to guide. Delete Tonywalton | Talk 23:39, 7 February 2006 (UTC) Delete...
Click to read more »2006 (UTC) 32 Google results, looks like the origional author is Eddie. WP:ISNOT a resume host Mysekurity(have you seen this?) 18:02, 27 December 2005 (UTC)...
Click to read more »encyclopedic, POV, OR etc. TheMadBaron 02:19, 15 September 2005 (UTC) Delete....WP:ISNOT a how-to. -Splashtalk 02:19, 15 September 2005 (UTC) Delete per above. -GregAsche...
Click to read more »(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:ISNOT applies. As useful or encyclopedic as a list of actors named Robert or films...
Click to read more »the debate was Delete. Rx StrangeLove 19:09, 23 September 2005 (UTC) WP:ISNOT an indiscriminate collection of raw information. I'm not quite sure what...
Click to read more »debate was Delete --Allen3 talk 14:43, August 17, 2005 (UTC) Delete, WP:ISNOT a how-to or FAQ. -Splash 01:12, 6 August 2005 (UTC) Delete, per above. --RoySmith...
Click to read more »not have any content of its own and is merely a catalogue. Violates WP:ISNOT. Instead of an article, a category may be considered. Cheers AKS 08:51,...
Click to read more »the debate was Delete. Redwolf24 (talk) 01:21, 30 August 2005 (UTC) WP:ISNOT a how-to, especially for stuff like this. --Ryan Delaney talk 12:36, 23...
Click to read more »This is just a gallery - delete CLW 11:30, 9 January 2006 (UTC) Delete: WP:ISNOT "Collections of photographs or media files"... Thanks/wangi 11:56, 9 January...
Click to read more »User:Michaeldsherman. — TheKMantalk 05:37, 24 January 2006 (UTC) Delete. WP:ISNOT a resume posting site. Carlossuarez46 22:08, 24 January 2006 (UTC) Userfy...
Click to read more »reveals many more, so WP:GNG is met and the article does not violate WP:ISNOT. The number of roles is not a requirement to meet WP:GNG. --Crystallizedcarbon...
Click to read more »Model Cycle 1 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Wikipedia isnot a web host for fantasy Next Top Model shows. Not U5 eligible as editor has...
Click to read more »debate was delete. – Robert 00:56, 14 December 2005 (UTC) Sad story, but WP:ISNOT a memorial. howcheng [ t • c • w • e ] 19:35, 2 December...
Click to read more »2005 (UTC) Delete per nom Zzzzz 22:52, 20 December 2005 (UTC) Delete WP:ISNOT a personal webhost. --Ryan Delaney talk 15:52, 21 December 2005 (UTC) Delete...
Click to read more »Texture's shoes - Tεxτurε 19:33, 20 September 2005 (UTC) Strong delete; WP:ISNOT WP:FARC WP:UP. Extreme inclusionists voting to keep this article puzzle...
Click to read more »notability. Walton monarchist89 16:49, 29 January 2007 (UTC) Delete. WP:ISNOT a soapbox. NN, young firm with as of yet no biz in an encyclopedia and should...
Click to read more »(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:ISNOT applies here; a PROD is probably a bit too indecisive for this case. smileguy91talk...
Click to read more »13:40, 9 November 2005 (UTC) Article for a 2007 (tentative) convention. WP:ISNOT a crystal ball. --howcheng [ t • c • w • e ] 17:50, 3 November...
Click to read more »been transwikied. Kappa 22:51, 14 September 2005 (UTC) Delete per Kappa WP:ISNOT a foreign language dictionary. Since this has previsouly been AfD'd, isn't...
Click to read more »debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 10:48, 18 November 2005 (UTC) NN-bio. WP:ISNOT a memorial service. Mentor of Daniel Thomas Pryor, also up for deletion...
Click to read more »contrary I'll take it back. Deco 07:05, 15 November 2005 (UTC) Delete. WP:ISNOT a dictionary, even of established words. encephalon 09:47, 15 November 2005...
Click to read more »-FrankTobia (talk) 05:28, 22 July 2008 (UTC) Withdrawn - although I think WP:ISNOT clearly frowns upon WP:OR (which most of these things can be argued to be)...
Click to read more »-- Rune Welsh | ταλκ | Esperanza 16:05, 10 October 2005 (UTC) Delete WP:ISNOT a propaganda machine, free host, and/or an indiscriminate collection of...
Click to read more »of the debate was Delete. Essjay · Talk 12:20, August 6, 2005 (UTC) WP:ISNOT a crystal ball. --malathion talk 03:05, 30 July 2005 (UTC) Speedy delete...
Click to read more »random factoids. --Lee Hunter 15:53, 4 September 2005 (UTC) Delete since WP:ISNOT a random collection of information. -Splash 23:16, 4 September 2005 (UTC)...
Click to read more »WP:WEB to see when website and other articles belong on Wikipedia, and to WP:ISNOT to see what does not. Stifle 16:24, 31 January 2006 (UTC) Delete, as per...
Click to read more »tags is testament to just how much this article presses the various WP:ISNOT buttons. Just zis Guy, you know? [T]/[C] AfD? 23:18, 28 December 2005 (UTC)...
Click to read more »time, but the neologism is a dickdef which is already in Wiktionary. WP:ISNOT Wiktionary. Tonywalton | Talk 00:42, 19 August 2005 (UTC) The above discussion...
Click to read more »--King of All the Franks 13:38, 28 December 2005 (UTC) Delete since WP:ISNOT a howto (explicitly). Just zis Guy, you know? [T]/[C] AfD? 13:43, 28 December...
Click to read more »December 2005 (UTC) Delete, doesn't say anything a map can't show and WP ISNOT an atlas or roadmap. - Mgm|(talk) 10:43, 7 December 2005 (UTC) Delete: In...
Click to read more »tidal) either makes it NPOV (surely not everyone agrees that hydro-power isnot part of this topic), and/or failing broadness criteria.YobMod 13:38, 6 July...
Click to read more »Sorry to say, the last part of your statement is incorrect. Any of the WP:ISNOT criteria are valid grounds to argue for deletion. In this case, the relevant...
Click to read more »SwisterTwister talk 07:29, 6 October 2015 (UTC) Delete - a clear example of WP:ISNOT. Onel5969 TT me 13:20, 9 October 2015 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »meeting an arbitrary criterion made after an arbitrary date. What part of "WP:ISNOT an indiscriminate collection of information" do these folks not understand...
Click to read more »FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Promotional article, probably by subject. Member RSA isnot notable--its a quite general society. DGG ( talk ) 18:25, 27 March 2019...
Click to read more »Michael Jordan's 1997 title shot, and those don't rate their own articles. WP:ISNOT SportsCenter. — Lomn | Talk / RfC 17:35, 11 October 2005 (UTC) Delete as...
Click to read more »encyclopaedic either) 212.101.64.4 07:43, 1 September 2005 (UTC) Delete. WP:ISNOT a dictionary, slang or otherwise.—Encephalon | ζ 09:40:53, 2005-09-01 (UTC)...
Click to read more »actually used. --Optichan 17:19, 25 October 2005 (UTC) Delete nn slang; WP:ISNOT Urban Dictionary — Lomn | Talk / RfC 18:16, 25 October 2005 (UTC) Delete...
Click to read more »(UTC) Transwiki to Wiktionary DV8 2XL 23:00, 1 September 2005 (UTC) WP:ISNOT a dictionary, but Wiktionary is. Transwiki. Tonywalton | Talk 23:13, 1...
Click to read more »Next Top Model (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Wikipedia isnot a web host for fantasy Next Top Model shows. Not U5 eligible as editor has...
Click to read more »FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Indiscriminate collection of external links violating WP:ISNOT (especially WP:LINKFARM). Randykitty (talk) 13:51, 21 January 2017 (UTC)...
Click to read more »was Delete. Redwolf24 (talk) 03:14, 27 August 2005 (UTC) Delete since WP:ISNOT a genealogy, nor should it be a list of names. -Splash 01:27, 20 August...
Click to read more »neither could the tagger. Is just one big horrific ad, however, which WP:ISNOT. -Splashtalk 00:10, 27 October 2005 (UTC) Delete. Ad. utcursch | talk 04:24...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Advertisement. Advertising is something WP:ISNOT for. Mr. Guye (talk) 19:05, 12 June 2014 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...
Click to read more »List of Yoshi series enemies as it is truly awful and seems to violate WP:ISNOT an indiscriminate collection of info and would be the same as having List...
Click to read more »only currently has a single Flash animation. (Crystal ball anyone?) WP:ISNOT a web directory. Doesn't look notable to me. Al 12:34, 18 August 2005 (UTC)...
Click to read more »on the two sources listed and other anime-based chats. --Zyber Delete WP:ISNOT a dictionary, and this is a neologism specific to one forum. Not encyclopedic...
Click to read more »Delete as per above. Roodog2k (talk) 23:20, 1 September 2005 (UTC) Delete WP:ISNOT a memorial as above. Borderline A7 speedy, but possibly not. -Splash 00:58...
Click to read more »August 2013 (UTC) @ User:Drmies: Iranian Azerbaijanis and Azeris in Iran isnot Iranians in Republic of Azerbaijan. i say in this talk page. Iranians in...
Click to read more »sock puppets. — JIP | Talk 10:38, 25 October 2005 (UTC) Protologism. WP:ISNOT a dictionary—even of established words. encephalon 09:15, 18 October 2005...
Click to read more »has been tagged as unreferenced and WP:OR for some time. Also violates WP:ISNOT. Eliz81 19:25, 19 July 2007 (UTC) Comment. Which part of WP:NOT does it...
Click to read more »Talk 08:11, 14 January 2006 (UTC) A list of commercial products (which WP:ISNOT); invites one to see the main MiniMates article which is where these also...
