Redirect to:
This page is a redirect. The following categories are used to track and monitor this redirect:
|
material about living persons is 'do no harm.'" This principle was ultimately rejected: while avoiding harm remains an important consideration within...
Click to read more »If you see a threat of physical harm (including self-harm): Treat all claims seriously Many threats are empty, but leave that evaluation to Wikimedia...
Click to read more »cause harm. The wrong medication given to a patient can cause harm. The wrong name on a surgery schedule can cause harm. Yes, medical errors cause harm. These...
Click to read more »result was redirect to grievous bodily harm. Non-admin closure. Jfire (talk) 06:16, 27 February 2008 (UTC) Bodily harm (edit | talk | history | protect |...
Click to read more »"is the second most common form of self-harm in the UK" - What is the most common? "A person who self-harms is not usually seeking to end their own life;"...
Click to read more »sub-section I wanted to find out if my ideas for the improvement of the Self-harm article are supported by people (other than me). This improvement focuses...
Click to read more »that one motivation of self harm is to seek attention, however it is noted that in the majority of cases of repetitive self harm attention seeking is NOT...
Click to read more »Guide to deletion (glossary) Help, my article got nominated for deletion! Harm (comics) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs |...
Click to read more »article may even play a role in its continued significance. For an act of self-harm committed, in some part, to publicize oneself or one's ideals, Wikipedia...
Click to read more »the appropriate talk pages. --MuZemike 03:04, 4 January 2012 (UTC) Do No Harm (HR report on Bahrain) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links |...
Click to read more »Self-harm to breasts and sexual organs was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no...
Click to read more »talk. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 07:01, 16 March 2007 (UTC) Later-no-harm criterion (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs |...
Click to read more »self-harm. See the discussion on the talk page. Nydas 14:43, 9 September 2006 (UTC) Keep Criteria: it is outlined in the parent article, self-harm. References:...
Click to read more »Shortcuts WP:HEBUWP:HEBU H:BUTTONH:BUTTON Threats of harm Learn how to respond to threats of self-harm or violence to others Privacy breaches Requesting...
Click to read more »(UTC) Disambiguation page no longer required due to changes made at Do No Harm. Tomcage9Talk Contribs 10:38, 19 June 2006 (UTC) I see no reason why this...
Click to read more »Articles for deletion/List of fictional self-harmers Articles for deletion/List of fictional self-harmers (2nd nomination) To have any content at all,...
Click to read more »withdrawn. (non-admin closure) Goodvac (talk) 07:47, 10 January 2012 (UTC) Al-Harm (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)...
Click to read more »between many different views on a highly contentious issue. However, WP:HARM was a failure. It failed to gain consensus for adoption as a formal guideline...
Click to read more »Guide to deletion (glossary) Help, my article got nominated for deletion! Harm Geert Muller (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch |...
Click to read more »help than harm" in terms of administrative actions is explicitly not numerical; 51 good deletions v. 49 bad ones is not "more help than harm". If you are...
Click to read more »templates, and I think the "harmonica" ones are more appropriate than the "harm" ones. Dancingbanana204 01:14, 19 December 2005 (UTC) Perhaps this belongs...
Click to read more »Wikipedia. Comment on content, not on the contributor. Personal attacks harm the Wikipedia community and the collaborative atmosphere needed to create...
Click to read more »blocking policy. Respond to a threat of physical harm or self-harm? See Wikipedia:Responding to threats of harm for instructions on how to do this immediately...
Click to read more »cleanup, for situations where an editor is clearly deliberately trying to harm Wikipedia. Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations, for situations where an editor...
Click to read more »free-for-alls that do more harm than good, with toxic piling-on that escalates instead of solving the dispute. Such a toxic culture harms Wikipedia's ability...
Click to read more »At the moment, Dani Harmer discography is simply a duplication of info already in Dani Harmer. With greatest respect to Ms Harmer, while there are good...
Click to read more »Wikipedia should help people more than it hurts them (Wikipedia:Avoiding harm). Wikipedia should have verifiable civility, and it should have measures...
Click to read more »before assuming bad faith. Instead of assuming that fellow editors are out to harm the project and its ideals, assume that they don't know how they're contributing...
Click to read more »WP:ADMINGUIDE/BWP:ADMINGUIDE/B Blocks exist to protect the project from harm, and reduce likely future problems. Appropriate use of a block can help prevent...
Click to read more »exercise is to relax the mind before confronting content forks, point-of-view forks, and sensationalism, which harm the encyclopedia. Counting juntas...
Click to read more »The result was delete. Joyous! | Talk 02:19, 10 December 2016 (UTC) David Harmer (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)...
Click to read more »First, do no harm. If following a policy or guideline would be wrong because of the harm it would cause, don't follow it. Wikipedia:Avoiding harm Wikipedia:Ignore...
Click to read more »calm and good faith. Even if you do not feel that you have been rude or harmed anyone, you may have given a false impression or contributed to a misunderstanding...
Click to read more »started as an application of the principle of Primum non nocere, "first, do no harm". Here is the WP:IAR interpretation of BLP--violations of this subset of...
Click to read more »few exceptional editing powers that have been granted to prevent or reduce harm to living persons, these can be abused as some sort of trump card to give...
Click to read more »think it's appropriate to refer to self-harmers as people to laugh at! Nor should that opinion of self-harmers be a reason to delete the article. Mdwh...
Click to read more »inappropriate or uncomfortable interactions with adults, and other forms of online harm. Reasonable measures which prevent and stop potential problems associated...
Click to read more »constructively). For threats of harm (to self or others) you must email emergencywikimedia.org (see the threats of harm page) and not use this page. Requests...
Click to read more »they can go on rampages similar to those of a WikiOgre, albeit with more harm to other WikiFauna. Wikipedia:Don't fight fire with fire § The Three Users:...
Click to read more »Threats of harm to self or others: This behaviour should be dealt with by following the procedures at Wikipedia:Responding to threats of harm. Depending...
Click to read more »related to Ukraine nationalism. The term "unintended to cause harm" means either (a) that no harm was intended or foreseen by the human actions which resulted...
Click to read more »mind before encountering with editors that vandalize, troll or otherwise harm the encyclopedia. Counting forks "Anonymous Serbian junta attacks Lvivske"...
Click to read more » The result was merge to Free (Dani Harmer song). v/r - TP 20:31, 7 April 2012 (UTC) Superheroes (Dani Harmer album) (edit | talk | history | protect |...
Click to read more »"do no harm". Whereas unsourced material in other articles may simply be tagged as requiring verification, unsourced material which may cause harm is to...
Click to read more »any harm. In other words, the logical extension of the "no harm" argument is that no title should ever be moved, since no title ever does any harm. For...
Click to read more »status examination Political abuse of psychiatry in the Soviet Union Self-harm Zuclopenthixol - 13th June 2007 Treatment of schizophrenia - 13th August...
Click to read more »pump (policy) § Recent changes to WP:LLM are too restrictive and actively harm some parts of Wikipedia – Page size issues on VPP. Anomie⚔ 23:40, 23 July...
Click to read more »the "Somebody Else's Problem"-effect may occur. If this happens, it does harm to the encyclopedia we are trying to build without anyone actually wanting...
Click to read more »you with a way to practice using the tools in an environment that will not harm the encyclopedia. Others simply document what you are able to do and their...
Click to read more »(no harm and productivity) should be a reason to keep. Dutchy45 (talk) 16:43, 3 August 2022 (UTC) As Neiltonks mentioned earlier, I don't see the harm in...
Click to read more »result was delete. Randykitty (talk) 10:47, 11 September 2015 (UTC) Olly Harmer (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)...
Click to read more »Grayautumnday (talk · contribs) Interests: Evidence-based tools (e.g. SMART Recovery, harm reduction, MAT). Constitutional protections for non-theists. Fighting stigma...
Click to read more »further edits should be made to this page. The result was redirect to Self-harm. Eddie891 Talk Work 14:08, 4 August 2022 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles...
Click to read more »making infrequent edits. Not particularly helpful, but not really doing any harm. Late one Saturday night Bigbro begins adding the same rhyming couplet containing...
Click to read more »available, is not readily available and putting it on Wikipedia could cause harm that having it in the original source does not. Therefore, I (Tango) propose...
Click to read more »information published? What if publication of the information might lead to real harm? When is it appropriate to edit such information out of an article? When...
Click to read more »Wikipedia's policy on biographies of living people says "the possibility of harm to living subjects must always be considered when exercising editorial judgment"...
Click to read more »confirmed (2026) Recent changes to WP:LLM are too restrictive and actively harm some parts of Wikipedia (2026) proposals: RfC LLMCOMM guideline (2026) Technical:...
Click to read more »journal |last= Kmietowicz |first= Z |date= 11 June 2013 |title= Potential harms of type 2 diabetes drugs have been ignored, finds BMJ investigation |journal=...
Click to read more »was delete. –Juliancolton | Talk 17:08, 28 April 2009 (UTC) Free (Dani Harmer Song) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs |...
Click to read more »oversight, and stewards. Users are restricted from sensitive actions that might harm the project if anyone could do them. Thus, anonymous users cannot edit semi-protected...
Click to read more »harms the quality of the encyclopedia, as it can lead to incorrect or biased information in articles. False information in Wikipedia articles harms the...
Click to read more »will harm Wikipedia through bad decisions and poor behavior Subtly vandalizing articles, in the belief that this will frustrate, discourage, and harm readers...
