Redirect to:
This page is a redirect. The following categories are used to track and monitor this redirect:
|
This guide presents the typical layout of Wikipedia articles, including the sections an article usually has, ordering of sections, and formatting styles...
Click to read more »contribs; 25) to w:ms:GTL Schools (diff - undo) - Link: www.schoolnet.my/default.php?page=About%20GTL%20Schools&structure=GTL%20Schools. * Links added...
Click to read more »headings don't conform to WP:MOS and WP:MSH. It doesn't conform with WP:GTL. Sandy (Talk) 19:58, 28 December 2006 (UTC) First up - a bigger lead with...
Click to read more »avail stickers x a lot a few annual reports for potential donors/those interested flatscreen (b?) projector misc computers: gtl wikipedia game demo x2 ??...
Click to read more »25 September 2007 (UTC) Tagged {{nofootnotes}}, renamed section IAW WP:GTL. Improved cite cosmetics. -- Boracay Bill (talk) 03:33, 4 February 2008 (UTC)...
Click to read more »review first. There are several problems with the sections: see WP:TRIV, WP:GTL, and WP:MSH (caps, articles). There are several [citation needed] tags all...
Click to read more »Quadell (talk) (random) 17:16, 19 September 2006 (UTC) See WP:LEAD, WP:MOS, WP:GTL, and a sample philosophy article, Hilary Putnam. This article currently is...
Click to read more »last few sections to follow guidelines at WP:GTL. The sections have been re-ordered, in compliance with WP:GTL This article needs footnotes, preferably in...
Click to read more »write better than me. "the GTL was negotiated in 2010 between $400,000 and $500,000." not sure I understand this, do you mean "GTLs were sold in 2010 for between...
Click to read more »sections, not well referenced, poorly organized lead, doesn't follow WP:GTL or WP:MOS, has external jumps, suggest WP:PR first to get the article a bit...
Click to read more »shortcutsAddLink ( 'Wikify', 'WP:WWF' ); shortcutsAddLink ( 'Guide to layout', 'WP:GTL' ); shortcutsAddLink ( 'Manual of Style', 'WP:MOS' ); }; Keep in mind that...
Click to read more »*Please reorder/rename the last few sections to follow guidelines at WP:GTL. *Please alphabetize the categories and interlanguage links. Please ensure...
Click to read more »if anything can be expanded upon. Please reorder/rename the last few sections to follow guidelines at WP:GTL. Thanks, AndyZ t 14:30, 21 May 2006 (UTC)...
Click to read more »fire and air) shouldn't be linked. See also needs serious pruning: see WP:GTL. Navigational templates go at the bottom. Please ask User:Brighterorange...
Click to read more »response. Oldelpaso 21:39, 18 September 2006 (UTC) *Minor Oppose. See WP:GTL I don't like the three short sections...Critical reaction, Transport and...
Click to read more »sections need to be reordered so that it complies with the order set at WP:GTL. …and more. Please give this article a proper copyedit so that the prose...
Click to read more »Please reorder/rename the last few sections to follow guidelines at WP:GTL. "Related content" should be renamed See also and moved upwards. Please alphabetize...
Click to read more »tables and images. I think setting it to 80-85% would be better. Per WP:GTL notes should come after see also. PumpkinSky talk 20:15, 29 August 2011 (UTC)...
Click to read more »and I don't even know what "Most cited books is" - perhaps that intends to be Further reading (see WP:GTL). Sandy (Talk) 20:25, 28 December 2006 (UTC)...
Click to read more »recently defeatured, and hasn't been improved. It doesn't conform to WP:GTL, is mostly uncited, the references aren't properly formatted, it has a trivia...
Click to read more »incorrectly at bottom of sections, see WP:GTL The For template was at the bottom; I moved it to the top per WP:GTL. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 17:43, 7 June 2007...
Click to read more »Also" goes before "References" that might be better named "Notes" per WP:GTL. On a personal question - Where is HD SciFi in the U.S.! Morphh (talk) 17:26...
Click to read more »WP:CITY Please reorder/rename the last few sections to follow guidelines at WP:GTL. Please move the "References" down to a ==References== section near the bottom...
Click to read more »Please reorder/rename the last few sections to follow guidelines at WP:GTL. Please alphabetize the categories and interlanguage links. Generally, trivia...
Click to read more »sections, Lambic Beers only has two sentences and needs expanded. See WP:GTL on how to set up everything from 'See also' on down. The index is too long...
Click to read more »Please reorder/rename the last few sections to follow guidelines at WP:GTL. Fixed. (Changed "Citations" to "Notes") Thanks, AndyZ t 19:38, 25 May 2006...
Click to read more »the one = headings in articles, as well as avoiding links in headings), WP:GTL, the WP:FOOTNOTEs are missing critical information which can be provided...
Click to read more »2006 (UTC) Remove I don't have a problem with the quote section (see WP:GTL), and the references section can be easily fixed (in fact, I believe I have...
Click to read more »review in May 2006. There is a massive link farm labeled (incorrectly—WP:GTL) as "Further reading". Citations are not formatted and the article needs...
Click to read more »(UTC) Please reorder/rename the last few sections to follow guidelines at WP:GTL. This article needs footnotes, preferably in the cite.php format recommended...
Click to read more »(UTC) Please reorder/rename the last few sections to follow guidelines at WP:GTL. Per WP:MOSNUM, at Units of measurement, numbers with SI units of measure...
Click to read more »AndyZ: Please reorder/rename the last few sections to follow guidelines at WP:GTL. Please alphabetize the categories and interlanguage links. The article will...
Click to read more »talk:Mdd/Archive 2#Orphaned non-free image (Image:Virginia Lentz.jpg) Image:Genomics_GTL_Program_Payoffs.jpg Image:Molecular_Machines_of_Life.jpg User talk:JeffGent#Thanks...
Click to read more »Talk 17:09, 26 September 2006 (UTC) Comment Sections don't conform to WP:GTL, and section headings need attention per WP:MOS. Notables are not sourced...
Click to read more »Please reorder/rename the last few sections to follow guidelines at WP:GTL. Please alphabetize the interlanguage links. There are a few occurrences...
Click to read more »needed WP:MSH issues Strange sections at bottom, not conforming with WP:GTL (what is Miscellany, and why do the navigational templates at the bottom...
Click to read more »(no-break space) between the number and the unit of measurement. As is done in WP:GTL, I suggest that "Web Links" be changed to "External links" (with a decapitalized...
Click to read more »Please reorder/rename the last few sections to follow guidelines at WP:GTL. Please alphabetize the categories and interlanguage links. Per WP:WIAFA...
Click to read more »Please reorder/rename the last few sections to follow guidelines at WP:GTL. Please alphabetize the categories and/or interlanguage links. As is done...
Click to read more »Please reorder/rename the last few sections to follow guidelines at WP:GTL. This article is a bit list-weighty; in other words, some of the lists should...
Click to read more »(UTC) Please reorder/rename the last few sections to follow guidelines at WP:GTL. Done. Slambo (Speak) 13:49, 2 June 2006 (UTC) Please alphabetize the categories...
Click to read more »Please reorder/rename the last few sections to follow guidelines at WP:GTL. Per WP:WIAFA, this article's table of contents (ToC) maybe too long- consider...
Click to read more »Please reorder/rename the last few sections to follow guidelines at WP:GTL. Please alphabetize the categories and interlanguage links. There are a few...
Click to read more »Please reorder/rename the last few sections to follow guidelines at WP:GTL. Per WP:CONTEXT and WP:MOSDATE, years, decades, and centuries without full...