Click to read more »to the world, somehow. Paul Klenk 21:25, 28 August 2005 (UTC) Delete WP:ISNOT a crystal ball and this needs lots of crystal. -Splash 21:46, 28 August...
Click to read more »Dec. 15, 2005 Delete as original research and several other things WP:ISNOT. Has anyone left a nice note for the editor? It's not malicious nonsense...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This is a fascinating essay, but it WP:ISNOT an encyclopedia article. Seems a bit WP:SYNTHy as well. Ahecht (TALK PAGE)...
Click to read more »result was no consensus. -- Vary | Talk 18:16, 22 August 2006 (UTC) WP:ISNOT, a dictionary, publisher of original thought, or a directory. This is a...
Click to read more »log) Not sure what this is. Looks like an indiscrimate list so violates WP:ISNOT. It is also not in English. Nv8200p talk 01:53, 28 June 2007 (UTC) Speedy...
Click to read more »Beto goes to great lengths to promote his project . Good for him, but WP:ISNOT a propaganda machine. Tonywalton | Talk 22:50, 20 October 2005 (UTC) Note...
Click to read more »include here. / Peter Isotalo 22:31, 4 September 2005 (UTC) Delete. WP:ISNOT a FAQ or a how-to. (And, as ever, per Uncle G.) -Splash 22:37, 4 September...
Click to read more »the debate was delete. Robert T | @ | C 01:49, 16 November 2005 (UTC) WP:ISNOT an instruction manual, especially a POV one. --howcheng [ t • c •...
Click to read more »reliable source and even if it was this would be a slang dictdef (and WP:ISNOT a slang dictionary). - Just zis Guy, you know? [T]/[C] AfD? 17:05, 7 January...
Click to read more »on this TV channel (which is the topic). Wikipedia is not a TV Guide WP:ISNOT ---Steve Quinn (talk) 06:28, 3 January 2018 (UTC) Hi Steve, per WP:Notability...
Click to read more »verifiability problem. Or maybe a neologism. Or a hoax. Or something else that WP:ISNOT. Just zis Guy, you know? [T]/[C] (W) AfD? 16:54, 1 December 2005 (UTC)...
Click to read more »December 2005 (UTC) Delete present-tense article about future-tense film. WP:ISNOT a crystal ball. Just zis Guy, you know? [T]/[C] (W) AfD? 21:38, 6 December...
Click to read more »suffice, this is completely WP:OR and should be deleted as per WP:GNG, WP:ISNOT and WP:NEO. Onel5969 TT me 12:23, 19 March 2018 (UTC) Delete- per nom and...
Click to read more »Delete as per nom. - Rudykog 09:15, 4 January 2006 (UTC) Delete per WP:ISNOT Just zis Guy, you know? [T]/[C] AfD? 12:06, 4 January 2006 (UTC) Delete...
Click to read more »(UTC) Delete per Trnj2000. Deli nk 18:50, 13 September 2006 (UTC) Delete WP:ISNOT a collection of links. Arbusto 22:35, 13 September 2006 (UTC) Delete per...
Click to read more »Mulder has to be suspect. I'd say this unsourced list runs afoul of WP:ISNOT, it isn't doing much to contribute to the state of human knowledge. Vrac...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable drink. WP:ISNOT applies. reddogsix (talk) 17:41, 8 October 2013 (UTC) Delete: non-notable...
Click to read more »(UTC) Delete per nom. --TM (talk) 18:25, 26 September 2005 (UTC) Delete, WP:ISNOT a chat log Still an unsupported neologism. — Lomn | Talk / RfC 19:02, 26...
Click to read more »speediable, regrettably. -Splashtalk 01:22, 25 September 2005 (UTC) Delete, WP:ISNOT a crytal ball which almost every word of this article is. It can be remade...
Click to read more »brand of cigarettes.--Nicodemus75 07:02, 8 November 2005 (UTC) Delete as WP:ISNOT a directory, and this article offers little else. Is this fagcruft, by the...
Click to read more »result was delete. The consensus after 2 relistings appears to be that he isnot yet notable. DGG ( talk ) 21:09, 27 August 2016 (UTC) Frank Dixon (musician)...
Click to read more »badly named recipes. --Miborovsky 00:32, 16 September 2005 (UTC) Delete WP:ISNOT a recipe book indeed. And we don't need to unload incorrect recipes onto...
Click to read more »StopForumSpam) 2014-04-19 21:29:13 (UTC): q:ku:User:Krezyeanza (t - c; 3) to q:ku:Isnot w taki sposób efektowne tak jak brzmi zaÅ potem (diff - DELETED) - Link:...
Click to read more »screw up the tags at the article's beginning. Clearly an example of WP:ISNOT. Onel5969 TT me 13:33, 19 December 2015 (UTC) Delete - if this can't be...
Click to read more »fits any CSD criterion. It is, however, a dicdef, which wiki is not WP:ISNOT --CastAStone 20:01, 4 October 2005 (UTC) It is referred to in the mohawk...
Click to read more »even to the country or state (or even city) in which it once existed? WP:ISNOT a random collection of trivia or a database of news cuttings. It is (or...
Click to read more »person contributing any content is connected to the site) and Wikipedia WP:ISNOT self promotion. --W.marsh 15:28, 27 November 2005 (UTC) Delete Izehar 21:04...
Click to read more »original research, POV, unencyclopaedic - a reasonable example of what WP:ISNOT, I'd say. Just zis Guy, you know? [T]/[C] (W) AfD? 12:19, 28 November 2005...
Click to read more »Counter-Strike). -- Saikiri~ 21:04, 2 December 2005 (UTC) Delete because WP:ISNOT a howto (explicitly stated). Just zis Guy, you know? [T]/[C] (W) AfD? 21:22...
Click to read more »yet (WP:TOOSOON). Amccann421 (talk) 17:06, 29 March 2016 (UTC) Delete WP:ISNOT a book reviewer. Particularly when no-one else appears to have reviewed...
Click to read more »Trek.--AlainV (talk) 03:43, 7 December 2007 (UTC) Delete- WP:OTHERSTUFF isnot a valid argument. This article does not attempt to establish notability...
Click to read more »it still includes over 3,000 entries and is 152,155 bytes long. Per WP:ISNOT this seems to me to be a directory. It also appears to be little more than...
Click to read more »(UTC) Delete per nom.--Alhutch 02:17, 4 December 2005 (UTC) Delete since WP:ISNOT a crystal ball. "Right now in its third week of production" seals it, since...
Click to read more »13:44, 31 August 2007 (UTC) Delete Does seem to violate WP:OR, WP:NEO, WP:ISNOT, and WP:N. Best case scenario would be to condense and transwiki to Wiktionary...
Click to read more »(UTC) Delete. Lots of unsourced research as stated above. Delete as per WP:ISNOT, since this appears to be a personal essay. Onel5969 TT me 23:27, 10 March...
Click to read more »some such nonsense and get the article up before the term is popular. WP:ISNOT a derogatory-slang crystal ball. JDoorjam Talk 21:36, 13 March 2006 (UTC)...
Click to read more »the debate was NO CONSENSUS. -Splashtalk 01:33, 23 November 2005 (UTC) WP:ISNOT a crystal ball. "Not much information is known at the moment." Then write...
Click to read more »|-| r 3 $ |-| t |-|) 06:49, 26 November 2005 (UTC) Common slang but WP:ISNOT a dictionary and as this is a dicdef it should be deleted, unless some user...
Click to read more »encyclopaedic topic. --Mais oui! 19:00, 4 April 2006 (UTC) Comment - WP:ISNOT a dictionary. Stringops 15:06, 5 April 2006 (UTC) The above discussion is...
Click to read more »In Bl♟ck (conspire | past ops) 23:18, 25 November 2005 (UTC) Delete WP:ISNOT a crystal ball, and this is gamecruft anyway. Just zis Guy, you know? [T]/[C]...
Click to read more »the gentleman is again a candidate. I'm sure WP wishes him well, but WP:ISNOT a soapbox. Tonywalton | Talk 22:39, 6 December 2005 (UTC) Oh, by the way...
Click to read more »per fvw. Demogorgon's Soup-taster 13:25, 30 August 2005 (UTC) Delete, WP:ISNOT a genealogy database. Zoe 21:46, August 30, 2005 (UTC) Keep. Nothing wrong...
Click to read more »delete. Sjakkalle (Check!) 08:20, 23 August 2005 (UTC) Delete since WP:ISNOT a web-directory which this article confesses to being in its title. I thought...
Click to read more »there are no reliable sources. The main author has vanished, and there isnot much sense to userfy, though if someone wants to work on the article, any...
Click to read more »That blatantly isn't the case here. Please read WP:GNG, WP:RS, and WP:ISNOT. Finally, you can write anything promotionally without being directly connected...
Click to read more »enough discussion. Titoxd(?!?) 05:31, 29 November 2005 (UTC) Delete. As WP:ISNOT a crystal ball says: Articles that present extrapolation, speculation, and...
Click to read more »terribly bad form and a violation of the AfD process. Aside from which, WP:ISNOT a dictionary either, so add dictdef to my reasons for deletion. --Kgf0 16:49...
Click to read more »ad, nor spam nor vanity nor bizzarity. I see a how-to, or a FAQ which WP:ISNOT. With that removed, the remaining content could possibly be mentioned in...
Click to read more »you trying to attack me? Kaldari 02:53, 26 January 2006 (UTC) Delete WP:ISNOT a memorial (explicitly). Notable poeple, yes, but none of this lot are independently...
Click to read more »others). The market capitalization corporations had on March 30th 2007 isnot a specific subject of study, so this list fails WP:NOTE. Fram (talk) 09:19...