Click to read more »cleanup, for situations where an editor is clearly deliberately trying to harm Wikipedia. Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations, for situations where an editor...
Click to read more »December 2013 (UTC) Benefits of philosophy is not proven, and it is possible harm (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)...
Click to read more »participant is in danger. This can include threats by a Wikipedia editor to harm another editor in real life or a threat by a Wikipedia editor to commit suicide...
Click to read more »mean it should continue. Walter Görlitz (talk) 13:53, 20 June 2016 (UTC) No harm in redirecting song titles to album articles. ---Another Believer (Talk)...
Click to read more »regarding a living person is questioned, the rule of thumb should be "do no harm." In practice, this means that such material should be removed until a decision...
Click to read more »actual bodily harm is different from the mens rea of assault occasioning actual bodily harm. To convict someone of inflicting actual bodily harm it is necessary...
Click to read more »prominence directly. Wikipedia acknowledges its own influence and potential for harm in some ways, such as with the biographies of living people policy, which...
Click to read more »dismiss people who self-harm, discouraging them from finding help. Our own article on self-harm notes: A common belief regarding self-harm is that it is an attention-seeking...
Click to read more »to deletion (glossary) Help, my article got nominated for deletion! Nick Harmer (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)...
Click to read more »will cause no harm, "Bradley Manning" may cause harm. BLP requires that in this situation we take the course of action that guarantees no harm will be caused...
Click to read more »A WikiImp is a wiki user who, while not harming Wikipedia, leaves the real work of improving Wikipedia to other users, such as WikiDragons, WikiGnomes...
Click to read more »page. The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 01:14, 13 June 2010 (UTC) Ben Harmer (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)...
Click to read more »is very simple. If a rule would prevent you from improving, or preventing harm to, the encyclopedia, then just ignore it. However, be certain that what...
Click to read more »Awareness Month, and Self-Harm Awareness Month? (I suspect that a surfeit of "awareness" campaigns is one cause of self-harm, myself.) - Smerdis of Tlön...
Click to read more »Hate and harm usually depend on context. Aim to build an encyclopedia; don't appeal to prurient interest, and don't aim to cause or abet harm and offense...
Click to read more »possibility of harm to living subjects must always be considered when exercising editorial judgment". Most typically, "harm" means harm to the reputation...
Click to read more »(UTC) AfDs for this article: Articles for deletion/Nick Harmer Articles for deletion/Nick Harmer (2nd nomination) [Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion...
Click to read more »between potential harm and potential educational benefit, with a bias towards running the image, and I'm not seeing any significant harm from running these...
Click to read more »encyclopedia. Keeping surplus pages around for a while does not do any significant harm to the encyclopedia; Wikipedia needs editors more than it needs webspace...
Click to read more »doubt that person's; his action in licensing it has caused loss/harm (or risk of harm, or so it's claimed) to a contractual party by virtue of breach...
Click to read more »experiment require researchers to design their studies such that they do no harm to participants. Researchers are expected to adhere to professional codes...
Click to read more »§ Selection criteria Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not Wikipedia:Avoiding harm#An inclusion test, part of an essay Wikipedia:Inclusion (disambiguation)...
Click to read more »has already started on the Talk page for the Beauty Pageant project. No harm will be done by closing this nomination as "keep" and letting the project-level...
Click to read more »directly typing the address. I see no harm in it. Henrik 16:09, 29 June 2007 (UTC) Linking is irrelivant (see above). The harm is the logical consequence of making...
Click to read more »Note: The suppression team does not respond to threats of harm. Such emergencies are dealt with as described at Wikipedia:Responding to threats of harm....
Click to read more »apologies. Smallbones(smalltalk) 18:01, 27 January 2020 (UTC) All good, no harm done. - Chris.sherlock (talk) 07:21, 28 January 2020 (UTC) The Signpost:...
Click to read more »protect Wikipedia and its editors from harm.", so I'd only consider blocking a user if it was clear they were harming Wikipedia or its users in a way that...
Click to read more »(non-admin closure) ☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 16:57, 12 March 2017 (UTC) Brian Harmer (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)...
Click to read more »links | watch | logs) (diff !top) - Link: oncenturyavenue.org/2015/03/harm-is-harm-hello/ (R/Xmeta/L) User is in a trusted group sysop on some wikis 2016-02-08...
Click to read more »that you are being bullied, or another user has threatened you with bodily harm, it is important that you report them immediately to the Incidents page on...
Click to read more »The redirect has existed since 2006 without any evidence of controversy, harm or confusion. While it's not a redirect that I would personally create, per...
Click to read more »2007 (UTC) Keep Self-harm is a major problem in some cultures and has numerous sources to attest to its importance. "self harm" gets over 1.1 million...
Click to read more »say it well and politely, and it helps all concerned, causing no further harm. Wikipedia:Articles are more important than policy Wikipedia:Don't-give-a-fuckism...
Click to read more »be unnecessary, deleting them is even less necessary. They don't do any harm. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 20:45, 7 November 2009 (UTC) Keep it';s definitely...
Click to read more »consensus that mandatory draftification will either not improve or even harm the encyclopaedia". ← Previous "Discussion report" Next "Discussion report"...
Click to read more »reviewing articles would catch the type of bad edits that cause harm to living people, and what harm a control on "open editing" would have to the success of...
Click to read more »(CSD A7, G3). (non-admin closure) Deadbeef 00:37, 6 May 2013 (UTC) Wayne Harmer (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)...
Click to read more »These include additions, removals, and modifications that cause intentional harm to the content of the encyclopedia. This page lists different forms of vandalism...
Click to read more »"featured article", while simultaneously ensuring that Wikipedia is not harmed by unconstructive edits. RC patrolling primarily consists of a four-step...
Click to read more »Foundation or an affiliate of the WMF. Editors responding to threats of harm can now contact the Wikimedia Foundation's emergency address by using...
Click to read more »specifically listed as one to avoid in deletion discussions and does more harm to your cause than good. If you are new to Wikipedia, or you are otherwise...
Click to read more »overlap with doxxing Medium Rules Wikipedia:Avoiding harm Wikipedia:Responding to threats of harm Wikipedia:Don't stuff beans up your nose Wikipedia:How...
Click to read more »more harm then good to when and if the clutter on lists of redirects get to a point when a very uncommon misspelling redirect would do more harm then...
Click to read more »above are all the same and only Blue Collar Wrestling Alliance. I see no harm in this page staying online. It is more credible than many other companies...
Click to read more »or attack page. - Smerdis of Tlön 20:35, 20 February 2007 (UTC) Barron Harms (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)...
Click to read more »we either contribute or subtract from safe and brave spaces. We point out harm when we see it and we work within community to speak up when/if we see event...
Click to read more »things can happen by chance. Unfairly blocking someone as a sockpuppet is a harm not easily undone. Decisions and case control at SPI are routinely managed...
Click to read more »will probably turn out to be a net positive to the encyclopedia anyway, no harm done. We should just assume good faith and go back to improving the encyclopedia –...
Click to read more »cleanup, for situations where an editor is clearly deliberately trying to harm Wikipedia. Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations, for situations where an editor...
Click to read more »injunction. This type of injunction is supposed to last a short time to minimize harm while a trial is ongoing and offers a party a temporary legal solution to...
Click to read more »(UTC) Speedily Approved. Discussed it with TSD on IRC, there's not much harm in performing this task and it will make the code easier to deal with in...
Click to read more »notability, and the article is a source of potential harm to a living person. While the issue of harm should not affect our coverage of solidly notable individuals...
Click to read more »contributors off, biased articles will drive readers away, and both will harm our reputation in the long term. There isn't a secret formula to achieve...
Click to read more »substantial harm? (Answer:Yes) Can inhalation of every substance known to man cause harm, and is it different to say that something could cause harm than it...
Click to read more »Wikipedia article on Desai do any actual harm to our readers? We should not blame all of the extensive harm caused by Desai’s recent publishing misadventures...
Click to read more »Falun Gong harms the NHS (UK) and the Chinese healthcare system (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block ·...
Click to read more »are our volunteers themselves. Where issues present a credible threat of harm to our users and to the security of Wikimedia platforms, we will do the best...
Click to read more »cause harm. The wrong medication given to a patient can cause harm. The wrong name on a surgery schedule can cause harm. Yes, medical errors cause harm. These...
Click to read more »considered harassment. This includes any real-world threats, such as threats of harm, and threats to disrupt a person's work on Wikipedia. Statements of intent...
Click to read more »archetypal "12 year old's Minecraft YouTube channel" draft is, if it's harming no one, entirely unproblematic. In fact, the biting effect of going out...
Click to read more »The result was delete. Wifione Message 08:46, 29 August 2014 (UTC) Kelly Harms (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)...
Click to read more »shortcut. Is there some harm done to the project by retaining it? — Gavia immer (talk) 13:22, 20 October 2007 (UTC) No harm to the project that I can...
Click to read more »drama. As with trolling, drama is a negative form of interaction that harms and destabilizes online communities. As with trolling, the goal of those...
Click to read more »was it possible to film movies based on White Fang such that no dogs were harmed in the making thereof? In particular, how was it possible to film the scene...
Click to read more »deletion (glossary) Help, my article got nominated for deletion! Daniel Harms (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)...
Click to read more »Completing nomination for IP. Reason on edit summary was: Delete or Merge with harm reduction. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.202.235.113 (talk) 19:05...
