Redirect to:
This page is a redirect. The following categories are used to track and monitor this redirect:
|
deletion § Images/Media. Shortcuts WP:THUMBSIZEWP:THUMBSIZE WP:IMGSIZEWP:IMGSIZE WP:IMAGESIZEWP:IMAGESIZE Images adjacent to text should generally carry...
Click to read more »consistent Rather than fixed image sizes, suggest using scaling - see WP:IMGSIZE. Nikkimaria (talk) 20:53, 25 February 2017 (UTC) Comments Why is the article...
Click to read more »smaller from GA1 doesn't seem to have happened. It is still too big for MOS:IMGSIZE. As well as the unsourced sections and inappropriate extlinks there is...
Click to read more »(UTC) It looks like the article is still using fixed px sizes? See WP:IMGSIZE. Nikkimaria (talk) 03:01, 3 September 2021 (UTC) My apologies, that issue...
Click to read more »generally not be done as per MOS:IMGSIZE. It's fine for the images in the table (which is given as an exception in MOS:IMGSIZE), but for the lead image, the...
Click to read more »The image of gameplay has fine detail so I increased its size per MOS:IMGSIZE. However, it is slightly blurry and increasing the size naturally worsened...
Click to read more »October 2015 (UTC) Question from John Why the hard-coded image sizes? Per WP:IMGSIZE we would generally allow readers to set their own display sizes and use...
Click to read more »least. Ceoil (talk) 23:46, 9 February 2013 (UTC) Unforced image per WP:IMGSIZE. I'm now down to 3 cn tags left. ww2censor (talk) 11:02, 11 February 2013...
Click to read more »article have been given a hard-coded size, which should be avoided per WP:IMGSIZE. Hope these comments are helpful, CMD (talk) 10:36, 8 May 2020 (UTC)...
Click to read more »2022 (UTC) Some images are fixed to a particular pixel size - per MOS:IMGSIZE they should almost always instead use |upright= to scale images relative...
Click to read more »for a more responsive design that considers the user's settings. See WP:IMGSIZE. Nikkimaria (talk) 14:37, 1 November 2015 (UTC) Comments I sympathise with...
Click to read more »16 December 2024 (UTC) Image review Don't use fixed px size, see MOS:IMGSIZE Suggest adding alt text Captions that aren't complete sentences shouldn't...
Click to read more »do not appear to include any alt text, and quite a few have a forced WP:IMGSIZE. A lot of sources seem a bit old, there may be quite a few places information...
Click to read more »as described in relevant formatting guidelines (e.g. WP:IMAGESIZE, MOS:IMGSIZE, Help:Pictures § Panoramas). Try to harmonize the sizes of images on a...
Click to read more »15:37, 21 January 2018 (UTC) Don't use fixed pixel size for images, per WP:IMGSIZE I have removed the fixed pixel sizes. Midnightblueowl (talk) 21:39, 21...
Click to read more »upright (scaling) values, as pixel sizes are officially discouraged by WP:IMGSIZE except when absolutely necessary. XFDcloser (source) by User:Evad37 – Close...
Click to read more »above. Also, one more note: fixed image sizes are discouraged per MOS:IMGSIZE, so change the infobox image to use relative scaling. RunningTiger123 (talk)...
Click to read more »Image review Suggest adding alt text Don't use fixed px size, see MOS:IMGSIZE. Nikkimaria (talk) 05:14, 9 October 2024 (UTC) @Nikkimaria: Issues have...
Click to read more »panoramas or photospheres), use {{PanoViewer}}. Shortcuts MOS:IMGSIZEMOS:IMGSIZE MOS:IMAGESIZEMOS:IMAGESIZE MOS:UPRIGHTMOS:UPRIGHT Images adjacent to text...
Click to read more »check.--Wehwalt (talk) 03:58, 9 September 2011 (UTC) I am curious; WP:IMGSIZE says "In general, do not define the size of an image unless there is a...
Click to read more »(talk) 00:28, 10 June 2013 (UTC) I've reverted the size increase per WP:IMGSIZE. There's no justification for this other than that some folk like bigger...
Click to read more »Images Generally, image sizes need not be specified in pixels (see WP:IMGSIZE and MOS:IMAGES). Note Wikipedia:Accessibility#Images: images should be...
Click to read more »fixed if for you. You had missed the |150px after the |thumb, see MOS:IMGSIZE NZFC(talk) 05:34, 18 October 2017 (UTC) This is a little nit picky, but...
Click to read more »revert the image setting at 280px per WP:Images#Forced image size, WP:IMGSIZE and MOS:IMAGES, but I will implement the map about mountains and drainage...