Click to read more »general notability guidelines. JbhTalk 19:09, 10 July 2015 (UTC) Delete By WP:ISNOT on various counts. Cheers, The Jolly Bard (talk) 20:47, 10 July 2015 (UTC)...
Click to read more »know that her family and friends must be very deeply grieving. However, WP:ISNOT a memorial, unless it can be established that she did something notable...
Click to read more »history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) C'mon people WP:ISNOT an indecrimate colection of information, the previous nom was a farce, I've...
Click to read more »clearly, as the article fails to specify the interior decor. (As well as WP:ISNOT a crystal ball.) Sliggy 22:06, 24 March 2006 (UTC) Delete, Whoo, I need...
Click to read more »02:11, 25 December 2005 (UTC) Delete per Brianzerox's admission and per WP:ISNOT. Just zis Guy, you know? [T]/[C] AfD? 17:27, 26 December 2005 (UTC) The...
Click to read more »WP:MUSIC, appear to have no website, have no presence on allmusic.com, and WP:ISNOT a crystal ball or an advertising medium. -Splashtalk 04:12, 4 December 2005...
Click to read more »however. Jclemens (talk) 04:24, 7 October 2017 (UTC) Comment as per WP:ISNOT: "Articles on fiction elements are expected to cover more about "real-world"...
Click to read more »was Redirected by someone else. Redwolf24 01:47, 24 August 2005 (UTC) WP:ISNOT a webhost. --Ryan Delaney talk 06:47, 18 August 2005 (UTC) Delete, blatant...
Click to read more »which are deliberate, while others just happen to be to that body part. WP:ISNOT an indiscriminate collection of information. Just zis Guy, you know? [T]/[C]...
Click to read more »summary may be appropriate as an aspect of a larger article." from the WP:ISNOT policy. Warriors (book series) herbs really is just fancruft and an indiscriminate...
Click to read more »school in the US. It doesn't deserve an entire page all for itself as per WP:ISNOT. I DO think you should merge the information into the Hialeah High article...
Click to read more »20:30, 28 May 2010 (UTC) Comment Notability doesn't count if it violates an ISNOT. The notability policy says: "A topic is presumed to merit an article if...
Click to read more »joke. It's not causing harm. Aren't people allowed to laugh? Abce2|This isnot a test 20:20, 27 September 2009 (UTC) Delete - per Talkingbirds' excellent...
Click to read more »long enough. --Pagrashtak 20:54, 8 January 2006 (UTC) Delete not merge. WP:ISNOT a howto or manual. Just zis Guy, you know? [T]/[C] AfD? 22:08, 8 January...
Click to read more »exist at least me and my friends still use it. I dont mind if that section isnot deemed encyclopedia worthy, but the histroy is definatly worthy Koikaze...
Click to read more »the speculation and all you have is a list of bus routes, which is a WP:ISNOT (a directory). Merge SPUI's rewrite to Fayetteville, North Carolina, with...
Click to read more »should be available from major retailers (etc.) "sometime in Q2 2006". WP:ISNOT a crystal ball; there is no evidence that this book will have any impact...
Click to read more »and shouldn't be. -- Dpark 21:22, 12 December 2005 (UTC) Good point. WP:ISNOT the Yellow Pages, I seem to recall... - Just zis Guy, you know? [T]/[C]...
Click to read more »G 15:18:54, 2005-07-30 (UTC) Then delete. It's been transwikied, and WP:ISNOT a how-to guide. - A Man In Black (Talk | Contribs) 02:55, 31 July 2005 (UTC)...
Click to read more »the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 04:42, 30 January 2006 (UTC) WP:ISNOT for things made up in school one day, as it sounds that htis game was Drdisque...
Click to read more »Uncle G 22:26, 2 December 2005 (UTC) Delete per above. I don't know if WP:ISNOT applies, but I just couldn't resist. 23skidoo 00:18, 3 December 2005 (UTC)...
Click to read more »August 2018 (UTC) Keep: The article does meet WP:GNG and does not violate WP:ISNOT. There is significant coverage (more than trivial mentions) from multiple...
Click to read more »sufficiently important tro qualify for an article of its own, given that WP:ISNOT a directory service, a collection of links or an indiscriminate collection...
Click to read more »Talk/Contributions 12:42, 26 September 2009 (UTC) Oppose Per above.Abce2|This isnot a test 13:27, 26 September 2009 (UTC) oppose. Also, that en-5 ubx needs...
Click to read more »seem merely to be an organized collection of links to external sites. WP:ISNOT a web directory. Al Keep and expand. Trollderella 21:19, 24 August 2005...
Click to read more »present condition. -Ad Orientem (talk) 00:41, 5 July 2018 (UTC) Support ISNOT deletion per Ad Orientem. Seraphim System (talk) 01:09, 5 July 2018 (UTC)...
Click to read more »genealogy database Tearlach 10:26, 16 July 2006 (UTC) I just reviewed the ISNOT page and there is no mention of "wikipedia is not a genealogical database"...
Click to read more »not platform for promotion of indiscriminate product information - see WP:ISNOT. Fails WP"GNG. ---Steve Quinn (talk) 03:32, 4 August 2017 (UTC) Delete --...
Click to read more »16:10, 3 February 2006 (UTC) Speedy Delete - if there's anything that WP:ISNOT, it's school boy pranks like this. Camillus (talk) 01:52, 3 February 2006...
Click to read more »semi-protection or protection as needed, and as others say block the POV pushers. WP:ISNOT a soapbox. Just zis Guy, you know? [T]/[C] AfD? 12:47, 20 January 2006...
Click to read more »sources. बिनोद थारू (talk) 05:04, 28 December 2023 (UTC) Delete very much WP:ISNOT. microbiologyMarcus (petri dish·growths) 19:56, 28 December 2023 (UTC) The...
Click to read more »itself seems borderline encyclopedic, but the article is entirely not so. WP:ISNOT a soapbox nor is it a repository for original research. --Ryan Delaney talk...
Click to read more »that have the title "...for Dummies". This list does not meet is what WP:ISNOT. This is a copied list stolen from the publisher's website, and all it will...
Click to read more »2005 (UTC) Keep. Kappa 12:29, 18 September 2005 (UTC) Strong Delete. WP:ISNOT the daily sports report. I have no idea what the justification is for articles...
Click to read more »Question. Do you guys consider Kent State shootings to be in violation of WP:ISNOT for listing the names of the four students who were killed? I'm just trying...
Click to read more »FENS · JSTOR · TWL) The page is an indiscriminate list in violation of WP:ISNOT epicAdam(talk) 22:32, 25 August 2011 (UTC) Keep: A list of notable hotels...
Click to read more »April 2008 (UTC) Delete by our usual practices, a lecturer with one book isnot enough,unless it is truly of sensational importance. Thisismerely the beginning...
Click to read more »(Clarification: for the avoidance of doubt, grounds for nomination is WP:ISNOT#Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information) Delete. This...
Click to read more »(UTC) Can I ask your reason ?--A73 19:16, 19 August 2005 (UTC) Delete. WP:ISNOT a Web directory. And do these chaps know what "nads" are in British English...
Click to read more »Delete meat is murder. Dunc|☺ 14:22, 21 September 2005 (UTC) Delete WP:ISNOT a travel guide. -Splashtalk 23:02, 21 September 2005 (UTC) Delete this article...
Click to read more »advertisements. I don't want to chase anybody away from en.wiki, but WP:ISNOT a crystal ball. This article should be deleted now, and re-added if Hackcon...
Click to read more »guide.(also WP:ISNOT) WP:MOS wikipedia article names are English nouns. This isn't a noun, and it's not English. The wikipedia WP:ISNOT a text book on...
Click to read more »find any WP:SIGCOV for "Greatest Hits Radio Yorkshire" as a network. WP:ISNOT a directory of radio frequencies. Flip Format (talk) 21:21, 17 November...
Click to read more »zis Guy, you know? [T]/[C] AfD? 12:33, 22 January 2006 (UTC) Delete: WP:ISNOT a directory. Thanks/wangi 12:55, 22 January 2006 (UTC) An easy Delete. Wikipedia...
Click to read more »genealogy database Tearlach 10:30, 16 July 2006 (UTC) I just reviewed the ISNOT page and there is no mention of "wikipedia is not a genealogical database"...
Click to read more »What does that have to do with it(at least the second part) Abce2|This isnot a test 13:35, 24 October 2009 (UTC) This has to do with the myspace thing...
Click to read more »[[User:Premeditated Chaos|User:Premeditated Chaos/Sig]] 04:17, 24 October 2005 (UTC) WP:ISNOT#Wikipedia is not a dictionary #3, WP:V, WP:NOR Kgf0 23:07, 18 October 2005...
Click to read more »genealogy database Tearlach 10:34, 16 July 2006 (UTC) I just reviewed the ISNOT page and there is no mention of "wikipedia is not a genealogical database"...
Click to read more »genealogy database Tearlach 10:37, 16 July 2006 (UTC) I just reviewed the ISNOT page and there is no mention of "wikipedia is not a genealogical database"...
Click to read more »Delete. Linuxbeak | Alex Schenck 01:44, 11 November 2005 (UTC) Delete. WP:ISNOT a publisher of critical reviews. encephalon 02:48, 11 November 2005 (UTC)...
Click to read more »would love to have the range of all planning theory on wikipedia, but WP:ISNOT a compendium of lesser or vague urban theory terms, nor is it a place for...
Click to read more »allusion to a newspaper space-filler and what you have is exactly what WP:ISNOT: a collection of links. Remove the links and you have... pretty much nothing...
Click to read more »as it is. — Tomíca(T2ME) 22:29, 11 February 2014 (UTC) USD$ the $ symbol isnot necessary when you write USD. Done. — Tomíca(T2ME) 22:29, 11 February 2014...