Click to read more »don't see any harm at a year, at all, if the project has potential use. Beyond that, I don't see any harm in waiting, so, unless specific harm is alleged...
Click to read more »state the following: 1. A robot may not harm a human being, or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm. 2. A robot must obey the orders given...
Click to read more »we either contribute or subtract from safe and brave spaces. We point out harm when we see it and we work within community to speak up when/if we see event...
Click to read more »similar articles exist would stunt the growth of Wikipedia, and do more harm than good. On the other hand, if a similar article was nominated for deletion...
Click to read more »contributions for now. --Irpen 22:26, August 16, 2005 (UTC) Redirect - no harm of the redirect, might help some unfortunate russian-speaking soul to find...
Click to read more »blocking, banning, and other sanctions is to protect the encyclopedia from harm. It is not to "punish" the offender for their wrongdoing. So if you decide...
Click to read more »ANI Possum may be quarantined (desysoped or blocked) to prevent further harm to the community. The phrase was popularised by the 19th-century poet Percy...
Click to read more »Threats of violence or harm made against a specific school or students at a school that can be identified should be reported to the [[WP:AN|Administrators'...
Click to read more »delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 21:20, 31 July 2017 (UTC) Fred Harms (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)...
Click to read more »giving undue weight to a minority view. Collectively, disruptive editors harm Wikipedia's reliability or exhaust the patience of other editors, who may...
Click to read more »do least harm, and there comes a point at which keeping information in the form and location in which it exists has the potential to do harm. Ideally...
Click to read more »or contacting other persons (either on- or off-wiki) in order to cause harm to that user. Repeated instances of incivility, if unchecked, can also constitute...
Click to read more »doing any harm. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 03:02, 5 November 2009 (UTC) no harm? WP:NOHARM LibStar (talk) 07:03, 11 November 2009 (UTC) Yes, no harm. I read...
Click to read more »meaning to a few people cause grave harm to Wikipedia by reducing the overall quality of the article set. The harm caused by one such article may be minimal;...
Click to read more »summoned to the home of local magistrate Roger Nowell on suspicion of causing harm by witchcraft, and were thereafter detained in the gaol at Lancaster Castle...
Click to read more »(talk) 13:47, 16 January 2010 (UTC) It is not harming anyone? Do you really think that this article doesn't harm Kaleb Schwade? Santa Claus of the Future (talk)...
Click to read more »of probable harm if it is deleted.Bridgeplayer (talk) 01:44, 11 September 2010 (UTC) Being long-standing is an indication of probable harm if it is deleted...
Click to read more »user box is doing no harm. Monty845 19:19, 16 September 2011 (UTC) Keep potentially useful, even if never used is doing no harm. Graeme Bartlett (talk)...
Click to read more »all edits made by the user were made to make Wikipedia better, and not to harm it. It is an extension of the good faith rule, and helps prevent confusion...
Click to read more »infrequent edits, which are not particularly helpful but not really doing much harm. Late one Saturday night, Bigbro begins adding the same childish rhyming...
Click to read more »purpose is not to punish but rather to protect the encyclopedia against harm. Unless repeated warnings have occurred, and despite this, the disruptive...
Click to read more »I'm not sure the details regarding his death pass the inclusion test. WP:HARM#TEST Sesamehoneytart 23:24, 4 August 2026 (UTC) Note: this discussion has...
Click to read more »ArbCom's scope: Referred to the WMF Legal and Community Liaison. Threats of harm to self or to others: Referred to the WMF emergency address, emergencywikimedia...
Click to read more »Wikiblower protection, the proportionality of the present benefit to the present harm is the deciding factor rather than the informal cliques or past contributions...
Click to read more »professional ethics of psychologists and has been alleged to indirectly harm future test subjects by undermining the test's effectiveness. Similarly,...
Click to read more »legal threats Wikipedia:Responding to threats of harm – for threats of violence, including self-harm This page is a list of project pages associated with...
Click to read more »deletion (glossary) Help, my article got nominated for deletion! Robbin Harms (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)...
Click to read more »could "do harm", then it would be a CSD, not an AfD. Having a bio of my gardener does no harm, but isn't very encyclopedic either. If "no harm in staying"...
Click to read more »correctly licensed and provide with required rationale. Deleting it would harm not improve the article. Archivey (talk) 14:37, 13 January 2009 (UTC) Delete...
Click to read more »mean they're simply populated only by the clueless. This probably does more harm than good. So, while the best solution may be to get rid of these things...
Click to read more »for sound editorial judgement. Responding to threats of harm Threats of harm (including self-harm) should be treated seriously and reported to the Wikimedia...
Click to read more »user box is doing no harm. Monty845 19:15, 16 September 2011 (UTC) Keep potentially useful, even if never used is doing no harm. Graeme Bartlett (talk)...
Click to read more »user box is doing no harm. Monty845 19:15, 16 September 2011 (UTC) Keep potentially useful, even if never used is doing no harm. Graeme Bartlett (talk)...
Click to read more »user box is doing no harm. Monty845 19:18, 16 September 2011 (UTC) Keep potentially useful, even if never used is doing no harm. Graeme Bartlett (talk)...
Click to read more »delete a redirect. A7V2 (talk) 03:46, 9 January 2023 (UTC) Keep what possible harm is done by a redirect that a user feels is superfluous? People will always...
Click to read more »Ne'er-do-wells article and also the frontman for the band. What can the harm be in leaving this article on. We are trying to release an album but it isn't...
Click to read more »made to this page. The result was delete. clear consensus. "What's the harm if kept" isn't an accepted argument here. DGG ( talk ) 03:25, 29 March 2015...
Click to read more »user box is doing no harm. Monty845 19:13, 16 September 2011 (UTC) Keep potentially useful, even if never used is doing no harm. Graeme Bartlett (talk)...
Click to read more »cleanup, for situations where an editor is clearly deliberately trying to harm Wikipedia. Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations, for situations where an editor...
Click to read more »'em."? What actual harm do these do? --Docg 12:13, 9 January 2007 (UTC) Delete per nom and per previous deletions. "What actual harm?" is not a good keep...
Click to read more »user box is doing no harm. Monty845 19:19, 16 September 2011 (UTC) Keep potentially useful, even if never used is doing no harm. Graeme Bartlett (talk)...
Click to read more »user box is doing no harm. Monty845 19:15, 16 September 2011 (UTC) Keep potentially useful, even if never used is doing no harm. Graeme Bartlett (talk)...
Click to read more »all edits and activities. However if that open history becomes a source of harm -- (perhaps because it effectively acts as a shrine to vandalism, or contains...
Click to read more »parties to the litigation. The harm to the public from waiting for this information is much less than the potential harm to the fair litigation process...
Click to read more »important pages. Reputation: Having articles on inappropriate topics can harm Wikipedia's image. How seriously would you take an encyclopaedia that had...
Click to read more »the platform to hit her. She sued the railroad, arguing that she had been harmed by the negligence of its employees while they assisted the man. She won...
Click to read more »think one exists). -- Black Falcon 22:28, 23 February 2007 (UTC) Keep. No harm in having an article about a fictional character. The stated reason as "not...
Click to read more »real harm to the career of actors and actresses who face age discrimination. ("Harm" has been mentioned a lot here without mentioning what that harm means;...
Click to read more »we either contribute or subtract from safe and brave spaces. We point out harm when we see it and we work within community to speak up when/if we see event...
Click to read more »dox their ID and report it to National Security Police". The "physical harm" cited by the WMF to justify the bans is only briefly implied by "threatening...
Click to read more »read it, it will do no harm before being deleted by the G13 process. A speedy deletion criteria to cover it would do more harm through false positives...
Click to read more »occasioning actual bodily harm; "Wounding or Inflicting Grievous Bodily Harm"; and "Wounding or Inflicting Grievous Bodily Harm with Intent". We can note...
Click to read more »historical and move on. There's no need to delete it, because keeping it will not harm the project. — Gavia immer (talk) 18:57, 27 January 2008 (UTC) Tag as historical...
Click to read more »deletion or merge tag on your favorite article, template, image etc, the harm it does is minimal, and either the article or the tag will be gone in around...
Click to read more »continually contesting my edits, no matter how ell cited or factual, on the Harm reduction page over a number of months, with him becoming very frustrated...
Click to read more »To cause harm to other living beings is to accept and revel in the imperfections of the world...
Click to read more »user box is doing no harm. Monty845 19:15, 16 September 2011 (UTC) Keep potentially useful, even if never used is doing no harm. Graeme Bartlett (talk)...
Click to read more »be made to this section. The result of the discussion was Keep. Does no harm, and while the WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS arguements are just that, there is valid...
Click to read more »user box is doing no harm. Monty845 19:18, 16 September 2011 (UTC) Keep potentially useful, even if never used is doing no harm. Graeme Bartlett (talk)...
Click to read more »May 17 (UTC) You guys are pretty humorless... it doesn't seem to do any harm to have personal entries like this. (unsigned by 24.17.63.29, IP did not...
Click to read more »coercing us, except by removing us from our unpaid positions (which does not harm us and indeed provides us with additional free time), there is no need to...
Click to read more »practical and realistic pitch. B) That said, there were several events that harmed the site. One was the tightening of policy and enforcement of content in...
Click to read more »might be shared without permission is if a user expresses an intention to harm another user in real life, which hopefully will never happen! Information...