Click to read more »Please reorder/rename the last few sections to follow guidelines at WP:GTL. (specifically "Quotes") Per WP:MOS#Headings, headings generally do not start...
Click to read more »Miscellaneous facts are tagged and unencyclopedic, article doesn't conform to WP:GTL, Recommend to peer review. Sandy 12:36, 22 September 2006 (UTC) Refer to...
Click to read more »Please reorder/rename the last few sections to follow guidelines at WP:GTL. Per WP:MOS#Headings, headings generally do not start with the word "The"...
Click to read more »prefer the standard WP:GTL, putting non-Wikified content (External links) last, but recognize the leeway provided there by GTL. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 17:16...
Click to read more »but looks very doable. Templates go at the top of each section (see WP:GTL). Please get rid of the awful scrolling window on references; that method...
Click to read more »Please reorder/rename the last few sections to follow guidelines at WP:GTL. Please alphabetize the interlanguage links. There are a few occurrences...
Click to read more »December 2008 (UTC) Keep. This is a legitimate issue, and is covered by the GTL. Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 15:20, 21 December 2008 (UTC) If it's...
Click to read more »Please reorder/rename the last few sections to follow guidelines at WP:GTL. Please alphabetize the categories and/or interlanguage links. Please ensure...
Click to read more »on section headings, WP:MOSDATE on date formatting needed throughout, WP:GTL on excess article links in See also that should be removed, and WP:MOS#Captions...
Click to read more »Please reorder/rename the last few sections to follow guidelines at WP:GTL. Done. Joelito (talk) 03:26, 17 June 2006 (UTC) Please alphabetize the categories...
Click to read more »useful, since there are so many instances. See also needs pruning per WP:GTL; most of those links could be incorporated into the text or should already...
Click to read more »called "Related contents" appears to want to be See also - please review WP:GTL. This appears appended to the end of references, with access date in a different...
Click to read more »other problems). Templates placed incorrectly at ends of sections (see WP:GTL). External jumps Most of WP:UNITS is attended to, but not all. WP:MSH issues...
Click to read more »aren't used on wiki). WP:MOS, PhD not Ph.D. See also should be pruned (see WP:GTL). Ideally, relevant links are incorporated into the text and not repeated...
Click to read more »Please reorder/rename the last few sections to follow guidelines at WP:GTL. Thanks, AndyZ t 14:03, 30 May 2006 (UTC) I've fixed most of these issues;...
Click to read more »also and External links need attention/pruning (per WP:EL, WP:NOT, and WP:GTL). Citation needs should be reviewed (one source used — http://nuclearweaponarchive...
Click to read more »working on the article I can list them. See also needs attention, per WP:GTL. There are also citation tags and uncited text. Unless someone is actually...
Click to read more »compliance with the MoS (read the entire WP:MoS, WP:Date, WP:NPOV, WP:LEAD, WP:GTL, etc.). Feel free to read other reviews I have done in order to get a better...
Click to read more »use rationale (see WP:FUC). Are there any useful external links? (see WP:GTL) The (no-break space) should be added between numbers and their units...
Click to read more »object: Please reorder/rename the last few sections to follow guidelines at WP:GTL. This article may need to undergo summary style, where a series of appropriate...
Click to read more »(UTC) Please reorder/rename the last few sections to follow guidelines at WP:GTL. Per WP:MOS#Headings, headings generally should not repeat the title of the...
Click to read more »Please reorder/rename the last few sections to follow guidelines at WP:GTL. Please provide WP:CITE information for references/footnotes. See also WP:CITE/ES;...
Click to read more »Please reorder/rename the last few sections to follow guidelines at WP:GTL. Please alphabetize the interlanguage links. There are a few occurrences...
Click to read more »manually) Please reorder/rename the last few sections to follow guidelines at WP:GTL. This article is a bit too short, and therefore may not be as comprehensive...
Click to read more »would be to start by first resolving the simpler style problems (WP:MOS, WP:GTL), and then increasing the level of content (as there are several stubby sections...
Click to read more »Please reorder/rename the last few sections to follow guidelines at WP:GTL. Please alphabetize the categories and interlanguage links. This article...
Click to read more »Please reorder/rename the last few sections to follow guidelines at WP:GTL. Watch for redundancies that make the article too wordy instead of being...
Click to read more »Please reorder/rename the last few sections to follow guidelines at WP:GTL. Please alphabetize the categories and interlanguage links. Per WP:MOS#Headings...
Click to read more »Please reorder/rename the last few sections to follow guidelines at WP:GTL. Please alphabetize the categories and interlanguage links. There are a few...
Click to read more »something that fits. Well, maybe a more appropriate place to look at is WP:GTL#Images, which devellops a bit on some points (although these two sections...
Click to read more »Please reorder/rename the last few sections to follow guidelines at WP:GTL. Moved "See also" ahead of the References; was there something else? This...
Click to read more »does the layout not conform with WP:GTL? --Rlandmann (talk) 11:52, 18 December 2007 (UTC) Actually it does. WP:GTL says: It is okay to change the sequence...
Click to read more »websources (see WP:CITE/ES). There's an External link in See also; see WP:GTL. Non-breaking hardspaces between numbers and units of measurement, per WP:MOSNUM;...
Click to read more »includes terms that are already linked in the article, like Virus (see WP:GTL). Ask User:Brighterorange to run his dash-fixing script (page number ranges...
Click to read more »Please reorder/rename the last few sections to follow guidelines at WP:GTL. Images with fair use tags need fair use rationales - please see WP:FUC....
Click to read more »Please reorder/rename the last few sections to follow guidelines at WP:GTL. Please alphabetize the categories and/or interlanguage links. Per WP:WIAFA...
Click to read more »see WP:ITALICS on foreign phrases, the gallery should go (see WP:MOS or WP:GTL, can't remember which), review Tony1 (talk · contribs)'s redundancy reducing...
Click to read more »Please reorder/rename the last few sections to follow guidelines at WP:GTL. Per WP:CONTEXT and WP:BTW, years with full dates should be linked; for example...
Click to read more »Please reorder/rename the last few sections to follow guidelines at WP:GTL. Thanks, AndyZ t 23:30, 19 May 2006 (UTC) Conditional Support, I think shall...
Click to read more »references"), then References (in this case "General references"). See WP:GTL. Half the links currently in the See also section are redundant (already...
Click to read more »a good article but not quite there yet. Some things you could do: Per WP:GTL, "see also" section is not in the right spot, and should not include external...
Click to read more »closing; I will list some things to address before re-approaching FAC. WP:GTL, see also, further, etc. templates belong at the top of sections. MOS:CAPS#All...
Click to read more »this myself, but since there are six, I'll let you do it). Per (I think) WP:GTL, the Kent Portal link belongs in See also, not at the top of the article...
Click to read more »Please reorder/rename the last few sections to follow guidelines at WP:GTL. Please alphabetize the categories and interlanguage links. Per WP:WIAFA...
Click to read more »unnecessary capitalization in the section headings, see [[WP:MSH] See also, see WP:GTL. Ideally, terms should be worked into the text, and terms which are in the...
Click to read more »almost no publishers are identified; See also is out of control (see WP:GTL). There is incorrect use of WP:MOSBOLD. The article doesn't stay tightly...
Click to read more »Please reorder/rename the last few sections to follow guidelines at WP:GTL. There are a few occurrences of weasel words in this article- please observe...
Click to read more »run-through and made changes per WP:DASH, WP:MSH, WP:UNITS, WP:MOSNUM, WP:GTL and WP:CONTEXT. The first occurrence of relevent terms should be linked,...