Click to read more »People list 21 Society recognition on their CVs. The bottom line is, WP:ISNOT paper, and as that page says, "This means that there is no practical limit...
Click to read more »"Need I also check her credit hisotry? Its posisble online." [3] "This isnot blackmail. The Article is abou her, not her work. All her information is...
Click to read more »with a link to the full page. But the effort to remove this altogether isnot meant as an improvement to Wikipedia, or even to the Daisaku Ikeda entry;...
Click to read more »is motivated by homophobia are woefully misguided. I suggest you read WP:ISNOT. This article is simply not encyclopedic. (And, frankly, I'm insulted. I...
Click to read more »websites. This website does not get near meeting them. Also consider WP:ISNOT. Thanks/wangi 03:28, 25 September 2006 (UTC) KeepI have given plenty of...
Click to read more »a page with a sentence, erasing contents of a page, etc.). Nif the bot isnot sure,it will skipe that edit. Thanks! Batreeqah (Talk) (Contribs) 03:00...
Click to read more »cache. That's a whole lot of RFCs. Wow. If not, I feel stupid. Abce2|This isnot a test 00:27, 21 October 2009 (UTC) The Signpost: doing it for free since...
Click to read more »hit a few thousand words. Osomec 02:22, 19 August 2005 (UTC) Delete WP:ISNOT a webdirectory, doesn't matter how popular the topic. If there were that...
Click to read more »as it's in moderation) Andjam 03:30, 17 September 2005 (UTC) Delete WP:ISNOT an indiscriminate collection of information. -- MCB 01:54, 17 September...
Click to read more »articles, helping with searches, etc., I feel like that's getting into WP:ISNOT territory. Kingofaces43 (talk) 22:54, 11 March 2019 (UTC) Strong keep She's...
Click to read more »as non-notable. --Carnildo 08:14, 4 January 2006 (UTC) Delete since WP:ISNOT a newspaper. Wait until the case is settled and see if it establishes any...
Click to read more »The fact that someone plays in the Isthmian leagues of the Premiership isnot a valid ground for exclusion. Its an established league with recognition...
Click to read more »being elected.) -- Vardion 20:05, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC) keep because wikipedia isnot paper Yuckfoo 01:22, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC) Keep. GrantNeufeld 02:20, 26 Apr...
Click to read more »of articles, each about every last name in existence. Delete as per WP:ISNOT. Onel5969 TT me 10:37, 6 April 2018 (UTC) Abstain I'm searching on Google...
Click to read more »arbitrary (indeed, the selection of tripel metre is itself arbitrary), and WP:ISNOT an indiscriminate collection of information. - Just zis Guy, you know? 13:13...
Click to read more »article. Jamyskis Whisper, Contribs 08:09, 4 January 2006 (UTC) Delete per WP:ISNOT (a genealogy) and generally unencyclopaedic in tone per WP:VAIN, or userfy...
Click to read more »(talk) 17:39, 19 July 2017 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:CORPDEPTH, WP:GNG and WP:ISNOT. Sources are mostly directory listings or non-reliable or contain only trivial...
Click to read more »17:02, 28 October 2013 (UTC) At least I should try first. I guess this isnot the case, because sometime it don't pop out onything from I start. Can anybody...
Click to read more »read the above where it says Wikipedia is not a directory? Those eight WP:ISNOT applies only to corporations and organizations, not the arts. It also directly...
Click to read more »Western Hemisphere and the Earth. None of them are towns, and this valley isnot either. Mangoe (talk) 18:11, 9 July 2020 (UTC) Delete The question when...
Click to read more »Keep, per — ░. Ëvilphoenix Burn! 06:48, 16 September 2005 (UTC) Delete WP:ISNOT a list of Unicode character codes. Is the moon full or something? Between...
Click to read more »(talk) 10:07, 18 November 2008 (UTC) Delete Hazard is notable, but this dojo isnot RogueNinjatalk 19:46, 16 November 2008 (UTC) This is not a dojo. It is an...
Click to read more »they have to define what they mean by the title, and this is covered by WP:ISNOT. Then it would be a 'stub article'.- (User) Wolfkeeper (Talk) 14:10, 28...
Click to read more »sorry about last time people, this is the one I wanted to nominate. WP:ISNOT an indiscriminate collection of information, there have been far more Keep...
Click to read more »2014 (UTC) Delete - Extremely general, trivial, non-encyclopedic list. WP:ISNOT applies. The list fails to contribute to the state of human knowledge. reddogsix...
Click to read more »thing, it's a bit selfserving) 2. WP:SYNTH does not apply because SYNTH_isnot. This seemed obvious to me, but perhaps I'm alone in that. There's no conclusion...
Click to read more »understanding of what the WP:ISNOT policy actually is, is an issue. The language of WP:NN should probably be restated in the WP:ISNOT policy. This isn't to question...
Click to read more »can't assume it'll become notable at some point in the future, and per WP:ISNOT such that we don't collect lists of empty retail space for future expansion...
Click to read more »of hours needed) and even if they were fixed, there are issues with WP:ISNOT. So if the deaths articles were rightfully deleted, then the cases articles...
Click to read more »is something people can relate to. Dhaluza 13:54, 29 March 2007 (UTC) WP:ISNOT a dictionary of neologisms. Not all news articles are fluff, but the ones...
Click to read more »Which of the five items in that list, or among the other sections of WP:ISNOT, does this article fall into? Bsherr 18:49, 15 November 2007 (UTC) Merge...
Click to read more »votes are not counted. - Dalbury 00:01, 4 November 2005 (UTC) Delete. WP:ISNOT a web directory. Tonywalton | Talk 23:39, 3 November 2005 (UTC) Delete...
Click to read more »candidate. --Calton | Talk 12:08, August 3, 2005 (UTC) Delete per R. fiend. WP:ISNOT a personal webhosting service. --malathion talk 00:27, 3 August 2005 (UTC)...
Click to read more »(UTC) Delete. While interesting if it wasn't a just a tabulation of data WP:ISNOT, even doing that wouldn't satisfy the policy. If a source creates a map...
Click to read more »for soap operas are the job of a fansite, which is one of the things WP:ISNOT. Changing vote to Merge in support of a fine piece of work by User:Evil...
Click to read more »used to be a gambling site), which indicates a lack of web presence. WP:ISNOT a propaganda machine, nor is it an indiscriminate collection of information...
Click to read more »---Balloonman NO! I'm Spartacus! 17:58, 19 March 2010 (UTC) The policy at WP:ISNOT says that words are very rarely valid. And if you actually click the random...
Click to read more »"Wikipedia is not gamefaqs.com" Scoo 11:11, 25 December 2005 (UTC) Delete. WP:ISNOT GameFAQs. RasputinAXP talk contribs 11:35, 25 December 2005 (UTC) Sorry...
Click to read more »there areno sales figures, no awards, no references. .Self-publishing isnot an absolute bar, but 21st century self publishing is usually an indication...
Click to read more »you explain me why the artcile is being listed for deletion. my intension isnot promote any brand. I just read some non profit organization wikipedia artciles...
Click to read more »government, or The city of Austin, etc... Since the article does not violate WP:ISNOT I see no reason to justify deletion. --Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 10:54,...
Click to read more »notice. Thanks, Sandstein 10:40, 23 December 2019 (UTC) Delete as per WP:ISNOT (specifically a game guide). Onel5969 TT me 19:30, 23 December 2019 (UTC)...
Click to read more »reliable sources with in depth coverage and the article does not violate WP:ISNOT in its current version. I think WP:AFG prevails. That an editor has a WP:SPA...
Click to read more »5 April 2018 (UTC) dear, the above reference man pulling snake in nose isnot Iqbal Jogi Which we are diacussing here, that is an other Iqbal Jogi. Jogi...
Click to read more »2017 (UTC) Delete - and this article could serve as a great example of WP:ISNOT. Onel5969 TT me 11:59, 18 May 2017 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »verifiable per that source. But, if there are no sources, the article goes. WP:ISNOT a receptacle for unverified claims. It is not a collection of weblinks appended...
Click to read more »updated in March: WT:What Wikipedia is not#Removal of 'exceptions' from ISNOT, March 2010 WT:Notability#This is only a guideline, March 2010 WP:ANI#Template:Wi...
Click to read more »coverage from multiple reliable sources and that it does not violate WP:ISNOT (which it does not). Not having the needed references yet in the article...
Click to read more »Gregory. In addition merging to nominated article make it too long so it isnot usefule alternative.Hispring (talk) 17:53, 18 February 2019 (UTC) Keep....
Click to read more »Crockspot (talk) 10:18, 26 September 2009 (UTC) Oppose Per Crockspot.Abce2|This isnot a test 13:31, 26 September 2009 (UTC) Oppose Per Roux --SPhilbrickT 13:47...
Click to read more »shop. That's taking it a little to far. Wikipedia isn't a mall. Abce2|This isnot a test 20:13, 27 September 2009 (UTC) Edit to make less garish. --SmokeyJoe...
Click to read more »two. Coolabahapple (talk) 12:36, 28 March 2019 (UTC) No, because sourcing isnot limited to the film. He shows up quite well in a gBook search [11]. Article...
Click to read more »of the debate was DELETE. Mo0[talk] 03:14, 14 January 2006 (UTC) Per WP:ISNOT: Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. The definition...
Click to read more »It sems this is a dispute about what is the closest language group. It isnot the province of WP to dcide such things, and certainly not at AfD. Rather...
Click to read more »deletion. I believe all these are using flimsy excuses to skirt the WP:ISNOT policy -Nv8200p talk 19:46, 14 June 2006 (UTC) Userfy to me As with the...
Click to read more »most respected magazines in the field. The login is free, so the source isnot paywalled, and it is an acceptable, reliable source. Montanabw(talk) 17:38...