Click to read more »do. I can't see the harm in this: if newbies ask "who's X vandal?" surely they can be told about this page?? I can't see the harm in it. Also, the user...
Click to read more »the public record. Often this is done for good reason - libel, threats of harm or obscene vandalism don't belong here - but it's best done quietly and without...
Click to read more »commentary be entirely excluded have argued that there is potential for harm to persons and that, through our related policy, the images should be excluded...
Click to read more »under the general rationale for BLP (Do No Harm), religion iwill be necessary to be avoided only where some harm is possible--by now, this is in a minority...
Click to read more »with Nguyen, in her capacity as a psychotherapist, on the issue of self-harm, amplifies the evidence supporting notability. Additionally, she gets traction...
Click to read more »{{Inactive userpage blanked}}. There is no harm in this page, certainly not if blanked while inactive, and there is harm in cleaning another's userspace. --SmokeyJoe...
Click to read more »Lowe Dickinson Mary Lowe Dickinson Mary Lowe Dickinson Frances Harmer Frances Harmer Please add Category:Media supported by WikiProject Women in Red...
Click to read more »majority before, but it's a matter for do no harm--and BLP trumps other considerations, If convicted, do no harm might well not be applicable, so if that...
Click to read more »anti-social activity. The balance must be weighed between the benefit to the encyclopedia of including a link, and the potential for offense or harm....
Click to read more »relevant to what has made them of encyclopedic interest. See Wikipedia:Avoiding harm § Pseudo-biographies for more details. Wikipedia:Only make links that are...
Click to read more »the German armed forces avoid bombing London, as the Kaiser had no wish to harm the British Royal Family. In modern times, such an order for strategic bombing...
Click to read more »lack of trustfulness, and when it isn't true it could cause significant harm. The maintenance needed to make this list suitably accurate is excessive...
Click to read more »Weapons, used to harm people...
Click to read more »Skomorokh 01:16, 14 May 2011 (UTC) Keep for historical reasons also what harm is there in not deleting? Miss E. Lovetinkle (talk) 01:39, 14 May 2011 (UTC)...
Click to read more »wondering under hair cleaning section it says Sulfate free shampoos are less harming on color treated hair than normal shampoos that contain sulfates. Sulfates...
Click to read more »potential harm to an individual.--DreamLinker (talk) 17:32, 11 September 2017 (UTC) The need to keep an article is never more important than potential harm. The...
Click to read more »spread of titillating claims about people's lives, and the possibility of harm to living subjects must always be considered when exercising editorial judgment...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Responding to threats of harm recommends revision deletion pending oversight for specific threats of suicide or self-harm. Wikipedia:Temporary account...
Click to read more »discussion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Harm Witteveen (talk • contribs) 16:14, 14 January 2019 (UTC) Harm Witteveen, the material you added had no sources...
Click to read more »false warnings (see here and here). Both were resolved quickly, and with no harm done. Otherwise, no, I haven't been in any major disputes. However, should...
Click to read more »to report a public health hazard, because the entity with adminitis may harm or infect others. Strongly believes that all users are equal but admins are...
Click to read more »warranted. Although Joe Roe says "No harm in keeping the redirect until someone can write an article", there is potential harm in keeping the redirect because...
Click to read more »first site in a google search comes with the google warning "This site may harm your computer." which is not a good sign. I found a third related article...
Click to read more »date service would help entertain our visitors, and it wouldn't seriously harm Wikipedia, would it? Also, a statement (such as "In my opinion, my cat is...
Click to read more »What is the name of the type of film which deliberately attempts to harm their viewers? I seem to remember it being on topic while reading about the Nouvelle...
Click to read more »editor's actions have harmed the project is not assuming bad faith, unless the charge made indicates a deliberate intention to harm. Bob nominates an article...
Click to read more »the leaders to slay, or at least cripple, the WikiOrc so that it could not harm another editor. Alas, the savage orc showed up and ravaged the discussion...
Click to read more »because we don't know whether they do good. If no harm is done, no need to delete. Does it do harm? Robert McClenon (talk) 08:31, 27 November 2018 (UTC)...
Click to read more »that the admin to be ostracized has reached a point where they cause more harm than good, have lost their focus or good judgement or otherwise need a reality...
Click to read more »information to tell if it is real, or if notable. In draftspace it does no harm. This is the purpose of draftspace. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 00:45, 15 February...
Click to read more »may lose sight of the actual disagreement, and instead focus on trying to harm the opponent, creating a cycle of vendetta. Wikipedia maintains remarkable...
Click to read more »chirps • HELP) 20:04, 31 January 2009 (UTC) Keep Useless, but not doing any harm as far as I can tell, and not breaking any rules. Politizer talk/contribs...
Click to read more »disheartened, regardless of the final decision. The process itself exacerbates the harm it seeks to halt. My contribution, should I be appointed to the Arbitration...
Click to read more »abusers with their aims or, in case of oversighted content, cause serious harm. If you have concerns about the reasoning for something, there are procedures...
Click to read more »one time was in the top 30 contributors. I check in daily and try to do no harm. dml Support. Adam Bishop 19:22, 9 Nov 2003 (UTC) Support. Daniel Quinlan...
Click to read more »pages, you may wish to start editing and creating edit filters. To avoid harm from mistakes, test all new filters in log only mode initially, and do not...
Click to read more »ahead and make as many snarky comments as you want, and nary a care about harming Wikipedia! Sarcasm is especially useful in controversial debates, the more...
Click to read more »investigation, but it was closed immediately, and I don't really think there's any harm in keeping it. What's the precedent for things like this? Buddy431 (talk)...
Click to read more »No evidence of harm to the project and user substantially contributes to encyclopedia. All in all: no evidence that pages cause harm to Wikipedia, and...
Click to read more »:) GarrettTalk 22:59, 19 July 2005 (UTC) Keep. Interesting portal. What harm is it actually doing? Grace Note 04:04, 20 July 2005 (UTC) None, but we are...
Click to read more »public embarrassment, or both. (A secondary reason is to protect subject from harm even in cases where Wikipedia is not exposed, but this is subsidiary to our...
Click to read more »image fails WP:NFCC#1. The replacement with text will not significantly harm reader's understanding. Peripitus (Talk) 12:06, 16 November 2009 (UTC) Delete...
Click to read more »was delete. But I'm going to just redirect instead; no harm in the redirect itself, and no harm in allowing people to work on more merging to the Cumberland...
Click to read more »Creating a wrongful consensus or wrongfully preventing consensus, therefore, harms Wikipedia. Wrongful editing or wrongful behavior by an editor sometimes...
Click to read more »ongoing are premature, and may have the effect of being aimed more at harming an editor than of seeking a collegial and collaborative environment." Discussion...
Click to read more »Guy (help!) 13:23, 22 July 2020 (UTC) update To the question, "what's the harm". The (huge) userbox states as fact that Singh portrayed the BCA as consciously...
Click to read more »does no harm as a stand-alone article, yet it could provide clarity to some. -- JamesTeterenko 20:21, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC) Precisely. What harm does it do...
Click to read more »are likely to offend many editors, or make threats of harm or imply an intent to cause harm. Usernames may still be considered inappropriate if they...
Click to read more »obviously be used a source for 2010 statistics), but I don't think it does any harm having them. --Ritchie333 (talk) 17:11, 7 November 2011 (UTC) The lack of...
Click to read more »7CDomthedude001.7D.7D. mono 18:00, 1 June 2010 (UTC) Keep per not doing any harm and per not actually being myspacey. This neither encourages established...
Click to read more »usage with mathbot's tool I disagree with "use redirects sparingly". What harm is there in having an extra redirect? And if someone types one thing in and...
Click to read more »we either contribute or subtract from safe and brave spaces. We point out harm when we see it and we work within community to speak up when/if we see event...
Click to read more »nobody harm with enything' and 'It is a hobby and i do nobody harm' on the former, and something almost exactly the same on the latter's: 'I harm nobody...
Click to read more »the spread of titillating claims about people's lives; the possibility of harm to living subjects must always be considered when exercising editorial judgment...
Click to read more »Moisturizing lotions are mainly intended to improve the skin, but can also harm it. How often should we moisturise? https://en.wikipedia...
Click to read more »per InedibleHulk. Further, I see no harm in keeping it. -- WV ● ✉ ✓ 18:09, 28 November 2015 (UTC) Keep - No harm, no foul. Agree with the others for it...
Click to read more »cleanup, for situations where an editor is clearly deliberately trying to harm Wikipedia. Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations, for situations where an editor...
Click to read more »don't see the harm of this. Crotalus horridus (TALK • CONTRIBS) 12:25, 30 March 2007 (UTC) Keep. I don't like it, but I don't see the harm or what violation...
Click to read more »states 'The possibility of harm to living subjects must be considered when exercising editorial judgment'. The possibility of harm to non-human living subjects...
Click to read more »(UTC) Keep These are important for TV industries. Keeping them would be no harm. Yadav0281 (talk) 07:43, 6 December 2020 (UTC) Above account was less than...
Click to read more »existing article. On the other hand, it has existed since 2002 without creating harm or controversy and the stats counter shows it getting a very steady number...
Click to read more »namespace. Northernhenge (talk) 10:24, 10 May 2022 (UTC) Weak Keep - Does no harm. The issues identified by the nominator can be discussed somewhere, or the...