Click to read more »and runs counter to the usability guidelines in MOS:IMAGES#Size and WP:IMGSIZE. The existing scanty documentation is terrible, and should be replaced...
Click to read more »size of portrait images using the "upright" parameter, as described at WP:IMGSIZE. For the SNL image, the current listed "purpose of use" is "The image shows...
Click to read more »px size. The Ultimate Boss (talk) 23:08, 26 September 2020 (UTC) See WP:IMGSIZE. Nikkimaria (talk) 23:25, 26 September 2020 (UTC) Nikkimaria, I have changed...
Click to read more »you should remove the custom size setting and change it to default. MOS:IMGSIZE warns against this. Also, the article is well written so finding any issues...
Click to read more »the vice-president? Specifying image sizes in px is discouraged per MOS:IMGSIZE, use the upright parameter instead There are a few seas of blue links throughout...
Click to read more »image, this is the expected behavior of using a frameless image (see MOS:IMGSIZE). Everything else has been addressed. TheDoctorWho (talk) 18:21, 21 May...
Click to read more »Image review Should use scaling rather than fixed image sizes, per MOS:IMGSIZE Can you explain how the flags in Legacy meet MOS:FLAGICON? File:Imelda-alone...
Click to read more »feature, but hard-wiring pixel sizes is generally frowned upon per MOS:IMGSIZE. Naturally occurring populations of Poecilia velifera are confined to nine...
Click to read more »Gerbis (talk) 09:50, 10 March 2020 (UTC) Don't use fixed px size per WP:IMGSIZE Ok, done. Gerbis (talk) 09:50, 10 March 2020 (UTC) Suggest adding alt text...
Click to read more »looks better, but should be done using |upright= rather than px per WP:IMGSIZE. Nikkimaria (talk) 17:10, 22 April 2017 (UTC) I have set them to |upright=1...
Click to read more »legitimate reason to set the size, and in this case there isn't. See WP:IMGSIZE. This article uses a mix of abbreviations (VT #) and full names (Vermont...
Click to read more »almost three years ago, at WP:IMGSIZE, WP:EIS, and probably other places too. Here is what each looked like a year ago: WP:IMGSIZE permalink, WP:EIS permalink...
Click to read more »the |upright= parameter for images rather than a fixed pixel size (MOS:IMGSIZE). Done. I also tried in vain to find some illustration of Prise in particular;...
Click to read more »For the first two points - should I just use "thumb"? |upright=. See MOS:IMGSIZE. Nikkimaria (talk) 12:40, 5 September 2022 (UTC) Some images are missing...
Click to read more »00:33, 5 October 2025 (UTC) This article needs a short description Per WP:IMGSIZE the logo shouldn't use a fixed px size, but instead the relevant upright...
Click to read more »that is generally not recommended as it messes with mobile browsers (MOS:IMGSIZE). Why are you citing a book on the History of Music in Russia for the specifications...
Click to read more »Please read the linked policies before reverting maintenance edits: WP:IMGSIZE, WP:V, WP:BURDEN, etc.". The issue now seems to be that a drive-by editor...
Click to read more »Nikkimaria, Fixed (I believe) Imonoz (talk) 06:40, 16 January 2018 (UTC) Per WP:IMGSIZE, don't use fixed pixel size - you can scale images up or down using |upright=...
Click to read more »upright (scaling) values, as pixel sizes are officially discouraged by WP:IMGSIZE except when absolutely necessary. XFDcloser (source) by User:Evad37 – Close...
Click to read more »that is generally not recommended as it messes with mobile browsers (MOS:IMGSIZE). Why are you citing a book on the History of Music in Russia for the specifications...
Click to read more »capitalization per WP:CITE, and removed fixed thumbnail pixel constraints per WP:IMGSIZE.) Tags: Visual edit Newcomer task Newcomer task: update diffhist m Cell...
Click to read more »without any problem. Amandajm (talk) 00:31, 19 November 2013 (UTC) Per WP:IMGSIZE it is usually preferable just to leave the images as unforced "thumb"s...
Click to read more »13:08, 22 November 2019 (UTC) Two tiny issues I just noticed: per MOS:IMGSIZE, specifying image widths in px is deprecated, use the "upright" parameter...
Click to read more »small for many screens, so it may be helpful, given the constraints of MOS:IMGSIZE, to make it larger. simongraham (talk) 18:08, 16 August 2024 (UTC) "The...
Click to read more »added to that effect! AA (talk) 18:26, 1 December 2024 (UTC) As per MOS:IMGSIZE a fixed width in pixels should not be specified for thumbnails, if you...