Click to read more »Please reorder/rename the last few sections to follow guidelines at WP:GTL. You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions (and the javascript...
Click to read more »readable prose was explained to me.) The article needs to conform to WP:GTL: please reorganize sections. (See all of the articles you referenced above:...
Click to read more »Please reorder/rename the last few sections to follow guidelines at WP:GTL. Fixed. Footnote Citations was renamed References. -DMurphy 04:13, 24 May...
Click to read more »manually) Please reorder/rename the last few sections to follow guidelines at WP:GTL. Please alphabetize the categories and interlanguage links. Per WP:WIAFA...
Click to read more »sintetico (diff !top) - Link: www.chemicals-technology.com/projects/pearl-gtl/ (R/Xmeta/L) 2014-01-24 19:32:53 (UTC): User Beagel t • c • dc • l • ef •...
Click to read more »encouraged to join in on the discussion as Wikipedia is based on consensus. WP:GTL has some guidelines on how to layout sections in an article. Cowman109Talk...
Click to read more »templates). Books section - what is that? Further reading or References? See WP:GTL. Incorrect use of dashes. The article is undercited. These kinds of parentheticals...
Click to read more »December 2006 (UTC) Yes, I really dislike it - it doesn't belong there. If WP:GTL, WP:LEAD, WP:MOS or some other part of Wikiland doesn't explain a proper...
Click to read more »me a while to find the references for your footnotes (I don't believe WP:GTL requires this, but it does make them easier to find). Also, where would a...
Click to read more »WP:MOS#Headings. Reordered the last few sections to follow guidelines at WP:GTL. Citations were found for all the {{fact}}s. And thanks to Jersyko for doing...
Click to read more »identified. Please see WP:CITE/ES. See also templates in the wrong place, per WP:GTL. External link farm needs to be pruned per WP:EL, WP:NOT. SandyGeorgia (Talk)...
Click to read more »should be renamed to References and the References renamed to Notes (see WP:GTL). Made the change Morphh (talk) 1:18, 27 June 2007 (UTC) The section "Life...
Click to read more »WP:MOSDATE, WP:DASH, WP:Images#Captions, WP:ITALICS, MOS:CAPS#All caps, WP:GTL at least, more than I can undertake to fix on my own, especially considering...
Click to read more »com/2009/11/porsche-365b-abarth-gtl-6.html. * Links added in this diff: abarthpertutti.blogspot.com/2009/11/porsche-365b-abarth-gtl-6.html (27, 28, 26, 2) 2010-01-07...
Click to read more »can they be worked into the article, do they need an explanation? See WP:GTL. The Winter Quarters Bay link is of interest and I've added a short explanation...
Click to read more »Please reorder/rename the last few sections to follow guidelines at WP:GTL. As done in WP:FOOTNOTE, footnotes usually are located right after a punctuation...
Click to read more »Please reorder/rename the last few sections to follow guidelines at WP:GTL. Please alphabetize the categories and/or interlanguage links. There are...
Click to read more »remove the lines in See also that are already mentioned in the text (see WP:GTL), then you won't need the multi-column output. Wim van Dorst (Talk) 19:52...
Click to read more »would be nice). Please reorder the last couple of sections according to WP:GTL. Image:SzpakIRcameraviews.jpg will need a fair use rationale (it has one...
Click to read more »Please reorder/rename the last few sections to follow guidelines at WP:GTL. Done Please alphabetize the categories and interlanguage links. Per WP:WIAFA...
Click to read more »on Wikipedia, for now.--Ltuck3 (talk) 22:38, 4 July 2011 (UTC) Comment If GTL is a major figure in fund law and family office law (which I understand him...
Click to read more »WP:BETTER and project pages and essays linked from there. I remember that WP:GTL and WP:CITE played a big part for me ad an editor early-on. I was not the...
Click to read more »Please reorder/rename the last few sections to follow guidelines at WP:GTL. Please alphabetize the categories and/or interlanguage links. Per WP:WIAFA...
Click to read more »note for the future. External links (which aren't listed correctly per WP:GTL) should be cleaned up per WP:EL and WP:NOT (not Gore's personal website,...
Click to read more »per WP:FOOT See also goes before Refs (should probably be "Notes") per WP:GTL I added an infobox,however I would suggest --Maniwar (talk) 21:47, 18 December...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Manual of Style (Medicine-related articles) and does not conform to WP:GTL (2), does not appear comprehensive per sections missing from MCOTW guidelines...
Click to read more »think the "Notes" and "References" are backward, at least according to WP:GTL#Notes. AZ t 14:27, 14 July 2006 (UTC) Ok sorted --Zak 15:54, 15 July 2006...
Click to read more »Please reorder/rename the last few sections to follow guidelines at WP:GTL. Please alphabetize the interlanguage links. There are a few occurrences...
Click to read more »WP:GTL? Also, wondering if some of the Seealso is already in or can be incorporated into the article; ideally, See also should be minimized (see WP:GTL)...
Click to read more »entirety of the Jezebel blog entry (the Gawker Media site you refer to): GTL has even infiltrated the Sunday funnies. The creators of the blog Jersey...
Click to read more »Please reorder/rename the last few sections to follow guidelines at WP:GTL. Per WP:WIAFA, this article's table of contents (ToC) maybe too long- consider...
Click to read more »Please reorder/rename the last few sections to follow guidelines at WP:GTL. Please alphabetize the categories and interlanguage links. There are a few...
Click to read more »I'll post it soon. References and Notes: I prefer these in one section (WP:GTL) because they are so intimately interlinked. I personally prefer the references...
Click to read more »references"), then References (in this case "General references"). See WP:GTL. Half the links currently in the See also section are redundant (already...
Click to read more »sandwiched between infoboxes (see WP:MOS#Images). Also, please have a look at WP:GTL regarding see also; it's very strange to see a link to Chick-fil-A Bowl in...
Click to read more »compelling prose Templates placed incorrectly at end of section (see WP:GTL) Unformatted Notes and incomplete References Image placement results in large...
Click to read more »78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 21:43, 16 July 2021 (UTC) D (corp) Draft:GTL Americas (114 days) D (corp) Draft:House of Prayer (religious group) (117...
Click to read more »Please reorder/rename the last few sections to follow guidelines at WP:GTL. Thanks, AndyZ t 22:08, 23 May 2006 (UTC) Comment: Per above. Also, the tone...
Click to read more »sections are supposed and generally are above reference sections (see WP:GTL) as for promoting external links, that's not what WIkipedia is here for (See...
Click to read more »please make the appendices at the bottom of the article conform with WP:GTL? I believe Wikiquotes belongs in External links, and the Resources heading...
Click to read more »Please reorder/rename the last few sections to follow guidelines at WP:GTL. Please alphabetize the interlanguage links. Per WP:WIAFA, this article's...
Click to read more »25 September 2007 (UTC) Tagged {{nofootnotes}}, renamed section IAW WP:GTL. Improved cite cosmetics. -- Boracay Bill (talk) 03:33, 4 February 2008 (UTC)...
Click to read more »supposed to come after the footnotes (what you call references)? In the GTL, it says Bibliography can be confused with a list of printed works by the...
Click to read more »References should be before External links Not done In fact, according to WP:GTL the ordering of these sections is not fixed, and in this particular case...
Click to read more »sections) --GoOdCoNtEnT 22:56, 4 August 2006 (UTC) Please have a look at WP:GTL for the correct ordering of sections. Your TOC is overwhelming: there are...
Click to read more »15:21, 30 August 2006 (UTC) Comments Your layout needs to correspond to WP:GTL. It would also be a good idea to include all PMIDs and ISBNs on your footnotes...