Click to read more »the spread of titillating claims about people's lives; the possibility of harm to living subjects must always be considered when exercising editorial judgment...
Click to read more »the article. I do not see that the article, as a whole, fails Wikipedia:HARM#TEST. Unomi (talk) 20:29, 1 December 2009 (UTC) Keep as notability has been...
Click to read more »character, and while they may be obsolete as actual guidelines they do no harm as long as they have a “historical” tag on top. User:GKFXtalk 00:36, 26 March...
Click to read more »Finishing incomplete nomination by User:Mwtoews. Keep, could be useful, no harm. TimBentley (talk) 04:13, 18 August 2006 (UTC) Keep. This redirect was created...
Click to read more »Grammy winners). Then again it could always be left there, I don't see the harm if its cleaned up and made more "serious" and informative than it is currently...
Click to read more »The use of color breathes life in to articles if done right. It doesn't harm them, again, if done right. This is not saying go crazy and use rainbow colors...
Click to read more »Rules Zero and One, a robot shall not harm another robot, nor through failure to act allow another robot to come to harm. So Wikipedia:Bot requests won't work...
Click to read more »making personal attacks. These exist because there is clear evidence of harm from these practices; no such evidence exists for users placing adjectives...
Click to read more » The result was Draftify. Unclear whether six months will help, but no harm in giving Wil540 art the time to work on it. Star Mississippi 01:39, 7 July...
Click to read more »with or without disambiguation, leaving the redirect as-is would not cause harm to Wikipedia as it simply redirects to the one article of that name, and...
Click to read more »maybe change "have a negative impact" → "harm". Also does it "seem" to harm Viren, or does it actually harm him? This might be a weasel word. Change "which"...
Click to read more »and many other countries across the world. To report any threats of harm or self-harm on Wikipedia, contact emergencywikimedia.org. ← Previous "Op-ed" In...
Click to read more »I can tell, the movie's still set to come out next year. I don't see any harm in letting the article stay in the incubator until it does (if it does)....
Click to read more »article claims that for a day or so, there wouldn't be any major physical harm, but after a few days it would lead to economic crisis and mass unemployment...
Click to read more »busy writing an encyclopedia ;-) Seriously, is this WikiProject doing any harm? Some 30 users think it purposeful enough to sign up for the principle, so...
Click to read more »themselves to restore the page if used as a sandbox. IMO, deleting causes more harm to newbies than the effort it takes to keep restoring it. --12 Noon 2¢ 21:21...
Click to read more »drafts of things sitting in my userspace that are not causing anyone any harm, so I don't see why this was singled out for deletion. An April Fools joke...
Click to read more »self-justification for acts that cause direct harm to the mission that they profess to be working to support. The harm need not be physical or monetary to directly...
Click to read more »think anyone would search for or link to the "Sketch" page, but it doesn't harm to redirect. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by YechielMan (talk...
Click to read more »can cut the user a bit of slack. I don't think this material is doing any harm there. MSGJ (talk) 13:25, 16 July 2008 (UTC) Keep. There are no time limits...
Click to read more »on the same day based on the contributions made by the two. Really what harm is there in checking for clarification? I do not wish to know her IP and...
Click to read more »with “promoting self harm”, this should be deleted. It referencing a popular meme is not good enough an excuse if promoting self harm. SmokeyJoe (talk) 02:04...
Click to read more »"cite X" arrives then it can be replaced with that. Otherwise, there is no harm in keeping it. Soft redirect it maybe to inform the user of what it is? Sillyfolkboy...
Click to read more »Foundation staff "responded to almost 500 threats of suicide and other imminent harm to people and property." The piece explores the general issue through the...
Click to read more »the more decisive nature of the discussions, and the greater likelihood of harm, it is important that discussion leading to a decision be as representative...
Click to read more »such as saying that self-harming behaviours are "a cry for help" or to "send a message"; and presenting suicide or self-harm as a "solution" to any problem...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Volunteer Response Team Wikipedia:Meetup Helpline Hotline Telephone WP:Spoken Wikipedia Wikipedia:Responding to threats of harm (in case of emergency)...
Click to read more »cleanup, for situations where an editor is clearly deliberately trying to harm Wikipedia. Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations, for situations where an editor...
Click to read more »of an arbitrator is to preserve the encyclopedia and to protect it from harm. In so doing, abritrators may provide informal advice with a view to reducing...
Click to read more »improving the encyclopedia is still the goal of even those in topic ban. If no harm is done, and no controversy addressed, its better to let it slide, unless...
Click to read more »are both targeting one user, and the IP has threatened another user with harm. Additionally, both the IP and the user have removed replies to the Iron...
Click to read more »deleted after one day due to lack of evidence of notability, it doesn't harm anything to allow the deletion process to run for its full seven days. At...
Click to read more »or topic Y are notable do not themselves need to be notable. (It doesn't harm your case if these authors and scholars have been deemed notable in Wikipedia...
Click to read more »identifiable, or their presence on pages in the English Wikipedia may cause harm to the person who posted it or owns it. Those are suppression worthy. Others...
Click to read more »→ A minister of state is excusable for the harm he does when the helm of government has forced his hand in a storm; but in the calm he is guilty of all...
Click to read more »Self-concept • Self control • Self disclosure • Self-efficacy • Self-esteem • Self harm • Self help • Self-identity • Self image • Self monitoring • Self-perception •...
Click to read more »undeletion requests needlessly wasted time, whereas there would have been no harm in leaving the few kilobytes of text alone. WP:STALEDRAFT, the official guideline...
Click to read more »disagree with your contention that "this page certainly does not harm wikipedia." It harms it by lowering the standards we've attempted to create for keeping...
Click to read more »the model shown doing something that would cause ridicule or professional harm, if he or she were identified? Is the model potentially under the highest...
Click to read more »constructively). For threats of harm (to self or others) you must email emergencywikimedia.org (see the threats of harm page) and not use this page. Requests...
Click to read more »I think Self-harm would be a better choice. -- œ™ 20:38, 15 May 2010 (UTC) Merge sources into the seperate articles masochism, Self-harm or algolagnia...
Click to read more »Firemind ^_^ Pokedex 04:09, 1 April 2015 (UTC) Delete per WP:HARM. This causes significant harm to living people and should not be allowed to stay. Reach...
Click to read more »pointless list. --Idont havaname 05:18, 13 Nov 2004 (UTC) Keep, I see no harm done by this, and it could turn out useful for various searching and research...
Click to read more »was delete. Sango123 16:57, 30 June 2006 (UTC) let it stay, it's doing no harm and if someone wrote it then why delete it? vanity. 3000 posts since its...
Click to read more »and many other countries across the world. To report any threats of harm or self-harm on Wikipedia, contact emergencywikimedia.org. See also this week's...
Click to read more »provide information mostly of local interest. There's no harm in providing it, but there's harm in removing it. We're not just an encyclopedia for topics...
Click to read more »project too. Losing the hype of providing the world with free knowledge would harm us a lot - so maintaining the hype, the personal fun and satisfaction of...
Click to read more »back several versions to clean up vandalism. The redirect does no apparent harm and potentially keeps those links from being broken. Rossami (talk) 07:21...
Click to read more »negatively impact our ability to collect, share, and disseminate free knowledge, harm the immediate well-being of individual Wikimedians, and threaten the long-term...
Click to read more »searches for this song, at least they will be redirect to the artist. What harm is this to Wikipedia? ---Another Believer (Talk) 23:48, 25 May 2015 (UTC)...
Click to read more »no consensus over whether the target should be Recreational drug use or Harm reduction. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 22:27, 15 July 2009 (UTC) AfDs for this article:...
Click to read more »season list, which is basically a timeline, into another order. It does no harm, but it seems pretty pointless. Struway2 (talk) Made the column unsortable...
Click to read more »matters a lot, but I'm sticking to my guns, on the basis of, shrug, "what harm does it do?" We're told that redirects are cheap, and it's a real historical...
Click to read more »WP:BLP "possibility of harm," "fair[ness]," and "human dignity." I am Chelsea Even were there no sources regarding potential harm (see above), and there...
Click to read more »situations should be treated seriously, as copyright violations not only harm Wikipedia's redistributability, but also create legal issues. The situation...
Click to read more »by doing so you may open a website that may spread malware, and thereby harm your computer or access private information. Clicking the links will also...
Click to read more »some particular reason why that would harm Wikipedia? DGG ( talk ) 03:08, 4 November 2009 (UTC) I feel it would harm wikipedia, as less new articles are...
Click to read more »was nomination withdrawn. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:39, 10 August 2009 (UTC) Ben harms (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)...
Click to read more »DemonDays64 (talk) 04:54, 8 April 2020 (UTC) Weak keep I don't see what the harm is in keeping it. It's not adding additional clutter and although it maybe...
Click to read more »Engineering question: water flowing through a steel pipe. Plant question: does UV harm fruit more after it left the plant? Wikipedia:Reference_desk/Archives/Science/2022...
Click to read more »continue working, since there's the possibility he might be notable. No harm in giving more time to work, but consensus is clear it's not appropriate...
Click to read more »Holt - Vladislav Horuženko - Ludmilla Hussar - Aado Hõimre - Lembit Härm - Martin Härm - Edkar Härmson Tiina Ideon - Hermann Iila - Andres Ild - Linda Ilja...
Click to read more »December 2009 (UTC) Attack page. I have blanked it, but there would be no harm in deleting it. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 20:21, 30 November 2009 (UTC)...