Click to read more »Image review White House caption shouldn't end in a period Done. Per WP:IMGSIZE, don't use a fixed pixel size - use upright to scale instead Done....
Click to read more »discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. per WP:IMGSIZE, the |image_size= should be deprecated fully from all infoboxes and replaced...
Click to read more »with BB) I don't agree with you, Caden. Nick referred Thewolfchild to WP:IMGSIZE, then warned and thereafter blocked him for his rude talk page messages...
Click to read more »opposite of what you intend, for some of our readers. There's a reason MOS:IMGSIZE says don't set image sizes to px. Additionally, for MOS:ACCESS reasons...
Click to read more »detailed reading, I am still somewhat unhappy with image formatting WP:IMGSIZE, the fancy font, and make versus take, in spite of your reasons given for...
Click to read more »exhibitions sect. Ceoil (talk) 13:53, 30 August 2015 (UTC) Image review Per WP:IMGSIZE, should generally use image scaling rather than fixed pixel size File:Agostini_-_Tahiti...
Click to read more »disputes, and correct me if I'm wrong, shouldn't we still be following WP:IMGSIZE? I don't think there's any good reason to force image sizes for these galleries...
Click to read more »action. Swarm {talk} 18:57, 15 December 2018 (UTC) If it helps, WP:IMGSIZE states: "Except with very good reason, do not use px (e.g. thumb|300px)...
Click to read more »above. Also, one more note: fixed image sizes are discouraged per MOS:IMGSIZE, so change the infobox image to use relative scaling. RunningTiger123 (talk)...
Click to read more »probably be reduced in size using the |upright= parameter as defined at MOS:IMGSIZE. Currently, there is a lot of whitespace between the first paragraph and...
Click to read more »I understand, thumb was overriden by 440px, so I removed the latter. MOS:IMGSIZE says Only where a smaller or larger image is appropriate... (do stuff to...
Click to read more »the vice-president? Specifying image sizes in px is discouraged per MOS:IMGSIZE, use the upright parameter instead There are a few seas of blue links throughout...
Click to read more »should generally be done with |upright= rather than fixed image size per WP:IMGSIZE. Nikkimaria (talk) 02:32, 7 May 2017 (UTC) Done. Only the infobox has fixed...
Click to read more »upright (scaling) values, as pixel sizes are officially discouraged by WP:IMGSIZE except when absolutely necessary. 38 13 ImageMapEdit (source) Adds a tool...
Click to read more »point me towards that policy? ~ HAL333 19:25, 23 August 2021 (UTC) WP:IMGSIZE. Nikkimaria (talk) 02:42, 24 August 2021 (UTC) It's been removed in all...
Click to read more »force some image sizes? Usually we don't define the image size per WP:IMGSIZE except for the lede image unless there is some specific details that need...
Click to read more »2008 (UTC) Would you be looking for the WP:SIZE guideline and/or the WP:IMGSIZE policy sub-section which states that you should generally use the "thumb"...
Click to read more »the two polar maps at 400px wide are at the limit of the guidance at WP:IMGSIZE for floated images. I think you've achieved as good a balance as possible...
Click to read more »noticed that a couple of the later images have fixed px size - see MOS:IMGSIZE. Nikkimaria (talk) 20:20, 19 August 2023 (UTC) The fixed px should now...
Click to read more »have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. See MOS:IMGSIZE ChamithN (talk) 05:27, 1 May 2016 (UTC) as a matter of fact, before knowing...
Click to read more »the same width as "thumbnail" images, which is user configurable, see WP:IMGSIZE. --Redrose64 (talk) 23:15, 20 April 2011 (UTC) 300px is generally the largest...
Click to read more »places where a forced image size is permissible, see MOS:IMAGES#Size and WP:IMGSIZE. --Redrose64 (talk) 15:36, 31 May 2014 (UTC) None of these are forced image...
Click to read more »Looks fine, but it would be preferable to use |upright= to scale per WP:IMGSIZE. Nikkimaria (talk) 01:50, 18 April 2017 (UTC) Thank you. I've replaced...
Click to read more »But I'd like to avoid specifying "heights" parameter (according to WP:IMGSIZE), and use the standard values. My question was: can "gallery" be corrected...
Click to read more »be done using |upright= in order to respect user preferences - see MOS:IMGSIZE. Nikkimaria (talk) 04:47, 25 September 2024 (UTC) Done here - I did set...
Click to read more »the current one repeats the article. I don't want to force a size (MOS:IMGSIZE), so removed. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 20:43, 28 February 2022 (UTC) Gog the...
Click to read more »When forcing a size like this, please bear in mind MOS:IMAGES and WP:IMGSIZE. --Redrose64 (talk) 12:57, 19 July 2012 (UTC) You can also get the image...
