This page is a redirect. The following categories are used to track and monitor this redirect:
|
uploading and including images, see Help:Files. Shortcuts MOS:IRELEVMOS:IRELEV MOS:IMAGERELMOS:IMAGEREL MOS:PERTINENCEMOS:PERTINENCE Images must be significant...
Click to read more »are not representative of the aforementioned place and in violation of WP:IRELEV. Vignesh Mani M (talk) 07:29, 11 April 2013 (UTC) Creating deletion discussion...
Click to read more »really finding very little to pick at. Take care with the images though—MOS:IRELEV notes that they "must be significant and relevant in the topic's context...
Click to read more »WP:UPLOAD. Ensure your image complies with the requirements as listed in WP:IRELEV, and also make sure it does not infringe on copyright. Name it appropriately...
Click to read more »(UTC) Will review this soon. One preliminary comment I have is per MOS:IRELEV the use of a photo of Trainor singing at the Jingle Ball 2014 is unjustified...
Click to read more »bunch of random pictures of Godzilla to the article that clearly fail WP:IRELEV. They are just random shots of the character from the movie trailer that...
Click to read more »(UTC) Things like 2014 Fifa Mascot are not really that important though. WP:IRELEV seems to catch quite a few of the problem ones, like 50%+ of the image being...
Click to read more »image on the 'Shooting of Trayvon Martin' which is the only use under WP:IRELEV as Chief Bill Lee played a minor role and is not the focus of the article...
Click to read more »templates/Wikipedia:NAVBOX (what says nothing about images). And last, he uses Wikipedia:IRELEV to remove the images, what means saying that a picture of spaghetti is irrelevant...
Click to read more »added a photograph of a salmon to the article about Multnomah Falls per MOS:IRELEV this appears to have been correctly removed as irrelevant. Theroadislong...
Click to read more »The pictures of officials in the article also are a large breach of MOS:IRELEV and after awhile, they just blur together into nothing (Ray Garofalo isn't...
Click to read more »good picture for this section, should i add the picture? I am aware of MOS:IRELEV, but I'm unsure, the picture can theoretically enhance the understanding...
Click to read more »somethings like "Wikipedia policies" (WP:NOTCENSORED, WP:PROFA, WP:NDA, WP:IRELEV, etc) which are not sitting there for nothing. 1. Wikipedia cannot guarantee...
Click to read more »are not representative of the aforementioned place and in violation of WP:IRELEV. Vignesh Mani M (talk) 07:29, 11 April 2013 (UTC) Creating deletion discussion...
Click to read more »Wadhurst Tunnel, which I'm assuming you'd include if you had one). Per WP:IRELEV you should go through the article and choose those most pertinent to the...
Click to read more »release? Reorganized I would remove the image of Paramore performing per WP:IRELEV My thinking was that showing the band performing on the tour supporting...
Click to read more »empty space with whatever strikes our fancy, cause we can. I stand by MOS:IRELEV: "Resist the temptation to overwhelm an article with images of marginal...
Click to read more »caption has been refused by Alexbrn. The image itself also violates WP:IRELEV which states that “images must be relevant to the article that they appear...
Click to read more »somethings like "Wikipedia policies" (WP:NOTCENSORED, WP:PROFA, WP:NDA, WP:IRELEV, etc) which are not sitting there for nothing. 1. Wikipedia cannot guarantee...
Click to read more »added to the title. Remove this This has not been addressed. Please see MOS:IRELEV. We regularly have to discourage fans from including decorative images in...
Click to read more »Wadhurst Tunnel, which I'm assuming you'd include if you had one). Per WP:IRELEV you should go through the article and choose those most pertinent to the...
Click to read more »empty space with whatever strikes our fancy, cause we can. I stand by MOS:IRELEV: "Resist the temptation to overwhelm an article with images of marginal...
Click to read more »added to the title. Remove this This has not been addressed. Please see MOS:IRELEV. We regularly have to discourage fans from including decorative images in...
Click to read more »(UTC) Will review this soon. One preliminary comment I have is per MOS:IRELEV the use of a photo of Trainor singing at the Jingle Ball 2014 is unjustified...
Click to read more »which was meant to refer to the full list of the current WP:PERTINENCE + WP:IRELEV + WP:MOSIM, all of which will be applied. If you have concerns on any of...
Click to read more »CAPTITLES 183 CENTURY 183 MUHAMMAD 183 DABBLUE 183 DABONEBLUE 183 OSNS 183 IRELEV 183 O.S. 183 DATELINK 183 MILLENNIUM 183 IMAGE RELEVANCE 183 IMAGERELEVANCE...
Click to read more »The pictures of officials in the article also are a large breach of MOS:IRELEV and after awhile, they just blur together into nothing (Ray Garofalo isn't...
Click to read more »images (which is basically the only type of edits they did) despite MOS:IRELEV and other editors' warnings on their talk page first warned on December...
Click to read more »release? Reorganized I would remove the image of Paramore performing per WP:IRELEV My thinking was that showing the band performing on the tour supporting...
Click to read more »inline images despite being warned about copyright twice and about MOS:IRELEV by three separate editors. First warned on December 2023, around ~35 edits...
Click to read more »