Click to read more »systematic bias is relevant: it does little harm to keep borderline notable articles as compared with the harm from not covering areas where usable sources...
Click to read more »and then thinking about harm. "Harm" would be a sensible reason to delete, so it is valid to consider whether a page does no harm. It is really important...
Click to read more »has already started on the Talk page for the Beauty Pageant project. No harm will be done by closing this nomination as "keep" and letting the project-level...
Click to read more »with security. I would assume it was for more security, but it certainly harmed the security of this report (last seen in the June 10 Signpost), as the...
Click to read more »Firstly, self-harm is hyphenated. There is no parent category for real-life self-harmers, but people who self-harm are referred to as "self-harmers" in the...
Click to read more »harmless" Gwimpey 08:26, 6 May 2004 (UTC) Keep. Of minor interest, but doing no harm. TB 22:18, 5 May 2004 (UTC) keep. It's pretty clear the user is going to...
Click to read more »this merits an article, or even a redirect to something else, like self-harm. CDN99 20:04, 25 October 2005 (UTC) Keep, real phenomenon, how is this not...
Click to read more »von Teighen 23:44, 28 Jan 2005 (UTC) A redirect to fundamental would do no harm. —Charles P. (Mirv) 23:51, 28 Jan 2005 (UTC) Actually, none of the articles...
Click to read more »offensive or overly speculative statements and are therefore not causing any harm. Dan1980 20:15, 31 May 2006 (UTC) Keep per Dan1980. Mark272 23:00, 31 May...
Click to read more »Delaney talk 19:43, 7 September 2005 (UTC) My answer about harm is that, of course, harm isn't really the criterion. However, if pressed I can demonstrate...
Click to read more »January 2009 (UTC) Keep Fans' userboxes exist. And attack on whom??? No harm. Falls well within usage by others on WP . Looks excessively like one persons'...
Click to read more »be used, the situation should be handled carefully to minimize potential harm. Publicly communicating the details of an issue would defeat the purpose...
Click to read more »It is one of only two confirmed terrorist uses of biological weapons to harm humans. Having previously gained political control of Antelope, Oregon, Rajneesh's...
Click to read more »apologize and to assure the subject (or their attorney) that you intended no harm and assure them that any perceived libel was inadvertent. Enlist the assistance...
Click to read more »refer to. He may have not followed up on much of this, but I don't see the harm. I don't think we're into WP:NOTMYSPACE territory here; he just didn't follow...
Click to read more »in that proposal discussion I detail why they can do harm, so the assertion that they do no harm is no conclusion to a still ongoing unclosed discussion)...
Click to read more »IT'S NOT DOING ANY HARM JUST LET IT BE THERE. This is crufty advertising about a non-notable website. If everything that "didn't do harm" was kept, Wikipedia...
Click to read more »certain chemical/biological/other information the pursuit of which might cause harm etc. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.104.132.41 (talk • contribs)...
Click to read more »distract or confuse a non-fan, when its exclusion would not significantly harm the factual coverage as a whole. Some users consider this a pejorative term...
Click to read more »Thank you kindly! Ken Wyattworks (talk) 06:29, 9 July 2016 (UTC) No real harm done. Your draft was declined. Just add the references and any other material...
Click to read more »is being said here. The potential for the journalistic process to cause harm to individuals needs to be managed. As journalists, we want to cover events...
Click to read more »me that each article can have up to three or four stub-tags. So what does harm you about some articles having a second one? "Wehret den Anfänge(r)n"? The...
Click to read more »March 2010 (UTC) Comment: This article is nearly six years old. But, oh, the harm it has caused to wikipedia by existing is immeasurable, right? I care not...
Click to read more »Apple Store article). I think it is a relevant list to have and it doesn't harm Wikipedia for it to exist. If this ends up getting deleted I would propose...
Click to read more »people that complaints to admin noticeboards in anyway harms Plaxico Burress. How does this redirect harm him? --Smashvilletalk 04:12, 29 December 2008 (UTC)...
Click to read more »to notability, and we're wandering into wp:BLP issues, in particular the harm clause about someone who's notable just for being a white nationalist who...
Click to read more »The guy has requested it. [1] He isn't a politician, or anyone who ever harmed anyone. So no reason not to honor his request. Dream Focus 17:17, 10 September...
Click to read more »no harm was not intended as an argument to keep, but as an argument to refute a delete opinion based on an alleged harm. If you disagree about harm v....
Click to read more »entry would have been helpful in that pursuit. I would think there is no harm in leaving this here. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 146.197.246.30...
Click to read more »notable individuals' rights to privacy and strive to limit unnecessary harms or discomfort to them. These factors should be balanced against the public...
Click to read more »thumb when writing biographical material about living persons is "do no harm". flatterworld, Philip_Cross The article is relatively short, and so this...
Click to read more »articles is found at WP:Notability, not WP:Does it do harm?. If we judged articles based on "well, what harm does it do?" we would be overrun with directory...
Click to read more »user box is doing no harm. Monty845 19:20, 16 September 2011 (UTC) Keep potentially useful, even if never used is doing no harm. Graeme Bartlett (talk)...
Click to read more »The study must also respect the policies of Wikipedia and not cause undue harm to the system. Results must be made freely available. The results of the...
Click to read more »for AHS, BHS, CHS, DHS ... (at, or linked from, those links). They do no harm. People do indeed refer to high schools by initials, these abbreviations...
Click to read more »portals are stupid, but if people want to make and use them, there's no harm in letting them do so. Which isn't an argument for keeping the portal, but...
Click to read more »We just want a little fame, and it's causing you no harm. Whether it's causing Wikipedia any harm is not a valid reason to keep something. It makes a...
Click to read more »was delete. The debate is leaning that way, but more importantly, do no harm. Stifle (talk) 16:51, 2 December 2008 (UTC) Sebastian Cole (edit | talk |...
Click to read more »cause net harm to Wikipedia, as the potential benefit (creating a less social-networking-type atmosphere) is outweighed by the potential harm (alienating...
Click to read more »reason, avoid using the term "vandalism" unless it is clear the user means to harm Wikipedia; this is even true when warning a user with a user warning template...
Click to read more »2013 (UTC) Support - Solid bird picture. A selective denoise would do no harm, methinks, but it's fine as is too. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 01:08, 13 October...
Click to read more »should be removed per do no harm in addition to BLP1E. Coccyx Bloccyx (talk) 16:32, 5 May 2008 (UTC) Comment How is it harming if it's simply summarising...
Click to read more »Liefting (talk - contribs) 11:54, 10 June 2012 (UTC) Keep This is doing no harm, and I can see no point in deleting it. if a user no longer wants it they...
Click to read more »cleanup, for situations where an editor is clearly deliberately trying to harm Wikipedia. Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations, for situations where an editor...
Click to read more »of this, the term is a neologism of questionable notability, but I see no harm in redirecting to dystheism to accommodate users who might be looking for...
Click to read more »information on others may seem harmless, it can potentially cause significant harm to them, allowing identity fraud, vigilante action, and physical attacks...
Click to read more »aren't and we hide them, no harm done to anyone at all. If they are, and we don't hide them, some harm is done. First, do no harm. I am amazed you don't grasp...
Click to read more »pages do not hurt, and when they are correct, there is no evidence that they harm anyone while they might be useful in the future, if not already. So why take...
Click to read more »mistakenly accepting a fraudulent licensing claim could result is significant harm to a third party. This could happen either commercially, by infringing on...
Click to read more »The principle of Do No Harm should be considered. What is the harm done by keeping this stub draft in draft space? There is no harm. The draft is not seen...
Click to read more »positive self-image. Or John Victim may be already depressed, liable to self-harm, perhaps already considering suicide. A Wikipedia editor finding such an...
Click to read more »of a redirect was causing no harm to Wikipedia, in my opinion. I'd like to see someone make a case as to why it was harming Wikipedia to have this here...
Click to read more »the issue of people getting the wrong ideas about a living person and harming them in the process. All of this impedes our core mission: to inform people...
Click to read more »each of the first seven months of 2014 for example), so deleting this would harm the encyclopaedia by making it much harder for people to find what they are...
Click to read more »of suicide crisis lines, or retargetting to WP:Responding to threats of harm, or Suicide, or hat-noting to one (or more) of those from a disambig page...
Click to read more »Foundation’s emergency response system Wikipedia:Responding to threats of harm Basic resources for staying safe online and on Wikipedia (Excerpted from...
Click to read more »Self-concept • Self control • Self disclosure • Self-efficacy • Self-esteem • Self harm • Self help • Self-identity • Self image • Self monitoring • Self-perception •...
Click to read more »tag as historic. They're part of the wiki's history, and since they do no harm, I suggest they stay. Elucidate (light up) 21:39, 6 January 2009 (UTC) Keep...
Click to read more »(UTC) Keep as plausible misspelling. Redirects are cheap and doesn't do much harm. --Eivind (t) 13:49, 19 January 2009 (UTC) The above is preserved as the...
Click to read more »result was Userfy - clear consensus to delete, creator wants to userfy, no harm in the latter. GiantSnowman 15:16, 13 November 2017 (UTC) Chris Kinnear (edit |...
Click to read more »will follow. What harm can this article do to have to put it up for deletion? Jkmarold55 (talk) 04:04, 26 March 2017 (UTC) The harm is that it does not...