Click to read more »admins wouldn't pretend that the Wikipedia can cover any topic, when WP:ISNOT clearly states that isn't the case. I guess we can't have everything, and...
Click to read more »article is a dictionary entry of what is claimed to be an English word. WP:ISNOT a dictionary, however, and therefore should not accept dictionary entries...
Click to read more »paper? I sure as hell don't. This is "indiscriminate information" per WP:ISNOT. I don't buy the comparison with Playboy lists either because Playboy is...
Click to read more »review two!) 21:51, 6 February 2007 (UTC) Support Changed my mind. AfD isnot a strict requirement. -- Selmo (talk) 22:15, 6 February 2007 (UTC) Support...
Click to read more »and redirect. While this term is prevalent in contemporary dialogue, it isnot widely accepted by all parties; some reject it as tendentious and misleading...
Click to read more »21:26, 14 October 2009 (UTC) Support Heck yeah! Oh, per above.Abce2|This isnot a test 21:28, 14 October 2009 (UTC) Support Good candidate, I'm sure he'll...
Click to read more »Very helpful for those who want to know the songs of YTMD. However, WP:ISNOT a web guide. --LBMixPro<Speak|on|it!> 21:32, 19 January 2006 (UTC) Keep...
Click to read more »term=Permadrunk 69.245.188.108 12:45, 6 May 2006 (UTC)Matthew B. Ghilardi Decline. WP:ISNOT a slang and idiom guide. Besides, since anyone can submit text without sources...
Click to read more »Diversity Database and IUCN. The Southern maned sloth (Bradypus crinitus) isnot in MSW3; it's also not in the IUCN catalog, but is in the MDD. As such,...
Click to read more »lists. Wikipedia is not a personal repository or hosting service (see: WP:ISNOT, specifically the sections WP:ORIGINALITY and WP:NOTDIRECTORY, as well as...
Click to read more »toss? You make a great case for this being covered on a fansite, but WP:ISNOT a fan site. - Just zis Guy, you know? [T]/[C] (W) AfD? 13:26, 22 November...
Click to read more »numerous, and to rely on others to feed you ? If we accept such a deal, isnot that clear there is a risk that non-sustainable ones will feel sort of "slaves"...
Click to read more »cooperation. --WalterJKin 14:56, 2 October 2005 (UTC) Unfortunately, WP:ISNOT a undiscriminate collection of information. The celebrity lists must go...
Click to read more »down a hagiography does that :-). If kept most of the books need to go, WP:ISNOT a directory. Just zis Guy, you know? [T]/[C] AfD? 12:10, 19 January 2006...
Click to read more »Netherzone (talk) 15:27, 19 March 2021 (UTC) @Netherzone: The Music Center isnot independent then: the content was entirely written/created by the article...
Click to read more »134.166 03:59, 18 December 2005 (UTC) Merge and redirect, per others. WP:ISNOT a memorial, or a news site. This is of interest solely in the context of...
Click to read more »non-WP:AGF response he posted here. I've tried to help, but the editor isnot listening. At least one other editor has noted he feels that the editor...
Click to read more »September 2009 (UTC) Man, I get called a nerd enough already.Abce2|This isnot a test 05:13, 11 September 2009 (UTC) [97] = probably not a hoax, but also...
Click to read more »another, calmly discuss things on the talk page, study carefully what WP:ISNOT and consider whether their editing style conforms rigorously to WP:NPOV...
Click to read more »we aim an full encyclopedic coverage, not just selected highlights. This isnot an abreidge encyclopedia . DGG ( talk ) 22:27, 17 October 2010 (UTC) Delete...
Click to read more »all Wikipedia articles. The policies linked under requirements include WP:ISNOT and it in fact fails that. I don't think we should hold up articles that...
Click to read more »t • c • w • e ] 16:57, 8 December 2005 (UTC) NN bio. WP:ISNOT a memorial service. howcheng [ t • c • w • e ] 17:39, 7 December...
Click to read more »--CyclePat 21:43, 19 February 2006 (UTC) I see no problem with this. Read WP:ISNOT#Wikipedia is not a crystal ball and get back to us, will you? The only trouble...
Click to read more »October 2009 (UTC) "Wikipedia, the encyclopedia anyone can edit" Abce2|This isnot a test 00:58, 21 October 2009 (UTC) That's can, not should. Rodhullandemu...
Click to read more »Atomic Bar, etc.), so North isn't even alone in this within Mudd. True, WP:ISNOT paper, but everything that is unique about North could be effectively conveyed...
Click to read more »that good reliable sources are always provided. (A mere mention in them isnot necessarily enough however). This also holds for comparable biographical...
Click to read more »- Calgacus (ΚΑΛΓΑΚΟΣ) 18:30, 4 April 2006 (UTC) Delete - Wikipedia WP:ISNOT a dictionary. Yes the term is used, yes I use it myself however Wikipedia...
Click to read more »don't allow lots of things that are notable if they violate any one of the ISNOT's, as this one does.- Wolfkeeper 15:02, 19 March 2010 (UTC) Comment. I am...
Click to read more »people.Abce2|This isnot a test 02:43, 3 October 2009 (UTC) Diff of impersonation. Tried to impersonate sig. [[14]]Abce2|This isnot a test 02:45, 3 October...
Click to read more »terms. This is specifically about the word craic. Note that according to WP:ISNOT, articles Macedonia (terminology) and truthiness are word articles, but...
Click to read more »as the current REDIRECT to Kurdistan isnot accurate since the former is just part of northern Iraq, and isnot equivalent to Kurdistan. Also the name...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Classic WP:ISNOT, Transwiki what can be to wikiquote but delete this as it is not encyclopedic...
Click to read more »and Noble page with that info linked to every book could do it too. WP:ISNOT a collection of links nor is it used for advertising products. Adding a...
Click to read more »(UTC) Delete - current sourcing does not pass WP:VERIFY, and as per WP:ISNOT. Onel5969 TT me 21:26, 26 August 2021 (UTC) Question this article is one...
Click to read more »in reaction to actual criminal aggression. Maddox not cooking you dinner isnot "aggression". In most cases it was jim Crow laws in the South, instituted...
Click to read more »like you, that prefer to editwar rather than discuss. This noticeboard isnot designed to discuss content disputes, but to discuss disruption by continuously...
Click to read more »policies. The only policies that I can think of that apply here are WP:ISNOT, WP:NOTPAPER, WP:NOTEVERYTHING, WP:INDISCRIMINATE, and WP:EDIT. So lets...
Click to read more »Portal:Current events page?Abce2|This isnot a test 01:57, 27 September 2009 (UTC) Anyone care to help me with todays?Abce2|This isnot a test 02:16, 27 September...
Click to read more »a threshold below which the "who would care?" test applies. Finally, WP:ISNOT either a promotional vehicle or a crystal ball. Adding articles for games...
Click to read more »the blogger in any non-trivial way. Once again fails GNG, BASIC, ANYBIO, ISNOT, and so on. However, the effort is appreciated. ---Steve Quinn (talk) 02:04...
Click to read more »have no Alexa rank at all. One computer just isn't encyclopedic and WP:ISNOT an indiscrimate collection of information. - Splashtalk 00:12, 27 October...
Click to read more »just don't have this type of article on adjectives, it's actually an ISNOT. If we started to have articles like this on adjectives then we will have...
Click to read more »he has doubt,i invite him to my taik page for healthy discussion but he isnot interested. Comments: This article has been in good shape with accurate...
Click to read more »article at all, let alone multiple articles related to the subject. WP:ISNOT an indiscriminate collection of information, after all. And do be aware...
Click to read more »contribstalk) 02:01, 10 October 2007 (UTC) Keep The page gives examples of what WP:ISNOT without showing red links, but also shows exceptions to the NOT rules where...
Click to read more »(UTC) As you say, there are limits on what goes into Wikipedia (e.g. WP:ISNOT, failure to provide WP:RS) and also ones on what constitutes acceptable...
Click to read more »Contribs) 00:49, 24 September 2005 (UTC) Delete per nom, Anetode and WP:ISNOT an indiscriminate collection of trivia and information. ♥purplefeltangel...
Click to read more »2006 (UTC) "For great justice" is right that the stuff on Calton's desk isnot worthy of an article. But Calton does raise a legitimate point. Just because...
Click to read more »to this notability criteria and so correlates with this portion of the ISNOT policy page. So, this demonstrates a contradiction with the notability criteria...
Click to read more »just remove it without a policy to back you up. As far as I can see WP:ISNOT#Wikipedia_is_not_censored applies, just as it would to article content....
Click to read more »WP:VERIFY Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not WP:NOT, WP:WWIN, WP:WWPIN, WP:ISNOT, WP:ALSONOT Wikipedia:Wikipedia is an encyclopedia WP:ENC Wikipedia:Wikipedia...
Click to read more »fromoutside sources, or because it was a page on a person, group, or idea that isnot sufficiently well-known for an encyclopedia article. If you believe after...
Click to read more »anything other than an indiscriminate collection of information (something WP:ISNOT). - Just zis Guy, you know? [T]/[C] AfD? 10:51, 13 December 2005 (UTC)...
Click to read more »!! FunnyDuckIsFunny (talk) 23:52, 20 October 2009 (UTC) Yep.Abce2|This isnot a test 23:53, 20 October 2009 (UTC) Since this is a straight recreation...
Click to read more »way everyone goes away happy. Spawn Man 08:49, 23 September 2005 (UTC) WP:ISNOT censored, including in external links, and a porn star's article could reasonably...
Click to read more »Islam in Israel. `'mikkanarxi 02:16, 28 November 2006 (UTC) Delete, WP:ISNOT/WP:V etc. Daniel.Bryant [ T · C ] 02:56, 28 November 2006 (UTC) Or, my second...