Click to read more »pump SecretName101 (talk) 17:23, 15 November 2022 (UTC) I think the MOS:IMGSIZE would be a right place to start with. AXONOV (talk) ⚑ 07:32, 16 November...
Click to read more »due to the 400 px fixed image size of the lead image, which is above MOS:IMGSIZE recommendations for fixed image size for the lead image. I've reduced it...
Click to read more »half a million pixels on a small mobile phone screen is inconvenient. WP:IMGSIZE advises people not to force images to be displayed in articles at a too...
Click to read more »to be the forced image size, which is generally not recommended (per WP:IMGSIZE). Let me have a shot. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 06:12, 10 May 2014 (UTC) This...
Click to read more »2022 (UTC) @Mrbeastmodeallday: You've set |350px, which is against MOS:IMGSIZE and WP:THUMBSIZE, particularly since it's not in the lead section. Since...
Click to read more »(talk) 00:28, 10 June 2013 (UTC) I've reverted the size increase per WP:IMGSIZE. There's no justification for this other than that some folk like bigger...
Click to read more »Forcing images without good reason can create accessibility problems, per WP:IMGSIZE (which is policy). Arsenikk (talk) 21:19, 18 February 2011 (UTC) Here is...
Click to read more »13:08, 22 November 2019 (UTC) Two tiny issues I just noticed: per MOS:IMGSIZE, specifying image widths in px is deprecated, use the "upright" parameter...
Click to read more »are you setting so many image sizes at smaller than the default? See WP:IMGSIZE I've put most of them back to default size. The full-size images used to...
Click to read more »the image, so you need not present it in the ideal viewing size. Per WP:IMGSIZE: "In general, do not define the size of an image unless there is a good...
Click to read more »WP:STYLE, WP:NOT, WP:COPYVIO, WP:PLAGIARISM, WP:VERIFY, WP:RS, MOS:IMAGES, WP:IMGSIZE, and WP:ETIQ#How to avoid abuse of talk pages, as can be seen on the article...
Click to read more »editors with minimal or no justification for your changes, while ignoring WP:IMGSIZE. There really are issues with different sized displays, particularly small...
Click to read more »(WP:IMAGESIZE). According to the MOS, we can go as high as upright=1.8 (MOS:IMGSIZE) So increased to that. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 20:56, 30 December 2022 (UTC)...
Click to read more »Background. It is also too small for me to read directly (see MOS:IMAGES and WP:IMGSIZE for justification of a larger chart). Beyond GA concerns, the lead image...
Click to read more »page, even on a wide monitor. I strongly suggest you read through MOS:IMGSIZE and act accordingly. All the best, The Bounder (talk) 18:40, 5 April 2017...
Click to read more »(UTC) They should generally be scaled, not set to a fixed px size. See WP:IMGSIZE. Nikkimaria (talk) 16:30, 11 October 2017 (UTC) Done – The images have...
Click to read more »Potrait.png Also, in the chart, some of the images are sized with px. MOS:IMGSIZE recommends using upright instead, so I think these images should be changed...
Click to read more »it later. Alt text has been added. I also removed some px sizes per MOS:IMGSIZE but kept it for others that I thought needed it (such as the maps or insignias)...
Click to read more »is correct. The one issue with what you've done is the scaling - per WP:IMGSIZE that should generally be done using |upright= rather than a fixed px size...
Click to read more »completely right that the current size of the site plan stretches MOS:IMGSIZE beyond its recommendations. (see what I did there?) I've been scratching...
Click to read more »done it in previous FAs of mine with no complaint. As for the sizes, WP:IMGSIZE says that there should be a "good reason" to do so. That's not a high hurdle...
Click to read more »this should be done using |upright= rather than a fixed px size - see MOS:IMGSIZE. Nikkimaria (talk) 16:27, 19 July 2020 (UTC) Suggest adding alt text Will...
Click to read more »only 13 inches. StringTheory11 (t • c) 18:43, 8 June 2015 (UTC) Per WP:IMGSIZE, if you use the 'upright' option rather than a fixed size, the images should...
Click to read more »Administrator? For the map, don't use pixels, but a scaling factor - see MOS:IMGSIZE. That's what I saw. Kind regards, Alavense (talk) 12:55, 26 May 2025 (UTC)...
Click to read more »least. Ceoil (talk) 23:46, 9 February 2013 (UTC) Unforced image per WP:IMGSIZE. I'm now down to 3 cn tags left. ww2censor (talk) 11:02, 11 February 2013...