Click to read more »Also lines should be at the top of a section, not at the end, to follow WP:GTL. Why is the budget of the city given at 10 significant figures for each individual...
Click to read more »featured status quality. See also should go before notes or references per WP:GTL. Also is this article comprehenive on the topic? Joelito (talk) 01:10, 19...
Click to read more »footnotes correctly (see WP:FN). The ref goes after punctuation. Refer to WP:GTL: your See also is in the wrong place. Now, once you clear all that "stuff"...
Click to read more »this passed FAC; there is a bit of work needed. See WP:GTL, portals belong in See also. See WP:GTL regarding See also: really needs pruning. All of those...
Click to read more »Please reorder/rename the last few sections to follow guidelines at WP:GTL. Watch for redundancies that make the article too wordy instead of being...
Click to read more »eliminate all the repeats. Also, the article doesn't currently conform with WP:GTL - External links are listed in Sources. Which are they? SandyGeorgia (Talk)...
Click to read more »image above it. See also has red links, and should be cleaned up. Per WP:GTL, See also should be minimized, and links should be incorporated into the...
Click to read more »00:23, 12 August 2006 (UTC) Yes, I see now that you changed them in the GTL a few days ago. I always check the FAC nom and edit history before working...
Click to read more »14 March 2007 (UTC) That info isn't entirely correct; read See also at WP:GTL. See also is fine in this case. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 05:27, 14 March 2007...
Click to read more »Contents is overwhelming, and the article does not conform to WP:MOS or WP:GTL, needs to emply Summary Sytle, and needs better inline citations from higher...
Click to read more »"Observation" and "Forecasting" headings. Oh my goodness, that See also ! See WP:GTL; topics related to an article should be mostly included within the text of...
Click to read more »5 February 2007 (UTC) See WP:GTL and {{See also}} SandyGeorgia (Talk) 02:01, 5 February 2007 (UTC) From Wikipedia:Gtl: "Rather than scattering such additional...
Click to read more »think it needs a 'see also' or 'related articles' section Please see WP:GTL; see also is neither required nor desired. A comprehensive article will already...
Click to read more »(UTC) Comment Please fix your refs, and your layout should conform to WP:GTL. Sandy 03:44, 1 September 2006 (UTC) Wow, I can't believe I've been in this...
Click to read more »PaddyLeahy 21:00, 30 April 2007 (UTC) Comments. Fails to comply with WP:GTL; either it has a massive link farm, or some of those are actually incorrectly...
Click to read more »work" should probably be renamed "Further reading" or "Bibliography" (see WP:GTL). Thanks, Andy t 22:03, 3 June 2006 (UTC) Lead Image and Bibliography: fixed...
Click to read more »matters" shouldn't 'who advises' be 'to'? Many paras seem short. See WP:GTL--for sequence of see also, ext links, refs,etcRlevse 16:50, 19 June 2006...
Click to read more »Notes/References format as you suggest.) As for the additional sections, since WP:GTL says that "See also" links should not be duplications of links from the text...
Click to read more »CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki · SI) Qwertyuiopftk,ytcfklyfyuk,gtl.yugy7p;tigy7lu.. f (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter...
Click to read more »May 2007 (UTC) See also is not required and should be minimized; See WP:GTL. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 14:27, 20 May 2007 (UTC) There are only three links...
Click to read more »MBisanz talk 04:49, 25 February 2008 (UTC) See also should be minimized per WP:GTL; there's no need to add to them. As soon as the personal webpage sources...
Click to read more »something that fits. Well, maybe a more appropriate place to look at is WP:GTL#Images, which devellops a bit on some points (although these two sections...
Click to read more »— Rlevse • Talk • 18:06, 15 June 2008 (UTC) "Other sources"? Wikipedia:GTL#Standard appendices and descriptions. Also, there are spaced emdashes mixed...
Click to read more »many of those articles should be worked into the text or eliminated (see WP:GTL), there is incorrect bolding in the text (WP:MOSBOLD), the Support section...
Click to read more »matter of asking Brighterorange (talk · contribs) to run a script. See WP:GTL, templates are incorrectly placed at the bottom of sections, they go at the...
Click to read more »Please reorder/rename the last few sections to follow guidelines at WP:GTL. Please alphabetize the categories and/or interlanguage links. Per WP:WIAFA...
Click to read more »edits an article for the first time;[83][84] Crum375 had never edited WP:GTL before. Third, this type of editing is occurring on other guideline and policy...
Click to read more »also" section in an article to be above the "References" section, per WP:GTL; that's easy for a person to understand (when looking at the diff), but potentially...
Click to read more »GST GSU GSV GSW GSX GSY GSZ GTA GTB GTC GTD GTE GTF GTG GTH GTI GTJ GTK GTL GTM GTN GTO GTP GTQ GTR GTS GTT GTU GTV GTW GTX GTY GTZ GUA GUB GUC GUD GUE...
Click to read more »(so I really like to thank you for your question). I've used Nextar 80 GTL with white light filter and with Canon XT (prime focus). In my opinion my...
Click to read more »the text, or could be incorporated in the text to reduce See also (see WP:GTL). SandyGeorgia (Talk) 12:43, 1 May 2007 (UTC) Also, WP:MSH adjustments needed...
Click to read more »readable prose was explained to me.) The article needs to conform to WP:GTL: please reorganize sections. (See all of the articles you referenced above:...
Click to read more »BMW boxer twin motorcycles {{User:UBX/BMW K1600GT}} I ride the BMW K1600GT/GTL Ducati {{User:Isthisthingworking/Userboxes/Ducati}} This user owns a Ducati...
Click to read more »tables and images. I think setting it to 80-85% would be better. Per WP:GTL notes should come after see also. PumpkinSky talk 20:15, 29 August 2011 (UTC)...
Click to read more »section saying in his/her edit (→See also: already linked, removed per WP:GTL). As I read this policy, I see that it can be left in as an editor's discretion...
Click to read more »gst gsu gsv gsw gsx gsy gsz gta gtb gtc gtd gte gtf gtg gth gti gtj gtk gtl gtm gtn gto gtp gtq gtr gts gtt gtu gtv gtw gtx gty gtz gua gub guc gud gue...
Click to read more »needs copyedit). See also templates belong at the top of sections (see WP:GTL). Why is Visual Arts capped here: to become a specialist Visual Arts school...
Click to read more »italics should be used for emphasis, not boldface. – Changed As per WP:GTL, "See also" templates should immediately follow the section heading. – Changed...
Click to read more »from websites. Just one example, http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=GTL_Ltd&diff=prev&oldid=386986130. User has simply copy pasted content. When...
Click to read more »(in a References section you just placed, per WP:MOS and in particular WP:GTL), place an HTML tag that reads "references/". You can see an example of that...
Click to read more »format of general article prose or sections within it (for which there is WP:GTL, WP:MOS and others). ITAQALLAH 00:28, 17 November 2006 (UTC) You seem happy...
Click to read more »Style/Korea-related articles WP:MOS-KO Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Layout WP:GTL, WP:LAY, WP:LAYOUT Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Lead section WP:LEAD, WP:LS...
Click to read more »the WP:LEAD doesn't appear to be an adequate and compelling summary, WP:GTL (portals belong in See also), WP:MOS#Ellipses, WP:MOSBOLD, I stopped there...
Click to read more »formatted referernces; external link farm and Seealso need pruning per WP:GTL, WP:EL, WP:RS, WP:NOT. WP:MSH#Captions attention to punctuation needed, also...
Click to read more »this point it has a ton more than Wikipedia does. Should it follow the WP:GTL and follow the notes? or should it go somewhere people will actually look...