Click to read more »WP:V, WP:CIVIL, WP:NPA, WP:3RR, WP:DISAMBIG, WP:TITLE, WP:LEAD, WP:CON, WP:ISNOT, WP:AGF, WP:SOCK, and who know which more..... And this included editors...
Click to read more »consensus and comments regarding such things as notability, references, COI, WP:ISNOT promo issues, etc. However, Davina.R made a point of lashing out at every...
Click to read more »K's behavior since then has hit most of the items in that section of WP:ISNOT as well as several others on that policy page. MarnetteD | Talk 00:40, 15...
Click to read more »the same problem in the Austrian economics/libertarian areas. Wikipedia:ISNOT#Wikipedia_is_not_censored. If we can have Wikipedia:HOTTIE forward to someone's...
Click to read more »does the work I want. If {{DISPLAYTITLE}} doesn't do that work, then why isnot there something else? A. Shohag 03:29, 9 August 2020 (UTC) @ShohagS: Because...
Click to read more »is characterized a a movie about geoicentrism, I would argue that that isnot conducive to WP:ENC. Encyclopedias should be factual.16:31, 16 February...
Click to read more »language is turkish. because Farah Pahlavi was born in Tehran, He says so she isnot Azerbaijani people[79]. In the event that his father is Azerbaijani ethnicity...
Click to read more »as it is. — Tomíca(T2ME) 22:29, 11 February 2014 (UTC) USD$ the $ symbol isnot necessary when you write USD. Done. — Tomíca(T2ME) 22:29, 11 February 2014...
Click to read more »journal itself that must stand on its own merits per WP:NOTINHERITED and WP:ISNOT. Also, thank you to Randykitty for showing me that User:Jpbowen has an article...
Click to read more »(UTC) WP:NOTCENSOR. GiantSnowman 23:51, 29 November 2009 (UTC) wikipedia isNOT A SOAPBOX and i believe the not censored part refers to encyclopedic material...
Click to read more »(UTC) I feel to see the WP:CREEP here. We lack a behavioral ISNOT equivalent, and ISNOT also covers the ground other policies do. ALso, this here is...
Click to read more »come here and 'vote' doesn't mean the page won't be deleted anyway. WP:ISNOT a democracy and closing admins are intelligent enough to work out who's...
Click to read more »User:JanesDaddy's word. JIP | Talk 09:09, 6 February 2006 (UTC) Delete Wikipedia ISNOT GameFAQs. FCYTravis 09:25, 6 February 2006 (UTC) Keep. For example, RuneScape...
Click to read more »author, i.e., "Lady Green". Yet here we have it as the lone source! 7.WP:ISNOT#Wikipedia_is_not_censored has a crucially important caveat. Yes, articles...
Click to read more »adminship. And a declined offer of peace is not a licence for open warfare. WP:ISNOT a battleground. -Splashtalk 18:32, 6 January 2006 (UTC) Oppose - I think...
Click to read more »you've, well to put it bluntly, got the experiance for adminship. Abce2|This isnot a test 15:06, 21 October 2009 (UTC) A note: my oppose isn't based on the...
Click to read more »editorial judgment, choosing not to include information for various reasons. ISNOT, which dates to 2001 and has carried policy weight since 2005, says: Information...
Click to read more »arguments in favor of deletion/redirection have centered around what WP:ISNOT. Outside of the opening summary there is not much providing context for...
Click to read more »September 2009 (UTC) Gut feeling gone. Will do well in conflicts.Abce2|This isnot a test 05:46, 19 September 2009 (UTC) Strong support Good answers. Seems...
Click to read more »utterly unsuitable to be in the Wikipedia because it violates any one WP:ISNOT.- Wolfkeeper 04:11, 28 February 2010 (UTC) For the amount of time you spend...
Click to read more »AtheWeatherman 21:15, 24 September 2009 (UTC) Support Why the heck not?!Abce2|This isnot a test 22:06, 24 September 2009 (UTC) Support clean block log, good tagging...
Click to read more »you for asking here. Yes, it is the wrong way to use wikipedia. See WP:ISNOT , one of the entries is that Wikipedia is not a publisher of original thought...
Click to read more »February 2014 (UTC) delete whether a species has been introduced elsehwere isnot defining of the species and can lead to category clutter. The tomato is...
Click to read more »{list the policies and guidelines that apply to the disputed conduct} WP:ISNOT#OR, item 3, "Personal essays or Blogs that state your particular opinions...
Click to read more »details over real-world discussion or concerns that the list is violating WP:ISNOT, then that should be discussed at the article's talk page. Those are not...
Click to read more »the reply to this. These three are your personal impressions on what is/isnot an acceptable category system, is why I ponted to 'invention'. Enough hairs...
Click to read more »do they can llegaly stay (Sugestion) The converse of that argument is WP:ISNOT a crystal ball. Delete them now and if they make it big, THEN reinstate...
Click to read more »2020 (UTC) Whether or not it's a "mistake" is a matter of opinion. No, it isnot: mathematics is the rare place where one can say unambiguously whether a...
Click to read more »referenced, so what? It's an ISNOT. A well referenced ISNOT is still not keepable. I don't like things that violate ISNOT, but according to you, every...
Click to read more »range from X-Y at their given articles. What currently exists falls into WP:ISNOT territory. I'm also seeing heavy reliance on primary sources too. As already...
Click to read more »guarantee that a subject should be included, particularly if it violates WP:ISNOT. In this case that would be WP:NOTCRYSTALBALL, which states: "Wikipedia...
Click to read more »You to can help yourself by reading as much as you can. Start with WP:ISNOT and WP:MOS, and others in you welcome message on your talk page. Don't be...
Click to read more »--LAAFansign review 20:46, 21 September 2009 (UTC) Oppose Per LAAFan.Abce2|This isnot a test 22:02, 21 September 2009 (UTC) Very weak oppose based on dearth of...
Click to read more »defines many date formats. DMacks (talk) 09:13, 6 July 2016 (UTC) And? WP:ISNOT the ISO. We have a different audience; much of ISO 8601 is intended for...
Click to read more »unsourced claim? The first screen I get is completely out of the blue and isnot how an "editing wizard" should start. Seems to be not ready for implementation...
Click to read more »should have its own stand-alone article. The WP:ISNOT criteria is specifically noted in WP:N; and "WP:ISNOT" is a policy page; and is one of the five pillars...
Click to read more »newer users, and having experiance in conflicts is something.Abce2|This isnot a test 00:16, 8 October 2009 (UTC) Weak Oppose-I generally dislike to oppose...
Click to read more »WP:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (which is a deletion criteria, and an ISNOT, and is-nots trump notability) because it's defined in the intro to be about...
Click to read more »demonstrate involvement in that. The core deletion policies (WP:N, WP:V, WP:ISNOT etc) have applications way beyond the AfD debates - an admin must be in...
Click to read more »word "actress". Wikipedia is not for remaking society (which is not a WP:ISNOT but perhaps should be). The term is used and the fact that you would rather...
Click to read more »May 2020 (UTC) Delete - The NFUR makes no statement as to why this image isnot replaceable. Fails WP:NFCC#1. The image's claimed purpose is to illustrate...
Click to read more »This kind of perennial and dictatorial Moralism, really pisses me off. ISNOT: A city on a Hill. The current CIVILITY provisions which emphasise the key...
Click to read more »dictionary policy be moved down to being only a guideline, or 'merged into WP:ISNOT' (i.e. removed completely as an independent policy). It is currently being...
Click to read more »sourcing shows that it fails WP:NRV, WP:ORGIND, and meets the above WP:ISNOT criteria. Also, basing the whole coverage on what Pugh says is another indicator...
Click to read more »---Balloonman NO! I'm Spartacus! 17:58, 19 March 2010 (UTC) The policy at WP:ISNOT says that words are very rarely valid. And if you actually click the random...
Click to read more »(talk) 19:50, 1 November 2009 (UTC) Support Why the heck not?Abce2|This isnot a test 21:12, 1 November 2009 (UTC) Support Obviously. Excellent editor...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable school. Abce2|This isnot a test 03:21, 20 October 2009 (UTC) Keep - consensus is that high schools...
Click to read more »not have any content of its own and is merely a catalogue. Violates WP:ISNOT. Instead of an article, a category may be considered. Cheers AKS 08:51,...
Click to read more »reliable sources with in depth coverage and the article does not violate WP:ISNOT in its current version. I think WP:AFG prevails. That an editor has a WP:SPA...
Click to read more »Wikipedias was once unified by Pangaea, Wikipedia is not a supercontinent. there isnot gona be some gramor thatnotreedabul? or otherwiz sum Grammer Not Zs and...
Click to read more »contribs | uploads | upload log). Orphaned. Although Ubuntu is open-source it isnot GFDL like the current licensing states. Additionally, individual programs...
Click to read more »(UTC) The article violates several of wikipedia's policies, including WP:ISNOT and does not seem to be significantly different to the wiktionary article...
Click to read more »September 2009 (UTC) Oppose Per Axl. Someday though, just not now.Abce2|This isnot a test 13:30, 26 September 2009 (UTC) Oppose too soon, you need to work...
Click to read more »User:Essjay (a block) note response. [54] Warning by User:Physchim62 re WP:ISNOT (soapboxing). [55] User:Physchim62 publishing disputes ... on user page...
Click to read more »(talk) 10:37, 11 February 2014 (UTC) Comment This article isnot nominated because the person isnot notable but because the article is a mess. Another solution...
Click to read more »20:30, 28 May 2010 (UTC) Comment Notability doesn't count if it violates an ISNOT. The notability policy says: "A topic is presumed to merit an article if...
Click to read more »Which of the five items in that list, or among the other sections of WP:ISNOT, does this article fall into? Bsherr 18:49, 15 November 2007 (UTC) Merge...