Click to read more »previous image sizes – as I believe they were carefully considered. MOS:IMGSIZE states "When specifying upright= values greater than 1, take care to balance...
Click to read more »00:33, 5 October 2025 (UTC) This article needs a short description Per WP:IMGSIZE the logo shouldn't use a fixed px size, but instead the relevant upright...
Click to read more »a88d65836&imgHeight=770&imgWidth=587&imgTitle=Twaggies+go+the+Far+Side&imgSize=651914&hostName=news.cnet.com (R/Xmeta/L) 2014-02-10 19:01:48 (UTC): User...
Click to read more »you once again. Display name 99 (talk) 19:41, 17 August 2021 (UTC) MOS:IMGSIZE has some details on how to do this. Nikkimaria (talk) 00:36, 18 August...
Click to read more »you once again. Display name 99 (talk) 19:41, 17 August 2021 (UTC) MOS:IMGSIZE has some details on how to do this. Nikkimaria (talk) 00:36, 18 August...
Click to read more »Tim riley talk 21:32, 16 July 2016 (UTC) Avoid fixed image sizes, per WP:IMGSIZE I've looked into doing so, however it results in some images becoming too...
Click to read more »the user and should therefore not be fixed to a size given in pixels (WP:IMGSIZE). You specify "| image_size = 300px". |image_size= should therefore be...
Click to read more »should only be used when a larger image is appropriate according to MOS:IMGSIZE, which is not necessarily the case here? Instead of having very large pictures...
Click to read more »February 2013 (UTC) The size is right. I've done it a bit differently per WP:IMGSIZE, see what you think. —WP:PENGUIN · [ TALK ] 23:09, 6 February 2013 (UTC)...
Click to read more »major copyedit is required. Images should be formatted according to WP:IMGSIZE as well. Feel free to ping me when you want me to take another look. --John...
Click to read more »are the only two editors that I've ever seen causing disruption over WP:IMGSIZE, or even mentioning it, in over seven years of editing: User talk:Curatrice#Pictures...
Click to read more »set a specific pixel size for display - that shouldn't be done. See WP:IMGSIZE. Nikkimaria (talk) 21:58, 6 June 2020 (UTC) @Nikkimaria: So how do I revert...
Click to read more »February 2017 (UTC) 2. Images are tending to the tiny side, and see WP:IMGSIZE regarding fixed px sizes True in principle but I was concerned to make...
Click to read more »the file name and the extension. You can denote the image size in the imgsize section, and put the statement for the image in the caption section. You...
Click to read more »its size? GinnevraDubois (talk) 17:10, 4 September 2016 (UTC) See MOS:IMGSIZE. It's best not to change the size of images directly, because the Mediawiki...
Click to read more »ru%2fpes%2f150306%2f150306.shtml&id=25760199&iid=6&imgwidth=586&imgheight=436&imgsize=42747&images_links=b (R/Xmeta/L) 2008-06-25 13:36:35 (UTC): w:ru:User:Ritsuka...
Click to read more »the defaults aren't good enough. I do feel obligation to note that MOS:IMGSIZE says "Except with very good reason, a fixed width in pixels (e.g. 17px)...
Click to read more »there any reason that it can't simply be omitted, in accordance with WP:IMGSIZE "do not define the size of an image unless there is a good reason to do...
Click to read more »solution? Venicescapes (talk) 12:51, 12 March 2022 (UTC) That can work. MOS:IMGSIZE allows for fixed px size when there is a very good reason, but in some...
Click to read more »"Siracha sauce (Huy Fong Foods)". It's seems a little big to me per WP:IMGSIZE, but maybe that something better off discussing on the article's talk page...
Click to read more »Battle of Cumae, it's fine but you should not force the image size per WP:IMGSIZE and "right" is the default so is unnecessary extra code. ww2censor (talk)...
Click to read more »19:18, 20 November 2012 (UTC) Hi, thanks for the quick reply but... WP:IMGSIZE is in the Wikipedia:Image use policy "policy"; "a widely accepted standard...
Click to read more »sizes? Apart from the panorama I think they should just default. (MOS:IMGSIZE) Hawkeye7 (discuss) 10:09, 16 March 2018 (UTC) @Hawkeye7: I fixed "web...
Click to read more »with vital details that would be invisible in standard size thumbs (MOS:IMGSIZE). Thumbs will always be a poor representation of a full size painting,...
Click to read more »fixed px size Says whom? Volcanoguy 05:29, 3 March 2026 (UTC) See MOS:IMGSIZE. Nikkimaria (talk) 05:38, 3 March 2026 (UTC) With no fixed px size, the...