Click to read more »(talk) 14:41, 15 June 2008 (UTC) Notes; I found MoS issues throughout (WP:GTL, WP:PUNC, missing links, missing nbsps, some undefined terms). Please see...
Click to read more »4777 Night Gyr (talk/Oy) 20:30, 4 June 2007 (UTC) Just a thought.... WP:GTL says, in pary, "Changing section names breaks links (hence the utility of...
Click to read more »article should not be in See also, and See also should be minimized. See WP:GTL. Example, NASA is in See also. Missing publishers on citations, example:...
Click to read more »fix this soon or I will be a Strong object. Have a look at WP:SS and WP:GTL for an explanation of the use of the main template - it is being used wrongly...
Click to read more »discussion was Keep Mhiji (talk) 17:03, 17 December 2010 (UTC) MOS:GTLMOS:GTL → Wikipedia:Manual of Style (layout) (links to redirect • history • stats) ...
Click to read more »(UTC) Which doesn't mean the section should be kept unreasonably short. WP:GTL is pretty clear on it: "Just as for paragraphs, sections and subsections...
Click to read more »example dates on BBC, see WP:CITE/ES), external links should conform to WP:GTL (not all are links). SandyGeorgia (Talk) 13:59, 15 December 2007 (UTC) The...
Click to read more »found a number of minor glitches when I read through;[1] WP:MOSDATE, WP:GTL, missing conversions, WP:OVERLINKing, MOS:CAPS#All caps, some missing data...
Click to read more »Description Manual of Style WP:MOS How to format an article Guide to Layout WP:GTL Rules for article layout Lead section WP:LEAD Lead paragraph formatting Cleanup...
Click to read more »"Further reading" up to before "Notes and references", as suggested by WP:GTL? I'd do it myself, but you may object, so... Fvasconcellos (t·c) 15:14, 6...
Click to read more »sections better), make the guidelines are met (the criteria above, WP:MoS, & WP:GTL), and go over everything with a fine-tooth comb. I suggest getting this article...
Click to read more »(talk) 06:00, 30 March 2008 (UTC) Note: the appendices do not conform to WP:GTL, and the article uses mixed reference sytles (both inline and cite.php, see...
Click to read more »anyway. When there is a discrepancy between the WikiProject guidelines and GTL, the discussion may best be handled at the WikiProject level in order to...
Click to read more »Awadewit 20:38, 7 April 2007 (UTC) WP:GTL recommends See also at the end of the article, above notes, refs, and links. GTL allows leeway, but the aim is to...
Click to read more »logic" about white bread. See also should be reviewed and minimized per WP:GTL. Considering the issues that I found on a quick pass, perhaps you can request...
Click to read more »(UTC) Opppose, and please submit to a lengthy peer review. Please see WP:GTL; all of the appendices need serious attention, including pruning of the External...
Click to read more »African-Americans, the affluent, ... incorrect placement of templates per WP:GTL, See also: Dukes v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., Mauldin v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc...
Click to read more »Please reorder/rename the last few sections to follow guidelines at WP:GTL. Please alphabetize the categories and interlanguage links. Please do not...
Click to read more »talk, history, links) — http://www.wikinvest.com/stock/Chart_Industries_(GTLS)/Cold_Boxes. CSBot reporting at 05:51, 27 August 2015 (UTC) Article cleaned...
Click to read more »Groupwise DONE grovel grunge gry GS gs GSBL GSI GSL GSM GSPL GSS GSS-API gt gtg GTL GT/SQL gu guaranteed scheduling guard NO IMPORT (already exists) Guarded...
Click to read more »does the layout not conform with WP:GTL? --Rlandmann (talk) 11:52, 18 December 2007 (UTC) Actually it does. WP:GTL says: It is okay to change the sequence...
Click to read more »sections? Is any useful information lost by doing that? According to WP:GTL this section "is generally for resources on the topic that are not specifically...
Click to read more »mi) The final image (red Supergiant) isn't loading on my browser ? Per WP:GTL, see also templates belong at the tops of sections (several are at the bottom)...
Click to read more »green2911 Nemaline myopathy KpocMU Polymicrogyria Connor.archer Sympathoadrenal G.T.L.Neuro Axon reflex Nickcallard Polymicrogyria MecciaC0410 Nemaline myopathy...
Click to read more »(so I really like to thank you for your question). I've used Nextar 80 GTL with white light filter and with Canon XT (prime focus). In my opinion my...
Click to read more »actually a mixture of See also and External links: can those be sorted per WP:GTL? Some of the references need WP:DASH attention, example: Powell,Nicholas...
Click to read more »(Talk) 14:42, 30 June 2008 (UTC) I've cleaned up the faulty layout (see WP:GTL), fixed the footnote placement (see WP:FN) and will ask User:Brighterorange...
Click to read more »As stated in the previous review, this article does not meet WP:MoS, WP:GTL, and FA requirements. I think the article is good, but is missing key ingredients...
Click to read more »some specified sequence. However, the quote above doesn't seem to be in WP:GTL. In fact, it's not uncommon to find the external links before "see also"...
Click to read more »--chaser - t 23:47, 18 November 2008 (UTC) Stubs go below navboxes: see WP:GTL#Navigational footers, categories, interlanguage links etc.. (And in the future...
Click to read more »Comment: That violates WP:CATRED -- 65.94.42.131 (talk) 05:08, 2 July 2017 (UTC) Comment: That violates WP:CATRED -- 65.94.42.131 (talk) 05:06, 2 July...
Click to read more »the references section (which you may want to rename to "Notes" - see WP:GTL) and some use embedded links - convert them all to footnotes (see WP:FOOT)...
Click to read more »"infobox" at the top of the article isn't an infobox per se, and goes against WP:GTL - it's only a collection of See also links. It should be converted to a horizontal...
Click to read more »have standardized templates and established usage guidelines (WP:SISTER, WP:GTL). --Muchness 23:24, 29 May 2007 (UTC) Delete per redundancy with the established...
Click to read more »good to go. Dana boomer (talk) 21:16, 22 July 2012 (UTC) Comment Per WP:GTL See also is for internal links. Links to Commons cats are supposed to be...
Click to read more »(UTC) Question: the See Also list repeats links present in the article. WP:GTL says that is not ideal. I don't mind either way, but all the links are in...
Click to read more »it appears to be only Sister cities. See also should be minimized (see WP:GTL) by including articles in the text where possible. Articles already in the...
Click to read more »Style Guide talk page? TimVickers 00:17, 5 June 2007 (UTC) Reading the WP:GTL I see there is no standard order for these sections. I have put the refs...
Click to read more »some discussion and probably some input which let to changes on WP:CITE, WP:GTL, and perhaps some other guidelines. Just yesterday I made this edit to WP:FOOT...
Click to read more »29 March 2008 (UTC) Better, except for the raging Bibliography; see WP:GTL for discussion of References vs. Further reading. Also, the size is now a...
Click to read more »Class 98.8-9 (bay. GtL 4/4), image Y DRG Class 98.10 (unofficially the Bav. GtL 4/5), image N DRG Class 98.11 (unofficially the Bav. GtL 4/5), image N DB...
Click to read more »entirety of the Jezebel blog entry (the Gawker Media site you refer to): GTL has even infiltrated the Sunday funnies. The creators of the blog Jersey...
Click to read more »for Linden. Kaiser matias (talk) 18:59, 21 May 2008 (UTC) Please read WP:GTL: if a site is used as a source, it doesn't belong in External links. SandyGeorgia...