Click to read more »January 2023 (UTC) Keep: I see no compelling reason to delete this, and no harm in retaining this. silvia (BlankpopsiclesilviaASHs4) (inquire within) 10:08...
Click to read more »08:54, 20 Aug 2004 (UTC) Moved this one and USer, above, to speedy...no harm done, Allyunion, we all made newbie mistakes when we started out :P In cases...
Click to read more »pass a new copyright directive that includes problematic rules that will harm free knowledge. They did so after years of discussions, revisions, and more...
Click to read more »actors) and is a form of information warfare ie. a weapon meant to cause harm. The purpose of this page is to centrally collect links and information about...
Click to read more »can be found on the course web page. (Click to return to your main course page and continue.) "Kyle Harms' Fall 2011 Conservation Biology Web Page"....
Click to read more »featured in the Taipei Times within the last two years. I'm not sure I see the harm in having the article (although it could use some sprucing up to expand it...
Click to read more »been a redirect since September 2018 when I created it (log). There is zero harm in keeping the page history intact. If there is edit warring, we have ways...
Click to read more »find the right article even after these redirects are deleted. What is this harm you spoke of? Keφr 13:08, 4 May 2013 (UTC) No, all that shows is that the...
Click to read more »contributions under the belief that the editor is not actively seeking to do harm to the project. When an editor's prior bad conduct is raised in a discussion...
Click to read more »not harming anyone and may be useful on occasion. violet/riga (t) 19:57, 20 Sep 2004 (UTC) Keep - interesting and useful list that's not harming anyone...
Click to read more »Instructor Kyle Harms (talk) Teaching Assistants Becky Carmichael & Metha Klock Campus Ambassadors Rebecca Burdette & Kristi Fernandez-Kim Online Ambassadors...
Click to read more »verified. Since this is a living person it is my belief that this article may harm him and his business. In addition, the article references personal data such...
Click to read more »statement about a total ban harming nobody is a common sense one. You will need to provide evidence that somebody will be harmed by it. HiLo48 (talk) 04:09...
Click to read more »conflict" between the two user groups, "which has resulted in significant harm to past, ongoing, and planned Wikimedia movement activities in Brazil". Wikimedia...
Click to read more »indulgences like this does any harm. My opinion is that things should only be banned or deleted if they are actually causing harm to the encyclopedia, and I...
Click to read more »"opposition to people who don't like the notion of comparative advantage", so no harm with redirecting there until a better article can possibly be written if...
Click to read more »page. The result was redirect to Chinese American. Redirects are cheap. No harm in making one. Yuser31415 (Editor review two!) 00:52, 8 February 2007 (UTC)...
Click to read more »the experiments turn out to not be very disruptive at all, so there's no harm in using them!" Also this week: WikiProject VfD — G4 & Jamie Kane — Experimental...
Click to read more »(talk) 19:50, 22 November 2009 (UTC) Delete I'm not really sure what the harm is in having articles on buildings like this... they can certainly be informative...
Click to read more »that they were sexually molested, that they suffer long-term psychological harm akin to - in some versions of the story, even equivalent to - that arising...
Click to read more »the culpability of the user they are trying to defend) actually cause real harm to good-faith editors Wikipedia:Ignore personal attacks Wikipedia:Don't accuse...
Click to read more »threats of harm and {{Suicide response}}. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 11:48, 11 January 2012 (UTC) Redirect to Wikipedia:Responding to threats of harm. —Scott5114↗...
Click to read more »same rules apply to all editors. Poor process or no process ultimately harms the product. There are many processes on Wikipedia. These include such Wikipedia...
Click to read more »criticized the work in The New York Review of Books and elaborated on this in The Harm in Hate Speech (2012). This prompted a critical analysis of both works in...
Click to read more »chairs game. How to disprove the claim that interest in banking will cause harm to at least one citizen? Thanks. 2A10:8012:3:DE50:BDE7:2606:BEB6:CFDA (talk)...
Click to read more »through deletion for understandable reasons that it might cause further harm to the encyclopedia. However, GNAA is already a chapter considered closed...
Click to read more »(Doc James) said "These sorts of activities have a significant potential to harm our shared brand" and joined at least one other administrator (JzG) in a...
Click to read more »complaints are a very direct way in which Wikipedia could be financially harmed. Wikipedia operates on donations only. To have to respond to copyright complaints...
Click to read more »Let me guess, Gallatin? --Aaron 04:41, 9 February 2006 (UTC) Whats the harm in allowing it to stay. I've seen articles on wikipedia that are still up...
Click to read more »this page. The result was redirect to Salò, or the 120 Days of Sodom. No harm in the redirect. joe deckertalk to me 19:55, 27 March 2012 (UTC) Giorgio...
Click to read more »away some users who have behaviors as explained in the essay. But does it harm the spirit and the premise of Wikipedia? --Horus (talk) 07:02, 15 August...
Click to read more »Keeping a page like this around for a while will do no harm to Wikipedia, whereas deleting it may harm the encyclopedia by driving away a potential contributor...
Click to read more »lightweight. Redirects are a valid ATD and this could be a viable search term. No harm is caused by the Redirect. Star Mississippi 02:14, 10 February 2022 (UTC)...
Click to read more »ongoing. Anyone who sees threats to sexually assault another person, or to harm them due to their identity, should report those threats to the WMF directly...
Click to read more »advertising, there is no harm in the draft being moved to a proper user subpage. – ukexpat (talk) 14:12, 8 June 2011 (UTC) the harm is that for non-notable...
Click to read more »necessary to bring something to AfD to redirect it. See WP:BOLD. But, no harm done. -- RoySmith (talk) 01:58, 9 October 2019 (UTC) [Hide this box] New...
Click to read more »result was redirect to 1963 Arab Cup#Matches. This seems to do the least harm. There's certainly no consensus to keep and this is just about a plausible...
Click to read more »is replaced by the following: Removal is protective, intended to prevent harm to the encyclopedia while investigations take place, and the advanced permissions...
Click to read more »and so resetting the calendar. No harm is done by allowing this useless draft to exist in draft space. The harm that would be done by deleting it is...
Click to read more »editor is getting paid and/or has a COI doesn't mean that they are here to harm the encyclopedia (in fact, there are quite a few that are assets to this...
Click to read more »But it is just as surely inappropriate in a case like this, where real harm has been done to a living person – on which more below – to praise community...
Click to read more »19:51, 14 September 2025 (UTC) Neutral at this time. No harm is done by leaving this here and no harm is done by deleting it. Editor has done a little other...
Click to read more »expressed interest in usurping [these redirects], I don't see [them] doing any harm." To date, no other use for {{wpcm}} has been suggested at all. Per WP:R#KEEP...
Click to read more »on the delete side is that the article should be deleted because of the harm it is causing the subject. That argument has, to a large extent, been refuted...
Click to read more »(talk) 04:40, 3 September 2021 (UTC) Keep per WP:TIND and because there is no harm in retaining these. Discussing them here, especially en masse and unbundled...
Click to read more »that the donations link was obtrusive, and believed that the message would harm future fund drives. The compromise automatically hides the message from all...
Click to read more »2009 (UTC) we need a redirect on every named plot element. Why not? What harm to you think it does? DGG (talk) 02:38, 19 July 2009 (UTC) There are essentially...
Click to read more »when that behavior is contrary to Wikipedia policies and guidelines and harms the project. But editors should not complain just for the sake of complaining...
Click to read more »December 2014 (UTC) So Milowent called he Star Wars prequels crap. How does harm anything? I seriously doubt anyone with an IQ above room temperature would...
Click to read more »there's no risk of confusion, so I don't see the harm in keeping it. User:christidy It's not what harm it does. It's what good it does. We are constructing...
Click to read more »the uploading editor from being able to request "keeping local" and see no harm to WP for allowing the exercise of that choice by an uploading editor. Vote...
Click to read more »they are relevant to discography page, and their inclusion there does no harm. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 16:43, 10 July 2008 (UTC)...
Click to read more »Aways think about the harm of losing an editor when deleting an article. He seems to have put some effort int this. I see no harm in keeping it though...
Click to read more »nominating all subpages. -N 20:50, 9 June 2007 (UTC) Keep I do not see any harm in keeping this. It is also revelant to wikipedia.--James, La gloria è a...
Click to read more »blocked, see my talkpage for the rationale. I am neutral, but there's no harm in discussion. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:38, 30 October 2019 (UTC) Note: This...
Click to read more »Sustainability stated that "we know that some users have been physically harmed" and that they "have no choice but to act swiftly and appropriately in response...
Click to read more »this request for comment is to consider how we should balance the "do no harm" principle, enshrined in our policy for living persons, and the need to respect...
Click to read more »attacked and pushed off traditional lands, and gold mining caused environmental harm. (more...) Recently featured: DNA – Make Way for Ducklings – Able Archer...
Click to read more »org) with the relevant information. See Wikipedia:Responding to threats of harm. For oversight and revision-deletion: To request information be hidden for...
Click to read more »Comprehensive School. Factitious 02:01, Nov 6, 2004 (UTC) Keep. if it does no harm on wikipedia, it should be left alone. there are a lot of articles about...
Click to read more »compromise can be reached, the proposal should never migrate into policy. Doing so would harm Wikipedia's status as an open-minded information source....
Click to read more »Speedy keep. This isn't the right venue for drafts. The article does no harm to the mainspace as long as it is drafted. —hueman1 (talk • contributions)...