Click to read more »concerned) has press coverage. The article itself needs to be reworked since WP:ISNOT a web guide. But out of all the fangame articles at Wikipedia, this one...
Click to read more »discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:11, 25 August 2011 (UTC) Template:Isnot (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages) Template:Boolnot (talk ·...
Click to read more »(talk) 17:39, 19 July 2017 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:CORPDEPTH, WP:GNG and WP:ISNOT. Sources are mostly directory listings or non-reliable or contain only trivial...
Click to read more »AfD) Not sure what this is. Looks like an indiscrimate list so violates WP:ISNOT. It is also not in English. Nv8200p talk 01:53, 28 June 2007 (UTC) Speedy...
Click to read more »the same way that articles are dropped from WP:GA and WP:FA, it certainly isnot a reason to oppose deletion. Mike33 - t@lk 12:42, 19 July 2007 (UTC) Response...
Click to read more »them in philosophical terms. He's probably right, however, Wikipedia WP:ISNOT a publisher of original thought. --CastAStone 02:35, 26 October 2005 (UTC)...
Click to read more »guide.(also WP:ISNOT) WP:MOS wikipedia article names are English nouns. This isn't a noun, and it's not English. The wikipedia WP:ISNOT a text book on...
Click to read more »definitely some demand for a 'censored' version of wikipedia. I know WP:ISNOT censored but it surprises me that someone has not tried to create an fork...
Click to read more »understanding of what the WP:ISNOT policy actually is, is an issue. The language of WP:NN should probably be restated in the WP:ISNOT policy. This isn't to question...
Click to read more »they have to define what they mean by the title, and this is covered by WP:ISNOT. Then it would be a 'stub article'.- (User) Wolfkeeper (Talk) 14:10, 28...
Click to read more »(UTC) Delete. Not sufficiently noteworthy to fulfill WP:V and WP:RS. Re WP:ISNOT paper: that it is not paper is a reason to accept articles that meet our...
Click to read more »lists three more, a mixed-initialism WP:WWPIN and two two-word redirects WP:ISNOT and WP:ALSONOT. There's no policy governing which and how many shortcuts...
Click to read more »history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD) WP:ISNOT a genealogical directory. There is nothing notable about this name, and...
Click to read more »Keep - WP:VG/EL is wrong in assuming that external links must abide by WP:ISNOT. That assumption would preclude Wikimedia sister project links. GameFAQs...
Click to read more »Image:Big hair!.JPG (talk | delete) Uploaded by -3AsHlEy3- (notify). UE - WP:ISNOT a personal webhost. —the iBook of the Revolution 17:32, 12 April 2006 (UTC)...
Click to read more »August 2018 (UTC) Keep: The article does meet WP:GNG and does not violate WP:ISNOT. There is significant coverage (more than trivial mentions) from multiple...
Click to read more »ImmortalWizard. In addition merging to nominated article make it too long so it isnot usefule alternative. I agree with renaming based on reliable sources.Hispring...
Click to read more »this is a viable entry, and should be KEPT. Reason For Nomination: Per WP:ISNOT: Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. The definition...
Click to read more »Trek.--AlainV (talk) 03:43, 7 December 2007 (UTC) Delete- WP:OTHERSTUFF isnot a valid argument. This article does not attempt to establish notability...
Click to read more »read the above where it says Wikipedia is not a directory? Those eight WP:ISNOT applies only to corporations and organizations, not the arts. It also directly...
Click to read more »different views that could be argued. TNXMan 15:41, 26 April 2010 (UTC) WP:ISNOT is also handy to reference when deciding if an article should exist. --NeilN...
Click to read more »The fact that someone plays in the Isthmian leagues of the Premiership isnot a valid ground for exclusion. Its an established league with recognition...
Click to read more »May 2017 (UTC) Delete, indiscriminate, subjective, a poster case for WP:ISNOT. Onel5969 TT me 01:50, 8 May 2017 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »August 2013 (UTC) @ User:Drmies: Iranian Azerbaijanis and Azeris in Iran isnot Iranians in Republic of Azerbaijan. i say in this talk page. Iranians in...
Click to read more »(talk) 10:07, 18 November 2008 (UTC) Delete Hazard is notable, but this dojo isnot RogueNinjatalk 19:46, 16 November 2008 (UTC) This is not a dojo. It is an...
Click to read more »advertisements. I don't want to chase anybody away from en.wiki, but WP:ISNOT a crystal ball. This article should be deleted now, and re-added if Hackcon...
Click to read more »only is the tite (Virginia Settler) inaccurate but it is confusing. It isnot the title of the article I produced in my sandbox. Thank youAlvanhholmes...
Click to read more »that good reliable sources are always provided. (A mere mention in them isnot necessarily enough however). This also holds for comparable biographical...
Click to read more »12:15, 16 December 2005 (UTC) Notability is the key to interpreting WP:ISNOT an indiscriminate collection on information. And yes, I would happily vote...
Click to read more »has been tagged as unreferenced and WP:OR for some time. Also violates WP:ISNOT. Eliz81 19:25, 19 July 2007 (UTC) Comment. Which part of WP:NOT does it...
Click to read more »(talk) 00:29, 8 September 2017 (UTC) Delete -- Reads like a genealogy. WP:ISNOT etc. -- no need for a list of people. Keira1996 01:22, 8 September 2017...
Click to read more »notability. Walton monarchist89 16:49, 29 January 2007 (UTC) Delete. WP:ISNOT a soapbox. NN, young firm with as of yet no biz in an encyclopedia and should...
Click to read more »of notability, and an internet search comes up with nothing Abce2|This isnot a test 03:12, 13 September 2009 (UTC) Comment I came up with the following...
Click to read more »FENS · JSTOR · TWL) The page is an indiscriminate list in violation of WP:ISNOT epicAdam(talk) 22:32, 25 August 2011 (UTC) Keep: A list of notable hotels...
Click to read more »editors who forge signatures or vandalize other votes. Additionally, WP:ISNOT a dictionary. UrbanDictionary is the home of arbitrary slang, Wikipedia...
Click to read more »policies. The only policies that I can think of that apply here are WP:ISNOT, WP:NOTPAPER, WP:NOTEVERYTHING, WP:INDISCRIMINATE, and WP:EDIT. So lets...
Click to read more »2017 (UTC) Delete - and this article could serve as a great example of WP:ISNOT. Onel5969 TT me 11:59, 18 May 2017 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »January 2009 (UTC) Now that you have brought this discussion on a tangent, ED:ISNOT. Saying that is like saying that Wikipedia is associated with Harry Potter...
Click to read more »You to can help yourself by reading as much as you can. Start with WP:ISNOT and WP:MOS, and others in you welcome message on your talk page. Don't be...
Click to read more »it is a democracy. David Lauder 22:18, 25 February 2007 (UTC) Comment WP:ISNOT#Wikipedia_is_not_a_democracy. Ben W Bell talk 08:12, 26 February 2007 (UTC)...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Dictionary definition. Specifically from WP:ISNOT "Wikipedia is not a dictionary, usage, or jargon guide." This very clearly...
Click to read more »admins wouldn't pretend that the Wikipedia can cover any topic, when WP:ISNOT clearly states that isn't the case. I guess we can't have everything, and...
Click to read more »WP:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (which is a deletion criteria, and an ISNOT, and is-nots trump notability) because it's defined in the intro to be about...
Click to read more »sourcing shows that it fails WP:NRV, WP:ORGIND, and meets the above WP:ISNOT criteria. Also, basing the whole coverage on what Pugh says is another indicator...
Click to read more »-FrankTobia (talk) 05:28, 22 July 2008 (UTC) Withdrawn - although I think WP:ISNOT clearly frowns upon WP:OR (which most of these things can be argued to be)...
Click to read more »++Lar: t/c 15:52, 13 September 2009 (UTC) Keep I doubt that. Abce2|This isnot a test 06:49, 13 September 2009 (UTC) Keep not an attack page; contains...
Click to read more »not platform for promotion of indiscriminate product information - see WP:ISNOT. Fails WP"GNG. ---Steve Quinn (talk) 03:32, 4 August 2017 (UTC) Delete --...
Click to read more »it is a democracy. David Lauder 22:18, 25 February 2007 (UTC) Comment WP:ISNOT#Wikipedia_is_not_a_democracy. Ben W Bell talk 08:12, 26 February 2007 (UTC)...
Click to read more »you explain me why the artcile is being listed for deletion. my intension isnot promote any brand. I just read some non profit organization wikipedia artciles...
Click to read more »can't assume it'll become notable at some point in the future, and per WP:ISNOT such that we don't collect lists of empty retail space for future expansion...
Click to read more »they choose there . Ihave read enough of the commentary to know that this isnot about what may be good for our school but hype about rights and censure...
Click to read more »government, or The city of Austin, etc... Since the article does not violate WP:ISNOT I see no reason to justify deletion. --Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 10:54,...
Click to read more »It sems this is a dispute about what is the closest language group. It isnot the province of WP to dcide such things, and certainly not at AfD. Rather...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Classic WP:ISNOT, Transwiki what can be to wikiquote but delete this as it is not encyclopedic...
Click to read more »(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:ISNOT applies. As useful or encyclopedic as a list of actors named Robert or films...
Click to read more »there areno sales figures, no awards, no references. .Self-publishing isnot an absolute bar, but 21st century self publishing is usually an indication...
Click to read more »present condition. -Ad Orientem (talk) 00:41, 5 July 2018 (UTC) Support ISNOT deletion per Ad Orientem. Seraphim System (talk) 01:09, 5 July 2018 (UTC)...
Click to read more »and thought it would be easiest. In any case, it all seems like Wikipedia:ISNOT#Wikipedia_is_not_a_soapbox_or_means_of_promotion to me and since there were...