Click to read more »be cleaned up. Done. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 19:04, 17 May 2007 (UTC) See WP:GTL and WP:MEDMOS; See also needs to be pruned. Articles should be linked into...
Click to read more »infobox on any other FAC; also, there is a commons link in the infobox (see WP:GTL, commons go in external links). SandyGeorgia (Talk) 15:41, 13 June 2008 (UTC)...
Click to read more »on Wikipedia, for now.--Ltuck3 (talk) 22:38, 4 July 2011 (UTC) Comment If GTL is a major figure in fund law and family office law (which I understand him...
Click to read more »sections (see also, references, notes, external links) follow order at WP:GTL Determine if extraneous bolding is used Determine if categories and interlanguage...
Click to read more »GST GSU GSV GSW GSX GSY GSZ GTA GTB GTC GTD GTE GTF GTG GTH GTI GTJ GTK GTL GTM GTN GTO GTP GTQ GTR GTS GTT GTU GTV GTW GTX GTY GTZ GUA GUB GUC GUD GUE...
Click to read more »be cleaned up. Done. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 19:04, 17 May 2007 (UTC) See WP:GTL and WP:MEDMOS; See also needs to be pruned. Articles should be linked into...
Click to read more »lowest quality in Europe, and bottom of the 122 countries studied. See WP:GTL; See also, Main, Further information etc. templates belong at the top of...
Click to read more »afraid... Elinks are for html resources, further reading for print, per MoS/GtL, IIRC.-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk 15:54, 1 March 2007...
Click to read more »19:02, 18 February 2007 (UTC) Delist per under-referencing and needs WP:GTL work.Rlevse 03:56, 19 February 2007 (UTC) DelistSumoeagle179 12:11, 19 February...
Click to read more »belong below the section heading, not at the end of the section (see WP:GTL and *{{See also}}). Sandy (Talk) 09:54, 27 December 2006 (UTC) Ok. I will...
Click to read more »oilprice.com/Energy/Energy-General/Iran-Besieged-by-Gasoline-Sanctions-Develops-GTL-to-Extract-Gasoline-from-Natural-Gas.html (35, 23, 2, 1 R/X/L) oilprice...
Click to read more »information about that here. For more help about "wikification", see WP:MOS and WP:GTL. I hope this has helped! Hersfold (talk/work) 02:11, 9 June 2007 (UTC) Also...
Click to read more »WP:MOS#Quotations, quotes should be neither bolded nor in italics. See WP:GTL, ideally see also should be minimized in a comprehensive article, as any...
Click to read more »Sample edits, encompassing WP:NBSP, WP:MOSDATE, WP:MOSNUM, conversions, WP:GTL, endashes, and WP:MOS#Captions (punctuation). SandyGeorgia (Talk) 15:17,...
Click to read more »has a POV tag, footnotes are not correctly formatted, doesn't follow WP:GTL. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 01:31, 8 January 2007 (UTC) Comment - there is a minor...
Click to read more »2016-12-20 10:31:16 (UTC): w:ru:User:Archivero (t - c; 6463) to w:ru:Uzbekistan GTL (diff !top) - Link: ru.sputniknews-uz.com/economy/20151217/1349372.html...
Click to read more »5 February 2007 (UTC) See WP:GTL and {{See also}} SandyGeorgia (Talk) 02:01, 5 February 2007 (UTC) From Wikipedia:Gtl: "Rather than scattering such additional...
Click to read more »picture of such relationships. Cwolfsheep 13:13, 29 December 2006 (UTC) WP:GTL is clear that "see also" should not contain articles already linked in the...
Click to read more »itself does not belong in Further reading, it's an External link—see WP:GTL. Perfectly right, and it's been moved. External link farm, needs to be pruned...
Click to read more »article in "see also" or "external links" sections. Here's quoting from WP:GTL:" A 'See also' section should ideally not repeat links already present in...
Click to read more »Souvik1709 was declined by Kashmorwiki on 17 Mar 2021 17 Feb 2021 – Draft:GTL Americas, LP submitted for AfC by Pupreti was declined by Kashmorwiki on...
Click to read more »links need pruning per WP:EL, WP:NOT. See also is a wreck; pls refer to WP:GTL; to the extent possible, important articles should be linked into the text...
Click to read more »Please reorder/rename the last few sections to follow guidelines at WP:GTL. Please alphabetize the categories and interlanguage links. Please do not...
Click to read more »Draft:Foresight Group submitted for AfC by Hawkvue was deleted 17 Feb 2021 – Draft:GTL Americas, LP submitted for AfC by Pupreti was deleted 17 Feb 2021 – Draft:Eden...
Click to read more »2016-12-20 10:31:16 (UTC): w:ru:User:Archivero (t - c; 8440) to w:ru:Uzbekistan GTL (diff !top) - Link: ru.sputniknews-uz.com/economy/20151217/1349372.html...
Click to read more »news report. We need a title and last accessdate, see WP:CITE/ES. Per WP:GTL, portals belong in See also (not External links). Since this article doesn't...
Click to read more »prefer the standard WP:GTL, putting non-Wikified content (External links) last, but recognize the leeway provided there by GTL. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 17:16...
Click to read more »(UTC) Comment Please fix your refs, and your layout should conform to WP:GTL. Sandy 03:44, 1 September 2006 (UTC) Wow, I can't believe I've been in this...
Click to read more »shouldn't be a subsection of References. I fixed that one, some other WP:GTL issues, and few other things (it might be good to have User:Epbr123 run through);...
Click to read more »and units of measurement; I did some as an example. Also, please see WP:GTL regarding the use of Seealso templates at the beginning of sections; See...
Click to read more »11:19:40 (UTC): w:it:User:Micap (t - c; 485) to w:it:Porsche 356 Carrera Abarth GTL (diff !top) - Link: www.classicdriver.com/uk/magazine/3300.asp?id=13687...
Click to read more »eliminate all the repeats. Also, the article doesn't currently conform with WP:GTL - External links are listed in Sources. Which are they? SandyGeorgia (Talk)...
Click to read more »lists. Citations aren't correctly formatted. There are WP:MSH issues, WP:GTL issues, and WP:ITALICS just on a quick glance, the article will need a lot...
Click to read more »also templates in the middle of sections: they belong at the top. See WP:GTL. Can the first section heading ("Historic attitudes regarding erotic depictions")...
Click to read more »Please reorder/rename the last few sections to follow guidelines at WP:GTL. Done. Joelito (talk) 03:26, 17 June 2006 (UTC) Please alphabetize the categories...
Click to read more »image above it. See also has red links, and should be cleaned up. Per WP:GTL, See also should be minimized, and links should be incorporated into the...
Click to read more »needs copyedit). See also templates belong at the top of sections (see WP:GTL). Why is Visual Arts capped here: to become a specialist Visual Arts school...
Click to read more »Awadewit 20:38, 7 April 2007 (UTC) WP:GTL recommends See also at the end of the article, above notes, refs, and links. GTL allows leeway, but the aim is to...
Click to read more »29 March 2008 (UTC) Better, except for the raging Bibliography; see WP:GTL for discussion of References vs. Further reading. Also, the size is now a...
Click to read more »anyway. When there is a discrepancy between the WikiProject guidelines and GTL, the discussion may best be handled at the WikiProject level in order to...
Click to read more »(UTC) Question: the See Also list repeats links present in the article. WP:GTL says that is not ideal. I don't mind either way, but all the links are in...
Click to read more »links | watch | logs) (diff !top) - Link: www.macroaxis.com/invest/manager/GTL.NS--Manoj-Tirodkar (R/Xmeta/L) 2018-02-25 00:45:18 (UTC): User CLCStudent...