Click to read more »images as that is not me. Aoba47 (talk) 05:11, 16 April 2022 (UTC) Per MOS:IMGSIZE, "Where a smaller or larger image is appropriate, use |upright=scaling...
Click to read more »I've moved two potential cases of MOS:SANDWICH (depending on a reader's imgsize settings) to multiple images templates. How does the gallery align with...
Click to read more »are you setting so many image sizes at smaller than the default? See WP:IMGSIZE I've put most of them back to default size. The full-size images used to...
Click to read more »the two polar maps at 400px wide are at the limit of the guidance at WP:IMGSIZE for floated images. I think you've achieved as good a balance as possible...
Click to read more »Gerbis (talk) 09:50, 10 March 2020 (UTC) Don't use fixed px size per WP:IMGSIZE Ok, done. Gerbis (talk) 09:50, 10 March 2020 (UTC) Suggest adding alt text...
Click to read more »(UTC) Don't use fixed px size How do I change this? - Augustios See MOS:IMGSIZE for alternative options. Nikkimaria (talk) 02:30, 28 March 2025 (UTC) Alt...
Click to read more »the image, so you need not present it in the ideal viewing size. Per WP:IMGSIZE: "In general, do not define the size of an image unless there is a good...
Click to read more »detailed reading, I am still somewhat unhappy with image formatting WP:IMGSIZE, the fancy font, and make versus take, in spite of your reasons given for...
Click to read more »October 2015 (UTC) Question from John Why the hard-coded image sizes? Per WP:IMGSIZE we would generally allow readers to set their own display sizes and use...
Click to read more »http://spotted.augusta.com/chronicle/display.html?gallery=63233&photo=228835&imgsize=#photo This is the cover of the author's book and picture 12:21, 20 November...
Click to read more »Forcing images without good reason can create accessibility problems, per WP:IMGSIZE (which is policy). Arsenikk (talk) 21:19, 18 February 2011 (UTC) Here is...
Click to read more »Tim riley talk 21:32, 16 July 2016 (UTC) Avoid fixed image sizes, per WP:IMGSIZE I've looked into doing so, however it results in some images becoming too...
Click to read more »done it in previous FAs of mine with no complaint. As for the sizes, WP:IMGSIZE says that there should be a "good reason" to do so. That's not a high hurdle...
Click to read more »force some image sizes? Usually we don't define the image size per WP:IMGSIZE except for the lede image unless there is some specific details that need...
Click to read more »looks better, but should be done using |upright= rather than px per WP:IMGSIZE. Nikkimaria (talk) 17:10, 22 April 2017 (UTC) I have set them to |upright=1...
Click to read more »should only be used when a larger image is appropriate according to MOS:IMGSIZE, which is not necessarily the case here? Instead of having very large pictures...
Click to read more »to be the forced image size, which is generally not recommended (per WP:IMGSIZE). Let me have a shot. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 06:12, 10 May 2014 (UTC) This...
Click to read more »revert the image setting at 280px per WP:Images#Forced image size, WP:IMGSIZE and MOS:IMAGES, but I will implement the map about mountains and drainage...
Click to read more »(WP:IMAGESIZE). According to the MOS, we can go as high as upright=1.8 (MOS:IMGSIZE) So increased to that. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 20:56, 30 December 2022 (UTC)...
Click to read more »possible one should avoid forcing the image to a specified size per WP:IMGSIZE and MOS:IMAGES#Size by adding a pixel size such as "200px" in the example...
Click to read more »completely right that the current size of the site plan stretches MOS:IMGSIZE beyond its recommendations. (see what I did there?) I've been scratching...
Click to read more »27 September 2020 (UTC) Remove the fixed widths from the images. MOS:IMGSIZE: Except with very good reason, a fixed width in pixels (e.g. 17px) should...
Click to read more »February 2017 (UTC) 2. Images are tending to the tiny side, and see WP:IMGSIZE regarding fixed px sizes True in principle but I was concerned to make...
Click to read more »Image review White House caption shouldn't end in a period Done. Per WP:IMGSIZE, don't use a fixed pixel size - use upright to scale instead Done....
Click to read more »Despite what ChiZeroOne says, you should not force the image size per WP:IMGSIZE] by adding a px size. ww2censor (talk) 16:17, 21 October 2010 (UTC) Good...
Click to read more »Nikkimaria, Fixed (I believe) Imonoz (talk) 06:40, 16 January 2018 (UTC) Per WP:IMGSIZE, don't use fixed pixel size - you can scale images up or down using |upright=...
Click to read more »should generally be done with |upright= rather than fixed image size per WP:IMGSIZE. Nikkimaria (talk) 02:32, 7 May 2017 (UTC) Done. Only the infobox has fixed...