Click to read more »Use {{Inactive userpage blanked}}. There is no harm in leaving the history accessibly, and there is harm in deleting others userspace without good enough...
Click to read more »should I be allowed to rejoin the editing community. I do understand the harm done to that person and to the principle of user privacy and -- through a...
Click to read more »some users are, doesn't help the project in any way, it actually does more harm than good as people who aren't chosen to get upset. No need to keep it, as...
Click to read more »made to this page. The result was speedy keep. Nominator withdrew - no harm done, no hard feelings (non-admin closure). StAnselm (talk) 08:39, 15 September...
Click to read more »real harm" means there is at least some technical harm even if there's no actual harm. That's what I disagree with. There's not even any technical harm in...
Click to read more »explains how to do so. As for not harming anyone - if the image is in violation of US copyright law, it could well harm Wikipedia. Also, the aim of the...
Click to read more »result was redirect to 1964 Arab Cup#Matches. This seems to do the least harm. There's certainly no consensus to keep and this is just about a plausible...
Click to read more »page does no harm. —Xezbeth (talk) 19:34, 16 January 2015 (UTC) @Xezbeth:- yes, but the short story is not notable at all. It may do no harm, but it is...
Click to read more »community-driven platforms to make changes to our public interest projects that could harm Wikipedia’s volunteer contributors’ commitment to the exchange of free knowledge...
Click to read more »legitimate community endeavor. Several of our projects have seen major damage and harm done when the communities have come into conflict with the Wikimedia Foundation...
Click to read more »why editors nominate these pages, you may not like them, but they do no harm. There are many pages I don't like and think are unnecessary, but I don't...
Click to read more »how userboxes can be abused <g>. Actually fun in that sense, I suppose. No harm. Single short page. Collect (talk) 14:32, 22 February 2009 (UTC) Keep; despite...
Click to read more »but on the other hand it's not an attack page and isn't causing anyone any harm. I concur with CSC being old isn't a reason to delete something. –Davey2010Talk...
Click to read more »promise was broken and Wikipedia was harmed. My point is that the harm has already occurred. (List of comments showing harm moved to separate section) Guy Macon...
Click to read more »column of the systems/criteria table which corresponds to the Lesser No Harm (LNH) criterion be colored, to indicate that satisfying LNH is a good thing...
Click to read more »use of which helps to maintain a neutral point of view. Although avoiding harm is not an official policy of Wikipedia, many forms of harmful language are...
Click to read more »Australia having a peacetime mentality while an infantry battalion was in harms way on the other side of the world, it would have been interesting if there...
Click to read more »I currently own do not allow me to claim that there is any intention to harm. Nevertheless, in effect, in fact and according to "the subject of history"...
Click to read more »22:34, 21 September 2007 (UTC) Keep No reason for it to be deleted. Does it harm Wikipedia by having articles? No. So why should this be deleted again? ~~...
Click to read more »sure why the Prod couldn't have been sufficient in this case. Anyhow, no harm done, this will more than likely be gone by this time next week. Bradjamesbrown...
Click to read more »2001 Memorial World Trade Center Crash Network Mueva York (en Ladino) The Harm in Being Harmless (9-11justice.org editorial) usa2gether.com: Personal Letters...
Click to read more »was accepted at the time and should remain accepted. Besides, what's the harm? User:Brett Duax (Husband) Brettduax (talk) 21:59, 20 March 2014 (UTC) Unfortunately...
Click to read more »reactivated later if needed. Deleting serves no purpose. It is not doing any harm, and moving it to a subpage will reassure people that it is properly filed...
Click to read more »as it will challenge current systems that have prevailed in perpetuating harms, however unintended, for many years. This will continue unless we address...
Click to read more »Study identifier: 98326492364 Possible harms to Wikipedia/Wikipedians No appreciable foreseeable risk of harm to participants since no private data will...
Click to read more »18:41, 7 November 2007 (UTC) No Harm has no bearing as well. the_undertow talk 19:23, 7 November 2007 (UTC) No Harm actually does have bearing here....
Click to read more »you do this. Do not publicly identify yourself if this could put you at harm in the real world, e.g., from stalkers. It may make more sense to declare...
Click to read more »"First, do no harm". What harm is this doing? None. What good is it doing? Probably not much, but doing more good than harm, it is doing no harm. Si Trew (talk)...
Click to read more »is a settlement. In truth, I see no merit in deletion - pray explain what harm this page is doing? To be fair, though, this does look a permastub as do...
Click to read more »to Touchstone Pictures. ...deleted before redirecting; a redirect does no harm Black Kite (talk) 15:48, 16 April 2012 (UTC) The Foot Shooting Party (edit |...
Click to read more »great harm done; I just think it's worth repeating the point so everyone's aware. --Trovatore (talk) 20:21, 27 July 2018 (UTC) Indeed, no harm done. I...
Click to read more »Prota 00:23, 2 February 2006 (UTC) Merge & redirect. I don't see what the harm in keeping the redirect is; should the technology become outdated, if people...
Click to read more »created it himself. Weird. Well, it can kick around for a few days without harm, I guess. <eleland/talkedits> 20:07, 21 November 2007 (UTC) Delete serves...
Click to read more »movement concerned with protecting the natural environment from human-caused harm. Environmental science: a multidisciplinary scientific discipline that draws...
Click to read more »deleting because of copyright violations that still exist in the article. No harm in creating a redirect after this version of the article is deleted. Liz...
Click to read more »Wikipedia to look for the Facebook article. Nevertheless, I don't see a harm in keeping it. --Nlu (talk) 03:24, 11 April 2011 (UTC) Delete Facebook was...
Click to read more »2018 (UTC) Redirect to NMS Rechinul. Keeping the history visible does no harm. — Godsy (TALKCONT) 18:58, 8 May 2018 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »sources apply directly to self-inflicted behaviour which falls under self-harm, with the results of this "challenge" being frostbite, but the act of "sticking...
Click to read more »an article no-one will look up will somehow encourage others? What's the harm in pretending I'm important enough to merit an encyclopedia article. I vote...
Click to read more »BOVINEBOY2008 23:38, 3 September 2021 (UTC) Keep - WP:TIND and no harm in retaining this. The time limit of G13 is arbitrary; the spirit of the...
Click to read more »see [1]. Zigger «º» 13:19, 12 September 2007 (UTC) Keep. I don't see the harm in this one. --UsaSatsui 21:33, 12 September 2007 (UTC) Keep. If someone...
Click to read more »your health, despite what they taste, smell, or look like. Claiming less harm or reduced risk of disease from using tobacco products misleads consumers...
Click to read more »Anonymous DissidentTalk 09:13, 2 November 2007 (UTC) Keep - not doing any harm. It's self-made and GJCP won't return a search result becuase it's his own...
Click to read more »related; no harm. jorgenev 18:22, 15 September 2011 (UTC) Keep - There doesn't seem to be much point in getting rid of this. It is doing no harm, and it is...
Click to read more »Template:Userpage blanked, which would have been preferable to an MfD nom. This does no harm - why waste admin time, and MfD time and space? A2soup (talk) 18:18, 17 February...
Click to read more »fluorescent lamp when brought near it. But here, it says Tesla Coil can harm humans. Which is correct? Rizosome (talk) 05:16, 18 October 2021 (UTC) The...
Click to read more »exposed to test items and responses. Such release imposes very concrete harm to the general public – loss of effective assessment tools. Because there...
Click to read more »all from webpages, a view references from peer reviewed journals are no harm. They are available not so easy but for a longer time. --Stone 18:26, 19...
Click to read more »a cartoon which is not reality but more notable than malcolm. Whats the harm. Plus it hasn't been linked to List of malcolm in the middle episodes yet...
Click to read more »18 January 2019 (UTC) Question - Is the shouting into the void doing any harm? Robert McClenon (talk) 21:01, 18 January 2019 (UTC) Correction It was the...
Click to read more »treat inadequate content with a sense of urgency due to the potential for harm.) Have your students post their prospective sources to article talk pages...
Click to read more »reason to practice my page making skills, but also this page is doing no harm. I deleted the "boss" which was un needed but the page is all true facts...
Click to read more »choice between doing harm to a real person, and doing no harm, and neither choice actually benefits us much...let's go with the do no harm. dihydrogen monoxide...
Click to read more »Please keep in mind that unless an edit is clearly done with an intent to harm Wikipedia, you must not use rollback without an edit summary (nor explicitly...
Click to read more »April 2007 (UTC) Redirect to Queen's Gambit Declined#Main variations. No harm in the redirect. The D59 means it has a name in MCO, which gives it some...
Click to read more »as the subject passes WP:PROF and the nomination has been withdrawn. No harm was done. Bearian (talk) 21:26, 15 April 2010 (UTC) P. A. Sampath Kumar (edit |...
Click to read more »("placebo") or (qualitatively)harms ("nocebo") -- with no restrictions upon how, were, why, when, and to whom the qualitative please/harm elements are effected...
Click to read more »important enough to have mention. While not of great notability there is NO HARM in keeping as the article suffers none of the other criteria. For the record...
Click to read more »that having fun like this for one day without causing actual destructive harm is actually GOOD for you, then this whole need to debate the merits of the...
Click to read more »Tito Dutta (Send me a message) 11:46, 10 April 2012 (UTC) Review does no harm. Any editor should be allowed to ask others to look at a page and give frank...
Click to read more »