Click to read more »15:21, 30 August 2006 (UTC) Comments Your layout needs to correspond to WP:GTL. It would also be a good idea to include all PMIDs and ISBNs on your footnotes...
Click to read more »sections need to be reordered so that it complies with the order set at WP:GTL. …and more. Please give this article a proper copyedit so that the prose...
Click to read more »this passed FAC; there is a bit of work needed. See WP:GTL, portals belong in See also. See WP:GTL regarding See also: really needs pruning. All of those...
Click to read more »but looks very doable. Templates go at the top of each section (see WP:GTL). Please get rid of the awful scrolling window on references; that method...
Click to read more »Evolution's Thermodynamic Failure See also could use a run-through per WP:GTL. Ideally, relevant links are incorporated into the article and not repeated...
Click to read more »fire and air) shouldn't be linked. See also needs serious pruning: see WP:GTL. Navigational templates go at the bottom. Please ask User:Brighterorange...
Click to read more »article. I urge you to try to reduce the lead to one or two paragraphs--see WP:GTL#Lead section, which recommends no more than three. · rodii · 03:39, 22 May...
Click to read more »wikilinking. See also need pruning, and the appendices don't conform with WP:GTL. There are raw URLs listed in citations and no consistent bibliographic style...
Click to read more »Quadell (talk) (random) 17:16, 19 September 2006 (UTC) See WP:LEAD, WP:MOS, WP:GTL, and a sample philosophy article, Hilary Putnam. This article currently is...
Click to read more »not the United States Lister Cars Lister Petter Lister Storm Lister Storm GTL Lists of automobiles Lithuanian Car of the Year Litocar Little (automobile)...
Click to read more »Also lines should be at the top of a section, not at the end, to follow WP:GTL. Why is the budget of the city given at 10 significant figures for each individual...
Click to read more »infobox on any other FAC; also, there is a commons link in the infobox (see WP:GTL, commons go in external links). SandyGeorgia (Talk) 15:41, 13 June 2008 (UTC)...
Click to read more »May 2007 (UTC) See also is not required and should be minimized; See WP:GTL. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 14:27, 20 May 2007 (UTC) There are only three links...
Click to read more »would be to start by first resolving the simpler style problems (WP:MOS, WP:GTL), and then increasing the level of content (as there are several stubby sections...
Click to read more »com/GNNTV48Naga/photos/a.1865471867007014/2895332807354243/?type=3&app=fbl</ref> File:GTL Infrastructure official logo.jpg: <ref>[http://www.gtlinfra...
Click to read more »Please reorder/rename the last few sections to follow guidelines at WP:GTL. Thanks, AndyZ t 14:30, 21 May 2006 (UTC) What a fantastic article, definately...
Click to read more »GST GSU GSV GSW GSX GSY GSZ GTA GTB GTC GTD GTE GTF GTG GTH GTI GTJ GTK GTL GTM GTN GTO GTP GTQ GTR GTS GTT GTU GTV GTW GTX GTY GTZ GUA GUB GUC GUD GUE...
Click to read more »December 2006 (UTC) Yes, I really dislike it - it doesn't belong there. If WP:GTL, WP:LEAD, WP:MOS or some other part of Wikiland doesn't explain a proper...
Click to read more »identified. Please see WP:CITE/ES. See also templates in the wrong place, per WP:GTL. External link farm needs to be pruned per WP:EL, WP:NOT. SandyGeorgia (Talk)...
Click to read more »good to go. Dana boomer (talk) 21:16, 22 July 2012 (UTC) Comment Per WP:GTL See also is for internal links. Links to Commons cats are supposed to be...
Click to read more »MBisanz talk 04:49, 25 February 2008 (UTC) See also should be minimized per WP:GTL; there's no need to add to them. As soon as the personal webpage sources...
Click to read more »"Further reading" up to before "Notes and references", as suggested by WP:GTL? I'd do it myself, but you may object, so... Fvasconcellos (t·c) 15:14, 6...
Click to read more »matters" shouldn't 'who advises' be 'to'? Many paras seem short. See WP:GTL--for sequence of see also, ext links, refs,etcRlevse 16:50, 19 June 2006...
Click to read more »review first. There are several problems with the sections: see WP:TRIV, WP:GTL, and WP:MSH (caps, articles). There are several [citation needed] tags all...
Click to read more »14 March 2007 (UTC) That info isn't entirely correct; read See also at WP:GTL. See also is fine in this case. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 05:27, 14 March 2007...
Click to read more »WP:GTL? Also, wondering if some of the Seealso is already in or can be incorporated into the article; ideally, See also should be minimized (see WP:GTL)...
Click to read more »for Linden. Kaiser matias (talk) 18:59, 21 May 2008 (UTC) Please read WP:GTL: if a site is used as a source, it doesn't belong in External links. SandyGeorgia...
Click to read more »also templates in the middle of sections: they belong at the top. See WP:GTL. Can the first section heading ("Historic attitudes regarding erotic depictions")...
Click to read more »(Talk) 14:42, 30 June 2008 (UTC) I've cleaned up the faulty layout (see WP:GTL), fixed the footnote placement (see WP:FN) and will ask User:Brighterorange...
Click to read more »readable prose was explained to me.) The article needs to conform to WP:GTL: please reorganize sections. (See all of the articles you referenced above:...
Click to read more »supposed to come after the footnotes (what you call references)? In the GTL, it says Bibliography can be confused with a list of printed works by the...
Click to read more »readable prose was explained to me.) The article needs to conform to WP:GTL: please reorganize sections. (See all of the articles you referenced above:...
Click to read more »(UTC) Opppose, and please submit to a lengthy peer review. Please see WP:GTL; all of the appendices need serious attention, including pruning of the External...
Click to read more »(talk) 06:00, 30 March 2008 (UTC) Note: the appendices do not conform to WP:GTL, and the article uses mixed reference sytles (both inline and cite.php, see...
Click to read more »Please reorder/rename the last few sections to follow guidelines at WP:GTL. Please alphabetize the categories and interlanguage links. Generally, trivia...
Click to read more »closing; I will list some things to address before re-approaching FAC. WP:GTL, see also, further, etc. templates belong at the top of sections. MOS:CAPS#All...
Click to read more »Please reorder/rename the last few sections to follow guidelines at WP:GTL. Thanks, AndyZ t 22:08, 23 May 2006 (UTC) Comment: Per above. Also, the tone...
Click to read more »see WP:ITALICS on foreign phrases, the gallery should go (see WP:MOS or WP:GTL, can't remember which), review Tony1 (talk · contribs)'s redundancy reducing...
Click to read more »aren't used on wiki). WP:MOS, PhD not Ph.D. See also should be pruned (see WP:GTL). Ideally, relevant links are incorporated into the text and not repeated...
Click to read more »Miscellaneous facts are tagged and unencyclopedic, article doesn't conform to WP:GTL, Recommend to peer review. Sandy 12:36, 22 September 2006 (UTC) Refer to...
Click to read more »2006 (UTC) Remove I don't have a problem with the quote section (see WP:GTL), and the references section can be easily fixed (in fact, I believe I have...
Click to read more »found a number of minor glitches when I read through;[28] WP:MOSDATE, WP:GTL, missing conversions, WP:OVERLINKing, MOS:CAPS#All caps, some missing data...
Click to read more »can they be worked into the article, do they need an explanation? See WP:GTL. The Winter Quarters Bay link is of interest and I've added a short explanation...
Click to read more »compliance with the MoS (read the entire WP:MoS, WP:Date, WP:NPOV, WP:LEAD, WP:GTL, etc.). Feel free to read other reviews I have done in order to get a better...