Click to read more »!top) - Link: wapexclusive.com/Repeat/step/3/if/the/stopping/criterion/isnot/met/ (R/Xmeta/L- removed) 2021-04-28 13:47:15 (UTC): User Chioma2 t • c •...
Click to read more »the blogger in any non-trivial way. Once again fails GNG, BASIC, ANYBIO, ISNOT, and so on. However, the effort is appreciated. ---Steve Quinn (talk) 02:04...
Click to read more »screw up the tags at the article's beginning. Clearly an example of WP:ISNOT. Onel5969 TT me 13:33, 19 December 2015 (UTC) Delete - if this can't be...
Click to read more »would love to have the range of all planning theory on wikipedia, but WP:ISNOT a compendium of lesser or vague urban theory terms, nor is it a place for...
Click to read more »however. Jclemens (talk) 04:24, 7 October 2017 (UTC) Comment as per WP:ISNOT: "Articles on fiction elements are expected to cover more about "real-world"...
Click to read more »Netherzone (talk) 15:27, 19 March 2021 (UTC) @Netherzone: The Music Center isnot independent then: the content was entirely written/created by the article...
Click to read more »5 April 2018 (UTC) dear, the above reference man pulling snake in nose isnot Iqbal Jogi Which we are diacussing here, that is an other Iqbal Jogi. Jogi...
Click to read more »Western Hemisphere and the Earth. None of them are towns, and this valley isnot either. Mangoe (talk) 18:11, 9 July 2020 (UTC) Delete The question when...
Click to read more »SwisterTwister talk 07:29, 6 October 2015 (UTC) Delete - a clear example of WP:ISNOT. Onel5969 TT me 13:20, 9 October 2015 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »thing, it's a bit selfserving) 2. WP:SYNTH does not apply because SYNTH_isnot. This seemed obvious to me, but perhaps I'm alone in that. There's no conclusion...
Click to read more »relative insignificant these days, and it is not surprising that there isnot enough material to show notability .Almost all the references are the expected...
Click to read more »result was delete. The consensus after 2 relistings appears to be that he isnot yet notable. DGG ( talk ) 21:09, 27 August 2016 (UTC) Frank Dixon (musician)...
Click to read more »(UTC) Delete. While interesting if it wasn't a just a tabulation of data WP:ISNOT, even doing that wouldn't satisfy the policy. If a source creates a map...
Click to read more »13:44, 31 August 2007 (UTC) Delete Does seem to violate WP:OR, WP:NEO, WP:ISNOT, and WP:N. Best case scenario would be to condense and transwiki to Wiktionary...
Click to read more »(UTC) The article violates several of wikipedia's policies, including WP:ISNOT and does not seem to be significantly different to the wiktionary article...
Click to read more »April 2008 (UTC) Delete by our usual practices, a lecturer with one book isnot enough,unless it is truly of sensational importance. Thisismerely the beginning...
Click to read more »we aim an full encyclopedic coverage, not just selected highlights. This isnot an abreidge encyclopedia . DGG ( talk ) 22:27, 17 October 2010 (UTC) Delete...
Click to read more »include here. / Peter Isotalo 22:31, 4 September 2005 (UTC) Delete. WP:ISNOT a FAQ or a how-to. (And, as ever, per Uncle G.) -Splash 22:37, 4 September...
Click to read more »detail. Fails WP:N. Wikipedia is not a manual and is not a directory WP:ISNOT. Steve Quinn (talk) 07:24, 28 December 2017 (UTC) Note: This debate has...
Click to read more »yet (WP:TOOSOON). Amccann421 (talk) 17:06, 29 March 2016 (UTC) Delete WP:ISNOT a book reviewer. Particularly when no-one else appears to have reviewed...
Click to read more »suffice, this is completely WP:OR and should be deleted as per WP:GNG, WP:ISNOT and WP:NEO. Onel5969 TT me 12:23, 19 March 2018 (UTC) Delete- per nom and...
Click to read more »others). The market capitalization corporations had on March 30th 2007 isnot a specific subject of study, so this list fails WP:NOTE. Fram (talk) 09:19...
Click to read more »on this TV channel (which is the topic). Wikipedia is not a TV Guide WP:ISNOT ---Steve Quinn (talk) 06:28, 3 January 2018 (UTC) Hi Steve, per WP:Notability...
Click to read more »Gregory. In addition merging to nominated article make it too long so it isnot usefule alternative.Hispring (talk) 17:53, 18 February 2019 (UTC) Keep....
Click to read more »investigate · cuwiki · SI) Evidence submitted by Abce2|This isnot a test Never mind. Already done.Abce2|This isnot a test 02:18, 14 October 2009 (UTC) Comments by...
Click to read more »them. Torchist (talk) 11:18, 7 October 2020 (UTC) No, the same information isnot included in these sources, Tuchman and others won't include e.g. Alexandre...
Click to read more »here. It's functionally indistinguishable form the Yellow Pages, which WP:ISNOT. Just zis Guy you know? 11:38, 11 March 2006 (UTC) Keep this is not an indescriminate...
Click to read more »of articles, each about every last name in existence. Delete as per WP:ISNOT. Onel5969 TT me 10:37, 6 April 2018 (UTC) Abstain I'm searching on Google...
Click to read more »is it is?) proud to support. I've been waiting for this day.Abce2|This isnot a test 18:08, 11 October 2009 (UTC) Support per all of the above. Tim Song...
Click to read more »articles, helping with searches, etc., I feel like that's getting into WP:ISNOT territory. Kingofaces43 (talk) 22:54, 11 March 2019 (UTC) Strong keep She's...
Click to read more »general notability guidelines. JbhTalk 19:09, 10 July 2015 (UTC) Delete By WP:ISNOT on various counts. Cheers, The Jolly Bard (talk) 20:47, 10 July 2015 (UTC)...
Click to read more »Featured in Zoo Tycoon 2 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) WP:ISNOT a collection of indiscriminate information. By parallel, it's not a collection...
Click to read more »there are no reliable sources. The main author has vanished, and there isnot much sense to userfy, though if someone wants to work on the article, any...
Click to read more »most respected magazines in the field. The login is free, so the source isnot paywalled, and it is an acceptable, reliable source. Montanabw(talk) 17:38...
Click to read more »comments, there not canvassing! Why are we poking a dead horse here?Abce2|This isnot a test 14:58, 21 October 2009 (UTC) Astronominov, I agree that 15-20% of...
Click to read more »notice. Thanks, Sandstein 10:40, 23 December 2019 (UTC) Delete as per WP:ISNOT (specifically a game guide). Onel5969 TT me 19:30, 23 December 2019 (UTC)...
Click to read more »FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Indiscriminate collection of external links violating WP:ISNOT (especially WP:LINKFARM). Randykitty (talk) 13:51, 21 January 2017 (UTC)...
Click to read more »terms. This is specifically about the word craic. Note that according to WP:ISNOT, articles Macedonia (terminology) and truthiness are word articles, but...
Click to read more »ImmortalWizard. In addition merging to nominated article make it too long so it isnot usefule alternative. I agree with renaming based on reliable sources.Hispring...
Click to read more »just don't have this type of article on adjectives, it's actually an ISNOT. If we started to have articles like this on adjectives then we will have...
Click to read more »FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Promotional article, probably by subject. Member RSA isnot notable--its a quite general society. DGG ( talk ) 18:25, 27 March 2019...
Click to read more »coverage from multiple reliable sources and that it does not violate WP:ISNOT (which it does not). Not having the needed references yet in the article...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Advertisement. Advertising is something WP:ISNOT for. Mr. Guye (talk) 19:05, 12 June 2014 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...
Click to read more »range from X-Y at their given articles. What currently exists falls into WP:ISNOT territory. I'm also seeing heavy reliance on primary sources too. As already...
Click to read more »May 2017 (UTC) Delete, indiscriminate, subjective, a poster case for WP:ISNOT. Onel5969 TT me 01:50, 8 May 2017 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »bears this out. Jehochman Talk 22:06, 15 November 2008 (UTC) Oppose. WP:ISNOT says that Wikipedia should not contain advocacy content, but can report...
Click to read more »to specific Wikipedia Policy if you have a specific problem. See also WP:ISNOT#Wikipedia_is_not_censored.Dandelion1 20:38, 3 April 2006 (UTC) The very...
Click to read more »notability guidelines is reasonably met and since it does no longer violate WP:ISNOT after my extensive rewrite, I don't think that we can recommend deletion...
Click to read more »there's good things are there's bad things. I'm just in the middle.Abce2|This isnot a test 18:44, 3 October 2009 (UTC) I haven't really read anything else here...
Click to read more »2014 (UTC) Delete - Extremely general, trivial, non-encyclopedic list. WP:ISNOT applies. The list fails to contribute to the state of human knowledge. reddogsix...
Click to read more »That blatantly isn't the case here. Please read WP:GNG, WP:RS, and WP:ISNOT. Finally, you can write anything promotionally without being directly connected...
Click to read more »reveals many more, so WP:GNG is met and the article does not violate WP:ISNOT. The number of roles is not a requirement to meet WP:GNG. --Crystallizedcarbon...
Click to read more »(UTC) Delete - current sourcing does not pass WP:VERIFY, and as per WP:ISNOT. Onel5969 TT me 21:26, 26 August 2021 (UTC) Question this article is one...
Click to read more »notability guidelines is reasonably met and since it does no longer violate WP:ISNOT after my extensive rewrite, I don't think that we can recommend deletion...
Click to read more »two. Coolabahapple (talk) 12:36, 28 March 2019 (UTC) No, because sourcing isnot limited to the film. He shows up quite well in a gBook search [54]. Article...
Click to read more »