Click to read more »only 13 inches. StringTheory11 (t • c) 18:43, 8 June 2015 (UTC) Per WP:IMGSIZE, if you use the 'upright' option rather than a fixed size, the images should...
Click to read more »is correct. The one issue with what you've done is the scaling - per WP:IMGSIZE that should generally be done using |upright= rather than a fixed px size...
Click to read more »previous image sizes – as I believe they were carefully considered. MOS:IMGSIZE states "When specifying upright= values greater than 1, take care to balance...
Click to read more »exhibitions sect. Ceoil (talk) 13:53, 30 August 2015 (UTC) Image review Per WP:IMGSIZE, should generally use image scaling rather than fixed pixel size File:Agostini_-_Tahiti...
Click to read more »Background. It is also too small for me to read directly (see MOS:IMAGES and WP:IMGSIZE for justification of a larger chart). Beyond GA concerns, the lead image...
Click to read more »probably be reduced in size using the |upright= parameter as defined at MOS:IMGSIZE. Currently, there is a lot of whitespace between the first paragraph and...
Click to read more »this should be done using |upright= rather than a fixed px size - see MOS:IMGSIZE. Nikkimaria (talk) 16:27, 19 July 2020 (UTC) Suggest adding alt text Will...
Click to read more »open with an image review Don't use fixed px sizes for images, see MOS:IMGSIZE done Suggest adding alt text where it is missing done...
Click to read more »Images Generally, image sizes need not be specified in pixels (see WP:IMGSIZE and MOS:IMAGES). Note Wikipedia:Accessibility#Images: images should be...
Click to read more »February 2013 (UTC) The size is right. I've done it a bit differently per WP:IMGSIZE, see what you think. —WP:PENGUIN · [ TALK ] 23:09, 6 February 2013 (UTC)...
Click to read more »sizes? Apart from the panorama I think they should just default. (MOS:IMGSIZE) Hawkeye7 (discuss) 10:09, 16 March 2018 (UTC) @Hawkeye7: I fixed "web...
Click to read more »Potrait.png Also, in the chart, some of the images are sized with px. MOS:IMGSIZE recommends using upright instead, so I think these images should be changed...
Click to read more »size might make them less useful. Good for you; I cannot. Please see MOS:IMGSIZE, which advises that "an image with fine detail (e.g. a map or diagram)"...
Click to read more »point me towards that policy? ~ HAL333 19:25, 23 August 2021 (UTC) WP:IMGSIZE. Nikkimaria (talk) 02:42, 24 August 2021 (UTC) It's been removed in all...
Click to read more »size of portrait images using the "upright" parameter, as described at WP:IMGSIZE. For the SNL image, the current listed "purpose of use" is "The image shows...
Click to read more »check.--Wehwalt (talk) 03:58, 9 September 2011 (UTC) I am curious; WP:IMGSIZE says "In general, do not define the size of an image unless there is a...
Click to read more »2022 (UTC) Some images are fixed to a particular pixel size - per MOS:IMGSIZE they should almost always instead use |upright= to scale images relative...
Click to read more »the current one repeats the article. I don't want to force a size (MOS:IMGSIZE), so removed. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 20:43, 28 February 2022 (UTC) Gog the...
Click to read more »it later. Alt text has been added. I also removed some px sizes per MOS:IMGSIZE but kept it for others that I thought needed it (such as the maps or insignias)...
Click to read more »the user and should therefore not be fixed to a size given in pixels (WP:IMGSIZE). You specify "| image_size = 300px". |image_size= should therefore be...
Click to read more »27 September 2020 (UTC) Remove the fixed widths from the images. MOS:IMGSIZE: Except with very good reason, a fixed width in pixels (e.g. 17px) should...
Click to read more »page, even on a wide monitor. I strongly suggest you read through MOS:IMGSIZE and act accordingly. All the best, The Bounder (talk) 18:40, 5 April 2017...
Click to read more »and cladograms could be scaled up (with the upright parameter), per MOS:IMGSIZE, as they are almost impossible to decipher at default size. Done. LittleJerry...
Click to read more »set a specific pixel size for display - that shouldn't be done. See WP:IMGSIZE. Nikkimaria (talk) 21:58, 6 June 2020 (UTC) @Nikkimaria: So how do I revert...
Click to read more »major copyedit is required. Images should be formatted according to WP:IMGSIZE as well. Feel free to ping me when you want me to take another look. --John...
Click to read more »15:37, 21 January 2018 (UTC) Don't use fixed pixel size for images, per WP:IMGSIZE I have removed the fixed pixel sizes. Midnightblueowl (talk) 21:39, 21...