Click to read more »References should be before External links Not done In fact, according to WP:GTL the ordering of these sections is not fixed, and in this particular case...
Click to read more »eliminate all the repeats. Also, the article doesn't currently conform with WP:GTL - External links are listed in Sources. Which are they? SandyGeorgia (Talk)...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Footnotes Template:WP:FN, Template:WP:FN3 Wikipedia:Guide to layout Template:WP:GTL Wikipedia:How to break up a page Template:WP:BREAK Wikipedia:Lead section...
Click to read more »Please reorder/rename the last few sections to follow guidelines at WP:GTL. Thanks, AndyZ t 14:03, 30 May 2006 (UTC) I've fixed most of these issues;...
Click to read more »WP:MOS#Headings. Reordered the last few sections to follow guidelines at WP:GTL. Citations were found for all the {{fact}}s. And thanks to Jersyko for doing...
Click to read more »Notes/References format as you suggest.) As for the additional sections, since WP:GTL says that "See also" links should not be duplications of links from the text...
Click to read more »working on the article I can list them. See also needs attention, per WP:GTL. There are also citation tags and uncited text. Unless someone is actually...
Click to read more »headings don't conform to WP:MOS and WP:MSH. It doesn't conform with WP:GTL. Sandy (Talk) 19:58, 28 December 2006 (UTC) First up - a bigger lead with...
Click to read more »Evolution's Thermodynamic Failure See also could use a run-through per WP:GTL. Ideally, relevant links are incorporated into the article and not repeated...
Click to read more »Wikitext userbox where used {{User:UBX/BMW K1600GT}} I ride the BMW K1600GT/GTL linked pages {{User:Jeffrey M Dean/userboxes/r68}} This user rides the rare...
Click to read more »sections) --GoOdCoNtEnT 22:56, 4 August 2006 (UTC) Please have a look at WP:GTL for the correct ordering of sections. Your TOC is overwhelming: there are...
Click to read more »gst gsu gsv gsw gsx gsy gsz gta gtb gtc gtd gte gtf gtg gth gti gtj gtk gtl gtm gtn gto gtp gtq gtr gts gtt gtu gtv gtw gtx gty gtz gua gub guc gud gue...
Click to read more »websources (see WP:CITE/ES). There's an External link in See also; see WP:GTL. Non-breaking hardspaces between numbers and units of measurement, per WP:MOSNUM;...
Click to read more »on section headings, WP:MOSDATE on date formatting needed throughout, WP:GTL on excess article links in See also that should be removed, and WP:MOS#Captions...
Click to read more »African-Americans, the affluent, ... incorrect placement of templates per WP:GTL, See also: Dukes v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., Mauldin v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc...
Click to read more »Wairau Hydro Scheme Kandadji dam Agbami Field Akpo Bonga Field Escravos GTL Jebba Hydroelectric Power Station Niger Delta province Shiroro Hydroelectric...
Click to read more »on section headings, WP:MOSDATE on date formatting needed throughout, WP:GTL on excess article links in See also that should be removed, and WP:MOS#Captions...
Click to read more »it appears to be only Sister cities. See also should be minimized (see WP:GTL) by including articles in the text where possible. Articles already in the...
Click to read more »00:23, 12 August 2006 (UTC) Yes, I see now that you changed them in the GTL a few days ago. I always check the FAC nom and edit history before working...
Click to read more »a good article but not quite there yet. Some things you could do: Per WP:GTL, "see also" section is not in the right spot, and should not include external...
Click to read more »talk, history, links) — http://www.wikinvest.com/stock/Chart_Industries_(GTLS)/Cold_Boxes. CSBot reporting at 05:51, 27 August 2015 (UTC) Article cleaned...
Click to read more »Ispat Steel 4 25 Reliance Industrial Infrastructure 4 26 Tulip Telecom 2 27 GTL Ltd 2 28 Inspirisys 3 29 Shirpur Gold Refinery 4 30 Kansai Nerolac Paints...
Click to read more »Please reorder/rename the last few sections to follow guidelines at WP:GTL. Please alphabetize the interlanguage links. Per WP:WIAFA, this article's...
Click to read more »the references section (which you may want to rename to "Notes" - see WP:GTL) and some use embedded links - convert them all to footnotes (see WP:FOOT)...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Manual of Style (Medicine-related articles) and does not conform to WP:GTL (2), does not appear comprehensive per sections missing from MCOTW guidelines...
Click to read more »includes terms that are already linked in the article, like Virus (see WP:GTL). Ask User:Brighterorange to run his dash-fixing script (page number ranges...
Click to read more »run-through and made changes per WP:DASH, WP:MSH, WP:UNITS, WP:MOSNUM, WP:GTL and WP:CONTEXT. The first occurrence of relevent terms should be linked,...
Click to read more »me a while to find the references for your footnotes (I don't believe WP:GTL requires this, but it does make them easier to find). Also, where would a...
Click to read more »article in "see also" or "external links" sections. Here's quoting from WP:GTL:" A 'See also' section should ideally not repeat links already present in...
Click to read more »ALBUM 956 HEAD 876 Title 849 PIPING 783 DOUBLE SPACE 777 JPN 763 Bold 748 GTL 727 NONPINYIN 716 SEEALSO 708 CHINA 692 Quote 671 J 664 NUM 622 DATE 622...
Click to read more »has a POV tag, footnotes are not correctly formatted, doesn't follow WP:GTL. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 01:31, 8 January 2007 (UTC) Comment - there is a minor...
Click to read more »Please reorder/rename the last few sections to follow guidelines at WP:GTL. Please alphabetize the categories and interlanguage links. There are a few...
Click to read more »MOS:APPENDIX (links) Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Layout (exists?) No 490 MOS:GTL (links) Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Layout (exists?) No 491 MOS:SEEALSO (links)...
Click to read more »Talk:Lister Cars Talk:Lister Petter Talk:Lister Storm Talk:Lister Storm GTL Talk:Lists of automobiles Talk:Lithuanian Car of the Year Talk:Litocar Talk:Little...
Click to read more »2010/01/03 19:19:51 12.50% MergeHistory 311 Bayerische GtL 4/4 222348311 2008/06/29 15:33:27 Bavarian GtL 4/4 222476444 2008/06/29 15:25:24 5.79% MergeHistory...
Click to read more »write better than me. "the GTL was negotiated in 2010 between $400,000 and $500,000." not sure I understand this, do you mean "GTLs were sold in 2010 for between...
Click to read more »FOREIGNITALIC 164 FOREIGNITALICS 164 FORITA 164 OPENPARABIO 164 Milterms 164 GTL 164 REVCAP 164 HANGULBOLD 164 HANGULITALICS 164 MILCITE 164 !LATIN 163 PEOPLETITLES...
Click to read more »(4632) *O Completed List of ice hockey line nicknames (790) *O Completed GTL Ltd (356) *O Completed Habs (2022 TV series) (817) *O Completed Elizabeth...
Click to read more »R/X/L) www.olmoantico.com (4236, 1, X, X R/X/L) www.zurlinde.isselhorst.gtl.de (4236, 1, X, X R/X/L) www.yamamotohonke.jp (4236, 1, X, X R/X/L) www.yamahiko1...
Click to read more »mNi4bYM/5ILP39K74ONXN4ZHRmwFJHyxePe+epHXhfLqRYFatN4mmJ2g1wvS7+LeJaD2NmXGdGTlX7PGXTsHaa+QB8879xxX2VBvMoEdeLkGEMt4NlwT7LXrjRdmnanMcsO7bpeASsT+kgPnsrm9o...
Click to read more »