Click to read more »solution? Venicescapes (talk) 12:51, 12 March 2022 (UTC) That can work. MOS:IMGSIZE allows for fixed px size when there is a very good reason, but in some...
Click to read more »px size. The Ultimate Boss (talk) 23:08, 26 September 2020 (UTC) See WP:IMGSIZE. Nikkimaria (talk) 23:25, 26 September 2020 (UTC) Nikkimaria, I have changed...
Click to read more »(UTC) They should generally be scaled, not set to a fixed px size. See WP:IMGSIZE. Nikkimaria (talk) 16:30, 11 October 2017 (UTC) Done – The images have...
Click to read more »nor does it allow use of the upright parameter. So, in violation of WP:IMGSIZE, I ended up hard-coding a px width into my {{maplink}} in Big Duck. Today...
Click to read more »without any problem. Amandajm (talk) 00:31, 19 November 2013 (UTC) Per WP:IMGSIZE it is usually preferable just to leave the images as unforced "thumb"s...
Click to read more »Administrator? For the map, don't use pixels, but a scaling factor - see MOS:IMGSIZE. That's what I saw. Kind regards, Alavense (talk) 12:55, 26 May 2025 (UTC)...
Click to read more »Image review Should use scaling rather than fixed image sizes, per MOS:IMGSIZE Can you explain how the flags in Legacy meet MOS:FLAGICON? File:Imelda-alone...
Click to read more »For the first two points - should I just use "thumb"? |upright=. See MOS:IMGSIZE. Nikkimaria (talk) 12:40, 5 September 2022 (UTC) Some images are missing...
Click to read more »be done using |upright= in order to respect user preferences - see MOS:IMGSIZE. Nikkimaria (talk) 04:47, 25 September 2024 (UTC) Done here - I did set...
Click to read more »added to that effect! AA (talk) 18:26, 1 December 2024 (UTC) As per MOS:IMGSIZE a fixed width in pixels should not be specified for thumbnails, if you...
Click to read more »generally not be done as per MOS:IMGSIZE. It's fine for the images in the table (which is given as an exception in MOS:IMGSIZE), but for the lead image, the...
Click to read more »I've moved two potential cases of MOS:SANDWICH (depending on a reader's imgsize settings) to multiple images templates. How does the gallery align with...
Click to read more »fixed px size Says whom? Volcanoguy 05:29, 3 March 2026 (UTC) See MOS:IMGSIZE. Nikkimaria (talk) 05:38, 3 March 2026 (UTC) With no fixed px size, the...
Click to read more »"upright" system or specifies fixed pixels. This I think goes beyond what MOS:IMGSIZE says ("As a general rule, images should not be set to a larger fixed width...
Click to read more »smaller from GA1 doesn't seem to have happened. It is still too big for MOS:IMGSIZE. As well as the unsourced sections and inappropriate extlinks there is...
Click to read more »(UTC) Don't use fixed px size How do I change this? - Augustios See MOS:IMGSIZE for alternative options. Nikkimaria (talk) 02:30, 28 March 2025 (UTC) Alt...
Click to read more »small for many screens, so it may be helpful, given the constraints of MOS:IMGSIZE, to make it larger. simongraham (talk) 18:08, 16 August 2024 (UTC) "The...
Click to read more »16 December 2024 (UTC) Image review Don't use fixed px size, see MOS:IMGSIZE Suggest adding alt text Captions that aren't complete sentences shouldn't...
Click to read more »Policy: No copyrighting Controlling line breaks - MOS:NBSP Image sizes - MOS:IMGSIZE City infobox name - WIKIPEDIA:USCITY - City, State - Sbmeirow (talk · contribs ·...
Click to read more »being previously warned: Making infobox images too large going against MOS:IMGSIZE: "the resulting image should usually be no more than (...) 300px [wide]...
Click to read more »noticed that a couple of the later images have fixed px size - see MOS:IMGSIZE. Nikkimaria (talk) 20:20, 19 August 2023 (UTC) The fixed px should now...
Click to read more »size might make them less useful. Good for you; I cannot. Please see MOS:IMGSIZE, which advises that "an image with fine detail (e.g. a map or diagram)"...
Click to read more »and cladograms could be scaled up (with the upright parameter), per MOS:IMGSIZE, as they are almost impossible to decipher at default size. Done. LittleJerry...
Click to read more »the defaults aren't good enough. I do feel obligation to note that MOS:IMGSIZE says "Except with very good reason, a fixed width in pixels (e.g. 17px)...
Click to read more »open with an image review Don't use fixed px sizes for images, see MOS:IMGSIZE done Suggest adding alt text where it is missing done...
Click to read more »